41313 proteins in cell regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the a-helix of one...

10
41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation Molecular Enzymology Group Colloquium Organized and Edited by A. Aitken (Division of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Edinburgh). 676th Meeting held at Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, 8- I0 April 2002. Specificity of I 4-3-3 isoform dimer interactions and phosphorylation A. Aitken', H. Baxter, T. Dubois, S. Clokie, S. Mackie, K. Mitchell, A. Peden and E. Zemlickova University of Edinburgh, Division of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, Scotland, U.K. Abstract Proteins that interact with 14-3-3 isoforms are involved in regulation of the cell cycle, intra- cellular trafficking/targeting, signal transduction, cytoskeletal structure and transcription. Recent novel roles for 14-3-3 isoforms include nuclear trafficking the direct interaction with cruciform DNA and with a number of receptors, small G- proteins and their regulators. Recent findings also show that the mechanism of interaction is also more complex than the initial finding of the novel phosphoserine/threoninemotif.Non-phosphoryl- ated binding motifs that can also be of high affinity may show a more isoform-dependent interaction and binding of a protein through two distinct binding motifs to a dimeric 14-3-3 may also be essential for full interaction. Phos- phorylation of specific 14-3-3 isoforms can also regulate interactions. In many cases, they show a distinct preference for a particular isoform(s) of 14-3-3. A specific repertoire of dimer formation may influence which of the 14-3-3-interacting proteins could be brought together. Mammalian and yeast 14-3-3 isoforms show a preference for dimerization with specific partners in vivo. Introduction The name 14-3-3 was given to an abundant mammalian brain protein family due to its par- ticular migration pattern on two-dimensional Key words: phosphorylation, protein-interaction motif; signalling. Abbreviations used : PKC, protein kinase C; AANAT, arylalkyl- amine N-acetyltransferase. 'To whom correspondence should be addressed (e-mail Alastai r.Aitken (4 ed.ac.u k), 351 DEAE-cellulose chromatography and starch gel electrophoresis [l]. The first function ascribed to this family of proteins was activation of tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylases, the rate-limiting enzymes involved in catecholamine and sero- tonin biosynthesis, essential for the synthesis of dopamine and other neurotransmitters [2]. Subsequently we showed that 14-3-3 could regu- late (inhibit) activity of protein kinase C (PKC) [3,4]. 14-3-3 was then implicated as a novel type of chaperone protein that modulates interactions between components of signal-transduction path- ways [S]. A large number of publications began to appear in the mid-1990s showing that 14-3-3 proteins could interact with a range of protein kinases, phosphatases and other signalling pro- teins. This implied a role for the 14-3-3 family of proteins to mediate the formation of protein complexes involved in signal transduction, traf- ficking and secretion, perhaps to bind to different signalling proteins on each subunit of the dimer, as a novel type of 'adapter protein'. It is now clear that 14-3-3 isoforms are involved in many other cell functions and this is only one of their many roles. A number of intrinsic enzymic activities have been ascribed to 14-3-3, but none have been substantiated in the literature. The five major mammalian brain 14-3-3 isoforms are named a-r in order of their respective elution positions on HPLC [2,6] and we showed that a and S are the phosphoforms of p and 4' respectively [7]. Two other isoforms, z and 0, are expressed in T-cells and epithelial cells respect- ively, although the former is also widely expressed in other tissues, including brain. Muslin and co-workers [8] showed that tar- get-protein phosphorylation is important for 0 2002 Biochemical Society

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jan-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation

Molecular Enzymology Group Colloquium Organized and Edited by A. Aitken (Division of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Edinburgh). 676th Meeting held at Heriot-Watt University,

Edinburgh, 8- I0 April 2002.

Specificity of I 4-3-3 isoform dimer interactions and phosphorylation A. Aitken', H . Baxter, T. Dubois, S. Clokie, S. Mackie, K. Mitchell, A. Peden and E. Zemlickova

University of Edinburgh, Division of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, Scotland, U.K.

Abstract Proteins that interact with 14-3-3 isoforms are involved in regulation of the cell cycle, intra- cellular trafficking/targeting, signal transduction, cytoskeletal structure and transcription. Recent novel roles for 14-3-3 isoforms include nuclear trafficking the direct interaction with cruciform DNA and with a number of receptors, small G- proteins and their regulators. Recent findings also show that the mechanism of interaction is also more complex than the initial finding of the novel phosphoserine/threoninemotif. Non-phosphoryl- ated binding motifs that can also be of high affinity may show a more isoform-dependent interaction and binding of a protein through two distinct binding motifs to a dimeric 14-3-3 may also be essential for full interaction. Phos- phorylation of specific 14-3-3 isoforms can also regulate interactions. In many cases, they show a distinct preference for a particular isoform(s) of 14-3-3. A specific repertoire of dimer formation may influence which of the 14-3-3-interacting proteins could be brought together. Mammalian and yeast 14-3-3 isoforms show a preference for dimerization with specific partners in vivo.

Introduction The name 14-3-3 was given to an abundant mammalian brain protein family due to its par- ticular migration pattern on two-dimensional

Key words: phosphorylation, protein-interaction motif; signalling. Abbreviations used : PKC, protein kinase C; AANAT, arylalkyl- amine N-acetyltransferase. 'To whom correspondence should be addressed (e-mail Alastai r.Aitken (4 ed.ac.u k),

351

DEAE-cellulose chromatography and starch gel electrophoresis [l]. The first function ascribed to this family of proteins was activation of tyrosine and tryptophan hydroxylases, the rate-limiting enzymes involved in catecholamine and sero- tonin biosynthesis, essential for the synthesis of dopamine and other neurotransmitters [2]. Subsequently we showed that 14-3-3 could regu- late (inhibit) activity of protein kinase C (PKC) [3,4]. 14-3-3 was then implicated as a novel type of chaperone protein that modulates interactions between components of signal-transduction path- ways [S]. A large number of publications began to appear in the mid-1990s showing that 14-3-3 proteins could interact with a range of protein kinases, phosphatases and other signalling pro- teins. This implied a role for the 14-3-3 family of proteins to mediate the formation of protein complexes involved in signal transduction, traf- ficking and secretion, perhaps to bind to different signalling proteins on each subunit of the dimer, as a novel type of 'adapter protein'. It is now clear that 14-3-3 isoforms are involved in many other cell functions and this is only one of their many roles. A number of intrinsic enzymic activities have been ascribed to 14-3-3, but none have been substantiated in the literature.

The five major mammalian brain 14-3-3 isoforms are named a-r in order of their respective elution positions on HPLC [2,6] and we showed that a and S are the phosphoforms of p and 4' respectively [7]. Two other isoforms, z and 0, are expressed in T-cells and epithelial cells respect- ively, although the former is also widely expressed in other tissues, including brain.

Muslin and co-workers [8] showed that tar- get-protein phosphorylation is important for

0 2002 Biochemical Society

Page 2: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

0

Tab

le I

w

0

0

-

w

0 rp

14-3

-3-in

tera

ctin

g se

quen

ces

in m

amm

alia

n sy

stem

s

pS, p

hosp

hose

rine;

pT,

pho

spho

thre

onin

e; G

M-C

SF, g

ranu

locy

te/m

acro

phag

e co

lony

-stim

ulat

ing

fact

or; T

NF,

tum

our

necr

osis

fact

or.

n

T

(D 3-

n

Targ

et p

rote

in a

nd m

otifs

Se

quen

ce

Ref

eren

ce

Ln

(a)

Pro

tein

kina

ses

u" EL

Bre

akpo

int c

lust

er r

egio

n pr

otei

n (B

cr)

RSQ

STPS

303E

Q

[331

C

a'+/

calm

odul

in-d

ep m

yosi

n lig

ht-c

hain

kin

ase,

ske

leta

l H

SP

pSI6

'CP

13

51

PK

Cp

(PKD

) R

LpS

Zo5N

VS

Zo8,

R

TSpS

219A

ELp

S22

3 P

I

B-Ra

f R

SA

PS

~~'E

P

[411

Wee

I ce

ll-cy

cle

Y k

inas

e R

SV

PS

~~'L

T [4

31

s. CD

PCTA

IRE-

I, p

rote

in k

inas

e K

RLp

S'I9

LP

~3

81

PKCC

RH

DM

pSlE

6Y

M P

~301

c-

Raf

- I k

inas

e R

STP

S'~

~TP

, RSA

pS6"

EP

~40

1

Test

icul

ar p

rote

in k

inas

e (T

ESK

I )

RC

RP

S~

~~

LP

14

21

W

(b)

Phos

phat

ases

m

h)

PTPH

I, ty

rosi

ne p

hosp

hata

se

Cdc

25A

, cel

l-cyc

le d

ual-s

peci

ficity

pho

spha

tase

C

dc25

C, c

ell-c

ycle

pho

spha

tase

(c)

Rec

epto

rs, G

-pro

tein

s an

d re

late

d pr

otei

ns

a-C

hain

of i

nter

ieuk

in 9

rec

epto

r (IL

-9R

) p-

Cha

in o

f GM

-CSF

, int

erle

ukin

-3 a

nd -5

rec

epto

rs

CLI

C4

(p64

H I )

, chl

orid

e ch

anne

l Ex

oenz

yme-

S, A

DP

-rib

osyl

atio

n G

Plb

a su

buni

t of p

late

let m

embr

ane

glyc

opro

tein

Ib-IX

-V

Insu

lin g

row

th fa

ctor

I re

cept

or

lip35

, maj

or h

isto

com

patib

ility

com

plex

-ass

ocia

ted

Insu

lin re

cept

or s

ubst

rate

I (

IRS-

I)

Na+

/H+

exch

ange

r iso

fom

- I (

NE

H I)

N

icot

inic

ace

tylc

holin

e re

cept

or a

4 s

ubun

it N

ucle

ar re

cept

or (N

ur77

) Ph

osdu

cin

(pho

tore

cept

or G

py-b

indi

ng p

rote

in)

RAS

effe

ctor

pro

tein

RIN

I

RpS

5 19W

pT52

1 F

HSR

S585

LP

R2I

9YLp

TNA

YpS

D

ALD

L4*'

RLP

SI~

~LT

DP

, R

YSG

HSL

610~

,oo,

S

VPLD

PSAS

SSpS

'283

LP

RSRp

S'CR

RSK

pSZ7

'QS,

H S

RP

S~'

~I

P, K

SV

PS

~~

' AP

R

IGpS

703D

P R

SLS

W1V

Q

RLP

PS~~

OKP

R

QM

PS

~~S

P,

RK

PS

~~

IQ

RS

MP

S~

~IA

A

m

8 3.

T

(D

n

FL Ln s. a Y - w 0 0 w

v <

0

C 2 W

-0

2

-0

w P

Page 3: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

W

m

W

Reg

ulat

ors

of G

-pro

tein

sig

nallin

g, R

GS3

, RG

S7 (

and

othe

rs)

p I S

ORh

oGEF

, gua

nine

nuc

leot

ide

exch

ange

fact

or

A20

, zin

c fin

ger p

rote

in, i

nhib

itor o

f TN

F-in

duce

d ap

opto

sis

Apo

ptos

is s

igna

l-reg

ulat

ing

kinas

e I

(ASK

I)

BA

D, a

popt

osis

-regu

latin

g

EK

DP

S~~

~YP

, K

SD

PS

~~

~Y

P

1137

0QA

IQN

L

RSKp

S DP

R

SIP

S~~

'LP

R

HSp

S' "Y

P, R

SR

PS

I~~A

P,

RR

MP

S'~

~DF

E

(d)

Apo

ptos

is-re

gula

ting

prot

eins

(e)

Ada

ptor

pro

tein

s KS

R (k

inas

e su

ppre

ssor

of R

as)

Cbl

(f)

Tran

scrip

tion

fact

ors

and

nucl

ear p

rote

ins

Fork

head

tran

scrip

tion

fact

or (F

KHR

L I )

H

isto

ne d

eace

tyla

se, H

DA

C4

His

tone

dea

cety

lase

, HD

AC

5 R

KT

AP

S~

~~

EP

, R

TQ

PS

~~

~S

P

His

tone

dea

cety

lase

, HD

AC

7 Tr

ansc

riptio

nal c

o-ac

tivat

or w

ith P

DZ-

bind

ing

dom

ain

(TA

Z)

Nuc

lear

fact

or o

f act

ivat

ed T

-cel

ls (

NFA

T3)

p53

tum

our-

supp

ress

or/tr

ansc

riptio

n fa

ctor

K

GQ

STP

S~'

~RH

/G

RP

RS

CP

T~~W

P,

RR

RA

VP

S~

~~

MD

R

KT

AP

S~

~~

EP

, R

TQP

S~~

'AP

, RA

QP

S~

~~

SP

RK

TV

PS

I~~E

P,

RT

RP

S~~

~EP

, R

AQ

PS

~~

~S

P

RSH

pSE9

SP

RR

YpS2

72pS

pSv RR

G pS

289

(g)

Enzy

mes

and

oth

ers

43 k

Da

inos

itol p

olyp

hosp

hate

5-p

hosp

hata

se

ELVL

RSE

SEEK

W3"

K

I F I C

, kin

esin

-like

pro

tein

R

RQ

RP

S'O

~~A

P

Ker

atin

I8

cyt

oske

leta

l com

pone

nt

RPV

pSSA

ApS3

3 0

Mid

dle

T an

tigen

, pol

yom

a vi

rus

RS

HP

S~~

'YP

N

0

Ser

oton

in N

-ace

tyltr

ansf

eras

e R

RH

pT3'

LP

m

F!

Tyro

sine

hyd

roxy

lase

R

RAV

pS l9

ELD

0

N

- e CrJ W

5-

n

EL

ID 3.

Ft

Y

Page 4: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

Biochemical Society Transactions (2002) Volume 30, part 4

14-3-3 binding via a novel phosphoserine se- quence motif. It has subsequently been shown that while many 14-3-3-interacting proteins con- tain this motif, many others do not, indicating that additional sequences and modes of inter- action/contacts also allow 14-3-3 binding. Co- crystal structures with non-phosphorylated motifs suggest that the same binding pocket or ‘groove’ is involved [9]. Not only can phosphorylation of the motif be an important regulatory component of the interaction but dephosphorylation can also lead to creation of an interaction motif. Waterman et al. [lo] showed that ionizing radiation led to dephosphorylation of Ser-376 in the sequence KGQS3i6TS3i8RH/G in the p53 tumour- suppressor protein (see Table l), creating a con- sensus binding site for 14-3-3 proteins which led to association of p53 with 14-3-3. This in turn increased the affinity of p53 for sequence-specific DNA.

14-3-3 isoforms and sequence conservation The 14-3-3 family is highly conserved over a wide range of mammalian species, where the individual isoforms /I, E , q, y , z (also called O) , c and G are either identical or contain a few conservative substitutions. Homologues of 14-3-3 proteins have also been found in a broad range of eukaryotic organisms and are probably ubiquitous (reviewed in [ l 1 ,121). In every organism studied, at least two isoforms of 14-3-3 have been observed.

The chromosomal location of 14-3-3 isoforms has been deduced from the human genome data- base. The haemopoietic E sequence variant, . . . VELDVE . . . , where the underlined D replaces T in this most highly conserved 14-3-3, is on chromosome 2 in the current draft genome se- quence. No variants in the amino acid sequence of E are otherwise known in any mammalian species. We have identified this haemopoietic tissue E

variant in human, ovine, bovine and rodent E 14-3-3, in the same individual animal ([13] and A. Aitken, A. Toker and Y. Soneji, unpublished results). This form may also be present at low levels in keratinocytes. Structure analysis of the variation on the outer surface of E 14-3-3 suggests this may have an important effect on interaction with other proteins. The most striking finding in the genome analysis is a large number of sequences matching the c isoform; at least nine protein translations in a number of chromosomes, most of which are presumably pseudogenes.

0 2002 Biochemical Society

14-3-3 proteins are quite distinct in sequence and structural topology from other protein fami- lies in the database. Exceptions may be tertiary structure similarity with tetratricopeptide repeat (‘ TPR ’) helices [ 141 and primary structure similarity with a-synuclein in particular regions ~ 5 1 .

14-3-3 dimers, binding motifs and their interactions Crystal structures of both the 5 and c isoforms of 14-3-3 [16,17] show that they are highly helical, dimeric proteins. Each monomer is composed of nine anti-parallel a-helices, organized into an N-terminal and a C-terminal domain. The dimer creates a large negatively charged channel. Those regions of the 14-3-3 protein which are invariant throughout all the isoforms are mainly found lining the interior of this channel, while the variable residues are located on the surface of the protein.

This channel would recognize common features of target proteins, so the specificity of interaction of 14-3-3 isoforms with diverse tar- get proteins may involve the outer surface of the protein. The N-terminal residues of all 14-3-3 homologues are variable, and as these residues are important for dimer formation there may be a limit to the number of possible homo- or hetero- dimer combinations. Residues involved in dimer- ization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1).

After the demonstration by Muslin and co- workers [8] that a novel phosphoserine-containing motif initially identified in Raf kinase was im- portant for interaction, the motif was further refined into two subtypes and the structural details of the interaction with 14-3-3 were elucidated [18,19]. The binding site for the phosphoserine consists of a basic pocket composed of Lys-49, Arg-56 and Arg-127, as well as Tyr-128, within the C and E helices (see the underlined residues in Figure 1).

The proline residues are in different confor- mations in the two classes of phosphopeptide con- sensus motif. In the mode 1 phosphopeptide [18] the proline is in a &-conformation while in the mode 2 phosphopeptide [19] the proline has a trans-conformation. Nevertheless, both proline conformations result in a sharp alteration in chain direction, allowing the peptide to exit the binding groove. This is also clear in the recent deter-

354

Page 5: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

14-3-3 Proteins in Cell Regulation

mination of the arylalkylamine N-acetyltrans- ferase (AANAT)/14-3-3 co-crystal structure [20].

The ligand-binding groove runs in opposite directions in the two subunits of the dimer and a highly stable and isoform-specific interaction may result, distinct from the involvement of 14-3-3 dimer in binding two distinct target proteins together in a chaperone-like role.

Many of the 14-3-3-interacting proteins con- tain either one or both of two consensus motifs, R(S/Ar)( +)pSXP and RX(Ar)( +)pSXP [18] where pS is phosphoserine, Ar is an aromatic residue (particularly Tyr or Phe in mode 2) and + is a basic amino acid. Residue X following the phosphoserine is commonly Leu, Glu, Ala or Met. The phosphorylated residue may also be a thre- onine. Although most motifs contain Ser some well-characterized ones, e.g. AANAT, have Thr and there seem to be no structural reasons why this residue could not fit equally well into the cleft. Other motifs that are listed in Table 1 may be categorized as RSXpS motifs, RX,-,SX,-,S motifs and non-phosphorylated motifs.

When phosphopeptide libraries were tested on six of the 14-3-3 isoforms and the yeast BMHl and BMH2, all the isoforms were found to have very similar preferences for the individual residues

within each consensus motif. There are seven mammalian isoforms of 14-3-3 that are all highly conserved and one supposes that each isoform would have a distinct function or subset of func- tions. For example, several isoforms of 14-3-3 are involved in the G,/M cell-cycle checkpoint: 14-3-3 (T is responsible for sequestering the Cdc2- cyclin B1 complex in the cytoplasm, while the j? and E isoforms bind Cdc25C [21].

The complete sequence conservation in the observed ligand-binding regions of 14-3-3 would support the hypothesis that there may be little isoform specificity in the interaction between 14-3-3 and protein ligands ; therefore many iso- form-specific functions of 14-3-3 observed in vivo may result either from subcellular localization or transcriptional regulation of particular isotypes rather than from inherent differences in their ability to bind to particular ligands. However, the finding that phosphorylated 14-3-3 negatively regulates the interaction with the Raf N-terminal domain [22] suggests that additional interactions may occur on the outer surface of 14-3-3 or its dimer. A number of publications in the literature confirm recently that for full functionality in at least some cases the dimer of 14-3-3 is essential ~231.

Figure I

Human 4 14-3-3 phosphorylation sites and motifs

The positions of the known phosphorylation sites on various isoforms are shown in large type and the phosphopeptide-binding residues are underlined Ac denotes the N-terminus of the monomer (this is N-acetylmethionine, residue I in most isoforms) The numbering is that of the alignment of the correctly processed longer memben of the family (ie E and longer form of that commence at residue I) and the introduction of gaps of two residues maximize the alignment

5 21

CMKsvTEQGAELSNEERNLLsvAY K NWOA A= - M D I ~ E ~ V Q K A K I A E Q A E R Y D ~ - ' dimerisation

AKT/SDKl/PKC PKC \ TO M

I +SWRWSSIEQKTEGAEKKQQWARE

RSX'SXP motif binding < ~LLEKPLIPNASQAESKVFYL~WKGDWRYLAEVAAODDKKOIVDQSQQAYQEAFEIS -

185 KREMQPTHP~RLGLALNFSVFW EILN SPEKA CS-TAE-DEA~AELDT~.,SE

233 ESYKDSTLIWQLLRDNLTLWTSDTQGD-GE WEN

C K l a

355 0 2002 Biochemical Society

Page 6: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

Biochemical Society Transactions (2002) Volume 30, part 4

Recent findings relating to the structures and mechanism of interaction of 14-3-3 with its part- ners strengthen the evidence that interaction is not simply mediated by the canonical phospho- serine-containing motif. Some well-characterized interacting proteins such as Raf kinase have been shown to have additional binding site(s) for 14-3-3 on their cysteine-rich regions. Bcr and Ksr also bind via serine-rich regions. The interaction be- tween 14-3-3 and Raf is complex and the exact role of 14-3-3 remains controversial. The fact that Raf contains a third interaction domain in the cys- teine-rich region would add further complexity. This could also confer isoform specificity. It has also been suggested that due to the very common occurrence of two binding sites or motifs on one polypeptide chain of an interacting protein, the synergy between the two may also lead to isoform preference of interaction. Interaction motifs that are near the optimum, as determined by surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy [18], show no specificity but less optimal ones do. The binding of a protein in both (lower) affinity sites may greatly increase target-protein specificity of rec- ognition and affinity. This suggests a dual site- recognition mechanism in which, for example, a 14-3-3 < dimer interacts with both glycoprotein I (GP1)ba (unphosphorylated motif) and GPIbP (with a phosphorylation-dependent binding site), resulting in high-affinity binding (see Table 1).

The 14-3-3 phosphoserine-binding motif is also a common feature in plant and other eukary- otic species [24]. The plant plasma membrane H+-ATPase motif, QQYpT947V-,,,,, is note- worthy in that it has so far been found only in plant proteins [25].

Around 100 proteins have been shown to interact with 14-3-3. The well-characterized 14-3-3-interacting proteins and the motif(s) that have been identified are listed in Table 1. Some target proteins contain more than one motif that has been shown to be involved in 14-3-3 binding and they are listed only once. In many cases the actual residue numbers will be different in mam- malian species other than the one(s) that were studied, although the site will be equivalent; for example, Ser-178 is the most important in mouse HDAC7. The equivalent residues in the human sequence are Ser-156, Ser-318 and Ser-446 in the motif RAQS446SP.

In addition to those listed in Table 1, mam- malian proteins that have been shown to interact include the following. (a) Protein kinases; CKla , Chkl kinase, MEKK1, -2 and -3, type I PKC

0 2002 Biochemical Society

(a$,y), PKCE, PKCB and PKUa. (b) Phos- phatase Cdc25B; see also (g). (c) Receptors; a2- adrenergic, y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (B), glucocorticoid, adrenergic, a and P oestrogen, nuclear receptor co-repressor RIP1 40 and small G-proteins and their regulators, Rad and Rem. (d) Proteins involved in apoptosis including a-synuclein and the neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR)-associated cell death executor NADE. (e) Adaptor/scaffolding molecules pl30Cas, Grb2 and Shc (p66). (f) Transcription factors and other proteins involved in transcriptional control, TATA box-binding proteins TBP and TFIIB, histone acetyltransferase 1, Msn2p and 4p, other forkhead family members, the co-activator YAP (Yes-associated protein), myocyte enhancer bind- ing factor 2 (MEF2D) proteins in the MADS [MCMI, AGAMOUS, DEFICIENS and S R F (where SRF is serum response factor)] box family of transcription factors, FKBPl2-rapamycin- associated protein (FRAP), primary response gene BRFl, PHDfinger-HD, topoisomerase IIa , initiation factor EIF2a, integrin CD18 chain, TLX-2 homeodomain transcription factor and histones. (g) Enzymes and others including tryp- tophan hydroxylase, catalytic subunit (pl10) of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, calmodulin, mito- chondrial uncoupling protein (UCP) and CMP- NeuAc: GM1 a-2,3-sialyltransferase; structural and cytoskeletal proteins including keratin K8, KiflC, Tau and vimentin; proteins involved in cell-cycle control including cell-cycle phosphat- ase Cdc25B and telomerase catalytic subunit (TERT).

I 4-3-3-binding motif kinases Kinases that have been shown to phosphorylate the phosphoserine or threonine in the phos- phorylated binding motifs include protein kinase B (also called Akt), CAMP-dependent protein kinase, p21-activated protein kinase 1 (PAK), Ras- mitogen-activated protein kinase (RSKI , also known as MAPKAP-Kl), MAP kinase-activated protein kinase-2 (MAPKAP-K2) and PKC, as would be expected from their substrate specificity. In most cases the physiological kinases(s) have not been demonstrated but those that co-localize in the cell would be prime candidates; e.g. Cdc25C has been reported to be phosphorylated by a number of kinases such as Cds-l/Chk2, Chkl and Cdc25C-associated kinase 1 (C-TAK1). The first two are nuclear-located. In addition, Ca2+- calmodulin-dependent kinase I1 (CAM kinase 11), p90 ribosomal S6K, protein kinase D (also known

356

Page 7: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

14-3-3 Proteins in Cell Regulation

as PKCp) and casein kinase I1 (CKII) have also been implicated in phosphorylation of the motifs.

14-3-3 isoform phosphorylation Our sequence analysis of brain 14-3-3 separated by reversed-phase HPLC failed to show any differences between a and /? on the one hand and 6 and c on the other [26]. We subsequently showed by mass spectrometric analysis that a and 6 were the phosphorylated forms of /? and respectively and we identified the site as Ser-185 [7] using the numbering of the generic mammalian 14-3-3. The acetylation at the N-terminus of 14-3-3 iso- forms, with or without removal of the initiator methionine, has been verified by mass spectro- metry for all isoforms except o [26].

/? 14-3-3 is expressed at alternate start sites, 40 n6 of which is co-translationally processed, resulting in an additional threonine residue at the N-terminus. There is no evidence that this would affect dimer formation.

This phosphorylation of Ser-185 may not ‘turnover ’, as high levels of the phospho-forms are recovered without precautions taken to inhibit phosphatases. Although the E and CJ isoforms contain a serine residue in equivalent positions (SPDR and SPEE respectively), they are not known to be phosphorylated at this site. The E isoform is particularly abundant in brain; therefore it would have been identified by mass spectrometric analysis when we characterized the a and 6 isoforms. We have found no evidence for a and 6 phospho-forms in a wide range of tissue

types and cell lines other than brain. Inspection of the many two-dimensional gel electrophoreto- grams that are in the literature lend support to the idea that this phosphorylation may be specific to brain 14-3-3.

We identified casein kinase la (CKIa) as the brain kinase that phosphorylated 14-3-3 c and t isoforms on Thr- and Ser-233 respectively. 14-3-3 [ is phosphorylated on Thr-233 in HEK- 293 cells [22]. Residue 233 is located within a region involved in the association of 14-3-3 with target proteins. In vivo phosphorylation of 14-3-3 c at this site negatively regulates its binding to c-Raf, and may be important in Raf-mediated sig- nal transduction. We have also shown (S. Mackie, T. Dubois and A. Aitken, unpublished work) that C K l a binds to 14-3-3 isoforms in vitro.

Some isoforms of 14-3-3 have been shown to be phosphorylated by a sphingosine-dependent kinase [27] and PKB/Akt [27a]. The site these authors determined, Ser-59, is masked in the dimer interface [ 161. If phosphorylation occurs, it could be a mechanism for regulation of dimer formation. However, it might be difficult under physiological conditions for a kinase to gain access, since the 14-3-3 dimer is very stable under normal conditions (see Figure 2). Our results have shown that while brain PKC did phosphoryl- ate some 14-3-3 isoforms on an adjacent residue, Ser-64, the phosphorylation did not appear to occur to any physiologically significant extent [6], although there is an excellent motif in this region. In contrast, in our deletion mutants that exposed

Figure 2

Structure of the r 14-3-3 dimer interface

The interface between the monomem is mainly hydrophobic, comprising 70% of the total 2 I50 A2 of inaccessible surface [ I61

357 0 2002 Biochemical Society

Page 8: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

Biochemical Society Transactions (2002) Volume 30, part 4

this site [28] there are very high levels of phos- phorylation. We also showed that large synthetic peptides are also stoichiometrically phosphoryl- ated at Ser-59 and there were low levels of phosphorylation at Ser-64 [29].

Van Der Hoeven et al. [30] showed that 14-3-3 B and t were substrates for PKC-( (sites not determined) and Autieri and Carbone [31] showed phosphorylation of human 14-3-3 y by PKC isoforms on undetermined site(s). However, their cDNA sequence was quite different from previous y sequences (including that in the human genome) and included changes in residues known to be invariant.

Reuther and co-workers [32] showed that 14-3-3 t interacted with c-Bcr and with Bcr/Abl. Their results indicated that 14-3-3 T was a sub- strate for the Bcr serine/threonine kinase and was also phosphorylated on tyrosine by Brc/Abl but not by c-Abl. On attempting to identify this site(s) of phosphorylation on these and other 14-3-3 isoforms we have evidence (S. Clokie, S. Mackie and A. Aitken, unpublished work) that the phos- phorylation is due to a co-immunoprecipitating kinase at a known site of phosphorylation.

Dimerization of mammalian and yeast 14-3-3 isoforms in vivo In many cases, interaction between 14-3-3 and other signalling proteins shows a distinct pref- erence for particular isoform(s) of 14-3-3. The existence of particular combinations of hetero- dimeric 14-3-3 isoforms in vivo has important implications for function as an adaptor protein in signalling. This may allow the interaction between signalling proteins that do not directly associate with each other. Bcr and Raf, for example, do not associate directly but form a complex mediated through 14-3-3 [33]. Band t 14-3-3 associate with Bcr while the ( and /? 14-3-3 isoforms interact with Raf. We have shown that isoforms of 14-3-3 can form homo- and hetero-dimers in vivo and in vitro and a specific repertoire of dimer formation may influence which of the 14-3-3-interacting proteins could in turn be brought together [34]. Since the residues involved in dimerization ex- hibit some isoform variation, this may limit the possible homo- or hetero-dimer combinations and may confer specificity on 14-3-3 function.

The dimers of 14-3-3 are stable and do not readily exchange unless they are denatured and renatured [34]. It should be noted that a single recombinant 14-3-3 isoform will form homo- dimers regardless of the actual preference in vivo

0 2002 Biochemical Society

since a monomeric form would be thermo- dynamically unstable. 14-3-3 proteins also have a slow rate of turnover.

We analysed the pattern of dimer formation for two of the most abundant isoforms of 14-3-3 E

and y , following their stable expression in the neuronal pheochromocytoma PC12 cell line (M. Chaudhri and A. Aitken, unpublished work). This revealed a distinct preference for particular dimer combinations that is largely independent of cellular conditions. y 14-3-3 formed homo- and hetero-dimers, mainly with E . In turn, the E isoform formed heterodimers with all the 14-3-3 isoforms tested (/I, q, y and (), but no homodimers were detected. This suggests that the observed dimer combinations may be due to structural properties of the dimer interface of the individual isoforms. This pattern may be generally applic- able since the dimerization patterns of y and E

isoforms in transiently transfected COS cells were also similar overall. The pattern of dimer forma- tion was not simply a reflection of the amounts of available 14-3-3 isoform present in the cell or in a particular subcellular location. Analysis of the two 14-3-3 homologues, BMHl and BMH2, from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae also re- vealed that between 65 and 80 o/o are heterodimers (M. Chaudhri and A. Aitken, unpublished work).

Homo- and hetero-dimers of 14-3-3 proteins may play different roles. It is possible that homo- dimers of a particular isoform will function to sequester or chaperone a protein, while hetero- dimers are more likely to act as adaptor proteins, modulating the interaction of two distinct pro- teins, each of which specifically associates with one of the isoforms of the heterodimer. The y isoform may be more involved in sequestration functions, while the E isoform is more likely to function as an adaptor protein in signal-transduction events. Indeed, y 14-3-3 has been found to be the major isoform in Golgi and is implicated in secretion and protein trafficking while the E isoform is more generally found in association with proteins in- volved in signal transduction.

In conclusion, association with 14-3-3 iso- forms has led to the activation or stabilization of some proteins, and the inactivation of others, while for many proteins 14-3-3 isoforms have played an organizational role as a ‘scaffold’. In the complex multistep process of Raf activation, 14-3-3 appears to play several of these roles. It is likely that its ability to form homo- and various heterodimeric combinations is crucial and the analysis of the exact combinations of homo- and hetero-dimers of

358

Page 9: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

14-3-3 Proteins in Cell Regulation

14-3-3 isoforms that are present within cell com- partment(s) and that are involved in interactions with particular proteins will be important.

The work in the authors' laboratory was supported by the Medical Research Council.

References I

2

3

4

5 6

7

8

9

10

I 1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

Moore, B. E. and Perez, V. J. ( I 967) in Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Nervous Integration (Carlson, F. D., ed.). pp. 343-359. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ Ichimura. T., Isobe, T.. Okuyama, T., Takahashi. N., Araki, K., Kuwano, R. and Takahashi, Y. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 7084-7088 Aitken, A., Ellis, C. A., Hams, A,, Sellers, L. A. and Toker, A. ( 1990) Nature (London) 344,594 Toker, A., Ellis, C. A., Sellers. L. A. and Aitken, A. ( 1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 19 I, 42 I 4 2 9 Aitken. A. ( I 996) Trends Cell Biol. 6, 34 1-347 Toker, A., Sellers, L. A., Arness, B., Patel, Y., Hams, A. and Aitken, A. ( 1992) Eur. J. Biochern. 206, 45346 I Aitken, A., Howell, S., Jones, D., Madrazo, J, and Patel, Y. ( 1995) J. Biol. Chern. 270, 5706-5709 Muslin, A. J,, Tanner, J. W., Allen, P. M. and Shaw, A. S. ( I 996) Cell 84, 889-898 Fu, H., Subramanian, R. R. and Masters, S. C. (2000) Annu. Rev. Phamacol. Toxicol. 40, 6 17-647 Waterman, M. J., Stavridi, E. S., Waterman, J. L. and Halazonetis, T. D. ( 1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 175- I78 Wang, W. and Shakes, D. C. ( I 996) J. Mol. Evol. 43,

Rosenquist, M., Sehnke, P., Fed, R. J., Sornmarin, M. and Lanson, C. (2000) J. Mol. Evol. 5 I, 446458 Pietromonaco, S. F., Seluja, G. A,, Aitken, A. and Elias, L. ( I 996) Blood Cells Molecules Dis. 22, 225-237 Das, A. K., Cohen, P. W. and Barford, D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1192-1 199 Ostrerova. N., Petrucelli, L.. Farrer, M., Mehta. N., Choi. P.. Hardy, J. and Wolozin, B. ( 1999) J. Neurosci. 19,

Xiao, B., Smerdon. S. 1.. Jones, D. H., Dodson. G. G., Soneji, Y., Aitken, A. and Garnblin, S. J. ( I 995) Nature (London)

Liu, D., Bienkowska, J., Petosa, C., Collier, R. J., Fu, H. and Liddington, R ( 1995) Nature (London) 376, I9 I - I94 Yaffe, M. B., Rittinger, K., Volinia, S., Caron, P. R., Aitken, A,, Leffers, H., Gamblin, S. J., Srnerdon, S. J. and Cantley, L. C. ( 1997) Cell 9 I, 96 1-97 I Rittinger, K., Budman, J., Xu, J., Volinia, S., Cantley, L. C., Smerdon, S. J., Gamblin, S. J. and Yaffe, M. B. ( 1999) Mol. Cell 4, 153- I66 Ganguly, S., Gastel, J. A., Weller, J. L., Schwartz, C., Jaffe, H., Namboodiri, M. A., Coon, S. L., Hickrnan, A. B., Rollag, M., Obsil, T. et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98,

Zeng, Y., Forbes, K. C., Wu, Z., Moreno, S., Piwnica- Worms, H. and Enoch, T. ( 1998) Nature (London) 395,

Dubois, T., Rommel, C., Howell, S., Steinhusen, U., Soneji, Y., Moelling, K. and Aitken, A. (1997) J, Biol. Chern. 272,

Tzivion. G. and Avruch, J. (2002) J, Biol. Chern. 277,

384-398

5782-579 I

376, 188-191

8083-8088

507-5 I0

28882-28888

306 1-3064

24 Moorhead, G., Douglas, P., Cotelle, V., Harthill, J,, Morrice, N., Meek S., Deiting, U., Stitt, M., Scarabel, M., Aitken, A. and MacKintosh, C. ( 1999) Plant J, 18, I - I2 Svennelid, F.. Olsson, A.. Piotrowski, M., Rosenquist, M., Ottrnan, C., Larsson, C., Oecking, C. and Somrnarin, M. ( 1999) Plant Cell. I I, 2379-239 I

26 Martin, H.. Patel. Y., Jones, D., Howell, S., Robinson, K. and Aitken, A. ( 1993) FEBS Lett. 33 I, 296-303

27 Megidish. T., Cooper, J., Zhang, L., Fu, H. and Hakomori. S. ( I 998) J. Biol. Chem 273, 2 1834-2 I845

27a Powell, D. W., Rane, M. J., Chen. O., Singh. S. and McLeish,

25

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36 37 38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

359

K. R. (2002) J. Biol. Chern 277, 2 1639-2 I642 Jones, D., Martin, H., Madrazo, J., Robinson, K., Nielsen, P.. Roseboorn, P., Patel, Y., Howell, S. and Aitken, A. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 245, 375-384 Dubois, T., Howell, S., Arness, R., Kerai, P., Leamonth, M. P., Madrazo, J., Chaudhri, M., Rittinger, K., Scarabel, M., Soneji. Y. and Aitken, A. ( 1997) J. Prot. Chern. 16,

Van Der Hoeven, P. C., Van Der Wal, J. C., Ruun, P. and VanBlitterswijk J. (2000) Biochern. J. 347, 78 1-785 Autieri, M. V. and Carbone, C. J, ( 1999) DNA Cell Biol. 18,

Reuther, G. W., Fu. H., Cripe, L. D., Collier, R. J, and Pendergast, A. M. ( I 994) Science 266, 129- I 33 Braselrnann, S. and McComick, F. ( I 995) EMBO J, 14, 48394848 Jones, D., Ley, S. and Aitken, A. ( I 995) FEBS Lett. 368,

Haydon, C. E., Watt, P. W., Momce, N., Knebel, A,, Gaestel, M. and Cohen, P. (2002) Arch. Biochern. Biophys.

Reference deleted Reference deleted Graeser, R., Gannon, J., Poon, R., Dubois, T., Aitken, A. and Hunt, T. J. (2002) J. Cell Sci.. in the press Hausser, A., Storz, P., Link G.. Stoll, H., Liu. Y. C., Altman, A.. Pfizenmaier, K. and Johannes. F. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem.

Michaud. N. R., Fabian. J. R.. Mathes. K. D. and Momson, D. K. (1995) Mot. Cell. Biol. 15, 339G3397 MacNicol, M. C., Muslin, A. J. and MacNicol, A. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 3803-3809 Toshima, J. Y., Toshirna, J., Watanabe, T. and Mizuno, K. (200 I ) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4347 I 4 3 48 I Honda, R., Ohba, Y. and Yasuda, H. (1997) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comrnun. 230, 262-265 Zhang, S. H., Kobayashi, R., Graves, P. R., Piwnica-Worms, H. and Tonks N. K. ( I 997) J. Biol. Chern. 272,

Conklin, D. S., Galaktionov, K. and Beach, D. ( 1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 7892-7896 Dalal, S. N., Schweitzer, C. M., Gan, J. and DeCaprio, J, A, ( I 999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 44654479 Peng, C. Y., Graves, P. R., Ogg, S., Thorna, R. S., Bymes, 3rd, M. J., Wu, Z., Stephenson, M. T. and Piwnica-Worms, H. ( 1998) Cell Death Differ. 19, 197-208 Sliva, D., Gu, M., Zhu, Y. X., Chen, J., Tsai, S., Du, X. and Yang, Y. C. (2000) Biochern. J, 345,74 1-747 Stornski, F. C., Dottore, M., Winnall, W., Guthridge, M. A,, Woodcock, J., Bagley, C. J., Thomas, D. T., Andrews, R. K., Bern&, M. C. and Lopez, A. F. ( I 999) Blood 94,

5 13-522

555-564

55-58

397,224-23 I

274,9258-9264

27281-27287

I 933- I942

0 2002 Biochemical Society

Page 10: 41313 Proteins in Cell Regulation - pdfs.semanticscholar.orgization are 5-21 in the A-helix of one subunit and residues 58-89 of the C and D helices of the other (see Figure 1). After

Biochemical Society Transactions (2002) Volume 30, part 4

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

Suginta, W., Karoulias, N., Aitken, A. and Ashley, R. H. (2001) Biochern. J. 359,55-64 Henriksson, M. L., Troller, U. and Hallberg, B. (2000) Biochern. J. 349, 697-70 I Andrews, R. K., Hams, S. J., McNally, T. and Bemdt, M. C. ( I 998) Biochemistry 37, 638-647 Craparo, A., Freund, R. and Gustafson, T. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chern. 272, I 1663-1 I669 Kuwana, T., Peterson, P. A. and Karlsson, L. ( I 998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 95, 1056-1 06 I Lehoux, S., Ji, A,, Florian, J. A. and Be&, B. C. (200 I ) J. Biol. Chern. 276, 15794- I5800 Jeanclos, E. M., Lin, L., Treuil, M. W., Rao, J,, DeCoster, M. A. and Anand, R. (2001) J. Biol. Chern. 276,

Masuyarna, N., Oishi, K., Mori, Y., Ueno, T., Takaharna, Y. and Gotoh, Y. (200 I ) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 32799-32805 Thulin, C. D., Savage, J. R., McLaughlin, J. N., Truscott, S. M., Old, W. M., Ahn, N. G., Resing, K. A., Harnrn, H. E., Bitensky, M. W. and Willardson, B. M. (200 I ) J. Biol. Chern.

Wang, Y., Waldron, R. T., Dhaka, A,, Patel, A,, Riley, M. M., Rozengurt, E. and Colicelli, J. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22,

Benzing, T., Yaffe, M. B., Amould, T., Sellin, L., Schemer, B., Schilling, B., Schreiber, R., Kunzelrnann, K., Leparc, G. G., Kim, E. and Walz, G. (2000) J. Biol. Chern. 275,

Zhai, J., Lin, H., Sharnirn, M., Schlaepfer, W. W. and Canete-Soler, R. (200 I ) J. Biol. Chern. 276, 4 I 3 I 8 4 I 324 Vincenz, C. and Dixit, V. M. ( I 996) J. Biol. Chern. 27 I,

Zhang, L., Chen, J. and Fu, H. ( I 999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 85 I 1-85 I5 Fang, X., Yu, S., Eder, A., Mao, M., Bast, Jr, R. C., Boyd, D. and Mills, G. B. ( I 999) Oncogene 18, 6635-6640 Lizcano, J. M., Momce, N. and Cohen, P. (2000) Biochern. J. 349.547-557

28281-28290

276,23805-238 I5

9 16-926

28167-28172

20029-20034

65a

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

Cacace, A. M., Michaud, N. R., Themen, M., Mathes, K., Copeland, T., Rubin, G. M. and Momson, D. K. ( I 999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 229-240 Liu, Y. C., Liu, Y., Elly, C., Yoshida, H., Lipkowitz, S. and Altrnan, A. ( I 997) J. Biol. Chern. 272, 9979-9985 Brunet, A., Bonni, A., Zigrnond, M. J., Lin, M. Z., Juo, P., Hu, L. S., Anderson, M. J., Arden, K. C., Blenis, J. and Greenberg, M. E. ( I 999) Cell 96, 857-868 Rena, G., Prescott, A. R., Guo, S., Cohen, P. and Unteman, T. G. (200 I ) Biochern. J. 354, 605-6 I2 Wang, A. H., Kruhlak M. J., Wu, J., Bertos, N. R., Vezrnar, M., Posner, 6. I., Bazett-Jones, D. P. and Yang, X. J. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 6904-69 I2 McKinsey, T. A., Zhang, C. L. and Olson, E. N. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 14400- I4405 Kanai, F., Marignani, P. A., Satbassova, D., Yagi, R., Hall, R. A., Donowitz, M., Hisarninato, A,, Fujiwara, T., Ito, Y., Cantley, L. C. and Yaffe, M. B. (2000) EMBO J. 19,

Kao, H. Y., Verdel, A., Tsai, C. C., Simon, C., Juguilon, H. and Khochbin, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chern. 276,47496-47507 Chow, C. W. and Davis, R. J. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20

Campbell, J. K., Gurung, R., Rornero, S., Speed, C. J., Andrews, R. K., Bemdt, M. C. and Mitchell, C. A. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 15363- I5370 Domer, C., Ullrich. A., Haring, H. U. and Larnrners, R. ( I 999) J. Biol. Chern. 274, 33654-33660 Ku, N. O., Liao, J. and Ornary, M. B. ( I 998) EMBO J. 17,

Cullere, X., Rose, P., Thatharnangalarn, U., Chatterjee, A., Mullane, K. P., Pallas, D. C., Benjamin, T. L., Roberts, T. M. and Schaffhausen, B. S. ( I 998) J. Virol. 72, 558-563 Itagaki, C., Isobe, T., Taoka. M., Natsurne, T., Nornura, N., Horigorne. T., Ornata, S., Ichinose, H., Nagatsu, T., Greene, L. A. and Ichirnura, T. ( I 999) Biochemistry 38,

6778-679 I

702-7 I2

1892- I906

15673-15680

Received I0 Apri 2002

Survival-promoting functions of I 4-3-3 proteins S. C. Masters, R. R. Subramanian, A. Truong, H. Yang, K. Fujii, H. Zhang and H. Fu'

Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, I5 I0 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, U.S.A.

Abstract The 14-3-3 proteins are a family of phospho- serine/phosphothreonine-binding molecules that control the function of a wide array of cellular proteins. We suggest that one function of 14-3-3 is to support cell survival. 14-3-3 proteins promote survival in part by antagonizing the activity of associated proapoptotic proteins, including Bad

Key words: apoptosis, ASK I , Bad, difopein. Abbreviations used: PKB, protein kinase B; ASK1 , apoptosis signal- regulating kinase I ; EYFP, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein. 'To whom correspondence should be addressed (e-rnail [email protected]).

and apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1). Indeed, expression of 14-3-3 inhibitor peptides in cells is sufficient to induce apoptosis. Inter- estingly, these 14-3-3 antagonist peptides can sensitize cells for effective killing by anticancer agents such as cisplatin. Thus, 14-3-3 may be part of the cellular machinery that maintains cell survival, and targeting 14-3-3-ligand interactions may be a useful strategy to enhance the efficacy of conventional anticancer agents.

Introduction 14-3-3 proteins can bind a variety of proteins that are critical mediators of intracellular signalling

0 2002 Biochemical Society 360