3-1 sect. 3.4 principles of reliable data transfer computer networking: a top down approach...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
218 views
TRANSCRIPT
3-1
Sect. 3.4Principles ofreliable data transfer
Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach Featuring the Internet, 1st edition. Jim Kurose, Keith RossAddison-Wesley, 2001.
All material copyright 1996-2002J.F Kurose and K.W. Ross, All Rights Reserved
Slides modified from originals by Jens B Jorgensen and Jonas Thomsen, University of Aarhus
3-2
Principles of Reliable data transfer important in application, transport, and link layers top-10 list of important networking topics!
characteristics of unreliable channel will determine complexity of reliable data transfer protocol (rdt)
3-3
Rdt1.0: reliable transfer over a reliable channel
underlying channel perfectly reliable no bit errors no loss of packets
separate FSMs for sender, receiver: sender sends data into underlying channel receiver read data from underlying channel
Wait for call from above packet = make_pkt(data)
udt_send(packet)
rdt_send(data)
extract (packet,data)deliver_data(data)
Wait for call from
below
rdt_rcv(packet)
sender receiver
3-4
Rdt2.0: channel with bit errors
underlying channel may flip bits in packet recall: UDP checksum to detect bit errors
the question: how to recover from errors: acknowledgements (ACKs): receiver explicitly tells
sender that packet is received OK negative acknowledgements (NAKs): receiver
explicitly tells sender that packet had errors sender retransmits packet on receipt of NAK
new mechanisms in rdt2.0 (beyond rdt1.0): error detection receiver feedback: control messages (ACK,NAK)
receiver->sender
3-5
rdt2.0: FSM specification
Wait for call from above
sndpkt = make_pkt(data, checksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
extract(rcvpkt,data)deliver_data(data)udt_send(ACK)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && isACK(rcvpkt)
udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && isNAK(rcvpkt)
udt_send(NAK)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && corrupt(rcvpkt)
Wait for ACK or
NAK
Wait for call from
belowsender
receiverrdt_send(data)
3-6
rdt2.0 has a fatal flaw!
What happens if ACK/NAK corrupted?
sender doesn’t know what happened at receiver!
can’t just retransmit: possible duplicate
What to do? sender ACKs/NAKs
receiver’s ACK/NAK? What if sender ACK/NAK lost?
retransmit, but this might cause retransmission of a correctly received packet!
Handling duplicates: sender adds sequence
number to each packet sender retransmits
current packet if ACK/NAK is garbled
receiver discards (doesn’t deliver up) duplicate packets
Sender sends one packet, then waits for receiver response
stop and wait
3-7
rdt2.1: sender, handles garbled ACK/NAKs
Wait for call 0 from
above
sndpkt = make_pkt(0, data, checksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_send(data)
Wait for ACK or NAK 0 udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && ( corrupt(rcvpkt) ||isNAK(rcvpkt) )
sndpkt = make_pkt(1, data, checksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_send(data)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt) && isACK(rcvpkt)
udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && ( corrupt(rcvpkt) ||isNAK(rcvpkt) )
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt) && isACK(rcvpkt)
Wait for call 1 from
above
Wait for ACK or NAK 1
3-8
rdt2.1: receiver, handles garbled ACK/NAKs
Wait for 0 from below
sndpkt = make_pkt(NAK, chksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && not corrupt(rcvpkt) && has_seq0(rcvpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt) && has_seq1(rcvpkt)
extract(rcvpkt,data)deliver_data(data)sndpkt = make_pkt(ACK, chksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
Wait for 1 from below
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt) && has_seq0(rcvpkt)
extract(rcvpkt,data)deliver_data(data)sndpkt = make_pkt(ACK, chksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && (corrupt(rcvpkt)
sndpkt = make_pkt(ACK, chksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && not corrupt(rcvpkt) && has_seq1(rcvpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && (corrupt(rcvpkt)
sndpkt = make_pkt(ACK, chksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
sndpkt = make_pkt(NAK, chksum)udt_send(sndpkt)
3-9
rdt3.0: channels with errors and loss
New assumption: underlying channel can also lose packets (data or ACKs) checksum, sequence
numbers, ACKs, retransmissions will be of help, but not enough
Q: how to deal with loss? sender waits until it is
certain that data or ACK is lost;then retransmits
Approach: sender waits “reasonable” amount of time for ACK
retransmits if no ACK is received in this time
if data (or ACK) just delayed (not lost): retransmission will be a
duplicate, but use of sequence numbers already handles this
receiver must specify sequence number of pkt being ACKed
requires countdown timer
3-10
rdt3.0 sender
sndpkt = make_pkt(0, data, checksum)udt_send(sndpkt)start_timer
rdt_send(data)
Wait for
ACK0
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && ( corrupt(rcvpkt) ||isACK(rcvpkt,1) )
Wait for call 1 from
above
sndpkt = make_pkt(1, data, checksum)udt_send(sndpkt)start_timer
rdt_send(data)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt) && isACK(rcvpkt,0)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && ( corrupt(rcvpkt) ||isACK(rcvpkt,0) )
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt) && isACK(rcvpkt,1)
stop_timerstop_timer
udt_send(sndpkt)start_timer
timeout
udt_send(sndpkt)start_timer
timeout
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt)
Wait for call 0 from
above
Wait for
ACK1
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt)
3-11
rdt3.0 in action
3-12
rdt3.0 in action
3-13
rdt3.0: stop-and-wait operation
first packet bit transmitted, t = 0
sender receiver
RTT
last packet bit transmitted, t = L / R
first packet bit arriveslast packet bit arrives, send ACK
ACK arrives, send next packet, t = RTT + L / R
rdt3.0 works, but performance stinks
3-14
Pipelined protocols
Pipelining: sender allows multiple, “in-flight”, yet-to-be-acknowledged packets range of sequence numbers must be increased buffering at sender and/or receiver
Two generic forms of pipelined protocols: go-Back-N, selective repeat
3-15
Go-Back-NSender: k-bit sequence number in packet header [0,2k-1] “window” of up to N, consecutive un-ACK’ed packets allowed
ACK(n): ACKs all packets up to, including sequence number n - “cumulative ACK” may deceive duplicate ACKs (see receiver)
timer for each in-flight packet timeout(n): retransmit packet n and all higher sequence numbered packets in window
3-16
GBN: sender extended FSM
Wait start_timerudt_send(sndpkt[base])udt_send(sndpkt[base+1])…udt_send(sndpkt[nextseqnum-1])
timeout
rdt_send(data)
if (nextseqnum < base+N) { sndpkt[nextseqnum] = make_pkt(nextseqnum,data,chksum) udt_send(sndpkt[nextseqnum]) if (base == nextseqnum) start_timer nextseqnum++ }else refuse_data(data)
base = getacknum(rcvpkt)+1If (base == nextseqnum) stop_timer else start_timer
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcorrupt(rcvpkt)
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && corrupt(rcvpkt)
3-17
GBN: receiver extended FSM
ACK-only: always send ACK for correctly-received packet with highest in-order sequence number may generate duplicate ACKs need only remember expectedseqnum
out-of-order packet: discard (don’t buffer) -> no receiver buffering! Re-ACK packet with highest in-order sequence number
Wait
udt_send(sndpkt)
default
rdt_rcv(rcvpkt) && notcurrupt(rcvpkt) && hasseqnum(rcvpkt,expectedseqnum)
extract(rcvpkt,data)deliver_data(data)sndpkt = make_pkt(expectedseqnum,ACK,chksum)udt_send(sndpkt)expectedseqnum++
3-18
GBN inaction
3-19
Principles of reliable data transfer: Summary
rdt1.0: Simplest case; a reliable channel given
rdt2.0 and rdt2.1: Compensation for bit errors
rdt3.0: Compensation for lost packets To solve rdt3.0 (stop-and-wait)
performance problems, pipelined protocols (Go-Back-N) are introduced