5-12 april 2008 winter workshop on nuclear dynamics star particle production at rhic aneta iordanova...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
219 views
TRANSCRIPT
5-12 April 2008
Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics
STARSTARParticle production at RHIC
Aneta Iordanova
for the STAR collaboration
25-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Outline
Motivation Analysis Technique Freeze-out
ChemicalKinetic
Baryon/meson and strangeness production Scaling properties
35-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Motivation
Identified particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions at different center-of-mass energies and system size provide: a unique tool to explore the QCD phase diagram. system size dependence of the freeze-out parameters at RHIC.
Bulk particle production provide: Kinetic freeze-out properties from spectral shapes
• Tkin at kinetic freeze-out, transverse radial flow (β) Chemical freeze-out properties from particle ratios
• Tch at chemical freeze-out, strangeness and baryon production
45-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Heavy ion collision evolution
Experimental Observation: the bulk of produced matter is “soft” (99%) to study the QGP → study hadronization and properties of produced
particles• species abundances (Chemical freeze-out and equilibration)• momentum distributions (Kinetic freeze-out)
Collision
HardPartonic
Scattering
Hot, DenseMatter, QGP?
HadronizationPhase
InelasticScattering
ElasticScattering
the current view
ChemicalFreeze-out
KineticFreeze-out
q
q
time: the system cools and expands
55-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Mapping the QCD Phase Diagram
Lattice QCD predicts critical temperature for QGP phase boundary:
Tc ~ 170 MeV
c ~ 1 GeV/fm3
Experimentally derived freeze-out parameters from different experiments
Extend the measurements at RHIC over a broad range of
Energy Centrality System size
J.Stachel (Trento 2004)
65-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
STAR Experiment
Time Projection Chamber Measures charged particle
momenta and energy loss
within ||<1 Full azimuthal acceptance
75-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Exploit the ionization energy loss (dE/dx)
Distribution normalized by the theoretical expectation for different particle types.
Normalized distribution sliced into p=50MeV/c for
|y|<0.1 (mid-rapidity) 6 centrality bins (60% of the cross-
section) Cu+Cu @ √sNN=62.4GeV and 200
GeV. Raw yields: extracted from multi-
Gaussian fits.
Consistent analysis technique for Different center-of-mass energies Colliding systems.
Cu+Cu 200 GeV0-10% central
0.50<pT<0.55 GeV/c
Cu+Cu 200 GeV
Minimum Bias
pion
kaon
electron
proton
normalized
STAR Preliminary
Low-pT particle identification
85-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Chemical freeze-out
Statistical model approach: particle ratios described by 4 fit parameters: chemical freeze-out
temperature, Tch
baryon chemical potential, μB
strangeness chemical potential, μS
strangeness suppression, S
STAR Preliminary
10% central, Cu+Cu @ 62.4 GeV10% central, Cu+Cu @ 200 GeV
Fits use only data from , K and p
2| |
( ) /20
( , )
2 1B s
i
i i isSi i
E B TS
N g p dp
V
T
e
Phys.Lett.B465(1999)15, arXiv:nucl-th/0405068
95-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Chemical freeze-out
B decreases with increasing collision energy Approaching a net baryon
free system
Freeze-out temperature independent of initial conditions Collision energy Energy density Net baryon density
Strangeness suppression (s) approaches unity with increasing Nch
Chemical equilibrium
Approaching ‘net baryon free’
Universal Tch~160MeV
105-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Transverse momentum spectra
Spectra Mass dependence Pressure build-up in the center, large pressure gradient
collective expansion Common expansion velocity?
Preliminary
Preliminary
115-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
PRC48 (1993) 2462
Kinetic freeze-out
Hydro-dynamically motivated “blast-wave” model fits
Gain insight into the dynamics of the collision.
Model assumes a boosted thermal source in transverse and longitudinal directions.
Can describe the data with a common set of fit parameters
Transverse flow velocity, β Kinetic freeze-out temperature,
Tkin
Studies show that resonance decays (at RHIC energies) do not affect the fit results significantly
n
sr R
rrr
)()( r 1tanh
kin
T
kin
TR
TTT T
mK
T
pIrdrm
dmm
dn coshsinh1
0
0
10% central, Cu+Cu @ 200 GeV
STAR Preliminary
125-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
STAR Preliminary
Tkin
Tch
Freeze-out properties
Extracted freeze-out parameters similar for the same number of
produced charged-particles, Nch• For all systems• For all colliding energies
135-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
STAR Preliminary
Tkin
Tch
Freeze-out properties
Tkin , ‹› with centrality information on system
expansion Explosive system, higher higher pressure gradients in
central events
Tch insensitive to centrality Insensitive to expansion and
cooling Close to TC
• QCD predicted TC~160-170 MeV
Coincides with hadronization
Thus, chemical freeze-out may probe the phase boundary
TTCC
145-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Probing the phase boundary
Current systematics: Increasing collision
energy Using different collision
systems and centrality
Next step: RHIC low-energy scan
J.Stachel (Trento 2004)
155-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Baryon/meson production
Low-pT Baryon < meson Centrality independent Ratio similar to p+p
Intermediate pT ratio enhanced relative to p+p Maximal at pT~2GeV/c Strong centrality
dependence centrality independent for
pT>5GeV/c (Cu+Cu) and pT>7GeV/c (Au+Au)
R.Hollis WWND07
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 112301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 152301
165-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Baryon/meson production
Energy dependence
Centrality dependence of Anti-proton/ enhancement versus pT is similar in 200 and 62.4GeV
Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 104
175-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Enhancement also evident in strangeness sector /K0 shows the same
systematic dependencies
/K
0 S
Baryon/meson production
185-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Strangeness production
PR C60 044904 (1999)E802 (AGS/BNL)
Nucl. Phys. A715 (2003) p474
NA49 (SPS/CERN)
Small system versus large system: Strangeness
enhancement reported at the AGS and SPS
• Relative to p+p• K/ ratio
195-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Charged kaons are enhanced in the Cu+Cu system compared to the Au+Au At the same Npart
Kao
n d
N/d
y
Npart
Charged kaon enhancement
STAR Preliminary
205-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
K/ - Cu+Cu versus Au+Au
K-/- versus Npart no apparent strangeness
enhancement Relative to the spectra
reference
are “enhanced” in the same way as kaons
Question: if pions (and perhaps all species) are “enhanced”, is Npart the relevant variable for comparison?
Look at Nch as the comparison variable
Nch ~
STAR PreliminarySTAR Preliminary
215-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Systematic study
similar values for all systems vs Nch
System size Center-of-mass energy
225-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
mean-pT vs Nch
STAR Preliminary
235-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
mean-pT vs Npart
STAR Preliminary
245-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
mean-pT vs Npart
STAR Preliminary
255-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
mean-pT vs Nch
All studied systems and energies are described better when using Nch,
STAR Preliminary
265-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
Summary
STAR has enlarged the variety of hadron spectra measurements at RHIC by providing new results for Cu+Cu at two different center-of-mass energies, √s=200 and 62.4 GeV.
The freeze-out properties (Tch, Tkin, S, at RHIC energies seem to scale by the number of produced charged hadrons at mid-rapidity determined at the initial stages of the collision and driven by the initial
energy density, Tch coincides with the LGT predicted Tc which is around 160 MeV.
In both Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions, mid-rapidity baryon production at intermediate pT is enhanced compared to that of mesons indicating the coalescence process for hadronization.
275-12 April 2008
Aneta IordanovaUniversity of Illinois at Chicago
Winter Workshop onNuclear Dynamics
STARSTAR
High-pT and Nch
similar scaling trends? Ncoll relevant at higher pT scaling with Nch (at mid-rapidity) for high-pT data
STAR
Preliminary
STAR
Preliminary
Au+Au 200GeV
Au+Au 62.4GeVAu+Au 200GeV
Au+Au 62.4GeV
++- ++-
Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 104