8. optical processes in conjugated materials full color display- active matrix - 200 x 150 pixels -...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
8. Optical processes in conjugated materials
Full color display - Active matrix
- 200 x 150 Pixels
- 2 inch diagonal
Cambridge Display Technology
8.1. Electron-Phonon Coupling
E
Q
Absorption
Relaxation effects
Emission
Ground state
Lowest excitation state
Excitations
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
PL
Int
ens
ity (
arb
. uni
ts)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
(x 1
05 cm
-1)1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
PL
Int
ens
ity (
arb
. uni
ts)
4.03.53.02.52.0Photon Energy (eV)
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
(x 1
05 cm
-1)n
8.1.1. Fluorescence
Polyfluorene (F8)
Carlos Silva, University of Cambridge
- Weak self-absorption
- Vibronic structure
8.1.2. Intrachain Exciton
1
2 3
4 5
6
3 2
3 46 2
64
4 4
Site number
Lowest excitedstate
INDO/SCI
Exciton size Binding energy 0.3 eV
Exciton=electron-hole pair
Probability to find the e- and h+ at one site
n8.2.1. Optical transition versus chain size
The “conjugation length” is the length of the oligomer emitting the same luminescence spectrum as the polymer. While the polymer may easily be 10-100 times longer than a conjugation length, the chain is effectively operating as a sequence of conjugation lengths along a common string. This description is valid for the behaviour of absorption processes; where emission is relevant, the excited state is often more localized.
Cornil, J. et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. (1997), 278, 139
1/m (m=number of bonds)
absorption
emissionabsorption
emission
8.2. Conjugation length
• Switch between different structures by applying mechanical force while monitoring the Langmuir monolayer's optical spectra. The figure shows the chemical structures, conformations and spatial arrangements at the air–water interface of the polymer.
8.2.1. Conformation changes
• Compression causes a transition from the face-on to the zipper structure, which breaks the conjugation, i.e. decreases the π-conjugation length and generates a large blue shift (34-nm).
Kim et al. Nature 411, 1030 - 1034 (2001)
SEKUNDÄR EFFEKTVridning av ring minskar pz-pz överlapp
w < W
EN
ER
GI
k
R
R
PRIMÄR EFFEKT:Tillför (tar bort) laddning
EN
ER
GI
kR
R
Bandgap och Dispersionvia Sidogrupper
Bandgap och Dispersionvia Sidogrupper
R
R
PRIMÄR EFFEKT
SEKUNDÄR EFFEKT
Gult område:pz densitet
8.3. Influence of Electroactive Substituents
Al
Need for small energy barriers to optimize hole/electron injection
+ 0.27 eV
+ 0.08 eVE
- 1.17 eV
- 0.99 eV
Molecular engineering to modulate the energy of the band edges
n
OCH3
CH3O n
CN
CN n
• Donor:
• σ-donor (electronegativity): symmetric destabilization • π-donor: asymmetric destabilization
• Acceptor:
• σ-acceptor : symmetric stabilization• π-acceptor : asymmetric stabilization
• Note that ”-O-CH3” acts as a globally as a donor. This is the results of a competition between its π-donor and σ-acceptor characters.
8.4. Modulation of the Optical Properties
Sn
nn
Red Yellow-Green Blue
- Molecular backbone
- Chain size
K. Müllen and co
8.4.1 Structure of the conjugated chain
8.4.2 Optical properties and Doping
E
H
L
Polaron Bipolaron
S
S
S
S
S
S
Electrochromism
Neutral
Singly charged
Doubly charged
Electrochromism in a substituted polythiophene, under electrochemical doping in contact with an electrolyte. The suppression of bandgap absorption in the polymer (with a maximum at 500 nm) due to doping is highly visible; formation of polarons is hardly visible, but the two optical transitions due to bipolarons are found, one peaking at 800 nm and another below 1200 nm. From Peter Åsberg, work in progress, Biorgel, IFM, LiU
Electrochromic Displays on Papers
Wavelength (nm)
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Abs
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Reduced PEDOTOxidized PEDOT
Prof. M. Berggren, Norrköping
8.5.1. Transition Dipole Moment
Atomic transition densities
1Ag 1BuN = 20
INDO/SCI
+-
qK rK = K
1Ag 1Bu
qK = 0 K
8.5. Solid State Effect: Exciton Splitting
1
2
E
G
E
G
Cofacial dimer
+ -
+-
2E1
E2+ -+ -
tot = 0
tot = 2
8.5.2. H-Aggregate
8.5.3. J-Aggregate
E
G
E
G
+ -+-
2E1
E2
+ -
+ -
tot = 0
tot = 2
8.6. Charge and energy transfer in conjugated polymers
Organic Solar Cells
Glass ITO
e
h
Energy transfer
LUMO
HOMOHOMO
LUMO
Charge transfer
8.6.1.Photoinduced Charge Transfer
LUMO
HOMOHOMO
LUMO
E
Photoinduced ELECTRON transfer
LUMO
HOMOHOMO
LUMO
E
Photoinduced HOLE transfer
Chemical Sensors
H
L
TNTPolymer
CH3
NO2NO2
NO2
TNT
Land-mine detector
(Detection limit : 10-15 g)
Photoinduced Electron Transfer
Tim Swager and co, MIT
8.6.2. Polymer / Polymer Interfaces
DMOS-PPV
Si
C8H17
O
O
C2H5
C4H9
MEH-PPV
OC6H13
C6H13O
OC6H13
C6H13O
CN
CN
CN-PPV
0.55 eV
0.17 eVH
L0.63 eV
0.44 eVH
L
MEH-PPV / CN-PPV Blend
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Ph
oto
lum
ines
cen
ce e
ffic
ien
cy (
%)
Qu
antu
m yield
(%)
Weight fraction of CN-PPV
8.6.3. Charge transfer8.6.3. Charge transfer
J.J.M. Halls, J. Cornil, et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 5721 (1999)
0.63 eV
0.44 eVH
L
MEH-PPV CN-PPV
DMOS-PPV / CN-PPV Blend
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4
No
rmal
ised
PL
inte
nsi
ty
Energy (eV)
Blend
CN-PPV
DMOS-PPV
8.6.4. Energy transfer8.6.4. Energy transfer
DMOS-PPV CN-PPV
0.55 eV
0.17 eVH
L
8.6.5. Charge versus Energy Transfer
Penalty to pay to dissociate an exciton on the order of 0.35 eV
0.63 eV
0.44 eVH
L
MEH-PPV CN-PPV
INTRA
INTRA
INTER
One-electron levels Excited states
GROUND STATE
INTRA CN-PPV
INTER
INTRA MEH-PPV0.28 eV 0.19 eV
Charge transfer at the polymer/polymer interface
MEH-PPV / CN-PPV Blend : Charge transfer
Penalty to pay to dissociate an exciton on the order of 0.35 eV
0.55 eV
0.17 eVH
L
DMOS-PPV CN-PPV
INTRA
INTRAINTER
One-electron levels Excited states
GROUND STATE
INTRA CN-PPV
INTER
INTRA DMOS-PPV
0.38 eV
0.20 eV
Energy transfer towards the CN-PPV chains
DMOS-PPV / CN-PPV Blend : Energy transfer