2a-c imp walsh drug transport, absorption 2011

Upload: scott-yee

Post on 07-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    1/74

    Drug Names

    Chemical name

    Code name

    Chosen by manufacturer during drug development

    Proprietary name Chosen by manufacturer for marketing purposes

    Also referred to as brand or trade name

    Official name

    Assigned by US Adopted Name Council

    Also referred to as generic or nonproprietary name Generic name

    Official, nonproprietary name

    Class name

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    2/74

    Procaine

    4-aminobenzoic acid 2(diethylamino) ethyl

    ester Local anesthetic

    NOVOCAINE

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    3/74

    Physicochemical Properties of

    Drug Molecules

    ZnO N2O

    C2H5OH

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    4/74

    Molecular weight

    Stability in vitro and in vivo

    Gas, liquid, or solid

    Solubility in water and in oil

    3-dimensional structure Ionizable groups

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    5/74

    Lipophilicity

    Solubility in lipid relative to water

    Measured by oil/water partition

    coefficient

    Drug concentration in oil versus water

    Oil

    Water

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    6/74

    Aspirin

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    7/74

    Amphetamine

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    8/74

    Influence of pKa

    AH A- + H+

    BH+ B + H+

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    9/74

    pKa

    Aspirin

    Weak acid

    pKa of 3.5

    Amphetamine

    Weak base

    pKa of 10

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    10/74

    Lidocaine pKa 8

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    11/74

    Henderson-Hasselbach

    Relationship: pKa and pH

    pH

    % Unionizedacid base

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    12/74

    Acetylcholine

    quaternary ammonium withfixed positive charge

    +

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    13/74

    Stereoisomers

    D vs L amphetamine

    NEXIUM (single stereoisomer) vsPRILOSEC (racemic mixture)

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    14/74

    TPA

    tissue plasminogen activator

    Protein with 527 aa and MW of 70,000

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    15/74

    Pharmacodynamics

    Mechanism of action

    Clincal efficacy Clinical indication

    Side effects and toxicity

    Selectivity

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    16/74

    Pharmacokinetics

    The time-course of:absorption

    distribution

    elimination

    Factors that modifypharmacokinetic phenomenon

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    17/74

    Dose

    Cp

    absorption

    distribution

    elimination

    EFFECT

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    18/74

    Objective of PK Analysis

    Characterize absorption, distributionelimination kinetics Dose dependence

    Species dependence

    Identification of other variables

    Predict concentration at site of action

    Predict time course of drug effect Design dosage regimen and individualize

    based on patient phenotype and genotype

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    19/74

    Biotransport

    Passive diffusion through cellmembrane

    Filtration

    Carrier-mediated transport

    Receptor-mediated endocytosis

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    20/74

    Passive Diffusion

    First-order kinetic process Rate dependent on concentration gradient

    Cellular structure Tight junctions

    Lack of porosity

    Chemical attributes

    Lipophilicity Ionizable residues and pKa

    Molecular weight

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    21/74

    Capillary PermeabilityPorosities Blood-Brain Barrier

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    22/74

    Lipophilicity

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    23/74

    Impact of Ionizable Groups

    Ionization markedly decreaseslipophilicity

    Drugs with fixed negative or positivecharge not readily transported bypassive diffusion Example of quaternary ammonium

    compounds R2

    R 1 N+

    R4 R3

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    24/74

    Filtration

    Transport in bulk flow of aqueous fluid

    Rate dependent on

    hydrostatic pressure molecular weight, size, charge, and binding to

    excluded macromolecules

    tissue porosity glomerular capillaries in kidney

    choroid plexus in brain

    sinusoids in liver

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    25/74

    Review of Medical Physiology, 2001

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    26/74

    Review ofMedical

    Physiology,2001

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    27/74

    Fenestrated Capillary of Renal GlomerulusD. Vaughan, Oxford University Press, 2002

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    28/74

    Carrier-mediated Transport

    Saturable kinetics

    Substrate competition

    Tissue differences inexpression of carriers

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    29/74

    Drug Transporters

    Multidrug resistancep-glycoproteins

    mdr gene products 170kD

    Amphipathic cationicand neutral substrates

    Verapamil sensitive

    Multidrug resistance-associated proteins

    MRP1-6, oatp 190kD

    Organic anionicsubstrates

    Probenecid sensitive

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    30/74

    MDR p-Glycoprotein

    Efflux pump, cause of resistance to someantitumor drugs

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    31/74

    Drug Transporter Localization Intestinal mucosa

    Hepatocyte

    Proximal renal tubule

    Brain

    Vascular endothelium

    Choroid plexus

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    32/74

    Receptor-mediated

    Endocytosis

    Importance in selective tissue uptake

    Rate dependent on receptor expressionand membrane insertion

    Saturable kinetics

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    33/74

    Dose

    Cp

    absorption

    distribution

    elimination

    EFFECT

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    34/74

    Absorption Kinetics

    Time-course of transport from site ofadministration to systemic circulation

    Characterization by absorption half-life

    percent dose absorbed (bioavailability)

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    35/74

    Routes of Administration

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    36/74

    Routes of Administration

    Intravenous

    100% bioavailability

    Rate dependent on technique ofadministration, not physiological process

    Importance of sterility, lack of particulates,

    aqueous solubility of agent

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    37/74

    Routes of Administration

    Subcutaneous

    Uptake of high molecular weight

    compounds into lymphatics Blood flow as rate-limiting factor for some

    drugs

    Improved bioavailability over oral route forsome drugs

    Delivery devices for sustained release

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    38/74

    Routes of Administration

    Inhalation

    Rapid absorption of gases and vapors due to

    high pulmonary blood flow low diffusional distance from alveolus to

    blood

    Route for localized delivery of drugs with

    actions in pulmonary tissue

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    39/74

    Topical

    Absorption through skin generally slow due tosurface layers of dead, keratinized cells

    (stratum corneum)

    Drugs with sufficient lipophilicity and potencymay have systemic clinical efficacy upon

    topical application in transdermal patch Avoids first-pass effect

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    40/74

    Enteral Administration

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    41/74

    Routes of Administration

    OralBioavailability may be low due to:

    Mucosa as barrier

    High MW

    low lipophilicity

    carrier-mediated extrusion

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    42/74

    Oral

    Bioavailability may be low due to:

    First-pass effectLumenal, mucosal and/or hepaticbiotransformation during absorption

    process

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    43/74

    Dose

    Cp

    absorption

    distribution

    elimination

    EFFECT

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    44/74

    Distribution Kinetics

    Rate and extent of distribution from vascular fluid totissue space

    Determinants of equilibration rate

    Blood flow Determinants of equilibrium gradient

    Tissue factors

    Vascular permeability

    Macromolecular binding in plasma and tissue

    Physicochemical factors MW, lipophilicity, affinity for carriers

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    45/74

    Sinusoids of the Liver

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    46/74

    Tissue Perfusion Rates

    (ml/min-100g tissue )High

    Lung 400

    Kidney 350

    Liver 85Brain 55

    Intermediate/variableSkeletal muscle 5

    LowFat 3

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    47/74

    Binding Sites in Plasma

    PROTEIN MW CONCENTRATION

    albumin 67,000 500-700 uM

    a1-acidglycoprotein

    42,000 9-23 uM

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    48/74

    Plasma Protein Binding

    DRUG

    PERCENT BOUND

    IN PLASMA

    Warfarin 99%

    Codeine 7%

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    49/74

    Fluid Compartments

    70-kg AdultCompartment Liters %BW Indicator

    plasma 3 4 131I-albumin

    extracellular water 12 17 sucrose

    total body water 41 58 D2O

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    50/74

    Apparent Volume of Distribution

    VD

    Volume of the body into which thedrug appears to have distributed

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    51/74

    Concentration = Amount

    Volume

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    52/74

    amount in body (grams)volume (liters)

    = plasma concentration Cp (g/l)

    Vd as Determinant of Cp

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    53/74

    Onecompartment

    Twocompartment

    Katzung, 2001

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    54/74

    Drug Structure and Vd

    High MW such as proteins Vd about plasma volume, 4% BW

    Small MW and polar Vd about extracellular fluid volume, 17% BW

    Small MW and lipophilic

    Vd about total body water, 58% BW even larger if highly lipophilic and

    accumulates in fat, >> 58% BW

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    55/74

    Elimination Kinetics

    Rate and extent of elimination byexcretion or biotransformation

    Quantitation by total clearance (ClT)

    Volume of plasma cleared of compound

    per unit time by all routes and mechanisms Expressed as ml/min or ml/hr

    Cl d Bl d Fl

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    56/74

    Clearance and Blood Flow

    organ

    Cp arterialCp venous

    Cl organ = ( blood flow ) (Cpa-Cpv) / Cpa

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    57/74

    Total Clearance

    Relates Cp to Elimination Rate

    ( ClT ) ( Cp ) = dA / dt

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    58/74

    Drug Elimination

    Parent

    compound

    Metabolite

    Excretion

    Excretion

    Furthermetabolism

    ClR

    ClNR

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    59/74

    Total Clearance

    Is sum of renal and nonrenal clearances

    ClT

    = ClR

    + ClNR

    Renal refers to urinary excretion unchanged

    Nonrenal refers to all other routes and

    mechanisms

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    60/74

    Nonrenal Clearance

    Excretion unchanged

    Lungs (if high vapor pressure)

    Bile

    Biotransformation

    Phase I oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis

    Phase II conjugations

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    61/74

    Significance of Biotransformation

    Prodrug Active Drug

    Metabolite 1 Metabolite 2 Metabolite 3

    (inactive) (active) (toxic)

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    62/74

    Kinetics of Biotransformation

    Enzymatic reactions and thereforeMichaelis-Menton kinetics

    Generally therapeutic levels

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    63/74

    Exceptions to First-Order Kinetics

    Drugs where therapeutic level >> Km Ethanol

    Aspirin

    Toxic levels may exceed Km Acetaminophen

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    64/74

    Causes of Variability inClearance by Biotransformation

    Exposures

    Genetics

    Age

    Disease

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    65/74

    Pathways of Biotransformation

    Drug

    phase 1Metabolite

    phase 2Conjugated Metabolite

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    66/74

    Phase 1

    Cytochrome P450 Enzymes Heme containing

    Imbedded in membrane of smoothendoplasmic reticulum (microsomes)

    Highest activity in liver

    Catalyze addition of molecular oxygen

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    67/74

    CYP450 Family

    About 17 human genes

    Promoters include certain drugs,

    herbal medicines and environmentalchemicals

    Isozymes differ in substrate specificity,

    promoters, and inhibitors

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    68/74

    Inducers of CYP450 Isozymes

    INDUCER ISOZYME

    Cigarettesmoke

    (PAHs)

    CYP1A1

    Barbiturates CYP2B

    Steroids CYP3A4

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    69/74

    Phase II Conjugating Moieties

    Glucuronic Acid

    Sulfate

    Methyl Groups

    Glutathione

    Acetyl Groups

    Glycine

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    70/74

    Sites of Morphine

    Biotransformation

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    71/74

    Renal Clearance

    Volume of plasma cleared by excretionunchanged into urine

    Mechanisms Glomerular filtration of unbound low MW

    drug

    Proximal tubular secretion, mediated by

    carrier proteins such as oatp, mdr Passive reabsorption of uncharged,

    lipophilic drug

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    72/74

    Mechanisms of Renal Clearance

    Glomerular filtration

    Proximal tubular secretion

    Reabsorption

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    73/74

    Determination of ClR

    ClR = Urinary excretion rate / Cp

    ClR = Amount excreted duringcollection interval / interval length

    / Cp at midpoint of interval

  • 8/4/2019 2a-c IMP Walsh Drug Transport, Absorption 2011

    74/74

    Relationship of ClR to Mechanism ofRenal Excretion

    ClR Mechanismml/min/70 kg

    0-120 exclusion from filtration and/ornet reabsorption

    120 (GFR) glomerular filtration and noreabsorption

    120-640 (RPF) glomerular filtration and net tubularsecretion