3d laser scanning technology in plant industries - … · · 2009-05-13overview of 3d laser...
TRANSCRIPT
2
AgendaAgenda1. Overview of 3D laser scanning
2. Current Plant Market
3. HDS 3D Laser scanning applications
4. Demonstration of HDS Scanstation2
5. Questions and Answers
Leica ScanStation2 True Color Scan
Leica HDS6000 Scan
3
HDS 3D Laser ScannerHDS 3D Laser Scanner
Phase-based500,000 points per second(No.1)Range up to 79mIntegrated Battery / Data StorageBuilt-in Control Panel주요 용도 : Indoor 중심
TOF (Time of Flight) 50,000 points per second(No.1)Range up to 300m3D Scanner + Total Station주요 용도 : 원/근 거리 스캔, 실내/외
LEICA HDS 6000LEICA ScanStation2
4
Point size = < 6mmPoint size = < 6mm
Distance = (C xDistance = (C x T)/2T)/2
LEICA HDS Scanstation2
50,000 points per sec.!!Scan Cloud Processing
Software
5
Current Plant Market Current Plant Market
Historic industry expansion
Effecting All industries
Significant project backlogs
Extreme worldwide demand for engineers
Improved productivity needed
Lots of cash and willingness to spend
Boom is expected to continue for at least five more years
Laser Scanning value now generally understood and appreciated
7
HDS Plant markets & applications
Oil & gas
Off-shore platforms
Ships
Refineries
Power plants
Nuclear plants
Pulp & paper
Automobile factories
Discrete manufacturingElectronics manufacturing
Aircraft assembly
Pipelines
What’s hot! What’s not
8
Facility / Asset Lifecycle Chain
Build /Construct
Manage /Operate
Renovate / Retrofit *
Decommission/ End of Life
3%-5% oflifecycle
95%-97% oflifecycle
* HDS Sweet Spot
9
Retrofit Project Complications
Complicated and congested environment
Inhospitable or hazardous environment
Many difficult and inaccessible locations
Missing plant Information
Existing drawings incomplete and inaccurate
Project scope changes
Process and design uncertainties
Unknown structural adequacies
Unforeseen space problems
Maintenance and operation considerations
Constructability issues
Identifying and managing ongoing new design Interferences
10
Where Traditional 3D As-built Model Methods Break-Down
Inaccurate As-built Model – Based on existing drawings, field measurements, assumptions, etc…
Simplified Model – Lacking detail
Incomplete Model – Existing documentation missing current information
Cost - Expensive to model from site collection data
Delay - As-built model to design team usually months later than needed
Problems with Old 3D As-built Model Technology – Many limitations with industrial photogrammetry
Retrofit Project Complications
11
12-person scanning services
Focus: North Sea oil platforms
Statoil, ConocoPhillips
>150 projects
10 Cyclone1 CycloneSoftware
1 HDS2500
2 HDS3000
1 HDS4500
2 Scanstation
Total stationTools
122# Staff
20062003
www.capnor.com
12
Plant Customer SuccessSantiago Y Cintra, Brazil
Dec. ‘01: began as dealer
2003: started separate scanning services business
2006: largest HDS customer
12 Leica HDS scanners
34 licenses MODEL
18 licenses CloudWorx
Markets: plants
Petrobras (oil company)
Off-shore + on-shore
www.santiagoecintra.com.br
13
Plant Customer SuccessFramatome ANP, USA
Bought first scanner March ‘01
Markets: nuclear power plants (100%)
By 2006
>400 HDS projects
2 @HDS2500
1 @HDS3000
2 @Scanstation
1 @HDS6000
1 @Scanstation2
+ Rent HDS4500 on project-basis
14
Process PlantsProcess Plants
AsAs--Built DrawingsBuilt Drawings
Piping, Tanks, Steel Piping, Tanks, Steel StructuresStructures
TOSCO Petroleum Refinery, Carson, California
20
Metrics: Creation of asMetrics: Creation of as--builtsbuilts
Work consisted of field scanning and creation of piping and structural members.
Cyrax
Field scanning time 45 minutes
Modeling & dwg.prep 3.5 hours
Total time: 4.25 hours
21
Power Plant RetrofitPower Plant Retrofit
•• Project started Oct. 99Project started Oct. 99
•• $150 million project$150 million project
•• 1st unit: 51 scans in 1 week1st unit: 51 scans in 1 week
•• AsAs--builts to be created builts to be created
•• Export model to PDS for automated Export model to PDS for automated
clash detectionclash detection
•• Projected >$10 million savings (by Projected >$10 million savings (by
reducing rework & rereducing rework & re--design)design)
•• 50% faster creation of models50% faster creation of models
22
Refinery Project:Refinery Project:Piping Piping ““SnakeSnake--pitpit””, API, API--570 Compliance570 Compliance
•• 0.1 mile long0.1 mile long
•• Upgrade 2 pipesUpgrade 2 pipes
•• Tight scheduleTight schedule
•• Complex areasComplex areas
23
Scope of WorkScope of Work
•• Produce a 3D model of the ResidProduce a 3D model of the Resid
ue Catalytic Crackingue Catalytic Cracking unit unit for impfor imp
orting into AutoCADorting into AutoCAD..
•• Keys areasKeys areas
–– 50m x 40m x 85m high50m x 40m x 85m high
•• Reactor Reactor –– Regenerator StandpipeRegenerator Standpipe
•• Catalyst Cooler Circulation Water Catalyst Cooler Circulation Water
PumpsPumps
24
Catalyst Cooler Circulation Water PumpsCatalyst Cooler Circulation Water Pumps
•• Complex pipingComplex piping
–– Multiple levelsMultiple levels
–– Different diametersDifferent diameters
–– Different bend radiiDifferent bend radii
•• Provide 3D ACAD modelProvide 3D ACAD model
29
3D Visualization:Being able to view things
from a perspective uncommonfor human eyes
현대정유현대정유 서산공장서산공장
31
3D Design3D DesignCase Study 1: VECO Alaska Case Study 1: VECO Alaska TyonekTyonek ProjectProject
Project Information:
Company VECO AlaskaCompany Type: Engineering / Construction / SPClient: ConocoPhillipsLocation: Cook Inlet Alaska / Tyonek PlatformProject Type: Off-Shore / Oil and Gas3d Design S/W: 3D Bentley AutoPLANTDeliverable: 3D Model & 2D Drawings
Project Description:Installing 2 new coalescing filters with associated piping and supports. Adding new filter platform, modifying HVAC and walls to allow installation
2005 Bentley BE Award Winner!
ConocoPhillips - Tyonek Platform
32
3D Design3D DesignCase Study 1: VECO Alaska Case Study 1: VECO Alaska TyonekTyonek ProjectProject
3D Model and 2D Drawing Deliverable
Engineering & Design Benefits:
In-house 3D modeling - short cycle time3D model imported into Bentley AutoPLANTReduced field tripsOptimize pipe routing - ongoing piping interference checks - lighting, structural steel and existing pipingMany interferences re-routed without a shutdownPoint cloud data available for future projectsTechnology delivered:
Operations design reviewEfficient engineeringMinimum of construction re-work
33
3D Design3D DesignCase Study 1: VECO Alaska Case Study 1: VECO Alaska TyonekTyonek ProjectProject
Photo and 3D As-Built Cyclone Model
Fabrication / Construction Benefits:
3D model of new equipment created from vendor supplied documents
New equipment verified against point cloud for feasibility and to be interference free
Prior to fabrication physical changes were requested to the equipment configurations, which was based on information learned during the feasibility study
All spool pieces fabricated on shore
Industry expected field re-work of 30% to 40% Actual reduced to less than 1%
Post construction – ability to re-scan area and produce accurate as-built drawings
34
VECO Alaska – Tyonek Project SavingsDescription Estimate Actual Cost Savings
Site Trips 23 17 $18,000
Survey Site Trips 3 0 $18,000
Production separators - Fabrication & Construction $975,515 $769,832 $205,863
Production separators - Fabrication & Construction $429,838 $357,923 $71,915
Production separators - Fabrication & Construction $864,784 $698,953 $165,831
Engneering Savings - - $36,000
As-built Scanning $0 $30,210 -30,210
$485,399TOTAL PROJECT SAVINGS
Note: customer claims HDS3000 would have reduced field costs by 1/3!
3D Design3D DesignCase Study 1: VECO Alaska Case Study 1: VECO Alaska TyonekTyonek ProjectProject
35
3D Design3D DesignCase Study 2: Case Study 2: CapnorCapnor MST Odin ProjectMST Odin Project
Project Information:
Company Capnor Laser Scanning ServicesCompany Type: Service ProviderClient: Marathon Oil CorporationProject: MST Odin ProjectLocation: NorwayProject Type: Marine3D Design S/W: Aveva PDMSDeliverable: 3D Model & 2D DrawingsHDS Scanner: HDS3000
Project Description:Convert shuttle tanker into an FPSO (Floating production, storage and offloading vessel). Complete 3D As-built model to be imported into PDMS and used for engineering modification
MST Odin – 3D Cyclone Model
36
Case Study 2: Case Study 2: CapnorCapnor MST Odin ProjectMST Odin Project
Project Metrics:
Scanner: HDS3000
Site Scanning 10 days/nights (300 hrs)
3D Cyclone Modeling: 4 operators (9 Weeks)
Modeled Items: Over 35,000 objects
As-built 3D model completed and delivered to the customer at an early stage, long before the vessel is to arrive at FELS shipyard Singapore for retrofit.
MST Odin – 3D Cyclone Model
37
Retrofit Project ComparisonRetrofit Project Comparison
Washington Group International – Birmingham, Alabama USA
CompanyAker Kvaerner
Australia VECO Alaska Capnor ASWashington Group
International
ClientSantos Limited / O&G
SolutionsConocoPhillips
Marathon Petroleum Company Norway
Confidential
Industry ChemicalOil & GasOffshore
Oil & GasFSPO Conversion Pulp & Paper
Project TIC Unknown 2.3 MIL USD Unknown Unknown
Engineering Use of Data
Engineering Directly in the Point Cloud 3D As-Built Model 3D As-Built Model
Partial 3D As-Built and Engineering Directly In the Point Cloud (In an External
Applicatrion)
Data Collection Time 4 Days 6 Day 11 Days 3 Day
Data Preparation Time 26 Hours16 Hours - Registration4 Weeks - 3D Modeling
40 Hours - Registration9 Weeks - 3D Model
30 Hours - Registration2 Weeks - Partial 3D Model
Site Data Collection Budget
-40% -26% -40% -31%
Engineering Budget -10% -12% Unknown -12%
Total Project Savings Unknown-19%
($449,000 USD)Unknown Unknown
Start-Up On Time On Time On Time On Time
Comments
Extreme Heat, Congested, Hazardous Area, Unreliable
As-Built, Remote, Increased Shop Fab
Very Remote, Extreme Congestion, Hazardous
Area, Unreliable As-Builts,
Short Window for Site Data Capture, Extreme
Congestion, Poor As-Built Information
Extreme Congestion, Inaccurate Existing
Dwgs,New Large Bore Piping Being Routed
• Extremely difficult site conditions
• Reduced site trips (Safer project)
• Easier and better engineering design
• Under budget
• Shut-downs and start-ups on time
• Successful projects leading to additional projects
What these sample projects have in common?
38
Summary Summary –– Plant Customer BenefitsPlant Customer Benefits
• Safer project
• Start-up on-time or ahead of schedule
• Reduced risk
• Answers for critical unknowns
• Reduced shutdown duration
• Better design and end product
• 2D, 3D, small or large projects
• Virtual site presence (Interactive Design)
• Proven technology – Rework cost 0.1% to 0.4% of TIC
• Cost savings
• Proven HDS work processes
• Creates new business opportunities
39
Top 3D Plant Design SystemsTop 3D Plant Design Systems
Company Product Leica Interface
Alias(Intergraph) I-Sketch PCF
AVEVA PDMS CloudWorx for PDMS
Bentley Systems AutoPLANT CloudWorx for AutoCAD
Bentley Systems PlantSpace CloudWorx for Microstation
CAE Plant4DCloudWorx for AutoCAD
CloudWorx for Microstation
COADE CADWorx CloudWorx for AutoCAD
Dassant Systems CATIA PTS Import
Intergraph PDS CloudWorx for Microstation
Intergraph SmartPlant 3D3D As-Built Model Import
(or SmartPlant Review Interface)
Intergraph SmartPlant Review CloudWorx for SPR
UGS FactoryCAD CloudWorx for AutoCAD
41
3D Design: 3D Design: CloudWorxCloudWorx for Intergraph SmartPlantfor Intergraph SmartPlant®® ReviewReview
Product Released May 16, 2005
Product is deployed in Intergraph’s next generation review and walk-through platform.
Some delays with shipping – temporary licenses available in interim.
CloudWorx for Intergraph SmartPlant®
3D expected Summer 2006 when Intergraph makes this functionality available.
Bentley CloudWorx is used with Intergraph PDS (Intergraph’s current 3D Detailed Engineering Design software)
42
3D Design: 3D Design: CloudWorxCloudWorx for Aveva PDMSfor Aveva PDMS
This product is designed for Aveva’s PDMS design environment.
Prototype product announcement and public demonstration at SPAR May 23, 2005
PDMS marketing video distributed to HDS sales organizations May 23, 20
Projected release target date 2H 2005.(Important Qualifier: Dependent on Aveva’s resource availability.)
Customer BETA Test opportunities for CloudWorx for PDMS for late July/early August.(Important Qualifier: Dependent on Aveva resource availability.)