$603,890,000 state of californiacdiacdocs.sto.ca.gov/2017-0865.pdfthe state of california (the...

NEW ISSUE-BOOK-ENTRY ONLY Ratings: Moody's: Aa3

S&P: AAFitch: AA

(See "RATINGS" herein)

In the opinion of Bond Counsel to the State of California, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. See "TAX MATTERS."

Dated: Date of Delivery

$603,890,000 STATE OF CALIFORNIA

VARIOUS PURPOSE GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS

Due: See "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING"

The State of California (the "State") is issuing $603,890,000 Various Purpose General Obligation Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds").

The Bonds are general obligations of the State to which the full faith and credit of the State is pledged. The principal of and interest on all State general obligation bonds, including the Bonds, are payable from any moneys in the General Fund of the State, subject under State law only to the prior application of such moneys to the support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education. See "AUTHORIZATION OF AND SECURITY FOR THE BONDS."

Interest on the Bonds is payable on February l and August l of each year, commencing August l, 2017, at the respective rates per annum set forth in the "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING" immediately following this cover page. Beneficial interests in the Flonds may be purchased in principal amounts of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof in book-entry form only. See "THE BONDS-General" and APPENDIX Fl- "THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM."

The Bonds are subject to optional redemption prior t0 their respective stated maturity dates as described herein. See "THE BONDS-Redemption."

This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not a summary of the security or terms of the Bonds. Investors are advised to read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making of an informed investment decision.

MATURITIES, PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS, INTEREST RATES, YIELDS AND CUSIPS (See "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING")

The Bonds are offered when, as and if issued by the State and received by the initial purchaser, subject to the approval of validity by the Honorable Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of the State of California, and by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the State. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Nixon Peabody LLP are serving as Co-Disclosure Counsel to the State with respect to the Bonds. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, a Professional Corporation, are serving as Co-Disclosure Counsel to the State regarding Appendix A. Public Resources Advisory Group is serving as the Municipal Advisor to the State with respect to the Bonds. The Bonds are expected to be available for delivery through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company on or about April 19, 2017.

HONORABLE JOHN CHIANG Treasurer of the State of California

THE BONDS WERE SOLD AT COMPETITIVE SALE ON APRIL 12, 2017. INITIAL OFFERING YIELDS HAVE BEEN SET BY THE INITIAL PURCHASER

Official Statement Dated: April 12, 2017

SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING

MATURITIES, PRINCIPAL AMOUNTS, INTEREST RATES, YIELDS AND CUSIPS1


VARIOUS PURPOSE GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS

Base CUSIP1: 13063C

Maturity Date Principal Interest cus1P1

(August I) Amount Rate Yield Suffix

2017 $5,660,000 5.000% 0.810% 8E3 2018 2,245,000 5.000 0.910 8F0 2019 4,520,000 5.000 1.070 SGS 2020 4,880,000 5.000 1.230 8H6 2021 2,275,000 5.000 1.410 812 2022 6,870,000 5.000 1.610 8K9 2023 2,345,000 5.000 1.790 8L7 2024 2,375,000 5.000 1.950 8M5 2025 2,425,000 5.000 2.110 8N3 2026 68,825,000 5.000 2.250 8P8 2027 132,345,000 3.500 2.860 8Q6 2028 137,430,000 5.000 2.470c 8R4 2029 59,580,000 5.000 2.570c 8S2 2030 172,115,000 5.000 2.660c 8T0

t Copyright 2017, American Bankers Association. CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP data herein is provided by CUSIP Global Services (CGS), which is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Global Market Intelligence. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the CGS database. CUSIP numbers have been assigned by an independent company not affiliated with the State and are included solely for the convenience of the registered owners of the applicable Bonds. The State is not responsible for the selection or uses of these CUSIP numbers, and no representation is made as to their correctness on the applicable Bonds or as included herein. The CUSIP number for a specific maturity is subject to being changed after the issuance of the Bonds as a result of various subsequent actions including, but not limited to, a refunding in whole or in part or as a result of the procurement of secondary market portfolio insurance or other similar enhancement by investors that is applicable to all or a portion of certain maturities of the Bonds.

c Yield to par call on August 1, 2027.

No dealer, broker, salesperson or other person has been authorized by the State to give any information or to make any representations with respect to the State or its Bonds other than those contained in this Official Statement and, if given or made, such other information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by any of the foregoing.

The information set forth herein has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable. Estimates and opinions are included and should not be interpreted as statements of fact. Summaries of documents do not purport to be complete statements of their provisions and such summaries are qualified by references to the entire contents of the summarized documents. The information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice, and neither the delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale made by use of this Official Statement shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Slate since the date hereof.

This Official Statement, including any supplement or amendment hereto, is intended to be deposited with, and may be obtained from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB") through the Electronic Municipal Market Access website of, the MSRB, currently located at http://emma.msrb.org. The information contained on such website is not part of this Official Statement and is not incorporated herein.

This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract with the purchasers of the Bonds.

IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, THE INITIAL PURCHASER MAY OVERALLOT OR EFFECT TRANSACTIONS WHICH STABILIZE OR MAINTAIN THE MARKET PRICES OF THE BONDS AT LEVELS ABOVE THOSE WHICH MIGHT OTHERWISE PREVAIL IN THE OPEN MARKET. SUCH STABILIZING, IF COMMENCED, MAY BE DISCONTINUED AT ANY TIME. THE INITIAL PURCHASER MAY OFFER AND SELL BONDS TO CERTAIN DEALERS, INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS AND OTHERS AT PRICES LOWER THAN THE PUBLIC OFFERING PRICES STATED ON THE "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING" IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE FRONT COVER PAGE HEREOF, AND SAID PUBLIC OFFERING PRICES MAY BE CHANGED FROM TIME TO TIME BY THE INITIAL PURCHASER.

THE BONDS WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, IN RELIANCE UPON AN EXEMPTION CONTAINED IN SUCH ACT. THE BONDS HA VE NOT BEEN REGISTERED OR QUALIFIED UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY STATE. THE BONDS HAVE NOT BEEN RECOMMENDED BY ANY FEDERAL OR STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION OR REGULATORY AUTHORITY, AND THE FOREGOING AUTHORITIES HAVE NEITHER REVIEWED NOR CONFIRMED THE ACCURACY OF THIS DOCUMENT.

http://emma.msrb.org

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 Description of the Bonds .................................................................................................... 1 Plan of Finance ................................................................................................................... 1 Upcoming General Obligation Bond Sales ......................................................................... 2 Security and Source of Payment for the Bonds .................................................................. 2 Redemption of Bonds ......................................................................................................... 2 Financial Condition of the State General Fund ................................................................... 2 Information Related to this Official Statement.. ................................................................. 3 Plan of Distribution ............................................................................................................. 4 Continuing Disclosure ........................................................................................................ 4

AUTHORIZATION OF AND SECURITY FOR THE BONDS ................................................... 5 Authorization ...................................................................................................................... 5 Security ............................................................................................................................... 5 Remedies ............................................................................................................................. 6

THEBONDS .................................................................................................................................. 6 General ................................................................................................................................ 6 Identification, Authorization and Purposes of the Bonds ................................................... 7 Plan of Refunding ............................................................................................................... 7 Redemption ......................................................................................................................... 8 Amendments to Resolutions or Bonds ................................................................................ 9 Refunding of the Bonds ...................................................................................................... 9

ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................... 11 LEGAL MATTERS ...................................................................................................................... 11 TAX MATTERS ........................................................................................................................... 12 LITIGATION ................................................................................................................................ 14 PURCHASE AND REOFFERING .............................................................................................. 14 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 14 RATINGS ..................................................................................................................................... 15 VERIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... 15 MUNICIPAL ADVISOR .............................................................................................................. 15 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 15

EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT2

BOND ACTS, PURPOSES, AND SERIES ............................................... EX 1-1 REFUNDED BONDS ................................................................................ EX 2-1

APPENDIX A THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ..................................................................... A-1 EXHIBIT 1 - PENSION SYSTEMS ............................................................ EX-1 EXHIBIT 2 - STATE CONTROLLER'S STATEMENT OF

GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS, JULY 1, 2016 - MARCH 31, 2017 (UNAUDITED) ............................................................ EX-2

APPENDIX B THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM .......................................................... B-1 APPENDIX C FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE .......................... C-1 APPENDIX D PROPOSED FORMS OF LEGAL OPINIONS .............................................. D-1 APPENDIX E STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSNE ANNUAL FINANCIAL

REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016 ...................... E-1

- I -

OFFICIAL STATEMENT


VARIO US PURPOSE GENERAL OBLIGATION

REFUNDING BONDS

INTRODUCTION

This Introduction contains only a brief summary of the terms of the above-captioned Bonds and a brief description of this Official Statement. A full review should be made of the entire Official Statement, including the Appendices. Summaries of provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of California (the "State") or any other documents referred to in this Official Statement do not purport to be complete and such summaries are qualified in their entirety by references to the complete provisions.

Description of the Bonds

This Official Statement describes $603,890,000 aggregate principal amount of various purpose general obligation refunding bonds to be issued by the State consisting of twenty five (25) series of bonds (the "Bonds"). The Bonds are described further below under "THE BONDS."

The Bonds will be registered in the name of a nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York ("DTC"), which will act as securities depository for the Bonds. Beneficial interests in the Bonds may be purchased in book-entry form only, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. See "THE BONDS-General" and APPENDIX B"THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM."

The issuance of each series of Bonds is authorized by the related general obligation bond act identified in Exhibit 1 (each a "Bond Act" and collectively, the "Bond Acts") approved by the voters of the State and by resolutions of the applicable finance committees designated under such Bond Acts ( collectively, the "Resolutions"). On any debt service payment date, all general obligation bonds, including the Bonds, have an equal claim on moneys in the General Fund of the State Treasury (the "General Fund") on that date for payment of debt service.

Plan of Finance

Proceeds of the Bonds will be used to: (i) current refund certain of the State's outstanding general obligation bonds for debt service savings and (ii) pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds. See "THE BONDS-Plan of Refunding."

1

Upcoming General Obligation Bond Sales

In addition to the Bonds described in this Official Statement, the State currently expects to issue taxable general obligation bonds prior to May 1, 2017. Whether such taxable general obligation bonds are issued, and the date and principal amount of any such issuance, are subject to change based upon legal, market and other factors. For additional information about future issuance plans, see APPENDIX A-"THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Future Issuance Plans; General Fund Debt Ratio."

Security and Source of Payment for the Bonds

The principal of and interest on all State general obligation bonds, including the Bonds, are payable from moneys in the General Fund, subject under State law only to the prior application of moneys in the General Fund to the support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education. See "AUTHORIZATION OF AND SECURITY FOR THE BONDS-Security." Also see APPENDIX A- "THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-The General Fund" and "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Capital Facilities FinancingGeneral Obligation Bonds."

Redemption of Bonds

The Bonds are subject to optional redemption prior to their respective stated maturity dates as described herein. See "THE BONDS-Redemption."

Financial Condition of the State General Fund

The following paragraphs present an extremely abbreviated summary of certain fiscal issues relating to the State, all of which are described in more detail in APPENDIX A. All cross references under this heading are to sections of APPENDIX A-"THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA." Investors should review the whole APPENDIX A.

The State's fiscal health continues to improve since the end of the severe recession in 2009 (the "Great Recession"), which caused large budget deficits, although at a slightly slower rate than estimated at the 2016 Budget Act. The State's General Fund budget has achieved structural balance for the last several fiscal years. As part of the development of the proposed 2017-18 Governor's Budget, a $1.6 billion deficit was projected, absent corrective actions. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget proposed a total of $3.2 billion of solutions to achieve balanced budgets for 2017-18 and future years and to provide a prudent operating reserve. Based on the proposals in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, by the end of fiscal year 2017-18, the Budget Stabilization Account ("BSA"), the State's "rainy day fund", is projected to have a balance of $7.9 billion. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVESBudget Reserves-Budget Stabilization Account."

In addition, in recent years, the State paid off billions of dollars of budgetary borrowings, debts and deferrals which were accumulated to balance budgets during the Great Recession and years prior. Under the Proposition 2 requirements, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget proposes to

2

pay down an additional $1.2 billion in various debts and liabilities in fiscal year 2017-18. See "DEBTS AND LIABILITIES UNDER PROPOSITION 2."

Despite significant budgetary improvements during the last several years, there remain a number of budget risks that threaten the financial condition of the State's General Fund. Some of these risks include the threat of recession, potential changes to federal fiscal policies, and the significant unfunded liabilities of the two main retirement systems managed by State entities, the California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") and the California State Teachers' Retirement System ("CalSTRS"). In recent years, the State has committed to significant increases in annual payments to these systems to reduce the unfunded liabilities. The State also has a significant unfunded liability with respect to other postemployment benefits. Important strategies to start µrefunding these costs have been put in place since 2015. The recent collective bargaining efforts resulted in essentially all state employees contributing towards these µrefunding costs. See "CURRENT STATE BUDGET-Budget Risks" and "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-Pension Systems" and "-Retiree Health Care Costs."

There can be no assurances that the Slate will not face fiscal stress and cash pressures again, or that other changes in the state or national economies or in federal policies will not materially adversely affect the financial condition of the State.

Information Related to this Official Statement

The information set forth herein has been obtained from official sources that are believed to be reliable, but such information is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. The information and expressions of opinion herein are subject to change without notice and neither delivery of this Official Statement nor any sale made hereunder or any future use of this Official Statement shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the State since the date hereof.

All financial and other information presented or incorporated by reference in this Official Statement has been provided by the State from its records, except for information expressly attributed to other sources. The presentation of historic information, including tables of receipts from taxes and other revenues, is intended to show recent historic information and is not intended to indicate future or continuing trends in the financial position or other affairs of the State. No representation is made that past experience, as it might be shown by such financial and other information, will necessarily continue or be repeated in the future. Certain statements included or incorporated by reference in this Official Statement constitute "forward-looking statements." Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as "plan," "expect," "estimate," "budget" or other similar words. The achievement of certain results or other expectations contained in such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements attained to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Any statements made in this Official Statement involving matters of opinion, whether expressly stated or not, are set forth as such and not as representations of fact.

3

A wide variety of other information concerning the State, including financial information, is available from State agencies, State agency publications and State agency websites. Such information includes websites operated by the State Department of Finance, the State Controller's Office and the State Treasurer's Office. Any such information that is inconsistent with the information set forth in this Official Statement should be disregarded. No such information is a part of or incorporated into this Official Statement, except as expressly noted in APPENDIX A-"THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

The information in APPENDIX B-"THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM" regarding DTC and its book-entry system has been furnished by DTC and no representation is made by the State or the Municipal Advisor as to the accuracy or completeness of such information.

This Official Statement does not constitute an offer to sell the Bonds or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of, the Bonds by any person in any state or other jurisdiction to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer, solicitation or sale in such state or jurisdiction.

Plan of Distribution

The Bonds were sold pursuant to a competitive bidding process on April 12, 2017. See "PURCHASE AND REOFFERING."

Continuing Disclosure

The State Treasurer will agree on behalf of the State to provide annually certain financial information and operating data relating to the Slate by not later than April 1 of each year in which any Bonds are outstanding ( the "Annual Report"), commencing with the report to be filed on or before April 1, 2018, containing fiscal year 2016-2017 financial information, and to provide notice of the occurrence of certain enumerated events. The specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report and the notices of events and certain other terms of the continuing disclosure obligation are set forth in APPENDIX C-"FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE." The State Treasurer has adopted policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these undertakings.

In May 2016, S&P Global Ratings ("S&P") lowered the ratings on certain letter of credit backed variable rate general obligation bonds issued by the State in 2003, 2004 and 2005 following application of S&P's updated Methodology and Assumptions for Rating Jointly Supported Financial Obligations criteria. In July 2016, the State, acting through the State Treasurer, filed a related event notice on EMMA.

The State's Annual Reports and other required reports relating to the Bonds will be available from the Electronic Municipal Market Access ("EMMA") website (www.emma.msrb.org) operated by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board ("MSRB") or on such other website as may be designated by the MSRB or the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information contained on any such website is not part of this Official Statement and is not incorporated herein.

4

http://www.emma.msfb.org

AUTHORIZATION OF AND SECURITY FOR THE BONDS

Authorization

The issuance of each series of Bonds is authorized by the related Bond Act identified in Exhibit 1 approved by the voters of the State and by the related Resolution. Each Bond Act and the State General Obligation Bond Law in Chapter 4 ( commencing with Section 16720) of Part 3 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Government Code, as incorporated by reference into each Bond Act, provide for the authorization, sale, issuance, use of proceeds, repayment and refunding of the related series of Bonds.

Security

The Bonds are general obligations of the State, and each series of the Bonds is payable in accordance with the related Bond Act and Resolution out of the General Fund, subject under State law only to the prior application of moneys in the General Fund to the support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education. Each of the Bond Acts provides that the State will collect annually in the same manner and at the same time as it collects other State revenue an amount sufficient to pay principal of and interest on the related series of Bonds in that year. Each of the Bond Acts also contains a continuing appropriation from the General Fund of the sum annually necessary to pay the principal of and interest on the related series of Bonds as they become due and payable. No further appropriation by the Legislature is required to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Under the State Constitution, the appropriation to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds as set forth in the Bond Acts cannot be repealed until the principal of and interest on the related Bonds are paid and discharged.

Each of the Bond Acts provides that the bonds issued thereunder shall be and constitute a valid and binding obligation of the State of California, and the full faith and credit of the State is pledged for the punctual payment of the principal of, and interest on, the bonds as the principal and interest become due and payable. The pledge of the full faith and credit of the State alone does not create a lien on any particular moneys in the General Fund or any other assets of the State, but is an undertaking by the State to be irrevocably obligated in good faith to use its taxing powers as may be required for the full and prompt payment of the principal of and interest on all general obligation bonds as they become due. The only provision of the State Constitution that creates a higher priority for any State fiscal obligation is a provision directing that from all State revenues there will first be set apart the moneys to be applied by the State for the support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education. In the past when cash resources in the General Fund have been constrained, State officials have worked within their powers granted by State law to manage cash resources to ensure that payments to schools and universities and for general obligation debt service would be made. On any debt service payment date, all general obligation bonds have an equal claim on moneys in the General Fund on that date for payment of debt service. See APPENDIX A-"THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Capital Facilities Financing---General Obligation Bonds" and "-CASH MANAGEMENT."

5

Remedies

Under each Resolution, it is an event of default of the State to fail to pay or cause to be paid, when due, principal of or interest or premium on any Bond issued pursuant thereto or to declare a moratorium on the payment of, or to repudiate, any such Bond.

The Resolutions do not contain any provision providing for the acceleration of the Bonds. Each Resolution states that in the case that one or more events of default occurs, then, and in every such case, the registered Bondholder is entitled to proceed to protect and enforce such registered Bondholder's rights by such appropriate judicial proceeding as such registered Bondholder deems most effectual to protect and enforce any such right, whether by mandamus or other suit or proceeding at law or in equity, for the specific performance of any covenant or agreement contained in the one or more Resolutions authorizing the affected Bonds, as more specifically set forth in each Resolution authorizing the Bonds pursuant to the respective Bond Acts. Beneficial owners of the Bonds (the "Beneficial Owners") cannot protect and enforce such rights except through the registered Bondholder. See "THE BONDS-General" and APPENDIX B- "THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM."

Since the State has never failed to make a debt service payment on any general obligation bond when due, the exact steps which would be taken, or the remedies available to Bondholders, have never been tested. There are no cross-default provisions among general obligation bonds, so any default with respect to any particular issue of bonds would not provide any remedy to holders of other bonds that are not affected. The State is not eligible to file for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws.

THE BONDS

General

The Bonds will be registered in the name of a nominee of DTC, which will act as securities depository for the Bonds. Beneficial interests in the Bonds may be purchased in bookentry form only in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof.

The Bonds will be dated and accrue interest from the date of their delivery, and will mature on the dates and in the amounts set forth in the "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING" immediately following the front cover page hereof. Interest on the Bonds will be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year comprising twelve 30-day months. Interest on the Bonds is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 2017, at the rates shown in the "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING" immediately following the front cover page hereof. If any payment on the Bonds is due on a day other than a Business Day, such payment shall be made on the next succeeding Business Day, and no interest will accrue as a result. "Business Day" means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday, a State holiday or any other day determined not to constitute a Business Day pursuant to the book-entry only system of DTC. Certain State holidays may fall on days that are not banking holidays, and can vary from year to year.

Principal and interest (including the redemption price, if any) will be paid by the State Treasurer directly to DTC on behalf of the State. Upon receipt of payments of principal and interest, DTC is to in turn remit such principal and interest to the Direct Participants in DTC for

6

disbursement by the Participants to the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. The record date for the payment of interest on the Bonds is the close of business on the 15th day of the month immediately preceding an interest payment date, whether or not the record date falls on a Business Day.

The State Treasurer can give no assurance that DTC will distribute to Direct Participants, or that Participants or others will distribute to the Beneficial Owners, payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds paid or any redemption or other notices or that they will do so on a timely basis or will serve and act in the manner described in this Official Statement. The State Treasurer is not responsible or liable for the failure of DTC or any Direct Participant or Indirect Participant to make any payments or to give any notice to a Beneficial Owner with respect to the Bonds or for any error or delay relating thereto.

See APPENDIX B- "THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM." The information in APPENDIX B- "THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM" has been furnished by DTC. No representation is made by the State as to the accuracy or completeness of such information.

The terms of each series of Bonds are substantially identical. The State may assign each maturity of the Bonds to one or more Bond Acts, rather than having all of the Bonds mature proportionally by Bond Act across the entire maturity schedule.

Proceeds of the Bonds may not be borrowed for cash flow management or other budgetary purposes.

Identification, Authorization and Purposes of the Bonds

The Bonds are being issued to (i) current refund certain of the State's outstanding general obligation bonds for debt service savings and (ii) pay certain costs of issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds are being issued as twenty-five (25) series under twenty-three (23) Bond Acts, each authorized by the voters, as set forth in Exhibit 1. Proceeds of the Bonds, after payment of certain costs of issuance, will be used to refund bonds that were issued to finance or refinance capital facilities or other voter approved costs authorized under the related Bond Act to further the public purpose of such Bond Act. The public purpose of each such Bond Act is generally described in Exhibit 1.

Plan of Refunding

The State will deposit a portion of the net proceeds of the sale of the Bonds in the amount of $710,008,834.02 into the refunding escrow fund of the State Treasury established pursuant to Section 16784 of the California Government Code (the "Refunding Escrow Fund") to current refund an aggregate principal amount of $701,360,000.00 of selected maturities of outstanding State general obligation bonds ( the "Refunded Bonds") and to redeem the Refunded Bonds on their respective redemption dates. The Refunded Bonds will be repaid within 90 days of the issuance of the Bonds so as to constitute a "current refunding" for federal tax purposes. Amounts held in the Refunding Escrow Fund with respect to the Refunded Bonds will be invested in the State Surplus Money Investment Fund, which is a portion of the State's Pooled Money Investment Account, described in APPENDIX A-"THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAINVESTMENT OF STATE FUNDS," or held as cash. See "VERIFICATION."

7

Proceeds of the Bonds deposited in the Refunding Escrow Fund will be irrevocably dedicated to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Refunded Bonds as they come due and may only be used for payment of debt service on the Refunded Bonds. Any remaining proceeds of the Bonds may be used for certain expenses associated with the issuance of the Bonds and for other purposes permitted under Section 16782 of the California Government Code.

Exhibit 2 to this Official Statement ("Exhibit 2") details the principal amount, maturity date, interest rate, redemption date and redemption price of the Refunded Bonds.

Redemption

Optional Redemption. The Bonds maturing on or before August 1, 2027, are not subject to redemption prior to their stated maturity dates. The Bonds maturing on or after August 1, 2028, are subject to optional redemption prior to their respective stated maturity dates, in whole or in part, in such order of maturity as may be designated by the State Treasurer and by lot within any maturity, on any date on or after August 1, 2027, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium.

Notice of Redemption. When any of the Bonds are to be redeemed, the State Treasurer is to give notice of redemption by mail and/or mutually acceptable electronic means only to DTC (not to the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds) not less than 20 or more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption. DTC, in turn, is to send the notice of redemption to its Participants for distribution to the Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. See APPENDIX B- "THE BOOKENTRY ONLY SYSTEM." The notice from the State Treasurer will state, among other things, that the Bonds or a designated portion thereof (in the case of partial redemption of a Bond) are to be redeemed, the dated date of the Bonds, the date fixed for redemption, the maturities of the Bonds to be redeemed and the redemption price. The notice will also state that after the date fixed for redemption no further interest will accrue on the principal of any Bonds called for redemption. The notice of redemption may also state that such redemption may be cancelled in whole or in part by the State Treasurer upon written notice to DTC no later than five Business Days prior to the date fixed for redemption. Notice of redemption will also be provided by electronic means to the MSRB's EMMA website.

Effect of Redemption. Notice of redemption having been duly given as aforesaid, and moneys for payment of the redemption price being held by the State Treasurer, the Bonds so called for redemption shall, on the redemption date designated in such notice, become due and payable at the redemption price specified in such notice, interest on the Bonds so called for redemption shall cease to accrue and the holders of said Bonds shall have no rights in respect thereof except to receive payment of the redemption price thereof (including interest, if any, accrued to the redemption date), without interest accrued on any funds held after the redemption date to pay such redemption price.

8

Amendments to Resolutions or Bonds

The State or the State Treasurer may at any time modify or amend any of the Resolutions, including any supplemental certificates thereto setting forth the terms of the Bonds, with respect to any outstanding Bonds and may amend such outstanding Bonds and the rights and obligations of the Bondholders of such outstanding Bonds and of the State, without notice to or the consent of any Bondholder, but only to make such provisions for the purpose of (i) curing any ambiguity or curing, correcting or supplementing any defective provision contained in a Resolution or (ii) complying with requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), in order to satisfy the covenants of the State set forth in each Resolution relating to maintaining the tax exemption of interest on the Bonds; in each case as the applicable finance committee or the State Treasurer, respectively, may deem necessary or desirable, and which shall not adversely affect the interests of the Bondholders of the affected Bonds.

Refunding of the Bonds

Pursuant to the Bond Acts and the prov1s10ns of California Government Code Section 16780 et seq. (the "Refunding Law"), refunding bonds may be issued to refund outstanding Bonds at or prior to their stated maturity dates. Pursuant to Section 16784 of the Refunding Law, the proceeds of such refunding bonds and other funds as described therein shall be deposited into the Refunding Escrow Fund and invested in Permitted Investments (defined below). The Refunding Escrow Fund is irrevocably dedicated to pay the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the refunded Bonds as they come due and for other purposes set forth in Section 16782 of the Government Code, including payment of costs of issuance of the refunding bonds. A separate account or accounts will be created within the Refunding Escrow Fund for each issue of refunding bonds.

"Permitted Investments" means (i) bonds or interest-bearing notes or obligations of the United States, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest, including receipts, certificates or any other evidences of an ownership interest in the investments identified in this clause (i) or in specified portions thereof; (ii) bonds or interest-bearing notes or obligations that are guaranteed as to principal and interest by a federal agency of the United States; (iii) pre-refunded municipal bonds which are rated no lower than the investments identified in clause (i) by each rating agency rating such bonds; (iv) bonds, consolidated bonds, collateral trust debentures, consolidated debentures or other obligations issued by federal land banks or federal intermediate credit banks established under the Federal Farm Loan Act, as amended; debentures and consolidated debentures issued by the Central Bank for Cooperatives and banks for cooperatives established under the Farm Credit Act of 1933, as amended; bonds or debentures of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board established under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act; bonds, debentures and other obligations of the Federal National Mortgage Association established under the National Housing Act as amended and bonds of any federal home loan bank established under that act; obligations of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; bonds, notes and other obligations issued by the Tennessee Valley Authority under the Tennessee Valley Authority Act as amended; and bonds, notes and other obligations guaranteed by the Commodity Credit Corporation for the export of California agricultural products under the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act as amended, provided, however that the Permitted Investments specified in this clause (iv) shall be rated by at

9

least two of any three rating agencies rating such obligations not lower than the higher of (1) the rating on the Bonds to be refunded at the time of the original issuance thereof and (2) the rating on the Bonds to be refunded at the time of refunding; or (v) deposit in the State Surplus Money Investment Fund.

In any refunding for which proceeds of refunding bonds (and other funds, if any) are deposited into the Refunding Escrow Fund for payment of Bonds greater than 90 days prior to the date of retirement of such Bonds, unless the moneys on deposit are held in the State Surplus Money Investment Fund or as uninvested cash or both and are sufficient to pay when due all of the principal, premium, if any, and interest on such refunded Bonds until maturity or the date fixed for redemption without accounting for investment earnings thereon, the State Treasurer is required to obtain a report from a firm of independent public accountants verifying the sufficiency of such deposit.

[BALANCE OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

10

ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

The following table sets forth the amounts of principal, interest and the fiscal year total debt service payments due on the Bonds.

Fiscal Year Ended

June 30 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total

Principal $ 5,660,000.00

2,245,000.00 4,520,000.00 4,880,000.00 2,275,000.00 6,870,000.00 2,345,000.00 2,375,000.00 2,425,000.00

68,825,000.00 132,345,000.00 137,430,000.00 59,580,000.00

172,115,000.00 $603,890,000.00

Interest $ 21,955,401.99

27,870,200.00 27,701,075.00 27,466,075.00 27,287,200.00 27,058,575.00 26,828,200.00 26,710,200.00 26,590,200.00 24,808,950.00 20,772,287.50 15,020,500.00 10,095,250.00 4,302,875.00

$ 314,466,989.49

Fiscal Year Total Debt

Service $ 27,615,401.99

30,115,200.00 32,221,075.00 32,346,075.00 29,562,200.00 33,928,575.00 29,173,200.00 29,085,200.00 29,015,200.00 93,633,950.00

153,117,287.50 152,450,500.00 69,675,250.00

176,417,875.00 $ 918,356,989.49

For additional information regarding the debt service payment obligations of the State, see APPENDIX A- "THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-STATE DEBT TABLES."

LEGAL MATTERS

The opm10n of the Honorable Xavier Becerra, Attorney General of the State (the "Attorney General"), approving the validity of the Bonds will be delivered concurrently with the issuance of the Bonds. The opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Bond Counsel to the State ("Bond Counsel"), approving the validity of the Bonds and addressing certain tax matters will be delivered concurrently with the issuance of the Bonds. The proposed forms of such legal opinions are set forth in APPENDIX D- "PROPOSED FORMS OF LEGAL OPINIONS." Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Nixon Peabody LLP are serving as Co-Disclosure Counsel to the State with respect to the Bonds ("Bond Co-Disclosure Counsel"). Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Stradling Y occa Carlson and Rauth, a Professional Corporation, are serving as Co-Disclosure Counsel to the State regarding Appendix A ("Appendix A CoDisclosure Counsel").

The Attorney General, Bond Counsel, Bond Co-Disclosure Counsel and Appendix A CoDisclosure Counsel, respectively, undertake no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of this Official Statement.

11

TAX MATTERS

In the opinion of Bond Counsel, based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings, and court decisions, and assuming, among other matters, the accuracy of certain representations and compliance with certain covenants, interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Code and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes. Bond Counsel is of the further opinion that interest on the Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes, although Bond Counsel observes that such interest is included in adjusted current earnings when calculating federal corporate alternative minimum taxable income. A complete copy of the proposed form of opinion of Bond Counsel is set forth in APPENDIX D-"PROPOSED FORMS OF LEGAL OPINIONS."

To the extent the issue price of any maturity of the Bonds is less than the amount to be paid at maturity of such Bonds ( excluding amounts stated to be interest and payable at least annually over the term of such Bonds), the difference constitutes "original issue discount," the accrual of which, to the extent properly allocable to each Beneficial Owner thereof, is treated as interest on the Bonds which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and exempt from State of California personal income taxes. For this purpose, the issue price of a particular maturity of the Bonds is the first price at which a substantial amount of such maturity of the Bonds is sold to the public ( excluding bond houses, brokers, or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers). The original issue discount with respect to any maturity of the Bonds accrues daily over the term to maturity of such Bonds on the basis of a constant interest rate compounded semiannually (with straight-line interpolations between compounding dates). The accruing original issue discount is added to the adjusted basis of such Bonds to determine taxable gain or loss upon disposition (including sale, redemption, or payment on maturity) of such Bonds. Beneficial Owners of the Bonds should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of ownership of Bonds with original issue discount, including the treatment of Beneficial Owners who do not purchase such Bonds in the original offering to the public at the first price at which a substantial amount of such Bonds is sold to the public.

Bonds purchased, whether at original issuance or otherwise, for an amount higher than their principal amount payable at maturity ( or, in some cases, at their earlier call date) ("Premium Bonds") will be treated as having amortizable bond premium. No deduction is allowable for the amortizable bond premium in the case of bonds, like the Premium Bonds, the interest on which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes. However, the amount of tax-exempt interest received, and a Beneficial Owner's basis in a Premium Bond, will be reduced by the amount of amortizable bond premium properly allocable to such Beneficial Owner. Beneficial Owners of Premium Bonds should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the proper treatment of amortizable bond premium in their particular circumstances.

The Code imposes various restrictions, conditions and requirements relating to the exclusion from gross income for federal income tax purposes of interest on obligations such as the Bonds. The State has made certain representations and covenanted to comply with certain restrictions, conditions, and requirements designed to ensure that interest on the Bonds will not be included in federal gross income. Inaccuracy of these representations or failure to comply

12

with these covenants may result in interest on the Bonds being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, possibly from the date of original issuance of the Bonds. The opinion of Bond Counsel assumes the accuracy of these representations and compliance with these covenants. Bond Counsel has not undertaken to determine ( or to inform any person) whether any actions taken (or not taken), or events occurring (or not occurring), or any other matters coming to Bond Counsel's attention after the date of issuance of the Bonds may adversely affect the value of, or the tax status of interest on, the Bonds. Accordingly, the opinion of Bond Counsel is not intended to, and may not, be relied upon in connection with any such actions, events or matters.

Although Bond Counsel is of the opinion that interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and is exempt from State of California personal income taxes, the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of amounts treated as interest on, the Bonds may otherwise affect a Beneficial Owner's federal, state, or local tax liability. The nature and extent of these other tax consequences depends upon the particular tax status of the Beneficial Owner or the Beneficial Owner's other items of income or deduction. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding any such other tax consequences.

Current and future legislative proposals, if enacted into law, clarification of the Code or court decisions may cause interest on the Bonds to be subject, directly or indirectly, in whole or in part, to federal income taxation or to be subject to or exempted from state income taxation, or otherwise prevent Beneficial Owners from realizing the full current benefit of the tax status of such interest. For example, presidential budget proposals in previous years have proposed legislation that would limit the exclusion from gross income of interest on the Bonds to some extent for high-income individuals. The introduction or enactment of any such legislative proposals or clarification of the Code or court decisions may also affect, perhaps significantly, the market price for, or marketability of, the Bonds. Prospective purchasers of the Bonds should consult their own tax advisors regarding the potential impact of any pending or proposed federal or state tax legislation, regulations or litigation, as to which Bond Counsel is expected to express no opm10n.

The opinion of Bond Counsel is based on current legal authority, covers certain matters not directly addressed by such authorities, and represents Bond Counsel's judgment as to the proper treatment of the Bonds for federal income tax purposes. It is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") or the courts. Furthermore, Bond Counsel cannot give and has not given any opinion or assurance about the future activities of the State, or about the effect of future changes in the Code, the applicable regulations, the interpretation thereof or the enforcement thereof by the IRS. The State has covenanted, however, to comply with the requirements of the Code.

Unless separately engaged, Bond Counsel is not obligated to defend the State or the Beneficial Owners regarding the tax-exempt status of the Bonds in the event of an audit examination by the IRS. Under current procedures, parties other than the State and their appointed counsel, including the Beneficial Owners, would have little, if any, right to participate in the audit examination process. Moreover, because achieving judicial review in connection with an audit examination of tax-exempt bonds is difficult, obtaining an independent review of IRS positions with which the State legitimately disagrees may not be practicable. Any action of

13

the IRS, including but not limited to selection of the Bonds for audit, or the course or result of such audit, or an audit of bonds presenting similar tax issues, may affect the market price for, or the marketability of, the Bonds, and may cause the State or the Beneficial Owners to incur significant expense.

LITIGATION

There is not now pending (with service of process on the State having been accomplished) or threatened any litigation seeking to restrain or enjoin the sale, issuance, execution or delivery of the Bonds or challenging the validity of the Bonds or any proceedings of the State taken with respect to the foregoing.

There are numerous litigation matters pending against the State, which could, if determined adversely to the State, affect the State's expenditures and, in some cases, its revenues and cash flow. While there can be no assurances as to the ultimate resolution and fiscal impact of such litigation, the State believes that the resolutions of such litigation are unlikely to adversely affect the ability of the State to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. See APPENDIX A- "THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-LITIGATION."

PURCHASE AND REOFFERING

The Bonds were sold at a competitive sale on April 12, 2017, and awarded to Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Initial Purchaser"). The Initial Purchaser has agreed to purchase the Bonds at a price of $710,808,834.02, representing the principal amount of the Bonds, plus original issue premium of $107,848,099.95, less an Initial Purchaser's discount of $929,265.93.

The Notice of Sale provides that the Initial Purchaser will purchase all of the Bonds if it purchases any of them. The obligations to make such purchases are subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Notice of Sale, the approval of certain legal matters by counsel and certain other conditions.

Prior to the delivery of the Bonds, the Initial Purchaser will execute and deliver to the State Treasurer a certificate to the effect that such Initial Purchaser has provided to the State Treasurer the initial reoffering prices or yields on the Bonds as set forth in the "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING" immediately following the front cover hereof. The Initial Purchaser may offer and sell the Bonds to certain dealers and others at prices lower than the offering prices stated in the "SUMMARY OF THE OFFERING" immediately following the front cover hereof. The public offering prices stated may be changed from time to time by the Initial Purchaser.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The State of California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 (the "Financial Statements") is included as Appendix E to this Official Statement. These Financial Statements have been examined by the State Auditor to the extent indicated in the report.

14

The State Controller's unaudited reports of the General Fund cash receipts and disbursements for the period from July 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 are included as Exhibit 2 to Appendix A to this Official Statement. See APPENDIX A-"THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

RATINGS

The Bonds have received ratings of "Aa3" by Moody's Investors Service, "AA-" by S&P and "AA-" by Fitch Ratings. An explanation of the significance and status of such credit ratings may be obtained from the rating agencies furnishing the same. There is no assurance that such ratings will continue for any given period of time or that they will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by any such rating agencies if, in their respective judgments, circumstances so warrant. Any revision or withdrawal of a credit rating could have an effect on the market prices and marketability of the Bonds. The State cannot predict the timing or impact of future actions by the rating agencies.

VERIFICATION

Upon delivery of the Bonds, Grant Thornton LLP, independent certified public accountants, will deliver a report that the firm has verified the mathematical accuracy of certain computations relating to the adequacy of the deposits to be made to the Refunding Escrow Fund with respect to the Refunded Bonds to pay the amounts required as described under "THE BONDS-Plan of Refunding." Bond Counsel will rely on this report in reaching their conclusion that the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal tax purposes.

MUNICIPAL ADVISOR

Public Resources Advisory Group is serving as the Municipal Advisor to the State in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. The Municipal Advisor has not been engaged, nor has it undertaken, to make an independent verification or assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information contained in this Official Statement.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The purpose of this Official Statement is to supply information to prospective buyers of the Bonds. Quotations from and summaries and explanations of the Bonds and of statutes or documents are brief summaries thereof which do not purport to be complete or definitive, and reference is made to such statutes or documents for full and complete statements of the contents thereof.

Any statements in this Official Statement involving estimates, forecasts or matters of opinion, whether or not expressly so stated, are intended as such and not as representations of fact. This Official Statement is not to be construed as a contract or agreement between the State and the purchasers or holders of any of the Bonds.

15

Questions regarding this Official Statement and the issuance of these securities may be addressed to the Office of the Honorable John Chiang, Treasurer of the State of California, 915 Capitol Mall, Room llO, Sacramento, California 95814, telephone (800) 900-3873.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA JOHN CHIANG Treasurer of the State of California

16

EXHIBIT 1

BOND ACTS, PURPOSES AND SERIES

REFUNDING BONDS

The Refunding Bonds will be issued in the amounts and series, and under the Bond Acts as set forth below. Proceeds of the Refunding Bonds will be used to refund bonds issued to finance or refinance capital facilities or other voter approved costs related to the public purpose of the applicable Bond Act. The public purpose of each Bond Act is generally described below.

Bond Act Finance Committee General Purpose of the Bond Series Amount

Act Designation ($)

1988 School Facilities Bond Act State School Building Finance Committee K-12 Public School Facilities AU 535,000

1992 School Facilities Bond Act State School Building Finance Committee K-12 Public School Facilities BP 50,000

California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Neighborhood Parks, and BE 2,575,000

Protection Act of 2002 Act Finance Committee Coastal Protection California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library California Library Construction and Renovation Library Construction and

AR 50,000 Construction and Renovation Bond Act of Finance Committee Renovation

2000 California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law California Safe Drinking Water Finance

Safe Drinking Water AR 750,000 ofl 988 Committee

Children's Hospital Bond Act of 2004 Children's Hospital Bond Act Finance

Children's Hospital AD 780,000 Committee

Class Size Reduction Kindergarten-Public Higher Education

University Public Education Facilities Higher Education Facilities Finance Committee Facilities

EL 36,805,000 Bond Act of 1998

Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Transportation Improvement Finance Clean Air & Transportation cu 30,030,000 Bond Act of 1990 Committee Improvement

County Correctioml Facility Capital 1988 County Correctioml Facility Capital Expenditure and Youth Facility Bond Act Expenditure and Youth Facility Finance Correctional Facilities AT 230,000

ofl 988 Committee

EX 1-1


Act Designation ($)

Higher Education Facilities Bond Act of Higher Education Facilities Finance Committee

Public Higher Education AR 90,000 1988 Facilities


Public Higher Education BL 570,000 June 1990 Facilities


Public Higher Education BR 3,005,000 June 1992 Facilities

Kindergarten-University Public Education Higher Education Facilities Finance Committee

Public Higher Education DM 10,120,000

Facilities Bond Act of 2002 Facilities

Kindergarten-University Public Education K-12 Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2002

State School Building Finance Committee Facilities DN 258,220,000

Kindergarten-University Public Education K-12 Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004

State School Building Finance Committee Facilities CR 4,595,000

Public Education Facilities Bond Act of Higher Education Facilities Finance Committee

Public Higher Education DP 23,910,000

1996 Facilities

Public Education Facilities Bond Act of State School Building Finance Committee

K-12 Public Education DN 18,830,000

1996 Facilities

Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Supply Act Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Supply Finance Safe, Clean and Reliable

BV 29,520,000 Committee Water Supply

Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Safe Drinking Water, Clean Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Protection, and Flood Protection Finance Water, Watershed Protection, BY 19,730,000

Act Committee and Flood Protection Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Safe Neighborhood Parks,

Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act Air, and Coastal Protection (Villaraigosa- Clean Water, Clean Air, and BR 58,700,000 of2000 (the Villaraigosa-Keeley Act) Keeley Act) Finance Committee Coastal Protection

School Facilities Bond Act of 1990 State School Building Finance Committee K-12 Public Education AS 1,345,000

Facilities

School Facilities Bond Act of 1992 State School Building Finance Committee K-12 Public Education

BW 2,435,000 Facilities

EX 1-2


Act Designation ($)

Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996 Seismic Retrofit Finance Committee Seismic Retrofit BY 47,285,000

Water Conservation Bond Law of 1988 Water Conservation Finance Committee Water Conservation AU 575,000

Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal Water Security, Clean

Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002 and Beach Protection Act of 2002 Fimnce Drinking Water, Coastal and BC 53,155,000

Committee Beach Protection

EX 1-3

[THIS PAGE IN1ENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

EXHIBIT 2

REFUNDED BONDS

The following table is a list of the bonds to be refunded with proceeds of the Refunding Bonds. The amounts in the column "Principal Amount to be Refunded" represent the respective amounts of such bonds to be refunded. Any difference between the amounts in the column "Principal Amount Outstanding" and the column "Principal Amount to be Refunded" represents bonds not selected by the State Treasurer to be refunded with proceeds of the Refunding Bonds.

Principal Principal Dated Date Amount Amount to be Interest Redemption

of Prior CUSIPt Outstanding Refunded Maturity Rate Redemption Price Bonds (1306) ($) ($) Date (%) Date (%)

6/1/2006 2TFDI 1,775,000 1,775,000 9/1/2018 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 6/1/2006 2TFE9 1,765,000 1,765,000 9/1/2019 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 6/1/2006 2TFF6 1,810,000 1,810,000 9/1/2020 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 11/1/2006 2TSY1 106,445,000 106,445,000 10/1/2027 3.500 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 2TG32 2,860,000 2,595,000 8/1/2019 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 2TG40 3,190,000 2,925,000 8/1/2020 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 3C2P4 2,070,000 1,805,000 8/1/2021 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 3C2Q2 2,070,000 1,805,000 8/1/2022 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 3C2R0 2,065,000 1,805,000 8/1/2023 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 3C2S8 2,060,000 1,800,000 8/1/2024 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 3C2T6 2,055,000 1,800,000 8/1/2025 5.000 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 2TH23 80,620,000 76,510,000 8/1/2026 4.500 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 2TH31 39,890,000 35,585,000 8/1/2027 4.500 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 2TH49 171,210,000 167,960,000 8/1/2028 4.500 5/19/2017 100.00 4/1/2007 2TH64 293,925,000 284,230,000 8/1/2030 4.500 5/19/2017 100.00 6/1/2007 3C2X7 5,240,000 5,240,000 6/1/2023 5.000 6/1/2017 100.00 6/1/2007 3C3D0 5,505,000 5,505,000 6/1/2027 4.500 6/1/2017 100.00

701,360,000

t Copyright 2017, American Bankers Association. CUSIP® is a registered trademark of the American Bankers Association. CUSIP data herein is provided by the CUSIP Global Services (COS), which is managed on behalf of the American Bankers Association by S&P Global Market Intelligence. This data is not intended to create a database and does not serve in any way as a substitute for the COS Database. CUSIP numbers have been assigned by an independent company not affiliated with the State and are included solely for the convenience of the registered owners of the applicable Bonds. The State is not responsible for the selection or uses of these CUSIP numbers, and no representation is made as to their correctness on the applicable Bonds or as included herein. The CUSIP number for a specific maturity is subject to being changed after the issuance of the Bonds as a result of various subsequent actions including, but not limited to, a refunding in whole or in part or as a result of the procurement of secondary market portfolio insurance or other similar enhancement by investors that is applicable to all or a portion of certain maturities of the Bonds.

EX 2-1

APPENDIX A

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

April 12, 2017

NOTE: Since the date of the Preliminary Official Statement, certain information in Appendix A has been updated, shown in italics on pages A-5, A-6, A-9, A-20, A-24, A-25, A-26, A-28, A-29 and A-88. In addition, Exhibit I to Appendix A has been updated to reflect the issuance of the June 30, 2016 Ca!PERS Actuarial Valuation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION TO APPENDIX A ....................................................................................... A-1

PART I ........................................................................................................................................ A-2

OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................... A-2

Population and Economy of the State ................................................................................... A-2

Financial Condition of the State General Fund ..................................................................... A-2

General Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Cash Management ........................................... A-3

State Indebtedness and Other Obligations ............................................................................ A-4

State Pension Systems and Retiree Health Care Costs ......................................................... A-5

Financial Statements ............................................................................................................. A-5

Certain Defined Terms .......................................................................................................... A-6

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS .................................................................................................... A-7

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget .......................................................................................... A-7

Recent Cash Receipts ............................................................................................................ A-7

Pension Fund Actions ........................................................................................................... A-8

Change in Federal Administration ........................................................................................ A-8

Recent Storms in California .................................................................................................. A-8

Collective Bargaining ........................................................................................................... A-8

Updates to Part II of Appendix A ......................................................................................... A-9

GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 BUDGET ........................................... A-9

Development of Revenue Estimates ................................................................................... A-11

Economic Assumptions Underlying the 2017-18 Governor's Budget ............................... A-12

CURRENT STATE BUDGET ................................................................................................. A-13

Budget Risks ....................................................................................................................... A-16

Multi-Year Budget Projections ........................................................................................... A-17

Fiscal Year 2016-17 Revised General Fund Estimates in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget .............................................................................................................. A-18

Summary of General Fund Revenues, Expenditures, and Fund Balance ........................... A-19

General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Assumptions ...................................................... A-22

DEBTS AND LIABILITIES UNDER PROPOSITION 2 ........................................................ A-23

LITIGATION ............................................................................................................................ A-24

Introduction ......................................................................................................................... A-24

Budget-Related Litigation ................................................................................................... A-25

1. Actions Challenging Cap and Trade Program Auctions ...................................... A-25

2. Action Challenging School Financing ................................................................. A-25

3. Actions Challenging Statutes That Reformed California Redevelopment Law ............................................................................................ A-25

Tax Cases ............................................................................................................................ A-26

Environmental Matters ........................................................................................................ A-27

Action Regarding Special Education .................................................................................. A-27

Prison Healthcare Reform and Reduction of Prison Population ......................................... A-27

High-Speed Rail Litigation ................................................................................................. A-28

Action Regarding State Mandates ...................................................................................... A-28

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS .................................................................................................. A-28

PART II ..................................................................................................................................... A-30

STATE FINANCES - REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES .......................... A-30

The Budget Process ............................................................................................................. A-30

The General Fund ............................................................................................................... A-30

Restrictions on Raising or Using General Fund Revenues ................................................. A-31

Sources of Tax Revenue ..................................................................................................... A-32

1. Personal Income Tax ............................................................................................ A-35

2. Sales and Use Tax ................................................................................................ A-37

3. Corporation Tax ................................................................................................... A-38

4. Insurance Tax ....................................................................................................... A-39

5. Other Taxes .......................................................................................................... A-39

6. Special Fund Revenues ........................................................................................ A-39

7. Taxes on Tobacco Products ................................................................................. A-40

8. Taxes on Marijuana Products ............................................................................... A-41

State Expenditures .............................................................................................................. A-41

1. K-14 Education under Proposition 98 .................................................................. A-41

2. Higher Education ................................................................................................. A-44

3. Health and Human Services ................................................................................. A-45

4. Public Safety ........................................................................................................ A-49

Five-Year Expenditure Summary ....................................................................................... A-50

Budget Reserves .................................................................................................................. A-52

1. Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties ........................................................... A-52

2. Budget Stabilization Account .............................................................................. A-53

STATE FINANCES - OTHER ELEMENTS .......................................................................... A-54

Pension Systems .................................................................................................................. A-54

11

Retiree Health Care Costs ................................................................................................... A-54

1. Ongoing Efforts ................................................................................................... A-57

State Appropriations Limit ................................................................................................. A-58

Local Government Impacts on State Finances .................................................................... A-59

1. Constitutional and Statutory Limitations ............................................................. A-59

2. Property Tax Revenues ........................................................................................ A-60

3. Dissolved Redevelopment Agency Funds ........................................................... A-61

4. Realigning Services to Local Governments ......................................................... A-61

CASH MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................... A-61

Traditional Cash Management Tools .................................................................................. A-61

1. General ................................................................................................................. A-61

2. Internal Borrowing ............................................................................................... A-62

3. External Borrowing .............................................................................................. A-62

Inter-Fund Borrowings ........................................................................................................ A-63

Cash Management Borrowings ........................................................................................... A-64

Cash Management in Fiscal Years 2015-16 and 2016-17 .................................................. A-65

Other Cash Management Tools .......................................................................................... A-65

State Warrants ..................................................................................................................... A-66

1. Registered Warrants ............................................................................................. A-67

2. Reimbursement Warrants ..................................................................................... A-67

3. Refunding Reimbursement Warrants ................................................................... A-68

STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS ................................................... A-68

General ................................................................................................................................ A-68

Capital Facilities Financing ................................................................................................ A-68

1. General Obligation Bonds .................................................................................... A-68

2. Variable Rate General Obligation Bonds ............................................................ A-69

3. General Obligation Commercial Paper Program ................................................. A-70

4. Bank Arrangements ............................................................................................. A-70

5. Lease-Revenue Obligations ................................................................................. A-71

6. Non-Recourse Debt .............................................................................................. A-71

7. Build America Bonds ........................................................................................... A-72

Future Issuance Plans; General Fund Debt Ratio ............................................................... A-72

Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds .................................................................................. A-73

Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Guarantees .................................. A-74

111

INVESTMENT OF STATE FUNDS ....................................................................................... A-75

OVERVIEW OF STATE GOVERNMENT ............................................................................. A-77

Organization of State Government ..................................................................................... A-77

Employee Relations ............................................................................................................ A-78

ECONOMY AND POPULATION ........................................................................................... A-79

Labor Force, Employment, Income, Construction and Export Growth .............................. A-80

BANK ARRANGEMENTS TABLE ....................................................................................... A-85

STATE DEBT TABLES ........................................................................................................... A-88

EXHIBIT I -PENSION SYSTEMS ........................................................................................ EX-1

EXHIBIT 2- STATE CONTROLLER'S STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS WLY I, 2016 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2017 (UNAUDITED) .............................................. EX-2

IV

TABLE 1

TABLE 2

TABLE3

TABLE4

TABLE 5

TABLE 6

TABLE7

TABLE 8

TABLE 9

TABLEl0

TABLE 11

TABLE12

TABLE 13

TABLE14

TABLE15

TABLE16

TABLE17

TABLE18

TABLE19

TABLE 20

TABLE21

TABLE 22

TABLES

GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY ................................................ A-11

SELECTED NATIONAL AND CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC DATA ....... A-13

GENERAL FUND MULTI-YEAR BUDGET PROJECTION ................... A-18

GENERAL FUND REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND FUND BALANCE (BUDGETARY BASIS) ..................................... A-20

GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE AND EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION ............................................................ A-22

DEBTS AND LIABILITIES UNDER PROPOSITION 2 2017-18 GOVERNOR'S BUDGET ............................................................ A-24

GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND TRANSFERS (INCLUDES PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND TRANSFERS) .................................................................................... A-34

PERSONAL INCOME TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES (PIT) (INCLUDES PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES AND TRANSFERS) .................................................................................... A-36

COMPARATIVE YIELD OF STATE TAXES - SPECIAL FUNDS (MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS) ............................................................... A-40

PROPOSITION 98 FUNDING .................................................................... A-43

PROPOSITION 98 FUTURE OBLIGATIONS BALANCES .................... A-44

HIGHER EDUCATION GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES ........................................................ A-45

MEDI-CAL EXPENDITURES ................................................................... A-46

IHSS EXPENDITURES .............................................................................. A-47

CALWORKS EXPENDITURES ................................................................ A-48

DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES EXPENDITURES ........................................................................................ A-49

GOVERNMENTAL COST FUNDS (BUDGETARY BASIS) SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION AND CHARACTER .................................................................................... A-51

OPEB PAY-AS-YOU-GO FUNDING ........................................................ A-56

ACTUAL COSTS/BUDGET FOR OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS ................................................................................................... A-57

STATE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT .......................................................... A-59

INTERNAL BORROW ABLE RESOURCES (CASH BASIS) ............................................................................................ A-64

STATE OF CALIFORNIA REVENUE ANTICIPATION NOTES ISSUED ........................................................................................................ A-65

V

TABLE23

TABLE24

TABLE 25

TABLE 26

TABLE 27

TABLE 28

TABLE 29

TABLE30

POPULATION ............................................................................................. A-80

LABOR FORCE .......................................................................................... A-80

NONFARM PAYROLL EMPLOYMENT BY MAJOR SECTOR 2006 AND 2016 ........................................................................................... A-81

TOTAL PERSONAL INCOME IN CALIFORNIA. ................................... A-82

PERSONAL INCOME PER CAPITA ........................................................ A-82

RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AUTHORIZED ............... A-83

NON-RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED ....................... A-83

CALIFORNIA'S EXPORTS OF GOODS .................................................. A-84

VI

INTRODUCTION TO APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A is the part of this Official Statement that provides investors with information concerning the State of California. The following section of APPENDIX A titled "OVERVIEW" is intended to give readers a very brief overview of some of the main topics covered in APPENDIX A. Investors are advised to read the entire Official Statement, including APPENDIX A and its Exhibits to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. See "Certain Defined Terms" at the end of the "OVERVIEW" section for certain defined terms used in APPENDIX A.

APPENDIX A is divided into two Parts. PART I contains information about the current state budget and economic forecasts, including an identification of certain Recent Developments since the state's last Official Statement, and the 2017-18 Governor's Budget. As the state (including certain of its agencies) issues bonds from time to time during the remainder of fiscal year 2016-17, PART I of APPENDIX A (including EXHIBIT 2) will be updated as needed to provide the most current, material information. PART II of APPENDIX A (including EXHIBIT I - "PENSION SYSTEMS") contains information on the basic structure of the state's finances, including details on revenues, expenditures and reserves, cash management, outstanding indebtedness and other information. The information in PART II will typically be updated twice per year: following release of the proposed Governor's Budget in January, and following enactment of the annual budget. The latter update will include revenue and economic forecasts presented in the May Revision of the Governor's January budget proposal. In the event there are material changes to the information contained in PART II after each update, such information will be highlighted in the "Recent Developments" section of PART I in the next published version of APPENDIX A, and the updated material will be clearly identified within PART II, such as by use of italics.

The principal of and interest on the securities described in this Official Statement are payable either primarily or secondarily from moneys deposited in, or available for transfer to, the General Fund as more particularly described in the front part of this Official Statement and in APPENDIX A. Accordingly, information concerning the state's finances that does not materially impact the availability of moneys deposited in, or available for transfer to, the General Fund or the expenditure of such moneys, and material risks related thereto, is generally not included in APPENDIX A or, if included, is not described in detail (e.g., information related to the California Air Resources Board's cap and trade program).

APPENDIX A is provided specifically for use in connection with the sale of securities described in this Official Statement. APPENDIX A may not be copied or used by any person for any other purpose or in connection with the sale of any other securities without the express written permission of the State Treasurer.

A-1

Population and Economy of the State

PART I

OVERVIEW

California is by far the most populous state in the nation, nearly 50 percent larger than the second-ranked state according to the 2010 United States Census. The estimate of California's population as of July 2016 was 39.4 million residents, which was 12 percent of the total United States population.

California's economy, the largest among the 50 states and one of the largest and most diverse in the world, has major components in high technology, trade, entertainment, manufacturing, government, tourism, construction and services. The relative proportion of the various components of the California economy closely resembles the make-up of the national economy. The California economy continues to benefit from broad-based growth.

Demographic and economic statistical information and a discussion of economic assumptions are included in APPENDIX A under "GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 BUDGET-Economic Assumptions Underlying the 2017-18 Governor's Budget" and "ECONOMY AND POPULATION."

Financial Condition of the State General Fund

The state's fiscal health continues to improve since the end of the severe recession in 2009 (the "Great Recession"), which caused large budget deficits, although at a slightly slower rate than estimated at the 2016 Budget Act. The state's General Fund budget has achieved structural balance for the last several fiscal years. As part of the development of the proposed 2017-18 Governor's Budget, a $1.6 billion deficit was projected, absent corrective actions. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget proposed a total of $3.2 billion of solutions to achieve balanced budgets for 2017-18 and future years and to provide a prudent operating reserve. Based on the proposals in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, by the end of fiscal year 2017-18, the Budget Stabilization Account ("BSA"), the state's "rainy day fund", is projected to have a balance of $7.9 billion. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVESBudget Reserves-Budget Stabilization Account."

In addition, in recent years, the state paid off billions of dollars of budgetary borrowings, debts and deferrals which were accumulated to balance budgets during the Great Recession and years prior. Under the Proposition 2 requirements, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget proposes to pay down an additional $1.2 billion in various debts and liabilities in fiscal year 2017-18. See "DEBTS AND LIABILITIES UNDER PROPOSITION 2."

Despite significant budgetary improvements during the last several years, there remain a number of budget risks that threaten the financial condition of the state's General Fund. Some of these risks include the threat of recession, potential changes to federal fiscal policies, and the significant unfunded liabilities of the two main retirement systems managed by state entities, the California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") and the California State Teachers' Retirement System ("CalSTRS"). In recent years, the state has committed to

A-2

significant increases in annual payments to these systems to reduce the unfunded liabilities. The state also has a significant unfunded liability with respect to other postemployment benefits. Important strategies to start prefunding these costs have been put in place since 2015. The recent collective bargaining efforts resulted in essentially all state employees contributing towards these prefunding costs. See "CURRENT STATE BUDGET-Budget Risks" and "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-Pension Systems" and "-Retiree Health Care Costs."

There can be no assurances that the state will not face fiscal stress and cash pressures again, or that other changes in the state or national economies or in federal policies will not materially adversely affect the financial condition of the state.

General Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Cash Management

The moneys of the state are segregated into the General Fund and over 1,000 other funds, including special, bond, federal, and other funds. The General Fund consists of revenues received by the State Treasury and not required by law to be credited to any other fund, as well as earnings from the investment of state moneys not allocable to another fund. The General Fund is the principal operating fund for the majority of governmental activities and is the depository of most of the major tax revenue sources of the state. For additional financial data relating to the General Fund, see the State Controller's unaudited report of General Fund cash receipts and disbursements attached to APPENDIX A as EXHIBIT 2 and the state's audited basic financial statements in APPENDIX E to this Official Statement. See "ST ATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES" and "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

The state receives revenues from taxes, fees and other sources, the most significant of which are the personal income tax, sales and use tax, and corporation tax (which collectively constitute over 90 percent of total General Fund revenues and transfers). The state expends money on a variety of programs and services. Significant elements of state expenditures include education (both kindergarten through twelfth grade ("K-12") and higher education), health and human services, and public safety programs. For a discussion of the sources and uses of the General Fund, see "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES."

For fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects $123.8 billion and $125 billion in resources for the General Fund, respectively, and $122.8 billion and $122.5 billion in expenditures from the General Fund, respectively. The fiscal year 2016-17 resources are comprised of $118.8 billion of revenues and transfers, and a $5 billion fund balance carried over from fiscal year 2015-16. The fiscal year 2017-18 resources are comprised of $124 billion of revenues and transfers, and a $1 billion fund balance carried over from fiscal year 2016-17. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects $1.6 billion in the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties ("SFEU") and $7.9 billion in the BSA at the end of fiscal year 2017-18. See "GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 BUDGET", "CURRENT STATE BUDGET" and "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVESBudget Reserves."

Over the years, a number of laws and constitutional amendments have been enacted, often through voter initiatives, which have made it more difficult for the state to raise taxes,

A-3

restricted the use of the General Fund or special fund revenues, or otherwise limited the Legislature and the Governor's discretion in enacting budgets. See "STATE FINANCESREVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Restrictions on Raising or Using General Fund Revenues."

The state manages its cash flow requirements during the fiscal year primarily with a combination of external borrowing, if required, and internal borrowing by the General Fund from over 700 special funds. The state ended fiscal year 2015-16 with a net borrowing of $646 million from special funds as of June 30, 2016. The state is projected to end fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18 with net borrowings from special funds of $7.3 billion and $6.1 billion, respectively. Similar to fiscal year 2015-16 and 2016-17, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects the state will not have any need to use external cash flow borrowing in fiscal year 2017-18. See "CASH MANAGEMENT-Traditional Cash Management Tools-External Borrowing" for a description of the priority of payment of the state's obligations, including the repayment of external and internal borrowing and see also "CASH MANAGEMENT-InterFund Borrowings."

Because the principal of and interest on the secunt1es being offered in this Official Statement are payable primarily or secondarily from moneys in the General Fund, the financial information contained in APPENDIX A relates principally to revenues and expenditures of, or moneys available for transfer to, the General Fund and material risks related thereto.

State Indebtedness and Other Obligations

As of February 1, 2017, the state had approximately $83.1 billion of outstanding general obligation bonds and lease revenue bonds payable principally from the state's General Fund or from lease payments paid from the operating budget of the respective lessees, which operating budgets are primarily, but not exclusively, derived from the General Fund. As of February 1, 2017, there were approximately $35.6 billion of authorized and unissued long-term voterapproved general obligation bonds which, when issued, will be payable principally from the General Fund and approximately $3.4 billion of authorized and unissued lease-revenue bonds. See "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Future Issuance Plans; General Fund Debt Ratio."

Certain state agencies and authorities issue revenue obligations for which the General Fund has no liability. These revenue obligations are either payable from state revenue-producing enterprises and projects, and not payable from the General Fund, or are conduit obligations payable only from revenues paid by local governments or private users of facilities financed by the revenue obligations.

The state has always paid when due the principal of and interest on its general obligation bonds, general obligation commercial paper notes, lease-revenue obligations and short-term obligations, including revenue anticipation notes and revenue anticipation warrants.

Detailed information regarding the state's long-term debt appears in the sections "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS" and "STATE DEBT TABLES."

A-4

State Pension Systems and Retiree Health Care Costs

The two main state pension funds (CalPERS and CalSTRS) each face unfunded future liabilities in the tens of billions of dollars. General Fund pension contributions to CalPERS and CalSTRS are estimated to be approximately $3.5 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, for fiscal year 2017-18. The combined contributions, which include contributions for California State University ("CSU"), represent about 5.1 percent of all General Fund expenditures in fiscal year 2017-18. See "GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 BUDGET."

Recent legislation with respect to both CalPERS and CalSTRS and changes made by both systems in actuarial assumptions, including expected investment returns and funding methodologies, are expected to result in significant annual increases in the amount the state is required to pay from the General Fund. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget included these factors in estimating General Fund contributions to both pension systems. See "RECENT DEVELOPMENTS" and EXHIBIT 1-"PENSION SYSTEMS-Prospective Funding Status; Future Contributions."

The state also provides retiree health care and dental benefits to retired state employees and their spouses and dependents (when applicable) and almost exclusively utilizes a "pay-asyou-go" funding policy. These benefits are referred to as "Other Postemployment Benefits" or "OPEB." As reported in the state's OPEB Actuarial Valuation Report, the state has an Actuarial Accrued Liability ("AAL") relating to OPEB estimated at $76.7 billion as of June 30, 2016 (virtually all unfunded) as compared to an AAL of $74.2 billion estimated as of June 30, 2015.

In 2015, the Administration initiated a comprehensive strategy to eliminate the OPEB unfunded AAL over approximately 30 years with increased prefunding shared equally between state employers and employees. The Administration is pursuing the prefunding strategy, as well as changes to retiree health benefits for new employees, through the collective bargaining process. Statutory language passed as part of the 2015-16 Budget contains the funding policy and framework designed to support the elimination of the unfunded AAL. The recently negotiated contracts with labor unions through collective bargaining include MOUs that reflect this prefunding strategy and lower employer contribution for future retiree health benefits for new employees. See "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-Retiree Health Care Costs-Ongoing Efforts."

Financial Statements

APPENDIX E to this Official Statement, which is incorporated into APPENDIX A, contains the Audited Basic Financial Statements of the state for the year ended June 30, 2016, together with certain information required by governmental accounting and financial reporting standards to be included in the Financial Statements, including a "Management's Discussion and Analysis" that describes and analyzes the financial position of the state and provides an overview of the state's activities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.

In addition, EXHIBIT 2 to APPENDIX A contains the State Controller's unaudited reports of General Fund cash receipts and disbursements for the period from July 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017. Information which may appear in APPENDIX A from the Department

A-5

of Finance concerning monthly receipts of "agency cash" may differ from the State Controller's reports of cash receipts for the same periods generally because of timing differences. Agency cash represents cash received by agencies. The Controller's report represents cash received by agencies as reported to and recorded by the Controller, which may be a day or so later than when cash is received by agencies.

Certain Defined Terms

The following terms and abbreviations are used in APPENDIX A:

"Administration" means the Governor's Office and those individuals, departments, and offices reporting to it (including the Department of Finance).

"BSA" or "Budget Stabilization Account" means the Budget Stabilization Account created under Proposition 58 and amended by Proposition 2. See "STATE FINANCESREVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES - Budget Reserves."

"EXHIBIT 2" means the State Controller's Unaudited Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements for the period from July 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017 as attached to APPENDIX A as EXHIBIT 2.

"LAO" means the Legislative Analyst's Office, an entity of the State Legislature.

"PMIA" means the state's Pooled Money Investment Account.

"Proposition 2" means a legislative constitutional amendment that amended the provisions governing the BSA, which was approved by the voters in the November 2014 statewide general election. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Budget Reserves."

"Proposition 30" means The Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012, an initiative measure, which was approved by the voters in the November 2012 statewide general election. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVESSources of Tax Revenue."

"Proposition 52" means an initiative measure approved by the voters in the November 2016 statewide general election that amended provisions of the Medi-Cal Hospital Reimbursement Improvement Act of 2013. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Budget Reserves."

"Proposition 55" means The California Children's Education and Health Care Protection Act of 2016, an initiative measure, which was approved by the voters in the November 2016 statewide general election. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Sources of Tax Revenue."

"Proposition 56" means The California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tax Act of 2016, an initiative measure, which was approved by the voters in the November 2016 statewide

A-6

general election. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Sources of Tax Revenue."

"SFEU" means the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties, created pursuant to Government Code Section 16418.

"2016-17 Budget" means the 2016 Budget Act plus related legislation to implement the budget.

"2016 Budget Act" means the Budget Act for fiscal year 2016-17, adopted on June 27, 2016.

"2016-17 May Revision" means the May Revision of the 2016-17 Governor's Budget released on May 13, 2016.

"2016-17 Governor's Budget" means the proposed Governor's Budget for fiscal year 2016-17 released on January 7, 2016.

"2017-18 Governor's Budget" means the proposed Governor's Budget for fiscal year 2017-18 released on January 10, 2017.

Reference to the "state" as a noun or adjective means the State of California, following the practice of the Department of Finance.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The following are certain significant recent developments concerning the state:

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget

On January 10, 2017, the Governor released his proposed budget for fiscal year 2017-18. The proposal continues to pay down debts and liabilities, increases the rainy day fund, invests in education and health care and maintains a structurally balanced budget. See "GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 BUDGET."

Recent Cash Receipts

The Department of Finance reported that, based on agency cash receipts, tax receipts for cash for January were $747 million above the 2017-18 Governor's Budget forecast of $14.518 billion. Fiscal year-to-date cash receipts for January, including revisions to prior months, were $9 million below the 2017-18 Governor's Budget forecast of $68.48 billion.

The Department of Finance reported that, based on agency cash receipts, tax receipts for cash for February were $256 million below the 2017-18 Governor's Budget forecast of $5.186 billion. Fiscal year-to-date cash receipts, including revisions to prior months, are $253 million below the 2017-18 Governor's Budget forecast of $73.66 billion.

A-7

Pension Fund Actions

The CalPERS Board of Administration voted at its December 21, 2016 meeting to reduce its assumed rate of return on investments to 7 percent over the next three years. The CalSTRS Board also approved new actuarial assumptions at its February 1, 2017 meeting, including the reduction of its assumed rate of return on investments to 7 percent on a phased basis over the next two years. These actions will result in an increase in state contributions over time. See EXHIBIT 1 - "PENSION SYSTEMS."

Change in Federal Administration

President Trump was inaugurated on January 20, 2017. The new presidential administration and leaders in Congress have suggested major changes to the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid, trade and immigration policy, and the federal tax structure in addition to other potential actions. Many of these proposed changes could have detrimental effects on the state's economy and budget. At this point, it is not clear what those changes will be or when they will take effect.

The U.S. Congress is currently considering replacement legislation for the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, which, if enacted, could result in a significant shift of costs from the federal government to California beginning in 2020. The State's preliminary assessment of the fiscal impact of the March 21 version of the proposed American Health Care Act on the Medi-Cal budget estimates it could result in several billion dollars in additional state costs in 2020, growing to tens of billions of dollars in increased yearly costs by 2027, of which approximately 70 percent would be payable from the General Fund. The actual fiscal impact will depend on the final legislation, if any, enacted by the federal government, and could vary significantly from the current estimate, and may also be materially affected by policy choices the Governor and the Legislature may make to address any proposed or enacted federal legislation. (The March 21 proposal was not adopted by the House of Representatives, but Congress is continuing to consider changes to the ACA.)

Recent Storms in California

Following five years of drought conditions, California has experienced rainfall significantly in excess of the average amount of rainfall through this point in the water year ( a water year consists of twelve consecutive calendar months beginning with the month of October). The high volume of rain and snowmelt has, among other effects, caused localized flooding in some areas and damage to roads and other infrastructure, including spillways at the Oroville Dam. The President has issued Presidential Disaster Declarations for the winter storms affecting 30 counties across California. At this time the effects of the high volume of rain and snow fall are not expected to materially impact the state's economy or budget; and repairs to the Oroville Dam are expected to be paid from sources other than the General Fund.

Collective Bargaining

On February 28, 2017, the Administration reached a tentative agreement with the employee organization representing Physicians and Dentists, the last bargaining unit without an agreement. Similar to the other agreements, it includes provisions to address the state's retiree

A-8

health care costs and the associated unfunded liability. Upon approval of the Legislature and the Governor, and ratification by the employee organization's membership, this agreement will be effective July I, 2016 through July I, 2020. See "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTSRetiree Health Care Costs."

Updates to Part II of Appendix A

Information under the headings "OVERVIEW OF STATE GOVERNMENT-Employee Relations," "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Five-Year Expenditure Summary," "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-Retiree Health Care Costs," "BANK ARRANGEMENTS TABLE" and "EXHIBIT I-PENSION SYSTEMS" has been updated.

GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR2017-18 BUDGET

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget, released on January 10, 2017, proposes a multi-year plan that is balanced through fiscal year 2020-21, and continues to build up the BSA (or rainy day fund) and pay down budgetary debt from past years.

However, the state faces its first budgetary challenge since 2012. Because of slowed economic growth resulting in lagging revenues, and higher than expected expenditures in fiscal year 2016-17, the state faces a projected deficit of $1.6 billion in fiscal year 2017-18, absent corrective actions. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget proposes a variety of solutions to bring the state's finances back into balance for 2017-18 and future years. With the budget solutions in place, the proposed budget provides increased funding for education while slowing the rate of spending growth in other areas to maintain a balanced budget through fiscal year 2020-21.

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget includes the following $3.2 billion in proposed solutions:

• Adjust Proposition 98 Funding ($1.7 billion)-Keeps funding K-14 education at the guarantee level for 2015-16 through 2017-18.

• Recapture 2016 Allocations ($0.9 billion)-Eliminates mostly uncommitted onetime funding. The two largest components are $400 million set aside for affordable housing and $300 million to modernize state office buildings planned for 2017-18.

• Constrain Spending Growth ($0.6 billion)-Limits spending proposals to keep spending flat in 2017-18 compared to 2016-17.

General Fund revenues and transfers for fiscal year 2017-18 are projected at $124.0 billion, an increase of $5.3 billion, or 4.4 percent, compared with a revised estimate of $118.8 billion for fiscal year 2016-17. These estimates include transfers to the BSA of $1.2 billion in 2017-18 and $3.2 billion in 2016-17. The transfers have the effect of lowering the total reported levels of General Fund revenues and transfers for the fiscal years by the amounts of the transfers. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Sources of Tax Revenue."

General Fund expenditures for fiscal year 2017-18 are projected at $122.5 billion, a decrease of over $0.2 billion, or 0.2 percent, compared with a revised estimate of $122.8 billion

A-9

for fiscal year 2016-17. The main components of the decrease in expenditures are: a $1.3 billion decrease in Health and Human Services costs, a $1.0 billion decrease in one-time Government Operations expenditures for state infrastructure in 2016-17, and a $1.6 billion increase for K-12 education (about $1.0 billion from Proposition 98). See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-State Expenditures."

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget assumes continued expansion of the economy, but recognizes state revenues are beginning to lag expectations and the state must plan for and save for the next recession. In connection with preparing the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, the Department of Finance estimates a moderate recession could reduce General Fund revenues by as much as $20 billion annually for several years. However, the state's financial obligation under Proposition 98 would also decrease.

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget has the following major components:

• Proposition 98 - proposes $73.5 billion guaranteed total funding for 2017-18, of which $51.4 billion is General Fund. See "STATE FINANCES - Proposition 98 and K-14 Funding."

• Higher Education - proposes total state funding of $15.1 billion for all major segments of Higher Education, including $14.6 billion from the General Fund (both Non-Proposition 98 and Proposition 98). The remaining funds include special and bond funds.

• Health and Human Services - proposes $59.8 billion, including $34.0 billion General Fund and $25.8 billion from special funds, for these programs. Implementing federal health care reform has provided coverage to millions of Californians, beginning in January 2014. See "STATE FINANCES - Health and Human Services."

• Public Safety -proposes total state funding of $13.8 billion, including $11.1 billion General Fund and $2. 7 billion from special funds, for Corrections and Rehabilitation. See "ST ATE FINANCES -California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation."


A-10

The following table summarizes the General Fund budget in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget and compares it to the General Fund budget for the current fiscal year:

TABLE 1 General Fund Budget Summary

(Dollars in Millions)

As of2016 As of2017-18 Budget Act Governor's Budget Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year

2016-17 2016-17 2017-18 Prior Year Balance $ 4,874 $ 5,023 $ 1,027 Revenues and Transfers 120 310 118 765 124 027

Total Resources Available $ 125,184 $ 123,788 $ 125,054

Non-Proposition 98 Expenditures 71,418 72,431 71,169 Proposition 98 Expenditures 51 050 50 330 51 351

Total Expenditures $ 122,468 $ 122,761 122,520

Fund Balance $ 2,716 $ 1,027 $ 2,534 Reserve for Liquidation of 966 980 980 Encumbrances Special Fund for Economic 1,750 47 1,554 Uncertainties

Budget Stabilization Account/ "Rainy Day Fund" $ 6,714 $ 6,713 $ 7,869

Source: State of California, Department of Finance.

Development of Revenue Estimates

Development of the forecast for the major General Fund revenues begins with a forecast of national economic activity prepared by an independent economic forecasting firm. The Department of Finance's Economic Research Unit, under the direction of the Chief Economist, adjusts the national forecast based on the Department of Finance's economic outlook. The national economic forecast is used to develop a forecast of similar indicators for California activity.

After finalizing the forecasts of major national and California economic indicators, revenue estimates are generated using revenue forecasting models developed and maintained by the Department of Finance. With each forecast, adjustments are made for any legislative, judicial, or administrative changes, as well as for recent cash flow results. The forecast is updated twice a year and released with the proposed Governor's Budget by January 10 and the May Revision by May 14. The economic forecast for the 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects continued growth in both the national and state economies. Certain significant elements of the forecast are set forth in Table 2.

National Economy. The national economy grew unevenly in 2016, with annual real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth expected to be 1.5 percent. More than 2 million people

A-11

joined the labor force and nonfarm employment grew by 2.5 million in 2016. The national unemployment rate reached 5 percent in October 2015 and has since stayed close to that level. There are still risks to the economy. Economic expansions do not last forever. Since World War II, the average economic expansion length is almost five years and the longest expansion was ten years. The current economic expansion began in July 2009, and while there are few immediate signs of a contraction, it would be a historical anomaly for the U.S. not to see another recession before 2020. A stock market correction remains a risk as well. In addition, significant policy changes in the U.S. or in foreign countries, such as to international trade or immigration, could lead to disruptions in the economy.

California Economy. California's real GDP increased by 4.1 percent in 2015, and totaled $2.46 trillion at current prices, making California the sixth largest economy in the world (2016 California GDP information will be available in June 2017). California has continued to add jobs at a faster rate than the nation since 2012, and the economy is expected to continue to grow throughout the forecast period. Despite the increase in the minimum wage from $9 to $10 per hour on January 1, 2016, lower-wage sectors such as leisure and hospitality, and educational and health services continued to grow in 2016. The stronger-than-expected growth in these lowerwage sectors led to greater labor force participation, but also led to slower overall wage and personal income growth than expected in 2016. The unemployment rate in 2016 was 5.4 percent and is expected to remain low despite the increase in the minimum wage to $10.50 for larger employers on January 1, 2017. However, housing permits were essentially the same in 2016 compared to 2015, falling well below population or job growth. Continued lack of housing growth is a risk for California's economy.

Economic Assumptions Underlying the 2017-18 Governor's Budget

The revenue and expenditure assumptions incorporated into the 2017-18 Governor's Budget were based upon certain assumptions concerning the performance of the California, national, and global economies in calendar years 2017 and 2018. These economic assumptions are set forth below. Additional information on the state's economy is set out in the section "ECONOMY AND POPULATION."


A-12

TABLE2 Selected National and California Economic Data

2017 2018

2016 (Projected) (Projected)

United States

Real gross domestic product (percent change)

Personal income (percent change)

Nonfann wage and salary employment (millions)

(percent change)

Housing starts (thousands)

(percent change)

California

Personal income ($ billions)

(percent change)

Nonfann wage and salary employment (thousands)

(percent change)

Unemployment rate (percent)

Housing units authorized (thousands)

(percent change)

Total taxable sales($ billions)

(percent change)

Note: Percentage changes calculated from unrollllded data.

1.5 2.2

3.3 4.3

144.3 146.1

1.7 1.2

I, 152 1,226

3.9 6.4

2,190.5 2,287.6

4.1 4.4

16,467.8 16,760.5

2.5 1.8

5.5 5.5

97.4 104.7

(0.8) 7.5

657.2 681.2

3.0 3.7

Source: State of California, Department of Finance, 2017-18 Governor's Budget forecast.

CURRENT STATE BUDGET

2.2

4.9

147.4

0.9

1,320

7.7

2,387.5

4.4

16,898.7

0.8

5.5

115.0

9.8

711.3

4.4

When the 2016-17 Budget was enacted in June 2016, General Fund revenues and transfers for fiscal year 2016-17 were projected at $120.3 billion. As of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, they are projected to decrease to $118.8 billion (net of a $3.2 billion transfer to the BSA that was originally estimated to be $3.3 billion), a net decrease of $1.5 billion or 1.2 percent General Fund expenditures for fiscal year 2016-17 were projected at $122.5 billion when the current fiscal year budget was enacted. As of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, they are projected to be $122.8 billion, an increase of $0.3 billion or 0.2 percent

For more information on revised fiscal year 2016-17 estimates, see "Fiscal Year 2016-17 Revised General Fund Estimates in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget" and "GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 BUDGET-Development of Revenue Estimates" and"Economic Assumptions Underlying the 2017-18 Governor's Budget."

A-13

The following chart summarizes the principal revenue and transfer components of the 2016 Budget Act at the time of enactment.

Pers:otta! tncwne Tet1t $83,393 693%

2016-17 General Fund Revenues and Transfers

in Mi!licn,s\

lfiSl.llnlf1C€' lW $2,345 2()%

Note: "Other" includes $3,294 million transfer from the General Fund to the BSA, which has the effect oflowering the total reported levels of General Flllld revenues and transfers by the amount of the transfer.


A-14

The following chart summarizes the principal expenditure components of the 2016 Budget Act at the time of enactment.

K-12 Education $51.277 41.9%

Public Safety $10.571

8.6%

2016-17 General Fund Expenditures

(Dollars in Millions) Government Operations

Higher Education $14.531 11.9%

Services $33.240 27.1%

Transportation $237 0.2%

Environmental Protection

$88 0.1%

$1.756 1.4%

General Government $3.383 2.8%

Legislative, Judicial, Executive

$3.513 2.9%

Business, Consumer Services & Housing

$877 0.7%

Labor and Workforce Development

$176 0.1%

Natural Resources $2.819 2.3%

Note: The state's expenditures for contributions to the pension funds ( 4.6 percent of total General Fund expenditures when combined) and for debt service on bonds (net of various reimbursements) payable from the General Fund ( 4.5 percent of total General Fund expenditures when combined) are not shown separately in this chart, but are included within the applicable expenditure categories in the chart.


A-15

The 2016-17 Budget included the following major General Fund expenditure components at the time of enactment:

• Proposition 98 - $71.9 billion total funding for fiscal year 2016-17, of which $51.1 billion is General Fund, and the balance is primarily from local property taxes.

• Higher Education - total state funding of $14.9 billion for all major segments of higher education, including $14.5 billion from the General Fund (both NonProposition 98 and Proposition 98). The remaining funds include special and bond funds.

• Health and Human Services - $53.8 billion in state funding, of which $33.2 billion is General Fund and $20.6 billion is from special funds.

• Public Safety - total state funding of $13.3 billion, including $10.6 billion General Fund and $2. 7 billion from special funds, for Corrections and Rehabilitation.

Budget Risks

The 2016-17 Budget and the 2017-18 proposed Governor's Budget are based on a variety of estimates and assumptions. If actual results differ from those assumptions, the state's financial condition could be adversely or positively affected. There can be no assurance that the financial condition of the state will not be materially and adversely affected by actual conditions or circumstances in fiscal year 2016-17 and beyond.

While the state projects a multi-year balanced budget, budget risks still exist. Risks with potentially significant General Fund impact include, but may not be limited to, the following:

• Threat of Recession - The economic forecast used in connection with the 2017-18 Governor's Budget assumes continued expansion of the economy; however, the current expansion is approaching three years longer than average. The Administration understands that another recession during this period is possible, particularly in light of the length of the current expansion. In connection with the development of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, the Department of Finance modeled an alternative scenario with a moderate one-year recession for the U.S. in 2018-19. This model indicated that such a recession could result in General Fund revenue losses that would approach $20 billion per year for several years. See "GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2017-18 BUDGET."

• Federal Fiscal Policy - The 2017-18 Governor's Budget assumes the continuation of existing federal fiscal policy. The new presidential administration and leaders in Congress have suggested major changes to the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid, trade and immigration policy and the federal tax structure, in addition to other actions. Many of these proposed changes could have detrimental effects on the state's economy and budget. At this point, it is not clear what those changes will be or when they will take effect.

A-16

• Capital Gains Volatility - Capital gains are the state's most volatile revenue source, and absent a recession, a stock market correction could significantly affect California. Under Proposition 2, some of this volatility is mitigated by requiring spikes in capital gains tax revenue be deposited in the Budget Stabilization Account and requiring pay down of the state's debts and liabilities. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Sources of Tax Revenue-Personal Income Tax" and "-Budget Reserves."

• Health Care Costs - The Medi-Cal program is currently the budget's second largest expenditure. Additionally, the state provides health benefits to its own employees and retirees. As the state implements federal health care reform, or the federal government makes significant policy changes, state budgetary spending could become more dependent upon the rate of health care inflation. If this inflation rises faster than expected, annual General Fund spending could quickly rise by hundreds of millions of dollars. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-State Expenditures-Health and Human Services."

• Debts and Liabilities - The state's past budget challenges were exacerbated by an unprecedented level of debts, deferrals, and budgetary obligations accumulated over the prior decade. Although the state has paid down a substantial amount of these debts in the past several years, see "DEBTS AND LIABILITIES UNDER PROPOSITION 2," the state faces hundreds of billions of dollars in other long-term cost pressures, debts, and liabilities, including state retiree pension and health care costs. See "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-Retiree Health Care Costs" and EXHIBIT 1 - "PENSION SYSTEMS."

Multi-Year Budget Projections

As required by Proposition 2, in connection with the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, the Department of Finance prepared high level multi-year budget projections, as set forth below. The projections are based on current state and federal law and state policies, adjusted for proposed changes included in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget. They reflect a variety of assumptions, including assumptions concerning state revenues and expenditures and future economic conditions (but not assuming another recession in the near term).

The year-to-year changes in revenues and transfers are driven, in general, by expected continued moderate economic growth. However, due largely to the strength of the stock market since the end of the Great Recession, capital gains are expected to be modestly above normal levels for 2016 and 2017. (Normal level is considered to be 4.5 percent of personal income in the state.) General Fund revenue from the major tax sources is expected to grow by 3.9 percent from fiscal year 2015-16 to fiscal year 2016-17, 2.8 percent from fiscal year 2016-17 to fiscal year 2017-18, 3.8 percent from fiscal year 2017-18 to fiscal year 2018-19, 4.6 percent from fiscal year 2018-19 to fiscal year 2019-20, and 4.3 percent from fiscal year 2019-20 to fiscal year 2020-21.

These tax revenue growth rates in fiscal year 2016-17 and 2017-18 are affected by the expiration on December 31, 2016 of the sales tax portion of Proposition 30. The personal income tax portion of Proposition 30, which had been set to expire on December 31, 2018, was extended by Proposition 55 until 2030. Actual conditions may differ materially from the assumptions, and there can be no assurances the projections will be achieved.

A-17

Table 3 below includes the effect of Chapter 4, Statutes of 2016 (SB 3), which gradually increases the minimum wage in California to $15 per hour by 2023 for all employees. By full implementation, the General Fund cost is projected to be approximately $3.1 billion annually, primarily for increased wages for home health care workers and developmental disability workers.

TABLE3 General Fund Multi-Year Budget Projection


Fiscal Year

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Prior Year Balance $ 5,023 $ 1,027 $ 2,534 $ 3,110 $ 2,270 Revenues and Transfers(a) 121,949 125,183 129,981 135,904 142,307 Transfer to BSA/Rainy Day Fund(bl -3, 184 -1, 156 -1,191 -1, 195 -1,201

Total Resources Available $ 123,788 $ 125,054 $ 131,324 $ 137,819 $ 143,376 Proposition 98 Expenditures 50,330 51,351 52,736 54,322 55,341

Non-Proposition 98 Expenditures 72,431 71,169 75,478 81,227 85,548

Total Expenditures $ 122,761 $ 122,520 $ 128,214 $ 135,549 $ 140,889

Fund Balance $ 1,027 $ 2,534 $ 3,110 $ 2,270 $ 2,487

Reserve for Encumbrances $ 980 $ 980 $ 980 $ 980 $ 980

Special Fund for $ 47 $ 1,554 $ 2,130 $ 1,290 $ 1,507 Economic Uncertainties

Budget Stabilization Account/ $ 6,713 $ 7,869 $ 9,060 $ 10,255 $ 11,456 ("Rainy Day Fund")

Operating Surplus/-Deficit with -$ 3,996 $ 1,507 $ 576 -$ 840 $ BSA/"Rainy Day Fund" Transfer

Source: State of California, Department of Finance. (a)

(b)

The personal income tax portion of Proposition 30 expires at the end of the 2018 tax year (December 31, 2018). Proposition 55, approved by the voters in November 2016, extends the three personal income tax brackets added by Proposition 30 llllt:il 2030. The sales tax portion of Proposition 30 expired December 31, 2016. The Proposition 30 and Proposition 55 revenue ammmts projected in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget are shown below (in millions):

Prop 30/55 - Income Tax Prop 30 - Sales Tax

2016-17 $6,787

$803

2017-18 $6,915

$0

2018-19 $7,166

$0

2019-20 $7,491

$0

Transfers to the BSA are pursuant to Proposition 2. The 2016-17 fiscal year includes a $1.8 billion transfer to the BSA in addition to the $1.3 billion required by Proposition 2. (For fiscal year 2016-17, the required $1.3 billion BSA deposit was made in September 2016 while the supplemental $1.8 billion deposit is projected to be made in May 2017.) See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Budget Reserves."

Fiscal Year 2016-17 Revised General Fund Estimates in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget makes various revisions to General Fund estimates for fiscal year 2016-17 involving the beginning fund balance, revenues, expenditures, and ending reserve balance. The revised revenue and expenditure estimates are set forth in Table 4 below. In addition to the information shown in Table 4, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget estimates that the beginning fund balance for the General Fund at July 1, 2016 was $148 million higher than had been assumed when the 2016 Budget Act was adopted. These figures are preliminary

A-18

217

estimates subject to further adjustment after receipt of additional information concerning final amounts for fiscal year 2016-17.

Offsetting the modest gain in the beginning fund balance as described above for fiscal year 2016-17, as shown in Table 5, is a decrease of $1.5 billion of revenues and transfers, primarily due to lower than projected tax revenues. Estimated expenditures increased by a net amount of $0.3 billion, the main components of which are the following:

• $0.7 billion downward adjustment in Proposition 98 spending (which keeps K-14 education at the updated guarantee level);

• $0.6 billion decrease to recapture allocations or spending authority made as part of the 2016-17 Budget, including $0.4 billion set aside for affordable housing that was never allocated;

• $0.2 billion net decrease in various other spending issues; and

• $1.8 billion increase in Medi-Cal program costs which includes two significant adjustments: (1) one-time retroactive payment of drug rebates to the federal government of nearly $500 million and (2) correction of a miscalculation of costs associated with the Coordinated Care Initiative of nearly $1.5 billion. For additional information relating to these adjustments, see "STATE FINANCES -REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES - State Expenditures - Health and Human Services."

The 2016 Budget Act projected an ending balance in the SFEU of $1.8 billion for fiscal year 2016-17. After taking into account the revised revenue and expenditure estimates, the revised estimate for the SFEU at June 30, 2017 is $47 million.

Summary of General Fund Revenues, Expenditures, and Fund Balance

The table below presents actual revenues, expenditures and fund balance information for the General Fund for fiscal years 2013-14 through 2015-16 (provided by the State Controller's Office), and estimated and projected results for fiscal years 2016-17 through 2017-18 (based on the 2017-18 Governor's Budget). In addition to the SFEU, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects a cumulative balance of$7.9 billion in the BSA ("rainy day fund"), at June 30, 2018.

Consistent with historical practice, the projected beginning fund balance of any given fiscal year may be updated from time to time to reflect changes attributable to revisions in preceding fiscal years' activity and estimates. Changes affecting the beginning of period fund balance may include changes in both revenue and expenditure final estimates for previous years' fiscal activity.

A-19

TABLE4 General Fund Revenues, Expenditures,

and Fund Balance (Budgetary Basis<•l-Dollars in Millions)

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Flllld Balance-Beginning of Period $ 4,285 $ 8,410 $ 6,460

Restatements

Prior Year Adjustment (316) 164 (1,901)

Fund Balance-Beginning of Period, as Restated $ 3,969 $ 8,574 $ 4,559

Revenues $ 102,420 $114,985 $ 119,113

Other Financing Sources

Transfers from Other Fllllds Cb) 1,154 421 460

Other Additions 213 277 123

Total Revenues and Other Sources $ 103,787 $115,683 $ 119,696

Expenditures

State Operations Cc) $ 25,811 $ 29,863 $ 29,374

Local Assistance 72,040 85,109 84,840

Capital Outlay 158 168 146

Unclassified

Other Uses

Transfer to Other Fllllds Cb) 1,339 2,657 3,614

Total Expenditures and Other Uses $ 99,348 $117,797 $ 117,974

Revenues and Other Sources Over or (Under)

Expenditures and Other Uses $ 4,441 $ (2,114) $ 1,722

FlllldBalance Deferred Payroll CJ) 949 1,026 1,082

Reserved for Encumbrances 840 967 1,016

Reserved for Unencumbered Balances of Continuing Appropriations Ce) 1,192 1,145 1,112

Umeserved-Undesignated CO 5,429 3,322 3,071

Fund Balance-End of Period $ 8,410 $ 6,460 $ 6,281

General Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

Proposed/ Estimated Projected

2016-17 2017-18 $ 6,281 $ 1,027

(1,258)

$ 5,023 $ 1,027

$122,441 $ 125,738

(3,676) (1,711)

$118,765 $124,027

$ 31,806 $ 32,353

89,753 89,980

1,202 187

$122,761 $ 122,520

$ (3,996) $ 1,507

980 980

47 1,554

$ 1,027 $ 2,534

(a) These statements have been prepared on a budgetary basis in accordance with state law and some modifications would be necessary in order to comply with generally accepted accmmting principles ("GAAP"). The Supplementary Information contained in the state's Audited Basic Financial Statements for the year ended hme 30, 2016, attached as APPENDIX E to

this Official Statement, contains a description of the differences between the budgetary basis and the GAAP basis of accounting and a reconciliation of the June 30, 2016 fund balance between the two methods. See "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

():,) For the State Controller's accounting purposes, the actuals reflect transfer to the BSA as Transfer to Other Funds as an expenditure transfer. For budgeting purposes, the Transfers to Other Funds line is netted with Transfers from Other Funds for 2016-17 through 2017-18. For those years, the transfers to the BSA are reflected within the Transfers from Other Funds amounts as revenue transfers.

(Footnotes Continued on Following Page)

A-20

(Continued from Previous Page)

Cc) Includes debt service on general obligation bonds. The estimated amount of debt service is approximately $4.8 billion and $4.9 billion for fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively. These amounts are net of the federal Build America Bonds subsidy, various reimbursements to the General Fund from other fimds, and amounts included in UC and CSU support budgets for debt service on UC and CSU debt, totaling approximately $2.0 billion and $2.2 billion in fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively, to offset debt service costs of certain bonds. See "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Capital Facilities Financing-Build America Bonds." Debt service amounts for earlier years are set forth in the table titled "Outstanding State Debt Fiscal Years 2011-12 tluough 2015-16" under "STATE DEBT TABLES."

CJ) Deferred Payroll, which began with the June 2010 payroll, is on-going and represents the amount of June payroll expenses deferred to July of the following fiscal year, for all state departments paid through the uniform payroll system. The Department of Finance, pursuant to Government Code Sections 12472.5 and 13302, implements the deferrals of June payroll expenditures for various governmental and nongovernmental cost funds. For fiscal years 2015-16 through 2017-18, the General Fund Deferred Payroll amounts are estimated at $1.1 billion per year and are included in the UmeservedUndesignated row. Per statute, these expenditures are not recognized until the following July, under the budgetary basis of accounting and budgeting.

Ce) For purposes of determining whether the General Fund budget, in any given fiscal year, is in a surplus or deficit condition, see Government Code Section 13307. Under this law, the unencumbered balances of continuing appropriations, which exist when no commitment for expenditure is made, should be an item of disclosure, but the amount shall not be deducted from the fimd balance. In accordance with Government Code Section 12460, the State Controller's Budgetary/Legal Basis Annual Report reflects a specific reserve for the encumbered balance for continuing appropriations.

CO Actual, estimated and projected amounts include SFEU. The Department of Finance generally includes in its estimates of the SFEU and other reserves, if any, the items reported as actual amounts by the Office of the State Controller under "Reserved for Unencumbered Balances of Continuing Appropriations."

Source: Actual amounts for fiscal years 2013-14 to 2015-16 State of California, Office of the State Controller. Estimated and projected amounts for fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18, respectively: State of California, Department of Finance.


A-21

General Fund Revenue and Expenditure Assumptions

The table below presents the Department of Finance's budget basis statements of General Fund revenue sources and expenditures by function for fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18, as set forth in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget.

TABLES General Fund Revenues by Source and Expenditures by Function


Revenue 2016-17 2016-17 2017-18 Enacted (as of Revised (as of Proposed (as of

Source June 2016) January 2017) January 2017) Personal Income Tax $83,393 $83,136 $85,866 Sales and Use Tax 25,727 24,994 25,179 Corporation Tax 10,992 10,389 10,878 Insurance Tax 2,345 2,309 2,368 Alcoholic Beverage Taxes and Fees 377 370 372 Cigarette Tax 85 79 65 Motor Vehicle Fees 22 24 24 OtherCa) 663 648 431

Subtotal $ 123,604 $121,949 $125,183

Transfer to the Budget Stabilization -3,294 -3,184 -1,156 Account/"Rainy Day Flllld"

Total Revenue $120,310 $ 118,765 $124,027

2016-17 2016-17 2017-18 Expenditures Enacted (as of Revised (as of Proposed (as of

Agency June 2016) January 2017) January 2017) Legislative, Judicial and Executive $3,513 $3,500 $ 3,322 Business, Consumer Services & Housing 877 493 388 Transportation 237 225 243 Natural Resources 2,819 3,110 2,811 Environmental Protection 88 90 89 Health and Human Services 33,240 35,263 33,994 Public Safety (includes Corrections and Rehabilitation) 10,571 10,889 11,088 K-12 Education 51,277 50,589 52,169 Higher Education 14,531 14,527 14,627 Labor and Workforce Development 176 177 122 Government Operations 1,756°> 1,112°> 741 General Government

Non-Agency Departments 752 787 691 Tax Relie£'Local Government 474 459 435 Statewide Expenditures 2,l 57(c) 880 l,800(c)

Total Expenditures $ 122,468 $122,761 $ 122,520

(a) Generally consists of transfers and loans, and various smaller amounts for miscellaneous fees, taxes, royalties, tribal gaming revenues, unclaimed property and other sources.

(b) Includes $1 billion for state office buildings infrastructure.

(c) Ammmts for the enacted and proposed budgets include unallocated funds for statewide expenditures such as deferred maintenance, potential employee compensation increases, subject to good faith bargaining and approval by unions/Legislature, and employee benefits that will be distributed to departments as authorized in subsequent legislation.


A-22

DEBTS AND LIABILITIES UNDER PROPOSITION 2

Voters approved Proposition 2 in November 2014, which revised the state's method of funding the BSA, the state's "rainy day fund." Starting in fiscal year 2015-16, 1.5 percent of annual General Fund revenues, plus the excess of capital gains tax receipts above a certain level, not necessary to fund Proposition 98, is applied equally to funding the BSA and paying down state debts and liabilities. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Budget Reserves." Debts and liabilities eligible under Proposition 2 include certain budgetary borrowing accumulated over a number of years and specified payments over and above the base payments for state pensions and retiree health costs. The two main retirement systems managed by state entities, CalPERS and CalSTRS, each have substantial unfunded liabilities. See EXHIBIT 1 - "PENSION SYSTEMS." The state also has a substantial unfunded liability relating to postemployment healthcare benefits for state employee retirees. See "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-Retiree Health Care Costs." Table 6 displays the categories of debts and liabilities the Administration considers eligible for accelerated payments under Proposition 2. Although included as an eligible use of Proposition 2 funds as shown in Table 6, the state is not legally responsible for the pension and retiree health care costs of the University of California, an independent corporate entity under state law.

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget will repay loans from special funds ($252 million), repay prior years of Proposition 98 underfunding (referred to as "settle up," $400 million), repay pre-Proposition 42 (2002) transportation loans ($235 million), prefund state retiree health care benefits ($100 million), and help pay down the unfunded liability associated with the University of California's retirement system ($169 million). The Administration projects that borrowing from pre-Proposition 42 transportation funds will be repaid by the end of fiscal year 2019-20, and the loans from special funds and from underfunding of Proposition 98 ( settle up payments) will be repaid by the end of fiscal year 2020-21.


A-23

TABLE6 Debts and Liabilities Under Proposition 2

2017-18 Governor's Budget (Dollars in Millions)

Fiscal Year

Remaining

Outstanding Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Amount Not

Amount at Start 2017-18Pay 2018-19 Pay 2019-20 Pay 2020-21 Pay Currently of2017-18 Down Down Down Down ScheduledCbl

Budgetary Borrowing Loans from special funds Underfunding of Proposition 98-Settle-Up Repayment of pre-Proposition 42 Transportation Loans

State Retirement Liabilities (Unfunded Actuarial Estimate)

State Retiree Health State Employee Pensions Teachers' PensionsCa) Judges' Pensions Deferred payments to Ca!PERS

University of California Retirement Liabilities (Unfunded Actuarial Estimate)

University of California Employee Pensions University of California Retiree Health

Unallocated Debt Payments

Total

$1,365

1,026

706

74,103 49,592 72,626

3,279 627

15,141

21,087

$239,552

$252

400

235

100 0 0 0 0

169

0 0

$1,156

$465

291

235

200 0 0 0 0

0

0 0

$1,191

$407

302

236

250 0 0 0 0

0

0 0

$1,195

$241

33

0

300 0 0 0 0

0

0 627

$1,201

(a) The state portion of the unfunded liability for teachers' pensions is $14 billion. See EXHIBIT 1 - "PENSION SYSTEMS-Ca!STRS."

(b) NI A-Remaining balance after the projection period is not known. The amount is dependent on future addition of liabilities and payments.

LITIGATION

Introduction

The state is a party to numerous litigation matters. See "LITIGATION" in the forepart of this Official Statement.

The following describes only those litigation matters that are pending with service of process on the state accomplished and that have been identified by the state as having a potentially significant fiscal impact upon revenues or expenditures of the state's General Fund or the amount of state funds available to be borrowed by the General Fund.

This description was developed by the state with the participation of the Office of the Attorney General and other state entities. The Office of the Attorney General does not represent the state, its subdivisions, departments, agencies and other units in all matters, and accordingly there may be litigation matters of which the Office of the Attorney General is not aware. The state does not conduct a docket search of federal or state court litigation filings to identify pending litigation matters, and no inquiry has been made into administrative claims and matters.

A-24

$0

0

0

NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA

NIA

NIA NIA

NIA

There may be claims and matters with potentially significant fiscal impacts that have not been described below.

The state makes no representation regarding the likely resolution of any specific litigation matter described below.

Budget-Related Litigation

1. Actions Challenging Cap and Trade Program Auctions

In two consolidated matters, California Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. Calzfornia Air Resources Board, (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2012-80001313) and Morning Star Packing Co., et al. v. California Air Resources Board (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2013-80001464), petitioners challenge the authority of the California Air Resources Board to conduct auctions under the state's cap and trade program and allege that the auction revenues are an unconstitutional tax under the state Constitution. The trial court ruled for the Board. Petitioners appealed. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgments. (Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, Case Nos. C075930, C075954).

2. Action Challenging School Financing

Plaintiff in California School Boards Association v. State of California (Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG-11-554698), challenges the use of block grant funding to pay for education mandates in the 2012 Budget Act and associated trailer bills. The amended complaint also contends that changes to the statutes that control how education mandates are directed and funded violate the requirements of the state Constitution that the state pay local school districts for the costs of state-mandated programs. After bifurcating the case, the trial court issued a ruling in favor of the state that addressed certain of plaintiff's claims, and subsequently dismissed the remaining claims. If the court had declared that the state had failed to properly pay for mandated educational programs, the state would be limited in the manner in which it funded education going forward. Plaintiff appealed (Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Case No. Al48606).

3. Actions Challenging Statutes That Reformed California Redevelopment Law

There are approximately 75 pending actions that challenge the statutory process for winding down the affairs of the redevelopment agencies ("RD As"), asserting a variety of claims, including constitutional claims. Some of the pending cases contend that various obligations incurred by the RDAs are entitled to payment from certain property tax revenues. For example, in Affordable Housing Coalition v. Sandoval (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2012-80001158), plaintiffs argue that all former RDAs had obligations to pay for affordable housing that should be funded going forward. The court denied a motion for class action status, and subsequently ruled against plaintiffs in this matter and ordered that judgment be entered for the state. Plaintiffs appealed (Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, Case No. C083811).

A-25

Tax Cases

A pending case challenges the fee imposed by former Revenue and Taxation Code Section 17942 upon the plaintiff and a purported class of similarly situated limited liability companies ("LLCs") registered in California, alleging that the fee violates the federal and state constitutions, is an improper exercise of the state's police powers, and has been misapplied by the Franchise Tax Board. Bakersfield Mall UC v. Franchise Tax Board (San Francisco County Superior Court, Case No. CGC-07-462728). The purported class action is on behalf of all LLCs operating both in and out of California during the years at issue. A second virtually identical lawsuit also seeks to proceed as a class action. CA-Centerside II, LLC v. Franchise Tax Board (Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 10 CECG00434). In each case, the individual plaintiff seeks a refund of $56,000 for itself and alleges a purported class of over 50,000 members. The cases are coordinated for hearing in San Francisco as the Franchise Tax Board LLC Tax Refund Cases, Judicial Council Proceeding No. 4742. The coordination trial judge denied plaintiffs' joint motion for class certification and plaintiffs appealed (Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Case No. Al40518). If the trial court order is reversed and plaintiffs prevail on the merits on behalf of themselves and the purported classes, the potential refunds could total $1.2 billion.

Two pending cases challenge the state's right to require interstate unitary businesses to report their income on a combined basis while allowing intrastate unitary businesses to report the income of each business entity on a separate basis. Harley Davidson, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. California Franchise Tax Board (San Diego County Superior Court, Case No. 37-2011-00100846-CU-MC-CTL) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. & Subsidiaries v. California Franchise Tax Board (Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 12 CE CG 03408) challenge the constitutionality of Revenue and Taxation Code Section 25101.15, allowing intrastate unitary businesses the option to report their income on a separate rather than combined basis. The trial court in Harley Davidson ruled on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, granting the Board's motion and denying plaintiff's motion. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. In each of these matters, plaintiff proposed an alternative method of calculating tax, which the Board estimated would have a possible one-time fiscal impact on corporate tax revenue of $5 billion and $ 1. 5 billion annually thereafter. The Board argued the proposed method is unsupported by existing law. At the trial of the Abercrombie matter, the court granted the Board's motion for judgment in its favor at the close of plaintiff's presentation of its evidence. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. At this time, it is unknown what future fiscal impact a potential adverse final ruling on the merits would actually have on corporation taxes (including potential rebates of previously collected taxes and reduced future tax revenue) because of the uncertainty regarding the number of businesses which would pay the tax and how taxation on those companies would change as a result of an adverse ruling. However, the fiscal impact could be significant. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Sources of Tax Revenues-Corporation Tax" for a discussion of corporation taxes ..

A pending case challenges the validity of a Board of Equalization regulation (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, § 1585) that requires the sales tax on mobile telephones to be based on the full "unbundled" price of the telephone rather than any discounted price that is contingent on a service plan commitment. In Bekkerman et al. v. Board of Equalization (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2015-80002242), petitioners seek to invalidate the regulation

A-26

insofar as it relates to sales in carrier-operated stores. Petitioners filed a second action, a class action lawsuit seeking refunds of any excess sales tax paid, should the court in the first action rule that the regulation is invalid. The second action, Bekkerman et al. v. Board of Equalization, et al. (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2016-80002287) could result in an order requiring sales tax refunds, potentially exceeding $1 billion. The second action was removed to federal court but the federal court returned the case to state court (United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 2: 16-cv-00709-MCE-EFB).

Environmental Matters

In Consolidated Suction Dredge Mining Cases (coordinated for hearing in San Bernardino County Superior Court, Case No. JCPDS4720), environmental and mining interests challenge the state's regulation of suction dredge gold mining. The Legislature placed a moratorium on all suction dredging until certain conditions are met by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Plaintiffs, who have pied a class action but have yet to seek certification, claim that as many as 11,000 claims, at a value of $500,000 per claim, have been taken. Following a hearing on certain of plaintiffs' claims, the trial court stayed the matters pending a California Supreme Court ruling in a separate pending matter, addressing whether federal law preempts state environmental regulation of suction dredge gold mining. The California Supreme Court issued its decision, holding that federal law does not preempt state regulation, and a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court seeking review of that decision has been filed. Trial of the takings claims is set for November 2017.

Action Regarding Special Education

Plaintiffs in Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Assoc. v. California Department of Education (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 2: ll-cv-3471-KJM), challenge the oversight and operation by the California Department of Education ("CDE") of the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ("IDEA"). The complaint alleges that CDE, as the designated State Education Agency, has failed to monitor, investigate, and enforce the IDEA statewide. Under the IDEA, local school districts are the Local Educational Agencies responsible for delivering special education directly to eligible students. The complaint seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, and asks the court to retain jurisdiction to monitor the operation of the IDEA by the state.

Prison Healthcare Reform and Reduction of Prison Population

The adult prison health care delivery system includes medical health care and mental health care. There are two significant cases pending in federal district courts challenging the constitutionality of prison health care. Plata v. Brown (U.S. District Court, Northern District, Case No. C 01-1351 TEH) is a class action regarding the adequacy of medical health care; and Coleman v. Brown (U.S. District Court, Eastern District, Case No. CIV S-90-0520 KJM KLN P) is a class action regarding mental health care. A third case, Armstrong v. Brown (U.S. District Court, Northern District, Case No. C 94-02307 CW) is a class action on behalf of inmates with disabilities alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. In Plata the district court appointed a Receiver, who took office in April 2006, to run and operate the medical health care portion of the health care delivery system. The

A-27

Plata Receiver and the Special Master appointed by the Coleman court, joined by the court representative appointed by the Armstrong court, meet routinely to coordinate efforts in these cases. To date, ongoing costs of remedial activities have been incorporated into the state's budget process. However, at this time, it is unknown what future financial impact this litigation may have on the state's General Fund. In March 2015, the Plata court modified its order to update and clarify the process to transition responsibility for inmate medical care back to the state. This transition process is ongoing.

In Plata and Coleman, discussed above, a three-judge panel issued orders requiring the state to meet a final population-reduction benchmark by February 28, 2016, and to implement a number of measures designed to reduce the prison population. In January 2015, the state met this court-ordered population benchmark. The three-judge panel's order requires ongoing oversight until the state demonstrates compliance with the population benchmark is durable. The state has agreed not to pursue further court appeals.

High-Speed Rail Litigation

In Tos, et al. v. California High-Speed Rail Authority, et al. (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2016-00204740), plaintiffs seek a declaration that a state law enacted in 2016 is an unconstitutional amendment of the high-speed rail bond act and to prevent the California High-Speed Rail Authority from expending bond proceeds in reliance on the challenged state law. The trial court denied plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order and scheduled a hearing on a preliminary injunction for April 19, 2017. The court has postponed the hearing until April 26, 2017. Plaintiffs have stated that they may file additional claims challenging the approval of the Authority's plans for expenditure of bond proceeds by the Director of the Department of Finance.

In the event a final decision in this matter prevented the use of bond proceeds, it is possible that the federal government may require the state to reimburse federal funds provided for the high-speed rail project if the state failed to provide other matching funds consistent with the federal grant agreement. As of February 2017, the amount of unmatched federal spending on the project was approximately $1.9 billion.

Action Regarding State Mandates

Petitioners in Coast Community College District, et al. v. Commission on State Mandates (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2014-80001842) assert that costs for complying with certain laws and regulations prescribing standards for the formation and basic operation of state community colleges are state-mandated costs that must be reimbursed by the state. The trial court denied the petition. Petitioners appealed (Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, Case No. C080349). The potential amount of reimbursement for such costs cannot be determined at this time.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Audited Basic Financial Statements of the State of California for the Year Ended June 30, 2016 (the "Financial Statements") are included as APPENDIX E to this Official Statement and incorporated into APPENDIX A. The Financial Statements consist of an

A-28

Independent Auditor's Report, a Management Discussion and Analysis, Basic Financial Statements of the state for the Year Ended June 30, 2016 ("Basic Financial Statements"), and Required Supplementary Information. Only the Basic Financial Statements have been audited, as described in the Independent Auditor's Report. A description of the accounting and financial reporting standards set by the Govermnental Accounting Standards Board and used in the Basic Financial Statements is contained in Note I of the Basic Financial Statements.

The State Controller issues a monthly report on General Fund cash receipts and disbursements. These reports are available on the State Controller's website, and are normally released by the 10th day of every calendar month for the period ended on the last day of the prior month. The State Controller's unaudited reports of General Fund cash receipts and disbursements for the period from July I, 2016 through March 31, 2017 are included as EXHIBIT 2 to APPENDIX A.

Periodic reports on revenues and/or expenditures during the fiscal year are issued by the Administration, the State Controller's Office and the LAO. The Department of Finance issues a monthly bulletin, available by accessing the internet website of the Department of Finance (www.dof.ca.gov), which reports the most recent revenue receipts as reported by state departments, comparing those receipts to budget projections. The Administration also formally updates its budget projections three times during each fiscal year, in January, May, and at the time of budget enactment. These bulletins and reports are available on the internet at websites maintained by the agencies and by contacting the agencies at their offices in Sacramento, California. Such bulletins and reports are not part of or incorporated into APPENDIX A. Investors are cautioned that interim financial information is not necessarily indicative of results for a fiscal year. Information which may appear in APPENDIX A from the Department of Finance concerning monthly receipts of "agency cash" may differ from the State Controller's reports of cash receipts for the same periods generally because of timing differences. Agency cash represents cash received by agencies. The Controller's report represents cash received by agencies as reported to and recorded by the Controller, which may be a day or so later than when cash is received by agencies.

A-29

http://www.dof.ca.gov

PART II

STATE FINANCES- REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES

The Budget Process

The state's fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30 of the following year. The state's General Fund budget operates on a legal basis, generally using a modified accrual system of accounting for its General Fund, with revenues credited in the period in which they are measurable and available and expenditures debited in the period in which the corresponding liabilities are incurred.

The annual budget is proposed by the Governor by January 10 of each year for the next fiscal year (the "Governor's Budget"). Under state law and the state Constitution, the annual proposed Governor's Budget cannot provide for projected expenditures in excess of projected resources for the ensuing fiscal year. Following the submission of the proposed Governor's Budget, the Legislature takes up the proposal. As required by the Balanced Budget Amendment ("Proposition 58") adopted by the voters in 2004, beginning with fiscal year 2004-05, the Legislature may not pass a budget bill in which General Fund expenditures exceed estimated General Fund revenues and beginning fund balances at the time of the passage and as set forth in the budget bill. Proposition 58 also provides for mid-year adjustments in the event that the budget falls out of balance and the Governor calls a special legislative session to address the shortfall. Proposition 58 prohibits the use of general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, and certain other forms of borrowing to cover fiscal year end budget deficits. The restriction does not apply to certain other types of borrowing, such as: (i) short-term borrowing to cover cash shortfalls in the General Fund (including RANs or RAWs), or (ii) inter-fund borrowings.

Under the state Constitution, money may be drawn from the State Treasury only through an appropriation made by law. The primary source of annual expenditure appropriations is the annual budget act as approved by the Legislature and signed by the Governor (the "Budget Act"). Pursuant to Proposition 25, enacted in 2010, the Budget Act (and other appropriation bills/"trailer bills" which are related to the budget) must be approved by a majority vote of each House of the Legislature, and legislators must forfeit their pay if the Legislature fails to pass the budget bill on time. The Governor may reduce or eliminate specific line items in the Budget Act or any other appropriations bill without vetoing the entire bill. Such individual line-item vetoes are subject to override by a two-thirds vote of each House of the Legislature.

Appropriations also may be included in legislation other than the Budget Act. Continuing appropriations, available without regard to fiscal year, may also be provided by statute or the state Constitution. Funds necessary to meet an appropriation are not required to be in the State Treasury at the time an appropriation is enacted; revenues may be appropriated in anticipation of their receipt.

The General Fund

The state's moneys are segregated into the General Fund and over 1,000 other funds, including special, bond, federal, and other funds. The General Fund consists of all revenues

A-30

received by the State Treasury that are not required by law to be credited to any other fund, as well as earnings from the investment of state moneys not allocable to another fund.

The General Fund is the principal operating fund for the majority of governmental activities and is the depository of most of the major revenue sources of the state. For additional financial data relating to the General Fund, see the State Controller's unaudited report of General Fund cash receipts and disbursements attached to APPENDIX A as EXHIBIT 2 and the state's audited basic financial statements in APPENDIX E to this Official Statement. See also the other information in "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES" and "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

The General Fund may be expended as a consequence of appropriation measures enacted by the Legislature and approved by the Governor (including the annual Budget Act and related legislation), as well as other appropriations made pursuant to various constitutional authorizations and initiative statutes. See "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-State Appropriations Limit."

Because the principal of and interest on the secunt1es being offered in this Official Statement are payable primarily or secondarily from moneys in the General Fund, and not from special, bond, federal, and other funds of the state, the description of state finances in APPENDIX A primarily includes information relating to revenues and expenditures of, or moneys available for transfer to, the General Fund.

Restrictions on Raising or Using General Fund Revenues

Over the years, a number of laws and constitutional amendments have been enacted, often through voter initiatives, which have reduced the state's budgetary flexibility by making it more difficult for the state to raise taxes or restricting or earmarking the use of tax revenues.

For example, Proposition 13, passed in 1978, makes it more difficult for the state to raise taxes by requiring that any change in state taxes enacted for the purpose of increasing revenues, whether by increased rates or changes in computation, be approved by a two-thirds vote in each house of the Legislature. More recently, in 2010 the voters approved Proposition 26, which specifies that a two-thirds vote of both houses of the Legislature is required for any increase in any tax on any taxpayer, eliminating the prior practice where a tax increase coupled with a tax reduction could be adopted by majority vote. It also provides that any increase in a fee beyond the amount needed to provide the specific service or benefit is deemed a tax requiring two-thirds vote. A related measure, Proposition 4, approved in 1979, limits government spending by establishing an annual limit on the appropriation of proceeds of taxes.

Several initiatives have earmarked certain taxes or funds for specific expenditures. For example, in 2012, voters approved Proposition 30, which provided temporary increases in personal income tax rates for high-income taxpayers and a temporary increase in the state sales tax rate, and specified that the additional revenues will support K-12 public schools and community colleges as part of the Proposition 98 guarantee. Proposition 30 also placed into the state Constitution the current statutory provisions transferring 1.0625 percent of the state sales tax to local governments to fund the "realignment" program for many services including housing

A-31

criminal offenders. The sales tax provisions of Proposition 30 expired December 31, 2016; and the personal income tax rates for high-income taxpayers was extended through tax year 2030 by Proposition 55 in the November 2016 election. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Sources of Tax Revenue." Under specified conditions, beginning in fiscal year 2018-19, Proposition 55 also authorizes the use of up to $2 billion in a fiscal year from these revenues for health care.

Proposition 98, enacted in 1988, directs a minimum portion of General Fund revenues to support K-12 schools and community colleges. In 2002, the voters approved Proposition 49 which requires the state to expand funding for before and after school programs in the state's public elementary, middle and junior high schools. These funds are part of the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee for K-14 education and expenditures can only be reduced in certain low revenue years. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-State Expenditures-K-12 Education under Proposition 98."

In 1998, Proposition 10 raised taxes on tobacco products and mandated how the additional revenues would be expended. In 2016, Proposition 56 further raised taxes on tobacco products and specified how the additional revenues could be expended.

In 2004, the voters approved Proposition 63 which imposes a I percent tax surcharge on taxpayers with annual taxable income of more than $1 million for purposes of funding and expanding mental health services. Proposition 63 prohibits the Legislature or the Governor from redirecting these funds or from reducing General Fund support for mental health services below the levels provided in fiscal year 2003-04. Another measure affecting tax receipts was Proposition 39 (2012), discussed below under "Sources of Tax Revenue - Corporation Tax."

Proposition 2, passed in 2014, directs the transfer of specified amounts of General Fund revenues to the BSA and to pay down specified debts and liabilities. See "DEBTS AND LIABILITIES UNDER PROPOSITION 2" and "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Budget Reserves-Budget Stabilization Account."

Sources of Tax Revenue

The following is a summary of the state's major tax revenues and tax laws. In fiscal year 2017-18, as in most years, the vast majority of the state's General Fund revenues and transfers are projected to be derived from three sources: personal income taxes, sales and use taxes, and corporation taxes. For a ten-year period, the bar chart and table below show total General Fund revenues and transfers by the three major revenue sources, and all other revenues and transfers, including transfers to the BSA beginning in 2014-15 that are represented as reductions in the total amount of other General Fund revenues and transfers.

A-32

Total General Fund Revenues and Transfers by Source (Billions of Dollars)

1~0.0

$119 $124

120.0 $112 $115

$100 $103

100.0 $93

$83 $87 $87

80.0

60.0

10.0

20.0

2CC8 09 200'.·) 10 201C 11 2C11 12 2012 13 2C13 14 2014 1.'3 201s 1s1•J 2C16 u\a) 2017 1,gi-•I

Ill Retail Sales and Use Tax Ill Personal Income Tax • Corporation Tax • Other Revenues & Transfers

(a) Estimated (2015-16 and 2016-17) and Projected (2017-18). Note: Chart reflects transfer of $1.9 billion in fiscal year 2015-16, $3.2 billion in fiscal year 2016-17, and $1.2 billion in fiscal year 2017-18 from the General Flllld to the BSA for rainy day purposes. These transfers have the effect of lowering the total reported levels of General Flllld revenues and transfers for those fiscal years by the ammmts of the transfers.


A-33

Fiscal Year

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16(•)

2016-l?(a)

2017-18(a)

TABLE? General Fund Revenues and Transfers

(Includes Percentage of Total General Fund Revenues and Transfers) Dollars in Millions

Personal Income Sales & Use Tax

Corporate Other Revenues Tax Income Tax and Transfers

$43,376 52% $23,753 29% $9,536 12% $6,107 7"/o

44,852 52 26,741 31 9,115 10 6,333 7

49,445 53 26,983 29 9,614 10 7,447 8

54,261 (b)(c) 62 18,658(d) 21 7,233 8 6,919(~ 8

64,484(c) 65 20,482(c) 20 7,783(,) 8 7,166 7

67,025(c) 65 22,263(c) 22 9,093(,) 9 4,994 5

76,169(c) 68 23,682(c) 21 9,417(,) 8 2,521(g) 2

78,947(c) 68 24,890(c) 22 9,902(,) 9 1,761(g) 2 83,136(c) 70 24,994(c) 21 10,389(,) 9 246(g) 0 85,866(c) 69 25,179 20 10,878(,) 9 2,104(g) 2

(a) Estimated (2015-16 and 2016-17) and Projected (2017-18).

Total

$82,772

87,041

93,489

87,071

99,915

103,375

111,789

115,500

118,765

124,027

~) Reflects the expiration ofa temporary 0.25-percent surcharge and the reduced dependent exemption credit for the 2009 and 2010 tax years. These two changes decrease General Fund revenues by an estimated $3.5 billion in fiscal year 2011-12.

(c) Reflects the passage of Proposition 30, which temporarily increases tax rates on the highest income Californians through December 31, 2018, and temporarily increased the sales and use tax rate by 0.25 percent through December 31, 2016. Since higher personal income tax rates applied to income received in 2012, a majority of the expected new revenue for that year is allocated to fiscal year 2011-12, although the cash receipts did not begin occuni.ng until December 2012.

CJ) Reflects a decrease in the sales and use tax rate from 6 percent to 5 percent (the rate was temporarily increased from 5 percent to 6 percent from April 1, 2009 through June 30, 2011) and realignment of revenues related to shifting 1.0625 percent of the sales and use tax rate to the Local Revenue Fund 2011. These two changes decrease General Fund revenues by over $10 billion annually.

Ce) Reflects the passage of Proposition 39, which requires single sales factor apportionment for most multi-state businesses. See

"STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Sources ofTaxRevenue-Corporation Tax."

CO Reflects the expiration of a temporary 0.5 percent increase in the vehicle license fee rate (the rate was increased from 0.65 percent to 1.15 percent, effective May 19, 2009 through hme 30, 2011), decreasing General Flllld revenues by an estimated $1.3 billion in fiscal year 2011-12.

(gJ Reflects transfer of $1.6 billion in fiscal year 2014-15, $1.9 billion in fiscal year 2015-16, $3.2 billion in fiscal year 2016-17, and $1.2 billion in fiscal year 2017-18 from the General Fund to the BSA for rainy day purposes.

Note: Percentages may not add to 100 percent because of rollllding.


A-34

1. Personal income Tax

California models its personal income tax after the federal income tax. It is imposed on net taxable income (gross income less exclusions and deductions), with rates ranging from I percent to 12.3 percent. In addition, the state imposes a I-percent surcharge on taxable income above $1 million and dedicates the proceeds from this surcharge to the Mental Health Services Fund. The personal income tax brackets, along with other tax law parameters, are adjusted annually by the change in the consumer price index to prevent taxpayers from being pushed into higher tax brackets without a real increase in income. Personal, dependent, and other credits are allowed against the gross tax liability. In addition, taxpayers may be subject to an alternative minimum tax ("AMT"), which is similar to the federal AMT. California's personal income tax structure is highly progressive. For example, the state's Franchise Tax Board indicates that the top I percent of California state income taxpayers paid 48 percent of the state's total personal income tax in tax year 2014.

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget revenue projections include the revenue expected from Proposition 30. This measure provides for a one percent increase in the personal income tax rate for joint filing taxpayers with income above $500,000 and equal to or below $600,000; a 2 percent increase for incomes above $600,000 and equal to or below $1,000,000; and a 3 percent increase for incomes above $1,000,000. For single filers these tax rate increases start at incomes one-half those for joint filers. The brackets for these higher rates are indexed for inflation each year. The Proposition 30 income tax increases are in effect for calendar years 2012 through 2018. The Administration estimates the additional revenue from the higher income tax was $5.8 billion in fiscal year 2013-14, $6.5 billion in fiscal year 2014-15, and $6.7 billion in fiscal year 2015-16; the administration projects the revenue from these additional tax brackets to be $6.8 billion in fiscal year 2016-17, and $6.9 billion in 2017-18. Voters approved Proposition 55 in November 2016, extending the three additional tax brackets through tax year 2030.


A-35

The next table shows actual and projected personal income tax revenues for ten fiscal years, including a breakout of capital gains income tax revenue:

(a)

~)

TABLES Personal Income Tax General Fund Revenues (PIT)

(Includes Percentage of Total General Fund Revenues and Transfers) Dollars in Millions

Fiscal Year Ca11ital Gains All Other PIT Total PIT 2008-09 $3,863 4.7% $39,513 47.7% $43,376 52.4%

2009-10<•) 2,983 3.4 41,869 48.1 44,852 51.5

2010-11<•) 4,526 4.8 44,919 48.0 49,445 52.9

2011-12(b) 6,020 6.9 48,241 55.4 54,261 62.3

2012-13(b) 9,552 9.6 54,932 55.0 64,484 64.5

2013-14(b) 8,711 8.4 58,314 56.4 67,025 64.8

2014-15(b)(c) 11,433 10.2 64,736 57.9 76,169 68.1 2015-16(b)(c)(d) 11,687 10.1 67,260 58.2 78,947 68.4 2016-17(b)(c)(d) 11,297 9.5 71,839 60.5 83,136 70.0 2017-18(b)(c)(d) 10,888 8.8 74,978 60.5 85,866 69.2

Includes revenue from the temporary 0.25 percent surcharge on all personal income tax brackets and a reduction in the dependent exemption credit in 2009 and 2010.

Includes revenue from the higher rates imposed by Proposition 30 that are dedicated to the Education Protection Account.

See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-State Expenditures-K-12 Education

under Proposition 98."

Cc) Estimated. For fiscal year 2014-15, only the portion of total PIT attributable to capital gains remains subject to possible further revision.

CJ) Revenue for fiscal year 2015-16 includes a reduction of $200 million, fiscal year 2016-17 reflects a reduction of $240 million, and fiscal year 2017-18 a reduction of $264 million, due to the state Earned Income Tax Credit.

Source: State of California, Franchise Tax Board provided calendar year estimates based on actual capital gains realizations

through 2011. From 2012 onward, State of California, Department of Finance estimated calendar year capital gains based on

actual capital gains realizations for 2012, 2013, and 2014, and the forecasted realizations for 2015 and forward. Fiscal year

totals for capital gains shown in this table are estimated by adding 70 percent of calendar year total in first half of fiscal year

to 30 percent of calendar year total in second half of fiscal year. All other information provided by State of California,

Department of Finance.

Note: Percentages may not add to 100 percent because of rounding.

Income taxes on capital gains realizations, which are linked to stock market and real estate performance, can add significant volatility to personal income tax receipts. For example, capital gains tax receipts accounted for nearly 9 percent of General Fund revenues and transfers in fiscal year 2007-08, but dropped below 5 percent in fiscal year 2008-09, and below 4 percent in fiscal year 2009-10. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects that capital gains will account for 9.5 percent of General Fund revenues and transfers in fiscal year 2016-17, and 8.8 percent in fiscal year 2017-18. The volatility in these percentages is primarily due to an underlying volatility in the level of capital gains tax revenues, rather than to volatility in other General Fund revenues and transfers. See "CURRENT STATE BUDGET-Budget Risks."

A-36

2. Sales and Use Tax

The sales tax is imposed upon retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property in California. Most retail sales and leases are subject to the tax. However, exemptions have been provided for certain essentials such as food for home consumption, prescription drugs, gas delivered through mains, and electricity. Other exemptions provide relief for a variety of sales ranging from custom computer software to aircraft.

The California use tax is imposed at the same rates as the regular sales tax on consumers of tangible personal property that is used, consumed, or stored in this state. Use tax applies to purchases from out-of-state vendors that are not required to collect tax on their sales. Use tax also applies to most leases of tangible personal property.

As of January I, 2017, the breakdown for the uniform statewide state and local sales and use tax (referred to herein as the "sales tax") rate of 7.25 percent was as follows (many local jurisdictions have additional sales taxes for local purposes):

• 3.9375 percent imposed as a state General Fund tax;

• 1.0625 percent dedicated to local governments for realignment purposes (Local Revenue Fund 2011 );

• 0. 5 percent dedicated to local governments for health and welfare program realignment (Local Revenue Fund);

• 0. 5 percent dedicated to local governments for public safety services (Local Public Safety Fund); and

• 1.25 percent local tax imposed under the Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law, with 0.25 percent dedicated to county transportation purposes and 1.0 percent for city and county general-purpose use.

Passage of Proposition 30 added a 0.25 percent additional sales tax rate from January I, 2013 through December 31, 2016. Proposition 30 also constitutionally guaranteed that 1.0625 percent of the sales tax rate is dedicated to the cost of the realignment of certain defined public safety services programs from the state to the counties and explicitly states that this sales tax revenue does not constitute General Fund revenue for purposes of the Proposition 98 guarantee. The 1.0625 percent of the sales tax rate is expected to generate $6.6 billion in fiscal year 2016-17 and $6.9 billion in fiscal year 2017-18.

Existing law provides that 0.25 percent of the base state and local sales tax rate may be suspended in any calendar year upon certification by the Director of Finance, by November I in the prior year, that both of the following have occurred: (I) the General Fund reserve ( excluding the revenues derived from the 0.25 percent special sales tax) is expected to exceed 3 percent of revenues in that fiscal year ( excluding the revenues derived from the 0.25 percent special sales tax) and (2) actual revenues for the period May I through September 30 equal or exceed the previous May Revision forecast. The 0.25 percent rate will be reinstated the following year if the Director of Finance subsequently determines conditions (I) or (2) above are not met for that

A-37

fiscal year. The Department of Finance estimates that the reserve level was insufficient to trigger a reduction for calendar year 2017. See "Governor's Proposed Budget -Summary of State Revenues and Expenditures" for a projection of the fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18 General Fund reserve.

3. Corporation Tax

Corporation tax revenues are derived from the following taxes:

• The franchise tax and the corporate income tax are levied at an 8. 84 percent rate on profits. The former is imposed on corporations for the privilege of doing business in California, while the latter is imposed on corporations that derive income from California sources but are not sufficiently present to be classified as doing business in the state.

• Banks and other financial corporations are subject to the franchise tax plus an additional tax at the rate of 2 percent on their net income. This additional tax is in lieu of personal property taxes and business license taxes.

• The AMT is similar to that in federal law. In general, the AMT is based on a higher level of net income computed by adding back certain tax preferences. This tax is imposed at a rate of 6.65 percent.

• A minimum franchise tax of up to $800 is imposed on corporations and SubChapter S corporations. Limited partnerships are also subject to the $800 minimum franchise tax. New corporations are exempted from the minimum franchise tax for the first year of incorporation.

• Sub-Chapter S corporations are taxed at 1.5 percent of profits.

• Fees and taxes paid by limited liability companies ("LLCs"), which accounted for 10.1 percent of corporation tax revenue in fiscal year 2015-16, are considered "corporation taxes."

Legislation enacted in the Budget Acts of 2008, 2009, and 2010 significantly reduced corporation tax revenues beginning in fiscal year 2011-12. However, the passage of Proposition 39 in November 2012 reverses portions of the reductions in revenue due to those tax changes. Proposition 39 amended a provision giving corporations an option on how to calculate the portion of worldwide income attributable to California. By requiring corporations to base their state tax liability on sales in California, it is estimated that state revenues will increase by $918 million in fiscal year 2016-17, $968 million in fiscal year 2017-18, and will further increase to over $1 billion by fiscal year 2018-19. The measure also, for fiscal years 2013-14 through 2017-18, dedicates 50 percent, up to $550 million, per year from the annual estimate of this increased revenue to funding of projects that create energy efficiency and clean energy jobs in California.

The legislative changes, offset by Proposition 39, are expected to reduce net revenue by $482 million in fiscal year 2016-17 and $542 million in fiscal year 2017-18.

A-38

4. Insurance Tax

The majority of insurance written in California is subject to a 2.35 percent gross premium tax. For insurers, this premium tax takes the place of all other state and local taxes except those on real property and motor vehicles. Exceptions to the 2.35 percent rate are certain pension and profit-sharing plans which are taxed at the lesser rate of 0. 5 percent, surplus lines and nonadmitted insurance at 3 percent and ocean marine insurers at 5 percent of underwriting profits.

Chapter 2, Statutes of 2016, authorized a tax on the enrollment of Medi-Cal managed care plans and commercial health plans and also reduced insurance and corporation taxes paid by the health plan industry. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget forecasts that this new law will reduce insurance tax revenue by $280 million annually in fiscal years 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19, while corporation tax revenue is forecast to decrease by $90 million for each fiscal year 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19. See "STATE EXPENDITURES - Health and Human ServicesReplacement of the Managed Care Organization Tax."

5. Other Taxes

Other general fund taxes and licenses include: alcoholic beverage taxes; horse racing license fees; and trailer coach license fees.

6. Special Fund Revenues

The state Constitution and statutes specify the uses of certain revenues. Such receipts are accounted for in various special funds. While these funds are not directly available to repay state general obligation bonds, the General Fund may, when needed to meet cash flow needs, temporarily borrow from certain special funds. See "CASH MANAGEMENT-Inter-Fund Borrowings." In general, special fund revenues comprise three categories of income:

• Receipts from tax levies, which are allocated to specified functions, such as motor vehicle taxes and fees and certain taxes on tobacco products.

• Charges for certain services provided by the state government to individuals, businesses, or organizations, such as fees for the provision of business and professional licenses.

• Rental royalties and other receipts designated for particular purposes ( e.g., oil and gas royalties).

Motor vehicle-related taxes and fees are projected to account for approximately 27 percent of all special fund revenues in fiscal year 2017-18. Principal sources of this income are motor vehicle fuel taxes, registration and weight fees and vehicle license fees. In fiscal year 2017-18, $13.7 billion of special fund revenues are projected to come from the ownership or operation of motor vehicles. For a discussion of Proposition lA of 2004, which replaced a portion of vehicle license fees with increased property tax revenues, see "STATE FINANCESOTHER ELEMENTS-Local Government Impacts on State Finances."

A-39

Fiscal Year

2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16(Q

2016-1 ?(D

2017-lS(D

The following table displays major special fund revenues ( actual and estimated).

TABLE9 Comparative Yield of State Taxes - Special Funds

(Modified Accrual Basis) (Dollars in Thousands)

Motor Sales and Personal Motor Vehicle Vehicle

Use<a) Income(b) Tobacco<c) Insurance<d) Fuel Fees<e)

$17,962,461 $1,063,543 $800,677 $251,073 $5,544,530 $5,817,168

19,161,183 1,683,780 778,703 21,379 5,492,850 5,838,702

20,167,858 1,281,664 746,748 6,063,356 6,204,720

21,025,351 1,830,637 746,062 5,711,160 6,489,447

20,774,834 1,805,958 754,690 5,000,539 6,809,481

21,169,691 1,863,048 1,077,384 4,803,903 7,023,674

22,983,388 1,887,584 2,026,162 5,110,500 8,539,318

Managed Care

Organization Tax

$827,561

1,464,288

1,632,534

2,283,263

2,428,921

(a) These figures include allocations to Public Transportation Accmmt, State Fiscal Recovery Fund, Local Public Safety Flllld, and both Local Revenue Funds (1991 and 2011 Realignment), and the Bradley-Burns tax, which is dedicated to city and county operations. The 0.25 percent State Fiscal Recovery Fund rate was in operation from July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2015, and the Bradley-Burns tax rate was temporarily reduced by 0.25 percentage point during the same time period.

(b) These figures include the revenue estimate for a 1.0 percent surcharge on taxpayers with taxable income over $1 million, with the proceeds flmding mental health programs pursuant to Proposition 63.

(c) Figures include allocations to the California Children and Families First Trust Fund, Breast Cancer Fund, and the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund, and the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 Fund.

(d) Figures include insurance tax on Medi-Cal managed care plans in fiscal years 2011-12 and 2012-13.

(e) Registration and weight fees, motor vehicle license fees and other fees. Includes $1.1 billion in 2017-18 from the Governor's proposed $65 per vehicle road improvement charge. See "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-Local Government Impacts on State Finances."

(f) Estimated for fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18.

Note: This table includes only Non-General Fund revenue accruing to special funds. Some revenue sources are dedicated to local governments.


7. Taxes on Tobacco Products

Cigarette and tobacco taxes primarily affect special funds, with $85 million going to the General Fund and $758 million to special funds in 2015-16. The California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 (Proposition 56), passed by the voters in November 2016, increases the excise tax rate on cigarettes, tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes, effective April 1, 2017. The excise tax increases by $2 from 87 cents to $2.87 per pack of 20 cigarettes on distributors selling cigarettes in California. The equivalent excise tax on the distribution of other tobacco products such as cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, and snuff also increases by $2 from a $1.37-equivalent to a $3.37-equivalent tax. Lastly, Proposition 56 newly imposes the $3.37-equivalent tobacco products tax to electronic cigarettes. All of the new money from Proposition 56 goes to special funds.

A-40

8. Taxes on Marijuana Products

Proposition 64, The California Legal Marijuana Initiative, passed by the voters in November 2016, legalizes the recreational use of marijuana within California for persons age 21 and over, effective November 9, 2016. The measure also levies new excise taxes on the cultivation and retail sale of both recreational and medical marijuana as of January 1, 2018. The cultivation tax is $9.25 per ounce of flower and $2.75 per ounce of leaves, adjusted for inflation beginning in 2020. In addition, there will be a 15-percent tax on the retail price of both recreational and medical marijuana. Recreational marijuana will also be subject to state and local sales taxes. Medical marijuana, on the other hand, is exempted from existing state and local sales taxes. However, future taxes on both medical and recreational marijuana can be levied by local governments.

State Expenditures

The four biggest categories of state expenditures-comprising approximately 90 percent of the annual budget each year-are K-12 Education, Higher Education, Health and Human Services and Public Safety (including Corrections and Rehabilitation). Other expenditure categories are shown in Table 17 below.

Expenditure estimates are updated twice a year after the Department of Finance has reviewed and considered data, budget requests, and other information from entities across state government. The estimates are included in the proposed balanced budgets released in the Governor's Budget by January 10 and the May Revision by May 14, with final expenditure estimates included in the enacted Budget Act. Actual expenditures may differ materially from these preliminary estimates, and there can be no assurances that the projected amounts will be spent.

1. K-14Education under Proposition 98

General. California provides instruction and support services to roughly six million students in grades kindergarten through twelve in more than 10,000 schools throughout the state. K-12 education programs are primarily funded under Proposition 98, and will receive funding of $52.2 billion from the General Fund for fiscal year 2016-17 (both Non-Proposition 98 and Proposition 98).

Proposition 98 Funding for K-12 and Community Colleges. State funding for K-12 schools and community colleges (referred to collectively as "K-14 education") is determined largely by Proposition 98, a voter-approved constitutional amendment passed in 1988. Proposition 98, as amended by Proposition 111 in 1990, is mainly comprised of a set of three formulas, or three tests, that guarantee schools and community colleges a minimum level of funding from the state General Fund and local property taxes, commonly referred to as the minimum guarantee. Which test applies in a particular year is determined by multiple factors including the level of funding in fiscal year 1986-87, local property tax revenues, changes in school attendance, growth in per capita personal income, and growth in per capita General Fund revenue. The applicable test, as determined by these factors, sets the minimum funding level. Most of the factors are adjusted frequently and some may not be final for several years after the

A-41

close of the fiscal year. Therefore, additional appropriations-referred to as settle-up fundsmay be required to fully satisfy the minimum guarantee for prior years. Settle-up payments are made in future years at the discretion of the Legislature and the Governor.

Although the Constitution requires a minimum level of funding for education, the state may provide more or less than the minimum guarantee. If the state provides more than is required, the minimum guarantee is increased on an ongoing basis. If the state provides less than required, the minimum guarantee must be suspended in statute with a two-thirds vote of the Legislature. When the minimum guarantee is suspended, the suspended amount is owed to schools in the form of a maintenance factor. A maintenance factor obligation is also created in years when the operative minimum guarantee is calculated using a per capita General Fund inflation factor (Test 3) and is lower than the calculation using a per capita personal income inflation factor (Test 2). (In Test 1 years, a fixed percentage of General Fund revenues is used in the calculation.) In Test 3 years, the amount of maintenance factor obligation created is equal to the difference between the funded level and the Test 2 level. Under a suspension, the maintenance obligation created is the difference between the funded level and the operative minimum guarantee. Maintenance factor is repaid according to a Constitutional formula in years when the growth in per capita General Fund revenues exceeds the growth in per capita personal mcome.

The passage of Proposition 30 temporarily created an additional source of funds for K-14 education. The Education Protection Account ("EPA"), created by Proposition 30, is available to offset Proposition 98 General Fund expenditures for fiscal years 2012-13 through 2018-19, freeing up General Fund resources for other purposes. In November 2016, voters passed Proposition 55, which extends the personal income tax increase imposed by Proposition 30 through the 2030 tax year. See "Funding for Fiscal Years 2016-17 and 2017-18" below.

Proposition 2, approved by the voters in November 2014, created the Public School System Stabilization Account ("PSSSA"), a special fund that serves as a Proposition 98 reserve, and requires a deposit in the PSSSA under specified conditions. As of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, there is no balance in the PSSSA as these conditions have not been met and no deposit into the PS SSA is currently anticipated.

Funding for Fiscal Years 2016-17 and 2017-18 for K-12 and Community Colleges Under Proposition 98. As shown in Table 1, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget estimates the Proposition 98 minimum guarantee to be $71.4 billion in fiscal year 2016-17 and $73.5 billion in fiscal year 2017-18, decreases of $506 million and $953 million, respectively, when compared to the levels assumed in the 2016 Budget Act. The decrease in these estimates is primarily due to a lower than previously expected revenue forecast. Despite the lower estimates, the minimum guarantee is still projected to grow over prior-year levels by $2.7 billion in 2016-17 and $2.1 billion in 2017-18. The General Fund share of the minimum guarantee is $50.3 billion in 2016-17 and $51.4 billion in 2017-18, which includes approximately $7 billion each year from the EPA. Property taxes, which combine with General Fund to meet the minimum guarantee requirement, are estimated to increase significantly over the two-year period mostly due to an increase in base property tax revenues.

A-42

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget reflects Proposition 98 General Fund expenditures m fiscal years 2015-16 through 2017-18, as outlined in the table below.

TABLElO Proposition 98 Funding


2015-16 Fiscal Year

2016-17 2017-18

Change From Revised 2016-17 to Proposed 2017-18

Enacted(a) Revised(c) Enacted(b) Revised(c) Proposed(c) Amount Percent

K-12 Proposition 98 State General Fund $36,884 $36,483 $38,738 $ 38,226 $ 39,815 $ 1,589 4.2% Education Protection Account 7,231 7,202 6,784 6,661 6,071 (590) -8.9% Local property tax revenue(d) 16,380 17,052 18,057 18,236 19,201 965 5.3%

Subtotals (,) $60,495 $ 60,737 $63,579 $ 63,123 $ 65,087 $ 1,964 3.1% CCC Proposition 98 State General Fund $ 4,407 $ 4,414 $ 4,690 (,) $ 4,620 $ 4,715 $ 95 2.1% Education Protection Account 894 890 838 823 750 (73) -8.9% Local property tax revenue(d) 2,613 2,629 2,767 2,803 2,959 156 5.6%

Subtotals (,) $ 7,914 $ 7,933 $ 8,295 $ 8,246 $ 8,424 $ 178 2.2% Total Proposition 98 State General Fund $41,291 $ 40,897 $43,428 $ 42,846 $ 44,530 $ 1,684 3.9% Education Protection Account 8,125 8,092 7,622 7,484 6,821 (663) -8.9% Local property tax revenue(d) 18,993 19,681 20,824 21,039 22,160 1,121 5.3%

TotalsCD $68,409 $ 68,670 $71,874 $ 71,369 $ 73,511 $2,142 30% (a) As of the 2015 Budget Act, adopted on June 24, 2015. 0) As of the 2016 Budget Act, adopted on June 27, 2016. (c) As of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, January 10, 2017.

CJ) Beginning in fiscal year 2011-12, local property tax revenues include arnmmts shifted to schools as a result of the elimination of redevelopment agencies. Fiscal years 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 include the one-time distribution of cash assets held by

redevelopment agencies.

Ce) Beginning in fiscal year 2015-16, the community college fimding includes $500 million for the K-14 Adult Education Block

Grant.

CO Totals may not add due to rmmding.


Future Obligations. As explained above, there are two forms of future obligations for the state General Fund which may be created under Proposition 98: maintenance factor and settle-up payments. Both of these obligations have been created in years leading up to fiscal year 2017-18. The following table shows the estimated balances of Proposition 98 future obligations as of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget:

A-43

TABLE 11 Proposition 98 Future Obligations Balances


Estimated Fiscal Year-End Balances<a)

Obligation

Maintenance Factor

QEIA Settle-up(bl

Other Settle-Up

2013-14

$6,175

410

1,500

2014-15

$482

0

1,500

2015-16

$500

0

1,244(,)

(a) Proposition 98 factors and appropriations have been certified through fiscal year 2008-09.

2016-17

$1,364

0

1,026(,)

2017-18

$1,628

0

626(,)

Cb) The Quality Education Improvement Act ("QEIA") enacted the settlement of a lawsuit concerning the proper ammmt of the guarantee in fiscal years 2004-05 and 2005-06 that obligated the state to pay a total of $2.7 billion in settle-up based on a statutory repayment plan. The final payment was made in fiscal year 2014-15.

Cc) Included in "Underfimding of Proposition 98" in Table 6.

Note: Proposition 98 budgetary deferrals are not included in this Table. The 2014 Budget Act included deferral payments of $5.2 billion: $662 million made toward the deferral balance in fiscal year 2014-15 and additional payments of $4.5 billion made in fiscal year 2014-15 toward deferral balances in fiscal years 2012-13 and 2013-14. In addition, a trigger mechanism included in the 2014 Budget Act resulted in the remaining deferral balance of $992 million being paid in fiscal year 2014-15. In total, these payments eliminated the remaining deferral balance at the end of fiscal year 2014-15. To align fiscal year 2016-17 General Fund expenditures to the minimum required under Proposition 98, a one-ti.me budgetary deferral of $859 million is included in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget. The payment to retire this deferral balance is included in the estimated expenditures for the 2017-18 fiscal year.

Maintenance factor payments are included in the multi-year projection (as shown in Table 3) developed by the Department of Finance based on factors known as of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget The maintenance factor balance is adjusted by average daily attendance and per capita personal income growth each year. No maintenance factor payment is required in fiscal years 2015-16 through 2018-19. Payments of $88 million and $206 million, respectively, as required by Constitutional formula, are built into fiscal years 2019-20 and 2020-21.

2. Higher Education

California has a system of public higher education comprised of three segments: the California Community Colleges ("CCCs"), the California State University System ("CSU") and the University of California ("UC").

As discussed above, the state funds its community colleges under Proposition 98, and the 2017-18 Governor's Budget provides a projected $8.4 billion Proposition 98 funds for community colleges (consisting of $5.5 billion from the General Fund and $3 billion from local property taxes). There are 113 community college campuses operated by 72 community college districts. These colleges provide associate degrees and certificates to students. Additionally, students may attend CCCs to meet basic skills or complete general education requirements prior to transferring to a four-year undergraduate institution. The CCCs awarded 223,938 associate degrees, certificates, and other awards in the 2015-16 school year. For the 2015-16 school year, approximately 1.1 million full-time equivalent students were enrolled at CCCs.

A-44

The CSU provides undergraduate and graduate programs, awarding about 113,000 degrees in the 2015-16 school year. The CSU enrolled 391,121 full-time students at 23 campuses in the 2015-16 school year.

The UC provides a range of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs, awarding about 69,000 degrees in the 2015-16 school year. The ten UC campuses and the Hastings College of Law enrolled 254,421 full time students in the 2015-16 school year.

The following table summarizes the direct General Fund support for the three segments of state public higher education:

Fiscal Year 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

TABLE 12 Higher Education

General Fund Expenditures (Dollars in Billions)

CSU'"'(b' $2.6

3.0 3.3 3.6 3.7

$2.8 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.5

(a) Includes costs of health benefits for CSU retirees. (b) Includes general obligation bond debt service costs beginning in fiscal year 2014-15.

(c) Includes general obligation bond debt service costs beginning in fiscal year 2013-14.

3. Health and Human Services

CCCs $4.2

5.0 5.3 5.4 5.5

Medi-Cal. Medi-Cal, California's Medicaid program, is a health care entitlement program for low-income individuals and families who receive public assistance or otherwise lack health care coverage. Medi-Cal serves approximately 36 percent of all Californians.

Average monthly caseload in Medi-Cal is estimated to be 14 million in fiscal year 2016-17. Caseload is expected to increase in fiscal year 2017-18 by 256,400, or 1.8 percent, to approximately 14.3 million people. The increase in caseload and expenditures in recent years is largely due to the implementation of federal health care reform. In addition, the current year increase of $1.8 billion includes two significant adjustments: (1) one-time retroactive payment of drug rebates to the federal government of nearly $500 million and (2) correction of a miscalculation of costs associated with the Coordinated Care Initiative of nearly $1.5 billion. In January 2017, Securities and Exchange Commission ("S.E.C.") staff contacted the state by telephone and requested information related to these adjustments. The state is cooperating with the S.E.C. and is providing the requested information. (The Coordinated Care Initiative allows persons eligible for both Medicare and Medi-Cal to receive medical, behavioral health, long-term services and supports, and home and community-based services coordinated through a single health plan.)

A-45

The following table shows Medi-Cal expenditures.

Fiscal Year 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-1 i•) 2017-13(a)

TABLE 13 Medi-Cal Expenditnres

(Dollars in Billions)

General Other State Fnnd Fnnds

$16.6 $5.7 17.1 8.3 17.7 7.9 19.6 13.7 19.1 16.7

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.

Federal Fnnds Total $34.1 $56.4

54.1 79.5 55.1 80.7 66.8 100.1 66.8 102.6

(a) Estimated. Above average growth in General Fund spending between 2015-16 and 2016-17 is largely attributable to a one-time pharmacy payment of nearly $500 million. This decreases costs in 2015-16 and increases costs by the same ammmt, resulting in year-over-year change of nearly $1 billion.

Health Care Reform. California continues implementation of the federal Affordable Care Act (ACA). Since January 1, 2014, approximately 6 million Californians have obtained health insurance, either through the state's new insurance exchange (Covered California) or through the two part (mandatory and optional) expansion of Medi-Cal. The mandatory Medi-Cal expansion simplified eligibility, enrollment, and retention rules that make it easier to get and stay on Medical.

The optional expansion of Medi-Cal extended eligibility to adults without children, and parent and caretaker relatives with incomes up to 13 8 percent of the federal poverty level. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget includes costs of $18.9 billion ($1.6 billion General Fund) in fiscal year 2017-18 for the optional expansion. The federal government paid nearly 100 percent of the costs of this expansion for the first three years. As of January 1, 2017, California is responsible for 5 percent of these costs with California's contribution gradually increasing each fiscal year until fiscal year 2020-21, when the state will pay 10 percent of the total costs. By fiscal year 2020-21, the General Fund share for the optional expansion is projected to be $2.5 billion. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects the optional expansion caseload to be 4.1 million in fiscal year 2017-18.

Medi-Cal 1115 Waiver Renewal. California negotiated with the federal government to renew the Medi-Cal Section 1115 "Bridge to Reform" waiver, which was critical to the successful implementation of the ACA. The state received approval for the waiver renewal, called "Medi-Cal 2020", effective January 1, 2016 through December 21, 2020. The total federal funding in the renewal is approximately $7.2 billion over five years.

In-Home Supportive Services ("IHSS"). The IHSS program provides domestic and related services such as housework, transportation, and personal care services to eligible lowincome aged, blind, or disabled persons. These services are provided to assist individuals to remain safely in their homes and prevent institutionalization.

A-46

The following table shows IHSS caseload and related General Fund expenditures.

Fiscal Year

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 20 l 6-1 i•)(b l 2017-1 s(a)(c)

(a) Estimated.

TABLE14 IHSS Expenditures


Caseload

425,526 443,734 466,493 507,463 531,069

General Fund Expenditures

$1.9 2.2 2.7 3.5 3.2

Cb) The increase in estimated fiscal year 2016-17 General Fund expenditures is primarily due to (1) implementation of federal Department of Labor overtime regulations for IHSS effective February 2016; (2) implementation of the state hourly minimum wage increase from $10.00 to $10.50, effective January 1, 2017; and (3) growth in caseload and average service hours per case.

Cc) The increase in projected fiscal year 2017-18 General Flllld expenditures is primarily due to increased costs related to (1) the full-year impact of federal Department of Labor overtime regulations for IHSS; (2) implementation of the state hourly minimum wage increase from $10.50 to $11.00, effective January 1, 2018; and (3) growth in caseload and average service hours per case. These increased costs are partially offset by General Fund savings resulting from eliminating the IHSS County maintenance-of-effort requirement that has been in place since 2012-13 and restoring the prior state-county cost-sharing arrangement to support the program.

CalWORKs. The California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids ("CalWORKs") program, the state's version of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families ("TANF") program, provides temporary cash assistance to low-income families with children to meet basic needs, such as shelter, food, and clothing. CalWORKs includes specific welfare-to-work requirements and provides supportive services, including child care, to enable adult participants to meet these requirements. Eligibility requirements and benefit levels are established by the state, but counties have flexibility in program design, services, and funding to meet local needs. The federal government pays a substantial portion of welfare benefit costs, subject to a requirement that states provide significant matching funds. Federal law imposes detailed eligibility and programmatic requirements for states to be entitled to receive federal funds. Federal law also imposes time limits on program availability for individuals, and establishes certain work requirements. Consistent with the federal law, CalWORKs contains time limits on the receipt of welfare aid. The centerpiece of CalWORKs is the linkage of eligibility to work participation requirements.

The state annually receives a TANF block grant allocation of $3.7 billion from the federal government. To qualify for the T ANF funds, the state is required annually to expend a "Maintenance of Effort" amount, which is currently $2. 9 billion.

Under federal law, states are required to demonstrate a SO-percent work participation rate among all T ANF-aided families. The federal government determined that California failed to meet this requirement for federal fiscal years ("FFY s") 2007 through 2014, and the state is therefore subject to a penalty. The federal government waived the penalties for FFY s 2007-2011 and the state is seeking relief from the FFY s 2012, 2013, and 2014 penalties, estimated to total

A-47

approximately $1.1 billion. On January 5, 2017, the federal government determined that the state successfully completed a corrective compliance plan to meet work participation rate requirements in FFY 2015. In addition, on January 20, 2017, the federal government determined that the state successfully completed a corrective compliance plan to meet work participation rate requirements in FFY 2016. By meeting the work participation requirements, the state avoids $587.1 million in aggregate fiscal penalties in FFYs 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. Similar corrective compliance plans were submitted to the federal government in October 2015 to address the FFY 2012 penalty, in February 2016 to address the FFY 2013 penalty, and in September 2016 to address the FFY 2014 penalty, which require the state to continue to meet or exceed federal work participation rate requirements in FFY s 2016 and 2017.

The following table shows CalWORKs caseload and General Fund expenditures.

Fiscal Year

2013-14 2014-15(•) 2015-16(a) 2016-17(a)(b)(c) 2017-18 (a)(c)(d)

TABLE15 CalWORKs Expenditures


Caseload

550,928 535,089 495,724 463,540 459,173

General Fund Expenditures

$1.2 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6

(a) Reflects General Fund savings of approximately $741 million in fiscal year 2014-15, $7 46 million in fiscal year 2015-16, $586 million in fiscal year 2016-17, and $546 million in fiscal year 2017-18 from redirecting a portion of fiscal year 1991-92 realignment revenues from indigent health to CalWORKs, pursuant to Chapter 24, Statutes of 2013.

Cb) Reflects increased General Fund costs primarily due to repeal of the maximum family grant rule, effective January 1, 2017.

Cc) Estimated.

CJ) Reflects a one-time shift of $265.9 million in costs from the General Fund to counties to reflect additional county indigent health care savings realized by cmmt:ies in 2014-15, pursuant to Chapter 24, Statutes of 2013.

SSI/SSP. The federal Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") program provides a monthly cash benefit to eligible seniors and persons with disabilities who meet the program's income and resource requirements. In California, the SSI payment is augmented with a State Supplementary Payment ("SSP") grant. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget includes approximately $2.9 billion for the SSI/SSP program from the General Fund for fiscal year 2017-18, 2 percent more than the revised fiscal year 2016-17 funding level. The year-over-year increase is primarily due to a slight increase in caseload and the full-year costs associated with the 2. 76-percent cost-of-living increase applied to the SSP portion of the SSI/SSP grant, effective January 1, 2017. The average monthly caseload in this program is estimated to be 1.3 million recipients in fiscal years 2016-17 and 2017-18.

Developmental Services. The Department of Developmental Services ("DDS") provides consumers with developmental disabilities a variety of services and supports that allow them to live and work independently or in supported environments. DDS serves approximately 304,000

A-48

individuals in the community and approximately 900 individuals m three state-operated developmental centers.

The following table shows the caseload and related General Fund expenditures for the Department of Developmental Services ( excluding capital outlay and Proposition 98 funding).

(a)

TABLE16 Department of Developmental Services Expenditures


General Fund Fiscal Year Caseload Expenditures

2013-14 275,337 $2.8 2014-15 280,570 3.1 2015-16 291,507 3.5 2016-17(a) 304,410 4.0 2017-18(•) 318,043 4.2

Estimated.

Replacement of the Managed Care Organization Tax. Since 2005, the state has levied a tax on Medi-Cal managed care plans to increase payments to Medi-Cal providers and fund health care costs that would otherwise be paid from the General Fund. The state's previous managed care organization (MCO) tax structure, which expired on June 30, 2016, did not comply with certain federal guidance that such a tax be broad-based and not limited narrowly to Medi-Cal plans. In response, the Legislature passed a package of bills to modify and continue the MCO tax for 3 years to provide at least $1.1 billion annually for Medi-Cal. The bills were signed by the Governor on March 1, 2016, and the package was approved by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on May 17, 2016, with some minor adjustments. The modified MCO tax was implemented beginning in fiscal year 2016-17.

4. Public Safety

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") operates 37 youth and adult correctional facilities and 44 youth and adult camps as well as numerous other facilities. The CDCR also contracts for multiple adult parolee service centers and community correctional facilities. The CDCR's infrastructure includes more than 42 million square feet of building space on more than 24,000 acres of land (3 7 square miles) statewide. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget assumes an average daily adult inmate population of 128,159 in fiscal year 2017-18 and an average daily adult parole population of 44,761 in fiscal year 2017-18.

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget includes total expenditures (excluding capital outlay) of $11.3 billion ($11 billion from the General Fund) for CDCR, including salaries and benefits of approximately $7.7 billion. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget continues to include savings from the implementation of Chapter 15, Statutes of 2011 (AB 109). This legislation shifted responsibility for short-term, lower-level offenders from the state to county jurisdictions. In addition, counties are responsible for community supervision of lower-level offenders upon completion of their prison sentences.

A-49

Prison Population. Pursuant to various rulings issued by a panel of three federal judges, (some affirmed by the United States Supreme Court), the state was ordered to reduce its prison population to 137.5 percent of the system's design capacity by February 28, 2016. In January 2015, CDCR met this court-ordered population benchmark because of successful implementation of a variety of court-ordered population reduction measures and approval of Proposition 47 by the voters in November 2014, which required reclassification of certain felonies to misdemeanors ( and related resentencing). Notwithstanding these changes, the fall 2016 adult inmate population projections estimate that population will increase by approximately 1,000 inmates per year. Given the need to establish a durable solution for prison crowding, the Governor sponsored, and the voters approved, Proposition 57 to maintain compliance with the court-ordered population cap, end federal court oversight, and establish more incentives for inmates to participate in rehabilitative programs. Proposition 57 reforms the juvenile and adult criminal justice system in California by creating a parole consideration process for non-violent offenders who have served the full term for their primary criminal offense in state prison, authorizing CDCR to award credits earned for good behavior and approved rehabilitative or educational achievements, and requiring judges to determine whether juveniles charged with certain crimes should be tried in juvenile or adult court.

Prison Medical Care. The federal receiver, the court appointed individual who oversees the CDCR's medical operations (the "Receiver"), has plans for the design and construction of additional facilities and improvements to existing facilities for inmates with medical or mental health care needs. See "LITIGATION-Prison Healthcare Reform and Reduction of Prison Population." All of these projects will be constructed at existing state correctional institutions.

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget includes $2 billion from the General Fund for the Receiver's Medical Services and Pharmacy Programs, compared to the 2016 Budget Act, which totaled $1.9 billion from the General Fund.

Citing "significant progress" in improving California's prison medical care, a federal District Court judge in January 2012 ordered California officials to begin planning for the end of the federal Receivership of the state's prison medical programs. On March 10, 2015, the court modified its order to update and clarify the process to transition responsibility for inmate medical care back to the state. This transition process is ongoing. As of January 25, 2017, IO institutions have been transitioned back to the state, with 25 facilities (including one leased facility) remaining to be transferred.

Five-Year Expenditure Summary

The following table summarizes the major categories of state expenditures, including both General Fund and Special Fund programs for fiscal years 2011-12 through 2015-16.

A-50

TABLE17 Governmental Cost Funds (Budgetary Basis)

Schedule of Expenditures by Function and Character Fiscal Years 2011-12 to 2015-16

(Dollars in Thousands) Fiscal Year

Function 2011-12(e) 2012-lJ(e) 201J-14(e) 2014-15(eXfJ

Legislative, Judicial, and Executive Legislative $ 331,052 $ 329,903 $ 345,319 $ 347,844 Judicial 3,360,882 2,961,759 3,257,190 3,540,001 Executive 1,543,381 1,548,666 1,879,794 1,843,252

Business, Consumer Services, andHousing (a) 1,488,872 1,487,220 712,575 884,008 Transportation (aXb) 5,452,535 5,950,645 7,389,121 7,390,367 Natural Resources 3,358,016 3,505,612 3,431,142 4,350,235 Environmental Protection 1,027,911 907,427 1,000,477 1,159,685 Health and Human Services 41,359,564 44,613,839 46,257,581 49,929,687 Corrections and Rehabilitation (a) 7,892,864 8,530,717 9,111,239 9,841,406 Education

Education - K through 12 32,755,642 39,789,023 38,742,395 48,853,440 Higher Education 9,256,322 9,055,279 10,659,644 12,658,443

Labor and Workforce Development 700,449 710,343 726,075 773,047 Government Operations (a) 888,422 946,248 General Government

General Administration 1,712,184 1,948,034 1,851,530 2,880,301 Debt Service 6,561,871 5,721,714 6,305,806 6,439,994 Tax Relief 434,385 427,285 421,734 416,755 Shared Revenues 1,997,607 3,660,110 2,082,676 1,879,362 Other Statewide Expenditures 1,453,787 1,365,657 1,109,007 2,891,100 Expenditure Adjustment for Encumbrances (c) 2,195,656 (136,097) 30,739 (633,345) Credits for Overhead Services by General Fund (485,301) (592,314) (642,848) (602,749) Statewide Indirect Cost Recoveries (109,807) (132,847) (133,400) (147,349)

Total $122,287,872 $131,651,975 $ 135,426,218 $155,641,732

Character State Operations $ 39,579,635 $ 39,122,859 $ 39,266,400 $ 43,274,995 Local Assistance (ct) 81,820,212 91,890,033 95,620,340 111,421,332 Capital Outlay 888,025 639,083 539,478 945,405

Total $122,287,872 $131,651,975 $ 135,426,218 $155,641,732

2015-J6(e)(g)

$ 362,845 3,593,129 2,016,591

831,493 7,560,409 2,908,453 2,858,230

51,906,730 10,016,807

47,105,843 13,470,420

811,335 972,837

2,316,440 5,871,876

413,953 2,139,016 1,440,270 (503,745) (671,457) (148,980)

$155,272,495

$ 43,170,643 111,415,101

$686,751

$155,272,495

(a) The Governor's Reorganization Plan (GRP), which became operative on July 1, 2013, cut the number of state agencies from twelve to ten and eliminated or consolidated dozens of departments and entities, thereby making government more efficient and reducing lll1Ilecessary spending. The GRP created a new flmctional category called Government Operations and several departments/functions moved armmd. In addition, the business and housing components under the previously reported Business, Transportation, and Housing function merged with the State and Consumer Services function and the remaining transportation components now comprise the Transportation Agency. Information reported W1der the new functions are not comparable to that of prior years. The prior year amounts were ai/Justed to the new functions.

Cb) Beginning with fiscal year 2011-12, the Department of Transportation (DOT) changed the basis of financial reporting from a modified accrual basis to a cash basis for the State Highway Account (Fund 0042), the Public Transportation Account (Fund 0046), the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (Fund 3007), the Transportation Investment Fund (Fund 3008), and the Transportation Deferred Investment Fund (Fund 3093). This change resulted in a reduction of the reported expenditures by DOT in these funds for fiscal year 2011-12 due to expenditures incurred, but not paid in fiscal year 2011-12 not being accrued, and the fiscal year 2010-11 reported accruals being reversed. Therefore, in fiscal year 2012-13, reported expenditures increased. The change to cash basis financial reporting for these funds was done at the direction of the Department of Finance, in accordance with the following statutes: Streets and Highways Code Section 183( c), for Fund 0042; Public Utilities Code Section 99310.6, for Fund 0046; Government Code Section 14556.S(b), for Fund 3007; Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7104.3, for Fund 3008; and Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7105(g), for Fund 3093.

(Footnotes Continued on Following Page)

A-51

(Continued from Previous Page)

Cc) Large variances between fiscal years are normal.

In fiscal years 2011-12 and 2012-13, the change to cash basis financial reporting by the DOT in Funds 0042, 0046, 3007, 3008, and 3093 accounts for most of the large variance between the two fiscal years.

In fiscal year 2014-15, the increase in Local Assistance expenditures in funds that had no prior year reversal of encumbered expenditures, such as the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (Fund 3228), accounts primarily for the much greater encumbrance adjustment amount than in fiscal year 2013-14.

CJ) In fiscal year 2009-10, Proposition IA of 2004 was suspended when Governor Schwarzenegger declared a fiscal emergency allowing the state to offset local assistance expenditures with $1.9 billion of property tax revenue borrowed from the local governments. The state repaid the obligation, plus interest, in June 2013. Additionally, $1.7 billion of local property tax revenues were shifted to offset General Fund costs in fiscal year 2009-10, $350 million were shifted in fiscal year 2010-11 and in fiscal year 2011-12 another $43 million were shifted.

Ce) Executive Orders 12/13-A, 13/14-A, 14/15-A, 15/16-A, and 16/17-A were issued by the Department of Finance, as authorized under Control Section 12.45 of the Budget Acts of 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively, and pursuant to Government Code Sections 12472.5 and 13302, to defer the June 2012, June 2013, June 2014, June 2015 and June 2016 payroll expenditures for various governmental and nongovernmental cost funds to July 2012, July 2013, July 2014, July 2015, and July 2016. This affected all State departments paid through the uniform payroll system

CO Six FI$Cal Wave 1 departments did not submit their required year-end statements to the State Controller's Office for fiscal year 2014-15 in time to be included in the BLEAR. These departments' amounts reported in the BLEAR include the June 30, 2015 cash balances plus accruals derived from actual activities reported through October 28, 2015.

W Twelve FI$Cal Wave 2 departments submitted estimated financial statements to the State Controller's Office for fiscal year 2015-16 to be included in the BLEAR.

Source: State of California, Office of the State Controller.

Budget Reserves

1. Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties

The SFEU is funded with General Fund revenues and was established to protect the state from unforeseen revenue reductions and/or unanticipated expenditure increases. The State Controller may transfer funds from the SFEU to the General Fund as necessary to meet cash needs of the General Fund and such transfers are characterized as "loans." The State Controller is required to return moneys so transferred, without payment of interest, as soon as there are sufficient moneys in the General Fund. At the end of each fiscal year, the State Controller is required to transfer from the SFEU to the General Fund any amount necessary to eliminate any deficit in the General Fund.

There is a continuous appropriation authorizing the State Controller to transfer the unencumbered balance of the General Fund to the SFEU as of the end of each fiscal year. However, if, at the end of any fiscal year it has been determined revenues exceed the amount that may be appropriated, then the transfer shall be reduced by the amount of the excess revenues. The estimates of the transfer shall be made jointly by the LAO and the Department of Finance. See "STATE FINANCES-OTHER ELEMENTS-State Appropriations Limit." In certain circumstances, moneys in the SFEU may be used in connection with disaster relief

For budgeting and accounting purposes, any appropriation made from the SFEU, other than the appropriations discussed above, is deemed an appropriation from the General Fund. For year-end reporting purposes, the State Controller is required to add the balance in the SFEU to

A-52

the balance in the General Fund so as to show the total moneys then available for General Fund purposes.

See Table 1 and footnote ( e) in Table 4 for information concerning the recent balances in the SFEU and projections of the balances for the previous and current fiscal years. The Budget Act and related trailer bills are not the only pieces of legislation which appropriate funds. Updated estimates of revenues and expenditures, existing statutory requirements and additional legislation introduced and passed by the Legislature may also impact the fiscal year-end balance in the SFEU.

2. Budget Stabilization Account

Proposition 58, approved in March 2004, created the BSA as a second budgetary reserve and established the process for transferring General Fund revenues to the BSA. In fiscal year 2014-15, $1.606 billion was transferred from the General Fund to the BSA under the provisions of Proposition 58 (the balance in the BSA had been $0 since fiscal year 2008-09). Beginning with fiscal year 2015-16, however, the BSA provisions of Proposition 58 were superseded by Proposition 2.

Proposition 2 provides for both paying down debt and other long-term liabilities, and saving for a rainy day by making specified deposits into the BSA. In response to the volatility of capital gains revenues and the resulting boom-and-bust budget cycles, Proposition 2 takes into account the state's heavy dependence on the performance of the stock market and the resulting capital gains. Beginning with fiscal year 2015-16, Proposition 2:

• Requires a calculation of capital gains revenues in excess of 8 percent of General Fund tax revenues that are not required to fund a Proposition 98 increase. In addition, it requires a calculation of 1.5 percent of annual General Fund revenues. The sum of the amounts so calculated will be applied for the purposes set forth below.

• Requires half of each year's calculated amount for the first 15 years be used to pay specified types of debt or other long-term liabilities. The other half must be deposited into the BSA. After the first 15 years, at least half of each year's deposit will be deposited in the BSA, with the remainder used for supplemental debt or liabilities payments at the option of the Legislature and to the extent not so used also deposited into the BSA.

• Allows the withdrawal of funds from the BSA only for a disaster or if spending remains at or below the highest level of spending from the past three years. The maximum amount that can be withdrawn in the first year of a recession is limited to half of the BSA balance.

• Creates the Public School System Stabilization Account ("PSSSA"), a special fund that serves as a Proposition 98 reserve, in which spikes in funding will be saved for future years. This will smooth school spending and thereby minimize future cuts. This reserve does not change the Proposition 98 minimum guarantee calculation, and transfers to the PS SSA will not occur until various operational and economic conditions are met.

A-53

• Sets the maximum size to be reserved in the BSA at 10 percent of General Fund tax revenues. When the amount in the BSA is equal to its then maximum size any amount that otherwise would have been deposited in the BSA may be spent only on infrastructure, including deferred maintenance.

Proposition 2 also requires that the state provide a multiyear budget forecast to help better manage the state's longer term finances.

Under current projections, Proposition 2 will result in $11.5 billion in the BSA by fiscal year 2020-21 (including a $1.8 billion deposit to the BSA in fiscal year 2016-17 above the amount required by law) and $7.9 billion in additional reductions of debts and liabilities in its first six years of operation. See Table 6 for the current debt payment plan.

ST ATE FINANCES - OTHER ELEMENTS

Pension Systems

The state participates in two principal retirement systems, CalPERS and CalSTRS. In each case, the state makes annual contributions from the General Fund. Additional contributions are made by other employers which are part of the systems, and by employees. The state's annual contribution to CalPERS is determined by the CalPERS Board of Administration, and depends upon a variety of factors, including future investment performance, actuarial assumptions, and additional potential changes in retirement benefits. The state's annual contribution to CalSTRS is set by statute, and the CalSTRS Board has limited authority to adjust the state's contribution. The state has always made its mandatory contributions. General Fund contributions to CalPERS and CalSTRS are projected to be approximately $3.5 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, for fiscal year 2017-18.

Both systems currently have unfunded liabilities in the tens of billions of dollars, and both systems have taken steps in recent years to address these gaps, which will result in increased state contributions in future years. Detailed information about the two retirement systems, including information regarding the unfunded liabilities of each system, is contained in EXHIBIT 1 - "PENSION SYSTEMS."

Retiree Health Care Costs

In addition to a pension, as described in EXHIBIT 1 - "PENSION SYSTEMS," the state also provides retiree health care and dental benefits to its retired employees and their spouses and dependents (when applicable), and, except as otherwise described below, utilizes a "pay-as-yougo" funding policy. These benefits are referred to as "Other Postemployment Benefits" or "OPEB."

As of June 30, 2016, approximately 178,750 retirees were enrolled to receive health benefits and 149,560 to receive dental benefits. Generally, employees vest for those benefits after serving 10 years with the state. Additional information on the State's OPEB plan can be found in the state's audited basic financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 included as APPENDIX E to this Official Statement.

A-54

Pursuant to the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, the state now reports on its liability for postemployment healthcare as well as other forms of postemployment benefits, such as life insurance, in its annual financial reports. The long-term costs for the state's OPEB may negatively affect the state's financial condition and impact its credit rating if the state does not adequately manage such costs.

On January 25, 2017, the State Controller's Office released the state's latest OPEB actuarial valuation report by the private actuarial firm, Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company ("GRS"), which was tasked with calculating the state's liability for these benefits. The actuarial valuation contained in the report covers the cost estimates for existing employees, retirees and dependents. The main objective of the report was to estimate the Actuarial Accrued Liability ("AAL"), which is the present value of future retiree healthcare costs attributable to employee service earned in prior fiscal years. The report was based on a variety of data and economic, demographic and healthcare trend assumptions described in the report. The primary assumption influencing annual O PEB costs and AAL is the assumed rate of return or discount rate on assets supporting the retiree healthcare liability. Based on PMIA's historical returns, investment policy and expected future returns, a discount rate of 4.25 percent was selected for the pay-as-you-go funding policy. The economic assumptions for price and wage inflation are 2. 75 percent and 3 percent, respectively.

The report looked at three different scenarios: (i) continuation of the "pay-as-you-go" policy; (ii) a "full funding" policy under which assets would be set aside to prepay the future obligations, similar to the way in which pension obligations are funded, and (iii) a "partial funding" policy, a hybrid of the two scenarios. According to the state's OPEB actuarial valuation report, as of June 30, 2016, the pay-as-you go funding policy results in an AAL of $76.68 billion, of which $76.53 billion is unfunded. Additionally, the pay-as-you go funding policy results in an annual OPEB cost of $5.85 billion, estimated employer contributions of $2.07 billion and an expected net OPEB obligation of $29.85 billion for fiscal year 2016-17. The annual required contribution for fiscal year 2017-18 is projected at $5.97 billion.

The actuarial liability increased from $74.19 billion as of June 30, 2015, to $76.68 billion as of June 30, 2016. If the previous assumptions had been realized, the actuarial liability would have increased to $78.13 billion as of June 30, 2016. The key factors contributing to the unexpected decrease in actuarial liabilities of $1.45 billion include:

• During the year, favorable healthcare claims experience and plan design changes, including the new Medicare Advantage program effective January 1, 2016, decreased the actuarial liability by $3. 78 billion. This change in accrued liability is mainly driven by the relationship between the assumed trend rate for claims cost in 2016 used in last year's valuation and the trend rate for 2016 based on actual experience.

• Demographic experience did not change the actuarial liabilities significantly. There were most likely offsetting gains and losses that led to this minimal change.

A-55

• Trend rates for the June 30, 2016, valuation were reviewed and updated since the last valuation. The trend rates are assumed to be 8.00 percent beginning in 2018 graded down to an ultimate rate of 4.50 percent beginning in 2023. This assumption change increased the liabilities by approximately $1.87 billion.

The valuation depended primarily on the interest discount rate assumption of 4.25% used to develop the present value of future benefits and on the assets available to pay benefits. The SCO plans to issue an actuarial valuation report annually.

The following table is the historic annual OPEB cost summary and the projected schedule of funding progress as of the valuation date for the five fiscal years indicated below:

TABLE18 OPEB Pay-As-You-Go Funding


Unfunded Annual Net Percentage of Actuarial

Fiscal OPEB Employer Annual OPEB Cost NetOPEB Accrued Year Cost Contribution Contribution Obligation Liability(bl

2012-13 $4.99 $1.78 36% $16.12 $64.57

2013-14 5.12 1.87 37 19.36 71.77

2014-15 5.13 2 01 39 22.48 74.10

2015-16 5.69 2.10 37 26.0 76.53

2016-17(•) 5.85 2.07 35 29.85 NIA

(a) Net employer contribution and Net OPEB Obligation estimated for fiscal year ending June 30, 2017.

(b) Ammmts are projected as of the valuation date. NIA Not available Source: State of California OPEB Valuation as of hme 30, 2016.

Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability as Percent of Payroll(bl

358%

373

367

380

NIA

The following table illustrates the state's budget for postemployment benefits from fiscal years 2013-14 to 2017-18 and does not reflect any future liability for current employees or annuitants. It is anticipated that these costs will continue to grow in the future. The employer contribution for health premiums maintains the average 100190 percent contribution formula established in the Government Code. Under this formula, the state averages the premiums of the four largest health benefit plans in order to calculate the maximum amount the state will contribute toward each retiree's health benefits. The state also contributes 90 percent of this average for the health benefits of each of the retiree's dependents.

Generally, with 10 years of service credit, employees are entitled to 50 percent of the state's full contribution. This rate increases by 5 percent per year and with 20 years of service, the employee is entitled to the full 100190 formula. CSU employees fully vest for the 100190 formula at 5 years of service. An agreement between the CSU Board of Trustees and the California Faculty Association doubles the vesting period for CSU faculty hired after July 1, 2017 from 5 years to 10 years. Most state employees hired after January 1, 2016, or January 1, 2017, are subject to a longer vesting schedule and an 80180 contribution formula. The effective date varies by contract.

A-56

Fiscal Year 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-l 7Cc) 2017-lSCc)

TABLE19 Actual Costs/Budget for

Other Postemployment Benefits

(Dollars in Thousands)

State State CSU Total Employees All Employees Employees All Contributions

Funds(a) General Fund General Fund All Funds $ 1,382,717 $ 1,378,709 $ 225,332 $ 1,608,049

1,461,931 1,455,931 255,638 1,717,569 1,556,348 1,551,748 263,459 1,819,807 1,646,829 1,642,229 272,695 1,919,524 1,783,118 1,778,518 295,283 2,078,401

Total General Fund Contributions $ 1,604,0410)

1,711,569 1,815,207 1,914,924 2,073,801

(a) "Pay-as-you-go" contributions from General Fund and Public Employee's Contingency Reserve Flllld.

(b) Contributions for posternployrnent benefits are included for all years displayed in this table.

(c) Estimated Contributions.


In accordance with state law, the Bureau of State Audits periodically identifies what it believes to be "high risk" issues facing the state. The funding of OPEB liabilities has been identified as a high-risk issue in the California State Auditor Report 2013-60 I dated September 2013.

1. Ongoing Efforts

In 2015, the Administration initiated a comprehensive strategy to eliminate the OPEB unfunded AAL over approximately 30 years by increasing prefunding shared equally between state employers and employees and reducing the cost structure of employee and retiree health care benefits. The Administration is pursuing the prefunding strategy, as well as changes to retiree health benefits for new employees, through the collective bargaining process. Statutory language passed as part of the 2015-16 Budget contains the funding policy and framework designed to support the elimination of the unfunded AAL.

The centerpiece of the strategy is a collective bargaining proposal to negotiate contributions for OPEB prefunding equivalent to the normal costs of those benefits. The goal is to have the additional contributions equally shared between employers and employees and phased in over a three-year period. Collective bargaining has concluded for nearly all expired contracts, and recently negotiated contracts include MOUs requiring matching contributions to an OPEB trust fund to set aside 100 percent of the actuarially determined "normal costs." The funding schedule for these agreements generally phases in contributions over three years beginning July I, 2016, July I, 2017, or July I, 2018, depending on the bargaining unit. Additionally, new employees will be subject to a lower employer contribution for future retiree health benefits, and a longer vesting period to qualify for the retiree health care contribution. State employees of the judicial branch are also subject to the prefunding strategy and retiree health provisions.

Additionally, as part of Chapter 2, Statutes of 2016 (AB 133), the 2015 Budget Act was amended to include a one-time allocation of $240 million to pay down the state's unfunded

A-57

liability for retiree health care. Currently, the state has approximately $400 million set aside in the prefunding trust fund to pay for future retiree health benefits. By the end of the 2017-18, the trust fund balance is projected to more than double and approach $1 billion in assets.

The funding plan to eliminate the OPEB unfunded actuarial accrued liability assumes that the state continues to pay for retiree health benefits on a pay-as-you-go basis while assets are accumulated in a trust fund, and that no investment income will be used to pay for benefits until the plan is fully funded. Statutory language passed as part of the 2015-16 Budget contains the framework for this funding plan preventing the use of investment income from the retiree health care trust fund for the payment of retiree health benefits until the earlier of:

1. The date the state bargaining unit subaccount within the trust fund reaches a 100 percent funded ratio.

2. July 1, 2046-the date the actuarial calculation of the Administration's prefunding plan is expected to reach a 100 percent funded ratio.

State Appropriations Limit

The state is subject to an annual appropriations limit imposed by the state Constitution (the "Appropriations Limit"). The Appropriations Limit does not restrict appropriations to pay debt service on voter-authorized bonds.

The state is prohibited from spending "appropriations subject to limitation" in excess of the Appropriations Limit. "Appropriations subject to limitation," with respect to the state, are authorizations to spend "proceeds of taxes," which consist of tax revenues, and certain other funds, including proceeds from regulatory licenses, user charges or other fees to the extent that such proceeds exceed "the cost reasonably borne by that entity in providing the regulation, product or service," but "proceeds of taxes" exclude most state subventions to local governments, tax refunds and some benefit payments such as unemployment insurance. No limit is imposed on appropriations of funds which are not "proceeds of taxes," such as reasonable user charges or fees and certain other non-tax funds.

There are various types of appropriations excluded from the Appropriations Limit. For example, debt service costs of bonds existing or authorized by January 1, 1979, or subsequently authorized by the voters, appropriations required to comply with mandates of courts or the federal government, appropriations for qualified capital outlay projects, appropriations for tax refunds, appropriations of revenues derived from any increase in gasoline taxes and motor vehicle weight fees above January 1, 1990 levels, and appropriation of certain special taxes imposed by initiative (e.g., cigarette and tobacco taxes) are all excluded. The Appropriations Limit may also be exceeded in cases of emergency.

The Appropriations Limit in each year is based on the Appropriations Limit for the prior year, adjusted annually for changes in state per capita personal income and changes in population, and adjusted, when applicable, for any transfer of financial responsibility of providing services to or from another unit of government or any transfer of the financial source for the provisions of services from tax proceeds to non-tax proceeds. The measurement of change in population is a blended average of statewide overall population growth and the change

A-58

in attendance at local school and connnunity college ("K-14") districts. The Appropriations Limit is tested over consecutive two-year periods. Any excess of the aggregate "proceeds of taxes" received over such two-year period above the combined Appropriations Limits for those two years is divided equally between transfers to K-14 districts and refunds to taxpayers.

An estimate of the Appropriations Limit is included in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, and is thereafter subject to the budget process and established in the Budget Act.

The following table shows the Appropriations Limit for fiscal years 2013-14 through 2017-18.

TABLE20 State Appropriations Limit


Fiscal Year

State Appropriations Limit

Appropriations Subject to Limit

Amount (Over)/Under Limit

(a) Estimated/projected.

2013-14

$89,716

-71,352

$18,364


Local Government Impacts on State Finances

2014-15 2015-16

$89,902 $94,042

-78,274 -69,15)(<)

$11,628 $24,891 (a)

2016-17 2017-18

$99,787 $102,991 (a)

-72,802(<) -78,232(<)

$26,985(<) $24,759(<)

The primary units of local government in California are the 5 8 counties, which range in population from approximately 1,200 in Alpine County to approximately 10.2 million in Los Angeles County. As summarized below, the fiscal condition of local governments and the relationship between local and state government finances can have an impact on the state's financial condition and flexibility.

1. Constitutional and Statutory Limitations

Counties are responsible for the provision of many basic services, including indigent health care, welfare, jails, and public safety in unincorporated areas. There are also 482 incorporated cities in California and thousands of special districts formed for education, utilities, and other services. The fiscal condition of local governments was changed when Proposition 13 was approved by California voters in 1978. Proposition 13 reduced and limited the future growth of property taxes and limited the ability of local governments to impose "special taxes" (those devoted to a specific purpose) without two-thirds voter approval.

Proposition 218, another constitutional amendment enacted by initiative in 1996, further limited the ability of local governments to raise taxes, fees, and other exactions. The limitations include requiring a majority vote approval for general local tax increases, prohibiting fees for services in excess of the cost of providing such service, and providing that no fee may be charged for fire, police, or any other service widely available to the public.

A-59

In the aftermath of Proposition 13, the state provided aid to local governments from the General Fund to make up some of the loss of property tax moneys, including assuming principal responsibility for funding K-12 schools and community colleges. During the recession of the early 1990s, the Legislature reduced the post-Proposition 13 aid to local government entities other than K-12 schools and community colleges by requiring cities and counties to transfer some of their property tax revenues to school districts. However, the Legislature also provided additional funding sources, such as sales taxes, and reduced certain mandates for local services funded by cities and counties.

The 2004 Budget Act, related legislation and the enactment of Proposition IA of 2004 and Proposition 22 in 2010 dramatically changed the state-local fiscal relationship. These constitutional and statutory changes implemented an agreement negotiated between the Governor and local government officials (the "state-local agreement") in connection with the 2004 Budget Act. One change relates to the reduction of the vehicle license fee ("VLF") rate from 2 percent to 0.65 percent of the market value of the vehicle. In order to protect local governments, which had previously received all VLF revenues, the 1.35 percent reduction in VLF revenue to cities and counties from this rate change was backfilled ( or offset) by an increase in the amount of property tax revenues they receive. This worked to the benefit of local governments because the backfill amount annually increases in proportion to the growth in property tax revenues, which has historically grown at a higher rate than VLF revenues, although property tax revenues declined between fiscal years 2009-10 and 2011-12. This arrangement will continue without change in the 2017-18 Budget.

As part of the state-local agreement, voters at the November 2004 election approved Proposition I A ("Proposition I A of 2004"). Proposition I A of 2004 amended the state Constitution to, among other things, reduce the Legislature's authority over local government revenue sources by placing restrictions on the state's access to local governments' property, sales, and VLF revenues as of November 3, 2004.

Proposition 22, adopted on November 2, 2010, supersedes Proposition IA of 2004 and prohibits any future borrowing by the state from local government funds, and generally prohibits the Legislature from making changes in local government funding sources. Allocation of local transportation funds cannot be changed without an extensive process.

2. Property Tax Revenues

Although the property tax is a local revenue source, the amount of property tax generated each year has a substantial impact on the state budget because local property tax revenues allocated to K-14 schools typically offset General Fund expenditures.

Statewide property tax revenues are estimated to increase 5.9 percent in fiscal year 2016-17 and 5.3 percent in fiscal year 2017-18. See Table 10 (Proposition 98 Funding) for information on the impact of these growth rates on the funding of the Proposition 98 guarantee. Property tax estimates used in the calculation of the guarantee are based on growth in statewide property taxes, but also include other factors such as excess tax, dissolved redevelopment agency funds, and the shift of property taxes from local governments to K-14 schools (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund).

A-60

3. Dissolved Redevelopment Agency Funds

Redevelopment agencies ("RDAs") were dissolved on February I, 2012, and their functions have been taken over by successor agencies tasked with winding down the RD As' affairs. Property tax revenue that would have gone to RDAs is now redirected to other local taxing entities, including cities, counties, school and community college districts, and special districts, after payments are made for (I) pre-existing "pass through" payments to local agencies, (2) the former RDAs' debts (also known as enforceable obligations), and (3) limited administrative costs.

Revenues distributed to school and community college districts result in corresponding savings for the state's General Fund. For the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, Proposition 98 General Fund savings are anticipated to be $1.3 billion in fiscal year 2016-17, $1.4 billion in fiscal year 2017-18, and$ 1.6 billion in fiscal year 2018-19. Proposition 98 General Fund savings are anticipated to be at least $1 billion in each fiscal year after fiscal year 2018-19, with annual growth proportionate to the changes in property tax growth, and the rate at which the enforceable obligations of the former RD As are retired.

Various local governments have disputed the implementation of the dissolution law and litigation is pending. See "LITIGATION-Budget-Related Litigation - Actions Challenging Statutes Which Reformed California Redevelopment Law."

4. Realigning Services to Local Governments

The 2011 Budget Act included a major realignment of public safety programs from the state to local governments ("AB I 09"). The realignment was designed to move program and fiscal responsibility to the level of government that can best provide the service, eliminate duplication of effort, generate savings, and increase flexibility. The implementation of the Community Corrections Grant Program authorized by AB 109 moved lower-level offenders from state prisons to county supervision and reduced the number of parole violators in the state's prisons. Other realigned programs include local public safety programs, mental health, substance abuse, foster care, child welfare services, and adult protective services. The 2011 Realignment is funded through two sources in fiscal year 2017-18: (I) a state special fund sales tax of 1.0625 percent (projected to total $6.9 billion) and (2) $643.7 million in vehicle license fees. As a result of realignment, General Fund savings have been over $2.0 billion annually from the realigned programs beginning in fiscal year 2011-12. The state estimates savings of $2. 7 billion in fiscal year 2016-17, and $2.8 billion in fiscal year 2017-18.

CASH MANAGEMENT

Traditional Cash Management Tools

1. General

The majority of the state's General Fund receipts are received in the latter part of the fiscal year. Disbursements from the General Fund occur more evenly throughout the fiscal year. The state's cash management program customarily addresses this timing difference by making

A-61

use of internal borrowing (see "-Internal Borrowing") and by issuing short-term notes in the capital markets when necessary (see "-External Borrowing").

2. Internal Borrowing

The General Fund is currently authorized by law to borrow for cash management purposes from more than 700 of the state's approximately 1,300 other funds in the State Treasury (the "special funds" and each a "special fund"). Total borrowing from special funds must be approved quarterly by the Pooled Money Investment Board ("PMIB"). The State Controller submits an authorization request to the PMIB quarterly, based on forecasted available funds and borrowing needs. The Legislature may from time to time adopt legislation establishing additional authority to borrow from special funds. As of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, the General Fund is projected to have up to approximately $32 billion of internal funds ( excluding the BSA and the SFEU) available during fiscal year 2017-18. See "-Inter-Fund Borrowings" for a further description of this process. See Table 21 for estimates of internal borrowable resources as of June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2018.

One fund from which moneys may be borrowed to provide additional cash resources to the General Fund is the BSA, which is projected to be funded at $7.9 billion by the end of fiscal year 2017-18. The state also may transfer funds into the General Fund from the SFEU, which is not a special fund. See "-Inter-Fund Borrowings" and "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES - Budget Reserves" for a further description of this process.

3. External Borrowing

External borrowing has typically been done with revenue anticipation notes ("RANs") that are payable not later than the last day of the fiscal year in which they are issued. Prior to fiscal year 2015-16, RANs had been issued in all but one fiscal year since the mid-1980s and have always been paid at maturity. No RANs were issued in fiscal year 2015-16 or are planned in fiscal year 2016-17 or 2017-18. See "-Cash Management Borrowings." The state also is authorized under certain circumstances to issue revenue anticipation warrants ("RAW s") that are payable in the succeeding fiscal year. The state issued RA Ws to bridge short-term cash management shortages in the early 1990's and early 2000's. See "-State WarrantsReimbursement Warrants" for more information on RAWs.

RANs and RA Ws are both payable from any "Unapplied Money" in the General Fund on their maturity date, subject to the prior application of such money in the General Fund to pay Priority Payments. "Priority Payments" consist of: (i) the setting apart of state revenues in support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education ( as provided in Section 8 of Article XVI of the state Constitution); (ii) payment of the principal of and interest on general obligation bonds and general obligation commercial paper notes of the state as and when due; (iii) a contingent obligation for General Fund payments to local governments for certain costs for realigned public safety programs if not provided from a share of state sales and use taxes, as provided in Article XIII, Section 36 of the state Constitution, enacted by Proposition 30 (see "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Restrictions on Raising or Using General Fund Revenues"); (iv) reimbursement

A-62

from the General Fund to any special fund or account to the extent such reimbursement is legally required to be made to repay borrowings therefrom pursuant to Government Code Sections 16310 or 16418; and (v) payment of state employees' wages and benefits, state payments to pension and other state employee benefit trust funds, state Medi-Cal claims, lease payments to support lease-revenue bonds, and any amounts determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be required by federal law or the state Constitution to be paid with state warrants that can be cashed immediately. See "-State Warrants."

Inter-Fund Borrowings

Inter-fund borrowing is used to meet temporary imbalances of receipts and disbursements in the General Fund. In the event the General Fund is or will be exhausted, the State Controller is required to notify the Governor and the PMIB ( comprised of the Director of Finance, the State Treasurer and the State Controller). The Governor may then order the State Controller to direct the transfer of all or any part of the moneys not needed in special funds to the General Fund, as determined by the PMIB. All money so transferred must be returned to the special fund from which it was transferred as soon as there is sufficient money in the General Fund to do so. Transfers cannot be made which will interfere with the objective for which such special fund was created, or from certain specific funds.

The amount of loans from the SFEU, the BSA and other internal sources to the General Fund, as of the end of any month is displayed in the State Controller's Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements, on the first page under "Borrowable Resources -Outstanding Loans." See EXHIBIT 2 to APPENDIX A.

Enactment of Proposition 22 in November 2010 prohibited future inter-fund borrowing from certain transportation funds. However, legislation was enacted on February 3, 2012 to clarify the intent of Proposition 22, making most transportation funds available for short-term cash management borrowing purposes.

In addition to temporary inter-fund cash management borrowings described in this section, budgets enacted in the current and past fiscal years have included other budgetary transfers and long-term loans from special funds to the General Fund. In some cases, such budgetary loans and transfers have the effect of reducing internal borrowable resources.


A-63

The following table shows internal borrowable resources available for temporary cash management loans to the General Fund on June 30 of each of the fiscal years 2013-14 through 2015-16 and projects the amount available in fiscal year 2016-17 and 2017-18 based on the 2017 Governor's Budget. See EXHIBIT 2 to APPENDIX A. The amount of internal borrowable resources fluctuates throughout the year.

TABLE21 Internal Borrowable Resources

(Cash Basis) (Dollars in Millions)

Fiscal year ended June 30 2014 2015 2016 2017(3 ) 2018(3)

Available Internal Borrowable Resources $23,761.5 $28,2913 $35,865.5 $39,834.2 $40,993.6

Outstanding Loans

From Special Flllld for Economic Uncertainties 0.0 CD 0.0 1,750.2 1,554.4 Budget Stabilization Account 0.0 CD 646.1 5,550.4 4,526.3 From Special Fllllds and Accounts 0.0 CD 0.1 0.0 0.0

Total Outstanding Internal $0.0 $0.0 $(646.2) $(7,300.6) $(6,080.7) Loans

Unused Internal Borrowable Resources $23,761.5 $28,291.3 $35,219.3 $32,533.6 $34,912.9

(a) Estimated.

Source: Years ended hme 30, 2014 through hme 30, 2016: State of California, Office of the State Controller. Years ending hme 30, 2017 and June 30, 2018: State of California, Department of Finance.

Cash Management Borrowings

As part of its cash management program, prior to fiscal year 2015-16 the state regularly issued short-term obligations to meet cash management needs. See "Traditional Case Management Tools-External Borrowing" above.

The following table shows the amount of RANs issued since 2011-12. No RANs were issued in 2015-16 or are planned in the current fiscal year.


A-64

TABLE22 State of California Revenue Anticipation Notes Issued


*

Fiscal Year 2011-12

2012-13

2013-14

2014-15

Type Interim Notes Series A Notes SeriesA-1 Notes Series A-2 Notes Series B (B-1 & B-2) Notes Series A-1 Notes Series A-2 Notes Series A-1 Notes Series A-2 Notes

Redemption date.

Source: State of California, Office of the State Treasurer.

Principal Amount

$54 0.5 4.9 1.0 2.5 7.5 1.5 4.0 2.8

Cash Management in Fiscal Years 2015-16 and 2016-17

Date of Issue July 28, 2011

September 22, 2011 September 22, 2011

February 22, 2012 August 23, 2012 August 23, 2012 August 22, 2013 August 22, 2013

September 23, 2014

Maturity or Redemption Date

September 22, 2011 * May 24, 2012 June 26, 2012 June 28, 2012 May 30, 2013 June 20, 2013 May 28, 2014 June 23, 2014 June 22, 2015

The state's cash position was strong entering fiscal year 2015-16, as the General Fund ended the previous year with a positive cash balance of $2.529 billion. The state's cash flow projections for fiscal year 2015-16 indicated that internal borrowings would be sufficient and available to meet the normal peaks and valleys of the state's cash needs, while maintaining a cushion at all times of at least $2.5 billion. Accordingly, the state did not issue any RANs in fiscal year 2015-16, only the second time this has occurred since the commencement of annual RANs borrowings in the early 1980s.

The state entered fiscal year 2016-17 in a strong cash pos1t10n, with General Fund internal loans at June 30, 2016 of only $646 million. Cash flow projections for the balance of the fiscal year show no plan for a RAN borrowing to manage cash requirements, with an estimated cash cushion of unused internal borrowable resources of at least $20 billion at the end of each month. Taking into account intra-month cash flows, the State Controller's Office projects that the state will have a cash cushion of at least $15 billion at any time during the year (including the availability of $3.4 billion to $6. 7 billion in the BSA).

State fiscal officers constantly monitor the state's cash position and if it appears that cash resources may become inadequate (including the maintenance of a projected cash reserve of at least $2.5 billion at any time), they will consider the use of other cash management techniques as described in this section, including seeking additional legislation.

Other Cash Management Tools

The state has employed additional cash management measures during some fiscal years; all of the following techniques were used at one time or another during the last several fiscal years, but none of them is planned to be used in fiscal year 2016-17.

• The State Controller has delayed certain types of disbursements from the General Fund.

A-65

• Legislation was enacted increasing the state's internal borrowing capability, and the state has increased the General Fund's internal borrowings. See "-InterFund Borrowings."

• Legislation has been enacted deferring some of the state's disbursements until later in the then-current fiscal year, when more cash receipts are expected.

• The issuance of registered warrants (commonly referred to as "IOUs") because of insufficient cash resources (last occurred in 2009). See "-State Warrants" for an explanation of registered warrants.

From time to time, the Legislature changes by statute the due date for various payments, including those owed to public schools, universities and local governments, until a later date in the fiscal year in order to more closely align the state's revenues with its expenditures. This technique has been used several times in the last few fiscal years. Some of these statutory deferrals were made permanent, and others were implemented only for one fiscal year.

In addition, state law gives the State Controller some flexibility as to how quickly the state must pay its bills. For instance, income tax refunds for personal income taxes are not legally due until 45 days after the return filing deadline, which is normally April 15. Accordingly, while the state has typically paid tax refunds as returns are filed, it can conserve cash by withholding refund payments until after the April 15 due date. Payments to vendors generally must be made within 45 days of receipt of an invoice. The state may delay payment until the end of this period, or it may even choose to make these payments later and pay interest. These delays are only used if the State Controller foresees a relatively short-term cash flow shortage.

State Warrants

No money may be drawn from the State Treasury except upon a warrant duly issued by the State Controller. The State Controller is obligated to draw every warrant on the fund out of which it is payable for the payment of money directed by state law to be paid out of the State Treasury; however, a warrant may not be drawn unless authorized by law and unless unexhausted specific appropriations provided by law are available to meet it. As described above, state law provides two methods for the State Controller to respond if the General Fund has insufficient "Unapplied Money" available to pay a warrant when it is drawn, referred to generally as "registered warrants" and "reimbursement warrants." "Unapplied Money" consists of money in the General Fund for which outstanding warrants have not already been drawn and which would remain in the General Fund if all outstanding warrants previously drawn and then due were paid subject to the prior application of such money to obligations of the state with a higher priority. See "CASH MANAGEMENT-Traditional Cash Management Tools." Unapplied Money may include moneys transferred to the General Fund from the SFEU and the BSA and internal borrowings from state special funds (to the extent permitted by law); however the state is not obligated to utilize interfund borrowings for the payment of state obligations if insufficient Unapplied Money is available for such payment. See "-Inter-Fund Borrowings" and "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-Budget Reserves."

A-66

1. Registered Warrants

If a warrant is drawn on the General Fund for an amount in excess of the amount of Unapplied Money in the General Fund, after deducting from such Unapplied Money the amount, as estimated by the State Controller, required by law to be earmarked, reserved or set apart from the Unapplied Money for the payment of obligations having priority over obligations to which such warrant is applicable, the warrant must be registered on the reverse side as not paid because of the shortage of funds in the General Fund. The State Controller may issue registered warrants before exhausting all cash management tools ( described above) that could provide Unapplied Money to the General Fund.

Registered warrants are interest bearing obligations that may be issued either with or without a maturity date. Most registered warrants bear interest at a rate designated by the PMIB up to a maximum of five percent per annum except, if the PMIB determines that it is in the best interests of the state to do so, the PMIB may fix the rate of interest paid on registered warrants at no more than 12 percent per annum. If issued with a maturity date, the principal and interest on such warrant will not be due until that date ( although it may be optionally redeemed early if the state has sufficient Unapplied Money to do so) and the state may make other payments prior to that maturity date. If a registered warrant is issued without a maturity date, or its maturity date has occurred, it becomes redeemable by the holders on the date determined by the State Controller, with the approval of the PMIB.

State law generally requires that registered warrants be redeemable in the order they are issued but not prior to their maturity date, if any. The state last issued registered warrants in 2009. The State Controller was able to manage cash resources to ensure that higher Priority Payments, such as for schools and debt service, were made on time when registered warrants were issued. The issuance of the registered warrants permitted the state to pay Priority Payments with regular warrants which could be cashed.

2. Reimbursement Warrants

In lieu of issuing individual registered warrants to numerous creditors, state law provides an alternative procedure whereby the Governor, upon request of the State Controller, may authorize utilizing the General Cash Revolving Fund in the State Treasury to borrow from other state special funds to meet payments authorized by law. The State Controller may then issue "reimbursement warrants" (sometimes called "revenue anticipation warrants" or "RA Ws") for sale to investors to reimburse the General Cash Revolving Fund, thereby increasing cash resources for the General Fund to cover required payments. The General Cash Revolving Fund exists solely to facilitate the issuance of reimbursement warrants. Reimbursement warrants have a fixed maturity date which may not be later than the end of the fiscal year following the year in which they were issued.

The principal of and interest on reimbursement warrants must be paid by the State Treasurer on their respective maturity dates from any Unapplied Money in the General Fund and available for such payment. In the event that Unapplied Money is not available for payment on the respective maturity dates of reimbursement warrants, and refunding reimbursement warrants (see "-Refunding Reimbursement Warrants") have not been sold at such times as necessary to

A-67

pay such reimbursement warrants, such reimbursement warrants will be paid, together with all interest due thereon (including interest accrued at the original interest rate after the maturity date), at such times as the State Controller, with the approval of the PMIB, may determine.

The state has issued reimbursement warrants on several occasions in order to meet its cash needs when state revenues were reduced because of a recession, and the state incurred budget deficits. The state last issued reimbursement warrants in June 2002 and in June 2003.

3. Refunding Reimbursement Warrants

If it appears to the State Controller that, on the maturity date of any reimbursement warrant there will not be sufficient Unapplied Money in the General Fund to pay maturing reimbursement warrants, the State Controller is authorized under state law, with the written approval of the State Treasurer, to issue and sell refunding reimbursement warrants to refund the prior, maturing reimbursement warrants. Proceeds of such refunding reimbursement warrants must be used exclusively to repay the maturing warrants. In all other respects, refunding reimbursement warrants are treated like reimbursement warrants, as described above.

STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

General

The State Treasurer is responsible for the sale of most debt obligations of the state and its various authorities and agencies. The state has always paid when due the principal of and interest on its general obligation bonds, general obligation commercial paper notes, leaserevenue obligations and short-term obligations, including RANs and RAWs. Additional information regarding the state's long-term debt appears in the section "STATE DEBT TABLES."

Capital Facilities Financing

1. General Obligation Bonds

The state Constitution prohibits the creation of general obligation indebtedness of the state unless a bond measure is approved by a majority of the electorate voting at a general election or a direct primary. Each general obligation bond act provides a continuing appropriation from the General Fund of amounts for the payment of debt service on the related general obligation bonds, subject under state law only to the prior application of moneys in the General Fund to the support of the public school system and public institutions of higher education. Under the state Constitution, appropriations to pay debt service on any general obligation bonds cannot be repealed until the principal of and interest on such bonds have been paid. See "STATE FINANCES-REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND RESERVES-State Expenditures." Certain general obligation bond programs, called "self-liquidating bonds," receive revenues from specified sources so that moneys from the General Fund are not expected to be needed to pay debt service, but the General Fund will pay the debt service, pursuant to the continuing appropriation contained in the bond act, if the specified revenue source is not sufficient. The principal self-liquidating general obligation bond program for the state is the

A-68

veterans general obligation bonds, which are supported by mortgage repayments from housing loans made to military veterans of the state.

General obligation bonds are typically authorized for infrastructure and other capital improvements at the state and local level. Pursuant to the state Constitution, general obligation bonds cannot be used to finance state budget deficits.

A summary of the general obligation bonds outstanding as well as authorized by the voters but unissued, as of February 1, 2017, is set forth in the following table. For greater detail, see the table "Authorized and Outstanding General Obligation Bonds" following the caption "STATE DEBT TABLES." Monthly updates of the State Debt Tables are available on the website of the State Treasurer.

General Obligation Bonds (as of February 1, 2017)

Authorized and Outstanding Authorized but Unissued *

Primarily Payable from General Fund

$73.5 billion

*

Self-Liquidating

$751.5 million

Primarily Payable from General Fund

$35.6 billion

Self-Liquidating

$367.9 million

May first be issued as commercial paper notes (see "General Obligation Commercial Paper Program" below).

In November, 2016 voters approved an initiative measure to authorize $9 billion of general obligation bonds for K-14 school construction (which is included in the figure above for unissued general obligation bonds).

2. Variable Rate General Obligation Bonds

The state's general obligation bond law permits the state to issue as variable rate indebtedness up to 20 percent of the aggregate amount of its long-term general obligation bonds outstanding. These bonds are described generally in the following table and represent about 5.00 percent of the state's total outstanding general obligation bonds. With respect to the $1,175,000,000 of variable rate general obligation bonds having mandatory tender dates, if these bonds cannot be remarketed on their respective scheduled mandatory tender dates, there is no default but the interest rate on the series of such bonds not remarketed on such date would be increased in installments thereafter until such bonds can be remarketed or refunded or are paid at maturity.


A-69

Type of Bonds

General Obligation

General Obligation

General Obligation

General Obligation

TOTAL

Outstanding Principal Amount ($000) as of

February 1, 2017

$2,452,690

500,000

675,000

98,100

$3,725,790

(a) See "Bank Arrangements Table."

Current Variable Rate Interest Mode

Daily/Weekly VRDO

Liquidity SupporfCa)

Letters of Credit

Indexed Floating Rate to None Respective Mandatory Tender Dates

Fixed Term Rate to Respective None Mandatory Tender Dates

Indexed Floating Rate to None Respective Maturity Dates


Other Information

Mandatory Tenders on December 1, 2017, May 1, 2018, December 3, 2018, December 1, 2020, and December 1, 2021

Mandatory Tenders on December 1, 2017, December 2, 2019 and December 1, 2021

Fixed Maturities on each May 1 in the years 2017 through 2020

The state is obligated to redeem, on the applicable purchase date, any weekly and daily variable rate demand obligations ("VRDOs") tendered for purchase if there is a failure to pay the related purchase price of such VRDOs on such purchase date from proceeds of the remarketing thereof, or from liquidity support related to such VRDOs. The state has not entered into any interest rate hedging contracts in relation to any of its variable rate general obligation bonds.

3. General Obligation Commercial Paper Program

Pursuant to legislation enacted in 1995, voter-approved general obligation indebtedness may be issued either as long-term bonds or, for some but not all bond acts, as commercial paper notes. Commercial paper notes may be renewed or may be refunded by the issuance of bonds. The state uses commercial paper notes to provide flexibility for bond programs, such as to provide interim funding for voter-approved projects or to facilitate refunding of variable rate bonds into fixed rate bonds. Commercial paper notes are not included in the calculation of permitted variable rate indebtedness described under "Variable Rate General Obligation Bonds." As of February I, 2017, a total of $2.225 billion in principal amount of commercial paper notes is authorized under agreements with various banks, including an agreement for the direct purchase of up to $500 million of commercial paper notes by a bank. See "BANK ARRANGEMENTS TABLE" for a list of the credit agreements supporting the commercial paper program.

4. Bank Arrangements

In connection with VRDOs and the commercial paper program ("CP"), the state has entered into a number of reimbursement agreements or other credit agreements with a variety of financial institutions as set forth in "BANK ARRANGEMENTS TABLE." These agreements include various representations and covenants of the state, and the terms (including interest rates and repayment schedules) by which the state would be required to pay or repay any obligations thereunder (including reimbursement of drawings resulting from any failed remarketings). To the extent that VRDOs or CP offered to the public cannot be remarketed over an extended period ( whether due to downgrades of the credit ratings of the institution providing credit enhancement

A-70

or other factors) and the applicable financial institution is obligated to purchase VRDOs or CP, interest payable by the state pursuant to the reimbursement agreement or credit agreement would generally increase over current market levels relating to the VRDOs or CP, and, with respect to VRDOs the principal repayment period would generally be shorter (typically less than five years) than the repayment period otherwise applicable to the VRDOs. In addition, after the occurrence of certain events of default as specified in a credit agreement, payment of the related VRDOs may be further accelerated and payment of related CP, as applicable, may also be accelerated and interest payable by the State on such VRDOs or CP could increase significantly.

5. Lease-Revenue Obligations

In addition to general obligation bonds, the state acquires and constructs capital facilities through the issuance oflease-revenue obligations ( also referred to as lease-purchase obligations). Such borrowing must be authorized by the Legislature in a separate act or appropriation. Under these arrangements, the State Public Works Board ("SPWB"), another state or local agency or a joint powers authority issued bonds to pay for the acquisition or construction of facilities such as office buildings, university buildings, courthouses or correctional institutions. These facilities are leased to a state agency, the CSU or the Judicial Council under a long-term lease which provides the source of revenues which are pledged to the payment of the debt service on the lease-revenue bonds. Under applicable court decisions, such lease arrangements do not constitute the creation of"indebtedness" within the meaning of the state constitutional provisions that require voter approval. For purposes of APPENDIX A and the tables under "STATE DEBT TABLES," the terms "lease-revenue obligation," "lease-revenue financing," "lease-purchase obligation" or "lease-purchase" mean principally bonds or certificates of participation for capital facilities where the lease payments providing the security are payable from the operating budget of the respective lessees, which are primarily, but not exclusively, derived from the General Fund. A summary of the lease-revenue bonds outstanding as well as those authorized by the Legislature but unissued, as of February 1, 2017, is set forth in the following table.

Lease-Revenue Obligations (as of February 1, 2017)

Outstanding General Fund Supported Issues Authorized but Unissued

$9.6 billion $3 .4 billion

The tables under "STATE DEBT TABLES" do not include equipment leases or leases which were not sold, directly or indirectly, to the public capital markets.

6. Non-Recourse Debt

Certain state agencies and authorities issue revenue obligations for which the General Fund has no liability. These revenue bonds represent obligations payable from state revenueproducing enterprises and projects (e.g., among other revenue sources, taxes, fees and/or tolls) and conduit obligations payable from revenues paid by private users or local governments of facilities financed by the revenue bonds. In each case, such revenue bonds are not payable from the General Fund. The enterprises and projects include transportation projects, various public

A-71

works projects, public and private educational facilities (including the CSU and UC systems), housing, health facilities and pollution control facilities. See the table "State Agency Revenue Bonds and Conduit Financing" under "STATE DEBT TABLES" for a summary of outstanding revenue bonds and notes which are non-recourse to the General Fund as of December 31, 2016.

7. Build America Bonds

In February 2009, Congress enacted certain new municipal bond provisions as part of the federal economic stimulus act ("ARRA"), which allowed municipal issuers such as the state to issue "Build America Bonds" ("BABs") for new infrastructure investments. BABs are bonds whose interest is subject to federal income tax, but pursuant to ARRA the U.S. Treasury was to repay the issuer an amount equal to 35 percent of the interest cost on any BABs issued during 2009 and 2010. The BAB subsidy payments related to general obligation bonds are General Fund revenues to the state, while subsidy payments related to lease-revenue bonds are deposited into a fund which is made available to the SPWB for any lawful purpose. In neither instance are the subsidy payments specifically pledged to repayment of the BABs to which they relate. The cash subsidy payment with respect to the BABs, to which the state is entitled, is treated by the Internal Revenue Service as a refund of a tax credit and such refund may be offset by the Department of the Treasury by any liability of the state payable to the federal government. None of the state's BAB subsidy payments to date have been reduced because of such an offset.

Between April 2009 and December 2010, the state issued $13. 5 billion of BAB general obligation bonds and the SPWB issued $551 million of BAB lease-revenue bonds (of which $150 million have been redeemed). The remaining aggregate amount of the subsidy payments expected to be received from fiscal year 2016-17 through the maturity of the outstanding BABs (mostly 20 to 30 years from issuance) based on the 35 percent subsidy rate is approximately $7.06 billion for the general obligation BABs and $180.3 million for the SPWB lease-revenue BABs.

Pursuant to certain federal budget legislation adopted in August 2011, starting as of March 1, 2013, the government's BAB subsidy payments were reduced as part of a governmentwide "sequestration" of many program expenditures. The impact on the state due to the reduction of the BAB subsidy payment has been less than $30 million annually and is presently scheduled to continue until 2025, although Congress can terminate or modify it sooner, or extend it. None of the BAB subsidy payments are pledged to pay debt service for the general obligation and SPWB BABs, so this reduction will not affect the state's ability to pay its debt service on time, nor have any material impact on the state's General Fund.

Future Issuance Plans; General Fund Debt Ratio

Based on estimates from the Department of Finance, and sales completed in the first half of fiscal year 2016-17, approximately $3.6 billion of new money general obligation bonds (some of which may initially be in the form of commercial paper notes) and approximately $202 million of lease-revenue bonds are expected to be issued in fiscal year 2016-17. Based on estimates from the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, approximately $5.4 billion of new money general obligation bonds are expected to be issued in fiscal year 2017-18. In addition, based on estimates from the Department of Finance, approximately $876 million of new money lease

A-72

revenue bonds are expected to be issued in fiscal year 2017-18. These estimates will be updated by the State Treasurer's Office based on information provided by the Department of Finance with respect to the updated funding needs of, and actual spending by, departments. In addition, the actual amount of bonds sold will depend on other factors such as overall budget constraints, market conditions and other considerations. The state also expects to issue refunding bonds as market conditions warrant.

The ratio of debt service on general obligation and lease-revenue bonds supported by the General Fund, to annual General Fund revenues and transfers (the "General Fund Debt Ratio"), can fluctuate as assumptions for future debt issuance and revenue projections are updated from time to time. Any changes to these assumptions will impact the projected General Fund Debt Ratio. Based on the revenue estimates contained in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget and bond issuance estimates referred to in the preceding paragraph, the General Fund Debt Ratio is estimated to equal approximately 6.56 percent in fiscal year 2016-17 and 6.51 percent in fiscal year 2017-18.

The General Fund Debt Ratio is calculated based on the amount of debt service expected to be paid, without adjusting for receipts from the U.S. Treasury for the state's current outstanding general obligation and lease-revenue BABs or the availability of any special funds that may be used to pay a portion of the debt service to help reduce General Fund costs. The total of these offsets is estimated to equal approximately $1.6 billion for fiscal year 2016-17 and $1.9 billion for fiscal year 2017-18. Including the estimated offsets reduces the General Fund Debt Ratio to 5.24 percent in fiscal year 2016-17 and 5.01 percent in fiscal year 2017-18. The actual General Fund Debt Ratio in future fiscal years will depend on a variety of factors, including actual debt issuance (which may include additional issuance approved in the future by the Legislature and, for general obligation bonds, the voters), actual interest rates, debt service structure, and actual General Fund revenues and transfers.

See the table "OUTSTANDING STATE DEBT, FISCAL YEARS 2011-12 THROUGH 2015-16" under "ST ATE DEBT TABLES" for certain historical ratios of debt service to General Fund receipts.

Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds

In 1998, the state signed a settlement agreement with the four major cigarette manufacturers, in which the participating manufacturers agreed to make payments to the state in perpetuity. Under a separate Memorandum of Understanding, half of the payments made by the cigarette manufacturers are paid to the state and half to certain local governments, subject to certain adjustments.

In 2002, the state established a special purpose trust to purchase the tobacco assets and to issue revenue bonds secured by the tobacco settlement revenues. Legislation in 2003 authorized a credit enhancement mechanism that requires the Governor to request an appropriation from the General Fund in the annual Budget Act for payment of debt service and other related costs in the event tobacco settlement revenues and certain other amounts are insufficient. The Legislature is not obligated to make any General Fund appropriation so requested.

A-73

The credit enhancement mechanism only applies to certain tobacco settlement bonds that were issued in 2005, 2013, and 2015 with an outstanding principal amount of approximately $2.28 billion (the "enhanced bonds"). The enhanced bonds are neither general nor legal obligations of the state and neither the faith and credit, nor the taxing power, nor any other assets or revenues of the state shall be pledged to the payment of the enhanced bonds. However, as described above, the state committed to request the Legislature for a General Fund appropriation in the event there are insufficient tobacco settlement revenues to pay debt service with respect to the enhanced bonds, and certain other available amounts, including the reserve fund for the enhanced bonds, are depleted. This appropriation has been requested and approved by the Legislature but use of the appropriated moneys has never been required.

Draws on the reserve fund for the enhanced bonds in the amount of approximately $7.94 million were used to make required debt service payments on the 2005 bonds in 2011 and 2012. In April 2013, the reserve fund was replenished in full from tobacco revenues. As of February I, 2017, the balance of the reserve fund for the enhanced bonds is approximately $154.4 million. If, in any future year tobacco settlement revenues are less than required debt service payments on the enhanced bonds in such year, additional draws on the reserve fund will be required and at some point in the future the reserve fund may become fully depleted. The state is not obligated to replenish the reserve fund from the General Fund, or to request an appropriation to replenish the reserve fund.

Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development Guarantees

The Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development ("OSHPD") insures loans and bonds that finance and refinance construction and renovation projects for nonprofit and publiclyowned healthcare facilities. This program ("Cal-Mortgage Loan Insurance") is currently authorized by statute to insure up to $3 billion for health facility projects.

State law established the Health Facility Construction Loan Insurance Fund (the "Fund") as a trust fund which is continuously appropriated and may only be used for purposes of this program. The Fund is used as a depository of fees and insurance premiums and any recoveries and is the initial source of funds used to pay administrative costs of the program and shortfalls resulting from defaults by insured borrowers. If the Fund is unable to make payment on an insured loan or bond, state law provides for the State Treasurer to issue debentures to the holders of the defaulted loan or bond which are payable on parity with state general obligation bonds. The Fund is liable for repayment to the General Fund of any money paid from the General Fund. All claims on insured loans to date have been paid from the Fund and no debentures have been issued.

As of November 30, 2016, OSHPD insured 89 loans to nonprofit or publicly owned health facilities through-out California with a current outstanding aggregate par amount of approximately $1.684 billion, and a cash balance of approximately $167.6 million as of November 30, 2016. The biennial actuarial study of the Fund as of June 30, 2014, was completed in July 2016 (the "2014 actuarial study"). Based upon a number of assumptions, the 2014 actuarial study concluded, among other things, that the Fund appeared to be sufficient, under the "expected scenario" to maintain a positive balance until at least fiscal year 2043-44. Even under the "most pessimistic scenario," the 2014 actuarial study found that there was a 70

A-74

percent likelihood that the Fund's reserves as of June 30, 2014 would protect against any General Fund losses until at least fiscal year 2022-23, and a 90 percent likelihood that the Fund's reserves as of June 30, 2014 would protect against any General Fund losses until at least fiscal year 2019-20. There can be no assurances that the financial condition of the Fund has not materially declined since the 2014 actuarial study. More information on the program can be obtained from OSHPD's website.

In December 2016, OSHPD, the Department of Finance, and the State Treasurer entered into a memorandum of understanding that outlined the processes for the (i) issuance of debentures; (ii) payment of debentures from the General Fund should the Fund fail to pay the debentures; and (iii) repayment to the General Fund for any money paid for debentures.

INVESTMENT OF STATE FUNDS

Moneys on deposit in the State Centralized Treasury System are invested by the State Treasurer in the PMIA. As of December 31, 2016, the PMIA held approximately $52.1 billion of state moneys, and $21. 6 billion invested for about 2,461 local govermnental entities through the Local Agency Investment Fund ("LAIF"). The assets of the PMIA as of December 31, 2016 are shown in the following chart.


A-75

PMIA Portfolio Composition-12/31/16 $73.7 billion

Commercial Paper 8.93%

Time Deposits __

7.17%

Certificates of

Deposit/Bank Notes

15.80%

Loans 11.03%

Agencies 12.67%


Treasuries 44.33%

Mortgages 0.07%

The State's Treasury operations are managed in compliance with the Government Code and according to a statement of investment policy which sets forth permitted investment vehicles, liquidity parameters and maximum maturity of investments. The PMIA operates with the oversight of the PMIB. The LAIF portion of the PMIA operates with the oversight of the Local Agency Investment Advisory Board ( consisting of the State Treasurer and four other appointed members).

The PMIA is not invested, nor has it ever been invested, in structured investment vehicles or collateralized debt obligations. The PMIA portfolio performance, and the PMIA's holdings are displayed quarterly on the State Treasurer's website and may be accessed under PMIB Quarterly Reports. The PMIA is not currently invested in auction rate securities.

The State Treasurer does not invest in leveraged products or inverse floating rate securities. The investment policy permits the use of reverse repurchase agreements subject to limits of no more than 10 percent of the PMIA. All reverse repurchase agreements are cash matched either to the maturity of the reinvestment or an adequately positive cash management date which is approximate to the maturity of the reinvestment.

The average life of the investment portfolio of the PMIA as of December 31, 2016 was 171 days. Over the prior 12 months, the average life has ranged from 146 days to 171 days.

A-76

OVERVIEW OF STATE GOVERNMENT

Organization of State Government

The state Constitution provides for three separate branches of government: the legislative, the judicial and the executive. The state Constitution guarantees the electorate the right to make basic decisions, including amending the state Constitution and local government charters. In addition, the state voters may directly influence state government through the initiative, referendum and recall processes. The state Constitution provides for mechanisms through which it may be amended or revised.

California's Legislature consists of a 40-member Senate and an SO-member Assembly. Assembly members are elected for two-year terms, and Senators are elected for four-year terms. Before passage of Proposition 28 on June 5, 2012, Assembly members were limited to three terms in office and Senators to two terms. Proposition 28 reduced the total amount of time a person may serve in the Legislature from 14 to 12 years, but allows a person to serve a total of 12 years in either the Assembly, the Senate, or a combination of both. The new term limits law applies only to members of the Legislature elected after the measure was passed.

The Legislature meets almost year round for a two-year session. The Legislature employs the Legislative Analyst, who provides reports on state finances, among other subjects. The Office of the California State Auditor, an independent office since 1993, annually issues an auditor's report based on an examination of the General Purpose Financial Statements of the State Controller, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. See "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

The Governor is the chief executive officer of the state. The Governor presents the annual budget and traditionally presents an annual package of bills constituting a legislative program. In addition to the Governor, state law provides for seven other statewide elected officials in the executive branch. The Governor and the other statewide officials may be elected for up to two four-year terms. The current elected statewide officials, their party affiliation and the dates on which they were first elected are as follows:

First Office Name Party Affiliation Elected

Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. Democrat 2010* Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom Democrat 2010 Controller Betty T. Yee Democrat 2014 Treasurer John Chiang Democrat 2014 Attorney General Xavier Becerra Democrat ** Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democrat 2014 Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Democrat 2010 Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones Democrat 2010

* Previously served as Governor 1975-83, prior to term limit law. ** Replaced Kamala D. Harris who left office when she was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2016.

The executive branch is principally organized through eleven agency areas.

A-77

Some state programs are administered by boards and commissions, such as The Regents of the University of California, Public Utilities Commission, Franchise Tax Board and California Transportation Commission, which have authority over certain functions of state government with the power to establish policy and promulgate regulations. The appointment of members of boards and commissions is usually shared by the Legislature and the Governor, and often includes ex officio members.

Employee Relations

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget estimates the state work force for fiscal year 2017-18 at approximately 363,000 positions. Approximately 154,000 of those positions represent state employees of the legislative and judicial branches of government, and institutions of higher education. Of the remaining 209,000 positions, over 80 percent are subject to collective bargaining on wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment with the Administration, which are contained in a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") subject to ratification by the Legislature; less than 20 percent are excluded from collective bargaining. State law provides that state employees, defined as any civil service employee of the state and teachers under the jurisdiction of the Department of Education or the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and excluding certain other categories, have a right to form, join, and participate in the activities of employee organizations for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations. Once a bargaining unit ("BU") selects an employee organization, only that organization can represent those employees.

There are 21 collective BUs that are represented by employee organizations. The Service Employees International Union ("SEIU") is the exclusive representative for 9 of 21 BUs, or approximately 50 percent of those represented employees subject to collective bargaining. Since the 2016 Budget Act, the Administration has negotiated successor contract agreements with all bargaining units that represent state employees. A key priority for the Administration during bargaining was addressing the state's unfunded retiree health care obligation ($74 billion as of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget, $76.5 billion as of the latest actuarial valuation) through shared prefunding of program costs along with other cost containment strategies. See "ST ATE FINANCES - OTHER ELEMENTS - Retiree Health Care Costs."


A-78

ECONOMY AND POPULATION

California's economy, the largest among the 50 states and one of the largest in the world, has major components in high technology, trade, entertainment, manufacturing, tourism, construction, and services. The makeup of the state economy generally mirrors that of the national economy. See "Governor's Proposed Budget-Development of Revenue Estimates."

In July 2016, California's total population reached 39.4 million residents, an increase of 0.75 percent since July 2015. Since the national census on April I, 2010, the state has grown by 2.1 million persons. California's population growth rate is expected to increase to 0.86 percent in 2017 and .88 percent in 2018, resulting in a population of39.7 million in July 2017 and 40.0 million in July 2018.

Natural increase (births minus deaths) will account for most of the growth during this time; however, net migration into the state is expected to continue to contribute to population growth. California's population is projected to reach 40.4 million people by July 2019.

Currently, over 9.1 million Californians are under age 18. California has a younger population than the remainder of the U.S., with a slightly higher percentage under 18, a lower percentage 65 and older, and a younger median age.

Population growth rates vary by age group. The state's overall projected five-year growth rate of 4.5 percent (from 2016-2021) is higher than the anticipated 3.8 percent growth in the working-age population (25-64 years old). Among younger ages, the school-age group (5-17 years old) is expected to grow by 0.7 percent and the college-age group (18-24 years old) decreases by 3.4 percent while the preschool-age group (0-4 years old) is expected to decline by 3.5 percent. The population of the retirement-age group (age 65 and older), is expected to expand rapidly (22 percent).


A-79

The following table shows population totals for California and the United States.

TABLE23 Population

California Annual Percent United States Annual Percent California as% Year PopulationC3) Change PopulationC3) Change of United States

2006 36,246,822 0.7 298,593,212 1.0 12.1 2007 36,552,529 0.8 301,579,895 1.0 12.1 2008 36,856,222 0.8 304,374,846 0.9 12.1 2009 37,077,204 0.6 307,006,550 0.9 12.1 2010 37,333,583 0.7 309,348,193 0.8 12.1 2011 37,674,954 0.9 311,663,358 0.8 12.1 2012 38,041,489 1.0 313,998,379 0.8 12.1 2013 38,373,434 0.9 316,204,908 0.7 12.1 2014 38,739,410 1.0 318,563,456 0.8 12.2 2015 39,059,809 0.8 320,896,618 0.7 12.2 2016 39,354,432 0.8 323,127,513 0.7 12.2

(a) Population as of July 1.

Source: U. S. figures from U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census; California figures from State of California, Department of Finance.

Labor Force, Employment, Income, Construction and Export Growth

The following table presents California's civilian labor force data for the resident population, age 16 and over, and unemployment rates for California and the United States.

TABLE24 Labor Force (Thousands)

Year Labor Force Employment 2006 17,654 16,789 2007 17,893 16,932 2008 18,178 16,854 2009 18,215 16,183 2010 18,336 16,092 2011 18,415 16,258 2012 18,551 16,628 2013 18,670 17,001 2014 18,828 17,418 2015 18,982 17,799 2016(<) 19,198 18,162

(a) Preliminary

Note: The annual benchmark revision will be released on March 3, 2017.

Source: State of California, Employment Development Department.

A-80

Unemployment Rate California United States

4.9% 4.6% 5.4 4.6 7.3 5.8

11.1 9.3 12.2 9.6 11.7 8.9 10.4 8.1 8.9 7.4 7.5 6.2 6.2 5.3 5.4 4.9

The following table shows California's nonfarm payroll employment distribution and growth for 2006 and 2016.

TABLE25 Nonfann Payroll Employment by Major Sector

2006 and 2016 (Thousands)

Employment

Industry Sector 2006 2016(3)

Mining and Logging 25.1 25.4

Construction 933.7 764.0

Manufacturing

Nondurable Goods 542.6 477.9

Durable Goods 948.3 806.1

High Technology 381.2 340.2

Other Durable Goods 567.1 465.9

Trade, Transportation & Utilities 2,876.4 2,997.7

Information 466.1 496.2

Financial Activities 927.4 810.4

Professional & Business Services 2,244.6 2,573.2

Educational & Health Services 1,883.1 2,549.3

Leisure & Hospitality 1,519.0 1,897.4

Other Services 507.1 552.4

Government

Federal Government 248.6 246.7

State & Local Government 2,203.6 2,265.9

Distribution

of Employment

2006 2016(3)

0.2% 0.2% 6.1 4.6

3.5 2.9

6.2 4.9

2.5 2.1

3.7 2.8

18.8 18.2

3.0 3.0

6.1 4.9

14.6 15.6

12.3 15.5

9.9 11.5

3.3 3.4

1.6 1.5

14.4 13.8

TOTAL 15,325.6 16,462.6 100.0% 100.0%

(a) Preliminary

Note: The annual benchmark revision will be released on March 3, 2017.

Note: Figures may not add due to rounding.

Source: State of California, Employment Development Department.


A-81

The following tables show California's total and per capita income patterns.

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

2016 available March 28, 2017.

TABLE26 Total Personal Income in Califontla


Total Personal Income Annual % Change $1,415,941 6.0%

1,524,920 7.7 1,583,852 3.9 1,616,530 2.1 1,560,649 -3.5 1,617,134 3.6 1,727,434 6.8 1,838,567 6.4 1,861,957 1.3 1,977,924 6.2 2,103,669 6.4

Note: Omits income for government employees overseas. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

TABLE27 Personal Income Per Capita

(Dollars)

Year California Annual % Change United States Annual % Change 2005 $39,521 5.2% $35,904 4.6% 2006 42,334 7.1 38,144 6.2 2007 43,692 3.2 39,821 4.4 2008 44,162 1.1 41,082 3.2 2009 42,224 -4.4 39,376 -4.2 2010 43,315 2.6 40,277 2.3 2011 45,820 5.8 42,453 5.4 2012 48,312 5.4 44,267 4.3 2013 48,471 0.3 44,462 0.4 2014 50,988 5.2 46,414 4.4 2015 53,741 5.4 48,112 3.7

2016 available March 28, 2017.

Note: Omits income for government employees overseas.

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.

California% ofU.S.

13.3% 13.4 13.2 12.9 12.9 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.2 13.4 13.6

California% ofU. S. 110.1% 111.0 109.7 107.5 107.2 107.5 107.9 109.1 109.0 109.9 111.7

The following tables show certain information with respect to residential and nonresidential construction in California.

A-82

TABLE28 Residential Construction Permits Authorized

Units

Year Total Single Multiple 2007 113,034 68,409 44,625 2008 64,962 33,050 31,912 2009 36,421 25,454 10,967 2010 44,762 25,526 19,236 2011 47,336 21,631 25,705 2012 59,225 27,560 31,665 2013 85,472 36,991 48,481 2014 85,348 36,787 48,561 2015 98,073 44,896 53,177 2016~) 99,975 48,216 51,759

(a) Valuation includes additions and alterations.

(b) Preliminary

Source: Construction Industry Research Board; California Homebuilding Foundation.

Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016(a)

(a) Preliminary

TABLE29 Non-residential Construction Authorized

(Dollars in Thousands)

Additions and Commercial Industrial Other Alterations

$8,812,083 $1,450,875 $3,496,471 $8,782,424 6,513,610 938,081 2,983,640 8,776,285 1,919,763 359,868 1,984,534 6,602,103 1,990,358 358,338 1,937,166 6,913,901 2,213,034 478,896 2,152,688 8,146,064 3,215,897 1,409,808 2,382,780 7,626,971 5,294,105 1,072,101 6,340,166 8,974,512 7,112,268 1,103,016 4,231,883 10,855,176 8,291,744 1,252,790 4,590,360 12,128,093 8,959,250 1,044,206 4,412,491 12,260,562

Source: Construction Industry Research Board; California Homebuilding Foundation.


A-83

ValuationC3)

(Dollars in Millions) $28,621

18,072 12,037 13,731 14,415 17,731 23,027 24,178 29,116 30,676

Total $22,541,853

19,211,616 10,866,268 11,199,763 12,990,682 14,635,456 21,680,884 23,302,343 26,262,987 26,676,509

The following table shows changes in California's exports of goods.

TABLE30 Califontla's Exports of Goods


Year Exports(a) Annual% Change 2006 127,770.8 9.5 2007 134,318.9 5.1 2008 144,805.7 7.8 2009 120,080.0 -17.1 2010 143,208.2 19.3 2011 159,421.4 11.3 2012 161,757.3 1.5 2013 168,191.6 4.0 2014 173,923.9 3.4 2015 165,390.5 -4.9 2016 163,616.5 -1.1

(a) Origin of Movement (OM) series

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.


A-84

BANKARRANGEMENTSTABLE

The following table includes certain information relating to relating to letters of credit, liquidity facilities and other bank arrangements entered into in connection with variable rate obligations and commercial paper notes. See also "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Capital Facilities Financing-Bank Arrangements."


A-85

BANKARRANGEMENTSTABLE

(See "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Capital Facilities Financing-Bank Arrangements.")

As of April 1, 2017

BANK ARRANGEMENTS (See "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Capital Facilities Financing-Bank Arrangements.")

Reset Mode

Program Series Outstanding Par

Credit Provider Expiration Type of

Amount Credit

GOVRDOs 2003A 1 $48.200.000 JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association 9/13/2018 LOC Daily

GOVRDOs 2003A 2-3 $193,200,000 Bank of Montreal 9/7/2018 LOC Daily

GOVRDOs 2003B 1-4 $250,000,000 Bank of America, N.A. 4/26/2019 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2003C 1 $96,600,000 Bank of America, N.A. 11/2/2018 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2003C 3-4 $96,500,000 US Bank National Association 11/16/2018 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2004A 1, 4 & 5 $200,000,000 Citibank, N.A. 9/7/2018 LOC Daily

GOVRDOs 2004A 2 &3 $147,100,000 State Street Bank & Trust Company 8/11/2020 LOC Daily

GOVRDOs 2004A 6, 7, 8 & 10 $200,000,000 Citibank, N.A. 9/7/2018 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2004 A 9 $49,000,000 State Street Bank & Trust Company 8/11/2020 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2004B 1-3 $165,000,000 Citibank, N.A. 9/7/2018 LOC Daily

GOVRDOs 2004B 4 $34,300,000 Citibank, N.A. 9/7/2018 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2004B 5-6 $99,100,000 US Bank National Association 4/5/2018 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2005A-1-1 $85,850,000 Royal Bank of Canada 11/4/2019 LOC Weekly


GOVRDOs 2005A-2-1 $143,200,000 Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation 11/16/2018 LOC Weekly


GOVRDOs 2005A-3 $49,100,000 Mizuho Bank, Ltd. 11/15/2019 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2005B-1 $147,100,000 Mizuho Bank, Ltd. 11/15/2019 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2005B-2 $98,100,000 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. 11/4/2019 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2005B-3 $49,100,000 Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation 11/16/2018 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2005B-4 $49,100,000 JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association 9/13/2018 LOC Weekly

GOVRDOs 2005B-5 $88,890,000 MUFG Union Bank, NA. 3/26/2021 LOC Daily

GOVRDOs 2005B-7 $49,100,000 JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association 9/13/2018 LOC Daily

Total GO VRDOs $2,452,690,000

A-86

BANK ARRANGEMENTS (See "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS-Capital Facilities Financing-Bank Arrangements.")

Al/Bl $500.000.000 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 11/2/2018 LOC Up to 90 days

A2/B2 $500.000.000 Royal Bank of Canada 11/4/2019 LOC Up to 90 days

A3/B3 $200.000.000 MUFG Union Bank, N.A. 11/30/2020 LOC Up to 90 days GO epa

A5/B5 $225.000.000 US Bank National Association 8/9/2019 LOC Up to 90 days

A6/B6 $50.000.000 Bank of America, N.A. 11/2/2018 LOC Up to 90 days

A7/B7 $125.000.000 Mizuho Bank, Ltd. 11/4/2019 LOC Up to 90 days

AS/BS $125.000.000 Bank of the West 2/11/2020 LOC Up to 90 days

Cl/Dl $500.000.000 Bank of America, N.A. 11/25/2017 Bank Note Up to 90 days

Total GO CP $2,225,000,000

Grand Total $4,677,690,000

(a) For commercial paper (CP), the total outstanding par represents the maximum principal commitment under related bank agreements.

A-87

STATE DEBT TABLES

The tables which follow provide information on outstanding state debt, authorized but unissued general obligation bonds and commercial paper notes, debt service requirements for state general obligation and lease-revenue bonds, and authorized and outstanding state revenue bonds. Also, see "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS." For purposes of these tables, "General Fund bonds," also known as "non-self liquidating bonds," are general obligation bonds expected to be paid from the General Fund without reimbursement from any other fund. Although the principal of general obligation commercial paper notes in the "non-self liquidating" category is legally payable from the General Fund, the state expects that principal of such commercial paper notes will be paid only from the issuance of new commercial paper notes or the issuance of long-term general obligation bonds to retire the commercial paper notes. Interest on "non-self liquidating" general obligation commercial paper notes is payable from the General Fund.

"Enterprise Fund bonds," also known as "self liquidating bonds," are general obligation bonds for which program revenues are expected to be sufficient to reimburse in full the General Fund for debt service payments, but any failure to make such a reimbursement does not affect the obligation of the state to pay principal and interest on the bonds from the General Fund.

The following tables do not include the following bond sales since January 1, 2017:

$2,792,640,000 of Various Purpose General Obligation Bonds closed on March 14, 2017. This sale included $2,279,405,000 of refunding bonds which will (together with premium paid by the purchasers of the bonds) refund $2,463,375,000 of currently outstanding General Obligation Bonds.

$43,200,000 aggregate principal amount of the State Public Works Board's Lease Revenue Bonds (Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) 2017 Series A (Various Correctional Facilities) closed on March 28, 2017.

$377,610,000 aggregate principal amount of the State Public Works Board's Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds 2017 Series B (Various Capital Projects) sold on April 6, 2017. This sale consisted of refunding bonds which will refund $404,620,000 of currently outstanding State Public Works Board Lease Revenue Bonds 2009 Series G (Various Capital Projects) Subseries G-1 (Tax-Exempt Bonds).

$156,475,000 aggregate principal amount of the State Public Works Board's Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds 2017 Series C (Various Capital Projects) sold on April 6, 2017. This sale consisted of refunding bonds which will refund $180,710,000 of currently outstanding State Public Works Board Lease Revenue Bonds 2010 Series A (Various Capital Projects) Subseries A-1 (Tax-Exempt Bonds).

A-88

Outstanding Debt (a) General Obligation Bonds

OUTSTANDING STATE DEBT FISCAL YEARS 2011-12 THROUGH 2015-16

(Dollars in Thousands Except for Per Capita Information)

General Fund (Non-Se\fLiquidating) ..

Enterprise Fund (Se\fLiquidating) .. Special Revenue Fund (Se\fLiquidating) ..

$

$ $

$

73,060,865 $

1,115,935 $ 5,910,480 $

80,087,280 $

74,456,230 $

884,180 $ 4,731,745 $

80,072,155 $

75,714,125 $

671,180 $ 3,417,115 $

79,802,420 $

76,005,055 $ 74,941,755

646,750 $ 787,760

Total General Obligation Bonds ..

Revenue Bonds

929,735 ~$-~=~=o 77,581,540 ~$ __ ~7~5,~7~2~9,~5~1~5

Lease-Purchase Debt.. $ $

$

11,330,355 $ 11,822,140 $ 11,266,240 $ 10,989,480 $ 9,808,190 Proposition 1 A Receivables Program .. 1,895,000 ~$ ____ ~0 ~$ _____ 0~ ~$ _____ ~0 ~$ _____ ~0

Total Revenue Bonds .. 13,225,355 $ 11,822,140 $ 11,266,240 $ 10,989,480 ~$ ___ 9,~8_0_8,~1_9_0

Total Outstanding General Obligation and Revenue Bonds .. $ 93,312,635 $ 91,894,295 $ 91,068,660 $ 88,571,020 ~$ ___ 8_5,~5_3_7,~7_0_5

Bond Sales During Fiscal Year Non-Se\fLiquidating General Obligation Bonds.. $ SelfLiquidating General Obligation Bonds.. $ Proposition 1 A Receivables Revenue Bonds .. SelfLiquidating Special Fund Revenue Bonds .. Lease-Purchase Debt..

Debt Service (b)

$ $ $

Non-SelfLiquidating General Obligation Bonds.. $ Lease-Purchase Debt.. $

General Fund Receipts (c,_ _______ $

Non-SelfLiquidating General Obligation Bonds Debt Service as a Percentage of General

Fund Receipts .. Lease-Purchase Debt Service as a

Percentage of General Fund Receipts ..

Population (d)-----------Non-SelfLiquidating General Obligation Bonds

Outstanding per Capita.. $

Lease-Purchase Debt Outstanding per Capita.. $

7,817,390 $ 0 $ 0 $

438,635 $ 2,627,115 $

5,768,589 $ 980,862 $

7,417,170 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $

1,678,130 $

5,424,867 $ 1,194,881 $

87,769,787 $ 103,424,674 $

6.57%

1.12%

37,676,006

1,939.19 $

300.73 $

5.25%

1.16%

38,037,860

1,957.42 $

310.80 $

5,905,370 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $

4,849,680 $

6,308,990 $ 978,202 $

103,966,197 $

6.07%

0.94%

38,370,164

1,973.26 $

293.62 $

6,613,070 $ 110,000 $

0 $ 0 $

728,085 $

6,580,411 $ 1,029,883 $

116,385,580 $

5.65%

0.88%

38,728,714

1,962.50 $

283.76 $

7,316,280 545,440

0 0

1,004,305

6,641,942 1,013,838

120,417,389

5.52%

0.84%

39,093,016

1,917.01 250.89

Personal Income (e,,___ _________ $ 1,664,635,750 $ 1,720,052,000 $ 1,827,919,750 $ 1,943,915,250 $ 2,061,149,250

Non-SelfLiquidating General Obligation Bonds Outstanding as Percentage of Personal Income.. 4.39% 4.33% 4.14% 3.91 % 3.64%

Lease-Purchase Debt Outstanding as Percentage of Personal Income .. 0.68% 0.69% 0.62% 0.57%

(a) Principal outstanding as of July 1 of the next fiscal year. Includes the initial value of capital appreciation bonds rather than the accreted value.

(b) Calculated on a cash basis. The amounts do not reflect any interest subsidy under the Build America Bonds program. Subsidy not pledged to the repayment of debt service. Debt service costs of bonds issued in any fiscal year largely appear in subsequent fiscal years.

(c) Calculated on a cash basis. General Fund Receipts includes both revenues and nonrevenues, such as borrowings, the proceeds of which are deposited in the General Fund (e.g. tobacco securitization bonds and economic recovery bonds).

( d) As of July 1, the beginning of the fiscal year. (e) Revised estimates as ofJune 22, 2016.

SOURCES: Population: State of California, Department ofFinance. Personal Income: United States, Department of Commerce, Bureau ofEconomic Analysis Outstanding Debt, Bonds Sales During Fiscal Year and Debt Service: State of California, Office of the Treasurer. General Fund Receipts: State of California, Office of the State Controller.

SOT-I

0.48%

AUTHORIZED AND OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS

As of 02/01/2017 (Thousands)

Voter Proposition Authorization

Number Date

GENERAL FUND BONDS (Non-Self Liquidating)

+ 1988 School Facilities Bond Act 79 11/08/88



California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of2002 40 03/05/02

+ California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988 85 11/08/88

*+ California Park and Recreational Facilities Act of 1984 18 06/05/84

* California Parklands Act of 1980 11/04/80

California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of2000 14 03/07/00

*+ California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1976 06/08/76

* California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1984 28 11/06/84

* California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1986 55 11/04/86

California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law of 1988 81 11/08/88

*+ California Wildlife, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation Act 70 06/07/88

Children's Hospital Bond Act of2004 61 11/02/04

Children's Hospital Bond Act of2008 11/04/08

Class Size Reduction Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1998 (Hi-Ed) IA 11/03/98

Class Size Reduction Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1998 (K-12) IA 11/03/98

* Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Bond Act of 1990 116 06/05/90

* Clean Water Bond Law of 1984 25 11/06/84

* Clean Water and Water Conservation Bond Law of 1978 2 06/06/78

Clean Water and Water Reclamation Bond Law of 1988 83 11/08/88

* Community Parklands Act of 1986 43 06/03/86

* County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure Bond Act of 1986 52 06/03/86

County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure and Youth Facility Bond Act of 1988 86 11/08/88

++++ Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of2006 IE 11/07/06

SDT-2

Long Term Commercial Authorization Bonds Paper

Amount Outstanding Outstanding (a) Un issued $ $ $ $

797,745 35,195 0 0

797,875 72,695 0 0

898,211 199,180 0 0

2,600,000 1,981,160 27,010 205,400

72,405 10,555 0 0

368,900 10,225 0 0

285,000 2,030 0 0

350,000 228,855 0 5,040

172,500 2,580 0 0

75,000 1,555 0 0

100,000 19,075 0 0

75,000 24,545 0 0

768,670 97,535 0 0

750,000 614,550 250 46,795

980,000 657,800 385 304,455

2,500,000 1,569,135 0 0

6,700,000 3,362,025 0 11,400

1,990,000 673,675 0 4,985

325,000 8,660 0 0

375,000 3,740 0 0

65,000 16,630 0 0

100,000 2,115 0 0

495,000 11,625 0 0

500,000 55,320 0 0

3,990,000 2,215,880 35,100 1,683,552

AUTHORIZED AND OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS As of02/01/2017

(Thousands)


Number Date


Earthquake Safety and Public Buildings Rehabilitation Bond Act of1990 122 06/05/90

* Fish and Wildlife Habitat Enhancement Act of 1984 19 06/05/84

Higher Education Facilities Bond Act of 1988 78 11/08/88

Higher Education Facilities Bond Act of June 1990 121 06/05/90

Higher Education Facilities Bond Act of June 1992 153 06/02/92

Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of2006 1B 11/07/06

Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of2002 46 11/05/02

Housing and Emergency Shelter Trust Fund Act of2006 IC 11/07/06

Housing and Homeless Bond Act of 1990 107 06/05/90

Kindergarten-Community College Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2016 (K-12) 51 11/08/16

Kindergarten-Community College Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2016 (CCC) 51 11/08/16

Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2002 (Hi-Ed) 47 11/05/02

Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2002 (K-12) 47 11/05/02

Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2004 (Hi-Ed) 55 03/02/04

Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2004 (K-12) 55 03/02/04

Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2006 (Hi-Ed) ID 11/07/06

Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of2006 (K-12) ID 11/07/06

* Lake Tahoe Acquisitions Bond Act 4 08/02/82

* New Prison Construction Bond Act of 1986 54 11/04/86

New Prison Construction Bond Act of 1988 80 11/08/88

New Prison Construction Bond Act of 1990 120 06/05/90

Passenger Rail and Clean Air Bond Act of 1990 108 06/05/90

Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1996 (Higher Education) 203 03/26/96

++ Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 1996 (K-12) 203 03/26/96

++++ Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Protection, and Flood Protection Act 13 03/07/00

++++ Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of2006 84 11/07/06

Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of2000 12 03/07/00

++++ Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Supply Act 204 11/05/96

Safe, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act for the 21st Century IA 11/04/08

* School Building and Earthquake Bond Act of 1974 11/05/74

SDT-3

Long Term Commercial Authorization Bonds Paper

Amount Outstanding Outstanding (a) Un issued $ $ $ $

300,000 55,650 635 7,490

85,000 4,540 0 0

600,000 20,260 0 0

450,000 40,355 0 540

900,000 255,675 0 0

19,925,000 16,514,595 157,010 1,808,655

2,100,000 402,165 8,820 76,995

2,850,000 1,403,275 123,430 713,135

150,000 1,170 0 0

7,000,000 0 0 7,000,000

2,000,000 0 0 2,000,000

1,650,000 1,250,040 0 0

11,400,000 8,740,770 24,420 33,040

2,300,000 1,925,800 100 58,019

10,000,000 8,110,410 39,610 51,690

3,087,000 2,947,480 1,810 38,775

7,329,000 6,584,605 34,145 317,485

85,000 50 0 0

500,000 1,030 0 0

817,000 9,330 200 1,965

450,000 11,670 0 605

1,000,000 26,235 0 0

975,000 436,555 1,725 4,650

2,012,035 734,250 0 0

1,884,000 1,302,935 0 43,346

5,283,000 2,763,615 299,485 1,945,875

2,100,000 1,341,445 0 73,820

969,500 487,210 0 62,915

9,950,000 788,430 0 8,791,730

150,000 13,300 0 0


School Facilities Bond Act of 1990

School Facilities Bond Act of 1992

Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of 1996

* State, Urban, and Coastal Park Bond Act of 1976

Stem Cell Research and Cures Bond Act of2004

Veterans Homes Bond Act of2000

Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Bond Act of2014

Voting Modernization Bond Act of2002

Water Conservation Bond Law of 1988

*++++ Water Conservation and Water Quality Bond Law of 1986

Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of2014


(Thousands)


Number Date

146 11/06/90

152 06/02/92

192 03/26/96

2 11/02/76

71 11/02/04

16 03/07/00

41 06/03/14

41 03/05/02

82 11/08/88

44 06/03/86

11/04/14

++++ Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach Protection Act of2002 50 11/05/02

Total General Fund Bonds

SDT-4

Authorization Amount

$

800,000

1,900,000

2,000,000

280,000

3,000,000

50,000

600,000

200,000

60,000

136,500

7,545,000

3,345,000

144,349,341

Long Term Commercial Bonds Paper

Outstanding Outstanding (a) Un issued $ $ $

114,800 0 0

411,705 0 10,280

1,032,745 0 0

3,230 0 0

1,165,565 89,445 942,150

33,685 0 975

2,240 1,695 595,560

11,665 0 64,495

19,485 0 5,235

22,985 0 230

40,320 113,385 7,382,675

2,565,810 1,425 309,574

73,473,420 960,085 34,603,531

ENTERPRISE FUND BONDS (Self Liquidating)

* California Water Resources Development Bond Act

Veterans Bond Act of 1986




Veterans Bond Act of2000

+++ Veterans Bond Act of2008

Total Enterprise Fund Bonds

TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS


(Thousands)


Number Date

11/08/60

42 06/03/86

76 06/07/88

142 11/06/90

206 11/05/96

32 11/07/00

12 11/04/08

Authorization Amount

$

1,750,000

850,000

510,000

400,000

400,000

500,000

300,000

4,710,000

149,059,341

Long Term Commercial Bonds Paper

Outstanding Outstanding (a) Un issued $ $ $

108,560 0 167,600

8,160 0 0

29,595 0 0

45,480 0 0

102,150 0 0

357,895 0 0

99,695 0 200,260

751,535 0 367,860

74,224,955 960,085 34,971,391

(a) A total of not more than $2.225 billion of commercial paper principal plus accrued interest may be owing at one time Bond acts marked with an asterisk(*) are not legally permitted to utilize commercial paper

SB 1018 (06/27/2012) reduced the voter authorized amount

++ SB 71 (06/27/2013) reduced the voter authorized amount +++ AB 639 (10/10/2013) reduced the voter authorized amount

++++ AB 1471 (11/04/2014) reallocated the voter authorized amount

SOURCE: State ofCalifomia, Office of the Treasurer

SDT-5

GENERAL OBLIGATION AND REVENUE BONDS SUMMARY OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

As of February 1, 2017

GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS

GENERAL FUND NON-SELF LIQUIDATING (b)

Fixed Rate Variable Rate (c)

ENTERPRISE FUND SELF LIQUIDATING Fixed Rate

REVENUE BONDS

GENERAL FUND LEASE-REVENUE Lease-Revenue

Interest

$ 54,063,395,716.75 $ 511,749,317.75

331,802,385.00

5,008,891,959.75

Total Debt

Principal

69,747,630,000.00 $

3,725,790,000.00

751,535,000.00

9,614,320,000.00

Total (a)

l23,8 l l ,025,7 l6.75 4,237,539,317.75

l ,083 ,337 ,385.00

14,623,211,959.75

General Fund and Lease-Revenue Total (d) $ 59,915,839,379.25 $ 83,839,275,000.00 $ 143,755,114,379.25

(a) Includes scheduled mandatory sinking fund payments. (b) Does not include outstanding commercial paper. ( c) The estimate of future interest payments is based on rates in effect as of February 1, 2017. The interest rates

for the daily, weekly and monthly rate bonds range from 0.43 - 1.81 %.

The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, Series 2013B & 2016A currently bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.00%, and Series 2014A bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.00%, until reset dates, and are assumed to bear that rate from reset until maturity.

(d) Estimated interest included.

SOURCE: State of California, Office of the Treasurer.

SDT-6

SCHEDULE OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

FOR GENERAL FUND NON-SELF LIQUIDATING BONDS Fixed Rate

As of February 1, 2017 Fiscal Year Current Debt

Ending June 30 Interest (a) Principal Total (b) 2017 (c) $ 1,611,349,862.23 $ 930,770,000.00 2,542,119,862.23 2018 $ 3,708,186,849.95 $ 2,8!0,090,000.00 6,518,276,849.95 2019 $ 3,583,531,824.37 $ 2,943,395,000.00 6,526,926,824.37 2020 $ 3,431,779,367.64 $ 2,867,865,000.00 6,299,644,367.64 2021 $ 3,301,931,527.73 $ 2,572,840,000.00 5,874,771,527.73 2022 $ 3,168,936,817.81 $ 2,767,055,000.00 5,935,991,817.81 2023 $ 3,034,875,896.78 $ 2,420,505,000.00 5,455,380,896.78 2024 $ 2,921,456,715.43 $ 2,097,105,000.00 5,018,561,715.43 2025 $ 2,814, 154,60 l.90 $ 2,342,505,000.00 5, 156,659,60 l.90 2026 $ 2,695,217,886.60 $ 2,456,055,000.00 5,151,272,886.60 2027 $ 2,564,809,298.31 $ 2,514,150,000.00 5,078,959,298.31 2028 $ 2,445,266,589.61 $ 2,280,020,000.00 4,725,286,589.61 2029 $ 2,331,179,720. lO $ 2,507,430,000.00 4,838,609,720. lO 2030 $ 2,208,261,647.60 $ 2,612,690,000.00 4,820,951,647.60 2031 $ 2,064,404,664.05 $ 2,700,8!0,000.00 4,765,214,664.05 2032 $ 1,934,954,876.90 $ 2,568,615,000.00 4,503,569,876.90 2033 $ l,797,0l0,312.51 $ 2,650,640,000.00 4,447,650,312.51 2034 $ 1,671,469,540.26 $ 3,314,520,000.00 4,985,989,540.26 2035 $ 1,443,834,111.59 $ 3,091,335,000.00 4,535,169,11 l.59 2036 $ 1,259,611,543.26 $ 2,798,335,000.00 4,057,946,543.26 2037 $ 1,089,699,391.87 $ 3,088,405,000.00 4,178,104,391.87 2038 $ 907,853,748.80 $ 3,244,015,000.00 4,151,868,748.80 2039 $ 756,443,428.95 $ 3,415,270,000.00 4,171,713,428.95 2040 $ 475,719,662.50 $ 1,767,885,000.00 2,243,604,662.50 2041 $ 313,907,793.75 $ 2,190,000,000.00 2,503,907,793.75 2042 $ 211,627,793.75 $ 1,319,000,000.00 1,530,627,793.75 2043 $ 156,170,418.75 $ 1,326,325,000.00 1,482,495,418.75 2044 $ 82,601,398.75 $ 875,000,000.00 957,601,398.75 2045 $ 51,723,425.00 $ 550,000,000.00 601,723,425.00 2046 $ 20,950,000.00 $ 500,000,000.00 520,950,000.00 2047 $ 4,475,000.00 $ 225,000,000.00 229,475,000.00

Total $ 54,063,395,716.75 $ 69,747,630,000.00 $ 123,811,025,716.75

(a) The amounts do not reflect any interest subsidy under the Build America Bonds program. Subsidy not pledged to the repayment of debt service.

(b) Includes scheduled mandatory sinking fund payments. Does not include outstanding commercial paper. ( c) Represents the remaining debt service requirements from March 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017.


SDT-7

SCHEDULE OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

FOR GENERAL FUND NON-SELF LIQUIDATING BONDS Variable Rate

As of February 1, 2017 Fiscal Year Current Debt

Ending June 30 Interest (a) Principal Total (b) 2017 (c) 19,538,321.90 184,675,000.00 204,213,321.90

2018 45,262,749.89 243,305,000.00 288,567,749.89 2019 43,606,060.13 113,420,000.00 157,026,060.13

2020 42,602,064.80 !05,500,000.00 148,102,064.80

2021 41,800,286.52 154,400,000.00 196,200,286.52 2022 40,529,533.03 39,200,000.00 79,729,533.03

2023 40,306,490.01 61,l00,000.00 lOl,406,490.01

2024 40,025,630.73 173,600,000.00 213,625,630.73 2025 38,976,285.27 116,400,000.00 155,376,285.27

2026 3 8,346,50 l.00 203,300,000.00 241,646,501.00

2027 36,324,640.53 215,600,000.00 251,924,640.53

2028 28,540,583.90 499,000,000.00 527,540,583.90 2029 19,847,736.98 407,700,000.00 427,547,736.98

2030 15,224,025.28 304,390,000.00 319,614,025.28

2031 11,241,215.34 263,600,000.00 274,841,215.34 2032 7,073,136.91 366,600,000.00 373,673,136.91

2033 2,453,895.14 271,400,000.00 273,853,895.14

2034 13,889.78 1,600,000.00 1,613,889.78 2035 6,130.00 6,130.00

2036 6,156.57 6,156.57

2037 6,103.43 6,103.43 2038 6,130.00 6,130.00

2039 6,130.00 6,130.00

2040 5,620.61 1,000,000.00 1,005,620.61

Total $ 511,749,317.75 $ 3,725,790,000.00 $ 4,237,539,317.75

( a) The estimate of future interest payments is based on rates in effect as of February 1, 2017. The interest rates for the daily, weekly and monthly rate bonds range from 0.43 - 1.81 %.

The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, Series 2013B & 2016A currently bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.00%, and Series 2014A bears interest at a fixed rate of 3 .00%, until reset dates, and are assumed to bear that rate from reset until maturity.

(b) Includes scheduled mandatory sinking fund payments. Does not include outstanding commercial paper. (c) Represents the remaining estimated debt service requirements from March 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017.


SDT-8

Fiscal Year

Ending June 30 2017 (b) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047

Total

SCHEDULE OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENTERPRISE FUND SELF LIQUIDATING BONDS

Fixed Rate As of February 1, 2017

Current Debt

Interest Principal Total (a) 12,250,677.38 20,260,000.00 32,510,677.38 23,566,917.15 62,325,000.00 85,891,917.15 21,923,951.25 49,000,000.00 70,923,951.25 20,626,766.35 41,365,000.00 61,991,766.35 19,422,272.50 31,445,000.00 50,867,272.50 18,669,240.00 15,785,000.00 34,454,240.00 18,291,190.00 12,015,000.00 30,306,190.00 18,092,725.00 4,365,000.00 22,457,725.00 17,943,932.50 7,070,000.00 25,013,932.50 17,856,195.00 17,856,195.00 17,569,377.50 19,300,000.00 36,869,377.50 17,041,146.01 16,275,000.00 33,316,146.0 I 16,339,241.90 32,315,000.00 48,654,241.90 15,035,163.89 51,425,000.00 66,460,163.89 13,365,250.26 51,170,000.00 64,535,250.26 11,631,245.85 50,580,000.00 62,211,245.85 9,884,426.25 44,685,000.00 54,569,426.25 8,297,135.18 39,750,000.00 48,047,135.18 6,976,645.00 30,985,000.00 37,961,645.00 5,939,917.50 25,220,000.00 31,159,917.50 4,970,976.54 25,525,000.00 30,495,976.54 4,119,601.99 17,915,000.00 22,034,60 l.99 3,409,557.50 18,735,000.00 22,144,557.50 2,666,238.75 19,605,000.00 22,271,238.75 1,887,422.50 20,520,000.00 22,407,422.50 1,357,240.00 7,775,000.00 9,132,240.00 1,088,381.25 8,075,000.00 9,163,381.25

808,756.25 8,365,000.00 9,173,756.25 519,031.25 8,670,000.00 9,189,031.25 218,775.00 8,985,000.00 9,203,775.00 32,987.50 2,030,000.00 2,062,987.50

$ 331,802,385.00 $ 751,535,000.00 $ 1,083,337,385.00

(a) Includes scheduled mandatory sinking fund payments. (b) Represents the remaining debt service requirements from March 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017.


SDT-9

Name of Issue

STATE PUBLIC WORKS BOARD AND OTHER LEASE-REVENUE FINANCING

OUTSTANDING ISSUES As of February 1, 2017

GENERAL FUND SUPPORTED ISSUES:

State Public Works Board

California Community Colleges

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Trustees of the California State University

Various State Facilities (a)

Total State Public Works Board Issues

Total Other State Facilities Lease-Revenue Issues (b)

Total General Fund Supported Issues

SPECIAL FUND SUPPORTED ISSUES: San Bernardino Joint Powers Financing Authority

Total Special Fund Supported Issues

TOTAL

$

$

$

$

$

$

( a) Includes projects that are supported by multiple funding sources in addition to the General Fund.

Outstanding

199,180,000

4,182,550,000

185,850,000

4,805,295,000

9,372,875,000

241,445,000

9,614,320,000

13,095,000

13,095,000

9,627,415,000

(b) Includes $71,295,000 Sacramento City Financing Authority Lease-Revenue Refunding Bonds State of California -

Cal/EPA Building, 2013 Series A, which are supported by lease rentals from the California Environmental

Protection Agency; these rental payments are subject to annual appropriation by the State Legislature.


SDT-10

SCHEDULE OF DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR LEASE-REVENUE DEBT

Fixed Rate As of February 1, 2017

Fiscal

Year Current Debt Ending June 30 Interest (a) Principal Total (b)

2017 (c) 239,524,418.68 206,200,000.00 445,724,418.68 2018 468,177,117.29 567,285,000.00 1,035,462,117.29 2019 441,371,402.96 543,335,000.00 984,706,402.96 2020 414,768,589.12 531,405,000.00 946,173,589.12 2021 389,453,969.63 503,435,000.00 892,888,969.63 2022 364,717,980.23 489,290,000.00 854,007,980.23 2023 342,079,123.61 445,695,000.00 787,774,123.61 2024 320,187,420.97 441,980,000.00 762,167,420.97 2025 297,943,133.65 459,725,000.00 757,668,133.65 2026 274,480,523.69 473,045,000.00 747,525,523.69 2027 250,031,791.07 497,460,000.00 747,491,791.07 2028 224,731,858.13 509,510,000.00 734,241,858.13 2029 198,812,210.57 475,000,000.00 673,812,210.57 2030 174,355,473.38 466,340,000.00 640,695,473.38 2031 150,383,397.50 459,015,000.00 609,398,397.50 2032 125,701,929.99 466,080,000.00 591,781,929.99 2033 l02,140,l06.99 399,610,000.00 501,750,106.99 2034 80,024,336.24 408,940,000.00 488,964,336.24 2035 57,614,051.05 380,750,000.00 438,364,051.05 2036 39,795,362.50 254,245,000.00 294,040,362.50 2037 27,779,150.00 249,975,000.00 277,754,150.00 2038 15,522,lOO.OO 179,825,000.00 195,347,lOO.OO 2039 7,217,712.50 124,310,000.00 131,527,712.50 2040 2,078,800.00 81,865,000.00 83,943,800.00

Total $ 5,008,891,959.75 $ 9,614,320,000.00 $ 14,623,211,959.75

(a) The amounts do not reflect any interest subsidy under the Build America Bonds program. Subsidy not pledged to the repayment of debt service.

(b) Includes scheduled mandatory sinking fund payments. ( c) Represents the remaining debt service requirements from March 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017.


SDT-11

STATE AGENCY REVENUE BONDS AND CONDUIT FINANCING

As of December 31, 2016

Issuing Agency

State Revenue Bond Financing Programs:

California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority .. California Department of Transportation - GARVEE.. California Earthquake Authority .. California Health Facilities Financing Authority .. California Housing Finance Agency .. California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank .. California State University .. Department of Water Resources - Central Valley Project ..

Department of Water Resources - Power Supply Program .. The Regents of the University of California .. Veterans Revenue Debenture ..

TOTA~-----------------------Conduit Financing:

California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority .. California Educational Facilities Authority .. California Health Facilities Financing Authority .. California Housing Finance Agency ..

California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank. California Pollution Control Financing Authority .. California School Financing Authority ..

TOTA~-----------------------

Outstanding<•)(b)(,)

2,982,933 40,345,000

$310,000,000 58,050,000

2,127,798,002

1,061,740,000 4,764,403,000 2,686,190,000 4,621,260,000

17,127,070,000 386,560,000

33,186,398,935

54,855,869 $4,001,868,942 14,304,990,505

685,348,014 3,936,432,969 3,640,588,322

824,006,119

27,448,090,740

( a) Totals for California Department of Transportation, California State University, Department of Water Resources and Veterans Revenue Debenture were provided by the State of California, Office of the Treasurer. All other totals were provided by the listed issuing agency.

(b) Does not include the Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds issued by Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation.

( c) Certain state agencies and authorities issue revenue obligations for which the General Fund has no liability. See "STATE INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS - Capital Facilities Financing-NonRecourse Debt." The tables above are intended to provide general information concerning the scope of the various State Revenue Bond Financing and Conduit Financing Programs referenced therein, and are not intended to be an exhaustive listing of all of the outstanding obligations of the respective programs.

SDT-12

EXHIBIT 1 TO APPENDIX A

PENSION SYSTEMS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PENSION SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................ EX-1-1

General ............................................................................................................................. EX-1-1

Pension Reform ................................................................................................................ EX-1-2

1. PEPRA ................................................................................................................ EX-1-2

2. CalSTRS Funding Solution ................................................................................ EX-1-3

CalPERS .......................................................................................................................... EX-1-3

1. General. ............................................................................................................... EX-1-3

2. Members and Employers .................................................................................... EX-1-4

3. Retirement Benefits ............................................................................................ EX-1-5

4. Member and State Contributions ........................................................................ EX-1-6

5. Prospective Funding Status; Future State Contributions .................................... EX-1-7

6. Investment Policy; Investment Retums .............................................................. EX-1-7

7. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions .................................................................. EX-1-9

8. Actuarial Valuation; Determination of Required Contributions ...................... EX-1-10

9. Funding Status .................................................................................................. EX-1-11

10. Other Retirement Plans ..................................................................................... EX-1-12

CalSTRS ........................................................................................................................ EX-1-12

1. General. ............................................................................................................. EX-1-12

2. Members and Employers .................................................................................. EX-1-13

3. Retirement Benefits .......................................................................................... EX-1-13

4. Funding for the DB Program ............................................................................ EX-1-14

5. Change in Accounting Standards ...................................................................... EX-1-16

6. Fundingforthe SMBA ..................................................................................... EX-1-16

7. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions ................................................................ EX-1-17

8. Actuarial Valuation ........................................................................................... EX-1-19

9. Funding Status .................................................................................................. EX-1-20

10. Prospective Funding Status; Future Contributions ........................................... EX-1-21

11. Investment Policy; Investment Retums ............................................................ EX-1-21

EX-1-i

TABLES

TABLE 31 CALPERS MEMBERSHIP (STATE EMPLOYEES) AS OF WNE 30 ........... EX-1-4

TABLE 32 CALPERS (STATE ONLY) SCHEDULE OF PENSION BENEFITS PAID ... EX-1-6

TABLE 33 STATE CONTRIBUTIONS TO PERF, INCLUDING CSU ............................. EX-1-7

TABLE 34 CALPERS INVESTMENT RESULTS BASED ON MARKET VALUE ......... EX-1-8

TABLE 35 PERF TIME-WEIGHTED AVERAGE RETURNS AS OF WNE 30, 2016 ..... EX-l-8

TABLE 36 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS-PERF ......................................................... EX-1-10

TABLE 37 PERF SCHEDULE OF FUNDING STATUS STATE EMPLOYEES ONLY ................................................................................................................ EX-1-11

TABLE 38 DB PROGRAM MEMBERSHIP ..................................................................... EX-1-13

TABLE 39 DB PROGRAM SCHEDULE OF BENEFITS PAID AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES .................................................................... EX-1-14

TABLE 40 SCHEDULE OF GENERAL FUND CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE STATE ............................................................................................................... EX-1-17

TABLE 41 ACTUARIAL METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS - DB PROGRAM ........... EX-1-19

TABLE 42 DB PROGRAM SCHEDULE OF FUNDING STATUS ................................. EX-1-20

TABLE 43 CALSTRS INVESTMENT RESULTS BASED ON MARKET VALUE ....... EX-1-22

TABLE 44 CALSTRS TIME-WEIGHTED GROSS RETURNS AS OF WNE 30, 2016 .................................................................................................. EX-1-23

EX-1-ii

PENSION SYSTEMS

General

The principal retirement systems in which the state participates or to which it contributes funds are the California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") and the California State Teachers' Retirement System ("CalSTRS"). The assets and liabilities of the funds administered by CalPERS and CalSTRS are included in the financial statements of the state as fiduciary funds. A summary description of CalPERS and CalSTRS is set forth in Note 24 (and the Schedule of Funding Progress included in the Required Supplementary Information) to the Audited Basic Financial Statements of the State of California for the Year Ended June 30, 2015. See "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."

The University of California ("UC") maintains a separate retirement system. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget does not allocate any of UC's appropriation specifically to fund its employer retirement costs, but directs $169 million in one-time Proposition 2 funds to help pay down the unfunded liability of the UC's retirement system. See Table 6.

As described below, the obligation of the state to make payments to CalPERS and CalSTRS to fund retirement benefits constitutes a significant financial obligation. CalPERS and CalSTRS each currently have unfunded liabilities in the tens of billions of dollars. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget reflects both completed and anticipated revisions of economic and/or demographic assumptions by CalPERS and CalSTRS that will increase state pension contributions from the General Fund. The CalPERS Board of Administration made a change to its actuarial assumptions at its December 21, 2016 meeting, consisting of a reduction in the assumed rate of return to 7 percent, phased in over the next three years. On February I, 2017, the CalSTRS Board also approved revisions to its actuarial assumptions to reduce the assumed rate of return to 7 percent over the next two years. The actions made by both boards will increase state contributions. Retirement-related costs payable from the General Fund are expected to increase in the foreseeable future. The actual amount of such increases will depend on a variety of factors, including but not limited to investment returns, actuarial assumptions, experience, retirement benefit adjustments and, in the case of CalSTRS, statutory changes to contribution levels.

The information in this section relating to CalPERS and CalSTRS is primarily derived from information produced by CalPERS and CalSTRS, their independent accountants and their actuaries. The state has not independently verified the information produced by CalPERS and CalSTRS and makes no representations nor expresses any opinion as to the accuracy of the information produced by CalPERS and CalSTRS.

The comprehensive annual financial reports of CalPERS and CalSTRS are available on their websites at www.calpers.ca.gov and www.calstrs.ca.gov, respectively. The CalPERS and CalSTRS websites also contain the most recent actuarial valuation reports, as well as other information concerning benefits and other matters. Such information is not incorporated by reference herein. The state cannot guarantee the accuracy of such information. Actuarial assessments are "forward-looking" information that reflect the judgment of the fiduciaries of the pension plans, and are based upon a variety of assumptions, one or more of which may not

EX-I-I

http://www.calpers.ca.gov

http://www.calstrs.ca.gov

materialize or be changed in the future. Actuarial assessments will change with the future experience of the pension plans.

On June 25, 2012, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") approved two new standards with respect to pension accounting and financial reporting standards for state and local governments and pension plans. The new standards are set forth in GASB Statements 67 and 68 which replace GASB Statement 27 and most of GASB Statements 25 and 50. The changes impacted the accounting treatment of pension plans in which state and local governments participate.

While these new accounting standards change financial statement reporting requirements, including a requirement that "net pension liability" be included on state and local government balance sheets, they did not impact funding policies of the pension systems. The impact of new G ASB reporting requirements are reflected in the CalPERS and CalS TRS Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports for year ended June 30, 2016.

Pension Reform

1. PEPRA

In 2012, the state enacted The Public Employees' Pension Reform Act ("PEPRA"), a comprehensive pension reform package affecting state and local government, which increased the retirement age and lowered retirement benefits for most new state and local government employees hired on or after January 1, 2013. PEPRA also includes provisions to increase current employee contributions. Though PEPRA covers most public employees in state government, cities, counties, special districts, school districts, and community colleges, the following discussion relates only to PEPRA's impact on state employee retirement. PEPRA excludes judges, the University of California, and charter cities with independent pension systems from the new retirement plans; however, newly elected or appointed judges are subject to the new cost-sharing provisions described below.

In a preliminary actuarial analysis in 2012, CalPERS estimated savings to the state of $10.3 billion to $12.6 billion over the next 30 years due primarily to increased employee contributions and, as the workforce turns over, lower benefit formulas that will gradually reduce normal costs. Other provisions reduce the risk of the state incurring additional unfunded liabilities, including prohibiting retroactive benefits increases, generally prohibiting contribution holidays, and prohibiting purchases of additional non-qualified service credit ("air time"). Key changes to retirement plans affecting the state include (1) lower defined-benefit formulas that increase retirement ages; (2) caps imposed on pensionable income for new public employees hired on or after January 1, 2013; and (3) a new standard that new employees must pay for at least 50 percent of the normal costs of their pensions.

Costs for retiree health and dental benefits ("OPEB") are not addressed in PEPRA; however, later retirement ages will reduce OPEB liabilities in the long term. See "ST ATE FINANCES-Retiree Health Care Costs." Provisions in PEPRA affecting CalSTRS did not change the state's statutory contribution rate. However, potential additional employee contributions, limits on pensionable compensation, and higher retirement ages for new members

EX-1-2

will reduce pressure on the system's unfunded liabilities and potentially on state contribution levels in the long term.

2. Ca!STRS Funding Solution

The funding of the Ca!STRS Defined Benefit Plan (the "DB Program") is based on contribution rates set by statute instead of actuarially determined amounts as is done for the Ca!PERS system. Over time, this has contributed to an underfunding of the DB Program which has been a concern in recent years. As one example, the funding status of the DB Program was identified as a high risk issue in the California State Auditor report 2013-601 dated September 2013 because, as stated in the report, the DB Program assets were projected to be depleted in 31 years (33 years based on the June 30, 2013 Ca!STRS Valuation) assuming existing contribution rates continue, and other significant actuarial assumptions are realized.

In 2014, the Legislature enacted AB 1469 (Chapter 47, Statutes of 2014), a comprehensive funding solution intended to eliminate the current Ca!STRS unfunded liability on the DB Program by 2046. The plan started modestly in fiscal year 2014-15 and will phase in, providing the state, schools, and teachers sufficient time to prepare for future increases in contributions.

Teacher (member) contributions increased from 8 percent to a total of 10.25 percent of creditable compensation for members not subject to PEPRA and 9.205 percent for members subject to PEPRA, school ( employer) contributions have already increased from 8.25 percent on July I, 2013 to 12.58 percent on July I, 2016 and are set to increase further each year until reaching a total of 19.1 percent of creditable compensation on July I, 2020, and the state's total contribution to the DB Program increased from approximately 3.5 percent on July I, 2014 to 6.3 percent of payroll on July I, 2016 and thereafter. The Ca!STRS Board approved new economic and demographic assumptions at its February 2017 meeting. In anticipation that changes to these assumptions will increase contribution rates, the state contribution for the DB Program for fiscal year 2017-18 has increased by the maximum amount permitted in statute of 0.5 percent, to 6.8 percent, in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget. In addition, the state will continue to pay 2.5 percent of payroll annually for a supplemental inflation protection program-for a total of 9.3 percent. See "Ca!STRS-Funding for the DB Program" for more information on the plan.

CalPERS

I. General

Ca!PERS administers a total of 12 funds, including four defined benefit retirement plans: the Public Employees' Retirement Fund ("PERF"), the Legislators' Retirement Fund ("LRF"), the Judges' Retirement Fund ("JRF"), and the Judges' Retirement Fund II ("JRF II"). (These plans, as well as the other plans administered by Ca!PERS, are described in the comprehensive financial reports ofCalPERS, which can be found on Ca!PERS' website at www.calpers.ca.gov. Such information is not incorporated by reference herein.) The PERF, LRF, JRF, and JRF II are defined benefit pension plans which generally provide benefits based on members' years of service, age, final compensation, and benefit formula. In addition, benefits are provided for disability, death, and survivors of eligible members or beneficiaries. Certain summary

EX-1-3

http://www.calpers.ca.gov

information concerning PERF is set forth below. Certain summary information concerning LRF, JRF, JRF II, and the 1959 Survivor Benefit program (which provides payments to the survivors of eligible members who die before retirement) is set forth at the end of this section.

CalPERS is administered by a 13-member Board of Administration (the "CalPERS Board"), that includes the State Controller, Director of the California Department of Human Resources, and the State Treasurer, who serve ex officio. The other CalPERS Board members include a member elected by active school employees, a member elected by retirees, a member elected by active state employees, a member elected by active public agency employees, a member designated by the State Personnel Board, a public representative appointed jointly by the Speaker of the Assembly and the Senate Rules Committee, an official of a life insurer appointed by the Governor, an elected local official appointed by the Governor, and two members elected by all members.

2. Members and Employers

The PERF is a multiple-employer defined benefit retirement fund. In addition to the state, employer participants include more than 3,000 public agencies and school districts. CalPERS acts as the common investment and administrative agent for the member agencies. The state and schools (for "classified employees," which generally consist of school employees other than teachers) are required by law to participate in CalPERS. Other public agencies can elect whether or not to participate in CalPERS or administer their own plans. Members of CalPERS generally become fully vested in their retirement benefits earned to date after five years of credited service. Separate accounts are maintained for each employer participating in CalPERS, and separate actuarial valuations are performed for each individual employer's plan to determine the employer's periodic contribution rate and other information for the individual plan, based on the benefit selected by the employer and the individual plan's proportionate share of CalPERS assets.

Unless otherwise specified, the information relating to CalPERS provided in this section relates only to state employees. State employees include Executive Branch, California State University, Judicial, and Legislature employees.

The following table reflects the number of state employee members of CalPERS as of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016.

TABLE31 CalPERS Membership (State Employees) as of June 30

Category 2015 2016 Retirees 186,144 196,789 Survivors and Beneficiaries 32,692 35,966 Active Members 250,959 257,960 Inactive Members 86,845 87,755

Total 556,640 578,470

Source: CalPERS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Years ended hme 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016.

EX-1-4

Benefits to state employees are paid according to the category of employment and the type of benefit coverage provided by the state. Generally, all employees in a covered class of employment who work on a half-time basis or more are eligible to participate in CalPERS. The five categories of membership applicable to state employees are set forth below. Certain categories also have "tiers" of membership. It is up to the employee to select his or her preferred membership tier. Different tiers may have different benefits, as well as different employee contribution requirements. The member categories are as follows:

• Miscellaneous Members - staff, operational, supervisory, and all other eligible employees who are not in special membership categories.

• Safety Members - employees whose principal duties are in active law enforcement or fire prevention and suppression work but are not defined as a State Peace Officer/Firefighter Member, or who occupy positions designated by law as Safety Member positions.

• State Industrial Members - employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation who have the same service retirement and other benefits as Miscellaneous Members, but who also have industrial death and disability benefits under certain limited circumstances.

• State Peace Officer/Firefighter Members - employees who are involved in law enforcement, firefighting and fire suppression, public safety, protective services, or the management and supervision thereof, whose positions are defined as State Peace Officer/Firefighter Members in the Government Code or by the Department of Human Resources.

• Patrol Members - California Highway Patrol officers and their related supervisors and managers.

3. Retirement Benefits

Generally, annual pension benefits depend on employment category, years of service credit, final compensation, and age of retirement. Annual pension benefits generally range from 2 percent of final compensation at age 5 5 for each year of service credit ( applicable to Miscellaneous and State Industrial category members) to 3 percent of final compensation for each year of service for retirement at age 50 (for State Peace Officer/Firefighter category members). Pension benefits are subject to annual cost of living adjustments (generally ranging from 2-3 percent) and an additional adjustment intended to preserve the "purchasing power" of the pension benefit. Additional pension benefits also generally include disability and death benefit provisions. A detailed description of the pension benefits payable by PERF to state employees is set forth in CalPERS actuarial valuations.

Pension reform legislation signed in 2012 (referred to herein as PEPRA) increased the retirement age for new CalPERS members hired on or after January 1, 2013 (referred to herein as PEPRA members). State Miscellaneous and State Industrial PEPRA members who retire at age 62 will be eligible for a benefit equal to 2 percent of final compensation for each year of credited

EX-1-5

service (up to 2. 5 percent of final compensation for members retiring after age 67). At the June 14, 2016 meeting of the CalPERS Pension and Health Benefits Committee's, an estimate was provided that approximately 29 percent of the active member population would consist of PEPRA members as of June 30, 2016.

The following table shows the amount of pension benefits paid from CalPERS for fiscal years 2010-11 through 2014-15.

TABLE32 CalPERS (State Only)

Schedule of Pension Benefits Paid (Dollars in Millions)

Fiscal Year 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Benefits Paid $6,017 6,711 6,935 7,410 7,859

Source: CalPERS State and Schools Actuarial Valuation for fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 through June 30, 2012; State Actuarial Valuation for Fiscal Years Ended hme 30, 2013 through June 30, 2015.

4. Member and State Contributions

The pension benefits for state employees in CalPERS are funded by contributions from members, the state, and earnings from investments. Member and state contributions are a percentage of applicable member compensation and are determined annually on an actuarial basis. Member contribution rates are defined by law and vary by bargaining units within the same employee classification. The required contribution rates of active CalPERS state members are based on a percentage of their salary ranging from 3.75 to 13 percent.

State contributions are made from the General Fund, special funds, and nongovernmental cost funds. The state has made the full amount of actuarially required contribution each year. The rates below also include additional state contributions due to savings realized by the state as a result of increased employee contributions under PEPRA.

EX-1-6

The 2017-18 Governor's Budget includes the following employer contribution rates:

State Miscellaneous Tier 1 California State University, Miscellaneous Tier 1 State Miscellaneous Tier 2 State Industrial State Safety State Peace Officers & Firefighters California State University, Peace Officers and Firefighters California Highway Patrol

Contribution Rates 28.9% 28.9 28.9 21.9 21.4 45.1 45.1 53.5

Table 33 shows the state's actual and estimated contributions to CalPERS.

State Employees

TABLE33 State Contributions to PERF, including CSU


State Employees CSU CSU

General Employees General Total Total

General Fiscal Year All Funds Fund All Funds Fund Contributions Fund

2013-14 $3,219 $1,645 $474 $474 $3,693 $2,118 2014-15 4,042 2,120 543 543 4,584 2,662 2015-16 4,338 2,281 585 584 4,922 2,866 2016-l?(a) 4,754 2,506 621 621 5,375 3,128 2017-18(•) 5,278 2,783 672 672 5,950 3,455

(a) Estimated contributions.

Note: Totals may not add due to rounding effects.


5. Prospective Funding Status; Future State Contributions

The level of future required contributions from the state depends on a variety of factors, including future investment portfolio performance, actuarial assumptions, and additional potential changes in retirement benefits. The CalPERS Board has voted to lower its assumed rate of return from 7.5 to 7.0 percent over three years, which will result in contribution increases for employers and some employees. The reduction of the discount rate results in additional state contributions of approximately $172 million ($105 million General Fund) in 2017-18, increasing to $2 billion ($1. 1 billion General Fund) when the discount rate changes are fully implemented. Total state pension contributions are expected to reach $9.7 billion ($5.6 billion General Fund) by 2023-24 due to changes in the discount rate, scheduled contribution increases under existing funding policies, and payroll growth.

EX-1-7

6. Investment Policy; Investment Returns

Pursuant to the state Constitution, the CalPERS Board has sole and exclusive fiduciary responsibility over the assets of the PERF. CalPERS' assets are managed both externally by professional investment management firms and internally by CalPERS investment staff. The CalPERS Board monitors the performance of the managers with the assistance of an external investment consultant.

CalPERS has established a series of procedures and guidelines with respect to investments. The procedures, grouped together as the "Total Fund Investment Policy," serve to guide CalPERS' investment strategy for PERF. The CalPERS Board reviews the Total Fund Investment Policy as needed, taking into consideration, among other things, the latest actuarial valuation. Additional information concerning CalPERS investments can be found on the CalPERS website.

The following tables set forth the total return on all assets for PERF for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2007 through June 30, 2016, as well as time-weighted average returns.

TABLE34 CalPERS Investment Results Based On Market Value

Fiscal Year 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Annualized Rate of Return

19.1% (5.1)

(24.0) 13.3 21.7

0.1 13.2 18.4 2.4 0.6

Source: CalPERS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Years ended hme 30, 2007 through June 30, 2016.

TABLE35 PERF Time-Weighted Average Returns as of June 30, 2016

Period 3 years 5 years 10 years 20 years

Time Weighted Average Rate

of Return

6.9% 6.8 5.1 7.03

Source: CalPERS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year ended hme 30, 2016; Legislative Report: CalPERS CIO Performance Report for Fiscal Year ended hme 30, 2016.

EX-1-8

All four rates are below 7.5 percent, CalPERS' former actuarially assumed rate of return. In order to more accurately reflect investment expectations given the current environment, the CalPERS Board of Administration voted at its December 21, 2016 meeting to phase to a 7 percent assumed rate of return over the next three years.

CalPERS has publicly indicated that it expects actual investment returns in the next ten year period will be less than the 7.0 percent rate of return. Actual investment returns lower than the actuarially assumed level will result in decreased funding status, and increased actuarially required contributions.

7. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions

The total cost CalPERS incurs to provide benefits includes administrative expenses. All of these costs are funded through contributions to the PERF and investment earnings on PERF's assets. CalPERS' actuary estimates the total cost of the benefits to be paid and, using the actuarial funding method determined by CalPERS (as described below), the actuary allocates these costs to the fiscal years. CalPERS' financial objective is to fund in such a manner as to keep contribution rates approximately level as a percentage of payroll from generation to generation, while accumulating sufficient assets over each member's working career in order to cover the total cost of providing benefits.

The primary funding method used to accomplish this objective is the "Entry Age Normal Cost Method." Under this method, projected benefits are determined for all members and the associated liabilities are spread in a manner that produces level annual costs as a level percent of pay in each year from the age of hire ( entry age) to the assumed retirement age. The cost allocated to the current fiscal year is called the "normal cost." The Actuarial Accrued Liability ("AAL") for active members is then calculated as the portion of the total cost of the plan allocated to prior years.

The CalPERS Chief Actuary considers various factors in determining the assumptions to be used in preparing the actuarial report. Demographic assumptions are based on a study of the actual history of retirement, rates of termination/separation of employment, years of life expectancy after retirement, disability, and other factors. This experience study is generally done once every four years. The most recent experience study was completed in 2014 in connection with the preparation of actuarial recommendations by the CalPERS Chief Actuary as described below. The following table sets forth certain economic actuarial assumptions for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 through June 30, 2015.

In December 2016, the CalPERS Board lowered the discount rate to be phased in over three years: for fiscal year 2017-18 to a rate of 7.375 percent, for fiscal year 2018-19 to a rate of 7.25 percent, and for fiscal year 2019-20 to a rate of 7 percent. The impact on the contribution rates will be phased-in for the state beginning in 2017-18.

EX-1-9

TABLE36 Actuarial Assumptions-PERF

Fiscal Year Assumption 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Investment Returns 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% Inflation 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 Salary Increase (Total Payroll) 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00

Source: CalPERS State and Schools Actuarial Valuation for fiscal years ended hme 30, 2012; State Actuarial Valuation for Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2013 through June 30, 2015.

On February 20, 2014, the CalPERS Board of Administration adopted new mortality and retirement assumptions as part of a regular review of demographic experience. Key assumption changes included longer post-retirement life expectancy, earlier retirement ages, and higher-thanexpected wage growth for State Peace Officers/Firefighters and California Highway Patrol. The impact of the assumption changes is being phased in over three years, with a 20-year amortization, beginning in fiscal year 2014-15.

On November 18, 2015, the CalPERS Board adopted a Funding Risk Mitigation Policy that seeks to reduce funding risk over time. It establishes a mechanism whereby CalPERS investment performance that significantly outperforms the discount rate triggers adjustments to the discount rate, expected investment return, and strategic asset allocation targets. Reducing the volatility of investment returns is expected to increase the long-term sustainability of CalPERS pension benefits for members. In February 2017, the CalPERS Board revised the Funding Risk Mitigation Policy. The revisions include suspension of the policy until fiscal year 2020-21, and a decrease of the required first excess investment return threshold from 4 to 2 percent.

8. Actuarial Valuation; Determination of Required Contributions

The required state contributions to PERF are determined on an annual basis by the CalPERS Chief Actuary. The actuary uses demographic and other data (such as employee age, salary, and service credits) and various assumptions ( such as estimated salary increases, interest rates, employee turnover, and mortality and disability rates) to determine the amount that the state must contribute in a given year to provide sufficient funds to PERF to pay benefits when due. The actuary then produces a report, called the "actuarial valuation," in which the actuary reports on the assets, liabilities, and required contribution for the following fiscal year. State law requires the state to make the actuarially-required contribution to PERF each year.

A portion of the actuarial valuations performed by CalPERS actuaries are audited each year by an independent actuarial firm. The actuarial valuations specific to state employees are audited every three years. The most recent audit was for the June 30, 2015 actuarial valuation and was completed in December 2016.

The market value of assets measures the value of the assets available in the pension plan to pay benefits and is used to determine the required employer contributions. At the April 16 and 17, 2013 meetings, the CalPERS Board approved a plan to replace the then current 15-year asset-

EX-1-10

smoothing policy with a 5-year direct-rate smoothing process and replace the then current 30-year rolling amortization of unfunded liabilities with a 30-year fixed amortization period.

9. Funding Status

The following table sets forth the schedule of funding status relating to the state's participation in PERF as of the five most recent actuarial valuation dates. Funding status is measured by a comparison of the state's share of PERF assets to pay state employee benefits with plan liabilities.

In September 2016, CalPERS released the June 30, 2015 State Actuarial Valuation, which shows an increase in state employer contribution rates for fiscal year 2016-17 and a decline in funded status due to less than assumed investment performance, and other demographic factors. The unfunded liability allocable to state employees ( excluding judges and elected officials) was $49.6 billion as of June 30, 2015 an increase of $6.3 billion from the June 30, 2014 valuation. The funded ratio decreased to 69.4 percent as of June 30, 2015, as compared to 72.1 percent in the June 30, 2014 valuation.

Market Value of Assets (MV AjC"l

Actuarial Accrued Liabilities

TABLE37 PERF Schedule of Funding Status

State Employees Only (Dollars in Millions)

2010-11 2011-12

$91,159 $88,810

129,648 134,314 Excess of Market Value of Assets over AAL or Surplus (Unfunded) Actuarial Accrued Liabilities (UAAL) MV A Basis (38,489) (45,504) Covered Payroll 16,212 15,680 Funded Ratio (MV A) 70.3% 66.1%

Fiscal Year 2012-13

$97,453

147,393

(49,940) 15,347 66.1%

(a) Table does not include actuarial value of assets (AV A) because CalPERS no longer measures AV A.

2013-14 2014-15

$111,982 $112,532

155,247 162,091

(43,265) (49,559) 16,476 17,453

72.10% 69.40%

Source: CalPERS State and Schools Actuarial Valuation, Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 and prior years; State Actuarial Valuation, Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2013 through June 30, 2015.

At the CalPERS Finance and Administration Committee's December 20, 2016 Board meeting, estimates were provided to demonstrate the impact of a reduction in the assumed rate of return to 7.0 percent, effective immediately. It was estimated that a 7.0 percent assumed rate of return would result in a 63.5 percent funded status for the total PERF, which includes state, school, and public agency employees. This estimate does not reflect the CalPERS Board's decision to phase in the 7.0 percent rate over three years, which delays the impact to the funded status.

EX-1-11

10. Other Retirement Plans

In addition to PERF, CalPERS also administers JRF, JRF II, LRF, and the 1959 Survivor Benefit program.

In the JRF actuarial reports for the year ended June 30, 2015, CalPERS reported that JRF had an unfunded actuarial liability of approximately $3.3 billion. For the same year, the JRF II and the LRF reported funding surpluses of $2.3 million and $15.7 million, respectively. In the 1959 Survivor Benefit program actuarial report for the year ended June 30, 2015, CalPERS reported that the program had an unfunded actuarial liability of approximately $33.2 million. The state's fiscal year 2017-18 retirement contributions from the General Fund are estimated to be $197 million for JRF and $67 million for JRF II, $4.9 million for the 1959 Survivor Benefit Program, and $1.0 million for LRF.

Further information concerning JRF, JRF II, and LRF can be found in CalPERS' financial reports and actuarial reports and is set forth in Note 24 (and the Schedule of Funding Status included in the Required Supplementary Information) to the Audited Basic Financial Statements of the State of California for the Year Ended June 30, 2016 attached as APPENDIX E to this Official Statement.

CalSTRS

1. General

CalSTRS was established under the California Education Code in 1913 to provide benefits to California public school and community college teachers and to certain other employees of the state's public school system (kindergarten through community college). CalSTRS is the administrator of multiple-employer, cost-sharing defined benefit plans, a taxdeferred defined contribution plan, a Medicare Premium Payment Program, and a Teachers' Deferred Compensation Fund.

The largest CalSTRS fund, the State Teachers' Retirement Plan (the "STRP"), is a multiple employer, cost-sharing, defined benefit plan comprised of four programs: the Defined Benefit Program (referred to in the state's 2015 Financial Statements and in this Official Statement as the "DB Program"), the Defined Benefit Supplement Program, the Cash Balance Benefit Program, and the Replacement Benefit Program. Within the DB Program there is also a Supplemental Benefits Maintenance Account (the "SBMA") which provides purchasing power protection for retired members.

The state is not an employer (with certain very limited exceptions) in any of CalSTRS programs but does contribute to the DB Program and the SBMA from its General Fund pursuant to statutes in the Education Code. The DB Program is funded through a combination of investment earnings and statutorily set contributions from three sources: the members of CalSTRS, the employers, and the state. Contribution rates for the members and employers to fund the DB Program are not adjusted to reflect or offset actual investment returns or other factors which affect the funded status of the DB Program. The same is true for the contribution rates for the state. For contributions from employers and the state, the CalSTRS Board was provided limited rate setting authority in 2014 under the provisions of AB 1469.

EX-1-12

The SBMA is a separate account within the DB Program that is funded with a combination of investment earnings and statutorily set contributions from the state. The Purchasing Power Protection Program payments for retired members are made only to the extent funds are available in the SBMA and are not a vested benefit. See "Funding for the SBMA."

CalSTRS is administered by a 12-member Teachers' Retirement Board (the "CalSTRS Board") that includes the California Director of Finance, State Controller, State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the State Treasurer, who serve ex officio. The other CalSTRS Board members serve four-year terms and include three CalSTRS member-elected representatives representing current educators, one retired CalSTRS member, three public representatives, and one school board representative, each appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate.

Certain summary information concerning the DB Program is set forth below.

2. Members and Employers

As of June 30, 2016, the DB Program included 1,740 employers. The following table reflects the total number of members in the DB Program as of June 30, 2015 and 2016.

TABLE38 DB Program Membership

Membership

Active Members

Inactive Members

Retirees and Beneficiaries

Total

June 30, 2016

438,537

187,722

288,195

914 454

June 30, 2015

429,460

184,396

282,100

895 956

Source: CalSTRS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2015 and hme 30, 2016.

3. Retirement Benefits

Member benefits are determined by statute in the Education Code and are generally based on a member's age, final compensation, and years of credited service. Members are 100 percent vested in retirement benefits after five years of credited service and are eligible for normal retirement at age 60 and for early retirement at age 55 or at age 50 with 30 years of credited service. The normal retirement benefit is 2 percent of final compensation ( as defined in the Education Code) for each year of credited service (up to 2.4 percent of final compensation for members retiring after age 60), and members who retired on or after January 1, 2001 with 30 or more years of service by December 31, 2010 receive monthly bonus payments ofup to $400 per month. Pension reform legislation signed in 2012 (referred to herein as PEPRA) increased the retirement age for new CalSTRS members hired on or after January 1, 2013. PEPRA members who retire at age 62 will be eligible for a benefit equal to 2 percent of final compensation for each year of credited service (up to 2.4 percent of final compensation for members retiring after age 62). The PEPRA member population in CalSTRS has been increasing steadily over the last few years. As of June 30, 2016, there were 60,492 active PEPRA members. CalSTRS expects that the number of PEPRA members will total about 80,000 on July 1, 2017, representing about

EX-1-13

20 percent of the total active population. CalSTRS expects the percentage to increase to about 30 percent of the total active population by 2020.

Benefits are increased by 2 percent (a simple, not a compounded, cost-of-living increase) of the initial allowance, on each September 1 following the first anniversary of the effective date of the benefit.

The following table shows the amount of benefits and administrative expenses paid under the DB Program for the last five fiscal years:

TABLE39 DB Program

Schedule of Benefits Paid and Administrative Expenses (Dollars in Millions)

Fiscal Year 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Amount of Benefits Paid $9,596 10,208 10,844 11,414 11,972 12,546

Administrative Expenses $104

131 133 154 146 183

Source: CalSTRS Actuarial Valuations for Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2011 through 2016.

4. Funding for the DB Program

The DB Program is funded with a combination of investment income and contributions from members, employers, and the state. The DB Program is one of the four programs under the State Teachers' Retirement Program (STRP). Although specific amounts vary from year to year, approximately 61 percent of total inflows to the STRP were derived from investment returns, according to CalSTRS. As described below, the contribution rates of the members, employers, and the state are determined by statute in the Education Code instead of actuarially determined amounts as is done for the CalPERS system. Over time, this has contributed to an underfunding of the DB Program which has been a concern in recent years.

On June 24, 2014, the Governor signed AB 1469, a comprehensive long-term funding solution intended to eliminate the current CalSTRS unfunded liability on the DB Program by 2046. The changes in contribution rates for members, employers and the state required by AB 1469 are described below. While the plan is intended to eliminate the unfunded liability of the DB Program by 2046, there is no assurance that it will be eliminated by that date. See "Prospective Funding Status; Future Contributions" below. Accordingly, there can be no assurances that the required amounts annually payable among the members, employers, and state will not significantly increase in the future.

Member Contributions. Members are required to make contributions to the DB Program in an amount equal to 8 percent of creditable compensation of the member. However, for services performed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2010, the member contribution

EX-1-14

to the DB Program was 6 percent because 2 percent was directed to the Defined Benefit Supplement Program (to which the state does not contribute).

Under AB 1469, member contributions increased over time on July 1, 2014, 2015 and 2016 to the current rate of 10.25 percent for members not subject to PEPRA and to 9.205 percent for members subject to PEPRA. In addition, PEPRA members are required to pay at least onehalf the normal cost of their DB Program benefits, and under AB 1469, the contribution rate for PEPRA members should be adjusted if the normal cost increases by more than 1 percent since the last time the member contribution rate was set. The CalSTRS Board adopted changes to its actuarial assumptions at its February 2017 meeting, which are referenced in the 2016 CalSTRS Valuation. The valuation determines that the actuarial assumption changes do not result in an increase in the contribution rate for PEPRA members.

Employer Contributions. Employers are required to make contributions to the DB Program in an amount equal to 8 percent of creditable compensation plus 0.25 percent to pay costs of the unused sick leave credit; provided that a portion of the employers' contributions has in the past and may in the future be transferred to the Medicare Premium Program which has the effect of further reducing aggregate annual contributions to the DB Program.

Under AB 1469, employer contributions have increased, and will continue to increase over time on each July 1 of 2014 through 2020 to 19.1 percent of creditable compensation in fiscal year 2020-21 through fiscal year 2045-46. Beginning in fiscal year 2021-22 through fiscal year 2045-46, AB 1469 authorizes the CalSTRS Board to adjust the employer contribution up or down 1 percentage point each year, but no higher than 20.25 percent total and no lower than 8.25 percent, to eliminate the remaining unfunded obligation that existed on July 1, 2014. Therefore, employers will not be subject to any additional rate increases as a result of the newly adopted actuarial assumptions until fiscal year 2021-22.

State Contributions. The state's General Fund contribution to the DB Program is 2.017 percent of creditable compensation from two fiscal years prior. For example, for fiscal year 2011-12, the state's contribution was based on creditable compensation from fiscal year 2009-10. Before fiscal year 2014-15, the state also contributed an additional 0.524 percent of creditable compensation from two fiscal years prior when there is an unfunded obligation or a normal cost deficit exists for benefits in place as of July 1, 1990. Under the prior structure, the percentage was adjusted up to 0.25 percent per year to reflect the contributions required to fund the unfunded obligation or the normal cost deficit. However, the supplemental contribution could not exceed 1.505 percent of creditable compensation from two fiscal years prior.

Under AB 1469, the state increased its supplemental contribution to the July 1, 1990 benefit obligation on a phased basis over a three year period. Starting in fiscal year 2014-15, the supplemental contribution increased to 1.437 percent, in fiscal year 2015-16 it increased to 2.874 percent, and in fiscal year 2016-17 it increased to 4.311 percent. Beginning fiscal year 2017-18 through fiscal year 2045-46, the CalSTRS Board is authorized to adjust the supplemental state contribution up 0.50 percent each year to eliminate the unfunded obligation for benefits in place as of July 1, 1990. If there is no unfunded obligation, the supplemental contribution shall be reduced to zero.

EX-1-15

In anticipation of the new actuarial assumptions the Ca!STRS Board approved at its February 2017 meeting, the 2017-18 Governor's Budget increased the fiscal year 2017-18 state contribution to the DB Program by the statutory maximum amount of 0. 5 percent, to 6. 8 percent.

As described above, AB 1469 provides the Ca!STRS Board with limited authority to increase or decrease the school and state contributions based on changing conditions. The plan is intended to eliminate the unfunded liability of the DB Program by 2046. However, while AB 1469 provides for significant increases in the statutorily required contributions to Ca!STRS from the state, employers and members, it does not provide that such statutory rates be adjusted to equal actuarially required amounts from time to time. Actuarially required amounts will vary from time to time based on a variety of factors, including actuarial assumptions, investment performance and member benefits. To the extent rates established pursuant to AB 1469 are less than actuarially required amounts from time to time, such circumstances could materially adversely affect the funded status of Ca!STRS.

5. Change in Accounting Standards

The 2016 Ca!STRS Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with GASB Statement 67. GASB Statement 67 impacts the financial reporting requirements for Ca!STRS but does not change the funding requirements for members, employers, or the state. The 2016 Ca!STRS Financial Statements are available on the Ca!STRS website at www.calstrs.ca.gov.

Under GASB Statement 67, Ca!STRS is required to report the net pension liability (NPL) instead of the previously required unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL). Additionally, Ca!STRS opted to provide other pension information to display the proportionate share of contributions per employer. Employers may consider this schedule when determining their proportionate share of the NPL to be recognized in their financial statements pursuant to GASB Statement 68.

Investors should note that the Ca!STRS 2016 Financial Statements display the NPL of the entire STRP and do not provide a calculation of the DB Program separately. Ca!STRS reports that an actuarial valuation of the DB Program will continue to be prepared. See "Actuarial Valuation" below for information about the most recent valuation report for the DB Program.

In Schedule A of the Independent Auditor's Report and Other Pension Information of the STRP for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 (which is available on the Ca!STRS website at www.calstrs.ca.gov), 36.28 percent of the total employer and state contributions is allocated to the state. This value is used by the state's financial statements to represent the percent of NPL allocated to the state. GASB Statement 68 requires employers and non-employer contributing entities to report any NPL as a liability in their Statement of Net Position. The state's proportionate share of the NPL is 37.65% or $22 billion as of the June 30, 2014 measurement date pursuant to the state's 2015 financial statements.

6. Funding for the SBMA

The SBMA is a separate account within the DB Program that is funded with a combination of investment income and contributions from the state. The contribution rate for the state's funding of the SBMA is also determined by statute in the Education Code. The

EX-1-16



Purchasing Power Protection Program funded from the SBMA provides quarterly payments to retired and disabled members and beneficiaries to restore purchasing power to beneficiaries if the purchasing power of their initial retirement or disability allowances have fallen below a specified percentage. The Purchasing Power Protection Program payments are made only to the extent funds are available in the SBMA and are not a vested benefit.

The state's General Fund contribution to the SBMA is 2.5 percent of creditable compensation of the fiscal year ending in the prior calendar year, less $70 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, $71 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 and $72 million thereafter.

The following table displays the total state contributions to CalSTRS for the DB Program, SBMA, and the additional Pre-1990 Defined Benefit supplemental payments made pursuant to AB 1469.

TABLE 40 Schedule of General Fund Contributions from the State

Fiscal Year

2013-14 2014-15Ca) 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18


DEPROGRAM $527

528 548 581 618

SBMA $581

582 607 649 694

Pre-1990 DB $252

376 781

1,243 1,474

Total $1,360 1,486 1,936 2,473 2,787

(a) Beginning in 2014-15, the state increased payments to the Pre-1990 Defined Benefit pursuant to AB 1469. Source: State of California, Department of Finance

7. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions

Although contributions are set by statute, CalSTRS retains an independent actuary (the "CalSTRS Consulting Actuary") that prepares annual actuarial valuation reports of the DB Program. The CalSTRS Consulting Actuary also prepares reports reviewing the DB Program's actual experience every four years. The CalSTRS Board uses experience reports to evaluate how realistic the long-term assumptions have been and may be in the future. The most recent valuation report for the DB Program, dated March 21, 2017 (the "2016 CalSTRS Valuation"), was prepared as of June 30, 2016. The actuarial assumptions and methods used in the 2015 CalSTRS Valuation were based on the experience report prepared by the CalSTRS Consulting Actuary in February 2012. In December 2016, the CalSTRS Consulting Actuary prepared the most recent experience report and recommended the changes in actuarial assumptions described below. The CalSTRS Board adopted these recommended changes at its February 2017 meeting. The newly adopted assumptions will be used in the valuation report for the DB Program to be prepared as of June 30, 2016, and are expected to be adopted by the CalSTRS Board at its April 2017 meeting.

EX-1-17

In preparing the 2016 Ca!STRS Valuation, the Ca!STRS Consulting Actuary used the Entry Age Actuarial Cost Method to measure the accruing costs of benefits under the DB Program. GASB Statements 67 and 68 require all state and local governments with pension liabilities to use the Entry Age Actuarial Cost Method beginning in fiscal year 2014-15 if they are not already doing so. Under the Entry Age Actuarial Cost Method, the actuarial present value of projected benefits of each individual is allocated on a level basis over the earnings of the individual between entry age and assumed exit age. The portion of the actuarial present value allocated to the valuation year is called the normal cost and represents the cost assigned to a member for a given year, such that it would meet the continuing costs of a particular benefit if contributed each year starting with the date of membership. The Ca!STRS Consulting Actuary notes that the Entry Age Actuarial Cost Method is designed to produce a normal cost rate that remains a level percentage of earned salaries and that the normal cost rate is expected to remain fairly stable so long as the benefit provisions are not amended, the assumptions are not changed, membership experience emerges as assumed, and the demographic characteristics of the membership remain reasonably consistent. Some of the key demographic information taken into account includes assumptions about membership, service retirements, disability retirements, deaths, and merit salary increases, and some of the economic items include assumptions about inflation and wage growth.

The portion of the actuarial value of benefits not provided for at a valuation date by the actuarial present value of future normal costs is called the actuarial obligation, and the excess, if any, of the actuarial obligation over the actuarial value of assets is the unfunded actuarial obligation. Assumptions about how long benefits will be paid for active and inactive members and when such members will retire and how long they will live are required in calculating the actuarial obligation, and economic assumptions and valuation methods are required in valuing assets. The following table sets forth certain actuarial methods and assumptions for the four fiscal years ended June 30, 2016.

EX-1-18

TABLE 41 Actuarial Methods and Assumptions - DB Program

Fiscal Year Methods 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Actuarial Cost Method Entry age Entry age Entry age Entry age normal normal normal normal

Amortization Method Level Percent Level Percent of Level Percent Level Percent of of payroll payroll of payroll payroll

Amortization Period Open Open Closed Closed Remaining Amortization Period 30 years 30 years 32 years 31 years Asset Valuation Method Expected value Expected value Adjustment to Adjustment to

with 33% with 33% market value market value adjustment to adjustment to market value market value

Actuarial Assumptions Investment Rate of Return 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% Interest on Accounts 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Wage Growth 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Consumer Price Inflation 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 Post-retirement Benefit Increases 2.00 (simple) 2.00 (simple) 2.00 (simple) 2.00 (simple)

Source: CalSTRS Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports for Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016.

At its February 1, 2017 meeting, the CalSTRS Board voted to lower the assumed investment rate of return in two steps in order to mitigate the impact on members. The CalSTRS Board voted to lower the assumed investment rate of return from 7. 50 percent to 7.25 percent effective with the June 30, 2016 valuation and to 7.00 percent effective with the June 30, 2017 valuation. For financial reporting purposes, CalSTRS is expected to implement the 7.00 percent assumed return for their financial statements for the period ending June 30, 2017. In addition, the CalSTRS Board approved several changes to demographic assumptions, which the most significant change being the mortality assumption. These changes generally create additional funding pressures on the DB Plan.

8. Actuarial Valuation

In calculating the actuarial value of assets, contributions for the past year are added to the actuarial value of assets at the end of the prior year; benefits and expenses are subtracted; an assumed rate of return is added, and as described below, a portion of market value gains and losses are added or subtracted. The assumed investment rate of return on DB Program assets (net of investment and administrative expenses) and the assumed interest to be paid on refunds of member accounts are based in part on an inflation assumption of 2. 7 5 percent

Actual market returns are taken into account but to reduce rate volatility, actual market gains and losses are spread or "smoothed" over a three-year period. That is, one third of the difference between the expected actuarial value of assets and the fair market value of assets is taken into account to determine the actuarial value of assets. Based on the 2016 CalSTRS Valuation, due to the asset smoothing method, approximately one-third of the approximately $4.9 billion investment loss has not been recognized (the difference between the AV A and MV A in Table 42 below). GASB Statements 67 and 68, beginning in fiscal year 2013-14 for pension plans and fiscal year 2014-15 for employers, required state and local governments with pension

EX-1-19

liabilities to recognize the differences between expected and actual investment returns over a closed 5-year period instead of the 3-year period currently used by CalSTRS. CalSTRS continues to use 3-year period for valuation purposes and the 5-year period for financial reporting purposes.

9. Funding Status

The following table sets forth the schedule of funding status as of the five most recent actuarial valuation dates based on information provided by CalSTRS from the actuarial valuation reports for such years. Funding status is measured by a comparison of DB Program assets with DB Program liabilities.

TABLE42 DB Program Schedule of Funding Status


Fiscal Year 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14(<) 2014-lSCal 2015-16~)

Market Value of Assets $134,835 $147,907 $169,406 $169,127 $165,118 (MVA)l

Actuarial Value of Assets 144,232 148,614 158,495 165,553 169,976 (AVA)

Actuarial Accrued Liabilities (AAL)-eutry age

215,189 222,281 231,213 241,753 266,704

Excess of Market Value of Assets over AAL or Surplus (Unfunded) Actuarial Accrued -80,354 -74,374 -61,807 -72,626 -101,586 Liabilities (U AAL) MV A Basis(a)

Excess of Actuarial Value of Assets over AAL or Surplus -70,957 -73,667 -72,718 -76,200 -96,728 (Unfunded) Actuarial Accrued Liabilities (U AAL) AV A Basis

Covered Payroll 25,388 25,479 26,470 28,013 29,826

Funded Ratio (MV A) 63% 67% 73% 70% 62%

Funded Ratio (AV A) 67% 67% 69% 69% 64% (a) The AAL is referred to as the Actuarial Obligation and the UAAL is referred to as the Unflmded Actuarial Obligation (UAO)

in the 2014, 2015, and20J6CalSTRS Valuation.

Source: CalSTRS Actuarial Valuations for Fiscal Years ended June 30, 2011 through 2016.

The 2016 CalSTRS Valuation includes the new actuarial assumptions adopted at the CalSTRS Board February 2017 meeting, and estimates the impact associated with the reduction in the assumed rate of return. The estimates associated with both the July 1, 2017 and July 1, 2018 phase-in levels are applicable to a point in time: June 30, 2016. The first reduction to a

EX-1-20

7.25 percent rate of return is estimated to result in a 63. 7 percent funded ratio, and an actuarial accrued liability of $266. 7 billion. The second reduction to a 7 percent rate of return is estimated to result in a 61.8% funded ratio, however, CalSTRS has not provided an associated impact to the actuarial accrued liability.

The market value of the entire DB Program investment portfolio (including the SBMA assets) was $177.9 billion as of June 30, 2016, a decrease from $180.6 billion (or 1.5 percent) on June 30, 2015.

I 0. Prospective Funding Status; Future Contributions

The Ca!STRS Consulting Actuary concluded in the 2013 Ca!STRS Valuation (prior to the enactment of AB 1469) that the unfunded actuarial obligation of the DB Program will not be amortized over any future period and that the DB Program is projected to have its assets depleted in about 33 years. As mentioned above, in 2014, the Governor signed AB 1469, a comprehensive funding solution intended to eliminate the Ca!STRS unfunded liability on the DB Program by 2046. The changes in contribution rates for members, employers and the state required by AB 1469 are described above.

Due to the changes made to actuarial assumptions by the Ca!STRS Board in February 2017, the state contribution rate will increase by 0.5 percent of payroll effective July I, 2017 (as already assumed by the 2017-18 Governor's Budget). In the 2016 CalSTRS Valuation, the 0.5 percent annual increase is projected to continue for at least the next decade. The 2017-18 Governor's Budget includes $2. 8 billion General Fund for 2017-18 state contributions to Ca!STRS. Ca!STRS' reduced assumed rate of return results in an approximately $153 million increase in General Fund contributions for 2017-18.

According to the 2016 Ca!STRS Valuation, future revenues from contributions and appropriations for the DB Program are projected to be sufficient to finance its obligation by 2046, except for a small portion of the UAAL attributable to New Benefits and Post-2014 service that is not actuarially funded. This amount is estimated to be $639 million as of June 30, 2016.

I I. Investment Policy; Investment Returns

Pursuant to the state Constitution, the Ca!STRS Board has sole and exclusive fiduciary responsibility over all Ca!STRS' assets (including the DB Program assets). Ca!STRS' assets (including the DB Program assets) are managed both externally by professional investment management firms and internally by Ca!STRS investment staff. The Ca!STRS Board monitors the performance of the managers with the assistance of an external investment consultant.

Ca!STRS has established a series of procedures and guidelines with respect to investments. The procedures, grouped together as the "Investment Policy and Management Plan," serve to guide Ca!STRS asset allocation strategy for all Ca!STRS' programs, including the DB Program. The Ca!STRS Board reviews the Investment Policy and Management Plan annually, taking into consideration the latest actuarial study. Ca!STRS follows strategic allocation guidelines that identify targets for the percentage of funds to be invested in each asset class. These targets are typically implemented over a period of several years. Additional information concerning Ca!STRS investments can be found on the Ca!STRS website.

EX-1-21

The following table sets forth the total return on all Ca!STRS' assets (including the DB Program assets) for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 through June 30, 2016, as well as timeweighted average returns.

TABLE 43 Ca!STRS Investment Results Based On Market Value

Annualized Rate of Gross

Fiscal Year Return

2006-07 21.03% 2007-08 (3.69) 2008-09 (25.03) 2009-10 12.20 2010-11 23.10 2011-12 1.84 2012-13 13.80 2013-14 18.66 2014-15 4.77 2015-16 1.35

Source: CalSTRS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Years ended hme 30, 2016.

EX-1-22

TABLE 44 CalSTRS Time-Weighted Gross Returns as of June 30, 2016

Source:

Period

3 years 5 years 10 years 20 years

Time-Weighted Rate of Return

7.81% 7.65 5.59 7.06

CalSTRS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2016.

The 10-year and 20-year rates of return fall below the Ca!STRS' former actuarially assumed 7.5 percent rate of return. The Ca!STRS Board reduced the assumed rate of return to 7.0 percent at its February 2017 meeting.

EX-1-23

EXHIBIT 2 TO APPENDIX A

March 2017

STATEMENT of GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPTS and DISBURSEMENTS

BETTYT. YEE California State Controller

EX-2-1

BETTYT. California State Controller

April 10, 2017

Enclosed is the Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements for the period July 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017. This statement reflects the State of California's General Fund cash position, and compares actual receipts and disbursements for the 2016-17 fiscal year to cash flow estimates prepared by the Department of Finance (DOF) for the 2016-17 Budget Act. The statement is prepared in compliance with Provision 5 of Budget Act item 0840-001-0001, using records compiled by the State Controller. Prior-year actual amounts are also displayed for comparative purposes.

Attachment A compares actual receipts and disbursements for the 2016-17 fiscal year to cash flow estimates published in the 2017-18 Governor's Budget. These cash flow estimates are predicated on projections and assumptions made by DOF in preparation of the 2017-18 Governor's Budget.

Attachment B compares actual receipts and disbursements for the 2016-17 fiscal year to cash flow estimates prepared by DOF based upon the 2016-17 Budget Act.

These statements also are available on the State Controller's website at www.sco.ca.gov under the category Monthly Financial Reports.

Please direct any questions relating to this report to Casandra Moore-Hudnall, Chief of the State Accounting and Reporting Division, by telephone at (916) 445-5834.

Sincerely,

Original signed by

BETTYT. YEE

EX-2-2

http://www.sco.ca.gov

Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements Bettv T. Yee, California State Controller

STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS A Comparison of Actual to 2017-18 Governor's Budget Estimates

(Amounts in thousands)

July 1 through March 31 2017

Actual Over or Actual Estimate (a) (Under) Estimate

Amount

GENERAL FUND BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $ $ $

Add Receipts: Revenues 80,905,527 80,068,466 837,061 Nonrevenues 572,076 452,496 119,580

Total Receipts 81,477,603 80,520,962 956,641

Less Disbursements: State Operations 23,809,850 23,770,818 39,032 Local Assistance 70,445,951 70,734,311 (288,360) Capital Outlay 1,107,595 1,136,225 (28,630) Nongovernmental 3,342,309 2,412,015 930,294

Total Disbursements 98,705,705 98,053,369 652,336

Receipts Over I (Under) Disbursements (17,228,102) (17,532,407) 304,305 Net Increase/ (Decrease) in Temporary Loans 17,228,102 17,532,407 (304,305)

GENERAL FUND ENDING CASH BALANCE

Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties

TOTAL CASH $ $ $

BORROWABLE RESOURCES

Available Borrowable Resources $ 40,378,847 $ 37,155,086 $ 3,223,761 Outstanding Loans (b) 17,874,318 18,178,623 (304,305)

Unused Borrowable Resources $ 22,504,529 $ 18,976,463 $ 3,528,066

General Note:

2016

Actual %

$ 2,529,412

1.0 78,366,587 26.4 1,351,069

1.2 79,717,656

0.2 23,175,236 (0.4) 70,857,210 (2.5) 140,665

38.6 2,415,076

0.7 96,588,187

(1.7) (16,870,531) (1.7) 14,341,119

$

8.7 $ 33,972,126 (1.7) 14,341,119

18.6 $ 19,631,007

This report is based upon funded cash. Funded cash is cash reported to and recorded in the records of the State Controller's Office. Amounts reported as funded cash may differ from amounts in other reports to the extent there are timing differences in the recording of in-transit items.

Footnotes: (a) A Statement of Estimated Cash Flow for the 2016-17 fiscal year was prepared by the Department of Finance for the

2017-18 Governor's Budget. Any projections or estimates are set forth as such and not as representation of facts.

(b) Outstanding loan balance of $17.87 billion is comprised of $17.87 billion of internal borrowing. Current balance is comprised of $646.2 million carried forward from June 30, 2016, plus current year Net lncrease/(Decrease) in Temporary Loans 01$17.23 billion.

(c) Negative amounts are the result of repayments received that are greater than disbursements made.

(d) Debt Service amounts are net of offsets such as federal subsidies and reimbursements from other sources. To the extent that these offsets do not occur when anticipated, there can be variances between actuals and estimates on a month-to-month basis.

(e) The 2016-17 Governor's Budget reclassified California State University Retiree Health Benefits expenses as a General Government disbursement to better align retiree health and dental care spending. From July 2016 to January 2017, these actual disbursements were inaccurately reflected as a State Universities and College expense. Effective February 2017, the reported actuals are correctly reported as General Government disbursements.

EX-2-3

Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements Betty T Yee, California State Controller

SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS (Amounts in thousands)

July 1 through March 31 Month of March 2017 2016

Actual Over or 2017 2016 Actual Estimate (a) (Under) Estimate Actual

Amount % ----REVENUES

Alcoholic Beverage Excise Tax $ 30,974 $ 33,012 $ 285,883 $ 287,926 $ (2,043) (0.7) $ 279,253 Corporation Tax 1,372,378 1,712,691 5,192,092 4,761,382 430,710 9.0 5,532,625 Cigarette Tax 12,820 9,653 64,612 66,826 (2,214) (3.3) 63,959 Estate, Inheritance, and Gift Tax 13 19 1,002 424 578 136.3 1,515 Insurance Companies Tax 241,710 262,375 1,484,159 1,443,392 40,767 2.8 1,517,622 Personal Income Tax 3,928,785 3,490,409 54,902,329 54,305,814 596,515 1.1 51,826,468 Retail Sales and Use Taxes 1,998,344 1,794,490 18,292,250 18,638,998 (346,748) (1.9) 18,147,579 Vehicle License Fees 2 8 8 20 Pooled Money Investment Interest 8,708 5,501 44,093 42,763 1,330 3.1 22,545 Not Otherwise Classified 33,375 101,274 639,099 520,941 118,158 22.7 975,001

----Total Revenues 7,627,107 7,409,426 80,905,527 80,068,466 837,061 1.0 78,366,587

NONREVENUES

Transfers from Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties 138,000

Transfers from Other Funds 10,951 15,488 341,719 258,896 82,823 32.0 405,566 Miscellaneous 25,544 72,978 230,357 193,600 36,757 19.0 807,503

----

Total Nonrevenues 36,495 88,466 572,076 452,496 119,580 26.4 1,351,069 ----

Total Receipts $ 7,663,602 $ 7,497,892 $ 81,477,603 $ 80,520,962 $ 956,641 1.2 $ 79,717,656

See notes on page A 1.

EX-2-4


SCHEDULE OF CASH DISBURSEMENTS (Amounts in thousands)



Amount %

STATE OPERATIONS (c)

Legislative/ Judicial/Executive $ 73,150 $ 96,441 $ 1,249,903 $ 1,272,097 $ (22,194) (1.7) $ 1,167,110 Business, Consumer Services and Housing (260) 2,016 18,992 20,548 (1,556) (7.6) 20,072 Transportation 3 2,222 (2,219) (99.9) 6 Resources 157,669 85,248 1,359,285 1,340,150 19,135 14 1,467,168 Environmental Protection Agency (9,119) 6,020 52,075 65,264 (13,189) (20.2) 33,373 Health and Human Services

Health Care Services and Public Health 12,265 15,604 229,597 240,426 (10,829) (4.5) 237,014 Department of State Hospitals 127,944 137,297 1,287,308 1,282,428 4,880 04 1,191,950 Other Health and Human Services 45,961 48,140 477,274 534,286 (57,012) (10.7) 483,069

Education University of California 257,613 237,548 2,742,601 2,746,600 (3,999) (0.1) 2,422,878 State Universities and Colleges 265,377 250,455 2,648,355 (e) 2,577,070 71,285 2.8 2,510,004 Other Education 22,119 15,808 184,508 176,890 7,618 4.3 161,099

Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation 877,429 870,201 7,742,653 7,800,321 (57,668) (0.7) 7,445,012 Governmental Operations 57,169 88,365 579,396 564,936 14,460 2.6 579,253 General Government (40,132) 189,192 1,754,982 (e) 1,833,273 (78,291) (4.3) 2,053,548 Public Employees Retirement

System (226,160) (204,947) (51,668) (225,895) 174,227 (77.1) (22,748) Debt Service (d) 856,121 774,759 3,524,614 3,528,813 (4,199) (0.1) 3,399,061 Interest on Loans 1,583 167 9,972 11,389 (1,417) (12.4) 27,367

Total State Operations 2,478,729 2,612,314 23,809,850 23,770,818 39,032 0.2 23,175,236

LOCAL ASSISTANCE (c)

Public Schools - K-12 4,941,361 5,450,037 35,548,004 35,974,333 (426,329) (1.2) 36,300,063 Community Colleges 519,775 554,244 4,376,763 4,450,294 (73,531) (1.7) 4,545,973 Debt Service-School Building Bonds Contributions to State Teachers'

Retirement System 1,692,566 1,692,566 1,299,725 Other Education 275,142 294,512 1,780,278 1,997,266 (216,988) (10.9) 2,386,454 School Facilities Aid Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation 2,878 1,017 258,823 274,748 (15,925) (5.8) 195,435 Dept. of Alcohol and Drug Program Health Care Services and Public Health

Medical Assistance Program 1,563,217 1,793,699 15,633,999 15,030,785 603,214 4.0 15,018,875 Other Health Care Services/Public Health 41,350 30,504 361,530 446,975 (85,445) (19.1) 156,141

Developmental Services - Regional Centers 228,140 173,747 2,908,036 2,715,855 192,181 7.1 2,812,747 Department of State Hospitals Dept. of Social Services

SSI/SSP/IHSS 757,730 291,125 4,251,256 4,660,489 (409,233) (8.8) 4,530,319 CalWORKs 126,257 74,419 847,895 759,776 88,119 11.6 811,726 Other Social Services (56,809) 69,145 589,067 672,889 (83,822) (12.5) 576,837

Tax Relief 205,505 211,001 (5,496) (2.6) 206,976 Other Local Assistance 79,947 74,501 1,992,229 1,847,334 144,895 7.8 2,015,939

Total Local Assistance 8,478,988 8,806,950 70,445,951 70,734,311 (288,360) (0.4) 70,857,210

See notes on page A 1

(Continued)

EX-2-5


SCHEDULE OF CASH DISBURSEMENTS (Continued) (Amounts in thousands)



Amount %

CAPITAL OUTLAY 20,748 1,572 1,107,595 1,136,225 (28,630) (2.5) 140,665

NONGOVERNMENTAL (c)

Transfer to Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties 634,500 634,500 804,000

Transfer to Budget Stabilization Account 1,294,000 1,294,000 1,854,000 Transfer to Other Funds 2,000 750 693,907 785,546 (91,639) (11.7) 32,256 Transfer to Revolving Fund 2 12,623 7,921 4,702 59.4 7,456 Advance

MediCal Provider Interim Payment 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 State-County Property Tax

Administration Program (6,268) (27,965) 5,079 32,547 (27,468) (84.4) 21,190 Social Welfare Federal Fund 34,616 32,900 21,443 (23,256) 44,699 (192.2) 2,178 Local Governmental Entities (1,215) (1,215) (1,188) Tax Relief and Refund Account Counties for Social Welfare (318,028) (318,028) (304,816)

Total Nongovernmental 1,030,350 5,685 3,342,309 2,412,015 930,294 38.6 2,415,076

Total Disbursements $ 12,008,815 $ 11,426,521 $ 98,705,705 $ 98,053,369 $ 652,336 0.7 $ 96,588,187

TEMPORARY LOANS

Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties $ $ $ 1,750,200 $ 1,750,200 $ $ 1,115,700

Budget Stabilization Account 4,068,322 4,068,322 3,460,422 Outstanding Registered Warrants Account Other Internal Sources 4,345,213 3,928,629 11,409,580 11,713,885 (304,305) (2.6) 9,764,997 Revenue Anticipation Notes

Net Increase /(Decrease) Loans 4,345,213 $ 3,928,629 $ 17,228,102 $ 17,532,407 $ (304,305) (1.7) $ 14,341,119

See notes on page A 1

(Concluded)

EX-2-6

Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements Betty T. Yee, California State Controffer

COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF REVENUES RECEIVED All Governmental Cost Funds


July 1 through March 31 General Fund Special Funds

2017 2016 2017 2016

MAJOR TAXES, LICENSES, AND INVESTMENT INCOME:

Alcoholic Beverage Excise Taxes $ 285,883 $ 279,253 $ $ 2 Corporation Tax 5,192,092 5,532,625 Cigarette Tax 64,612 63,959 562,995 558,383 Estate, Inheritance, and Gift Tax 1,002 1,515 Insurance Companies Tax 1,484,159 1,517,622 1,775,473 1,132,378 Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax:

Gasoline Tax 3,271,052 3,500,810 Diesel & Liquid Petroleum Gas 390,807 316,296 Jet Fuel Tax 2,499 2,193

Vehicle License Fees 8 20 2,030,646 1,863,354 Motor Vehicle Registration and Other Fees 3,397,665 3,319,549

Personal Income Tax 54,902,329 51,826,468 980,592 926,436 Retail Sales and Use Taxes 18,292,250 18,147,579 9,841,081 10,653,545 Pooled Money Investment Interest 44,093 22,545 212 138

Total Major Taxes, Licenses, and Investment Income 80,266,428 77,391,586 22,253,022 22,273,084

NOT OTHERWISE CLASSIFIED:

Alcoholic Beverage License Fee 1,521 1,861 40,620 42,179 Electrical Energy Tax 461,415 473,160 Private Rail Car Tax 8,989 9,868 Penalties on Traffic Violations 34,865 39,149 Health Care Receipts 6,741 9,069 Revenues from State Lands 67,727 68,843 Abandoned Property (101,697) (119,780) Trial Court Revenues 27,712 30,489 1,029,310 1,037,776 Horse Racing Fees 844 845 9,696 9,505 Cap and Trade 380,863 1,819,098 Miscellaneous 627,262 973,806 10,727,753 9,350,482

Not Otherwise Classified 639,099 975,001 12,684,522 12,771,349

Total Revenues, All Governmental Cost Funds $ 80,905,527 $ 78,366,587 $ 34,937,544 $ 35,044,433

See notes on page A 1.

EX-2-7

Statement of General Fund Cash Receipts and Disbursements Betty T. Yee, California State Controller

STATEMENT OF GENERAL FUND CASH RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS A Comparison of Actual to 2016-17 Budget Act


July 1 through March 31 2017 2016

Actual Over or Actual Estimate (a) (Under) Estimate Actual

Amount %

GENERAL FUND BEGINNING CASH BALANCE $ $ $ $ 2,529,412

Add Receipts: Revenues 80,905,527 81,512,839 (607,312) (0,7) 78,366,587 Nonrevenues 572,076 812,731 (240,655) (29,6) 1,351,069

Total Receipts 81,477,603 82,325,570 (847,967) (1,0) 79,717,656

Less Disbursements: State Operations 23,809,850 24,658,592 (848,742) (3,4) 23,175,236 Local Assistance 70,445,951 69,971,730 474,221 0,7 70,857,210 Capital Outlay 1,107,595 1,234,014 (126,419) (10,2) 140,665 Nongovernmental 3,342,309 2,291,622 1,050,687 45.8 2,415,076

Total Disbursements 98,705,705 98,155,958 549,747 0,6 96,588,187

Receipts Over/ (Under) Disbursements (17,228,102) (15,830,388) (1,397,714) 8,8 (16,870,531) Net Increase/ (Decrease) in Temporary Loans 17,228,102 15,830,388 1,397,714 8,8 14,341,119

GENERAL FUND ENDING CASH BALANCE

Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties

TOTAL CASH $ $ $ $

BORROWABLE RESOURCES

Available Borrowable Resources $ 40,378,847 $ 36,729,726 $ 3,649,121 9,9 $ 33,972,126 Outstanding Loans (b) 17,874,318 16,476,604 1,397,714 8,5 14,341,119

Unused Borrowable Resources $ 22,504,529 $ 20,253,122 $ 2,251,407 11.1 $ 19,631,007

General Note: This report is based upon funded cash. Funded cash is cash reported to and recorded in the records of the State Controller's Office. Amounts reported as funded cash may differ from amounts in other reports to the extent there are timing differences in the recording of in-transit items.

Footnotes: (a) A Statement of Estimated Cash Flow for the 2016-17 fiscal year was prepared by the Department of Finance for the

2016-17 Budget Act. Any projections or estimates are set forth as such and not as representation of facts.

(b) Outstanding loan balance of $17 .87 billion is comprised of $17 .87 billion of internal borrowing. Current balance is comprised of $646.2 million carried forward from June 30, 2016, plus current year Net lncrease/(Decrease) in Temporary Loans of $17.23 billion.

(c) Negative amounts are the result of repayments received that are greater than disbursements made.

(d) Debt Service amounts are net of offsets such as federal subsidies and reimbursements from other sources. To the extent that these offsets do not occur when anticipated, there can be variances between actuals and estimates on a month-to-month basis.

(e) The 2016-17 Governor's Budget reclassified California State University Retiree Health Benefits expenses as a General Government disbursement to better align retiree health and dental care spending. From July 2016 to January 2017, these actual disbursements were inaccurately reflected as a State Universities and College expense. Effective February 2017, the reported actuals are correctly reported as General Government disbursements.

EX-2-8


SCHEDULE OF CASH RECEIPTS (Amounts in thousands)


Actual Over or 2017 2016 Actual Estimate (a) (Undeq Estimate Actual

Amount %

REVENUES

Alcoholic Beverage Excise Tax $ 30,974 $ 33,012 $ 285,883 $ 284,123 $ 1,760 0.6 $ 279,253 Corporation Tax 1,372,378 1,712,691 5,192,092 5,834,629 (642,537) (11.0) 5,532,625 Cigarette Tax 12,820 9,653 64,612 62,310 2,302 3.7 63,959 Estate, Inheritance, and Gift Tax 13 19 1,002 1,002 1,515 Insurance Companies Tax 241,710 262,375 1,484,159 1,304,615 179,544 13.8 1,517,622 Personal Income Tax 3,928,785 3,490,409 54,902,329 54,343,247 559,082 1.0 51,826,468 Retail Sales and Use Taxes 1,998,344 1,794,490 18,292,250 19,069,207 (776,957) (4.1) 18,147,579 Vehicle License Fees 2 8 8 20 Pooled Money Investment Interest 8,708 5,501 44,093 40,415 3,678 9.1 22,545 Not Otherwise Classified 33,375 101,274 639,099 574,293 64,806 11.3 975,001

Total Revenues 7,627,107 7,409,426 80,905,527 81,512,839 (607,312) (0.7) 78,366,587

NONREVENUES

Transfers from Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties 138,000

Transfers from other Funds 10,951 15,488 341,719 183,788 157,931 85.9 405,566 Miscellaneous 25,544 72,978 230,357 628,943 (398,586) (63.4) 807,503

Total Nonrevenues 36,495 88,466 572,076 812,731 (240,655) (29.6) 1,351,069

Total Receipts $ 7,663,602 $ 7,497,892 $ 81,477,603 $ 82,325,570 $ (847,967) (1.0) $ 79,717,656

See notes on page B1.

EX-2-9


SCHEDULE OF CASH DISBURSEMENTS (Amounts in thousands)



Amount %

STATE OPERATIONS (c)

Leg is lativ e/ Judicial/Executive $ 73,150 $ 96,441 $ 1,249,903 $ 1,312,436 $ (62,533) (4.8) $ 1,167,110 Business, Consumer Services and Housing (260) 2,016 18,992 24,156 (5,164) (21.4) 20,072 Transportation 3 2,916 (2,913) (99.9) 6 Resources 157,669 85,248 1,359,285 1,345,320 13,965 1.0 1,467,168 Environmental Protection Agency (9,119) 6,020 52,075 53,137 (1,062) (2.0) 33,373 Health and Human Services

Health Care Services and Public Health 12,265 15,604 229,597 266,108 (36,511) (13.7) 237,014 Department of State Hospitals 127,944 137,297 1,287,308 1,213,596 73,712 6.1 1,191,950 Other Health and Human Services 45,961 48,140 477,274 506,349 (29,075) (5.7) 483,069

Education University of California 257,613 237,548 2,742,601 2,714,314 28,287 1.0 2,422,878 State Universities and Colleges 265,377 250,455 2,648,355 (e) 2,490,270 158,085 6.3 2,510,004 Other Education 22,119 15,808 184,508 180,675 3,833 2.1 161,099

Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation 877,429 870,201 7,742,653 7,638,067 104,586 14 7,445,012 Governmental Operations 57,169 88,365 579,396 568,199 11,197 2.0 579,253 General Government (40,132) 189,192 1,754,982 (e) 3,269,317 (1,514,335) (46.3) 2,053,548 Public Employees Retirement

System (226,160) (204,947) (51,668) (211,584) 159,916 (75.6) (22,748) Debt Service (d) 856,121 774,759 3,524,614 3,268,106 256,508 7.8 3,399,061 Interest on Loans 1,583 167 9,972 17,210 (7,238) (42.1) 27,367

Total State Operations 2,478,729 2,612,314 23,809,850 24,658,592 (848,742) (3.4) 23,175,236

LOCAL ASSISTANCE (c)

Public Schools - K-12 4,941,361 5,450,037 35,548,004 36,165,603 (617,599) (1.7) 36,300,063 Community Colleges 519,775 554,244 4,376,763 4,343,752 33,011 0.8 4,545,973 Debt Service-School Building Bonds Contributions to State Teachers'

Retirement System 1,692,566 1,692,565 1 0.0 1,299,725 Other Education 275,142 294,512 1,780,278 2,092,325 (312,047) (14.9) 2,386,454 School Facilities Aid Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation 2,878 1,017 258,823 261,221 (2,398) (0.9) 195,435 Dept. of Alcohol and Drug Program Health Care Services and Public Health

Medical Assistance Program 1,563,217 1,793,699 15,633,999 13,689,170 1,944,829 14.2 15,018,875 Other Health Care Services/Public Health 41,350 30,504 361,530 262,848 98,682 37.5 156,141

Developmental Services - Regional Centers 228,140 173,747 2,908,036 2,686,259 221,777 8.3 2,812,747 Department of State Hospitals Dept. of Social Services

SSI/SSP/IHSS 757,730 291,125 4,251,256 5,054,776 (803,520) (15.9) 4,530,319 CalWORKs 126,257 74,419 847,895 789,780 58,115 74 811,726 Other Social Services (56,809) 69,145 589,067 677,035 (87,968) (13.0) 576,837

Tax Relief 205,505 208,801 (3,296) (1.6) 206,976 Other Local Assistance 79,947 74,501 1,992,229 2,047,595 (55,366) (27) 2,015,939

Total Local Assistance 8,478,988 8,806,950 70,445,951 69,971,730 474,221 0.7 70,857,210

See notes on page 81

(Continued)

EX-2-10


SCHEDULE OF CASH DISBURSEMENTS (Continued) (Amounts in thousands)

July 1 through March 31

Month of March 2017 2016 Actual Over or

2017 2016 Actual Estimate (a) (Undeq Estimate Actual Amount %

CAPITAL OUTLAY 20,748 1,572 1,107,595 1,234,014 (126,419) (10.2) 140,665

NONGOVERNMENTAL (c)

Transfer to Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties 634,500 634,700 (200) (0.0) 804,000

Transfer to Budget Stabilization Account 1,294,000 1,254,000 40,000 3.2 1,854,000 Transfer to other Funds 2,000 750 693,907 729,722 (35,815) (4.9) 32,256 Transfer to Revolving Fund 2 12,623 12,623 7,456 Advance

MediCal Provider Interim Payment 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 State-County Property Tax Administration Program (6,268) (27,965) 5,079 5,079 21,190

Social Welfare Federal Fund 34,616 32,900 21,443 21,443 2,178 Local Governmental Entities (1,215) (1,215) (1,188) Tax Relief and Refund Account Counties for Social Welfare (318,028) (326,800) 8,772 (27) (304,816)

Total Nongovernmental 1,030,350 5,685 3,342,309 2,291,622 1,050,687 45.8 2,415,076

Total Disbursements $ 12,008,815 $ 11,426,521 $ 98,705,705 $ 98,155,958 $ 549,747 0.6 $ 96,588,187

TEMPORARY LOANS

Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties $ $ $ 1,750,200 $ 1,750,400 $ (200) (0.0) $ 1,115,700

Budget Stabilization Account 4,068,322 4,068,322 3,460,422 Outstanding Registered Warrants Account other Internal Sources 4,345,213 3,928,629 11,409,580 10,011,666 1,397,914 14.0 9,764,997 Revenue Anticipation Notes

Net Increase/ (Decrease) Loans 4,345,213 $ 3,928,629 $ 17,228,102 $ 15,830,388 $ 1,397,714 8.8 $ 14,341,119

See notes on page 81

(Concluded)

EX-2-11

APPENDIXB

THE BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM

The information in numbered paragraphs 1 through 10 of this Appendix B regarding DTC's Book Entry System has been provided by DTC for use in securities offering documents, and the State takes no responsibility for the accuracy or completeness thereof The State cannot and does not give any assurances that DTC, DTC Participants or Indirect Participants will distribute to the Beneficial Owners either (a) payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, with respect to the Bonds or (b) certificates representing ownership interest in or other confirmation of ownership interest in the Bonds, or that they will so do on a timely basis or that DTC, DTC Participants or DTC Indirect Participants will act in the manner described in this Official Statement. The current "Rules" applicable to DTC are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the current "Procedures" of DTC to be followed in dealing with DTC Participants are on file with DTC.

1. The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"), New York, New York, will act as securities depository for the bonds (the "Bonds"). The Bonds will be issued as fully-registered securities registered in the name of Cede & Co. (DTC's partnership nominee) or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One fully-registered Bond certificate will be issued for each maturity of the Bonds, each in the aggregate principal amount of such maturity, and will be deposited with DTC. If, however, the aggregate principal amount of any such maturity exceeds $500 million, one certificate will be issued with respect to each $500 million of principal amount and an additional certificate will be issued with respect to any remaining principal amount of such maturity.

2. DTC, the world's largest securities depository, is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New York Banking Law, a "banking organization" within the meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a "clearing corporation" within the meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a "clearing agency" registered pursuant to the provisions of Section 17 A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. DTC holds and provides asset servicing for over 3.5 million issues of U.S. and non-U.S. equity issues, corporate and municipal debt issues, and money market instruments (from over 100 countries) that DTC's participants ("Direct Participants") deposit with DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among Direct Participants of sales and other securities transactions in deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry transfers and pledges between Direct Participants' accounts. This eliminates the need for physical movement of securities certificates. Direct Participants include both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing corporations, and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation ("DTCC"). DTCC is the holding company for DTC, National Securities Clearing Corporation and Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, all of which are registered clearing agencies. DTCC is owned by the users of its regulated subsidiaries. Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as both U.S. and non-U.S. securities brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, and clearing corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a Direct Participant, either directly or indirectly ("Indirect Participants"). DTC has a Standard & Poor's rating of

B-1

AA+. The DTC Rules applicable to its Participants are on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about DTC can be found at www.dtcc.com.

3. Purchases of Bonds under the DTC system must be made by or through Direct Participants, which will receive a credit for the Bonds on DTC's records. The ownership interest of each actual purchaser of each Bond ("Beneficial Owner") is in turn to be recorded on the Direct and Indirect Participants' records. Beneficial Owners will not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase. Beneficial Owners are, however, expected to receive written confirmations providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic statements of their holdings, from the Direct or Indirect Participant through which the Beneficial Owner entered into the transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the Bonds are to be accomplished by entries made on the books of Direct and Indirect Participants acting on behalf of Beneficial Owners. Beneficial Owners will not receive certificates representing their ownership interests in the Bonds, except in the event that use of the book-entry system for the Bonds is discontinued.

4. To facilitate subsequent transfers, all Bonds deposited by Direct Participants with DTC are registered in the name of DTC's partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such other name as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The deposit of Bonds with DTC and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or such other DTC nominee do not effect any change in beneficial ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. DTC's records reflect only the identity of the Direct Participants to whose accounts such Bonds are credited, which may or may not be the Beneficial Owners. The Direct and Indirect Participants will remain responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers.

5. Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to Direct Participants, by Direct Participants to Indirect Participants, and by Direct Participants and Indirect Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by arrangements among them, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Beneficial Owners of Bonds may wish to take certain steps to augment the transmission to them of notices of significant events with respect to the Bonds, such as redemptions, tenders, defaults, and proposed amendments to the Bond documents. For example, Beneficial Owners of Bonds may wish to ascertain that the nominee holding the Bonds for their benefit has agreed to obtain and transmit notices to Beneficial Owners. In the alternative, Beneficial Owners may wish to provide their names and addresses to the registrar and request that copies of notices be provided directly to them.

6. Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the Bonds within a maturity are being redeemed, DTC's practice is to determine by lot the amount of the interest of each Direct Participant in such maturity to be redeemed.

7. Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee) will consent or vote with respect to the Bonds unless authorized by a Direct Participant in accordance with DTC's MMI Procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an Omnibus Proxy to the State Treasurer as soon as possible after the record date. The Omnibus Proxy assigns Cede & Co.'s consenting or voting rights to those Direct Participants to whose accounts the Bonds are credited on the record date (identified in a listing attached to the Omnibus Proxy).

B-2

http://www.dtcc.com

8. Redemption proceeds, principal and interest payments on the Bonds will be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC's practice is to credit Direct Participants' accounts upon DTC's receipt of funds and corresponding detail information from the State Treasurer, on the payable dates in accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTC's records. Payments by Participants to Beneficial Owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in bearer form or registered in "street name," and will be the responsibility of such Participant and not of DTC or the State Treasurer, subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time. Payment of redemption proceeds, principal and interest to Cede & Co. ( or such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC) is the responsibility of the State Treasurer, disbursement of such payments to Direct Participants will be the responsibility of DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the Beneficial Owners will be the responsibility of Direct and Indirect Participants.

9. DTC may discontinue providing its services as depository with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving reasonable notice to the State Treasurer. Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor depository is not obtained, Bond certificates are required to be printed and delivered.

10. The information in this section concerning DTC and DTC's book-entry system has been obtained from sources that the State believes to be reliable, but the State takes no responsibility for the accuracy thereof.

The foregoing description of the procedures and record keeping with respect to beneficial ownership interests in the Bonds, payment of principal of and interest and other payments with respect to the Bonds to Direct Participants, Indirect Participants or Beneficial Owners, confirmation and transfer of beneficial ownership interest in such Bonds and other related transactions by and between DTC, the Direct Participants, the Indirect Participants and the Beneficial Owners is based solely on information provided by DTC. Accordingly, no representations can be made concerning these matters and neither the Direct Participants, the Indirect Participants nor the Beneficial Owners should rely on the foregoing information with respect to such matters but should instead confirm the same with DTC or the Participants, as the case may be. The State Treasurer will not have any responsibility or obligation to Direct Participants and Indirect Participants or the persons for whom they act as nominees with respect to the Bonds.

THE STATE TREASURER, AS LONG AS A BOOK-ENTRY ONLY SYSTEM IS USED FOR THE BONDS, WILL SEND ANY NOTICE OF REDEMPTION OR OTHER NOTICES FOR OWNERS TO ONLY DTC. ANY FAILURE OF DTC TO ADVISE ANY DTC PARTICIPANT, OR OF ANY DTC PARTICIPANT TO NOTIFY ANY BENEFICIAL OWNER, OF ANY NOTICE AND ITS CONTENT OR EFFECT WILL NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO THE REDEMPTION OF THE BONDS CALLED FOR REDEMPTION OR OF ANY OTHER ACTION PREMISED ON SUCH NOTICE.

B-3

SO LONG AS CEDE & CO. IS THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THE BONDS, AS NOMINEE OF DTC, REFERENCES HEREIN TO THE HOLDERS OF THE BONDS (OTHER THAN UNDER THE CAPTION "TAX MATTERS") SHALL MEAN CEDE & CO., AS AFORESAID, AND SHALL NOT MEAN THE BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF THE BONDS.

The State Treasurer may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry-only transfers through DTC ( or a successor securities depository). If the State Treasurer determines not to continue the DTC book-entry only system, or DTC discontinues providing its services with respect to the Bonds and the State Treasurer does not select another qualified securities depository, the State will deliver physical Bond certificates to the Beneficial Owners. The Bonds may thereafter be transferred upon the books of the Slate Treasurer by the registered owners, in person or by authorized attorney, upon surrender of Bonds at the Office of the State Treasurer in Sacramento, California, accompanied by delivery of an executed instrument of transfer in a form approved by the State Treasurer and upon payment of any charges provided for in the Resolutions. Certificated bonds may be exchanged for Bonds of other authorized denominations of the same aggregate principal amount and maturity at the Office of the State Treasurer in Sacramento, California, upon payment of any charges provided for in the Resolutions. No transfer or exchange of Bonds will be made by the State Treasurer during the period between the record date and the next Interest Payment Date.

B-4

APPENDIXC

FORM OF CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE

This Continuing Disclosure Certificate ( this "Disclosure Certificate") is executed and delivered as of April 19, 2017 by the Treasurer of the State of California (the "State Treasurer") in connection with the issuance of $603,890,000 aggregate principal amount of the State of California Various Purpose General Obligation Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds") as authorized by the related general obligation bond acts approved by the voters of the State of California (the "State") and identified in the Official Statement (defined below) (the "Acts"). The Bonds are being issued pursuant to resolutions of finance committees (the "Resolutions") designated under the Acts. Pursuant to the Resolutions, the State Treasurer, on behalf of the State, covenants and agrees as follows:

Section 1. Nature of the Disclosure Certificate. This Disclosure Certificate is executed and delivered for the benefit of the Holders and Beneficial Owners (as defined below) of the Bonds from time to time, and in order to assist the Participating Underwriters (as defined below) in complying with the Rule (as defined below), but shall not be deemed to create any monetary liability on the part of the State or the State Treasurer to any other persons, including Holders or Beneficial Owners of the Bonds based on the Rule. The sole remedy in the event of any failure of the State Treasurer to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance of any act required hereunder.

Section 2. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in the Resolutions, which apply to any capitalized term used in this Disclosure Certificate unless otherwise defined in this Section, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings:

"Annual Report" shall mean any Annual Report provided by the State Treasurer pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 3 and 4 of this Disclosure Certificate.

"Beneficial Owner" shall mean any person who has or shares the power, directly or indirectly, to make investment decisions concerning ownership of any Bonds (including persons holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries).

"Dissemination Agent" shall mean the State Treasurer, acting in its capacity as Dissemination Agent hereunder, or any successor Dissemination Agent designated in writing by the State Treasurer and which has filed with the State Treasurer a written acceptance of such designation.

"Holder" shall mean any person listed on the registration books of the State Treasurer as the registered owner of any Bonds.

"Listed Event" shall mean any of the events listed in Section 5(a) or (b) of this Disclosure Certificate.

"MSRB" shall mean the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board or any other entity designated or authorized by the SEC to receive reports or notices pursuant to the Rule. Until otherwise designated by the MSRB or the SEC, filings with the MSRB are to be made through

C-1

the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) website of the MSRB, currently located at http://emma.msrb.org.

"Official Statement" shall mean the official statement relating to the Bonds, dated April 12, 2017.

"Participating Underwriter" shall mean any of the original purchasers of the Bonds required to comply with the Rule in connection with the offering of the Bonds.

"Rule" shall mean Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) adopted by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as the same may be amended from time to time.

"SEC" shall mean the Securities and Exchange Commission.

"Slate" shall mean the Slate of California.

Section 3. Provision of Annual Reports.

(a) The State Treasurer on behalf of the State shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to, not later than April 1 of each year in which the Bonds are outstanding, commencing with the report for the 2016-17 fiscal year (which is due not later than April 1, 2018), provide to the MSRB an Annual Report which is consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. The Annual Report must be submitted in electronic format, accompanied by such identifying information as is prescribed by the MSRB, and may cross-reference other information as provided in Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate; provided, that the audited financial statements of the State may be submitted separately from the balance of the Annual Report and later than the date required above for the filing of the Annual Report if they are not available by that date in accordance with Section 4(a). If the State's fiscal year changes, it shall give notice of such change in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(f). The Annual Report shall be submitted on a standard form in use by industry participants or other appropriate form and shall identify the Bonds by name and CUSIP number.

(b) Not later than 15 business days prior to said date, the State Treasurer shall provide the Annual Report to the Dissemination Agent (if other than the State Treasurer). If the State Treasurer is unable to provide to the MSRB an Annual Report by the date required in subsection (a), the State Treasurer shall send a notice to the MSRB in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A.

(c) The Dissemination Agent shall (if the Dissemination Agent is other than the State Treasurer) file a report with the State Treasurer certifying that the Annual Report has been provided pursuant to this Disclosure Certificate, stating the date it was provided to the MSRB.

Section 4. Content of Annual Reports. The Annual Report shall contain or include by reference the following:

(a) The audited Basic Financial Statements of the State for the fiscal year ended on the previous June 30, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated to apply to government entities from time to time by the Governmental Accounting

C-2

http://e

Standards Board. If the State's audited financial statements are not available by the time the Annual Report is required to be provided to the MSRB pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Report shall contain unaudited financial statements in a format similar to the financial statements contained in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be provided to the MSRB in the same manner as the Annual Report when they become available.

(b) Financial information relating to the State's General Fund budget for the fiscal year ended on the previous June 30 and information concerning the State budget for the fiscal year in which the Annual Report is issued. Such information shall describe the sources of revenues, the principal categories of expenditures, and changes in fund balances, a summary of expected State revenues and budgeted expenditures, and significant assumptions relating to revenue and expenditure expectations; including updating information of the type appearing in the following tables contained under the caption APPENDIX A- "THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-CURRENT STATE BUDGET" in the Official Statement:

Tables Entitled

General Fund Revenues, Expenditures, and Fund Balance (Budgetary Basis)

General Fund Revenue by Source and Expenditures by Function

(c) Information concerning the total amount of the State's authorized and outstanding debt, long-term lease obligations and other long-term liabilities as of the most recent June 30, which debt is supported by payments from the State's General Fund and which includes shortterm debt. Such information shall include schedules of debt service for outstanding general obligation bonds and lease-purchase debt. This shall be accomplished by updating information of the type appearing in the following tables contained under the caption APPENDIX A- "THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA-STATE DEBT TABLES" in the Official Statement.

Tables Entitled

Outstanding Slate Debt

Authorized and Outstanding General Obligation Bonds

General Obligation and Revenue Bonds-Summary of Debt Service Requirements

Schedule of Debt Service Requirements for General Fund Non-Self Liquidating Bonds-Fixed Rate

Schedule of Debt Service Requirements for General Fund Non-Self Liquidating Bonds-Variable Rate

Schedule of Debt Service Requirements for Enterprise Fund Self Liquidating Bonds-Fixed Rate

Schedule of Debt Service Requirements for Lease-Revenue Debt-Fixed Rate

C-3

State Public Works Board and Other Lease-Revenue Financing Outstanding Issues

State Agency Revenue Bonds and Conduit Financing

Notwithstanding the foregoing, information referenced in this Section 4(c) will no longer be updated for any twelve month period ended June 30 that commences after all of the debt, long-term lease obligations, other long-term liabilities and/or short-term debt referenced in the respective table, as applicable, is no longer outstanding.

(d) Financial information relating to the State referenced in section 4(b) and 4(c) may be updated from time to time, and such updates may involve displaying data in a different format or table or eliminating data that is no longer available.

(e) The Annual Report may consist of one or more documents. Any or all of the items listed above may be included in the Annual Report by reference to other documents that have been filed by the State with the MSRB, including any final official statement (in which case such final official statement must also be available from the MSRB). The State Treasurer shall clearly identify in the Annual Report each such document so included by reference.

Section 5. Reporting of Significant Events.

(a) The State Treasurer shall give, or cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds in a timely manner not later than ten business days after the occurrence of the event:

1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies;

2. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties;

3. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties;

4. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform;

5. Adverse tax opinions or issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determination of taxability or of a Notice of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 TEB);

6. Tender offers;

7. Defeasances;

8. Rating changes; or

9. Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person.

C-4

Note: for the purposes of the event identified in subparagraph (9), the event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governmental body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person.

(b) The State Treasurer shall give, or cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds, if material, in a timely manner not later than ten business days after the occurrence of the event:

1. Unless described in paragraph 5(a)(5), other notices or determinations by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the tax status of the Bonds or other events affecting the tax status of the Bonds;

2. Modifications to rights of Bond holders;

3. Optional, unscheduled or contingent Bond calls;

4. Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds;

5. Non-payment related defaults;

6. The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms; or

7. Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee.

(c) The State Treasurer notes that Sections 5(a)(2), (3) and (4) and 5(b)(4) are not applicable to the Bonds.

( d) The State Treasurer shall give, or cause to be given, in a timely manner, notice of a failure to provide the annual financial information on or before the date specified in Section 3(a), as provided in Section 3(b).

C-5

(e) Whenever the State Treasurer obtains knowledge of the occurrence of a Listed Event described in Section 5(b ), the State Treasurer shall determine if such event would be material under applicable federal securities laws.

(f) Any notice required to be given pursuant to subsection (a) or (b) above shall be filed with the MSRB in electronic format, accompanied by such identifying information as is prescribed by the MSRB. Notice of the Listed Event described in subsection (b)(3) need not be given under this subsection any earlier than the notice of the underlying event is given to Holders of affected Bonds pursuant to the Resolutions.

Section 6. Termination of Reporting Obligation. The State's obligations under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of this Disclosure Certificate shall terminate with respect to any Bonds upon the maturity, legal defeasance, prior redemption or acceleration of such Bonds.

Section 7. Dissemination Agent. The State Treasurer may, from time to time, appoint or engage a Dissemination Agent to assist it in carrying out the obligations under this Disclosure Certificate, and may discharge any such Dissemination Agent, with or without appointing a successor Dissemination Agent. The Dissemination Agent shall not be responsible in any manner for the content of any notice or report prepared by the State Treasurer pursuant to this Disclosure Certificate. If at any time there is not any other designated Dissemination Agent, the State Treasurer shall be the Dissemination Agent. The initial Dissemination Agent shall be the State Treasurer.

Section 8. Amendment; Waiver. Notwithstanding any other prov1s10n of this Disclosure Certificate, the State Treasurer may amend any provision of this Disclosure Certificate, and any provision of this Disclosure Certificate may be waived, provided that the following conditions are satisfied:

(a) If the amendment or waiver relates to the provisions of Section 3(a), 4, 5(a), 5(b ), 5(d) or 5(f), 8(a), 8(b) (excluding the requirement that the related determination be set forth in an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel) or 8( c) ( excluding both the percentage of Holders required for approval and the requirement that the related determination be set forth in an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel), it may only be made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements, change in law, or change in the identity, nature or status of an obligated person with respect to the Bonds, or the type of business conducted;

(b) The undertaking, as amended or taking into account such waiver, would, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, have complied with the requirements of the Rule at the time of the original issuance of the Bonds, after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in circumstances; and

(c) The amendment or waiver either (i) is approved by the Holders of 60 percent of the Bonds outstanding or (ii) does not, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, materially impair the interests of the Holders or Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. The State also may amend this Disclosure Certificate without approval by the Holders to the extent permitted by rule, order or other official pronouncement of the SEC.

C-6

In the event of any amendment or waiver of a provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the State Treasurer shall describe such amendment in the next Annual Report, and shall include, as applicable, a narrative explanation of the reason for the amendment or waiver and its impact on the type (or, in the case of a change of accounting principles, on the presentation) of financial information or operating data being presented by the State. In addition, if the amendment relates to the accounting principles to be followed in preparing financial statements, (i) notice of such change shall be given in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(f), and (ii) the Annual Report for the year in which the change is made should present a comparison (in narrative form and also, if feasible, in quantitative form) between the financial statements as prepared on the basis of the new accounting principles and those prepared on the basis of the former accounting principles.

Section 9. Additional Information. Nothing in this Disclosure Certificate shall be deemed to prevent the Slate Treasurer from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Certificate or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event, in addition to that which is required by this Disclosure Certificate. If the State Treasurer chooses to include any information in any Annual Report or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Disclosure Certificate, the State Treasurer shall not have any obligation under this Disclosure Certificate to update such information or include it in any Annual Report or future notice of occurrence of a Listed Event.

Section 10. Default. In the event of a failure of the State or State Treasurer to comply with any provision of this Disclosure Certificate, any Holder or Beneficial Owner of the Bonds may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the State or State Treasurer to comply with its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate. The sole remedy under this Disclosure Certificate in the event of any failure of the State or State Treasurer to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance.

Section 11. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Certificate shall inure solely to the benefit of the Holders and Beneficial Owners from time to time of the Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity (except the right of the Dissemination Agent or any Holder or Beneficial Owner to enforce the provisions of this Disclosure Certificate on behalf of the Holders). This Disclosure Certificate is not intended to create any monetary rights on behalf of any person based upon the Rule.

Section 12. Partial Invalidity. If any one or more of the agreements or covenants or portions thereof required hereby to be performed by or on the part of the Slate Treasurer shall be contrary to law, then such agreement or agreements, such covenant or covenants or such portions thereof shall be null and void and shall be deemed separable from the remaining agreements and covenants or portions thereof and shall in no way affect the validity hereof, and the Holders of the Bonds shall retain all the benefits afforded to them hereunder. The State Treasurer hereby declares that he would have executed and delivered this Disclosure Certificate and each and every other article, section, paragraph, subdivision, sentence, clause and phrase hereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more articles, sections, paragraphs, subdivisions,

C-7

sentences, clauses or phrases hereof or the application thereof to any person or circumstance may be held to be unconstitutional, unenforceable or invalid.

Section 13. Governing Law. The laws of the State shall govern this Disclosure Certificate, the interpretation thereof and any right or liability arising hereunder. Any action or proceeding to enforce or interpret any provision of this Disclosure Certificate shall be brought, commenced or prosecuted in any courts of the State located in Sacramento County, California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the State Treasurer has executed this Disclosure Certificate as of the date first above written.

By: Deputy Treasurer For California State Treasurer John Chiang

C-8

CONTINUING DISCLOSURE EXHIBIT A

FORM OF NOTICE TO THE MUNICIPAL SECURITIES RULEMAKING BOARD OF FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL REPORT

Name of Issuer:

Name of Bond Issue:

Date of Issuance:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Various Purpose General Obligation Refunding Bonds

April 19, 2017

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Issuer has not provided an Annual Report with respect to the above-named Bonds as required by Section 4 of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate of the Issuer, dated the Date oflssuance. [The Issuer anticipates that the Annual Report will be filed by

------. l

Dated: -------

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

By: [to be signed only if filed]

C-9

APPENDIXD

PROPOSED FORMS OF LEGAL OPINIONS

FORM OF FINAL OPINION OF BOND COUNSEL

[Closing Date]

The Honorable John Chiang State Treasurer Sacramento, California

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

$603,890,000 VARIOUS PURPOSE GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS

(Final Opinion)

We have acted as bond counsel to the Slate of California ( the "Slate") in connection with the issuance by the State of $603,890,000 aggregate principal amount of State of California Various Purpose General Obligation Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds"). All the bond acts under which the Bonds are issued are identified in Schedule A hereto, which is incorporated by reference. The Bonds are authorized pursuant to the respective bond acts identified in Schedule A ( collectively, the "Laws") and are issued pursuant to Part 3 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Government Code and to resolutions (the "Resolutions") adopted by the respective finance committees designated under the Laws.

In such connection, we have examined the Resolutions, the tax certificate of the State relating to the Bonds, dated the date hereof (the "Tax Certificate"), other certifications of officials of the State, and such other documents, opinions and matters to the extent deemed necessary to render the opinions set forth herein.

The opinions expressed herein are based on an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions and cover certain matters not directly addressed by such authorities. Such opinions may be affected by actions taken or omitted or events occurring after the date hereof. We have not undertaken to determine, or to inform any person, whether any such actions are taken or omitted or events do occur or any other matters come to our attention after the date hereof. Accordingly, this letter speaks only as of its date and is not intended to, and may not, be relied upon or otherwise used in connection with any such actions, events or matters. We have no obligation to update this letter. We have assumed the genuineness of all documents and signatures presented to us (whether as originals or as copies). We have assumed, without undertaking to verify, the accuracy of the factual matters represented, warranted or certified in the documents referred to in the second paragraph hereof. Furthermore, we have assumed compliance with all covenants and agreements contained in the Resolutions and the Tax

D-1

Certificate, including (without limitation) covenants and agreements compliance with which is necessary to assure that future actions, omissions or events will not cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes.

We call attention to the fact that the rights and obligations under the Bonds, the Resolutions and the Tax Certificate and their enforceability may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership, reorganization, arrangement, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium and other laws relating to or affecting creditors' rights, to the application of equitable principles, to the exercise of judicial discretion in appropriate cases, and to the limitations on legal remedies against the State. We express no opinion with respect to any indemnification, contribution, liquidated damages, penalty (including any remedy deemed to constitute a penalty), right of setoff, choice of law, choice of forum, choice of venue, non-exclusivity of remedies, waiver or severability provisions contained in foregoing documents. Our services did not include financial or other non-legal advice. Finally, we undertake no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the Official Statement dated April 12, 2017, or other offering material relating to the Bonds and express no opinion with respect thereto.

Based on and subject to the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, as of the date hereof, we are of the following opinions:

1. The State has lawful authority for the issuance of the Bonds, and the Bonds constitute valid and binding general obligations of the State payable in accordance with the Laws from the General Fund of the State. The full faith and credit of the State is pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as the principal and interest become due and payable.

2. Interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"). Interest on the Bonds is not a specific preference item for purposes of the federal individual or corporate alternative minimum taxes, although we observe that it is included in adjusted current earnings when calculating corporate alternative minimum taxable income. Interest on the Bonds is exempt from State personal income taxes. We express no opinion regarding any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the amount, accrual or receipt of interest on, the Bonds.

Very truly yours,

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

Per

D-2

FINANCE COMMITTEE

State School Building Finance Committee


California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe

Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act

Finance Committee

California Library Construction and

Renovation Finance Committee

California Safe Drinking Water Finance Committee

Children's Hospital Bond Act Finance Committee

Higher Education Facilities Finance Committee

Transportation Improvement Finance

Committee

1988 County Correctional Facility Capital

Expenditure and Youth Facility Finance Committee




Schedule A


VARIO US PURPOSE GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS

NAME OF BONDS (STATE OF

BOND ACT CALIFORNIA)

1988 School Facilities Bond Act School Facilities Bonds


California Clean Water, Clean Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe

Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Neighborhood Parks, and

and Coastal Protection Act of 2002

Coastal Protection Bonds

California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Library Construction and

Construction and Renovation Renovation Bonds Bond Act of 2000

California Safe Drinking Water Safe Drinking Water Bonds

Bond Law of 1988

Children's Hospital Bond Act of Children's Hospital Bonds

2004

Class Size Reduction Class Size Reduction

Kindergarten-University Public Kindergarten-University Public

Education Facilities Bond Act of 1998

Education Facilities Bonds

Clean Air and Transportation Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Bond Act of 1990 Improvement Bonds

County Correctional Facility County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure and Youth Capital Expenditure and Youth

Facility Bond Act of 1988 Facility Bonds

Higher Education Facilities Bond Higher Education Facilities Act of 1988 Bonds

Higher Education Facilities Bond Higher Education Facilities Act of June 1990 Bonds


D-3

PRINCIPAL SERIES AMOUNT

AU $535,000

BP $50,000

BE $2,575,000

AR $50,000

AR $750,000

AD $780,000

EL $36,805,000

cu $30,030,000

AT $230,000

AR $90,000

BL $570,000

BR $3,005,000

NAME OF BONDS FINANCE (STATE OF PRINCIPAL

COMMITTEE BOND ACT CALIFORNIA) SERIES AMOUNT

Higher Education Facilities Kindergarten-University Public

Kindergarten-University Public Finance Committee

Education Facilities Bond Act of Education Facilities Bonds

DM $10,120,000 2002

State School Building Kindergarten-University Public



DN $258,220,000 2002




CR $4,595,000 2004

Higher Education Facilities Public Education Facilities Bond Public Education Facilities DP $23,910,000

Finance Committee Act of 1996 Bonds

State School Building Public Education Facilities Bond Public Education Facilities DN $18,830,000


Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Safe, Clean, Reliable Water BV $29,520,000

Supply Fimnce Committee Supply Act Supply Bonds

Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Safe Drinking Water, Clean Safe Drinking Water, Clean

Protection, and Flood Water, Watershed Protection, Water, Watershed Protection, BY $19,730,000 Protection Finance and Flood Protection Act and Flood Protection Bonds

Committee

Safe Neighborhood Parks, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean

Clean Water, Clean Air, Water, Clean Air, and Coastal

Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection

Protection Bond Act of2000 (the Clean Water, Clean Air, and BR $58,700,000

(Villaraigosa-Keeley Act) Villaraigosa-Keeley Act)

Coastal Protection Bonds Finance Committee

State School Building School Facilities Bond Act of School Facilities Bonds AS $1,345,000

Finance Committee 1990

State School Building School Facilities Bond Act of School Facilities Bonds BW $2,435,000


Seismic Retrofit Finance Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of Seismic Retrofit Bonds BY $47,285,000

Committee 1996

Water Conservation Water Conservation Bond Law Water Conservation Bonds AU $575,000

Finance Committee of! 988

Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal Water Security, Clean Drinking Water Security, Clean Drinking

and Beach Protection Act Water, Coastal and Beach Water, Coastal and Beach BC $53,155,000 of 2002 Finance Protection Act of 2002 Protection Bonds

Committee

D-4

FORM OF OPINION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

[Closing Date]


Various Purpose General Obligation Refunding Bonds

The Honorable John Chiang State Treasurer Sacramento, California

We have acted as counsel to the State of California (the "State") in connection with the issuance by the State of $603,890,000 aggregate principal amount of State of California Various Purpose General Obligation Refunding Bonds (the "Bonds"). The Bonds are all dated [Closing Date], and are issued as twenty-five (25) separate series under twenty-three (23) bond acts, all as identified in Schedule A hereto, which is incorporated by reference. The Bonds are authorized pursuant to the respective bond acts identified in Schedule A ( collectively, the "Laws") and are issued pursuant to Chapter 4 of Part 3 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Government Code and to resolutions ( the "Resolutions") adopted by the respective finance committees designated under the Laws.

In such connection, we have examined the record of proceedings submitted to us relative to the issuance of the Bonds, including the Resolutions, certifications of officials of the State, and such other documents and matters deemed necessary by us to render the opinions set forth herein, although in doing so, we have not undertaken to verify independently and have assumed the accuracy of the factual matters represented, warranted or certified therein.

The opinions expressed herein are based upon an analysis of existing laws, regulations, rulings and court decisions and cover certain matters not directly addressed by such authorities. Such opinions may be affected by actions taken or omitted or events occurring after the date hereof and we disclaim any obligation to update this letter. We have neither undertaken to determine, nor to inform any person, whether any such actions are taken or omitted or events do occur or whether any other matters come to our attention after the date hereof. We have assumed the genuineness of all documents and signatures presented to us, the conformity to original documents and certificates of all documents and certificates submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies, and the authenticity of the originals of such latter documents and certificates. Furthermore, we have assumed compliance with the agreements and covenants contained in the Resolutions.

We call attention to the fact that the rights and obligations under the Bonds and the Resolutions and their enforceability may be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, arrangement, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium and other laws relating to or affecting creditors' rights, to the application of equitable principles, to the exercise of judicial discretion in appropriate cases, and to the limitations contained in state law regarding legal remedies against the State. We express no opinion with respect to any inderunification, contribution, penalty,

D-5

choice of law, choice of forum, choice of venue, severability or waiver provisions contained in the foregoing documents. We express no opinion as to whether interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes or exempt from state personal income taxes or as to any other tax consequences related to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Bonds. Finally, we undertake no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the Official Statement dated April 12, 2017, or other offering material relating to the Bonds and express no opinion with respect thereto.

Based on and subject to the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, as of the date hereof, we are of the opinion that the State has lawful authority for the issuance of the Bonds, and the Bonds constitute the valid and binding general obligations of the State payable in accordance with the Laws from the General Fund of the State. The full faith and credit of the State is pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds, as the principal and interest become due and payable.

Sincerely,

Deputy Attorney General

For XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General

D-6

FINANCE COMMITTEE



California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe

Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act

Finance Committee

California Library Construction and

Renovation Finance Committee

California Safe Drinking Water Finance Committee

Children's Hospital Bond Act Finance Committee


Transportation Improvement Finance

Committee

1988 County Correctional Facility Capital

Expenditure and Youth Facility Finance Committee




Schedule A


VARIO US PURPOSE GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS

NAME OF BONDS (STATE OF

BOND ACT CALIFORNIA)



California Clean Water, Clean Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe

Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Neighborhood Parks, and

and Coastal Protection Act of 2002

Coastal Protection Bonds

California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public Library Library Construction and

Construction and Renovation Renovation Bonds Bond Act of 2000

California Safe Drinking Water Safe Drinking Water Bonds

Bond Law of 1988

Children's Hospital Bond Act of Children's Hospital Bonds

2004

Class Size Reduction Class Size Reduction

Kindergarten-University Public Kindergarten-University Public

Education Facilities Bond Act of 1998

Education Facilities Bonds

Clean Air and Transportation Clean Air and Transportation Improvement Bond Act of 1990 Improvement Bonds

County Correctional Facility County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure and Youth Capital Expenditure and Youth

Facility Bond Act of 1988 Facility Bonds

Higher Education Facilities Bond Higher Education Facilities Act of 1988 Bonds



D-7

PRINCIPAL SERIES AMOUNT

AU $535,000

BP $50,000

BE $2,575,000

AR $50,000

AR $750,000

AD $780,000

EL $36,805,000

cu $30,030,000

AT $230,000

AR $90,000

BL $570,000

BR $3,005,000

NAME OF BONDS FINANCE (STATE OF PRINCIPAL

COMMITTEE BOND ACT CALIFORNIA) SERIES AMOUNT

Higher Education Facilities Kindergarten-University Public



DM $10,120,000 2002




DN $258,220,000 2002




CR $4,595,000 2004

Higher Education Facilities Public Education Facilities Bond Public Education Facilities DP $23,910,000


State School Building Public Education Facilities Bond Public Education Facilities DN $18,830,000


Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Safe, Clean, Reliable Water Safe, Clean, Reliable Water BV $29,520,000

Supply Fimnce Committee Supply Act Supply Bonds

Safe Drinking Water, Clean Water, Watershed Safe Drinking Water, Clean Safe Drinking Water, Clean

Protection, and Flood Water, Watershed Protection, Water, Watershed Protection, BY $19,730,000 Protection Finance and Flood Protection Act and Flood Protection Bonds

Committee

Safe Neighborhood Parks, Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean

Clean Water, Clean Air, Water, Clean Air, and Coastal

Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection

Protection Bond Act of2000 (the Clean Water, Clean Air, and BR $58,700,000

(Villaraigosa-Keeley Act) Villaraigosa-Keeley Act)

Coastal Protection Bonds Finance Committee

State School Building School Facilities Bond Act of School Facilities Bonds AS $1,345,000


State School Building School Facilities Bond Act of School Facilities Bonds BW $2,435,000


Seismic Retrofit Finance Seismic Retrofit Bond Act of Seismic Retrofit Bonds BY $47,285,000

Committee 1996

Water Conservation Water Conservation Bond Law Water Conservation Bonds AU $575,000

Finance Committee of! 988

Water Security, Clean Drinking Water, Coastal Water Security, Clean Drinking Water Security, Clean Drinking

and Beach Protection Act Water, Coastal and Beach Water, Coastal and Beach BC $53,155,000 of 2002 Finance Protection Act of 2002 Protection Bonds

Committee

D-8

APPENDIXE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

State of California

om reheooioe nnual ,nancial a o

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016

BETIYT. YEE California State Controller's Office

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016

Prepared by The Office of the State Controller

BETIYT. YEE California State Controller

INTRODUCTORY SECTION California State Controller's Transmittal Letter ..

Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ..

Principal Officials ofthe State of California ..

Organization Chart of the State of California ..

FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report ..

Management's Discussion and Analysis ..

BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Statement ofNet Position ..

Statement of Activities ..

FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds ..

Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to

the Statement of Net Position.

Statement ofRevenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -

Governmental Funds .

Reconciliation ofthe Statement ofRevenues, Expenditures, and Changes in

"' ,x

X

x,

2

30

34

38

40

42

Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities.. 44

Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds. 46

Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position - Proprietary Funds. 50

Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds.. 52

Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds and Similar Component Units.. 56

Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds and

Similar Component Units .. 57

DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Statement of Net Position - Discretely Presented Component Units - Enterprise Activity.. 60

Statement of Activities - Discretely Presented Component Units - Enterprise Activity ..

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Notes to the Financial Statements - Index ..

Notes to the Financial Statements.

62

63

67

State of California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedule of Changes in Net Position Liability and Related Ratios ........................................... 160

Schedule of State Pension Contributions ................................................................................... 168

Schedule of the State's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability- CalSTRS .................... 171

Schedule of the State's Contributions - CalSTRS ..................................................................... 171

Schedule ofFunding Progress .................................................................................................... 172

Infrastructure Assets Using the Modified Approach .................................................................. 172

Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund and Major Special Revenue Funds ............. 176

Reconciliation of Budgetary Basis Fund Balances of the General Fund and the Major Special Revenue Funds to GAAP Basis Fund Balances ........................................ 179

Notes to the Required Supplementary Information.

COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES NONMAJOR AND OTHER FUNDS

179

Nonmajor Governmental Funds ---------------------185

Combining Balance Sheet .......................................................................................................... 188

Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances. 192

Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Budgetary Basis ................................................................. 196 Internal Service Funds ________________________ 197

Combining Statement of Net Position ........................................................................................ 198

Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position .................. 202

Combining Statement of Cash Flows ......................................................................................... 204

Nonmajor Enterprise Funds---------------------- 209


Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position .................. 212

Combining Statement of Cash Flows ......................................................................................... 213

Private Purpose Trust Funds---------------------- 215

Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ....................................................................... 216

Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position .................................................... 217

Fiduciary Funds and Similar Component Units - Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trnst Funds------------------- 219

Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ....................................................................... 222

Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position .................................................... 224

Agency Funds--------------------------- 227

Combining Statement of Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities ......................................................... 228

Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Assets and Liabilities ...................................... 230

Nonmajor Component Units---------------------- 233


Combining Statement of Activities ............................................................................................ 238

Contents

STATISTICAL SECTION Financial Trends-------------------------- 243

Schedule of Net Position by Component ................................................................................... 244

Schedule of Changes in Net Position ......................................................................................... 246

Schedule of Fund Balances - Governmental Funds. 250

Schedule of Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds ................................................ 252

Revenue Capacity-------------------------- 255

Schedule ofRevenue Base ......................................................................................................... 256

Schedule of Revenue Payers by Income Level/Industry ............................................................ 260

Schedule of Personal Income Tax Rates .................................................................................... 262

Debt Capacity--------------------------- 265

Schedule of Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type ...................................................................... 266

Schedule of Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding ......................................................... 268

Schedule of General Obligation Bonds Outstanding ................................................................. 270

Schedule of Pledged Revenue Coverage .................................................................................... 271

Demographic and Economic Information----------------- 275

Schedule ofDemographic and Economic Indicators ................................................................. 276

Schedule of Employment by Industry ........................................................................................ 278

Operating Information------------------------ 279

Schedule of Full-time Equivalent State Employees by Function. 280

Schedule of Operating Indicators by Function ........................................................................... 282

Schedule of Capital Asset Statistics by Function ....................................................................... 286

Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 290


This page intentionally left blank


March 22, 2017


To the Citizens, Covernor, and Members of the Legislature of the State of California:

Tam pleased to submit the State of California's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. This report meets the requirements of Government Code section 12460 for an annual report prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and contains information to help readers gain a reasonable understanding of the State's financial activities.

California ended the fiscal year with total General Fund revenues of $117.6 billion, a $796 million net increase compared to the prior year. Personal income tax and sales and use tax increased by $1.6 billion and $1.2 bill ion, respectively, while corporation tmces declined by $1.6 billion. At June 30, 2016, the General Fund's cash balance of $5.2 billion represents approximately 17 days of General Fund operating expenditures for the State, compared to a cash balance of $5.8 billion at June 30, 2015, which represented 20 days of expenditures.

California's economy has recovered from the Great Recession and budgeted spending has increased over the last four years. The 2016-17 State Budget, enacted on June 27, 2016, continues to build the Budget Stabilization Account (the State's Rainy Day Fund) and limits ongoing spending obligations. Looking ahead, the State has begun to prepare for the next economic slowdown.

T extend my appreciation to all government agencies for their support and cooperation in submitting the required information for the CAFR. Thank you, as well, to the California State Auditor and her staff for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism in the management ofthe State's finances. Finally, T wish to thank my entire team for their skill, effort, and dedication in completing this financial report

Sincerely,

Original signed by

BETTYT. YEE


Report Overview

The State's management assumes responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, and fairness of information presented in the CAFR, including all disclosures, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal controls established for this purpose. The internal control structure is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of material misstatements. The objective of these controls is to ensure compliance with legal prov1s1ons embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the Legislature and Governor.

The California State Auditor has issued an unmodified opinion on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2016, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.

The State of California also is required to undergo an annual single audit in conformity with the provisions of the United States Office of Management and Budget's Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. This report is issued separately.

The Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor's report and contains an introduction, overview, and analysis of the financial statements. The T'v!D&A also contains information regarding California's economy for the year ended June 30, 2016, and its economic performance as of December 31, 2016, for the 2016-17 fiscal year. The T'v!D&A complements this transmittal letter and should be read in conjunction with it

Prome of the State of Ca!ifomia

The State of California was admitted to the Union on September 9, 1850. The State's population, as of 2016, is estimated to be more than 39 million residents. The State's government is divided into three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. Executive power is vested in the Governor. Other members of the Executive branch include the Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, State Controller, Insurance Commissioner, and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. All officers of the Executive branch are elected to a four-year term. The Legislative branch of government is the State's law-making authority and is made up of two houses: the Senate and the Assembly. The Judicial branch is charged with interpreting the laws of the State. Tt provides settlement of disputes between parties in controversy, determines the guilt or innocence of those accused ofviolating laws, and protects the rights of Californians.

California's government includes control agencies that help to regulate internal governmental operations. The State Controller's Office, the State's independent fiscal watchdog, ensures that the State's budget is spent properly, offers fiscal guidance to local governments, reports on the State's financial position, and uncovers fraud and abuse of taxpayer dollars. The Department of Finance, part of the Executive branch of government, establishes fiscal policies to carry out the State's programs and serves as the Governor's chief fiscal policy advisor. The California State Auditor promotes the efficient and effective management of public funds through independent evaluations of state and local governments.

The State of California provides a wide range of services to its citizens, including social, health, and human services; kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) and higher education; and business and transportation, consumer services, general government, and correctional programs. The State also is financially accountable for legally separate entities (component units) that provide post-secondary

education programs, promote agricultural activities and financial assistance to small business, and finance coastal and inland urban waterfront restoration projects. The State, through its related organizations (organizations for which the primary government is not financially accountable), provides services such as the operation of the statewide energy transmission grid; earthquake insurance for homeowners and renters; workers' compensation insurance; health insurance for individuals, families, and employees of small businesses; financing for pollution control facilities, and for acquiring, constructing, and equipping health facilities; and loans to students attending public and private nonprofit colleges and universities. The financial information of these institutions is not included in the State's financial statements.

The State Legislature approves an annual budget that contains estimates of revenues and expenditures for the ensuing fiscal year. This budget is the result of negotiations between the Governor and the Legislature. The State Controller's Office is statutorily responsible for controlling revenues due the primary government and for expenditures of each appropriation contained in the budget The State's annual budget is submitted by the Governor no later than January 10 preceding the beginning of the fiscal year on July 1, and must be approved by the Legislature by June 15 each year. This annual budget serves as the foundation for the State's financial planning and control. Additional information on the budgetary basis of accounting can be found in Note 2, Budgetary and Legal Compliance, and in the Required Supplementary Information section of the CAFR that follows the Notes to the Financial Statements.

Overview of the State's Economy

California's economy is the sixth largest in the world, with a 2015 Gross Domestic Product of $2.5 trillion. Tn 2015, California exported $165.3 billion in products; its two largest export markets are Mexico ($26.7 billion) and Canada ($17.2 billion). California's five largest exports are computer and electronic products, transportation equipment, machinery except electrical, chemicals, and miscellaneous manufactured commodities. California also enjoys one of the finest and most diverse collections of natural, cultural, and recreational resources in the nation. California's travel and tourism industry generated revenues of $122.5 billion in 2015, including more than $21.2 billion from international visitors.

Budget Outlook

2016-17 Fiscal Year

The 2016 Budget Act focuses new spending on one-time activities, such as repairing and replacing aging infrastructure, building affordable housing, addressing the effects of California's drought, and preparing the State for the next recession by increasing the Budget Stabilization Account (BSA), the State's Rainy Day Fund. Based on January 2017 estimates, total General Fund revenues and transfers are estimated to be $118.8 billion, $1.5 billion less than budgeted. Tn addition, total General Fund expenditures are estimated to be $122.8 billion, $300 million more than budgeted. The General Fund is projected to end the 2016-17 fiscal year with $6.7 billion in its BSA and $47 million in its Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties.

2017-18 Fiscal Year

The Governor released his proposed 2017-18 Budget on January 10, 2017. Tn it, he notes that the economy is finishing its eighth year of expansion (three years longer than average) and that revenues fell below projections in the last year. Consequently, the 2017-18 Budget estimates only a

conservative increase of $2.7 billion in personal income tax revenue (3.3%) and proposes $3.2 billion in actions to reduce General Fund spending growth in order to avoid a budget deficit while continuing to increase the State's reserves. The proposed actions include a $1.7 billion adjustment to the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee for K-14 education, the recapture of $900 million of uncommitted 2016 allocations, and $600 million in delays or eliminations of proposed spending increases. The Governor's Budget proposes total reserves of $9.4 billion by the end of the 2017-18 fiscal year-$7.9 billion in the BSA and $1.5 billion in the General Fund's Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties.

Other significant proposals from the Governor's Budget include $59.8 billion for health and human services, $52.3 billion for K-12 education, $15.1 billion for higher education, $11.4 billion for transportation, $13.8 billion for corrections and rehabilitation, and $27.1 billion for general government and other. The Budget also proposes $1.2 billion in accelerated payments to reduce the State's long-term debts and obligations.

Long-term Finanda! Planning

Long-term financial planning initiatives that will impact the State's long-term financial goals include:

The Governor's 2017 Infrastructure Plan proposes $43 billion over the next ten years to address the most urgent state and local transportation needs, focusing on "fix-it-first" investments to repair and improve neighborhood roads and state highways and bridges. Specifically, the plan proposes $16.2 billion for highway repair and maintenance, $2.3 billion for trade corridors, $13.5 billion for local roads, and $4.0 billion for transit and intercity rail. The plan also proposes using $14.6 billion from general obligation bonds and Cap and Trade funds in fiscal year 2018-19 to help meet the High Speed Rail Authority's goals.

The Governor's Budget includes $5.3 billion ($3.5 billion from the General Fund) for the State's contributions to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) for state pension costs. This proposal reflects the recent decision of the CalPERS board to reduce the current discount rate from 7.5% to 7% over the next three budget years. This reduction of the discount rate results in approximately $172 million in additional state contributions in 2017-18, increasing to $2.0 billion once the discount rate changes are fully implemented. The Budget also includes $2.8 billion from the General Fund in 2017-18 to the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) for state contributions. The Budget assumes CalSTRS will adopt new mortality assumptions, implement a discount rate reduction, and exercise its authority to increase state contributions by 0.5%, resulting in a $153 million increase in General Fund contributions.

The State provides health care and dental benefits to retired state employees and their spouses and dependents (when applicable). Collectively, these benefits are known as other postemployment benefits (OPEB). Historically, the State has almost exclusively used a "pay-as-you-go" funding policy for OPEB, resulting in an actuarial accrued liability (AAL). As of June 30, 2016, California's OPEB AAL is estimated to be $76.7 billion. The State has initiated a prefunding strategy, as well as changes to retiree health benefits for new employees through the collective bargaining process, to support the elimination of the unfunded AAL. As part of the process, the State made a one-time allocation of $240 million to certain bargaining units' OPEB trust fund accounts for bargaining units that reached an agreement with the Administration by November 1, 2016, to contribute towards their retiree healthcare. Currently, the State has set

vii

viii

aside approximately $400 million to pay for future retiree health benefits. The Governor expects the trust fund balance to more than double and approach $1.0 bill ion by the end of 2017-18.

As part of its strategy to address climate change, the State conducts cap-and-trade auctions of emissions allowances to fund various programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Governor's budget proposes to spend $2.2 billion in cap-and-trade revenue in 2017-18. This amount would come from $1.5 billion in auction revenue assumed to be collected in 2017-18 and approximately $700 million in unallocated prior-year collections. Consistent with current law, 60% ($900 million) of the 2017-18 auction revenue would be continuously appropriated to programs such as high-speed rail and affordable housing and sustainable communities. The remaining $1.3 bill ion in proposed discretionary spending would occur only if the Legislature extends the Cap-and-Trade program beyond 2020 with a two-third vote.

A new president was inaugurated on January 20, 2017. The new administration and leaders in Congress have suggested major changes to the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid, trade and immigration policy, and the federal tax structure, as well as other actions. Many of these proposed changes could have detrimental effects on the State's economy and budget At this point, it is not clear what those changes will be or when they will take effect.

Following five years of drought, California has experienced significantly higher-than-average rainfall through this point in the current water year, which started October 2016. The high volume of rain and snowmelt has caused some localized flooding and damage to roads and other infrastructure, including spillways at the Oroville Dam. Tn 2017, the President issued Presidential Disaster Declarations for both the winter storms affecting 30 counties across California and the evacuation of the areas in danger of flooding from the possible breach of the Oroville Dam. At this time, the effects of the high volume of rainfall and snowfall are not expected to affect materially the State's economy or budget, and repairs to the Oroville Dam are expected to be paid from resources other than the General Fund. Nevertheless, the State continues to address the potential for future droughts by encouraging water conservation, facilitating water management where possible, and providing funding for critical water infrastructure projects.

Awards

The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the State of California for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. Tn order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.

A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.

Govemment Finance Ofticen; Association

Certificate of Achieve1nent for Excellence in Financial Reporting

Presented to

State of California

For its Annual Firrnncia1

for the Fiscal Year Ended

June 30, 2015


Executive Branch

Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Governor

Gavin Newsom Lieutenant Governor

Betty T. Yee State Controller

Xavier Becerra Attorney General

John Chiang State Treasurer

Alex Padilla Secretary of State

Tom Torlakson Superintendent of Public Instruction

Dave Jones Insurance Commissioner

Board ofEqualization George Runner, Member, First District

Fiona Ma, Member, Second District Jerome E. Horton, Member, Third District Diane L. Harkey, Member, Fourth District

Legislative Branch

Kevin de Le6n President pro Tempore, Senate

Anthony Rendon Speaker ofthe Assembly

Judicial Branch

Tani Cantil-Sakauye Chief Justice, State Supreme Court

California State Controller's Transmittal Letter

Organization Chart of the State of California

Board of Governors Community

Colleges

Trustees of State

Universities

Office of the lnspeGl:or

General

University of State Board of Regents

Delta Stewardship

Council

Public Utilities

Commission

Ms Council

Military State Department Public

Defender

Lieutenant Governor

State Superintend.ant

of Public Instruction

State Treasurer

Judicial

State Supreme

Court

Courts o<

Appeal

Superior Courts

State Bar o<

California

Judicial Council

Commission on Judicial

Performance

Habeas Corpus

Resource Center

Commission on Judicial

Appointments

Government Operations

Agency


' I I


Elaine M. Howle State Auditor Doug Cordiner ChiefDeputy

Independent Auditor's Report

THE GOVERNOR AND THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the State of California, as of and for the year ended June 3 0, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the State's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents

Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error

Auditor's Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit We did not audit the financial statements of the following:

Government-wide Financial Statements

Certain enterprise funds that, in the aggregate, represent 80 percent of the assets and deferred outflows, and 40 percent of the revenues of the business-type activities

The University of California and the California Housing Finance Agency that represent 93 percent of the assets and deferred outflows, and 94 percent of the revenues ofthe discretely presented component units

Fund Financial Statements

The Safe Drinking Water State Revolving fund, that represents 15 percent of the assets and deferred outflows, and 3 percent of the additions, revenues, and other financing sources of the Environmental and Natural Resources fund, a major governmental fund

The fol lowing major enterprise funds: Electric Power fund, Water Resources fund, State Lottery fund, and California State University fund

The Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, the Public Building Construction, the Public Employees' Retirement, the State Teachers' Retirement, the State Water Pollution Control, and the 1943 Veterans Farm and Home Building funds, that represent 84 percent of the assets and deferred outflows, and 27 percent of the additions, revenues and other financing sources of the aggregate remaining fund information

The discretely presented component units noted above

621 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, CA 95814 916445 0255 916 327 0019 fax

The related financial statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinions, insofar as they relate to the amounts included for those funds and entities, are based solely on the reports ofthe other auditors. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The financial statements of the Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, the Public Building Construction, the Public Employees' Retirement, the State Lottery, and the 1943 Veterans Farm and Home Building funds were not audited in accordance with Government Auditing Standards

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions

Opinions

In our opinion, based on our audit and the reports of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the State of California, as of June 30, 2016, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America

Other Matters

Required Supplementary Infonnation

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that a discussion and analysis by management, schedule of changes in net pension liability and related ratios, schedule of state pension contributions, schedules related to the State's support of the California State Teachers' Retirement System, schedule of funding progress for other postemployment benefits, infrastructure information, budgetary comparison information, reconciliation of budgetary and GAAP-basis fund balances, and related notes be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context We and the other auditors have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the

http://www.iuditor.ca.gov

basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance

Other Infonnation

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the State's basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining financial statements, and statistical section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements

The combining financial statements are the responsibility of management and were derived from, and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America by us and other auditors. In our opinion, based on our audit, the procedures performed as described above, and the reports of other auditors, the combining financial statements are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole

The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated March 22, 2017 on our consideration of the State's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal contro I over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the State's internal control over financial reporting and compliance

CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR

J,,A--_ ..-i1. ~ (/ JOHN F. COLLINS U, CPA

Deputy State Auditor

March 22, 2017

.,_ .,,_ __

Management's Discussion and Analysis

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis is required supplementary information to the State of California's financial statements. Tt describes and analyzes the financial position of the State, providing an overview of the State's activities for the year ended June 30, 2016. We encourage readers to consider the information we present here in conjunction with the information presented in the Controller's transmittal letter at the front ofthis report and in the State's financial statements and notes, which follow this section.

Financial Highlights Primary Government

Government-wide Highlights

After seven years of economic expansion, California is approaching an economic plateau as its rate of growth has started to slow. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, the State's general revenues increased by only $1 .4 billion (1.0%) over the prior year-significantly less than the 10.0% growth experienced in the 2014-15 fiscal year. Expenses and transfers for the State's governmental activities increased by $12.0billion (5.1%) but were less than total revenues received, resulting in a $7.5 billion increase in the governmental activities' net position. Total revenues and transfers for the State's business-type activities also surpassed expenses by $3.1 billion in the 2015-16 fiscal year.

Net Position - The primary government ended the 2015-16 fiscal year with a net deficit position of $30.3 billion, an improvement of $10.6 billion (26.0%). The total net deficit position is reduced by $107.1 billion for net investment in capital assets and by $34.8 billion for restricted net position, yielding a negative unrestricted net position of $172.2 bill ion. Restricted net position is dedicated for specified uses and is not available to fund current activities. More than 59.0%, or $101.6 billion, of the negative $172.2 billion consists of unfunded, employee-related, long-term liabilities that are recognized as soon as an obligation has been incurred, even though payment will occur over many future periods (net pension liability, net other postemployment benefit obligations, and compensated absences). Another 38.6%, or $66.5 billion, consists of outstanding bonded debt issued to build capital assets of school districts and other local governmental entities. Bonded debt reduces the State's unrestricted net position; however, local governments, not the State, own the capital assets that would normally offset this reduction.

Fund Highlights

Governmental Funds - As of June 30, 2016, the primary government's governmental funds reported a combined ending fund balance of$30.9 billion, an increase of$4.8 billion over the prior fiscal year. This year is the first in more than 15 years without any governmental fund deficits. The unrestricted fund balance, comprised of committed, assigned, and unassigned balances, was $1. 9 bill ion, an increase of $2.4 bill ion over the prior fiscal year's deficit balance of $448 million. The nonspendable and restricted fund balances were $87 million and $28.9 billion, respectively .

Proprietary Funds - As of June 30, 2016, the primary government's proprietary funds reported a combined ending net position of $4.1 billion, an increase of $3.0 billion over the prior fiscal year. The total net position is reduced by $2.9 billion for net investment in capital assets, expendable restrictions of $5.9 billion, and nonexpendable restrictions of $9 million, yielding a negative unrestricted net position of $4.7 billion, an improvement of $1.3 billion over the prior fiscal year.


Non current Assets and Liabilities

As of June 30, 2016, the primary government's noncurrent assets totaled $156.2 billion, of which $136.7billion is related to capital assets. State highway infrastructure assets of $73.5 billion represent the largest portion ofthe State's capital assets.

The primary government's noncurrent liabilities totaled $221.4 billion, which consists of $101.6 billion in unfunded employee-related future obligations, $76.6 billion in general obligation bonds, $29.4 billion in revenue bonds, and $13.9 billion in other noncurrent liabilities. During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the primary government's noncurrent liabilities increased by $7.0 billion (3.2%) over the previous fiscal year. The most significant changes were increases of $8.1 billion in net pension liability and $3.5 billion in net other postemployment benefits obligation, and decreases of$2.6 billion in loans payable and $1.5 billion in general obligation bonds payable.

Overview of the Financial Statements

This discussion and analysis is an introduction to the section presenting the State's basic financial statements, which includes four components: (1) government-wide financial statements, (2) fund financial statements, (3) discretely presented component units financial statements, and (4) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains required supplementary information and combining financial statements and schedules intended to furnish additional detail to support the basic financial statements.


Government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the State's finances. The government-wide financial statements do not include fiduciary programs and activities of the primary government and component units because fiduciary resources are not available to support state programs.

The statements provide both short-term and long-term information about the State's financial position to help readers assess the State's economic condition at the end of the fiscal year. These statements are prepared using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, similar to methods used by most businesses. These statements take into account all revenues and expenses connected with the fiscal year, regardless ofwhen the State received or paid the cash. The government-wide financial statements include two statements: the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities.

The Statement of Net Position presents all of the State's financial and capital resources in a format in which assets and deferred outflows of resources equal liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, plus net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position indicate whether the financial position of the State is improving or deteriorating.

The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the State's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. The State reports changes in net position as soon as the event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. Thus, this statement reports revenues and expenses for some items that will result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected tmces and earned but unused vacation leave). This statement also presents a comparison between direct expenses and program revenues for each function of the State.


The government-wide financial statements separate into different columns the three types of state programs and activities-governmental activities, business-type activities, and component units.

Governmental activities are mostly supported by tmces, such as personal income and sales and use taxes, and intergovernmental revenues, primarily federal grants. Most services and expenses normally associated with state government fall into this activity category, including general government; education (public kindergarten through 12th grade [K-12] schools and institutions of higher education); health and human services; natural resources and environmental protection; business, consumer services, and housing; transportation; corrections and rehabilitation; and interest on long-term debt

Business-type activities typically recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges to external users of goods and services. The business-type activities of the State of California include providing unemployment insurance programs, providing housing loans to California veterans, providing water to local water districts, providing services to California State University students, selling California State Lottery tickets, and selling electric power. These activities are conducted with minimal financial assistance from the governmental activities or general revenues ofthe State.

Component units are organizations that are legally separate from the State, but are at the same time related to the State financially ( i.e., the State is financially accountable for them) or the nature of their relationship with the State is so significant that their exclusion would cause the State's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. Various types of component units are presented; all are legally separate. However, blended component units function as part of the State's operations. Fiduciary component units are primarily the resources and operations of the California Public Employees' Retirement System and the California State Teachers' Retirement System. Discretely presented component units contain some form of accountability either from or to the State.

Most component units prepare their own separately issued financial statements. For information regarding obtaining the financial statements of the individual component units, refer to Note 1 A, Reporting Entity.


The State of California, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal and contractual requirements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. All of the funds of the State may be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds.

Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions that are reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the governmentwide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on short-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's short-term financing requirements. This approach is known as the flow of current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. These governmental fund statements provide a detailed shortterm view of the State's finances, enabling readers to determine whether adequate financial resources exist to meet the State's current needs.

Because governmental fund financial statements provide a narrower focus than do government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing


so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's short-term financing decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. Primary differences between the government-wide and fund-based statements relate to noncurrent assets, such as land and buildings, and noncurrent liabilities, such as bonded debt and amounts owed for net pension liability, compensated absences, and capital lease obligations. These amounts are reported in the government-wide statements but not in the fund-based statements.

Proprietary funds show activities that operate more like those found in the private sector. The State of California has two proprietary fund types-enterprise funds and internal service funds.

Enterprise funds record activities for which a fee is charged to external users; they are presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements.

Internal service funds accumulate and allocate costs internally among the State's various functions. For example, internal service funds provide public buildings construction, information technology, printing, fleet management, and architectural services primarily for state departments. As a result, their activity is considered governmental.

Fiduciary funds account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the State. Fiduciary funds and the activities of fiduciary component units are not reflected in the government-wide financial statements because the resources of these funds are not available to support state programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds and similar component units is similar to that used for trusts.

Discretely Presented Component Units Financial Statements

The State has financial accountability for discretely presented component units, which have certain independent qualities and operate in a similar manner as private sector businesses. The activities of the discretely presented component units are classified as enterprise activities.

Notes to the Financial Statements

The notes to the financial statements in this publication provide additional information that is essential for a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements, which describe particular accounts in more detail, are located immediately following the discretely presented component units financial statements.

Required Supplementary Information

A section of required supplementary information follows the notes to the basic financial statements in this publication. This section includes several schedules of information for the State's pension plans and the State's contributions to those plans, a schedule of funding progress for other postemployment benefit trust funds, information on infrastructure assets based on the modified approach, a budgetary comparison schedule, and a reconciliation of the budgetary basis and the GAAP basis fund balances for the major governmental funds presented in the governmental fund financial statements.


Combining Financial Statements and Schedules

The Combining Financial Statements and Schedules - Nonmajor and Other Funds section presents combining statements that provide separate financial statements for nonmajor governmental funds, nonmajor proprietary funds, fiduciary funds, and nonmajor component units as supplementary information. The basic financial statements present only summary information for these activities.

Government·w!de Financial Ana!ys!s

Net Position

The primary government's combined net position (governmental and business-type activities) increased by $10.6 billion (26.0%) from a negative $40.9 billion to a negative $30.3 billion at June 30, 2016.

The primary government's $107.1 billion net investment in capital assets, such as land, buildings, equipment, and infrastructure (roads, bridges, and other immovable assets) comprise a significant portion of its net position. This amount of capital assets is net of any outstanding debt used to acquire those assets. The State uses capital assets when providing services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the State's investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, the resources needed to repay this debt must come from other sources because the State cannot use the capital assets to pay off the liabilities.

Another $34.8 billion of the primary government's net position represents resources that are externally restricted as to how they may be used, such as resources pledged to debt service. The internally imposed earmarking of resources is not presented in this publication as restricted net position. As of June 30, 2016, the primary government's combined unrestricted net deficit position was $172.2 billion-$168.5 billion for governmental activities and $3. 7 billion for business-type activities.

A significant factor contributing to the unrestricted net deficit is that governments recognize a liability on the government-wide Statement of Net Position as soon as an obligation has been incurred, while financing and budgeting functions focus on when a liability will be paid. As of June 30, 2016, the primary government recognized $101.6 billion (59.0% of the $172.2 billion unrestricted net deficit) in unfunded employee-related obligations-net pension liability, net other postemployment benefits obligation, and compensated absences. Tn addition, the primary government recognized $66.5 billion (38.6% of the $172.2 billion unrestricted net deficit) in outstanding bonded debt issued to build capital assets for school districts and other local governmental entities, a common state practice nationwide. As the State does not own these capital assets, neither the assets nor the related bonded debt is included in the portion of net position reported as "net investment in capital assets." Instead, the bonded debt is reported as a noncurrent liability that increases the State's unrestricted net deficit position. The State can expect continued deficits in the unrestricted net position of governmental activities as long as it has significant unfunded employee-related obligations and outstanding obligations for school districts and other local governmental entities.


Table 1 presents condensed financial information derived from the Statement of Net Position for the primary government.

Table I

Net Position - Primary Government- Two-year Comparison June 30, 2016 and 2015

(amounts in millions}

Governmental Activities

2016 2015

ASSETS

Current and other assets 78,452 74,530

Capital assets 126,859 123,201

Total assets 205,311 197,731

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS

OF RESOURCES 7,726 6,128

Total assets and deferred outflows of resources ____ 213,037 203,859

LIABILITIES

Noncurrenl liabilities 194,826 186,897

Other liabilities 47,847 47,391

Total liabilities 242,673 234,288

DEFERRED INFLOWS

OF RESOURCES 5,249 11,989

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources 247,922 246,277

NET POSITION

Net investment in capital assets .. 104,597 100,695

Restricted 29,061 26,632

Unrestricted (168,543} (169,745}

Total net position (deficit) .. (34,885) (42,418)

Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and net position .. 213,037 203,859

Business-type Activities

2016 2015

25,226 24,539

9,849 9,220

35,075 33,759

1,328 1,050

36,403 34,809

26,618 27,511

4,127 3,841

30,745 31,352

1,085 2,003

31,830 33,355

2,521 2,278

5,759 4,537

(3,707} (5,361}

4,573 1,454

36,403 34,809

Nole: Prior-year adjustments recorded in the current year have nol been renecled in the prior-year column.

10

Total

2016 2015

103,678 99,069

136,708 132,421

240,386 231,490

9,054 7,178

249,440 238,668

221,444 214,408

51,974 51,232

273,418 265,640

6,334 13,992

279,752 279,632

107,118 102,973

34,820 31,169

(172,250} (175,106)

(30,312) (40,964)

249,440 238,668

Chart 1 presents a two-year comparison of the State's net position.

Chart I

Net Position - Primary Government- Two-year Comparison June 30, 2016 and 2015

(amounts in billions}

Net Investment in Capital Assets

Restricted

Unrestricted (:172.~}

(175.1):

($180) ($120) ($60)

11111111 2016 11111111 2015


$0 $60 $120

Nole: Prior-year adjustments recorded in the current year have nol been renecled in the 2015 amounts.

Changes in Net Position

The expenses of the primary government totaled $272.7 billion for the year ended June 30, 2016. Of this amount, $142.8 billion (50.4%) was funded with program revenues (charges for services or program-specific grants and contributions), leaving $129.9 billion to be funded with general revenues (mainly taxes). The primary government's general revenues of $140.5 billion exceeded net unfunded expenses by $10.6 billion, resulting in a 26.0% increase in net position.

11


Table 2 presents condensed financial information derived from the Statement of Activities for the primary government.

Table 2

Changes in Net Position - Primary Government- Two-year Comparison Years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015


Governmental Activities Business-type Activities

2016 2015 2016 2015

REVENUES

Program Revenues:

Charges Lor services 27,422 24,390 25,427 24,091

Operating grants and contributions .. 86,629 84,896 1,765 1,666

Capital grants and contributions .. 1,480 1,320 67 108

General Revenues:

Taxes 140,028 138,600

Investment and interest 132 58

Miscellaneous 305 401

Total revenues 255,996 249,665 27,259 25,865

EXPENSES

Program Expenses:

General government 16,686 15,804

Education 65,468 59,521

Health and human services .. 127,543 122,064

Natural resources and environmental

protection 6,988 6,420

Business, consumer services, and

housing 815 904

Transportation 12,121 12,898

Corrections and rehabilitation .. 11,875 11,483 Interest on long-term debt 4,232 4,881

Electric Power 728 799

Waler Resources 1,087 1,020

Stale Lollery 6,316 5,560

Unemployment Programs 11,459 11,390

Calilornia Stale University .. 7,199 6,848

Other enterprise programs 151 145

Total expenses 245,728 233,975 26,940 25,762

Excess (deficiency} before transfers .. 10,268 15,690 319 103

Gain on early exlinquishmenl ol debt .. 41

Translers (2,800} (2,555} 2,800 2,555

Change in nel position 7,509 13,135 3,119 2,658

Net position, beginning (restated} .. (42,394} (55,553} 1,454 * (1,204}

Net position (deficits}, ending .. (34,885} (42,418} 4,573 $ 1,454

* Nol res la led


12

Total

2016 2015

52,849 48,481

88,394 86,562

1,547 1,428

140,028 138,600

132 58

305 401

283,255 275,530

16,686 15,804

65,468 59,521

127,543 122,064

6,988 6,420

815 904

12,121 12,898

11,875 11,483

4,232 4,881

728 799

1,087 1,020

6,316 5,560

11,459 11,390

7,199 6,848

151 145

272,668 259,737

10,587 15,793

41

10,628 15,793

(40,940} (56,757}

(30,312} (40,964}



During the 2015-16 fiscal year, governmental activities' expenses and transfers totaled $248.5 billion. Program revenues totaling $115.5 bill ion, including $88.1 bill ion received in federal grants and contributions, funded 46.5% of expenses and transfers, leaving $133.0 billion to be funded with general revenues (mainly taxes). General revenues for governmental activities ($140.5 billion) exceeded net unfunded expenses and transfers, resulting in the governmental activities' net deficit position of $34.9billion for the year ended June 30, 2016, an improvement of $7.5 billion (17.7%) over the prior-year's net deficit position of $42.4 billion.

Chart 2 presents a comparison of governmental activities' expenses to related revenue by program.

Chart 2

Program Revenues and Expenses - Governmental Activities Year ended June 30, 2016


General government

Education

Health and human services

Transportation

Corrections and rehabilitation

Other programs

~5.5 84,9

,127.5

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130

ffl Program Revenues ffl Expenses

For the year ended June 30, 2016, total governmental activity revenue was $256.0 billion, an increase of 2.5% over the prior year. General revenues increased by $1.4 billion (1.0%) to $140.5 billion, and program revenues increased by $4. 9 bill ion (4.5%) to $115.5 billion. These increases are significantly smaller than the 2014-15 fiscal year growth of 10.0% for general revenues and 18.1% for program revenues, reflecting the slowing of the recent economic recovery and expansion. Personal income taxes and corporation taxes had the greatest impact on the slowing growth rate during the 2015-16 fiscal year. Corporation taxes decreased by $1.5 billion (14.1 %) from the prior year. Personal income taxes increased by $2.2 billion over the prior year, representing only a 2.8% increase compared to the 2014-15 fiscal year increase of 13.5%.

Overall expenses for governmental activities increased by $11.8 bill ion (5.0%) over the prior year. The largest increase in expenditures, $5.9 billion (10.0%), was for education due to the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee; the increased spending was triggered by higher General Fund revenue. Another significant increase, $5.5 billion (4.5%), occurred in health and human services programs; the majority of the increase is attributable to the Department of Health Care Services, which administers the State's Medi-Cal program. This growth in spending reflects the continuing expansion in Medi-Cal caseload under federal health care reform.

13


Charts 3 and 4 present the percentage of total expenses for each governmental activities program and the percentage of total revenues by source.

ChartJ

Expenses by Program Year ended June 30, 2016

(as a percent}


Chart4

Revenues by Source Year ended June 30, 2016

(as a percent}

Ch,rgesfor services 101%

As of June 30, 2016, business-type activities' expenses totaled $26.9 billion. Program revenues of $27.2 billion, primarily generated from charges for services, and $2.8 billion in transfers, were sufficient to cover these expenses. As a result, the business-type activities' total net position of $4.6 billion increased by $3.1 billion (214.4%) over the prior-year's net position of$1.5 billion.

Chart 5 presents a two-year comparison ofthe expenses of the State's business-type activities.

Chart 5

Expenses - Business-type Activities - Two-year Comparison Years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015


Stale Lollery

Waler Resources

Unemployment Programs

Calilomia Stale University

Other enterprise programs

$0 $3 $6

1111 2016 1111 2015

14

$9

1i.5

1h4

$12


Fund F!nanda! Ana!ys!s

The State's governmental funds' balance increased by $4.8 billion over the prior year's ending fund balance. The 2015-16 fiscal year marks the first time since before the 2001-02 fiscal year implementation of GASB Statement No. 34 that all of the State's governmental funds ended the year with positive fund balances. Proprietary funds' net position increased by $3.0 billion during the 2015-16 fiscal year, of which $2.4 billion was in the Unemployment Programs Fund, increasing its fund balance to $1.5 billion-its first postive balance in eight years.

Governmental Funds

As of June 30, 2016, the governmental funds' Balance Sheet reported $82.3 billion in assets, $51.4 billion in liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, and $30.9 billion in fund balance. Total assets of governmental funds increased by 5.4%, while total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources decreased by 1.2%, resulting in a total fund balance increase of $4.8 billion (18.5%) over the prior year's balance.

Within the governmental funds' total fund balance, $87 million is classified as nonspendable, as this amount consists of long-term interfund receivables, loans receivable, and legal or contractual requirements. Additionally, $28.9 billion is classified as restricted for specific programs by external constraints such as debt covenants and contractual obligations, or by constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Furthermore, of the total fund balance, $5.7 billion is classified as committed for specific purposes and $15 million is classified as assigned for specific purposes. The remaining unassigned balance of the governmental funds is a negative $3.8 billion, an improvement of$830 million over the prior fiscal year.

The Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of the governmental funds reported $255.7 billion in revenues, $255.3 billion in expenditures, and a net $4.4 billion in receipts from other financing sources. The ending fund balance of the governmental funds for the year ended June 30, 2016, was $30. 9 bill ion, a $4.8 billion increase over the prior year's ending fund balance of $26.1 bill ion.

Governmental funds' revenue consists primarily of taxes (54.6%) and intergovernmental revenue (35.6%). Personal income taxes accounted for 57.2% of tax revenues and increased by $1.7 billion over the prior fiscal year. Sales and use taxes accounted for 28.0% of tax revenues and increased by $746 million over the prior fiscal year. Corporation tmces accounted for 6.6% oftmc revenues and decreased by $1.6 billion from the prior fiscal year. The decline in corporation tmc revenue is largely due to significantly increased refunding activity as corporate tmcpayers continue to adjust to changes in the calculation of their California tmcable revenue under Proposition 39 that was enacted in 2012. Tntergovermental revenue, primarily from the federal goverment, increased by $3.3 billion (3.8%) over the prior fiscal year.

Governmental funds' expenditures increased by $6.9 billion (2.8%) over the prior fiscal year, primarily for health and human services and education. The increase in health and human services expenditures, of $4.9 billion (4.0%), is due primarily to the continued expansion of the Medi-Cal caseload under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (federal health care reform). The $2.3 billion increase in education expenditures is to comply with constitutional requirements (Proposition 98) that provide a minimum funding guarantee to support California's K-12 schools and community colleges; the minimum funding guarantee increased as a result of increased General Fund revenue in the 2015-16 fiscal year. Offsetting these two governmental funds' expenditure increases is a decrease of $2.0 billion (15.2%) in debt service principal and interest payments for bonds and commercial paper.

15


Chart 6 presents a two-year comparison of governmental funds' tax revenues.

Chart 6

Governmental Funds Tax Revenue - Two-year Comparison Years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015


Personal income laxes

Sales and use laxes

Corporation laxes

Motor vehicle excise laxes

Insurance laxes

Other laxes

$0 $10 $20 $30 $40

lil!liii 2016 lil!liii 2015

$50 $60 $70

Chart 7 presents a two-year comparison of the components of the governmental funds' balance.

Chart 7

Governmental Funds - Components of Fund Balance - Two-year Comparison Years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015


Nonspendable

Restricted

Commilled

Assigned

Unassigned

($8) ($4) $0 $4 $8 $12 $16

lil!liii 2016 lil!liii 2015

16

$20 $24

79.9 7p

$80

$28

$90

28.9


The State's major governmental funds are the General Fund, the Federal Fund, the Transportation Fund, and the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund. The General Fund ended the fiscal year with a fund balance of $362 million, an increase of $2.6 billion over the prior year's fund deficit The Federal Fund, the Transportation Fund, and the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund ended the fiscal year with fund balances of $248 million, $8.5 billion, and $10.1 billion, respectively. The nonmajor governmental funds ended the fiscal year with a total fund balance of$11.6 billion.

General Fund: As shown on the Balance Sheet, the General Fund (the State's main operating fund) ended the 2015-16 fiscal year with assets of $20.9billion; liabilities and deferred inflows of resources of $20.6 billion; and nonspendable, restricted, and committed fund balances of $76 million, $4.0 billion, and $68 million, respectively, leaving the General Fund with a negative unassigned fund balance of $3.8 bill ion. Total assets of the General Fund decreased by $1.3 billion (5.6%) from the prior fiscal year, while total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources decreased by $3.8 billion (15. 7%). The General Fund's unassigned fund balance deficit decreased by $830 million (17.8%).

As shown on the Statement of Revenue, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance, the General Fund had an excess of revenues over expenditures of $5.8 billion ($117.6 billion in revenues and $111.8 billion in expenditures). Approximately $112.5 billion (95.7%) of General Fund revenue is derived from the State's largest three taxes--personal income taxes ($78.5 billion), sales and use tmces ($24.8 bill ion), and corporation tmces ($9.2 billion). As a result of fund classifications made to comply with generally accepted governmental accounting principles, a total of $246 million in revenue, essentially all from unemployment programs, is included in the General Fund. These revenues are not considered General Fund revenues for any budgetary purposes or for the State's Budgetary/Legal Basis Annual Report

During the 2015-16 fiscal year, total General Fund revenue increased by $796 million (0.7%). The increase is a result of increases in personal income tmces of $1.6 billion (2.1 %) and sales and use tmces of $1.2 billion (5.1 %), offset by a decrease in corporation tmces of$1.6 billion (14.5%).

General Fund expenditures increased by $4.6 billion (4.3%). The largest increases were in education and health and human services expenditures, which were up $2.3 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively. The General Fund's net fund balance of $362 million for the year ended June 30, 2016, was an improvement of $2.6 billion over the prior year's ending fund deficit of$2.2 billion.

Federal Fund: The Federal Fund reports federal grant revenues and the related expenditures to support the grant programs. The largest of these programs is for health and human services, which accounted for $73.8 billion (84.5%) ofthe total $87.4 billion in fund expenditures. The Medical Assistance program and the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program are included in this program area. Education programs also constituted a large part of the fund's expenditures, amounting to $6.9 billion (7.9%) of the total. The Federal Fund's revenues increased by $1.9 billion, which was approximately the same amount of increase in the combined expenditures and transfers, resulting in only a $30 million fund balance increase over the prior year's ending fund balance of$218 million.

Transportation Fund: The Transportation Fund accounts for fuel taxes, bond proceeds, and other revenues used primarily for highway and passenger rail construction. The Transportation Fund's revenues decreased by $535 million (5.1%), while its expenditures decreased by $1.4 billion (11.6%). Other financing sources provided net receipts of$1.3 billion. The Transportation Fund ended the fiscal year with an $8.5 billion fund balance, an increase of $322 million over the prior year.

17


Environmental and Natural Resources Fund: The Environmental and Natural Resources Fund accounts for fees, bond proceeds, and other revenues that are used for maintaining the State's natural resources and improving the environmental quality of its air, land, and water. The Environmental and Natural Resources Fund's revenues increased by $534 million (10.7%), while its expenditures decreased by $265 million (5.1 %). Other financing sources provided net receipts of $1.2 bill ion. The Environmental and Natural Resources Fund ended the fiscal year with a $10.1 billion fund balance, an increase of $1.8 bill ion (20. 9%) over the prior year.

Proprietary Funds

Enterprise Funds: The economic recovery continued to have a positive impact on the State's enterprise funds. The total net position of the enterprise funds at June 30, 2016, was $4.6 billion-$3.1 billion greater than the prior year's net position of $1.5 billion. The Unemployment Programs Fund had an increase in its net position of$2.4 billion to end the fiscal year with a balance of $1.5 billion. This balance represents the Unemployment Programs Fund's first positive net position since 2009-the end of the recession that dramatically increased the State's unemployment and resulted in the fund's insolvency. The State Lottery Fund, the California State University Fund, and the nonmajor enterprise funds increased their net positions by $52 million, $538 million, and $121 million, respectively.

As shown on the proprietary funds' Statement of Net Position, total assets and deferred outflows of resources for the enterprise funds were $37.0 billion as of June 30, 2016. Of this amount, current assets totaled $12. 9 bill ion, noncurrent assets totaled $22.8 billion, and deferred outflows of resources totaled $1.3 bill ion. The total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources for the enterprise funds was $32.5 billion. The three largest liabilities of the enterprise funds are $13.9 billion in revenue bonds payable, $7.5 billion in net pension liability, and $3.1 billion in noncurrent loans payable. During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the State reduced by $2.6 billion the balance of the loans from the U.S. Department of Labor that covered prior-year deficits in the Unemployment Programs Fund, leaving a balance of $3.1 billion as of June 30, 2016.

Total net position consisted of four segments: net investment in capital assets of $2.5 bill ion, a nonexpendable restricted net position of $9 million, a restricted expendable net position of $5.7 billion, and an unrestricted net deficit of $3. 7 bill ion.

As shown on the Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position of proprietary funds, the enterprise funds ended the year with operating revenues of $24.2 billion, operating expenses of $24.0 bill ion, and net expenses from other transactions of $3 mill ion. The largest sources of operating revenue were unemployment and disability insurance receipts of $13.8 billion in the Unemployment Programs Fund, and lottery ticket sales of $6.3 billion collected by the State Lottery Fund. The unemployment and disability insurance receipts in the Unemployment Programs Fund increased by $453 million to $13.8 billion over the prior fiscal year. These receipts came primarily from the federal government unemployment account to pay unemployment and disability benefits. The largest operating expenses were distributions of $11.1 billion to beneficiaries by the Unemployment Programs Fund, personal services of $4.6 billion by the California State University Fund, and lottery prizes of$4.0 billion distributed by the State Lottery Fund.

Internal Service Funds: The total net deficit of the internal service funds was $458 million as of June 30, 2016. The net position consists of three segments: net investment in capital assets of$383 million, a restricted expendable net position of $131 million, and an unrestricted net deficit of $972 million.

18


Fiduciary Funds

The State of California has four types of fiduciary funds: private purpose trust funds, pension and other employee benefit trust funds, investment trust funds, and agency funds. The private purpose trust funds ended the fiscal year with a net position of $6.8 billion. The pension and other employee benefit trust funds ended the fiscal year with a net position of $507.6 billion. The State's only investment trust fund, the Local Agency Investment Fund, ended the fiscal year with a net position of $22.7 billion. Agency funds act as clearing accounts and thus do not have a net position.

For the year ended June 30, 2016, the fiduciary funds' combined net position was $537.1 billion, a $4.3 billion decrease from the prior year net position. The net position decreased primarily because payments made to participants exceeded contributions received and investment income in pension and other employee benefit trust funds.

General Fund Budget High!ights

The original General Fund budget of $115.2 billion was increased by $1.7 billion during the 2015-16 fiscal year. This increase is mainly comprised of funding for education, natural resources and environmental protection, and health and human services programs. The funding for education programs increased due primarily to the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee per Education Code Section 41202; an increase in General Fund revenue causes an increase to the minimum funding guarantee. Additional funding for droughtrelated activities accounts for most of the increase in the natural resources and environmental protection budget The increase in health and human services program funding is due primarily to the continuing implementation of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the General Fund's actual budgetary basis expenditures were $114.4billion, $2.5 billion less than the final budgeted amount of$116.9 billion.

Table 3 presents a summary of the General Fund original and final budgets.

Table J

General Fund Original and Final Budgets

Year ended June 30, 2016


Budgeted amounts

Business, consumer services, and housing

Transportation

Natural resources and environmental protection

Health and human services

Corrections and rehabilitation

Education

General government

Tax reliel

Debt service

Other general government

Total

Original

36

83

1,717

31,939

9,920

60,008

432

5,496

5,589

115,220

Final Increase

37

83

2,044 327

32,259 320

10,130 210

60,765 757

432

5,496

5,672 83

116,918 1,698

19


Capita! Assets and Debt Administration

Capital Assets

As of June 30, 2016, the State's investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities amounted to $136. 7 bill ion (net of accumulated depreciation/amortization). The State's capital assets include land, state highway infrastructure, collections, buildings and other depreciable property, intangible assets, and construction/development in progress. The buildings and other depreciable property account includes buildings, improvements other than buildings, equipment, certain infrastructure assets, certain books, and other capitalized and depreciable property. Intangible assets include computer software, land use rights, patents, copyrights, and trademarks. Infrastructure assets are items that normally are immovable, such as roads and bridges, and can be preserved for a greater number of years than can most capital assets.

As of June 30, 2016, the State's capital assets increased $4.3 billion, or 3.2% over the prior fiscal year. The majority of the increase occurred in state highway infrastructure and buildings and other depreciable property.

Additional information on the State's capital assets can be found in Note 7.

Table 4 presents a summary of the primary government's capital assets for governmental and business-type activities.

Table 4

Capital Assets - Primary Government - Two-year Comparison June 30, 2016 and 2015


G overnrn ental Activities

2016 2015

La"d 19,383 19,131

Stale highway inlraslruclure 73,463 70,686

Collections nondepreciable .. 23 23

Buildings and other

depreciable properly 29,616 28,310

Intangible assets amorlizable .. 2,032 1,215

Less: accumulated

deprecia lion/amorlizali on (13,400} (12,668}

Conslruclion/developmenl in progress .. 15,316 16,085

Intangible assets nonamorlizable .. 426 419

Total 126,859 123,201


2016 2015

245 237

16 11

12,743 12,274

336 338

(5,244} (4,939}

1,639 1,183

114 116

9,849 9,220


20

Total

2016 2015

19,628 19,368

73,463 70,686

39 34

42,359 40,584

2,368 1,553

(18,644} (17,607}

16,955 17,268

540 535

136,708 132,421


Modified Approach for Infrastructure Assets

The State has elected to use the modified approach for capitalizing infrastructure assets of the state highway system (state roadways and bridges). Under the modified approach, the State does not report depreciation expense for its roads and bridges but capitalizes all costs that add to their capacity and efficiency. All maintenance and preservation costs are expensed. Under the modified approach, the State maintains an asset management system to demonstrate that the infrastructure is preserved at or above established condition levels. During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the actual amount spent on preservation was 48.0% of the estimated budgeted amount needed to maintain the infrastructure assets at the established condition levels. Although the amount spent fell short of the budgeted amount, the assessed condition of the State's bridges and roadways is better than the established condition baselines with 84.1 % of lane miles judged to be of excellent, good, or fair quality in the last completed pavement-condition survey. The State is responsible for maintaining 49,645 lane miles and 12,972 bridges.

The Required Supplementary Information includes additional information on how the State uses the modified approach for infrastructure assets; it also presents the established condition standards, condition assessments, and preservation costs.

Debt Administration

At June 30, 2016, the State had total bonded debt outstanding of $110.9 billion. Ofthis amount, $79.8 billion (71.9%) represents general obligation bonds, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the State. The current portion of general obligation bonds outstanding is $3.2 billion and the long-term portion is $76.6 billion. The remaining $31.1 billion (28.1%) of bonded debt outstanding represents revenue bonds, which are secured solely by specified revenue sources. The current portion of revenue bonds outstanding is $1.7 billion and the long-term portion is $29.4 billion.

During the fiscal year, the State issued $7.3 billion in new general obligation bonds for governmental activities, including: parks, clean water and clean air; reading and literacy improvement and public libraries; safe drinking water; children's hospitals; earthquake safety and public building rehabilitation; public primary, secondary, community college and university education facilities; highway safety, traffic reduction, air quality and port security; transportation; clean water, watershed protection and flood protection; water security, water quality, water supply and river, coastal and beach protection; water conservation; seismic retrofit; wildlife, coastal and parkland conservation; medical research; housing and emergency shelters; veterans' homes; high speed passenger train projects; and to refund previously outstanding general obligation bonds and commercial paper. The State also issued $545 million in new general obligation bonds for veterans farm and home buildings, a business-type activity.

21


Table 5 presents a summary of all the primary government's long-term obligations for governmental and business-type activities.

Table 5

Long-term Obligations - Primary Government- Two-year Comparison Years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015



2016 2015 2016 2015 Government-wide noncurrent liabilities

General obligation bonds 75,854 77,527 736 579

Revenue bonds payabl 16,530 17,739 12,905 11,670

Total bonded debt 92,384 95,266 13,641 12,249

Net pension liability/obligation .. 64,294 57,456 7,462 6,249

Net olherposlemploymenl

benellls obligation 24,967 21,594 851 735

Mandated cost claims payable .. 2,764 2,377

Loans payable 3,112 5,671

Compensated absences payable .. 3,777 3,681 201 188

Workers' compensation benelils payable .. 3,528 3,448

Capital lease obligations 345 215 346 1,136

Cerli llcales olparlicipalion

and commercial paper ' 771 482 47 89

Other noncurrenl liabilities 1,996 2,378 955 1,191

Total noncurrent liabilities .. 194,826 186,897 26,618 27,511 Current portion ollong-lerm obligations .. 4,777 5,071 2,278 2,078

Total long-term obligations .. 199,603 191,968 28,896 29,589


1 All ccrlificalcs ofparlicipalion were rel ired in fiscal year 201 6

Total

2016 2015

76,590 78,106

29,435 29,409

106,025 107,515

71,756 63,705

25,818 22,329

2,764 2,377

3,112 5,671

3,978 3,869

3,531 3,451

691 1,351

818 571

2,951 3,569

221,444 214,408

7,055 7,149

228,499 221,557

During the year ended June 30, 2016, the primary government's total long-term obligations increased by $6.9 billion over the prior year's balance. The largest increases were $8.1 billion in net pension liability and $3.5 billion in other postemployment benefit obligations because the State does not fully fund these benefits. The largest decrease was $2.6 billion in loans payable to the U.S. Department of Labor for prior-year shortfalls in the unemployment program.

Note 9, Long-term Obligations, and Notes 10 through 16 include additional information on the State's long-term obligations.

Tn July 2015, Standard and Poor's Rating Services raised the State's general obligation rating to "AA-" from "A+", citing the enactment of the State's 2015-16 budget which marked an improved fiscal sustainability. During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the ratings from Fitch Ratings and Moody's Investors Service remained unchanged at "A+" and "Aa3", respectively.

22


Economic Condition and Future Budgets

The Economy for the Year Ending June 30, 2016

California, along with the United States as a whole, completed its seventh year of economic recovery as the State ended its fiscal year on June 30, 2016. California's economy demonstrated continued economic growth throughout the 2015-16 fiscal year. California's personal income growth outperformed that of the nation as a whole during the 2015-16 fiscal year, increasing by 5.2% compared with a 3.8% increase nationally. Consequently, consumer spending increased, as demonstrated by a 2.8% increase in California's new vehicle registrations in the 2015-16 fiscal year and a $1.2 billion (5.1 %) increase in sales and use tax revenue.

The State's real estate market showed mixed signs of continued strength during the 2015-16 fiscal year. As of June 2016, median prices for existing single family homes were 6.1 % higher than June 2015, though sales were essentially flat (down by 0.1 %) and the pace of homebuilding had largely leveled off. As of June 2016, the rate of new residential building permits issued increased by 1.7% to nearly 97,000 units compared to the same period a year earlier. Nonresidential construction activity showed more strength relative to the residential sector, with new permit activity increasing 15.9% during the 2015-16 fiscal year to $28.1 billion.

California's labor market continued to add jobs during the 2015-16 fiscal year. Total employment for June 2016 stood at 18.1 million jobs, a gain of more than 300,000 jobs from the same period a year earlier. Mirroring the increase in jobs, the State's unemployment rate fell from 6.2% in June 2015 to 5.4% in June 2016.

Economic Outlook for the 2016-17 Fiscal Year as of December 31, 2016

During the first several months of the 2016-17 fiscal year, California continued to experience job growth. By December 2016, total employment was nearly 18.4 million jobs, reflecting a year-to-year increase of 500,000 jobs compared to December 2015. The unemployment rate largely held steady since June 2016, with only a slight decrease to 5.2% by December 2016.

California's personal income growth continued to outpace the nation during the beginning of the 2016-17 fiscal year, with total personal income for the third quarter of2016 4.8% above the level observed in the same period in 2015, compared with an increase of3.6% nationally.

The State's real estate market continued to show mixed results during the beginning of the 2016-17 fiscal year. As of December 2016, median home prices were up by 4.0% over the same period one year earlier, but the number of sales decreased 0.6% from the level observed in December 2015. New residential construction activity also leveled off in the first half of the 2016-17 fiscal year with the number of permits for new residential units coming in just under 100,000 units as of December 2016, an increase of 1.9% from the same period one year earlier. The pace of nonresidential construction showed signs of slowing during the first half of the 2016-17 fiscal year. The annual value of nonresidential permits for the period ending December 2016 had a year-to-year increase of 1.6%.

The State's Department of Finance expects only moderate economic growth during the next two years, although this economic recovery has already lasted longer than many previous recoveries, including the expansion from 2001 to 2007. As the economic recovery matures and unemployment decreases, the pace of job growth is expected to slow and inflation is expected to gradually rise.

23


California's 2016-17 Budget

California's 2016-17 Budget Act was enacted on June 27, 2016. The Budget Act appropriated $170.9 billion-$122.5 billion from the General Fund, $44.6 billion from special funds, and $3.8 billion from bond funds. The General Fund's budgeted expenditures increased by $6.9 billion, or 6.0% over last year's General Fund budget \Vhen the budget was enacted, the General Fund's revenues were projected to be $120.3 billion after a $3.3 billion transfer to the Budget Stabilization Account (BSA), the State's rainy day fund. General Fund revenue comes predominantly from taxes, with personal income tmces expected to provide 67.5% of total revenue. California's major tmces (personal income, sales and use, and corporation taxes) are projected to supply approximately 98.1% of the General Fund's resources in the 2016-17 fiscal year. \Vhen the budget was enacted, the General Fund was projected to end the 2016-17 fiscal year with $8.5 billion in total reserves-$6.7 billion in the BSA and $1.8 billion in the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties (SFEU), resulting in the fifth consecutive year of projected budget surplus in the General Fund.

Tn January 2017, the proposed 2017-18 Governor's Budget provided revised General Fund revenue, expenditure, and reserve estimates for the 2016-17 fiscal year. The revised estimate projects General Fund revenue of $118.8 billion, expenditures of $122.8 billion, and total year-end reserves of $6.8 billion -$6.7billion in the BSA and only $47 million in the SFEU, which is $1.7 billion less than projected in June 2016 for the enacted budget Actual General Fund cash receipts for the first half of the 2016-17 fiscal year have fallen short of the estimates used in preparing the enacted budget, which supports the need for revised estimates. As of January 1, 2017, revenues were $1.7 billion less than forecasted for the first six months of the fiscal year, while disbursements were $2.2 billion more than estimated. As a result, the General Fund's temporary borrowing was $4.0 billion more than projected, leaving a balance as of December 31, 2016, of$17.8 billion in outstanding loans-comprised entirely of internal borrowing from special funds.

The majority of the spending plan for the 2016-17 fiscal year included funding that maintains existing state policies or is based on spending allocations driven by constitutional funding requirements, such as the Proposition 98 guaranteed minimum funding levels for K-12 schools and community colleges and the Proposition 2 required minimum transfers to the BSA and minimum annual debt reduction payments. The discretionary portion of the 2016-17 spending plan allocated $2.6 billion toward additional General Fund reserves-an additional $2.0 billion transfer to the BSA and $600 million to the SFEU; funding for one-time activities, such as $1.5 billion for repairing and replacing aged infrastructure, $500 mill ion for building affordable housing, and $200 million for drought-related activities; and ongoing funding augmentations for specific programs, including $300 million to the University of California and California State Universities. To offset the impact of reduced General Fund revenues in the 2016-17 fiscal year, the administration is proposing to reduce or eliminate some of these discretionary items in the 2016-17 spending plan.

California's 2017-18 Budget

The Governor released his proposed 2017-18 budget on January 10, 2017. The large revenue growth that the State experienced in the past few years is beginning to slow and, if no action is taken, the Governor's Budget projects a budget shortfall (a gap between estimated revenue and expenditures) of$1.6 billion for the 2017-18 fiscal year. The proposed budget includes a variety of solutions to bring the State's budget back into balance for the 2017-18 fiscal year and future years, including a $1.7 billion reduction in the Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantee for K-12 schools and community colleges based on the lower revenue estimates, a $900 million elimination of uncommitted one-time spending included in the prior year budget (2016-17), and a $600 million delay or elimination of proposed spending increases. After addressing the budget shortfall, the

2017-18 Governor's Budget prioritizes the achievements made in recent years-more money for education, an earned income tax credit for working families, raising the minimum wage, extending health care to millions of Californians, paying down long-term liabilities, and continuing to plan and save for the next recession.

24


The 2017-18 Governor's Budget projects (with all budget solutions enacted) that General Fund revenues and transfers will be $124.0 billion and expenditures will be $122.5 billion, leaving an estimated year-end reserve of $1.5 billion in the General Fund's SFEU. Estimated 2017-18 General Fund revenues and transfers are 4.4% higher than the revised 2016-17 fiscal year projection of$118.8 billion, but are 2.2% less than estimated for the 2017-18 fiscal year in June 2016. The proposed 2017-18 General Fund expenditures are slightly less than the revised 2016-17 fiscal year projected expenditures of $122.8 billion, but are 3.0% less than projected for the 2017-18 fiscal year in June 2016.

Tn addition to the $1.5 billion reserve in the General Fund's SFEU, the Governor's budget projects that the 2017-18 fiscal year will end with $7.9 billion in the BSA for a total reserve of$9.4 billion. This would be an increase of $1.2 billion in the BSA, the minimum transfer required by Proposition 2, and $1.5 billion in the SFEU over their estimated 2016-17 fiscal year ending balances. Tn accordance with the requirements of Proposition 2, the budget proposes an equivalent $1.2 billion General Fund allocation for debt reduction that includes partial repayment of special fund loans and pre-Proposition 42 transportation loans; partial settle-up of prior-years' Proposition 98 underfunding; contributions toward unfunded state retiree postemployment health care benefits; and contributions toward unfunded University of California retirement benefits.

The Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO), California's nonpartisan fiscal and policy advisor, believes the Governor's 2017-18 fiscal year revenue estimates are too low, but supports the Governor's decision to build reserves and limit any new commitments to one-time purposes in order to prepare for the next economic downturn. Both the Governor and the LAO acknowledge that the State is facing uncertainties about the future economy and potential changes to federal fiscal policy that could have significant financial impact on the State's budget and financial condition.

Requests for Information

The State Controller's Office designed this financial report to provide interested parties with a general overview of the State of California's finances. Address questions concerning the information provided in this report or requests for additional information through email to the State Controller's Office, State Accounting and Reporting Division at [email protected]. This report is also available on the State Controller's Office's website at www.sco.ca.gov.

25

mailto:[email protected]



I


26


' I


28


of June JO, 2016 (amounts in thousands}

ASSETS Current assets:

Cash and pooled investments ______ _

Amount on deposit with U.S. Treasury .. Investments ___________ _

Restricted assets: Cash and pooled investments _____ _ Investments __________ _

Due lrom other governments _____ _

Net investment in direct llnancing leases .. Receivables (net) _________ _ Internal balances _________ _

Due lrom primary government _____ _


32,761,989

439,028

1,358,022

53,923

17,166,891 224,839

Business-type

Activities

6,915,588

11,711 2,637,905

818,524

156,108 12,356

1,984,477

(224,839}

Due lrom other governments_______ 19,165,674 216,951 Prepaid items___________ 189,466 58,072 Inventories____________ 77,108 14,668 Recoverable power costs (nel} ______ 72,000

Othercurrenlassels_________ 55,644 5,312

Non::~~:~~s::::,ssels --------- ___ 71c,4_9c2,c58_4 ____ 12c,6_7_8,c83_3_

Restricted assets: Cash and pooled investments _____ _ Investments __________ _

Loans receivable _________ _ Investments ___________ _

Net investment in direct llnancing leases .. Receivables (net) _________ _ Loans receivable _________ _

Recoverable power costs (nel} _____ _ Long-term prepaid charges ______ _

Capital assets:

204,388

326,402 1,968,037 4,458,159

2,383

Land_____________ 19,383,236 Stale highway inlraslruclure ______ 73,462,607

724,741 363,669

1,411,250 1,757,874

329,823 365,159

3,045,643 3,245,000

1,279,465

244,725

1ofol

11.711

GG,2~9 19,151,' ,\

19,l\7,'.,)5 ~.:~}3S

'15,,

8'1.1~1,· 1~

1,111,2-:~, 1,757,n:.

,,v,,~~~

JS, .,~,2 \Jt.5,)'

Component Units

2,754,318

6,759,866

406,741 3,190

3,986,304

170,203 94,307

1,520 214,680

393,270

14,784,399

25,588 16,058

26,905,181

2,492,391 3,240,601

1,316,721

Collections nondepreciable ______ 22,627 16,206 445,038

Buildings and other depreciable properly .. 29,616,279 12,743,444 48,485,473 Intangible assets amorlizable _____ 2,032,279 336,460 .. ,'..,\,, ·' 921,156

Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization .. (13,399,721} (5,244,397} \ 1 \,: "",11 \i (23,368,971} Conslruclion/developmenl in progress.. 15,316,059 1,639,244 I ',?'I),\~,\ 3,091,841 Intangible assets nonamorlizable ____ 426,186 113,531 5' \717 5,098

Othernoncurrenl assets________ 24,194 ~.;,19,; 230,752

Total noncurrenl assets -------- -~1~33c,8c1~8,c92cl_ --~22~,3c9~6,~03cl_ -~'-',C~,,.l_'~, __ c6~3,~80c6,,9~27_ Total assets _________ _ 205,311,505 35,074,864 24(UBLH9 78,591,326

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES .. 7,725,585 1,328,282 ~.~,)',';G~ 5,657,571

Total assets and deferred outflows of resources ________ _ 213,037,090 36,403,146 $ 249,4411,136 84,248,897

JO 'The notes to thefmanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement


P~imnn Go~ernrnea/

Governmental Business-type Component Activities Activities fofo! Units

LIABILITIES Current liabilities:

Accounts payable 24,535,430 388,266 2,326,701 Due lo component units 170,203 I~'.'

Due lo other governments 8,433,603 131,762 8,5G),3G)

Revenues received in advance 1,531,190 337,229 1x,\,:.1-1 1,241,723 Tax overpayments 5,294,406 Deposits 467,642 40,: 824,745 Contracts and notes payable 1,595 1,)9) 8,592 Unclaimed properly liability 863,807 V.l/.J7 Interest payable 1,172,201 67,011 1.2:19,~1~ 42,573

Securities lending obligations 866,650

Benellls payable 437,574 .n7, 57:_

Current portion ollong-lerm obligations .. 4,776,639 2,277,631 ,:_s:,~~:, 3,996,704 Other current liabilities 600,365 487,786 1,( \\.1S1 1,734,324

Total current liabilities 47,847,081 4,127,259 11,042,012 Noncurrenl liabilities:

Loans payable 3,112,178 :u l~,1~,

Lollery prizes and annuities 708,900 Compensated absences payable 3,777,407 200,898 3,~7\ ~,~ 310,665 Workers' compensation benelils payable .. 3,527,832 3,282 \q1_11:. 436,043 Commercial paper and other borrowings .. 771,215 47,016 81\~31 700

Capital lease obligations 344,493 345,567 c<,, ·G~, 496,087

General obligation bonds payable 75,853,643 736,359 Revenue bonds payable 16,530,008 12,904,897 '1'1, ,9'.'~ 20,108,214 Mandated cost claims payable 2,764,469 ~,~(,',

Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation .. 24,967,059 850,827 ?5,81~,';';G 10,597,002 Net pension liability 64,294,029 7,462,215 '.'l,'.'~",):.C. 15,352,733 Revenues received in advance 14,271 1.:,~~1

Other noncurrenl liabilities 1,995,504 232,124 ?,?r,G2'; 2,154,140 Total noncurrenl liabilities 194,825,659 26,618,534 221, .):.,1-1' 49,455,584

Total liabilities 242,672,740 30,745,793 27.\418,Hl 60,497,596

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES .. 5,249,323 1,084,851 1,781,557

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources 247,922,063 31,830,644 5 279,7~2/f(li 62,279,153

(continued}

The notes to the.financial statements are an integral part ofth,s statement JI

June JO, 2016 (amounts in thousands}

NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets _____ _

Restricted:

Nonexpendable endowment~----

Expendable: Endowments and gi fls ______ _

General government _______ _ Education __________ _

Health and human services _____ _

Natural resources and environmental protection _________ _

Business, consumer services, and housing .. Transportation _________ _

Corrections and rehabilitation ____ _ Unemployment programs ______ _ Indenture __________ _

Statute ___________ _

Other purposes ________ _

Total expendable _______ _

Unrestricted __________ _

Total net position (deficit) _____ _

Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and net position ____ _

Governmental

Activities

104,596,917

3,729,072

808,286

4,330,820

4,569,098

3,930,803

8,271,822

648

3,420,422

29,060,971

(168,542,861}

(34,884,973}

213,037,090

Business-type

Activities

2,520,621

8,653

279,304

112,239

159,808

1,688,061

22,476

6,728

3,482,018

5,750,634

(3,707,406}

4,572,502

1ofol

~'~'\O~G ,5)5

C,2<:~,JS:9

:1.9~}

36,403,146 ~ 24YA4U,L>6

32 'The notes to thefmanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement

Component

Units

13,358,197

5,927,327

9,845,250

1,363,748

531,130

1,339,909

28,431

13,108,468

(10,424,248}

21,969,744

84,248,897

(concluded}



The notes to thefinanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement JJ

Year Ended June JO, 2016 (amounts in thousands} P~ug~mn Rew-,me,

Operating Grants and

Contributions FUNCTIONS/PROGRAMS Expenses Charges

for Services

Capital Grants and

Contributions

Primary government Governmental activities:

General government _______ _

Education __________ _

Health and human services _____ _

Natural resources and environmental

16,686,037

65,467,497 127,543,288

protection__________ 6,988,442

Business, consumer services, and housing.. 814,676 Transportation __________ 12,120,820

Corrections and rehabilitation _____ 11,875,294

Interest on long-term debt ______ -~4~,~23~1~,5~81~ Total governmental activities_____ 245,727,635

6,525,736

66,298 10,630,859

4,823,861 823,189

4,532,300 19,411

27,421,654

1,007,189

6,888,076 74,290,799

472,533 68,197

3,866,244 35,789

86,628,827

1,480,351

1,480,351 Business-type activities:

Electric Power_________ 728,000 Waler Resources_________ 1,086,650 StaleLollery __________ 6,315,957

Unemployment Programs ______ 11,458,966

Calilomia Stale University______ 7,199,277

Stale Waler Pollution Control Revolving.. 11,814 Housing Loan__________ 55,627

Otherenlerpriseprograms ______ --~8~4~,1~88~

Total business-type activities _____ --~'~6,~94~0~,4_79_ Total primary government_____ 272,668,114

728,000 1,086,650 6,367,902

13,866,028 3,172,154

70,245 53,617

82,029

25,426,625

52,848,279

1,764,962 66,914

1,764,962 66,914

88,393,789 1,547,265

Component Units University olCalilomia _______ 34,098,910 20,030,835

37,896

1,039,572

9,020,465 248,705 Calilomia Housing Finance Agency____ 204,542

Nonmajor component uni ls _______ --~2,~03~3~,1~26~ 640,574 29,230

34

Total component units_______ s~~3~6,3~3~6~,5~78~ 21,108,303 9,661,039 277,935

General revenues: Personal income laxes---------------

Sales and use laxes----------------Corporation laxes----------------Motor vehicle excise lax--------------

Insurance laxes-----------------Other laxes __________________ _

Investment and interest income (loss}-----------Eschea( ___________________ _ Other ___________________ _

Gain on early exlinguishmenl oldebl ___________ _ Translers ___________________ _

Total general revenues and transfers __________ _

Change innel position---------------Net position (deficit}- beginning ___________ _

Net position (deficit}- ending _____________ _

* Restated

'The notes to thefmanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement


(9,153,112}

(58,513,123) (42,621,630}

(1,692,048} 76,710

(2,241,925} (11,820,094}

(4,231,581}

(130,196,803}

$ (130,196,803} $

80,303,076 39,121,061

9,213,173 5,028,589 4,203,885

2,158,874 131,615 304,960

40,516 (2,800,101}

137,705,648

7,508,845

(42,393,818} * (34,884,973} $

Business-type

Activities

51,945 2,407,062

(2,262,161} 125,345

(2,010} (2,159}

fofal

·s~,s1,,1~>) .;~_6?1,'

'.'(.'.'])

51,~-b l('.'.(0

'.~-~C?,ICI; j~~,,40

-~,r. j() ;?,15~;

318,022 1]\(2)

318,022 ~ il29$!8.'!8l)

2,800,101

19,121,U.I

'.21:1.173

'1C.516

2,800,101 l4il.5il5.'Y49

3,118,123

1,454,379 (4U,9.l9,4.l9)

4,572,502 t _____ \'.lfl,::lll,471)

Component Units

(4,798,905} (166,646}

(323,750}

(5,289,301}

(63,506}

3,277,793

3,214,287

(2,075,014}

24,044,758

21,969,744


The notes to the.financial statements are an integral part ofth,s statement 35



36 'The notes to thefmanc,a/ statements are an integral part ofth,s statement

Govcrnrncn:al Funds

June 30, 2016 (amounts in thousands}

ASSETS

Cash and pooled investments-----------------

Investments ----------------------Receivables (nel}-------------------

Due lrom other lunds ------------------Due lrom other governments----------------

Tnlerlund receivables------------------

Loans receivable--------------------

General

5,232,634

13,814,675

1,470,536

286,667

69,034

43,283

13,762 Other assets ______________________ ----~

20,930,591 Total assets _____________________ ~~~~c

LIABILITIES

Accounts payable-------------------

Due lo other lunds -------------------Due lo component units-----------------

Due lo other governments-----------------

Tnlerlund payables-------------------Revenues received in advance----------------

Tax overpayments--------------------Deposits ______________________ _

Interest payable---------------------Unclaimed properly liability ________________ _

1,821,395

3,823,174

137,882

2,005,713

3,983,168

726,648

5,294,406

1,848

863,807

340,648 Otherliabililies _____________________ ---~=c

18,998,689 Total liabilities-------------------- --~== 1,570,174 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES------------- ---~=

20,568,863 Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources _________ --~=, FUND BALANCES

Nonspendable ____________________ _ 75,939 Restricted _____________________ _ 4,044,911 Commilled ______________________ _ 68,102 Assigned ______________________ _

(3,827,224} Unassigned ______________________ ----=c 361,728 Total fund balances------------------- ---~=c

Total Habilites, deferred inflows of resources, and fund balances .. 20,930,591


Federal Transportation

332,432 5,502,453

14,950 948,967

961,034

17,897,348 5,598

2,424,616

240,613

30,722

18,485,343 9,873,390

1,193,869 362,920

14,696,218 136,424

2,270,505 241,914

10,864

47,207 20,023

2,640

846

15,879 457,772

18,224,524 1,232,557

12,985 101,916

18,237,509 1,334,473

247,834 8,487,110

51,807

247,834 8,538,917

18,485,343 9,873,390

Environmental

and Natural

Resources

8,110,249

509,734

362,169

53,425

454,800

1,424,076

10,914,453

476,704

42,173

54,264

14,790

149,491

915

12,865

751,202

36,157

787,359

6,140,880

3,987,251

(1,037}

10,127,094

10,914,453

Nonmajor

Governmental

12,328,681

439,028

3,691,001

1,140,413

909,805

801,246

2,750,187

11,160

22,071,521

847,986

4,419,317

32,321

4,196,870

23,975

113,179

461,092

145,725

10,240,465

182,484

10,422,949

11,188

10,009,342

1,613,420

14,622

11,648,572

22,071,521

1ofal

-1,.'.-)\1)9

ss,:,:.:. 82,175,198

2\117," 1~:,.~:,3

2.~9~ 1,Js ,s:.~

4YA4TA->'7

I,<, .~JG

~l,JSJ,JSJ

j.'..6~~

'.\\2\2(1i

'.Hl.914.14~

The notes to the.financial statements are an integral part ofth,s statement


39

(amounts in thousands}

Total fund balances - governmental funds

Amounts reported Lor governmental activities in the Statement ol Net Position are diITerenl lrom those in the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet because:

The lollowing capital assets used in governmental activities are nol llnancial resources and, lherelore, are nol reported in the lunds:

La"d Stale highway inlraslruclure

Collections nondepreciable

Buildings and other depreciable properly

Intangible assets amorlizable

Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization

Conslruclion/developmenl in progress

Intangible assets nonamorlizable

19,381,154

73,462,607

22,627

29,012,566

1,966,630

(12,915,431}

14,199,912

426,186

Stale revenues lhal are earned and measurable, but nol available within 12 months ol the end ollhe reporting period, are reported as deterred in nows olresources in the lunds.

Internal service lunds are used by management lo charge the costs ol certain activities, such as building construction and architectural, procurement, and technology services, lo individual lunds. The assets and liabilities ol the internal service lunds are included in governmental activities in the Statement ol Net Position, excluding amounts Lor activity between the internal service lunds and governmental lunds.

30,924,145

125,556,251

1,903,716

(7,798,090}

Bond premiums/discounts and prepaid insurance charges are amortized over the lile ol the bonds and are (4,381,983} included in the governmental activities in the Statement olNel Position.

Del erred in nows and out nows olresources related lo pension transactions are nol reported in the lunds. 1,810,250

Deterred in nows and out nows olresources resulting lrom bond relunding gains and losses, respectively, are 563,989 amortized over the lile ollhe bonds and are nol reported in the lunds.

General obligation bonds and related accrued interest totaling $75,977,987, revenue bonds totaling (83,686,009} $6,936,807, and commercial paper totaling $771,215 are nol due and payable in the current period and are nol reported in the lunds.

The lollowing liabilities are nol due and payable in the current period and are nol reported in the ltmds:

Compensated absences

Capital leases

Net pension liability

Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation

Mandated cost claims Workers' compensation

Proposition 98 lunding guarantee

Pollution remediation obligations

Other noncurrenl liabilities

(3,622,022}

(370,182)

(63,131,928}

(24,370,278}

(2,764,469}

(3,485,636}

(996,740}

(1,021,854}

(14,133}

Net position of governmental activities

(99,777,242}

(34,884,973}

40 'The notes to thefmanc,a/ statements are an integral part ofth,s statement



41

Gcvcmmcn:al Funds

Year Ended June 30, 2016 (amounts in thousands}

REVENUES

Personal income laxes------------------Sales and use laxes-------------------

Corporation laxes--------------------Motor vehicle excise laxes------------------

Insurance laxes---------------------

Other laxes----------------------

Intergovernmental -------------------Licenses and permits------------------Charges Lor services-------------------Fees _______________________ _

Penalties ______________________ _

Investment and interest-------------------Eschea( ______________________ _

General

78,510,777 24,837,111

9,214,173 113,000

2,569,104

599,375

6,929 329,038

288,858 273,936 42,819

304,945

483,357 Other ________________________ ----~

117,573,422 Total revenues-------------------- ---~-

EXPENDITURES

Current

General government------------------- 4,577,584

Education ---------------------- 57,456,958

Health and human services----------------- 31,685,307 Natural resources and environmental protection __________ _ 1,696,631

Business, consumer services, and housing------------- 27,544

Transportation---------------------Corrections and rehabilitation---------------- 9,935,849

Capital outlay ____________________ _ 1,148,774

Debt service:

Bond and commercial paper retirement ------------ 2,434,028

2,841,773 Interest and llscal charges----------------- --~==~ 111,804,448 Total expenditures------------------ --~==~

5,768,974 Excess (dellciency} oLrevenues over (under} expenditures _______ --~==~ OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES)

General obligation bonds and commercial paper issued ________ _ ReLundingdeblissued __________________ _

Payment lo reLund long-term debt ---------------Premium on bonds issued _________________ _ 113,106

Capital leases--------------------- 1,148,774

TransLers in---------------------- 626,175

(5,066,669} TransLers ou( _____________________ --~==~

Total other financing sources (uses)-------------- ---~='="Net change in Lund balances------------------

(3,178,614)

2,590,360

(2,228,632) Fund balances (defidt)-beginning _______________ --~===

Federal

88,096,152

40

88,096,192

979,580

6,875,091

73,788,372 287,972

65,254 5,335,202

35,789

8,970

2,423

87,378,653

717,539

(687,585}

(687,585)

29,954

217,880

Fund balances- ending ___________________ <~~~~""'° <~~~~""'° 361,728 247,834

*Restated


Transportation

464,607

4,788,282

4,329,468 140,302

20,458 42,611 58,722

2 123,745

9,968,197

262,408

1,935

2,806 164,628

97,265 9,399,244

997,241

6,704

10,932,231

(964,034}

2,051,115 331,870

(2,790}

157,554

10,021

(1,261,882}

1,285,888

321,854

8,217,063

8,538,917


Environmental

and Natural Nonmajor

Resources Governmental foul

1,423,508 13,834,322 3~,ViG,~,.:',

9,)lt-,17' 26,649 100,658

1,634,781

152,988 1,433,327 2,973,601

405,514 2,870,640 7,G12:i)l

131,846 268,956 ,, ',1.'.2

2,487,994 7,985,780 JC,7n,P' 63,004 720,018 56,683 74,061 )lJ,)\5

447 1:,~,39.;

2,185,530 1,257,157 4.Y 1 7\-1

5,510,208 34,577,256 2ss,ns,11s

55,202 10,841,118

2,567 876,991 65,21',)-'.2

50,595 21,674,234 ]2'.',JJl,l!C. 3,908,418 220,714 (,)7\,".

72,604 867,546 1,13 '.~13 70,979 9,404 1'1,S1-'.,S~9

1,479,342 237,238 106,430

516,397 2,973,230 C,929,';GG

20,772 1,186,235 .) )57,

4,934,772 40,235,244 255,2i~.-''4i

575,436 (5,657,988}

846,870 1,176,995 ,9';~,

766,015 4,122,435 ~ ~v, (823,890} (3,551,648} ;'1.:178.:1281

166,973 600,287 l,)

235,941 3,512,986 ,~.1~}

(14,098} (99,908} '.'.',PC,J.\2i

1,177,811 5,761,147 4,JSB,641

1,753,247 103,159 '1,~9\~~-'.

8,373,847 11,545,413 26,11S,S1J

10,127,094 11,648,572 JU,924,14~



Reconciliation of the Statement ol Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Baiances ol Governmental Funds to the Statement ol Activities (amounts in thousands}

Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds

Amounts reported Lor governmental activities in the Statement ol Activities are diITerenl lrom those in the Statement olRevenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances olGovernmenlal Funds because:

44

Governmental lunds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement ol Activities, the cost ollhose assets is al localed over their estimated uselul lives as depreciation expense. In the current year, these amounts are:

Purchase olassels

Disposal olassels

Depreciation expense, nel olassel disposal

7,550,591

(3,899,467}

(760,016)

Some revenues in the Statement ol Activities do nol provide current linancial resources and, lherelore, are unavailable in governmental lunds.

Internal service lunds are used by management lo charge the costs ol certain activities, such as building construction and architectural services, procurement, and technology, lo individual ltmds. The nel revenue (expense} ollhe internal service lunds is reported with governmental activities.

The issuance ol long-lerm debt instruments provides current linancial resources lo governmental lunds, while the repayment ol the principal ol long-lerm debt is an expenditure ol governmental lunds. Neither

transaction, however, has any eITecl on the Statement ol Activities. Also, governmental lunds report the eITecl ol premiums, discounts, and similar items when debt is llrsl issued, whereas these amotmls are deterred and amortized in the Statement ol Activities. The lollowing shows the eITecl ol these diITerences in the lrealmenl ollong-lerm debt and related items:

Cerlilicales ol

General Participation and

Obligation Revenue Commercial

Bonds Bonds ~ Total

Debt issued (7,316,280} (162,500} (1,816,520} (9,295,300}

Premium on debt issued (1,017,928} (19,992} (1,037,920}

Accreted interest (45,346} (45,346}

Principal repayments 5,302,930 87,831 1,539,105 6,929,866 Payments lo relund long-term debt 4,172,348 205,980 4,378,328

Related expenses nol reported

in governmental lunds:

Premium/discount amortization 362,554 20,507 (30) 383,031

Deterred gain/loss on relunding (33,143} (16,028} (46) (49,217}

Prepaid insurance (619) (619)

Accrued interest ~ __ 1_,1_32_ (5,119}

1,464,230 70,965 (277,491}

'The notes to thefmanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement

4,798,574

2,891,108

234,735

(65,414}

1,257,704

(continued}


The lollowing expenses reported in the Statement ol Activities do nol require the use ol current llnancial resources and, lherelore, are nol recognized as expenditures in governmental lunds. Once the use ol current llnancial resources is required, expenditures are recognized in governmental lunds but are eliminated lrom the Statement ol Activities. In the current period, the nel adjustment consists ol:

Compensated absences

Capital leases

Net pension liability

Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation

Mandated cost claims Workers' compensation

Proposition 98 lunding guarantee

Pollution remediation obligations

Other noncurrenl liabilities

Change in net position of governmental activities

(94,077}

(95,422}

1,598,122

(3,294,378}

23,170

(84,046}

259,729

75,782

3,258

The notes to thefinanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement

(1,607,862}

7,508,845

(concluded}

45


of P·ooric:ar; Funds


ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and pooled investments----------------

Amount on deposit with U.S. Treasury--------------

Investments ----------------------Restricted assets:

Cash and pooled investments---------------

Due lrom other governments---------------

Net investment in direct llnancing leases------------

Receivables (nel}-------------------

Due lrom other lunds ------------------Due lrom other governments-----------------Prepaid items ____________________ _

Inventories _____________________ _

Recoverable power costs (nel} -----------------

Electric Power

581,000

4,000

72,000

Other current assets------------------- _____ _

657,000 Total currenlassels ___________________ ---~=~ Noncurrenl assets:

Restricted assets:

Cash and pooled investments----------------Investments ____________________ _


Investments ----------------------Net investment in direct llnancing leases------------

Receivables (nel}-------------------

Tnlerlund receivables------------------

Loans receivable-------------------

Recoverable power costs (nel} ----------------Long-term prepaid charges----------------

Capital assets: Land ______________________ _

Colleclions-nondepreciable _______________ _

Buildings and other depreciable properly ------------

Intangible assets- amorlizable ----------------Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization ___________ _

Conslruclion/developmenl in progress-------------

Intangible assels-nonamorlizable ---------------

609,000

302,000

3,245,000

Othernoncurrenl assets------------------ _____ _

4,156,000 Total noncurrenl assets------------------ ---~~-

4,813,000 Total assets--------------------- ---~-

118,000 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES------------ ----~"

Water

Resources

550,968

119,701

1,265

38,596

5,171

715,701

115,661

61,669

92,011

12,968

1,270,731

147,681

4,717,570

36,994

(2,084,676}

769,871

111,883

5,252,363

5,968,064

230,231

4,931,000 6,198,295 Total assets and deferred outflows of resources _________ ~~~==~ ~~~==~


Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds

State Unemployment California State

Lottery Programs University

741,273 3,979,688 634,165

11,711

88,393 2,549,512

12,356

461,786 1,211,282 158,103

1,394 7,667 823

36,730

5,223 52,849

7,066

5,312

1,305,224 5,252,301 3,407,808

80

840,662 900,055

329,823

76,086 289,073

308,233

81,246

8,734

11,577 84,195

16,206

235,507 23,307 7,748,225

166,966 130,913

(83,168} (31,541} (3,027,327}

86,302 782,857

1,648

17,798

1,013,312 629,353 7,354,792

2,318,536 5,881,654 10,762,600

20,125 29,029 922,449

2,338,661 5,910,683 11,685,049

Nonmajor

Enterprise

1,009,494

237,524

156,108

33,605

1,578

141,625

2,431

1,582,365

1,411,250

17,157

1,600

2,951,429

1,272

18,835

1,587

(17,685}

214

6,396

4,392,055

5,974,420

8,448

5,982,868


foul

6,91~}SS 11,~11

2,GO~,<,-:

S1\~~.;

12,0)G ~:.,:-77

16,~~~

21G,9)1

5~,

" P,

~2.:,~.:1

l.'111,~~:, 1,~-:~.,~.;

'>\P' 36~,1~9

A '•,'.),G.'.\

',J:.s, J,

1.~~9,,'.6~

):.:.,7)5

16,~'.'6 J;',7~0 A

\\G,.'.G~,

·~,~44,>rJ 1,639,~,;.·

11',)31 ):.,1-1:.

~~.~9~.,~~

35,118,1%4

1.'.U.U;>

.>TJl46,~~6

Governmental

Activities

Internal

Service Funds

1,255,540

1,358,022

453,875

91,280

515,148

12,831

189,466

77,108

3,953,270

204,388

7,267,038

25,363

1,373

2,082

603,713

65,649

(484,290}

1,116,147

8,801,463

12,754,733

191,843

12,946,576

(continued}

The notes to thefinanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement 47


of Funds


LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable,-------------------

Due lo other lunds -------------------Due lo other governments-----------------

Revenues received in advance-----------------Deposits ______________________ _

Contracts and notes payable----------------

Interest payable--------------------

Benellls payable--------------------Current portion ollong-lerm obligations--------------

Electric Power

2,000

37,000

756,000

795,000 Other current liabilities------------------- ----==

7 Total current liabilities------------------

Noncurrenl liabilities: ---~~~

lnlerlund payables--------------------Loans payable ____________________ _

Lollery prizes and annuities----------------

Compensated absences payable---------------

Workers' compensation benelils payable--------------

Commercial paper and other borrowings--------------

Capital lease obligalion,~------------------

General obligation bonds payable----------------

Revenue bonds payable------------------Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation ___________ _

Net pension liability------------------Revenues received in advance-----------------

405

4,124,000 6,595

5,000

Water

Resources

115,898

39,370

94,551

11,229

199,665

460,713

25,888

42,776

88,300

2,636,703 230,198

485,502

O~:;a~::~:r::~:i~i~~:11:~i:,------------------ ----4-,-13-6-,0-0-0 ----3,"5:c:c:~c:~: Total liabilities-------------------- 4,931,000 4,059,764

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES ---~~~ ---~93°3", 1°0~3

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources_________ 4,931,000 4,992,867 NETPOSITION ---~~~ ---~~~

Net investment in capital assets---------------

Restricted: Nonexpendable endowments---------------

Expendable:

Construction-------------------

Debt service--------------------Security Lor revenue bonds----------------Lollery _____________________ _

Unemployment programs-----------------

Other purposes-------------------- ______ _

Total expendabl~------------------Unreslricled ____________________________ _

Total net position (deficit----------------- ______ _

1,155,487

49,941

49,941

1,205,428

Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and net position----- cccc~cc"ccc"cccc "ccc~cc"ccc"cccc 4,931,000 6,198,295




Lottery

42,190 384,733

2,859

976,209

214 1,406,205

708,900

2,260

58,564

104,521

874,245

2,280,450

2,248

2,282,698

163,916

146,174

146,174

(254,127)

55,963

2,338,661

Programs

2,769 217,160

37,207

44,569

437,574

38,288

777,567

3,112,178

54,426

173,273

252,559

3,592,436

4,370,003

5,505

4,375,508

245,034

3,482,018

3,482,018

(2,191,877}

1,535,175

5,910,683

University

223,033

289,763

301,653

449,270

1,263,719

109,575

4,240

345,567

5,340,583

368,803

6,578,194

14,271

93,619

12,854,852

14,118,571

143,167

14,261,738

951,956

8,653

19,752

46,769

45,718 112,239

(3,649,537}

(2,576,689)

11,685,049

Nonmajor

Enterprise

2,368 2,155

4 38

18,782

44,104

14 67,465

10,604

1,022

648,059

803,611

13,394

36,439

48,821

1,561,950

1,629,415

828

1,630,243

4,228

66,876

1,567,358

326,028 1,960,262

2,388,135

4,352,625

5,982,868


1ofal

\';\2)';

G.'.\ '.J';

'1,7'.,)

1:.,n1 ~3~,1~-'.

JJ,JB9,11JJ 1)S-'.,S~1

.>2AT4,U~4

UG~,-,-,, lt-\17:.

3,-'.S~)1S

Governmental

Activities

Internal

Service Funds

431,786 106,081

60,018

474,642

1,147

8,779

109,738

547,641

38,691

1,778,523

144,106

160,434

42,196

9,473,620

596,781

1,162,101

20,818

11,600,056

13,378,579

25,499

13,404,078

383,387

130,894

130,894

(971,783}

(457,502)

12,946,576

The notes to thefinanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement (concluded}

49


Water

Electric Power Resources

OPERATING REVENUES

Unemployment and disability insurance

Lollery ticket sales

Power sales (182,000} 71,236

Student tuition and lees

Services and sales 1,015,414

Investment and interest

Rent

Grants and contracts

Other

Total operating revenues (182,000} 1,086,650

OPERATING EXPENSES

Lollery prizes

Power purchases (nel olrecoverable power costs} (191,000} 219,661

Personal services 363,980

Supplies

Services and charges 9,000 147,946

Depreciation 77,170

Scholarships and lellowships

Distributions lo benellciaries

Interest expense Amortization ol long-term prepaid charges

Other 65,004

Total operating expenses (182,000} 873,761

Operating income (loss} 212,889

NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES}

Donations and grants

Private girls

Investment and interest income 910,000

Interest expense and liscal charges (910,000} (106,978}

Lollery payments Lor education

Other (105,911}

Total nonoperating revenues (expenses} (212,889}

Income (loss} belore capital contributions and lranslers

Capital contributions

Gain on early exlinguishmenl ol debt

Translers in

Translers oul

Change in nel position

Total net position (deficit)- beginning 1,205,428

Total net position (deficit)- ending 1,205,428

*Restated





13,847,329

6,275,597

2,204,941

533,959

73,161

200,497

6,275,597 13,847,329 3,012,558

3,955,791

79,415 177,623 4,578,876

19,807 1,212,500

647,386 125,129

13,529 7,144 302,916

881,578

11,149,036

34

4,715,928 11,458,966 6,975,870

1,559,669 2,388,363 (3,963,312}

1,764,962

68,010

92,112 18,699 65,962

(36,879} (223,407}

(1,563,150}

193 25,624

(1,507,724} 18,699 1,701,151

51,945 2,407,062 (2,262,161}

2,800,101

51,945 2,407,062 537,940

4,018 (871,887} (3,114,629)

55,963 1,535,175 (2,576,689)

Nonmajor

Enterprise

93,817

107,204

209

2,306

203,536

44,307

35,672

33,516

284

33,428

321

147,528

56,008

2,166

(2,199}

(1,713}

(1,746}

54,262

66,914

121,176

4,231,449

4,352,625 L


fowl

G,2~):)9~

"11· ,~(;4\

L[' pi

L,~,2~,.:

~3,161 2~,2,,~,\

24,24i\6i(l

2\GGJ 5,J:.:.,JJI

1,~6~,9~9

~~1,57~ 11,1,'.9,

6~,}~9

13,99(1,(153

:,17

1,J'.,:.,

6\, j'.:

;l.27•'.'1tT, "J,~C',1~( \

'.\],\( '.',l

e,~n9/ 2-:1,L,';

11:.

2,'; ·~,,L,1

\11~,P'

1,454,3'79

457151)2

Governmental

Activities

Internal

Service Funds

2,896,039

9,258

404,816

3,310,113

875,130

10,222

1,964,227

50,858

453,052

3,608

3,357,097

(46,984}

858

(18)

(5,079}

(4,239)

(51,223}

375

40,516

1,459

(56,541}

(65,414}

(392,088) * (457,502)


of Funds


CASH FLOWS FROM OPERA TING ACTMTIES

Receipts Lrom customers/employers---------------Receipts Lrom inlerLund services provided ____________ _

Payments lo suppliers------------------Payments lo employees------------------Payments Lor inlerLund services used ______________ _

Payments LorLollery prizes-----------------

Claims paid lo other than employees---------------

Electric Power

(174,000}

(7,000}

(6,000}

Water

Resources

1,129,333

(319,699}

(374,380}

Otherreceipls (paymenls} ------------------ ----=~~ ----~50,7041~ Net cash provided by (used in} operating activities ____________ 0(10807,00000~) ____ 404000,9095~

CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTMTIES Changes in inlerLund receivables and loans receivable _________ _

Changes in inlerLund payables and loans payable __________ _ Receipt oLbond charge __________________ _

Proceeds Lrom general obligation bond _____________ _

. Retirement oLgeneral obligation bonds--------------Proceeds Lrom revenue bond ________________ _

Retirement oLrevenue bonds-----------------Interest received ____________________ _

Interest paid _____________________ _

TransLers in---------------------

TransLers oul ---------------------Grants received ____________________ _

1,094

914,000

(669,000}

(253,000}

Lollery payments Lor education---------------- ___________ _

Net cash provided by (used in} noncapital financing activities ______ ---~(,8,00000~) ____ 010,0094~

CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTMTIES

Acquisition oLcapilal assets----------------

Proceeds Lrom sale oLcapilal assets---------------Proceeds Lrom notes payable and commercial paper _________ _

Principal paid on notes payable and commercial paper _________ _

Proceeds Lrom capital leases-----------------

Payment on capital leases-----------------

Retirement oL general obligation bonds-------------

Proceeds Lrom revenue bonds----------------

Retirement oLrevenue bonds-----------------Interest paid _____________________ _

(243,811}

180,375

(225,500}

(49,915}

215,805

(171,455}

(91,841} Grants received __________________________________ _

Net cash provided by (used in} capital and related financing activities .. (386,342}

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTMTIES

Purchase oLinveslmenls ------------------ (110,585} Proceeds Lrom maturity and sale oLinveslmenls ___________ 100,870

Earnings on investments------------------ ---~'c'~·"c""c _____ 207~,6

067c

Net cash provided by (used in} investing activities _________ ---~2020,0000~ ____ 01070,9052~

Net increase (decrease} in cash and pooled investments__________ (173,000} 73,699

Cash and pooled investments - beginning------------- --~1,,306030,0000~ ---~509020,9030~

Cash and pooled investments - ending-------------- cc~~'s•'s's"s'"s""cc s~~~'s6a6a,6a29cc





6,345,402 13,984,128 2,737,067

(248,079} (125,129} (1,395,267}

(59,405} (134,462} (4,568,576}

(21,819} (8,411}

(3,898,471}

(432,981} (11,185,872}

272,700 130,608 (694,304}

1,957,347 2,660,862 (3,921,080}

12,800

(2,255,018} (4,001}

137,022

(184,431}

28,671

(26,991}

2,800,101

1,865,328

(1,562,889}

(1,562,889} (2,255,018} 4,628,499

(47,873} (1,206} (597,600}

190 34 3,276

1,065

(423,225}

1,800,445

(1,040,256}

35,869

(47,683} (1,172} (220,426}

(11,200} (9,522,788}

92,557 (68) 9,287,576

20,661 18,699 38,931

102,018 18,631 (196,281}

448,793 423,303 290,712

292,480 3,556,385 343,533

741,273 3,979,688 634,245

Nonmajor

Enterprise

334,284

2,507

(66,664}

(31,048}

(737)

(371,811}

(133,469}

547,565

(354,415}

501,961

(77,085}

(2,608}

67,889

683,307

(516)

(516)

(1,100}

1,912

1,608

2,420

551,742

695,276

1,247,018


fowl

;2.ltl.8:18\ -~,1~,,\~j\

'.\\%,.l'.'l,l ; 1 l.t18.85:1l

1,4B6,99J

I,)

),Jl",)5)

n.~11,711; '.9J,\.)Ji \),';G9

(.l.l,2/Jil)

1/sl ),)C.,1

6,i4.\6(l4

BA~B.B~J

Governmental

Activities

Internal

Service Funds

31,610

3,745,711

(1,513,796}

(707,951}

(440,607}

(520,901}

594,066

(11,408}

4,461

(18)

1,459

(56,541}

(62,047}

(1,327,912}

11,367

958,237

(1,243,020}

(1,601,328}

858

858

(1,068,451}

3,886,401

2,817,950

The notes to the.financial statements are an integral part ofth,s statement (continued}

53

State of California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Fund Financial Statements

of Funds

Governmental

Year Ended June 30, 2016 Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds Activities

(amounts in thousands} Water State Unemployment California State Nonmajor Internal

Electric Power Resources Lottery Programs University Enterprise fowl Service Funds

RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS} TO NET CASH

PROVIDED BY (USED IN} OPERA TING ACTMTIES Operating income (loss} 212,889 1,559,669 2,388,363 (3,963,312} 56,008 17 (46,984} Adjustments lo reconcile operating income (loss} lo nel cash provided

by (used in} operating activities: Depreciation 77,170 13,529 7,144 302,916 284 50,858 Provisions and allowances 9,041 (2,161} Amortization otpremiums and discounts 1,136 (76,985} Amortization ot long-term prepaid charges and credits 116,809 553 Other 5,741 17 (99,155} (13,708} '.JC'.',JC~i 10,173 Change in account balances:

Receivables (39,766} 39,417 118,028 (948) (1,589} (69,933} Due trom other tunds (23,226} 823 (301) 57,264 Due trom other governments (1,189} 2,856 (3,962} 688 Prepaid items 3,646 (7,694} (383) (73,648} Inventories (12) 2,876 853 1,581 Net investment in direct llnancing leases 477,029 Recoverable power costs (nel} (184,000} Other current assets 66 (1,285} Loans receivable (167,012} Deterred out now otresources (3,000} (4,652} (208,337} (6,547} (51,451} Accounts payable 77,797 (9,296} 18,764 (1,689} S~}~6 83,721 Due lo other tunds (5,695} (10,608} 155,291 109 I' (111,348} Due lo component uni ls (132) Due lo other governments 7,651 (856) (33) 163 Deposits 462 Contracts and notes payable (5,207} Interest payable 2,622 (12,981} Revenues received in advance (63) 18,771 6,729 I 125,266 Other current liabilities (613) (11,834} 2,165 337 8,545 Benell ls payable (36,836} 27,315 590 12,207 Lollery prizes and annuities 329,961 Compensated absences payable 8,368 12,181 1,993 (124)

Other noncurrenl liabilities (10,400} 19,705 73,815 (956,104} 3,287 ;JC~,C~J; 361,347

Deterred in now otresources (34,370} 943,577 (2,019} <,~y,, (146,998} Total adjustments (187,000} 228,106 397,678 272,499 42,232 (189,477} )G/,~, 9 641,050

Net cash provided by (used in} operating activities (187,000} 440,995 1,957,347 2,660,862 (3,921,080} (133,469} BJ1,6SS 594,066

Noncash investing, capital, and financing activities: (concluded} Issuance ot long-term debt lo terminate SP\1/B capitalized lease obligations .. 831,538 ,,u,, Termination otSP\1/B capitalized lease obligations 800,559 Reclassi llcalion otlong-lerm debt lo capitalized lease obligation 57,672 Amortization ot bond premium and discount 82,000 19,637 22,766 Unrealized gain on investments 2,000 54,508 Contributed capital assets 37,240 Change in accrued capital asset purchases 9,191 Interest accreted on annuilized prizes 36,879 Unclaimed lollery prizes directly allocated lo another en lily 24,267 Amortization ot deterred loss on retundings 28,000 10,902 4,746 Interest accreted on zero coupon bonds 16,226 Other miscellaneous non cash transactions 9,445 6,619

54 'The notes to thefmanc,al statements are an integral part ofth,s statement The notes to the.financial statements are an integral part ofth,s statement 55


Statement of Fiduciary Net Position Fiducia')' Funds and Simila" Cornponcn: Units


ASSETS Cash and pooled investments ______ _

Investments, al lair value: Shorl-lerm ___________ _

Equity securities _________ _ Debt securities __________ _ Real estate ___________ _

Securities lending collateral ______ _ Other ____________ _

Total investments ________ _ Receivables (net) __________ _

Due lrom other lunds ________ _

Due lrom other governments ______ _ Loans receivable __________ _ Other assets ___________ _

Total assets __________ _

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES ..

Total assets and deferred outflows of resources __________ _

LIABILITIES Accounts payable __________ _

Due lo other governments _______ _ Tax overpayments _________ _ Benellls payable __________ _

Revenues received in advanc ______ _ Deposits ____________ _

Private Purpose

Trust

103,974

3,323,022 2,227,087

235,924

962,251

6,748,284

11,956 11,036

176,181 7,051,431

7,051,431

46,165

176,181

Pension and Other Employee

Benefit Trust

3,231,528

28,785,152 252,240,485 119,382,887

57,958,450 30,343,896 51,753,835

540,464,705

19,873,271 627,475

7,007 2,134,015

932,631 567,270,632

22,879

567,293,511

1,497,840 615

2,926,977

Securities lending obligations_______ 30,299,546 Loans payable____________ 2,129,694

Investment Trust

Local Agency Investment

22,742,368

22,742,368

22,742,368

30,210

Agency

5,815,718

3,830,029 18,762,267

34,906 7,935

70 28,450,925

17,117,963 8,182,636

646

680 1,279,229

Other liabilities ______________ 05

0,5

081~ __

022

0,70

808

0,0

082~ ______ --~1,

086

09c,7c7~1

Total liabilities___________ 227,927 59,642,754 30,210 28,450,925

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES ..

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources __________ _

NET POSITION

Held in trust for: Pension and other poslemploymenl benellls .. Del erred compensation participants ____ _ Pool participants __________ _

Individuals, organizations, or other governments .. Total net position _________ _

15,723

227,927 59,658,477 30,210

489,273,640 13,227,692

22,712,158

6,823,504 5,133,702

6,823,504 507,635,034 22,712,158


Statement ol Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Fiducia-y Funds and Sinilar Componcn: Units


ADDITIONS Contributions:

Employer ________________ _ Plan member _______________ _

Private Purpose

Trust

Non-employer---------------- ____ _ Total contributions-------------

Investment income: Net appreciation (depreciation} in lair value olinveslmenls .. (191,108) Interest, dividends, and other investment income______ 288,592

Less: investment expense------------- ---~(~3,~93~3~} Net investment income------------- 93,551

Receipts lrom depositors-------------- 3,483,700 Other _______________________ _

Total additions---------------

DEDUCTIONS Distributions paid and payable lo participants _______ _

Relunds olconlribulions -------------Administrative expense--------------

3,577,251

Payments lo and Lor depositors ____________ --~3,~25~7~,4~03~

Total deductions--------------- 3,257,410

Change in nel position --------------- 319,841

Net position - beginning-------------- 6,503,663

Net position - ending--------------- "~-• ~82~3~5~04~


Pension and Other Investment Employee Trust

Benefit Local Agency Trust Investment

16,353,889 8,455,029 1,939,902

26,748,820

(1,901,217} 6,451,755 90,709

(1,198,350} 3,352,188 90,709

23,802,929 82,590

30,183,598 23,893,638

34,714,503 89,147 328,665 403,271 1,562 585,291 22,579,919

36,031,730 22,670,628 (5,848,132) 1,223,010

513,483,166 21,489,148

507,635,034 22,712,158




58


Statement of Net Position Disc·o:oly P0 cscntcd Cornponcn: Units En:crpdsc Activi:y


ASSETS

Current assets: Cash and pooled investments ______ _ Investments ___________ _

Restricted assets: Cash and pooled investments ______ _ Investments ___________ _

Receivables (net) __________ _

Due lrom primary government ______ _ Due lrom other governments ______ _ Prepaid items ___________ _

Inventories-------------

University

of California

461,477 6,224,967

3,452,191

170,203 94,307

214,680 334,877 Other current assets __________ ----~-

10,952,702 Total current assets __________ --~=~~ Noncurrenl assets:

Restricted assets: Cash and pooled investments ______ _ Investments ___________ _

Investments ___________ _ 24,816,866 Receivables (net) __________ _ 2,251,456 Loans receivable __________ _

Capital assets: Land _____________ _ 1,163,095 Collections nondepreciable ______ _ 434,738 Buildings and other depreciable properly .. 46,413,298 Intangible assets amorlizable _____ _ 910,769 Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization .. (22,298,114} Conslruclion/developmenl in progress ___ _ 3,065,029 Intangible assets nonamorlizable ____ _

178,367 Othernoncurrenl assets _________ ---==~ 56,935,504 Total noncurrenl assets_________ --~-~-

67,888,206 Total assets ___________ -~~= DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES .. 5,573,864

Total assets and deferred outflows 73,462,070 of resources __________ cCc~"""""'°

California Housing

Finance Agency

1,246,992 57,386

213,352

468

18,622

1,536,820

247,183

2,944,550

1,249

(662)

7,686

3,200,006

4,736,826

38,037

4,774,863

Nonnrnjor

Component Units

1,045,849 477,513

406,741 3,190

320,761

1,052

39,771

2,294,877

25,588 16,058

1,841,132 240,935

296,051

153,626 10,300

2,070,926

10,387 (1,070,195)

26,812 5,098

44,699

3,671,417

5,966,294

45,670

6,011,964


2.:5:., 11~ t.7~9.Sf,6

',P' :1.,,sc,y,.:

1~_\;,_)"

1}~'.' ~l~.:,I.)

J.\,'.'\t.,''

,.,,.,,, ]', )5~

,:~.1S1

~.4n "'-)1

1,,1:-n1 -1.'.).~,

.\\.!~5,:.7' n1.1~:

;2:1.:1cs."711

11/t-1 ~)9S

~'..) 707

~/57,571

34,'.¼B.397

(ccnlinucdl

Component Unit Financial Statements

Statement ol Net Position (continued) Disc·c:oly Pmscntcd Componcn: Units En:crpriso Activi:y


LIABILITIES

Current liabilities: Accounts payable __________ _

Revenues received in advance ______ _ Deposits ____________ _

Contracts and notes payable _______ _ Interest payable __________ _

University

of California

1,720,584 1,173,229

578,901

Securities lending obligations_______ 866,650

California Housing

Finance Agency

60,373

243,911

39,690

Nonmajor

Component Units

545,744 68,494

1,933 8,592 2,883

Current portion ollong-lerm obligations____ 3,845,664 59,438 91,602

Other current liabilities_________ 1,531,365 924 202,035

Non::~~;~;::i\i:t::iilies --------- ---""''='=6=,3=93" ___ 4=0=4,=3=36" ---"='='·='=83"

Compensated absences payable_______ 294,842 15,823 Workers' compensation benelils payable____ 391,440 44,603

Commercial paper and other borrowings.. 700 Capital lease obligation~-------- 147,745 348,342 Revenue bonds payable_________ 17,107,477 2,529,360 471,377

Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation .. 10,456,840 29,611 110,551 Net pension liability__________ 15,124,690 47,369 180,674

Othernoncurrenl liabilities________ 1,480,656 217,739 455,745

Total noncurrenl liabilities________ 45,003,690 2,824,079 1,627,815

Turn!

~,>~C7.)1 1,2-11.~2,

\2-l,7:.5 8}9~

4~-~7"'

\99(,7Y.

11,(.4~ .. )1;,

.1 IC/<',~ 4>CY"

-!9(,.Jn

.ICS.~1-'. 1,,~r .. ).);, 1~,1~,.~~A 2,1 ·.i,1:.)

Total liabilities __________ -~54",7=2=0=,0=83" --='"''='="•=4=15" --='=,5=4=9,=0=98" --="=0•="='='="~" DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES .. 1,733,739 9,219 38,599

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources __________ -~56

0,40503

0,8

022~ --=3

0,23=7,

063

04~ __ c2

0,50

Bc7,06

097~

NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets ______ _

Restricted:

Nonexpendable endo"1llenl~-----Expendable:

Endowments and gi fls _______ _ Education ___________ _ Indenture ___________ _

Statute ____________ _

12,816,190

4,847,898

9,826,929 461,402

Other purposes ______________ _

Total expendable ________ _ Unrestricted ___________ _

Total net position _________ _

Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources,

10,288,331 (10,944,171}

17,008,248

587

531,130 1,059,583

1,590,713 (54,071}

1,537,229

541,420

1,079,429

18,321 902,346

280,326 28,431

1,229,424 573,994

3,424,267

and net position _________ ~~730,406020,o07oac >~c4,,77""4,0B063'° e~a•,,00101,09064'°

The notes to the.financial statements are an integral part ofth,s statement

62,279,JSJ

~,8-15,2)~, 1,1c,7:.~

5:11,1}'.: 1,»s .1 , ..

?J,.:

; lC,S?S,?S~;

21,%9.744

6f

State of California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Notes to the Financial Statements

Statement of Activities Disc-o:oly P"cscntcd Cornponon: Units En:crpdso Activi:y

Notes to the Financial Statements - Index

Year Ended June 30, 2016 Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. 67 (amounts in thousands} California

University Housing Nonnrnjor A. Reporting Entity .. 68

of Finance Component 1. Blended Component Units. 68 California Agency Units TctRl 2. Fiduciary Component Units. 68

OPERATING EXPENSES

Personal services 20,979,910 28,983 516,087 ?1,~2.:y,~, 3. Discretely Presented Component Units. 69

Scholarships and lellowships 651,565 58,951 '.'LJ,51', 4. Joint Venture. 70 Supplies 3,108,907 9,949 .1.11\S~6 Services and charges 282,692 24,327 1,262,914 J,~f") .'O'

5. Related Organizations. 71

Department olEnergy laboratories 1,252,842 l,?52,';.'.2 B. Government-wide and Fund Financial Statements. 72 Depreciation 1,804,046 232 72,443 l,\'.'",771

Interest expense and liscal charges 693,062 72,288 34,078 7,,9 .. :~s C. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting. 75

Grants provided 889,278 \\·l.7.U 1. Government-wide Financial Statements. 75

Other 4,436,608 78,712 78,704 2. Fund Financial Statements. 75 Total operating expenses 34,098,910 204,542 2,033,126 .%}%,S1B

D. Cash and Investments . 76 PROGRAM REVENUES

Charges Lor services 20,030,835 37,896 1,039,572 ~l,H.I"'" E. Receivables. 76

Operating grants and contributions 9,020,465 640,574 Cl,~, F. Inventories. 76 Capital grants and contributions 248,705 29,230

Total program revenues 29,300,005 37,896 1,709,376 .ll.il47,177 G. Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases. 76

Net revenues (expenses} (4,798,905} (166,646} (323,750} '~.>9,1( Ji H. Long-term Prepaid Charges. 77

GENERAL REVENUES I Capital Assets. 77 Investment and interest income (loss} (275,479} 223,127 (11,154} ;t:1.Seti

Other 2,799,236 31,717 446,840 :1.2T,~93 l Long-term Obligations. 78

Total general revenues 2,523,757 254,844 435,686 .UU,181 K. Compensated Absences . 78

Change in net position (2,275,148} 88,198 111,936 '.2.( '.'Z.( Pi L Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows ofResources 79 Net position - beginning 19,283,396 1,449,031 . 3,312,331 . 24,tl44/f~g

1. Deferred Outflows ofResources. 79 Net position - ending 17,008,248 1,537,229 $ 3,424,267 ' 21,%9,144

*Restated 2. Deferred Inflows ofResources. 79

M. Abnormal Account Balances . 80

N. Nonmajor Enterprise Segment Information. 80

0. Net Position and Fund Balance. 81

1. Net Position. 81

2. Fund Balance . 81

3. Budget Stabilization Account. 82

p Restatement of Beginning Fund Balances and Net Position. 83

1. Fund Financial Statements. 83

2. Government-wide Financial Statements. 83

Q. Guaranty Deposits. 83

Note 2. Budgetary and legal Compliance. 83

A. Budgeting and Budgetary Control. 83

B. Legal Comp] iance . 84

62 'The notes to thefmanc,a/ statements are an integral part ofth,s statement 63


Note 3. Deposits and Investments.

A. Primary Government.

1. Control of State Funds.

2. Valuation of State Investments.

3. Oversight oflnvesting Activities.

4. Risk oflnvestments.

a. Interest Rate Risk.

b. Credit Risk.

c. Custodial Credit Risk.

d. Concentration of Credit Risk.

B. Fiduciary Funds.

C. Discretely Presented Component Units.

Note 4. Accounts Receivable.

Note 5. Restricted Assets.

Note 6. Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases.

Note 7. Capital Assets .

Note 8 Accounts Payable.

Note 9. Long-term Obligations.

Note 10. Pension Trusts.

A. California Public Employees' Retirement System.

1. Public Employees'Retirement Fund (PERF).

2. Single-employer Plans.

B. California State Teachers' Retirement System.

Note 11. Postemployment Health Care Benefits.

Note 12. Commercial Paper and Other Long-term Borrowings.

Note 13. Leases.

Note 14. Commitments.

Note 15. General Obligation Bonds.

A. Variable-rate General Obligation Bonds.

B. Mandatory Tender Bonds.

C. Build America Bonds.

D. Debt Service Requirements.

E. General Obligation Bond Defeasances.

1. CurrentYearActivity ..

2. Outstanding Balance.

64

84

85

85

85

87

88

89

90

90

90

91

91

92

94

95

96

98

100

104

105

105

115

123

127

130

131

132

133

134

135

135

136

136

136

137

Note 16. Revenue Bonds.

A. Governmental Activities.

B. Business-type Activities.

C. Discretely Presented Component Units.

D. Revenue Bond Defeasances.

1. Current Year - Governmental Activities.

2. Current Year - Business-type Activities.

3. Outstanding Balances.

Note 17. Service Concession Arrangements.

Note 18. Tnterfund Balances and Transfers.

A. Tnterfund Balances .

B. Tnterfund Transfers .

Note 19. Fund Balances, Net Position Deficits, and Endowments.

A. Fund Balances.

B. Net Position Deficits.


C. Discretely Presented Component Unit Endowments and Gifts.

137

137

138

138

140

140

141

141

141

142

142

148

150

150

151

151

151

153

153

154

154

155

155

155

156

Note 20. Risk Management.

Note 21. Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows ofResources.

Note 22. No Commitment Debt.

Note 23. Contingent Liabilities.

A. Litigation.

B. Federal Audit Exceptions.

Note 24. Subsequent Events.

A. Debt Issuances .

B. Other.

65



66


NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accompanying financial statements present information on the financial activities of the State of California over which the Governor, the Legislature, and other elected officials have direct or indirect governing and fiscal control. These financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The provisions of the following Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statements have been implemented for the year ended June 30, 2016:

GASB Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application, effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, defines fair value and provides guidance for determining fair value measurement for financial reporting purposes, applying fair value to certain investments, and disclosures related to fair value measurements. A new schedule categorizing the State's investments by levels of fair value measurement hierarchy was added to Note 3, Deposits and Investments.

GASB Statement No. 73, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and Related Assets That Are Not within the Scope of GASB Statement No. 68, and Amendments to Certain Provisions of GASB Statements 67 and 68, includes some provisions that are applicable to the State that are effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016. The State does not offer any defined benefit pensions that are not within the scope of Statement No. 68; thus, the provisions of Statement No. 73 related to those pensions are not applicable. The provisions that amended Statements Nos. 67 and 68 are applicable to the State; however, implementation of these provisions had no impact on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2016.

GASB Statement No. 76, The Hierarchy of Gene ratty Accepted Accounting Principles for State and Local Governments, became effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, and should be applied retroactively. The objective of this Statement is to identify the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles for governmental financial reporting and establish the framework for selecting those principles. This statement supersedes Statement No. 55, The Hierarchy of Generatfy Accepted Accounting Principles for State and Local Governments. Implementation of Statement No. 76 had no impact on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2016.

GASB Statement No. 79, Certain External Investment Poofs and Poof Participants, with some provisions effective for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, and others effective for next fiscal year, establishes criteria for an external investment pool to qualify for making the election to measure all of its investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes. The State administers one external investment pool for local governments and public agencies, the Local Agency Investment Fund (LATF). The California State Treasurer has determined that LATF does not meet the criteria established by Statement No. 79 and, therefore, the election was not made. Implementation of Statement No. 79 had no impact on the financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2016.

67


A. Reporting Entity

These financial statements present the primary government of the State and its component units. The primary government consists of all funds, organizations, institutions, agencies, departments, and offices that are not legally separate from the State. Component units are organizations that are legally separate from the State, but for which the State is financially accountable, or organizations whose relationship with the State is such that exclusion would cause the State's financial statements to be misleading. Following is information on the blended, fiduciary, and discretely presented component units of the State.

1. Blended Component Units

Blended component units, although legally separate entities, are in substance part of the primary government's operations. Therefore, data from these blended component units are integrated into the appropriate funds for reporting purposes.

Building authorities are blended component units because they have been created through the use of joint exercise of powers agreements with various cities to finance the construction of state buildings. The building authorities' financial activities are reported in capital projects funds. As a result, capital lease arrangements between the building authorities and the State have been eliminated from the financial statements. Instead, only the underlying capital assets and the debt used to acquire them are reported in the government-wide financial statements. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the building authorities, email the State Controller's Office, State Accounting and Reporting Division at [email protected].

The Golden State Tobacco Securitimtion Corporation (GSTSC) is a not-for-profit corporation established through legislation in September 2002 solely for the purpose of purchasing Tobacco Settlement Revenues from the State. The five voting members of the State Public Works Board serve ex officio as the directors of the corporation. The GSTSC is authorized to issue bonds as necessary to provide sufficient funds for carrying out its purpose. The GSTSC's financial activity is reported in the combining statements in the Nonmajor Governmental Funds section as a special revenue fund. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of GSTSC, contact the Department of Finance, Natural Resources, Energy, Environmental, and Capital Outlay Section, 915 L Street, 9th Floor, Sacramento, California 95814.

2. Fiduciary Component Units

The State has two legally separate fiduciary component units that administer pension and other employee benefit trust funds. The State appoints a voting majority of the board members of both plans which, due to their fiduciary nature, are presented in the Fiduciary Fund Statements as pension and other employee benefit trust funds, along with other primary government fiduciary funds.

The California Public Employees' Retirement System (Ca/PERS) administers pension plans for state employees, non-teaching school employees, and employees of California public agencies. Its Board of Administration has plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for the investment of monies and the administration ofthe plan. CalPERS administers the following seven pension and other employee benefit trust funds: the Public Employees' Retirement Fund, the Judges' Retirement Fund, the Judges' Retirement Fund TT, the Legislators' Retirement Fund, the State Peace Officers' and Firefighters' Defined Contribution Plan Fund, the Public Agency Deferred Compensation Plan, and the public employee Supplemental Contributions Program Fund. CalPERS' separately issued financial statements may be found on its website at www.CaIPERS.ca.gov.

68


The California State Teachers' Retirement System (Ca!STRS) administers pension benefit plans for California public school teachers and certain other employees of the public school system. The State is financially accountable for CalSTRS. CalSTRS administers the following four pension and other employee benefit trust funds: the Defined Benefit Program, the Defined Benefit Supplement Program, the Cash Balance Benefit Program, and the Replacement Benefit Program. CalSTRS' separately issued financial statements may be found on its website at www.CalSTRS.com.

3. Discretely Presented Component Units

Enterprise activity of discretely presented component units is reported in a separate column in the government-wide financial statements. Discretely presented component units are legally separate from the primary government and usually provide services to entities and individuals outside the primary government Discretely presented component units that report enterprise activity include the University of California, the California Housing Finance Agency, and nonmajor component units. Most component units separately issue their own financial statements. Tn general, the notes to the financial statements in this publication do not include information found in the component units' separately issued financial statements. Instead, references to the individual component unit financial statements are provided where applicable.

The Universi(Y of California was founded in 1868 as a public, state-supported, land-grant institution. Tt was written into the State Constitution of 1879 as a public trust to be administered by a governing board, the Regents of the University of California (Regents). The University is a component unit of the State because the State appoints a voting majority of the Regents and provides financial assistance to the University. The University offers defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution pension plans to its employees through the University of California Retirement System (UCRS), a fiduciary responsibility of the Regents. The financial information of the UCRS is not included in the financial statements of this report due to its fiduciary nature. The University's financial statements may be found on its website at www.ucop.edu.

The California Housing Finance Agency (Ca!HFA) was created by the Zenovich-Moscone-Chacon Housing and Home Finance Act, as amended. CalHFA's purpose is to finance the housing needs of persons and families of low and moderate income. Tt is a component unit of the State because the State appoints a voting majority of CalHFA's governing board and the executive director, who administers the day-to-day operations. CalHFA's financial statements may be found on its website at www.CalHFAca.gov.

State legislation created various nonmajor component units to provide certain services outside the primary government and to provide certain private and public entities with a low-cost source of financing for programs deemed to be in the public interest California State University auxiliary organizations are considered component units because they exist entirely or almost entirely for the direct benefit of the universities. The remammg nonmajor component units are considered component units because the majority of members of their governing boards are appointed by or are members of the primary government, and the primary government can impose its will on the entity; or the entity provides a specific financial benefit to or imposes a financial burden on the primary government For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of these component units, email the State Controller's Office, State Accounting and Reporting Division at [email protected].

The nonmajor consolidated component unit segments are:

California State Universi(Y auxiliary organizations, which provide services primarily to university students through foundations, associated student organizations, student unions, food service entities, book stores, and similar organizations.

69


http://www.CalPERS.ca.gov

http://www.CalSTRS.com

http://www.ucop.edu

http://www.CaIHFA.ca.gov



Financing authorities, which provide financing for specific purposes. These agencies include:

The California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, which provides financing for alternative energy and advanced transportation technologies;

The California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, which provides financing for business development and public improvements; and

The California Urban Waterfront Area Restoration Financing Authority, which provides financing for coastal and inland urban waterfront restoration projects.

District agricultural associations, which exhibit all of the industries, industrial enterprises, resources, and products of the State (the district agricultural association's financial report is as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015).

Other component units, which include the following entities:

The University of California Hastings Cotfege of the Law, which was established as the law department oft he University of California to provide legal education programs and operates independently under its own board of directors. The college has a discretely presented component unit, the Foundation, which provides private sources of funds for academic programs, scholarships, and faculty research;

The State Assistance Fund for Enterprise, Business and Industrial Development Corporation, which provides financial assistance to small business; and

The Public Employees' Contingency Reserve, which provides health benefit plans for state employees and annuitants.

4. Joint Venture

A joint venture is an entity resulting from a contractual arrangement; it is owned, operated, or governed by two or more participants as a separate and specific activity subject to joint control. Tn such an arrangement, the participants retain an ongoing financial interest or an ongoing financial responsibility in the entity. These entities are not part ofthe primary government or a component unit

The State participates in a joint venture called the Capitol Area Development Authority (CADA). CADA was created in 1978 by the joint exercise of powers agreement between the primary government and the City of Sacramento for the location of state buildings and other improvements. CADA is a public entity, separate from the primary government and the city, and is administered by a board of five members-two appointed by the primary government, two appointed by the city, and one appointed by the affirmative vote ofat least three of the other four members of the board. The primary government designates the chairperson of the board. Although the primary government does not have an equity interest in CADA, it does have an ongoing financial interest The primary government subsidizes CADA's operations by leasing land to CADA without consideration; however, the primary government is not obligated to do so. At June 30, 2016, CADA had total assets and deferred outflows of resources of $33.6 million, total ] iabilities and deferred inflows of resources of $21.3 million, and total net position of$12.3 million. Total revenues for the fiscal year were $11 .4 million and expenses were $8.8 million, resulting in an increase in net position of $2.6 million. As the primary government does not have equity interest in CADA, CADA's financial information is not included in the financial statements of this report. Separately issued financial statements may be obtained from the Capitol Area Development Authority, 1522 14th Street, Sacramento, California 95814-5958 or on its website at www.cadanetorg.

70


5. Related Organizations

A related organization is an organization for which a primary government is accountable because that government appoints a voting majority of the organization's governing board, but for which it is not financially accountable.

Chapter 854 of the Statutes of 1996 created an Independent System Operator (ISO), a state-chartered, nonprofit market institution. The TSO provides centralized control of the statewide electrical transmission grid to ensure the efficient use and reliable operation of the transmission system. The TSO is governed by a fivemember board, the members of which are appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the initial oversight board appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the TSO, the financial information ofthis institution is not included in the financial statements ofthis report. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the TSO, contact the Independent System Operator, P.O. Box 639014, Folsom, California 95763-9014 or go to its website at www.caiso.com..

The California Earthquake Authority (CEA), a legally separate organization, offers earthquake insurance for California homeowners, renters, condominium owners, and mobilehome owners. A three-member board of state-elected officials governs the CEA. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the CEA, the financial information of this institution is not included in the financial statements of this report For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the CEA, contact the California Earthquake Authority, 801 K Street, Suite 1000, Sacramento, California 95814 or go to its website at www.earthquakeauthority.com.

The State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund) was established by the State through legislation enacted in 1913 to provide an available market for workers' compensation insurance to employees located in California. State Fund operates in competition with other insurance carriers to serve California businesses. The State appoints all 11 members of the State Fund's governing board. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the initial oversight board appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the State Fund, the financial information ofthis institution is not included in the financial statements ofthis report. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the State Fund, contact the State Compensation Insurance Fund, 333 Bush Street, 8th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104 or go to its website at www.statefundca.com.

The California Health Benefit Exchange (the Exchange), an independent public entity, offers new health insurance to individuals, families, and small businesses. A five-member board of state-elected officials governs the Exchange. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the Exchange, the financial information of this institution is not included in the financial statements of this report. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the Exchange, contact Covered California, P.O. Box 989725, West Sacramento, California 95798-9725.

The California Potfution Control Financing Authority (CPCFA) was created through the California Pollution Control Financing Authority Act of 1972. The CPCFA is a legally separate entity that provides financing for pollution control facilities. A three-member board of state-elected officials governs the CPCFA. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the CPCFA, the financial information of this institution is not included in the financial statements ofthis report. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the CPCFA, contact the State Treasurer's Office, 915 Capitol Mall, Room 457, Sacramento, California 95814 or go to its website at www.treasurer.ca.gov/cpc&.

71

http://www.cadanet.org

http://www.caiso.com

http://www.earthquakeauthority.com

http://www.statefundca.com

http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/cpcfa


The California Health Facilities Financing Authority (CHFFA) was established by the State through legislation enacted in 1979. The CHFFA is a legally separate entity that provides financing for the construction, equipping, and acquisition of health facilities. A nine-member board of state-elected officials and appointees govern the CHFFA. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the CHFFA, the financial information of this institution is not included in the financial statements of this report. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the CHFFA, contact the State Treasurer's Office, 915 Capitol Mall, Suite 590, Sacramento, California 95814 or go to its website at www.treasurer.ca.gov/chffa.

The California Educational Facilities Authority (CEFA) was created by Board of Control approval in 1974. The CEFA is a legally separate entity established to issue revenue bonds to finance loans for students attending public and private colleges and universities, and to assist private educational institutions of higher learning in financing the expansion and construction of educational facilities. A five-member board of stateelected officials and appointees govern the CEFA. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the CEFA, the financial information ofthis institution is not included in the financial statements ofthis report. For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements for the CEF A, contact the State Treasurer's Office, 915 Capitol Mall, Suite 590, Sacramento, California 95814 or go to its website at www.treasurer.ca.gov/cefa.

The Caftfornia Schoof Finance Authority (CSFA) was created in 1985. The CSFA is a legally separate entity that provides loans to school and community college districts to assist them in obtaining equipment and facilities. A three-member board of state officials governs the CSFA. The State's accountability for this institution does not extend beyond making the appointments. As the primary government is not financially accountable for the CSFA, the financial information for this institution is not included in the financial statements ofthis report For information regarding obtaining copies of the financial statements of the CSFA, contact the State Treasurer's Office, 300 South Spring Street, Suite 8500, Los Angeles, California 90013 or go to its website at www.treasurer.ca.gov/csfa.

B. Government-wide and Fund F!nanda! Statements

Government-wide financial statements (the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities) provide information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. The primary government is reported separately from legally separate component units for which the State is financially accountable. Within the primary government, the State's governmental activities, which are normally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support The effect of interfund activity has been removed from the statements, with the exception of amounts between governmental and business-type activities, which are presented as internal balances and transfers. Centralized services provided by the General Fund for other funds are charged as direct costs to the funds that received those services. Also, the General Fund recovers the cost of centralized services provided to federal programs from the federal government

The Statement of Net Position reports all of the financial and capital resources of the government as a whole in a format in which assets and deferred outflows of resources equal liabilities and deferred inflows of resources, plus net position. The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the expenses of a given function are offset by program revenues. Program revenues include charges to customers who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function. Program revenues also include grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function. Tmces and other items that are not program-related are reported as general revenues.

72


Fund financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, fiduciary funds and similar component units, and discretely presented component units. A fund is a fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts. Fund accounting segregates funds according to their intended purpose and is used to aid management in demonstrating compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions. The State maintains the minimum number of funds consistent with legal and managerial requirements. Fiduciary funds, although excluded from the government-wide statements, are included in the fund financial statements. Major governmental and enterprise funds are reported in separate columns in the fund financial statements. Nonmajor governmental and proprietary funds are grouped into separate columns. Discretely presented component unit statements, which follow the fiduciary fund statements, also separately report the enterprise activity of the major discretely presented component units. Tn this report, the enterprise activity of nonmajor discretely presented component units is grouped in a separate column.

Governmental fund types are used to account for activities primarily supported by tmces, grants, and similar revenue sources.

The State reports the following major governmental funds:

The General Fund is the main operating fund of the State. Tt accounts for transactions related to resources obtained and used for those services that need not be accounted for in another fund.

The Federal Fund accounts for the receipt and use of grants, entitlements, and shared revenues received from the federal government that are all restricted by federal regulations.

The Transportation Fund accounts for fuel taxes, including the State's diesel, motor vehicle, and fuel use tmces; bond proceeds; automobile registration fees; and other revenues that are restricted for transportation purposes, including highway and passenger rail construction and transportation safety programs.

The Environmental and Natural Resources Fund accounts for fees, bond proceeds, and other revenues that are restricted for maintaining the State's natural resources and improving the environmental quality of its air, land, and water.

Proprietary fund types focus on the determination of operating income, changes in net position, financial position, and cash flows.

Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. Operating expenses include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. For its proprietary funds, the State applies all applicable GASB pronouncements.

The State has two proprietary fund types: enterprise funds and internal service funds.

Enterprise funds record business-type activity for which a fee is charged to external users for goods and services. Tn addition, the State is required to report activities as enterprise funds in the context ofthe activity's principal revenue sources when any of the following criteria are met:

The activity's debt is secured solely by fees and charges of the activity;

There is a legal requirement to recover costs; or The pricing policies of fees and charges are designed to recover costs.

73

http://www.tF6asurer.ca.gov/chffa

http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/cefa

http://www.treasurer.ca.gov/csfa


The State reports the following major enterprise funds:

The Electric Power Fund accounts for the acquisition and resale of electric power to retail end-use customers.

The Water Resources Fund accounts for charges to local water districts and the sale of excess power to public utilities.

The State Lottery Fund accounts for the sale of California State Lottery (Lottery) tickets and the Lottery's payments for education.

The Unemployment Programs Fund accounts for employer and worker contributions used for payments of unemployment insurance and disability benefits.

The California State University Fund accounts for student fees and other receipts from gifts, bequests, donations, federal and state grants, and loans that are used for educational purposes.

Nonmajor enterprise funds account for additional operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises.

Additionally, the State reports internal service funds as a proprietary fund type with governmental activity. Internal service funds account for goods or services provided to other agencies, departments, or governments on a cost-reimbursement basis. The goods and services provided include architectural services, public building construction and improvements, printing and procurement services, goods produced by inmates of state prisons, data processing services, and administrative services related to water delivery. Internal service funds are included in the governmental activities at the government-wide level.

Fiduciary fund types are used to account for assets held by the State. The State acts as a trustee or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governments, or other funds. Fiduciary funds, including fiduciary component units, are not included in the government-wide financial statements.

The State has the following four fiduciary fund types:

74

Private purpose trust funds account for all trust arrangements, other than those properly reported in pension or investment trust funds, whereby principal and income benefit individuals, private organizations, or other governments. The following are the State's largest private purpose trust funds:

The Scholarshare Program Trust Fund accounts for money received from participants to fund their beneficiaries'higher education expenses at certain postsecondary educational institutions.

The Unc!aimed Property Fund accounts for unclaimed money and properties held in trust by the State. Unclaimed money is remitted to the General Fund where it can be used by the State until it is claimed.

Pension and other employee benefit trnstfunds of the primary government and fiduciary component units account for transactions, assets, liabilities, and net position available for plan benefits of the retirement systems and for other employee benefit programs.

An investment trnst fund accounts for the deposits, withdrawals, and earnings of the Local Agency Investment Fund, an external investment pool for local governments and public agencies.


Agency funds account for assets held by the State, which acts as an agent for individuals, private organizations, or other governments. The following are the State's largest agency funds:

The Receipting and Disbursing Fund accounts for the collection and disbursement of revenues and receipts on behalf of local governments. This fund also accounts for receipts from numerous state funds, typically for the purpose of writing a single warrant when the warrant is funded by multiple funding sources.

The Deposit Fund accounts for various deposits, such as those from condemnation and litigation proceedings.

Discretely presented component units consist of certain organizations that have enterprise activity. The enterprise activity component units are the University of California, the California Housing Finance Agency, and nonmajor component units. Tn this report, all of the enterprise activity of the discretely presented component units is reported in a separate column in the government-wide financial statements and on separate pages following the fund financial statements.

C. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting

1. Government-wide Financial Statements

The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when they are earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Grants and similar transactions are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met

2. Fund Financial Statements

The measurement focus and basis of accounting for the fund financial statements vary with the type of fund. Governmental fund types are presented using the current financial resources measurement focus. With this measurement focus, operating statements present increases and decreases in net current assets; the unassigned fund balance is a measure of available, spendable resources.

The accounts of the governmental fund types are reported using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under the modified accrual basis, revenues are recorded as they become measurable and available, and expenditures are recorded at the time the liabilities are incurred. The State records revenue sources when they are earned or when they are due, provided they are measurable and available within the ensuing 12 months. When an asset is recorded in a governmental fund statement, but the revenue is not available within the ensuing 12 months, the State reports a deferred inflow of resources until such time as the revenue becomes available. Principal tax revenues susceptible to accrual are recorded as taxpayers earn income (personal income and corporation taxes), as sales are made (consumption and use taxes), and as a taxable event occurs (miscellaneous taxes), net of estimated tax overpayments.

Proprietary fund types, the investment trust fund, private purpose trust funds, and pension and other employee benefit trust funds are accounted for using the economic resources measurement focus. Agency funds are custodial in nature and do not measure the results of operations.

The accounts of the proprietary fund types, the investment trust fund, private purpose trust funds, pension and other employee benefit trust funds, and agency funds are reported using the accrual basis of accounting.

75


Under the accrual basis, most transactions are recorded when they occur, regardless of when cash is received or disbursed.

Lottery revenue and the related prize expenses are recognized when sales are made. Certain prizes are payable in deferred installments. Such liabilities are recorded at the present value of amounts payable in the future.

Discretely presented component units are accounted for using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting.

D. Cash and Investments

The State considers cash and pooled investments, for the purpose of the Statement of Cash Flows, as cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand; deposits in the State's pooled investment program; restricted cash and pooled investments for debt service, construction, and operations; restricted cash on deposit with fiscal agents (for example, revenue bond trustees); and highly liquid investments with an original maturity date ofthree months or less.

The State reports investments at fair value, as prescribed by GAAP, which was recently updated by the provisions of GASB Statement No. 72, Fair Value Measurement and Application. Additional information on the State's investments and fair value measurement can be found in Note 3, Deposits and Investments.

E Receivab!es

Amounts are aggregated into a single receivables account net of allowance for uncollectible amounts. The detail ofthe primary government's accounts receivable can be found in Note 4, Accounts Receivable.

F, !nventories

Inventories of supplies are reported at cost and inventories held for resale are stated at the lower of average cost or market Tn the government-wide financial statements, inventories for both governmental and business-type activities are expensed when they are consumed and unused inventories are reported as an asset on the Statement of Net Position. Tn the fund financial statements, governmental funds report inventories as expenditures when purchased, and proprietary funds report inventories as expenditures when consumed. The discretely presented component units have inventory policies similar to those of the primary government

G. Net Investment in Direct Financing Leases

The State Public Works Board accounts for its activities in the Public Buildings Construction Fund, an internal service fund, and has entered into lease-purchase agreements with various other primary government agencies and certain local agencies. The payments from these leases are used to satisfy the principal and interest requirements of revenue bonds issued by the State Pub] ic Works Board to finance the cost of projects such as acquisition and construction of facilities and equipment Upon expiration of these leases, title to the facilities and projects transfers to the primary government agency or the local agency. The State Public Works Board records the net investment in direct financing leases at the net present value of the minimum lease payments in the internal service fund financial statements. As the majority of this lease receivable is from governmental funds, it is eliminated within the governmental activities column of the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

The California State University (CSU) system accounts for its lease activities in the California State University Fund, a major enterprise fund, and has entered into 30-year capital lease agreements with certain

76


auxiliary organizations. These agreements lease existing and newly constructed facilities to the CSU auxiliary organizations. A portion of the proceeds from certain revenue bonds issued by CSU were used to finance the construction ofthese facilities.

H. Long-term Prepaid Charges

The long-term prepaid charges account in the enterprise funds primarily represents operating and maintenance costs that will be recognized in the Water Resources Fund as expenses over the remaining life of long-term state water supply contracts. These costs are billable in future years. Tn addition, the account includes unbilled interest earnings on unrecovered capital costs that are recorded as long-term prepaid charges. These charges are recognized when billed in the future years under the terms of water supply contracts. Long-term prepaid charges are also included in the State Lottery Fund. These prepaid charges are incurred in connection with certain contracts that extend beyond a one-year period, which are amortized as expenses over the remaining life of the contracts. The long-term prepaid charges for the Public Buildings Construction Fund, an internal service fund, include prepaid insurance costs on revenue bonds issued. Tn the government-wide financial statements, the prepaid charges for governmental activities include prepaid insurance costs on revenue bonds issued.

L Capita! Assets

Capital assets are categorized into land, state highway infrastructure, collections, buildings and other depreciable property, intangible assets, and construction in progress. The buildings and other depreciable property account includes buildings, improvements other than buildings, equipment, certain infrastructure assets, certain books, and other capitalized and depreciable property. Intangible assets include computer software, land-use rights, patents, copyrights, and trademarks. The value of the capital assets, including the related accumulated depreciation and amortization, is reported in the applicable governmental, business-type, or component unit activities columns in the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

The primary government has a large collection of historical and contemporary treasures that have important documentary and artistic value. These assets are not capitalized or depreciated because they are cultural resources and cannot reasonably be valued and/or the assets have inexhaustible useful lives. These treasures and works of art include furnishings, portraits and other paintings, books, statues, photographs, and miscellaneous artifacts. These collections meet the conditions for exemption from capitalization because the collections are held for public exhibition, education, or research in furtherance of public service, rather than financial gain; protected, kept unencumbered, cared for, and preserved; and subject to an organizational pol icy that requires the proceeds from sales of collection items to be used to acquire other items for collections.

Tn general, capital assets of the primary government are defined as assets that have a normal useful life ofat least one year and a unit cost of at least $5,000. These assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost, including all costs related to the acquisition. Donated capital assets are recorded at the fair market value on the date the gift was received. Major capital asset outlays are capitalized as projects are constructed.

Buildings and other depreciable or amortizable capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method with no salvage value for governmental activities. Generally, buildings and other improvements are depreciated over 40 years, equipment is depreciated over five years, and intangible assets are amortized over 10 to 20 years. Depreciable or amortizable assets of business-type activities are depreciated or amortized using the straight-] ine method over their estimated useful or service lives, ranging from three to 1 00 years.

California has elected to use the modified approach for capitalizing the infrastructure assets of the state highway system. The state highway system is maintained by the California Department of Transportation. By

77


using the modified approach, the infrastructure assets of the state highway system are not depreciated and all expenditures made for those assets, except for additions and improvements, are expensed in the period incurred. All additions and improvements made after June 30, 2001, are capitalized. All infrastructure assets that are related to projects completed prior to July 1, 2001, are recorded at the historical costs contained in annual reports of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials and the Federal Highway Administration.

The capital assets of the discretely presented component units are reported at cost at the date of acquisition or at fair market value at the date of donation, in the case of gifts. They are depreciated or amortized over their estimated useful service lives.

J. Long-term Obligations

Long-term obligations consist ofunmatured general obligation bonds, unmatured revenue bonds, capital lease obligations, certificates of participation, commercial paper, net pension liability, net other postemployment benefits obligation (OPEB), employees' compensated absences and workers' compensation claims, pollution remediation obligations, amounts owed for lawsuits, reimbursement for costs mandated by the State, outstanding Proposition 98 funding guarantee owed to schools, the liability for Lottery prizes and annuities, loans from other governments, and the primary government's share of the University of California's pension liability that is due in more than one year. Tn the government-wide financial statements, the obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, and component units columns of the Statement of Net Position. The current portion----amount due within one year-of the longterm obligations is reported under current liabilities.

Pollution remediation obligations are recorded by the State when one or more of the GASB Statement No. 49 obligating events have occurred and when a reasonable estimate of the remediation cost is available. These liabilities are measured using actual contract costs, where no change in cost is expected, or the expected cash flow technique. The remediation obligation estimates that appear in this report are subject to change over time. Costs may vary due to price fluctuations, changes in technology, changes in potential responsible parties, results of environmental studies, changes to statutes or regulations, and other factors that could result m rev1s1ons to these estimates. Prospective recoveries from responsible parties may reduce the State's obligation.

Bond premiums and discounts for business-type activities and component units are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds. Tn these instances, bonds payable is reported net of the applicable premium and discount Bond premiums and discounts for governmental funds are reported as other financing sources (uses). However, in the government-wide financial statements, the bonds payable for governmental activities is reported net of the applicable unamortized premium and discount Bond issuance costs, excluding prepaid insurance, are expensed when incurred.

With advance approval from the Legislature, certain authorities and state agencies may issue revenue bonds. Principal and interest on revenue bonds are payable from the pledged revenues of the respective funds, building authorities, and agencies. The General Fund has no legal liability for payment of principal and interest on revenue bonds. With the exception of certain special revenue funds (Transportation and the Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation) and the building authorities capital projects fund, the liability for revenue bonds is recorded in the respective fund.

K. Compensated Absences

The government-wide financial statements report both the current and the noncurrent liabilities for compensated absences, which are vested unpaid vacation, annual leave, and other paid leave programs.

78


However, unused sick-leave balances are not included in the compensated absences because they do not vest to employees. Tn the governmental fund financial statements, only the compensated absences liability for employees who have left state service and have unused reimbursable leave at fiscal year-end is included. The amounts of vested unpaid vacation and annual leave accumulated by state employees are accrued in proprietary funds when incurred. Tn the discretely presented component units, the compensated absences are accounted for in the same manner as in the proprietary funds of the primary government

L Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources

The government-wide and fund financial statements report deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources.

1. Deferred Outflows of Resources

Deferred outflows of resources are the consumption of assets that are applicable to future reporting periods. Deferred outflows of resources are presented separately after "Total Assets" in the Balance Sheet and Statement of Net Position.

Deferred outflows of resources consist of the following transactions:

Loss on Refunding of Debt: The defeasance of previously outstanding general obligation and revenue bonds results in deferred refunding losses for governmental activities, business-type activities, and component units. These deferred losses are recognized as a component of interest expense over the remaining life of the old debt or the life of the new debt, whichever is shorter.

Decrease in Fair Value of Hedging Derivatives: Negative changes in the fair value of hedging derivatives are reported for component units.

Net Pension Liability: Increases in net pension liability that are not recognized in pension expense for the reporting period are reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions. Differences between expected and actual experience with regard to economic or demographic factors; changes of assumptions about future economic or demographic factors, or of other inputs used by the actuaries to determine total pension liability; and increases in the State's proportionate share of net pension liability for plans that have a special funding situation, such as CalSTRS, are all recognized in pension expense over the average of the expected remaining service lives of participating employees. A deferred outflow of resources is also reported when projected earnings on pension plan investments exceed actual earnings, with the net difference amortized to pension expense over a five-year period beginning in the current reporting period. Employer contributions, and state contributions in the case ofCalSTRS' special funding situation, made subsequent to the measurement date are reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions and reduce net pension liability in the following year. Deferred outflows of resources related to net pension liability are reported for governmental activities, business-type activities, fiduciary funds, and component units.

2. Deferred Inflows of Resources

Deferred inflows of resources are the acquisition of assets that are applicable to future reporting periods. Deferred inflows of resources are presented separately after "Total Liabilities" in the Balance Sheet and Statement of Net Position.

79


The State's deferred inflows of resources consist of the following transactions:

Unavailable Revenues: Governmental funds report deferred inflows of resources for earned and measurable revenue from long-term receivables that is not available within 12 months of the end of the reporting period. These deferred amounts are recognized as revenue in the periods that they become available.

Gain on Refunding of Debt: The defeasance of previously outstanding general obligation and revenue bonds results in deferred refunding gains for governmental activities and discretely presented component units. These deferred gains are recognized as a component of interest expense over the remaining life of the old debt or the life of the new debt, whichever is shorter.

Service Concession Arrangements: The State and its component units have entered into service concession arrangements with third parties for park facility services, student housing, and certain other services. The upfront payment received or present value of installment payments expected to be received from the third parties are reported as deferred inflows of resources.

Net Pension Liability: Reductions in net pension liability that are not recognized in pension expense for the reporting period are reported as deferred inflows of resources related to pensions. Differences between expected and actual experience with regard to economic or demographic factors; changes of assumptions about future economic or demographic factors, or of other inputs used by the actuaries to determine total pension liability; and decreases in the State's proportionate share of net pension liability for plans that have a special funding situation, such as CalSTRS, are all recognized against pension expense over the average of the expected remaining service lives of participating employees. A deferred inflow of resources is also reported when actual earnings on pension plan investments exceed projected earnings, with the net difference amortized against pension expense over a five-year period beginning in the current reporting period. Deferred inflows of resources related to net pension liability are reported for governmental activities, business-type activities, fiduciary funds, and component units.

Other Deferred Inflows of Resources: Revenues generated from current rates charged by regulated business-type activities that are intended to recover costs expected to be incurred in the future are reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position. A component unit's sale of future royalty payments plus residual interest made to a third party are reported as deferred inflows of resources and will be recognized on a straight-line basis through the expiration of the patents.

M. Abnormal Account Ba!ances

Tn the 2015-16 fiscal year, the Water Resources Electric Power Fund had a net refund of $182 million in power charges revenue. The refund resulted from lower power sales, return of prior year over-collection, and return of reserves as lower levels of reserve were required. During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the fund returned $178 million through adjustments to power charges and through separate monthly payments to its ratepayers.

N. Nonmajor Enterprise Segment Information

Two nonmajor enterprise fund segments are displayed discretely in the Combining Statement of Net Position; the Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position; and the Combining Statement of Cash Flows ofthe nonmajor enterprise funds. A segment is an identifiable activity reported as or within an enterprise fund or another stand-alone entity for which debt is outstanding and a revenue stream has been pledged in support of that debt Tn addition, to qualify as a segment, an activity must be subject to an external requirement to separately account for revenues, expenses, gains and losses, assets and deferred outflows of resources, and liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. All of the activities reported for the fund segments listed below meet these requirements.

80


State Water Potfution Control Revolving Fund: Interest charged on loans to communities for construction of water pollution control facilities and projects.

Housing Loan Fund: Interest payments from low-interest, long-term farm and home mortgage loan contracts to eligible veterans 1 iving in California.

0. Net Position and Fund Ba!ance

The difference between fund assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources is called "net position" on the government-wide financial statements, the proprietary and fiduciary fund statements, and the component unit statements; it is called "fund balance" on the governmental fund statements.

1. Net Position

The government-wide financial statements include the following categories of net position:

Net investment in capital assets represents capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, reduced by the outstanding debt attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets.

Restricted net position results from transactions with purpose restrictions and is designated as either nonexpendable or expendable. Nonexpendable restricted net position is subject to externally imposed restrictions that must be retained in perpetuity. Expendable restricted net position is subject to externally imposed restrictions that can be fulfilled by actions of the State. As of June 30, 2016, the government-wide financial statements show restricted net position for the primary government of $34.8 billion, of which $7.9 bill ion is due to enabling legislation.

Unrestricted net position is neither restricted nor invested in capital assets.

2. Fund Balance

Tn the fund financial statements, proprietary funds include categories of net position similar to those in the government-wide financial statements. Fund balance amounts for governmental funds are reported as nonspendable, restricted, committed, assigned, or unassigned.

Nonspendable fund balance includes amounts that cannot be spent because they are not in spendable form (inventories; prepaid amounts; long-term portion of loans or notes receivable; or property held for resale unless the proceeds are restricted, committed, or assigned) or they are legally or contractually required to remain intact

Restricted fund balance has constraints placed upon the use of the resources either by an external party ( creditors, grant ors, contributors, or laws and regulations of other governments) or through a constitutional provision or enabling legislation.

Committed fund balance can be used only for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by state law as adopted by the California State Legislature. The state law that commits fund balance to a specific purpose must have been adopted prior to the end of the reporting period, but the amount subject to the constraint may be determined in a subsequent period. Committed fund balance incorporates contractual obligations to the extent that existing resources in the fund have been specifically committed for use in satisfying those contractual requirements.

81


Assigned fund balance: California does not have a formal policy to delegate authority to assign resources. However, fund balance can be classified as assigned when a purchase order creates an outstanding encumbrance amount, unless the purchase order relates to restricted or committed resources. Furthermore, in governmental funds created by state law for a specific purpose, other than the General Fund, all resources that are not reported as nonspendable, restricted, or committed are classified as assigned for the purpose ofthe respective funds.

Unassigned fund balance is the residual amount of the General Fund not included in the four classifications described above. Tn other governmental funds in which expenditures incurred for specific purposes exceeded amounts restricted, committed, or assigned to those purposes, a negative unassigned fund balance is reported.

Fund balance spending order: For the purpose of reporting fund balance in this financial report under GASB Statement No. 54, the State considers resources to be spent in the following order when an expenditure is incurred for which these classifications are available: restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned.

Fiduciary fund net position represents amounts held in trust for pension and other postemployment benefits, deferred compensation participants, pool participants, individuals, organizations, or other governments.

3. Budget Stabilization Account

Tn accordance with Article 16, Section 20 of the California State Constitution, the State maintains the Budget Stabilization Account The Budget Stabilization Account is reported in the General Fund. By October 1 of each fiscal year, a transfer must be made from the General Fund to the Budget Stabilization Account in an amount equal to one-half of (a) 1.5% of the estimated General Fund revenues for that fiscal year and (b) personal capital gains tax revenues in excess of 8% of estimated General Fund taxes for that fiscal year less amounts that must be spent on Proposition 98. The remaining half of the calculated amount is used as appropriated by the State legislature to pay down (1) interfund loans, (2) specified debts to local governments, and (3) debts for pension and retiree health benefits.

The State Legislature may suspend or reduce the transfer of funds to, or withdrawal of funds from, the Budget Stabilization Account if the Governor declares a budget emergency. For this purpose, budget emergency means either (1) a natural disaster or other event that creates a condition of extreme peril to the safety of persons or property, or (2) there is not enough money to keep General Fund spending at the highest level of the past three fiscal years (adjusted for changes in state population and cost of living). The amount of the withdrawal from the Budget Stabilization Account is limited to the actual amount needed for the natural disaster or to keep General Fund spending at the highest level of the past three years. Tn addition, if there was no budget emergency in the prior fiscal year, no more than one-half of the Budget Stabilization Account balance may be withdrawn; the entire remaining balance could be withdrawn in the second straight year of a budget emergency.

When the balance of the Budget Stabilization Account reaches 10% of the estimated General Fund revenues for that fiscal year, the amount that would have been transferred to the Budget Stabilization Account would instead be used to build and maintain infrastructure. At June 30, 2016, the Budget Stabilization Account had restricted fund balance of $3.4 billion.

82

P. Restatement of Beginning Fund Balances and Net Position

1. Fund Financial Statements


The beginning fund balance of governmental funds increased by $24 million. The net increase is comprised of a $27 million increase in the Health Care Related Programs Fund, a nonmajor special revenue fund for the reclassification of a program previously reported in an agency fund and a decrease of $3 million due to the overstatement of prior-year revenue reported in the Building Authorities Fund, a nonmajor capital projects fund.

The beginning net position of the internal service funds decreased by $183 million due to the allocation of net pension liability and related amounts to a department included in the Other Internal Service Programs Fund. Tn the prior year, this amount was part of the unallocated total reported only within governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.

The beginning net position of the discretely presented component units decreased by $90 million ($264 thousand in the California Housing Finance Agency Fund, a major component unit, and $90 million in the District Agriculture Associations Fund, a nonmajor component unit) for the recognition of net pension liability and deferred outflows of resources from the first-year implementation of GASB Statements No. 68 and No. 71 for entities whose financial information is presented as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

2. Government-wide Financial Statements

The beginning net position of governmental activities increased by $24 million. Tn addition to the $24 million increase described in the previous section for governmental funds, the restatement also includes a $35 million decrease for overstated capital assets and a $35 million increase for overstated pollution remediation liability. As internal service funds are also included in governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements, there is no impact to governmental activities for the allocation of pension liability and related amounts described in the previous section for internal service funds.

The beginning net position of component units was restated as described in the previous section for discretely presented component units.

Q. Guaranty Deposits

The State is the custodian of guaranty deposits held to protect consumers, to secure the State's deposits in financial institutions, and to ensure payment of taxes and fulfillment of obligations to the State. Guaranty deposits of securities and other properties are not shown on the financial statements.

NOTE 2: BUDGETARY AND LEGAL COMPLIANCE

A. Budgeting and Budgetary Contra!

The State's annual budget is primarily prepared on a modified accrual basis for governmental funds. The Governor recommends a budget for approval by the Legislature each year. This recommended budget includes estimated revenues, but revenues are not included in the annual budget bill adopted by the Legislature. Under state law, the State cannot adopt a spending plan that exceeds estimated revenues.

SJ


Under the State Constitution, money may be drawn from the treasury only through a legal appropriation. The appropriations contained in the Budget Act, as approved by the legislature and signed by the Governor, are the primary sources of annual expenditure authorizations and establish the legal level of control for the annual operating budget The budget can be amended throughout the year by special legislative action, budget revisions by the Department of Finance, or executive orders of the Governor. Amendments to the original budget for the year ended June 30, 2016, increased spending authority for the budgetary/legal basis-reported General Fund and Transportation Funds, and decreased spending authority for the Environmental and Natural Resources Funds.

Appropriations are generally available for expenditure or encumbrance either in the year appropriated or for a period of three years if the legislation does not specify a period of availability. At the end of the availability period, the encumbering authority for the unencumbered balance lapses. Some appropriations continue indefinitely, while others are available until fully spent Generally, encumbrances must be liquidated within two years from the end of the period in which the appropriation is available. Tf the encumbrances are not liquidated within this additional two-year period, the spending authority for these encumbrances lapses.

B. Legs.! Compliance

State agencies are responsible for exercising basic budgetary control and ensuring that appropriations are not overspent The State Controller's Office is responsible for overall appropriation control and does not allow expenditures in excess of authorized appropriations.

Financial activities are mainly controlled at the appropriation level but can vary, depending on the presentation and wording contained in the Budget Act The Budget Act appropriations are identified by department, reference item, and fund. The annual appropriated budget may establish detailed allocations to specific programs, projects, or sources of reimbursement within an appropriation. The Department of Finance can authorize adjustments between the detail allocations but cannot increase the amount of the overall appropriation. While the financial activities are controlled at various levels, the legal level of budgetary control-the extent to which management may amend the budget without seeking approval of the governing body-has been established in the Budget Act for the annual operating budget

The Budgetary Comparison Schedule is not presented in this document at the legal level of budgetary control because such a presentation would be extremely lengthy and cumbersome. The State prepares a separate report, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Supplement, which includes statements that demonstrate compliance with the legal level of budgetary control in accordance with Government Accounting Standards Board's Codification of Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards, section 2400.121. The supplement includes the comparison of the annual appropriated budget with expenditures at the legal level of control. A copy of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Supplement is available upon request by emailing the State Controller's Office, State Accountmg and Reportmg Division at StateGovReports@sco,ca.gov.

NOTE 3: DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS

Cash balances not required for immediate use are invested by the State Treasurer. The State Treasurer administers a single pooled investment program comprising both an internal investment pool and an external investment pool (the Local Agency Investment Fund). A single portfolio of investments exists, with all participants having an undivided interest in the portfolio. Both pools are administered in the same manner.

84

A. Primary Government

1. Control of State Funds


The State's pooled investment program and certain funds of the primary government are allowed by state statutes, bond resolutions, and investment policy resolutions to invest in United States government securities, federal agency securities, negotiable certificates of deposit, bankers' acceptances, commercial paper, corporate bonds, bank notes, other debt securities, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, and other investments.

Certain discretely presented component units and related organizations participate in the State Treasurer's Office pooled investment program. As of June 30, 2016, the discretely presented component units and related organizations account for approximately 3.4% of the State Treasurer's pooled investment portfolio. This program enables the State Treasurer's Office to combine available cash from all funds and to invest cash that exceeds current needs.

Both deposits and investments are included in the State's investment program. For certain banks, the State Treasurer's Office maintains cash deposits that cover uncleared checks deposited in the State's accounts and that earn income that compensates the banks for their services.

Demand and time deposits held by financial institutions as of June 30, 2016, totaling approximately $7.8 billion, were insured by federal depository insurance or by collateral held by the State Treasurer's Office or an agent ofthe State Treasurer's Office in the State's name. The California Government Code requires that collateral pledged for demand and time deposits be deposited with the State Treasurer.

As of June 30, 2016, the State Treasurer's Office had on deposit with a fiscal agent amounts totaling $22 million related to principal and interest payments to bondholders. These deposits were insured by federal depository insurance or by collateral held by an agent of the State Treasurer's Office in the State's name.

Certain funds have elected to participate in the pooled investment program even though they have the authority to invest on their own. Others may be required by legislation to participate in the program; as a result, the deposits of these funds maybe considered involuntary. However, these funds are part of the State's reporting entity. The remaining participant in the pool, the Local Agency Investment Fund, is voluntary.

Certain funds that have deposits in the State Treasurer's pooled investment program do not receive the interest earnings on their deposits. Instead, by law, the earnings are assigned to the State's General Fund. Most of the $41 million in interest revenue received by the General Fund from the pooled investment program in fiscal year 2015-16 was earned on balances in these funds.

Enterprise funds and special revenue funds also make separate investments, which are presented at fair value.

2. Valuation of State Investments

The State Treasurer's Office reports its investments at fair value. The State Treasurer's Office performs a quarterly fair market valuation of the pooled investment program portfolio. The fair value of securities in the State Treasurer's pooled investment program generally is based on quoted market prices. Tn addition, the State Treasurer's Office performs a monthly fair market valuation of all securities held against carrying cost These valuations can be obtained from the State Treasurer's Office website at www.treasurer.ca.gov.

85

http://www.treasurer.ca.gov


Table 1 categorizes fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the assets and liabilities. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets at the date of measurement; Level 2 inputs are significant other directly or indirectly observable inputs other than quoted prices; and Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. The State does not use Level 3 inputs to measure the fair value of its investments.

Table I

Schedule of Investments - Primary Government- Investments by Fair Value Level June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Pooled investments U.S. Treasury bills and notes------------U.S. Agency bonds and discmmt notes (TBRD}-------Supranational debentures--------------Small Business Administration loans __________ _

Mortgage-backed securities------------Certi llcates oldeposit ---------------Bank notes _________________ _

Commercial paper----------------Total pooled investments at fair value ________ _

Other primary government investments U.S. Treasuries and agencies -------------Commercial paper----------------Corporate debt securities-------------Repurchase agreements--------------Other ___________________ _

Total other primary government investments at fair value ..

Investments measured at the net asset value (NAV) 2a-7 money market lunds --------------

Total investments measured at the NAV ________ _

Other investment instruments Guaranteed investment contracts 1 __________ _

Total other investment instruments _________ _

Funds outside primary government included in pooled investments Less: investment trust lunds -------------Less: other trust and agency lunds __________ _

Less: discretely presented component units and related organizations .. Total primary government investments ________ _

1 Rcporicd al carrying value

86

June 30, 2016

33,912,924 9,241,229

601,736 705,336

63,530 16,574,127

799,736 7,492,217

69,390,835

2,585,251 40,056

1,030,765 19,774

1,035,204 4,711,050

287,426 287,426

200,000 200,000

22,701,071 4,323,877 2,373,319

45,191,044

Fair Value Measurements Using Quoted Prices Significant

in Active Other Markets for Observable

Identical Assets (Level 1)

33,912,924 9,241,229

601,736 705,336

63,530

44,524,755

1,488,790

406,656 1,895,446

Inputs (Level 2)

16,574,127 799,736

7,492,217 24,866,080

1,096,461 40,056

1,030,765 19,774

628,548 2,815,604


As of June 30, 2016, the weighted average maturity of the securities in the pooled investment program administered by the State Treasurer's Office was approximately 174 days. Weighted average maturity is the average number of days, given a dollar-weighted value of individual investments, that the securities in the portfolio have remaining from evaluation date to stated maturity.

3. Oversight of Investing Activities

The Pooled Money Investment Board (P"MTB) provides oversight of the State Treasurer's pooled investment program. The purpose of the board is to design and administer an effective cash management and investment program, using all monies flowing through the State Treasurer's Office bank accounts and keeping all available funds invested in a manner consistent with the goals of safety, liquidity, and yield. The PMTB is comprised of the State Treasurer as chair, the State Controller, and the Director of Finance. This board designates the amounts of money available for investment The State Treasurer is charged with making the actual investment transactions for this program. This investment program is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment company.

The value of the deposits in the State Treasurer's pooled investment program, including the Local Agency Investment Fund, is equal to the dollars deposited in the program. The fair value of the position in the program may be greater or less than the value of the deposits, with the difference representing the unrealized gain or loss. As of June 30, 2016, this difference was immaterial to the valuation of the program. The pool is run with "dollar-in, dollar-out" participation. There are no share-value adjustments to reflect changes in fair value.

The State Treasurer's pooled investment program values participants' shares on an amortized cost basis. Specifically, the program distributes income to participants quarterly, based on their relative participation during the quarter. This participation is calculated based on (1) realized investment gains and losses calculated on an amortized cost basis, (2) interest income based on stated rates (both paid and accrued), (3) amortization of discounts and premiums on a straight-line basis, and (4) investment and administrative expenses. This amortized cost method differs from the fair value method used to value investments in these financial statements; the amortized cost method is not designed to distribute to participants all unrealized gains and losses in the fair value of the pool's investments. Because the total difference between the fair value of the investments in the pool and the value distributed to pool participants using the amortized cost method described above is not material, no adjustment was made to the financial statements. The State Treasurer's Office also reports participant fair value as a ratio of amortized cost on a quarterly basis. The State Treasurer's Office has not provided or obtained a legally binding guarantee to support the principal invested in the investment program.

As of June 30, 2016, medium-term asset-backed securities comprised approximately 1.1% of the pooled investments. The asset-backed securities consist of mortgage-backed securities, Small Business Administration (SBA) pools, and asset-backed commercial paper. The mortgage-backed securities are called real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs), and are securities backed by pools of mortgages. The REMICs in the State's portfolio have a fixed principal payment schedule. A portion of the asset-backed securities consisted of floating-rate SBA notes. For floating-rate SBA notes held in the portfolio during the fiscal year, the interest received by the State Treasurer's pooled investment program rose or fell as the underlying index rate rose or fell. The structure of the floating-rate SBA notes in the State Treasurer's pooled investment program portfolio provided a hedge against the risk of increasing interest rates. A portion of the asset-backed portfolio holdings were short-term, asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP), which represented 1.37% ofthe pooled investments.

87


Table 2 identifies the investment types that are authorized by the California Government Code and the State Treasurer's Office Investment Policy for the Pooled Investment Program. Maturities are limited by the State Treasurer's Office Investment Policy for the Pooled Money Investment Program. For commercial paper, the Investment Policy matches the Government Code. For corporate bonds and notes, the Government Code requires that a security falls within the top three ratings of a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (NRSRO). Items reported as N/A have no limitation in either the Government Code or the State Treasurer's Office Investment Policy.

Table 2

Authorized Investments

Maximum Maximum

Maximum Percentage Investment Credit Authorized Investment Type Maturity of Portfolio in One Issuer Rating

U.S. Treasury securities 5 years N/A N/A N/A Federal agency and supranational securities 5 years N/A N/A N/A Certilicates oldeposit 5 years N/A N/A N/A Bankers acceptances 180 days N/A N/A N/A Commercial paper 270 days 30% 10 % olissuer's outstanding A-3/P-3/F-3

Commercial Paper Corporate bonds/notes 5 years N/A N/A A-/A3/A-

Repurchase agreements 1 year N/A N/A N/A Reverse repurchase agreements 1 year 10% N/A N/A

4. Risk of Investments

The following types of risks are common in deposits and investments, including those of the State:

88

Interest Rate Risk is the risk that the value of fixed-income securities will decline because of changing interest rates. The prices of fixed-income securities with longer time to maturity tend to be more sensitive to changes in interest rates than those with shorter durations.

Credit Risk is the risk that a debt issuer will fail to pay interest or principal in a timely manner, or that negative perceptions oft he issuer's ability to make these payments will cause security prices to decline.

Custodial Credit Risk is the risk that, in the event a financial institution or counterparty fails, the investor will not be able to recover the value of deposits, investments, or collateral.

Concentration of Credit Risk is the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of an investor's holdings in a single issuer.

Foreign Currency Risk is the risk that changes in exchange rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment or a deposit


a. Interest Rate Risk

Table 3 presents the interest rate risk of the primary government's investments. Tn calculating SBA holdings' weighted average maturity, the State Treasurer's Office assumes that stated maturity is the quarterly reset date. Total pooled investments do not include $5.5 billion of time deposits and $502 million of internal loans to state funds. Repurchase agreements of the California State University system mature in one day. Most mortgage-backed securities are issued by U.S. government agencies, or government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association, and entitle the purchaser to receive a share of the cash flows, such as principal and interest payments, from a pool of mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities are highly sensitive to interest rate changes because principal prepayments either increase (in a low interest rate environment) or decrease (in a high interest rate environment) the security yield. As of June 30, 2016, only $64 million, or 0.09% of the total pooled investments, was invested in mortgage-backed securities.

Table J

Schedule of Investments - Primary Government - Interest Rate Risk June30,2016


Pooled investments

U.S. Treasury bills and notes------------------

U.S. Agency bonds and discount notes (TBRD} -------------Supranational debentures-------------------

Small Business Administration loans----------------

Mortgage-backed securities--------------------Certillcates oldeposit ____________________ _ Bank notes _______________________ _

Commercial paper _____________________ _

Total pooled investments-------------------

Other primary government investments

U.S. Treasuries and agencies-------------------Commercial paper _____________________ _

Guaranteed investment contracts-----------------

Corporate debt securities--------------------

Repurchase agreements---------------------Other _________________________ _

Total other primary government investments-------------

Funds outside primary government included in pooled investments

Less: investment trust lunds -------------------

Less: other trust and agency lunds ------------------Less: discretely presented component units and related organizations _______ _

Total primary government investments---------------

Weighted

Average

Fair Value Maturity

at Year End (in years)

33,912,924 0.68

9,241,229 0.42

601,736 1.24

705,336 0.25

63,530 2.12

16,574,127 0.21

799,736 0.35

7,492,217 0.15

69,390,835

2,585,251 3.36

40,056 3.40

200,000 5.83

1,030,765 1.12

19,774

1,322,630 2.02

5,198,476

22,701,071

4,323,877

2,373,319

45,191,044

89


b. Credit Risk

Table 4 presents the credit risk of the primary government's debt securities. Tf a particular security has multiple ratings, the lowest rating of the three major NRSROs is used. Similar to interest rate risk shown in Table 3, time deposits and internal loans to state funds are not included.

Table 4

Schedule of Investments in Debt Securities - Primary Government- Credit Risk June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Credit Rating as of Year End

Short-term

Pooled investments A-1+/P-1/F-1+ A-1/P-1/F-1 A-2/P-2/F-2

Long-term

AAA/Aaa/AAA AA/Aa/AA A/A/A

Nol rated ______________ _

Nol applicable-------------Total pooled investments ________ _

Other primary government investments A-1+/P-1/F-1+

A-1/P-1/F-1 A-2/P-2/F-2 A-3/P-3/F-3

BINPIB

AAA/Aaa/AAA

AA/Aa/AA A/A/A BBB/Baa/BBB

BB/Ba/BB Nol rated ______________ _

Nol applicable-------------

Total other primary government investments ..

c. Custodial Credit Risk

Fair Value

7,549,713 25,809,354

1,349,978

63,530 34,618,260

69,390,835

935,887

1,780,339 1,080,922

22,384 5,101

1,373,837

5,198,476

The State has a deposit pol icy for custodial credit risk that requires deposits held by financial institutions to be insured by federal depository insurance or secured by collateral. As of June 30, 2016, one guaranteed investment contract of the Electric Power Fund in the amount of $100 million was uninsured and uncollateral ized.

d. Concentration of Credit Risk

The investment policy of the State Treasurer's Office contains no limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond those limitations stipulated in the California Government Code. As of June 30, 2016, the State had investments in the Federal National Mortgage Association totaling 6.6% of the total pooled investments.

90


B. Fiduciary Funds

The fiduciary funds include pension and other employee benefit trust funds of the following fiduciary funds and component units: California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), the fund for the California Scholarshare program, and various other funds. CalPERS and CalSTRS account for 97% of these separately invested funds. CalPERS and CalSTRS exercise their authority under the State Constitution and invest in stocks, bonds, mortgages, real estate, and other investments, including derivative instruments.

Additional disclosure for CalPERS' investments and derivative instruments is included in CalPERS' separately issued financial statements, which may be found on its website at www.CalPERS.ca.gov. Additional disclosure for CalSTRS' investments and derivative instruments is included in CalSTRS' separately issued financial statements, which may be found on its website at www.CalSlRS.com.

C. Discretely Presented Component Units

The discretely presented component units consist of the University of California and its foundation, the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA), and various nonmajor component units. The University and CalHFA constitute 93.1 % of the total investments of discretely presented component units. State law, bond resolutions, and investment policy resolutions allow component units to invest in U.S. government securities, state and municipal securities, commercial paper, corporate bonds, investment agreements, real estate, and other investments. Additionally, a portion of the cash and pooled investments of CalHFA, and other nonmajor component units are invested in the State Treasurer's pooled investment program.

Additional disclosures for the University of California's investments and derivative instruments are included in the University's separately issued financial statements, which can be obtained from the University on its website at www.ucop.edu. Additional disclosure for CalHFA's investments and derivative instruments is included in CalHFA's separately issued financial statements, which may be found on its website at www.CalHFA.ca.gov.

91



http://www.ucop.edu

http://www.CalHFA.ca.gov


NOTE 4: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Table 5 presents the disaggregation of accounts receivable attributable to tmces; licenses, permits, and fees; Lottery retailer collections; unemployment program receipts; and the California State University. Other receivables are for interest, gifts, grants, penalties, and other charges.

Table 5

Schedule of Accounts Receivable June30,2016


Licenses, Permits Lottery

Taxes and Fees Retailers

Current governmental activities General Fund _____________ _

Federal Fund _____________ _

Transportation Fund ___________ _

Environmental and Natural Resources Fund ____ _ Nonmajor governmental Ltmds ________ _

Internal service Lunds ___________ _

Adjustment Unavailable revenue 1 __________ _

Total current governmental activities ____ _

Amounts not scheduled for collection

during the subsequent year (unavailable revenue} ..

Current business-type activities Waler Resources Fund __________ _ Stale Lollery Fund ____________ _

Unemployment Programs Fund ________ _ CaliLornia Stale University _________ _

Nonmajor enterprise programs ________ _

Total current business-type activities _____ _

Amounts not scheduled for collection

during the subsequent year (unavailable revenue} ..

12,993,809

476,056 386,211

389,485

340,242 2,504,787

(1,484,015} (74,059}

12,326,092 3,206,424

1,484,015 74,059

1 The unavailable revenue reported in the governmental Lund llnancial slalemenls represents revenues thal are earned and measurable, but nol available within 12 months oL the end oLlhe reporting period.

461,786

461,786

l Amount includes noncurrenl receivables Lor service concession arrangements oL $64 million thal were nol included in the

governmental Lund llnancial slalemenls.

92

Unemployment

Programs

1,211,282

1,211,282

76,086

California

State

University

158,103

158,103

289,073

Other

820,866

14,950

86,700

120,249

845,972

91,280

(345,642}

1,634,375

409,963 2

119,701

33,605

153,306


Total

13,814,675

14,950

948,967

509,734

3,691,001

91,280

(1,903,716}

17,166,891

1,968,037

119,701

461,786

1,211,282

158,103

33,605

1,984,477

365,159

93


NOTE 5: RESTRICTED ASSETS

Table 6 presents a summary of the legal restrictions placed on assets of the primary government and the discretely presented component units.

Table 6

Schedule of Restricted Assets June 30, 2016 (amounts in thousands}

Cash Due From and Pooled Other Loans

Investments Investments Governments Receivable Total Primary government

Debt service 1,677,885 363,669 156,108 $ 1,411,250 3,608,912 Construction 1,381,096 1,381,096

Operations 46,000 46,000 Other 694 694

Total primary government 3,105,675 363,669 156,108 1,411,250 5,036,702

Discretely presented component units Debt service 422,294 19,248 441,542 Other 10,035 10,035

Total discretely presented component units .. 432,329 19,248 451,577

Total restricted assets 3,538,004 382,917 156,108 1,411,250 5,488,279

94


NOTE 5: NET INVESTMENT IN DIRECT FINANCING LEASES

The State Public Works Board (SPWB) accounts for its activities in the Public Buildings Construction Fund, an internal service fund, and has entered into lease-purchase agreements with various other primary government agencies and certain local agencies. Payments from these leases will be used to satisfy the principal and interest requirements of revenue bonds issued by the SP\VB. The lease-purchase activity between the SP\VB and the primary government agencies shown in the schedule below represents only that activity with agencies reported as enterprise funds. The lease receivable of $7.3 billion from governmental funds and the corresponding lease obligation were eliminated within the governmental activities column of the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

The CSU system accounts for its lease activities in the California State University Fund, a major enterprise fund, and has entered into capital lease agreements with certain auxiliary organizations. These agreements lease existing and newly constructed facilities to the auxiliary organizations. A portion of the proceeds from certain revenue bonds issued by CSU were used to finance the construction of these facilities.

Table 7 summarizes the minimum lease payments to be received by the primary government

Table 7

Schedule of Minimum Lease Payments to be Received by the Primary Government (amounts in thousands}

Year Ending June 30

2017 ____________ _ 2018 _____________ _ 2019 _____________ _

2020 ____________ _

2021 --------------2022-2026 -------------2027-2031 -------------2032-2036 -------------2037-2041 -------------

2042-2046 -------------Total minimum lease payments ______ _ Less: unearned income _________ _

Net investment in direct financing leases .. Less: current portion _________ _

Noncurrent net investment in direct financing leases ..

State Public Works Board Primary

Government Local

Agencies Agencies

37,793 39,986 24,864 32,698 15,986 26,183

15,978 13,369 15,960 12,754 79,696 63,523 79,031 56,823 62,789 7,513

332,097 252,849 143,688 60,933

188,409 191,916

23,235 30,688

165,174 161,228

Total

77,779 57,562 42,169

29,347 28,714

143,219 135,854 70,302

584,946 204,621

380,325

53,923

326,402

California State

University

30,433 26,714 26,741

26,995 27,281

160,755 131,348 74,898 28,647

17,972 551,784 209,605

342,179

12,356

329,823

95


NOTE 7: CAPITAL ASSETS

Table 8 summarizes the capital activity for the primary government.

Table 8

Schedule of Changes in Capital Assets - Primary Government June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Governmental activities Capital assets not being depreciated/amortized

Land Stale highway inlraslruclure Collections Conslruclion/developmenl in progress Intangible assets Total capital assets not being depreciated/amortized ..

Capital assets being depreciated/amortized Buildings and improvements Tnlraslruclure Equipment and other assets Intangible assets Total capital assets being depreciated/amortized ..

Less accumulated depreciation/amortization for: Buildings and improvements Tnlraslruclure Equipment and other assets Intangible assets Total accumulated depreciation/amortization .. Total capital assets being depreciated/amortized, net ..

Governmental activities, capital assets, net Business-type activities

Capital assets not being depreciated/amortized Land Collections Conslruclion/developmenl in progress Intangible assets Total capital assets not being depreciated/amortized ..

Capital assets being depreciated/amortized Buildings and improvements Tnlraslruclure Equipment and other assets Intangible assets Total capital assets being depreciated/amortized ..

Less accumulated depreciation/amortization for: Buildings and improvements Tnlraslruclure Equipment and other assets Intangible assets Total accumulated depreciation/amortization .. Total capital assets being depreciated/amortized, net ..

Business-type activities, capital assets, net

• Rcslaicd

96

Beginning Balance

19,014,276 * $ 70,684,432 *

22,630 15,886,117 *

418,477 * 106,025,932

22,568,634 * 736,156

4,903,365 * 1,659,204 *

29,867,359

7,722,917 * 360,410

4,019,521 , 624,453 *

12,727,301 17,140,058

$ 123,165,990

239,322 * $ 11,088

1,167,867 * 115,761

1,534,038

11,098,198 * 305,549 740,532 337,629

12,481,908

4,205,428 * 84,420

437,292 151,979

4,879,119 7,602,789 9,136,827

Additions Deductions

495,565 126,605 2,882,122 103,947

3 3,322,560 3,892,618

7,709 6,707,956 4,123,173

1,395,331 55,711 1,592 83

398,668 331,673 435,860 62,785

2,231,451 450,252

588,915 30,330 16,667 83

317,564 320,335 159,334 59,312

1,082,480 410,060 1,148,971 40,192 7,856,927 4,163,365

7,963 2,560 5,125 7

787,871 316,494 4,643 6,873

805,602 325,934

446,877 1,790 69,344 2,044

107,225 20,447 13,609 14,778

637,055 39,059

294,595 961 18,041 2,115 69,984 18,657 18,423 14,032

401,043 35,765 236,012 3,294

1,041,614 329,228

Ending Balance

19,383,236 73,462,607

22,627 15,316,059

426,186 108,610,715

23,908,254 737,665

4,970,360 2,032,279

31,648,558

8,281,502 376,994

4,016,750 724,475

13,399,721 18,248,837

$ 126,859,552

244,725 16,206

1,639,244 113,531

2,013,706

11,543,285 372,849 827,310 336,460

13,079,904

4,499,062 100,346 488,619 156,370

5,244,397 7,835,507 9,849,213


Table 9 summarizes the depreciation expense charged to the activities of the primary government.

Table 9

Schedule of Depreciation Expense - Primary Government June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Governmental activities Amount

General government------------------------- 226,524 Education---------------------------- 163,433 Health and human services----------------------- 119,322

Natural resources and environmental protection ----------------- 59,895 Business, consumer services, and housing------------------- 13,029 Transportation___________________________ 176,347

Corrections and rehabilitation----------------------- 273,072 Internal service lunds (charged lo the activities lhal utilize the Lund}------------ ----~5,00,8058~

Total governmental activities--------------------- ___ cls,Oe8e2c,4c80~

Business-type activities------------------------- _____ 400010,0043~

Total primary government---------------------- ,~ __ 10,40Bc3c,5a23~

Table 10 summarizes the capital activity for discretely presented component units.

Table 10

Schedule of Changes in Capital Assets - Discretely Presented Component Units June30,2016


Beginning Balance Additions

Capital assets not being depreciated/amortized Land 1,125,463 193,328 Collections 394,180 51,030 Conslruclion/developmenl in progress 2,859,030 276,209 Intangible assets 5,098 Total capital assets not being depreciated/amortized .. 4,383,771 520,567

Capital assets being depreciated/amortized Buildings and improvements 35,276,089 1,775,033 Inlraslruclure 734,287 20,985 Equipment and other depreciable assets 10,445,545 660,216 Intangible assets 863,343 101,071 Total capital assets being depreciated/amortized .. 47,319,264 2,557,305

Less accumulated depredation/amortization for: Buildings and improvements 13,806,309 1,126,322 Inlraslruclure 352,449 24,729 Equipment and other depreciable assets 7,332,506 651,652 Intangible assets 360,964 74,018 Total accumulated depredation/amortization .. 21,852,228 1,876,721 Total capital assets being depreciated/amortized, net .. 25,467,036 680,584

Capital assets, net 29,850,807 1,201,151

Deductions

2,070 172

43,398

45,640

60,028 5,085

361,569 43,258

469,940

27,988 5,085

295,667 31,238

359,978 109,962 155,602

Ending Balance

1,316,721 445,038

3,091,841 5,098

4,858,698

36,991,094 750,187

10,744,192 921,156

49,406,629

14,904,643 372,093

7,688,491 403,744

23,368,971 26,037,658 30,896,356

97


NOTE 8: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

Accounts payable are amounts, related to different programs, that are due taxpayers, vendors, customers, beneficiaries, and employees. Table 11 presents details related to accounts payable.

The adjustment for the fiduciary funds represents amounts due fiduciary funds that were reclassified as external payables on the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

Table II

Schedule of Accounts Payable June30,2016


Governmental activities General Fund _____________ _

Federal Fund _____________ _

Transportation Fund ___________ _

Environmental and Natural Resources Fund ____ _ Nonmajor governmental ltmds ________ _ Internal service lunds __________ _

Adjustment

Fiduciary lunds -------------

Total governmental activities _______ _

Business-type activities Electric Power Fund ___________ _

Waler Resources Fund __________ _

Stale Lollery Fund ____________ _

Unemployment Programs Fund ________ _ Calilornia Stale University _________ _

Nonmajor enterprise lunds _________ _

Adjustment

Fiduciary lunds -------------

General

Government

250,452

124,941

2,217

3,987

613,248

278,147

710,696

1,983,688

42,190

47

42,237 Total business-type activities ________ ~~~~"""°

98

Health and

Education Human Services

454,545 482,163

213,362 303,604

51 915

929 199,152

127,340

1,473,320 17,153,402

2,142,207 18,266,577

2,769

223,033

31 55

223,064 2,824

Natural Resources

and Environmental

Protection

267,880

54,128

10,446

336,439

5,286

15,799

689,978

2,000

115,898

617

118,515

Transportation

463,134

350,205

134,811

1,837

63,352

1,013,339

Other

366,355

34,700

51 501

27,534

10,500

439,641

1,618

1,626

Total

1,821,395

1,193,869

362,920

476,704

847,986

431,786

19,400,770

24,535,430

2,000

115,898

42,190

2,769

223,033

2,368

388,266


99


NOTE 9: LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS

As of June 30, 2016, the primary government had long-term obligations totaling $228.5 billion. Of that amount, $7.1 billion is due within one year. Governmental activities had a net increase in long-term obligations of$7.7 billion. Significant increases included $6.8 billion in net pension liability and $3.4 billion in net OPEB obligation. Significant decreases included $1.5 billion in general obligation bonds payable, $1.2 bill ion in revenue bonds payable, and $298 million in Proposition 98 funding guarantees.

Not included in the mandated cost claims payable shown in Table 12 are certain state-mandated programs that are in the adjudication process. Until the Commission on State Mandates rules on a test claim and the claim's parameters and guidelines are established, expected costs cannot be reasonably determined; however, a positive finding for any of the claimants could individually or in aggregate pose a significant cost to the State.

As of June 30, 2016, the pollution remediation obligations decreased by $75 million to $1.0 billion. Under federal Superfund law, responsibility for pollution remediation is placed on current and previous owners or operators of polluted sites. Currently, the State's most significant superfund site is the Stringfellow Class 1 Hazardous Waste Disposal Facility (Stringfellow) located in Riverside County. As of June 30, 2016, the State estimates that remediation costs at Stringfellow will total $426 million. At two other sites, Leviathan Mine and BKK Landfill, obligating events have occurred. At the Leviathan Mine site, litigation was concluded by settlement in March 2015. The settlement requires the State to pay 20% to 25% of ongoing cleanup costs at the Leviathan Mine site, with the remainder paid by ARCO. At the BKK Landfill site, reasonable estimates of the remediation costs cannot be made at this time. Tn addition to superfund sites, the State's other pollution remediation efforts include underground storage tank removal and cleanup, cleanup of polluted groundwater, and contaminated soil removal and cleanup, as required by state law.

The other long-term obligations for governmental activities consist of $18 million owed to the University of California, the Technology Services Revolving Fund notes payable of $23 million, and the Water Resources Revolving Fund notes payable of $5 million. The compensated absences will be liquidated by the General Fund, special revenue funds, capital projects funds, and internal service funds. Workers' compensation and capital leases will be liquidated by the General Fund, special revenue funds, and internal service funds. The General Fund will liquidate net pension liabilities, the Proposition 98 funding guarantee, lawsuits, and reimbursement of costs incurred by local agencies and school districts for costs mandated by the State.

Business-type activities had a net decrease in long-term obligations of $550 million, as restated. Significant decreases included $2.6 billion in loans payable to the US Department of Labor for prior-year's shortfalls in the Unemployment Fund and $821 million in capital lease obligations. Significant increases included $1.3 billion in revenue bonds payable, $1.2 billion in net pension liability, and $343 million in lottery prizes and annuities.

100



IOI

State of California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Notes to the Financial Statements

Table 12 summarizes the changes in long-term obligations during the year ended June 30, 2016.

Table 12

Schedule of Changes in Long-term Obligations (amounts in thousands}

Balance Balance Due Within Noncurrent July 1, 2015 Additions Deductions June 30, 2016 One Year Liabilities

Governmental activities Compensated absences payable 3,686,010 1,459,159 1,361,803 3,783,366 5,959 3,777,407 Workers' compensation benelils payable 3,840,191 539,868 443,621 3,936,438 408,606 3,527,832

Cerli llcales olparlicipalion and commercial paper oulslanding1 493,800 1,816,520 1,539,105 771,215 771,215 Discounts (30) (30)

Total cerli llcales olparlicipalion and commercial paper payable 493,770 1,816,520 1,539,075 771,215 771,215

Capital lease obligations 274,760 120,535 25,113 370,182 25,689 344,493

General obligation bonds outstanding 76,949,340 7,316,280 9,323,865 74,941,755 2,963,410 71,978,345 Premiums 3,560,462 1,017,929 476,851 4,101,540 226,242 3,875,298

Total general obligation bonds payable 80,509,802 8,334,209 9,800,716 79,043,295 3,189,652 75,853,643

Revenue bonds outstanding 17,187,495 990,835 2,245,691 15,932,639 585,661 15,346,978 Accreted interest 467,317 45,346 512,663 512,663 Premiums 756,579 136,424 127,386 765,617 94,938 670,679 Discounts (1,420} (1,000} (420) (108) (312)

Total revenue bonds payable 18,409,971 1,172,605 2,372,077 17,210,499 680,491 16,530,008

Mandated cost claims payable 3,006,566 145,525 209,941 2,942,150 177,681 2,764,469 Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation 21,593,644 5,423,222 2,049,807 24,967,059 24,967,059 Net pension liability 57,456,241 22,325,704 15,487,916 64,294,029 64,294,029 Other long-term obligations:

Proposition 98 lunding guarantee 1,512,469 13,274 311,003 1,214,740 218,000 996,740 Pollution remediation obligations 1,098,641 43,695 118,978 1,023,358 59,544 963,814 Other 50,857 15,653 20,543 45,967 11,017 34,950

Total other long-term obligations 2,661,967 72,622 450,524 2,284,065 288,561 1,995,504 Total governmental activities 191,932,922 41,409,969 33,740,593 199,602,298 4,776,639 194,825,659

Business-type activities Loans payable 5,670,653 2,558,475 3,112,178 3,112,178 Lollery prizes and annuities 1,334,895 4,265,312 3,922,738 1,677,469 968,569 708,900 Compensated absences payable 337,561 133,628 114,315 356,874 155,976 200,898 Workers' compensation benelils payable 2,976 442 136 3,282 3,282 Commercial paper outstanding 237,186 183,970 373,740 47,416 400 47,016 Capital lease obligations 1,210,409 66,972 887,996 389,385 43,818 345,567

General obligation bonds outstanding 651,150 545,440 404,330 792,260 58,010 734,250 Premiums 3,697 72 3,625 3,625 Discounts (1,017} (1,573} (1,074} (1,516} (1,516}

Total general obligation bonds payable 650,133 547,564 403,328 794,369 58,010 736,359

Revenue bonds oulslandin 11,813,518 3,073,320 2,107,660 12,779,178 943,470 11,835,708 Premiums 857,295 428,669 136,718 1,149,246 80,007 1,069,239 Discounts (194) (144) (50) (50)

Total revenue bonds payable 12,670,619 3,501,989 2,244,234 13,928,374 1,023,477 12,904,897

Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation 735,176 188,642 72,991 850,827 850,827 Net pension liability 6,248,976 2,544,017 1,330,778 7,462,215 7,462,215 Other long-term obligations 347,339 31,073 104,636 273,776 27,381 246,395

Total business-type activities 29,445,923 11,463,609 12,013,367 28,896,165 2,277,631 26,618,534

• Rcslaicd 1 All ccrlificalcs ofparlicipalion were ~li~d in ihc 201 5-16 fiscal year

102 103


NOTE 10: PENSION TRUSTS

The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) provides retirement and health benefits to eligible employees of the State, public agencies, and public schools through single-employer, agent multiple-employer, and cost-sharing plans. The California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) provides pension benefits to full-time and part-time employees of the State's public school system. Both are fiduciary component units of the State, and their financial activity is included in the pension and other employee benefit trust funds column of the fiduciary funds and similar component units' financial statements ofthis report.

CalPERS administers four defined benefit retirement plans: the Public Employees' Retirement Fund (PERF), the Judges' Retirement Fund (Judges'), the Judges' Retirement Fund TI (Judges' TT), and the legislators' Retirement Fund (legislators'). CalPERS previously administered three defined contribution plans: the State Peace Officers' and Firefighters' Defined Contribution Plan Fund (SPOFF), the Public Employees' Deferred Compensation Fund, and the Supplemental Contributions Program Fund. The SPOFF plan was terminated in 2014 and, as directed by state statute, the remaining funds were transferred to the Supplemental Contributions Program Fund.

The PERF accounts for the majority of assets and liabilities reported for CalPERS' plans. CalPERS issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for these plans. The report may be found on CalPERS' website at www.CalPERS.ca.gov.

Contributions to the CalPERS' pension trust funds are recognized in the period in which the contributions are due, pursuant to legal requirements. Benefits and refunds in the defined benefit plans are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the terms of each plan.

CalSTRS administers four defined benefit retirement plans within the State Teachers' Retirement Plan: the Defined Benefit Program, the Defined Benefit Supplement Program, the Cash Balance Benefit Program, and the Replacement Benefit Program. CalSTRS issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for these plans. This report may be found on its website at www.CalSTRS.com.

Member contributions to CalSTRS' pension plans are recognized in the period in which the contributions are earned. Employer and state contributions are recognized when earned and when the employer or the State has made a formal commitment to provide the contributions. Benefits and refunds are recognized when due and payable, in accordance with the retirement and benefits programs.

For the purpose of measuring net pension liability, deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net positions ofCalPERS' and CalSTRS' plans and changes to the plans' fiduciary net positions has been determined on the same basis as reported by the plans.

The University of California, a discretely presented component unit, administers the University of California Retirement System (UCRS), which consists of two defined benefit plans funded with University and employee contributions, and four defined contribution plans with options to participate in internally or externally managed investment portfolios generally funded with employee non-elective and elective contributions. The State does not directly contribute to the UCRS. Additional information on the UCRS can be found in the University's separately issued financial statements on its website at www.ucop.edu.

104


A. Ca!ifom!a Public Emp!oyoos' Retirement System

1. Public Employees' Retirement Fund (PERF)

Plan Description: The PERF is comprised of and reported as three separate entities for financial reporting purposes, of which the State reports only PERF A. PERF A is comprised of agent multiple-employer plans, which include the State of California and most public agencies' rate plans that have more than 100 active members. PERF B is a cost-sharing multiple-employer plan comprised of school employers and consisting of non-teaching and non-certified employee members. PERF C is a cost-sharing multiple-employer plan comprised of public agencies' plans that generally have fewer than 100 active members. Employers participating in the PERF as of June 30, 2015, included the primary government and certain discretely presented component units; 1,423 school employers, including charter schools; and 1,630 public agencies. As the State is not an employer in PERF B or PERF C, the term "PERF" is used hereafter to refer exclusively to the agent multiple-employer plans that include employees of the primary government and certain discretely presented component units.

CalPERS acts as the common investment and administrative agent for participating employers. State employees served by the PERF include first- and second-tier miscellaneous and industrial employees, California Highway Patrol (CHP) employees, peace officers and firefighters, and other safety members.

Benefits Provided: All employees in a covered class of employment who work half-time or more are eligible to participate in the PERF. The PERF provides retirement, death, disability, and survivor benefits. Vesting occurs after five years, or after ten years for second-tier employees. The benefit provisions are established by the Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) and the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), and are summarized in Appendix B of the State's June 30, 2014 Actuarial Valuation Report, which may be found at www.CalPERS.ca.gov/docs/fo1II1S-publications/2014-state-va1wrti.on.pdf. Tn general, for the PERF plans, retirement benefits are based on a formula using a member's years of service credit, age at retirement, and final compensation (average salary for a defined period of employment). Retirement formulas vary based on:

Classification (e.g., miscellaneous, safety, industrial, CHP, or peace officers and firefighters); Membership category (pre-PEPRA and post-PEPRA); and Specific provisions in employees' contracts.

The four basic types of retirement are:

Service Retirement - The "normal" retirement is a lifetime benefit Tn most cases, employees become eligible for service retirement as early as age 50 with five years of service credit Tf the employee became a member on or after January 1, 2013, he or she must be at least 52 year old with at least five years of service to retire. Second-tier employees (miscellaneous and industrial) become eligible at age 55 with at least ten years of service credit Vested Deferred Retirement - Vested members who leave employment but keep their contribution balances on deposit with CalPERS are eligible for this benefit Disability Retirement - Vested members who can no longer perform the usual duties of their current position due to illness or injury may receive this benefit Industrial Disability Retirement - This benefit is available for eligible safety members, industrial employees, CHP employees, and peace officers and firefighters, who are unable to perform the usual duties of their current position due to job-related illness or injury.

105



http://www.ucop.edu

http://www.CalPERS.ca.gov/docs/fonns-publications/2014-state-valuation.pdl


Employees Covered by Benefit Terms: The State's June 30, 2015 Actuarial Valuation Report provides information about the number of employees by type covered within the various PERF plans. Table 13 shows the number of employees covered by the benefit terms of each of the PERF plans as of the most recent valuation.

Table 13

Number of Employees by Type Covered by Benefit Terms - PERFPlans Jtme30,2015

Inactive employees or beneliciaries

currently receiving benellls ..

Inactive employees entitled lo but

nol yel receiving benellls ..

Active employees

Total

State State

Miscellaneous Industrial

182,297 12,752

51,939 3,202

204,731 19,888

438,967 35,842

State

Safety

22,687

5,857

31,536

60,080

State Peace California

Officers and Highway Total

-~'"~'~'"~\- PERFPlans Firefighters

34,781 8,650 261,167

6,378 366 67,742

46,237 7,493 309,885

87,396 16,509 638,794

Contributions: Section 20814(c) of PERL requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. The total plan contributions are determined through CalPERS' annual actuarial valuation process. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Employer contribution rates may change if plan contracts are amended.

Table 14 shows the average active employee and the employer contribution rates for each ofthe PERF plans as a percentage of annual pay for the measurement period ended June 30, 2015.

Table 14

Contribution Rates - PERFPlans Jtme30,2015

Average active employee rate

Employer rate olannual payroll

Total

106

State

Miscellaneous

6.587 %

24.265 %

30.852 %

State

Industrial

7.735 %

18.134 %

25.869 %

State Peace California

State Officers and Highway

Safety Firefighters Patrol

10.450 % 11.498 % 10.388 %

19.278 % 36.780 % 43.455 %

29.728 % 48.278 % 53.843 %


Actuarial Methods and Assumptions: The total pension liability for PERF plans was measured as of June 30, 2015 (measurement date), by rolling forward the total pension liability determined by the June 30, 2014 actuarial valuation (valuation date), based on the actuarial methods and assumptions shown in Table 15.

Table 15

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions - PERFPlans

Valuation dale:

Actuarial cost method:

Actuarial assumptions:

Discount rate

In nation

Salary increases

Investment rate olrelum

Mortality

Posl-reliremenl benelll adjustments (COLAs}

June 30, 2014

Entry age normal in accordance with the requirement olGASB 68

7.65%

2.75%

Varies by entry age and service

7.65% nel ol pension plan investment expense but without reduction Lor administrative expenses; includes in nation

Mortality rates are based on the 2014 CalPERS Experience Study adopted by the CalPERS Board and include 20 years ol mortality improvements using Scale BB published by the Society ol Actuaries.

Contract COLA up lo 2.75% until the Purchasing Power Protection Allowance noor on purchasing power applies, 2.75% lherearler

Discount Rate: The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.65% for the PERF. To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CalPERS stress-tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would differ from the actuarially assumed discount rate. Results of the testing showed that none of the tested plans would exhaust assets. Therefore, the current 7.65% discount rate is adequate and the use of the municipal bond rate calculation is not necessary. The long-term expected discount rate of 7.65% was applied to all plans in the PERF. The stress test results are presented in the "GASB Crossover Testing Report," which may be found on CalPERS' website at www.CalPERS.ca.gov/docs/gasb-crossover-testing-2015.pdf.

The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return ( expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class.

Tn determining the long-term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account both short- and long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Such cash flows were developed assuming that both members and employers will make their required contributions on time and as scheduled in all future years. Using historical returns of all the funds' asset classes, CalPERS calculated expected compound (geometric) returns over the short-term ( first 10 years) and the long-term ( 11---60 years) using a building-block approach. Using the expected nominal returns for both short- and long-term, the present value of benefits was calculated for each fund. The expected rate of return was set by calculating the single equivalent expected return that arrived at the same present value of benefits for cash flows as the one calculated using both short- and long-term returns. The expected rate of return was then set equivalent to the single equivalent rate calculated above and rounded down to the nearest one quarter of one percent

107

http://www.CalPERS.ca.gov/docs/gasb-crossover-testmg-2015.pdt


Table 16 shows long-term expected geometric real rate of return by asset class for all plans in the PERF.

Table 16

Long-term Expected Real Rate of Return by Asset Class - PERFPlans

Asset Class

Global equity---------------Global lixed income-------------

In nation sensitive-------------

Private equity---------------Real estate _______________ _

Tnlrastructure and lorestland __________ _ Liquidity ________________ _

Current Target

Allocation

51.0 %

19.0

6.0 10.0

10.0

2.0 2.0

100.0 % Tota\ _________________ ~~=~~~

I An expecied inna1ion rale of2 5% used for I his period

1 An expecied inna1ion rale of3 0% used for I his period

108

Real Return Real Return Years 1-10 1 Years ll+l

5.25 % 5.71 %

0.99 2.43

0.45 3.36

6.83 6.95

4.50 5.13

4.50 5.09

(0.55) (1.05}



109


Changes in Net Pension Liability: Table 17 shows changes in net pension liability recognized over the measurement period for the PERF plans.

Table 17

Changes in Net Pension Liability- PERFPlans (amounts in thousands}

S(a(e Miscellaneous

Balance a( June 30, 2014

(Valuation Da(e)

Changes recognized for

(he measurement period:

Servicecosl

lnleresl on lolal pension liabilily

Difference beiween expeciedand

aclual experience

Plan lo plan resources movemenl

Employer conlribulions

Employee conlribulions

lnveslmenl income

Benefil paymenls, including refunds

of employee conlribulions

Adminislralive expense

Ne( changes

Balance a( June 30, 201S

(Measurement Da(e)

• Reslaied

$$0

$

Total

Pension

Liability

92,189,174

1,576,695

6,970,837

693,639

(5,098,222)

4,142,<)4<)

$ %,332,123

Plan

Fiduciary

Ne( Position

$ 68,380,562

(354)

2,608,785

771,()46

1,505,()42

(5,098,222)

(76,678)

(290,3Sl)

6S,090,lSl

$

,., Pension

Liability

23,808,612

1,576,695

6,970,837

693,639

"' (2,608,785)

(771,046)

(1,505,042)

76,678

4,433,330

2S,24l,942

$

Total

Pension

Liability

3,367,907

100,006

257,527

26,976

(157,029)

227,480

3,S9S,3S7

S(a(e Industrial

$

Plan

Fiduciary

Ne( Position

2,826,449

'" 107,238

49,482

62,385

(157,029)

(3,252)

SS,SS4

2,SSS,303

$

,., Pension

Liability

541,458

100,006

257,527

26,976

(30)

(107,238)

(49,482)

(62,385)

3,252

l6S,626

7l0,0S4


S!a!eSarety State Peace Officer, and Firelighters

Total Plan ,., Total Plan ,., Pension Fiduciary Pension Pension Fiduciary Pension

Liability Ne( Position Liability Liability Ne( Position Liability

9,626,597 * $ 7,841,392 $ 1,785,205 $ 36,219,196 • $ 26,367,989 9,851,207

422,634 422,634 838,628 838,628

734,333 734,333 2,759,982 2,759,982

(4,150) (4,150) 288,526 288,526

m (499) '°' (194)

393,925 (393,925) 1,146,192 (1,146,192)

215,482 (215,482) 366,419 (366,419)

175,677 (175,677) 584,142 (584,142)

(469,275) (469,275) (1,697,676) (1,697,676)

(9,200) 9,200 (30,069) 30,069

6S3,S42 307,lOS 376,434 2,lS<),460 369,202 l,S20,2SS

10,310,13<) S,l4S,S00 2,161,63<) 3S,40S,6S6 26,737,l<)l ll,671,46S

(conlinued)

$$$


Table 17 (wntinued)

Changes in Net Pension Liability- PERFPlans (wntinued) (amounts in thousands}

California Highway Patrol

Balance al June 30, 2014

Total

Pension

Liability

Plan

Fiduciary

Ne( Position

,., Pension

Liability

Total

Pension

Liability

Total PERF Plans

Plan

Fiduciary

Ne( Position

,., Pension

Liability

(Valuation Dale) ____ _ $ IQ,Q6Q,Q85 $ 6,656,447 $ 3,403,638 $ lSl,462,<)S<) $ ll2,072,S3<) $ 39,390,120

Changes recognized for

lhe measurement period:

Service cosl

lnle~sl on lolal pension liabilily

Difference beiween expecied

and aclual experience

Plan lo plan movcmenl



lnvcslmenl income

Benefil paymenls, including ~funds



198,665

764,348

75,593

(487,061)

(214)

351,197

85,791

146,782

(487,061)

(7,600)

SS,S<)S Ne( changes ________ ,»0

<0,s<

0,0 --~=

Balance al June 30, 201S

(Measurement Dale) .. J0,611,630 6,745,342

198,665 3,l36,62S

764,348 ll,487,027

75,593 l,OS0,SS4

'" <,;

(351,197) 4,607,337

(85,791) l,4SS,220

(146,782) 2,474,028

(7,909,263) (7,909,263)

7,600 (126,7<)<))

462,6S0 7,794,976 S33,67S

3,S66,2SS $ 1S9,2S7,93S $ ll2,606,Sl7

Rcporied in govcmmenlal aclivilies

Reported in business-lype aclivilies

Rcporied by discreidy p~senied componenl uni ls

Nol ~ported in govcmmenl-wide Sialcmenl ofNel Posilion 1

Total net pension liability - PERF plan,

Includes amounls allocaied lordaied organizalions and fiduciary funds Addilionally, lhi, amounl includes ihe diffr~nce in nel pension liabilily for discreidy presenied componenl uni ls wilh a rcporlingpcriod ended December 31, 20 15 Also includes adjuslmenls fornel pension liabilily underslalmenls or overslalemenls included in ihe scparaidy issued financial slalcmenls ofproprielary funds, fiduciary componenl uni ls, and disc~idy pres en led componenl uni ls

112

3,l36,62S

ll,487,027

l,OS0,SS4

(lSS)

(4,607,337)

(l,4SS,220)

(2,474,028)

126,7<)<)

7,26l,29S

46,6Sl,4lS

37,543,522

7,462,215

133,525

1,512,156

46,6Sl,4lS

(concluded)


Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate: Table 18 shows the net pension liability of the State, with regard to the PERF plans, calculated using the discount rate of 7.65%, as well as what the State's net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (6.65%) or one percentage point higher (8.65%) than the current rate.

Table 18

Net Pension Liability Sensitivity - PERFPlans June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Stale Miscellaneous------------

Stale Industrial---------------Stale Salely ______________ _

Stale Peace Omcers and Firelighters _______ _

Current Rate -1%

39,887,881 1,195,626 3,525,745

17,052,265 5,342,954 Calilornia Highway Patrol ___________ --~==~

67,004,471 Total PERFplans ------------- aa,,,""'a;aaac;;;~

Current Rate Current Rate 7.65% +1%

28,241,942 18,471,007 710,084 308,543

2,161,639 1,054,683

11,671,465 7,258,454 3,866,288 2,655,853

46,651,418 29,748,540

Pension Plans Fiduciary Net Position: Detailed information about the PERF plans' fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial report

Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions: For the PERF plans, for the year ended June 30, 2016, the State recognized pension expense of $4.3 billion. At June 30, 2016, the State reported deferred outflows of resources from contributions made by the State to the PERF plans subsequent to the measurement date of June 30, 2015, but prior to the year ended June 30, 2016. Differences between expected and actual expenses are recognized as deferred outflows and inflows of resources. The aggregate difference (positive and negative) between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments arising in different measurement periods are reported as net deferred inflows of resources. Deferred outflows of resources related to contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the subsequent year.

IIJ


Table 19 shows pension expense and sources of deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to each PERF plan.

Table 19

Pension Expense and Sources ofDeferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions - PERF Plans

June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

State Peace California State State State Officers and Highway Total

Miscellaneous Industrial Safety Firefighters Patrol PERFP\ans

Pension Expense 2,415,705 84,220 294,062 $ 1,153,836 352,040 4,299,863 Deferred Outflows of Resources:

Employer contributions .. 2,814,126 116,594 404,595 1,263,436 377,534 4,976,285 Di ITerence between expected

and actual experience ____ 515,782 19,042 231,952 61,594 828,370 Deferred Inflows ofResoun:es:

Di ITerence between expected and actual experience ____ (3,207} (3,207}

Net diITerence between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments .. (616,506} (21,457} (52,450} (214,556} (54,680} (959,649)

Table 20 shows amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions that will be recognized in pension expense in future years for the PERF plans. Increases to pension expense are shown as positive amounts and decreases to pension expense are shown as negative amounts.

Table 20

Recognition ofDeferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows ofResources - PERFPlans


State Peace

State State State Officers and Year Ending June 30 Miscellaneous Industrial Safety Firefighters

2017 .. (270,130) (9,405} (46,902} (109,417} 2018 .. (270,130) (9,404} (46,902} (109,417} 2019 .. (287,915} (14,165} (46,901} (109,416}

2020 .. 727,451 30,559 85,048 339,989 2021 .. 5,657

California Total

Highway PERF Patrol Plans

(28,161} (464,0l~ (28,161} (464,014) (28,161} (486,558)

85,798 1,268,845 5,599 11,256

Payable to the Pension Plans: At June 30, 2016, the State reported a payable of $628 million for the outstanding amount of contributions to the PERF pension plans required for the year ended June 30, 2016.

114


2. Single-employer Plans

Plan Description: CalPERS administers three single-employer defined benefit retirement plans.

Judges' - Judges' membership includes judges working in the California Supreme Court, the courts of appeal, and the superior courts who were appointed or elected prior to November 9, 1994. Judges' is funded on a "pay-as-you-go" basis, where short-term investments, contributions received during the year, and a General Fund augmentation are used to provide funding for benefit payments.

Judges' ll - Judges' TI membership includes judges working in the California Supreme Court, the courts of appeal, and the superior courts, who were appointed or elected on or after November 9, 1994. There are two types of service retirement available for plan members: the Defined Benefit Plan and the Monetary Credit Plan, in which members can choose a single lump sum payment or annuity at retirement

Legislators' - Legislators' was established in 1947 and its members consist of state legislators, constitutional officers, and legislative statutory officers. The PEPRA closed Legislators' to new participants effective January 1, 2013.

Benefits Provided: All employees in a covered class of employment who work on a half-time basis or more are eligible to participate. The benefits for the defined benefit plans are based on a member's years of service, age, final compensation, and a benefit formula. Benefits are provided for disability, death, and survivors of eligible members or beneficiaries. Members become fully vested in their retirement benefits earned to date after five years of credited service. Benefits are established in accordance with the provisions of the Judges' Retirement Law, Judges' Retirement System TT law, and Legislators' Retirement Law. Additional information is available in the Actuarial Valuation Report for each plan, which may be found on CalPERS' website at www.CalPERS.ca.gov.

Judges' - The four basic types of retirement are:

Service Retirement- Members must be at least age 60 with 20 years of service or age 70 with at least 1 0 years of service. Deferred Retirement - Vested members are eligible for deferred retirement at any age with at least 5 years of service. Disability Retirement - The service requirement is four years. The retirement allowance is 65% of a judge's final salary, or 75% of his or her final salary if the judge has 20 or more years of service. Death Benefits - Beneficiaries may receive 25% of a current active judge's salary for life if the judge was not eligible for retirement Beneficiaries receive one-half of what the retirement allowance would have been if the judge had retired on the date of death.

Judges' ll - The four basic types of retirement are:

Service Retirement - Judges must be at least age 65 with 20 years of service or age 70 with a minimum of five years of service to receive the defined benefit plan. Judges must have at least five years of service to receive the monetary credit plan. Disability Retirement (non-work related) - Judges who have five years of service and become permanently disabled because of a mental or physical disability may apply to the Commission on Judicial Performance for disability retirement Disability Retirement (work related) - Judges receive 65% of their average monthly salary earned during the 12 months preceding their retirement date, regardless of age or length of service.

115



Death Benefits - Beneficiaries receive the judge's monetary credits or three times the annual salary at the time of death, whichever is greater, if the judge was not eligible for retirement Beneficiaries receive one-half of the retirement pension for 1 ife if the judge was retired on the date of death.

Legislators' - The three basic types of retirement are:

Service Retirement - Members must be age 60, with four or more years of service credit, or any age with 20 or more years. The retirement age for legislative statutory officers is 55, or any age with 20 years or more of service credit Disability Retirement - Disability retirement uses the same formula as service retirement There is no reduction for members of the Legislature if retirement is before age 60. Death Benefits - Beneficiaries have multiple options depending on whether the member was eligible for retirement or was retired at the time of death.

Employees Covered by Benefit Terms: The June 30, 2015 actuarial valuation reports for each single-employer plan provide information about the number of employees by type covered within the plans. Table 21 shows the number of employees covered by the benefit terms of each of the single-employer plans as of the most recent valuation.

Table 21

Number of Employees by Type Covered by Benefit Terms - Single-employer Plans Jtme30,2015

Judges' Judges'II

Inactive employees or beneliciaries currenliy receiving benelils .. 1,924 96

Inactive employees entitled lo but nol yel receiving benellls .. 15

Active employees 231 1,470

Total 2,170 1,567

Legislators'

244

14

267

Total

2,264

30

1,710

4,004

Contributions: As Judges' is funded on a "pay-as-you-go" basis, the contributions made will be less than the actuarially determined contribution requirement of normal cost plus a 10-year amortization of the unfunded accrued liability. The actual contribution is the estimated amount ofbenefit payouts during the year. Currently, Judges' member contributions are 8% of pay. Tn certain situations, employers make member contributions.

Judges' TT contribution rates are determined through the CalPERS' annual actuarial valuation process as required by section 75600.5 of the PERL. Classic members contribute 8% of their annual compensation to the plan. New members contribute half of the total normal cost calculated on January 1, 2013. The percentage only changes in any given year once the change to the total normal cost is greater than one percent from the original percentage determined.

For Legislators', contribution rates are determined through the CalPERS' annual actuarial valuation process as required by section 9358 on the PERL. The minimum employer contribution rate under PEPRA is the greater of the actuarially determined employer rate or the employer normal cost

116


Table 22 shows the average active employee and the employer contribution rates for each of the single-employer plans as a percentage of annual pay for the measurement period ended June 30, 2015.

Table 22

Contribution Rates - Single-employer Plans June30,2015

Average active employee rate--------------Employer rate olannual payroll ____________ _ Tota\ ____________________ _

Judges'

"Pay-

as-you-

go"

Judges'II Legislators'

8.062 % 7.533 %

24.615 % 42.257 %

32.677 % 49.790 %

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions: The total pension liability for single-employer plans was measured as of June 30, 2015 (measurement date), by rolling forward the total pension liability determined by the June 30, 2014 actuarial valuations (valuation date), based on the actuarial methods and assumptions shown in Table 23.

Table 23

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions - Single-employer Plans

Valuation dale:

Actuarial cost method:

Actuarial assumptions:

Discount rate

In nation

Salary increases

Investment rate olrelum

Mortality

Posl-reliremenl benelll adjustments (COLAs}

June 30, 2014

Entry age normal in accordance with the requirement olGASB 68

Judges' 3.82%, Judges' TT 7.15%, Legislators' 6.00%

All single-employer plans 2.75%

All single-employer plans 3.00%

Judges' 3.82%, Judges' TT 7.15%, Legislators' 6.00%, nel ol pension plan investment without reduction oladminislralive expenses; includes in nation.

Mortality rates are based on the 2014 CalPERS Experience Study adopted by the CalPERS Board and include 20 years ol mortality improvements using Scale BB published by the Society ol Actuaries.

Judges' 3.00% Judges' TT 2.75% Legislators' 2.75%

117


Discount Rate: To determine whether the municipal bond rate should be used in the calculation of a discount rate for each plan, CalPERS stress tested plans that would most likely result in a discount rate that would differ from the actuarially assumed discount rate. For the single-employer plans, the following rates were used:

Judges' - 3.82%, reflecting the short-term nature of the assets. As the plan is insufficiently funded, CalPERS uses a discount rate of 3.82%, which falls within a reasonable range of yields on 20-year tax-exempt general obligation municipal bonds with an average rating of AA.

Judges'll-7.15%

Legislators' - 6.00%

With the exception of Judges', which uses a lower rate of return, the information regarding the discount rate and the long-term expected real rate of return described previously for the PERF plans is also applicable to the single-employer plans. GAAP requires that the long-term discount rate should be determined without reduction for pension plan administrative expense.

Table 24 shows long-term expected real rates of return by asset class for Judges' TT and legislators'.

Table 24

Long-term Expected Real Rate of Return by Asset Class - Judges' TT and Legislators' Plans

Asset Class

Global equity _________ _

Global llxed income _______ _

In nation sensitive ________ _ Commodities _________ _

Real estate __________ _ Tota\ __________ _

An expecied inflalion rale of2 5% used for I his period 1 An expecied inflalion rale of3 0% used for I his period

118

Judges'II

Current Target

Allocation

50.0 %

34.0

5.0

3.0

8.0

100.0 %

Legislators'

Current Target

Allocation

24.0 %

39.0

26.0

3.0

8.0

100.0 %

Real Return Years 1-10 1

5.25 %

1.79

1.00

1.66

3.25

Real Return Years ll+l

5.71 %

2.40

2.25

4.95

7.88



119


Changes in Net Pension Liability: Table 25 shows the changes in net pension liability recognized over the measurement period for the single-employer plans.

Table 25

Changes in Net Pension Liability - Single-employer Plans (amounts in thousands}

Balance al June 30, 2014

(Valuation Dale) • Changes recognized for

lhe measurement period:

Service cosl

lnleresl on lolal pension ~a bi lily

Diffrrcnce beiween expecied

andaclual experience

Changes of assumplions



lnveslmenl income

Benefil paymenls, including refunds



Oiher miscellaneous income

Ne( changes

Balance a( June 30, 201S

(Measurement Da(e) ..

120

Total

Pension

Liability

3,357,212

27,841

133,181

57,568

158,646

(201,868}

175,368

3,532,580

Judges'

Plan

Fiduciary

Nel Position

57,199

180,910

3,878

88

(201,868}

(1,227}

2,198

(16,021)

41,178

•

,., Pension

Liability

3,300,013

27,841

133,181

57,568

158,646

(180,910}

(3,878}

(88)

1,227

(2,198}

191,389

3,491,402

Total

Pension

Liability

967,962

79,641

69,128

(17,319}

(16,619}

(14,041}

100,790

1,068,752

•

Judges' JJ

Plan Nel

Fiduciary Pension

Nel Position Liabililyl(A.,el)

1,013,840 (45,878}

79,641

69,128

(17,319}

(16,619}

65,629 (65,629}

22,242 (22,242}

(2,402} 2,402

(14,041}

(1,127} 1,127

70,301 30,489

1,084,141 (15,389)


Legislator,' Total Single-employer Plan,

Total

Pension

Liability

115,521

769

6,268

(4,246}

(2,654}

(9,087}

Plan Ne( Total

Fiduciary Pension Pension

Ne( Position Liabili(y/(A.,e!) Liability

130,354 • (14,833} • 4,440,695

769 108,251

6,268 208,577

(4,246} 36,003

(2,654} 139,373

590 (590)

105 (105)

(94) 94

(9,087} (224,996)

(399) 399

(8,950) --=

106,571

(8,885)

121,469

(65) 267,208

(14,898) 4,707,903

Plan Ne(

Fiduciary Pension

Ne( Position Liabili(y/A.,e!

• 1,201,393 • 3,239,302

108,251

208,577

36,003

139,373

247,129 (247,129)

26,225 (26,225)

(2,408) 2,408

(224,996)

(2,753) 2,753

2,198 (2,198)

45,395 221,813

1,246,788 3,461,115

Reported in governmental activities 3,461,115

121


Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate: Judges' net pension liability was calculated using a discount rate of 3.82%; Judges' TI used 7.15%; and Legislators' used 6.00%. Table 26 shows the net pension liability for each single-employer plan, calculated using the current discount rate, as well as what the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower or one percentage point higher than the current rate.

Table 26

Net Pension Liability/ Asset Sensitivity - Single-employer Plans June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Judges' (3.82%)-------------Judges'TT (7.15%)-------------

Legislalors' (6.00%} -------------Total Single-employer Plans _________ _

Current Rate -1%

3,906,181 124,249

(2,489}

4,027,941

Current Rate

3,491,402 (15,389}

(14,898}

3,461,115

Current Rate +1%

3,143,782 (124,114}

(25,065}

2,994,603

Pension Plans Fiduciary Net Position: Detailed information about the single-employer plans' fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial report

Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions: For the single-employer plans, for the year ended June 30, 2015, the State recognized pension expense of $227 million. At June 30, 2016, the State reported deferred outflows of resources from contributions made by the State to the single-employer plans subsequent to the measurement date of June 30, 2015, but prior to the year ended June 30, 2016, which will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the subsequent year.

Table 27 shows pension expense and sources of deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to each single-employer plan.

Table 27

Pension Expense and Sources ofDeferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources

Related to Pensions - Single-employer Plans June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Pension Expense-------------Deferred Outflows of Resources: Employer contributions subsequent lo the measurement dale .. Net di ITerence between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investment __________ _

Deferred Inflows of Resources: DiITerence between expected and actual experience ... Changes olasslilllplion ___________ _

122

Judges' Judges' II

194,248 40,216

3,252 60,476

3,510 7,231

(15,305} (14,686}

Legislators'

(7,278}

549

1,212

Total

227,186

64,277

11,953

(15,305) (14,686)


Table 28 shows amounts reported as deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions that will be recognized in pension expense in future years for the single-employer plans. Increases to pension expense are shown as positive amounts and decreases to pension expense are shown as negative amounts.

Table 28

Recognition of Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources - Single-employer Plans


Year Ending June 30

2017 .. 2018 .. 2019 ..

2020 .. 2021 .. Thereafler ..

Deferred Outflows of Resources

Judges'

1,051 1,051 1,050

358

B. Ca!!fomia State Teachers· Retirement System

Deferred Inflows of Resources

Judges'II Legislators'

(6,702} (106) (6,702} (106) (6,702} (106)

11,552 1,530 (3,946}

(10,260}

Total

(5,757} (5,757} (5,758)

13,440 (3,946)

(10,260)

The State reports a net pension liability, deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources, and expenses as a result of its statutory requirement to contribute to the State Teachers' Retirement Fund as a non-employer contributing entity.

Plan Description: CalSTRS administers the State Teachers' Retirement Fund, which is an employee benefit trust fund created to finance the State Teachers' Retirement Plan (STRP). The STRP is a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan that provides retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to teachers and certain other employees of the California public school system. Four programs comprise the STRP: the Defined Benefit (DB) Program, the Defined Benefit Supplement (DBS) Program, the Cash Balance Benefit (CBB) Program, and the Replacement Benefit (RB) Program. CalSTRS issues a publicly available financial report, which maybe found on CalSTRS' website at www.CalSTRS.com.

Benefits Provided: Membership in the DB Program is mandatory for all employees meeting certain statutory requirements. The DB Program provides retirement benefits based on a member's age, final compensation, and years of service. Tn addition, the retirement program provides benefits to members upon disability and to their survivors or beneficiaries upon the death of eligible members. The Teachers' Retirement Law establishes the benefits for the DB Program. The DB Program had 1740 contributing employers, 438,388 active and 187,804 inactive program members, and 288,079 benefit recipients as of June 30, 2016. The payroll for employees covered by the DB Program for the year ended June 30, 2015, was approximately $32.0 billion.

Membership in the DBS Program is automatic for all members of the DB Program. The DBS Program provides benefits based on the amount of funds contributed. Vesting in the DBS Program occurs automatically with vesting in the DB Program. The Teachers' Retirement Law establishes the benefits for the DBS Program. The primary government does not contribute to the DBS Program.

Contributions: The DB Program contribution rates are based on the provisions of AB 1469 and Education Code Section 22955. l(b). The Legislature may amend these provisions at anytime and submit the amendment to the Governor for approval. The contribution rates for members and employers for the reporting period were

123

http://www.CaISTRS.com


8.15% and 8.88% of creditable compensation, respectively. The General Fund contributed an additional 2.017% of total creditable compensation of the fiscal year ending in the prior calendar year. Contributions will increase to 4.311% in the next year and continue to increase until fiscal year 2046-47. The State contributed a total of $1.9 billion for the fiscal year 2015-16. CalSTRS' June 30, 2014 Defined Benefit Actuarial Valuation Report, may be found on CalSTRS' website at www.CalSTRS.com/sites/main/files/file-attachements/ 2014_ db_ valuation_ reportpdf.

The CB Benefit Program is designed for employees of California public schools who are hired to perform creditable service for less than 50% of the full-time equivalent for the position. Employer participation in the CB Benefit Program is optional. However, if the employer elects to offer the CB Benefit Program, then each eligible employee will automatically be covered by the CB Benefit Program, unless the member elects to participate in the DB Program or an alternative plan provided by the employer within 60 days of hire or the election period determined by the employer. At June 30, 2015, the CB Benefit Program had 33 contributing school districts and 36,530 contributing participants.

The RB Program is a qualified excess benefits arrangement for DB Program members that is administered through a separate pension trust apart from the other three STRP programs; it was established in accordance with Internal Revenue Code section 415(m). Internal Revenue Code section 415(b) imposes a dollar limit on the annual retirement benefits an individual may receive from a qualified defined benefit pension plan. The program is funded as needed. Monthly contributions that would otherwise be credited to the DB program are instead credited to the RB Program to fund monthly program costs. Monthly employer contributions are received and paid to members in amounts equal to the benefits not paid as a result of Internal Revenue Code section 415(b), subject to withholding for any applicable income or employment taxes. At June 30, 2015, 287 individuals were receiving benefits from the RB program.

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions: The total pension liability in the June 30, 2014 actuarial valuation (valuation date) was determined using the actuarial methods and assumptions shown in Table 29, applied to the measurement period ended June 30, 2015.

Table 29

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions - CalSTRS

Valuation dale ____________________ _

Experience study--------------------Actuarial cost method __________________ _

Investment rate olrelum -----------------Consumer price in nation------------------

Wage growth----------------------Posl-reliremenl benelll increases (COLAs} -------------

June 30, 2014 July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2010

Entry age normal

7.60 %

3.00 %

3.75 %

2.00 % simple

CalSTRS uses custom mortality tables to best fit the patterns of mortality among its members. These custom tables are based on RP2000 series tables adjusted to fit CalSTRS experience. RP2000 series tables are an industry standard set of mortality rates published by the Society of Actuaries.

Discount Rate: The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.60%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members and employers will be made at statutory contribution rates in accordance with the rate increases created by AB 1469. Projected inflows from investment earnings were calculated using the long-term assumed investment rate of return (7.60%) and assuming that contributions, benefit payments, and administrative expense occur midyear.

124


Based on those assumptions, the STRP's fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments to current plan members. Therefore, the long-term assumed investment rate of return was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension 1 iability.

The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. The best estimate ranges were developed using capital market assumptions from CalSTRS' general investment consultant as an input to the process. Based on the model from CalSTRS' consulting actuary's investment practice, a best estimate range was determined by assuming that the portfolio is re-balanced annually and that annual returns are lognormally distributed and independent from year to year to develop expected percentiles for the long-term distribution of annualized returns. The assumed asset allocation is based on board policy for target asset allocation in effect since 2012.

Table 30 shows the assumed allocation and best estimates of 10-year geometric real rate of return for each major asset class.

Table JO

Long-term Expected Real Rate of Return by Asset Class - CalSTRS

Asset Class

Global equity-------------------

Private equity-------------------Real estate ___________________ _

In nation sensitive------------------Fixed income--------------------

Assumed Asset

Allocation

47 %

12 15

20 Cash/liquidity ____________________ -----~-

Tota\ _____________________ ~~~~~~~ 100 %

Long-term Expected

Real Rate of Return

4.50 %

6.20 4.35 3.20 0.20 0.00

Pension Liabilities, Pension Expense, and Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions: CalSTRS' net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2015 (measurement date) by applying update procedures and rolling forward the total pension liability determined by the actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2014 (valuation date). The State's proportion ofthe net pension liability was based on CalSTRS' calculated non-employer contributions to the pension plan relative to the total contributions of the State and all participating school districts. Per CalSTRS' revenue recognition policy, CalSTRS recognizes state contributions for the entire fiscal year at the beginning of each fiscal year. Contributions excluded from the proportionate share per CalSTRS' policy include employer contributions for retirement incentives, additional service credit, and unused sick leave. As of June 30, 2015, the State's proportionate share of the CalSTRS' net pension liability was 34.593%, or $23.3 billion; this amount is reported in the governmental activities column of the government-wide Statement of Net Position as of June 30, 2016.

125

http://www.CalSTRS.com/sites/inaiii/files/file-attacbement8/


As a result of its requirement to contribute to CalSTRS, the State recognized expense of $1.55 billion for the year ended June 30, 2016 and reported deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources as shown in Table 31.

Table JI

Sources of Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions - CalSTRS

June30,2016


Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows

of Resources

Net di ITerence between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments .. DiITerence between expected and actual experiences _________ _

Proportionate share change-----------------

of Resources

1,898,464

389,171

1,908,275

Stale contributions subsequent lo the measurement dale--------- ___ clc,9c3c5,c28c7 _______ _

Tota\ _______________________ ,~~""''s·'a'as,02807~ ,~~""''s·'a'as,091000

The $1.9 billion reported as deferred outflows of resources resulting from State contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2017.

Table 32 shows amounts reported as deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions that will be recognized in pension expense in futures years as a result of the State's requirement to contribute to CalSTRS. Increases to pension expense are shown as positive amounts and decreases to pension expense are shown as negative amounts.

Table 32

Recognition of Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources - CalSTRS (amounts in thousands}

2017 ..

2018 ..

2019 ..

2020 ..

2021 ..

Year Ending June 30

Thereafler ___________________________ _

126

Amount

(1,168,663}

(1,168,663}

(1,168,663}

75,820

(382,883}

(382,858}


Sensitivity of the State's Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate: Table 33 shows the State's proportionate share of the net pension 1 iability calculated using the discount rate of 7.60%, as well as what the State's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (6.60%) or one percentage point higher (8.60%) than the current rate.

Table JJ

Net Pension Liability Sensitivity - CalSTRS June30,2016


State's proportionate share olnel pension liability ____ _

Current Rate -1%

35,165,160

Current Rate 7.60%

23,289,390

Current Rate +1%

13,419,660

Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position: Detailed information about CalSTRS' pension plans' fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalSTRS financial report.

NOTE 11 POSTEMPLOYMENT HEALTH CARE BENEFITS

Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) Plan Description: The primary government provides health benefits (medical and prescription drug benefits) and dental benefits to annuitants of retirement systems through a substantive single-employer defined benefit plan to which the primary government contributes as an employer (State substantive plan). The primary government also offers life insurance, long-term care, and vision benefits to retirees; however, because these benefits are completely paid for by the retirees, the primary government has no liability. The design of health and dental benefit plans can be amended by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) Board of Administration and the California Department of Human Resources (CalHR), respectively. Employer and retiree contributions are governed by the primary government and can be amended by the primary government through the legislature. The State contributes to the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust Fund (CERBTF). The CERBTF is a self-funded trust fund for the prefunding of health, dental, and other non-pension benefits. CalPERS reports on the CERBTF as part of its separately issued annual financial statements, which can be obtained from CalPERS on its website at www.CalPERS.ca.gov.

Fifty-eight county superior courts (trial courts) are included in the primary government. However, each trial court is a separate employer for GASB Statement No. 45 reporting purposes. Fifty-one trial courts have a single-employer defined benefit plan; these plans have separate biennial actuarial valuations. One trial court (San Diego) has a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit plan. Six trial courts (Alameda, Fresno, Mendocino, Modoc, San Benito, and Stanislaus) have no plan. Twenty-one plans are not accounted for in a trust fund and do not issue separate reports.

To be eligible for these benefits, primary government first-tier plan annuitants must retire on or after age 50 with at least five years of service, and second-tier plan annuitants must retire on or after age 55 with at least 10 years of service. Tn addition, annuitants must retire within 120 days of separation from employment to be eligible to receive these benefits. During the 2015-16 fiscal year, approximately 178,750 annuitants were enrolled to receive health benefits and approximately 149,560 annuitants were enrolled to receive dental benefits. As of July 1, 2015, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the trial courts had approximately 4,750 enrolled retirees and spouses.

127



Funding Policy: The contribution requirements of plan members and the State are established and may be amended by the legislature. Tn accordance with the California Government Code, the State generally pays 100% of the health insurance premium cost for annuitants, plus 90% of the additional premium required for the enrollment of family members of annuitants. The State generally pays all or a portion of the dental insurance premium cost for annuitants, depending upon the completed years of credited state service at retirement and the dental coverage selected by the annuitant, as specified in the California Government Code. The State funds the cost of providing health and dental insurance to annuitants primarily on a pay-as-you-go basis, with a modest amount of prefunding for members of Bargaining Units 5, 12, and 16. The maximum 2016 monthly State contribution was $705 for one-party coverage, $1,343 for two-party coverage, and $1,727 for family coverage.

Each of the trial courts determines its respective retirees' benefits and benefit levels as well as the funding policy for its respective plan. Nineteen trial courts fund retirees' benefits on a strictly pay-as-you-go basis. The fiscal year 2015-16 monthly contribution rate for the trial courts with single-employer defined benefit plans, the latest year for which contribution information is available, ranged from $0 to $2,977,294, with the average being $145,805. One trial court (Yolo) continuously contributes at least the annual required contribution (ARC) of the employer, an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement No. 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. San Diego's plan, a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit plan, had a contribution rate of 1.78% of annual covered payroll for active members of the San Diego County Employees Retirement Association. Twenty-one trial courts will make future trust contributions as funds are made available. For 2016, Orange contributed either 3.5% of payroll or no less than the ARC, with no commitment to future contributions. Kern and Lassen are fully funded and no future trust contributions are expected. Sonoma and Solano anticipate future contributions to be equal to the annual direct subsidy amount, with Sonoma ceasing contributions once the plan is fully funded. Both Marin and Santa Clara expect to contribute to their trusts until sufficient funds are available to pay all future benefits, with Santa Clara expecting to initially contribute $31 million in the 2015-16 fiscal year and an amount annually thereafter, and Marin expecting to annually contribute $100,000. Los Angeles and Nevada expect to contribute to their trusts as funds are available, with Los Angeles initially contributing $21 million in the 2016-17 fiscal year, and Nevada contributing $25,000 in the 2015-16 fiscal year. Shasta will make future trust contributions as funds are available, with an annual target of $100,000. For the year ended June 30, 2016, the State contributed $2.1 billion toward annuitants' health and dental benefits. Of this amount, the trial courts represent $91 million and certain discretely presented component units represent $4 million.

128


Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation: The State's annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the ARC. Table 34 presents the State's OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the year ended June 30, 2016, and the two preceding years, including trial courts.

Table 34

Schedule of Annual OPEB Cost, Percentage of Annual OPEB Cost Contributed and Net OPEB Obligation (amounts in thousands}

Fiscal Year Ended Annual OPEB Cost

Percentage of Annual

OPEB Cost Contributed Net OPEB Obligation

June 30, 2014

June30,2015

June30,2016

5,129,284

5,156,787

5,693,106

37.20 %

39.33

37.74

19,489,030

22,617,653

26,162,194

Table 35 presents the components of the State's net OPEB obligation to the OPEB plan, including trial courts.

Table 35

Schedule of Net OPEB Obligation June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Amount

Annual required contribution----------------------- 5,626,380 Interest on nel OPEB obligation---------------------- 967,619 Adjustment lo annual required contribution------------------- (900,893}

Annual OPEB cost ---c5c,6c93-",c!Oc6c

Contributions made------------------------- ___ (020,10480,056050}

Increase in net OPEB obligation-------------------- 3,544,541

Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year------------------- ___ c2=2=,6=1=7,c65=3-

Net OPEB obligation - end of year 1 -------------------- ~~~206,,10602,019040

1 This lolal is nol fully rcporied wilhin lhi, Siale's financial slalemcnls as a porlion is allocaied lo rdaied organizalions ihal arc nol included in ihe CAFR and fiduciary componenl uni ls ihal deem ihe amounl immalerial for inclusion in !heir separaidy issued

financial slalcmcnls

Funded Status and Funding Progress: As of June 30, 2016-the most recent actuarial valuation date for the State substantive plan-the actuarial accrued liability (AAL) for benefits was $76.7 billion, and the actuarial value of assets was $148 million, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of$76.5 billion. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was $20.2 billion, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 380%.

For the trial courts, as of July 1, 2015-the most recent actuarial valuation date-the AAL for benefits was $1.5 billion and the actuarial value of assets was $88 million, resulting in an UAAL of $1.4 billion. The covered payroll was $1.0 billion and the ratio of the UAAL to covered payroll was 139%.

129


Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about mortality and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the plan's funded status and the employer's annual required contributions are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued 1 iabilities for benefits.

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions: Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point The actuarial methods and assumptions used are consistent with a long-term perspective.

Tn the June 30, 2016 State substantive plan actuarial valuation, the individual entry age normal cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included a 4.25% investment rate of return and an annual health care cost trend rate of actual increases for 2017 and 8.00% in 2018 initially, reduced to an ultimate rate of 4.50% in 2023. Both rates included a 2.75% annual inflation assumption. Annual wage inflation is assumed to be 3.00%. The UAAL is being amortized as a level percentage of active member payroll on an open basis over 30 years.

Tn the July 1, 2015 biennial actuarial valuations, the entry age normal cost method was used for 51 of the trial courts. The actuarial assumptions included a 3.75% investment rate of return for 19 trial courts. There are 32 other trial courts with investment rates of return ranging from 4.95% to 7.28%. The actuarial assumptions included a health care cost trend assumption based on the Society of Actuaries' "Getzen" trend model that incorporates (1) initial short-term rates (up to five years); (2) a multi-decade transition period of medium-term rates until projected healthcare costs reach gross domestic product capacity; and (3) a transition to the ultimate trend rate. The initial trend rates start at 8.25% for most trial courts and then reduce gradually to an ultimate trend rate of 4.4% after 60 years. Annual inflation and payroll growth are assumed to be 2.75% and 3.00%, respectively, for most trial courts. The UAAL is amortized on an open basis over 30 years as a level percentage of payroll for 47 trial courts. Three other trial courts (Lassen, Orange, and Yolo) amortize on a closed basis as a level percentage of payroll over 27, 22, and 23 years, respectively. Alpine is amortizing using the level dollar amount over 22 years on a closed basis.

NOTE 12: COMMERCIAL PAPER AND OTHER LONG-TERM BORROWINGS

The primary government has two commercial paper borrowing programs: a general obligation commercial paper program and an enterprise fund commercial paper program for the Department of Water Resources. Commercial paper (new issuance or rollover notes that replace maturing new issuances) may be issued at the prevailing market rate, not to exceed 11 % for the general obligation program and 12% for the Department of Water Resources enterprise fund program, for periods not to exceed 270 days from the date of issuance. The proceeds from the initial issuance of commercial paper are restricted primarily for construction costs of general obligation bond program projects and certain state water projects. For both commercial paper borrowing programs, the commercial paper is retired by the issuance of long-term debt, so commercial paper is considered a noncurrent liability.

To provide liquidity for the programs, the State has entered into revolving credit agreements with credit providers such as commercial banks. The current "letter of Credit" or "Note Purchase" agreements for the general obligation commercial paper program authorize the issuance of notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $2.2 billion. As of June 30, 2016, the general obligation commercial paper program had

IJO


$771 million in outstanding commercial paper notes for governmental activities. The current agreement for the enterprise fund commercial paper program authorizes the issuance of notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $140 million. As of June 30, 2016, the enterprise fund commercial paper program had $43 million in outstanding notes.

The primary government has a bond anticipation note program that consists of borrowing for capital improvements on certain California State University campuses. As of June 30, 2016, $5 million in outstanding bond anticipation notes existed in anticipation of the primary government issuing revenue bonds to the public.

The University of California, a discretely presented component unit, has a commercial paper program and other uncollateralized borrowings. Additional disclosures for the University's commercial paper and other long-term borrowings are included in the University's separately issued financial statements, which can be obtained from the University on its website at www.ucop.edu.

NOTE 13: LEASES

The aggregate amount of lease commitments for facilities and equipment of the primary government in effect as of June 30, 2016, was approximately $1.8 billion. Primary government leases that are classified as operating leases, in accordance with the applicable standards, contain clauses providing for termination. Operating lease expenditures are recognized as being incurred over the lease term. Operating lease expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2016, amounted to approximately $256 million for governmental activities and $27 million for business-type activities. Tt is expected that, in the normal course of business, most ofthese operating leases will be replaced by similar leases.

The total present value of net minimum capital lease payments for the primary government is $760 million. Note 9, Long-term Obligations, reports current additions and deductions for these capital lease obligations. Included in the capital lease commitments are lease-purchase agreements, amounting to a present value of net minimum lease payments of $208 million that the California State University, reported as an enterprise fund, has entered into with the State Public Works Board (SPWB), reported as an internal service fund. This amount represents 27.3% of the total present value of minimum capital lease payments of the primary government Also included in the capital lease commitments are lease-purchase agreements to acquire equipment Total assets related to capital leases have a net carrying value of $254 million for governmental activities and $467 million for business-type activities.

The capital lease commitments do not include $7.3 billion in lease-purchase agreements with the SP\VB and $186 million in lease purchase agreements with building authorities that are blended component units. The SP\VB and the building authorities acquire or develop office buildings and then lease the facilities to state agencies. Upon expiration of the lease, title passes to the primary government The costs of the buildings and the related outstanding revenue bonds are reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. Accordingly, the lease receivables and capital lease obligations associated with these buildings are not included in the government-wide financial statements.

The University of California, a discretely presented component unit, leases land, buildings, and equipment under agreements recorded as operating leases. Additional disclosure for the University's lease obligations is included in its separately issued financial statements that maybe found on its website at www.ucop.edu.

IJI

http://www.ucop.edu

http://www.ucop.edu


Table 36 summarizes future minimum lease commitments of the primary government

Table 36

Schedule of Future Minimum Lease Commitments - Primary Government (amounts in thousands}


Operating Capital Operating Capital Year Ending June 30 Leases Leases Leases Leases

2017 215,480 65,031 25,274 63,683 2018 166,683 54,120 19,227 61,232 2019 122,124 46,876 15,918 34,614 2020 68,942 30,025 14,355 33,229 2021 27,511 26,423 15,289 32,476 2022-2026 65,915 65,846 30,268 144,813 2027-2031 9,538 42,143 15,920 127,436 2032-2036 3,735 39,765 5,198 91,829 2037-2041 104 21,106 2,603 13,005 2042-2046 104 262 397

2047-2051 104 324 2052-2056 98 33 2057-2061 45 33 2062-2066 211

Total minimum lease payments 680,383 391,597 $ 145,050 602,317

Less: amount representing interest 21,415 212,932

Present value of net minimum lease payments .. 370,182 389,385

Less: current portion 25,689 43,818

Capital lease obligation, net of current portion .. 344,493 345,567

NOTE 14: COMMITMENTS

Total

369,468 301,262 219,532 146,551 101,699

306,842 195,037 140,527 36,818

763

428

131 78

211

1,819,347

As of June 30, 2016, the primary government had commitments of $7.3 billion for certain highway construction and high-speed rail projects. These commitments are not included as a liability in the Federal Fund or the Transportation Fund because future expenditures related to these commitments will be reimbursed with $1.1 billion from local governments and $6.2 billion from proceeds of approved federal grants. The primary government also had other commitments for which the future expenditures will be reimbursed by the proceeds of approved federal grants of $623 million for various education programs, $371 million for terrorism prevention and disaster-preparedness response projects, $296 million for services under the workforce development program, $189 million for services provided under various public health programs, $111 million for community service programs, $44 million for services provided under the welfare program, and $18 million for services provided under the child support program.

The primary government had other commitments, totaling $9.1 billion, that are not included as a liability on the Balance Sheet or the Statement of Net Position. The $9.1 billion in commitments includes grant agreements totaling approximately $4.9 billion to reimburse other entities for construction projects for school building aid, parks, transportation-related infrastructure, housing, and other improvements; and to reimburse counties and cities for costs associated with various programs. Any assets that have been constructed will not belong to the primary government, whose payments are contingent upon the other entities entering into

132


construction contracts. The $9.1 billion in commitments includes $379 million in undisbursed loan commitments for various programs aimed at providing housing and emergency shelter to persons in need and $2.0 billion for undisbursed loan commitments to qualified agencies for clean water projects.

The $9.1 billion in commitments also includes contracts of $1.0 billion for the construction of water projects and the purchase and transmission of power that are not included as a liability on the Statement of Net Position of the Water Resources Fund. Included in this amount are certain power purchase, sale, and exchange contracts. The primary government had commitments of $473 million for CSU construction projects. Tn addition, CSU participates in forward-purchase contracts of natural gas and electricity. As of June 30, 2016, CSU's obligation under these special purchase arrangements requires it to purchase at fixed prices an estimated total of $30 million in electricity through December 2019 and $10 million in natural gas through June 2018. The primary government also had commitments of $43 million to veterans for the purchase of properties under contracts of sale. The California State Lottery Commission had commitments of $243 million for gaming and telecommunication systems and services. These are long-term projects, and all of the contracts' needs may not have been defined. The projects will be funded with existing and future program resources or with the proceeds of revenue and general obligation bonds.

As of June 30, 2016, the primary government encumbered expenditures of $989 million for the General Fund, $2.5 billion for the Transportation Fund, $977 million for the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund, and $910 million for the nonmajor governmental funds. See Note 2A, Budgeting and Budgetary Control, for an explanation of the primary government's policy concerning encumbrances.

As of June 30, 2016, the discretely presented and fiduciary component units had other commitments that were not included as liabilities on the corresponding Statement of Net Position. Additional disclosure for the University of California's commitments is included in its separately issued financial statements, which may be found on its website at www.ucop.edu. Additional disclosure for the California Housing Finance Agency's (CalHFA) commitments is included in its separately issued financial statements, which may be found on its website at www.CalHFAca.gov. Additional disclosure for the California Public Employees' Retirement System's (CalPERS) commitments is included in its separately issued financial statements, which may be found on its website at www.CalPHRS.ca.gov. Additional disclosure for the California State Teachers' Retirement System's (CalSTRS) commitments is included in its separately issued financial statements, which may be found on its website at www.CalSTRS.com.

NOTE 15: GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS

The State Constitution permits the primary government to issue general obligation bonds for specific purposes and in such amounts as approved by a two-thirds vote of both houses of the Legislature and by a majority of voters in a general or direct primary election. The debt service for general obligation bonds is appropriated from the General Fund. Under the State Constitution, the General Fund is used first to support the public school system and public institutions of higher education; the General Fund can then be used to service the debt on outstanding general obligation bonds. Enterprise funds and certain other funds reimburse the General Fund for any debt service it provides on their behalf. General obligation bonds that are directly related to, and are expected to be paid from, the resources of enterprise funds are included as a liability of such funds in the financial statements. However, the General Fund may be liable for the payment of any principal and interest on these bonds that is not met from the resources of such funds.

As of June 30, 2016, the State had $74.9 billion in outstanding general obligation bonds related to governmental activities and $792 million related to business-type activities. Tn addition, $27.9 billion in long-term general obligation bonds had been authorized but not issued, of which $27.6 billion is related to governmental activities and $368 million is related to business-type activities. The total amount authorized but not issued includes $15.5 billion authorized by the applicable finance committees for issuance in the form

1JJ

http://www.ucop.edu

http://www.CalHFA.ca.gov

http://www.CalPHRS.ca.gov



of commercial paper notes. Of this amount, $771 million in general obligation indebtedness in the form of commercial paper notes was not yet retired by long-term bonds.

A. Var!ab!e-rnte Genera! Obligation Bonds

The State issues both fixed and variable-rate general obligation bonds. As of June 30, 2016, the State had $3.0 billion in variable-rate general obligation bonds outstanding, consisting of $803 million in daily-rate bonds with credit enhancement and $1.7 billion in weekly-rate bonds with credit enhancement, and $498 million in weekly- or monthly-rate bonds without credit enhancement The interest rates associated with the credit-enhanced bonds are determined by the remarketing agents to be the lowest rate that would allow the bonds to sell on the effective date of such rate at a price (without regard to accrued interest) equal to 100% of the principal amount The interest rates associated with the unenhanced Index Floating Rate Bonds are determined by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (STFMA) Index rate or percentage of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LTBOR) then in effect plus a pre-determined spread. The interest on variable-rate bonds is generally paid on the first business day of each calendar month.

The credit-enhanced bonds are secured by letters of credit that secure payment of principal and interest on the bonds. The State has entered into different credit agreements with various banks for each series of creditenhanced bonds. Under these credit agreements, the credit providers agree to pay all principal and interest payments or the commitment amounts to the bondholders; the State is then required to reimburse the credit providers for the amounts paid. Tn return, the credit providers are compensated with commitment fees that are calculated as a percentage of the bank commitment amounts. The bondholders have the right to tender the bonds daily if the bonds are in a daily-rate mode and weekly if the bonds are in a weekly-rate mode. Upon a tender, the remarketing agent will attempt to remarket the bonds to a new investor. Tf the remarketing of the bonds is unsuccessful, the bonds will enter into a bank bond period and accrue interest at higher rates, which cannot exceed 11 % as permitted by law until remarketed or redeemed. Tfthe bonds cannot be remarketed and remain in a bank bond period ranging from 45 days to 90 days, the bonds will be subject to term loan payment in 12 equal quarterly installments under the terms stated in the credit agreements. The term loan period may exceed the expiration dates of the credit agreements. The bonds may be remarketed at any time during the bank bond or term loan period. There were no bank bonds during fiscal year 2015-16.

The letters of credit for the Series 2003 variable-rate bonds have expiration dates of December 16, 2016; September 7, 2018; November 2, 2018; November 16, 2018; and April 26, 2019. The letters of credit for the Series 2004 variable-rate bonds have expiration dates of April 5, 2018; September 7, 2018; and August 11, 2020. The letters of credit for the Series 2005 variable-rate bonds have expiration dates of December 16, 2016; April 11, 2017; November 16, 2018; November 4, 2019; and November 15, 2019. The Series 2012A and 2013 C, D, and E Index Floating Rate Bonds have mandatory purchase dates on December 1, 2016 (Series 2013C); December 1, 2017 (Series 2013D); May 1, 2018 (Series 2012A); and December 3, 2018 (Series 2013E). The Series 2012B STFMA Index Floating Rate Bonds have final maturities from 2017 to 2020.

Based on the schedules provided in the Official Statements, any required sinking fund deposits for the variable-rate general obligation bonds were set aside in a mandatory sinking fund at the beginning of each of fiscal year 2015-16 and will continue through 2033-34, and 2039-40. The deposits set aside in any fiscal year may be applied, with approval of the State Treasurer and the appropriate bond finance committees, to the redemption of any other general obligation bonds then outstanding. To the extent that the deposit is not applied by January31 of each fiscal year, the variable-rate general obligation bonds will be redeemed in whole or in part on an interest payment date in that fiscal year.

134


B. Mandatory Tender Bonds

As of June 30, 2016, the State had $1.1 billion in outstanding general obligation mandatory tender bonds, including $675 million with a fixed interest rate and $400 million with an index floating rate (discussed in Section A). On their respective mandatory tender dates, these bonds are subject to mandatory tender for purchase at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest, without premium, unless the bonds have been called for redemption on or prior to that day. These bonds have mandatory tender dates on December 1, 2016; December 1, 2017; May 1, 2018; December 3, 2018; December 2, 2019; and December 1, 2021. Tn the event of an unsuccessful remarketing of all the outstanding bonds on the scheduled mandatory tender dates, the bonds will enter into a delayed remarketing period and accrue interest at a higher effective interest rate, gradually increasing on a stepped basis until they are remarketed, redeemed, or paid at maturity. Current state laws limit interest rates to 11 % per annum. With respect to $100 million of the Index Floating Rate Bonds, beginning six months after the scheduled mandatory tender date, the bonds will be subject to special mandatory redemption in 20 equal quarterly installments until they are remarketed or refunded.

C. Build America Bonds

As of June 30, 2016, the State had $13.5 billion in taxable various-purpose general obligation bonds outstanding that were issued as "Build America Bonds" under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) signed into law on February 17, 2009. The bonds will mature between 2020 and 2040. Pursuant to ARRA, the State receives a cash subsidy payment from the United States Treasury equal to 35% of the interest payable by the State on the Build America Bonds on or near each interest payment date. Subsequent federal legislation reduced the Build America Bonds subsidy by 7.3% for the federal fiscal year ending September 30, 2015, and by 6.8% for the federal fiscal year ending September 30, 2016. The cash payment does not constitute a full faith and credit guarantee of the federal government, but is required to be paid by the United States Treasury under ARRA. The subsidy payments are deposited into the State's General Fund.

135


D. Debt Service Requirements

Table 37 shows the debt service requirements for all general obligation bonds as of June 30, 2016. The estimated debt service requirements for the $3.0 billion variable-rate general obligation bonds are calculated using the actual interest rates in effect on June 30, 2016. For mandatory tender bonds, the debt service requirements shown in Table 37 are based on the assumption that the interest rate will remain in effect until the applicable reset dates and that the bonds will be fully redeemed on their scheduled maturity dates. The amounts do not reflect any interest subsidy under the Build America Bonds program or any other offsets to general fund costs of debt service.

Table 37

Schedule of Debt Service Requirements for General Obligation Bonds (amounts in thousands}


Year Ending June 30 Principal Interest

2017 .. 2,963,410 3,842,972

2018 .. 2,922,565 3,744,362

2019 .. 2,856,030 3,621,838

2020 .. 2,975,970 3,470,786

2021.. 2,724,850 3,340,243

2022 - 2026 .. 12,644,665 14,832,444

2027 - 2031 .. 14,360,190 11,729,861

2032 - 2036 .. 15,178,125 8,111,319

2037 - 2041 .. 13,745,625 3,502,269

2042 - 2046 .. 4,570,325 478,323

2047..

Total 74,941,755 56,674,417

E. Genera! Ob!!gation Bond Defeasances

1. Current Year Activity

Total

6,806,382

6,666,927

6,477,868

6,446,756

6,065,093

27,477,109

26,090,051

23,289,444

17,247,894

5,048,648

$131,616,172


Principal Interest Total

58,010 25,933 83,943

62,325 23,640 85,965

49,000 21,997 70,997

41,365 20,700 62,065

31,445 19,496 50,941

39,235 91,220 130,455

172,830 79,632 252,462

191,805 42,744 234,549

102,300 17,062 119,362

41,915 3,996 45,911

2,030 33 2,063

792,260 346,453 1,138,713

On September 9, 2015, the primary government issued $1 .4 billion in general obligation bonds to current and advance refund $1.5 billion in outstanding general obligation bonds maturing in 2016 to 2036. As a result, the refunded bonds are defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the financial statements. The refunding decreased overall debt service by $273 million and resulted in an economic gain of $205 million. The economic gain is the difference between the present value of the old debt service requirements and the present value of the new debt service requirements, discounted at 2.80% per year over the life of the new bonds.

On November 3, 2015, the primary government issued $866 million in general obligation bonds to advance refund $930 million in outstanding general obligation bonds maturing in 2017 to 2035. As a result, the refunded bonds are defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the financial statements. The refunding decreased overall debt service by $160 million and resulted in an economic gain of $123 million. The economic gain is the difference between the present value of the old debt service requirements and the present value of the new debt service requirements, discounted at 2.71 % per year over the life of the new bonds.

136


On March 17, 2016, the primary government issued $1.8 billion in general obligation bonds to current and advance refund $2.0 billion in outstanding general obligation bonds maturing in 2016 to 2037. As a result, the refunded bonds are defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the financial statements. The refunding decreased overall debt service by $399 million and resulted in an economic gain of $294 million. The economic gain is the difference between the present value of the old debt service requirements and the present value of the new debt service requirements, discounted at 2.62% per year over the life of the new bonds.

On April 28, 2016, the primary government issued $998 million in general obligation bonds to current and advance refund $1.1 billion in outstanding general obligation bonds maturing 2017 to 2037. As a result, the refunded bonds are defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the financial statements. The refunding decreased overall debt service by $251 million and resulted in an economic gain of $196 million. The economic gain is the difference between the present value of the old debt service requirements and the present value of the new debt service requirements, discounted at 2.05% per year over the life of the new bonds.

2. Outstanding Balance

Tn the current and prior years, the primary government placed the proceeds of the refunding bonds in a special irrevocable escrow trust account with the State Treasury to provide for all future debt service payments on defeased bonds. The assets of the trust accounts and the liability for defeased bonds are not included in the State's financial statements. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding balance of defeased general obligation bonds was approximately $3.6 billion.

NOTE 16: REVENUE BONDS

A. Governmental Activities

The State Treasurer is authorized by state law to issue Federal Highway Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicles (GARVEE bonds). The purpose of these bonds is to accelerate the funding and construction of critical transportation infrastructure projects in order to provide congestion relief benefits to the public significantly sooner than with traditional funding mechanisms. These bonds are secured and payable from the annual federal appropriation for the State's federal-aid transportation projects. The primary government has no legal liability for the payment of principal and interest on these revenue bonds. Total principal and interest remaining on the bonds is $46 million, payable through 2020. Tn addition, the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority is authorized to issue Clean Renewable Energy Bonds to fund the acquisition and installation of certain transportation-related solar energy facilities located throughout the State. Both of these bonds finance activity in the Transportation Fund and are included in the governmental activities column of the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

The Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation (GSTSC), a blended component unit, as authorized by state law, has issued asset-backed bonds to purchase 100% of the State's rights to future revenues from the Master Settlement Agreement with participating tobacco companies. These bonds are secured by and payable solely from future Tobacco Settlement Revenue and interest earned on that revenue. The primary government has no legal liability for the payment of principal and interest on the bonds. The legislature has annually granted a General Fund appropriation for payment of debt service in the event tobacco settlement revenues and other available amounts prove insufficient to make these payments during the next fiscal year. However, the use of the appropriated monies has never been required. Tn 2013 and 2015, bonds were issued to partially refund the 2005 bonds. Total principal and interest remaining on all asset-backed bonds is $16.6 billion, payable through 2047. All of the Tobacco Settlement Revenue and interest has been pledged in support of these asset-backed bonds. Principal and interest paid in the current year totaled $371 million, while Tobacco

137


Settlement Revenue and interest earned totaled $365 million. These bonds are included in the governmental activities column of the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

Under state law, the State Public Works Board (SPWB), an agency that accounts for its activity in the Public Buildings Construction Fund, an internal service fund, and certain building authorities may issue revenue bonds. These bonds are issued for the purpose of constructing state office buildings. leases with state agencies pay the principal and interest on the revenue bonds issued by the Public Buildings Construction Fund and building authorities. The General Fund has no legal liability for the payment of principal and interest on these revenue bonds. Total principal and interest remaining on the bonds is $14.8 billion, payable through 2040. These revenue bonds are included in the governmental activities column of the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

For the specific debt service coverage ratios, refer to the Schedule of Pledged Revenue Coverage in the Statistical Section.

[l Business-type Activities

Revenue bonds that are directly related to, and are expected to be paid from, the resources of enterprise funds are included in the accounts of such funds. Principal and interest on revenue bonds are payable from the pledged revenues of the respective funds of agencies that issued the bonds. The General Fund has no legal liability for payment of principal and interest on revenue bonds. For specific debt service coverage ratios, refer to the Schedule of Pledged Revenue Coverage in the Statistical Section.

Revenue bonds to acquire, construct, or renovate state facilities or to refund outstanding revenue bonds in advance of maturity are issued for water resources, financing of electric power purchases for resale to utility customers, state university campuses, and certain nonmajor enterprise funds.

C. Discretely Presented Component Units

The University of California issues revenue bonds to finance various auxiliary, administrative, academic, medical center, and research facilities. The revenue bonds are not collateralized by any encumbrance, mortgage, or other pledge of property except pledged revenues, and do not constitute general obligations of the University. For more information regarding revenue bonds, current year defeasances, and outstanding defeasances of the University, refer to its separately issued financial report for fiscal year 2015-16, which may be found on its website at www.ucop.edu.

Under state law, the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) issues fixed-rate and variable-rate revenue bonds to fund loans to qualified borrowers for single-family houses and multifamily developments. Variable-rate debt is typically related to remarketed rates or common indices, such as the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (STFMA) or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LTBOR) and is reset periodically. CalHFA issues both federally taxable and tax-exempt bonds. The bonds issued by CalHFA are payable solely from and collateralized by revenues and other pledged assets. For more information regarding revenue bonds, current year defeasances, and outstanding defeasances of the CalHFA, refer to its separately issued financial report for fiscal year 2015-16, which maybe found on its website at www.CalHFA.CLgov.

IJS


Table 38 shows outstanding revenue bonds of the primary government and the discretely presented component units.

Table 38

Schedule of Revenue Bonds Payable June30,2016


Primary government

Governmental activities

Transportation Fund-------------------------Public Buildings Construction Fund ___________________ _

Nonmajor governmental lunds:

44,213 10,017,624

Golden Stale Tobacco Securilizalion Corporation Fund______________ 6,926,057

Building authorities------------------------ ---~20202,060050

Total governmental activities---------------------- 17,210,499 Business-type activities

Electric Power Fund_________________________ 4,880,000 Waler Resources Fund________________________ 2,770,888

Calilomia Stale University----------------------- 5,450,928

Nonmajor enterprise lunds ----------------------- ---~c8c2c6,c55c8_ Total business-type activities---------------------- ___ 1030,90208,037040 Total primary government----------------------- 31,138,873

Discretely presented component units

University olCalilomia ------------------------ 18,379,830 Cali lomia Housing Finance Agency -------------------- 2,583,952 Nonmajor component units----------------------- _____ 40805,,30000

Total discretely presented component units------------------ ___ 2_1c,4_4c9,_08_2_

Total revenue bonds payable----------------------- cccc~c5c2C,5c8S7,0950S0

IJ9

http://www.ucop.edu

http://www.CaIHFA.ca.gov


Table 39 shows the debt service requirements for fixed-rate and variable-rate bonds. Tt excludes unamortized premiums and discounts that are included in Table 38.

Table 39

Schedule of Debt Service Requirements for Revenue Bonds (amounts in thousands}

Primary Government


Year Ending June 30 Principal Interest Principal Interest

2017 585,661 794,652 943,470 590,843 2018 633,856 766,394 1,001,000 545,980 2019 611,811 736,244 1,050,405 498,776

2020 621,616 705,990 1,105,103 449,566 2021 628,206 676,967 1,128,540 397,369 2022-2026 2,918,736 3,081,895 2,651,660 1,372,908 2027-2031 3,116,910 2,347,108 1,751,670 909,721 2032-2036 2,930,995 1,482,848 1,552,955 534,444 2037-2041 1,968,860 885,462 801,235 267,891 2042-2046 1,579,475 667,894 490,145 109,699 2047-2051 849,176 3,169,381 258,580 28,189 2052-2116 44,415 777

Total 16,445,302 15,314,835 12,779,178 5,706,163

* Includes interest on variable-rate bonds based on rates in eITect on June 30, 2016.

D. Revenue Bond Defeasances

1. Current Year- Governmental Activities

Discretely Presented

Component Units

Principal

418,057 441,035 446,010

753,840 727,630

2,958,465 3,310,730 3,531,885 3,490,031

2,304,190 684,735

1,375,810 20,442,418

Interest *

913,104 898,970 879,669

856,823 832,652

3,658,865 2,910,341 2,099,123 1,296,701

687,053 380,862

4,077,092 19,491,255

Tn April 2016, the SPWB and the California State University (CSU) entered into a restructuring agreement in which the bonds held by SP\VB for CSU projects were refunded by revenue bonds issued by CSU. A portion of the bond proceeds of the CSU refunding bonds were deposited into escrow accounts and will be used to make principal and interest payments for the refunded debt, resulting in the legal defeasance of $773 million in bonds payable. The restructuring was authorized in the 2015-16 budget

The SP\VB and CSU also executed termination agreements for the leases related to the defeased bonds. As a result, the net investment in direct financing leases, construction work in progress, and bonds payable related to these leases were removed from the Public Buildings Construction Fund's Statement of Net Position. The net effect of these transactions was a gain of $41 million, and is shown in the Public Buildings Construction Fund's Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position.

During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the SPWB issued $618 million in lease revenue refunding bonds. The bond proceeds were used to refund $731 million in outstanding lease revenue bonds. The net proceeds of the refunding bonds, along with additional resources, were deposited into an escrow account to provide for all future debt service payments on the refunded bonds. As a result, the bonds are considered defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the financial statements. The refunding decreased debt service payments by $137 million and resulted in an economic gain of $117 million. These lease revenue bonds are reported in the Public Buildings Construction Fund, an internal service fund.

140


During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the San Francisco State Building Authority issued $103 million in lease revenue refunding bonds to advance refund $132 million in outstanding lease revenue bonds. The net proceeds of the refunding bonds were deposited in an escrow account to provide for all future debt service payments on the refunded bonds. As a result, the bonds are considered defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the financial statements. The refunding decreased debt service payments by $15 million and resulted in an economic gain of$15 million.

During the 2015-16 fiscal year, the Oakland State Building Authority issued $59 million in lease revenue refunding bonds to advance refund $74 million in outstanding lease revenue bonds. The net proceeds of the refunding bonds were deposited in an escrow account to provide for all future debt service payments on the refunded bonds. As a result, the bonds are considered defeased and the liability for those bonds has been removed from the financial statements. The refunding decreased debt service payments by $11 million and resulted in an economic gain of$10 million.

2. Current Year- Business-type Activities

Tn August 2015 and April 2016, the CSU issued a total of$2.4 billion in systemwide revenue refunding bonds to refund certain outstanding systemwide revenue bonds. A portion of the proceeds was deposited into an escrow account to provide for all future debt service payments on the refunded bonds. As a result, the bonds are considered defeased and the liability for these bonds has been removed from the financial statements. This refunding decreased debt service payments by $210 million over the life of the bonds and resulted m an economic gain of $154 million for the refunded bonds.

3. Outstanding Balances

Tn current and prior years, the primary government defeased certain bonds by placing the proceeds of new bonds in irrevocable trust accounts to provide for all future debt service requirements. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities for these defeased bonds are not included in the financial statements. As of June 30, 2016, the outstanding balances of defeased revenue bonds were $233 million for governmental activities and $2.3 billion for business-type activities.

NOTE 17: SERVICE CONCESSION ARRANGEMENTS

The State entered into various service concessions arrangements with independent third parties to develop, equip, operate, and maintain nonexclusive concessions at park grounds in exchange for fixed installment payments, for a fixed period of time. These third parties are compensated by user fees. These existing facilities are reported as capital assets by the State, the present value of installment payments are reported as receivables, and a corresponding deferred inflow of resources is reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position. The State reserves the right to provide or modify the types of goods and services provided by the operator to ensure that the public receives fair pricing, proper service, and appropriate quality. The State is not obligated by the debts of the operator in the event of a default, nor does the State guarantee minimum revenue to the operator. The amount of the primary government's service concession arrangements can be found in Note 21, Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows ofResources.

The University of California, a discretely presented component unit, has entered into service concession arrangements with third parties for student housing and certain other faculty and student services. Payments received or to be received by the University from service concession arrangements are reported as deferred inflows of resources. Additional information on the University's service concession arrangements can be found in the University's separately issued financial statements on its website at www.ucop.edu.

141

http://www.ucop.edu


NOTE 18: INTERFUND BALANCES AND TRANSFERS

A. !nteriund Balances

Short-term interfund receivables and payables result from the time lag between the dates on which goods and services are delivered and the dates on which payments between entities are made. Tn addition, interfund borrowing, mainly from nonmajor governmental funds and fiduciary funds, is used to meet temporary imbalances of receipts and disbursements in the General Fund.

Table 40 shows the amounts due from and due to other funds.

Table 40

Schedule of Due From Other Funds and Due To Other Funds June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

General Transportation

Due From '""' '""' Governmental funds

General Fund

Federal Fund 113,110 920,411 Transportation Fund 13,920 Environmental and Natural Resources Fund .. 10,841 16,547 Nonmajor governmental ltmds 1,109,148 18,138

Total governmental funds 1,247,019 955,096

Enterprise funds Waler Resources Fund Stale Lollery Fund 952

Unemployment Programs Fund 217,160 Nonmajor enterprise lunds 1,292

Total enterprise funds 219,404

Internal service funds 4,113 5,938

Total due from other funds 1,470,536 961,034

142

Due To

Environmental and Natural Nonmajor Electric Resources Governmental Power

Fund Funds Fund

574,836

339,175 90,647 48,757

1,758 13,926 15,009

353,101 731,007

383,781

195 343

195 384,124

8,873 25,282 4,000

362,169 1,140,413 4,000


Due To

California Water State Unemployment State Nonmajor Internal Total

Resources Lottery Programs University Enterprise Service Fiduciary Due to Fund Fund Fund Fund Funds Funds Funds Other Funds

254 305,722 2,942,362 3,823,174 3,183 81 39,876 13,189,735 14,696,218

23,437 50,310 136,424 13,027 42,173

231 57 46,979 3,215,829 4,419,317

3,183 485 138 429,041 19,398,236 23,117,306

39,370 39,370 384,733 217,160

317 2,155

39,687 643,418

1,265 1,394 4,484 338 1,440 46,420 2,534 106,081

1,265 1,394 7,667 823 1,578 515,148 19,400,778 23,866,805

143


Tnterfund receivables and payables are the result of interfund loans that are not expected to be repaid within one year. Tn addition to the temporary interfund cash-flow borrowing shown in Table 40, annual enacted budgets provide for long-term loans from many of the State's special funds-mainly the Transportation Fund, Environmental and Natural Resources Fund, and nonmajor governmental funds-to the General Fund. The $2.4 billion in Transportation Fund loans payable from the General Fund also includes $849 million in deferred Proposition 42 transfers for traffic congestion relief and other direct loans from the Traffic Congestion Relief Program.

Table 41 shows the primary government's interfund receivables and payables.

Table 41

Schedule of Tnterfund Receivables and Payables June30,2016


Interfund Receivables

Governmental funds General Fund ______________ _

Transportation Fund ____________ _

Environmental and Natural Resources Fund _____ _

General

'""'

4,790

22,527 Nonmajor governmental ltmds __________ ---~= Total governmental funds _________ _ 27,317

41,717 Internal service funds------------- ----~"

Interfund Payables

Transportation

Fund

2,413,168

10,000

1,448

2,424,616

Environmental

and Natural

Resources

Fund

454,800

454,800

69,034 2,424,616 454,800 Total primary government ___________ ~~~~=~ ~~~==~ ~~~~=~

144


Interfund Payables

Nonmajor Water Unemployment Nonmajor Internal

Governmental Resources Programs Enterprise Service

Funds Fund Fund Funds Funds Total

791,160 308,233 1,600 14,207 3,983,168

10,000 864 10,864

14,790

23,975

801,160 308,233 1,600 15,071 4,032,797

86 92,011 10,292 144,106

801,246 92,011 308,233 1,600 25,363 4,176,903

145


The amounts shown as due from primary government and due to component units represent short-term receivables and payables between the primary government and component units resulting from the time lag between the dates on which goods and services are provided and received and the dates on which payments between entities are made.

Table 42 shows the amounts due from the primary government and due to component units.

Table 42

Schedule of Due from Primary Government and Due to Component Units June 30, 2016


Due From

Governmental funds

Due To

University

of California

General Fund___________________________ 137,882

Nonmajor governmental ltmds ----------------------- _____ 3~2,_32_1_

Total governmental funds----------------------- ____ 1_7~0,_20_3_

Total primary government------------------------ s~~""''s's"•s'"s3~

146



147


B. !ntmiund Transfers

Transfers move money collected by one fund to another fund, which then disburses it as required by law. The General Fund and certain other funds transfer money to support various programs accounted for in other funds. The largest transfer from the General Fund was $2.3 billion to nonmajor governmental funds, mainly for support of trial courts, local governments, and health care related programs. The General Fund also transferred $2.8 billion to the California State University, an enterprise fund. The Transportation Fund transferred $1.1 billion in weight fee revenues to the Transportation Debt Service Fund, a nonmajor governmental fund, for transportation-related debt service costs. The Federal Fund transferred $500 million to the General Fund for administration of the Unemployment Insurance Program.

Table 43 shows interfund transfers of the primary government

Table 43

Schedule of Tnterfund Transfers June30,2016


Transferred From

Governmental funds General Fund ______________ _ Federal Fund ______________ _

Transportation Fund ____________ _

Environmental and Natural Resources Fund _____ _

General

'""' 500,156

72,868 1,067

35,636 Nonmajor governmental ltmds __________ ----~~-

Total governmental funds _________ _ 609,727

16,448 Internal service funds------------- ----~=~ 626,175 Total primary government ___________ ~~~~;,;~

148

Transferred To

Environmental and Natural

Transportation Resources Fund Fund

853

168,572 40,409

10,021 26,107

10,021 235,941

10,021 235,941

Nonmajor Governmental

Funds

2,265,715

18,857 1,148,605

13,031 28,144

3,474,352

38,634 3,512,986

Transferred To

California State

University

Fund

2,800,101

2,800,101

2,800,101

Internal Service

Funds

1,459 1,459

Total

5,066,669

687,585 1,261,882

14,098 99,908

7,130,142

56,541

7,186,683


149


NOTE 19: FUND BALANCES, NET POSITION DEFICITS, AND ENDOWMENTS

A. Fund Balances

Table 44 shows the composition of the governmental fund balances.

Table 44

Schedule of Fund Balances by Function

June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Environmental and Natural

General Federal Transportation Resources

'""' Fund Fund Fund

Nonspendable Long-term inlerlund receivables .. 69,034 Long-term loans receivable 6,905 Other

Total nonspendable 75,939

Restricted General government 6,360 27,906 7,220 5,603 Education 457,181 432 457 Health and human services 153,726 257 1,685,994 Natural resources and environmental

protection 5,578 10,808 4,406,860 Business, consumer services, and

housing 1,644 208,431 216,772 42,423 Transportation 8,262,661 Corrections and rehabilitation .. Budget stabilization 3,420,422

Total restricted 4,044,911 247,834 8,487,110 6,140,880

Committed General government 12,193 18,212 Education 3,745 Health and human services 4,057 1,251 Natural resources and environmental

protection 2,024 3,930,112 Business, consumer services, and

housing 50,552 38,927 Transportation Corrections and rehabilitation .. 46,083

Total committed 68,102 51,807 3,987,251

Assigned - general government ..

Unassigned (3,827,224} (1,037}

Total fund balances 361,728 247,834 8,538,917 $ 10,127,094

150

Nonmajor Governmental

Funds

11,188

11,188

3,551,089 350,216

2,490,843

145,852

3,461,533 9,161

648

10,009,342

385,512 46,454

350,900

686,605

131,973 3,818 8,158

1,613,420

14,622

$ 11,648,572

B. Net Position Deficits

Table 45 shows the net position deficit balances.

Table 45

Schedule of Net Position Deficits June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Architecture Revolving Fund ________________ _ Service Revolving Fund __________________ _

Technology Services Revolving Fund ______________ _

Waler Resources Revolving Fund---------------

Other Internal Service Programs Fund--------------


Internal Service Funds

22,877 642,247 202,472

5,301

55,604

Enterprise Funds

Calilornia Stale University Fund________________ 2,576,689

Total net position deficits------------------ s~~~'e28e,5e"e1" s~~s2e,5e7e6'e68e9"

C. Discretely Presented Component Unit Endowments and Gifts

The University of California, a discretely presented component unit, administers certain restricted nonexpendable, restricted expendable, and unrestricted endowments that are included in the related net position categories of the government-wide and fund financial statements. As of June 30, 2016, the value of restricted endowments and gifts totaled $14.6 billion, and unrestricted endowments and gifts totaled $3.0 billion. The University's policy is to retain realized and unrealized appreciation on investments with the endowment after an annual income distribution. The net appreciation available to meet future spending needs upon approval by the Board of Regents amounted to $2.1 billion at June 30, 2016. The portion of investment returns earned on endowments and distributed each year to support current operations is based on a rate approved by the Board of Regents. Tn addition, the California State University Auxiliary Organizations and the University of California Hastings College of the Law, nonmajor component units, have restricted nonexpendable and restricted expendable endowments of $1.1 bill ion and $9 mill ion, respectively.

NOTE 20: RISK MANAGEMENT

The primary government has elected, with a few exceptions, to be self-insured against loss or liability. The primary government generally does not maintain reserves. Losses are covered by appropriations from each fund responsible for payment in the year in which the payment occurs. The State is permissively self-insured and, barring any extraordinary catastrophic event, the potential amount of loss faced by the State is not considered material in relation to the primary government's financial position. Generally, the exceptions are when a bond resolution or a contract requires the primary government to purchase commercial insurance for coverage against property loss or liability. There have been no significant reductions in insurance coverage from the prior year. Tn addition, no insurance settlement in the last three years has exceeded insurance coverage. All claim payments are on a "pay-as-you-go" basis, with workers' compensation benefits for selfinsured agencies initially being paid by the State Compensation Insurance Fund.

151


The discounted liability for unpaid self-insurance claims of the primary government is estimated to be $3.9 billion as of June 30, 2016. This estimate is primarily based on actuarial reviews of the State's workers' compensation program and includes indemnity payments to claimants, as well as all other costs of providing workers' compensation benefits, such as medical care and rehabilitation. The estimate also includes the liability for unpaid services fees, industrial disability leave benefits, and incurred-but-not-reported amounts. The estimated total liability of approximately $5.6 billion is discounted to $3.9 billion using a 3.5% interest rate. Of the total discounted liability, $409 million is a current liability, of which $276 million is included in the General Fund, $130 million in the special revenue funds, and $3 million in the internal service funds. The remaining $3.5 billion is reported as other noncurrent liabilities in the government-wide Statement of Net Position.

The University of California, a discretely presented component unit, is self-insured or insured through a wholly-owned captive insurance company. Additional disclosures for the University's risk management and self-insurance claims liability is included in its separately issued financial statements, which can be obtained from the University on its website at www.ucop.edu.

Table 46 shows the changes in the self-insurance claims liability for the primary government

Table 46

Schedule of Changes in Self-Insurance Oaims Year Ended June 30 (amounts in thousands}

Unpaid claims, beginning--------------

Incurred claims-----------------Claim payments-----------------

Unpaid claims, ending----------------

* Includes $3,282 Lor business-type activities.

152

2016 2015

3,843,167 3,703,970 540,310 566,194

(443,757} (426,997}

3,939,720 * ·'~~~~'•·"~'~'··1~67


NOTE 21: DEFERRED OUTFLOWS ANO DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES

Tn the fund financial statements, governmental funds reported deferred inflows of resources of $1. 9 bill ion as this amount represents revenues that are earned and measurable, but not available within 12 months of the end ofthe reporting period.

Table 47 shows the detail of the deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources reported in the government-wide Statement of Net Position. For descriptions of the deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources transactions, see Note 1.L.

Table 47

Schedule of Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows ofResources June30,2016 (amounts in thousands}

Primary Government Governmental Business-Type

Activities Activities

Deferred outflows of resources: Loss on reltmding ol debt 808,177 390,176

Decrease in lair value olhedging derivatives .. Net pension liability 6,917,408 938,106

Total deferred outflows of resources .. 7,725,585 1,328,282

Deferred inflows of resources:

Gain on relunding ol debt 194,700 Service concession arrangements 64,321 Net pension liability 4,990,302 162,346 Other deterred in nows 922,505

Total deferred inflows of resources .. 5,249,323 1,084,851

NOTE 22: NO COMMITMENT DEBT

Component

Total Units

1,198,353 397,863

179,564 7,855,514 5,080,144

9,053,867 5,657,571

194,700 773

64,321 71,139 5,152,648 1,210,490

922,505 499,155

6,334,174 1,781,557

The California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA), a major component unit, issued conduit debt to provide financial assistance for the acquisition, construction, and development of multifamily rental housing. As of June 30, 2016, the CalHFA had $592 million of conduit debt obligations outstanding, which is not debt of the State.

Certain debt of the nonmajor component units is issued to finance activities such as the promotion of renewable energy sources and financing for economic development projects. This debt is secured by the credit of private and public entities and is administered by trustees independent of the State. As of June 30, 2016, these component units had approximately $4.3 billion of debt outstanding, which is not debt of the State.

153

http://www.ucop.edu


NOTE 23: CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

A. Litigation

The primary government is a party to numerous legal proceedings, many of which are not unusual for governmental operations. To the extent they existed, the following legal proceedings were accrued as a liability in the government-wide financial statements: those decided against the primary government before June 30, 2016; those in progress as of June 30, 2016, and settled or decided against the primary government as of March 22, 2017; and those having a high probability of resulting in a decision against the primary government as of March 22, 2017, and for which amounts could be estimated. Tn the governmental fund financial statements, the portion of the liability that is expected to be paid within the next 12 months is recorded as a liability in the fund from which payment will be made. Tn the proprietary fund financial statements, the entire liability is recorded in the fund from which payment will be made.

Tn addition, the primary government is involved in certain other legal proceedings that, if decided against the primary government, may impair its revenue sources or require it to make significant expenditures. Because of the prospective nature of these proceedings, no provision for the potential liability has been made in the financial statements.

Following are the more significant lawsuits pending against the primary government:

The primary government is a defendant in two cases, Bakersfield Matt, LLC v Franchise Tax Board, and CA-Centerside ll, LLC v Franchise Tax Board, both regarding the constitutionality of a fee imposed on limited-liability companies (LLC). Plaintiffs allege class action and declaratory relief, and seek attorney fees based on alleged violations to the state and federal constitutions. They seek certification of two classes of allegedly similarly situated LLCs and unspecified amount of refunds on behalf of the LLC classes, alleged to be in excess of 50,000 members. The trial court has denied class certification and the plaintiffs have appealed. Briefing of the appeal was completed on December 17, 2014, and the parties are waiting for notice of oral argument

Tn a previously settled case, Northwest Energetic Services, LLC v Franchise Tax Board, the Court of Appeal found the fee unconstitutional only as applied to the plaintiff. The primary government has already begun to pay refunds to LLCs, with the same facts as Northwest, that have no income earned inside California Tn another previously settled case, Ventas Finance!, LLC v Franchise Tax Board, the Court of Appeal also ruled that the fee is unconstitutional as applied to the plaintiff, but it awarded only a partial refund because Ventas received income from both inside and outside of California. Bakersfield Matt, LLC v Franchise Tax Board raised the same constitutional issues as Northwest and Ventas, but initially pertained to LLCs that conduct business solely within California. Bakersfield Mall, LLC later amended its complaint to reflect the fact that not all of its income is derived within the state, making it similar to the Ventas case. This plaintiff also intended to bring a class action suit for refund on behalf of all similarly situated LLCs and to declare the LLC fee unconstitutional. However, the Court of Appeal ruled that Bakersfield Mall, LLC did not follow mandatory class action claim procedures. CA-Centerside ll, LLC v Franchise Tax Board raised the same constitutional issues as the Bakersfield case, and alleges that the LLC fee is unconstitutional regarding any activities, whether in-state or out-of-state. Actual and expected future claims for refunds from LLCs are estimated to be as high as $1.2 billion.

The primary government is a defendant in another case, Abercrombie & Fitch Co & Subsidiaries v Franchise Tax Board, regarding constitutionality of Revenue and Taxation Code section 25101.15. Tfthe plaintiff were to prevail and obtain the remedy it seeks, the estimated loss to the plaintiff and all similarly situated taxpayers is approximately $5.0 billion in refunds and $1.5 billion in lost annual revenues going forward. The case went to

154


trial and on September 13, 2016, the court granted the State's motion for judgement, which was entered for the State on October 31, 2016. A Notice of Appeal was filed December 7, 2016.

A writ petition, Bekkerman et al v. California Board of Equalization, has been filed against the primary government challenging the validity of a Board of Equalization (the Board) sales tax regulation (Cal. Code of Regulations, Title 18, section 1585) that requires the sales tax charged on a mobile telephone be based on the full "unbundled" price of the phone, rather than any discounted price that is contingent on a service plan commitment A companion class action has been filed. One plaintiff has removed the class action to federal court The primary government has filed a motion to remand that is fully briefed and pending before the District Court Tfthe sales tax regulation is invalidated, the companion class action could lead to an order requiring the Board to refund up to $1.0 billion in sales tax collections. The superior court will hold a hearing on the merits ofthe writ on June 2, 2017.

The primary government is a defendant in several matters collectively known as the Suction Dredge Mining Cases. Mining interests have challenged the State's regulation of suction dredge gold mining, alleging federal preemption and takings claims. One of these matters, The New 49 'ERS, Inc. et al. v. California Department of Fish and Game (The New 49 'ERS), is also pied as a class action. Tfthe plaintiffs in The New 49 'ERS succeed in certifying a class of miners, and that class ultimately prevails in their claim that the state moratorium on suction dredge mining resulted in a constitutional taking of their federal mining rights, the State could face a judgment in excess of $5 billion.

The primary government was a defendant in the following cases: Anthem Blue Cross v David Maxwetf-Jotfy, et al.; Molina Family Health Plan v DHCS; and Health Net of California v DHCS regarding application of budget reduction factors to managed-care capitated rates. These cases have been settled on a contingent basis based on the plans' profitability. The estimated combined total potential loss is more than $400 million based on three separate settlement agreements that were entered into in 2013 and 2014. The primary government is involved in similar disputes with LA Care and other local initiatives regarding application ofbudget reduction factors to managed-care capitation rates; these disputes are still pending in administrative hearings. The combined total potential loss is more than $200 million.

B. Federn! Audit Exceptions

The primary government receives substantial funding from the federal government in the form of grants and other federal assistance. The primary government, the University of California, California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA), and certain nonmajor discretely presented component units are entitled to these resources only if they comply with the terms and conditions of the grants and contracts and with the applicable federal laws and regulations; they may spend these resources only for eligible purposes. Tfaudits disclose exceptions, the primary government, the University, CalHFA, and certain nonmajor discretely presented component units may incur a liability to the federal government

155


NOTE 24: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The following information describes significant events that occurred subsequent to June 30, 2016, but prior to the date ofthe auditor's report

A. Debt issuances

Tn August 2016, October 2016 and March 2017, the primary government issued $2.7 billion, $1.6 billion, and $2.8 billion, respectively, in general obligation bonds to finance or refinance capital facilities or other voterapproved costs for public purposes, including: stem cell research; housing and emergency shelter; high-speed rail; K-12 public school facilities; K-12 public education facilities; public higher education facilities; library construction and renovation; safe drinking water; clean air and transportation improvement; earthquake safety and public building rehabilitation; new prison construction; passenger rail and clean air; safe, clean, and reliable water supply; safe drinking water, clean water, watershed and flood protection; safe neighborhood parks, clean water, clean air, and coastal protection; seismic retrofit; water consetvat10n; children's hospitals; highway safety, traffic reduction, air quality and port security; safe drinking water, water quality and supply, flood control, river and coastal protection; veterans' housing; water quality, supply, and infrastructure improvement; clean water, clean air, safe neighborhood and coastal protection; disaster preparedness and flood protection; public safety; correctional facilities; water security, clean drinking water, coastal and beach protection.

Tn August 2016, the University of California, a major component unit, issued a total of $1.0 billion in revenue bonds to finance and refinance certain facilities and projects of their medical centers.

Tn September 2016, the primary government issued $100 million in general obligation bonds for public purposes, including highway safety, traffic reduction, air quality and port security. The primary government also remarketed $1 00 mill ion in mandatory tender bonds originally issued to finance capital facilities or other voter-approved costs for public purposes ..

Tn September 2016 and October 2016, the Department ofWater Resources issued a combined $995 million in revenue bonds. The $567 million in power supply revenue bonds were issued to refund outstanding power supply bonds and to pay related issuance costs. The $428 million in water system revenue bonds were issued to fund construction of certain water system projects, to refund or redeem certain outstanding water system revenue bonds and commercial paper notes, to fund deposits to a debt service reserve account, to fund capitalized interest, and to pay related issuance costs.

Tn October 2016, the State Public Works Board issued $705 million in lease revenue bonds to refund outstanding lease revenue bonds, to finance and refinance certain design and construction cost on various projects for the benefit of the Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, to reimburse interim loans, and to pay related issuance costs.

Tn October 2016, the primary government issued $167 million in veterans home purchase revenue bonds to refund certain outstanding home purchase revenue bonds, to make deposits into funds, accounts or subaccounts as provided in the resolution, to finance new and refinance existing contracts of purchase, and to pay related issuance costs.

Tn November 2016, two of the State's building authorities issued $22 million in lease revenue bonds to refund outstanding bonds for two state office buildings, to fund a debt service reserve account, and to pay related issuance costs.

156


Subsequent to June 30, 2016, the California State University issued $199 million in bond anticipation notes to fund capital projects at various campuses. Tn September 2016, the university deposited cash and certain investment securities in an irrevocable escrow with the State Treasurer as security for the partial refunding of certain outstanding Systemwide Revenue Bonds maturities. Tn February 2017, the university issued $1.2 billion in revenue bonds to finance and refinance the acquisition, construction, improvement, and renovation of certain university facilities, to refund certain outstanding Systemwide Revenue Bond maturities, to fund capitalized interest, and to pay related issuance costs.

B. Other

Tn the November 8, 2016 general election:

Voters passed Proposition 51 authorizing the State to sell $9.0 billion in general obligation bonds for education facilities-$7.0 billion for K-12 public school facilities and $2.0 billion for community college facilities. The bonds will be issued over a five-year period and will increase the General Fund's debt service expenditures by approximately $500 mill ion per year for 35 years.

Voters passed Proposition 55 authorizing the State to extend through 2030 the income tax rates established by Proposition 30 that were scheduled to end in 2018. Proposition 55 guarantees revenues for K-12 public schools and community colleges, health care services for low-income Californians, budget reserves, and outstanding debt paydowns. After satisfying these constitutional requirements, remaining revenues, if any, would be available for any budget purpose.

Voters passed Proposition 56 authorizing the State to increase its excise tax on cigarettes by $2 per pack and by a similar amount for other tobacco products such as cigars, chewing tobacco, and electronic cigarettes effective April 1, 2017. Revenue from these higher taxes will be used for many purposes, but primarily to increase spending on health care services for low-income Californians.

Voters passed Proposition 64 legalizing the use, growth, and possession of marijuana for adults 21 years and older for nonmedical purposes, with certain restrictions. The State will regulate nonmedical marijuana businesses and tax the growing and selling of medical and nonmedical marijuana. Most of the revenue from these taxes will support youth programs, environmental protection, and law enforcement

Tn August 2016, Fitch Ratings raised the State's general obligation rating to "AA-" from "A+", stating that the upgrade reflected a combination of positive credit developments for the State, including Fitch's revised criteria for U.S. state and local governments. Tn addition, Fitch stated, "California is fundamentally better positioned to withstand a future economic downturn than has been the case in prior recessions due to numerous institutional improvements."

California's demand for unemployment insurance benefits requires the State to continue borrowing from the U.S. Department of Labor during the 2016-17 fiscal year. As of June 30, 2016, the State had $3.1 billion in outstanding loans with the U.S. Department of Labor that were used to cover deficits in the Unemployment Programs Fund. As of March 22, 2017, the State had an outstanding loan balance of $3.0 billion and estimates that these loans will be fully repaid in 2018.

Tn December 2016, the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) Board of Administration voted to lower the discount rate used in its actuarial assumptions from 7.5% to 7.0% over the next three years. The Board approved separate timelines for implementing the new rate for the State, school districts, and public agencies. The new discount rate for the State would take effect July 1, 2017, and the new discount rate for school districts and public agencies would take effect July 1, 2018. CalPERS' decrease in the discount rate will

157


potentially increase the State's unfunded pension liability and will likely result in higher employer contributions in the future.

Tn February 2017, the California State Teacher's Retirement System (CalSTRS) Board of Administration voted to adopt a new set of actuarial assumptions that reflect members' increasing life expectancies and current economic trends. The board voted to decrease the discount rate over a two-year period from 7.50% to 7.25% for the June 30, 2016 actuarial valuation to be presented at the April 2017 board meeting, and a decrease from 7.25% to 7.00% for the June 30, 2017 actuarial valuation to be presented at the April/May 2018 board meeting. CalSTRS' decrease in the discount rate will potentially increase the State's share of CalSTRS' unfunded liability and will likely result in a higher non-employer contribution required from the State.

158

' I


Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1


ST ATE MISCELLANEOUS i Total pension liability

Service cost-------------------Interest on lolal pension liability ___________ _

DiITerences between expected and actual experienc~-----

Benelll payments, including relunds ol employee contributions .. Net change in lolal pension liability __________ _

2014'

1,477,762

6,670,928

(4,844,631}

3,304,059

88,885,115 Total pension liability - beginning ____________ -== Total pension liability - ending (a) ___________ _

Plan fiduciary net position

Contributions employer-------------

Contributions employee--------------

Net investment income--------------

Benell! payments, including relunds ol employee contributions ..

Plan lo plan resourcemovemenl ------------Administrative expense---------------

Net change in plan liduciary nel position _________ _

Plan fiduciary net position - beginning __________ _

92,189,174

2,156,312

766,896

10,370,838

(4,844,631}

(86,473}

8,362,942

60,017,620

68,380,562 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) ----------- <~=e

State's net pension liability- ending (a) - (b) ________ _ 23,808,612

Plan liduciary nel position as a percentage ollhe

lolal pension liability---------------- 74.17%

Covered-employee payroll --------------- 10,019,739

State's nel pension liability as a percentage ol covered-employee payroll _____________ _ 237.62%

1 This schedule will be buili prospcclivdy uni ii ii conlains len years ofdala

2015 3

1,576,695

6,970,837

693,639

(5,098,222}

4,142,949

92,189,174

96,332,123

2,608,785

771,046

1,505,042

(5,098,222}

(354)

(76,678}

(290,381}

68,380,562

68,090,181

28,241,942

70.68%

10,640,884

265.41%

(continued}

1Thi, schedule includes amounls allribuiable lo rdaicd organizalions, fiduciary componenl uni ls, and discrcidy pres en led componenl uni ls, which arc nol part oflhc primary govcmmenl

160

J The dale in ihc column heading rcprcscnls ihc end oflhc measurcmenl period of ihcncl pension liabi~ly, which is one year

prior lo ihc ~porling period


Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios (continued) For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1


STATETNDUSTRTALi Total pension liability

Service cost-----------------

Interest on lolal pension liability------------

Di ITerences between expected and actual experienc~-----

Benelil payments, including reltmds ol employee contributions .. Net change in lolal pension liability __________ _

Total pension liability - beginning ___________ _

2014'

92,324

241,278

(146,977}

186,625

3,181,282

3,367,907 Total pension liability - ending (a)____________ cCc~~


Contributions employer--------------

Contributions employee-------------


Benelil payments, including reltmds ol employee contributions ..

88,516

44,459

423,076

(146,977}

Plan lo plan resource movement------------

Administrative expense--------------- --~ Net change in plan liduciary nel position _________ _

(3,583}

405,491 Plan fiduciary net position - beginning __________ _ 2,420,958

2,826,449 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) __________ cCc~"'

541,458 State's net pension liability-ending (a)- (b) _________ s~~=

Plan llduciary nel position as a percentage ollhe lolal pension liability _______________ _ 83.92%

Covered-employee payroll ______________ _ 532,490

State's nel pension liability as a percentage ol

covered-employee payroll -------------- 101.68%

2015 3

100,006

257,527

26,976

(157,029}

227,480

3,367,907

3,595,387

107,238

49,482

62,385

(157,029}

30

(3,252}

58,854

2,826,449

2,885,303

710,084

80.25%

577,711

122.91%

(continued}

161




STATE SAFETYi Total pension liability




2014'

402,902

663,219

(429,353}

636,768

8,682,750 Total pension liability - beginning ____________ -~=

162

Total pension liability - ending (a) ___________ _









9,319,518

339,232

196,148

1,162,050

(429,353}

(9,945}

1,258,132

6,583,260

7,841,392 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) ___________ <~=~

State's net pension liability- ending (a) - (b) ________ _ 1,478,126



Covered-employee payroll --------------- 1,901,235


* Restated

2015 3

422,634

734,333

(4,150}

(469,275}

683,542

9,626,597 * 10,310,139

393,925

215,482

175,677

(469,275}

499

(9,200}

307,108

7,841,392

8,148,500

2,161,639

79.03%

2,003,777

107.88%

(continued}


Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability end Related Ratios (continued) For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1


STATE PEACE OFFICERS AND FTREFTGHTERS i Total pension liability

Service cost-----------------



Benelil payments, including reltmds ol employee contributions .. Net change in lolal pension liability __________ _

Total pension liability - beginning ___________ _

2014'

816,836

2,622,406

(1,568,738}

1,870,504

34,655,771

36,526,275 Total pension liability - ending (a)____________ cCc~"'






959,741

331,956

3,964,754

(1,568,738}

Plan lo plan resource movement------------

Administrative expense--------------- -~~ Net change in plan liduciary nel position _________ _

(33,334}

3,654,379 Plan fiduciary net position - beginning __________ _ 22,713,610

26,367,989 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) __________ cCc~~

10,158,286 State's net pension liability-ending (a)- (b) _________ C-aEe


Covered-employee payroll ______________ _ 3,030,525



* Restated

2015 3

838,628

2,759,982

288,526

(1,697,676}

2,189,460

36,219,196 * 38,408,656

1,146,192

366,419

584,142

(1,697,676}

194

(30,069}

369,202

26,367,989

26,737,191

11,671,465

69.61%

3,115,287

374.65%

(continued}

163




CALIFORNIA HTGHWAYPATROL Total pension liability




2014'

191,730

724,474

(460,991}

455,213

9,604,872 Total pension liability - beginning ____________ -~=

164










10,060,085

277,702

83,161

1,005,007

(460,991}

(8,417}

896,462

5,759,985

6,656,447 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) ----------- a~=~ State's net pension liability- ending (a) - (b) ________ _ 3,403,638



Covered-employee payroll --------------- 765,283


2015 3

198,665

764,348

75,593

(487,061}

551,545

10,060,085

10,611,630

351,197

85,791

146,782

(487,061}

(214)

(7,600}

88,895

6,656,447

6,745,342

3,866,288

63.57%

809,610

477.55%

(continued}




JUDGES' Total pension liability

Service cost-----------------



Changes olassumplions --------------Benelil payments, including reltmds ol employee contributions ..

Net change in lolal pension liability __________ _ Total pension liability - beginning ___________ _

2014'

27,581

140,256

(193,935}

(26,098}

3,383,310

3,357,212 Total pension liability - ending (a)____________ ~~~





Other miscellaneous income------------


191,148

7,248

59

(193,935}

(1,141} Administrative expense--------------- --~~ Net change in plan liduciary nel position _________ _ 3,379

Plan fiduciary net position - beginning __________ _ 53,820

57,199 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) __________ ~~~~

3,300,013 State's net pension liability-ending (a)- (b) _________ <~=~





2015 3

27,841

133,181

57,568

158,646

(201,868}

175,368

3,357,212

3,532,580

180,910

3,877

88

2,198

(201,867}

(1,227}

(16,021}

57,199

41,178

3,491,402

1.17%

28,770

12135.56%

(continued}

165




JUDGES'Tl Total pension liability

Service cost-------------------Interest ___________________ _


Changes olassumplions --------------Benell! payments, including relunds ol employee contributions ..

Net change in lolal pension liability __________ _

2014'

78,670

61,044

(8,950}

130,764

837,198 Total pension liability - beginning ____________ -~=~

166







Administrative expense---------------Net change in plan liduciary nel position _________ _


967,962

57,027

20,413

150,168

(8,950}

(785)

217,873

795,967

1,013,840 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) ___________ C~""~

(45,878) State's net pension liability/(asset)- ending (a)- (b) ------- <~""'2



Covered-employee payroll --------------- 40,476

State's nel pension liability/(assel} as a percentage ol covered-employee payroll _____________ _ -113.35%

2015 3

79,641

69,128

(17,319}

(16,619}

(14,041}

100,790

967,962

1,068,752

65,629

22,242

(2,402}

(14,041}

(1,127}

70,301

1,013,840

1,084,141

(15,389)

101.44%

180,230

-8.54%

(continued}




LEGISLATORS'

Total pension liability

Service cost-----------------



Changes olassumplions --------------Benelil payments, including reltmds ol employee contributions ..

Net change in lolal pension liability __________ _ Total pension liability - beginning ___________ _

2014'

732

6,465

(7,482}

(285)

115,806

115,521 Total pension liability - ending (a)____________ ~~~2






565

113

15,372

(7,482}

Administrative expense--------------- --~~ Net change in plan liduciary nel position _________ _

(362)

8,206 Plan fiduciary net position - beginning __________ _ 122,148

130,354 Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) __________ cCc~~~

(14,833) State's net pension liability/(asset)- ending (a)- (b) ------- s~-2




covered-employee payroll -------------- -1008.36%

2015 3

769

6,268

(4,246}

(2,654}

(9,087}

(8,950}

115,521

106,571

590

105

(94)

(9,087}

(399)

(8,885}

130,354

121,469

(14,898)

113.98%

1,397

-1066.43%

(concluded}

167


Schedule of State Pension Contributions For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1


168

2015

STATE MISCELLANEOUS 1

Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _ 2,421,157

Contributions in relation lo the actuarially

(2,583,400} determined contribution--------------- -=~ Contribution deliciency (excess}-------------

Covered-employee payroll --------------

Contributions as a percentage ol covered-employee payroll _____________ _

STATE INDUSTRIAL 1

Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _


(162,243}

10,655,117

24.25%

92,024

determined contribution--------------- -~= Contribution deliciency (excess}-------------

(104,769}

(12,745}

Covered-employee payroll -------------- 577,713

Contributions as a percentage ol covered-employee payroll _____________ _ 18.14%

STATE SAFETY 1

Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _ 341,509


determined contribution--------------- -~= Contribution deliciency (excess}-------------

(387,508}

(45,999}

Covered-employee payroll -------------- 2,003,716

Contributions as a percentage ol covered-employee payroll _____________ _ 19.34%

STATE PEACE OFFICERS AND FIREFIGHTERS 1

Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _ 1,086,102


(1,148,597} determined contribution--------------- -~~

Contribution deliciency (excess}-------------

Covered-employee payroll --------------

Contributions as a percentage ol covered-employee payroll _____________ _

1 This schedule will be buili prospeclivdy uni ii ii conlains lcn years ofdala

(62,495}

3,115,364

36.87%

1Thi, schedule includes amounls allribuiable lo rdaied organizalions, fiduciary componcnl uni ls, and discreidy

p~scnied componcnl uni ls, which arenol parl of iheprimary govcmmcnl

2016

2,718,895

(2,814,126}

(95,231}

11,197,607

25.13%

103,293

(116,594}

(13,301}

625,220

18.65%

368,444

(404,595}

(36,151}

2,100,289

19.26%

1,197,160

(1,263,436}

(66,276}

3,241,763

38.97%

(continued}


Schedule of State Pension Contributions (continued) For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1


CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _


2015

323,393

2016

363,634

determined contribution--------------- --~(3~5~2,~13~90} -~(307~7,~5340 )0

Contribution deliciency (excess}------------- ~~~(2~8,~74~6~} ~~(~}~3,~90~0}0 Covered-employee payroll ______________ _ 809,610 808,032

Contributions as a percentage ol

covered-employee payroll -------------- 43.49% 46.72%

JUDGES' Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _ 1,884,555 463,073


(3,598} determined contribution--------------- --~~ (3,252}

1,880,957 Contribution deliciency (excess}------------- ~~~ 459,821

Covered-employee payroll ______________ _ 167,542 29,771



JUDGES'II Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _ 63,193 58,362


(59,982} determined contribution--------------- --~~ (60,476}

3,211 Contribution deliciency (excess}------------- ""~-s (2,114}




LEGISLATORS' Actuarially determined contribution ___________ _ 260 )4)


(544) determined contribution--------------- ---~ (549)

(284) Contribution deliciency (excess}------------- ~~~~ (408)




(continued}

169


Schedule of State Pension Contributions (continued) For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1


Notes to Required Supplementary Information for the most recent fiscal year presented: Public Employees' Retirement Fund (PERF} and Single-Employer Plans

Actual contribution amounts: Based on slalulorily required contributions as outlined in CaliLornia Government Code

section 20683.2, which dictates lhal any excess employer contributions due lo increased employee

contributions must be al localed lo the unLunded liability.

Covered-employee payroll: Pensionable earnings provided by the employer

Valuation dale: Actuarially determined contribution rates were calculated as oL Jtme 30, 2013.

Methods and assumptions used lo determine contribution rates:

Actuarial cost method

Amortization method

Asset valuation method

Tnnation

Salary increases

Payroll growth

Entry age normal

See each plan's June 30, 2013 Actuarial Valuation Report

Actuarial value oLassels; Lor details see each plan's June 30, 2013 Actuarial Valuation Report

2.75%

PERF varies by entry age and service Judges' 3.00%

Judges'TT varies by entry age and service

Legislators' varies by entry age and service

3.00%

Investment rate oLrelurn Net oLpension plan investment expenses and administrative expenses; includes in nation:

Retirement age

Mortality

170

PERF 7.50%, which is used Lor contribution purposes

Judges' 4.25%

Judges'TT 7.00%

Legislators' 5.75%

The probabilities oLreliremenl are based on the 2014 CalPERS Experience Study Lor the period

Lrom 1997 lo 2011.

Mortality rates are based on the 2014 CalPERS Experience Study adopted by the CalPERS Board and posl-reliremenl mortality rates include 20 years oLprojecled on-going mortality

improvements using Scale BB published by the Society oL Actuaries.


Schedule of the State's Proportionate Shere of Net Pension Liability - CelSTRS For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1

(amounts in thousands} 2014 1 2015 l

State's proportion ofCalSTRS' net pension liability ..

State's proportionate share ofCalSTRS' net pension liability .

Plan fidudary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability ..

1 This schedule will be buili prospcclivdy uni ii ii conlains lcn years ofdaia

37.65%

22,001,531

76.52%

34.59%

23,289,391

74.02%

1Thc dale in ihc column hcadingrcprcscnls ihc end of ihcmcasurcmcnl period oflhc ncl pension liabilily, which is one year prior lo ihc rcporlingpcriod

Schedule of the State's Contributions - CelSTRS For the Past Two Fiscal Years 1


Statutorily required wntribution .

Contributions in relation to the statutorily required wntribution .

Annual wntribution defkiency/(excess).

1 This schedule will be bu iii prospcclivdy uni ii ii conlain, Ion years ofdaia

2015

1,486,004

1,486,004

Notes to Required Supplementary Information for the most recent fiscal year presented:

State's Participation in CalSTRS

2016

1,935,288

1,935,288

Actual contribution amounts: Based on slalulorily required contributions as outlined in Cali Lomia Education Code

sections 22954 and 22955, as well as Cali Lomia Public Resources Code section 6217.

Valuation dale: Actuarially determined contribution rates were calculated as oL June 30, 2014.

Methods and assumptions used lo determine contribution rates:

Actuarial cost method Entry age normal

Amortization method/period Level percent oLpayroll, closed/open period, 32 years remaining amortization period

Asset valuation method Adjustment lo market value

Consumer price in nation

Payroll growth

Investment rate oLrelum

Interest on accounts

Posl-reliremenl benelll increases (COLAs}

3.00%

3.75%

For calculating the actuarially determined contribution:

7.50%, nel oLpension plan investment and administrative expenses

For calculating lolal pension liability:

7.60%, nel oLpension plan investment expenses, but gross oLadminislralive expenses

4.50%

2.00% simple

171



Other Postemployment Benefit Plan

Actuarial Actuarial Unfunded UAAL as a

Actuarial Value of Accrued Actuarial Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of

Valuation Assets Liability Liability (UAAL) Ratio Payroll Covered Payroll

Date (•) ~, (b- a) (alb) (,) ((b- a)/ c)

State substantive plan

June 30, 2014 $ 41 71,814 71,773 0.0 % 19,250 372.8 %

June30,2015 86 74,189 74,103 0.1 20,180 367.2

June30,2016 148 76,681 76,533 0.2 20,160 379.6

Trial Courts 1

July 1, 2011 17 1,385 1,368 12 % 922 148.4 %

July 1, 2013 30 1,421 1,391 2.1 931 149.4

July 1, 2015 88 1,494 1,406 5.9 1,014 138.7

1 The lrial courls ~porting is based on 52 individual biennial acluarial valualions as of July 1 2015

Nole: The University ol Calilornia provides OPEB benellls through its Retirement Health Plan lo its eligible retirees and their lamilies. As the University is the employer providing these benellls, the Stale will nol be reporting these benelils in Nole 11 or the Required Supplementary Tnlormalion. Tnlormalion regarding the University and relerences lo its llnancial slalemenls can be lound in Nole 1, Section A.3., Discretely Presented Component Uni ls.

Pursuant to Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34, the State uses the modified approach to report the cost of its infrastructure assets (state roadways and bridges). Under the modified approach, the State does not report depreciation expense for roads and bridges but capitalizes all costs that add to the capacity and efficiency of State-owned roads and bridges. All maintenance and preservation costs are expensed and not capitalized.

A. Infrastructure Asset Reporting Categories

The infrastructure assets reported in the State's financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016, are in the following categories and amounts: state highway infrastructure (completed highway projects) totaling $73.5 billion, land purchased for highway projects totaling $14.3 billion, and infrastructure construction-in-progress (uncompleted highway projects) totaling $11.0 billion.

Donation and Relinquishment: Donation and relinquishment activity affects the inventory of statewide lane miles, land, and/or bridges as adjustments to the infrastructure assets and/or land balance in the State's financial statements. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016, there were no donations of infrastructure land, and relinquishments are $40 million of state highway infrastructure (completed highway projects) and $8 million of infrastructure land.

172

B. Condition Baselines and Assessments

1. Bridges


The State uses the Bridge Health Index (BHI}-a numerical rating scale from Oto 100 that uses element-level inspection data-to determine the aggregate condition of its bridges. The inspection data is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' "Guide Manual for Bridge Element Inspection."

The BHI represents the remaining asset value of the bridge. A new bridge that has 100% of its asset value has a BHI of 100. As a bridge deteriorates, it loses asset value, as represented by a decline in its BHI. When a bridge is repaired, it will regain some (or all) of its asset value and its BHI will increase.

The following table shows the State's established condition baseline and actual BHI for fiscal years 2013-14 through 2015-16:

Fiscal Year

Ended June 30

2014

2015

2016

Established BHI Baseline 1

80.0

80.0

80.0

1 The aclual slalewide BHI should nol be lower ihan iheminimum BHI esiablished by ihe Siale

The following table provides details on the State's actual BHI as of June 30, 2016:

BHIRange1 Bridge Count Percent

Greater than 99.50 4,739 36.53 % 90.0 < - HT<- 99.50 5,784 44.59

80.0 < - HT< 90.0 862 6.65 70.0 < - HT< 80.0 980 7.55

0.0 <HT< 70.0 367 2.83

Does nol carry lraITic 240 1.85

Total 12,972 100.00 %

Actual BHI

95.6

95.7

94.5

Network BHI

99.9

97.0

85.8

73.9

58.9

97.3

1 Effrclive FY 2015-16, ihe BHI Range is being displayed inslcad of ihe BHI Descriplion for ihe analysis ofSiale Bridges - Sialewide as requesied

by ihe Office ofSirnclure Mainlcnance and lnvesigalions

2. Roadways

The State conducts a periodic pavement-condition survey, which evaluates ride quality and structural integrity and identifies the number of distressed lane miles. The State classifies a roadway's pavement condition by the following descriptions:

1. Excellent/good condition - few potholes or cracks 2. Fair condition - moderate number of potholes or cracks 3. Poor condition - significant or extensive number of potholes or cracks

173


Statewide lane miles are considered "distressed lane miles" if they are in poor condition. The actual distressed lane miles are compared to the established condition baseline to ensure that the baseline is not exceeded.

The following table shows the State's established condition baseline and actual distressed lane miles from the last three completed pavement-condition surveys:

Condition Established Condition Actual Actual Distressed

Assessment Baseline Distressed Distressed Lane Miles as Percent

Date 1 Lane Miles (maximum) l Lane Miles of Total Lane Miles

December 2011 18,000 12,333 24.9 %

December 2013 18,000 7,820 15.7

December2015 18,000 7,889 15.9

1 Condilion assessmcnl for ihe Siale's esiablished condilion basdine and aclual dislrcssed lane miles is beingrcporied as oflhe Sialeoflhe Pavemenl rcporl publicalion dale

1The aclual slalewide dislressed lane miles should nol exceed ihe maximum dislressed lane miles esiablished by ihe Siale

The following table provides details on the State's actual distressed lane miles as of the last completed pavement-condition survey:

Pavement Condition

Excellent/Good

Fair

Poor

Total

C. Budgeted and Actual Preservation Costs

Lane Miles

26,484

15,272

7,889

49,645

Distressed Lane Miles

7,889

7,889

The estimated budgeted preservation costs represent the preservation projects approved by the California Transportation Commission and the State's scheduled preservation work for each fiscal year. The actual preservation costs represent the cumulative cost to date for the projects approved and work scheduled in each fiscal year.

The State's budgeted and actual preservation cost information for the most recent and four previous fiscal years is shown in the following table:

Estimated Budgeted Actual

Fiscal Year Preservation Costs Preservation Costs

Ended June 30 (in mi\Hons) 1 (in mi\Hons) 1

2012 3,362 3,184

2013 2,621 2,533

2014 2,510 2,353

2015 3,340 2,686

2016 3,975 1,909

1 In fiscal year 2014-15, ihe melhodology for idcnlifying ihe prcscrvalion budgeiedand aclual cos ls was adjusied loincludeaddilional cos ls nol previously rcporied

174



175


Gens'al Fund and


Revenue Funds

General

REVENUES

Corporation lax-------------

Intergovernmental -------------Cigarelle and tobacco laxes _________ _

Insurance gross premiums lax _________ _

Vehicle license lees-------------Motor vehicle luel lax ___________ _

Personal income lax-------------Retail sales and use laxes __________ _

Other major laxes and licenses ________ _

Budgeted Amounts

Original Final

10,304,000 10,309,000

84,000 87,000

2,493,000 2,486,000

839 839

81,354,000 79,962,000

25,246,000 25,028,000

366,000 370,000

Other revenues-------------- -~==~-~==c 1,619,161 1,732,161

Total revenues------------- -====--==== 121,467,000 119,975,000

EXPENDITURES Business, consumer services, and housing _____ _ 36,217 36,931

Transportation-------------- 83,423 83,423 Natural resources and environmental protection ____ _ 1,717,223 2,043,758 Health and human services __________ _ 31,939,104 32,259,043 Corrections and rehabilitation _________ _ 9,919,638 10,130,414

Education-------------- 60,007,610 60,765,227

General government Tax relier ______________ _ 431,657 431,657

Debt service-------------- 5,495,445 5,495,446 Other general government __________ -~==~-~==~-5,589,125 5,672,413

Total expenditures ___________ -===~~===~ 115,219,442 116,918,312

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Translers lrom other lunds __________ _

Translers lo other lunds __________ _

Actual

Amounts

10,024,833

85,344

2,561,932

23,559

79,427,730

24,782,415

369,769

1,837,251

119,112,833

36,774

83,423

1,854,968

31,436,819

9,947,947

60,509,876

413,953

4,874,617

5,201,493

114,359,870

460,146

(3,614,440}

Variance With

Final Budget

(284,167}

(1,656}

75,932

22,720

(534,270}

(245,585}

(231)

105,090

(862,167}

(157)

(188,790}

(822,224}

(182,467}

(255,351}

(17,704}

(620,829}

(470,920}

(2,558,442)

(1,778,426} Other additions (deductions}---------- -----------===~------Total other financing sources (uses)------ _________ _ (4,932,720)

Excess (dellciency} olrevenues and other sources over (under} expenditures and other uses ______ _ (179,757}

6,459,790 Fund balances- beginning ___________ --------------===------6,280,033 Fund balances- ending ____________ aa,,,~~~-a~~~~-,a~aaaaaaa,.ac~~~~

176


Federal Transportation

Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance With Budgeted Amounts Actual Variance With

Original Final Amounts Final Budget Original Final Amounts Final Budget

80,431,240 80,431,240 80,431,240

4,909,791 4,958,537 5,003,318 44,781

4,154,218 4,138,032 4,161,638 23,606

39 39 39 436,916 415,833 447,238 31,405

80,431,279 80,431,279 80,431,279 9,500,925 9,512,402 9,612,194 99,792

63,715 63,715 63,715 110,082 110,082 101,613 (8,469}

5,327,977 5,327,977 5,327,977 8,744,420 9,354,009 8,006,473 (1,347,536}

463,526 463,526 463,526 402,811 403,189 376,719 (26,470}

65,071,720 65,071,720 65,071,720 3,546 3,546 2,838 (708)

48,357 48,357 48,357

6,918,928 6,918,928 6,918,928 2,550 2,550 2,297 (253)

1,175 1,175 188 (987)

1,061,272 1,061,272 1,061,272 913,714 913,543 904,218 (9,325}

78,955,495 78,955,495 78,955,495 10,178,298 10,788,094 9,394,346 (1,393,748)

5,548,078 15,538,760

(6,992,514} (15,863,508}

(32,036} (324,857}

(1,476,472) (649,605)

(688) (431,757}

7,032 15,603,396

6,344 15,171,639

(continued}

177


Budgetary Comparison Schedule (continued) Gens'al Fund and Majer Special Revenue Funds

Year Ended June 30, 2016

(amounts in thousands} Environmental and Natural Resources

Budgeted Amounts

Original

REVENUES

Corporation lax-------------Intergovernmental ___________ _

Cigarelle and tobacco laxes _________ _

Insurance gross premiums lax ________ _ Vehicle license lees ___________ _

Motor vehicle luel lax __________ _ Personal income lax ___________ _

Retail sales and use laxes _________ _

Other major laxes and licenses ________ _ 171,601

5,436,934 Other revenues------------- -~= Total revenues ___________ _

EXPENDITURES Business, consumer services, and housing ____ _

Transportation------------Natural resources and environmental protection .. Health and human services _________ _

Corrections and rehabilitation ________ _

Education--------------General government

Tax relier _____________ _

Debt service-------------

5,608,535

81,084

70,673

4,973,544

59,220

814

52,768 Other general government _________ --=~ Total expenditures __________ _ 5,238,103

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES} Translers lrom other lunds _________ _

Translers lo other lunds __________ _

Other additions (deductions}--------- ____ _

Total other financing sources (uses}------ ____ _

Excess (dellciency} olrevenues and other sources over (under} expenditures and other uses _____ _

Fund balances - beginning ______________ _

Fund balances - ending___________ a~~~~

178

Final

171,601

5,436,934

5,608,535

81,084

72,506

4,875,648

59,220

814

54,964

5,144,236

Actual

Amounts

171,601

5,436,934

5,608,535

72,585

69,337

4,357,661

53,887

404

48,709

4,602,583

632,771

(394,357}

121,255

359,669

1,365,621

19,149,003

20,514,624

Variance With

Final Budge(

(8,499}

(3,169}

(517,987}

(5,333}

(410)

(6,255}

(541,653}

(concluded}


Reconciliation of Budgetary Basis Fund Balances of the General Fund and the Major Special Revenue Funds to GAAP Basis Fund Balances


Major Special Revenue Funds

General

Budgetary fund balance reclassified into

GAAP statement fund structure 6,280,033

Basis difference:

Tnlerlund receivables 66,034

Loans receivable 43,283

Tnlerlund payables (3,983,168)

Escheal properly (949,685}

Bonds authorized but unissued

Tax revenues (997,000}

Fund classi llcalion changes 4,037,384

Other

Timing difference:

Liabilities budgeted in subsequent years (4,135,153}

GAAP fund balance - ending 361,728

Notes to Um Required Supplementary Information

Budgetary Comparison Schedule

Environmental

and Natural

Federal Transportation Resources

6,344 15,171,639 20,514,624

2,424,616 454,800

240,613 1,424,076

(10,864} (14,790}

(11,068,265} (12,111,532}

2,053

2,486,799 (52,875}

(1,176} (465,008} (87,209}

247,834 8,538,917 10,127,094

The State annually reports its financial condition based on a Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) basis and on the State's budgetary provisions (budgetary basis). The Budgetary Comparison Schedule for the General Fund and Major Special Revenue Funds reports the original budget, the final budget, the actual expenditures, and the variance between the final budget and the actual expenditures, using the budgetary basis of accounting.

On the budgetary basis, individual appropriations are charged as expenditures when commitments for goods and services are incurred. However, for financial reporting purposes, the State reports expenditures based on the year in which goods and services are received. The Budgetary Comparison Schedule includes all of the current year expenditures for the General Fund and major special revenue funds as well as related appropriations that typically are legislatively authorized annually, continually, or by project While the encumbrances relate to all programs' expenditures on a budgetary basis, adjustments for encumbrances are made under "other general government," except for Environmental and Natural Resources where adjustments for encumbrances are made under each program's expenditures.

The Budgetary Comparison Schedule is not presented in this document at the legal level of budgetary control because such a presentation would be extremely lengthy and cumbersome. The State of California prepares a separate report, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Supplement, which includes statements that demonstrate compliance with the legal level of budgetary control in accordance with Government Accounting

179


Standards Board's (GASB) Codification of Governmental Accounting and Financial Reporting Standards, Section 2400.121. The supplement includes a comparison of the annual appropriated budget with expenditures at the legal level of control. A copy of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Supplement is available by emailing the State Controller's Office, State Accounting and Reporting Division at [email protected].

Reconciliation of Budgetary With GAAP Basis

The reconciliation of budgetary basis fund balances of the General Fund and the major special revenue funds to GAAP basis fund balances is presented on the previous page and the reconciling items are explained in the following paragraphs.

The beginning fund balance for the General Fund on the budgetary basis is restated for prior-year revenue adjustments and prior-year expenditure adjustments. A prior-year revenue adjustment occurs when the actual amount received in the current year differs from the amount of revenue accrued in the prior year. A prior-year expenditure adjustment results when the actual amount paid in the current year differs from the prior-year accrual for appropriations for which the ability to encumber funds has lapsed in previous periods. The beginning fund balance on a GAAP basis is not affected by these adjustments.

Basis Difference

lnterfund Receivables and Loans Receivable: Loans made to other funds or to other governments are normally recorded as either expenditures or transfers on a budgetary basis. However, in accordance with GAAP, these loans are recorded as assets. The adjustments related to interfund receivables caused increases of $66 million in the General Fund, $2.4 billion in the Transportation Fund, and $455 million in the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund. The adjustments related to loans receivable caused increases of $43 million in the General Fund, $241 million in the Federal Fund, and $1.4 billion in the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund.

lnterfund Payables: Loans received from other funds are normally recorded as transfers on a budgetary basis. However, in accordance with GAAP, these loans are recorded as liabilities. The adjustments related to interfund payables caused decreases of $4.0 billion in the General Fund, $11 million in the Transportation Fund, and $15 million in the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund.

Escheat Property: A liability for the estimated amount of escheat property expected to ultimately be reclaimed and paid is not reported on a budgetary basis. The liability is required to be reported on a GAAP basis. This adjustment caused an $950 million decrease in the General Fund.

Bonds Authorized but Unissued: Tn the year that general obligation bonds are authorized by the voters, the full amount authorized is recognized as revenue on a budgetary basis. Tn accordance with GAAP, only the amount of bonds issued each year is reported as an other financing source. The adjustments related to bonds authorized but unissued caused decreases of $11.1 billion in the Transportation Fund and $12.1 billion in the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund.

Tax Revenues: Estimated tax payments are accrued on a budgetary basis pursuant to Chapter 751, Statutes of 2008. However, in accordance with GAAP, tax payments are accrued based on the portion of estimated net final payments related to the fiscal year. This adjustment caused a decrease of $997 million in the General Fund.

Fund Classification Changes: The fund balance amounts for governmental funds have been reclassified in accordance with governmental accounting standards. These reclassifications caused increases of $4.0 billion

180


in the General Fund and $2 million in the Federal Fund. These increases represent the fund balances of funds that are not considered part of the General Fund or the Federal Fund, respectively, for any budgetary purpose or for the Budgetary/Legal Basis Annual Report.

Other: Certain other adjustments and reclassifications are necessary in order to present the financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The other adjustments caused an increase of $2.5 billion in the Transportation Fund and a decrease of$53 million in the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund.

Timing Difference

Liabilities Budgeted in Subsequent Years: On a budgetary basis, the primary government does not accrue 1 iabilities for which there is no existing appropriation or no currently available appropriation. The adjustments made to account for these liabilities in accordance with GAAP caused decreases of $4.1 billion in the General Fund, $1 million in the Federal Fund, $465 million in the Transportation Fund, and $87 million in the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund. The large decrease in the General Fund primarily consists of $1.9billion for medical assistance, $1.1 billion for June 2016 payroll that was deferred to July 2016, $627 million for pension contributions, and $285 million for workers' compensation claims.

181




182



184

Nonmajor governmental funds account for the State's activities that do not meet the criteria of a major governmental fund. Following are brief descriptions ofnonmajor governmental funds.

Special revenue funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources, other than debt service or capital projects, that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures for specific purposes.

The Business and Professions Regulatory and Licensing Fund accounts for fees and other revenues charged for regulating and licensing specific industries, professions, and vocations.

The Financing for Local Governments and the Public Fund accounts for tmces, fees, bond proceeds, and other revenues used to finance the construction and maintenance of parks, jails, and other public and local government programs.

The Cigarette and Tobacco Tax Fund accounts for a surtax on cigarette and tobacco products that is used for various health programs.

The Local Revenue and Public Safety Fund accounts for vehicle license fees and a 1.5625% state sales tax dedicated to local governments for realigning costs from the State to local governments, and a 0.5% state sales tmc dedicated to local governments to fund public safety programs.

The Health Care Related Programs Fund accounts for fees, taxes, bond proceeds, transfers from other state funds, and other revenues used for the Medi-Cal program, medical research, and other health and human services programs.

The Trial Courts Fund accounts for the various fees collected by the courts, maintenance-ofeffort payments from the counties, transfers in from the General Fund, and trial court operating costs.

The Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation Fund is a blended component unit that accounts for the receipt of Tobacco Revenue Settlements pledged for the payment of debt service.

Other special revenue programs funds account for all other proceeds of revenue sources, other than debt service or capital projects, that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specific purposes.

Debt service funds account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned for the payment of principal and interest on general long-term obligations.

The Economic Recovery Bond Sinking Fund accounts for General Fund transfers, proceeds from the sale of surplus property, and the 0.25% sales and use tmc revenue collected for the payment of principal, interest, and other related costs of the Economic Recovery Bonds. Tn August 2015, the outstanding Economic Recovery Bonds were defeased and all excess revenue remaining in this fund was transferred to the Financing for Local Governments and the Public Fund.

(continued)

185


186

(continued)

The Transportation Debt Service Fund accounts for Transportation Fund transfers used for the payment of principal and interest related to various transportation-related general obligation bonds.

Capital projects funds account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets.

The Higher Education Construction Fund accounts for bond proceeds used to construct state colleges and universities.

The Hospital Construction Fund accounts for bond proceeds used to construct hospitals.

The Local Government Construction Fund accounts for bond proceeds used to construct schools, libraries, and other major capital facilities for local governments.

Building authorities are blended component units created by joint-powers agreements between local governments and the State or other local governments for the purpose of financing the construction of state buildings. The funds account for bond proceeds used to finance and construct state buildings and parking facilities.

Other capital projects funds account for transactions related to resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays, including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets.

Nonmajor Governmental Funds


187

Govc·nnontal Funds


ASSETS Cash and pooled investments _________ _

Investments---------------Receivables (net) _____________ _

Due lrom other lunds -------------Due lrom other governments __________ _

Tnlerlund receivables------------

Loans receivable--------------Other assets ______________ _

Total assets---------------

LIABILITIES

Accounts payable-------------

Due lo other lunds -------------Due lo component units ___________ _

Due lo other governments __________ _

Tnlerlund payables-------------Revenues received in advance _________ _ Deposits _______________ _

Other liabilities _____________ _

Business and

Professions

Regulatory

and Licensing

1,335,354

80,970

50,617

10,332

203,186

108,693

15

1,789,167

60,940

21,798

380

20,505

39,953

35,008

178,584 Total liabilities-------------- ---~=c DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES _____ _

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources .. 178,584

FUND BALANCES

Nonspendable ---------------Restricted _______________ _ 853,096 Commilled ______________ _ 757,487 Assigned _______________ _

Total fund balances ___________ _ 1,610,583

Total liabilites, deferred inflows of resources,

1,789,167 and fund balances ____________ ~~~""~~

188

Special Revenue

Financing

for Local Cigarette Local

Governments ""' Revenue and

and the Public Tobacco Tax Public Safety

1,153,682 465,288 3,610,114

18,280 240,551 45,813

487,035 54,449 41,649

551

180,660

2,543,668

4,383,876 760,288 3,697,576

245,319 10,797 15,792

9,238 7,440 24,159

31,345

242,326 10,059 3,429,959

2,825

977

500,685 59,641 3,469,910

176,527

500,685 236,168 3,469,910

3,608,751 524,120 170,190

274,440 57,476

3,883,191 524,120 227,666

4,383,876 760,288 3,697,576


Special Revenue

Golden State Other 1ofol

Health Tobacco Special :inn,imjm

Care Related Trial Securitization Revenue :>pecbl

Programs Courts Corporation Programs ttn,n«<

1,525,586 1,387,472 396,620 2,057,402 11,-1 1,51\

287,432 151,596 .:39_::~s

2,610,752 260,359 200,639 233,595

81,247 1,552 395,376 1,111,92)

802,485 29,429 63,117 1)5,-11:.

90,000 327,400

32,156 65,670 2.~)~,.1,~

11,145 11,1','

5,052,226 2,067,389 748,855 3,142,560 11,641,937

82,655 241,309 23 189,557

4,267,574 24,460 60,991 .'..'.J),GG~,

976 '7,PI 12,160 127,581 374,405 -'..196.S~'.'

3,470

15,465 12,003 42,933 l ll,17-1

440,499 20,593 ,'.61)9~

34 87,576 22,049 1~s.,,~, 4,377,888 933,428 23 714,974 rn,2-,~,n,

5,957 ]';2,.'.';.'.

4,377,888 933,428 23 720,931 11),411,611

11,188 JLH\

552,932 994,351 748,832 2,155,380 9.G~,~.G)2

121,406 113,800 266,249 1,1 )/5\

14,622 1-'./,~~

674,338 1,133,961 748,832 2,421,629 11,114,31(1

5,052,226 2,067,389 748,855 3,142,560 21,641,9->'7

(ccnl.nueS,

189

Govc·nnontal Funds


ASSETS Cash and pooled investments------------

Investments ------------------Receivables (net) _______________ _

Due lrom other lunds --------------

Due lrom other governments ------------

Tnlerlund receivables--------------

Loans receivable----------------Other assets _________________ _

Economic Recovery

Bond Sinking

Debt Service

Transportation Debt

Service

TctRl :in»,irnjn,

Debf

Total assets----------------- ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ____ _

LIABILITIES

Accounts payable---------------

Due lo other lunds ---------------Due lo component units-------------

Due lo other governments-------------

Tnlerlund payables---------------

Revenues received in advance-------------Deposits __________________ _

Otherliabililies ______________________ _

Total liabilities---------------- _________ _ DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES ______________ _

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources ____ _

FUND BALANCES Nonspendable ________________ _ Restricted _________________ _

Commilled _________________ _

Assigned ________________________ _

Total fund balances--------------- _____ _

Total liabilites, deferred inflows of resources,

and fund balances-------------- ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~----

190

Higher Education

Construction

176,432

252

176,684

91 394

485

485

176,199

176,199

176,684

Hospital Construction

52,817

81

52,898

21

21

21

52,877

52,877

52,898

Capital Projects

Local Government Construction

29,875

107

3,891

33,873

962

962

962

32,911

32,911

33,873

Building Authorities

25,425

19,397

44,822

81

81

81

44,741

44,741

44,822

Other Capital

Projects

112,614

42

8,651

121,307

1,482

2,301

3,783

3,783

94,962

22,562

117,524

121,307


Tornl

Kn.,nmJm C'Rpit~]

hnj,n,·

1,5-1:.

~I

5,331

~ .. H2

.;:,1,69'.'

424,2~2

419,584

fowl '<uamn,io~

(;"'""""""ml

1.1'1C.'113

\( l,>h

2.75C.18~ 11,J(;.)

\-l'.',%',

'1.'1 l''.:11~ ,~,,~1 1,l~C,n~,

2\9'.'5

J.l ,'.'25

lil.24il.405

182.'18-'.

lil,422,949

ll, l \~ 1,: ,:,:-c.-1'1~ J,(;J,,4~.)

11,(?2

lJ,Mti,572

22.il'Yl.521

191


Govc"nncntal Funds

Special Revenue Special Revenue

Year Ended June 30, 2016 (amounts in thousands} Business and Financing Golden State Other fornl

Professions for Local Cigarette Local Health Tobacco Special .¾mwrnio~

Regulatory Governments ""' Revenue and Care Related Trial Securitization Revenue -'ip,:nu(

and Licensing and the Public Tobacco Tax Public Safety Programs Courts Corporation Programs Rne,rne REVENUES

Personal income laxes 1,423,508 1,-'.~ y,s Sales and use laxes 13,834,322

Motor vehicle excise laxes 38,883 61,775 ' -~,,G<;';

Insurance laxes 1,634,781 I,', :.,7~1

Other laxes 35,783 650,739 746,428 377 1,-'.}\

Intergovernmental 2,154,318 819,283 :,.))

Licenses and permits 417,677 18,057 '88 2,422,408 11,241 2,';G9,S:~1

Charges Lor services 42,061 2,679 9' 60,072 163,998 ~6\9'.'1 Fees 1,042,567 6'9 24 4,863,375 537,691 1,541,504

Penalties 52,548 9,674 7,099 415,434 235,263

Investment and interest 36,139 4,307 1,805 4,355 5,768 5,226 3,740 8,462

Escheal n 434 Other 16,880 52,087 '56 289,696 155,032 361,560 367,152 1.;,<'.S:·"

Total revenues 1,682,551 2,223,445 748,601 16,261,085 8,955,128 1,993,172 365,300 2,327,997 .>4,~~i,279

EXPENDITURES

Current

General government 595,436 654,344 17,883 5,148,048 209 3,214,364 586 1,171,838 o,s:,~_~:,s Education 20,573 266,841 39,652 193,538 5,866

Health and human services 399,834 1,505,731 457,157 9,598,400 9,007,895 705,217 21,G~-'.,21-'

Natural resources and environmental protection 53,977 100,166 9,166 237 53,020 71\5V

Business, consumer services, and housing 565,003 277,710 ,03 24,730 S6~}-'.6

Transportation 8,264 1,140

Corrections and rehabilitation 125,097 1,331,696 22,549

Capital outlay

Debt service:

Bond and commercial paper retirement 128,480 166,265 70,535 \GS:,2';~,

Interest and llscal charges ,04 '58 299,935 ')),1-17

Total expenditures 1,643,087 3,058,473 523,858 16,078,144 9,368,302 3,214,467 371,056 1,984,360 36,141,i'fl

Excess (dellciency} oLrevenues over (under} expenditures .. 39,464 (835,028} 224,743 182,941 (413,174} (1,221,295} (5,756} 343,637 ;1,(8-1,-1(8;

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES}

General obligation bonds and commercial paper issued .. 375,860 373,265

ReLunding debt issued 1,115 1,11)

Payment lo reLund long-term debt (1,280}

Premium on bonds issued 9,888 '58 TransLers in 3,700 874,645 2,626 142,309 1,242,688 26,563

TransLers oul (16,572} (19,508} (15,984} (44,382}

Total other financing sources (uses} (12,872} 1,240,720 (15,984} 2,626 515,732 1,242,688 (17,819}

Net change in Lund balances 26,592 405,692 208,759 185,567 102,558 21,393 (5,756} 325,818

Fund balances - beginning 1,583,991 3,477,499 315,361 42,099 571,780 1,112,568 754,588 2,095,811

Fund balances - ending 1,610,583 3,883,191 524,120 227,666 674,338 1,133,961 748,832 2,421,629

• Rcslaicd

192 193


Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances (continued) Nonr1ajo-Govc 0 nr1cntal Funds


REVENUES

Personal income laxes--------------

Sales and use laxes---------------Motor vehicle excise laxes-------------

Insurance laxes----------------

Other laxes-----------------

Intergovernmental ---------------Licenses and permits--------------

Charges Lor services---------------Fees ___________________ _

Penalties __________________ _

Investment and interest---------------Eschea( __________________ _

Economic

Recovery

Bond

Sinking

144

Other-------------------- ____ c3c3~5

Total revenues----------------

EXPENDITURES

Current

General government--------------

Education -----------------Health and human services-------------Natural resources and environmental protection ______ _

Business, consumer services, and housing ________ _

Transportation-----------------Corrections and rehabilitation ___________ _

Capital outlay ________________ _

Debt service:

479

Bond and commercial paperreliremenl _________ 929,735

Interest and llscal charges------------- ___ 6_7c,5_2_7

Total expenditures-------------- --~99c7c,2c6~2

Excess (dellciency} oLrevenues over (under} expenditures.. (996,783}

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) General obligation bonds and commercial paper issued ____ _ ReLunding debt issued ______________ _

Payment lo reLund long-term debt __________ _

Premium on bonds issued _____________ _

TransLers in-----------------(2,619} TransLers oul ----------------- ---~

Total other financing sources (uses) ________ _ (2,619)

Net change in Lund balances------------- (999,402}

999,402 Fund balances- beginning-------------- ----~-

Debt Service

Transportation

Debt

Service

355,985

755,268

1,111,253

(1,111,253}

1,111,253

1,111,253

'fot.l

.\/o.,mRjcr

Dd•t :>tnicc-

144

4"."9

],~\~,~~, 8??,7~5

1,111,?53 ,J,.,P

l.lil8./J.l4

999,401

Fund balances- ending _______________ e~~~~e ~~~~~~ _____ _

• Rcslaicd

194

Higher

Education

Construction

872

872

49,575

181,055

9,133

239,763

(238,891}

6,880

775,315 (698,729}

107,527

190,993

(47,898}

224,097

176,199

Hospital

Construction

296

296

38,410

442

12,550

913

52,315

(52,019}

11,450

67,210 (76,847}

11,825

13,638

(38,381}

91,258

52,877

Capital Projects

Local

Government

Construction

2,835

2,835

350,521

6,657

1,106,375

38,689

1,502,242

(1,499,407}

405,455

3,115,845 (2,568,330}

450,559

(843)

1,402,686

(96,721}

129,632

32,911

Building

Authorities

45

45

19,815

14,502

34,317

(34,272}

162,500

(205,980}

19,992

48,677

25,189

(9,083}

53,824

44,741

Other

Capital

Projects

1,069

55

67

14,259

15,450

4,148

49,756

2,435

6

56,345

(40,895}

4,085

450 (482)

338

60,525

64,916

24,021

93,503

117,524


fnfal l\o,mrnjo~

c~pitnt P~uiech

~~

4. 11 ~

1:.,)5.1

19,498

'\/I) }~ '}~1

.'.,].'.';

I)

1.~;,;,_;,~.) G\2.'.\

1,BB4,9B1

;1,865,1';.'.

<7.7.\7.)

:.,IJl,P) \\

~9:,,~.:1

J~:9,2~,2

\\~"'

1,697,411 ( l(\.)~))

~n,.,u 424,2~2

1ofal :inn,imjm

Gw,ernmenfo!

1,1? ,5C'; 1\\1.)

1:,>'i' J,(;>4,~\1

1,1 3,1r

2.9'.'\UI ~,\~L/A.)

?C8,~5G

'.',%~_'.'\) ,:1s

~4,(,(;)

.l4.5".f".f.256

1.).\.\J,l ]\

\7~. '1 ~1,C4,~">"

??C,71-:

S,4("' l,17~,

JC c_.n)

1,17(,~~., .i, 122_.n5

'',5~1/;4\)

( ,~\7

3,51?,~h 'SS S( ~)

~.761,141 H.>,F-1

11,545,41.,

lJ,Mti,572

195


REVENUES

Cigarelle and tobacco laxes------------

Vehicle license lees--------------

Personal income lax--------------

Retail sales and use laxes--------------Other major laxes and licenses ___________ _

Other revenues---------------

Total revenues----------------

EXPENDITURES Business, consumer services, and housing ________ _

Transportation-----------------Natural resources and environmental protection ______ _

Health and human services-------------Corrections and rehabilitation ___________ _

Education-----------------General government

Tax relier _________________ _

Other general government ------------

Budgeted

Amounts

480,212

1,883,513

1,423,508

13,834,408

1,647,881

10,622,509

29,892,031

775,209

1,060,705

248,110

21,712,662

32,917

548,033

798,776

9,201,732

34,378,144 Total expenditures--------------- --~~

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES}

Translers lrom other lunds ------------

Translers lo other lunds --------------Other additions and deductions ___________ _

Total other financing sources (uses} ________ _

Excess olrevenues and other sources over

expenditures and other uses-------------

Fund balances- beginning------------- ____ _

Actual

Amounts

480,212

1,883,513

1,423,508

13,834,408

1,647,881

10,622,509

29,892,031

712,354

1,060,309

223,730

21,485,725

23,894

540,683

798,776

8,719,209

33,564,680

25,869,653

(23,110,739)

726,878

3,485,792

(186,857}

11,997,297

Variance with

Final Budget

(62,855}

(396)

(24,380}

(226,937}

(9,023}

(7,350}

(482,523}

(813,464}

11,810,440 Fund balances- ending ______________ ~~~~~ ~~==~ ~~~~~

On a budgetary basis, the State's lunds are classilled as either governmental cost lunds or nongovernmental cost lunds. The governmental cost lunds include the General Ftmd, most ol the lunds lhal comprise the Transportation Fund and the Environmental and Natural Resources Fund, and many other ltmds lhal make up the nonmajor governmental lunds reported in these llnancial slalemenls. Governmental cost lunds derive their revenue lrom laxes, licenses, and lees lhal support the general operations ol the Stale. The appropriations ol the budgetary basis governmental cost lunds loTTll the annual appropriated budget ol the Stale. Nongovernmental cost lunds consist ol lunds lhal derive their receipts lrom sources other than general and special laxes, licenses, lees, or stale revenues and mainly represent the proprietary and llduciary lunds reported in these linancial slalemenls. Expenditures ollhese lunds do nol represent a cost ol government and most ol the nongovernmental cost lunds are nol included in the annual appropriated budget Therelore, the expenditures ol these lunds are nol included in this schedule. The Federal Fund is one nongovernmental cost Lund lhal is included in the annual appropriated budget The Budgetary Comparison Schedule Lor the General Fund, Federal Fund, Transportation Fund, and Environmental and Natural Resources Fund is included in the Required Supplementary Tnlormalion section; the remaining governmental cost lunds are renecled in this schedule. Additional inloTTllalion on the budgetary basis ol accotmling can be lound in the Management's Discussion and Analysis, Nole 2 Budgetary and Legal Compliance, notes lo the Required Supplementary TnloTTllalion, and in the separately issued Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Supplement.

196

Internal service funds account for state activities that provide goods and services to other state departments or agencies on a cost reimbursement basis. Following are brief descriptions of the internal service funds.

The Public Buildings Construction Fund accounts for rental charges from the lease of public assets and the related lease-purchase revenue bonds.

The Architecture Revolving Fund accounts for charges for the costs of architectural services, construction, and improvements.

The Service Revolving Fund accounts for charges for printing and procurement services rendered by the Department of General Services for state departments and other pub] ic entities.

The Prison Industries Fund accounts for charges for goods produced by inmates in state prisons that are sold to state departments and other governmental entities.

The Financial Information Systems Fund accounts for charges for the development and subsequent use ofthe State's new financial information system.

The Technology Services Revolving Fund accounts for charges for technology services performed for various state, federal, and local government entities by the California Technology Agency.

The Water Resources Revolving Fund accounts for charges for administrative services related to water delivery provided by the Department of Water Resources to federal, state, and local government agencies.

Other internal service program funds account for all other goods and services provided to other agencies, departments, or governments on a cost-reimbursement basis.

197

State of California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Internal Service Funds

of lntc·nal Sc"Vicc Funds


Other

Public Financial Technology Water Internal

Buildings Architecture Service Prison Information Services Resources Service

Construction Revolving Revolving Industries Systems Revolving Revolving Programs fowl

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and pooled investments 398,815 123,856 215,906 47,841 63,129 11,208 394,785 1.255.5'1'.' Restricted assets:

Cash and pooled investments 1,358,022

Net investment in direct llnancing leases 453,875 .V\\'.'5

Receivables (nel} 30 1,073 1,148 20 7,143 27,173 54,693

Due lrom other lunds 219,094 18,727 43,551 600 39,711 63,766 129,699 515,1-1'; Due lrom other governments 1,048 184 619 10,980 12,\11

Prepaid items 46,133 125,125 351 6,496 1,054 9,354 953 18''.'1t6 Inventories 8,275 39,150 28,845 838 ~~,](,\

Total current assets 2,030,991 463,705 302,928 257,339 54,357 140,501 112,339 591,110 3,~53,?J~, Noncurrenl assets:

Restricted assets:

Cash and pooled investments 204,388

Net investment in direct llnancing leases 7,267,038 '.',2C'.'J 1~

Tnlerlund receivables 25,363 2.'dt} Long-term prepaid charges 1,373 1,,~"'

Capital assets:

Land 2,082 2,( \)

Buildings and other depreciable properly 317 154,318 174,451 2,646 222,473 38,235 11,273 ,,~F Intangible assets amorlizable 10,237 3,672 1,913 47,265 2,449 113 C5,H9

Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization (317) (107,185) (127,234} (1,781} (199,245} (40,684} (7,844} •:./C-f,~S(-.

Conslruclion/developmenl in progress 893,929 1,838 217,530 2,753 97 1,llt.1'1~

Total noncurrenl assets 8,366,728 57,370 52,727 220,308 73,246 31,084 \\(. 1,4(;"'

Total assets 10,397,719 463,705 360,298 310,066 274,665 213,747 112,339 622,194 12,'7~4,'7.\J

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES 49,488 6,017 56,361 13,896 4,778 23,228 38,075

Total assets and deferred outflows of resources 10,447,207 469,722 416,659 323,962 279,443 236,975 112,339 660,269 Jl,946,576

(G~nli<mcdl

198 199




Other




LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable 79,742 12,524 56,228 10,499 36,714 16,006 15,801 204,272 .nJ,'.'\',

Due lo other lunds 16,176 5,567 37,706 2,255 2,686 642 1,437 39,612

Due lo other governments 59,536 49 23 5 405 CC/18

Revenues received in advance 443,780 30,504 270 88 .)'.'.\/.\2

Deposits 1,147 1.1'17

Contracts and notes payable 1,595 6,086 1,098 \~~s Interest payable 109,738 IC~,738

Current portion ollong-lerm obligations 544,004 2,727 910 5'17.HI

Other liabilities 33,497 76 1,750 492 2,876 'i\,(;SJ

Total current liabilities 842,693 461,947 127,180 17,501 40,359 22,757 18,921 247,165 ],~~\~~, Noncurrenl liabilities:

Tnlerlund payables 494 8,246 37,650 2,583 95,047 86 1'1'1.IU

Compensated absences payable 8,625 67,824 9,859 4,521 43,563 26,042 j(;(.,4';4

Workers' compensation benelils payable 1,236 22,553 17,358 1,049 -1?,l~C

Revenue bonds payable 9,473,620 9,.l'.'\CC

Net other poslemploymenl benellls obligation 16,643 294,491 62,649 97,134 125,864 .o''t.781

Net pension liability 3,576 527,152 39,717 31,909 249,761 309,986 1,IC?,ICI

Other noncurrenl liabilities 17,146 3,672

Total noncurrenl liabilities 9,473,620 30,574 920,266 129,583 74,080 411,236 98,719 461,978

Total liabilities 10,316,313 492,521 1,047,446 147,084 114,439 433,993 117,640 709,143 L\.\73,~7') DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 78 11,460 1,080 697 5,454 6,730 ?5,-1~9

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources 10,316,313 492,599 1,058,906 148,164 115,136 439,447 117,640 715,873 l.l.4il4.il".ffl

NET POSITION

Net investment in capital assets 57,370 52,727 220,308 47,261 5,721 ';\';,';\7

Restricted expendable:

Construction 130,894 l:1C.8•'-'.

Total expendable 130,894

Unrestricted (22,877} (699,617} 123,071 (56,001} (249,733} (5,301} (61,325} ;9~1.78:11

Total net position (deficits} 130,894 (22,877} (642,247} 175,798 164,307 (202,472} (5,301} (55,604}

Total liabilites and net position 10,447,207 469,722 416,659 323,962 279,443 236,975 112,339 660,269

(ccnchd,--d;

200 201

Internal Service Funds

lntc"nal Sc"Vicc Funds

Year Ended June 30, 2016 Other (amounts in thousands} Public Financial Technology Water Internal



OPERATING REVENUES

Services and sales 182,332 635,612 253,821 103,715 357,013 447,041 916,505

Investment and interest 8,991 267 ,.20,

Rent 404,816 4(.4,\J:,

Total operating revenues 413,807 182,332 635,612 253,821 103,715 357,280 447,041 916,505 J,JJ1l,lH

OPERATING EXPENSES

Personal services 29,478 252,161 81,269 22,691 211,054 278,477 ~~ ,Pl Supplies 4,601 5,389 232

Services and charges 6,455 147,270 298,592 164,456 16,851 179,592 440,607 710,404

Depreciation 10,962 6,813 262 26,950 5,734 137

Interest expense 452,796 256 '10'1.C'i~ Amortization ol long-term prepaid charges 3,608 ,,u.\

Total operating expenses 462,859 176,748 561,715 257,139 39,804 417,852 451,730 989,250 .\.\~'7,(197

Operating income (loss} (49,052} 5,584 73,897 (3,318} 63,911 (60,572} (4,689} (72,745} ;'1t.•CS,,\

NONOPERA TING REVENUES (EXPENSES}

Investment and interest income 445 413 \',';

Interest expense and liscal charges (18) '.l\i Other (2,270} 134 (2,943} ;5.C7•C1

Total nonoperating revenues (expenses} (2,270} 561 (2,943} 413 i4,2.\9i

Income (loss} belore lranslers (51,322} 5,584 73,897 (2,757} 63,911 (63,515} (4,689} (72,332} ·~1,~~';)

Capital contributions 375 .17~

Gain on early exlinguishmenl ol debt 40,516 ,~J:,

Translers in 1,459

Translers oul (38,634} (17,907} ;5· ,5-11;

Change in nel position (10,806} 5,584 35,263 (2,382} 63,911 (63,515} (4,689} (88,780} ;65,-11-1;

Total net position (deficit}- beginning 141,700 (28,461} (677,510} 178,180 100,396 (138,957} (612) 33,176 . 092,(!SSJ

Total net position (deficit}- ending 130,894 (22,877} (642,247} 175,798 164,307 (202,472} (5,301} (55,604} s /4~'7.~(IJJ

• Rcslaicd

202 203




Other



Construction Revolving Revolving Industries Systems Revolving Revolving Programs 'fofo(


Receipts lrom customers 25,043 6,567 'l,(;1(

Receipts lrom inlerlund services provided 869,339 334,330 596,098 247,994 103,268 355,615 440,410 798,657 3,~,:~,~1 I

Payments lo suppliers (491) (189,129} (292,853} (168,112} (169,801} (6,190} (687,220} (1,51 l,7-Y

Payments lo employees (29,873} (233,940} (72,216} (17,421} (151,722} (202,779} r~r,s~1

Claims paid lo other than employees (440,607}

Other receipts (payments} (522,848} 1,893 833 49 (6,791} 4,673 1,288 r-,2~,,<,1

Net cash provided by (used in} operating activities 371,043 115,330 71,198 15,066 85,896 27,301 (1,714} (90,054} ~94,(166

CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTMTIES

Changes in inlerlund receivables and loans receivable (11,408}

Changes in inlerlund payables and loans payable (1,037} 4,632 948 (82) :.,'f(;j

Interest paid (18) m; Translers in 1,459 HS'' Translers oul (38,634} (17,907} \S:,.s~1 \

Net cash provided by (used in} noncapital financing activities (1,037} (34,002} (18) 948 (82) (27,856} \h2,ll47}

CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTMTIES

Acquisition olcapilal assets (1,168,785} (23,661} (13,825} (86,692} (29,017} (5,734} (198) rl, )7,-11),l

Proceeds lrom sale ol capital assets 146 837 2,199 7,587 598 1L:1t7 Proceeds lrom revenue bonds 958,237 15~,~,~

Retirement olrevenue bonds (1,243,020} !1,2.'.

Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (1,453,568) (23,515) (12,988) (84,493) (21,430) (5,734) 400 (1 ,bill ,J1B)_


Earnings on investments 445 413 ~~~

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 445 413 H~H

Net increase (decrease} in cash and pooled investments (1,082,525} 114,293 13,681 2,505 1,403 6,819 (7,530} (117,097} !1,~,G\>'1i Cash and pooled investments - beginning 2,644,935 284,522 110,175 213,401 46,438 56,310 18,738 511,882

Cash and pooled investments - ending 1,562,410 398,815 123,856 215,906 47,841 63,129 11,208 394,785

204 205




Other




RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS} TO NET CASH

PROVIDED BY (USED IN} OPERA TING ACTMTIES

Operating income (loss} (49,052} $ 5,584 73,897 (3,318} $ 63,911 (60,572} $ (4,689} $ (72,745} 3 Adjustments lo reconcile operating income (loss} lo nel cash

provided by operating activities:

Depreciation 10,962 6,813 262 26,950 5,734 137

Amortization otpremiums and discounts (76,985} ;~C,~85; Amortization ot long-term prepaid charge 297 256

Othe 10,173 IC,173 Change in account balances:

Receivables 470 (111) 272 (11) 14 (19,529} (51,038}

Due trom other tunds 12,541 25,756 (11,995} (2,677} 6,094 (1,010} 11,058 17,497 ~~,~(A

Due trom other governments (43) 12 168 551

Prepaid items (46,133} (35,573} 149 (14) 6,958 840 125 ;~3,HJ; Inventories (1,406} 774 2,147 66

Net investment in direct llnancing leases 477,029

Deterred out now otresources 3,311 (4,581} (20,742} (7,183} (1,859} (6,272} (14,125} "51,4~1" Accounts payable 284 4,274 42,718 22 14,153 686 (1,707} 23,291 8:1.721

Due lo other tunds 3,150 (32,385} 3,329 (3,818} 871 1,812 (84,307} "J1l,1.l\i

Due lo component uni ls (132) ']';~\

Due lo other governments 49 17 (12) 109 lt:1

Deposits 462 4(;~

Contracts and notes payable 1,490 (7,795} 1,098 ;5.2C71

Interest payable (12,981}

Revenues received in advance (637) 122,622 4,977 (184) (1,540} 28 125.2U

Other current liabilities 7,063 2 (16) 821 (85) 760 \~4~

Benell ls payables 12,207

Compensated absences payable 1,814 (2,175} (304) 2,636 (2,524} 429

Other noncurrenl liabilities 2,850 117,247 24,386 8,432 95,684 3,672 109,076 ';(;J,>47 Deterred in now otresources (478) (76,109} (7,846} (3,939} (26,737} (31,889} : J.'.t. '81

Total adjustments 420,095 109,746 (2,699} 18,384 21,985 87,873 2,975 (17,309}

Net cash provided by (used in} operating activities 371,043 115,330 71,198 15,066 85,896 27,301 (1,714} (90,054}

206 207



208

Enterprise funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises, in which the costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis are intended to be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Following are brief descriptions of nonmajor enterprise funds.

The State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund accounts for loans to finance the construction of publicly owned water pollution control facilities.

The Housing Loan Fund accounts for financing and contracts for the sale of properties to eligible California veterans.

Other enterprise program funds account for all other goods or services provided to the general public on a continuing basis when all or most of the cost involved is to be financed by user charges, or when periodic measurement of the results of operations is appropriate for management control, accountability, capital maintenance, public policy, or other purposes.

209


ASSETS

Current assets: Cash and pooled investments _______ _

Restricted assets: Cash and pooled investments ______ _

Due lrom other governments _______ _

State Water

Pollution Control Housing

Revolving

521,615

237,524

156,108

Loan

248,996

Other

Enterprise

Programs

238,883

Receivables(nel}----------- 31,444 2,161 Due lrom other lunds __________ 882 323 373

Due lrom other governments ________ 141,307 318

Inventories__________________ 2,431

Total current assets---------- __ 10,00507,04036" ___ 2,8000,7063" --~20404,01,66" Noncurrenl assets:

Restricted assets: Loans receivable __________ _ 1,411,250

Investments------------- 17,157 Tnlerlund receivables _________ _ 1,600 Loans receivable ___________ _ 2,021,885 815,047 114,497

Capital assets: Land ______________ _ 443 829 Buildings and other depreciable properly ___ _ 16,260 2,575 Intangible assets amorlizable ______ _ 1,587

Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization .. (16,062} (1,623} Conslruclion/developmenl in progress ____ _ 214

Other noncurrenl assets _________ _ 6,396

Total noncurrenl assets ___________ c30,40303,

01

035" 839,241 119,679

Total assets ___________ _ 4,490,571 1,120,004 363,845

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES .. 40 3,313 5,095

Total assets and deferred outflows of resources __________ _ 4,490,611 1,123,317 368,940

210

'fofo(

,)5

15~S

141,:

1,-111,2-;~,

l'.',157

1,:,.))

un ;17,(85;

;,1~ (,'%

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities: Accounts payable __________ _

Due lo other ltmds _________ _

Due lo other governments _______ _

Revenues received in advance ______ _ Interest payable __________ _

Current portion ollong-lerm obligations ___ _ Other current liabilities ________ _

Total current liabilities ________ _

Noncurrenl liabilities: Compensated absences payable ______ _

Workers' compensation benelils payable ___ _

General obligation bonds payable _____ _ Revenue bonds payable ________ _

Net other poslemployrnenl benellls obligation .. Net pension liability _________ _

Othernoncurrenl liabilities _______ _

Total noncurrenl liabilities _______ _

Total liabilities _________ _

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES ..

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources _________ _

NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets ______ _

Restricted expendable: Debt service __________ _

Security Lor revenue bonds ______ _ Other purposes __________ _

Total expendable _________ _ Unrestricted ___________ _

Total net position ________ _

Total liabilities and net position ___ _

Nonmqjor Enterprise Funds

State Water Other

Pollution Control Housing Enterprise

Revolving Loan Programs TctRl

617 47 1,704 2, v,~ 41 347 1,767 2.1~~

4

33 '~ 4,329 14,453 18 ~,~

22,947 11,265 9,892 44.1Y 14 ].'.

27,939 26,112 13,414 C'.'/ ,1

10,604 ](''

1,022 I, 648,059 (-l\ 5.1

507,846 295,765 8C:1.tl1

4,143 9,251

1,108 14,581 20,750 1(/'' 726 48,095 '18.S~1

508,954 963,274 89,722 1,~(;J.-1).)

536,893 989,386 103,136 l,629.41~

142 160 526 ';2';

537,035 989,546 103,662 L!,Jil,143

641 3,587 -1,22';

66,876 u.s~c, 1,567,358

133,130 192,898 nc,2,

1,634,234 133,130 192,898

2,319,342 68,793 2.:188.13~

3,953,576 133,771 265,278 4,.,~2.h!~

4,490,611 1,123,317 368,940 ~,932.BhB

211


Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses. and Changes in Fund Net Position Nonriajo- Entorpdsc Funds


OPERATING REVENUES

Services and sales

Investment and interest

Rent

Other

Total operating revenues

OPERATING EXPENSES

Personal services

Supplies

Services and charges

Depreciation

Interest expense

Other

Total operating expenses

Operating income (loss}

NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)

Investment and interest income

Interest expense and liscal charges

Other

Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) ..

Income (loss} belore capital contributions

andlranslers

Capital contributions

Translers oul


Total net position - beginning

Total net position - ending

212

State Water

Pollution Control Housing

Revolving Loan

11,211 2,390

57,638 49,379

1,659

68,849 53,428

8,194

7,392 13,911

94

33,428

321

7,713 55,627

61,136 (2,199}

1,396

(2,199}

(1,902} 189

(2,705) 189

58,431 (2,010}

66,914

125,345 (2,010}

3,828,231 135,781

3,953,576 133,771

Other

Enterprise

Programs 'fofo(

80,216 9~J17 187 IC~,2~,.:

209

647

81,259 2ilJSH

36,113

35,672 :1~,6~~

12,213 ~1 ,,

190 2,,: ,n\ }~1

84,188 147523

(2,929} 5G, ·~,, 770 ),IV

;?,I~~;

;1.71:11

770 (l,o/4!,)

(2,159} .S'.,~6~ ,)j~

(2,159} 1?1,FG

267,437 4,2.~1,449

265,278 4 . .l51,615

Combining Statement of Cash Flows Nonriajo- Entc-pisc Funds



Receipts lrom customers/employers

Receipts lrom inlerlund services provided ..

Payments lo suppliers

Payments lo employees

Payments Lor inlerlund services used

Other receipts (payments}

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities ..

CASH FLOWS FROMNONCAPITAL

FINANCING ACTMTIES

Proceeds lrom general obligation bonds

Retirement ol general obligation bonds

Proceeds lrom revenue bonds

Retirement olrevenue bonds

Interest paid

Grants received

Net cash provided by (used in) noncapital financing activitie

CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND

RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Acquisition olcapilal assets

Net cash provided by (used in) capital and related financing activities


Purchase olinveslmenls

Proceeds lrom maturity and sale olinveslmenls ..

Earnings on investments

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ...

Net increase (decrease} in cash and pooled investments ..

Cash and pooled investments - beginning ____

Cash and pooled investments - ending

State Water

Pollution Control

Revolving

50,459

(7,978}

76

(22)

(140,922}

(98,387)

501,961

(13,000}

(2,608}

67,889

554,242

838

838

456,693

302,446

759,139

Nonmqjor Enterprise Funds

Other

Housing Enterprise

Loan Programs fowl

204,666 79,159 ',:.,)\:.

2,507 ~}r

(9,299} (49,387} '.((.(,(.!i

(8,196} (22,928} ;:1 I.C'18l

(715)

(217,907} (12,982} }~1,811;

(30,736) (4,346) /l.~.\469)

547,565 5:.7,5'.,5

(354,415} .\.!Fi

.,~,1,%1

(64,085} ;~~,(.\~)

;?,CU; :,7,\\,)

129,065 6Kl,J1l1

(516) '~](i

(516) \~l6i

(1,100} '.l,JC(i

1,912 1,912

770 I,' )\

812 770 1,411)

99,141 (4,092} ~~1,~,;~

149,855 242,975 h9~.27h

248,996 238,883 l.147.lllB

,-,,·nuw.,,\j

213


Combining Statement of Cash Flows (continued) Nonnajo· Enterprise Funds


RECONCILIATION OF OPERA TING

INCOME (LOSS} TO NET CASH PROVIDED

BY (USED IN} OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Operating income (loss}--------

Adjuslmenls lo reconcile operating income (loss}

lo nel cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation ___________ _

Provisions and allowances _______ _

Amortization olpremiums and discounts .. Other _____________ _

Change in account balances: Receivables ___________ _

Due lrom other lunds ________ _

Due lrom other governments ______ _ Prepaid items __________ _ Inventories ___________ _

Other current assets ________ _ Loans receivable _________ _

Deterred out now olresources ______ _ Accounts payable _________ _

Due lo other lunds _________ _

Due lo other governments _______ _ Interest payable __________ _

Revenues received in advance ______ _

State Water

Pollution Control

Revolving

61,136

(13,708}

(22)

(4,210}

(141,392}

(75)

(114)

(2)

Housing

Loan

(2,199} $

94 (2,161}

1,136

305

(1,285}

(27,615}

(2,259}

283 )47

2,622

Other

Enterprise

Programs

(2,929} ~

)90

(1,894}

(279)

248 (383)

853

1,995

(4,213}

(1,972}

76

(33)

Other current liabilities_________ 337

Benell ls payables__________ 590

fofat

;2.ltl 1

1,1" ;IJ,7C~;

"l,~\9\

;JCI;

'.\9Ci ;:18:11

~5' ;I,?~~;

'.]('.',( 12i

1.),)

;:1:11

Compensated absences payable______ 1,993 1,993

Othernoncurrenlliabililies_______ 1,488 1,799 "'U7 Delerredinnowsolresources _________________ (c}c,2_92~} ____ (c7_27~} ;2.Cl''l

Total adjustments---------- --~(_}5_9c,5_23~} --~(2_8c,5_37~} --~(c},c4_}7~} __ c;l_8_''·c7_T~>

Net cash provided by (used in} operating activities.. (98,387) (30,736} (4,346} i0.',469i

Noncash investing, capital, and financing activities Miscellaneous noncash activities _____ _ 6,619

214

Private Purpose Trust Funds

Private purpose trust funds account for all trust arrangements, other than those properly reported in pension and other employee benefit trust funds or investment trust funds, under which both principal and income benefit individuals, private organizations, or other governments. Following are brief descriptions of private purpose trust funds.

The Scholarshare Program Trust Fund accounts for money received from participants to fund their beneficiaries' higher-education expenses at certain postsecondary educational institutions.

The Unclaimed Property Fund accounts for unclaimed money and properties held in trust by the State.

Other private purpose trust funds account for other assets held in a trustee capacity when both principal and income benefit individuals, private organizations, or other governments.

215


Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position P·iva:c Purpose Tus: Funds


Scholanhare

Program Unclaimed

Trust Property

ASSETS

Cash and pooled investments 77,157

Investments, al lair value:

Equity securities 3,323,022

Debt securities 2,227,087

Real eslale 235,924

Other 962,251

Total investments 6,748,284

Receivables (nel} 11,953

Due lrom other lunds 10,999

Other assets 176,181

Total assets 6,760,239 264,339

LIABILITIES

Accounts payable 12,234 14,062 Deposits 176,181

Other liabilities

Total liabilities 12,234 190,247

NET POSITION

Held in trust for individuals, organizations,

or other governments 6,748,005 74,092

216

Other Private

Purpose

Trust 'fofal

26,815 I)' n4

~:';7

~3~,9~-1 .1,,;,,;,01

:, 7~1.U,!

11;15(;

37 11)}(

17:,.1\l

26,853 TJi~lA.>i

19,869 .:(',,1(',~

1~6,1SI

5,577 .,,.,,1 25,446 227,927

1,407 6,i2.\~(l4

Private Purpose Trust Funds

Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position P"iva:c Pul)oso Tus: Funds


ADDITIONS

Investment income:

Net appreciation (depreciation} in lair value

olinveslmenls

Interest, dividends, and other investment income ..

Less: investment expense

Net investment income

Receipts lrom depositors

Total additions

DEDUCTIONS

Administrative expenses

Payments lo and Lor depositors

Total deductions


Net position - beginning

Net position - ending

Scholanhare Other Private

Program Unclaimed Purpose

Trust Property Trust

(191,108}

288,592

(3,933}

93,551

3,152,700 321,301 9,699

3,246,251 321,301 9,699

2,927,818 320,045 9,540

2,927,818 320,045 9,547

318,433 1,256 152

6,429,572 72,836 1,255

6,748,005 74,092 1,407

'fofo(

(1·11,1.J\)

288.5''2 '\9',',)

~3,551 !\\'.'((

.l.STT.251

'i 0)\4 i

6,~fl.\66.~

!,,82.l.5il4

217



218

Fiduciary Funds and Similar Component Units - Pension and Other

Employee Benefit Trust Funds

Pension and other employee benefit trust funds account for transactions, assets, liabilities, and net position available for pension and other employee benefits of the two public employees' retirement systems that are fiduciary component units, and for other primary government employee benefit programs. Following are brief descriptions of pension and other employee benefit trust funds.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans are pension plans that provide defined benefit pensions to employees after separation from service:

The Public Employees' Retirement Fund is administered by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and accounts for the employee and employer contributions of the agent and cost-sharing multiple-employer retirement plans that provide pension benefits to employees of the State of California, non-teaching school employees, and employees of California public agencies.

The State Teachers' Retirement Fund is administered by the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) and accounts for the employee, employer, and primary government contributions of the cost-sharing multiple-employer retirement plan that provides pension benefits to teachers and certain other employees oft he California pub] ic school system.

The Judges' Retirement Fund is administered by CalPERS and accounts for the employee and employer contributions of the single-employer retirement plan that provides pension benefits to judges of the California Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts who were appointed or elected prior to November 9, 1994.

The Judges' Retirement Fund II is administered by CalPERS and accounts for the employee and employer contributions of the single-employer retirement plan that provides pension benefits to judges of the California Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts who were appointed or elected on or subsequent to November 9, 1994.

The Legislators' Retirement Fund is administered by CalPERS and accounts for the employee and employer contributions of the single-employer retirement plan that provides pension benefits to members of the Legislature serving prior to November 7, 1990, constitutional officers, and legislative statutory officers who elect to participate in the plan.

(continued)

219


(continued)

The Deferred Compensation Fund accounts for monies withheld from the salaries of participants per Internal Revenue Code sections 401(k), 457, and 403(b). The monies are invested until the employee retires or resigns, at which time all money withdrawn, including investment income, is subject to income taxes.

Other pension and other employee benefit trust funds account for funds contributed to smaller retirement plans and programs that are not defined benefit pension plans including the Annuitants' Health Care Coverage Fund, Teachers' Health Benefits Fund, State Peace Officers' and Firefighters' Defined Contribution Plan Fund, Supplemental Contributions Program Fund, Boxers' Pension Fund, and Flexelect Benefit Fund.

220

Pension and Other Employee Benefit Trust Funds


221

c1ouc1ac; Funds and Simila" Cornc,onco: Units Pension and O:hc· Er,olovcc Bcnciit T0 us: Funds


ASSETS

Cash and pooled investments----------------

Investments, al lair value:

Shorl-lerm ----------------------Equity securities-------------------

Debt securities--------------------Real estate _____________________ _

Securities lending collateral-----------------

Public

Employees'

Retirement

2,818,148

19,970,763

141,565,010

81,359,745

31,225,522

12,714,487

26,153,355 Other _______________________ --~=c

Total investments------------------

Receivables (nel}-------------------

Due lrom other lunds ------------------Due lrom other governments----------------


312,988,882

17,488,315

627,255

701,741 Other assets ______________________ -----~

334,624,341 Total assets _____________________ --~=~ DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES------------ ______ _

334,624,341 Total assets and deferred outflows of resources__________ --~==

LIABILITIES

Accounts payable-------------------Due lo other governments-----------------

Benellls payable-------------------Securities lending obligations-----------------Loans payable ____________________ _

13,293

1,682,747

12,664,098

21,560,201 Otherliabililies _____________________ ---== 35,920,339 Total liabilities-------------------- --~=c

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES------------- ______ _

35,920,339 Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources _________ ---~-

NET POSITION

Held in Trust for:

Pension and other poslemployrnenl benellls ------------Del erred compensation participants---------------

298,704,002

Individuals, organizations, or other governments ________________ _

Defined Benefit

State

Teachers'

Retirement

289,739

5,717,784

99,824,467

34,034,433

26,732,928

17,524,290

23,582,474

207,416,376

1,836,363

6,999

2,131,694

230,890

211,912,061

22,756

211,934,817

1,479,643

560

1,188,518

17,530,264

2,129,694

477,106

22,805,785

15,545

22,821,330

189,113,487

298,704,002 189,113,487 Total net position------------------- ~~~~~- ~~~~~-

222

Pension Plans

Judges' Judges'

Retirement Retirement II

2,823 10,769

35,041 74,736

654,415

473,035

53,795

35,041 1,255,981

2,575 115,305

22 13

40,461 1,382,068

40,461 1,382,068

111 125

52

53,828

504 155,162

667 209,115

667 209,115

39,794 1,172,953

39,794 1,172,953


Other

Pension

and Other

Legislators' Deferred Employee

Retirement Compensation Benefit Trust fornl

868 18,982 90,199

7,702 2,592,864 386,262 ~\~S~,1~~

37,105 7,043,042 3,116,446

79,362 1,537,365 1,898,947 119, ,2,,,~ 57, 5\/5)

3,514 47,810 ": 1,'.3,S96

2,018,006 SL7S-' \'.S

127,683 13,191,277 5,449,465 ~,,,;G,;

12,838 23,488 394,387 \n ,771 155 30 ~~

2,321 7,1'.C-, II 93~,6}1

141,389 13,236,231 5,934,081 %7.27ll.H2

81 42 ;>;'J7,)

141,389 13,236,312 5,934,123 567,2YJ,5Jl

54 3,978 636

3 Gl)

589 1,843 53,280

3,517 47,839 '",··"",><', ;,,1;,.1 ,, ,,

18,179 2,640 574,290 )),7\\,,)\7

22,339 8,464 676,045 S9,M1,1S4

156 22 1~,~~}

22,339 8,620 676,067 ~9.h~B.477

119,050 124,354 C\,\;,7"'

13,227,692 1\22~,G92

5,133,702 1,1 119,050 13,227,692 5,258,056 5(17,635,(134

223


Funds and Simiia· Units Pension and O:hc" 8cnciit T·us: Funds


Other

Defined Benefit Pension Plans Pension

Public State and Other Employees' Teachers' Judges' Judges' Legislators' Deferred Employee

Retirement Retirement Retirement Retirement II Retirement Compensation Benefit Trust 'fofo(

ADDITIONS

Contributions:

Employer 10,892,489 3,391,140 192,287 65,839 549 1,363 1,810,222 16, ~3,SS9

Plan member 4,015,754 2,957,477 3,559 24,598 97 1,416,432 37,112 9 .,.,,~,29

Non-employer 1,939,902

Total contributions 14,908,243 8,288,519 195,846 90,437 646 1,417,795 1,847,334

Investment income:

Net appreciation (depreciation} in lair value olinveslmenls 736,827 (2,138,824} 20,595 4,562 (602,957} 78,580 ;I. ,:1.21~', Interest, dividends, and other investment income 1,677,128 4,760,676 195 825 46 12,561 324 \C-51,755

Less: investment expense (878,613} (316,894} (1) (612) (63) (462) (1,705}

Net investment income (loss 1,535,342 2,304,958 194 20,808 4,545 (590,858} 77,199

Other 13,100 41,519 2,568 18,895 6,506 P,5-1'

Total additions 16,456,685 10,634,996 198,608 111,247 5,191 845,832 1,931,039 J1l,1Kl,S9B

DEDUCTIONS

Distributions lo benellciaries 20,093,933 13,064,557 199,271 21,549 7,028 33,841 1,294,324

Relunds ol contributions 238,821 84,001 78 155 379 5,231 \2\GG)

Administrative expense 184,447 195,287 642 732 203 17,565 4,395 ,771

Payments lo and Lor depositors 569,161 16,130

Total deductions 20,517,201 13,343,845 199,991 22,436 7,610 625,798 1,314,849

Change in nel position (4,060,516} (2,708,849} (1,383} 88,811 (2,419} 220,034 616,190 ;s.Hs.1:e Net position - beginning 302,764,518 191,822,336 41,177 1,084,142 121,469 13,007,658 4,641,866 SJJ,48-l,JM

Net position - ending 298,704,002 189,113,487 39,794 1,172,953 119,050 13,227,692 5,258,056 sn1,6::is,n::i,,

224 225



226

Agency funds account for the receipt and disbursement of various taxes, deposits, deductions, and property collected by the State, acting in the capacity of an agent, for distribution to other governmental units or other organizations. Following are brief descriptions of agency funds.

The Receipting and Disbursing Fund accounts for the collection and disbursement of revenues and receipts on behalf of local governments. This fund also accounts for receipts from many state funds, typically for the purpose of writing a single warrant when the warrant is funded by multiple funding sources.

The Deposit Fund accounts for various deposits, such as those from condemnation and litigation proceedings.

Other agency activity funds account for other assets held by the State, which acts as an agent for individuals, private organizations, and other governments.

227

Funds


ASSETS

Cash and pooled investments

Receivables (nel}

Due lrom other lunds

Due lrom other governments

Loans receivable

Other assets

Total assets

LIABILITIES

Accounts payable

Due lo other governments

Tax overpayments

Revenues received in advance

Deposits

Other liabilities

Total liabilities

228

Receipting

""' Disbursing

2,729,053

3,665,883

18,757,825

34,625

55

25,187,441

16,985,632

8,172,020

646

29,009

134

25,187,441

Agency Funds

Other

Agency

Deposit Activities fofat

3,062,415 24,250 ~.\F,'.'l\

162,694 1,452 1s1,:, 3,665 777 ~(-~ ~(-~

281 31,~CC

7,935 7_,;·10

15

3,229,070 34,414 23,4~(1,92~

128,859 3,472 17Jl'.',9C

4,087 6,529

This page intentionally left blank 680

1,239,867 10,353

1,855,577 14,060 1,\(; --~~1 3,229,070 34,414 lti,450,925

229

Funds


Receipting and Disbursing Fund

ASSETS Cash and pooled investments ______ _ Receivables (net) __________ _

Due Lrom other Lunds ________ _

Due Lrom other governments ______ _ Prepaid items ___________ _ Other assets ___________ _

Total assets __________ _

LIABILITIES

Balance July 1, 2015 *

2,204,168 1,749,662

16,367,074

33,852 26,001

55

20,380,812

Accounts payable___________ 14,726,634 Due lo other governments________ 5,617,817 Tax overpayments__________ 1,100 Revenues received in advance_______ 2 Deposits_____________ 35,184

Additions

190,945,714 5,604,941

21,910,799

7,886

218,469,340

44,621,984 38,015,882

117,847

Other liabilities _______________ c75~ ____ _ 59

Total liabilities___________ 20,380,812 82,755,772

Deductions

190,420,829 3,688,720

19,520,048

7,113 26,001

213,662,711

42,362,986 35,461,679

118,301 2

6,175

77,949,143

* Re slated Lor reclassiLicalion oLa Lund lo the Health Care Related Programs Fund, a nonmajor special revenue Lund

Deposit Fund Balance July 1, 2015 Additions Deductions

ASSETS

Cash and pooled investments 2,580,812 16,894,117 16,412,514 Receivables (nel} 115,601 336,591 289,498 Due Lrom other Lunds 3,699 79,211 79,245 Due Lrom other governments 4 290 13

Prepaid items 491 491

Other assets 34 15 34

Total assets 2,700,641 17,310,224 16,781,795

LIABILITIES Accounts payable 105,739 472,157 449,037

Due lo other governments 4,069 1,331 1,313 Revenues received in advance 697 17

Deposits 1,106,164 475,435 341,732 Other liabilities 1,483,972 15,964,527 15,592,922

Total liabilities 2,700,641 16,913,450 16,385,021

230

lfalm,ee Jm,e'.\fl, 1(116

:1'1.t2'i

55

J __ 2~, !S'.\441

It. 85.t:12

25,Jti7,44J

Jm,ei>O, 2016

3,CC?,-115

1.~~o

" .l.229.il".fil

.\,( \'.' ~f,:

1,855,577

.\229,(17(1

Agency Funds

Other Agency Activity Funds Balance July 1, 2015 Additions Deductions Jm,c- JO, 2016

ASSETS Cash and pooled investments ______ _ 24,603 455 808 Receivables (nel} __________ _ 1,511 524 583 ],.\

Due Lrom other Lunds ________ _ 773 1,098 1,094

6,459 Loans receivable ___________ ----~ 1,476 7,~35

33,346 Total assets------------ c~~~a 3,553 2,485 34,414

LIABILITIES Accounts payable __________ _ 2,808 765 IOI .1.'172 Due lo other governments _______ _ 6,656 283 410 Deposits ____________ _ 9,855 498 IC,353

14,027 Other liabilities----------- ___ cc 65 32 J.\J u 33,346 Total liabilities----------- a~~~e 1,611 543 .l4.4l4

Total Agency Funds Balance lfolm,cc-

July 1, 2015 Additions Deductions Jm,e.~ll, 11)16

ASSETS Cash and pooled investments ______ _ 4,809,583 207,840,286 206,834,151 ~.\F,'.'l\ Receivables (nel} __________ _ 1,866,774 5,942,056 3,978,801 1s1,:, Due Lrom other Lunds ________ _ 16,371,546 21,991,108 19,600,387 ~(-~ ~(-~

Due Lrom other governments ______ _ 33,856 8,176 7,126 3-1,~CC Prepaid items ___________ _ 26,492 26,492 Loans receivable __________ _ 6,459 1,476

89 Other assets ________________ _ 15 34 JC

23,114,799 Total assets------------ c~-~- 235,783,117 230,446,991 lti,450,925

LIABILITIES Accounts payable __________ _ 14,835,181 45,094,906 42,812,124 F,117. ~-1

Due lo other governments _______ _ 5,628,542 38,017,496 35,463,402 Tax overpayments _________ _ 1,100 117,847 118,301 Revenues received in advance ______ _ 699 19 Deposits ____________ _ 1,151,203 475,933 347,907

1,498,074 Other liabilities ___________ --~~- 15,964,651 15,592,954 1,8(~,771

23,114,799 99,670,833 94,334,707 Total liabilities----------- c~-~-~ c~-~~c c~~~~~ lti,450,925

231



232

n

Nonmajor component units are legally separate entities that are discretely presented in the State's financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The inclusion of component units in the State's financial statements reflects the State's financial accountability for or relationships with these organizations such that exclusion would cause the State's financial statements to be misleading. Following are brief descriptions of the nonmajor consolidated component unit segments.

Financing authorities provide financing for transportation, business development and public improvements, and coastal and inland urban waterfront restoration projects. These agencies include: the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, and the California Urban Waterfront Area Restoration Financing Authority.

California State University Auxiliary organizations provide services primarily to university students through foundations, associated student organizations, student unions, food service entities, book stores, and similar organizations.

District agricultural associations were created to exhibit all of the industries, industrial enterprises, resources, and products of the State. The financial information presented is as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Other component units provide legal education programs, financial assistance to businesses, and health benefits for state employees and annuitants. These entities include: the University of California Hastings College of the Law; the State Assistance Fund for Enterprise, Business and Industrial Development Corporation; and the Public Employees' Contingency Reserve.

233


ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and pooled investments-----------------Investments _____________________ _

Restricted assets:


Receivables (nel}--------------------Prepaid ilems ____________________ _

Financing

Authorities

5,516

396,706

18,909

California

State

University

Auxiliary

Organizations

409,495

476,891

272,013

39,244 Othercurrenlassels ------------------- ______ ----~

1,197,643 Total current assets------------------- ____ 4c2clc,lc31c ---~ccc Noncurrenl assets:

Restricted assets:


Investments _____________________ _

Receivables (nel}-------------------

Loans receivable-------------------Capital assets:

La"d ______________________ _

Collections nondepreciable ---------------Buildings and other depreciable properly------------

Intangible assets amorlizable ----------------Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization ___________ _

Conslruclion/developmenl in progress-------------

Intangible assets nonamorlizable ---------------

25,588

12,761

1,771,550

226,867

293,504

126,305

10,300

1,207,873

9,336

(563,725}

20,684

5,098

36,345 Othernoncurrenl assets------------------ ______ ---~= 2,876,221 Total noncurrenl assets------------------ ____ 3_0_6c,2_65_ ---~-"

4,073,864 Total assets--------------------- ____ 7c2c7c,3c96c ---~ccc

19,721 DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES------------ ----~4c,9c43c ____ ccc

4,093,585 Total assets and deferred outflows of resources--------- ~~~~703020,3039"' '""'~d~S

234

Nonmqjor Component Units

District Other

Agricultural Component

Associations Units foul

109,683 521,155 1,'. :~,S,'.9

622 "77,SP

5,837 4,198

3,190

5,534 24,305 \2~,,~Gl

936 116 1,,)5)

527 39,~~1

126,329 549,774 "!.77

~~}SS

3,297

69,582 J,';, 1,132

14,068 :,,93~

2,547

22,232 5,089 15'., j'.:'

726,479 136,574

1,051 J,ln (450,281} (56,189} ;l,CJC,1~5;

4,209 1,919 ·9';

8,354

305,936 182,995 3,6~1,, JC

432,265 732,769 ~.9M.294

10,361 10,645

442,626 743,414 6,Ull,%4

•·:c·ntn'1e,,\)

235


LIABILITIES Current liabilities:

Accounts payable-------------------Revenues received in advance-----------------Deposits ______________________ _

Contracts and notes payable-----------------

Financing Authorities

4,881

Interest payable--------------------- 2,134

California State

University Auxiliary

Organizations

86,503 65,349

8,400

Current portion ollong-lerrn obligations-------------- 11,570 75,429 Other current liabilities------------------- ____ c3,60,0,38~ ____ 08040,7094~

Total current liabilities------------------ 54,623 320,475 Noncurrenlliabililies: ----~- ----~-

Compensated absences payable---------------- 268 5,629 Workers' compensation benellls payable-------------- 44,257

Commercial paper and other borrowings-------------- 700

Capital lease obligation~------------------ 348,342 Revenue bonds payable__________________ 361,018 43,436

Net other poslemploymenl benelils obligation____________ 1,375 100,764

Net pension liability------------------- 5,671 62,432

Other noncurrenl liabilities----------------- ---~2070,4017~ ---~309090,4076~

Total noncurrenl liabilities----------------- ___ c309050,7049c ____ 10,000050,0,36~

Total liabilities-------------------- ____ 4_5_0c,3_72 _____ lc,3_2_5c,5_11_ DEFERRED INFLOWS OFRESOURCES ___________________ 1_23 ______ 1_6c,2_63_

Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources--------- ____ 4c5c0c,4c95c ___ clc,3c4clc,7c74c

NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets---------------Restricted:

Nonexpendable endo'Mllenl ---------------Expendable:

Endowments and girls------------------

Education ---------------------Statute---------------------- 280,326

227,166

1,057,270

893,104

Other purposes-------------------- ----~10,6018~ ______ _ Total expendable___________________ 281,944 893,104

Unrestricted ______________________ ----~(clc00"} ___ c5c7c4c,2c71c

Total net position------------------- ___ c2c8clc,8c44" ___ c2c,7c5clc,8cllc

Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, and net position----- <~~~703020,3039~ <~~c4S,0S9S3S,5S85~

236

District Agricultural Associations

7,266 2,564 1,570

93

749

3,148 3,147

18,537

9,554 346

46,449 7,762

80,485 9,631

154,227

172,764

16,457

189,221

246,934

16,318 16,318

(9,847}

253,405

442,626

Other Component

Units

447,094 581

363

99

1,455 78,056

527,648

372

20,474 650

32,086 19,221

72,803

600,451

5,756

606,207

67,320

22,159

18,321 9,242

10,495 38,058

9,670

137,207

743,414

:.71,'.77

11'.'}~1 LU

1\ ~1

2';~,, 2G

)~,C-ll

.\.424.267

6,Ull,%4


237


OPERATING EXPENSES

Personal services

Scholarships and lellowships

Supplies

Services and charges

Depreciation

Interest expense and llscal charges

Other

Total operating expenses

PROGRAM REVENUES

Charges Lor services

Operating grants and contributions

Capital grants and contributions

Total program revenues

Net revenues (expenses}

GENERAL REVENUES

Investment and interest income (loss}

Other

Total general revenues

Change in net position

Net position - beginning

Net position - ending

* Restated

238

California

State

University

Financing Auxiliary

Authorities Organizations

3,707 369,673

55,386

33,588 1,106,056

51,560

7,422 23,694

71,560

44,717 1,677,929

1,769 736,244

28,470 598,192

28,540

30,239 1,362,976

(14,478} (314,953}

10,956 (21,487}

1,072 433,439

12,028 411,952

(2,450} 96,999

284,294 2,654,812

281,844 2,751,811


District Other

Agricultural Component

Associations Units foul

105,553 37,154 II \Y7

3,565 ~\9~1 9,949

109,074 14,196 l,2G2,9J.'.

17,826 3,057

1,971 991

486 6,658 ~\~~,.:

234,910 75,570 l.(L'->,126

238,550 63,009 :}9}~~

13,912

266 424 29,2\~,

238,816 77,345

3,906 1,775

60 (683) ; 11.15'11

3,217 9,112 :.C.\~C.)

3,277 8,429 4JS,6B6

7,183 10,204 111;1"''

246,222 127,003 .'UlLHl

253,405 137,207 JAM,267

239


I


240



242

Financial trend schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the State's financial performance and well-being have changed over time. This section includes the following financial trend schedules.

Schedule of Net Position by Component

Schedule of Changes in Net Position

Schedule of Fund Balances - Governmental Funds

Schedule of Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds

Sources: The inlorrnation in the loll owing schedules is derived lrom the State's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.

243

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis olaccotmting, amounts in thousands}

2007 2008 2009 2010


Net investment in capital assets 81,352,744 84,255,048 83,285,184 84,085,632

Restricted Expendabl 10,543,602 10,148,648 8,391,814 14,987,867

Unrestricted 1 (56,519,478} (69,346,950} (86,302,434} (103,272,097)

Total governmental activities net position (deficit) .. $ 35,376,868 $ 25,056,746 $ 5,374,564 $ (4,198,598)

Business-type activities

Net investment in capital assets 208,268 49,510 (130,634} 89,334

Restricted Nonexpendable


Unrestricted 2,430,492 3,009,297 717,740 (4,250,609}

Total business-type activities net position (deficit) .. 11,213,692 9,912,428 4,442,157 (756,593)

Primary government

Net investment in capital assets 81,561,012 84,304,558 83,154,550 84,174,966

Restricted Nonexpendable


Unrestricted (54,088,986} (66,337,653} (85,584,694} (107,522,706}

Total primary government net position (deficit) .. $ 46,590,560 $ 34,969,174 $ 9,816,721 $ (4,955,191)

1 Govcmmenlal aclivilies' un~slricled nel posilion rdlccis a negalive balance because ofoulslanding bonded debi issued lo build capilal assels

for school dislricls and olher local govcmmenlal enlilies 1 In fiscal year 2011, ihe nel posilion ofgovcmmenlal aclivilies and business-lypeaclivilies changed primarily as a resuli oflhe reclassificalion of

ihe $1 2 billion beginningnel posilion oflhe California Siale Universily Fund from agovcmmenlal fund loan enlerprise fund

J In fiscal year 2014, ihenel posilion ofgovcmmenlal aclivilies and business-lype aclivilies changed primarily as a resuli oflhe ~classificalion of

ihe $380million beginning nel posilion of ihe Public Buildings Conslrnclion Fund from an enlcrprise fund lo an inlemal service fund 4 In fiscal year 201 5, ihenel posilion ofgovcmmenlal aclivilies and business-lype aclivilies significanily decreased as a ~suli ofimplcmenling

GASB Sialcmenls No 68 and No 71 requiring ihe recognilion ofnel pension liabilily and rdaied pension expense and defrrred oulnows

and innows ofresources

244

$

$

Statistical Section

2011 l 2012 2013 2014 3 2015 4 2016

85,460,957 80,768,527 84,931,030 94,001,659 100,694,652 104,596,917

27,865,821 24,871,510 24,315,913 24,950,740 26,632,502 29,060,971

(123,783,314} (123,897,753} (117,383,903} (116,948,128} (169,744,967} (168,542,861}

(10,456,536) $ (18,257,716) $ (8,136,960) $ 2,004,271 $ (42,417,813) $ (34,884,973)

1,382,957 1,561,258 1,718,648 2,065,550 2,278,252 2,520,621

21,812 21,584 20,627 16,219 13,448 8,653

3,615,945 4,571,036 5,151,915 4,897,314 4,523,496 5,750,634

(4,214,494} (3,346,849} (2,824,738} (1,661,692} (5,360,817} (3,707,406}

806,220 2,807,029 4,066,452 5,317,391 1,454,379 4,572,502

86,843,914 82,329,785 86,649,678 96,067,209 102,972,904 107,117,538

21,812 21,584 20,627 16,219 13,448 8,653

31,481,766 29,442,546 29,467,828 29,848,054 31,155,998 34,811,605

(127,997,808} (127,244,602} (120,208,641} (118,609,820} (175,105,784) (172,250,267}

(9,650,316) $ (15,450,687} $ (4,070,508) $ 7,321,662 $ (40,963,434) $ (30,312,471)

245

Statistical Section

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis olaccotmling, amounts in thousands}

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 4 2012 2013 2014 5 2015 2016


Expenses

General government 1 14,261,590 13,187,080 13,895,948 12,454,969 13,520,557 14,411,737 15,390,100 14,292,179 15,804,281 16,686,037

Education 61,542,105 65,130,420 65,643,486 61,764,385 56,486,944 51,288,647 50,586,387 54,719,677 59,521,018 65,467,497

Health and human services 69,979,980 74,309,784 79,077,015 80,799,454 92,475,364 89,939,730 94,069,749 105,037,102 122,063,805 127,543,288

Natural resources and environmental protection .. 5,316,769 6,333,252 5,626,359 6,019,104 5,853,278 5,950,635 5,670,922 5,854,685 6,419,591 6,988,442

Business, consumer services, and housing .. 1,214,740 1,129,063 1,518,402 979,962 1,405,019 1,241,269 1,475,486 589,715 903,782 814,676

Transportation 9,763,200 13,068,043 11,980,315 14,155,767 11,119,644 13,719,927 12,836,192 13,427,229 12,897,591 12,120,820

Corrections and rehabilitation 8,945,325 10,504,182 10,835,203 10,310,229 10,295,564 10,343,574 10,081,736 11,234,705 11,483,573 11,875,294 Interest on long-term debt 2,596,316 4,184,631 3,801,283 4,146,259 4,377,064 4,365,181 4,349,632 4,699,265 4,880,625 4,231,581

Total expenses 173,620,025 187,846,455 192,378,011 190,630,129 195,533,434 191,260,700 194,460,204 209,854,557 233,974,266 245,727,635

Program revenues

Charges Lor services:

General government 1 4,495,166 4,404,126 4,781,126 4,918,132 5,057,082 6,841,334 6,196,586 5,994,608 6,502,363 6,525,736

Education 2,689,906 3,343,205 3,483,072 4,231,692 110,423 81,212 64,480 67,165 53,498 66,298

Health and human services 4,751,011 5,191,548 4,256,069 3,769,794 8,471,261 4,940,650 8,761,781 7,961,897 8,259,696 10,630,859

Natural resources and environmental protection .. 2,110,593 2,648,952 2,578,738 2,597,712 2,797,264 2,866,232 3,269,315 3,403,524 4,546,413 4,823,861

Business, consumer services, and housing .. 704,512 692,348 658,486 654,034 660,196 724,222 682,503 586,055 626,960 823,189

Transportation 4,040,268 3,987,958 4,210,461 5,420,261 4,010,433 4,342,668 4,082,616 4,247,258 4,382,901 4,532,300

Corrections and rehabilitation 30,821 27,702 21,592 18,097 14,981 16,757 45,153 13,645 18,557 19,411

Operating grants/contributions 43,440,102 45,849,413 57,828,622 75,469,783 67,849,215 58,777,006 60,943,536 69,861,130 84,896,237 86,628,827

Capital grants/contributions 1,164,526 1,207,101 1,142,691 962,388 1,272,326 2,193,189 1,669,021 1,515,890 1,319,430 1,480,351

Total program revenues 63,426,905 67,352,353 78,960,857 98,041,893 90,243,181 80,783,270 85,714,991 93,651,172 110,606,055 115,530,832

Total governmental activities net program expenses .. (110,193,120) (120,494,102) (113,417,154) (92,588,236) (105,290,253) (110,477,430) (108,745,213) (116,203,385) (123,368,211) (130,196,803)

General revenues and other changes in net position

General revenues:

Personal income laxes 53,272,229 55,355,266 45,709,344 43,866,857 51,719,107 54,368,347 67,502,738 68,793,292 78,098,865 80,303,076

Sales and use laxes 35,427,013 34,856,824 31,244,979 33,784,106 33,521,221 31,216,438 33,839,065 36,477,724 38,224,080 39,121,061

Corporation laxes 11,211,267 11,207,468 10,741,140 9,472,611 9,384,416 8,629,935 7,289,910 9,102,128 10,720,647 9,213,173 Motor vehicle excise laxes l 5,263,435 5,219,605 5,777,167 5,393,994 5,028,589

Insurance laxes 2,165,567 2,190,870 2,063,555 2,235,251 2,311,880 2,408,473 2,295,579 3,359,043 3,926,319 4,203,885

Other laxes l 5,939,890 5,594,970 5,264,685 5,234,531 7,768,010 2,368,748 2,498,248 2,302,231 2,235,498 2,158,874

Investment and interest 730,066 639,059 175,584 114,933 62,946 72,237 57,285 80,969 58,016 131,615

Escheal 334,002 282,287 315,642 149,996 229,146 372,215 551,580 487,937 400,807 304,960 Special item J (54,537} 40,516

Translers 29,855 54,994 21,015 (13,441,875} (3,251,598} (2,031,032} (1,997,759} (2,296,010} (2,554,970} (2,800,101}

Total general revenues

and other changes in net position 109,109,889 110,181,738 95,535,944 81,416,410 101,745,128 102,668,796 117,256,251 124,029,944 136,503,256 137,705,648

Total governmental activities change in net position .. (1,083,231) (10,312,364) (17,881,210) (11,171,826) (3,545,125) (7,808,634) 8,511,038 7,826,559 13,135,045 7,508,845

(continued} 1 Tax ~~cf program expenses and revenues rcporicd scparaidy prior lo fiscal year 2009 arc now included wilh "general govcmmenl" 1 Molor vehicle excise laxes, rcporicd scparaidy in fiscal year 201 2 due lo malcrial inc~ascs, we~ included wilh "oiher laxes" in prior years

J In fiscal year 2014, a componenl uni I assumed dcbi on behalf of ihcprimary govcmmenl In fiscal year 201 6, ihc California Sia le Univcrsily,

an enlcrprisc fund, assumed dcbi on bchalfoflhc Public Buildings Conslruclion Fund, an inlcmal service fund 4 In fiscal year 2011, ihc California Sia le Univcrsily Fund was reclassified from a govcmmenlal fund lo an cnlcrprisc fund 5 In fiscal year 2014, ihc Public Buildings Conslrnclion Fund was ~classified from an enlcrprisc fund lo an inlcmal service fund

246 247

Statistical Section

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis olaccotmling, amounts in thousands}

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


Expenses

Electric Power 5,865,000 5,362,000 4,560,000 3,908,000 2,317,000 915,000 488,000 835,000 799,000 728,000

Waler Resources 951,590 1,009,214 914,837 1,069,662 1,115,793 1,047,574 1,127,195 983,048 1,019,378 1,086,650

Public Buildings Construction 5 334,777 371,904 420,465 494,332 390,173 403,853 410,404

Stale Lollery 3,470,615 3,173,060 3,069,365 3,166,447 3,507,524 4,431,709 4,499,451 5,078,935 5,560,299 6,315,957

Unemployment Programs 9,136,218 10,622,582 19,609,068 29,614,598 25,619,138 21,111,658 17,599,219 13,673,403 11,390,227 11,458,966

Cali lomia Stale University 4 5,851,355 6,181,397 6,196,541 6,544,936 6,847,789 7,199,277

High Technology Education 22,704 16,916 15,590 15,025 9,590 7,778 6,568 847

Stale University Dormitory Building

Maintenance and Equipment 844,798 699,018 486,349 856,106

Stale Waler Pollution Control Revolving 12,702 13,056 12,261 16,893 10,953 8,780 3,698 5,072 9,082 11,814

Housing Loan 127,206 132,101 130,777 122,114 104,667 89,570 70,356 57,206 58,280 55,627

Other enterprise programs 141,859 122,921 147,441 130,329 118,006 78,601 58,578 79,641 77,475 84,188

Total expenses 20,907,469 21,522,772 29,366,153 39,393,506 39,044,199 34,275,920 30,460,010 27,258,088 25,761,530 26,940,479

Program revenues

Charges Lor services:

Electric Power 5,865,000 5,362,000 4,560,000 3,908,000 2,317,000 915,000 488,000 835,000 799,000 728,000

Waler Resources 951,590 1,009,214 914,837 1,069,662 1,115,793 1,047,574 1,127,195 983,048 1,019,378 1,086,650

Public Buildings Construction 5 396,895 384,816 366,151 430,069 456,467 428,260 616,041

Stale Lollery 3,461,699 3,242,828 3,051,320 3,145,259 3,484,689 4,484,291 4,445,921 5,077,976 5,553,418 6,367,902

Unemployment Programs 9,017,969 8,829,018 14,273,975 11,255,098 24,678,783 21,947,781 18,597,962 15,167,258 13,402,902 13,866,028

Cali lomia Stale University 4 2,505,545 2,915,123 2,891,432 3,014,030 3,113,988 3,172,154

High Technology Education 22,966 20,600 15,975 13,015 10,498 8,452 5,585 424

Stale University Dormitory Building

Maintenance and Equipment 554,851 640,208 811,454 599,571

Stale Waler Pollution Control Revolving 78,564 71,404 59,923 56,121 55,957 57,540 60,173 62,985 65,959 70,245

Housing Loan 130,293 130,139 109,636 85,321 89,224 84,830 66,050 65,247 57,742 53,617

Other enterprise programs 134,018 137,476 124,952 98,957 105,676 74,693 80,540 77,671 78,625 82,029

Operating grants/contributions 1,216,808 1,249,995 1,323,345 1,491,559 1,666,292 1,764,962

Capital grants/contributions 182,989 189,064 71,882 91,808 86,272 106,057 142,304 80,903 107,746 66,914

Total program revenues 20,796,834 20,016,767 24,360,105 20,752,881 36,122,712 33,319,596 29,844,548 26,856,101 25,865,050 27,258,501

Total business-type activities

net program revenues (expenses) (110,635) (1,506,005) (5,006,048) (18,640,625) (2,921,487} (956,324) (615,462) (401,987} 103,520 318,022

Other changes in net position Special item J (26,913}

Translers (29,855} (54,994} (21,015} 13,441,875 3,251,598 2,031,032 1,997,759 2,296,010 2,554,970 2,800,101

Total business-type activities change in net position .. (140,490) (1,560,999) (5,027,063) (5,198,750) 330,111 1,074,708 1,382,297 1,867,110 2,658,490 3,118,123

Total primary government change in net position .. (1,223,721) $ (11,873,363) $ (22,908,273) $ (16,370,576) (3,215,014) (6,733,926) 9,893,335 9,693,669 15,793,535 10,626,968

(concluded}

248 249

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (modi lied accrual basis ol accounting, amounts in thousands}

2007 2008 2009 2010

General Fund Reserved 2,596,537 2,113,149 2,260,504 1,320,782

Unreserved (4,504,075} (6,282,018} (18,344,400} (20,929,640}

Nonspendable

Restricted

Commilled

Unassigned

Total General Fund $ (1,907,538) $ (4,168,869) $ (16,083,896) $ (19,608,858)

All other governmental funds Reserved 21,955,300 19,512,083 27,465,566 41,087,578

Unreserved, reported in:

Special revenue lunds (914,843} (1,817,290} (3,539,254} (8,554,611}

Capital projects lunds (1,128,608} (837,349} 686,113 838,879

Nonspendable

Restricted

Commilled

Assigned

Unassigned

Total all other governmental funds $ 19,911,849 $ 16,857,444 $ 24,612,425 $ 33,371,846

Nole: In llscal year 2011, the Stale implemented GASB Statement No. 54, which signi llcanlly changed the ltmd balance

classillcalions. Fiscal year 2011 and subsequent Lund balance classi llcalions are nol comparable lo prior years' classi llcalions.

1 In fiscal year 2011, ihe California Siale Univcrsily Fund, which consisled of$1 2 billion beginning fund balance, was reclassified from

a govcmmcnlal fund lo an enlcrprise fund

250

2011 I

148,019

156,496

29,850

(20,273,606}

$ (19,939,241)

39,448

27,709,325

2,701,702

268,888

(21,847}

30,697,516

Statistical Section

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

7,614 140,107 128,609 53,431 75,939

80,849 178,643 394,246 2,266,635 4,044,911

19,600 22,879 125,120 102,793 68,102

(23,069,351} (14,596,085} (8,092,571} (4,651,491} (3,827,224}

$ (22,961,288) $ (14,254,456) (7,444,596) (2,228,632) 361,728

15,022 27,260 5,620 11,188

24,790,661 24,137,270 24,269,093 24,224,167 24,885,166

2,109,089 2,318,035 2,914,747 4,090,563 5,652,478

209,171 18,857 16,767 14,622

(103,177} (176,066} (20,145} (6,456} (1,037}

26,796,576 26,503,432 27,209,812 28,330,661 30,562,417

251

Statistical Section

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (modi lied accrual basis ol accounting, amounts in thousands}

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 4 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Revenues Personal income laxes 53,289,524 55,197,062 45,482,726 43,884,798 51,691,153 54,442,733 67,424,576 68,771,667 78,245,616 79,934,285

Sales and use laxes 35,451,311 34,764,651 31,425,308 33,696,412 33,488,805 31,205,183 33,869,961 36,409,311 38,389,972 39,136,040 Corporation laxes 11,210,267 11,201,468 10,738,140 9,467,611 9,433,416 8,609,935 7,261,910 9,242,454 10,780,647 9,214,173 Motor vehicle excise laxes 1 5,263,435 5,219,605 5,777,167 5,393,994 5,028,589 Insurance laxes 2,165,567 2,190,870 2,063,555 2,235,251 2,311,881 2,408,473 2,295,579 3,359,043 3,926,319 4,203,885

Other laxes 1 5,800,027 5,675,894 5,245,416 5,235,801 7,829,662 2,306,717 2,425,184 2,297,025 2,312,875 2,185,690 Intergovernmental 46,442,519 48,969,006 61,053,091 79,183,291 69,160,916 62,235,671 64,418,808 73,000,600 87,740,667 91,069,753 Licenses and permits 5,266,142 5,326,854 5,805,369 6,900,747 6,767,437 6,600,001 6,659,078 6,957,117 7,270,994 7,612,551

Charges Lor services 911,387 1,025,569 986,773 974,181 1,008,647 728,980 741,201 769,302 849,895 870,142 Fees and penalties 6,093,948 6,800,633 6,204,288 7,291,894 10,262,387 8,315,452 10,673,104 9,757,476 10,510,727 11,882,699 Investment and interest 1,555,202 1,591,025 1,108,058 281,881 212,116 175,898 135,928 137,754 119,690 232,285 Escheal 334,002 282,287 315,642 149,996 229,146 372,215 551,580 488,945 406,899 305,394

Other 3,732,591 4,265,010 3,933,035 3,555,282 2,941,484 2,542,505 3,227,347 2,903,335 3,975,144 4,049,789

Total revenues 172,252,487 177,290,329 174,361,401 192,857,145 195,337,050 185,207,198 204,903,861 219,871,196 249,923,439 255,725,275

Expenditures General government l 14,062,920 12,745,860 13,075,901 12,036,503 12,997,651 13,484,305 15,748,069 14,778,214 16,202,395 16,715,892 Education 61,103,008 64,367,612 63,857,066 59,229,726 55,547,139 50,362,337 49,692,763 53,309,436 62,952,621 65,213,542 Health and human services 70,157,806 74,102,708 78,731,136 80,321,470 91,941,309 89,473,391 94,621,630 104,781,494 122,259,036 127,201,314

Natural resources and environmental protection .. 5,191,078 6,123,609 5,209,684 5,456,904 5,254,757 5,358,575 5,318,332 5,508,860 6,006,446 6,278,363 Business, consumer services, and housing 1,214,752 1,239,397 1,266,068 1,088,494 1,183,536 1,219,499 1,259,392 621,037 670,774 1,130,213 Transportation 11,485,069 14,747,506 13,803,518 14,083,790 13,181,390 15,684,611 15,008,671 15,721,532 15,137,217 14,814,829

Corrections and rehabilitation 9,030,299 9,972,507 9,883,593 9,553,992 9,253,791 9,805,846 9,681,086 10,395,234 11,182,926 11,450,980 Capital outlay 1,345,021 1,724,074 1,432,376 1,691,674 1,128,011 1,296,413 1,222,342 1,909,010 1,019,335 1,492,442 Debt service:

Bond and commercial paper retirement 5,691,791 8,970,533 5,131,600 3,259,203 3,118,906 4,435,992 5,189,150 7,002,941 8,482,380 6,929,866 Interest and llscal charges 2,881,849 3,394,433 3,584,358 4,022,922 4,355,110 4,453,643 4,363,260 4,321,040 4,473,799 4,057,907

Total expenditures 182,163,593 197,388,239 195,975,300 190,744,678 197,961,600 195,574,612 202,104,695 218,348,798 248,386,929 255,285,348

Excess (dellciency} olrevenues over (under} expenditures .. (9,911,106} (20,097,910} (21,613,899} 2,112,467 (2,624,550} (10,367,414} 2,799,166 1,522,398 1,536,510 439,927

Other financing sources (uses) General obligation bonds and commercial paper issued .. 9,040,500 14,193,760 16,764,085 12,039,472 4,525,000 4,165,515 4,038,095 5,082,305 4,343,165 4,074,980 Revenue bonds issued 97,635

Relunding/remarkeling debt issued 9,098,376 1,798,685 4,176,050 4,300,555 4,634,365 2,077,330 5,086,100 5,220,320 Payment lo relund/remarkel long-term debt (7,840,621} (1,844,006} (4,221,604} (4,508,834} (3,174,613} (328,024} (3,865,093} (4,378,328} Premium on bonds issued J 295,439 126,107 267,980 32,607 667,931 964,211 505,026 1,116,811 1,037,920 Proceeds lrom loans 1,996,737 35,538

Capital leases 4 178,936 268,686 364,813 811,816 204,631 528,804 710,440 1,486,204 625,282 1,148,774 Translers in 9,311,462 11,414,132 6,776,476 6,548,447 8,705,229 5,523,644 2,957,762 4,041,250 5,344,134 4,385,123 Translers oul (9,242,771} (11,336,764} (6,689,658} (19,952,766} (11,902,800} (7,499,131} (4,898,754} (6,304,047} (7,934,754} (7,130,142}

Total other financing sources 10,545,882 14,789,932 17,439,458 1,666,132 1,600,205 3,178,484 5,231,506 6,560,044 4,715,645 4,358,647

Total change in fund balance 634,776 (5,307,978) (4,174,441) 3,778,599 (1,024,345) (7,188,930) 8,030,672 8,082,442 6,252,155 4,798,574

Debt service as a percentage olnoncapilal expenditures .. 4.7% 6.3% 4.5% 3.9% 3.8% 4.6% 4.8% 5.2% 5.2% 4.3%

1 Molor vehicle excise laxes, reported scparaidy in fiscal year 201 2 due lomalerial increases, were included wilh 'oiherlaxes' m pnor years 1 Tax rdiefprogram expcndilures rcporied scparaidy prior lo fiscal year 2009 arc now included wilh general govcmmcnl J Prior lo fiscal year 2008, premiums on bonds issued were nelied againsl debi scrviceinlercsl and fiscal charges 4 In fiscal year 2011, ihe California Siale Universily Fund was reclassified from agovcmmenlal fund loan cnlerprise fund

252 253



254

Revenue capacity schedules contain information to help the reader assess the State's capacity to raise revenue and the sources of that revenue. This section includes the following revenue capacity schedules.

Schedule ofRevenue Base

Schedule ofRevenue Payers by Industry/Income Level

Schedule of Personal Income Tax Rates

255

For the Past Ten Calendar Years (amounts in thousands}

2006 2007 2008 2009

Personal Income by Industry

(all items restated as loolnoled} 1

Farm earnings 10,502,902 12,862,117 10,766,257 11,973,440

Forestry, llshing, and other natural resources .. 5,833,348 6,094,846 6,089,767 6,147,847

Mining 5,211,109 5,194,458 7,140,140 4,119,811

Construction and utilities 96,033,933 89,077,633 75,328,934 65,061,973

Manulacluring 122,827,189 125,304,412 123,299,811 113,518,283

Wholesale trade 54,764,594 58,385,776 57,972,229 52,454,196

Retail trade 81,580,803 80,873,164 73,042,916 68,818,022

Transportation and warehousing 31,793,178 33,337,952 32,451,085 30,688,997

Tnlormalion, llnance, and insurance 126,375,035 127,946,372 118,123,454 120,213,222

Real eslale and rental and leasing 31,859,819 25,073,627 32,287,873 33,903,893

Services 395,786,577 416,568,707 436,006,483 419,074,508

Federal, civilian 20,978,437 21,578,358 22,347,584 23,426,267

Military 12,812,404 13,447,304 14,560,197 15,558,704

Stale and local government 164,416,341 176,638,739 185,038,204 184,143,378 Otherl 364,143,953 391,468,081 422,075,503 411,546,787

Total personal income $ 1,524,919,622 $ 1,583,851,546 $1,616,530,437 $ 1,560,649,328

Average eITeclive rate J 5.1% 5.0% 5.7% 5.2%

Source: Bureau olEconomic Analysis, U.S. Department olCommerce

1 2QQ6-2014informalion updaied 1 Oiherpersonal income includes dividends, inlercsl, renlal income, residence adjuslmenl, govcmmenl lransfers for individuals, and deduclions

for social insurance

J The lolal direcl rale for personal income is nol available The average effrclive rale equals personal income lax revenue divided by adjusied

grossmcome

256

Statistical Section

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

12,433,312 14,373,226 15,953,332 18,381,388 17,495,977 17,605,974

6,566,707 6,854,997 7,638,250 8,068,569 8,522,241 9,203,366

4,514,175 5,106,115 6,001,577 6,428,622 6,651,227 5,608,197

62,660,496 61,873,357 66,556,171 73,683,266 78,847,459 87,898,106

115,688,797 120,111,759 124,899,276 126,311,618 133,530,187 139,691,173

53,682,251 57,472,618 60,035,740 62,295,590 65,623,042 68,608,235

70,039,926 73,130,362 77,231,735 79,105,234 82,313,799 86,231,777

31,303,667 34,174,605 35,593,342 37,370,800 39,795,961 43,261,714

130,736,844 135,518,145 143,425,308 154,787,569 159,689,475 175,851,729

36,358,312 45,843,400 52,588,792 50,457,768 48,428,630 49,896,044

430,851,698 458,596,036 496,398,719 500,793,929 538,770,068 579,603,097

25,978,417 26,293,383 26,445,830 26,044,538 26,690,415 27,752,861

16,264,215 16,059,376 15,919,310 15,351,742 15,063,581 14,701,712

185,265,970 189,759,590 189,141,123 194,484,812 204,595,848 215,902,598

434,789,463 482,266,610 520,738,657 508,391,069 551,905,830 581,852,890

$ 1,617,134,250 $1,727,433,579 $ 1,838,567,162 $ 1,861,956,514 $ 1,977,923,740 $ 2,103,669,473

4.7% 5.3% 5.0% 6.1% 5.6% 6.1%

257

For the Past Ten Calendar Years (amounts in thousands}

Taxable Sales by Industry 1

Retail Apparel _____________ _

General merchandise _________ _

Specially--------------Food ______________ _

Restaurant and bars __________ _ Household ____________ _

Buildingmalerials __________ _

Automotive-------------Other ______________ _

Business and personal service _______ _

2006

19,829,416

59,264,894

54,695,680

21,864,179

49,229,418

17,383,449

36,163,326

115,154,535

15,481,675

23,650,322

146,935,543

559,652,437

All other--------------- -~~c

Total taxable sales------------ ccccc'cc

Direct sales lax rate l __________ _

Taxable Sales by Industry (Using NAT CS Codes) 1

Retail and Food Services

5.25%

2007 2008

20,855,890 22,120,094

59,897,350 56,425,472

34,122,471 27,380,740

22,461,059 21,504,308

51,658,575 52,051,404

16,720,852 17,199,187

32,656,324 26,647,007

117,864,918 106,555,420

30,787,663 27,434,795

23,355,672 22,045,958

150,669,375 152,289,155

561,050,149 531,653,540

5.25% 5.25%

Motor vehicle andparls dealers----------------------

Furniture and home lumishings stores--------------------

Electronics and appliance stores----------------------

Buildingmalerials, garden equipment and supplies----------------

Food and beverage--------------------------Health and personal care stores-----------------------Gasoline stations __________________________ _

Clothing and clothing accessories stores--------------------

Sporting goods, hobby, book and music stores------------------

General merchandise stores-----------------------

Miscellaneous slorerelailers ------------------------Nonslorerelailers __________________________ _

Food services and drinking places----------------------All other outlets ___________________________ _

Total taxable sales----------------------------

Direclsaleslax ralel __________________________ _

Source: Calilomia Stale Board olEqualizalion (BOE}

2009 I

44,488,198

8,481,020

13,384,338

23,978,313

22,546,285

9,244,958

39,077,835

25,641,272

10,294,172

44,921,639

16,385,169

2,849,864

49,921,543

145,278,339

456,492,945

6.25% 3

1 Due lo ihc BOE', conversion from business coding lo Norlh American Jnduslry Classificalion Syslcm (NAICS) coding for ihcrcporling ofTaxable

Sales by lnduslry, induslry levd daia for 2009 and forward is nol comparable lo ihal rcporicd for prior years The NAICS conversion process for over

one million pCITTlil holders was nol compleicd uni ii ihc end of 2008, so 2009 was ihc firs I year ihc BOE used ihc new formal wilh NAICS codes 1 The di~cl sales lax ralc used is ihc slalc lax ralc ihal provides revenue lo ihc Sialc's General Fund and dcbi service fund II docs nol include ihc I%

local lax ralc ihal is allocaicd lo cilics and counlics

J Raio change was dfrclivc on April I, 2009 4 Raio change was dfrclivc on January I, 201 3

258

2010

47,355,568

8,742,984

13,749,019

24,750,865

22,787,407

9,525,910

45,226,491

27,267,430

10,365,480

46,323,804

16,569,690

2,830,615

51,282,453

150,570,269

477,347,985

6.25%

Statistical Section

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

53,303,501 61,547,848 67,986,436 73,232,242 79,563,170

9,280,688 9,937,187 10,645,523 11,408,837 12,169,888

14,297,402 14,744,723 14,765,485 15,148,893 16,349,542

26,064,428 27,438,083 29,680,053 31,299,110 33,659,726

23,606,132 24,511,714 25,289,203 26,298,414 27,939,656

10,309,491 10,787,801 11,294,049 11,640,870 12,364,559

55,210,076 58,006,168 56,860,585 55,733,384 47,397,553

29,600,057 32,357,516 34,918,036 36,822,241 38,438,074

10,602,711 10,751,814 11,113,831 11,056,024 11,341,328

48,219,018 49,996,451 51,431,094 52,013,855 48,371,010

17,187,402 17,880,765 18,382,224 19,024,905 19,852,685

3,081,188 4,375,432 7,296,839 8,292,788 9,531,606

54,755,944 59,037,320 62,776,360 67,864,614 73,889,708

165,050,017 177,014,427 184,399,899 195,985,698 202,290,021

520,568,055 558,387,249 586,839,617 615,821,875 633,158,526

6.25% 6.25% 6.50% 4 6.50% 6.50%

(concluded}

259


For Calendar Years 2006 and 2014

Personal Income Tax Filers and Liability by Income Level 1

Number Percent

of Filers of Total

Under $ 50,000 9,154,344 63.6 %

50,000 '° 99,999 3,124,860 21.7

100,000 '° 149,999 1,120,321 7.8

150,000 '° 199,999 401,419 2.8

200,000 '° 299,999 293,496 2.1

300,000 '° 399,999 102,006 0.7

400,000 '° 499,999 52,115 04

500,000 '° 599,999 29,757 0.2

600,000 '° 699,999 21,085 0.1

700,000 '° 799,999 13,970 0.1

800,000 '° 899,999 10,176 0.1

900,000 '° 999,999 8,076 0.1

1,000,000 '° 1,999,999 30,387 0.2

2,000,000 '° 2,999,999 8,320 0.1

3,000,000 '° 3,999,999 3,683 0.0

4,000,000 '° 4,999,999 2,097 0.0

5,000,000 and over 6,563 0.0

Total 14,382,675 100.0 %

Number Percent

of Filers of Total

Under $ 50,000 9,618,850 60.6 %

50,000 '° 99,999 3,344,856 21.1

100,000 '° 149,999 1,344,009 8.5

150,000 '° 199,999 636,172 4.0

200,000 '° 299,999 473,588 3.0

300,000 '° 399,999 170,913 LI

400,000 '° 499,999 81,703 0.5

500,000 '° 599,999 46,780 0.3

600,000 '° 699,999 28,648 0.2

700,000 '° 799,999 19,264 0.1

800,000 '° 899,999 14,760 0.1

900,000 '° 999,999 10,783 0.1

1,000,000 '° 1,999,999 41,086 0.3

2,000,000 '° 2,999,999 10,160 0.1

3,000,000 '° 3,999,999 4,489 0.0

4,000,000 '° 4,999,999 2,531 0.0

5,000,000 and over 7,429 0.0

Total 15,856,021 100.0 %

Source: Calilomia Franchise Tax Board

1 For California rcsidcni lax rel urns Calendar year 20 14i, ihc mosl ~ccnl year for which daia is available 1 Amounls a~ in ihousands

260

2006

T"' Percent Liability l of Total

1,735,639 3.8 %

5,485,178 12.0

5,213,440 11.4

3,418,630 7.5

4,200,513 9.2

2,395,258 5.2

1,710,759 3.7

1,242,962 2.7

1,066,599 2.3

826,564 18

686,372 15

625,027 14

3,521,137 7.7

1,798,113 3.9

1,155,898 2.5

871,004 19

9,762,812 21.5

45,715,905 100.0 %

2014

T"' Percent

Liabilit~ l of Total

1,426,734 2.2 %

5,754,882 8.8

6,527,053 10.0

5,566,060 8.5

6,834,617 10.4

4,015,091 6.1

2,706,437 4.1

1,985,825 3.0

1,497,823 2.3

1,219,536 19

1,090,658 17

914,837 14

5,517,828 84

2,673,193 4.1

1,749,934 2.7

1,296,972 2.0

14,681,417 22.4

65,458,897 100.0 %

Statistical Section


Sales Tax Permits and Tax Liability by Industry

2006 (Using Business Codes) 1

Number Percent T"' Percent of Permits l of Total Liability 3 of Total

Retail: Apparel ____________ _ 45,053 4.3 % 1,041,044 3.5 % General merchandise ________ _ 17,897 17 3,111,407 10.4 Specially ___________ _ 207,230 19.8 2,871,523 9.7 Food ____________ _ 24,975 24 1,147,869 3.7 Restaurant and bars ________ _ 88,021 84 2,584,544 8.7 Household ___________ _ 34,168 3.3 912,631 3.1 Buildingmalerials _________ _ 11,760 LI 1,898,575 6.5 Automotive __________ _ 37,649 3.6 6,045,613 21.1 Other ____________ _ 23,245 2.2 812,788 2.8

Business and personal service ______ _ 103,343 9.9 1,241,642 4.2 All other ____________ _ 455,017 43.3 7,714,116 26.3

1,048,358 Tota\ ______________ ~~eee 100.0 % 29,381,752 100.0 %

2015 (UsingNATCS Codes) 1

Number Percent T"' Percent of Permits l of Total Liability 3 of Total

Retail and Food Services:

Motor vehicle and parts dealers 36,153 3.2 % 4,773,790 12.6 % Furniture and home lurnishings stores ____ 21,267 19 730,193 19

Electronics and appliance stores 26,931 24 980,973 2.6

Buildingmalerials, garden equipment & supplies .. 18,774 17 2,019,584 5.3

Food and beverage 35,056 3.1 1,676,379 44

Health and personal care stores 35,149 3.1 741,874 2.0

Gasoline stations 9,917 0.9 2,843,853 7.5

Clothing and clothing accessories stores .. 106,337 9.7 2,306,284 6.1

Sporting goods, hobby, book & music stores .. 37,274 3.3 680,480 18

General merchandise stores 26,744 24 2,902,261 7.6

Miscellaneous store retailers 192,293 17.2 1,191,161 3.1

Nonslore retailers 50,043 4.5 571,896 15

Food services and drinking places 107,690 9.6 4,433,383 11.7

All other outlets 412,959 37.0 12,137,401 31.9

Total 1,116,587 100.0 % 37,989,512 100.0 %

Source: Cali lomia Stale Board olEqualizalion (BOE}

1 Due lo ihc BOE', conversion from business coding lo Norlh American Jnduslry Classificalion Syslcm (NAICS) coding for ihc rcporling of Taxable

Sales by lnduslry, induslry levd daia for 2009 and forward is nol comparable lo ihal rcporicd for prior years The NAICS conversion process for over

one million pcrmil holders was nol compleicd uni ii ihc end of 2008, so 2009 was ihc firs I year ihc BOE used ihc new formal wilh NAICS codes 1 As of July I

J Calculaicd by muliiplying ihc laxable sales by induslry shown on pages 258 and 259 by ihc dirccl sales lax ralc Amounls arc in ihousands

261

For Calendar Years 2006-2015

Tax Rate 1

Tax Rate 1

' " '" '" '" '" °' '"' '" '" '"

Tax Rate 1

' " '" '" '" '" °' '"' '" '" 13.3

Soun:c: California Franchise Tax Board (F'TB)

Married Filing Jointly and Surviving Spouse

2006 2007

Income Level Income Level

Uplo$13,244 Up 10$13,654

13,245 -31,396 13,655 -32,370

31,397 -49,552 32,371 -51,088

49,553 -68,788 51,089-70,920

68,789 -86,934 70,921 -89,628

86,935 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 89,629 -999,999

$1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQI and over

Single and Married Filing Separately

2006 2007


Up lo $6,622 Up lo $6,827

6,623- 15,698 6,828 -16,185

15,699- 24,776 16,186 -25,544

24,777 - 34,394 25,545 -35,460

34,395-43,467 35,461 -44,814

43,468 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 44,815-1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQlandover

Head or Household

2006 2007


Uplo $13,251 Up 10$13,662

13,252- 31,397 13,663 -32,370

31,398-40,473 32,371 -41,728

40,474- 5Q,Q9Q 41,729-51,643

50,091 - 59,166 51,644-61,QQQ

59,167-1,QQQ,QQQ 61,QQI -1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQlandover

200S

Income Level

Uplo$14,336

14,337- 33,988

33,989- 53,642

53,643- 74,466

74,467 - 94, 11 Q

94,111-1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQlandover

200S

Income Level

Uplo $7,168

7,169- 16,994

16,995- 26,821

26,822 - 37,233

37,234-47,055

47,056-1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQI and over

200S

Income Level

Uplo$14,345

14,346- 33,989

33,990-43,814

43,815 - 54,225

54,226 - 64,050

64,QS I - 1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQI and over

1 FTB lax brackcls arc indexed lo ihc California Consumer Price Index and arc adj us led accordingly on a yearly basis

Average Effective Rate (amounls in ihousands)

Personal income lax revenue 1

Adjusicd gross income 1

Average cffrclivcralc J

$

2006

50,798,418

990,695,484

51%

1 Personal income lax revenue is rcporicd on a fiscal year basis

2007 200S

53,289,524 55,197,062

$1,059,967,500 972,420, I QQ

5 0% 57%

1 Source: California Franchise Tax Board Fiscal year 201 5 informal ion rcflccls rel urns processed as of November 201 6

J The average dfrclivc ralc equals personal income lax revenue divided by adjusicdgross income

262

200<) 2010


Uplo$14,120 Uplo$14,248

14,121 -33,478 14,249 -33,780

33,479 -52,838 33,781 -53,314

52,839 -73,350 53,315-74,QIQ

73,351 -92,698 74,011 -93,532

92,699 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 93,533 -1,QQQ,QQ()

$1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQI and over

200<) 2010


Uplo$7,Q6Q Up 10$7,124

7,061 -16,739 7,125 -16,890

16,740-26,419 16,891 -26,657

26,420 - 36,675 26,658-37,Q(\5

36,676 -46,349 37,006 -46,766

46,350 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 46,767 - 1,QQQ,QQ()

$1,QQQ,QQlandover $1,QQQ,QQI and over

200<) 2010


Uplo$14,13Q Up 10$14,257

14,131 -33,479 14,258 -33,780

33,480-43,157 33,781 -43,545

43,158 -53,412 43,546 -53,893

53,413 -63,089 53,894-63,657

63,090 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 63,658 - 1,QQQ,QQ()

$1,QQQ,QQlandover $1,QQQ,QQI and over

200<) 2010

$ 45,482,726 $ 43,884,798

881,160,200 939,888,50()

52% 47%

Statistical Section

Married Filing Jointly and Surviving Spouse

2011 2012 2013 2014 201S

Income Level Income Level Income Level Income Level Income Level

Up 10$14,632 Uplo$14,91Q Uplo $15,164 Uplo $15,498 Uplo$15,7QQ

14,633 -34,692 14,911 -35,352 15,165- 35,952 15,499 - 36,742 15,701-37,220

34,693 -54,754 35,353 -55,794 35,953- 56,742 36,743 - 57,990 37,221-58,744

54,755-76,QQ8 55,795 -77,452 56,743- 78,768 57,991 - 80,50() 58,745- 81,546

76,009 - 96,058 77,453 -97,884 78,769- 99,548 80,501-101,738 81,547-103,060

96,059 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 97,885 - 5QQ,QQQ 99,549 - 508,50() 101,739 - 519,688 I 03061 - 526,444

$1,QQQ,QQI and over 5QQ,QQI -6QQ,QQQ 508,501 - 61 Q,200 519,689- 623,624 526445 - 631,732

6QQ,QQI -1,QQQ,QQQ 610,201-1,QQQ,QQQ 623,625 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 631,733-1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQI and over 1,QQQ,QQI -1,017,QQQ 1,QQQ,QQI -1,039,374 1,QQQ,QQI -1,052,886

$1,017,QQI and over $1,039,375 and over $1,052,887 and over

Single and Married Filing Separately

2011 2012 2013 2014 201S


Up 10$7,316 Up 10$7,455 Uplo $7,582 Uplo $7,749 Uplo $7,850

7,317 -17,346 7,456 -17,676 7,583- 17,976 7,750- 18,371 7,851 - 18,610

17,347-27,377 17,677-27,897 17,977- 28,371 18,372-28,995 18,611 - 29,372

27,378-38,0()4 27,898 - 38,726 28,372- 39,384 28,996 - 40,250 29,373-40,773

38,005 -48,029 38,727 -48,942 39,385-49,774 40,251 - 50,869 40,774-51,530

48,030-1,QQQ,QQQ 48,943 - 250,QQQ 49,775- 254,250 50,870- 259,844 51,531 - 263,222

$1,QQQ,QQI and over 250,QQI -3QQ,QQQ 254,251 - 305,I QQ 259,845 -311,812 263,223 - 315,866

3QQ,QQI -5QQ,QQQ 305,I QI - 508,5QQ 311,813- 519,687 315,867 - 526,443

5QQ,QQ I - 1,QQQ,QQQ 508,501 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 519,688-1,QQQ,QQQ 526,444-1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQlandover $1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQI and over

Head or Household

2011 2012 2013 2014 201S


Uplo$14,642 Uplo$14,920 Uplo $15,174 Uplo $15,508 Uplo$15,710

14,643 -34,692 14,921 -35,351 15,175- 35,952 15,509 - 36,743 15,711 - 37,221

34,693 -44,721 35,352 -45,571 35,953-46,346 36,744-47,366 37,222-47,982

44,722 - 55,348 45,572 - 56,40() 46,347- 57,359 47,367- 58,621 47983- 59,383

55,349 -65,376 56,401 -66,618 57,360- 67,751 58,622- 69,242 59,384- 70,142

65,377 - 1,QQQ,QQQ 66,619-340,QQQ 67,752- 345,780 69,243- 353,387 70,143 - 357,981

$1,QQQ,QQI and over 340,QQI -408,QQQ 345,781-414,936 353,388-424,065 357,982 -429,578

408,QQI -680,QQQ 414,937- 691,560 424,066 - 706,774 429,579 - 715,962

680,QQI - 1,QQQ,QQQ 691,561 -1,QQQ,QQQ 706,775-1,QQQ,QQQ 715,963-1,QQQ,QQQ

$1,QQQ,QQlandover $1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQI and over $1,QQQ,QQI and over

2011 2012 2013 2014 201S

51,691,153 $ 54,442,733 $ 66,220,132 $ 67,584,256 76,879,115

980,167,100 $ 1,087,823,40() $ I ,Q91,Q8Q,3QQ $1,216,QQ2,7QQ $1,265,341,200

53% 5 0% 61% 56% 61%

263



264

Debt capacity schedules contain information to help the reader understand the State's outstanding debt, the capacity to repay that debt, and the ability to issue additional debt in the future. This section includes the following debt capacity schedules.

Schedule of Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type

Schedule ofRatios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding

Schedule of General Obligation Bonds Outstanding

Schedule of Pledged Revenue Coverage

Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the inlorrnation in the loll owing schedules is derived lrom the State's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.

265

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (amounts in thousands, except per capita}

2007 2008 2009 2010


General obligation bonds 1 50,269,442 56,424,532 68,653,507 77,745,789

Revenue bonds l 8,009,784 7,811,832 7,767,855 7,611,939

Cerli llcales olparlicipalion and commercial paper J 1,358,051 1,736,089 1,407,908 1,342,119

Capital lease obligations 4 4,346,179 4,376,410 4,456,039 4,967,290

Total governmental activities 63,983,456 70,348,863 82,285,309 91,667,137


General obligation bonds 1 1,954,220 1,907,243 1,702,377 1,477,663 Revenue bonds l 22,934,094 23,003,097 23,053,114 24,538,094

Commercial paper 179,782 67,204 51,307 64,518

Capital lease obligations

Total business-type activities 25,068,096 24,977,544 24,806,798 26,080,275

Total primary government 89,051,552 95,326,407 $ 107,092,107 $117,747,412

Debt as a percentage olpersonal income l, 1 58% 6 0% 66%

Amount ol debt per capita 6, 1 2,472 2,630 2,926

Nole: Details regarding the State's outstanding debt can be lound in Noles 9, 12, 13, 15, and 16 ollhe llnancial slalemenls.

1 Prior lo fiscal year 2008, ncl unamortized bond premiums and refunding gains/losses were nol included Beginning in fiscal year 201 3,

refunding gains/losses arc no longer included in bonds payable, bui arc shown as dcfrrrcd inflows and dcfr=d oulflows ofrcsoun:cs 1 Prior lo fiscal year 20 14, ihc Public Buildings Conslrnclion Fund was included in busincss-lypcaclivilics

J All ccrtificalcs ofparlicipalion wernclircd in fiscal year 201 6

75%

3,186

4 Prior lo fiscal year 20 14, govcmmcnlal aclivilics rcporicd a capilal lease obliglion lo ihc Public Buildings Conslruclion Fund In fiscal year 2014,

ihc fund was reclassified from an cnlcrprisc fund lo an inlcmal service fund and ihc govcmmcnlal aclivilics' obligalion and ihc fund's ncl

invcslmcnl in din:cl financing leases w= ncllcdagainsl each olher wilhin govcmmcnlal aclivilics 5 Ralio calculaicd using personal income daia shown on pages 276 and 277 for ihc prior calendar year 6 Amounl calculaicd usingpopulalion daia shown on pages 276 and 277 for ihcprior calendar year 7

Some prior years wen: updaicd based on mon: currcnl informal ion

266

Statistical Section

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

79,469,085 81,060,111 82,346,211 83,276,347 80,509,802 79,043,295

7,511,092 7,421,198 7,735,053 18,917,443 18,409,971 17,210,499

1,335,340 46,098 538,593 598,094 493,770 771,215

4,882,233 5,176,341 5,319,487 260,088 274,760 370,182

93,197,750 93,703,748 95,939,344 103,051,972 99,688,303 97,395,191

1,218,639 1,118,634 887,053 674,394 650,133 794,369

23,290,315 24,790,918 25,558,129 12,991,827 12,670,619 13,928,374

139,974 67,325 77,560 204,647 237,186 47,416

791,489 817,687 909,871 1,250,274 1,210,409 389,385

25,440,417 26,794,564 27,432,613 15,121,142 14,768,347 15,159,544

$ 118,638,167 $ 120,498,312 $ 123,371,957 $ 118,173,114 $ 114,456,650 $ 112,554,735

73% 7 0% 67% 63% 58% 54%

3,178 3,196 3,242 3,076 2,951 2,875

267

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (amounts in thousands, except per capita}

2007 2008 2009

Net general bonded debt

General obligation bonds 1 43,234,702 47,828,805 61,724,439 Economic Recovery bonds 8,988,960 10,502,970 8,631,445

Less: restricted debt service Lund 792,841 552,326 894

Net Economic Recovery bonds l 8,196,119 9,950,644 8,630,551

Net general bonded debt 51,430,821 57,779,449 70,354,990

Net general bonded debt as a percentage olpersonal income J 34% 36% 44%

Amount olnel general bonded debt per capita 4 .. 1,428 1,594 1,922

Nole: Details regarding the State's general bonded debt outstanding can be lound in Nole 15 ollhe llnancial slalemenls.

1 Prior lo fiscal year 2008, ncl unamortized bond premiums and refunding gains/losses were nol included Beginning in fiscal year 201 3,

refunding gains/losses arc no longer included in bonds payable, bui arc shown as dcfrrrcd inflows and dcfr=d oulflows ofrcsoun:cs

2010

71,284,447 7,939,005

113,172

7,825,833

79,110,280

51%

2,140

1 In fiscal year 201 6, ihc oulslanding balance of ihc Economic Recovery bonds were def eased and ihc balance in ihc rcslriclcd dcbi service

fund was lransfrrrrcd oul

J Ralio calculaicd using personal income daia shown on pages 276 and 277 for ihc prior calendar year 4 Amounl calculaicd usingpopulalion daia shown on pages 276 and 277 for ihcprior calendar year

268

Statistical Section

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

73,516,674 75,791,795 78,001,049 79,368,794 80,215,650 79,837,664 7,171,050 6,386,950 5,232,215 4,581,745 944,285

143,777 330,297 278,425 318,171 818,321

7,027,273 6,056,653 4,953,790 4,263,574 125,964

80,543,947 81,848,448 82,954,839 83,632,368 80,341,614 79,837,664

51% 48% 46% 45% 41% 38%

2,157 2,171 2,179 2,176 2,071 2,040

269


Schedule of General Obligation Bonds Outstanding


Governmental activity Calilomia Clean Waler, Clean Air, Sale Neighborhood Parks and Coastal Protection _____ _ Calilomia Library Construction and Renovation---------------Calilomia Park and Recreational Facilities------------------CalilomiaParklands _______________________ _

Calilomia Sale Drinking Waler--------------------Calilomia Stem Cell Research and Cures------------------Calilomia Wildlile, Coastal, and Park Land Conservation-------------Children's Hospital------------------------Class Size Reduction Public Education Facilities---------------Clean Air and Transportation Improvement------------------Clean Waler __________________________ _

Clean Waler and Waler Conservation------------------Clean Waler and Waler Reclamation-------------------Community Parklands -----------------------County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure----------------County Correctional Facility Capital Expenditure and Youth Facility _________ _

Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention ----------------Earthquake Salely and Public Building Rehabilitation --------------Fish and Wildlile Habitat Enhancement------------------Higher Education Facilities----------------------Highway Salely, Trame Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security __________ _

Housing Emergency Sheller---------------------Housing and Homeless-----------------------Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities--------------Lake Tahoe Acquisitions----------------------New Prison Construction----------------------Passenger Rail and Clean Air---------------------Public Education Facilities----------------------Sale, Clean, Reliable Waler Supply--------------------Sale Drinking Waler, Clean Waler, WalershedProleclion, and Flood Protection _______ _ Sale Drinking Waler, Waler Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection .. Sale Neighborhood Parks ______________________ _

Sale, Reliable High-Speed Passenger Train-----------------School Building and Earthquake---------------------School Facilities ________________________ _ SeismicRelrolit _________________________ _

Stale, Urban, and Coastal Park---------------------Velerans'Homes ________________________ _

2,014,645 248,510

11,125 2,340

50,760 1,237,730

103,865 1,295,415 5,292,785

707,065 8,835 3,990

18,795 2,455

13,595 62,810

2,228,850 62,785 4,760

344,435 16,375,915 1,716,540

1,330 30,242,130

26,935 33,980

1,276,995 510,025

1,329,560 2,748,930 1,379,620

758,975 13,300

957,705 1,094,480

3,555 34,495

Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention----------------- 1,725 Voling Modernization------------------------ 11,755 Waler Conservation------------------------- 20,965 Waler Conservation and Waler Quality___________________ 25,095

Waler Quality, Supply, & Tnlraslruclure ------------------- 20,500 Waler Security, Clean Drinking Waler, Coastal and Beach Protection ----------- ---~e'"s's' 'S'°s'-

Total governmental activity--------------------- --~7c4c,9c41c,7c5c5_ Business-type activity

Calilomia Waler Resources Development------------------ 135,045

v~:::~~::~:e:::Y::::t!~!~d_i"_'::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::= ---~/c:2c\s';a:-

Total outstanding general obligation bonds---------------- 75,734,015 Unamortized bond premiums/discounts------------------- ____ ,,,010,20;;02_

Total general obligation bonds payable------------------ ,e,,~,,,e'e'e•"e"e''e's'Source: Calilomia Stale Treasurer's OITice

270

Schedule of Pledged Revenue Coverage

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (amounts in thousands}

Statistical Section

Net Revenue Debt Service Requirements 3 Available for ---~~~~~~~~~~---

June30

Gross

Revenue 1

Operating

Expenses l Debt Service Principal Interest ~ Coverage

Housing Loans

Waler Resources

Waler Pollution Control

2007 2008

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

2016

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2013 2014 2015 2016

2007 2008

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

130,128 130,139

109,636 85,321 89,224 84,830 66,050 65,247 57,742

53,428

951,590 989,275 914,837

1,042,843 1,096,196 1,045,812

1,127,195 973,508

1,019,378 1,086,650

78,564 71,404

59,923 53,365 49,585 50,183 51,642 54,968 56,350 59,034

Source: Cali lomia Stale Controller's Omce

19,062 21,263

21,838 16,404 15,802 20,322 18,369 19,452 24,413

21,916

694,060 773,362 694,598 837,459 880,540 852,404

822,637 798,653 607,407 796,591

3,387 4,521

4,416 9,880 4,876 2,849 1,055 1,739 1,092

321

111,066 108,876

87,798 68,917 73,422 64,508 47,681 45,795 33,329

31,512

257,530 215,913 220,239 205,384 215,656 193,408

304,558 174,855 411,971 290,059

75,177 66,883

55,507 43,485 44,709 47,334 50,587 53,229 55,258 58,713

292,461 56,225

22,205 111,085 130,770 88,105 51,554 47,620 12,960 64,085

70,860 100,945 80,347 97,360

108,870 116,150

174,660 150,911 203,481 171,455

22,850 23,585

22,930 23,655 24,390 24,285 45,755 13,000 13,000 13,000

33,959 33,333

33,699 34,874 32,619 24,914 16,271 14,926 14,095 21,525

123,376 114,213 130,219 124,296 117,668 121,804

145,660 107,727 200,563

84,099

9,178 8,422

7,747 6,928 5,996 4,984

533 355 293

2,199

326,420 89,558

0.34 1.22

55,904 1.57 145,959 0.47 163,389 0.45 113,019 0.57 67,825 0.70 62,546 0.73 27,055 1.23 85,610 0.38

194,236 1.33 215,158 1.00 210,566 1.04 221,656 0.93 226,538 0.95 237,954 0.81 320,320 0.95

258,638 0.68 404,044 1.02 255,554 1.14

32,028 2.35 32,007 2.09

30,677 1.80 30,583 1.42 30,386 1.47 29,269 1.62 46,288 1.09 13,355 3.99 13,293 4.16 15,199 3.86

(continued}

I Toial gross ~venue includes non-operaling inlercsl revenue Building aulhorilics' revenue includes opera ling lransfrrs in The nalu~ of ihc revenue pledged for each lypc ofdcbi is as follows: invcslmenl and inlc~sl earnings for Housing Loans bonds and Waler Pollulion Conlrol bonds; charges for services and sales for Waler Resources bonds; power sales ~venue for Eleclric Power bonds; renlal revenue for Public Buildings Conslrnclion bonds, High Technology Educalion bonds, CSU Channd Island Financing Aulhorily bonds, and building aulhorilics bonds; residence fros for California Sialc Universily bonds; iobacco sclilcmenls and invcslmcnl earnings for ihc Golden Sialc Tobacco Sccurilizalion Corporalion bonds; and frdcral lransporlalion funds for Gran I Anlicipalion Revenue Vehicles

1 Toial opcraling expenses a~ exclusive of dcprccialion, inlercsl expense, and amorlizalion (~covery) of long-lCITT1 prepaid charges Prior lo fiscal year 201 2, bond issuance cos ls we~ amorlizcd over ihc ICITT1 of ihc bond Beginning fiscal year 201 2, bond issuance cosls arc operaling expenses in ihc fiscal year incurred

J Debi service ~qui~menls include principal and inlc~sl of~venuc bonds 4 All revenue bonds have been ~deemed

s In fiscal year 2011, ihc California Sia le Univcrsily Fund was reclassified from a govcmmenlal fund lo an cnlcrprisc fund s Federal lransportalion funds arc ihc only source of slalc ~venue lo pay ihcsc bonds, and ihc slalc obligalion lo pay dcbi service on ihcsc bonds is

limilcd lo and dcpendeni on rcccipl oflhc federal funds

271

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years (amounts in thousands}

Gross NetRevenue ----"""'bcl0S0ec"ckcecR0,,g"eicrecrnc,e"'"'-'--

Operating Available for

Electric Power

Public Buildings

Construction

High Technology

Educalion 4

Calilornia Stale

University 5

272

June30 Revenue I Expensesl Debt Service

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

$5,865,000 $4,843,000

5,362,000

4,560,000

3,908,000

2,317,000

915,000

488,000

835,000

799,000

728,000

396,895

384,816

366,151

430,069

423,775

426,960

616,041

431,890

462,703

413,807

22,966

20,600

15,975

13,015

10,498

8,452

5,585

424

554,851

640,209

811,454

599,572

3,722,414

4,165,118

4,215,258

4,505,589

4,780,280 4,937,116

4,323,000

3,604,000

3,007,000

1,427,000

29,000

(408,000}

(46,000}

(132,000}

(182,000}

3,699

33,566

78,489

120,565

507

13,211

13,479

14,403

3,646

6,455

1,514

3,511

3,837

5,009

681

689,223

511,895

261,628

577,765

5,455,059

5,770,880

5,754,800

6,376,502

6,363,534 6,672,956

1,022,000

1,039,000

956,000

901,000

890,000

886,000

896,000

881,000

931,000

910,000

393,196

351,250

287,662

309,504

423,268

413,749

602,562

417,487

459,057

407,352

21,452

17,089

12,138

8,006

9,817

8,452

5,585

424

(134,372}

128,314

549,826

21,807

(1,732,645}

(1,605,762}

(1,539,542}

(1,870,913}

(1,583,254} (1,735,840}

Principal _fo_l_ee_,rt ___ T_o_fo_l_ Coverage

447,000

470,000

493,000

518,000

460,000

556,000

574,000

611,000

618,000

669,000

365,953

342,582

360,559

377,998

394,490

405,585

554,985

412,085

782,975

1,192,065

25,624

22,265

36,730

19,665

19,995

21,105

22,275

24,771

99,598

105,229

43,572

47,815

56,344

138,535

126,395

257,964

400,412 114,585

448,000

447,000

399,000

373,000

344,000

354,000

341,000

312,000

268,000

253,000

324,246

331,355

335,248

367,055

383,185

384,400

395,073

439,888

492,868

452,796

21,062

13,344

11,704

9,977

8,878

7,754

6,568

847

31,149

115,928

129,238

151,988

172,231

174,914

181,969

173,424

177,642 166,964

895,000

917,000

892,000

891,000

804,000

910,000

915,000

923,000

886,000

922,000

690,199

673,937

695,807

745,053

777,675

789,985

950,058

851,973

1,275,843

1,644,861

46,686

35,609

48,434

29,642

28,873

28,859

28,843

25,618

130,747

221,157

172,810

199,803

228,575

313,449

308,364

431,388

578,054 281,549

1.14

1.13

1.07

1.01

1.11

0.97

0.98

0.95

1.05

0.99

0.57

0.52

0.41

0.42

0.54

0.52

0.63

0.49

0.36

0.25

0.46

0.48

0.25

0.27

0.34

0.29

0.19

0.02

(1.03}

0.58

3.18

0.11

(7.58}

(5.12}

(4.99)

(4.34}

(2.74) (6.17}

CSU Channel Islands 2007

Financing Authority 4 2008

Building 2007

Authorities 2008

Golden Stale

Tobacco

Securilizalion

Corporation

Grant Anticipation

Revenue Vehicles 6

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Gross

7,397

245

81,342

79,077

78,733

76,535

63,168

57,386

53,441

53,157

54,090

48,722

413,246

445,097

493,448

393,487

361,974

368,853

555,392

355,918

414,992

365,300

72,149

71,945

77,193

83,272

84,294

84,290

84,296

84,289

84,289

11,393

Statistical Section

NetRevenue ---~"c'cbcleSee•c•i0re,R=''"""''"'rn='""''''---Operating Available for

13

68

68

68

7,389

232

81,274

79,009

78,665

76,535

63,168

57,386

53,441

53,157

54,090

48,722

413,246

445,097

493,448

393,487

361,974

368,853

555,392

355,918

414,992

365,300

72,149

71,945

77,193

83,272

84,294

84,290

84,296

84,289

84,289

11,393

45,437

47,475

48,594

50,948

51,957

36,473

38,400

39,895

38,800

19,815

133,555

129,120

116,960

138,260

60,230

65,765

623,510

50,910

133,900

70,535

49,190

50,985

55,275

62,335

64,785

67,730

70,990

74,400

78,090

8,970

6,951

556

29,228

27,260

25,028

34,058

20,071

22,889

18,390

29,882

19,701

14,502

276,965

326,631

320,679

316,038

315,268

312,815

308,056

325,884

292,173

299,935

22,959

20,960

21,918

20,937

19,509

16,560

13,306

9,889

6,199

2,423

6,951

556

74,665

74,735

73,622

85,006

72,028

59,362

56,790

69,777

58,501

34,317

410,520

455,751

437,639

454,298

375,498

378,580

931,566

376,794

426,073

370,470

72,149

71,945

77,193

83,272

84,294

1.06

0.42

1.09

1.06

1.07

0.90

0.88

0.97

0.94

0.76

0.92

1.42

1.01

0.98

1.12

0.87

0.96

0.97

0.60

0.94

0.97

0.99

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

84,290 1.00

84,296 1.00

84,289 1.00

84,289 1.00

11,393 1.00

(concluded}

273



274

The demographic and economic schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand the environment in which the State's financial activities occur. This section includes the following demographic and economic schedules.

Schedule of Demographic and Economic Indicators

Schedule of Employment by Industry

275

Statistical Section

For the Past Ten Calendar Years

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Population (in thousands) 1

Calilomia 36,021 36,250 36,604 36,961 37,334 37,700 38,056 38,414 38,792 39,145

% Change 0.5% 0.6% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 0.9%

United Stales 298,380 301,231 304,094 306,772 309,347 311,719 314,103 316,427 318,907 321,419

% Change 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8% 0.8%

Total personal income (in millions) 1

Calilomia 1,524,920 1,583,852 1,616,530 1,560,649 1,617,134 1,727,434 1,838,567 1,861,957 1,977,924 2,103,669

% Change 7.4% 3.9% 2.1% -3.5% 3.6% 6.8% 6.4% 1.3% 6.2% 6.4%

United Stales 11,381,350 11,995,419 12,492,705 12,079,444 12,459,613 13,233,436 13,904,485 14,068,960 14,801,624 15,463,981

% Change 7.3% 5.4% 4.1% -3.3% 3.1% 6.2% 5.1% 1.2% 5.2% 4.5%

Per capita personal income 2

Calilomia 42,334 43,692 44,162 42,224 43,315 45,820 48,312 48,471 50,988 53,741

% Change 6.8% 3.2% 1.1% -4.4% 2.6% 5.8% 5.4% 0.3% 5.2% 5.4%

United Stales 38,144 39,821 41,082 39,376 40,277 42,453 44,267 44,462 46,414 48,112

% Change 6.2% 4.4% 3.2% -4.2% 2.3% 5.4% 4.3% 0.4% 4.4% 3.7%

Labor force and employment (in thousands)

Calilomia

Civilian labor Loree 17,687 17,921 18,203 18,208 18,316 18,385 18,511 18,573 18,941 18,996

Employed 16,821 16,961 16,890 16,145 16,052 16,227 16,740 17,044 17,600 17,894

Unemployed 865 960 1,313 2,064 2,265 2,158 1,771 1,530 1,341 1,102

Unemployment rate 4.9% 5.4% 7.2% 11.3% 12.4% 11.7% 9.6% 8.2% 7.1% 5.8%

United Stales employment rate 4.6% 4.6% 5.8% 9.3% 9.6% 8.9% 8.1% 7.4% 6.2% 5.3%

Source: Economic Research Unit, Calilomia Department olFinance; Bureau olEconomic Analysis, United Stales Department olCommerce; Labor Markel Tnlormalion Division, Cali lomia Employment Development Department; Bureau olLllbor Statistics, United Stales Department olLllbor.

1 Some prior years w= updaied based on mo~ currcnl infomalion 1 Calculaied by dividing lolal personal income by populalion

276 277


2006

Percent

of Total State

Employees Employment

Industry

Services 6,153,800 39.1 %

Government

Federal 248,600 16

Military 53,900 0.3 Stale and Local 2,203,600 14.0

Retail trade 1,680,IQQ 10.6

Manulacluring 1,490,900 9.5

Tnlormalion, llnance, and insurance 1,105,QQQ 7.0 Construction and utilities 990,QQQ 6.3

Wholesale trade 700,300 44 Transportation and warehousing 439,SQQ 2.8 Farming 375,200 24 Real eslale 288,500 18 Natural resources and mining 25,IQQ 0.2

Total 15,754,800 100.0 %

Source: Labor Markel Tnlormalion Division, Calilornia Employment Development Department

278

2015

Employees

7,325,700

244,300

59,IQQ

2,214,600

1,663,100

1,291,900

1,008,900

785,300

721,200

496, I QQ

423,300

271,500

29,IQQ

16,534,100

Percent

of Total State

Employment

44.3 %

15

04 13.4

10.1

7.8 6.0 4.7

44 3.0 2.6 16 0.2

100.0 %

The operating information schedules assist the reader in evaluating the size, efficiency, and effectiveness of the State's government. This section includes the following operating information schedules.

Schedule ofFull-time Equivalent State Employees by Function

Schedule of Operating Indicators by Function

Schedule of Capital Asset Statistics by Function

279

For the Past Ten Fiscal Years

Natural Resources

Health ""' State and Business, Corrections

General and Human Environmental Consumer Transportation, ""' Government Education Services Protection Services and Housing Rehabilitation Total ----

Fiscal Year

2007 21,035 134,974 49,533 19,677 15,530 41,314 53,321 335,384

2008 21,825 134,832 49,330 20,868 15,840 42,139 58,284 343,118

2009 22,347 135,720 50,996 21,985 16,350 42,254 60,957 350,609

2010 30,390 133,642 43,663 22,223 15,868 40,590 59,401 345,777

2011 32,535 138,017 48,638 23,611 17,043 44,844 67,272 371,960

Natural Resources Business, ' Health ""' Consumer Corrections

General 1 and Human Environmental Services, ""' Government Education Services Protection and Housing Transportation 1 Rehabilitation Total ----

Fiscal Year

2012 44,673 131,039 46,431 24,199 6,236 41,758 62,472 356,808

2013 43,241 132,492 43,431 23,796 5,395 39,222 58,742 346,319

2014 43,858 136,244 44,343 24,156 5,409 39,015 60,871 353,896 2015l 45,383 139,958 44,589 24,996 5,552 39,636 60,745 360,859

2016 42,904 146,552 40,943 22,804 5,083 39,050 53,344 350,680

Source: Annual Governor's Budget Summary, Calilomia Department olFinance

Nole: The number ol lull-lime equivalent employees is calculated by counting each person who works lull lime as one lull-lime equivalent and those who work part lime as lraclional equivalents based on lime worked.

I Effrclive July 1, 2013, under ihe Governor's 2012 Rcorganizalion Plan No 2, a significanl reorganizalion look place ihal impacied previously ~ported funclions The Govcmmenl Opera lions Agency, including bui nol limiled lo Franchise Tax Board, Dcparlmenl of General Services, and ihe Public Employees' Relircmenl Syslem, was crcaied and added lo ihe General Govemmenl funclion Also, ihe business and housing componenls under ihe p~viously rcporied Business, Transporlalion, and Housing funclion merged wilh ihe Siale and Consumer Services funclion and ihe ~maining lransporlalion componenls now comprise ihe Transporlalion Agency lnformalion ~ported under ihe new funclions a~ nol comparable lo ihal of prior years

1 Some prior years were updaied based on mo~ currenl informal ion

280

Statistical Section


281


2007 2008 2009 2010

General Government State Lottery

Total revenue 1 3,318 3,050 2,955 3,041 Allocation lo Education Ftmd 1 1,177 1,069 1,028 1,072

Judicial Council of California Supreme Court l, 9

Cases [i]ed 9,198 10,752 9,486 9,759

Cases disposed 9,324 10,593 9,689 9,537 Courts ol Appeal

Notices olappeal [i]ed J, 9

Civil 6,116 5,913 5,958 6,122 Criminal 6,508 6,681 6,819 6,857 Juvenile 2,880 2,900 2,858 2,759

Trial Courts

Total civil cases 4· 9

Filings 1,462,820 1,582,092 1,729,648 1,647,817 Dispositions 1,286,736 1,280,184 1,537,243 1,530,502

Department of Food and Agriculture Milk production (million lbs.} l, 9 40,683 41,203 39,512 40,385 Farm land (thousand acres} l, 9 25,400 25,400 25,500 25,500

Education

Public Colleges and Universities Fall enrollment 9

Community Colleges 9 1,723,781 1,823,729 1,822,836 1,747,233 Calilornia Stale University 433,017 437,008 433,054 412,372 University ol Calilornia 9 220,034 226,040 231,853 234,464

K-12 Schools

Fall enrollment Public 6,286,943 6,275,469 6,252,011 6,190,425

Private 583,794 564,734 536,393 531,111

Source: Cali lornia Stale Lollery; Judicial Council ol Calilornia; U.S. Department ol Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service; Calilornia Departments ol the Calilomia Highway Patrol, Finance, Fish and Wildlile, Education, Public Health, Motor Vehicles, Transportation, and Corrections and Rehabilitation; Employment Development Department; Calilomia Energy Commission; and Franchise Tax Board.

1 Dollars in millions 1 Includes deaih penally cases, habeas rdaied lo aulomalic appeals, pelilions forreview, original proceedings, and Siale Bar mailers

J Includes only one nolice of appeal per case 4 Includes personal injury, property damage, wrongful deaih, small claims, family law, probaie, and olher cases 5 Dala based on calendar year 6 Tola I non farm and farm 7 Dala compiled from a I 0% sample of California licensed drivers

' A cenler-line mile is measured by ihe yd low dividing slrip ihal runs down ihe middle oflhe road, regardless oflhe number of lanes on each side 9 Some prior years were updaied based on more cu=nl informal ion 10 Toe a mo uni for fiscal year 201 6 is projecied

NIA- Nol available

282

Statistical Section

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

3,439 4,371 4,446 5,035 5,525 6,276 1,103 1,300 1,262 1,328 1,364 1,563

10,328 9,232 8,027 7,913 7,868 N/A

10,200 9,724 8,493 7,775 7,560 N/A

6,258 6,505 6,052 5,983 6,062 N/A 6,877 6,387 6,004 6,373 7,113 N/A 2,106 2,830 2,713 2,857 3,036 N/A

1,574,569 1,454,810 1,355,345 1,264,123 1,142,937 N/A 1,599,388 1,432,231 1,321,710 1,215,974 1,115,831 N/A

41,462 41,801 41,256 42,339 40,898 N/A 25,600 25,600 25,500 25,500 25,500 N/A

1,655,074 1,582,303 1,582,456 1,578,785 1,588,554 N/A 426,534 436,560 446,530 460,200 474,571 N/A 236,691 238,617 244,126 252,263 257,438 270,112

6,217,002 6,220,993 6,226,989 6,236,672 6,235,520 6,226,737 515,143 497,019 516,119 511,286 503,295 500,543

(continued}

283

Statistical Section


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Health and Human Services

Department of Public Health

Vital slalislics Live births l, 9· 1~ 566,137 551,567 526,774 509,974 502,023 503,788 494,390 502,973 491,781 507,917

Department of Soda\ Services

Callresh programs households (avg. per month} .. 823,335 892,992 1,067,358 1,340,857 1,576,042 1,757,387 1,898,283 2,004,016 2,102,031 2,130,583

Employment Development Department Number olemployed l, 6· 9 15,691,100 15,142,000 14,326,300 14,476,400 14,614,600 15,240,400 16,109,200 16,062,300 16,474,800 N/A

Resources

Department of Fish and Wildlife

Sport llshing licenses sold 9 3,003,783 2,857,236 2,838,776 2,410,008 2,483,680 2,580,762 2,539,244 2,490,383 2,484,124 2,505,078

Hunting licenses sold 9 1,718,657 1,670,190 1,679,864 1,677,864 1,863,202 1,988,422 2,032,788 1,979,809 2,041,670 2,114,679

California Energy Commission

Electrical energy generation

plus nel imports (gigawall hours} 9 304,909 307,450 298,449 291,184 293,779 302,320 296,250 297,062 295,405 N/A Business Consumer Services, and Housing

Franchise Tax Board

Personal Income Tax l, 9

Number ollax returns llled 15,016,273 14,806,335 14,638,204 14,814,427 15,042,359 15,152,800 15,487,100 15,877,000 16,257,600 N/A Taxable income 1 872,869 799,490 729,658 794,758 838,347 948,523 949,655 1,064,347 1,107,474 N/A Total lax liability 1 49,693 41,676 38,870 44,472 43,921 58,652 55,679 66,583 68,498 N/A

Corporation Tax 5

Number ollax returns llled 709,937 722,358 727,675 738,224 754,315 784,086 801,045 828,080 N/A N/A

Income reported Lor taxation 1 121,843 67,921 55,367 96,965 93,456 96,772 101,913 122,976 N/A N/A

Total lax liability 1 9,414 9,106 7,858 8,604 7,808 6,921 7,166 8,593 N/A N/A

Transportation

Department of Motor Vehicles

Motor vehicle registration 5 32,047,124 31,920,649 31,799,398 31,987,821 31,802,483 31,946,422 32,903,847 33,550,486 34,346,325 N/A License issued by age l, 1

Under age 18 262,415 244,481 229,545 218,997 227,069 224,809 221,385 223,024 221,250 N/A Between 18-80 22,804,927 22,922,361 22,910,011 23,001,119 23,150,222 23,462,971 23,824,697 24,195,705 25,089,910 N/A Over age 80 562,518 552,150 560,491 579,397 579,207 602,508 597,350 595,739 603,691 N/A

California Highway Patrol Total number olDUT arrests l, 9 92,270 97,019 95,135 89,814 86,901 79,993 76,860 73,425 65,016 55,150

Department of Transportation Highway center-line miles rural l, 8 10,830 10,811 10,808 10,785 10,780 10,784 10,315 10,312 10,407 N/A Highway center-line miles urban l, 8 4,439 4,393 4,384 4,375 4,353 4,363 4,789 4,787 4,685 N/A

Correctional Programs

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Division ol Adult Institutions

Institution population al December 31 each year .. 170,452 170,283 167,922 162,200 147,181 132,768 134,333 134,431 127,815 129,415

Division ol Juvenile Juslice9

Institution population al June 30 each year .. 2,531 1,877 1,589 1,474 1,263 922 712 675 681 690

(concluded}

284 285


2007 2008 2009 2010

General Government

Department of Food and Agriculture

Vehicles and mobile equipment 1 915 818 803 746

Square loolage olslruclures (in thousands} 453 453 466 466

Department of Justice

Vehicles and mobile equipment 966 826 870 816

Department of Military


Square loolage olslruclures (in thousands} 3,388 3,387 3,383 3,154

Department of Veterans Affairs

Veterans homes



Education

California State University

Vehicles and mobile equipment 1 3,343 3,994 4,015 4,338

Campuses 23 23 23 23


Health and Human Services

Department of Developmental Services


Developmental centers


Department of State Hospitals l


Stale hospitals


Sources: Cali lomia Department olGeneral Services (DGS}

1 For fiscal year 2008, DGS was nol able lo oblain complcie daia from iheagcncy 1 In fiscal year 201 2, porlions oflhe Dcparlmcnl of Menial Healih became ihe Dcparlmcnl ofSiale Hospilals

J In fiscal year 2008, California Highway Palrol purchased numerous vehicles, and in I heir physical counl also included molorcycles, which had nol

been rcporied forp~vious years

286

Statistical Section

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

809 804 792 747 747 752

466 466 455 455 455 455

677 531 527 520 520 484

249 233 211 211 211 217

3,530 3,511 3,623 4,019 3,977 3,965

132 143 267 285 285 235

2,086 2,086 2,488 2,543 2,541 2,541

4,415 4,415 4,466 4,619 4,619 4,558

23 23 23 23 23 23

71,287 73,785 73,866 73,316 73,988 75,292

818 789 632 424 571 640

5,294 5,294 5,279 5,308 4,699 3,664

709 718 699 886 752 678

6,331 6,336 6,457 6,460 6,445 6,445

(continued}

287

Statistical Section


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Resources

Department of Fish and Wildlife

Vehicles and mobile equipment 3,311 2,868 3,640 2,630 3,180 3,012 2,896 2,954 2,954 3,104

Square loolage olslruclures (in thousands} 1,120 1,192 1,269 1,301 1,313 1,317 1,317 1,311 1,311 1,297

Department of Forestry and Fire



Department of Parks and Recreation


Stale Parks 276 279 278 278 279 280 280 279 280 280

Acres olslale park land (in thousands} 1,235 1,248 1,331 1,365 1,334 1,333 1,590 1,590 1,605 1,605


State Lands Commission

Vehicles and mobile equipment 51 49 57 47 50 42 42 41 41 41

Acres olland (in thousands} 4,492 4,491 4,491 4,491 4,491 4,491 4,489 4,489 4,482 4,480

Business Consumer Services, and Housing

Department of Consumer Affairs


Department of General Services



Transportation

California Highway Patrol

Vehicles and mobile equipment J 4,655 5,228 5,914 5,422 5,337 5,013 5,341 5,170 5,170 5,167


Department of Motor Vehicles


Square loolage olslruclures (in thousands} .. 1,866 1,848 1,855 1,855 1,842 1,842 1,842 1,845 1,786 1,780

Department of Transportation



Correctional Programs

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Vehicles and mobile equipment 1 6,657 7,908 7,778 5,787 5,985 5,952 5,156 5,137 5,968 5,291

Prisons and juvenile Laci lilies 41 41 39 39 39 39 37 37 39 39


(concluded}

288 289

Acknowledgements

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ollice ol the State Controller


Executive Office

Karen Greene-Ross

Chief of Staff George Lolas

Chief Operating Officer

State Accounting and Reporting Division

Casandra Moore-Hudnall, CPA

Division Chief

Liz Cornell, CPA Assistant Division Chief

State Government Reporting Financial Information Systems and Technology

Bureau Chief

Renee Davenport Emmanuel Lasu

May Lam

Janet Delorey Judy Eng

Marla Garske Jim Graham

Yolanda Green Meredith Hatai

Robert Holpuch, CPA Lilian Le

Edlene Leathers Grace Lee

Will leMarQuand Bing Leng

Rupinder Atwal Judy Lee

Managers

Supervisors

Staff

Technical Advisor Julianne Talbot

Yi-Wen Tsai

Janti Tam

TuongKhanh Nguyen Allen Nunley Alex Olson

Marissa Parris Randy Phan

April Ramos, CPA Kao Saephan

Samprit Shergill, CPA Corrie Smithers

Scott Taylor, CPA Perry Tseng-Liu

Special Thanks Dana Parker

Bureau Chief Steven Taketa

Supervisor Technical Advisor Larry Butler Rod Renteria

Staff Ross Boyer

Matthew Cardoza Marcelino Hernandez

Jason Kronemeyer Andy Leung

Miguel Quistian Cesar Vigil Fuentes

Carl Walker Thomas Wong

Editors Estelle Manticas Teresa Moraga

BETIYT. YEE Office of California State Controller

State Accounting and Reporting Division P O Box 942850

Sacramento. CA 94250 (916) 445-2636 www.sco.ca.gov


STATE OF CALIFORNIA• VARIOUS PURPOSE GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS

• hi ~ ~? ! i' ~... "'J . ;[il g> .Ut• !i :sul j-... ~I .. .,. I

http://www.knagcniBster.eoni

$603,890,000 state of californiacdiacdocs.sto.ca.gov/2017-0865.pdfthe state of california (the...

Documents