3 roi killers for data projects
TRANSCRIPT
All rights reserved.
3 UNUSUAL ROI KILLERS FOR DATA PROJECTS
Bob Suh, CEO and Founder
All rights reserved. 2®
Here are 3 reasons to be skeptical of your returns
on data
3
All rights reserved. 3®
If you miss1, it
takes too long to reset
1
1. Missing could be: 1) being wrong about how users will react to data, 2) being wrong about which users to target, 3) predicting events that don’t occur.
2. It takes about 20 seconds to reload a musket. A problem if the enemy is less than a 20 second run from the shooter.
All rights reserved. 4®
Because we spend too much time processing data, believing more is better
Ready Aim Fire Check Shot Repeat
Capi
tal a
nd T
ime
Engagement Rate
BIG DATA
Process all data
Cycle time to develop and deploy
Predictions off and engagement rate low
All rights reserved. 5®
And we’ve made it too complicated to make changes once we know we’re wrong
All rights reserved. 6®
And sometimes we don’t even know we missed until it’s too late
All rights reserved. 7®
People change their behavior
when they know there’s a
downside to being tracked
2
All rights reserved. 8®
Because sales people keep two records of their activity: unreported and reported
6%
ONCORPS CASE
Unreported
opportunities
Reported
opportunities
6%6%
Salesforce research
on conversion rates of
all CRM opportunities
90%
Actual conversion rate
All rights reserved. 9®
And this results in a common CFO revenue forecasting practice known as “the haircut”
ONCORPS CASE:
CFO of a major bank trims 20% off the top of his CRM forecasts
All rights reserved. 10®
Predictive systems will be
wrong more than they’re right, making users ignore them
3
11®
Because it is mathematically impossible to accurately predict something rare
All rights reserved.
Prior Rate of Occurrence
The odds something actually happens
Reporting Accuracy
The odds you called it right when it happened
5/50 = 10%
Red = +
Red = -
Red = +
Not red = +
Not red = +
+ = 80%
FalsePositives
The odds you will be wrong when you predict it\
1
70%
+ + +
+
+ +
+ ++ +
\1. Applying Bayes Theorem of conditional probability
1 2 3
All rights reserved. 12®
And users stop responding when data are inaccurate and negative
Predictive alert
Didn’t happen
Response declines
Data distorte
d
FALSE-POSITIVE CYCLE
All rights reserved. 13®
So how can you change your data projects to avoid these ROI killers?
?
All rights reserved. 14®
Make it easier to measure reactions and adapt to changing decisions
Ready Aim Fire Check Shot Repeat
Capi
tal a
nd T
ime
Engagement Rate
BIG DATA
Process all data
Cycle time to develop and deploy
Predictions off and engagement rate low
ADAPTIVE DECISION ANALYTICSLearn from select data
Decision makers track goals, choices and outcomes
Nudge with personalized data to improve decisions
All rights reserved. 15®
Make the user experience a self-regulated experience with no downsides to sharing data
Adaptive decision analytics Is likeToday’s user experience is like
All rights reserved. 16®
Learn from the lessons of sports analytics in managing to only the most predictable outcomes
1st
2nd
3rd
HR
Players are 1000% more likely to get to the first stage then the final stage…
32%
4.9%
.05%
2.9%
…teams that focused on these odds were significantly more
efficient
The top 10% of teams at achieving the first stage paid $530K per win
The bottom 10% of teams paid 43% more - $756K per win
Players who perform better at the first stage have significantly lower market values
The odds of getting to each base from a single attempt in
2015
21
All rights reserved. 17®
And follow a method that allows for quick changes to hypotheses based on user reactions
1
Loading…
What data do we need to evaluate our goal?
2
25%
45%
17%
100%
39%
What are the odds
we’ll meet our goal?
3
+
What scenarios
may change our odds?
4
Are the right people
reacting to our nudges?
5
How may we adapt based
on the response?
18®
©
Cambridge, Massachusetts | Bristol, United Kingdom
All rights reserved.
THANK YOU
See our website here
See our video here