document26

1
26 Analysis of Rigid When analyzing the frame by moment distribution, begin by locking the joints b and c. Fig. 12 illustrates the static conditions from which the fixed end moment at b is determined. It can be shown that F. E. M. at b = (3 X 106 X 122) X 0.02 E XD X Sb X £ X (l - rj^j 17.88 X 13.3 X (1/12) X 2.503 X \ 13.3 X 6.0/ 17.88 354,000 ft.lb. According to Problem 2, the formula for both corner and crown moment when deck is straight may be written as Moment = 354,000 X [(1.0000 - 0.8590 - 0.0094) - 0.0905] = 354,000 X 0.0411 = 14,500 ft.lb. Final moments allowing for curvature of deck equal ( 17 88 \2 17 88 + 1 5oj = 12,300 fUb. / 17 88 \ Crown: 14,500 X ( 17 88 + 1 5o) = 13>400 ft lb- + 1.50, The foregoing procedure is simple and general; it is applicable to frames with relatively high and slender legs. In most rigid frame bridges, however, the legs are generally so short and stubby that it is preferable to determine moments due to change in deck length by an independent method. The reason may be illustrated by an example. Consider the case in which the coefficients in the same frame as above have been determined with less degree of accuracy, and substitute in the original formula the slightly different values for the frame coefficients as follows : Moment = 354,000 X [ (1.00 - 0.85 - 0.01) - 0.09] = 354,000 X 0.05 = 17,700 ft.lb. By comparing the original with the assumed case, it is seen that the slight changes in the frame coefficients create a variation in the moment which exceeds 20 per cent. A considerable amount of analytical work was made in order to sub stitute for moment distribution asimpler procedure for change in deck length. The following empirical formula was developed for single-span, hinged frames with proportions as indicated in Chart I : Corner moment = 4.35 X 106 X ^2 X (Crown thickness)2 {tl-\-K) D is the relative displacement of each hinge (see Fig. 12) ; and the con stant is based upon a value of modulus of elasticity equal to 3 X 106 X 122 lb. per sq. ft. The numerical values are to be inserted in feet, and the moment is in ft.lb. per linear foot of width of the frame. The formula Generated on 2015-11-26 09:03 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/coo.31924003881277 Public Domain, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-google

Upload: suman-nakarmi

Post on 28-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

p26

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Document26

26 Analysis of Rigid

When analyzing the frame by moment distribution, begin by lockingthe joints b and c. Fig. 12 illustrates the static conditions from which thefixed end moment at b is determined. It can be shown that

F. E. M. at b =

(3 X 106 X 122) X 0.02

E XDX Sb X £ X (l

-

rj^

j

17.88X 13.3 X

(1/12) X 2.503

X \ 13.3 X 6.0/17.88354,000 ft.lb.

According to Problem 2, the formula for both corner and crown moment —

when deck is straight —may be written as

Moment = 354,000 X [(1.0000 - 0.8590 - 0.0094) - 0.0905] =

354,000 X 0.0411 = 14,500 ft.lb.

Final moments —allowing for curvature of deck —equal(

17 88 \217 88 + 1 5

oj = 12,300 fUb.

/ 17 88 \Crown: 14,500 X ( 17 88 + 1 5

o) =

13>400 ft lb-+ 1.50,

The foregoing procedure is simple and general; it is

applicable to frames with relatively high and slender legs.

In most rigid frame bridges, however, the legs are generallyso short and stubby that it is preferable to determinemoments due to change in deck length by an independentmethod. The reason may be illustrated by an example.Consider the case in which the coefficients in the same frameas above have been determined with less degree of accuracy,and substitute in the original formula the slightly differentvalues for the frame coefficients as follows :

Moment = 354,000 X [ (1.00 - 0.85 - 0.01) - 0.09] = 354,000 X0.05 = 17,700 ft.lb.

By comparing the original with the assumed case, it is seen that theslight changes in the frame coefficients create a variation in the momentwhich exceeds 20 per cent.

A considerable amount of analytical work was made in order to substitute for moment distribution a simpler procedure for change in decklength. The following empirical formula was developed for single-span,hinged frames with proportions as indicated in Chart I :

Corner moment = 4.35 X 106 X ^2

X (Crown thickness)2{tl-\-K)

D is the relative displacement of each hinge (see Fig. 12) ; and the constant is based upon a value of modulus of elasticity equal to 3 X 106

X 122 lb. per sq. ft. The numerical values are to be inserted in feet, and themoment is in ft.lb. per linear foot of width of the frame. The formula

Genera

ted o

n 2

01

5-1

1-2

6 0

9:0

3 G

MT /

htt

p:/

/hd

l.hand

le.n

et/

20

27

/coo.3

19

24

00

38

81

27

7Public

Dom

ain

, G

oog

le-d

igit

ized

/

htt

p:/

/ww

w.h

ath

itru

st.o

rg/a

ccess

_use

#pd-g

oogle