23 mass diagram

44
1 CE 453 Lecture 23 Earthwork and Mass Diagrams

Upload: sweeny-garrett

Post on 07-Apr-2015

3.712 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 23 Mass Diagram

1

CE 453 Lecture 23

Earthwork and Mass Diagrams

Page 2: 23 Mass Diagram

2

The Basics

Don’t call it dirt Borrow is not returned Waste is excess Frequently big volumes At low unit prices Adding up to big $$$

Page 3: 23 Mass Diagram

3

Terrain Effects on Route Location

Don’t forget your design criteria (grades, etc)

Attempt to minimize amount of earthwork necessary Set grade line as close as

possible to natural ground level

Set grade line so there is a balance between excavated volume and volume of embankment

http://www.agtek.com/highway.htm

Page 4: 23 Mass Diagram

4

Earthwork Analysis

Take cross-sections (typically 50 feet)

Plot natural ground level Plot proposed grade profile Indicate areas of cut and fill Calculate volume between cross-

sections

Page 5: 23 Mass Diagram

5

Average End Area Method

Assumes volume between two consecutive cross sections is the average of their areas multiplied by the distance between them

V = L(A1 + A2)÷(2*27)

V = volume (yd3)A1 and A2 = end areas of cross-sections 1 & 2 (ft2)

L = distance between cross-sections (feet)

Page 6: 23 Mass Diagram

6Source: Garber and Hoel, 2002

Page 7: 23 Mass Diagram

7

Shrinkage

Material volume increases during excavation

Decreases during compaction Varies with

soil type fill height cut depth

Page 8: 23 Mass Diagram

8

Swell

Excavated rock used in embankment occupies more space

May amount to 30% or more

Page 9: 23 Mass Diagram

9

Computing Volume (Example)

Shrinkage = 10%, L = 100 ftStation 1:

Ground lineCut

Fill

Cut Area = 6 ft2

Fill Area = 29 ft2

Page 10: 23 Mass Diagram

10

Computing Volume (Example)

Shrinkage = 10%Station 2:

Ground line

Cut Area = 29 ft2

Fill Area = 5 ft2

Cut Fill

Page 11: 23 Mass Diagram

11

Vcut = L (A1cut + A2cut) = 100 ft (6 ft2 + 29 ft2) = 64.8 yd3 *

54 54

Vfill = L (A1fill + A2fill) = 100 ft (29 ft2 + 5 ft2) = 63.0 yd3

54 54

Fill for shrinkage = 63.0 * 0.1 = 6.3 yd3

Total fill = 63.0 ft3 + 6.3 ft3 = 69.3 yd3

Total cut and fill between stations 1 and 2 = 69.3 yd3 fill – 64.8 yd3 cut = 4.5 yd3 borrow*note: no allowance made for expansion

Page 12: 23 Mass Diagram

12

Page 13: 23 Mass Diagram

13

Estimating End Area

Station 1:

Ground line

Cut

Fill

Page 14: 23 Mass Diagram

14

Estimating End Area

Station 1:

Ground line

Cut

Fill

Fill Area = ∑Shapes

Page 15: 23 Mass Diagram

15

Mass Diagram

Series of lines that shows net accumulation of cut or fill between any 2 stations

Ordinate is the net accumulation of volume from an arbitrary starting point

First station is the starting point

Page 16: 23 Mass Diagram

16

Calculate Mass Diagram Assuming Shrinkage = 25%

Page 17: 23 Mass Diagram

17

Calculate Mass Diagram Assuming Shrinkage = 25%

Volumefill = 100 ft (20 ft2 + 0 ft2) = 37.0 yd3 fill

54

Volumecut = 100 ft (40 ft2 + 140 ft2) = 333.3 yd3 cut

54

Page 18: 23 Mass Diagram

18

Calculate Mass Diagram Assuming Shrinkage = 25%

Volumefill = adjusted for shrinkage = 37.0 yd * 1.25 = 46.3 yd3

Page 19: 23 Mass Diagram

19

Calculate Mass Diagram Assuming Shrinkage = 25%

Total cut = 333.3 yd3 - 46.3 yd3 = 287.0 yd3

Page 20: 23 Mass Diagram

20

Calculate Mass Diagram Assuming Shrinkage = 25%

Total cut 1 to 2 = 555.6 yd3 – 104.2 yd3 = 451.4 yd3

Volumefill = 100 ft (20 ft2 + 25 ft2) = 83.3 yd3 fill

54

Volumecut = 100 ft (140 ft2 + 160 ft2) = 555.6 yd3 cut

54

Volumefill = adjusted for shrinkage = 83.3 yd * 1.25 = 104.2 yd3

Page 21: 23 Mass Diagram

21

Calculate Mass Diagram Assuming Shrinkage = 25%

Total cut = 451.4 yd3 + 287 = 738.4 yd3

Page 22: 23 Mass Diagram

22

Calculate Mass Diagram Assuming Shrinkage = 25%

Final Station

Page 23: 23 Mass Diagram

23

Mass Diagram

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Station

Net

Cu

mu

lati

ve V

olu

me

(C.Y

.)

Series1

Page 24: 23 Mass Diagram

24

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Ne

t C

um

ula

tive

Vo

lum

e (C

.Y.)

Station

Mass Diagram

Series1

Station 1: net volume = 287 cy

Page 25: 23 Mass Diagram

25

Mass Diagram

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Station

Net

Cu

mu

lati

ve V

olu

me

(C.Y

.)

Series1

Station 1: net volume = 287.04 ft3

Station 2: net volume = 738 cy

Page 26: 23 Mass Diagram

26

Mass Diagram

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Station

Net

Cu

mu

lati

ve V

olu

me

(C.Y

.)

Series1

Station 1: net volume = 287.04 ft3

Station 2: net volume = 738.43 ft3

Station 3: net volume = 819 cy

Page 27: 23 Mass Diagram

27

Balance point: balance of cut and fill

A’ and D’

D’ and E’

N and M

Etc.

note: note: aa horizontal horizontal line defines line defines locations where locations where net accumulation net accumulation between these between these two balance two balance points is zeropoints is zero

Page 28: 23 Mass Diagram

28

Locations of balanced cut and fill JK and ST

ST is 5 stations long

[16 + 20] – [11 + 20]

Page 29: 23 Mass Diagram

29

Special Terms Free haul distance (FHD)- distance earth is moved

without additional compensation Limit of Profitable Haul (LPH) - distance beyond

which it is more economical to borrow or waste than to haul from the project

Overhaul – volume of material (Y) moved X Stations beyond Free haul, measured in sta–yd3 or sta-m3

Borrow – material taken from outside of project Waste – excavated material not used in project

Page 30: 23 Mass Diagram

30

Mass Diagram Development

1) Calculate LPH distance (LPH = FHD + (borrow$ ÷ overhaul$))

2) Place FHD and LPH distances in all large loops

3) Place other Balance lines to minimize cost of movement Theoretical; contractor may move dirt differently

4) Calculate borrow, waste, and overhaul in all loops

5) Identify stations where each of the above occur

Page 31: 23 Mass Diagram

31

Mass Diagram Example

FHD = 200 m LPH = 725 m

Page 32: 23 Mass Diagram

32Source: Wright 1996

Between Stations 0 + 00 and 0 + 132, cut and fill equal each other, distance is less than FHD of 200 m

Note: definitely NOT to scale!

Page 33: 23 Mass Diagram

33Source: Wright, 1996

Between Stations 0 + 132 and 0 + 907, cut and fill equal each other, but distance is greater than either FHD of 200 m or LPH of 725 m

Distance = [0 + 907] – [0 + 132] = 775 m

Page 34: 23 Mass Diagram

34Source: Wright, 1996

Between Stations 0 + 179 and 0 + 379, cut and fill equal each other, distance = FHD of 200 m

Treated as freehaul

Page 35: 23 Mass Diagram

35Source: Wright, 1996

Between Stations 0 + 142 and 0 + 867, cut and fill equal each other, distance = LPH of 725 m

Page 36: 23 Mass Diagram

36Source: Wright, 1996

Material between Stations 0 + 132 and 0 + 142 becomes waste and material between stations 0 + 867 and 0 +907 becomes borrow

Page 37: 23 Mass Diagram

37Source: Wright, 1996

Between Stations 0 + 970 and 1 + 170, cut and fill equal each other, distance = FHD of 200 m

Page 38: 23 Mass Diagram

38Source: Wright, 1996

Between Stations 0 + 960 and 1 + 250, cut and fill equal each other, distance is less than LPH of 725 m

Page 39: 23 Mass Diagram

39Source: Wright, 1996

Project ends at Station 1 + 250, an additional 1200 m3 of borrow is required

Page 40: 23 Mass Diagram

40

Volume Errors

Use of Average End Area technique leads to volume errors when cross-sections taper between cut and fill sections (prisms)

Consider Prismoidal formula

Page 41: 23 Mass Diagram

41

Prismoidal Formula

Volume = (A1+ 4Am + A2)/6 * L

Where A1 and A2 are end areas at ends of section

Am = cross sectional area in middle of section, and

L = length from A1 to A2

Am is based on linear measurements at the middle

Page 42: 23 Mass Diagram

42

Consider cone as a prism

Radius = R, height = H End Area 1 = πR2

End Area 2 = 0 Radius at midpoint = R/2 Volume =((π R2+4π(R/2)2+ 0)/ 6) * H = (π R2/3) * H

Page 43: 23 Mass Diagram

43

Compare to “known” equation

Had the average end area been used the volume would have been

V = ((π R2) + 0)/2 * L (or H)

Which Value is correct?

Page 44: 23 Mass Diagram

44

Extra Credit (due 3/12)

Try the prismoidal formula to estimate the volume of a sphere with a radius of zero at each end of the section length, and a Radius R in the middle.

How does that formula compare to the “known” equation for volume?

What would the Average End area estimate be?