500 years later
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 500 Years Later
1/2
Grace Chen 500 Years Later 10/9/13
While reading The Prince , I was continuously drawing parallels between
Machiavellis suggestions and modern day political strategies. There were moments
when I remarked thats horrible and thats brilliant at the same time for the
unsugared honesty of his statements. If the text is from a specific point in time, written
under specific circumstances, why does it still resonate with us so deeply?
Even while his tactics are clearly outlined and based on specific situation,
Machiavellis text is somewhat ideologically ambiguous. His disentanglement of politics
from other considerations allows his ideas to be coopted by leaders from across the
political spectrum. While he seems to envision a one-man-rule in The Prince, he believed
the best form of government was the republic since it allowed the voices of people to be
heard to some extent, mediating conflict, and allowing a select few could rule with
utmost authority. Eve n while Machiavellis text seems to advocate for a different
political system, Communists leaders like Antonio Gramsci have coopted his ideas in
thinking about revolutionary rule.
In modern times, his name periodically appears in the news in reference to some
contemporary leader. Recently, for example, Putin was compared to Machiavelli for his
pragmatic foreign policy in contrast to Obamas idealism. However, such a view is
superficial and masks the prevalence of Machiavellian strategies within our society.
While The Prince is very pragmatic, there is something repugnant about the
straightforwardness of the work and a human thirst for ideals. In America, we have
ideals such as freedom, liberty, equality, and justice but are these just
ideological masks for the underlying Machiavellian politics? Machiavelli urges his prince
that he must seem virtuous while knowing that it is impossible to be completely
virtuous. Can Machiavellis unveiling of the mechanizations of power also help us
understand contemporary power structures that have been obfuscated by ideology?
There is something about our own reality that is difficult to see clearly while we can read
textbook accounts of the past and easily condemn past practices.
-
8/12/2019 500 Years Later
2/2
One such example is our current system of incarceration. In The New Jim Crow ,
Michelle Alexander powerfully unveils the structural violence against Blacks that has
continued and transformed in modern day times: By targeting black men thought the
War on Drugs and decimating communities of color, the U.S. criminal justice system
functions as a contemporary system of racial control relegating millions to a
permanent second-class status even as it formally adheres to the principle of
colorblindness. Her argument fits into Machiavellis st ructural understanding of power
and how it maneuvers. For example, factions allow the prince to manage his subjects
more easily. The people who struggle under our current economic system can be better
managed. Blacks and poor Whites have had similar grievances since before the
inception of our country. By pitting the two groups against each other and supporting
the more powerful group (Whites), the government can continue to operate under the
same economic system and status quo. According to the more popular interpretation,
however, the staggering increase in incarceration rates in communities of color to the
predictable, though unfortunate consequences of poverty, racial segregation, unequal
educational opportunities, and the resumed realities of the drug market, including the
mistaken belief that most drug dealers are black or brown. This interpretation doesnt
take into account the top-down, strategic manipulation of power in the creation ofpresent circumstances. Instead, it focuses on historical fallout and individual
responsibility, inspiring mild criticism of the current system, rather than outright hate
and sense of injustice, which Machiavelli recognizes is very dangerous.
After considering these powerful implications of Machiavellis work, I won der
how it can be used in our present times for a better understanding of our present
circumstances.