4500presentation1.ppt
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
VENTURE CAPITAL ANDPOST IPO PERFORMANCE
Group A-8
David Allison #100326780
Donaldo Madrid #100292425
Eghan Rashidi #100321747
Suzanne Robertson #100621555
Victor Samuel #100326398
![Page 3: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Agenda
• Introduction• Previous Studies• Benefits of Venture Capital financing on
start-up firms• Methodology and Data• Results• Implications of study and policy issues• Conclusion• Question
![Page 4: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Literature Review
• Main objective was to compare post-IPO performance of venture-backed firms to that of non-venture backed firms
• To develop a model that will measure the success of a firm’s post-IPO performance that accounts for both venture capital financing and the role of the venture capitalists
![Page 5: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Post-IPO Performance of Venture Capital Firms
Brav and Gompers (1997)
• Results found that venture-backed IPOs over a five year period outperformed non-venture backed IPOs only when using equally weighted returns
• Underperformance of non-venture backed is not an IPO effect, it is an industry and firm effect
![Page 6: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Post-IPO Performance of Venture Capital Firms
Da Silva Rosa, Velaythuen and Walter (2003)• Studied the strength and validation of Brav and
Gompers (1997)• No indications that the long-run performance of
venture capital and non-venture capital-backed IPOs was based on their industry
• Concluded that in the long-run, venture capital-backed firms outperform non-venture capital-backed firms
![Page 7: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Post-IPO Performance of Venture Capital Firms
Florin (2005)
• Examined the difference in post IPO performance comparing firms that had received venture capital financing to firms that did not
• Marginal differences were concluded to be insignificant
![Page 8: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Monitoring and Reputations of the Venture Capitalists
Brau et al. (2004)
• Found that experience and monitoring of the venture capitalists has no effect on the success of a firm
• Findings were inconsistent
Jain and Kini (1995)
• In the aftermarket venture capital-backed IPOs have stronger operating performance
• Non-venture capital-backed firms experience a decline in operating profits
![Page 9: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Monitoring and Reputations of the Venture Capitalists
Jain and Kini (2000)
• Completed a survival analysis which resulted that venture capital-backed firms have a higher survival rate post-IPO
• This is because of prestige, reputation and monitoring of the venture capitalists
![Page 10: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Literature Review Conclusion
• Enabled us to better understand how venture capital and capitalists help in the survival of a firm post-IPO
• The trend is that firms that have had venture capital as a source of financing prior to the IPO have a better rate of survival post IPO
![Page 11: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Benefits of Venture Capital
•More than just financial value is brought to the firm- expertise, experience, contacts, and credibility
•Venture capitalists can play an integral role in helping the firm in its strategic decisions by bringing knowledge and experience from running other firms
•Efficiently monitoring and overseeing strategy as a counter to managers’ entrenchment and cognitive limitations
![Page 12: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Benefits of Venture Capital• Corporate governance: venture capitalists add
detailed knowledge to the development and growth of the firm
• Can also establish contractual constraints on management decisions
• A greater stake in the firm can increase incentives for more effective oversight
• The quality of due diligence and participation in corporate governance can send a positive signal to the markets
![Page 13: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Two Perspectives
• The Certification/Monitoring model
– (Megginson & Weiss, 1991; Lin, 1996; Lerner, 1994; Jain & Kini, 1995; Brav & Gompers, 1997)
• The Adverse Selection/Grandstanding model
– (Amit et. al., 1990; Gompers, 1996)
![Page 14: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Another Perspective
• Lange, Bygrave, et. al. (2001) found that top venture capitalists, combined with top underwriters, also contribute to the success of a firm.
![Page 15: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Hypothesis
• Venture capital-backed firms will exhibit superior financial and equity returns relative to non-venture-backed firms
![Page 16: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Methodology
• Fama French (1992)…
• Generalized Least Squares (GLS) estimator
• Dummy Variable
• Expected Returns
• Significance test (t-test)
![Page 17: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Data
• Thompson/Mergent and Yahoo! Finance
• Indices ( NYSE, AMEX, NASDAQ, Wilshire 5000)
• 2001- #US Firms IPO
• 2003-BV, ME, Market Beta
• #VC-Backed # non-VC backed
![Page 18: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Results
• There is enough evidence from the data to suggest at a 0.10, 0.05, or 0.01 level of significance that venture-backed firms had higher returns than non-venture-backed firms– P-value of 0.004
• Also evidence that venture-backed firms had lower unsystematic risk
![Page 19: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Table of regression results R-SQUARE = 0.4593 R-SQUARE ADJUSTED = 0.4161
VARIABLE ESTIMATED STANDARD T-RATIO
NAME COEFFICIENT ERROR 50 DF P-VALUE
CG -2.48E-02 7.94E-03 -3.122 0.003
BG 1.97E-04 1.55E-03 0.1269 0.9
LNMEG 1.34E-03 3.62E-04 3.705 0.001
LNBTMG -1.34E-03 4.09E-04 -3.289 0.002
DVCG 3.98E-03 1.34E-03 2.978 0.004
R-SQUARE = 0.4592 R-SQUARE ADJUSTED = 0.4273
VARIABLE ESTIMATED STANDARD T-RATIO
NAME COEFFICIENT ERROR 51 DF P-VALUE
CG -2.46E-02 7.76E-03 -3.174 0.003
LNMEG 1.34E-03 3.58E-04 3.742 0.000
LNBTMG -1.34E-03 4.03E-04 -3.324 0.002
DVCG 3.98E-03 1.32E-03 3.009 0.004
![Page 20: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Proof of Unsystematic Risk
• Total risk = unsystematic + systematic risk
• Total risk measured in variance or st. dev.
• Systematic risk measured in market beta
• VB st. dev = 0.0958, NVB st. dev = 0.0868
• VB mkt beta = 0.783,NVB mkt beta =0.582
• Since total risk is very close, but VB has higher systematic risk, suggests VB has less unsystematic risk
• Consistent with theory
![Page 21: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
IPOs on London’s Alternative Market
• Many venture-backed Canadian firms issue their IPOs on the London Stock Exchange’s Alternative Investment Market (AIM)
• Issue on AIM because of institutional investors interests in small-growth firms
• About 34 Canadian companies on AIM including Ottawa based Ubiquity Software Inc. & March Networks
![Page 22: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Success of IPO’s on AIM
• 2005 - the value of IPO’s on AIM more than doubled from $2.37 billion to $5.63 billion
• International IPO’s increased to 76 from 40
• Value of international IPO’s has quadrupled from $2.09 billion to $529.5 billion
• 2005 - AIM’s listing rose 60% compared with TSX Venture growth rate of only 16%
![Page 23: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Advantages and Disadvantages of issuing on AIM
• ADVANTAGES• Pursues listings from a
wide variety of sectors• “Light regulation” &
“User Friendly”• European investors are
less skeptical about high-tech startups
• Faster to issue IPO
DISADVANTAGES• Financial statements filed
semi-annually, not quarterly
• Not subject to CEO/CFO or internal control certification
• Analysis and management discussion not required
![Page 24: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Implications
• Government should create policy to induce Canadian venture start-ups to IPO in Canada not overseas
• Policy suggestions:– Semi-annual reporting for first few years
• High costs associated with current regulations
– Tax incentives for investors– Examine Canadian security regulations to
attempt to increase liquidity
![Page 25: 4500Presentation1.ppt](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061219/54b9ed244a795920738b4573/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
QUESTIONS