5 elements of the ideal service recovery
TRANSCRIPT
OF THE IDEAL SERVICERECOVERY & COMPLAINT RESPONSE
5 ELEMENTS
WHAT SCIENCE SAYS*
1 OFFER A QUALITY APOLOGY FOR THE FAILURE OR PROBLEM.
2 OFFER AN EXPLANATION FOR WHAT HAPPENED.
It’s amazing how far an apology will go to diffuse anger and restore customer trust and loyalty.
Be careful on this one! Customers will see through your explanation if it’s nothing more than an excuse. A good explanation is an honest description of what went wrong.
Even when remedies to failures are poor, customers still report higher satisfaction and loyalty when processes are fair and seek their input.
SATISFACTION WITH FIRM RECOVERY
WHAT DOES A HIGH QUALITY RESPONSE INTERACTION LOOK LIKE?WHAT CUSTOMERS SAY WHEN ASKED
WHY CUSTOMER INPUT MATTERS
GETTING THE FAILURE-RESPONSE FIT RIGHT
DIFFERENT MOTIVES, DIFFERENT RESPONSE
MEANS ON A 9-POINT SCALE
3 SEEK THE CUSTOMER’S INPUT INTO HOW TO BEST RESOLVE A PROBLEM.
Not all failures are the same, and neither are all responses. The most effective responses are when there is a good fit between the failure type and the recovery response.
4 MATCH THE RECOVERY RESPONSE TO THE FAILURE TYPE.
All complaints are not the same, and neither are all complainers. When a customer complains to benefit the firm, an apology and explanation may be all that is needed.
But some customers complain with an eye on the value they have lost, and it is especially important to offer these customers a remedy that makes up for their loss.
5 ADAPT THE RECOVERY RESPONSE TO THE MOTIVES OF THE CUSTOMER.
But not just any apology will do – it must be empathetic (given with warmth and understanding), elaborate (multiple
indications of sorrow), and soon after the failure.
47% 33% 32% 20% 20% 11%Apology Politeness Empathy Effort Explanation Honesty
High Quality Apology (empathetic, elaborate, &
prompt)
Low Quality Apology(says “I’m sorry” but without
empathy, elaboration, or promptness)
No Apology
Being Asked How to Remedy the Failure
Perceived Fairness of Procedures
Overall Recovery Satisfaction
When Asked
When Not Asked
6.1 4.8When High Procedural
Fairness
When Low Procedural
Fairness
6.8 4.1
FAILURE TYPE RECOVERY RESPONSE
Monetary Failure, e.g., overcharge, financial loss
Monetary Compensation, e.g., discount, refund
GOODFIT
BIG IMPACT
Failed Goods or Service, e.g., low quality product,long wait New Goods or
Service, e.g., exchange, new meal
GOODFIT
BIG IMPACT
Lack of Attention, e.g., unavailable staff, poor attitude
Apology
GOODFIT
BIG IMPACT
Roschk, Holger and Susanne Kaiser (2013), “The Nature of an Apology: An Experimental Study on How to Apologize After a Service Failure,” Marketing Letters 24 (3) (2013), 293-309.Tax, Stephen S., Stephen W. Brown, and Murali Chandrashekaran (1998), “Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (April), 60-76.Karande, Kiran, Vincent P. Magnini, and Leona Tam (2007), “Recovery Voice and Satisfaction After Service Failure: An Experimental Investigation of Mediating and Moderating Factors,” Journal of Service Research, 10 (2), 187-203.Holger, Roschk and Katja Gelbrich (2014), “Identifying Appropriate Compensation Types for Service Failures: A Meta-Analytic and Experimental Analysis,” Journal of Service Research, 17 (May), 195-211.Yeoh, Poh-Lin, Sam W. Woolford, Abdolreza Eshghi, and Gul Butaney (2014), “Customer Response to Service Recovery in Online Shopping,” Journal of Services Research, 14 (2), 33-56.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
RESEARCH SOURCES
To learn more about how the world-class professors of LIFT PhD can help your company, visit our website.
WWW.LIFTPHD.COM
Service recovery & complaint handling refer to the actions taken by a firm in response to a product or service failure or problem.
I want you to know this
cost me
That’s what I
expected
I am just trying to help That’s not
necessary