25 th march 2014 crewe alexandra pupil premium review conference
TRANSCRIPT
25th March 2014
Crewe Alexandra
Pupil PremiumReview Conference
Programme for Today
• Unfortunately Tony Crane, Director of CS is unable to join us today.
• Real sense of momentum to address the achievement gap for Disadvantaged Learners – today is an important event to :
a. share best practice, b. Feedback on strategies being adopted across our schools,c. Outline a range of next steps for schools to consider,d. Plan future PP events and strategies WITH YOU.Therefore, your contributions to today’s event are essential.• WARNING ..... There is too much information for one meeting.• RESOURCES .... Pack on tables including recording framework.
Additional resources ....
http://www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/schools/education_partnership.aspx
3 Separate Sections : CPD & Training EventsNational ResourcesBest Practice documents for Schools
3 Separate Sections : CPD & Training EventsNational ResourcesBest Practice documents for Schools
More to be added as best practice documentation is sourced ...
Alerts in the BULLETIN
More to be added as best practice documentation is sourced ...
Alerts in the BULLETIN
Pupil premium: the gap in 2013
The gap gets wider as pupils get older: • 19% gap (60%: 79%) in level 4 at 11 • 27% gap (38%: 65%) in 5A-CsEM at 16 Big variations between schools and between LAs• Level 4 gap: Newham 4%; Warrington 14%; Cheshire East 19%; Cheshire West 24%• GCSE gap: London < 20%; Warrington 30%; Cheshire West 33%; Cheshire East 38%Attainment of PP pupils–Level 4: Camden 79%; Warrington 69%; Cheshire East 64%; Cheshire West 59%–GCSE: Tower Hamlets 63%; Warrington 41%; Cheshire West 37%; Cheshire East 31%
Cheshire East is 140th out of 150 LAs for PP learners at KS4
Smallest gaps in schools with high or low FSM
The SuttonTrust2011
The Pupil Premium report
Where Pupil Premium had little impact schools …
Where pupil premium had little impact schools…
had a lack of clarity about the intended impact of the spending spent the funding indiscriminately on teaching assistants, with little impact did not monitor the quality and impact of interventions well enough, even where other monitoring was effective did not have a good performance management system for teaching assistants and other support staff did not have a clear audit trail for where the funding had been spent
Where pupil premium had little impact schools…
focused on pupils attaining the nationally expected level at the end of the key stage (Level 4, five A* to C grades at GCSE) but did not to go beyond these expectations, so some more able eligible pupils underachieved planned their Pupil Premium spending in isolation to their other planning, for example, it was not part of the school development plan compared their performance to local rather than national data, which suppressed expectations if they were in a low-performing local authority
Where pupil premium had little impact schools…
compared the performance of their pupils who were eligible for free school meals with other eligible pupils nationally, rather than all pupils, again lowering expectations did not focus their pastoral work on the desired outcomes for pupils and did not have any evidence to show themselves whether the work had or had not been effective did not have governors involved in making decisions about the Pupil Premium, or challenging the way in which it was allocated.
The Pupil Premium report made by …
Where it went well schools …
Where it went well schools…
carefully ring-fenced the funding so that they always spent it on the target group of pupils (F)
thoroughly involved governors in the decision making and evaluation process (FG)
had a clear policy on spending the Pupil Premium, agreed by governors and publicised on the school website (FG)
drew on research evidence and evidence from their own and others’ experience to allocate the funding to the activities that were most likely to have an impact on improving achievement (FS)
Where it went well schools…
ensured that a designated senior leader had a clear overview of how the funding was being allocated and the difference it was making to the outcomes for pupils (St)
ensured that class and subject teachers knew which pupils were eligible for the Pupil Premium so that they could take responsibility for accelerating their progress (St)
had a clear and robust performance management system for all staff, and included discussions about pupils eligible for the Pupil Premium in performance management meetings (St)
Where it went well schools… never confused eligibility for the Pupil Premium with low ability, and focused on supporting their disadvantaged pupils to achieve the highest levels (ID)
thoroughly analysed which pupils were underachieving, particularly in English and mathematics, and why (ID)
used achievement data frequently to check whether interventions or techniques were working and made adjustments accordingly, rather than just using the data retrospectively to see if something had worked (D)
were able, through careful monitoring and evaluation, to demonstrate the impact of each aspect of their spending on the outcomes for pupils (D)
Where it went well schools…
understood the importance of ensuring that all day-to-day teaching meets the needs of each learner, rather than relying on interventions to compensate for teaching that is less than good (T) allocated their best teachers to teach intervention groups to improve mathematics and English, or employed new teachers who had a good track record in raising attainment in those subjects (T)
made sure that support staff, particularly teaching assistants, were highly trained and understood their role in helping pupils to achieve (T)
Where it went well schools…
provided well-targeted support to improve attendance, behaviour or links with families where these were barriers to a pupil’s learning (S)
systematically focused on giving pupils clear, useful feedback about their work, and ways that they could improve it (S)
EEF Toolkit
16
Feedback
Peer Tutoring
Parental Involvement
Small Group tuition
One to one tuition
Teaching Assistants
Mentoring
Ability grouping
The SuttonTrust2012
EEF Toolkit
17
Feedback
Peer Tutoring
Parental Involvement
Small Group tuition
One to one tuition
Teaching Assistants
Mentoring
Ability grouping
Meta-cognition & self-regulation
Social and emotional learning
Mastery Learning
Collaborative Learning
Reducing class size
Individualised instruction
Learning Styles
The SuttonTrust2012
EEF Toolkit
18
Feedback
Peer Tutoring
Parental Involvement
Small Group tuition
One to one tuition
Teaching Assistants
Mentoring
Ability grouping
Meta-cognition & self-regulation
Social and emotional learning
Mastery Learning
Collaborative Learning
Reducing class size
Individualised instruction
Summer schools
Learning Styles
The SuttonTrust2012
The Pupil Premium position in …
Where it is going well schools …
Where it is going well schools… carefully ring-fenced the funding so that they always spent it on the target group of pupils ensured that a designated senior leader had a clear overview of how the funding was being allocated and the difference it was making to the outcomes for pupils had a clear policy on spending the Pupil Premium, agreed by governors and publicised on the school website
thoroughly involved governors in the decision making and evaluation process
were able, through careful monitoring and evaluation, to demonstrate the impact of each aspect of their spending on the outcomes for pupils
Where it is going well schools… were able to demonstrate the impact of each aspect of their spending on the outcomes for pupils
have identified specific budget for pupil premium pupils
have created costed action plan for intervention
have shared costed action plan with governors
have closely monitored and evaluated cost effectiveness
have carefully documented audit trail and Pupil Premium case studies detailing impact
Where it is going well schools… never confused eligibility for the Pupil Premium with low ability, and focused on supporting their disadvantaged pupils to achieve the highest levels thoroughly analysed which pupils were underachieving, particularly in English and mathematics, and why used achievement data frequently to check whether interventions or techniques were working and made adjustments accordingly, rather than just using the data retrospectively to see if something had worked have a sound grasp of data
apply data effectively at all levels analyse data as part of rigorous monitoring of progress use data to challenge pupils and colleagues use data to demonstrate impact
Where it is going well schools… drew on research evidence and evidence from their own and others’ experience to allocate the funding to the activities that were most likely to have an impact on improving achievement understood the importance of ensuring that all day-to-day teaching meets the needs of each learner, rather than relying on interventions to compensate for teaching that is less than good
apply a range of successful interventions
have already raised attainment and progress
challenge colleagues to improve classroom teaching and learning
measure the impact of interventions
Where it is going well schools… understood the importance of ensuring that all day-to-day teaching meets the needs of each learner, rather than relying on interventions to compensate for teaching that is less than goodhad a clear and robust performance management system for all staff, and included discussions about pupils eligible for the Pupil Premium in performance management meetings
focus on Pupil Premium in performance management
challenge colleagues to improve classroom teaching and learning
establish effective performance management for support staff
Where it is going well schools…
allocated their best teachers to teach intervention groups to improve mathematics and English, or employed new teachers who had a good track record in raising attainment in those subjects made sure that support staff, particularly teaching assistants, were highly trained and understood their role in helping pupils to achieve
have placed good teachers on the C/D borderline
have changed the role of Teaching Assistants
have focussed INSET on intervention strategies
Where it is going well schools… systematically focused on giving pupils clear, useful feedback about their work, and ways that they could improve it ensured that class and subject teachers knew which pupils were eligible for the Pupil Premium so that they could take responsibility for accelerating their progress
established whole school marking systems that focus on effective feedback
drilled down the use of data and intervention strategies to include all colleagues
implemented rigorous monitoring of intervention at all levels
Where it is going well schools… provided well-targeted support to improve attendance, behaviour or links with families where these were barriers to a pupil’s learning
Key staff target Pupil Premium children:Attendance OfficerFamily Support WorkerEWO
Separated Pastoral and Academic Achievement roles
Established links with hard-to-reach families
Used rewards to motivate disaffected pupils
The Pupil Premium position in …
Existing Good Practice …
1. Improving the quality of teaching and learning2. Deployment of staff3. Re-structuring of staff roles4. Efficient use of Data5. School Development Plans6. Commercial Packages7. Role of Governors
The Pupil Premium
1. Improving the quality of teaching and learning
Identifying Pupil Premium championsDrilling down to classroom levelTraining middle managers
The Pupil Premium
2. Deployment of staff
Teachers of PP pupils – in-class, small groupsMaths and EnglishAppointment of ASTs, SLEsCreating PP postsTraining HLTAs and TAs
The Pupil Premium
3. Re-structuring of staff roles
Separation of pastoral and academic rolesIdentification of Pupil Premium ManagersPP targets in Performance ManagementResponsibilities linked to Upper Pay SpinePP Responsibility for small numbers
The Pupil Premium
4. Efficient use of Data
School wide understanding of dataClassroom use of data
Creating practical ways to measure progress
Demonstrating the impact of PP spending
The Pupil Premium
5. School Development Plans
Specific Pupil Premium targetsCosted intervention strategiesStaff responsibleIntended impactForecast outcomes
The Pupil Premium
6a. Commercial Packages
Achievement for All: Closing the Gap focusLiteracy: Ruth Miskin, Read-Write-Gold, Super SpellNumeracy: Toe-by-toe, Power by 2, Number ShopAssessment packages: PIXLStudy Plus – literacy and numeracyEarly Bird Reading, SRA Reading labsLexia literacy/phonics interventionBlue Hills (linked to SIMS)
The Pupil Premium
6b. Commercial Packages
Tute: teaching packages for targeted groupsBigfoot Tutors: 1:2:1 tuitionCommando Joes: menotring & problem-solvingCrick: reading & writing software (Clicker)Explore Learning: maths & English tuitionThe Brilliant Club: PhD targeted supportThe Letter Box Club: home library (summer hols)Star reading programme & Access Reading Test
The Pupil Premium
7. Role of Governors
Reporting to governorsFinancial accountabilityUnderstanding ROL and other indicatorsApproval of PP strategiesMonitoring and evaluating PP outcomes
What’s happened since 6th Feb Conference ?• Letter to David Laws following PP Letter to schools.• Sharing our strategic interventions with Ofsted – risk of LA
Inspection. • Establishing this PP Champions Network was a priority.• Appointing a PP Champion for Primary Sector.• Considering external PP review options – AfA.• Vulnerable Grps : Commissioned support for EAL – SC College.• Firming up a dedicated budget for PP activities.• Considering a range of networks in Core subjects.• Evidencing potential PP programmes for schools to commit to.• Raising /Explaining the Disadvantaged gap with Elected
Members.• Working closely with Teaching Schools – integrated working
The Pupil Premium
Coffee Break
After Coffee …
Sharing existing practice
Pupil Premium
Pupil Premium
Pupil Premium
The Pupil Premium
Pupil premium hot tubs
Pupil prem tubs
Pupil premium hot tubs
emium hot tubs
Pupil prem tubs
The Pupil Premium position in …
Achievement for All – Martin James - Eaton Bank Experiencing Ofsted – Paul Reed – Macclesfield Intervention Strategies – Charlotte Casewell – Sir William Stanier Governors – Janine Edwards – Malbank Mentoring – Heidi Thurland – Alsager Utilising Data – Damian Haigh – Wilmslow
Sharing existing practice