4d pre-stack inversion workflow integrating reservoir model control and lithology supervised...
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 4D Pre-Stack Inversion Workflow Integrating Reservoir Model Control and Lithology Supervised Classification
1/5
72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010
Barcelona, Spain, 14 - 17 June 2010
A027
4D Pre-stack Inversion Workflow IntegratingReservoir Model Control and LithologySupervised Classification
S. Toinet* (Total E&P Angola), S. Maultzsch (Total), V. Souvannavong(CGGVeritas) & O. Colnard (CGGVeritas)
SUMMARY
4D pre-stack inversion is used in the industry to image reservoir changes due to production and injection,and to make reservoir management decisions in order to optimize hydrocarbon recovery. We present aninnovative workflow to prepare, constrain and compute 4D pre-stack inversion attributes. Specific
properties of the studied field (huge time-shifts due to gas coming out of solution, various turbiditiccontexts) implied building a composite warping result, filtered using a 4D mask to build the initial monitor
model for 4D inversion. The pre-stack 4D inversion workflow not only integrates seismic information, butalso well information, used to discriminate sand from shale during the 4D mask building, and a 4D rock-
physics model. Applied to simulated reservoir properties, the rock-physics model defines a range ofrelative density and velocity variations in which the inversion results can vary. Moreover, because water-
bearing sands are hard to discriminate from shales in some of the field reservoirs using a cross-plot of Pand S impedances, information from the reservoir grid was also introduced to help locating water-bearingsands in the 4D mask. Preliminary analyses of 4D inversion attributes show an improved image comparedto previous 4D attributes.
-
7/30/2019 4D Pre-Stack Inversion Workflow Integrating Reservoir Model Control and Lithology Supervised Classification
2/5
Introduction
4D pre-stack inversion is used in the oil and gas industry primarily to image and analyse reservoir
changes due to production and injection (McInally et al., 2001), and ultimately to make reservoir
management decisions in order to optimise hydrocarbon recovery (Rutledal et al., 2003). In some
cases, quantitative analysis based on 4D pre-stack inversion attributes is carried out to access fluid
saturation and pressure changes in the reservoir (Lumley et al., 2003).
A 4D pre-stack inversion has been run on a giant field located offshore Angola, in average water
depths of 1400 meters. Oil production started in December 2006. Reservoirs are located in
unconsolidated sandy turbiditic deposits, confined (thick channels) and unconfined (lobes).
We present an innovative workflow to prepare, constrain and compute 4D pre-stack inversion
attributes. This is followed by a preliminary analysis of 4D inversion results obtained.
Warping of monitor before 4D inversion
A 4D high-resolution seismic survey was acquired in the summer of 2008 on the field, with several
objectives: monitor the effects of one year and a half of production and injection, understand verticalcommunications and fault behaviour, update the reservoir model according to the extension of 4D
anomalies, help reservoir management and the location of future development and infill wells.
4D seismic data first went through a fast-track processing sequence. Analysis of 4D images from fast-
track processing has shown very large time-shifts (up to +18 ms) at the base of produced reservoirs,
and amplitude variations of more than 100% between base and monitor seismic data. Such large
variations are due to the fact that initial reservoir pressures are close to the bubble point, in
unconsolidated sands with a shallow burial: production-induced depletion rapidly liberates gas, giving
rise to a strong P-wave velocity decrease.
The two different types of reservoirs of the field (confined and unconfined turbidites) induced large
differences of time-shifts and amplitude variations: largest time-shifts were observed in confined
turbidites due to stronger depletion and significant vertical communication (Figure 1), whereas in
unconfined turbidites the time shift values were generally much smaller (around 5 ms). Thisvariability in magnitude of the 4D anomalies for the different reservoir complexes required the use of
different algorithms to warp the monitor data to the base data and generate a cube of relative P-wave
velocity change (dv/v) as a 4D attribute. The warping techniques consist of existing and newly
developed TOTAL proprietary algorithms (Williamson et al., 2007).
Figure 1 left: amplitudes from base 99 survey. Right: amplitudes monitor 2008. Orange line (left and
right images) represents the initial isochron of the reservoir base.
Finally, three dv/v blocks were produced, using different algorithms and computation parameters.
Because the 4D inversion algorithm requires using a single dv/v cube to create the initial model for
the inversion of the monitor data, a composite dv/v cube was built by merging the different warping-
derived dv/v blocks, using seismic interpreted horizons. This composite dv/v volume is also used for
4D interpretation purposes, as it is valid in confined and unconfined systems.
72ndEAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010
Barcelona, Spain, 14 - 17 June 2010
-
7/30/2019 4D Pre-Stack Inversion Workflow Integrating Reservoir Model Control and Lithology Supervised Classification
3/5
4D inversion workflow
The 4D inversion workflow starts with a 3D simultaneous inversion of the base survey data after
additional specific pre-conditioning of the angle stacks. Then the 3D inversion result on base is
updated using the dv/v attribute from the warping process. Finally, a global pre-stack 4D inversion
scheme (Lafet et al., 2009) is applied, where all partial angle stacks from base and monitor are jointly
inverted.
During the update phase with the dv/v attribute, a 4D mask is used: it defines reservoir and non-
reservoir samples in the seismic volumes, and finally samples where 4D dv/v is applied or not to
create the initial model for the monitor. This masking process allows in some specific places to
remove unwanted noise in the dv/v attribute (Figure 2).
The 4D mask is a combination of several types of data: lithology classification, reservoir model
facies, and 4D seismic energy.
The lithology classification is carried out using a supervised Bayesian classification scheme. It is
based on sand/shale Probability Density Functions (PDFs) that are defined from a cross-plot of elastic
properties (Figure 3). Unfortunately in this field, PDFs overlap significantly for water-sands and
shales. Furthermore, the well training set for water-sands is poorly defined as the majority of original
log sample points correspond to oil-bearing sands. Discriminating water-bearing sands from shalesbecomes therefore very uncertain using this cross-plot-based approach only.
Figure 2 an example of unwanted noise in the
dv/v attribute. Below a strong anomaly due to
production, another anomaly is visible below a
reservoir without any production or injection.Figure 3 Cross plot of Vp/Vs versus P-wave
impedance showing PDFs and log data points
corresponding to water-sands, oil-sands, gas-sands and shales.
In order to reduce potentially large uncertainties in the cross-plot-based approach, the initial (before
production) reservoir model was used to constrain the lihology classification. Fluid contacts are
integrated in the reservoir model, based on well information or Direct Hydrocarbon Indicators. For a
given reservoir unit, all cells located below the oil-water contacts are flagged as water-bearing sands.
The reservoir model was converted from depth to time. After careful validation of the seismic-to-
reservoir grid tie in the time domain, the water-sand distribution from the reservoir model was
integrated in the sand/shale 4D mask (Figure 4).
Accounting for water-bearing sands is critical, in order to properly define the initial model for
inversion of the monitor data and especially to allow mapping of water injection in water. To finalise
the sand-shale classification, a lithofacies cube based on a Total proprietary classification algorithm
72ndEAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010
Barcelona, Spain, 14 - 17 June 2010
-
7/30/2019 4D Pre-Stack Inversion Workflow Integrating Reservoir Model Control and Lithology Supervised Classification
4/5
was also integrated into the 4D mask. This lithofacies cube is used to optimize well locations and has
proven to be very predictive in oil-bearing reservoirs.
In addition to the lithology component of the 4D mask, 4D seismic information was introduced in
form of 4D energy. A threshold was applied to the cube of 4D seismic energy, computed from the
difference between the 1999 base and the 2008 warped seismic monitor. The dv/v is then only used in
areas where the 4D energy is greater than the threshold. As a result, isolated dv/v values, outside
sands and outside areas of significant 4D energy are not used to build the initial monitor model,
before inversion. An example of the final 4D mask is shown Figure 5.
Figure 4 Lithology discrimination integrating
information from reservoir model for water-
bearing sand (in blue).
Figure 5 example of the 4D mask. In red, areas
where 4D initial differences between base and
monitor models will be introduced through the
dv/v.
4D global inversion applied uses a CCGVeritas proprietary algorithm that optimizes a multi-vintage
cost function that combines several terms. Time-lapse coupling of the inversion scheme is achieved
by restricting the range of perturbations between successive surveys according to user-specified
constraints. Specifically, between each consecutive vintage, perturbations are restricted to specific
min-max intervals of expected variations of density and P- and S-wave velocity. These intervals were
directly derived from a 4D rock-physics model and reservoir simulations performed. Simulated
reservoir parameters (fluid saturations, pressure, ) at the time of the 4D and at initial reservoir state
are used as inputs of the rock-physics model which predicts the corresponding density, P-wave and S-
wave velocity ranges in the reservoirs. Final inverted impedance variations are limited by this a priori
range of property variations.
Figure 6Example of simulated relative P and S
wave impedance variations between initial state
of reservoir and time of 4D seismic survey. The
cross-plot is computed from simulated reservoir
properties and a 4D rock-physics model.
In the 4D inversion workflow the 4D mask is used to create the initial monitor model, and can be used
during the inversion process in order to impose areas where no impedance variations are allowed. The
dv/v cube showed several places with significant 4D anomalies that had not been classified as
reservoir in the lithology classification cubes. Therefore there was a danger of the mask being too
restrictive in the actual 4D inversion process. 4D inversion tests without the mask confirmed theanomalies observed in the dv/v cube and also led to a decrease of residuals in these places. Therefore
72ndEAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010
Barcelona, Spain, 14 - 17 June 2010
-
7/30/2019 4D Pre-Stack Inversion Workflow Integrating Reservoir Model Control and Lithology Supervised Classification
5/5
72ndEAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010
it was decided to use the 4D mask only for the initial monitor model building, but to run the final 4D
inversion in a more data-driven way, without a deterministic mask..
Example of 4D inversion result
Preliminary analysis of the 4D inversion results provided new information, compared to previous
attributes. In general, 4D inversion allows a better fine tuning of 4D anomalies with less noise. In
particular the image from 4D inversion around water-injectors is generally of better quality than the
image obtained on previous attributes, like dv/v, as shown on Figure 6: the anomalies visible on the
4D inversion are better aligned with sands. Moreover, the positive anomaly associated with injected
water was extending towards the reservoir top on dv/v, which was not consistent with gravitational
segregation. Relative P-impedance from inversion brings a more relevant image.
Figure 7 example of 4D inversion result. a: bandpass P-impedance (oil sands in yellow, brown.
shales in green. Debris flows and basal lags in blue). b: dv/v from warping. c: relative P-impedance
variation from 4D inversion.
Conclusions
An innovative 4D pre-stack inversion workflow was built. Specific properties of the studied field(huge time-shifts due to gas coming out of solution, various turbiditic contexts) implied building a
composite warping result, a mandatory step to build the initial monitor model for 4D inversion. The
pre-stack 4D inversion workflow not only integrates seismic information, but also well information,
used to discriminate sand from shale during the 4D mask building, and a 4D rock-physics model.
Moreover, because water-bearing sands are hard to discriminate from shales in some of the field
reservoirs, information from the reservoir grid was also introduced in the process. All these different
steps were carefully validated. On top of the technical challenges, operational deadlines were met as a
result of close interaction between TOTAL E&P ANGOLA, CGGVeritas teams in Luanda and
TOTAL Headquarters. Preliminary analyses of 4D pre-stack inversion results already show
encouraging results.
Acknowledgements:Total thanks the block concessionaire, Sonangol and its partners Statoil, ExxonMobil and BP for their
authorization to publish this work.
ReferencesMcInally, A., Kunka, J., Garnham, J., Redondo-Lopez, T., and Stenstrup-Hansen, L., 2001. Tracking Production Changes in
a turbidite Reservoir Using 4D Elastic Inversion, 63rdEAGE Conference And ExhibitionRutledal, H., Helgesen, J., and Buran, H., 2003. 4D Elastic Inversion helps locate in-fill wells at Oseberg field, First Break,Vol. 21, N8, August 2003.
Lumley, D., Adams, D., Meadows, M., Cole, S. and Ergas, R., 4D Seismic Pressure-Saturation Inversion at Gullfaks field,Norway, First Break, Vol 21, N9, September 2003.
Williamson, P.R., Cherrett, A.J., Sexton, P.A., 2007, A New Approach to Warping for Quantitative TimeLapseCharacterisation, EAGE, Expanded Abstracts
Lafet, Y., Roure, B., Doyen, P.M., and Buran, H., 2009, Global 4-D seismic inversion and time-lapse fluid classification.SEG Expanded Abstracts.
Barcelona, Spain, 14 - 17 June 2010