21/11/09 | slide 1
DESCRIPTION
Theme 1 Keynote: Responding to learners. Helen Beetham, Rhona Sharpe. 21/11/09 | slide 1. Joint Information Systems Committee. Supporting education and research. Responding to Learners. Presenters: Helen Beetham, Rhona Sharpe Facilitator: Greg Benfield. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
21/11/09 | slide 1
Theme 1 Keynote: Responding to learnersHelen Beetham, Rhona Sharpe
Joint Information Systems Committee Supporting education and research
Joint Information Systems Committee
Responding to Learners
Helen Beetham is a Consultant to JISC, in which role she supports the Curriculum Design and Open Educational Resources programmes. Rethinking Pedagogy for the Digital Age, edited with Rhona Sharpe, is becoming a standard textbook in the discipline, and a second volume, Rethinking Learning for the Digital Age, is forthcoming from Routledge.
Dr. Rhona Sharpe is principal lecturer in the Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development (OCSLD) at Oxford Brookes University UK. She has managed learners' experiences of e- learning projects funded by the JISC and Higher Education Academy. She is a founder member of ELESIG, co-editor of ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology and is Fellow of the Staff and Educational Development Association.
Presenters: Helen Beetham, Rhona Sharpe Facilitator: Greg Benfield
Greg Benfield is a senior lecturer/educational developer at Oxford Brookes University in OCSLD. He has been involved in a number of JISC and HEA projects, including the JISC Learner Experiences of e-Learning Programme. His particular area of interest technology-mediated group work, and assessment.
& then click on “Send”
How to text-chat
great video! great video!
Type in your messageYou can filter who sees your message
e.g. If you have a technical problem,
choose “moderators”
How to ask a question (1) Put up your hand
To indicate that you would like to speak, click the ‘raise hand’ button underneath the participants’ window. You will see a number appear beside your name. This is where you are in the queue of people waiting to speak.
Click on the ‘raise hand’ button.
A number beside your name indicates you are in the queue to speak.
How to ask a question (2) Click the talk button
When your name is called by the moderator, click the talk button in the Audio window and speak into your microphone.
Click the talk button again to release your microphone when you have finished speaking.
Click the button or enter the hot keys to speak.
Click the button or enter the hot keys when you have finished speaking.
Protocol:(1) You must have a headset (with microphone) to ask a question (2) Only click on the button to speak when directed by the Facilitator
When asked, click either the green “tick” or red “cross”
When asked, click the letter that matches your choice (A, B, C....)
How to respond to a Yes/No question
How to respond to a multiple-choice question
Responding to learners
Helen Beetham Rhona Sharpe
“a consumer revolution for students”
Higher Ambitions: the future of universities in a knowledge
economy
problems with the consumer model... at an individual level,
not developmental, not ambitious
at a societal level, rhetorically allows next year’s cohort of students and this year’s top graduate employers to define purposes of FE/HE: in practice sidelines the debate
The consumer or client replaces the learner... [and] as the language of performance and management has
advanced, so we have lost a language of education which recognises the intrinsic
value of pursuing certain sorts of question...
needs and expectations... how are they framed?
are they the same thing?
can needs be met by having expectations challenged?
how can we avoid charges of patronage, normalisation, elitism, being ‘supply-side’ driven...?
we need to debunk a couple of
myths learners are digital natives
have high expectations of technology-supported learning
What are learners’ expectations of technology
enhanced learning?
And, how should we respond?
Familiarity with technology in students’
social and leisure lives has created high expectations for technology enhanced
learning
Do you agree? YES / NO
Distinguishing between myths and reality
Research approaches that are fit for purpose
Sound, ethical methods
Contextualised data
Understanding of individual differences
Conceptual accounts
Familiarity with technology?
91% of students use social networking and 73% use SN sites to discuss coursework
54% regularly or sometimes use wikis, blogs or online networks
28% maintaining their own wiki or blog
(JISC Great Expectations study, 2008)
Holistic, participatory methods
"the online resources that are available are good. WebCT is really good. I didn't come to university with any expectations about what would be available, coming here and finding that there are quite good resources is quite good. ..
”The resources I’ve used have been recommended by tutors. .. This is different from when I was at school, we never got recommended books, just Googled everything …"
I knew what blogging was, from online newspapers, but it wasn't something I'd ever done..
Understanding of individual differences
Equivocal findings related to age, although prior educational experience clearly important.
Technology is largely used in ways suggested by course and tutor, with some notable creative, exceptions.
Technology use to enable a specific, individual learning requirement e.g. international students, learners with disabilities.
High expectations?
Learners value ubiquitous access, flexibility, convenience, rapid response
Learners make extensive use of technology mediated peer support networks
Learners value access to academic digital content, consistency in use and a blend with face to face teaching
A developmental model
Creative appropriati
on
Creative appropriation
Driven by contextual or individual need, not provided by tutors, e.g.
‘Had a phone tutorial with my supervisor referring to a support document he emailed to me – I digitally recorded the tutorial and saved it as a digital file on my laptop. This has then been playing while I make the adjustments to the document’ (Clarke 2009: 12)
“One of the group members was not able to make it today so what we did we were connected by using MSN Messenger so we were discussing notes. We were feeding back to the other person.” (Jefferies et al. 2009: 16)
Creative appropriation
Blending social and academic…
‘Chun-Tao also blended the academic side of her life with social technology by using Facebook to find out about software and sites that would be useful for her work, like Zotero and ClickUni, which “looks something like iGoogle but it has things like Facebook [… and] College News.” (Thema Case Study)
Enablers towards creative appropriation: which of these enablers do
you think you provide most well?A. Access that meets personal needs, in
multiple formats and locations
B. Opportunities to develop generic technical, information, communication and learning skills.
C. To practise making decisions about which technology to use for which purpose
D. Perceived value and/or relevance of technology
E. Confidence (risk taking?) to move beyond established, conservative views of study, to explore , to find and use new tools in appropriate ways.
we need to debunk a couple of
myths learners are digital natives
have high expectations of technology-supported learning
Young people who have been immersed in digital technologies
('digital natives') have more advanced learning practices and
capabilities than earlier generations.
Do you agree? YES / NO
we need to debunk a couple of
myths what practices and capabilities do learners need for a digital age?
how do we enable learners to develop them?
What counts as an educated 19-year-old
in this day and age?
Helen BeethamLou McGillAllison Littlejohn
Small-scale JISC studyFinal report May 09
what capabilities will today's learners need in 2020?
economic uncertaintyhigh competition for employment in the global knowledge
economyincreased alternative, contract-based and self-employment
inter-disciplinarity and multi-role work teams a networked society and communities
multi-cultural working and living environmentsdigitally-enhanced environment: geo-tagging, embedded datablurring boundaries of real/virtual, public/private, work/leisure
increasing ubiquity, availability and reusability of digital knowledge
distribution of cognitive work into (human+non-human) networks
personal 'cloud' of information, personal/wearable devicesrapid social and techno-social change
As knowledge is increasingly accepted as being multi-modal, always potentially capable of digital capture and sharing, then the significance of 'the digital' as a separate space for living, learning and working may recede
We are not rethinking some part or aspect of
learning, we are rethinking all of learning in these
new digital contexts
How will we manage multiple identities in a world where public and private are being redefined? How will we act safely and responsibility in hybrid spaces?
Creative appropriation
What would you describe as the priority for graduates in the C21st?
A high level skills for a knowledge economyB creative production of ideas in multiple mediaC critical information and technology literacyD digital participation and citizenshipE personal and social resilience
what capabilities are being supported
in UK HE and FE today?
academic and prof literacies
Competence frameworks
information and media literacies ICT skills
slow change, cultural and institutional inhibitors
rapid change, economic and techno-social
drivers
critical thinkingproblem solvingreflectionacademic writingnote-takingconcept mappingtime managementanalysis, synthesisevaluationcreativity, innovationself-directed learningcollaborative learning
searching, retrievinganalysing, interpreting critiquingevaluatingmanaging resourcesnavigating info spacescontent creationediting, repurposingenriching resourcesreferencingsharing content
web searchingusing CMCusing TELEusing digital devicesword processingusing databasesanalysis toolsassistive techsocial softwareimmersive envtspersonalisation...
A developmental model
Creative appropriati
on
hand-out: mapping capabilities to the
developmental model
hand-out: mapping capabilities to the
developmental modelStrategies tend to focus on 'employability' – occasionally 'graduateness' – both very poorly conceptualised. In practice, how should the curriculum change? How will learners benefit? How will they be supported, challenged and progressed?
creativeappropriation
Learners over-estimate their information skills
Many lack general critical and inquiry skills
Most learners still strongly led by tutor / course practices
Most learners unwilling to explore or creatively appropriate technologies
Separate 'skills' provision poorly engaged with
Need support integrating skills at task/practice level
Problems transferring skills from personal/social contexts to study
Potential clash of academic/personal knowledge cultures
what are the challenges for learners?
how might institutions respond?
What do learners arriving in HE and FE need to make the best of their learning experience?
A info/digital literacy module integrated into all programmes in semester 1B intensive study skills support including ICTC student mentors with strong digital skillsD teaching staff with strong digital skillsE personal development plan that centres on digital literacies
Rethink the capabilities graduates need
Rethink how they are taught, supported, assessed
Rethink how different capabilities and practices are valued by the institution
Digital participation, production and enquiryMultiple modes of knowing, multiple media, multiple communities
Self-management of learning, career and reputationCreativity, innovation and agility...
Peer learning, informal learning, 360 degree support and reviewAuthentic contexts for practice, including digitally-mediated contextsIndividual scaffolding and support Making explicit community practices of knowledge and meaning-makingAnticipating and helping learners manage conflict between practice contextsRecognising and helping learners integrate practicesInterdisciplinarity? Cross-contextual learning? Learner-generated contexts?
Transparency over processes and valuesRecognition and reward (staff and student, cultural and financial)
Digital scholarship = learning and teaching practice, research and innovation, content production
Digital professionalism recognised and nurtured
Learning, living and working are understood to take place in a digital society: there is no separate space of learning which is
'digital'Learners are blending their own learning environments
There is an entitlement to access and basic skills of learning in a digital age, plus a recognition of diverse personal goals and
needsLiteracies for learning are continually assessed and supported:
the emphasis is on producing digitally capable lifelong learners
The focus is on what formal post-compulsory education uniquely offers in the digital age
References and resources JISC Responding to Learners pack
Sharpe, R. et al (2009) Learners’ experiences of e-learning synthesis report: Explaining learner differences, available from https://mw.brookes.ac.uk/display/JISCLE2
Beetham, H., et al (2009) Thriving in the 21st Century: report of the JISC Learning Literacies for a Digital Age project, available fromhttp://caledonianacademy.net/spaces/LLiDA/
ELESIG, next event 21 January 2010, Reading
Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age, Routledge (Spring 2010)
Joint Information Systems Committee
Theme 1 Keynote: Responding to learners
Helen Beetham, Rhona Sharpe
Thank you for your attendance and participation.
We hope you will join us now in the conference discussion area http://www.online-conference.co.uk/WebX/.eed229f/
where we will continue these discussions over the next two days.