6.-log interpretation methods
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
1/71
September 2014
A K S Kakani
Foundations Basic Well Log Tool Physics andFormation Evaluation
Log Interpretation Methods
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
2/71
QUALITATIVE INTERPRETATION - QUICKLOOK
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
3/71
Qualitative Interpretation -Quicklook
Three quick look (qualitative) methods exist for rapidly locating pay (oilor gas) from logs without performing calculations (next section).
The three quick look methods are: Side by side technique
Overlay technique
Neutron-Density Crossover
All are effective in experienced hands and are widely used. It is
recommended to use them to have a general idea of the presence of
hydrocarbons in the well
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
4/71
Side by Side Technique (1)
Logs are scaled so both the resistivity and porosity curves move in thesame direction (left or right) in water filled zones.
Resistivity increases to the right.
Porosity decreases to the right (decreasing porosity causes increasingresistivity).
As the porosity varies, both the porosity and resistivity curves will movein the same direction (right or left) as long as the rock is water filled.
If the rock contains hydrocarbons, the resistivity and porosity curves willgo in opposite directions.
These last two statements are the basis for qualitative hydrocarbondetection.
Shale reduces the amount of separation, but the effect still holds true.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
5/71
Lay the resistivity and porosity logs side by side with depths aligned.
Only three things cause the resistivity to go to high values:
Low porosity Hydrocarbons
Fresh Water (discarded by local area knowledge)
Look for any place where the resistivity increases. Check to see if the
porosity decreases there. If the porosity decreases, the zone is mostlikely water bearing (resistivity increase due to decreasing porosity). Ifthe porosity increases (or remains the same), this is a potentialhydrocarbon bearing zone.
The zone one wants to find has high resistivity AND high porosity
(hydrocarbon bearing).
This side by side technique is a good, first, fast-look method.
Side by Side Technique (2)
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
6/71
Exercise - Side by Side Technique
Find the pay zone,
what kind of
hydrocarbon is
there? Is there a
water zone, where
is the OWC?
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
7/71
Other Techniques
Overlay Technique
The overlay technique consists of laying the resistivity log on top the porositylog on a light table, with depths aligned. Slide the resistivity log left or right(sideward) to align the deep resistivity curve on top the porosity curves in aclean high porosity zone.
Maintain this same relative position and examine the overlaid logs over theentire log.
The logs (deep resistivity and porosity) should track each other fairly well,except in hydrocarbon bearing zones. In hydrocarbon bearing zones the
resistivity will lie significantly to the right of the porosity curves. Look for thisseparation of resistivity curve to the right of the porosity curves, making surethe two curves remain on top each other in water sands.
Neutron-Density Crossover
It consists of looking at only the neutron-density curves for crossover and
mirror imaging. Such crossover with mirror imaging means gas is present.Nothing else causes such a response. Be sure the mirror imaging ispresent, as washouts or lithology can cause mere crossover .
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
8/71
Low Resistivity Pay
A certain type of pay sand exists fairly commonly in certain typeenvironments that is not as obvious on the resistivity logs asconventional pay sands.
This type sand is called a Low Resistivity Pay sand. It is marked by amuch lower resistivity than would be expected for a pay sand.
Basically, shales or very fine pores reduce the resistivity to much lowerthan normal values for hydrocarbon bearing sands.
Low resistivity Pay sands can be quite prolific producers.
The key to spotting them is a very careful study for even a smallresistivity increase over what should be there for a water sand. The useof image logs and cores are also a good help to identify these sanda.Detecting these sands requires experience, and preferable specificexperience in the area of question
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
9/71
SATURATION
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
10/71
Saturation
The saturation of a formation represents the amount of a given fluid
present in the pore space.
The porosity logs react to the pore space.
The resistivity logs react to the fluids in the pore space.
The combination of the two measurements gives the saturation
Matrix
water
oil
Sw= Swirr + Sw"free"
So= Soresidual+ So"free"
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
11/71
Saturation Basics (1)
Rw = resistivity of water in the pore space.
Define Ro = resistivity of a rock totally filled with water.
F: Formation Factor.
At constant porosity F is constant.
As porosity increases, Ro decreases and F decreases.
Experiments have shown that F is inversely proportional to m.
m: is called the "cementation exponent".
a: is called the "lithology" constant.
F = R
0
Rw
F = a
m
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
12/71
Saturation Basics (2)
Saturation can be expressed as a ratio of the resistivities:
Sw
n=
R0
R t
Sw
n=
FRw
Rt
where n is the "saturation exponent", an empirical constant.
Substituting for Ro:
Substituting for F:
w
n
S ==== a
mR
w
R t
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
13/71
Archies Saturation Equation
The Archie equation is hence very simple. It links porosity and
resistivity with the amount of water present, Sw.
Increasing porosity,, will reduce the saturation for the same Rt.
Increasing Rt for the same porosity will have the same effect.
w
n
S ==== a
mR
w
R t
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
14/71
Invaded Zone The same method can be applied to the invaded zone. The
porosity is identical, the lithology is assumed to be the same,
hence the constants a, n, m are the same.
The changes are the resistivities which are now Rxo and Rmf
measured by the MSFL tool.
The equation is then:
Sxon
=
aRmf
mRxo
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
15/71
Other Relationships
Dividing for Sxo and Sw, with n set to 2
Observations suggest:
Hence:
providing a quick look saturation answer when porosity is not available.
Sw
Sxo
= R
xo R
t
R mf R w
1
2
Sxo
Sw
1
5
Sw=
Rxo
Rt
Rmf
Rw
5
8
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
16/71
Archie parameters Rw = resistivity of connate water.
m = "cementation factor", set to 2 in the simple case.
n = "saturation exponent", set to 2 in the simple case.
a = constant, set to 1 in the simple case.
Two common sets of numbers for these constants are:
In a simple carbonate, the parameters are simplified to:
m = 2,
n = 2,
a = 1
In a sandstone the following values are often quoted:
m = 2.15,
n = 2, a = 0.62
w
n
S ==== a
mR
w
R t
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
17/71
Rw determination
Rw is an important parameter.
Sources include:
Client.
Local tables / knowledge.
SP.
Resistivity plus porosity in water zone.
RFT sample.
From Rxo and Rt tools.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
18/71
Rw from Rwa
If Sw = 1, the saturation equation can become:
Assuming simple values for a, m, n.
Procedure is to:
Compute an Rwa (Rw apparent) using this relationship.
Read the lowest value over a porous zone which contains water
This is the method employed by most computer based interpretation
systems.
Rw
= 2
Rt
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
19/71
Rw from resistivity
In a water zone Sw = 1, thus the alternative saturation equation
becomes:
The value of Rmf is measured; Rxo and Rt are measured, thevalue of Rw can be calculated.
Sw
Sxo
= R
xo R
t
R mf R w
1
2
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
20/71
Other Archie Parameters
The constants a, m, n are an integral part of Archie's
saturation equation. They can, and do, vary. They areusually taken from local knowledge if at all possible.
n is dependent on the wettability of the rocks; in
the common water wet case it is usually close to 2.
a and m are dependent on the lithology and pore
systems of the rock.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
21/71
F Relation chart
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
22/71
Computing Saturation
The standard saturation equation can be used with specialattention taken to obtain the correct value for the cementexponent m:
In vuggy formations this will be greater than 2. Theresistivity logs see read higher as the pathway is more
tortuous. Saturations calculated with an m of 2 will showtoo much hydrocarbon
In fractured formations m will be less than one as theresistivity pathways are straight. In this case saturationscomputed with m = 2 will show too much water.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
23/71
Variation of m
m reflects the tortuosityof the formation, thepathway for electricalcurrent flow Carbonateshave complex porositiesand hence currentpathways an values of m
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
24/71
Variable m
Hence in a carbonate the major problem is the determinationof m
A good method of determining m is as follows:
In a water zone, rearranging Archies formula
Log Rt = - m log + log (aRw)
Plotting on a log-log scale, slope will give m, and theintercept a . The assumption is that m is constant through theentire reservoir.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
25/71
M relationship to secondary porosity
This chart gives the value of the fracture or vug porosityas a function of the total porosity and the cementationfactor, m.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
26/71
DUAL WATER MODEL
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
27/71
Shale and Saturation
The Archie equation has to be changed to take
account of the shale effect.
The shale looks like low resistivity so another term is
added to the equations.
The result is an equation which will can be used to
compute water saturation in shaly sands.
All these equations return to Archies equation if thereis no shale present.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
28/71
Saturation Equations (1)
Indonesia Equation
Nigeria Equation
Waxman-Smits Equation
Dual Water Equation
1
R t=
S w2
F *R w
+ BQ v S w
F *
C t = tm S wtn
aC w +
S wb
S wtC wb C w( )
S w = 1
V cl
1 V cl
2
R cl+
eR w
* 1
R t
1
R t=
V cl1 . 4
R cl+
em
2
aR w
2
S wn
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
29/71
Saturation Equations (2)
One of the difficulties is the number of equations
available for shaly sands.
They are often country oriented, Nigeria, Venuzeula..
The choice of equation is dictated by local practice.
Waxman-Smits (WS) and Dual Water (DW) approach
the problem from experiments on the clay properties and
are thus more realistic and universal.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
30/71
Dual water
The Dual Water Model takes the basic work of Waxman
Smits and expands it for use with logged information
It divides the formation into solids and fluids.
It splits the clay into dry clay and its associated water,
called bound water
The standard definitions for porosity and saturation to
describe the fractions of fluids in the formation areexpanded to include the new model.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
31/71
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
32/71
Clean to Shale t
t
t
t
Matrix
Matrix
Matrix
Dry Colloid
Dry Colloid
Bound water
Far Water
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
33/71
Dual Water definitions
the porosities are combined to give the saturations of the fluids present
S wb =
wb
t
S wf = wf
t
S hy = hy
t
S wt = S wf + S wb
t = e + wb = t 1 S wb( ) + tS wb
S wt + S hy = 1
V cl = V dcl + tS wb
saturation of bound water
saturation of free water (this is Sw)
Hydrocarbon saturation
Total water saturation is the sumof the saturations of the two waters
total water saturation plus hydrocarbon saturationmust be one
wet clay volume includes the
volume of bound water
The total porosity is given by
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
34/71
Simplified DWM (1)
Swt2
==== Rf
t2
Rt
Archie Equation can be generalized into the following form;
where;
Swt - total water saturation
ft - total porosity
Rt - true formation resistivity
Rf - resistivity of the water(s)
The equation can be solved if Rf is known.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
35/71
Simplified DWM (2)
1) Clean water bearing zone
Swt = 1
t2Rt = Rf
This is Rwf, the resistivity of Free water
2) Clean 100% shale zone
Swt = 1
t2Rt = Rf
This is Rwb, the resistivity of Bound water
These are the two end points. To give a universal solution they are
combined linearly using the volume of shale.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
36/71
Practical DWM
Ct
=
t
m
Swt
n
aC
wf+
Swb
Swt
Cwb
Cwf
( )
The standard equation for the water saturation is expressed in terms of theconductivity, as it is linear.
This equation is in terms of measured quantities, porosity andresistivity and parameters that can be found, the far and boundwater conductivities.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
37/71
DWM Saturation solution
S wt = x + x 2 + C tF 0
C w
x =S wb C w C wb( )
2 C w
F o = a
m
The solution to the equation is
where
and
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
38/71
Practical outputs
The equations give total water saturation Swt and total porosityt. These have to be transformed into effective saturation, Swand effective porosity, wf (or e)
S w =
S wt S wb
1 S wb
wf
= t
Swt
Swb
( )
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
39/71
Dual water equation solution
This derivation of the Dual Water equations is valid for any rock withany mixture of fluids
It is possible to use the Dual Water Model to make a manualcomputation of a shaly zone.
However computer programs are best equipped to handle the
calculations.
The selection of key parameters is essential to obtain the correct
answers,
Cwf - free water conductivity
Cwb - bound water conductivity
Swb - bound water saturation
t - total porosity
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
40/71
SHALES
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
41/71
Shale Deposition Types
Clean formation Structural shale
Porosity
Porosity
Matrix
Matrix
Porosity
Matrix
Porosity Shale
Shale
Matrix
Porosity
Matrix
Laminar shale Dispersed shale
Shale
Shale
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
42/71
Clay Minerals
b N (thermal) Pe
Kaolinite 2.54 59.6 1.85
Illite 2.52 47.9 3.97
Smectite 2.02 87 1.70
Chlorite 2.73 59.6 4.07
Most shales are comprised of these clay minerals.
Clay minerals frequently occur together in "mixed layers", e.g. Illite -Montmorillonite.
Kaolinite Al, Si, little K
Illite K, Fe, Mg, Si
Smectite Very high porosity.
Chlorite Fe, Mg, no K
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
43/71
Shale and Logs (1)
Shales have properties that have importantinfluences on log readings:
They have porosity.
The porosity is filled with salted water.
They are often radioactive.
Resistivity logs exhibit shales as low resistivity zones.
Sh l d (2)
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
44/71
Shale and Logs (2)
Neutron porosity logs exhibit shales as high porosity.
Density and sonic logs react to the porosity and matrix changes.
Gamma ray logs react to shale radioactivity.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
45/71
Shale Corrections
The electrical properties of shales greatly influence thecalculation of fluid saturations.
A layer of water close to the clay surface is electricallycharged.
Archie's equation assumes that the formation water is the onlyelectrically-conductive material in the formation.
The clay layer requires an additional term in the saturationequation.
Porosity tools can be corrected for the shale effect. An"effective porosity" can be computed as compared to a "totalporosity" which includes the shale effect.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
46/71
Sh l V l (2)
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
47/71
Shale Volume (2)
However, as every tool reacts to shale, each tool is a shaleindicator. For example:
Shale volume can be computed from different sources andfrom crossplots of different kinds of log data.
The ideal method of computing shale volume is to use theNeutron Density plot.
(((( )))) (((( )))) clclclmawhwwb VVSS ++++++++++++==== 11
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
48/71
LITHOLOGY AND POROSITY
Lith l d P it
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
49/71
Lithology and Porosity
The next major step in the procedure is lithology identification. Lithology data gives information onporosity and other parameters.
Lithology of a formation can be:
Simple
Dirty
Complex
Lithology Determination
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
50/71
Lithology Determination
The lithology can be obtained in several ways:
From the cuttings (depth problems).
From local knowledge (good during development).
From the known depositional environment (good in general basis).
From a log Quicklook (good starting point).
From individual log readings (difficult if there are no areas of zeroporosity).
From crossplots (the best method).
Lithology and Porosity Tools
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
51/71
Lithology and Porosity Tools
All tools react to lithology - usually in conjunction with theporosity.
Major lithology tools are: Neutron - reacts to fluid and matrix.
Density - reacts to matrix and fluid.
Sonic - reacts to a mixture of matrix and fluid,
complicated by seeing only primary porosity. SGT - identifies shale types and special minerals.
NMR - magnetic resonance reacts to the porosity witha small element if lithology.
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
52/71
Volume
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
53/71
Volume Formation model:
Water-bearing, mono-mineral.
This formation can be described by the density tool and the neutron tool.
2 equations for 1 unknown:
system is over-determined.
for limestone: Nma = 0
for sand: Nma = 0.04
(((( )))) ++++==== 1mamfb(((( )))) ++++==== 1mamfn
Crossplot Solution
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
54/71
Crossplot Solution The plot is a straight line from the matrix point to the 100%
porosity, water point. It is scaled in porosity.
Neutron-density X-plot (1)
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
55/71
Neutron-density X-plot (1)
This crossplot
has b plottedagainst the
corrected
neutronporosity. Fluiddensity in this
plot is1.0g/cm3.
Neutron-density X-plot (2)
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
56/71
Neutron density X plot (2)
This plot is the
same as theprevious one
except that the
fluid densityhere is 1.19g/cm3.
Dual Mineral model
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
57/71
Dual Mineral model
= + V + V B mf m1 m1 m2 m2
= + V + V N N mf m1 N m1 m2 N m2
1 = + V + Vm1 m2
3 unknown : , V , V , 3 equations
system is just determined
m1 m2
(Material Balance Equation)
Dual Mineral plot
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
58/71
p
The plot now has two lines, one from each matrix point. The equi-porosity lines join the lines, anypoint falling between can be assigned its porosity the zero porosity line is scaled in ratio (or percent)of the two minerals. This can be extended to the water point. Points falling inside the lines can besubdivided in mineral percent
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
59/71
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
60/71
Z-axis Plot
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
61/71
Z axis Plot
Other Crossplots
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
62/71
p
There are numerous other crossplots to identify minerals
using combinations of tools.
ma - Uma b - Pe
MID plot (n, b, t)
MN plot (n, b, t)
The z -axis is used for clarification.
Pe - b Crossplot
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
63/71
p
This plot is ideal toidentify the lithologyin conjunction withthe neutron density
plot.
ma - Uma (1)
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
64/71
( )
ma - Uma
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
65/71
(2)Umadetermination
Matrix Identification Plot
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
66/71
The Matrix Identification Plotuses neutron, density andsonic data as inputs. Anapparent crossplot porosity is
found on a density-neutronand a sonic neutroncrossplot. The values areentered into the relevantsection of the following chartand the values of tmaa and
maa read;
MN plot
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
67/71
The MN plot usesdata from the
neutron, density andsonic logs to solve
complex lithology.Used when Pef is not
available or as extrainformation.
Hydrocarbon Effect
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
68/71
The presence of light hydrocarbons especially gas, in the invaded zone seriouslyaffects the main porosity tools, the density and neutron.
Both tools are calibrated to read correctly in water-filled rock.
Light hydrocarbon has a lower hydrogen index, hence the neutron reads low andthe low density of the fluid makes the density low.
Points exhibiting this problem plot above and to the right of the lithology line on thecrossplot.
Hydrocarbon Effect Correction
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
69/71
Complete Well Evaluation
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
70/71
Perform a complete well evaluation, determining VSH, f, RT, RW, SW, lithology type, fluidcontents on the attached log, assume all environmental corrections have already beenmade
-
8/10/2019 6.-Log Interpretation Methods
71/71