3d stress fields for beams with arbitrary cross-sections … the unified formulation with...

20
3D stress fields for beams with arbitrary cross-sections using the Unified Formulation with Serendipity Lagrange polynomial expansions Mayank Patni, Sergio Minera, Prof. Paul Weaver, Dr. Alberto Pirrera www.bris.ac.uk/composites MECHCOMP3 3 rd International Conference on Mechanics of Composites 4-7 July 2017 (Bologna, Italy)

Upload: vantu

Post on 06-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

3D stress fields for beams with arbitrary cross-sections using the Unified Formulation with Serendipity

Lagrange polynomial expansions

Mayank Patni, Sergio Minera, Prof. Paul Weaver, Dr. Alberto Pirrera

www.bris.ac.uk/composites

MECHCOMP3

3rd International Conference on Mechanics of Composites

4-7 July 2017 (Bologna, Italy)

2/19

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

Outline

Motivation & Objective

Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF) for refined 1D models

Various cross-section expansion models Taylor expansions (TE) Lagrange expansions (LE) Serendipity Lagrange expansions (SLE)

Numerical examples

Node-dependent kinematics (NDK)

Conclusions and future developments

3/19

Motivation

Reddy’s third order theory for plates

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

Classical to Refined Kinematic Models

Limited by the Saint-Venant

Principle

What about this?

The richer the kinematic field, then the more accurate is the 1D model

General guideline[1]

[1]K. Washizu. Variational Methods in Elasticity and Plasticity. Oxford, 1968.

Stress concentration

regions

4/19

Motivation

3D finite element analysis

Ni - 3D shape

functions

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

Classical to Refined Kinematic Models

What about this?

Stress concentration

regions

Computationally Expensive!

3D stress fields?

Carrera Unified Solution (CUF)

Proposed Solution

𝑢 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑢ζ𝑖𝑣 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑣ζ𝑖𝑤 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑤ζ𝑖

Generalized beam theory (GBT)

(Thin-plate theory is adopted)

𝑢 𝑥,𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝛹𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑠

𝛾𝑦𝑧 = 0, 𝛾𝑥𝑧 = 0, 𝜀𝑧𝑧 = 0

(for prismatic thin-walled beams)

5/19

The Unified Formulation - Overview

Taylor-like

polynomial expansions

(TE)

Lagrange

polynomial expansions

(LE)

Serendipity

Lagrange expansions

(SLE)

Computational expansion of the displacement field

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

3D structure Cross-section expansion

1D FE model

𝑢 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑢ζ𝑖𝑣 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑣ζ𝑖𝑤 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑤ζ𝑖

Ref: E, Carrera. Finite Element Analysis of Structures through Unified Formulation. Wiley Publications, 2014.

6/19

Taylor-like

polynomial expansions

(TE)

Lagrange

polynomial expansions

(LE)

Serendipity

Lagrange expansions

(SLE)

Computational expansion of the displacement field

The Unified Formulation - Overview

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

3D structure Cross-section expansion

1D FE model

𝑢 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑢ζ𝑖𝑣 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑣ζ𝑖𝑤 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑤ζ𝑖

7/19

Taylor-like

polynomial expansions

(TE)

Lagrange

polynomial expansions

(LE)

Serendipity

Lagrange expansions

(SLE)

Computational expansion of the displacement field

The Unified Formulation - Overview

L4 L9

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

3D structure Cross-section expansion

1D FE model

𝑢 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑢ζ𝑖𝑣 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑣ζ𝑖𝑤 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑤ζ𝑖

8/19

Computational expansion of the displacement field

Taylor-like

polynomial expansions

(TE)

Lagrange

polynomial expansions

(LE)

Serendipity

Lagrange expansions

(SLE)

p =2p =1

The Unified Formulation - Overview

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

3D structure Cross-section expansion

1D FE model

𝑢 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑢ζ𝑖𝑣 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑣ζ𝑖𝑤 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 𝑁𝑖 𝑦 𝐹ζ 𝑥, 𝑧 𝑤ζ𝑖

Advanced Numerical

Techniques 1 (7th July Morning

session – 9:40)

-Sergio Minera

9/19

Numerical Results

T-section beam structure

488 L9 66 SL8

Cross-section mesh

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

DOFs ~550k

10/19

Numerical Results (T-section beam structure)

Shear stress along the flange at mid-span

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

11/19

Numerical Results (T-section beam structure)

Through-thickness shear stress in the web at mid-span

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

12/19

Numerical Results (T-section beam structure)

Through-thickness shear stress in the flange at various locations along the beam

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

2% 5% 50%

13/19

Numerical Results (T-section beam structure)

Through-thickness shear stress in the web at various locations along the beam

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

2% 5% 50%

14/19

Distribution of transverse shear and normal stress in the cross-section

at 2% of the beam length from the clamped end

Numerical Results (T-section beam structure)

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

15/19

Node-Dependent Kinematics (NDK)

Need for local kinematic refinement CUF can be used to derive NDK models

without any ’ad hoc’ assumptions. Less model building effort when used with

SLE model Increases accuracy Reduces computational cost

Low order model

Refined model

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

Clamped at both endsPoint load at B

16/19

Cantilever C-section beam Load applied at free endVertical deflection at Point A

Node-Dependent Kinematics (NDK)

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

Low order model

Refined model

17/19

Conclusions

The Serendipity Lagrange expansion (SLE) model is introduced within the framework of Carrera Unified Formulation.

Able to capture full 3D stress fields and accuracy is not limited to Saint-Venant’s Principle.

The SLE model retains benefits of both the Lagrange model (cross-section discretization) and the Taylor model (order of expansion), without retaining any of their disadvantages.

The SLE model discretises cross-sections locally, and therefore, is able to capture localised stress fields unlike the Taylor expansion model.

Local refinement can be achieved using Node-dependent kinematics technique with SLE model.

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

18/19

Ongoing Developments & Future Extensions

CUF-SLE model for laminated composite structures.

Extension of CUF to Tow-Steered Composite structures.

Introduction of CUF-SLE model to analyse curved cross-section beams.

Acknowledgement

This research has been developed in the framework of the FULLCOMP project. The H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie European Training Network is gratefully acknowledged.

For more details visit: www.fullcomp.net

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

19/19

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

ANY QUESTIONS?

Accurate 3D stress fields in localised regions

Mayank Patni

3D stress fields for beams with arbitrary cross-sections using the Unified Formulation with Serendipity

Lagrange polynomial expansions

Mayank Patni, Sergio Minera, Prof. Paul Weaver, Dr. Alberto Pirrera

www.bris.ac.uk/composites