503 program development report
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 1/28
1
PROGRAMDEVELOPMENTREPORT
NameofDeveloper:KrisMesler Date:May11,2008
1. Overview
Program Title: Proportional Reasoning: Using Relationships
Grade or age level(s): 7th or 8th grade Pre-Algebra students
Major goal: The students learn to approach thecreation of a proportional equation from severaldifferent angles and show understanding by
creating and calculating proportions based onratios that are directly proportional.
2. Program Description
Instructional Objectives:
1. The student will write and solve proportions correctly using the Means andExtremes Property, when given three of the four proportion values.
2. The student will use similar figures to correctly create proportional ratios.
3. The student will create tables to illustrate proportional reasoning.
4. The student will use tables to compute comparative ratios.
5. The student will use calculated proportions to create correlating graphs.
6. The student will use correlating graphs to find other values with the sameproportional quantity.
7. The student will apply the knowledge he/she gained about proportions tocomplete a real-life activity.
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 2/28
2
Materials:
The Proportional Reasoning: Using Relationships unit consists of all thematerials needed for instruction and assessment on the unit content andobjectives including:
Teacher Guide:Contains lesson-by-lesson instructional procedures for the unit andPowerPoint slides, student activity sheets, teacher examples, and studentanswer keys.
Student Materials:The student materials needed for each lesson are included with eachlesson plan for ease of teacher use, but could be separated into a studentmanual, if desired.
Student and Teacher activity sheets and PowerPoint slides are providedwith the unit. The rest of the materials listed below, must be provided bythe school:
• Access to a computer lab
• SMARTboard
• Meter sticks or tape measure with metric
• Graph paper
• Paper, pencil
• Photocopied activity sheets
3. Tryout
Participants: The participants were 24 8th grade studentsenrolled in Pre-Algebra at a local charter school in a self-contained classroom.
Process:
One instructor presented the materials as described in the ProportionalReasoning: Using Proportions unit Teacher Guide. The instructor guided, withexamples, the instruction and discussions with each activity. The instructor thenallowed time with each lesson to complete the activity before the next classperiod. At the conclusion of each lesson, both the students and instructorscompleted attitude surveys. For purposes of this report, the scores wereconsolidated in the results, but comments on individual lessons were consideredseparately. The unit took 3 days to finish, with each day containing more than
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 3/28
3
one lesson. The instructor was able to add more math time, due to being a self-contained classroom.
Data Source and Collection:
The Proportional Reasoning: Using Relationships activities are exercises thatrequire completion of several hands-on activities, activity sheets, graphs, and aculminating real-life activity. These activities are evaluated separately throughoutthe unit, using a combination of rubrics, class discussions, and demonstrationsby students. The activities are evaluated by the criteria presented in Tables 1.0-7.1. The instructor and student attitude surveys were created to collect field testdata beneficial for revision of the program.
4. Results
Assessment performance:
The mean percentage score of the field-test students on the required andenrichment assessments are shown by evaluation criteria component for eachlesson in Tables 1.0 – 7.1. The tables reveal that the students completed therequired and enrichment assessment activities with the following mean scores:
Required ActivityMean
Enrichment ActivityMean
Lesson 1 97% 98%
Lesson 2 91.8% 96%
Lesson 3 91.8% 96%
Lesson 4 80% 86%
Lesson 5 96% 95%
Lesson 6 99% 97%
Lesson 7 88.75% 100%
Students scored 80 percent or above in every criteria component of the requiredactivities. Scores on the enrichment activities never dipped below 86%.Students also showed mastery overall, scoring an average of 96.25% on the finalassessment.
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 4/28
4
Student Attitudes:
Responses to the student reaction surveys are summarized in Appendix B. Thetable reveals an overall positive attitude to the unit. 77 percent of all responsesfall within the positive categories of agree and strongly agree, including 100percent of responses to 52 of 70 the lesson questions asked about ten Likert
items. The table also indicates that 94 percent of students agreed the contentwas worthwhile to learn, 98 percent reported they liked the lessons, and 99%said they would be able to apply proportional reasoning in future word problems.All students were willing to add comments in respect to improving the lessons for future use.
Teacher Attitudes:
The responses of the field-test instructor to the instructor survey are summarizedin Appendix A. One-hundred percent of responses from the instructor fell into the“agree” or “strongly agree” categories to all items. The instructor averaged“strongly agree” to the items:
• There was solid agreement between the instructor and student materials
• The examples and SMARTboard activities were helpful
• The assessment was appropriate
The instructor averaged “agree” to “strongly agree” to the rest of the items, andwould use this unit again.
Classroom observation:During the field-testing of the unit students were engaged and showed interest inthe material and lessons, with the exception of the latter part of Lesson 4, wherestudents seemed to be tired of working after the first part of the activity. Thereappeared to be a few terms used during the unit that should have beenintroduced to the students’ vocabulary before the lessons began. The majority of the students enjoyed the lessons enough to take advantage of the enrichmentactivities, including the baking of cookies for the class.
The instructor did a great job of following the provided materials, and as a mathteacher, was able to fill the gap of new vocabulary from his own knowledge of thesubject. Also, the instructor was able to implement great class discussionsbecause of his vast knowledge and experience.
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 5/28
5
5. Revisions
A number of revisions to the unit were identified as a result of the field test. Amodification indicated by both the instructor and the students was the reductionof work involved in Lesson 4. This revision has not yet been completed, but willeasily be done by shortening the length of the activity sheet for Lesson 4. Thiswill give students and teachers more time for interaction during the lesson. Asecond revision, not yet completed, is the addition of a vocabulary list for eachlesson. Several of the questions throughout the unit were due to lack of knowledge of proportion vocabulary, and the instructor and students felt it was asetback to gaining the new knowledge of each lesson. A third revision camefrom the instructor’s comments, when he said he would like more topics for classdiscussion outlined in the lesson procedure during those lessons when classdiscussions are scheduled to occur. This revision is yet to be completed. Noneof the three revisions will be too complicated to implement, just time-consuming.The three revisions are currently in process.
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 6/28
6
Table 1.0
Lesson 1 - Using the Means/Extremes Property
Performance on Lesson 1 by Grading Criteria
Criteria % Required ActivityMean
% Enrichment Activity*Mean
Assignment completedon time
100% 100%
Figure’s height measureswithin 0.5cm of the
correct height100% NA
Table is created correctly
and calculations arecorrect
NA 96%
Written explanationshows good thinking andcalculations are correct
92% NA
Poster board figure isneat and creative in
design96% NA
Weighted Mean Totals 97% 98%
*19 of 24 (79.2%) students completed the enrichment activity
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 7/28
7
Table 1.1
Lesson 1 - Using the Means/Extremes Property
Activity Scoring Rubric
Lesson 1 Baseball BatActivity Rubric
Points Possible Score
Assignment completed on time 1
Figure’s height measures within 0.5cmof the correct height
1
Written explanation shows goodthinking and calculations are correct
1
Poster board figure is neat and
creative in design 1
TOTAL 4
Table 1.2
Lesson 1 - Using the Means/Extremes Property
Enrichment Scoring Rubric
Lesson 1 EnrichmentActivity Rubric
Points Possible Score
Assignment completed on time 1
Table is created correctly andcalculations are correct
1
TOTAL 2
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 8/28
8
Table 2.0
Lesson 2 - Creating Proportional Ratios
Performance on Lesson 2 by Grading Criteria
Criteria % Required ActivityMean
% Enrichment Activity*Mean
Assignment completedon time
100% 100%
Fulfill team role 100% NA
Share information 92% NA
Listen to other teammates
79% NA
Cooperate withteammates 88% NA
Calculates three other heights using theShadow Method
NA 100%
Student writes report onfindings
NA 87%
Weighted Mean Totals 91.8% 96%
*23 of 24 (96%) students completed the enrichment activity
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 9/28
9
Table 2.1
Lesson 2 - Creating Proportional Ratios
Activity Scoring Rubric
Lesson 2ActivityRubric
0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points Totalpoints
Completion
ofAssignment(Scored by
teacher)
Did notcomplete
assignment
Completedless than1/2 of the
assignment
Completedmore than1/2 of the
assignment
Completedall of the
assignment
Fulfill teamrole
Does notperform
any of assigned
duties
Performslittle duties
Performsnearly all
duties
Performs allof assigned
team duties
Shareinformation
Does notrelay any
informationto
teammates
Relays verylittle
information-some
relates tothe topic
Relayssome basicinformation-
mostrelates tothe topic
Relays agreat deal
of information-all relates
to the topicListen to
other
teammates
Is alwaystalking-
never allowsanyoneelse tospeak
Usuallydoing most
of thetalking-rarelyallows
others tospeak
Listens butsometimes
talks toomuch
Listens andspeaks a
fair amount
Cooperate
with
teammates
Usuallyargues withteammates
Sometimesargues
Rarelyargues
Never argues
TOTALSCORE=
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 10/28
10
Table 2.2
Lesson 2 - Creating Proportional Ratios
Enrichment Scoring Rubric
Lesson 2Enrichment
Activity Rubric
0 or 1 pt. Points Scored
Assignment
completed on time
Calculates three other
heights using the
Shadow Method
Student writes reporton findings
TOTAL SCORE=
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 11/28
11
Table 3.0
Lesson 3 - Creating Tables
Performance on Lesson 3 by Grading Criteria
Criteria % Required ActivityMean
% Enrichment Activity*Mean
Assignment completedon time
100% 100%
Fulfill team role 100% NA
Share information 92% NA
Listen to other teammates
79% NA
Cooperate withteammates 88% NA
Calculates three other heights using theShadow Method
NA 100%
Student writes report onfindings
NA 87%
Weighted Mean Totals 91.8% 96%
*23 of 24 (96%) students completed the enrichment activity
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 12/28
12
Table 3.1
Lesson 3 – Creating Tables
Group Work Scoring Rubric
Lesson 3ActivityRubric
0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points Totalpoints
Completionof
Assignment
(Scored by
teacher)
Did notcomplete
assignment
Completedless than1/2 of the
assignment
Completedmore than1/2 of the
assignment
Completedall of the
assignment
Fulfill team
role
Does not
performany of
assignedduties
Performs
little duties
Performs
nearly allduties
Performs all
of assignedteam duties
Share
informationDoes notrelay any
informationto
teammates
Relays verylittle
information-some
relates tothe topic
Relayssome basicinformation-
mostrelates tothe topic
Relays agreat deal
of information-all relates
to the topicListen to
otherteammates
Is always
talking-never allowsanyoneelse tospeak
Usually
doing mostof the
talking-rarelyallows
others tospeak
Listens but
sometimestalks too
much
Listens and
speaks afair amount
Cooperate
withteammates
Usuallyargues withteammates
Sometimesargues
Rarelyargues
Never argues
TOTAL
SCORE=
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 13/28
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 14/28
14
Table 4.0
Lesson 4 – Using Tables to Compute Ratios
Performance on Lesson 4 by Grading Criteria
Criteria % Required ActivityMean
% Enrichment Activity*Mean
Completion of assignment
79% 100%
Correctness of assignment
79% NA
Volunteer to displayexercises on board
83% NA
Completed ratios of other
family members NA 100%
Obtained info on previouscenturies and created
Vitruvian ratiosNA 58%
Weighted Mean Totals 80% 86%
*14 of 24 (58%) students completed the enrichment activity
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 15/28
15
Table 4.1
Lesson 4 – Using Tables to Compute Ratios
Activity Scoring Rubric
Lesson 4ActivityRubric
0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points
Completionof
assignment
Did notcomplete
assignment
Completedless than 1/2
of theassignment
Completedmore than 1/2
of theassignment
Completed allof the
assignment
Correctnessof
assignment
None of assignmentwas done
correctly
Less than 1/2of assignment
was done
correctly
More than 1/2of assignment
was done
correctly
All of theassignmentwas done
correctlyVolunteer to
display
answers on
board
Did notvolunteer
Volunteeredat least once
Volunteeredmore than
once
Volunteerednumerous
times
TOTALSCORE =
Table 4.2
Lesson 4 – Using Tables to Compute Ratios
Enrichment Scoring Rubric
Lesson 4Enrichment
Rubric
0 or 1 point Points Scored
Completion of
assignmentCompleted ratios of
other family members
Obtained info on
previous centuriesand created Vitruvian
ratios
TOTAL SCORE =
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 16/28
16
Table 5.0
Lesson 5 – Creating Correlating Graphs
Performance on Lesson 5 by Grading Criteria
Criteria % Required ActivityMean
% Enrichment Activity*Mean
Completion of assignment
96% 100%
Correctness of assignment
92% NA
Volunteer to displayexercises on board
100% NA
Correct Creation of Direct
Proportion Word Problem NA 100%
Correct Creation of Tableand Graph
NA 86%
Weighted Mean Totals 96% 95%
*21 of 24 (87.5%) students completed the enrichment activity
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 17/28
17
Table 5.1
Lesson 5 – Creating Correlating Graphs
Activity Scoring Rubric
Lesson 5ActivityRubric
0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points
Completionof
assignment
Did notcomplete
assignment
Completedless than 1/2
of theassignment
Completedmore than 1/2
of theassignment
Completed allof the
assignment
Correctness
ofassignment
None of
assignmentwas donecorrectly
Less than 1/2
of assignmentwas donecorrectly
More than 1/2
of assignmentwas donecorrectly
All of the
assignmentwas donecorrectly
Volunteer to
displayanswers on
board
Did notvolunteer
Volunteeredat least once
Volunteeredmore than
once
Volunteerednumerous
times
TOTALSCORE =
Table 5.2
Lesson 5 – Creating Correlating Graphs
Enrichment Scoring Rubric
Lesson 5Enrichment
Rubric
0 or 1 point Points Scored
Completion of
assignment
Correct Creation of DirectProportion Word Problem
Correct Creation of Table
and Graph
TOTAL SCORE =
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 18/28
18
Table 6.0
Lesson 6 – Finding Other Proportional Values
Performance on Lesson 6 by Grading Criteria
Criteria % Required ActivityMean
% Enrichment Activity*Mean
Completion of assignment
100% 100%
Correctness of assignment
100% NA
Volunteer to displayexercises on board
96% NA
Correct Creation of Direct
Proportion of Gas Prices NA 100%
Correct Creation of Graph of Gas Prices
NA 92%
Weighted Mean Totals 99% 97%
*21 of 24 (87.5%) students completed the enrichment activity
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 19/28
19
Table 6.1
Lesson 6 - Finding Other Proportional Values
Activity Scoring Rubric
Lesson 6ActivityRubric
0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points
Completionof
assignment
Did notcomplete
assignment
Completedless than 1/2
of theassignment
Completedmore than 1/2
of theassignment
Completed allof the
assignment
Correctness
ofassignment
None of
assignmentwas donecorrectly
Less than 1/2
of assignmentwas donecorrectly
More than 1/2
of assignmentwas donecorrectly
All of the
assignmentwas donecorrectly
Volunteer to
displayanswers on
board
Did notvolunteer
Volunteeredat least once
Volunteeredmore than
once
Volunteerednumerous
times
TOTALSCORE=
Table 6.2
Lesson 6 - Finding Other Proportional Values
Enrichment Scoring Rubric
Lesson 6Enrichment
Rubric
0 or 1 point Points Scored
Completion of assignment
Correct Creation of DirectProportion of Gas Prices
Correct Creation of Graphof Gas Prices
TOTAL SCORE =
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 20/28
20
Table 7.0
Lesson 7 – Christmas Cookie Caper Web Quest
Performance on Lesson 7 by Grading Criteria
Criteria % Required ActivityMean
% Enrichment Activity*Mean
Did you follow directions? 96% NA
Does your spreadsheetreflect the quantities of
ingredients in therecipes?
92% NA
Is your shopping list
complete and correct?
79% NA
How did you rate in your contribution and
participation in your group?**
88% NA
Extra Credit: Did youmake and bring to classcookies from one of your project recipes?
NA 100%
Weighted Mean Totals 88.75% 100%
*9 of 24 (37.5%) students completed the enrichment activity**student will use the group work rubric from Lesson 6 to receive score for this
section (teacher will calculate the score after group input)
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 21/28
21
Table 7.1
Lesson 7 – Christmas Cookie Caper Web Quest
Activity and Enrichment Scoring Rubric
Lesson 7Activity andEnrichment
Rubric
Excellent
90 – 100%
Adequate
70 – 89%
Insufficient
0 – 69%
Did you followdirections?
(25 pts.)
Followed all of thedirections
Followed most of thedirections
Did not followdirections
Does your spreadsheet reflect
the quantities of ingredients in the
recipes?
(25 pts.)
Calculations andgraphs are done
correctly
Most of thecalculations were
done correctly; graphwas completed
correctly
Most of thecalculations wereincorrect and/or graph was done
incorrectly
Is your shopping listcomplete and
correct?
(25 pts.)
Compiled list wasorderly and
calculated correctly
Compiled list wassomewhat orderly
and mostly calculatedcorrectly
List was in disarray or most calculations
were done incorrectly
How did you rate inyour contribution andparticipation in your
group?
(25 pts.)
Rated highly by themembers of the team
Rated somewhathighly by the
members of the team
Rated poorly by themembers of the team
ExtraCredit:Didyoumake
andbringtoclasscookies
fromoneofyourproject
recipes?
(15 pts.)
Made and broughtcookies to class from
project recipe
Did not make andbring cookies to class
from project recipe
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 22/28
22
Table 8.0
Final Assessment
Range Scores
0 - 59% 60 – 69% 70 – 79% 80 – 89% 90 – 100%
# students 1 3 20
Average Score for final assessment = 96.25%
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 23/28
23
Appendix A
Instructor Survey
Please do not write your name on this survey.
Your responses to the following items will be used to evaluate and improve the
instructional lesson. Please circle your response to each statement.
SA - Strongly Agree A – Agree N – neutral D – disagree
SD – Strongly Disagree
SA A N D SD
1.Theinstructor materialswere well
organized.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
2. There wassolidagreementbetween theinstructor and studentmaterials.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
3. I receivedadequateinstruction for teaching thelesson.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
4. Thecontent was
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 24/28
24
worthwhile tolearn.
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
5. Thepracticematerialshelped thestudentslearn.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%6. TheexamplesandSMARTboardactivitieswere helpful.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
7. The step-by-stepdirectionswere clear.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
8. Theassessmentwasappropriate.
Lesson 1 100%Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 25/28
25
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
FINALAssessment
100%
9. I liked thelesson.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
10. I would
use thislesson again.
Lesson 1 100%
Lesson 2 100%
Lesson 3 100%
Lesson 4 100%
Lesson 5 100%
Lesson 6 100%
Lesson 7 100%
11. What
could bedone toimprove thelesson?
Lesson 1 Lesson was fine as is
Lesson 2 Fun outside activity! Could use a vocabulary wordlist.
Lesson 3Add or change example to use decimal quantitiesinstead of whole amounts.
Lesson 4
The activities took more time than was allotted.The first activity was enough to get the pointacross.Also, on recording sheet, the measurements will beeasier to calculate if they are in cm, not inches.
Lesson 5A vocabulary list would help with this lesson.Also, some topics for class discussion would helpin my leading the discussion.
Lesson 6Lesson was done before time allotted. Timeframeneeds to be adjusted.
Lesson 7Great idea for a real-life lesson! Students werevery involved with the lesson!
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 26/28
26
Appendix B
Participant Survey
Please do not write your name on this survey.
Your responses to the following items will be used to evaluate and improve theinstructional lesson. Please circle your response to each statement.
SA - Strongly Agree A – Agree N – neutral D – disagree
SD – Strongly Disagree
SA A N D SD
1.The
studentmaterialswere wellorganized.
Lesson 1 80% 20%
Lesson 2 87% 13%
Lesson 3 90% 10%
Lesson 4 75% 13% 12%
Lesson 5 75% 25%
Lesson 6 80% 16% 4%
Lesson 7 96% 4%
2. Iunderstood
what I wassupposed tolearn.
Lesson 1 78% 22%
Lesson 2 85% 15%Lesson 3 92% 8%
Lesson 4 80% 12% 8%
Lesson 5 72% 16% 12%
Lesson 6 79% 21%
Lesson 7 90% 10%
3. Thecontent wasworthwhile tolearn.
Lesson 1 74% 26%
Lesson 2 81% 15% 4%
Lesson 3 79% 13% 8%
Lesson 4 7% 65% 28%
Lesson 5 68% 32%
Lesson 6 74% 22% 4%
Lesson 7 94% 6%
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 27/28
27
4. Theteachingmethod wasa good wayfor me to
learn.
Lesson 1 92% 8%
Lesson 2 88% 12%
Lesson 3 75% 25%
Lesson 4 72% 28%
Lesson 5 81% 19%
Lesson 6 85% 15%
Lesson 7 92% 8%
5. The lessonprovidedenoughpractice.
Lesson 1 96% 4%
Lesson 2 89% 11%
Lesson 3 75% 25%
Lesson 4 90% 10%
Lesson 5 89% 11%Lesson 6 86% 14%
Lesson 7 96% 4%
6. TheexamplesandSMARTboardactivitieswere helpful.
Lesson 1 85% 15%
Lesson 2 88% 12%
Lesson 3 81% 15% 4%
Lesson 4 78% 18% 4%
Lesson 5 90% 10%
Lesson 6 96% 4%
Lesson 7 74% 18% 8%
7. The step-by-stepdirectionswere clear.
Lesson 1 88% 12%
Lesson 2 90% 10%
Lesson 3 82% 10% 8%
Lesson 4 48% 40% 12%
Lesson 5 89% 11%
Lesson 6 84% 16%Lesson 7 100%
8. I learnedsomethingnew about
Lesson 1 90% 10%
Lesson 2 80% 20%
Lesson 3 78% 18% 4%
8/3/2019 503 Program Development Report
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/503-program-development-report 28/28
proportions. Lesson 4 35% 61% 4%
Lesson 5 89% 11%
Lesson 6 74% 18% 8%
Lesson 7 87% 13%
9. I liked thelesson aboutproportions.
Lesson 1 96% 4%
Lesson 2 80% 20%
Lesson 3 75% 25%
Lesson 4 70% 14% 8% 8%
Lesson 5 92% 8%
Lesson 6 72% 28%
Lesson 7 96% 4%
10. I wouldbe able touseproportionssuccessfullyin the future.
Lesson 1 96% 4%Lesson 2 88% 12%
Lesson 3 78% 22%
Lesson 4 70% 22% 8%
Lesson 5 88% 12%
Lesson 6 92% 8%
Lesson 7 96% 4%
11. What
could bedone toimprove thelesson?
Lesson 1 Really liked the demonstration with the bats (13)
Lesson 2 Loved going outside (18)
Lesson 3Didn’t know for sure what to do with decimals inproportion (13)
Lesson 4The activities were too long (14)Had trouble with measurements when trying to findthe ratio amount (19)
Lesson 5Didn’t understand some of the words they wereusing (5)
Lesson 6
Had lots of time left over to goof off (7)
Pretty easy (9)
Lesson 7Loved it! The assignment took quite a bit of time, butliked it. (16)