21.10third party logistics-studie 2012

Upload: paras-nath-verma

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    1/52

    Results and Findings of the 16th Annual Study

    2012 THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STUDYThe State o Logistics Outsourcing

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    2/52

    Contents

    2012 C. Jo Lagley, Jr., P.D., ad Capgemii. All Rigts Reserved.

    no part o tis docmet may be reprodced, displayed, modiied or

    distribted by ay process or meas witot prior writte permissio

    rom Capgemii. Rigtsore is a trademar belogig to Capgemii.

    4 Exective Smmary

    7 Crret State o te 3PL Maret

    15 Emergig Marets

    23 Electroics

    33 Talet Maagemet

    41 Strategic Assessmet

    44 Abot te Stdy

    48 Abot te Sposors

    50 Credits

    GIVE US YOUR OPINIONSca tis code ad sare yorsggestios or topics to coveri ext years stdy.

    2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    3/52

    SpportigOrgaizatios

    Balance is te state o eqilibrim a cotios ad sometimes evasive qest or spplycai exectives ad te teme o tis report. Weter teyre explorig emergig marets,avigatig te calleges o te electroics spply cai or i dig te rigt talet, attaiigeqal ad satisactory distribtio o resorces is a ogoig callege.

    www.3plstdy.com

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    4/52

    Current State o the MarketSrvey resposes rom 1,561 idstry exec-

    tives ad maagers represetig sers ad

    o-sers o 3PL services, as well as respos-

    es rom 697 3PL exectives ad maagers,

    corm tat 3PLs cotie to provide strategic

    ad operatioal vale, provide ew ad io-

    vative ways to improve logistics eectiveess

    ad are ey cotribtors to sippers overall

    bsiess sccess. Total logistics expeditres

    represet a average o 12% o sippers sales

    revees, ad o tis, a average 42% is devot-ed to otsorcig. Metrics relatig to logistics

    cost redctio, ivetory cost redctio, ad

    logistics xed asset redctio remai co-

    sistet wit te two previos years stdies.

    A majority o sipper respodets, 64%, are

    icreasig teir se o 3PL services, wile

    24% are retrig to isorcig some 3PL

    services ad 58% report tey are redcig

    or cosolidatig te mber o 3PLs tey

    se. Logistics activities most reqetly ot-

    sorced cotie to iclde tose tat are

    more trasactioal, operatioal ad repeti-

    tive, wile tose tat are more strategic,cstomer-acig ad IT-itesive ted to be

    less reqetly otsorced. A similar pe-

    omeo is preset i expectatios o 3PLs

    IT capabilities; exectio-orieted activities

    ad processes sc as trasportatio ad

    wareose/DC maagemet-related IT capa-

    bilities are more i demad ta tose tat

    are more strategic ad aalytical.

    3PLs cotie to ra teir relatiosips

    wit sippers a bit iger ta sippers

    do, bt te vast majority (88% o sippers

    ad 94% o 3PLs) view teir relatiosipsas sccessl. Opeess, trasparecy,

    ad good commicatio as well as agility

    ad fexibility cotribte to tis sccess.

    Iterestigly, gres rom tis years stdy

    sggest decreases i te se o gaisar-

    ig ad collaboratio.

    Tis report presets digs

    o te 2012 16th Annual Third-

    Party Logistics Study, based

    o researc codcted i

    mid-2011. I additio to doc-

    metig te ogoig evoltio

    o te tird-party logistics

    maret, tis years report also

    taes a close-p loo at treespecial topics:

    Te logistics o operatig i

    emergig marets

    Te iqe calleges acig

    te electroics spply cai

    For te rst time i te

    stdys istory, te report

    cosiders te implicatios o

    talet i te spply cai ad

    i sipper-3PL relatiosips

    Eective wit tis report, we

    are bradig eacAnnual 3PL

    Studyi terms o its rst ll

    year o circlatio ollowig

    te reports aal October

    release. Tereore, tis report

    costittes te 2012 3PL Study.

    Emerging MarketsA sbstatial 80% o sippers ad 77% o

    3PLs i te srvey codct bsiess wit or

    witi a emergig cotry atios wit

    ecoomies tat are experiecig rapid growt

    trog idstrializatio. Cia, Idia, Brazil

    ad Mexico are cosidered top emergig mar-

    et opportities by srvey respodets.

    Operatioal diclties, icldig logistics

    calleges, treate to erode te potetial

    beets associated wit doig bsiess witor witi emergig marets. For sippers

    based i matre marets, diclt laws ad

    reglatios, cltral diereces, te ability

    to deliver agaist promises or agreed-to ser-

    vice levels ad complicated tax regimes top

    te list o calleges.

    Brazil is represetative o te ris/reward

    calleges tat are posed by a emerg-

    ig ecoomy. Govermet ivestmet i

    irastrctre, as well as tax redctios

    ad participatio i te Mercosr ree trade

    agreemet, ave cotribted to te ast

    growt tat as attracted global maac-trers ad 3PLs. Bt compaies movig ito

    Brazil ace te very calleges sippers cite.

    Ideed, eterig ay ew maret reqires

    de diligece; we its a emergig mar-

    et, its eve more critical. More ta al o

    sippers based i bot matre ad emergig

    marets agree tat a global 3PL coordiatig

    wit a local 3PL is te most sccessl oper-

    atig model or 3PLs operatig wit or witi

    a emergig maret.

    Te 3PL capabilities sippers most vale

    we eterig emergig marets are visibility,expertise o te latest global trade regla-

    tios ad maagig ad optimizig sipmet

    rotig based o ree trade agreemet (FTA)

    owledge. Tose participatig i worsops

    spportig te stdy also added proactive

    cosltig services, local isigt ad exper-

    tise ad itegrated soltios to tat list. Te

    majority o sippers i matre ad emergig

    marets call 3PLs owledge o FTAs very

    importat (65% ad 73%, respectively).

    Executive Summary

    4 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    5/52

    ElectronicsElectroics prodcts ca be igly poplar,

    bt alog wit eviable demad comes pres-

    sre to mae prodcts smaller, aster, cooler

    ad at a lower price poit. hittig tese tar-

    gets demads a ast ad imble spply cai.

    Icreasig pressre to lower costs ad ma-

    age material ad sppliers more ecietly

    as triggered a preerece amog electroics

    compaies or asset ligtess, otsorcig

    bot prodctio ad logistics, especially iemergig marets. Sippers call price pres-

    sre to redce operatig costs teir top

    logistics callege (59%), bt electroics

    maactrers also wrestle wit oter isses

    icrred by a log, ti spply cai, employ-

    ig strategies sc as postpoemet.

    Te electroics idstry is otoriosly dis-

    itegrated, wit mltiple players ivolved i

    te spply cai ad a ig rate o mergers

    ad acqisitios. Frter complicatig mat-

    ters, electroics compaies sell ito may ver-

    tical marets, eac wit its ow iqe eeds.

    Mltiple layers, spply costraits, mased-togeter spply cais ad te specic cal-

    leges o retail caels itrodce cost,

    saety stoc, orecast calleges ad addi-

    tioal time ito logistics processes. Aoter

    callege is to desig a commo, cost-e-

    ciet irastrctre across spply cais.

    Becase electroics prodcts are ote

    ig vale, tey pose calleges icldig

    assrig secrity, prevetig coter-

    eit ad pacagig scietly to adle

    log-distace trasportatio. Sort lie-

    cycles combied wit te calleges oaccrately orecastig demad also mea

    ivetory obsolescece is a sigicat

    problem, leadig electroics compaies to

    see soltios sc as o-lie actios.

    uortately, electroics sippers give

    low mars to 3PLs ability to solve teir top

    logistics calleges. Te largest gaps occr

    o teir igest priorities: or example, 59%

    regard price pressre to redce operatig

    costs as teir top callege, wile jst 28%

    believe 3PLs ca elp tem wit tis cal-

    lege. 3PLs eed to do a better job o sellig

    te qality ad vale o teir capabilities to

    electroics cstomers, ad sippers eed to

    be more ope to collaboratig wit 3PLs to

    address teir top calleges.

    Talent ManagementDespite te spply cais role as a sigicat

    cotribtor to attaiig strategic bsiess

    goals, te logistics idstry is experiecig

    a sortage o capable ad well-roded sp-

    ply cai maagers prepared to step ito ey

    maagemet positios. Tis ca be overcome

    by developig programs or talet maage-

    met te vigoros, systematic process o

    coectig a clear, well-deed bsiess

    strategy to te recritmet, retetio ad

    developmet o talet.

    May sippers ad 3PLs are trobled by te

    crret state o talet maagemet witi

    teir orgaizatios, wit promotio ad rota-

    tio practices ad idetiyig ad developig

    leaders te top cocers.

    As spply cais grow more complex ad

    itrisic to a compays ability to attai its

    bsiess goals, tey reqire leaders wo are

    more diverse ad mlti-aceted. A sigi-

    cat mber o sippers ad 3PLs eel teir

    crret leaders dot ave wat it taes

    to address tre bsiess calleges.Sippers ad 3PLs most igly vale opera-

    tioal exectio (51% ad 60%) ollowed

    by people maagemet ad developmet

    sills (54% ad 43%) i teir leaders.

    Todays spply cai leaders ave bee

    reqired to grow well beyod teir opera-

    tios bacgrods, developig a broad

    rage o competecies wile o te job;

    sippers (37%) ad 3PLs (39%) are most

    codet i te learig ability o todays

    leaders. Also importat are leaders ability

    to dedce, execte, codct talet reviewprocesses ad lead visioary cage ad

    orgaizatio by-i. Bt ew orgaizatios

    ave bee idoctriatig tese compete-

    cies ito mid-maagemet traiig ad

    developmet, leadig to te talet crisis.

    Te scarcity o spply cai talet pres-

    ets a real callege or may sippers ad

    3PLs. To date, te majority o bot sip-

    pers ad 3PLs recrit rom iside teir ow

    idstries, bt a growig tred is to loo or

    talet i adjacet idstries. Compay sc-

    cess ad perormace, attractive salary ad

    beets ad persoal developmet oppor-

    tities witi te compay are cosidered

    te top qalities eeded to attract talet.

    Strategic AssessmentCostatly cagig ecoomic ad political

    dyamics ecessitate cotial re-evala-

    tio o spply cai directios. Ispired by

    te digs o tis years stdy, i tis stra-

    tegic assessmet, te stdy team examies

    several treds sprrig yet more cage ad

    iovatio i te spply cai world.

    Te srvey od sippers i developig

    regios exibit a greater icliatio to bot

    otsorce ad isorce logistics servicesta tose i te more developed cotries.

    Wile tese reslts may seem to cotradict

    oe aoter, te derlyig dig is tat

    sippers i developig ecoomies are more

    liely to mae cages to teir otsorc-

    ig strategies ta tose i more developed

    regios. Cosiderig te icreasig complex-

    ity o may spply cais, tere is a strog

    argmet tat sippers sold be looig

    carelly at bolsterig logistics capabilities

    via 3PLs ad 4PLs.

    A growig mber o compaies aspire to

    maage tis complexity via spply caicotrol towers, a cetral repository or all

    evet data, ad several 4PLs oer tis ser-

    vice. A well-desiged spply cai cotrol

    tower eables a compay to measre ad

    cotrol te eectiveess o te spply cai

    i terms o agility, resiliece, reliability ad

    resposiveess. Tis tred ca be viewed as

    a positive metod o maagig overall spply

    cai activities ad processes, bt 3PL ad

    sipper mst collaborate to prevet dplica-

    tio o eorts ad de added costs.

    nearsorig is aoter sig o costatlycagig global dyamics. Compaies ave

    moved prodctio to emergig marets i

    prsit o lower costs, bt tat decisio

    sometimes caged coditios i tose

    very marets. Tis calleges compaies

    to recosider te overall ecoomics ad i

    some cases retr to earsorig.

    Lie oter idstries, te spply cai ids-

    try is i te early stages o worig ot ow

    to best leverage social media or tass sc

    as collaboratio, eacig orecastig ad

    locatig talet, to eace day-to-day bsi-

    ess ctios wile miimizig te riss.

    Tog social media was ot iclded as a

    topic drig tis years srvey, a sigicat

    mber o respodets ad participats see

    te beets o social media i te logistics

    world ad qestio ot weter social media

    will tae o, bt oly we.

    5EXECuTIVE SuMMARY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    6/52

    Balancing internal logistics competencies with external expertise

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    7/52

    Results o the 2012 16th Annual Third-Party

    Logistics Studyonce again rearmed that

    third-party logistics providers continue to

    provide strategic and operational value to

    many shippers across the globe. Shippers

    consider logistics and supply chain man-

    agement as key contributors to their over-

    all business success, and approximately

    three-quarters o survey respondents say

    3PLs provide new and innovative ways to

    improve logistics eectiveness.

    These results are based on survey

    responses rom 1,561 industry executives

    and managers representing users and

    non-users o 3PL services (reerred to as

    shippers or shipper respondents through-

    out this report), as well as 697 executives

    and managers representing rms that

    provide 3PL services (called 3PLs or 3PL

    respondents). 3PLs were added to the

    survey group in 009 in order to capture

    both sides o the buyer-seller relationship.

    The number o usable survey responsescontinues to rise each year, with a signi-

    cant increase or the 2012 Study.

    Please see About the Study on page 44 or

    detailed inormation about survey respons-

    es and the our streams o research used to

    ully analyze the state o the 3PL market:

    a web-based survey, desk research, ocus

    interviews, and acilitated workshop ses-

    sions at Capgemini Accelerated Solutions

    Environment (ASE) locations in Chicago,

    Illinois, and Utrecht, The Netherlands,and at the 011 eyeortransport 3PL

    Summit in Atlanta, Georgia.

    Current Global EconomicClimate and Use o 3PLs

    As acknowledged in our Annual 3PL Studies

    over the past two to three years, economic

    volatility and uncertainty have impacted

    global business markets and in turn, global

    markets or 3PL services. Figure 1 includes

    data rom Armstrong & Associates that

    estimates the magnitude o global 3PL rev-

    enues or 010 (US $541.6B), and provides

    breakdowns or the our major geographies

    that are included in the 2012 3PL Study.

    Global 3PL revenues reported or 010

    represent an increase o 6.8% over those

    reported in 009, conrming the general

    trend toward improving global business

    conditions. Focusing specically on the US,

    3PL revenues reported by Armstrong &

    Associates have increased rom US $107.1B

    in 009 to US $17.3B in 010, and are

    expected to increase to US $141.B in 011.

    Generally, these refect the somewhat-

    improving global business environment

    and ongoing economic globalization.

    The Competitive StartingLine Has Been Re-SetThe chie reason or conducting the

    2012 3PL Studyis to update our knowl-

    edge o 3PL-shipper relationships, and

    to learn how both types o organiza-

    tions are using these relationships to

    improve and enhance their businesses

    and supply chains. Many shippers are

    currently in search o new and innovative

    global supply chain strategies, suggest-ing new opportunities or 3PLs to make

    signicant contributions to supply chain

    Current State o the 3PL MarketSippers Refect Cotied Codece wit use o 3PL Services

    Figure 1: Global 3PL Revenues or 2010

    Region2010 Global 3PL Revenues

    (US$ billions)

    nort America 149.1

    Erope 165.1

    Asia-Pacic 157.6

    Lati America 27.5

    Oter Regios 42.3

    Total 541.6

    Source: Armstrong & Associates, 2011

    7CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    8/52

    are also similar to last year. A new series o

    questions in the 2012 3PL Studyasked ship-

    pers to report the percentages o trans-

    portation and warehousing spend that are

    managed by third parties. As indicated inFigure , the overall average or transpor-

    tation was 56%, but the regional averages

    ranged rom 41% in North America, to

    more than 60% or shippers in Europe,

    Asia-Pacic and Latin America. The aver-

    age warehouse operations spend managed

    by third parties was 39%, with only modest

    variation by individual region.

    Reported Changes inUse o 3PL ServicesIn recent years studies, we began to ask

    shippers whether they were increasing

    their use o outsourced logistics services,

    or returning to insourcing many o them.

    The responses represent an interesting

    record o the shiting use o 3PL services:

    Increasing use o 3PL services: Nearly

    two-thirds (64%) o shipper respon-

    dents report an increase in their use o

    outsourced logistics services, and 76%

    o 3PL respondents agree this is what

    they are seeing rom their customers.

    Regionally, 58% o North America ship-pers reported increased use, as well as

    57% o European, 78% o Asia-Pacic

    and 73% o Latin American shippers.

    Returning to insourcing: Consistent

    with the churn that occurs each year

    with some companies increasing out-

    sourcing and others bringing logistics

    activities back in-house, an average

    o 4% o shipper respondents are

    returning to insourcing some o their

    logistics activities, and 37% o 3PLrespondents observe that some o their

    eciency and eectiveness. Many ship-

    pers and 3PLs agree that todays business

    challenges represent some version o a

    new normal, driving the need or both

    types o organizations to identiy andimplement new strategies or success. In

    eect, the starting line has been re-set,

    injecting a new, highly invigorated and

    highly competitive spirit into the logistics

    business environment.

    Todays 3PL marketplace is experiencing

    signicant change. Established 3PLs are re-

    calibrating their business models to provide

    greater value to their shipper-customers,

    noted one prominent 3PL industry observ-

    er. At the same time, they are looking over

    their shoulders at emerging sources o com-

    petition and the new and innovative oer-

    ings they are bringing to market.

    Spending on Logisticsand 3PL Services

    As seen in Figure , shipper respondents

    to the 2012 3PL Studyreport that total

    logistics expenditures represent an aver-

    age o 1% o their companies sales rev-

    enues. Total logistics expenditures include

    transportation, distribution, warehousing

    and value-added services. Regional di-erences range rom 11% in each o three

    regions to Latin Americas 14% o com-

    pany sales revenues.

    Shippers devote an average 4% o this

    total to outsourcing, the same as reported

    in last years study. That suggests that in

    comparison with the previous year, average

    changes in expenditures or outsourced

    logistics have been proportional to chang-

    es in total logistics expenditures. The

    average percentages o logistics spendingshippers devote to outsourcing by region

    customers are returning to insourcing

    logistics activities.

    Reducing or consolidating the num-

    ber o 3PLs used: Slightly over one-hal (58%) o shipper respondents are

    consolidating the number o 3PLs they

    use, and 7% o 3PLs eel that customers

    in general are reducing or consolidat-

    ing the number o 3PLs they use. This

    general trend toward consolidation is

    consistent with contemporary trends in

    procurement and strategic sourcing.

    Interestingly, the percentage o shippers

    increasing/decreasing their use o 3PL ser-

    vices is very close to the gures we report-

    ed in last years study. So, again this year,

    there is strong evidence that the predomi-

    nant direction among shippers is to move

    toward increased use o outsourced logis-

    tics services.

    3PL-Shipper RelationshipsContinue to Progress and ImproveSimilar to last years study, 88% o shippers

    view their 3PL relationships as generally suc-

    cessul, compared with 94% o 3PL respon-

    dents. Shippers ratings are consistent across

    regions: North America 89%; Europe 88%;Asia-Pacic 89%; and Latin America 87%.

    Somewhat ewer shippers, 71%, indicate

    that 3PLs provide them with new and

    innovative ways to improve logistics eec-

    tiveness; 91% o 3PL providers eel that

    this statement accurately characterizes

    the services they provide. The gap con-

    tinues between the ratings that shipper

    respondents assign to various aspects o

    the 3PL-shipper relationship and the more

    positive evaluations provided by the 3PLrespondents themselves.

    Figure 2: Outsourcing Spending Remains Consistent

    Selected Inormation All RegionsNorth

    AmericaEurope Asia-Pacifc Latin America

    Total Logistics Expeditres as a

    Percetage o Sales Revees12% 11% 11% 11% 14%

    Percet o Total Logistics Expeditres

    Directed to Otsorcig42 38 46 47 35

    Percet o Trasportatio Sped Maagedby Tird Parties

    56 41 66 61 66

    Percet o Wareose Operatios

    Sped Maaged by Tird Parties39 36 42 42 40

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    8 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    9/52

    Success Factors: According to the survey

    ndings, the ollowing are key ingredients

    to successul 3PL-shipper relationships:

    Openness, transparency and good

    communication: While 69% o shipper

    respondents are satised with the open-

    ness, transparency, and communication

    received rom 3PLs, only 6% o 3PLs

    are satised with these characteristics in

    their relationships with customers. So,

    apparently there is a need or both par-

    ties to consider the value that could be

    gained by being more willing to share

    appropriate inormation with their busi-

    ness partners.

    Agility and exibility to accommodate

    current and uture business needs and

    challenges: Nearly all (98%) 3PLs eel

    that their customers expect them to be

    suciently agile and fexible to accom-

    modate their (shippers) current and

    uture business needs and challenges.

    But just 68% o shippers judge their3PLs as suciently agile and fexible,

    down rom 7% last year. This aspect

    o 3PL-customer relationships clearly

    needs improvement, and deserves care-

    ul watching.

    Interest in gainsharing between 3PLs

    and shippers: Gainsharing comes up

    requently during our shipper work-

    shops, and we are receiving mixed sig-

    nals regarding this orm o shipper-3PL

    collaboration. This year 56% o 3PL

    respondents and 4% o shippers (ver-

    sus 56% last year), report engaging in

    gainsharing arrangements. While many

    shippers consider gainsharing to be a

    useul incentive or themselves and their

    3PL providers to work toward agreed-

    upon objectives and in keeping with the

    principles o good collaboration, others

    seem to eel that the basic agreement

    with a 3PL should cover all areas where

    Figure 3: Shippers Continue to Experience Measurable Benef ts From Use o 3PL Services

    Results All Regions

    Logistics Cost Redctio (%) 13%

    Ivetory Cost Redctio (%) 9%

    Logistics Fixed Asset Redctio (%) 25%

    Order Fill RateCaged From 70%

    Caged To 79%

    Order AccracyCaged From 80%

    Caged To 87%

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    Figure 4: Shippers Still Prioritize Execution-Oriented 3PL IT Capabilities

    Inormation TechnologiesPercentages Reported By

    Shippers 3PL Providers

    Trasportatio Maagemet (Exectio) 75% 79%

    Trasportatio Maagemet (Plaig) 68 76

    Wareose/Distribtio Ceter Maagemet 67 79

    Electroic Data Itercage (Orders, Advaced Sipmet notices, Ivoicig) 66 78

    Visibility (Order, Sipmet, Ivetory, etc.) 63 75

    Web Portals or Booig, Order Tracig, Ivetory Maagemet, ad Billig 55 68

    Bar Codig 47 56

    Cstomer Order Maagemet 42 63

    Trasportatio Sorcig 41 51

    Global Trade Maagemet Tool 37 37

    Spply Cai Plaig 31 54

    networ Modelig ad Optimizatio 25 42

    Collaboratio Tools (SarePoit, Lots notes, Video Coerecig, etc.) 25 38

    Spply Cai Evet Maagemet 24 44

    RFID 21 32

    Advaced Aalytics ad Data Miig Tools 19 37

    Yard Maagemet 16 26

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    9CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    10/52

    perormance is expected, and that it is

    not necessary or appropriate to engage

    in gainsharing practices. Interest in gain-

    sharing may be diminishing somewhat

    due to slight improvements in the globalbusiness economy. We plan to ollow this

    closely in uture studies.

    Interest in collaborating with oth-

    er companies, even competitors, to

    achieve logistics cost and service

    improvements: When this question was

    asked last year or the rst time, 68% o

    shipper respondents and 80% o 3PLs

    expressed interest in these strategies.

    This year these percentages dropped to

    44% and 67%, respectively. So, while last

    year we stated it was reassuring to see

    percentages that suggest a true interest

    by both parties in working with other

    companies, even competitors, perhaps

    the easing o global economic condi-

    tions have made this less o a priority.

    We will continue to ocus on this issue in

    uture studies.

    Measurable Benefts: Shipper respondents

    experience measurable benets rom 3PL

    services, as seen in Figure 3. Metrics relat-

    ing to logistics cost reduction, inventory

    cost reduction, and logistics xed asset

    reduction are consistent with what was

    reported in the two previous years studies.

    Shippers also report improvements in

    order ll rate and order accuracy resulting

    rom use o 3PLs, although the absolute

    levels o these metrics are a little lower

    than those reported in both the 2009and

    2010 3PL Studies. This may be an indicator

    o the continuing impact o the global eco-

    nomic recession.

    Finally, survey results showed that 60% o

    the shipper respondents report their use

    o 3PLs has led to year-over-year incre-

    mental benets; and 88% o 3PL respon-

    dents agree. Despite the positive success

    ratings perceived by both shippers and

    3PLs, there appears to be opportunity to

    enhance the benets experienced by users

    o outsourced logistics services.

    Inormation TechnologyFigure 4 summarizes the inormation tech-

    nology (IT) capabilities that shippers and

    3PLs eel are must haves or 3PLs to suc-

    cessully serve customers. Overall, the most

    needed capabilities are those that relate

    directly to execution-oriented activities

    and processes such as transportation, ware-house/DC management, electronic data

    interchange, visibility, etc. Others that have

    somewhat lower rankings tend to be more

    strategic and analytical.

    Highlighted in Figure 5 is a ten-year view

    o shippers opinions on whether they eel

    inormation technologies are a necessary

    element o 3PL expertise, and whether

    they are satised with their 3PL provid-

    ers IT capabilities, the dierence that has

    become known as the IT Gap. In recent

    years there has been a modest increase in

    the percentages o shippers who indicate

    satisaction with the IT capabilities o their

    3PLs; in act, it is worth noting that the sat-

    isaction rate has doubled since this ques-

    tion was rst asked in 00. Despite this

    improvement, the opportunity remains to

    urther narrow the gap between these two

    ratings. Similar to last years study, 68% o

    3PLs eel that their customers are satised

    with the IT services they provide.

    Figure 5: IT Gap Shows Improvement, But Further Opportunity Remains

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    2011201020092008200720062005200420032002

    IT Capabilities Necessary Element of 3PL Expertise

    Shippers Satisfied with 3PL IT Capabilities

    IT Gap

    89%

    27%

    85%

    33%

    91%

    42%

    90%

    40%

    92%

    35%

    92%

    42%

    92%

    37%

    88%

    42%

    94%

    54%

    93%

    54%

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    10 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    11/52

    What 3PL Users Outsourceand What 3PL Providers OerFigure 6 shows the percentages o shipper

    respondents that outsource specic logis-

    tics activities. Provided below are somegeneral observations about this years

    results and the contrasts they reveal rom

    previous years:

    Transactional, operational, and repeti-

    tive activities tend to be the most re-

    quently outsourced. These include

    international and domestic transporta-

    tion (78% and 71% across all regions

    studied), warehousing (6%), reight

    orwarding (57%) and customs broker-

    age (48%). This usage varies across each

    o the regions. Another observation

    is that or the most part, the percent-

    ages indicated in Figure 6 or the all

    regions results are somewhat lower

    than comparable percentages rom

    the previous years study. This may beexplained somewhat by the act that the

    current study yielded a higher percent-

    age o shipper respondents in the lowest

    revenue category than in the previ-

    ous years study, as noted in the About

    the Study chapter later in this report.

    Further analysis o the available data

    conrmed that the higher the sales cat-

    egory, the higher the average number o

    logistics activities outsourced.

    Perhaps due to the globally volatile

    business environment, the percentage

    o shippers outsourcing internation-

    al transportation declined rom 84%

    in 009 to 75% in 010, and now has

    increased slightly to 78%. Over the same

    time rame, the reported use o customsbrokerage declined rom 71% to 58% to

    48% and the reported use o reight or-

    warding services declined rom 65% to

    53% and then increased to 57%.

    The less-requently reported activities

    indicated in Figure 6 tend to be some-

    what more strategic, customer-acing,

    and IT-intensive. Examples include: IT

    services; supply chain consultancy servic-

    es; order management and ulllment;

    feet management; customer service;

    and LLP/4PL services.

    Figure 6: Shippers Continue to Outsource a Wide Variety o Logistics Services

    Outsourced Logistics Service

    User Percentages

    All RegionsNorth

    AmericaEurope

    Asia-Pacifc

    LatinAmerica

    Iteratioal Trasportatio 78% 66% 91% 77% 84%

    Domestic Trasportatio 71 65 77 74 69

    Wareosig 62 65 61 65 63

    Freigt Forwardig 57 52 54 64 65

    Cstoms Broerage 48 49 43 56 45

    Reverse Logistics (Deective, Repair, Retr) 27 25 28 33 22

    Cross-Docig 26 29 28 25 22

    Prodct Labelig, Pacagig, Assembly, kittig 24 19 28 24 26

    Trasportatio Plaig ad Maagemet 23 24 27 21 16

    Ivetory Maagemet 21 20 16 27 25

    Freigt Bill Aditig ad Paymet 17 35 12 11 8Iormatio Tecology (IT) Services 15 15 14 13 16

    Order Maagemet ad Flllmet 14 19 10 15 14

    Service Parts Logistics 14 10 14 19 10

    Cstomer Service 11 9 7 14 16

    Spply Cai Cosltacy Services Provided by 3PLs 11 15 7 13 9

    Fleet Maagemet 10 8 9 14 9

    LLP (Lead Logistics Provider)/4PL Services 9 7 10 13 4

    Sstaiability/Gree Spply Cai-Related Services 4 3 3 6 4

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    11CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    12/52

    Figure 7 is a summary o the types o logis-

    tics services provided by 3PLs participating

    in the 01 survey and reveals that many

    3PLs provide a wide range o services.

    Based on ndings rom last year, it is very

    common or 3PLs to oer many, or even

    most, o the range o services included in

    the question: the typical model is or 3PLs

    to oer a substantial number o services to

    respond eectively to their customers and

    their logistics needs.

    Earlier, the 2008 3PL Studyincluded a

    special topic ocus on shippers expecta-

    tions and usage o 3PLs as a part o their

    green supply chain initiatives. Follow-up

    questions on this topic in the 2012 3PL

    Studyreveal that 9% o shippers rely on

    3PLs to provide visibility to uel eciency

    and carbon emissions inormation. Fully

    53% o shippers say uel eciency and

    carbon emissions have become an impor-

    tant part o their 3PL procurement

    decision processes.

    The Voices o CurrentNon-Users o 3PL ServicesThe Annual 3PL Studysurvey also reaches

    a substantial number o organizations

    who do not currently use 3PLs. One objec-

    tive o this study is to provide insight into

    shippers decisions not to outsource. As

    indicated in Figure 8, the most common

    reasons are core competency, the impor-

    tance o logistics, realization o cost reduc-

    tions, integrating IT systems with 3PLsystems and control over outsourced activi-

    ties. While there is a certain logic behind

    using these concerns to support a decision

    not to outsource, our discussions with

    shippers indicate that sometimes these

    very issues are used by other companies to

    justiy their decision to outsource certain

    logistics services.

    Figure 7: 3PLs Provide a Wide Range o Outsourced Logistics Services

    Outsourced Logistics ServiceProvider Percentages

    All Regions

    Domestic Trasportatio 83%

    Wareosig 81

    Iteratioal Trasportatio 70

    Ivetory Maagemet 66

    Order Maagemet ad Flllmet 65

    Cstomer Service 64

    Trasportatio Plaig ad Maagemet 63

    Cross-Docig 62

    Prodct Labelig, Pacagig, Assembly, kittig 62

    Freigt Forwardig 58

    Cstoms Broerage 50

    Reverse Logistics (Deective, Repair, Retr) 56

    Iormatio Tecology (IT) Services 51

    Spply Cai Cosltacy Services Provided by 3PLs 51

    LLP (Lead Logistics Provider)/4PL Services 42

    Service Parts Logistics 38

    Freigt Bill Aditig ad Paymet 34

    Sstaiability/Gree Spply Cai-Related Services 31

    Fleet Maagemet 26

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    Figure 8: Why Non-Users Do Not Use 3PLs

    Reason Percent in Agreement

    Logistics is a Core Competecy at Or Firm 19%

    Logistics Too Importat to Cosider Otsorcig 18

    Cost Redctios Wold not be Experiec ed 17

    Too Di clt to Itegrate Or I T Systems wit t e 3PLs Systems 14

    Cotrol Over te Otsorced Fctio(s) Wold Dimiis 13

    Service Level Commitmets Wold not Be Realized 12

    We have More Logistics Expertise Ta Most 3PL Providers 9

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    12 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    13/52

    GO ONLINEFor more iormatio go towww.3plstudy.com

    13CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    14/52

    Balancing growth and opportunity

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    15/52

    For many companies, doing business in

    emerging markets is no longer a nice-to-

    have; its a must-have to uel continued

    growth. For example, General Motors

    sold more cars in China than it did in

    the United States last year, and PepsiCo

    captured about hal o the Russian juice

    market through an acquisition, accord-

    ing to a CNNMoneyreport. As seen in

    Figure 9, a substantial 80% o shippers in

    the survey conduct business with or with-

    in an emerging market, with the major-

    ity (5%) doing so rom a mature market

    and 8% rom within emerging markets.

    Among 3PL respondents, 77% conduct

    business with or within an emerging mar-

    ket, 48% rom a mature market.

    We dene emerging markets as nations

    with economies that are experiencing

    rapid growth through industrialization.

    Mature markets are largely industrial-

    ized nations with economies growing at a

    slower, steadier rate. As seen in Figure 10on page 16, shippers and 3PLs in mature

    markets concur that their top emerging

    market opportunities are in China, India,

    Brazil and Mexico, though their rankings

    dier a bit.

    Market Expansion ChallengesThe potential benets o moving into an

    emerging market are oten ar more clear

    than is the correct path to establishing busi-

    ness there, particularly when making logis-

    tics decisions. Successully balancing riskand reward requires a careul assessment o

    the unique characteristics o each market.

    As seen in Figure 11 on page 17, or ship-

    pers based in mature markets dicult

    laws and regulations, cultural dierences,

    the ability to deliver against promises or

    agreed-to service levels and complicated

    tax regimes top the list o challenges.

    Because o such obstacles, I could set up

    a new operation in a more mature market

    in much less time than in an emerging

    market, says Gokhan Cakmak, Global

    Logistics Manager or Orifame. This is

    mainly due to the state o laws and regula-

    tions as well as the inrastructure and lack

    o international 3PL players present in

    these markets.

    Global trade compliance also represents

    a hurdle or many companies operating

    in emerging markets. For example, oneLogistics Director or a US-based apparel

    manuacturer described the application

    o customs regulations in Asia as a vexing

    challenge. The authorities can become

    bureaucratic and are normally not very

    transparent, leaving a lot o execution and

    interpretation to the eld ocers, and they

    can be very erratic in their classication.

    Bureaucracy and local processes make

    working in emerging markets more chal-

    lenging, says Cyrill Gaechter, Head oMarketing and Sales or Panalpina Black

    and Caspian Sea. In more mature markets

    it is less complex, however the emerging

    markets are catching up continuously.

    Proper preparation such as documentation

    is o high importance around the world but

    even more critical in emerging markets to

    achieve reliable end-to-end-service.

    Concerns vary by market and industry. For

    example, shippers in electronics express

    ar more concern than the overall respon-

    dents (45% vs. %) about global trade

    compliance, as well as attracting and

    retaining good local sta and lack o secu-

    rity or their goods.

    Indeed, in contrast with the overall sur-

    vey respondents, 3PL StudyASE workshop

    participants and ocus interview partici-pants assert that security and countereit

    intervention are key considerations in

    operating global supply chains: How well

    do you know the suppliers youre working

    with and the quality o their due diligence?

    Governments that are clear and consistent

    on their security metrics and initiatives

    make it easier to manage risk than those

    where security eorts are less evident,

    notes one US manuacturer. Some shippers

    engage transportation security providers

    when they perceive a high level o risk.

    In ocus interviews, several experts

    also cited green concerns as they move

    into emerging markets. One Head o

    Distribution or a communications equip-

    ment manuacturer noted the diculty in

    reducing its CO2 ootprint, which requires

    limiting air reight and road transporta-

    tion, while catering to the sales growth

    expected in the next two years. To mini-

    mize these modes we need to plan ahead

    to allow or alternative modes like sea

    reight and rail, not always an easy task in

    a ast-growing market.

    Opportities or Drivig Corporate Growt

    Emerging Markets

    Figure 9: Most Shippers Are Active In Emerging Markets

    Neither

    I am Based in an Emerging Market

    I am Based in a Mature Market,But I Conduct Business With

    or Within an Emerging Market

    Shippers3PLs

    52%

    48%

    28%

    29%

    20%

    23%

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    15EMERGInG MARkETS

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    16/52

    Case in Point: BrazilBrazil is representative o the risk/reward

    challenges posed by an emerging econo-

    my. Brazil will play host to two mega sport-

    ing events, the FIFA World Cup in 014and the Olympics in 016, events which

    are driving a large-scale inrastructural

    improvement program. The Brazilian gov-

    ernment plans to invest up to US $880B

    in an economic stimulus program by 014

    to propel growth, with a portion o those

    unds devoted to upgrading its inrastruc-

    ture, primarily roads and railways, but

    also ports and waterways. The government

    is also oering eligible corporations a 75%

    corporate tax reduction on exploration

    prots until 013. Brazils gross domestic

    product average growth rate rom 1991

    through 011 was 3.6%, according toTrading Economics.

    A critical step in Brazils growth was

    the ormation o Mercosur, the South

    American ree trade agreement. Regional

    growth together with the tax incen-

    tives available in ree trade zones such as

    Manaus have attracted global manuac-

    turers such as Sony, Whirlpool, Samsung

    and Honda, as well as international 3PLs,

    according to a story inDC Velocity. Fast

    growth in the 3PL market has enabled the

    emergence o modern, specially built ware-

    houses that meet the needs o multipleshippers. More than 90% o Brazilian com-

    panies outsource transportation, accord-

    ing to a survey by BDP International, while

    75% outsource other activities, such as cus-

    toms expediting and warehousing. Quality

    o service has become a key metric or

    Brazilian shippers.

    Figure 10: Shippers and 3PLs Concur on Top Emerging Markets

    Colombia

    Egypt

    Other

    Philippines

    Vietnam

    Indonesia

    South Africa

    Turkey

    Russia

    Mexico

    Brazil

    India

    China

    Shippers Based in Mature Markets 3PLs Based in Mature Markets

    Other

    Egypt

    Colombia

    Philippines

    Russia

    Turkey

    South Africa

    Vietnam

    Indonesia

    Brazil

    Mexico

    India

    China77%

    63%

    56%

    55%

    47%

    44%

    41%

    39%

    37%

    34%

    30%

    29%

    28%

    80%

    61%

    60%

    56%

    41%

    41%

    41%

    40%

    39%

    37%

    27%

    26%

    22%

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    16 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    17/52

    However, or all o its opportunity, Brazil

    presents some logistics challenges:

    Byzantine Tax Laws: Brazils complex

    tax laws can vary signicantly amongregions, with at least 70 dierent types

    o taxes, many o which require monthly

    debits and credits. Enorcement is noto-

    riously inconsistent. For example, regula-

    tory law requires products manuactured

    in Brazil to be returned to their point

    o origin or disposition. One electron-

    ics manuacturer was excused rom

    compliance in 009, then required to ol-

    low the regulation in 010, and was once

    again excused in 011.

    In addition, companies must get alicense or a warehouse to ship to custom-

    ers, and then goods can only fow rom

    that warehouse, says Wally Shaw, Market

    Group Supply Lead, Americas, or Philips

    Consumer Liestyle. You cannot ship

    rom an overfow warehouse; you have to

    ship the goods back to the main licensed

    warehouse, which is very inecient.

    Limited Inrastructure: Brazil is best

    considered as dierent countries inside

    one country in terms o its inrastruc-

    ture and markets. In the south and

    southeast regions, there is a big satura-tion o providers, which generates more

    competition and lower costs. The cen-

    tral west, northern (Amazon area) and

    northeast regions lack providers and

    inrastructure, so costs are much higher.

    Many companies work with independent

    drivers who own their own trucks as a

    cost ecient solution or transporting

    Figure 11: Difcult Laws Top Mature-Market Shipper Challenges in Emerging Markets

    Other

    Lack of Free Trade Agreements/Free Trade Zones

    Lack of Security

    Lack of IT Capabilities

    Corruption

    Global Trade Compliance

    Attracting and Retaining Good Local Staff

    Inadequate Physical Infrastructure

    Language Barriers

    Complicated Tax Regimes

    Ability to Deliver Against Promises/Agreed Service levels

    Cultural Differences

    Difficult Laws and Regulations50%

    47%

    42%

    42%

    32%

    31%

    30%

    28%

    20%

    19%

    19%

    15%

    42%

    29%

    55%

    28%

    20%

    36%

    34%

    22%

    22%

    33%

    21%

    12%

    3%

    5% Shippers Based in Mature MarketsShippers Based in Emerging Markets

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    17EMERGInG MARkETS

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    18/52

    low-cost products such as seeds and con-

    struction materials, but its a challenge

    or these independent truck drivers to

    secure a steady volume. Brazils invest-

    ment in ports and airports has been

    limited over the past many years; a con-

    sequence is that containers can sit in cer-

    tain ports or weeks awaiting unloading.

    Brazils government has resisted private

    investment in inrastructure.

    Trade Zone Tradeos: Free trade zones

    such as Manaus encourage growth in

    underdeveloped areas by attracting

    large manuacturers, but also serve as anexample o how tax benets alone do not

    translate into logistics eciency. Manaus

    has one road in and out, which cannot

    take heavy truck trac, orcing many

    shippers to use air/water reight.

    Political and Regulatory Obstacles: Like

    many emerging markets, Brazil has its

    share o political infuences that impact

    supply chain eciency. For example,

    Brazils customs and duty regulations

    have created a protectionist market orsome goods.

    Evolving Logistics Marketplace: Rapid

    growth has ueled demand or outsourc-

    ing, creating a ragmented marketplace

    populated by a range o providers. Many

    were started by individual truck drivers

    who acquired more trucks and then even-

    tually bought a warehouse, though Brazil

    is also served by major national and inter-

    national players. Many logistics provid-

    ers are individual-unction oriented, with

    ew integrated supply chain, value-added

    oerings, says Mauricio Ferreira, Latin

    America Supply Chain Director or Krat

    Foods. A ragmented logistics inrastruc-

    ture oten drives companies to maintain

    higher inventory levels.

    In Brazil we are ten hours away rom

    the US by air and 11 hours rom the

    main European cities by air. It takes 17

    days navigation by water to Europe and

    38 to 45 days to reach China ports with

    direct service, says Gilberto Zanon,

    Head o Industry Verticals, Brazil at

    Panalpina. The longer lead times mean

    planning to avoid stock-outs or excess

    stock is a challenge that companies need

    to overcome. Successul companies and3PLs work together to do this.

    Like other emerging markets, Brazils com-

    pelling rate o growth and potential or

    improvement has convinced many compa-

    nies that the obstacles are worth the invest-

    ment. As one participant at the eyeortrans-

    port workshop noted, emerging markets

    have the opportunity to build on what the

    developed markets have already done and

    then leaprog over them. One example is

    the pervasive use o cell phones or bank-ing purposes in some emerging markets.

    Selecting a 3PL Partneror Emerging MarketsEntering any new market requires due dili-

    gence; when its an emerging market, gain-

    ing local insight is even more critical, since

    conditions are oten evolving rapidly. 3PLs

    can play a critical role in both the plan-

    ning and execution o shippers entry and

    growth in emerging markets.

    Early in the process, shippers must ask

    themselves: What type o 3PL partner do we

    want? Is it best to seek out a local player with

    intimate knowledge o local practices, or a

    global partner with more resources to bear?

    As seen in Figure 1, more than hal o

    shippers based in both mature and emerg-

    ing markets agree that a global 3PL coor-

    dinating with a local 3PL is the most suc-

    cessul operating model or 3PLs operating

    with or within an emerging market. We

    look or two dierent types o providers,

    says Tony Xia, Senior Logistics Manager

    with Emerson Electric. One must be big

    enough to have good coverage and good

    IT, good assets, and can help growth and

    expand. The other type is niche players,where they are pretty good in a small piece

    o logistics.

    The ideal, many shippers say, is to nd a

    global player with strong local knowledge.

    When they dont nd these qualities avail-

    able in emerging markets, the combina-

    tion o global and local 3PLs is the next

    best thing. Michael Keong, Director,

    Regional Logistics Asia, Levi Strauss and

    Company, noted, We need to ensure

    3PLs have the right resources, contentexperts, etcetera, to understand the local

    favor. A strong account manager who

    understands the local area is important to

    us. That person need not know it all, but

    must have the right network to solve any

    problems that break.

    Shippers participating in the ASE work-

    shops illustrated the value o local knowl-

    edge: One shared the story o a global

    company that established a supply ware-

    house in China to US specications, only

    to nd the unloading docks to be at the

    wrong height or local supply trucks.

    Another shipper ound its pallet shiters

    Figure 12: Shippers See Global 3PLs with Local 3PL Partners as Most Successul

    Shippers Based in Emerging Markets

    Shippers Based in Mature Markets(with Operations in Emerging Markets)

    Global 3PL Coordinating with a Locally Based 3PLGlobal 3PLLocally Based 3PL

    58% 24% 18%

    51% 22% 27%

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    18 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    19/52

    did not work in the narrow-bodied air-

    crat coming out o Panama.

    Signs indicate that the combination o

    global and local players is working; as seenin Figure 13 on page 0, shippers and

    3PLs are pretty well aligned in what they

    believe are the most important services

    in emerging markets. Shippers primary

    needs rom 3PLs in emerging markets are

    visibility (77% o those based in emerging

    markets, 81% o those based in mature

    markets), expertise on the latest global

    trade regulations (60% and 69%) and

    managing and optimizing shipment rout-

    ing based on ree trade agreement knowl-

    edge (59% and 57%).

    Visibility: With the added risk and uncer-

    tainty o emerging markets, the impor-

    tance o visibility to shippers is understand-

    able. Delivering products in Russia is

    complex, says Panalpinas Gaechter, and

    visibility over where our customers prod-

    ucts are and a reliable service to ensure

    products arrive on time are two critical

    aspects o our customers needs. This is no

    dierent than, or example, China, where

    lead-time rom actory to exporting port

    can take many days. Visibility and reliabil-ity play a key role there as well, and excel-

    ling in this is more dicult in emerging

    markets than more mature markets.

    Its highly important or service-centric

    computer manuacturers to be able to

    provide order-level tracking to customers,

    says the Supply Chain Director or a large

    computer company, and 3PLs need this

    capability to provide visibility to customers.

    Even better is a 3PL taking proactive steps

    to resolve issues detected through visibility,which many 3PLs in emerging markets do

    not do, he says.

    Global Trade Regulations: As noted in

    Figure 13, 3PLs active in emerging markets

    concur with shippers rankings, with the

    exception o providing expertise on the

    latest global trade regulations. Shippers

    ranked this as the second most important

    service they would like to get, whereas 3PLs

    in mature and emerging markets ranked it

    somewhere in the middle.

    Compliance: In emerging markets, many

    shippers rely on 3PL expertise to navigate

    import/export documentation, embargoed

    products/countries screening and other

    compliance services. It would be useul

    or 3PLs to have better relationships with

    customs ocers to ensure they have localinput, etcetera, said Levi Strauss Keong.

    3PLs should engage more in customs

    meetings and be the conduit to discuss

    customer requirements.

    Other Services Sought From 3PLsIn addition to those capabilities cited in the

    survey, ASE workshop and ocus interview

    participants concur that they would like to

    see these additional qualities and capabili-

    ties in 3PLs active in emerging markets:

    Proactive Consulting Services: At the

    ASE workshop held in Utrecht, shippers

    concurred that the timing o 3PLs assis-

    tance was also key. Very oten an initia-

    tive to move into an emerging market

    begins with the shipper conducting ini-

    tial research because their 3PL partners

    lack insight into that market. Then the

    3PL ollows, ramping up its own investi-

    gation. Shippers would like to see 3PLs

    take a more proactive approach and

    are willing to pay or it.

    Local Insight and Expertise: Its the

    lack o local expertise on the part o

    global 3PLs without a strong local pres-

    ence, such as the best way to move prod-

    uct in that country, that drives ship-

    pers to local 3PLs and other experts.

    Shippers want creative, inormed ideas

    to overcome local barriers, or example,

    using a barge in Vietnam to circum-

    vent road congestion, or overland or

    cross-border trucking in India and

    Bangladesh or even how to handlelocal events such as labor stoppages.

    In one telecom companys emerging

    markets experience, Logistics service

    providers ail to come up with new logis-

    tics solutions or improvements, says its

    Head o Distribution. Any new solution

    or idea is brought up ourselves. This is

    where LSPs really ail.

    Integrated Solutions: Shippers that want

    to amass the requisite logistics services

    and knowledge required or an integrat-

    ed approach oten nd they must engage

    multiple 3PLs because no single 3PL has

    what they need. One ASE participant

    related how his company was seeking

    integrated warehouse and transporta-

    tion services in an emerging market it

    was entering, ideally with the warehouseslocated close to air hubs. But the 3PL

    they wanted to work with was not set up

    to accommodate the shippers needs.

    Security: Shippers in emerging markets

    expect 3PLs to address their security

    concerns through measures such as

    delivery trucks with GPS systems, engine

    shut-down systems, and drivers trained

    on security protocols.

    Long-Term Commitment: Its also

    important that 3PLs eorts be stra-

    tegic, not tactical. 3PLs still lack a

    longer term sustainable plan or com-

    ing into a country, says Arun Salvi,

    Logistics Manager Asia Pacic, or Shell

    Lubricants. They are taking more o

    a short-term approach to make pro-

    its much quicker than they should be.

    Global players end up being like the

    local players, but with a oreign name,

    because they have not invested properly

    in inrastructure, people and processes.

    All o these points can make or a dicult

    environment and require 3PLs and ship-

    pers to work closely together and with high

    degrees o trust i success in emerging mar-

    kets is to be achieved. This might be one

    o the reasons people choose global 3PLs

    working with local players.

    Free-Trade Agreements and 3PLsA ree trade agreement (FTA) is a pact

    between two or more countries or areas in

    which they agree to lit most or all taris,quotas, special ees and taxes, and other

    barriers to trade among them to allow

    aster transactions and a higher volume o

    business. According to the United Nations

    Statistics Division, FTAs such as the

    North American Free Trade Agreement

    (NAFTA), the European Union (EU-

    7) and the Organisation or Economic

    Co-operation and Development (OECD)

    have made a denitive impact on growth

    across sectors such as machinery, manuac-

    tured goods and chemicals.

    FTAs, ree trade zones (FTZ) and Special

    Economic Zones (SEZ) have in turn ueled

    19EMERGInG MARkETS

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    20/52

    Figure 13: 3PLs Are Delivering on Shippers Emerging Market Needs

    ProvidingFinancial Services(Such as Factoring)

    Managing10+2 Filings

    Screening forEmbargoed Countries and

    Restricted Products

    Maintaining aProduct Database forGlobal Classification

    Establishing and/orManaging Operations

    Within a Free Trade Zone

    ProactiveComplianceConsulting

    Managing and ValidatingExport/ImportDocumentation

    Managing and OptimizingShipment Routing

    Based on Free TradeAgreement Knowledge

    Providing Expertiseon the Latest Global

    Trade Regulations

    Providing ShipmentVisibility

    82%

    46%

    58%

    74%

    45%

    46%

    28%

    34%

    34%

    12%

    81%

    69%

    57%

    70%

    50%

    37%

    26%

    29%

    26%

    11%

    81%

    48%

    51%

    64%

    42%

    41%

    23%

    23%

    19%

    14%

    77%

    60%

    59%

    58%

    50%

    38%

    30%

    21%

    19%

    17%

    Shippers3PLs

    Based in Emerging Markets Based in Mature Markets

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    20 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    21/52

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    22/52

    Balancing long lead times with short product liecycles

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    23/52

    Electronics products are oten the rock

    stars o the consumer and business prod-

    ucts worlds, with buyers eagerly anticipat-

    ing the next release with the latest and

    greatest eatures. But along with enviable

    demand comes pressure to make products

    smaller, aster, cooler and at a lower price

    point. Some electronics products liecycles

    closely resemble ashion: Whats in today

    is out tomorrow. But even everyday devices

    are eeling the heat. Everyone wants to pro-

    duce the next iPad.

    Hitting these targets demands a ast and

    nimble supply chain. The challenges o

    attaining this all into three major buckets:

    global manuacturing and sourcing issues,

    channel and network complexity and the

    implications o an intricate, high-value

    product set.

    Electronics Manuacturing andSourcing Challenges

    Electronics products liecycles are growingever shorter and margins tighter, increas-

    ing pressure to lower costs and manage ma-

    terial and suppliers more eciently. This

    has triggered the ollowing trends in man-

    uacturing and sourcing:

    Asset Lightness: One industry trend

    is toward ewer original equipment

    manuacturers (OEMs) actually manu-

    acturing, moving or storing their own

    products. Many preer to engage both

    contract manuacturers and third-partylogistics providers or these services. For

    example, Sonys adoption o an asset

    light philosophy prompted the com-

    pany to sell o assets including a major

    TV manuacturing acility in Mexico to

    Foxconn Electronics in January, 010.

    Emerging Markets Sourcing: Many

    electronics companies have sought out

    manuacturing and logistics partners

    in emerging markets, a move which can

    lower costs but at the same time create a

    long, thin supply chain. Sourcing rom

    emerging markets also oten means

    insucient inrastructure and emerging

    logistics capabilities, creating challenges

    in expediting reight and maintaining

    pipeline inventory, as well as increasing

    supplier and global trade compliance

    risks. 3PLs with experience in these mar-

    kets can play a critical role in devising

    strategies to overcome these obstacles.

    Global Supply Chain Complexity and

    Risk: Too many product lines and too

    many components sourced rom too

    many araway places creates a com-

    plex, costly and long supply chain. As

    seen in Figure 15 on page 4, supply

    chain complexity and risk is the second-

    highest-ranked challenge or shippers.

    Figure 18 on page 30 reveals that 3PLs

    are somewhat more condent in their

    ability to help address this challenge

    than shippers are (4% to %), per-

    haps because more o the cost empha-

    sis is on the product itsel and not the

    logistics wrapped around it. An excep-

    tion is Philips, which merged two divi-

    sions, both selling to retail and at timesto the same customers, in an eort to

    reduce complexity and lower its ware-

    house count.

    Make to Order/Make to Stock: A make

    to order production strategy enables

    electronics companies to customize

    products such as computers to cus-

    tomers exacting specications. Dell

    achieved signicant supply chain rec-

    ognition or its work toward its make to

    order supply chain model. The majorityo electronics companies in the survey

    (78%) agree that or most electron-

    ics companies, a make to order supply

    chain model may not always be as cost

    eective as a make to stock model. It

    can also lead to inventory obsolescence,

    especially when product liecycles are

    short. Dell maintains as many as six

    supply chains. Business products are

    made to order, but diering demand

    requirements mean some move via air

    reight while others leverage alternative

    modes, according to a Supply Chain Digest

    Webcast. Dells retail products are made

    to stock and planned well in advance to

    get products to market cost eectively

    or peak seasons.

    Complexity Iside ad Ot

    Electronics

    23ELECTROnICS

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    24/52

    Figure 15: Price Pressure Tops Electronics Shippers Logistics Challenges

    Pressure to ManufactureOnshore or Near Shore

    Make/Configure to Order Products

    High Obsolescence RatesAssociated with Stocked Product

    High Product Throughput LevelsAssociated with New Product

    Launches and Seasonal Demand

    Data Integration and Synchronization

    Short Product Lifecycles

    Supply Chain Security

    Service Parts Logistics, IncludingProduct Returns Processing

    Supply Chain Disruptions

    Volatile/Unpredictable Demand

    Lack of Supply Chain Visibility

    Global Supply Chain Complexityand Risk (Including Compliance)

    Price Pressure to Reduce Operating Costs60%

    60%

    47%

    37%

    38%

    54%

    47%

    44%

    28%

    40%

    37%

    24%

    24%

    59%

    54%

    41%

    37%

    36%

    36%

    35%

    30%

    30%

    20%

    17%

    14%

    13%

    Shippers3PLs

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    24 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    25/52

    The bottom line is that one size does

    not t all, even within one electronics

    company, due to varying market and cus-

    tomer needs.

    Postponement: A related strategy

    avored by electronics manuacturers,

    which both reduces inventory and pro-

    vides a higher level o customization, is

    postponing nal conguration, includ-

    ing packaging, until the product is in or

    close to the market where the product

    will be consumed services that may be

    perormed by 3PLs in these markets.

    People want the benets o manuactur-

    ing in China, but are doing more pack-

    aging in the US, as well as light assembly

    where possible, says Wally Shaw, Market

    Group Supply Lead, Americas at Philips

    Consumer Liestyle. This helps with

    orecasting by reducing the number o

    SKUs you are planning, and also helps

    reduce cube in transportation by using a

    bulk pack.

    Price Pressure: Shippers view price

    pressure to reduce operating costs as

    their top logistics challenge (59%). One

    increasingly common solution is to shit

    rom a heavy emphasis on ast but costly

    air reight to other modes according to

    specic channel needs, but this requires

    signicant advance planning. Nearly

    two-thirds (65%) o electronics shippers

    in the survey avor air reight over slower

    modes to shorten supply chain transittime. 3PLs believe they can play a larger

    role in helping electronics shippers

    address this challenge than shippers do

    (Figure 18, 38% vs. 8% o shippers).

    Use o Contract Manuacturers as 3PLs:

    The lines between industry groups are

    blurring as contract manuacturers in

    emerging markets oer services that

    are more traditionally associated with

    3PLs, a trend noted by about two-thirds

    o shippers and 3PLs in the survey. Most

    common services include transportation

    management, warehousing and distri-

    bution services and returns manage-

    ment. Some contract manuacturers are

    oering the more advanced services

    typically provided by 3PLs, such as sup-

    ply chain network design, logistics plan-

    ning and consulting services. Contract

    manuacturers see this as a logical

    extension o their services and a higher-

    margin opportunity. Discussions with

    3PLs reveal that they do not see this as

    a major threat yet, since logistics is their

    core competency and they believe that

    electronics companies will choose them

    over contract manuacturers or complex

    international logistics needs.

    Environmental and Social

    Sustainability: Like many industries,

    electronics manuacturers are con-

    cerned with CO2 emissions and uel

    consumption, particularly with long sup-

    ply chains. Manuacturing byproducts

    such as lead rom printed circuit board

    production are an additional concern;

    70% o heavy metals in US landlls

    come rom discarded electronics prod-

    ucts, according to Supply Chain BrainsHigh Tech Outlook, February 011.

    Companies and savvy 3PLs are get-

    ting creative to solve materials and pack-

    aging problems. Dell is trying protective

    packaging made o bamboo and even

    mushrooms and is scaling down package

    sizes to t more on a pallet, according to

    an April, 011, article inFortune.

    Complex Networks and ChannelsThe electronics industry is notoriously

    segregated, with multiple players involved

    in the supply chain, not all o which are

    marching to a common beat. These play-

    ers include:

    Component suppliers

    Contract Manuacturers, Original

    Design Manuacturers and Joint Ventures

    Original Equipment Manuacturers/

    Brand Owners

    Distributors/Partners/Value-Added

    Resellers

    End Customers

    Electronics is also a highly dynamic indus-

    try: Technology changes so rapidly that

    many companies are driven to ailure due

    to their inability to keep up with changing

    technologies. That in turn drives signi-

    cant merger, acquisition, and divestiture

    activity; Cisco alone has acquired more

    than 145 companies in the last 18 years,according to the companys Web site.

    Motorola recently split into a consumer

    products company and a business and gov-

    ernment products company while selling

    o a division that makes network inra-

    structure equipment.

    Further complicating matters, electronics

    companies sell into many vertical markets,

    each with its own unique needs. Among

    the most trying is retail, which oers

    opportunity but also complexity to elec-tronics supply chains. Among the challeng-

    es o interacting with retailers:

    Inaccurate retail-level orecasts

    Retailers risk tolerance

    Exacting vendor compliance programs

    with signicant penalties

    Consumer electronics products oten

    have a long lead time and a short prod-

    uct cycle, which creates obsolescence or

    excess stock

    25ELECTROnICS

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    26/52

    More than two-thirds o electronics com-

    panies in the survey (73%) agree that

    establishing a branded retail presence

    themselves is a good way or consum-

    er electronics manuacturers to driveincreased revenue.

    Multiple layers, mashed-together supply

    chains and the specic challenges o retail

    channels introduce cost, saety stock, ore-

    cast challenges and additional time into

    logistics processes.

    One impact can be seen in electron-

    ics companies orecast accuracy, which

    averages 60% to 70%. Chris Armbruster,

    Senior Director, Business Transormation,

    at Motorola Solutions, who participated in

    the ASE workshop in Chicago, noted that

    the vertically dis-integrated supply chain

    common in electronics slows and oten

    limits the sharing o orecasts, leading to

    a bullwhip eect in inventory levels at both

    the retail and sourcing levels, when chang-

    es in supply or demand occur. Sharing

    inormation on true demand more quickly

    would result in improved orecasts and

    reduced inventory levels. Electronics com-

    panies must be agile to adapt to market

    changes and unanticipated events, such asthe recent Japanese tsunami or earthquake

    in China, and use demand sensing and

    shaping to detect and infuence demand.

    Another challenge is to design a common,

    cost-ecient inrastructure across supply

    chains. Lean is a common goal reducing

    inventory, containing SKU prolieration,

    and limiting xed assets, such as in Sonys

    supply chain, described previously.

    These challenges provide opportunity or3PLs to oer services such as visibility, set-

    ting up inventory hubs in key locations,

    helping to rationalize inventory across the

    supply chain and nding ways to reduce

    cycle time on transit legs. Fully 55% o

    3PLs report that they can help electron-

    ics companies redesign supply chain

    networks, which can help them respond

    to diering channel needs while shar-

    ing common inrastructure and services

    wherever cost eective. However, as seen

    in Figure 17 on page 9, only 14% o ship-

    pers use 3PLs or this service. To capture

    more o this business, 3PLs need to invest

    in understanding the customer at all lev-

    els in the organization. An electronics

    manuacturers Supply Chain Manager

    participating in the ASE workshop in

    Utrecht noted that in his experience some

    3PLs lack the ability to eectively respond

    to shippers organizational changes.

    Consumer electronics products share

    characteristics with ashion retail (veloc-

    ity) and consumer products (short lie-

    cycles, demand volatility, peak season

    demands); 3PLs with experience in retail

    and consumer products can also cross-pol-

    linate best practices in product distribu-

    tion and demand management with elec-

    tronics companies.

    High-Demand, High-Value ProductsElectronics companies build products peo-

    ple want, with the latest, most in-demand

    eatures that appeal to specic markets.

    That makes them high valued and sub-

    ject to thet, countereit and the whims o

    consumer tastes. These are some o the

    challenges this poses:

    Visibility: Global supply chain visibility is

    a clear priority or electronics shippers. In

    Figure 15, its the third-most-cited logistics

    challenge (41%). Electronics shippers in

    the US rank this more highly than thosein Europe and Latin America, and larger

    shippers place more importance on it than

    smaller companies. Visibility is essential to

    provide inventory availability and order sta-

    tus to customers as well as to provide secu-

    rity while in transit.

    In Figure 16, 74% o electronics companies

    cite visibility as the top service they would

    like to see rom 3PLs, no matter the size or

    location o the shipper. A leading comput-

    er manuacturer, or example, has begunto pursue a model in which a 4PL manages

    all o its 3PLs in a given country in order to

    ensure visibility.

    Figure 17 reveals that improved orecast-

    ing and inventory visibility is the third

    most-used cost-saving strategy by elec-

    tronics companies, although curiously,

    despite the act that 3PLs are ideally situ-

    ated to provide visibility to customers,

    both shippers and 3PLs report that 3PLs

    are not very likely to be assisting in this

    improvement process. Perhaps 3PLs are

    providing sucient visibility, but work

    needs to be done on the shipper side to

    maximize its use.

    74%o electronics companies cite

    visibility as the top service they

    would like to see rom 3PLs

    26 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    27/52

    Figure 16: Visibility Tops Services Electronics Companies Seek rom 3PLs

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    Software Loading/Flashing

    Launch of New Product

    Warranty Processing

    Testing

    Willingness to Own and Manage Inventory

    Managing Global Production Supply

    Lean/Six Sigma

    Environmental Certifications Such as ISO 14000

    Final Assembly/Configuration/Postponement

    Facilitate Just in Time (JIT)Manufacturing/Kanban Systems

    Kitting

    Service Parts Logistics

    Quality Certifications Such as ISO 9000

    Experience with Local Product Regulations

    Vendor Managed Inventory

    Reverse Logistics

    Supply Chain Security

    Global Supply Chain Visibility 74%

    56%

    44%

    40%

    11%

    6%

    11%

    7%

    25%

    12%

    21%

    19%

    17%

    12%

    8%

    15%

    40%

    38%

    4%

    8%

    26%

    11%

    22%

    15%

    21%

    9%

    34%

    27%

    24%

    32%

    6%

    11%

    22%

    9%

    5%

    8%

    Important Today

    Important in Near Future

    27ELECTROnICS

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    28/52

    Security: As seen in Figure 15, 35% o ship-

    pers call security a supply chain challenge;

    while thet o electronics goods has steadilydeclined over the past ve years, it still rep-

    resents 1 in 5 thets across all industries,

    according to FreightWatchs Annual Supply

    Chain Survey. Figure 16 reveals that security

    is the second most important capability

    that electronics companies look or when

    they hire 3PLs. Security is a particular pri-

    ority in emerging markets which dont have

    all o the protections available in mature

    markets. Technologies can help, such as

    covert and visible shipment tracking solu-

    tions, GPS and engine shutdown systems,

    as well as practices including driver train-

    ing and use o transportation security com-

    panies such as FreightWatch. As the results

    indicate, shippers are looking to 3PLs to

    enact these measures.

    Countereiting: A related need is to com-

    bat countereiting o goods through pre-

    vention and detection; electronics compa-

    nies must thoroughly vet their suppliers

    and employ security measures or com-

    ponent parts as well as nished goods.

    Package seals with serial numbers are animportant anti-countereit measure. One

    potential concept is to borrow e-pedigree

    practices rom the pharmaceuticals indus-

    try; 3PLs could provide the supply chain

    integrity and manage the component pedi-

    gree processes.

    On-Board Intelligence: Electronics compa-

    nies are beginning to tap the digital supply

    chain or applications such as remote mon-

    itoring and diagnosis. Diebold, or exam-

    ple, enables predictive maintenance oATMs via an embedded device, according

    to a company white paper. The company is

    notied when a component is at risk o ail-

    ure and dispatches a service repair person

    with the correct part beore it ever aects a

    user, reducing costs and increasing custom-

    er service. 3PLs could act as the centralized

    depot in this scenario to receive service

    messages and send replacement parts.

    Packaging: Shiny packaging or oten-del-

    icate electronics products is designed to

    attract customers, but oten requires outer

    boxes to protect it. Electronics companies

    are testing cost-reduction and sustainabil-

    ity strategies such as using new protective

    materials, including the mushrooms andbamboo mentioned on page 5, as well as

    smaller packages and postponement o

    light assembly and packaging to the desti-

    nation market also a SKU reducer, and

    an opportunity or 3PLs.

    Many retailers place electronics cartons

    right on the sales foor. I this packag-

    ing is too thin, it is susceptible to damage,

    and glossy coatings can be slick, causing

    cartons to shit in transit and pallets to

    collapse, damaging cartons and, poten-

    tially, contents. Sony solved this problem

    by improving shipment integrity through

    the use o corner boards, banding, air bags

    and improved shrink wrapping techniques.

    Local Market Customization: Individual

    markets come with their own appetites

    and preerences, such as 0-volt electric

    service in Europe and Asia with dierent

    electrical outlets in dierent countries vs.

    110-volt in The United Sates and Canada.

    Regulation may also dictate specic design

    eatures. 3PLs might help electronics com-panies with sotware downloads or minor

    localization o the hardware, such as power

    supply units, as well as insight into local

    regulations and import/export require-

    ments, especially in emerging markets.

    Short Liecycles: Like ashion apparel,

    many electronics products are made in

    emerging countries such as China, Taiwan,

    India and Brazil and consumed in US and

    European markets. This means a relatively

    long supply chain or liecycles that otenrun just six to 18 months, creating obsoles-

    cence issues.

    These short liecycles combined with

    the challenges o accurately orecasting

    demand also means inventory obsolescence

    is a signicant problem or electronics

    companies, particularly or make to stock.

    The majority (69%) o electronics ship-

    pers believe 3PLs can help them deal with

    inventory obsolescence by proactively iden-

    tiying slower moving items and items that

    have been replaced with newer releases.

    26%o shippers eel 3PLs can help

    them improve distribution center

    processes as a cost-saving

    strategy, the top-ranked way

    they believe 3PLs can assist

    them in lowering costs

    28 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    29/52

    Figure 17: Electronics Companies Employ Many Logistics Cost Savings Methods

    Employed More Fuel-Efficient Transport

    Moved to a Make to Order Model

    Improved Inventory Turns ThroughVendor Managed Inventory

    Rationalized or Decreased the Number of SKUs

    Implemented or Improved Logistics-RelatedInformation Technology Tools or Enablers

    Improved Returns Management/Reverse Logistics Processes

    Improved Shipment Density/Load Utilization

    Redesigned Supply Chain Network

    Switched to Multimodal or Slower Mode of Transport

    Increased Outsourcing

    Instituted Internal Training Programs to EncourageCost Effectiveness/Lean Behaviors

    Renegotiated Rates for Warehouse Services

    Improved Forecasting and Inventory Visibility

    Improved Distribution Center Processes

    Renegotiated Rates for Logistics Services63%

    62%

    57%

    52%

    49%

    49%

    48%

    45%

    39%

    37%

    18%

    26%

    10%

    17%

    10%

    10%

    19%

    18%

    14%

    10%

    47%

    41%

    37%

    31%

    22%

    14%

    16%

    2%

    6%

    9% Our Company Uses

    Assisted by 3PLs

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    29ELECTROnICS

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    30/52

    Figure 18: More 3PLs Than Shippers Believe 3PLs Can Help with Challenges

    Other

    Pressure to ManufactureOnshore or Near Shore

    Make/Configure to Order Products

    High Obsolescence RatesAssociated with Stocked Product

    Short Product Lifecycles

    High Product Throughput LevelsAssociated with New Product

    Launches and Seasonal Demand

    Volatile/Unpredictable Demand

    Data Integration and Synchronization

    Supply Chain Disruptions

    Service Parts Logistics, IncludingProduct Returns Processing

    Supply Chain Security

    Global Supply Chain Complexity andRisk (Including Compliance)

    Lack of Supply Chain Visibility

    Price Pressure to Reduce Operating Costs38%

    39%

    42%

    32%

    43%

    27%

    17%

    16%

    26%

    14%

    13%

    11%

    13%

    28%

    24%

    22%

    21%

    20%

    17%

    13%

    11%

    9%

    4%

    4%

    2%

    0%

    1%

    0%Shippers3PLs

    Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study

    30 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY

  • 8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012

    31/52

    3PLs could help to identiy at risk inven-

    tory in the warehouses that they manage,

    as well as arrange intermodal and other

    consolidation services to increase the sup-

    ply chain velocity without dramatically

    increasing transportation costs. You need

    a very good level o integration to be adap-

    tive and fexible to cope with these shorter

    lie cycles, says Tony Xia, Sr. Logistics

    Manager with Emerson Electric.

    When inventoried items become obsolete,

    58% o electronics shippers in the survey

    agree that online auctions are an impor-

    tant means or electronics companies to

    reclaim some value. Facilitating online

    inventory disposition is the next logical

    step in a 3PL value-added service oering.

    A number o electronics companies use

    FreeFlow, provider o online private mar-

    ketplaces and auctions, to sell at-risk inven-

    tory through secure channels or each

    stage o the inventory aging process.

    The Role o 3PLsAs seen throughout this chapter, electron-

    ics companies avor outsourcing in both

    manuacturing and logistics services.

    Thats especially true in emerging markets.

    Yet there is a clear gap between the services

    3PLs are currently providing and the addi-

    tional value they could provide.

    As seen in Figures 15 and 18, electronics

    shippers give low marks to 3PLs ability to

    solve their top logistics challenges. The

    largest gaps occur on their highest pri-orities: 59% call price pressure to reduce

    operating costs their top challenge, while

    just 8% believe 3PLs can help them with

    this challenge. A similar gap is revealed

    in 3PLs ability to help electronics com-

    panies with global supply chain complex-

    ity and risk, including compliance. 3PLs

    themselves also see a gap, albeit smaller,

    between these challenges and their involve-

    ment in helping their customers with these

    challenges.

    The same is true in top savings methods

    used by electronics companies in Figure 17;

    there are signicant gaps between strate-

    gies used and assistance by 3PLs in those

    eorts, conrmed by 3PLs themselves.

    At the ASE workshop in Utrecht, one con-

    tract manuacturer shed some light on

    one o the reasons shippers may not seek

    to undertake problem-solving with 3PLs.

    They do not bring cost reductions and

    a lean approach to the table very oten,

    he said. They will do only what they are

    asked to do; they do not proactively oer

    many value-added services.

    Its clear in Figure 18 that 3PLs see oppor-

    tunities to support shippers in ways elec-

    tronics shippers themselves do not. Both

    sides need to meet in the middle: 3PLs

    need do a better job in selling the quality

    and value o their capabilities to electron-

    ics customers, and shippers need to be

    more open to collaborating with 3PLs to

    address their top challenges.

    Generally speaking, electronics shippers

    view 3PLs as skilled and capable at un-

    damental