231 se barrington dr, suite 205 engineering cam co-op draft cost analysis ltr ro mr0916gc.docx cane...
TRANSCRIPT
14-05-T01 Cam Co-op DRAFT Cost Analysis Ltr RO MR0916gc.docx
Cane Engineering
231 SE Barrington Dr, Suite 205 P.O. Box 459 Oak Harbor, WA 98277
Tel: 360-279-0615 Fax: 360-679-5046
Gregory R. Cane, P.E.
March 9, 2016
Camano Cooperative Water and Power Co.
Re: Central Camano Water Systems Cooperation Study - Report Appendix (Capital Facilities Replacement Review)
Dear Camano Cooperative Members:
Please find enclosed the DRAFT Capital Facilities Replacement Review for your water system. The purpose of analyses such as this is to use available information to estimate both the total cost, and the annual contribution to the eventual replacement, of all water system components.
I have prepared the analysis based on the records available to me at this time. One reason for this initial draft is to seek refining data (e.g. for Camano Cooperative, the age of the Indian Beach pressure reducing valve). Once the data is refined, the final report can be a very useful tool for the Board of Directors in guiding future decisions relative to assessments for the replacement of the water system’s facilities (I’ve discussed this further below).
There is one caution that I always make when preparing these analyses, that is, we should be wary of over-refinement. There is no doubt that there could be much fine-tuning on the margins. For example, should the useful life of the storage tank be 40 years, as I have used, or should it be 50 years? Or, should interest / inflation be included in the calculations? Communities invariably determine, even after many tweaks, that the required cost per household per year (as reflected in Column K) is still very high. The lesson, therefore, is not whether the Co-op’s cost per household per year should be $1,065.27, or $900, or $1,200, but that the replacement cost of the water systems capital facilities is high and should be addressed to the best ability of the Association.
If community members would like to further discuss the results of this review, I would be happy to answer any questions that may arise. As possible, it would be very helpful if you could forward to me any updates or corrections that you may have by Monday, April 11, 2016.
- - - - -
The notes below discuss the columns in the attached table.
Page 2 of 4
14-05-T01 Cam Co-op DRAFT Cost Analysis Ltr RO MR0916gc.docx
Column A
This column reflects a summary of the water system components. Water system component sizes, capacities, age, etc. have been based upon record information and documents. Please review this column and if you find incorrect information, please note it.
Column B
This is an estimate of the replacement cost (construction only) for the various water system components. For the most part, it is based on the budget cost information sheets enclosed herein. For instance, for the 100 square foot Conklin pumphouse, it is prudent to budget $670 per square foot for a new pumphouse. This is an all‐inclusive construction cost and takes into account the building, piping, pumps, electrical, control system, etc. The Column B value therefore for the 100 square foot pumphouse is (100 x $670/sq. ft.) = $67,000.
Column C
Recent experience has shown that other (non‐construction) costs for water system projects in Island County can add as much as 35% – 40% on top of construction costs. For this cost analysis, an additional 35% has been used. These additional costs can include engineering, construction management, archaeological / environmental review and mitigation, permitting, attorney’s fees and contingencies. This column reflects the total estimated component replacement costs.
Column D
The review year for this report is 2016.
Column E
Based on available information, the installation year for the noted component is reflected in this column. In some cases, I have estimated the installation year of a component. Please review this column. If your information differs from that included herein, please note this also. Column F
Column D minus Column E.
Column G
The expected life of a component is based upon the table enclosed in this report (Enclosure E-1). This Expected Useful Life table is a summary of fourteen data sources which evaluated
Page 3 of 4
14-05-T01 Cam Co-op DRAFT Cost Analysis Ltr RO MR0916gc.docx
the expected life of water system components. In the right hand column of the table, I have suggested an anticipated useful life for the various components. Column H
Column H is the arithmetic difference between the component age and the expected life. As noted herein, the result may not necessarily be meaningful for this cost review. For example, for the Monticello Storage Tank, the years remaining to replacement is zero. Clearly, the tank is functioning, and will continue to function for some time into the future.
Column I
This column allows the reviewer to use a more reasonable anticipated remaining life value for the various components. Again, considering the Monticello storage tank, I have estimated a remaining life of ten years for this component. The values placed within this column will be based upon the reviewer’s knowledge of the condition of the various water system facilities.
Column J
The current number of households (aka, Equivalent Residential Units) connected to the water system.
Column K
This is the amount that each household would need to contribute toward a Capital Facilities Replacement Fund (“Replacement Fund”) each year to provide their share of the cost for the noted component. For example, for the Monticello storage tank, each household would need to contribute $22.19 per year for the replacement of this component.
Column L
The noted support documents for your report are included herein, and the location reflected in this column.
Column M Miscellaneous notes, including cost information not reflected elsewhere in the report.
Discussion
Looking at the bottom of Column K, the total required contribution per household of $1,065.27 per year to a Replacement Fund is much more than is typically acceptable to the average homeowner. With the exception of a new water system, I am not aware of any similar analysis which did not result in an uncomfortably high required contribution to a Replacement Fund. Most communities, therefore, do not find it feasible to contribute to a Replacement
Page 4 of 4
14-05-T01 Cam Co-op DRAFT Cost Analysis Ltr RO MR0916gc.docx
Fund at the level provided in these analyses.
Having said that, however, one should not cast aside the results of this analysis as it does a reasonably good job of providing a long‐term replacement cost of a community’s water system. Most communities of which I am aware, have utilized the results of these analyses to increase (or to initiate) contributions to a Replacement Fund. If a given component were to fail and require replacement before there is sufficient money in the Fund, a water system may elect to finance these capital replacements through one of a number of loan programs available.
Sincerely,
Cane Engineering
Gregory R. Cane, P.E.
Encl
CAMANO COOPERATIVE WATER & POWER CO.PIPE AGE RECORD INFORMATION (SAMPLE)
8 IN. PVC PIPE
INSTALLED - 2013
- - - - -
RECORD INFORMATION:
ASBUILTS - 2013
ROWE RD
8 IN. PVC PIPE.
INSTALLED - 2006.
- - - - -
RECORD INFORMATION:
ASBUILTS - 2006.
C
H
A
P
M
A
N
R
D
RO
WE
RD
SE
CO
ND
C
T
8 IN. PVC PIPE.
INSTALLED - 1991
- - - - -
RECORD INFORMATION:
MISC. PLANS - 1991.
C
H
A
P
M
A
N
R
D
GA
RY
LN
6 IN. PVC PIPE.
INSTALLED - 1980 AND1986.
- - - - -
RECORD INFORMATION:
PLAT - 1980 AND
PROJECT PLANS - 1986
EB
ON
Y P
L
S F
ALC
ON
R
D
A B C D E F G H I J K L M
Water System ComponentReplacement
Cost - Construction
Replacement Cost -
Total (1)Review
Year
Year Installed (Approx.)
Component AgeExpected
Life (2)
Years to Replacement (Theoretical)
Years to Replacement (For
Analysis)
Number of Households
Required per Household per
YearEnclosure Notes
Wells
Lost Meadows Well - 220' Deep, 8" Casing 17,600 23,760 2016 2003 13 35 22 22 538 2.01 E-2
Lost Meadows Well Pump - 15 Hp 16,900 22,815 2016 2003 13 15 2 5 538 8.48 E-3 Well Pump Age Estimated
Weston Well - 315' Deep, 8" Casing 25,200 34,020 2016 1984 32 35 3 10 538 6.32 E-2
Weston Well Pump - 25 Hp 21,100 28,485 2016 2011 5 15 10 10 538 5.29 E-3
Well Houses
Lost Meadows - 66 SF 33,000 44,550 2016 2004 12 40 28 28 538 2.96 E-4
Weston - 180 SF 90,000 121,500 2016 2015 1 40 39 39 538 5.79 E-4
Treatment
Lost Meadows - 100 Gpm 90,000 121,500 2016 2008 8 15 7 7 538 32.26 E-5
Storage Tanks
Springs - 105,700 Gal 143,752 194,065 2016 2013 3 40 37 37 538 9.75 E-6 Reinforced Concrete; "Low" Tank"; Per Graph, Use $1.36 / Gal.
Weston - 104,100 Gal 143,658 193,938 2016 1988 28 40 12 12 538 30.04 E-7 Reinforced Concrete; "Low" Tank"; Per Graph, Use $1.38 / Gal.
Monticello - 47,800 Gal 88,430 119,381 2016 1976 40 40 0 10 538 22.19 E-8 Reinforced Concrete; "Low" Tank"; Per Graph, Use $1.85 / Gal.
Lost Meadows - 31,300 62,600 84,510 2016 1986 30 40 10 10 538 15.71 E-9 Reinforced Concrete; "Low" Tank"; Per Graph, Use $2.00 / Gal.
Pump Houses
Lost Meadows - 570 SF 381,900 515,565 2016 1991 25 40 15 15 538 63.89 E-10
Springs - 192 SF 128,640 173,664 2016 2013 3 40 37 37 538 8.72 E-10
Conklin - 100 SF 67,000 90,450 2016 1977 39 40 1 5 538 33.62 E-10
Monticello - 64 SF 42,880 57,888 2016 1988 28 40 12 12 538 8.97 E-10
Pipes
8" PVC:
1980 to 1989 (5,033 LF) 578,795 781,373 2016 1985 31 75 44 44 538 33.01 E-11
1990 to 1999 (4,740 LF) 545,100 735,885 2016 1995 21 75 54 54 538 25.33 E-11
2000 to 2009 (4,696 LF) 540,040 729,054 2016 2005 11 75 64 64 538 21.17 E-11
2010 to 2016 (5,877 LF) 675,855 912,404 2016 2013 3 75 72 72 538 23.55 E-11
8" PE:
2010 to 2016 (160 LF) 18,400 24,840 2016 2013 3 75 72 72 538 0.64 E-11
8" DI:
2010 to 2016 (476 LF) 61,880 83,538 2016 2013 3 75 72 72 538 2.16 Use $130/LF for Estimate
6" PVC:
1980 to 1989 (10,103 LF) 1,060,815 1,432,100 2016 1985 31 75 44 44 538 60.50 E-12
1990 to 1999 (4,693 LF) 492,765 665,233 2016 1995 21 75 54 54 538 22.90 E-12
2000 to 2009 (573 LF) 60,165 81,223 2016 2005 11 75 64 64 538 2.36 E-12
4" PVC:
1960 to 1969 (1,131 LF) 118,755 160,319 2016 1965 51 75 24 24 538 12.42 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
1970 to 1979 (1,762 LF) 185,010 249,764 2016 1975 41 75 34 34 538 13.65 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
1980 to 1989 (712 LF) 74,760 100,926 2016 1985 31 75 44 44 538 4.26 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
2010 to 2016 (252 LF) 26,460 35,721 2016 2013 3 75 72 72 538 0.92 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
4" DI:
2010 to 2016 (476 LF) 49,980 67,473 2016 2013 3 75 72 72 538 1.74 Use $105/LF for Estimate
4" AC:
1960 to 1969 (6,641 LF) 697,305 941,362 2016 1965 51 45 -6 10 538 174.97 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
3" PVC:
1960 to 1969 (202 LF) 21,210 28,634 2016 1965 51 75 24 24 538 2.22 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
1980 to 1989 (163 LF) 17,115 23,105 2016 1985 31 75 44 44 538 0.98 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
3" AC:
1960 to 1969 (6,240 LF) 655,200 884,520 2016 1965 51 45 -6 10 538 164.41 E-12 Replace w/ 6" HDPE/PVC
2" PVC:
1970 to 1979 (1,931 LF) 125,515 169,445 2016 1975 41 75 34 34 538 9.26 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1980 to 1989 (1,111 LF) 72,215 97,490 2016 1985 31 75 44 44 538 4.12 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1990 to 1999 (410 LF) 26,650 35,978 2016 1995 21 75 54 54 538 1.24 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
2000 to 2009 (419 LF) 27,235 36,767 2016 2005 11 75 64 64 538 1.07 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
2010 to 2016 (176 LF) 11,440 15,444 2016 2013 3 75 72 72 538 0.40 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
2" PE:
2010 to 2016 (1,293 LF) 84,045 113,461 2016 2013 3 75 72 72 538 2.93 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
2" GIP:
1960 to 1969 (232 LF) 15,080 20,358 2016 1965 51 30 -21 5 538 7.57 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1 1/2" PVC:
1960 to 1969 (5,724 LF) 372,060 502,281 2016 1965 51 75 24 24 538 38.90 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1970 to 1979 (4,165 LF) 270,725 365,479 2016 1975 41 75 34 34 538 19.98 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1980 to 1989 (1,076 LF) 69,940 94,419 2016 1985 31 75 44 44 538 3.99 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1990 to 1999 (675 LF) 43,875 59,231 2016 1995 21 75 54 54 538 2.04 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1 1/2" PE:
1980 to 1989 (3,621 LF) 235,365 317,743 2016 1985 31 75 44 44 538 13.42 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
1 1/2" GIP:
1960 to 1969 (2,562 LF) 166,530 224,816 2016 1965 51 30 -21 5 538 83.57 Replacement for all Pipes, 2" and Smaller; Use $65 / LF
Pressure Reducing Vaults
Manaco 29,000 39,150 2016 2014 2 35 33 33 538 2.21 E-13
Indian Beach 29,000 39,150 2016 1977 39 35 -4 5 538 14.55 E-13 Age Estimated
Cove Beach 29,000 39,150 2016 2014 2 35 33 33 538 2.21 E-13
Hill St. 29,000 39,150 2016 1977 39 35 -4 5 538 14.55 E-13 Age Estimated
Standby Generators
Monticello - 12 Kw 20,200 27,270 2016 2010 6 15 9 9 538 5.63 E-14
Conklin - 12 Kw 20,200 27,270 2016 2010 6 15 9 9 538 5.63 E-14
Chain Link Fence
Springs - 423 LF 10,787 14,562 2016 2013 3 40 37 37 538 0.73 E-15
Lost Meadows - 810 LF 18,630 25,151 2016 2001 15 40 25 25 538 1.87 E-15 Fence Age and Length Estimated
Monticello - 190 LF 8,265 11,158 2016 2008 8 40 32 32 538 0.65 E-15 Fence Age and Length Estimated
Conklin - 95 LF 4,560 6,156 2016 2010 6 40 34 34 538 0.34 E-15
Weston - 164 LF 7,462 10,074 2016 2015 1 40 39 39 538 0.48 E-15
Misc.
Corporate Office - Storage (660 SF) 66,000 89,100 2016 2001 15 50 35 35 538 4.73 Use $100/SF Replacement Cost
Totals 9,025,049 12,183,815 1,065.27
Camano Cooperative Water & Power Co. - Capital Facilities Replacement Review - 2016
(1) Total Cost reflects additional 35% for engineering, archaeological and environmental review / mitigation, permitting, construction administration, attorney's fees and contingencies.(2) See Enclosure E-1.
Expected Useful Life Table,
Fannie Mae, 2014
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2014
Environmental Finance Center,
New Mexico Tech, 2006
Water Resource Engineering
Linsley/ Franzini 3rd ed
Illinois Municipal Treasurers Association,
Website 2007
Irrigation Practice and Engineering, Early 1900's
Long Term Performance
Prediction of PVC Pipes,
AWWARF, 2005
Drinking Water Distribution Systems,
Assessing and Reduction of
Risks, National Academies Press, 2006
EPA, 2005
Corrosion Protection of Ductile Iron
Pipe, Corrpro Companies, Inc.
Asset Management:
A Handbook for Small Water
Systems, EPA, 2003
EPA Control and Mitigation
of Drinking Water Losses in
Distribution Systems, 2009
JM Eagle Pipe Web Page,
2010
Plastics Pipe Institute Web Page, 2010
USE - First Pass
Water Storage Tank (Generic) 30 50-80 30 30-60Concrete Water Storage Tank 50 40Steel Water Storage Tank 40 50+
Pipe (Generic) 50 35-40 35 35-40 35Transite Pipe 50 45PVC Pipe 25 100 (New Pipe?) 50-100 100 75HDPE Pipe 50 50-100 75Steel Pipe 30-40 15-50 30Ductile Iron Pipe 75 40+ 75-100 100 75Cast Iron Pipe 65-75
Wells 25-35 40-50 25-35 35Well Pump 15
Water Meter 10-15 30 40 15 10-15 15
Hydrants 40 50 40-60 40
Pumphouse Bldg 30 60-70 50 30-60 40
Water Pump (Generic) 15 10-15 18-25 10-15 15
Standby Generator 25 10-20 14-17 15
Site and Building Electrical 7-10 25 20 20
Valves 35-40 35
Water Treatment 15 10-15 10-15 15
Source
Component
Cane Engineering, 2016a Table - Water System Life JA2716.xls
Chain Link Fence 40 40
Co-op E-1
Project Cost Per Ft
Recent Bid Information 62.48$ Estimate for Budgeting 65.00$
New Drilled Well - Budget Construction Cost
(Estimated Lifespan: 35 years)
Island County (2015 Dollars)
Cost Assumptions:‐ 6‐inch casing‐ ≥ 100 ft deep‐ Includes tax‐ Includes some site work‐ Does not include contingency
Well Costs DE1815gc.xlsx
Co-op E-2
$10000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
$24,000
eplacement CostWell Pump ‐Budget Rep
lacement Cost ‐Island County (2015 Dollars)
Estimated
Useful Life: 15 Years
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
05
10
15
20
25
30
R
Capacity (HP)
Cost Assumptions:
‐Includes new piping and wiring
‐Includes minor well rehabilitation
‐Includes tax
‐Does not include contingency
Co-op E-3
Area (SF) Year Project LocationTotal
Construction Cost
Cost per SF
432 2007 South Whidbey - Bid $208,000 $481
256 2010 North Whidbey - Bid 109,000 426
192 2012 Camano Island - Bid 174,000 906
437 2013 North Whidbey - Bid 212,000 485
620 2015 Camano Island - Bid 481,000 776$615
53
Pumphouse - Budget Construction Cost - Island CountyEstimated Useful Life - Building: 40 years, Electrical: 20 years
(2015 Dollars)
Average Per SFSales Tax (8.7%)
668$670
( )Total
Estimate for Budgeting
Cost Assumptions:‐ All costs in 2015 dollars‐ Includes electrical components‐ Includes building and concrete slab‐ Includes booster pumps and appurtenances‐ Includes site piping‐ Includes tax‐ Includes some site work
Pumphouse Costs DE1915gc.xlsx
Co-op E-4
1,400
1,500
1,600
1,700
1,800
1,900
2,000
2,100
2,200
2,300
Per gpm (2015$)
Fe/M
n/As
Rem
oval Treatmen
tBu
dget Cost Information for Islan
d Co
unty (2
015 Dollars)
(Design Flow
Greater Tha
n 100 gpm)
USEPA
201
5 Co
st Evaluation: In
clud
es
Equipm
ent, Installatio
n, Pum
phou
se,
Engine
ering an
d Pe
rmits.
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
1,200
1,300
100
150
200
250
Cost
Design Flow
Rate ‐gpm
Use fo
r Islan
d Co
unty
for
100 ‐1
50 gpm
.Treatmen
t System
Equipm
ent a
nd In
stallatio
n Only.
Co-op E-5
20'D x 15'H
20'D x 19'H
20'D x 25'H
30'D x 20'H
20'D x 20'H
14' D
x 50'H
14'D x 55'H
20'D x 50'H
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
Cost per GallonReservoir‐B
udget Installation Cost ‐
Island County (2015 Dollars)
(Estim
ated
Useful Life: 40 Years)
Low Tank
High Tank
30'D x 20'H
30'D x 40'H
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
020,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
Size (Gallons)
Cost Assumptions:
‐Reinforced
Concrete Tank
‐Includes Piping Under Tank
‐Includes Some Site Preparation
‐Includes Tax
‐Does Not Include Contingency
(Note: High Tank >32'H)
Co-op E-6
20'D x 15'H
20'D x 19'H
20'D x 25'H
30'D x 20'H
20'D x 20'H
14' D
x 50'H
14'D x 55'H
20'D x 50'H
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
Cost per GallonReservoir‐B
udget Installation Cost ‐
Island County (2015 Dollars)
(Estim
ated
Useful Life: 40 Years)
Low Tank
High Tank
30'D x 20'H
30'D x 40'H
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
020,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
Size (Gallons)
Cost Assumptions:
‐Reinforced
Concrete Tank
‐Includes Piping Under Tank
‐Includes Some Site Preparation
‐Includes Tax
‐Does Not Include Contingency
(Note: High Tank >32'H)
Co-op E-7
20'D x 15'H
20'D x 19'H
20'D x 25'H
30'D x 20'H
20'D x 20'H
14' D
x 50'H
14'D x 55'H
20'D x 50'H
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
Cost per GallonReservoir‐B
udget Installation Cost ‐
Island County (2015 Dollars)
(Estim
ated
Useful Life: 4
0 Years)
Low Tank
High Tank
30'D x 20'H
30'D x 40'H
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
020,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
Size (Gallons)
Cost Assumptions:
‐Reinforced
Concrete Tank
‐Includes Piping Under Tank
‐Includes Some Site Preparation
‐Includes Tax
‐Does Not Include Contingency
(Note: High Tank >32'H)
Co-op E-8
20'D x 15'H
20'D x 19'H
20'D x 25'H
30'D x 20'H
20'D x 20'H
14' D
x 50'H
14'D x 55'H
20'D x 50'H
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
Cost per GallonReservoir‐B
udget Installation Cost ‐
Island County (2015 Dollars)
(Estim
ated
Useful Life: 40 Years)
Low Tank
High Tank
30'D x 20'H
30'D x 40'H
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
020,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
Size (Gallons)
Cost Assumptions:
‐Reinforced
Concrete Tank
‐Includes Piping Under Tank
‐Includes Some Site Preparation
‐Includes Tax
‐Does Not Include Contingency
(Note: High Tank >32'H)
Co-op E-9
Area (SF) Year Project LocationTotal
Construction Cost
Cost per SF
432 2007 South Whidbey - Bid $208,000 $481
256 2010 North Whidbey - Bid 109,000 426
192 2012 Camano Island - Bid 174,000 906
437 2013 North Whidbey - Bid 212,000 485
620 2015 Camano Island - Bid 481,000 776$615
53
Pumphouse - Budget Construction Cost - Island CountyEstimated Useful Life - Building: 40 years, Electrical: 20 years
(2015 Dollars)
Average Per SFSales Tax (8.7%)
668$670
( )Total
Estimate for Budgeting
Cost Assumptions:‐ All costs in 2015 dollars‐ Includes electrical components‐ Includes building and concrete slab‐ Includes booster pumps and appurtenances‐ Includes site piping‐ Includes tax‐ Includes some site work
Pumphouse Costs DE1915gc.xlsx
Co-op E-10
Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
Mobilization LS 1 11,000.00 $11,000.00Removal of Structure & Obstruction LS 1 5,000.00 5,000.008-Inch HDPE Pipe LF 1,000 36.00 36,000.008-Inch Gate Valve EA. 2 1,400.00 2,800.008-Inch Tees, Bends & Fittings EA. 4 500.00 2,000.006 Inch Hydrant Assembly EA. 1 3,700.00 3,700.00Air Vacuum Valve Assembly EA. 1 1,900.00 1,900.00Single Service - Near Side EA. 10 900.00 9,000.00Single Service - Far Side EA. 10 1,800.00 18,000.00Connect Main to Existing System EA. 2 1,800.00 3,600.00Crushed Surfacing TN 75 32.00 2,400.00Commercial HMA - Pavement Patch TN 10 275.00 2,750.00Topsoil / Bark Mulch CY 20 45.00 900.00
8-Inch HDPE Piping
Preliminary Cost Estimate: Installation Per Typical 1,000 FT
Distribution System Piping - Budget Construction Cost - Island CountyHDPE with Meters and Appurtenances
(Estimated Useful Life: 75 years)(2015 Dollars)
Corrugated Polyethylene Culv. Pipe 12 Inc. Diam. LF 60 22.00 1,320.00Project Temporary Traffic Control LS 1 500.00 500.00Select Gravel Backfill TN 300 15.00 4,500.00
$105,370.009,167.19
$114,537.19$114.54$115.00
Estimated Price Per LFEstimate Per LF For Budgeting
Sub-TotalSales Tax (8.7%)Total
Cost Assumptions:‐ Pipe installed on shoulder of road‐ Typical residential‐ Assume HDPE pipe but similar for PVC pipe‐ Includes tax‐ Does not include permits, engineering, archaeological review (these additional items can be 30‐40% additional cost)‐ Does not include contingency
Eight Inch Pipe Costs JA2816gc.xlsx
Co-op E-11
Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
Mobilization LS 1 10,000.00 $10,000.00Removal of Structure & Obstruction LS 1 5,000.00 5,000.006-Inch HDPE Pipe LF 1,000 28.00 28,000.006-Inch Gate Valve EA. 2 900.00 1,800.006-Inch Tees, Bends & Fittings EA. 4 500.00 2,000.006 Inch Hydrant Assembly EA. 1 3,700.00 3,700.00Air Vacuum Valve Assembly EA. 1 1,900.00 1,900.00Single Service - Near Side EA. 10 900.00 9,000.00Single Service - Far Side EA. 10 1,800.00 18,000.00Connect Main to Existing System EA. 2 1,800.00 3,600.00Crushed Surfacing TN 75 32.00 2,400.00Commercial HMA - Pavement Patch TN 10 275.00 2,750.00Topsoil / Bark Mulch CY 20 45.00 900.00
6-Inch HDPE Piping
Preliminary Cost Estimate: Installation Per Typical 1,000 FT
Distribution System Piping - Budget Construction Cost - Island CountyHDPE with Meters and Appurtenances
(Estimated Useful Life: 75 years)(2015 Dollars)
Corrugated Polyethylene Culv. Pipe 12 Inc. Diam. LF 60 22.00 1,320.00Project Temporary Traffic Control LS 1 500.00 500.00Select Gravel Backfill TN 300 15.00 4,500.00
$95,370.008,297.19
$103,667.19$103.67$105.00
Estimated Price Per LFEstimate Per LF For Budgeting
Sub-TotalSales Tax (8.7%)Total
Cost Assumptions:‐ Pipe installed on shoulder of road‐ Typical residential‐ Assume HDPE pipe but similar for PVC pipe‐ Includes tax‐ Does not include permits, engineering, archaeological review (these additional items can be 30‐40% additional cost)‐ Does not include contingency
Six Inch Pipe Costs JA2816gc.xlsx
Co-op E-12
Year Project Name Cost2006 North Whidbey - Bid $34,6522010 North Whidbey - Estimate 27,9402011 North Whidbey - Bid 19,4352013 Camano Island - Bid 23,033
$26,2652,285
28 550T t lSales Tax (8.7%)Average
4-Inch PRV Station (For 6" Main)
(Estimated Useful Life: 35 Years)Island County Budget Construction Cost (2015 Dollars)
28,550$29,000Estimate for Budgeting
Total
Cost Assumptions:‐ Includes tax‐ Includes some site work‐ Does not include contingency
Four Inch PRV Costs DE1915gc.xlsx
Co-op E-13
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
nstalled CostBack‐up Gen
erator
Budget Installation Cost ‐Island County (2015 Dollars)
Estimated
Useful Life: 15 Years
$0
$10,000
$20,000
010
20
30
40
50
60
70
I
Capacity (kW)Cost Assumptions:
‐Installed and tested, in place, on concrete pad
‐Includes both diesel and propane fueled
gen
erators
‐Includes automatic transfer switch
‐Includes tax
‐Includes purchase of fuel tank
‐Includes some site work
‐Does not include contingency
Co-op E-14
$30
$35
$40
$45
$50
placement Cost / FtChain Link Fence‐Budget Rep
lacement Cost ‐Island County (2015 Dollars)
Estimated
Useful Life: 40 Years
$15
$20
$25
$30
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Rep
Fence Len
gth (Ft)
Cost Assumptions:
‐6 Ft High Fence
‐Includes Barbed
Wire Atop
‐Includes Gate(s)
‐Includes SomeSite Preparation
‐Includes Tax
‐Does Not Include Contingency
Co-op E-15