7/27/2019 612 - A Legal Way To Defeat The System of Admiralty Law.pdf

1/2

Maine Republic Free State News, 3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine 04011

http://maine-patriot.com /drobin88@comcast.net

A Legal Way to Defeat the System of Admiralty Law. . . if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself for battle? I Corinthians 14:8 10/06/13

Maine RepublicEmail Alert. . . that I should bear witness unto the truth. John 18:33 // David E. Robinson, Publisher

No.612

Admiralty law was introduced into

England by the French Queen Eleanorof Aquitaine while she was acting as the

regent for her son, King Richard theLionheart.

Queen Eleanor had earlier

established admiralty law on the islandof Oleronwhere it was published as the

Rolls of Oleronin her own lands ofFrance.

She is often referred to in admiralty

law books, as Eleanor of Guyenne,having learned about it in the easternMediterranean while on a Crusade withher first husband, King Lois VII of France.

In England, special admiralty courtshandle all admiralty cases. These courts

are not under the common law of Englandbut are civil law courts largely based upon

Justinians Corpus Juris Civilis.

Admiralty courts were a prominent

feature in the American Colonies in the

prelude to their Revolution with England.For Example, the phrase in the

Declaration of Independence Fordepriving us in many cases, of the

benefits of Trial by Jury refers toParliaments practice of giving Admiralty

Courts jurisdiction to enforce The StampAct in the American Colonies.

Because the Stamp Act wasunpopular, a colonial jury was unlikelyto convict a colonist of its violation.

However, because admiralty courts donot grant trial by jury, a colonist accused

of violating the Stamp Act could by moreeasily convicted by the Crown.

So Roman Admiralty law became partof the law of the United States as it was

gradually introduced through admiraltycases arising after the adoption of theU.S. Constitution in 1789.

Many American lawyers who where

prominent in the American Revolutionwere admiralty and maritime lawyers in

their private lives. Those included areAlexander Hamilton in New York, andJohn Adams in Massachusetts.

In 1787 John Adamswho was thenambassador to Francewrote to James

Madison proposing that the U.S.Constitution, under consideration by the

colonial States, be amended to includetrial by jury in all matters of fact triable

by the laws of the land and not by the

laws of Nations, i.e., not by the law ofadmiralty.

This resulted in the SeventhAmendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Alexander Hamilton and John Adamswere both admiralty lawyers and Adams

represented John Hancock in anadmiralty case in colonial Boston

involving the seizure of one of Hancocksships for violations of Customsregulations.

The Roman court is confusingevenfor some judgesbecause it does not

operate according to any true set rulesof law but rather by presumptions of law

insteadprovided by the Private BARGuild without our knowledge or consent.

If these mostly hidden presumptionsare not rebutted they become fact andtherefore stand as Truth in Commerce.

Despite the facade, the world unde

admiralty law is a playground ocommercial business which is secretly

owned by private corporations.

QUESTION: Why is the BAR Guildso intent on keeping everything on the

private side?

ANSWER: Because the public side

invokes constitutional issues wherebynothing they do can withstand a

constitutional challenge.

The organic Constitution still exists

but it is buried in the U.S. Printing officeAll amendments since 1871 do not existWhy? The Constitution of 1871written

to resemble the organic Constitutionbecame the corporate mission State

ment for the District of Columbia; aka.the Corporate United States.

It is that corporate mission statementhat has been amended since 1871, and

chopped up as of late.

The answer to this puzzle is toproperly register the all-caps-name oyour Strawman as the Fictitious Name

that it is; with your State.

This identifies you as having a

commercial interest in the all-capsname. By entering this fact on the Public

Record, you rebut the (12) privatepresumptions of the Admiralty Court; andnullify its jurisdiction thereby.

Registering a Fictitious name issomething you might do to start a

commercial business and you wanted toreserve a creative name to identify it.

This process, however, does noobligate you to start a business or to

incorporate one. It simply reserves thename for your future use and as youcommercial and intellectual property.

7/27/2019 612 - A Legal Way To Defeat The System of Admiralty Law.pdf

2/2

Maine Republic Free State News, 3 Linnell Circle, Brunswick, Maine 04011

http://maine-patriot.com /drobin88@comcast.net

2

For many years patriots haveattempted to disassociate their sovereign

selves from the legal fictionthe all-caps-name/strawmancreated by the

corporate government to make youpersonally vulnerable, and convert yourliving self into a corporationa thing

property of the corporate government.

Certain patriots decided to embrace

the corporate fictional strawman as theirown personal property instead, by affidavit

per a Financial Statement filed under theUCC (Uniform Commercial Code) as a

notice to the world, because anunrebutted affidavit stands as Truth inCommerce, and the government never

rebuts these affidavits.

So Why Doesnt this Work?

The patriots bypassed one crucial

step. They failed to rebut thepresumptions of the private side of the

corporate government, and the courtsthat imprison their sweat equity and labor.

Repeat: An unrebutted presumption

stands as Truth in commerce.

The governments presumptions

nullified the patriots affidavits and placethem on the private side of the law.

There are (12) key presumptionsasserted by the Private BAR Guilds,

which if left unchallenged, stand as Truthin commerce.

These are presumptions of . . .:

1. Public Record;2. Public Service;

3. Public Oath;4. Immunity;

5. Summons;6. Custody;

7. Court Guardians;8. Court Trustees;

9. Govt. as Executor/Beneficiary;10. Executor De Son Tort (not a party

to)

11. Incompetence;12 Guilt.

Canon 3228 (i) Presumption of PublicRecord:

Although any matter brought beforea lower Roman Court is a matter for the

public recordit is presumed by thePrivate BAR Guild to be private business.

Unless this presumption is openlyrebutted by filing or stating clearly on the

public record that the matter is to be apart of the Public Record; the matterremains on the private side as private

BAR Guild business under private Guildrules.

By filing on the Public Record thepapers issued by the state identifying

your registered control of the fictitiousall-caps-name you prove that you are notthe alleged defendant on the Courts

docket, and are not the alleged defendantin the case.

Canon 3228 (II), (iii), (iv):Presumptions of Public Service; oath;and Immunity.

If the judge ignores the alleged

defendants Fictitious Name Registration

entered into the Public Record, which isclearly presented to him in open Court,and then decides to move forward with

the case, he violates his public serviceoath and judicial immunity under thesesub-sections.

Canon 3228 (v): Presumption ofSummons.

Attendance in a Court is usuallyinvoked by invitation, so someone who

attends Court initiated by a summons,warrant, subpoena, or replevin bond, is

presumed to accept the position of adefendant, juror, witness, or thing, andthe jurisdiction of the Court.

If these instruments are not rejectedand returned, with a copy of the rejection

filed clearly on the Public Record(jurisdiction) the presumed private

position, and presumption of guilt standas Truth in Commerce.

Canon 3228 (vi): Presumption ofCustody.

Those who attend a Court initiated

pursuant to the command of a summonsor warrant, are presumed to be

corporate property or a thing andtherefore are liable to be detained in

custody by the courts appointed orelected Custodian.

Custodians may only retain custody

over property and things and not overflesh and blood living beings.

Unless this presumption is openly

challenged by rejection of the summonsor warrant on the Public Record, the

presumption stands a Truth in commerceand you are therefore treated as a thing

or property belonging to the state.Proving a case of mistaken identity

prevents the Court Custodian from

detaining you after that.Sixteen words written across the fac

of the summons or warrant; notarizedand filed on the Public Record will cure

most problems. Those words are:

I do not accept this offer tocontract and I do not consentto these proceedings.

In addition to the above six sections

of Canon Law 3228, you will haveunknowingly rebutted the balance of the

(12) presumptions of law.

7. Court Guardianship;

8. Court Trusteeship;9. Govt. as Executor/Beneficiary;

10. Executor De Son Tort (not a partyto)

11. Incompetence;

12 Guilt.

Checkmate.There is no way for the federa

government and the private Roman Courto proceed against this living being. If theprosecutor was to disclose the

presumptive frauds that the Court has

been operating under in the private sideit would also nullify the case and subjecthe judge to arrest and damages for

prosecutorial fraud and the absence ojurisdiction.

The judges only response to the

alleged defendant would be to Order aStay until the defendant secures

counsel (an attorney and BAR Guildmember).

If it is reported that the allegeddefendant has not obtained counsel, the

case remains deadlocked. The defendancan do nothing or he can file a two pageMotion to Dismiss or a Rule to Show

Cause seeking summary judgment fodamages on behalf or his living being.

All matters are presumed to be onthe private side, therefore none canwithstand a Constitutional Challenge