4207-13730-4-pb
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
1/9
Received 19 March 2013, revised 14 Ma 2013, onine pubished 19 Ju 2013
Deence Science Journa, Vo. 63, No. 4, Ju 2013, pp. 346-354 2013, DESIDOC
1. IntroDuCtIon
The primar objective o an aunch vehice is to deiver
the Paoad to the desired target within the given toerance
bounds. Since the rst use of ballistic missile in 1940s, a lot of
innovation has gone in the deveopment o more sophisticated
guidance, contro, navigation agorithms to enhance the
range, accurac, reiabiit, etc., In view o the current
working scenario there is a demand or the maneuver during
ight (trajectory reshaping) such that the mission objectivesare achieved without an compromise on the mission end
objective. A typical in-ight mid-course maneuver scenario
is shown in fig. 1, where the trajector in bue coor is the
one which is going to be oowed b the vehice i there is no
intentiona maneuver (non-maneuvering) is executed on board
and the trajector in green coor is the intentiona maneuver
trajector which is hard to predict as compared to the non-
maneuvering trajector.
A reentr vehice approaches at a ver high veocit,
tpica veocities varing rom 5 Km/s - 7 Km/s based on the
seected trajector, downrange, guidance mechanism empoed
in the design procedure1. But with growth o computing power,
more powerful and reliable estimation (prediction) and ltering
techniques are avaiabe toda b virtue o which it is possibeto predict the trajector o the reentr vehice we ahead and
take some advance corrective measures.
Optimization based trajector panning and tracking the
reerence trajector using dnamic inversion guidance aws are
proposed b Ran2, et al. In the paper the author describes the re-
ral tim Mid-cs Mav ad Gidac f a Gic ry Vicl
Avinash Chander* and I.V. Muraikrishna#
*Defence Research and Development Organisation, New Delhi-110 001, India#Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad-500 085, India
*E-mail: [email protected]
AbStrACt
The aim of any mission is to accomplish the nal objective with desired accuracy and the same is valid for ageneric aunch vehice. In man missions it is necessar to execute mid-course maneuvers with an intentiona diversiontrajectory to create a counter measure or to avoid certain specic known geographical locations. The current workeaborates a nove and practica impementabe mid-course maneuver and an ascent phase guidance o a reentrvehicle executing an in-ight determined mid-course maneuver (trajectory reshaping) without compromising theaccuracy of the nal achieved target position. The robustness of the algorithm is validated with 6DoF simulationresuts b considering the dispersion o the burnout state vector conditions which arises due to variations in thrust
prole, aerodynamics characteristics of the vehicle, atmosphere, etc.
Kywds: Ascent phase guidance, mid-course maneuver, reentr vehice, termina accurac, range augmentation,trajector reshaping.
Fig 1. nmalizd ajcy f a -mavig ad mav vicl.
NormalizedAltitude
Normaized Downrange
346
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
2/9
CHANDER& MURAlIKRISHNA: REAl TIME MID-COURSEMANEUVER AND GUIDANCE Of A GENERIC REENTRy VEHIClE
347
entr vehice trajector panning and guidance b considering
the path constraints ike aerodnamics heating, aerodnamic
load, etc., in r-V plane with an aero assisted conguration.
Gao Changsheng3, et al. describes a virtua dispacement
concept based reentr vehice guidance using optimization
technique and lQG based tracking o the reerence trajector.
Page & Rogers4 summarizes a ew investigations carried out
in guidance and contro o maneuvering reentr vehices b
considering cross-product, proportiona and tangent cubicguidance mechanisms having cruciform, bank to turn and xed
trim control congurations.
Expicit re-entr guidance equations or maneuvering re-
entr vehices (MaRVs) using characteristic curve approach
is deveoped Cameron5. Whie ormuating the guidance it
is ensured that termina trajector constraints on path anges
and it acceeration and its derivatives are achieved. Variabe
gain vector guidance equations are estabished b orcing
termina equation structure to be simiar to the characteristic
curve equations. But the stud doesnt consider the imitation
on aerodnamic capabiit, maximum acceeration imit nor
did an energ management requirement and it assume that this
tpe o characteristic curve cas or ess acceeration or argerange to go than that or sma range to go.
A practica impementabe agorithm described in the
current paper describes methodology to execute the in-ight
determined maneuver o the vehice and to guide the vehice in
the ascent phase to its predetermined target accurate with in
the desired toerance bounds. The basis o the current approach
reies on the capabiit o simuating the rea time scenario o
the vehice dnamics in the background simuation rom the
burnout point6,7 to the desired target point.
2. DeSIGn MethoDoLoGY
Most o the cassica aunch vehice guidance agorithms
re on required veocit vector concept8, which acts as basis
or hit equation6 to be soved in order to reach the desired target.
Once this required veocit vector is cacuated, the desired
burnout position and burnout ight path angle are determined9.
The innovative undering concept o the proposed agorithm
is performing an in-ight dened maneuver during the mid-
course (ater apogee i.e., decent phase) b keeping in view o
the paoad capabiities.
The duration o maneuver can be decided based ontempora or spatia means. I the duration o maneuver is based
on time then the maneuver wi be open oop orm, because the
time of ight of the vehicle will vary based on the propulsion
characteristics, range, burnout conditions. I the duration o
maneuver is a unction o atitude/range then the maneuver wi
be in cosed orm, because the aim o the paoad to impact
the desired coordinates at the predened altitude, irrespective
o time. The predetermined maneuver can be an reaizabe
unction ike sinusoida, puse, trianguar, exponentia, etc. as
shown in fig. 2. I the maneuver is o sinusoida the variabe
parameters are maneuver ampitude and requenc, i the
maneuver is puse then the variabe parameter is the puse
ampitude and i the maneuver is exponentia then the variabeparameter is the deca or rise sope o the maneuver. Maneuver
can be executed by a variable or xed thruster at center of
gravit or cose to center o gravit. Generic representation o
the maneuver unction is given beow:
Z=F(a, f, y) (1)
where
Z = Maneuver unction
a = Ampitude o the considered maneuver unction
f= frequenc o the considered maneuver unction
y = Independent variabe (time, atitude, downrange)
Vaues o the a & are decided b the vehice propusive
capabiit and the extent o dispersion panned and seection
Fig 2. Pdmid mav fcis as a fci f malizd im ad alid.
Generic Maneuver function
PredeterminedManeuver
PredeterminedM
aneuver
Normaized Atitude Normaized Atitude
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
3/9
DEf. SCI. J., VOl. 63, NO. 4, JUly 2013
348
of maneuver function can be random in selection but denite
once seected. Once the determined maneuver initiation point,
duration and the maneuver function is nalized, initiate the
background simuation rom the burnout point to the target.
During the simuation, initiate the determined maneuver rom
the determined initiation point up to maneuver duration point
(time, atitude). With this maneuver, compute the dierence
in the desired and achieved atitude and ongitude at the impact
point. Augment the ascent phase target coordinates with theabove computed dierence vaues in atitude and ongitude and
sove the hit equation (initiate the ascent phase guidance) with
this augmented coordinates and repeat the above procedure
ti convergence criteria is met. Because o the mid-course
maneuver there wi be a change in the guidance soution
(burnout conditions) to reach the desired target, which can
be seen as the perturbation on the initia soution as shown
beow7.
( ) ( )( )0
2
sin1 cos
sin sin
r
a
f + f f + f= +
(2)
where
r0 = (a+h) = missie position rom the center o the eartha = equatoria radius (m), h = vehice atitude rom the
surace o the earth2
0r v
GM =
G = Universa gravitationa constant
= range angle = ight path angle at burn out
f = Augmented range ange corresponding to change innal coordinates
The steps invoved in the proposed agorithm are given
beow:
(i) With the desired burnout state vector as the initia
states, simuate the vehice trajector up to the desired
predetermined atitude, rom where determined maneuver
is panned.(ii) from predetermined atitude start o maneuver to
the termination o the maneuver, superimpose a
predetermined pseudo random maneuver (varing
ampitude and requenc with atitude as the reerence) to
the actua attitude. During this maneuver period, activate
thruster provided in the paoad (tpica caed veocit
package10) or side thrusters ocated at the center o gravit
(i known accurate) can be used.
(iii) Once the predetermined attitude maneuver period
competed, deactivate the thruster and simuate the vehice
trajector up to the impact point. Note the achieved
atitude and ongitude.
(iv) find the dierence between the desired and achieved
atitude and ongitude, and augment the desired coordinates
with this dierence vaues.
(v) Repeat the steps rom I to IV ti the dierence between
the desired and achieved atitude and ongitude ie within
the desired toerance bounds.
3. MAtheMAtICAL MoDeLLInG oF the
PAYLoAD VehICLe
for the current work a standard noninear 6Dof
mathematica mode with 3 orces and 3 moments is
considered11. In order to make the simuation more reaistic
a noninear aerodnamic mode is considered, where the
drag and aerodnamic orces are modeed as the unctions o
atitude, ange o attack and Mach number. The earth shape and
rotationa eects12 are incuded in the simuation as the time o
trave is variabe which, i not accounted correct, eads to tens
o kiometers range errors13. A universa earth gravit mode
up to J214 term is considered to take care o earth gravitationa
eects, which is a unction o coatitude and atitude.Reentry atmospheric effects play a signicant role during
reentr, as the veocit with which the vehice reenters is ver
high, in order to take care o this unwanted aerodnamic eects
because o atmosphere, a more eaborate atmospheric mode15
is considered or simuation. In order to take care o wind
eects during the reentr phase, a reaistic wind mode 16 is
considered or studies. To assess the perormance accurate a
reaistic inertia navigation mode17 is incuded in the simuation
taking care o rea time hardware eatures (acceerometer or
acceeration, groscope or rate). A noninear reaction contro
sstem and iquid veocit package modes are considered or
the simuation studies.
( )
( )
( )
( )( )
( )( )
( ),
fx fx
x
fy fy
y
fz fz
z
T Dg
m
T A
m
T A
m
X U
g
u
v gw
X fMp x
Ixq
r M I I przy xIy
M I I pqz x yIz
= =
+
+
(3)
where u, v, w and p, q, r are transation and rotationa
components. Tfx
, Tfy
, Tfz
andAfy
, Afz
are thrust and aerodnamic
orce components.Dfx
is the drag orce action aong the bod
axia direction. m is the mass o the pa oad, gx, g
y, g
zare
the gravitationa components, andMx, M
y, M
zandI
x, I
y, I
zare
moment and inertia components respective
for the present stud, a 2 stage soid propeed aunch
vehicle with ex nozzle actuated control system is considered.
Once the soid propeed stages are separated ater propeent
got consumed, the paoad is controed b using a reaction
contro sstem powered b iquid thrusters, enabing the
exibility of switching on and off when desired. During the
ascent phase the vehice oows a preprogrammed attitude
turn keeping in view the initia constraints ike structura oad
&contro imitation, etc., Once the vehice attains the desired
reaxed conditions usua out o atmosphere, an expicit cosed
oop guidance8 wi guide and pace the vehice at burnout on
a desired ellipse (function of burnout position, velocity, ight
path ange &earth rotation rate compensated desired target
position), b virtue o which the vehices reaches the desired
target. With these desired burnout state vector, a back ground
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
4/9
CHANDER& MURAlIKRISHNA: REAl TIME MID-COURSEMANEUVER AND GUIDANCE Of A GENERIC REENTRy VEHIClE
349
6Dof agorithm is initiated iterative b using the proposed
agorithm, ti the 6Dof achieved impact atitude and ongitude
coincides with the desired ones as per the specied tolerance
bounds.
4. SIMuLAtIon reSuLtS
To vaidate the proposed agorithm, dierent burnout
conditions are considered or a given target as shown in Tabe
1. for the stud a sinusoid (quaternion
18
) with an ampitudeand requenc o 0.0001 Hz and 0.15 Hz is considered or
determined attitude maneuver. Here it shoud be noted that
the maneuver activation is based on atitude not on time, since
the trajector varies with burnout conditions and the guidance
probem considered or simuation is a ree time probem (i.e.,
the aim is to reach the target without an constraint on the time
of ight). The input amplitude and frequency are same for all
the three cases considered or simuation, but the trajector
parameters var based on burnout conditions i.e., veocit,
position, ight path angle, etc.
The thrust orce can be provided b a sma propusionpackage with respect to atitude. During maneuver phase, a
thruster with constant thrust orce o 20 KN is considered. Once
Cas
Sa vc a sa f
proposed algorithm (fight
pa agl, vlciy &
psii)
Dsid mial
cdiis
lc d
0.01o (dg)
Acivd mial cdiis
(wi mid-cs mav
dcpi algim) dcpi
ajcy (psd ag) (dg)
Acivd mial cdiis
(wi mid-cs mav
dcpi algim) acal
ajcy (acal ag) (dg)
BO
(D)
VBO
(m/s)
PBO
(m)latitude longitude latitude longitude latitude longitude
1 13.85 4658 6514670
41.488637 87.088686 41.366969 87.115274 41.482585 87.090507
(Desired -Achieved)
latitude & longitude0.121668 -0.026588 0.006051 -0.001821
2 16.07 4492 6519650
41.488637 87.088686 41.367018 87.111770 41.480964 87.088383
(Desired -Achieved)
latitude & longitude0.121619 -0.023084 0.007672 0.000303
3 13.55 4612 6526009
41.488637 87.088686 41.395181 87.115627 41.496412 87.089302
(Desired -Achieved)
latitude & longitude0.093455 -0.026941 -0.007775 -0.000616
tal 1. Diff cdiis a csidd f a giv ag
Fig 3. Cas 1 Alid vs laid ad lgid ajcy.
longitude (D)
longitude (D)latitude (D)
latitude (D)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Note: The trajectory (nal achieved coordinates) is sensitive to the burnout conditions and the band for burnout conditions considered for the
simuation is seected considering some variations o soid propusion.
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
5/9
DEf. SCI. J., VOl. 63, NO. 4, JUly 2013
350
the maneuver period is competed the thruster gets deactivated
and the vehice oows the baistic path there ater.
The execution o the determined maneuver or case 1
is shown in fig. 3. The trajector shown in bue coor is the
one which is generated b the paoad without an deception
maneuver and the green one is the one which is generated b
the paoad with a predetermined maneuver execution. from
the fig. 3 it is evident that the deception maneuver started at
150 km with a deviation rom the predicted trajector (buetrajector). The trajector shown in red coour is the background
6Dof trajector which provides the reerence or rea time
deception trajector (green trajector). The background and
rea time trajector are in tight agreement because o which
it is not possibe to see the dierence between red and green
trajectory in the gure(s). Finally the realtime trajectory
achieves the desired atitude and ongitude with in the given
toerance bounds. figure 4 shows the atitude variation or
with and without maneuver with respect to time. from the
data markings in the gure, it is clear that the difference in
the atitude between the non maneuvering and maneuvering
trajector is varing rom 0 km to 9 km rom 150 km atitude
point to impact point. This magnitude can be increased b an
additiona impuse in the maneuvering vehice.
The working o the agorithm or case 2 and case 3 areshown in figs 5 and 6. figures 5 and 6 shows the atitude and
ongitude variation with respect to atitude and it is cear rom
this gures that the algorithm drives the payload towards the
desired target rom the start o the deception point.
The robustness o the proposed agorithm under mode
uncertaint is studied b perturbing the wind, atmosphere
Fig 4. Cas 1 : tim vs alid.
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Time (s)
Time (s) Time(s) Time(s)
Fig 5. Cas 2 : Alid vs laid ad lgid ajcy.
latitude (D)
latitude (D)
longitude (D)
longitude (D)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
6/9
CHANDER& MURAlIKRISHNA: REAl TIME MID-COURSEMANEUVER AND GUIDANCE Of A GENERIC REENTRy VEHIClE
351
Fig 8. Cas 4 : Alid vs laid ad lgid.
Fig 6. Cas 3 : Alid vs laid ad lgid ajcy.
longitude (D)
longitude (D)latitude (D)
latitude (D)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Fig 7. Cas 4 : Alid vs wid vlciy, dsiy ad dag.
Zona Wind Veocit (m/s)Meridian Wind Veocit (m/s)
Deceeration (m/s2)Densit (kg/m3)
Altitude(Km
)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km
)
Altitude(Km)
longitude (D)latitude (D)
latitude (D) longitude (D)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
7/9
DEf. SCI. J., VOl. 63, NO. 4, JUly 2013
352
BO
(D)
VBO
(m/s)
PBO
(m)
13.85(D) 4658(m/s) 6514670(m)
tal 3. b sa vc csidig f sss sdis
Fig 9. Cas 5 : Alid vs wid vlciy, dsiy, ad dag.
Zona Wind Veocit(m/s)Meridian Wind Veocit(m/s)
Densit(kg/m3) Deceeration(m/s2)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Fig 10. Cas 5 : Alid vs laid ad lgid.
longitude(D)
longitude(D)latitude(D)
latitude(D)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Altitude(Km)
Cas Pcag f vaiai mial wid,
dsiy ad dag (assmd mdl)
Wind Densit Drag coefcient
4 50 5 2
5 -50 -5 -2
tal 2. Pai ads csidd f sss sdis
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
8/9
CHANDER& MURAlIKRISHNA: REAl TIME MID-COURSEMANEUVER AND GUIDANCE Of A GENERIC REENTRy VEHIClE
353
tal 4. rsss s cas simlai sls
CasDsid mial
cdiis (dg)
Acivd mial cdiis
(wi mid-cs mav
dcpi algim) psd
ag (dg)
Acivd mial cdiis
(wi idal mdl mid-cs
mav dcpi algim)
acal ag (dg)
Acivd mial cdiis
(wi pd mdl mid-
cs mav dcpi
algim) (dg)
latitude longitude latitude longitude latitude longitude latitude longitude
4
41.488637 87.088686 41.348213 87.112340 41.485034 87.086906 41.480771 87.085815
(Desired -Achieved)
latitude & longitude0.1404 -0.0237 0.0036 0.0018 0.0079 0.0029
5
41.488637 87.088686 41.348213 87.112340 41.485034 87.086906 41.491567 87.089976
(Desired -Achieved)
latitude & longitude0.1404 -0.0237 0.0036 0.0018 -0.0029 -0.0013
and aero modes. The case studies are isted in Tabe 2. The
burnout state vector consider or the simuation studies shown
in Tabe 3.
Tabe 4 shows the desired target point ocation, achieved
termina point ocation without (predictabe trajector) and
with (deception trajector) reentr maneuver.
figure 7 & 9 shows the wind, atmospheric densit
and drag variation with respect to the atitude. The curves in
green shows the mode considered or background trajector
simuation, whie the red one is considered or ore ground
simuation. figures 8 & 10 shows the atitude and ongitude
variation with respect to the atitude and it is cear rom the
gures that the nal impact is achieved with in the prescribed
toerance bound, under mode perturbations.
5. ConCLuSIonA practica working and impementabe agorithm or
rea time mid-course maneuver with pre-corrected ascent
phase guidance is described in the current paper. The work
describes in detai the impementation o the deception
maneuver and guidance agorithm b means o a 6Dof
simuation rom burnout point to impact. With the practicabe
avaiabe subsstems the paper shows the robustness o the
agorithm b means o some simuation cases b considering
a wide band o burnout state vector vaues at the burnout. One
of the exibility of the proposed work is in selecting online
the start and end point o maneuver with the variation o the
ampitude and requenc o the maneuver, b keeping in view
o the thrust orce avaiabiit and capabiit. The present workcan be extended to ascent phase guidance b virtue o which a
wide band o dispersion at reentr can be taken care and it is
aso possibe to use side thruster during the maneuver phase to
decrease the paoad response time or maneuver.
reFerenCeS
George, N. lewis & Theodore A. Posto, Deense1.
and Arms Contro Studies. Massachusetts Institute o
Technoog, future Chaenges to the Baistic missie
deense.IEEE Spectrum, 1997, 34(9), 60-68.
Ran, Zhang; Huieng, li & Xudong, Cao. A new approach2.
or re-entr vehice trajector panning and guidance,
ICAS, 2012-5.7.5, 4, pp. 3158-3164.
Changsheng, Gao; Wuxing, Jing; & Chaoong, li.3.Optima guidance aw design or reentr vehice using
virtua dispacement concept. In the Proceedings o the
26th Chinese Contro Conerence, Zhangjiajie, Hunan,
China, Ju 26-31, 2007, pp. 507-510.
Page, J.A. & Rogers, R.O. Guidance and contro o4.
maneuvering reentr vehices, Decision and Contro
incuding the 16th Smposium on Adaptive Processes and
a Specia smposium on fuzz set theor and appications,
1977 IEEE Conerence, Dec-1977, 16, pp. 659-664.
Cameron, J.D.M. Expicit guidance equations or5.
maneuvering reentr vehices, re-entr and environmenta
sstems divisions. Genera Eectric Compan,
Phiadephia, Pa 19101, TP3-3:30.
George; R. & Pitman, Jr, Inertia Guidance. John Wie6.
& Sons, INC. Nework, london, 1962.
Wheelon, Albert D. Free ight of a ballistic missile.7. ARS
Journal, 1959, 29(12), 915-926.
Siouris, George M. Missie guidance and contro sstems.8.
Springer, 2004
Thomas, Tess. Guidance scheme or soid propeed9.
vehice during atmospheric phase, Def. Sci. J., 2005,
55(3), 253-264.
Wike, John W. Veocit package. United States Patent10.
No. 3,260,204. Ju 12, 1966.
Kadam, N.V. Practical design of ight control systems for11.aunch vehices and missies. Aied Pubishers Pvt ltd.
2009.
Department o deence word geodetic sstem 1984.12.
Nationa Imager and Mapping Agenc, 3 Januar 2000.
Corneisse, J.W.; Schoer, H.f.R. & Wakker, K.f. Rocket13.
propulsion and space ight dynamics. Pitman Publishing
limited, 1979.
Kenneth R. Britting, inertia navigation sstems anasis,14.
Wie-Interscience, 1971.
Ananthasaanam, M.R. & Narasimha R. Standard15.
-
7/29/2019 4207-13730-4-PB
9/9
DEf. SCI. J., VOl. 63, NO. 4, JUly 2013
354
atmosphere or aerospace appications in India. Dept. o
Aerospace Engg. Indian Institute o Science, Bangaore.
Report No. 79 fM 5.
Narasimha, R. The wind environment in India.16. NAl.
Technica Memorandum Du 8501, 1985.
Titterton, David & Weston, John. Strapdown inertia17.
navigation technoog, IET, 2ndEd, 2004.
Kuipers, Jack B. Quaternions and rotation sequences. A18.
primer with appication to Orbits. Aerospace, and Virtuareait. Princeton Universit Press, Princeton, New Jerse.
2002.
Cis
M Avias Cad received his BE
(Eectrica Eng.) rom IIT Dehi, in 1972 and
MS (Spatia Inormation Technoog) rom
Jawahara Nehru Technoogica Universit,
Hderabad. He is present working as
Distinguished Scientist in DRDO. He
received man Awards ike,DRDO Scientist
of the Year-1989, Astronautical Society
of India Award-1997, DRDO AGNI Selfreliance Award-1999, Dr Biren Roy Space award-2000, DRDO
Award for Path Breaking Research/Outs tanding Technology
Development-2007, Outstanding Technologis t Award-2008 b
Punjab Technica Universit. His areas o interest incude:
Navigation, guidance, mission des ign.
D Iyyaki V. Mali Kisa received
his MTech rom IIT Madras and PhD rom
IISc, Bangaore in 1977. He is present
working as Director, Institute o Science
and Technoog and Coord inator o Centre
or Atmospheric Sciences and Weather
Modiication Technoogies at Jawahara
Nehru Technoogica Universit, Hderabad.His areas o interest incudes: Geospatia
technoog and data mining, sot computing technoogies, disaster
management, sateite meteoroog and weather inormatics.