444: engineered exosomes efficiently deliver stat6 ......e x o s o m e s o n l y e x o a s o s c r a...
TRANSCRIPT
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
444: ENGINEERED EXOSOMES EFFICIENTLY DELIVER STAT6 ANTISENSE OLIGONUCLEOTIDES TO TUMOR ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGES (TAMS) RESULTING IN POTENT LOCAL AND SYSTEMIC ANTI-TUMOR ACTIVITYSushrut Kamerkar1, Charan Leng1, Olga Burenkova1, Su Chul Jang1,Christine McCoy1, Tong Zi1, Kelvin Zhang1, William Dahlberg1, Kyriakos Economides1, Timothy Soos1, Dalia Burzyn1, Sriram Sathyanarayanan1
1Codiak BioSciences, Cambridge, MA
Session: Oligonucleotide TherapeuticsAbstract Number: 444
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
Introduction
2
Anti-tumoralF
att
y A
cid
Pro-tumoral
LP
S
Tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) are potent drivers of an
immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment
Experimental therapies targeting TAM differentiation, recruitment or survival
have shown marginal anti tumor efficacy
Alternative approach→ reprogramming from an immunosuppressive M2 to an
anti-tumoral pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype
Targeting key TAM transcription factor STAT6 could
effectively reprogram M2 macrophages to anti-tumoral M1 macrophages
Codiak has developed novel, engineered exosomes that
selectively deliver antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) targeting STAT6, to M2 macrophages
exoASO™
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
Exosomes mediate preferential delivery of ASOs to myeloid cells and TAMs in vivo
3
B c
ells
T cel
ls
NK c
ells
Monocy
tes
gMDSC/n
eutrophil
mM
DSCs
CD11
b+ DCs
CD11
b- DCs
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
Cy
5 M
FI (
min
us
PB
S c
on
tro
l)
Exo ASO
Free ASO
✱✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱
11x
11x12x
B c
ell
T cel
l
NK c
ell
Mac
s
Red
pulp
mac
s
Monocy
tes
mM
DSC
gMDSCs/
neutr
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
Cy
5 M
FI (
min
us
PB
S c
on
tro
l)
Exo ASO
Free ASO
✱✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱✱✱✱✱
3.5x 2.2x2.7x
CD45
-
CD11
b+
Mac
rophag
es
CD11
b-
Mac
rophag
es B c
ells
T cel
ls
0
5000
10000
15000
2000040000
50000
60000
Cy
5 M
FI (
min
us
PB
S c
on
tro
l)
Exo ASOFree ASO
✱✱
6x
✱✱✱✱
12x
CD45
-
Kupffe
r ce
lls
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
Cy
5 M
FI (
min
us
P
BS
co
ntr
ol)
Exo ASO
Free ASO✱
✱✱✱
9x
CD45
-
Mac
rophag
es
NK c
ells
T cel
lsDCs
B c
ells
mM
DSCs
gMDSCs
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
Cy
5 M
FI (
min
us
P
BS
co
ntr
ol) Exo ASO
Free ASO
✱
✱✱✱
✱✱✱✱
1.3x
3.5x
5x
BLOOD (IV) LIVER (IV) SPLEEN (IV)
BONE MARROW (IV) TUMOR (IV)
A B C
D E
Exosome tropism to myeloid cells promotes selective delivery of
ASOs. A-E: BALB/c mice bearing CT26 subcutaneous (SC) tumors
received one intravenous (IV) dose (8μg) of fluorescently-labeled Cy5
exoASO or free ASO. One hour later, peripheral blood (A), liver (B),
spleen (C), bone marrow (D) and tumor (E) were dissected and
enzymatically digested, and cell suspensions analyzed by flow cytometry.
****, P < 0.0001, ***, P < 0.001, **, P < 0.01 and *, P < 0.05 by two-way
ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test.
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
Effective and durable STAT6 silencing in TAMs by exoASO-STAT6
4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Timepoint (Days)
No
rmalize
d %
Pro
tein
exp
ress
ion
(h
ST
AT
6)
1Day 10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
102 103 104
concentration (nM)
No
rmalized
% g
en
e e
xp
ressio
n (h
ST
AT
6)
0
4 days
7 days
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Timepoint (Days)
No
rmalized
% P
rote
in e
xp
ressio
n (m
ST
AT
6)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Timepoint (Days)
No
rmalize
d %
Pro
tein
exp
ress
ion
(h
ST
AT
6)
exoASO-STAT6 2.5 uM
STAT6 Free ASO 2.5 uM
exoASO-Scramble 2.5 uM
Day 7
A B CHuman M2 Macrophages Mouse M2 Macrophages Cyno M2 Macrophages
2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 3 4
Potent and durable knockdown of STAT6 across species. Human monocyte derived M2 macrophages (A), mouse bone marrow derived M2 macrophages (B),
and cynomolgus monkey monocyte derived M2 macrophages (C) were incubated for 24h with equivalent doses of exoASO STAT6 and free STAT6 ASO, along with
an exoASO Scramble control. Expression of STAT6 protein was quantified over time by automated western blot (WES™). Legend: (1: exoASO STAT6, 2: Free
STAT6 ASO, 3: exoASO Scramble, 4: Untreated)
Day 3
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
Potent monotherapy activity by exoASO-STAT6 treatment in CT26 tumors
5
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Days post re-challenge(Mice rechallenged 42 days post first tumor inoculation)
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me, m
m3
Control (Naive)
exoASO STAT6 TIW (2wk) 6ug (n=7)
exoASO STAT6 BIW (3wk) 6ug (n=8)
A B C
8 12 16 20 24
0
400
800
1200
1600
Days Post Tumor Implantation
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me, m
m3
PBS TIW (2wk)
exoASO Scramble TIW (2wk) 6ug
exoASO STAT6 TIW (2wk) 6ug
exoASO STAT6 BIW (3wk) 6ug
10 20 30 40
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Days Post Tumor Implantation
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me, m
m3
10 20 30 40
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Days Post Tumor Implantation
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me, m
m3
PBS
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6 18 ug
exoASO STAT6 6 ug
exoASO STAT6 2 ug
exoASO STAT6 0.67 ug
exoASO STAT6 0.22 ug
Exo Only
Monotherapy efficacy in CT26 is dependent on cumulative dose and induces immunological memory. CT26 tumor cells were implanted SC in the flanks of
mice (n=10 per group). A: Tumor growth volumes of mice injected intratumorally with PBS, exosomes only, exoASO Scramble (6ug) (BIW, 3wk) or exoASO STAT6
(0.22, 0.67, 2, 6 and 18ug) (BIW, 3wk), n=10 mice per group. B: Tumor growth volumes of mice injected intratumorally with PBS (TIW, 2wk), exoASO STAT6 (6ug)
(BIW, 3wk) or (TIW, 2wk) or exoASO Scramble (6ug) (TIW, 2wk). C: Tumor growth volumes of mice re-challenged with CT26 tumors on the opposite flank of
complete responders from B, naïve Balb/C mice bearing SC CT26 tumors were used as controls. (BIW: 2x a week, TIW: 3x a week)
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
exoASO-STAT6 monotherapy efficacy in CT26 tumors is CD8 T-cell dependent
6
5 10 15 20 25
0
1000
2000
3000
Days Post Tumor Implantation
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me, m
m3
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Tu
mo
r G
row
th R
ate
******
5 10 15 20 25
0
1000
2000
3000
Days Post Tumor Implantation
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me, m
m3
exoASO Scramble (6ug) + All Isotypes
exoASO Scramble (6ug) + antiCD8
exoASO Scramble (6ug) + antiCD4
exoASO STAT6 (6ug) + All Isotypes
exoASO STAT6 (6ug) + antiCD8
exoASO STAT6 (6ug) + antiCD4
A B
Monotherapy efficacy in CT26 is dependent on CD8 T-cells. CT26 tumor cells were implanted SC in the flanks of mice (n=10 per group). A-B: Tumor growth
volumes (A) and tumor growth rates (B) of after CD8 and CD4 T cell depletion, injected intratumorally with either exoASO Scramble (6ug) (TIW, 2wk) or exoASO
STAT6 (6ug) (TIW, 2wk). Mice received one dose of 10mg/kg of anti-CD8 or anti-CD4 antibody, or 10mg/kg of isotype control antibody, prior to IT injections, and
BIW thereafter. ****, P < 0.0001, **, P < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (BIW: 2x a week).
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
exoASO-STAT6 monotherapy results in remodeling of the tumor microenvironment in CT26 tumors
7
exoASO STAT6exoASO Scramble
Retnla (Fizz-1) (M2)
Nos2 (M1)
exoASO STAT6exoASO Scramble
exoASO Scramble exoASO STAT6
Intra tumoral administration of exoASO STAT6 leads to remodeling of the tumor microenvironment
in CT26. CT26 tumor cells were implanted SC in the flanks of mice (n=3 mice per group). exoASO STAT6
(6ug) and exoASO Scramble (6ug) were dosed IT, (TIW, 1 week). A: tSNE plots from scRNA seq data, of
intra tumoral cells from exoASO Scramble or exoASO STAT6 group, to identify individual immune cell
populations. B: tSNE plots from data from (A), showing global changes in expression of Nos2 and Retnla
(Fizz-1) in immune cell populations
AB
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
Systemic administration of exoASO-STAT6 results in monotherapy activity in HCC orthotopic model
8
D0
Inoculation
IV injection, TIWx2, 6 total
D3 D14 D16
IP injection, DIWx2, 4 total
Randomization
End of Study
EXOSOMES ONLY SCRAMBLE EXOASO
STAT6 EXOASO
Exo
som
es O
nly
exoA
SO S
cram
ble
exoA
SO S
TAT6
0
10
20
30
40
LW/BW ratio
% L
ive
r w
eig
ht/
Bo
dy w
eig
ht ****
****
Untr
eate
d
aCSF1R
aPD-1
0
10
20
30
40
LW/BW ratio
Exoso
mes
Only
exoA
SO S
cram
ble
exoA
SO
STA
T6
0
20
40
60
80
% Tumor cells
% T
um
or
cells
*******
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
A
B C
Anti-tumor monotherapy activity and reprogramming of the TME by exoASO STAT6 in HCC . Hepa1-6 cells were implanted in the livers of C57BL/6J by partial
hepactectomy, followed by splenectomy (n=8 mice per group). ExoASOs (12ug/dose) and exosomes only were administered by intravenous injections, while
antibodies were dosed intraperitoneally following dosing regimen in (A). A: Dosing scheme. B: Efficacy as determined by % of liver weight/body weight ratio, images
of resected livers at end point. C: Percentage (%) of tumor cells as calculated by Halo Imaging Analysis Platform from H&E-stained sections of livers ****, P <
0.0001, ***, P < 0.001, **, P < 0.01 and *, P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
Systemic administration of exoASO STAT6-in HCC tumor model results in iNOS induction and reprogramming of the TME
9
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Stat6
No
rmalized
ST
AT
6 m
RN
A e
xp
ressio
n
********
-4 -2 0 2 4 6
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Log 2 (Fold change exoASO STAT6 vs exoASO Scramble baseline)
-lo
g10
(P
valu
e) Myc Cd276
Ccl17
Mmp9
Cd3e
Cd8aCd8b1
Cd3gCd3dTgfb1
Cd86Cd80
p<0.05
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
50
100
150
200
250
Ccl17
mR
NA
no
rmalized
lin
ear
co
un
ts ****
*
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Myc
mR
NA
no
rmalized
lin
ear
co
un
ts ********
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
50
100
150
200
Cd276
mR
NA
no
rmalized
lin
ear
co
un
ts *******
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
100
200
300
400
Icos
mR
NA
no
rmalized
lin
ear
co
un
ts
*****
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
Cell proliferation
Cell P
rolife
rati
on
Sco
re ********
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
TGF beta Signaling
TG
F b
eta
Sig
nalin
g S
co
re
********
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
50
100
150
200
250
CD8 T cell
CD
8 T
ce
ll S
co
re
***
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
100
200
300
400
500
Cytotoxic cells
Cyto
toxic
cells S
co
re
**
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
% FoxP3+ T cells
% F
oxP
3+
cells
**
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
5
10
15
20
% CD8+ T cells
% C
D8
+ c
ells
****
CD
8/D
AP
I
Exosomes Only exoASO Scramble exoASO STAT6
Fo
xP
3/D
AP
IS
TA
T6/D
AP
I
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
20
40
60
80
100
% Stat6 +ve cells
% S
tat6
+ c
ell
s
******
iNO
S
Exosomes Only
exoASO Scramble
exoASO STAT6
0
10
20
30
% iNOS+ in tumor
% N
os
2
**
DA
B C
Anti-tumor monotherapy activity and reprogramming of the TME by exoASO STAT6 in HCC A-B: Gene
expression analysis (A) and pathway and cell type scoring (B) by Nanostring using the nCounter Mouse PanCancer IO
360 panel from whole liver tissue. C: STAT6 knockdown in whole liver tissue at study end point. D: Expression of
STAT6, CD8, FoxP3 and iNOS by IHC.
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use
exoASO™: A novel engineered exosome therapeutic
10
• exoASO is a novel, engineered exosome that can
selectively deliver antisense oligonucleotides to
tumor associated M2 macrophages.
• exoASO enables selective silencing of STAT6, a key
transcription factor that controls the
immunosuppressive program.
• Effective silencing of STAT6 both in vitro and in vivo,
and across species, lead to the modulation of key
factors involved in the M2→M1 transition
• Intratumoral administration of exoASO-STAT6 resulted
in a potent monotherapy response that is dependent
on cumulative dose
• exoASO STAT6 treatment induced immunological
memory, and demonstrated an establishment of an
adaptive anti-tumor response mediated by cytotoxic
CD8 T cells
exoASO™
exoASOs against STAT6 represent a first-in-class strategy to target tumor-
associated myeloid cells in a highly selective manner
• Single cell RNA sequencing confirmed an
increase in Nos2+ macrophage population, and
a reduction in Retnla (Fizz1)+ macrophage
population
Codiak Proprietary Information – Not for Further Dissemination or Use 11