3.3 workshop on partner country perspectives for tracking domestic and international climate- and...

24
Seite 1 Dr. Andrea Iro Competence Centre for Climate Change Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) OECD DAC ENVIRONET-WPSTAT Task Team Paris, 19-20 May 2015 Workshop on Partner Country Perspectives for Tracking Domestic and International Climate- and Biodiversity-Related Finance

Upload: development-co-operation-directorate-dcd-dac

Post on 24-Jul-2015

199 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Seite 1

Dr. Andrea Iro Competence Centre for Climate Change

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)

OECD DAC ENVIRONET-WPSTAT Task Team

Paris, 19-20 May 2015

Workshop on Partner Country Perspectives for Tracking Domestic and

International Climate- and Biodiversity-Related Finance

Seite 2

The broader picture: relevance of OECD data/method and tracking capacities in partner countries

I

Entry points and examples of GIZ support II

Points for further reflection III

Content

Page 3

• GIZ is a German federal enterprise and implementing organisation with a

special focus on long-term capacity development programms

• GIZ’s mission is to promote international cooperation for sustainable

development and international education work

• Main commissioning party: German Federal Ministry for Economic

Cooperation and Development (BMZ); GIZ also works on behalf of other

German ministries and public/private bodies

• GIZ operates in over 130 countries with more than 17,000 staff members

around the globe

• Projects with climate focus account to 20%

of GIZ portfolio

GIZ Profile

Seite 4

Content

The broader picture: use/relevance of OECD data/method and tracking capacities in partner countries

I

Entry points and examples of GIZ Support II

III Points for further reflection

Seite 5

Why does the OECD DAC data/method

and the strengthening of tracking capacities

in partner countries become more relevant?

→ Focus on 3 key points

use/relevance of OECD data/method and tracking capacities in partner countries

Seite 6

Biennial Update Reports (BURs) by developing country Parties to present

information on „finance, technlogy and capacity-building support

needded and received“ (Decision 2/CP.17)

Future reporting arrangements under the new 2015 aggreement to be further

developed and specified

1. Meeting international reporting requirements under UNFCCC

Seite 7

2. Enhancing opportunities to access funding

… by demonstrating accountable and transparent spending to

donors and financial mechanisms.

Seite 8

3. Strengthening efficiency + effectiveness of climate finance

By in-country tracking aiming for a better understanding of the scale,

sectorial/regional distribution of finance and uncovering trends and

gaps

→ Use scarce (public) finance more efficiently and effectively

→ Use tracking for a „reality-check“: do national policies/strategies match with

funding?

→ Undertake further work on budget risk-analysis: are national investments

climate-proof?

Seite 9

Use and relevance of OECD DAC system and methodology…

1. … as a data source for reporting

2. … as a methodological option for classifying/labbeling

national expenditure by using the climate markers

Seite 10

Content

Entry points and examples of GIZ Support

II

The broader picture: use/relevance of OECD data/method and tracking capacities in partner countries

I

III Points for further reflection

Seite 11

Primary project goal: strengthening in-country capacities for enhanced

climate reporting (Biennial Update Reports/BURs and National

Communications/NatComs) under UNFCCC

4 pilot countries: Chile, Dominican Republic, Ghana and the

Philippines

Focus on mitigation reporting, but discussions also on reporting on

support including finance

1. Meeting international reporting requirements under UNFCCC

Seite 12

Issues raised by partner countries:

So far no jointly aggreed comon reporting format for BURs → Lack of definition

and understanding on how to report on support including financing

Missing institutional capacity, central institution/coordination structures gathering

and collecting climate-related finance data

Activities included: identification of specific needs and priorities; tailor-made

capacity-building trainings, peer-to-peer exchange; generation of knowledge

products

1. Meeting international reporting requirements under UNFCCC

Seite 13

Knowledge Product: „Biennial Update Report Template“

Template provides reporting guidance by offering structure; guiding

questions differentiated in minimum information and additional information/best

practice; exemplary tables

Seite 14 ICMP 2014-2017 26-May-2015

„Biennial Update Report Template“: Financial, technology and capacity

building needs and support received

Seite 15

GIZ’s

Ready for Climate

Finance approach

and activities

Contact: CFReady Team

[email protected]

2. Enhancing opportunities to access funding

Seite 16

Page 17

Further project example activities from Grenada:

„Pilot Programme on Integrated Climate Change Adaptation Strategies“

Climate Expenditure Labbeling analysis and budget tagging of

2015/2016 budgets

Aims:

1. To quantify climate change related expenditures in the national budget

providing better baseline for future analysis

2. To identfy how much of the national budget could be impacted by

climate change

3. To achive a better understanding of formulation of climate change

policy and its linkages to expenditures

3. Strengthening efficiency + effectiveness of climate finance

Page 18

Further project

example activities

from Vietnam:

3. Strengthening efficiency + effectiveness of climate finance

Seite 19

Entry points and examples of GIZ Support

II

The broader picture: use/relevance of OECD data/method and tracking capacities in partner countries

I

III

Content

Points for further reflection

Seite 20

Consideration of trade-offs: regular snapshot vs. systematic integration?

→ CPEIRs and other budget tagging analyses provide a „snapshot“ of climate

finance; to be conducted on a regular basis

→ Systematic integration of labbeling/classifying climate-related finance in

national budgets can become very labour-intensive; added value need to be

evident.

What are the incentives to set up such a system?

How can national/subnational buy-in be ensured to avoid gaps in

implementation?

Points (and some more questions) for reflection and discussion…

Seite 21

How can harmonisation between various methodologies be

strengthened/ensured (OECD, CPEI, etc.)?

How to ensure that methodology is used consistently within/among

countries?

How can national differences be mitigated when reporting to

international institutions, e.g. UNFCCC?

Are there quality standards and quality checks in order to deliver

meaningful and comparable data?

Points (and some more questions) for reflection and discussion…

Seite 22

Thank you for your attention!

Merci pour votre attention!

Contact

Dr. Andrea Iro

Competence Centre for Climate Change

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Godesberger Allee 119

53175 Bonn , Germany

T +49 228 24934-134

M +49 160 96392190

E [email protected]

I www.giz.de

Seite 23

Additional slides

Seite 24

UNFCCC Requirements related to Chapter 5: Financial, technology

and capacity building needs and support received

Table 24 presents the UNFCCC requirements covered in Chapter 5 and

indicates where each requirement is addressed within the chapter.