35.)inc vs. ca

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

1/50

/---!e-library! 6.0 Philippines Copyright 2000 by Sony Valdez---\

[6V"#$%SC&' [/$' ()*%S(+ ,( C(S (,C.1 petitioner 3s. 4%4,+5*% C 7 +PP%+*S 5+& 7 %V(%8 7 9(, P(C%S+,& %*%V(S(, and 4,+5*% 4%,(%+ S. 9%,&%: respondents.6

;& % C ( S ( ,

P, ;.?

his is a petition @or re3ieA o@ the &e=ision dated 9ar=h 2" # o@ therespondent Co

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

2/50

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

3/50

( re@

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

4/50

>1 %Dhibit E>E letter dated =tober 2 2 o@ 4enrietta S. 9endezaddressed to the Christian %ra 5road=asting Ser3i=e Ahi=h reads in part?

D D D

(n the atter o@ yo

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

5/50

@ro oJending and atta=King other eDisting religions in shoAing F+ng (glesiani CristoF progra is hereby deleted and set aside. espondents are @

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

6/50

5oard has the poAer to re3ieA petitionerFs V progra E+ng (glesia niCristoE and 21 se=ond ass

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

7/50

3i1 hose Ahi=h are libelo

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

8/50

he indi3id

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

9/50

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

10/50

and 2G be=a

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

11/50

religion. Vis-a-3is religio

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

12/50

=ontrary to laA and/or good =

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

13/50

spee=h other than s

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

14/50

o

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

15/50

proposition Ahether or not =o' riginal e=ords p. 2#.

["' riginal e=ords p. 2$.

[#' riginal e=ords p. 2G.

[6' riginal e=ords p. 2. he se=ond re3ieA shoAs the @olloAing a=tion o@the respondent 5oard?

%9+OS?

+n

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

16/50

interpretations and1 Ahile the sides o@ the Protestants and the Catholi=s Ahothey pi=K on in this episode are not heard o@.

8e @eel that this topi= o@ the (glesia ni Oristo Ahi=h is U1 o@ atta=Kingother religio.

[' riginal e=ords pp. 2-20Q pp. ""-".

[0' riginal e=ords pp. 2-220.

[' riginal e=ords pp. 22>-2>0.

[2' riginal e=ords pp. 2>>-2"2.

[>' riginal e=ords pp. 2"#-2#0.

["' riginal e=ords pp. >$->G.

[#' enth &i3ision Aith +sso=iate ; S 6$ >1Q 5anta 5ooKs (n=. 3. S$2 S #G 6>1Q ,eA orK ies 3. nited States "0> S $> $1.

[20' >0 S 26.

[2' Se=. ". )o3erning Standard. - a1 the 5oard shall M

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

17/50

DDD DDD DDD

3ii. hose Ahi=h =learly =onstit" S 2#2 262 Ahere ;. 5la=K obser3ed that thetest Ehas aJorded a pra=ti=al g" S "" #1.

[2G' (d. at p. #0.

[2' )0' 4entoJ Spee=h 4ar and Sel@ )o3ernent? nderstanding the +bito@ the Clear and Present &anger est Col. *aA e3. ,o. 6 p. "#> 1.

[>' >$0 S "$G 621.

[>2' >G0 S # 6#1.

[>>' (d. at p. #G.

[>"' " Phil. "6G 21 per ;#' See 4 G21 @or the 3ieAthat =o

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

18/50


[6V"#$%SC&' [2/$' ()*%S(+ ,( C(S (,C.1 petitioner 3s. 4%4,+5*% C 7 +PP%+*S 5+& 7 %V(%8 7 9(, P(C%S+,& %*%V(S(, and 4,+5*% 4%,(%+ S. 9%,&%: respondents.6;=on=

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

19/50


[6V"#$%SC&' [>/$' ()*%S(+ ,( C(S (,C.1 petitioner 3s. 4%4,+5*% C 7 +PP%+*S 5+& 7 %V(%8 7 9(, P(C%S+,& %*%V(S(, and 4,+5*% 4%,(%+ S. 9%,&%: respondents.6;=on=

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

20/50

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

21/50

9otion Pi=t

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

22/50

3ii1 hose Ahi=h ay =onstit

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

23/50

=o

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

24/50

o==asion @or perissible liitation. +nd e3en in s

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

25/50

3iolen=e or o@ a Arong or =rie s

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

26/50

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

27/50

8e are @a=ed Aith a =ase o@ =ensorship and restraint Ahi=h ( stated earlierto

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

28/50

+s has been said the per@oran=e o@ the d

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

29/50

the =ategory o@ the printed atter pros=ribed in the old +dinistrati3e Code.7reedo o@ Aorship is s .S. "# #21.

['(d. at #0.

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

30/50

[0' (d.

[' >G0 .S. # 6#1.

[2' (d. at #$.

[>' 0 Phil. >G6 #$1.

["' (d. at >G.

[#' S". &issenting1.

[6' he di=hotoy betAeen the @reedo to belie3e and the @reedo to a=t 661.

[22' ollo p. "2. tali=s s' +rti=le 20 pro3ides?

+. 20. (oral do=trines obs=ene p

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

31/50

[2$' (n any so=iety the ost a==

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

32/50

P+,)+,(5+, ;.?

( thinK the basi= iss

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

33/50

eligio

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

34/50

the =ensorsF N

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

35/50

G6 sho

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

36/50

=onstit

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

37/50

M

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

38/50

=oission o@ 3iolen=e or o@ a Arong or =rie s

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

39/50

["' >$ SC+ $$ ;

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

40/50

Ahi=h in the M

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

41/50

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

42/50

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

43/50

and all pla=es . . . . ,or does it @olloA that otion pi=t

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

44/50

i31 hose Ahi=h ser3e no other p

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

45/50

8hile ( thinK the 5oard ay be granted the poAer to pre3ieA aterials it isonly @or the p

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

46/50

(V. he aMority liit thesel3es to a deterination o@ the =orre=tness o@ the5oardFs Hnding that the 3ideo tapes in N

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

47/50

8hat abo

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

48/50

8e ha3e long ago done aAay Aith =ontrols on print edia it is tie Ae didthe sae Aith the =ontrol on broad=ast edia Ahi=h @or so long hasoperated 2' lea3ing the p".

[$' " Phil. "6G 21.

[G' (d. at "$0.

[' .

[0' >"> .S. "# 6 *. %d. 0G #21.

[' See +yer ProdQ %astern 5road=asting Corp. &%1 3.&ans ;r. >$ SC+ 62G 6># G#1.

[2' 5"> .S. at #02-#0> 6 *.%d. at 06.

[>' )onzales 3. OalaA OatigbaK >$ SC+ at $2.

["' %astern 5road=asting Corp. &%1 3. &ans ;r. >$ SC+ at 6>#.

[#' 7reedan 3. 9aryland >G0 .S. # > *.%d. 2d 6" 6#1.

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

49/50

[6' P+* +. 7%,& 4% SP%9% C 7 4% ,(%& S+%S 6661.

[$' hanKs to *.%d. 2d 66 6G1Q 5lo SC+ > G$1Q ropi=al 4oes (n=.3. ,4+ #2 SC+ #"0 G$1.

[2>' 7reedan 3. 9aryland >G0 .S. at #G > *. %d. 2d at 6#".

[2"' Copare the @olloAing? EOnoAledge is essential to *.%d. "$0 1QPrii=ias 3. 7

8/10/2019 35.)INC vs. CA

50/50

6a1 o@ Ahi=h aKes it andatory @or ayors to grant perits @or the $ SC+ at $2# N2' he Hrst Hl =ensorship laA +=t ,o. >#G2 o@ the Philippine *egislat

35.)inc vs. ca

Documents