601 s. college avenue usa editor, journal of organic...

28
Allison Eckert Undergraduate Researcher Telephone: (618) 975-3099 Email: [email protected] April 26, 2017 Dr. Rainer Glaser, Professor of Chemistry Editor, Journal of Organic Chemistry Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO 65201 RE: REVISED The Synthesis of Adipic Acid through CO2 Utilization to Produce Nylon 6-6 By: Allison Eckert, Chris Gusmano, and Dillon James Dear Dr. Glaser: Thank you for your communication on April 20 th with the peer reviews of our original manuscript. We were pleased to see their suggestions and have taken them all into consideration during the revising of our manuscript. Based off the recommendations given to us by our peer reviewers, we have changed our manuscript accordingly. The changes are described as follows: Major Revision [M.1] Data from Figure 1 and Figure 2 were discussed more in the text. Bridges were included in the text where the figures were referenced. [M.2] Sources were added in the introduction section of the paper. [M.3] The issue with the scheme numbers was fixed. [M.4] Specific data from Table 1 was added and referenced in the text. [M.5] Table 2 was moved to the supporting information section. The supporting information was alluded to more often in the description of the synthesis. [M.6] Scheme 2 was redone to include color and a better mechanism that explains the generic Grignard reaction. Department of Chemistry University of Missouri-Columbia 105 Chemistry Building 601 S. College Avenue Columbia, Mo 65211 USA

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Allison Eckert

    Undergraduate Researcher

    Telephone: (618) 975-3099

    Email: [email protected]

    April 26, 2017

    Dr. Rainer Glaser, Professor of Chemistry

    Editor, Journal of Organic Chemistry

    Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia

    Columbia, MO 65201

    RE: REVISED

    The Synthesis of Adipic Acid through CO2 Utilization to Produce Nylon 6-6

    By: Allison Eckert, Chris Gusmano, and Dillon James

    Dear Dr. Glaser:

    Thank you for your communication on April 20th with the peer reviews of our

    original manuscript. We were pleased to see their suggestions and have taken them all

    into consideration during the revising of our manuscript. Based off the recommendations

    given to us by our peer reviewers, we have changed our manuscript accordingly. The

    changes are described as follows:

    Major Revision

    [M.1] Data from Figure 1 and Figure 2 were discussed more in the text. Bridges were

    included in the text where the figures were referenced.

    [M.2] Sources were added in the introduction section of the paper.

    [M.3] The issue with the scheme numbers was fixed.

    [M.4] Specific data from Table 1 was added and referenced in the text.

    [M.5] Table 2 was moved to the supporting information section. The supporting

    information was alluded to more often in the description of the synthesis.

    [M.6] Scheme 2 was redone to include color and a better mechanism that explains the

    generic Grignard reaction.

    Department of Chemistry

    University of Missouri-Columbia

    105 Chemistry Building

    601 S. College Avenue

    Columbia, Mo 65211

    USA

    mailto:[email protected]

  • 3

    [M.7] Consistency with grammar and format was improved by editing the entirety of the

    paper.

    Response to Reviewer 1

    [1.1] Wording of the manuscript was revised to sound more continuous. Abstract and

    introduction sections were edited with more descriptions and explanations. Paper was

    thoroughly edited to improve the presentation and crispness of the manuscript.

    [1.2] Nylon 66 was changed to nylon 6-6 where applicable. Please refer to [M.7].

    [1.3] Scheme 2 was revised to account for color and confusion with the second halide

    shown in the original. Please refer to [M.6].

    [1.4] Table 1 was cited throughout the text in both the Material and Methods section and

    Results and Discussion section. Please refer to [M.4].

    [1.5] Table 2 was moved to the supporting information section. It was kept in the paper

    to verify the significance of the structure and properties of Adipic acid and why it is the

    best substrate to create Nylon 6-6. Please refer to [M.5]

    [1.6] The electricity increase using the Grignard method was quantified in the results

    section.

    [1.7] Font sizes were changed to be a consistent 12 point font. Please refer to [M.7].

    [1.8] Discussion section was expanded to include more correlations and differences

    between synthesis methods.

    Response to Reviewer 2

    [2.1] Scheme numbers were fixed to go in order. Please refer to [M.3].

    [2.2] Grignard reaction scheme was made clearer. Please refer to [M.6].

    [2.3] Table 2 was moved to the supporting information section. It was kept in the paper

    to verify the significance of the structure and properties of Adipic acid and why it is the

    best substrate to create Nylon 6-6. Please refer to [M.5]

    [2.4] CO2 was changed to CO2 throughout the paper. Please refer to [M.7].

    [2.5] Titles go below figures only. This is proper JOC formatting.

    [2.6] Figure 1 remains unchanged, but there is now information providing the reader what

    the translation would equate to in American dollars. Please refer to [M.1].

  • 4

    Response to Reviewer 3

    [3.1] Figures 1 and 2 were discussed more thoroughly in the text. Table 1, however, is

    briefly mentioned in the Materials and Methods section. The table is referred to most

    often in the Results and Discussion section. Please refer to [M.1].

    [3.2] Sources were added in the introduction section of the paper. Please refer to [M.2]

    [3.3] CO2 was changed to CO2 throughout the paper. Please refer to [M.7].

    [3.4] Nylon 66 was changed to nylon 6-6 where applicable. Please refer to [M.7].

    [3.5] Format of Results and Discussion subheadings were changed from all capital letters

    to an italicized format.

    [3.6] Font sizes were changed to be a consistent 12 point font. Please refer to [M.7].

    Sincerely,

    Allison Eckert, Chris Gusmano, and Dillon James

  • 1

    The Synthesis of Adipic Acid through CO2 Utilization to Produce Nylon 6-6

    Allison Eckert, Christopher Gusmano, and Dillon James

    Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, 65201

    Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 2

    Abstract

    It has been shown that atmospheric CO2 can be utilized to make many common

    appliances that not only can be easily commercialized but can also reduce CO2 from

    carbon storage sites. In this study, the Grignard reagent Adipic acid is produced from

    1,4-butanediol and captured CO2 which will be further synthesized into Nylon 6-6. The

    procedure and data were recorded and compared to two other methods for the synthesis

    of Adipic acid, oxidation of cyclohexanone and the carboxylation of butadiene. The

    Grignard synthesis of Adipic acid resulted in similar purity compared to the other two

    methods. The new method featuring the Grignard reagent had the highest percent yield

    along with the shortest reaction time compared to its competitors. Along with the value

    increase that this new method provides, the Grignard synthesis of Adipic acid to form

    Nylon 6-6 has shown potential results to make the current methods of Nylon 6-6

    production inefficient.

  • 3

    Introduction

    With drastic environmental impacts occurring, carbon capture methods and

    technologies have become appealing and necessary processes to reduce CO2

    concentrations in the atmosphere. Methods to avoid emissions include the production of

    low carbon, carbon neutral, and carbon negative alternatives to common and bulk

    chemicals.1 This can be accomplished through incorporating carbon dioxide into a desired

    product. In this way, when the product is consumed or degraded, there is a reduced

    change in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels associated with that product. Alkaline earth

    metal compounds – such as Grignard reagents – have the ability to capture and activate

    CO2 directly from the capturing process at room temperature and ambient pressures with

    high yield and selectivity.

    One major product synthesized from Grignard reactions is the carboxylic acid

    derivative, Adipic acid (Scheme 1). The acid can be extracted from the magnesium nylon

    salt formed during the preparation of the substrate through extraction, esterification,

    and/or distillation.3

    Scheme 1: Structure of Adipic Acid

    Adipic acid is an important industrial dicarboxylic acid that is mainly used to

    produce nylon 6-6 (Scheme 2). Nylon 6-6 is created by a step growth polymerization

  • 4

    reaction and a condensation polymerization from diacids and diamines.2 Nylon 6-6 has a

    variety of uses such as textiles and 3D structural objects including ball bearing cages, air

    intake manifolds, pipes, and various machine parts. Due to the diversity of uses of Nylon

    6-6, there is a continually increasing economic market.

    Scheme 2: Structure of Nylon 6-6

    Here we report the results of a study conducted using various Grignard reagents

    with CO2 in order to create Adipic acid versus other methods. The three different

    methods of synthesis recognized include the substrates cyclohexanone, butadiene, and the

    Grignard reagent reaction. It was hypothesized that the Grignard reagent synthesis could

    potentially have the fastest and highest yielding reaction of adipic acid with relatively

    low cost in comparison to other methods.

    Materials and Methods

    Preparation of Materials

    Adipic acid is the primary component in the synthesis of nylon 6-6.1 Its synthesis

    has been experimented with by trying various techniques. A new synthesis technique

    regarding Grignard reagents and the capture of CO2 has been tested for economic use and

    immediate employment. Adipic acid can be synthesized by using 1,4-butanediol and CO2

    via a halogenation reaction.2 1,4-dichlorobutane is formed from the halogenation

  • 5

    reaction and used in the reaction to create nylon 6-6. Reaction of 1, 4-dichlorobutane with

    sodium cyanide will alternatively produce hexylmethylenediamine (HMD), the other

    main constituent of nylon synthesis. HMD and Adipic acid are combined in a 1:1 molar

    ratio to form a magnesium nylon salt which can be further polymerized.3 The carboxylic

    acid derivative – Adipic acid – is extracted from the magnesium salt by solvent

    extraction, esterification, and/or distillation.4 From this method, a variety of substrates –

    including Adipic acid – can be synthesized (Scheme 3).

    Scheme 3.

  • 6

    Insertion of the carbon dioxide molecule between the carbon-magnesium bonds of

    a halide is what characterizes this mechanism as a standard Grignard reaction (Scheme

    4). This reaction is exothermic when carried out at 20 to 25°C and atmospheric pressure.2

    High yields are obtained when these reaction conditions are observed and solvents with a

    variety of side chains are utilized. Compared to the oxidation of cyclohexanone and

    synthesis from butadiene, these temperatures and pressures account for a large value

    increase (Table 1). Even though the purity remains approximately the same for all three

    methods, the economic function for the Grignard reaction lies within short reaction time,

    ambient temperatures and pressures, and middle-ground costs.

    This method shows a dramatic increase in value for many of the substrates that

    can possibly be synthesized. Substrates synthesized from Grignard reagents have the

    potential for great commercial and environmental interest such as Adipic acid and nylon

    6-6 synthesis. Adipic acid has approximately 657 Euros per ton value increase through

    this method.2 A Euro is the equivalent to $1.09 United States’ dollars. The expected

    value increase for our focused substrate (Adipic acid) equates to $716.13. Other

    substrates such as acetic acid and acrylic acid show a substantial increase in value as well

    (Figure 1). An increase in value of approximately $671.44 is expected for acetic acid

    produced from the substrate methanol. About a $1,250 increase in value would be

    observed from the synthesis of Acrylic acid from the reagent vinyl chloride. Over $1,500

    from Terepthalic Acid of increased value could be seen as well.2 These four acids show

    the economic reason behind the Grignard method.

  • 7

    Scheme 4.

    Measuring Primary Function

    Monomers for condensation polymerization contain types of functional groups.

    Two functional groups are commonly seen with condensation polymerization unlike

    addition polymerization mechanisms. For Adipic acid, we see two carboxylic acid

    groups. Adipic acid’s carboxylic acid functional groups react with the amine (HMD) and

    produce the corresponding amide linkage.5 This is the process of polymerization. Once

    the amide linkage is formed, an amine group still remains on the outside of the molecule.5

    This allows for the opportunity for another monomer of acid to react, creating an even

    longer polyamide. The direct polymerization of 1,4-butanediol and CO2 show high

    selectivity (Figure 2). A near 100% selectivity is important for the polymerization

    process because slightly modifying the structure of any nylon will change its properties

    dramatically.7 When synthesizing Nylon 6-6, high selectivity of the reagents is a

    requirement.

    Nylon 6-6 is named based on the number of carbon atoms from the diamine and

    the dicarboxylic acid components – HMD and Adipic acid.3 Adipic acid is the most

    crucial substrate for nylon 6-6 production because it is the best dicarboxylic acid for the

    job. It has very low toxicity and no carcinogenic effects. It is not considered flammable

    or explosive – the flash point is approximately 196°C and self-ignition temperature is

    greater than 400°C (Table S2).6 The selectivity of Adipic acid is also optimal, which is

    further explained in Figure 2.7 These characteristics make Adipic acid a proper monomer

  • 8

    for polymerization. More characteristic information is given in the supporting

    information to express the significance of the properties of Adipic acid. A different

    polymer would require a monomer that fits the desired structure.

    Measuring the primary function of Adipic acid can be done with a variety of

    different techniques. Any spectroscopy that shows the carboxylic acid of the substrate

    and the amine that subsequently forms the polyamide shows the function. An FTIR

    spectra of Nylon 6-6 shows the two main functional groups. When comparing the FTIR

    spectra of the product to its components, the varying intensities of the wavenumbers

    show the suitability of the polyamide formation. Analysis of the FTIR spectra of Adipic

    acid is provided as Supporting Information.

  • 9

    Table 1: Comparison of Three Different Syntheses of Adipic Acid

    Cyclohexanone Butadiene Grignard Reagent

    Yield of Adipic Acid 87.1% 72% 95.2%

    Time of Reaction 8 hours 10 hours 20 minutes

    Cost of Reagent $890/ton $2000/ton $920/ton

    Pressure 11.03 bar First Step: 600 bar

    Second Step: 150 bar

    1.00bar

    U.S. Production 6 × 106 tons per year 1.21 × 105 tons/year 5.0 × 105 tons/year

    Temperature 150-160°C Step 1: 130°C

    Step 2: 170 ۤ °C

    25.5-30.5°C

    Purity of Adipic Acid >99% >99% >99%

  • 10

    Figure 1. Production of substrates from the different Grignard reagent reactions used to

    produce them. Values of added value per raw material used are in Euros per ton.2 One

    Euro is equal to $1.09 US dollars which means the four values above would go as

    follows: $671.44 for Acetic Acid ( from Methanol), $716.13 Adipic Acid (from

    Butanediol), $1255.68 Acrylic acid (from Vinyl Chloride), $1548.89 Terepthalic Acid

    (from Benzene). Adipic acid synthesized from Butanediol is the main focus of this paper,

    but it is shown that Grignard reagents and captured carbon have a broader impact than

    only nylon 6-6 synthesis.

  • 11

    Figure 2. Time-course of direct polymerization of 1,4-butanediol and CO2.

    • indicates the conversion of 1,4 butanediol to 1,4-dicholorbutane. ▵ indicates the

    selectivity to 4-hydroxybutyl picolinate – an oligomer. This is significant because the

    oligomer was not produced from the catalyst used in the direct polymerization reaction.

  • 12

    Results and Discussion

    Results

    This reaction was performed at atmospheric pressure and ambient temperatures.

    High yields are obtained based on the dried components of reaction system and solvents,

    with a wide range of possible R-groups. Apparatus and system of this reaction must be

    dry because of violent reaction with water. The resulting carboxylic acid derivative from

    the varying R-groups is isolated from the magnesium salt in the majority of cases by

    solvent extraction or distillation. The rate of consumption of CO2 was measured based

    on the pressure drop seen from sparging the 10 mL Grignard reagent (butane-1,4-

    dimagnesium chloride) with CO2 intermittently. The data first appears to follow pseudo-

    first order kinetics based on the constant CO2 concentrations. There was a change in rate

    constant when the concentration of CO2 was changed due to the fact that the rate constant

    is saturated at the maximum rate of CO2 consumption under the concentration

    parameters. There is a strong dependence on both reagents. A decrease in the rate

    constant is observed as the concentration of CO2 is lowered from 100%.

    To measure the rate of the reaction, the CO2 consumption was measured by a

    pressure transducer within the apparatus. The gas supply entered the round-bottom flask

    from a sparging needle. Every minute, the flow of CO2 would be paused while the

    readings were logged every 0.2 seconds from a pressure sensor following the condenser.

    A pressure drop was observed due to the reaction with CO2. Constant values observed

    were the gas bubbling periods. Once there was no pressure drop recorded during the

    pause of CO2, the reaction was deemed complete. This took about 20 minutes for 100%

    CO2 concentrations, which is remarkably fast in comparison to other methods of

    synthesis. These measurements were used to calculate the reaction rates at different

  • 13

    concentrations of CO2. At 100% CO2, the pseudo rate constant was 5.49 x 10-3 s-1. At

    50% CO2, the rate constant was lowered to 4.36 x 10-3 s-1.

    Yields were decreased when the concentrations were lowered. When the

    concentration of CO2 is lowered, the reaction time was then extended to complete the

    reaction. This decrease in yields could be because of the sensitivity of Grignard chemistry

    to the extended reaction time that corresponds with a decrease in concentration. An

    extended reaction time increases the changes for contamination and moisture to appear in

    the system. However, selectivity of the reagents were not affected from extended

    reaction time. At normal conditions and 100% of CO2, yields of Adipic acid from this

    reaction reached 95.2% due to the high selectivity of this reaction. Yields for the

    supplemental Grignard reactions with the varying R-groups producing similar substrates

    also give high yields.

    Grignard reagents and captured carbon have a broader impact than only nylon 6-6

    synthesis. Production of a wide range of substrates from the Grignard reagent reactions

    shows production cost benefits and added values to these raw materials. It is estimated

    that nearly 657 euros per ton of Adipic acid will be added to the current value.2

    Electricity for the production of Adipic acid from the Grignard reagent method is higher

    than industry values, which offsets the value increase of Adipic acid only slightly.

    Electricity is increased by about 4.26 times per unit price of normal synthesis of Adipic

    acid by oxidation of cyclohexanone. This increase brings electrical costs up

    approximately 29.48 cents per kilowatt-hour.7

    Reference Data

    Adipic acid is most commonly synthesized by cyclohexane and butadiene. The

    comparison data is listed out in Table 1. Cyclohexane and phenol form cyclohexanone.

  • 14

    This is then oxidized to form adipic acid and nitric acid. This method produces a higher

    yield than butadiene at 87.1%. The total reaction takes approximately 8 hours at high

    temperatures and pressures close to 11 bar. These requirements cause temperatures to

    range from 150-160°C. This is the most commonly used industrial method to produce Adipic

    acid.

    Butadiene is a popular method, but used less because of lower yields and higher

    production costs. 72% of Adipic acid is made from butadiene over 10 hours of synthesis.

    This reaction requires extremely high pressures as well which contribute to the high

    production costs. This first step must occur at 600 bar. Subsequently, the second step

    occurs at 150 bar. Table 1 compares the reaction components and results between the use

    of butadiene, cyclohexanone, and the Grignard reagent used to produce the data

    explained in the results section.

    Discussion

    Adipic acid synthesis by Grignard chemistry is the quickest process with the

    highest yields. Compared to cyclohexanone, the percent yield is increased by 8% and the

    process is 24 times shorter. Grignard reagent synthesis also occurs at ambient

    temperature and pressure which is favorable for industrial scaling. As shown in Table 1,

    cost and production rates fall in between cyclohexanone and butadiene. It costs $920 per

    ton of the Grignard reagent, but 500,000 tons of Adipic acid are produced each year with

    a gradually expanding market. This explains the value increase observed in Figure 1.

    To clarify, the observation that the Grignard reagent synthesis occurs at lower

    temperatures and pressure is due to the structural differences between the reagents of

    each method. For instance, the production of the Adipic acid at the lower temperature

    range of 25.5-35.5 degrees Celsius in Grignard chemistry comes from the reactivity of

  • 15

    the carboxyl group on the Grignard reagent. A carboxyl group requires less energy and

    temperature to react with another molecule compared to a ringed or alkene functional

    group. On the other hand, the cyclohexanone has a ringed structure with a carbonyl

    attached to it. This requires more energy and pressure (11 bar) in order to produce Adipic

    acid.7 Despite needing more strenuous conditions, the use of cyclohexanone is one of the

    most common methods to produce Adipic acid and currently is one of the cheapest and

    most productive methods for Adipic acid out of all three of them. As for the newer

    method of using butadiene, the reaction requires a multiple step synthesis. This makes it

    more challenging to synthesize and leads to higher costs of production with lower yields.

    Therefore, this decrease in temperature and pressure due to the use of reactive Grignard

    reagents shows the possibility of allowing companies to cheaply and more effectively

    produce Adipic acid at a rate that is similar to very common methods for Nylon 6-6

    production, such as cyclohexanone.

    This rate of Adipic acid production through Grignard synthesis not only allows

    for a competitive production of Adipic acid and the further synthesis of Nylon 6-6, but

    also allows for a decrease in the level of atmospheric CO2. With a twenty minute reaction

    time, multiple reactions can happen hourly compared to the 8 hour minimum reaction

    time of cyclohexanone. This process would utilize CO2 in a 1:1 ratio with 1-4 butanediol

    which would lead to quick and effective turnovers of atmospheric CO2 into Adipic acid.

    Furthermore, with the highest efficiency and quickest reaction process, the use of CO2 in

    Grignard syntheses seems like the best method for the future production of Adipic acid

    and the further production of Nylon 6-6.

  • 16

    Conclusion

    In this experiment, the production of Adipic acid was produced through the

    innovative method using a Grignard reaction between CO2 and 1,4-butanediol. When

    compared to the most popular type of reaction, synthesis via cyclohexanone, the Grignard

    reagent produced the highest yield of Adipic acid in the quickest amount of time. With

    the low cost per ton, this suggests that the Grignard reagent synthesis is the most efficient

    method for production of Adipic acid and can lead to more cheap, eco-friendly means of

    Nylon 6-6 production.

    The main finding of this experiment concludes that we can use captured CO2 from

    the atmosphere and utilize it to produce Nylon 6-6 which has many different applications

    in machinery parts and textiles. This allows for the turnover of harmful greenhouse

    gasses into commercialized products. To further this study, we will be experimenting

    with other green reagents to optimize the use of CO2 utilization and the overall

    production of Nylon 6-6. Our study has shown high yields and purities but many other

    methods of Nylon production should be further examined.

    Supplementary Material Available

    The appendix contains a more detailed description of the process and preparation

    of Adipic acid. H-NMR of the substrate are shown and discussed. The FTIR of the

    substrates required for Nylon 6-6 synthesis are found in the appendix as well.

    References

    [1] Van de Vyver, S.; Roman-Leshkov, Y. Emerging catalytic processes for the

    production of Adipic acid. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 1465-1479.

  • 17

    [2] Dowson, G. R. M.; Dimitriou, I.; Owen, R. E.; Reed, D. G.; Allen, R. W. K.; Styring,

    P. Kinetic and economic analysis of reactive capture of dilute carbon dioxide with

    Grignard reagents. Faraday Discuss., 2015, 183, 47-65.

    [3] Kent, J. A. Manufactured Textile Fibers. Kent and Riegel's Handbook of Industrial

    Chemistry and Biotechnology; Springer Science & Business Media: 2010; Volume 1,

    454-456.

    [4] Alger, M. Polymer Science Dictionary; Springer Science & Business Media: 1996;

    241.

    [5] Condensation Polymerization.

    https://www.materialsworldmodules.org/resources/polimarization/4-condensation.html

    (accessed April 2, 2017).

    [6] Adipic Acid GPS Safety Summary; Rhodia: 2012; 1-6.

    [7] Tamura, M.; Ito, K.; Honda, M.; Nakagawa, Y.; Sugimoto, H.; Tomishige, K. Direct Copolymerization of CO2 and Diols. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24038.

  • S1

    Supporting Information

    The Synthesis of Adipic Acid through CO2 Utilization to Produce Nylon 6-6

    Allison Eckert, Christopher Gusmano, and Dillon James

    Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, 65201

    Email: [email protected] ; [email protected] ;

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • S2

    Table of Contents

    Grignard Reactions………………………………………………………………....S3

    1H-NMR of Adipic Acid…………………………………….……………………...S5

    IR Spectra of Nylon and Components………………………………………….…..S6

    Bibliography …………………………………………………………………….....S7

  • S3

    Grignard reactions such as the synthesis of Adipic acid are tracked by the titration

    of the reagent using 1,10-phenanthroline of 99.5% purity. A color change indicates the

    formation of a charge transfer complex with the reagent in a 1:1 molar ratio which is then

    titrated by using 2-butanol of 99% purity. For the reaction of butane-1,4-dimagnesium

    chloride and CO2, no color change occurred 1,10-phenanthroline in dry THF was injected

    into solution. To determine the rate of reaction of CO2 with butane-1,4-dimagnesium

    chloride, a high-accuracy pressure transducer measured CO2 consumption. The pressure

    drop was monitored intermittently between sparging CO2 to encourage stability. Carbon

    dioxide gas was bubbled through the Grignard reagent solution. This reaction with CO2

    was assumed to also be quantitative because of the high yields measured. Reactions were

    performed under inert (N2) atmosphere. HPLC grade THF was dried. CO2 and N2 mixture

    compositions were achieved using a pair of Bronkhorst 100 mL min-1 mass flow

    controllers. Compressed air was dried using a Drierite™ 8 Mesh Laboratory Drying Unit.

    NMR spectra were recorded using D2O. A dried 2-neck 100 mL round bottom

    flask with a condenser was charged with 20 mL dried THF under nitrogen. The flask was

    connected to a sparging needle. A flow of 100 mL min-1 of CO2 gas was vented through

    a silicone oil bubbler. To avoid water condensation during preparation, gas flowed

    through the apparatus for 20 minutes before a salt-ice slurry was added. The apparatus

    was set in an ice bath and allowed 30 minutes to chill. 3 M butane-1,4-dimagnesium

    chloride was added to the vessel under positive nitrogen pressure. Each minute, the CO

    gas flow was stopped for 10 to 20 seconds. Pressure readings were recorded every 0.2

    seconds. Once there was no pressure drop being observed, the reaction was complete. 3.5

    M of HCl was added until the mixture cleared was tested to be acidic. 1 M of NaOH was

    added until the reaction mixture became basic and a precipitate formed. Rotary

    evaporation was used to extract the precipitate from the basic liquid. The precipitate was

  • S4

    then dried and dissolved in 2 mL of D2O and 10 mL of DMSO. DMSO was added to use

    in the NMR spectroscopy.

    The NMR spectra showed peaks at 2.81 and 1.94 ppm. The peak at 2.81 ppm was

    the solvent peak, showing six hydrogens. The carboxylic acid derived hydrogens are

    seen at 1.94 ppm. The integration of both peaks was used to determine the resulting

    carboxylate yield of Adipic acid.

    The FTIR of Adipic acid shows peaks that indicate the carboxylic acid dimers at

    1700 cm-1. The alcohol is seen broadly around 3000 cm-1. Carbon hydrogen bonds are

    seen at a much more acute peak at 2800 cm-1.

    The Nylon 6-6 salt has alcohol and carbon hydrogen bond stretches similar to

    those on the FTIR of Adipic acid. The FTIR of Nylon 6-6 shows combinations of the

    stretches seen in Adipic acid and hexamethylenediamine.

  • S5

    Figure S1. 1H-NMR of Adipic Acid

  • S6

    Figure S2. FTIR Spectra of Nylon 6-6 and Components

  • S7

    Table S2. Characteristic data of substrate Adipic Acid

    .

  • S8

    Bibliography

    Dowson, G. R. M.; Dimitriou, I.; Owen, R. E.; Reed, D. G.; Allen, R. W. K.; Styring, P.

    Kinetic and economic analysis of reactive capture of dilute carbon dioxide with Grignard

    reagents. Faraday Discuss., 2015, 183, 47-65.

    AIST : Spectral Database for Organic Compounds,

    SDBS. http://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/direct_frame_top.cgi (accessed March 24,

    2017).

    Lee Ware, S.; Gaunt, C. Adipic acid to nylon 6-6: a two-step process.

    https://leeware.wordpress.com/2010/12/31/Adipic-acid-to-nylon-6-6-a-two-step-process/

    (accessed March 24, 2017).

    Deng, Y.; Ma, L.; Mao, Y. Biological Production of Adipic Acid from Renewable

    Substrates: Current and Future Methods. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 105, 16-26.

    Vyver, Stijn Van De, and Yuriy Román-Leshkov. "Emerging catalytic processes for the

    production of Adipic acid." Catalysis Science & Technology. Royal Society of

    Chemistry, 30 Jan. 2013. Web. 03 Apr. 2017.

    Zhang, S.; Jiang, H.; Gong, H.; Sun, Z. “Green Catalytic Oxidation of Cyclohexanone to

    Adipic Acid.” Petroleum Science and Technology. Department of Materials Science,

    2003. Web 01 Apr. 2017.

    http://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/sdbs/cgi-bin/direct_frame_top.cgi