6505410 luo tianyi strategic management ii
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
1/13
Strategic Management
1
Assignment #1: You have conducted the external and internal analysis of Starbucks
around the mid of 1990s (based on the case of Starbucks), what strategies would
you recommend to Starbucks then? How would you assess Starbucks realized
strategies from mid-1990s to 2007 (based on the case of Trouble Brews at
Starbucks)
Mid of 1990s
Starbucks SWOT synthesisis below with possible strategies.
To evaluate these strategies, I choose five criterions: the fitness with SWOT synthesis,
the consistency of Starbuckss missions, the harmony at different levels, the feasibility
and whether it enhances competitive advantages. In terms of SO strategies, market
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
2/13
Strategic Management
2
growth strategy both in New York and Asia Pacific is consistent with Starbucks rapid
growth goal, and is also feasible under its leadership advantage. It could then bring
the first mover advantage and maintain their dominance. However, too rapid growth
rate will cause financial crisis and management problems. Brand extend strategy is
conform to the opportunity of more venture chances. It could help Starbucks enlarge
customer base in an easy way. However, it is inconsistent with the mission at initial
stage: only focus on specialty coffee, and it would lead to brand dilution. Therefore, a
concentric extend strategy that avoid over diversified profile is more suitable.
Regarding to the pressure on finance, licensing and franchising could be approval.
However, it may conflict with the goal of maintaining high quality experience. It is
difficult to achieve perfectly harmony between headquarters and subsidiaries, thus it
has low feasibility. Considering ST strategies, differentiation is a feasible way to
avoid direct competition on price. By well utilizing its resources, differentiation can
become sustainable competitive advantage. Clustering location is unique but
consistent with its mission in real estate, and can gain synergy growth. Concerning
about WT strategies, although it is inconsistent with Starbucks growth objective, it is
a feasible way to improve Starbuckss efficiency by allocating resources more
effective. Although it will not enhance the competitiveness of Starbucks, it could
release the pressure on financing as well.
Generally, Mild expansion strategy could be undertaken with licensing and
franchising under united merchandising. According to growth matrix, market
development is important when entering a new market, like Asia Pacific, while
product development should be valued in old market as New York. Meanwhile,
Starbucks should focus on its high-end and professional coffee service, and insist its
experience principle by fully leveraging its resources. Related ventures on coffee
line and clustering location strategy are encouraged as well. Therefore, I recommend
Starbucks not to partner with McDonald, but insist its own strategic position.
Otherwise, Starbuckss brand image will be eroded by McDonalds fast food culture.
And there is another concern that key information know-how leakage of making
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
3/13
Strategic Management
3
coffee may benefit McDonald.
Mid-1900s to 2007
Starbucks began to enter new phase of development since mid-1990s, mainly
pursuing continuous growing and claiming its leadership in this category. It focused
on a series of strategies to expand the business model. Instead of only providing
specialty coffee, Starbucks accepted the suggestion that providing what customers
wants, and this strategy generated more considerably revenue than before. After
expanding beyond its traditional roots, it started to partner with other companies, such
as Pepsi, to broaden customer base. In the meantime, to achieve the goal of fast
expansion, Starbucks applied sophisticated location model that based on a matrix of
regional demographic profile with an analysis of the best way to leverage
infrastructure. Starbucks also uniquely insisted clustering the retail store to achieve
growth synergy and increase accessibility. Later on, drive-through service and
licensing were applied for grabbing new market. Besides, Starbucks valued
connecting with customers, thus added music, book and movies to product mix to
offer a better coffee experience. In 1995, Starbucks began its expansion outside the
North America. And in 2004, it doubled its pace of expansion.
Although Starbucks realized strategies have commons with my recommendation,
such as licensing, locating nearby and doing partnership, they are not fully consistent.
For example, drive-in service was conflicting with the goal of being a third place
and excessive sideline product would distract the business focus. Also, aggressive
expansion was very risky. These inconsistencies rose mainly because Starbucks
preferred aggressive development while I pursued stable growth. In fact, Starbucks
did make some strategic mistakes that lead to the commoditization of this brand.
Double pace of expansion made Starbuck sacrifice real estate, unique store location
formula and customers perception of company. And sightless expansion in the South
and in Southern California leaded to an unexpected loss due to the downturn economy.
Meanwhile, its drive-through windows and in-store food was pushing Starbucks to
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
4/13
Strategic Management
4
fast-food industry. Customers could not enjoy the coffee experience due to the
automated coffee machine and decreasing number of comfy chairs. In the meantime,
declines in the quality of Starbucks experience created opportunities for regular coffee
makers to enter the specialty coffee markets, and Starbucks had to face increasingly
fierce competition. In 2007, after Starbucks two quarters of flat growth, it faced the
first ever decline in the fourth quarter. The share price was $18, while previous year
was $35. This failure also confirmed the strategies were in wrong direction. (793)
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
5/13
Strategic Management
5
Assignment #2: Please reflect on your Capstone simulation experience and
articulate how to apply balanced scorecard to strategy implementation?
The balanced scorecard translate companys intangible vision and strategy to four
measurements, which allows us to track financial results while simultaneously
monitoring progress in internal business process, customer and learning and growth
(Kaplan& Norton, 2007). There are four processes to manage strategy by using
balanced scorecard. First is translating vision and strategy. After we discussed and
achieved consensus, we clarified our vision into easily understood statement-
providing premium products with satisfying features in a high qualityand chose broad
differentiation strategy. So we valued high-end segment by providing products almost
in ideal position to achieve the goal of dominance in this segment, while still kept
presence in other segments. In terms of communicating and linking, we insisted board
participation every round, for it enhanced the coordination of strategy and our
understanding of long-term strategic goal. In business planning process, we identified
the critical divers and had an agreement on resource allocation priority. For example,
we applied TQM to reduce R&D cycle time instead of reducing material cost. Also
we chose to invest mass in promotion to increase our customer awareness and
accessibility instead of improving automation. Finally, the balanced scorecard
provided feedback constantly, which allowed continually strategic learning. The
causal relationship between performance drivers and objectives in balanced scorecard
allowed us to evaluate the validity of strategy and the quality of implementation. For
instant, by reviewing balanced scorecard, we found we got very low score in
employee productivity in early rounds. It made us realize the failure of strategy in
improving employee efficiency, so we invested considerably in six sigma and Quality
Function Development effect. In later rounds, the productivity index illustrated that
our employees were better trained and worked more efficiently, as well as showed in
balanced scorecard.
However, we still had some failures in leveraging balance scorecard. Because early
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
6/13
Strategic Management
6
investment on customer awareness is neither effective nor enough, we got zero score
from Round 1 to Round 4. So we kept doing trials to find the optimal configuration of
promotion budgets to reach 5 score in balance scorecard. However, when we could
effectively invest in promotion, it was too late to climb to full score, especially for
differentiators focusing on high end. We should have fully invested on promotion and
tried to achieve 100% as soon as possible. In addition, during our executing our
strategy, we were several times in the dilemma that whether we should upgrade
automation level. Improving in automation could broaden the contribution margin but
would sacrifice the design cycle time related with customer buying criteria. As a
major player in high-end segment, we made efforts to deliver the latest products and
get a higher customer buying criteria score, so we gave up improving automation.
Consequently, this decision made us sacrifice too much profit to pay the labor cost,
and also led to the situation that we had the biggest market share, but earn relatively
small profits. (479)
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
7/13
Strategic Management
7
Assignment #3: Is it possible for a firm to achieve sustainable competitive
advantages in the Capstone industry? Is it possible for any firm in the
Capstone industry to adopt the blue Ocean strategy?
Sustainable competitive advantage will be achieved when a company is forced to
make trade-offs and has a strategic fit among all activities (Porter, 1996). Firstly,
trade-offs means a company has to choose its strategy between operational
effectiveness and strategic positioning. In the simulation, our company chose to
establish a strategic position as broad differentiation, and so did Chester, while
Digby preferred pursuing operational effectiveness. Therefore, we differentiators
focused on achieving high sales by investing mass in R&D and promotion to
improve the product, awareness and accessibility, while cost leader made efforts
to lower cost by improving the automation and decreasing the depreciation and
interest. Take the two most profitable companies as examples. In Round 7,
Chester owned $200,413 of sales, in contrast to Digbys $175,033 of sales, but
Digbys cost was much lower than Chester in variable cost. Therefore they both
achieved competitive advantage by completely different strategy in our industry.
On the other hand, competitive advantage cannot be sustainable without
developing the fit among all activities to lock out imitation by creating a value
chain with strongest link. I think the ultimate success of Chester in our industry
also depended on this principle that they aligns all activities with their
differentiation strategy as an integrated system. They invested mass in R&D to
improve MTBF in performance segment, which made product more competitive
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
8/13
Strategic Management
8
but shared higher material cost. To guarantee the R&D cycle time first pursue,
they invested little in automation in performance segment, despite of bearing
higher labor cost. Meanwhile, they fully invested promotion in several
continuous rounds. Such consistent activities had already ensured their
competitive advantage cumulated and finally achieved sustainable. Nevertheless,
because it was hard to achieve second-order and third-order fit (activity are
reinforcingand optimization of efforts respectively) in Capstone simulation, their
strategy still could be imitated to some degree. Therefore, by making trade-offs in
competing and achieving fit among activities, a firm could enjoy sustainable
competitive advantages. But due to limitation in Capstone, the sustainable
competitive advantage cannot lasts for a very long time.
Blue oceans refer to the industry or unknown market that is not existed today,
and the philosophy of blue ocean strategy is to create demand instead of fought
over competitors (Kim & Mauborgne, 2004). There are two ways to create
demand. One is to give rise completely new industries, such as Apple personal
computer. The other is created from a red ocean when a company alters the
boundaries of an existing industry, which is more common. Meanwhile, blue
ocean strategy breaks the value and cost trade-offs, and lasts long benefits due to
the barriers to imitate. However, in the Capstone simulation, it is impossible to
execute blue ocean strategy to large extent. The simulation has set the five
segment and the ideal position of the product in each segment. The customers
could only accept the products in the dashed circles. Companies cannot create
uncontested marketplace while they can only grab more market share from other
competitors by improving their values or decreasing their costs. (497)
Assignment #4: Should teams make significant investment in humanresources in the Capstone simulation?
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
9/13
Strategic Management
9
Human resource is a vital factor in the increasing fierce competition. Investment in
HR will increase productivity index and reduce the turnover rate, which will
subsequently reduce the labor demand and therefore reduce labor cost. Determining
whether we should invest significantly in human resource, we could compare total
investment in HR with the cost saving of labor cost.
The spreadsheet of related data
Firstly, calculating the total investment in HR. As learnt in HRM, productivity could
be improved by compensates and further education (Ivancevish, 2010). We offer
additional payment per person recruiting for new talent workers, and we also need to
train workers with $20 per training hour. Therefore the recruitment spend will be
(recruitment spent+1,000)*new employees+ training hours*20 * complement.
Namely,
Total cost of HR investment= (5,000+1,000)* new employees+ tr ain ing hour s* 20 *
complement= recruit cost+ tr aini ng cost
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8
eeded
omplement
652 687 1020 893 664 513 496 448
omplement 652 687 1020 893 664 513 496 448urnover
ate
10.00% 9.30% 8.50% 7.90% 7.90% 8.30% 7.90% 7.80%
ew
mployees
65 58 416 71 53 42 39 35
ecruiting
pend
$0 $1,000 1,500 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 2,500 $2,500
raining
ours
0 40 50 50 50 40 50 50
roductiviy index 100% 100.00% 102.30% 106.10% 109.70% 112.00% 115.50% 118.60%
ecruiting
ost
$65 $117 $1,039 $177 $158 $106 $136 $123
raining
ost
$0 $550 $1,020 $893 $664 $410 $496 $448
irect
abor cost
$34,426 $37,779 $56,019 $55,598 $38,150 $29,210 $29,886 43,629
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
10/13
Strategic Management
10
In terms of cost saving, labor cost will be reduced due to increase of productivity.
Needed complement *(1-productivity index) is the number of workers we do not hire
this year. And labor cost per person is total labor cost / needed complement.
Therefore,
Cost saving = needed complement * (1-productivity index)* total l abor cost/ need
complement=total labor cost* (1-productivi ty index)
The results of calculation
According to figure 2, the first three rounds suffered loss due to the initial investment
and lag of effects. But since Round 4, our company enjoyed considerable gains
because of the significant investment in HR. Thus, we may conclude that significant
investment in HR to improve the productivity will bring benefits in long term. (399)
Assignment #5: Please read the case GreenWood Resources and write up an
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8
Cost saving $0 $0 $1,288 $3,391 $3,701 $3,505 $4,632 $5,174
Total investment $65 $667 $2,059 $1,070 $822 $516 $632 $571
Gain or loss ($65) ($667) ($771) $2,321 $2,879 $2,989 $4,000 $4,603
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
11/13
Strategic Management
11
essay about do well by doing good?
To enter Chinese market, Green Wood Inc. prepared two projects, Luxi and Dongji,
but cannot decide to choose which one. Therefore, their difference would be analyzed
from economic, social and environmental aspects.
Economic analysis:
According to Exhibit 7, the initial investment in existing plantation assets of Luxi and
Dongji were 296,376,843 RMB and 100, 208, 839 RMB respectively. Current
standing inventory probably was the existed volume that Green Wood could get when
brought the land. It could be sold for RMB 296,565,711 and 100,298,995. Therefore,
the initial expense could be offset as:
Luxi: 296,376,843- 296,565,711=-185868
Dongji: 100,208,839-100, 298,955=90,156
In first year, Luxi should pay 632RMB/mu while Donji would pay 255 RMB/mu. The
variable cost of Luxi was 477RMB/mu/year, while Dongji cost 132 RMB/mu/year.
Therefore, with the expense in first year, Luxi totally cost 3971 RMB/mu in 7 years,
and Dongji cost 1575 RMB/mu in 10 years. To calculate revenue, Luxi could earn
12.6*559 RMB/mu, and Dongji was 8.0*445 RMB/mu. Therefore, profit per year =
(revenue-cost in one rotation)/rotation.
Luxi: (7043.4-3971) *92037/ 7= 40412155
Dongji: (3560-1575)*202650/10= 40226025
Overall, although Dongji was more attractive in initial investment period, it would be
soon offset because Luxi had 186130 RMB more profit than Dongji every year.
Social and environmental analysis:
To compare social and environmental competitiveness of these two projects, an
advanced diamond framework with government and opportunities could be use. In the
dimension of firm strategy, structure and rivalry context, Green Wood planned to
establish a wholly owned company and launched a seven-year rotation strategy.
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
12/13
Strategic Management
12
However, it was not harmonized between Green Wood and Luxi Forestry Bureau due
to their fight of responsibility and the complexity of this project. Regarding to factor
conditions, Luxi County not only had favorable natural conditions, such as fertile soil
and gentle landscapes, but also established sophisticated irrigation networks. Also,
maximum 190.000muplantation could be acquired. Luxi Forestry Bureau also could
provide lower cost labors and local relationships. In the aspect of local demand, Luxi
had 2.2million m annual timber demand, which was far more than current market
supply of 1 million m. And due to the increasingly high tariffs and high
transportation, local buyers would gradually stop importing timber but find supply
locally. In terms of the related and supporting industries dimension, there was a
timber processing hub and wood market near Luxi, called Linyi. Linyi had 2600 mills
and the largest 200 mills demand 15000 m of timber annually. And Forest Bureau
asked Greenwood to establish a mill, which could not only become the supported
industry but also take social responsibility to provide employment opportunities.
From the government dimension, Luxi project could receive fully support with
government by partnering with government agency. Meanwhile, Green Wood was in
the opportunity that Luxi government had been making great effort in afforestation
and sustainable economic development since 2002.
Considering Dongji in corporate and rivalry context dimension, Lideng, as the
potential partner with Green Wood, was a private forestry development company with
an annual capacity of 200,000mu. It had not only patented planting technique suited to
the environment of northern China but also the sole right to propagate commercially
superior plant materials. Nevertheless, Green Wood concerned about the reputational
risks of this collaboration, for Lideng once provided service for two illegal companies.
In terms of rivalry, Russia could be a strong competitor to Dongji for their proximity
border. Regarding to factor conditions, although Donji was suitable for poplar
cultivation due to its appropriate soil texture and access to river system, its
environment was worse than Luxi. 57% of Donji was sandy, unfertile land, and the
area was semi-arid and subject to windy weather all year. Therefore, the annual tree
-
8/12/2019 6505410 LUO Tianyi Strategic Management II
13/13
Strategic Management
13
growth rate would be maximum 0.7m per mu, which lead to a 10-year rotation.
However, compared to Luxi, Dongji could enjoy more benefits with Greenwoods
help, suffering less deforestation and densification. Additionally, the available
purchasing land was 82,644 mucurrently, and additional 120,000mu land could also
be acquired by Green Wood in future. Lideng could provide elite labors that had been
formed into a professional poplar tree planting team. Local demand of Donji was 0.2
million m annually lower than Luxi. Export market was also hard to developed
because of its inland location. In addition, there were 698 wood processing mills
existed as its supporting industry, which was substantially fewer than Luxi. But
government in Donji thought highly of tree plantation and tried to raise forest
coverage up to 30%, which was also an opportunity.
In conclusion, Luxi did have more economic value and environmental advantage.
However, corporate social responsibility is playing increasingly important role in
achieving corporations competitive success (Porter & Kramer, 2006). It should be
highly valued during Green Wood choosing these two projects. As its vision is to
built a resource that lasts forever, Green Wood could further achieve CSR in Dongji
project. (800)