21909779
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 21909779
1/6
O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E
Citric acid production by Aspergillus nigeron wet corndistillers grainsG. Xie1 and T.P. West2
1 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA
2 Department of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA
Introduction
Citric acid has a variety of commercial applications in
foods, beverages and pharmaceuticals (Tran et al. 1998).
Nearly 1 million tons of citric acid are produced globally
every year (Karaffa et al. 2001). Previous investigations
have studied the use of the fungus Aspergillus niger to
produce citric acid from brewery wastes such as brewers
spent grain liquor and from ground corn using surface
fermentation (Moyer 1953; Hang et al. 1975, 1977; Rou-
kas and Kotzekidou 1986). Using solid-state fermentation,
A. nigerstrains were able to produce citric acid from sub-
strates such as apple pomace (Hang and Woodams 1984),
grape pomace (Hang and Woodams 1985), kiwifruit peel
(Hang and Woodams 1987), pineapple waste (Tran et al.
1998), figs (Roukas 2000) or cassava bagasse (Van-
denberghe et al. 2004). Wet corn distillers grains are a
major co-product resulting from ethanol fermentation
and it has not been determined whether the grains could
be utilized as a substrate by A. niger strains to produce
citric acid. For each bushel (3524 l) of corn processed at
ethanol plants, c. 18 pounds (82 kg) of dry corn distillers
grains are produced and over a million tons
(907 000 metric tons) of dry distillers grains are produced
each year. The primary use of wet corn distillers grains is
as a protein supplement in animal feeds (Ham et al.
1994). In this study, seven citric acid-producing A. niger
strains were screened for their ability to synthesize citric
Keywords
Aspergillus niger, biomass, citric acid, wet
corn distillers grains, yield.
Correspondence
Thomas P. West, Department of Biology and
Microbiology, South Dakota State University,
Box 2140D, Brookings, SD 57007, USA.E-mail: [email protected]
2005/1500: received 19 December 2005,
revised 5 April 2006 and accepted 13 April
2006
doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01958.x
Abstract
Aims: To determine which citric acid-producing strain ofAspergillus nigerutil-
ized wet corn distillers grains most effectively to produce citric acid.
Methods and Results:Citric acid and biomass production by the fungal strains
were analysed on the untreated grains or autoclaved grains using an enzyme
assay and a gravimetric method respectively. Fungal citric acid production on
the grains was found to occur on the untreated or autoclaved grains. The high-est citric acid level on the grains was produced by A. niger ATCC 9142. The
autoclaved grains supported less citric acid production by the majority of
strains screened. Biomass production by the fungal strains on the untreated or
autoclaved grains was quite similar. The highest citric acid yields for A. niger
ATCC 9142, ATCC 10577, ATCC 11414, ATCC 12846 and ATCC 26550 were
found on the untreated grains. Treatment of the grains had little effect on citric
acid yields based on reducing sugars consumed by A. niger ATCC 9029 and
ATCC 201122.
Conclusions:It is feasible for citric acid-producing strains ofA. niger to excrete
citric acid on wet corn distillers grains whether the grains are treated or
untreated. The most effective citric acid-producing strain ofA. nigerwas ATCC
9142.Significance and Impact of the Study: The study shows that the ethanol pro-
cessing co-product wet corn distillers grains could be utilized as a substrate for
the commercial production of citric acid by A. nigerwithout treatment of the
grains.
Letters in Applied Microbiology ISSN 0266-8254
2006 The Authors
Journal compilation 2006 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology 43 (2006) 269273 269
-
8/12/2019 21909779
2/6
acid on untreated and autoclaved wet corn distillers
grains by solid-state fermentation.
Methods
Micro-organisms and inoculum
Seven citric acid-producing strains, namely A. niger
ATCC 9029, ATCC 9142, ATCC 10577, ATCC 11414,
ATCC 12846, ATCC 26550 and ATCC 201122, were used
in this study. The source of the wet distillers grains was
Dakota Ethanol LLC (Wentworth, SD, USA) and it con-
tained 54% total carbohydrates. When sterilized by auto-
claving, the wet corn distillers grains was subjected to
121C at 1172 kPa of pressure for 20 min. A loopful of
fungal mycelium of A. niger strain was inoculated into
potato dextrose broth (20 ml), and the culture was grown
for 72 h at 25C. This culture served as the inoculum.
Solid-state fermentation and substrate processing
One millilitre inoculum (5 103 conidia) was added to
5 g corn distillers grains (65% moisture) in a sterile
125 ml Erlenmeyer flask and the fungus was grown for
240 h at 25C. After cultivation, the citric acid present in
each solid-state fermentation culture was collected by the
following procedure. To each culture, sterile water
(25 ml) was added. After shaking each culture for 60 min
at 25C, the grains were filtered through a Whatman no.
1 filter. The fungal biomass in each culture was washed
with sterile water (10 ml) and also filtered through a
Whatman no. 1 filter. The fungal biomass was separatedfrom the grains during the course of washing the biomass
with water. The filtrates from each culture were com-
bined. To precipitate any protein present in each culture
filtrate, ice-cold 05 mmol l)1 HClO4 (05 ml) was added
and the filtrate was stirred. Any protein precipitate pre-
sent was removed. The filtrate was subsequently neutral-
ized to pH 70 with 1 mmol l)1 NaOH. The volume of
each culture filtrate was recorded.
Citric acid and biomass determinations
The neutralized filtrate was assayed for its citric acid con-
tent using a coupled enzyme spectrophotometric assay
(Moellering and Gruber 1966; Henniger and Mascaro
1985). The modified assay mix (1 ml) contained
01 mmol l)1 glycylglycine buffer pH 78, 02 mmol l)1
NADH, 06 mmol l)1 ZnCl2, 5 U citrate lyase, 6 U malate
dehydrogenase, 3 U lactate dehydrogenase and sample.
Citric acid standards were also assayed. The reaction was
monitored at 340 nm by following the decrease in
absorbance that is proportional to the concentration of
citric acid present in the sample. To measure biomass
production, wet fungal biomass collected after 240 h of
growth was placed in a preweighed beaker and dried at
105C to constant weight. The beaker containing the dry
fungal biomass was re-weighed to derive the weights for
each culture. The weight of the inoculum added to each
culture determined by collection on preweighed filtersand drying to constant weight at 105C was determined
after 240 h by subtracting from the biomass levels. To
measure the reducing sugar levels in the untreated or
autoclaved grains, a sample of the grains was brought to
100% moisture content, subjected to high-speed mixing
and an aliquot was removed for analysis. The reducing
sugar levels were assayed by a previously described
method using glucose as a standard (Dygert et al. 1965).
All values represent the mean of three independent deter-
minations involving three separate cultures. The Students
t-test was used during statistical analysis. All determina-
tions were performed in triplicate.
Results
Seven citric acid-producing strains of A. niger were
screened for their ability to utilize wet corn distillers grains
as a substrate for citric acid production. The strain found
to produce the highest level of citric acid after growth for
240 h on corn distillers grains was ATCC 9142 (Fig. 1).
There was a significant difference (P< 005) in citric acid
levels between ATCC 9142 and ATCC 11414 but not
between ATCC 9142 and ATCC 12846. Compared with
citric acid production by ATCC 9142, it was determined
that ATCC 9029 and ATCC 10577 produced about three-fold less citric acid after 240 h. Citric acid production by
ATCC 26550 and ATCC 201122 was noted to be twofold
lower than the level produced by ATCC 9142. It was also
of interest to learn whether autoclaving the wet corn dis-
tillers grains had an effect on citric acid production by the
sevenA. niger strains. A prior study reported that autocla-
ving pineapple waste improved fungal citric acid produc-
tion (Tran et al. 1998). Citric acid production by ATCC
201122 on the autoclaved grains was found to be highest
after 240 h and citric acid production on the treated
grains was higher than on the untreated grains. On the
autoclaved grains, citric acid production by ATCC 11414
or ATCC 12846 was 13-fold lower than ATCC 201122
while ATCC 26550, ATCC 9142, ATCC 10577 and ATCC
9029 were 14-, 15-, 19- and 21-fold lower respectively.
Citric acid production by ATCC 11414, ATCC 12846 and
ATCC 9142 on the autoclaved grains was significantly
lower (P< 001) than observed on the untreated grains.
Citric acid production by ATCC 9029, ATCC 10577 and
ATCC 26550 on the autoclaved grains was also lower than
on the untreated grains.
Fungal citric acid production on grains G. Xie and T.P. West
270 Journal compilation 2006 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology 43 (2006) 2692732006 The Authors
-
8/12/2019 21909779
3/6
Biomass production by the strains after growth on wet
corn distillers grains for 240 h was investigated. The cell
weights after 240 h growth on wet corn distillers grains
were similar for ATCC 10577, ATCC 9029, ATCC 11414,
ATCC 12846 and ATCC 201122 (Fig. 2). Only biomass
production by ATCC 9142 and ATCC 26550 was slightly
lower. The effect of autoclaving the grains on biomass
production by the strains was examined. Although bio-
mass production by the seven strains was similar, biomass
production by ATCC 26550 on the autoclaved grains was
the highest of the strains tested. Biomass production by
ATCC 26550 was significantly higher (P< 001) on the
autoclaved grains compared with the untreated grains.
The highest citric acid yields were observed for ATCC
9142, ATCC 11414, ATCC 12846 and ATCC 26550
(Fig. 3). Slightly lower citric acid yields were measured
for ATCC 26550, ATCC 10577 and ATCC 201122. The
lowest citric acid yield was observed for ATCC 9029. On
the autoclaved grains, the highest yield was observed for
ATCC 201122, which was significantly higher (P< 001)
than the yields calculated for ATCC 9029, ATCC 10577,
ATCC 11414, ATCC 12846 and ATCC 26550. The citric
acid yields on the autoclaved grains were significantly
lower (P< 001) for ATCC 9142, ATCC 11414, ATCC
12846 and ATCC 26550 compared with the yieldsobserved for these strains on the untreated grains. This
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
ATCC
9029
ATCC
9142
ATCC
10577
ATCC
11414
ATCC
12846
ATCC
26550
ATCC
201122
Strain
CitricAcid(gk
g1)
Figure 1 Citric acid production [g citric acid
(kg wet corn distillers grains))1] byAspergillus
nigerATCC 9029, ATCC 9142, ATCC 10577,
ATCC 11414, ATCC 12846 and ATCC 20112-
2 grown on untreated (() and autoclaved
( ) corn distillers grains for 240 h at 25C.
Data represent the mean of three separate
trials SD.
0
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
ATCC
9029
ATCC
9142
ATCC
10577
ATCC
11414
ATCC
12846
ATCC
26550
ATCC
201122
Strain
Biomass(gg1)
Figure 2 Biomass production [g biomass
(g wet corn distillers grains))1] byAspergillus
nigerATCC 9029, ATCC 9142, ATCC 10577,
ATCC 11414, ATCC 12846 and ATCC 20112-
2 grown on untreated (() and autoclaved
( ) corn distillers grains for 240 h at 25C.
Data represent the mean of three separate
trials SD.
G. Xie and T.P. West Fungal citric acid production on grains
2006 The Authors
Journal compilation 2006 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology 43 (2006) 269273 271
-
8/12/2019 21909779
4/6
occurred despite the initial reducing sugar concentration
(mean of three trials SD) of the untreated wet distillers
grains being 2783 511 g reducing sugar (kg grains))1
and the initial reducing sugar concentration of the auto-
claved grains being 4935 454 g reducing sugar (kg
grains))1. The specific productivity (mean of three tri-
als SD) of ATCC 9142 on the untreated grains was
012 003 g citric acid (kg biomass))1 h)1 and it was
the highest specific productivity of the strains screened.
On the autoclaved grains, the highest specific productivity
(mean of three trials SD) was ATCC 201122 at
005 0
01 g citric acid (kg biomass)
)1
h)1
. The specificproductivity of ATCC 201122 was identical whether
untreated or autoclaved grains served as the substrate.
Discussion
Previous studies have investigated citric acid production
by the strains of A. niger utilized in this study using
solid-state fermentation on various substrates (Hang et al.
1977; Hang and Woodams 1984, 1985; Tran et al. 1998;
Roukas 2000; Vandenberghe et al. 2004). Apple pomace
or grape pomace were utilized as substrates for solid-state
fermentation by A. niger ATCC 9142, ATCC 11414 and
ATCC 12846. The highest citric acid yield on untreated
apple pomace (30%) was produced by ATCC 9142 after
96 h of growth (Hang and Woodams 1984). On the
untreated grape pomace, the highest citric acid yield
(48%) was produced by ATCC 9142 after 120 h of
growth (Hang and Woodams 1985). Citric acid produc-
tion by A. niger ATCC 9142, ATCC 11414 and ATCC
12846 on kiwifruit peel was also studied and it was found
that ATCC 12846 produced 70 g citric acid (kg kiwifruit
peel))1 which was the highest level observed after 120 h
of growth (Hang and Woodams 1987). With autoclaved
pineapple waste as a substrate for solid-state fermenta-
tion, A. niger ATCC 9142 and ATCC 12846 were able to
produce citric acid after 168 h but ATCC 9142 produced
the highest citric acid yield (Tran et al. 1998). A yield of
065 g citric acid (g sugar consumed))1 was produced by
ATCC 9142 on the pineapple waste (Tran et al. 1998).
When figs served as a substrate for solid-state fermenta-
tion, A. niger ATCC 10577 produced 64 g citric acid (kg
figs))1 after 360 h with a citric acid yield of 8% (Roukas
2000). Citric acid was produced at a level of 78 g citricacid (kg dry bagasse))1 byA. niger ATCC 9142 following
the solid-state fermentation of cassava bagasse after 144 h
(Vandenberghe et al. 2004). In this study, the citric acid
level produced by ATCC 9142 on the wet corn distillers
grains after 240 h was the highest level observed for the
seven strains tested. Although the concentration of citric
acid produced by ATCC 9142 on wet corn distillers grains
was several-fold lower than the concentration produced
by ATCC 12846 on kiwifruit peel or by ATCC 10577 on
figs, its concentration was found to be about 13-fold
higher than when ATCC 9142 was grown on cassava
bagasse (Vandenberghe et al. 2004). The citric acid yield
produced by ATCC 9142 on the grains was comparable
with the citric acid yield produced by ATCC 9142 on
apple pomace but was lower than the yield on grape
pomace (Hang and Woodams 1984, 1985). In addition,
the citric acid yield produced by ATCC 9142 on the
grains was higher than the citric acid yield of ATCC
10577 on figs (Roukas 2000). It was not clear why there
was a difference in citric acid production by some of the
strains when grown on the autoclaved grains. It may be
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
ATCC
9029
ATCC
9142
ATCC
10577
ATCC
11414
ATCC
12846
ATCC
26550
ATCC
201122
Strain
Yield(gg1
100%)
Figure 3 Citric acid yields [g citric acid
(g reducing sugar consumed))1 100%] by
Aspergillus nigerATCC 9029, ATCC 9142,
ATCC 10577, ATCC 11414, ATCC 12846 and
ATCC 201122 grown on untreated (() and
autoclaved ( ) corn distillers grains for 240 h
at 25C. Data represent the mean of three
separate trials SD.
Fungal citric acid production on grains G. Xie and T.P. West
272 Journal compilation 2006 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology 43 (2006) 2692732006 The Authors
-
8/12/2019 21909779
5/6
that autoclaving the grains resulted in less available sub-
strates for citric acid production by some of the strains or
in fermentation inhibitors being formed. Despite the cit-
ric acid level produced by ATCC 9142 on the grains being
low compared with a high sugar substrate such as figs,
the wet corn distillers grains still has the potential as a
substrate for fungal citric acid production considering thequantity of grains being produced each year. The solid-
state fermentation process may be further optimized for
possible commercial use by adjusting the moisture con-
tent of the grains or by adding supplements such as
methanol to the grains (Roukas 2000).
Overall, citric acid was produced by the seven strains
of A. niger used in this study whether they were grown
on untreated or autoclaved corn distillers grains. The
concentration of citric acid and the citric acid yields were
found to be highest for A. niger ATCC 9142 on the
untreated corn distillers grains.
Acknowledgements
Published as paper 3539, Journal Series, South Dakota
Agricultural Experiment Station. This work was supported
by the South Dakota AES and the South Dakota Corn
Utilization Council. This paper reports results of research
only and the mention of brand or firm names does not
constitute an endorsement by the South Dakota AES over
those mentioned but of a similar nature.
References
Dygert, S., Li, L.H., Florida, D. and Thoma, J.A. (1965) Deter-mination of reducing sugar with increased precision.Anal
Biochem 13, 367374.
Ham, G.A., Stock, R.A., Klopfenstein, T.J., Larson, E.M., Shain,
D.H. and Huffman, R.P. (1994) Wet distillers byproducts
compared with dried distillers grains with solubles as a
source of protein and energy for ruminants. J Anim Sci 72,
32463257.
Hang, Y.D. and Woodams, E.E. (1984) Apple pomace: a
potential substrate for citric acid production byAspergillus
niger. Biotechnol Lett6, 763764.
Hang, Y.D. and Woodams, E.E. (1985) Grape pomace: a novel
substrate for microbial production of citric acid.Biotechnol
Lett7, 253254.
Hang, Y.D. and Woodams, E.E. (1987) Microbial production
of citric acid by solid state fermentation of kiwifruit peel.
J Food Sci 52, 226227.
Hang, Y.D., Splittstoesser, D.F. and Woodams, E.E. (1975)
Utilization of brewery spent grain liquor byAspergillus
niger. Appl Microbiol30, 879880.
Hang, Y.D., Splittstoesser, D.F., Woodams, E.E. and Sherman,
R.M. (1977) Citric acid fermentation of brewery waste.
J Food Sci 42, 383384.
Henniger, G. and Mascaro, L. Jr (1985) Enzymatic-ultraviolet
determination of L-citric acid in wine: collaborative study.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem 68, 10241027.
Karaffa, L., Sandor, E., Fekete, E. and Szentirmai, A. (2001)
The biochemistry of citric acid accumulation byAspergillus
niger(a review). Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 48, 429
440.
Moellering, H. and Gruber, W. (1966) Determination of citrate
with citrate lyase. Anal Biochem 17, 369376.
Moyer, A.J. (1953) Effect of alcohols on the mycological pro-
duction of citric acid in surface and submerged culture. II.
Fermentation of crude carbohydrates. Appl Microbiol1,
713.
Roukas, T. (2000) Citric and gluconic acid production from
fig by Aspergillus niger using solid-state fermentation. J Ind
Microbiol Biotechnol 25, 298304.
Roukas, T. and Kotzekidou, P. (1986) Production of citric acid
from brewery wastes by surface fermentation usingAsperg-
illus niger. J Food Sci 51, 225228.
Tran, C.T., Sly, L.I. and Mitchell, D.A. (1998) Selection of a
strain ofAspergillus for the production of citric acid frompineapple waste in solid state fermentation. World J Micro-
biol Biotechnol 14, 399404.
Vandenberghe, L.P.S., Soccol, C.R., Prado, F.C. and Pandey, A.
(2004) Comparison of citric acid production by solid-state
fermentation in flask, column, tray, and drum bioreactors.
Appl Biochem Biotechnol118, 293303.
G. Xie and T.P. West Fungal citric acid production on grains
2006 The Authors
Journal compilation 2006 The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology 43 (2006) 269273 273
-
8/12/2019 21909779
6/6