5. research design_1!23!12
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
1/22
Research Design
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
2/22
Research Design Typology
Quantitative
MixedQualitativ
e
Experimenta
l
Quasi-Experimenta
l
Non-Experimenta
l
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
3/22
Research Design Typology
MixedQualitativ
e
Quantitative
Ethnography
GroundedTheory
HistoricalResearch
Phenomenology
Case Study
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
4/22
Research Design Typology
4 important differences:
1. Philosophy
2. Objective
3. Assumptions
4. Strengths/Weaknesses
Quantitative
Mixed
Qualitative
VS.
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
5/22
Primary form of research until the 1980s.
Takes the positivistapproach to researchoThe scientific method is the only valid approach
to solving problems and answering questions.Introspection/intuition is considered invalid.
Deductive (top-down) reasoning
Central belief:oPhenomena should be studied in controlled
settings, where extraneous variables can be
Philosophical Differences
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
6/22
Slowly gained popularity over the past 20years.
Takes the constructivistapproach toresearch
There is no Truth. Rather, each individualconstructs their own reality.
Inductive (bottom-up) reasoning
Philosophical Differences
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
7/22
Became an accepted form of research overpast decade
Incompatibility Thesis Takes the pragmaticapproach to researchoPhilosophical preferences should not dictate
research design.
oFocus on what works.
Attempts to utilize the strengths of oneparadigm to account for the weaknesses of
the other.
Philosophical Differences
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
8/22
Quantitative Research1. Determine statistical relationships2. Generalize to a population of interest
3. Test theories
Qualitative Research1. Provide the emicperspectiveDescription of phenomenon by the actor, rather than
the observer(i.e., etic)
2. Build theoriesMixed Research
1. Flexible design
2. Corroboration
Research Objectives
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
9/22
Quantitative Research1. Behavior is regular and predictive.
2. Reality is objective.
3. Inquiry is value-free.
Qualitative Research1. Behavior is fluid, dynamic, contextual, and
social.
2. Reality is subjective.
3. Inquiry is value-laden.Mixed Research
1. Behavior is somewhat predictable.
2. Makes no assumption regarding reality
3. Inquiry may not be value-free, therefore
Assumptions
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
10/22
1. Testing Theory2. Generalization
3. Making quantitative predictions4. Eliminating Confounds
5. Relatively quick data collection andanalysis
6. Precise Measurements
Strengths
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
11/22
1. Too rigid Lack of flexibility2. Lack of creativity
3. Confirmation bias
Weaknesses
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
12/22
1. Theory Generation2. Findings represent the meanings of
participants
3. Appropriate (i.e., naturalistic) settings
4. Has the ability to study complex
phenomena
5. Can study dynamicprocesses (i.e.,
those that change due to various reasons)
Strengths
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
13/22
1. Not generalizable2. Quantitative predictions are difficult
3. Results are vulnerable to researcherbias and idiosyncrasies
4. More time-consuming
5. Lower practitioner credibility
Weaknesses
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
14/22
1. Has a mixture of the strengths ofquantitative and qualitative research
2. Answers a broad and complete range
of research questions
3. Utilizes convergence, corroboration,&
triangulation
Mixed Research: Strengths
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
15/22
1. Often very complex2. Disapproved by methodological
purists
3. Few researchers are skilled in bothdesigns
4. Very time-consuming
Mixed Research: Weaknesses
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
16/22
Quantitative Research
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
17/22
Types of Quantitative Research
1. Experimental
2. Quasi-Experimental
3. Non-Experimental
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
18/22
Experimental Research
Considered the most pureform of research
Conditions:1. Control
2. Random Assignment
3. Manipulation
Strength: Internal Validity
Weakness: External Validity
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
19/22
Example
Research Question: How does alcohol influenceattentional processes?
Procedure
1. Sample 100 participants from your population
2. Randomlyassign 50 to an alcohol group and 50 toa placebo group
3. Ensure that there are no differences between theexperiences of the two groups, other than the
contents of their drink.
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
20/22
Quasi-Experimental Research
Not ideal but often necessary
Only difference is a lackof randomassignment.
Difference between groups is pre-determined
Example: What is the influence of spanking
on childrens tendency toward aggressive
behavior?
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
21/22
Non-Experimental Research
Lacks both random assignment and
manipulation.
Examples include:
Survey Research
Secondary Research
Causal-comparative Research
Example: Interested in the relationship between TV
watching and academic achievement. Children are
divided into 3 groups based on TV watching habits
(high, medium, low). Grades in school are compared.
-
8/2/2019 5. Research Design_1!23!12
22/22
Qualitative Research
1. Phenomenology
2. Ethnography
3. Case Study4. Grounded Theory
5. Historical Research
-Interest is a phenomenon.
-Interest is a culture.
-Interest is a case.