2/15/2013 dear secretary steven chu, · 2/19/2013 . dear secretary steven chu, d natural gas...
TRANSCRIPT
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
While not a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG)
export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other
things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011
study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s --
while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry. In addition, the job market will
expand along with the new industry. Can anyone doubt this benefit??? Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by
Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we
have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic
increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas
prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing
the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from
between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural
gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by
becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study
commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits
from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the
level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than
corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the
economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are
supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of
dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for
flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and
employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to
create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
D Douglas
Phoenix, AZ
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
What better way to move us to renewables but, to exhaust our existing energy sources Millions of Americans own oil and
natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent
of the oil and natural gas industry. Why not try to maximize that worth reasonably? As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the daily
produced volumes from shale gas resources located in the United States. As has been demonstrated, higher gas production is
cheaper at the nozzle. Across all reasonable scenarios, the U.S. is projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports.
Sincerely,
Nick Privett
Edmond, OK
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
We need i here to keep prices low so I can afford to heat my house. Thank you. mark
Sincerely,
mark Wiley
tigard, OR
-
2/19/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
d natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG)
export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other
things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011
study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s --
while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of
LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the
benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal
drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns
about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled
\"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG
exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets
limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas
prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here
at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net
economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic
benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net
economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report
for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000
total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate
billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would
allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production
and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export
permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Wayne Charlton
Ogdensburg, NY
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
The oil and gas industry is a bright spot in our economy. Please help our economy thrive by supporting the export of U.S.
natural gas. The proliferation of shale gas production should be a jackpot for the U.S. Currently, we can\'t take advantage of the
opportunity because the abundant supply has saturated the market depressing domestic prices. Let\'s capitalize on this
unexpected opportunity by allowing natural gas to be sold abroad, creating thousands of jobs and helping to stabilize the world
gas market, for the benefit the global economy. I disagree with Congressman Markey\'s objections and don\'t want our
economy to be held hostage by protectionism. Please support efforts to export natural gas for the benefit of our country and
our economy.
Sincerely,
Jan Sieving
The Woodlands, TX
-
2/22/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
Sending our liquified natural gas over seas creates private profit from public lands. The pollution of our environment and the
addition of those extra fossil fuels let loose on our earth would have a huge impact on our children\'s future. Keep all fossil fuels
in the ground where they belong. Save the earth.
Sincerely,
Patt Doyle
Heisson, WA
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support of LNG exports as an employee of the oil industry. They should be approved because we\'ll have
an abundance of natural gas that future technical advances will only increase and because pricing issues raised in opposition to
increased exports appear overstated from recent analyses. The benefits of added domestic jobs, support of allies in an
increasingly hostile world, and the higher net benefits and deficit reductions of unconstrained exports outweigh such concerns.
Added flexibility in periods of market imbalances is a further added advantage. In a recovering economy such LNG exports
create jobs, reduce trade deficites, and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Will Ollison
Rockville, MD
-
2/16/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
M. Davis
Pittsboro, IN
-
2/16/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Sue Gilbert
Surprise, AZ
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Martha Shirley
Hope Hull, AL
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security. Please use the Natural Resources that we ALREADY have.
Sincerely,
Michelle Hollien
Gainesville, FL
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Marie Ferrell-Mewes
Pocahontas, IL
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Roger Teeter
Lake Tapps, WA
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Teresa Stone
Florissant, MO
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Cheryl Little
Chandler, AZ
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Mike McEuen
Concordia, KS
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
David Dunham
Oxnard, CA
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Porter Conerly
Chapel Hill, NC
-
2/5/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought
up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment
benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil
and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three
percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we
should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of
natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the
estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem
to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S.
Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11
percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise,
showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG
supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE
states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG
exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG
exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding
cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of
shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout
the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Suzanne Schuelke
Waukesha, WI
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address points brought up in the
comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would
not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas
holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil
and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these
significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry
advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale
gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent
studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied
Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64
cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG
exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our
allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the
following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports.
Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports
increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases
with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale
gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the
economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much
needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in
times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and
enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the
American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Sarah Anderson
Tyler, TX
-
2/16/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits. As a 2011 study found that millions of
Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s, but corporate management owns less
than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry. Rather than delay the export of LNG, we should approve these significant
projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. The US has an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have also led to a dramatic increase in our recoverable shale gas resources. Concerns about
domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such indicate that the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG
exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). One study concludes that global markets limit how
high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic prices. By becoming a
larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad we could create many new liveable wage jobs here at home. The domestic job creation
potential is so great that one report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale
gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. The additional gas production for
export would generate billions of tax dollars that federal and state governments alike really need every year, and especially in
view of our soaring federal deficit. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market
imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, and maintain production and employment levels,. In our still fragile
economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy
security. Thank you for your consideration of my remarks.
Sincerely,
Ray Taylor
West Linn, OR
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
Dear Steven, As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas
(LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other
things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011
study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s --
while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of
LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the
benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal
drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns
about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled
\"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG
exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets
limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas
prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here
at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net
economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic
benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net
economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report
for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000
total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate
billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would
allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production
and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export
permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Brenda Teachman
Houston, TX
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As user of the products of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas
(LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other
things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011
study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s --
while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of
LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the
benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal
drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns
about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled
\"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG
exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets
limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas
prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here
at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net
economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic
benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net
economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report
for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000
total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate
billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would
allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production
and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export
permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Frances Innes
Villa Hills, KY
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As someone who has been chronically unemployed over the past 3 years, but have the electronics, electrical and other skills
well suited for the LNG industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and
address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman
Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found,
millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate
management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested
by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we
have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic
increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas
prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing
the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from
between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural
gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by
becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study
commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits
from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the
level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than
corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the
economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are
supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of
dollars annually in much needed federal and state government revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for
flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and
employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to
create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Perry Bonney
Rosharon, TX
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As President of the Albuquerque Petroleum Association, and a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my
support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment
from Representative Ed Markey. Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue
widely to Americans. I disagree. As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings
through mutual funds, pensions and 401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural
gas industry Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant
projects so that the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in
hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources
located in the United States. Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as
the May 2012 Brookings report, entitled \"Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,\" state
the price impact of 6 bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings
study concludes that global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a
minimal impact on domestic natural gas prices. In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could
create tens of thousands of new jobs here at home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following: \"Across all these
scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for every one of the
market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In particular, scenarios with
unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited exports.\" The domestic job
creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for every 1 bcf/d of
shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the additional gas
production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state government
revenue. In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps
the industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security. In our still
fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and increase energy
security.
Sincerely,
Jerra Gonzales
Albuquerque, NM
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Lisa Lewis
Louisville, CO
-
2/16/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
William Kropf
Wauwatosa, WI
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
N.L. Hauser
Carmel, IN
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Thomas Hauck
Pittsboro, NC
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Don & Sue McFarland
Grand Junction, CO
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Kerry Stone
Fort Lauderdale, FL
-
2/15/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Michael Gamble
Dallas, OR
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling have led to a dramatic increase in the estimated recoverable shale gas resources located in the
United States.
Concerns about domestic natural gas prices rising seem to be overstated. Recent studies such as the May 2012 Brookings
report, entitled "Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas," state the price impact of 6
bcf/day of LNG exports would range from between two and 11 percent (12 and 64 cents). The Brookings study concludes that
global markets limit how high U.S. natural gas prices will rise, showing that LNG exports would have a minimal impact on
domestic natural gas prices.
In addition, by becoming a larger LNG supplier to our allies abroad, we could create tens of thousands of new jobs here at
home. The study commissioned by DOE states the following:
"Across all these scenarios, the U.S. was projected to gain net economic benefits from allowing LNG exports. Moreover, for
every one of the market scenarios examined, net economic benefits increased as the level of LNG exports increased. In
particular, scenarios with unlimited exports always had higher net economic benefits than corresponding cases with limited
exports."
The domestic job creation potential is great: an IHS report for ANGA on the economic impacts of shale gas estimates that for
every 1 bcf/d of shale gas production, approximately 32,000 total jobs are supported throughout the economy. Plus, the
additional gas production associated with exports would generate billions of dollars annually in much needed federal and state
government revenue.
In addition, approving export permits would allow for flexibility to export in times of market imbalance, which helps the
industry operate efficiently, maintain production and employment levels, and enhance U.S. energy security.
In our still fragile economy, it is crucial to approve LNG export permits to create jobs, support the American economy and
increase energy security.
Sincerely,
Mark Franck
Papillion, NE
-
2/14/2013
Dear Secretary Steven Chu,
As a member of the oil and natural gas industry, I want to express my support for approving liquefied natural gas (LNG) export
permits and address some of the points brought up in the comment from Representative Ed Markey.
Among other things, Congressman Markey asserts that investment benefits would not accrue widely to Americans. I disagree.
As a 2011 study by Sonecon found, millions of Americans own oil and natural gas holdings through mutual funds, pensions and
401(k)s -- while corporate management owns less than three percent of the oil and natural gas industry
Rather than delay the export of LNG as suggested by Congressman Markey, we should approve these significant projects so that
the nation can enjoy the benefits. As a nation, we have an abundance of natural gas. Industry advancements in hydraulic
fracturing and horizontal drilling