2.11.2007 horticultural systems – from fork to farm © eth zürich strawberries salomeh ahmadi...
TRANSCRIPT
2.11.2007
Horticultural Systems – from fork to farm
© ETH Zürich
Strawberries
Salomeh Ahmadi Abhari, Diana Niklaus, Daniel Fröhlich
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 22
Overview
Introduction
Consumers
Material and Methods
Results
Conclusion and Discussion
References
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 33
Introduction
Botanical classification: family of Rosaceae
Origin
Romans → cultivation of woodland strawberry (Fragaria
vesca)
→ small fruits
New World → new varieties from north- and southamerica
→ bigger fruits
Our garden strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa)
Cultivation: soil culture or soilless-cultures
More than 1‘000 varieties with different characteristics
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 44
Consumers
On demand: Taste > without chemical residues > health value
But also appearance (brightness, size, colour)
Recent trends: Appearance, storability, transportability, agronomic
parameters have been improved
But: Sensory quality hasn’t been improved
Our focus: Link parameters from lab analysis with consumer
panels to improve the sensory quality.
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 55
Materials and Methods
Material
Code Retailer Price per Kg (CHF) Number of
strawberries in each
batch
A MIGROS 2.80 18
B Carrefour 1 2.50 28
C Carrefour 2 2.50 31
D PAM 3.20 26
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 66
Materials and Methods
Firmness → Penetrometer
Sugar content → Refractometer
Acidity → pH-Meter (Titration)
Hedonic consumer test with categorisation:
Scale of the sensory quality score (SQS) from 1 (very bad) to 9
(excellent).
Penetrometer.3gp
Acidity.3gp
Refractrometer.3gp
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 77
Results - Sensory quality scores of different cultivars of
strawberries Significant differences
Variations for 2006 > 2007
2006: Best → MB / Worst → Ma
2007: Best → Ca / Worst → Da
Sen
sory
qua
lity
scor
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9MB Ca Pe El Ml Ma
2006 (n=115)
a ab bc cd d e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9Ca MB Ma Ra Da
2007 (n=117)
a a a b b
Ca=Carezza, Da=Darselect, El=Elsanta,
MB=Mara des Bois, Ml=Madeleine,
Ma=Marmolada, Pe=Pegasus, Ra=Rauricar
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 88
Results – Consumers vs. Lab analysis
Sugar content ↑ → SQS ↑
Acidity → SQS?
Volatile compounds↑ → SQS↑
CTC 2006 Sensory quality score 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Soluble solids (°Brix)
Titrable acidity
Volatile compounds
6.4
7.2
0.38
6.6
6.7
0.35
7.2
7.0
0.33
7.4
6.8
0.58
7.7
6.9
0.77
8.3
6.9
0.94
8.4
6.6
0.97
Soluble solids (°Brix)
Titrable acidity
Volatile compounds
7.1
6.8
1.07
6.8
7.4
0.85
7.7
7.0
1.13
8.0
6.6
1.13
9.1
7.3
1.56
9.5
7.0
1.75
9.8
6.6
1.87
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 99
Results – Our Lab analysis
Firmness ↑ → Acceptability ↑ >>>> Migros is the best
Sugar content: 8 °Brix for good quality >>>> Bad quality same
range
Acidity: Highest: Migros and lowest for Carrefour 2
Type Firmness Sugar content Acidity
Durofel 50 S CV °Brix mI NaOH g acid/I juice
A 79 5 6 6.5 13.65 8.73
B 73 9 12 6.7 11.19 7.16
C 67 16 23 6.2 10.41 6.66
D 62 8 12 6.2 11.80 7.55
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References
2.11.2007 ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT OF THE AGRI-FOOD CHAIN15.11.2007 POLICY INSTRUMENTS FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES8. Mai 2008 Horticultural Systems 1010
Conclusion and Discussion
Sensory quality score can vary from year to year within a cultivar
There’s a positive correlation for both the sugar content and
volatile
compounds with sensory quality score.
There’s no clear correlation between acidity and sensory quality
score.
Measurements in the lab reveals the sugar content is very low
due
to the fact that they were imported from Spain.
The NIR as a non-destructive method enables to receive results
faster and catches more fruit characteristics.
Overview Introduction Consumers Materials and Methods Results Conclusion and Discussion References