21.10third party logistics-studie 2012
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
1/52
Results and Findings of the 16th Annual Study
2012 THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STUDYThe State o Logistics Outsourcing
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
2/52
Contents
2012 C. Jo Lagley, Jr., P.D., ad Capgemii. All Rigts Reserved.
no part o tis docmet may be reprodced, displayed, modiied or
distribted by ay process or meas witot prior writte permissio
rom Capgemii. Rigtsore is a trademar belogig to Capgemii.
4 Exective Smmary
7 Crret State o te 3PL Maret
15 Emergig Marets
23 Electroics
33 Talet Maagemet
41 Strategic Assessmet
44 Abot te Stdy
48 Abot te Sposors
50 Credits
GIVE US YOUR OPINIONSca tis code ad sare yorsggestios or topics to coveri ext years stdy.
2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
3/52
SpportigOrgaizatios
Balance is te state o eqilibrim a cotios ad sometimes evasive qest or spplycai exectives ad te teme o tis report. Weter teyre explorig emergig marets,avigatig te calleges o te electroics spply cai or i dig te rigt talet, attaiigeqal ad satisactory distribtio o resorces is a ogoig callege.
www.3plstdy.com
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
4/52
Current State o the MarketSrvey resposes rom 1,561 idstry exec-
tives ad maagers represetig sers ad
o-sers o 3PL services, as well as respos-
es rom 697 3PL exectives ad maagers,
corm tat 3PLs cotie to provide strategic
ad operatioal vale, provide ew ad io-
vative ways to improve logistics eectiveess
ad are ey cotribtors to sippers overall
bsiess sccess. Total logistics expeditres
represet a average o 12% o sippers sales
revees, ad o tis, a average 42% is devot-ed to otsorcig. Metrics relatig to logistics
cost redctio, ivetory cost redctio, ad
logistics xed asset redctio remai co-
sistet wit te two previos years stdies.
A majority o sipper respodets, 64%, are
icreasig teir se o 3PL services, wile
24% are retrig to isorcig some 3PL
services ad 58% report tey are redcig
or cosolidatig te mber o 3PLs tey
se. Logistics activities most reqetly ot-
sorced cotie to iclde tose tat are
more trasactioal, operatioal ad repeti-
tive, wile tose tat are more strategic,cstomer-acig ad IT-itesive ted to be
less reqetly otsorced. A similar pe-
omeo is preset i expectatios o 3PLs
IT capabilities; exectio-orieted activities
ad processes sc as trasportatio ad
wareose/DC maagemet-related IT capa-
bilities are more i demad ta tose tat
are more strategic ad aalytical.
3PLs cotie to ra teir relatiosips
wit sippers a bit iger ta sippers
do, bt te vast majority (88% o sippers
ad 94% o 3PLs) view teir relatiosipsas sccessl. Opeess, trasparecy,
ad good commicatio as well as agility
ad fexibility cotribte to tis sccess.
Iterestigly, gres rom tis years stdy
sggest decreases i te se o gaisar-
ig ad collaboratio.
Tis report presets digs
o te 2012 16th Annual Third-
Party Logistics Study, based
o researc codcted i
mid-2011. I additio to doc-
metig te ogoig evoltio
o te tird-party logistics
maret, tis years report also
taes a close-p loo at treespecial topics:
Te logistics o operatig i
emergig marets
Te iqe calleges acig
te electroics spply cai
For te rst time i te
stdys istory, te report
cosiders te implicatios o
talet i te spply cai ad
i sipper-3PL relatiosips
Eective wit tis report, we
are bradig eacAnnual 3PL
Studyi terms o its rst ll
year o circlatio ollowig
te reports aal October
release. Tereore, tis report
costittes te 2012 3PL Study.
Emerging MarketsA sbstatial 80% o sippers ad 77% o
3PLs i te srvey codct bsiess wit or
witi a emergig cotry atios wit
ecoomies tat are experiecig rapid growt
trog idstrializatio. Cia, Idia, Brazil
ad Mexico are cosidered top emergig mar-
et opportities by srvey respodets.
Operatioal diclties, icldig logistics
calleges, treate to erode te potetial
beets associated wit doig bsiess witor witi emergig marets. For sippers
based i matre marets, diclt laws ad
reglatios, cltral diereces, te ability
to deliver agaist promises or agreed-to ser-
vice levels ad complicated tax regimes top
te list o calleges.
Brazil is represetative o te ris/reward
calleges tat are posed by a emerg-
ig ecoomy. Govermet ivestmet i
irastrctre, as well as tax redctios
ad participatio i te Mercosr ree trade
agreemet, ave cotribted to te ast
growt tat as attracted global maac-trers ad 3PLs. Bt compaies movig ito
Brazil ace te very calleges sippers cite.
Ideed, eterig ay ew maret reqires
de diligece; we its a emergig mar-
et, its eve more critical. More ta al o
sippers based i bot matre ad emergig
marets agree tat a global 3PL coordiatig
wit a local 3PL is te most sccessl oper-
atig model or 3PLs operatig wit or witi
a emergig maret.
Te 3PL capabilities sippers most vale
we eterig emergig marets are visibility,expertise o te latest global trade regla-
tios ad maagig ad optimizig sipmet
rotig based o ree trade agreemet (FTA)
owledge. Tose participatig i worsops
spportig te stdy also added proactive
cosltig services, local isigt ad exper-
tise ad itegrated soltios to tat list. Te
majority o sippers i matre ad emergig
marets call 3PLs owledge o FTAs very
importat (65% ad 73%, respectively).
Executive Summary
4 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
5/52
ElectronicsElectroics prodcts ca be igly poplar,
bt alog wit eviable demad comes pres-
sre to mae prodcts smaller, aster, cooler
ad at a lower price poit. hittig tese tar-
gets demads a ast ad imble spply cai.
Icreasig pressre to lower costs ad ma-
age material ad sppliers more ecietly
as triggered a preerece amog electroics
compaies or asset ligtess, otsorcig
bot prodctio ad logistics, especially iemergig marets. Sippers call price pres-
sre to redce operatig costs teir top
logistics callege (59%), bt electroics
maactrers also wrestle wit oter isses
icrred by a log, ti spply cai, employ-
ig strategies sc as postpoemet.
Te electroics idstry is otoriosly dis-
itegrated, wit mltiple players ivolved i
te spply cai ad a ig rate o mergers
ad acqisitios. Frter complicatig mat-
ters, electroics compaies sell ito may ver-
tical marets, eac wit its ow iqe eeds.
Mltiple layers, spply costraits, mased-togeter spply cais ad te specic cal-
leges o retail caels itrodce cost,
saety stoc, orecast calleges ad addi-
tioal time ito logistics processes. Aoter
callege is to desig a commo, cost-e-
ciet irastrctre across spply cais.
Becase electroics prodcts are ote
ig vale, tey pose calleges icldig
assrig secrity, prevetig coter-
eit ad pacagig scietly to adle
log-distace trasportatio. Sort lie-
cycles combied wit te calleges oaccrately orecastig demad also mea
ivetory obsolescece is a sigicat
problem, leadig electroics compaies to
see soltios sc as o-lie actios.
uortately, electroics sippers give
low mars to 3PLs ability to solve teir top
logistics calleges. Te largest gaps occr
o teir igest priorities: or example, 59%
regard price pressre to redce operatig
costs as teir top callege, wile jst 28%
believe 3PLs ca elp tem wit tis cal-
lege. 3PLs eed to do a better job o sellig
te qality ad vale o teir capabilities to
electroics cstomers, ad sippers eed to
be more ope to collaboratig wit 3PLs to
address teir top calleges.
Talent ManagementDespite te spply cais role as a sigicat
cotribtor to attaiig strategic bsiess
goals, te logistics idstry is experiecig
a sortage o capable ad well-roded sp-
ply cai maagers prepared to step ito ey
maagemet positios. Tis ca be overcome
by developig programs or talet maage-
met te vigoros, systematic process o
coectig a clear, well-deed bsiess
strategy to te recritmet, retetio ad
developmet o talet.
May sippers ad 3PLs are trobled by te
crret state o talet maagemet witi
teir orgaizatios, wit promotio ad rota-
tio practices ad idetiyig ad developig
leaders te top cocers.
As spply cais grow more complex ad
itrisic to a compays ability to attai its
bsiess goals, tey reqire leaders wo are
more diverse ad mlti-aceted. A sigi-
cat mber o sippers ad 3PLs eel teir
crret leaders dot ave wat it taes
to address tre bsiess calleges.Sippers ad 3PLs most igly vale opera-
tioal exectio (51% ad 60%) ollowed
by people maagemet ad developmet
sills (54% ad 43%) i teir leaders.
Todays spply cai leaders ave bee
reqired to grow well beyod teir opera-
tios bacgrods, developig a broad
rage o competecies wile o te job;
sippers (37%) ad 3PLs (39%) are most
codet i te learig ability o todays
leaders. Also importat are leaders ability
to dedce, execte, codct talet reviewprocesses ad lead visioary cage ad
orgaizatio by-i. Bt ew orgaizatios
ave bee idoctriatig tese compete-
cies ito mid-maagemet traiig ad
developmet, leadig to te talet crisis.
Te scarcity o spply cai talet pres-
ets a real callege or may sippers ad
3PLs. To date, te majority o bot sip-
pers ad 3PLs recrit rom iside teir ow
idstries, bt a growig tred is to loo or
talet i adjacet idstries. Compay sc-
cess ad perormace, attractive salary ad
beets ad persoal developmet oppor-
tities witi te compay are cosidered
te top qalities eeded to attract talet.
Strategic AssessmentCostatly cagig ecoomic ad political
dyamics ecessitate cotial re-evala-
tio o spply cai directios. Ispired by
te digs o tis years stdy, i tis stra-
tegic assessmet, te stdy team examies
several treds sprrig yet more cage ad
iovatio i te spply cai world.
Te srvey od sippers i developig
regios exibit a greater icliatio to bot
otsorce ad isorce logistics servicesta tose i te more developed cotries.
Wile tese reslts may seem to cotradict
oe aoter, te derlyig dig is tat
sippers i developig ecoomies are more
liely to mae cages to teir otsorc-
ig strategies ta tose i more developed
regios. Cosiderig te icreasig complex-
ity o may spply cais, tere is a strog
argmet tat sippers sold be looig
carelly at bolsterig logistics capabilities
via 3PLs ad 4PLs.
A growig mber o compaies aspire to
maage tis complexity via spply caicotrol towers, a cetral repository or all
evet data, ad several 4PLs oer tis ser-
vice. A well-desiged spply cai cotrol
tower eables a compay to measre ad
cotrol te eectiveess o te spply cai
i terms o agility, resiliece, reliability ad
resposiveess. Tis tred ca be viewed as
a positive metod o maagig overall spply
cai activities ad processes, bt 3PL ad
sipper mst collaborate to prevet dplica-
tio o eorts ad de added costs.
nearsorig is aoter sig o costatlycagig global dyamics. Compaies ave
moved prodctio to emergig marets i
prsit o lower costs, bt tat decisio
sometimes caged coditios i tose
very marets. Tis calleges compaies
to recosider te overall ecoomics ad i
some cases retr to earsorig.
Lie oter idstries, te spply cai ids-
try is i te early stages o worig ot ow
to best leverage social media or tass sc
as collaboratio, eacig orecastig ad
locatig talet, to eace day-to-day bsi-
ess ctios wile miimizig te riss.
Tog social media was ot iclded as a
topic drig tis years srvey, a sigicat
mber o respodets ad participats see
te beets o social media i te logistics
world ad qestio ot weter social media
will tae o, bt oly we.
5EXECuTIVE SuMMARY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
6/52
Balancing internal logistics competencies with external expertise
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
7/52
Results o the 2012 16th Annual Third-Party
Logistics Studyonce again rearmed that
third-party logistics providers continue to
provide strategic and operational value to
many shippers across the globe. Shippers
consider logistics and supply chain man-
agement as key contributors to their over-
all business success, and approximately
three-quarters o survey respondents say
3PLs provide new and innovative ways to
improve logistics eectiveness.
These results are based on survey
responses rom 1,561 industry executives
and managers representing users and
non-users o 3PL services (reerred to as
shippers or shipper respondents through-
out this report), as well as 697 executives
and managers representing rms that
provide 3PL services (called 3PLs or 3PL
respondents). 3PLs were added to the
survey group in 009 in order to capture
both sides o the buyer-seller relationship.
The number o usable survey responsescontinues to rise each year, with a signi-
cant increase or the 2012 Study.
Please see About the Study on page 44 or
detailed inormation about survey respons-
es and the our streams o research used to
ully analyze the state o the 3PL market:
a web-based survey, desk research, ocus
interviews, and acilitated workshop ses-
sions at Capgemini Accelerated Solutions
Environment (ASE) locations in Chicago,
Illinois, and Utrecht, The Netherlands,and at the 011 eyeortransport 3PL
Summit in Atlanta, Georgia.
Current Global EconomicClimate and Use o 3PLs
As acknowledged in our Annual 3PL Studies
over the past two to three years, economic
volatility and uncertainty have impacted
global business markets and in turn, global
markets or 3PL services. Figure 1 includes
data rom Armstrong & Associates that
estimates the magnitude o global 3PL rev-
enues or 010 (US $541.6B), and provides
breakdowns or the our major geographies
that are included in the 2012 3PL Study.
Global 3PL revenues reported or 010
represent an increase o 6.8% over those
reported in 009, conrming the general
trend toward improving global business
conditions. Focusing specically on the US,
3PL revenues reported by Armstrong &
Associates have increased rom US $107.1B
in 009 to US $17.3B in 010, and are
expected to increase to US $141.B in 011.
Generally, these refect the somewhat-
improving global business environment
and ongoing economic globalization.
The Competitive StartingLine Has Been Re-SetThe chie reason or conducting the
2012 3PL Studyis to update our knowl-
edge o 3PL-shipper relationships, and
to learn how both types o organiza-
tions are using these relationships to
improve and enhance their businesses
and supply chains. Many shippers are
currently in search o new and innovative
global supply chain strategies, suggest-ing new opportunities or 3PLs to make
signicant contributions to supply chain
Current State o the 3PL MarketSippers Refect Cotied Codece wit use o 3PL Services
Figure 1: Global 3PL Revenues or 2010
Region2010 Global 3PL Revenues
(US$ billions)
nort America 149.1
Erope 165.1
Asia-Pacic 157.6
Lati America 27.5
Oter Regios 42.3
Total 541.6
Source: Armstrong & Associates, 2011
7CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
8/52
are also similar to last year. A new series o
questions in the 2012 3PL Studyasked ship-
pers to report the percentages o trans-
portation and warehousing spend that are
managed by third parties. As indicated inFigure , the overall average or transpor-
tation was 56%, but the regional averages
ranged rom 41% in North America, to
more than 60% or shippers in Europe,
Asia-Pacic and Latin America. The aver-
age warehouse operations spend managed
by third parties was 39%, with only modest
variation by individual region.
Reported Changes inUse o 3PL ServicesIn recent years studies, we began to ask
shippers whether they were increasing
their use o outsourced logistics services,
or returning to insourcing many o them.
The responses represent an interesting
record o the shiting use o 3PL services:
Increasing use o 3PL services: Nearly
two-thirds (64%) o shipper respon-
dents report an increase in their use o
outsourced logistics services, and 76%
o 3PL respondents agree this is what
they are seeing rom their customers.
Regionally, 58% o North America ship-pers reported increased use, as well as
57% o European, 78% o Asia-Pacic
and 73% o Latin American shippers.
Returning to insourcing: Consistent
with the churn that occurs each year
with some companies increasing out-
sourcing and others bringing logistics
activities back in-house, an average
o 4% o shipper respondents are
returning to insourcing some o their
logistics activities, and 37% o 3PLrespondents observe that some o their
eciency and eectiveness. Many ship-
pers and 3PLs agree that todays business
challenges represent some version o a
new normal, driving the need or both
types o organizations to identiy andimplement new strategies or success. In
eect, the starting line has been re-set,
injecting a new, highly invigorated and
highly competitive spirit into the logistics
business environment.
Todays 3PL marketplace is experiencing
signicant change. Established 3PLs are re-
calibrating their business models to provide
greater value to their shipper-customers,
noted one prominent 3PL industry observ-
er. At the same time, they are looking over
their shoulders at emerging sources o com-
petition and the new and innovative oer-
ings they are bringing to market.
Spending on Logisticsand 3PL Services
As seen in Figure , shipper respondents
to the 2012 3PL Studyreport that total
logistics expenditures represent an aver-
age o 1% o their companies sales rev-
enues. Total logistics expenditures include
transportation, distribution, warehousing
and value-added services. Regional di-erences range rom 11% in each o three
regions to Latin Americas 14% o com-
pany sales revenues.
Shippers devote an average 4% o this
total to outsourcing, the same as reported
in last years study. That suggests that in
comparison with the previous year, average
changes in expenditures or outsourced
logistics have been proportional to chang-
es in total logistics expenditures. The
average percentages o logistics spendingshippers devote to outsourcing by region
customers are returning to insourcing
logistics activities.
Reducing or consolidating the num-
ber o 3PLs used: Slightly over one-hal (58%) o shipper respondents are
consolidating the number o 3PLs they
use, and 7% o 3PLs eel that customers
in general are reducing or consolidat-
ing the number o 3PLs they use. This
general trend toward consolidation is
consistent with contemporary trends in
procurement and strategic sourcing.
Interestingly, the percentage o shippers
increasing/decreasing their use o 3PL ser-
vices is very close to the gures we report-
ed in last years study. So, again this year,
there is strong evidence that the predomi-
nant direction among shippers is to move
toward increased use o outsourced logis-
tics services.
3PL-Shipper RelationshipsContinue to Progress and ImproveSimilar to last years study, 88% o shippers
view their 3PL relationships as generally suc-
cessul, compared with 94% o 3PL respon-
dents. Shippers ratings are consistent across
regions: North America 89%; Europe 88%;Asia-Pacic 89%; and Latin America 87%.
Somewhat ewer shippers, 71%, indicate
that 3PLs provide them with new and
innovative ways to improve logistics eec-
tiveness; 91% o 3PL providers eel that
this statement accurately characterizes
the services they provide. The gap con-
tinues between the ratings that shipper
respondents assign to various aspects o
the 3PL-shipper relationship and the more
positive evaluations provided by the 3PLrespondents themselves.
Figure 2: Outsourcing Spending Remains Consistent
Selected Inormation All RegionsNorth
AmericaEurope Asia-Pacifc Latin America
Total Logistics Expeditres as a
Percetage o Sales Revees12% 11% 11% 11% 14%
Percet o Total Logistics Expeditres
Directed to Otsorcig42 38 46 47 35
Percet o Trasportatio Sped Maagedby Tird Parties
56 41 66 61 66
Percet o Wareose Operatios
Sped Maaged by Tird Parties39 36 42 42 40
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
8 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
9/52
Success Factors: According to the survey
ndings, the ollowing are key ingredients
to successul 3PL-shipper relationships:
Openness, transparency and good
communication: While 69% o shipper
respondents are satised with the open-
ness, transparency, and communication
received rom 3PLs, only 6% o 3PLs
are satised with these characteristics in
their relationships with customers. So,
apparently there is a need or both par-
ties to consider the value that could be
gained by being more willing to share
appropriate inormation with their busi-
ness partners.
Agility and exibility to accommodate
current and uture business needs and
challenges: Nearly all (98%) 3PLs eel
that their customers expect them to be
suciently agile and fexible to accom-
modate their (shippers) current and
uture business needs and challenges.
But just 68% o shippers judge their3PLs as suciently agile and fexible,
down rom 7% last year. This aspect
o 3PL-customer relationships clearly
needs improvement, and deserves care-
ul watching.
Interest in gainsharing between 3PLs
and shippers: Gainsharing comes up
requently during our shipper work-
shops, and we are receiving mixed sig-
nals regarding this orm o shipper-3PL
collaboration. This year 56% o 3PL
respondents and 4% o shippers (ver-
sus 56% last year), report engaging in
gainsharing arrangements. While many
shippers consider gainsharing to be a
useul incentive or themselves and their
3PL providers to work toward agreed-
upon objectives and in keeping with the
principles o good collaboration, others
seem to eel that the basic agreement
with a 3PL should cover all areas where
Figure 3: Shippers Continue to Experience Measurable Benef ts From Use o 3PL Services
Results All Regions
Logistics Cost Redctio (%) 13%
Ivetory Cost Redctio (%) 9%
Logistics Fixed Asset Redctio (%) 25%
Order Fill RateCaged From 70%
Caged To 79%
Order AccracyCaged From 80%
Caged To 87%
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
Figure 4: Shippers Still Prioritize Execution-Oriented 3PL IT Capabilities
Inormation TechnologiesPercentages Reported By
Shippers 3PL Providers
Trasportatio Maagemet (Exectio) 75% 79%
Trasportatio Maagemet (Plaig) 68 76
Wareose/Distribtio Ceter Maagemet 67 79
Electroic Data Itercage (Orders, Advaced Sipmet notices, Ivoicig) 66 78
Visibility (Order, Sipmet, Ivetory, etc.) 63 75
Web Portals or Booig, Order Tracig, Ivetory Maagemet, ad Billig 55 68
Bar Codig 47 56
Cstomer Order Maagemet 42 63
Trasportatio Sorcig 41 51
Global Trade Maagemet Tool 37 37
Spply Cai Plaig 31 54
networ Modelig ad Optimizatio 25 42
Collaboratio Tools (SarePoit, Lots notes, Video Coerecig, etc.) 25 38
Spply Cai Evet Maagemet 24 44
RFID 21 32
Advaced Aalytics ad Data Miig Tools 19 37
Yard Maagemet 16 26
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
9CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
10/52
perormance is expected, and that it is
not necessary or appropriate to engage
in gainsharing practices. Interest in gain-
sharing may be diminishing somewhat
due to slight improvements in the globalbusiness economy. We plan to ollow this
closely in uture studies.
Interest in collaborating with oth-
er companies, even competitors, to
achieve logistics cost and service
improvements: When this question was
asked last year or the rst time, 68% o
shipper respondents and 80% o 3PLs
expressed interest in these strategies.
This year these percentages dropped to
44% and 67%, respectively. So, while last
year we stated it was reassuring to see
percentages that suggest a true interest
by both parties in working with other
companies, even competitors, perhaps
the easing o global economic condi-
tions have made this less o a priority.
We will continue to ocus on this issue in
uture studies.
Measurable Benefts: Shipper respondents
experience measurable benets rom 3PL
services, as seen in Figure 3. Metrics relat-
ing to logistics cost reduction, inventory
cost reduction, and logistics xed asset
reduction are consistent with what was
reported in the two previous years studies.
Shippers also report improvements in
order ll rate and order accuracy resulting
rom use o 3PLs, although the absolute
levels o these metrics are a little lower
than those reported in both the 2009and
2010 3PL Studies. This may be an indicator
o the continuing impact o the global eco-
nomic recession.
Finally, survey results showed that 60% o
the shipper respondents report their use
o 3PLs has led to year-over-year incre-
mental benets; and 88% o 3PL respon-
dents agree. Despite the positive success
ratings perceived by both shippers and
3PLs, there appears to be opportunity to
enhance the benets experienced by users
o outsourced logistics services.
Inormation TechnologyFigure 4 summarizes the inormation tech-
nology (IT) capabilities that shippers and
3PLs eel are must haves or 3PLs to suc-
cessully serve customers. Overall, the most
needed capabilities are those that relate
directly to execution-oriented activities
and processes such as transportation, ware-house/DC management, electronic data
interchange, visibility, etc. Others that have
somewhat lower rankings tend to be more
strategic and analytical.
Highlighted in Figure 5 is a ten-year view
o shippers opinions on whether they eel
inormation technologies are a necessary
element o 3PL expertise, and whether
they are satised with their 3PL provid-
ers IT capabilities, the dierence that has
become known as the IT Gap. In recent
years there has been a modest increase in
the percentages o shippers who indicate
satisaction with the IT capabilities o their
3PLs; in act, it is worth noting that the sat-
isaction rate has doubled since this ques-
tion was rst asked in 00. Despite this
improvement, the opportunity remains to
urther narrow the gap between these two
ratings. Similar to last years study, 68% o
3PLs eel that their customers are satised
with the IT services they provide.
Figure 5: IT Gap Shows Improvement, But Further Opportunity Remains
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2011201020092008200720062005200420032002
IT Capabilities Necessary Element of 3PL Expertise
Shippers Satisfied with 3PL IT Capabilities
IT Gap
89%
27%
85%
33%
91%
42%
90%
40%
92%
35%
92%
42%
92%
37%
88%
42%
94%
54%
93%
54%
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
10 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
11/52
What 3PL Users Outsourceand What 3PL Providers OerFigure 6 shows the percentages o shipper
respondents that outsource specic logis-
tics activities. Provided below are somegeneral observations about this years
results and the contrasts they reveal rom
previous years:
Transactional, operational, and repeti-
tive activities tend to be the most re-
quently outsourced. These include
international and domestic transporta-
tion (78% and 71% across all regions
studied), warehousing (6%), reight
orwarding (57%) and customs broker-
age (48%). This usage varies across each
o the regions. Another observation
is that or the most part, the percent-
ages indicated in Figure 6 or the all
regions results are somewhat lower
than comparable percentages rom
the previous years study. This may beexplained somewhat by the act that the
current study yielded a higher percent-
age o shipper respondents in the lowest
revenue category than in the previ-
ous years study, as noted in the About
the Study chapter later in this report.
Further analysis o the available data
conrmed that the higher the sales cat-
egory, the higher the average number o
logistics activities outsourced.
Perhaps due to the globally volatile
business environment, the percentage
o shippers outsourcing internation-
al transportation declined rom 84%
in 009 to 75% in 010, and now has
increased slightly to 78%. Over the same
time rame, the reported use o customsbrokerage declined rom 71% to 58% to
48% and the reported use o reight or-
warding services declined rom 65% to
53% and then increased to 57%.
The less-requently reported activities
indicated in Figure 6 tend to be some-
what more strategic, customer-acing,
and IT-intensive. Examples include: IT
services; supply chain consultancy servic-
es; order management and ulllment;
feet management; customer service;
and LLP/4PL services.
Figure 6: Shippers Continue to Outsource a Wide Variety o Logistics Services
Outsourced Logistics Service
User Percentages
All RegionsNorth
AmericaEurope
Asia-Pacifc
LatinAmerica
Iteratioal Trasportatio 78% 66% 91% 77% 84%
Domestic Trasportatio 71 65 77 74 69
Wareosig 62 65 61 65 63
Freigt Forwardig 57 52 54 64 65
Cstoms Broerage 48 49 43 56 45
Reverse Logistics (Deective, Repair, Retr) 27 25 28 33 22
Cross-Docig 26 29 28 25 22
Prodct Labelig, Pacagig, Assembly, kittig 24 19 28 24 26
Trasportatio Plaig ad Maagemet 23 24 27 21 16
Ivetory Maagemet 21 20 16 27 25
Freigt Bill Aditig ad Paymet 17 35 12 11 8Iormatio Tecology (IT) Services 15 15 14 13 16
Order Maagemet ad Flllmet 14 19 10 15 14
Service Parts Logistics 14 10 14 19 10
Cstomer Service 11 9 7 14 16
Spply Cai Cosltacy Services Provided by 3PLs 11 15 7 13 9
Fleet Maagemet 10 8 9 14 9
LLP (Lead Logistics Provider)/4PL Services 9 7 10 13 4
Sstaiability/Gree Spply Cai-Related Services 4 3 3 6 4
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
11CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
12/52
Figure 7 is a summary o the types o logis-
tics services provided by 3PLs participating
in the 01 survey and reveals that many
3PLs provide a wide range o services.
Based on ndings rom last year, it is very
common or 3PLs to oer many, or even
most, o the range o services included in
the question: the typical model is or 3PLs
to oer a substantial number o services to
respond eectively to their customers and
their logistics needs.
Earlier, the 2008 3PL Studyincluded a
special topic ocus on shippers expecta-
tions and usage o 3PLs as a part o their
green supply chain initiatives. Follow-up
questions on this topic in the 2012 3PL
Studyreveal that 9% o shippers rely on
3PLs to provide visibility to uel eciency
and carbon emissions inormation. Fully
53% o shippers say uel eciency and
carbon emissions have become an impor-
tant part o their 3PL procurement
decision processes.
The Voices o CurrentNon-Users o 3PL ServicesThe Annual 3PL Studysurvey also reaches
a substantial number o organizations
who do not currently use 3PLs. One objec-
tive o this study is to provide insight into
shippers decisions not to outsource. As
indicated in Figure 8, the most common
reasons are core competency, the impor-
tance o logistics, realization o cost reduc-
tions, integrating IT systems with 3PLsystems and control over outsourced activi-
ties. While there is a certain logic behind
using these concerns to support a decision
not to outsource, our discussions with
shippers indicate that sometimes these
very issues are used by other companies to
justiy their decision to outsource certain
logistics services.
Figure 7: 3PLs Provide a Wide Range o Outsourced Logistics Services
Outsourced Logistics ServiceProvider Percentages
All Regions
Domestic Trasportatio 83%
Wareosig 81
Iteratioal Trasportatio 70
Ivetory Maagemet 66
Order Maagemet ad Flllmet 65
Cstomer Service 64
Trasportatio Plaig ad Maagemet 63
Cross-Docig 62
Prodct Labelig, Pacagig, Assembly, kittig 62
Freigt Forwardig 58
Cstoms Broerage 50
Reverse Logistics (Deective, Repair, Retr) 56
Iormatio Tecology (IT) Services 51
Spply Cai Cosltacy Services Provided by 3PLs 51
LLP (Lead Logistics Provider)/4PL Services 42
Service Parts Logistics 38
Freigt Bill Aditig ad Paymet 34
Sstaiability/Gree Spply Cai-Related Services 31
Fleet Maagemet 26
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
Figure 8: Why Non-Users Do Not Use 3PLs
Reason Percent in Agreement
Logistics is a Core Competecy at Or Firm 19%
Logistics Too Importat to Cosider Otsorcig 18
Cost Redctios Wold not be Experiec ed 17
Too Di clt to Itegrate Or I T Systems wit t e 3PLs Systems 14
Cotrol Over te Otsorced Fctio(s) Wold Dimiis 13
Service Level Commitmets Wold not Be Realized 12
We have More Logistics Expertise Ta Most 3PL Providers 9
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
12 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
13/52
GO ONLINEFor more iormatio go towww.3plstudy.com
13CuRREnT STATE OF ThE 3PL MARkET
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
14/52
Balancing growth and opportunity
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
15/52
For many companies, doing business in
emerging markets is no longer a nice-to-
have; its a must-have to uel continued
growth. For example, General Motors
sold more cars in China than it did in
the United States last year, and PepsiCo
captured about hal o the Russian juice
market through an acquisition, accord-
ing to a CNNMoneyreport. As seen in
Figure 9, a substantial 80% o shippers in
the survey conduct business with or with-
in an emerging market, with the major-
ity (5%) doing so rom a mature market
and 8% rom within emerging markets.
Among 3PL respondents, 77% conduct
business with or within an emerging mar-
ket, 48% rom a mature market.
We dene emerging markets as nations
with economies that are experiencing
rapid growth through industrialization.
Mature markets are largely industrial-
ized nations with economies growing at a
slower, steadier rate. As seen in Figure 10on page 16, shippers and 3PLs in mature
markets concur that their top emerging
market opportunities are in China, India,
Brazil and Mexico, though their rankings
dier a bit.
Market Expansion ChallengesThe potential benets o moving into an
emerging market are oten ar more clear
than is the correct path to establishing busi-
ness there, particularly when making logis-
tics decisions. Successully balancing riskand reward requires a careul assessment o
the unique characteristics o each market.
As seen in Figure 11 on page 17, or ship-
pers based in mature markets dicult
laws and regulations, cultural dierences,
the ability to deliver against promises or
agreed-to service levels and complicated
tax regimes top the list o challenges.
Because o such obstacles, I could set up
a new operation in a more mature market
in much less time than in an emerging
market, says Gokhan Cakmak, Global
Logistics Manager or Orifame. This is
mainly due to the state o laws and regula-
tions as well as the inrastructure and lack
o international 3PL players present in
these markets.
Global trade compliance also represents
a hurdle or many companies operating
in emerging markets. For example, oneLogistics Director or a US-based apparel
manuacturer described the application
o customs regulations in Asia as a vexing
challenge. The authorities can become
bureaucratic and are normally not very
transparent, leaving a lot o execution and
interpretation to the eld ocers, and they
can be very erratic in their classication.
Bureaucracy and local processes make
working in emerging markets more chal-
lenging, says Cyrill Gaechter, Head oMarketing and Sales or Panalpina Black
and Caspian Sea. In more mature markets
it is less complex, however the emerging
markets are catching up continuously.
Proper preparation such as documentation
is o high importance around the world but
even more critical in emerging markets to
achieve reliable end-to-end-service.
Concerns vary by market and industry. For
example, shippers in electronics express
ar more concern than the overall respon-
dents (45% vs. %) about global trade
compliance, as well as attracting and
retaining good local sta and lack o secu-
rity or their goods.
Indeed, in contrast with the overall sur-
vey respondents, 3PL StudyASE workshop
participants and ocus interview partici-pants assert that security and countereit
intervention are key considerations in
operating global supply chains: How well
do you know the suppliers youre working
with and the quality o their due diligence?
Governments that are clear and consistent
on their security metrics and initiatives
make it easier to manage risk than those
where security eorts are less evident,
notes one US manuacturer. Some shippers
engage transportation security providers
when they perceive a high level o risk.
In ocus interviews, several experts
also cited green concerns as they move
into emerging markets. One Head o
Distribution or a communications equip-
ment manuacturer noted the diculty in
reducing its CO2 ootprint, which requires
limiting air reight and road transporta-
tion, while catering to the sales growth
expected in the next two years. To mini-
mize these modes we need to plan ahead
to allow or alternative modes like sea
reight and rail, not always an easy task in
a ast-growing market.
Opportities or Drivig Corporate Growt
Emerging Markets
Figure 9: Most Shippers Are Active In Emerging Markets
Neither
I am Based in an Emerging Market
I am Based in a Mature Market,But I Conduct Business With
or Within an Emerging Market
Shippers3PLs
52%
48%
28%
29%
20%
23%
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
15EMERGInG MARkETS
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
16/52
Case in Point: BrazilBrazil is representative o the risk/reward
challenges posed by an emerging econo-
my. Brazil will play host to two mega sport-
ing events, the FIFA World Cup in 014and the Olympics in 016, events which
are driving a large-scale inrastructural
improvement program. The Brazilian gov-
ernment plans to invest up to US $880B
in an economic stimulus program by 014
to propel growth, with a portion o those
unds devoted to upgrading its inrastruc-
ture, primarily roads and railways, but
also ports and waterways. The government
is also oering eligible corporations a 75%
corporate tax reduction on exploration
prots until 013. Brazils gross domestic
product average growth rate rom 1991
through 011 was 3.6%, according toTrading Economics.
A critical step in Brazils growth was
the ormation o Mercosur, the South
American ree trade agreement. Regional
growth together with the tax incen-
tives available in ree trade zones such as
Manaus have attracted global manuac-
turers such as Sony, Whirlpool, Samsung
and Honda, as well as international 3PLs,
according to a story inDC Velocity. Fast
growth in the 3PL market has enabled the
emergence o modern, specially built ware-
houses that meet the needs o multipleshippers. More than 90% o Brazilian com-
panies outsource transportation, accord-
ing to a survey by BDP International, while
75% outsource other activities, such as cus-
toms expediting and warehousing. Quality
o service has become a key metric or
Brazilian shippers.
Figure 10: Shippers and 3PLs Concur on Top Emerging Markets
Colombia
Egypt
Other
Philippines
Vietnam
Indonesia
South Africa
Turkey
Russia
Mexico
Brazil
India
China
Shippers Based in Mature Markets 3PLs Based in Mature Markets
Other
Egypt
Colombia
Philippines
Russia
Turkey
South Africa
Vietnam
Indonesia
Brazil
Mexico
India
China77%
63%
56%
55%
47%
44%
41%
39%
37%
34%
30%
29%
28%
80%
61%
60%
56%
41%
41%
41%
40%
39%
37%
27%
26%
22%
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
16 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
17/52
However, or all o its opportunity, Brazil
presents some logistics challenges:
Byzantine Tax Laws: Brazils complex
tax laws can vary signicantly amongregions, with at least 70 dierent types
o taxes, many o which require monthly
debits and credits. Enorcement is noto-
riously inconsistent. For example, regula-
tory law requires products manuactured
in Brazil to be returned to their point
o origin or disposition. One electron-
ics manuacturer was excused rom
compliance in 009, then required to ol-
low the regulation in 010, and was once
again excused in 011.
In addition, companies must get alicense or a warehouse to ship to custom-
ers, and then goods can only fow rom
that warehouse, says Wally Shaw, Market
Group Supply Lead, Americas, or Philips
Consumer Liestyle. You cannot ship
rom an overfow warehouse; you have to
ship the goods back to the main licensed
warehouse, which is very inecient.
Limited Inrastructure: Brazil is best
considered as dierent countries inside
one country in terms o its inrastruc-
ture and markets. In the south and
southeast regions, there is a big satura-tion o providers, which generates more
competition and lower costs. The cen-
tral west, northern (Amazon area) and
northeast regions lack providers and
inrastructure, so costs are much higher.
Many companies work with independent
drivers who own their own trucks as a
cost ecient solution or transporting
Figure 11: Difcult Laws Top Mature-Market Shipper Challenges in Emerging Markets
Other
Lack of Free Trade Agreements/Free Trade Zones
Lack of Security
Lack of IT Capabilities
Corruption
Global Trade Compliance
Attracting and Retaining Good Local Staff
Inadequate Physical Infrastructure
Language Barriers
Complicated Tax Regimes
Ability to Deliver Against Promises/Agreed Service levels
Cultural Differences
Difficult Laws and Regulations50%
47%
42%
42%
32%
31%
30%
28%
20%
19%
19%
15%
42%
29%
55%
28%
20%
36%
34%
22%
22%
33%
21%
12%
3%
5% Shippers Based in Mature MarketsShippers Based in Emerging Markets
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
17EMERGInG MARkETS
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
18/52
low-cost products such as seeds and con-
struction materials, but its a challenge
or these independent truck drivers to
secure a steady volume. Brazils invest-
ment in ports and airports has been
limited over the past many years; a con-
sequence is that containers can sit in cer-
tain ports or weeks awaiting unloading.
Brazils government has resisted private
investment in inrastructure.
Trade Zone Tradeos: Free trade zones
such as Manaus encourage growth in
underdeveloped areas by attracting
large manuacturers, but also serve as anexample o how tax benets alone do not
translate into logistics eciency. Manaus
has one road in and out, which cannot
take heavy truck trac, orcing many
shippers to use air/water reight.
Political and Regulatory Obstacles: Like
many emerging markets, Brazil has its
share o political infuences that impact
supply chain eciency. For example,
Brazils customs and duty regulations
have created a protectionist market orsome goods.
Evolving Logistics Marketplace: Rapid
growth has ueled demand or outsourc-
ing, creating a ragmented marketplace
populated by a range o providers. Many
were started by individual truck drivers
who acquired more trucks and then even-
tually bought a warehouse, though Brazil
is also served by major national and inter-
national players. Many logistics provid-
ers are individual-unction oriented, with
ew integrated supply chain, value-added
oerings, says Mauricio Ferreira, Latin
America Supply Chain Director or Krat
Foods. A ragmented logistics inrastruc-
ture oten drives companies to maintain
higher inventory levels.
In Brazil we are ten hours away rom
the US by air and 11 hours rom the
main European cities by air. It takes 17
days navigation by water to Europe and
38 to 45 days to reach China ports with
direct service, says Gilberto Zanon,
Head o Industry Verticals, Brazil at
Panalpina. The longer lead times mean
planning to avoid stock-outs or excess
stock is a challenge that companies need
to overcome. Successul companies and3PLs work together to do this.
Like other emerging markets, Brazils com-
pelling rate o growth and potential or
improvement has convinced many compa-
nies that the obstacles are worth the invest-
ment. As one participant at the eyeortrans-
port workshop noted, emerging markets
have the opportunity to build on what the
developed markets have already done and
then leaprog over them. One example is
the pervasive use o cell phones or bank-ing purposes in some emerging markets.
Selecting a 3PL Partneror Emerging MarketsEntering any new market requires due dili-
gence; when its an emerging market, gain-
ing local insight is even more critical, since
conditions are oten evolving rapidly. 3PLs
can play a critical role in both the plan-
ning and execution o shippers entry and
growth in emerging markets.
Early in the process, shippers must ask
themselves: What type o 3PL partner do we
want? Is it best to seek out a local player with
intimate knowledge o local practices, or a
global partner with more resources to bear?
As seen in Figure 1, more than hal o
shippers based in both mature and emerg-
ing markets agree that a global 3PL coor-
dinating with a local 3PL is the most suc-
cessul operating model or 3PLs operating
with or within an emerging market. We
look or two dierent types o providers,
says Tony Xia, Senior Logistics Manager
with Emerson Electric. One must be big
enough to have good coverage and good
IT, good assets, and can help growth and
expand. The other type is niche players,where they are pretty good in a small piece
o logistics.
The ideal, many shippers say, is to nd a
global player with strong local knowledge.
When they dont nd these qualities avail-
able in emerging markets, the combina-
tion o global and local 3PLs is the next
best thing. Michael Keong, Director,
Regional Logistics Asia, Levi Strauss and
Company, noted, We need to ensure
3PLs have the right resources, contentexperts, etcetera, to understand the local
favor. A strong account manager who
understands the local area is important to
us. That person need not know it all, but
must have the right network to solve any
problems that break.
Shippers participating in the ASE work-
shops illustrated the value o local knowl-
edge: One shared the story o a global
company that established a supply ware-
house in China to US specications, only
to nd the unloading docks to be at the
wrong height or local supply trucks.
Another shipper ound its pallet shiters
Figure 12: Shippers See Global 3PLs with Local 3PL Partners as Most Successul
Shippers Based in Emerging Markets
Shippers Based in Mature Markets(with Operations in Emerging Markets)
Global 3PL Coordinating with a Locally Based 3PLGlobal 3PLLocally Based 3PL
58% 24% 18%
51% 22% 27%
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
18 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
19/52
did not work in the narrow-bodied air-
crat coming out o Panama.
Signs indicate that the combination o
global and local players is working; as seenin Figure 13 on page 0, shippers and
3PLs are pretty well aligned in what they
believe are the most important services
in emerging markets. Shippers primary
needs rom 3PLs in emerging markets are
visibility (77% o those based in emerging
markets, 81% o those based in mature
markets), expertise on the latest global
trade regulations (60% and 69%) and
managing and optimizing shipment rout-
ing based on ree trade agreement knowl-
edge (59% and 57%).
Visibility: With the added risk and uncer-
tainty o emerging markets, the impor-
tance o visibility to shippers is understand-
able. Delivering products in Russia is
complex, says Panalpinas Gaechter, and
visibility over where our customers prod-
ucts are and a reliable service to ensure
products arrive on time are two critical
aspects o our customers needs. This is no
dierent than, or example, China, where
lead-time rom actory to exporting port
can take many days. Visibility and reliabil-ity play a key role there as well, and excel-
ling in this is more dicult in emerging
markets than more mature markets.
Its highly important or service-centric
computer manuacturers to be able to
provide order-level tracking to customers,
says the Supply Chain Director or a large
computer company, and 3PLs need this
capability to provide visibility to customers.
Even better is a 3PL taking proactive steps
to resolve issues detected through visibility,which many 3PLs in emerging markets do
not do, he says.
Global Trade Regulations: As noted in
Figure 13, 3PLs active in emerging markets
concur with shippers rankings, with the
exception o providing expertise on the
latest global trade regulations. Shippers
ranked this as the second most important
service they would like to get, whereas 3PLs
in mature and emerging markets ranked it
somewhere in the middle.
Compliance: In emerging markets, many
shippers rely on 3PL expertise to navigate
import/export documentation, embargoed
products/countries screening and other
compliance services. It would be useul
or 3PLs to have better relationships with
customs ocers to ensure they have localinput, etcetera, said Levi Strauss Keong.
3PLs should engage more in customs
meetings and be the conduit to discuss
customer requirements.
Other Services Sought From 3PLsIn addition to those capabilities cited in the
survey, ASE workshop and ocus interview
participants concur that they would like to
see these additional qualities and capabili-
ties in 3PLs active in emerging markets:
Proactive Consulting Services: At the
ASE workshop held in Utrecht, shippers
concurred that the timing o 3PLs assis-
tance was also key. Very oten an initia-
tive to move into an emerging market
begins with the shipper conducting ini-
tial research because their 3PL partners
lack insight into that market. Then the
3PL ollows, ramping up its own investi-
gation. Shippers would like to see 3PLs
take a more proactive approach and
are willing to pay or it.
Local Insight and Expertise: Its the
lack o local expertise on the part o
global 3PLs without a strong local pres-
ence, such as the best way to move prod-
uct in that country, that drives ship-
pers to local 3PLs and other experts.
Shippers want creative, inormed ideas
to overcome local barriers, or example,
using a barge in Vietnam to circum-
vent road congestion, or overland or
cross-border trucking in India and
Bangladesh or even how to handlelocal events such as labor stoppages.
In one telecom companys emerging
markets experience, Logistics service
providers ail to come up with new logis-
tics solutions or improvements, says its
Head o Distribution. Any new solution
or idea is brought up ourselves. This is
where LSPs really ail.
Integrated Solutions: Shippers that want
to amass the requisite logistics services
and knowledge required or an integrat-
ed approach oten nd they must engage
multiple 3PLs because no single 3PL has
what they need. One ASE participant
related how his company was seeking
integrated warehouse and transporta-
tion services in an emerging market it
was entering, ideally with the warehouseslocated close to air hubs. But the 3PL
they wanted to work with was not set up
to accommodate the shippers needs.
Security: Shippers in emerging markets
expect 3PLs to address their security
concerns through measures such as
delivery trucks with GPS systems, engine
shut-down systems, and drivers trained
on security protocols.
Long-Term Commitment: Its also
important that 3PLs eorts be stra-
tegic, not tactical. 3PLs still lack a
longer term sustainable plan or com-
ing into a country, says Arun Salvi,
Logistics Manager Asia Pacic, or Shell
Lubricants. They are taking more o
a short-term approach to make pro-
its much quicker than they should be.
Global players end up being like the
local players, but with a oreign name,
because they have not invested properly
in inrastructure, people and processes.
All o these points can make or a dicult
environment and require 3PLs and ship-
pers to work closely together and with high
degrees o trust i success in emerging mar-
kets is to be achieved. This might be one
o the reasons people choose global 3PLs
working with local players.
Free-Trade Agreements and 3PLsA ree trade agreement (FTA) is a pact
between two or more countries or areas in
which they agree to lit most or all taris,quotas, special ees and taxes, and other
barriers to trade among them to allow
aster transactions and a higher volume o
business. According to the United Nations
Statistics Division, FTAs such as the
North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), the European Union (EU-
7) and the Organisation or Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD)
have made a denitive impact on growth
across sectors such as machinery, manuac-
tured goods and chemicals.
FTAs, ree trade zones (FTZ) and Special
Economic Zones (SEZ) have in turn ueled
19EMERGInG MARkETS
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
20/52
Figure 13: 3PLs Are Delivering on Shippers Emerging Market Needs
ProvidingFinancial Services(Such as Factoring)
Managing10+2 Filings
Screening forEmbargoed Countries and
Restricted Products
Maintaining aProduct Database forGlobal Classification
Establishing and/orManaging Operations
Within a Free Trade Zone
ProactiveComplianceConsulting
Managing and ValidatingExport/ImportDocumentation
Managing and OptimizingShipment Routing
Based on Free TradeAgreement Knowledge
Providing Expertiseon the Latest Global
Trade Regulations
Providing ShipmentVisibility
82%
46%
58%
74%
45%
46%
28%
34%
34%
12%
81%
69%
57%
70%
50%
37%
26%
29%
26%
11%
81%
48%
51%
64%
42%
41%
23%
23%
19%
14%
77%
60%
59%
58%
50%
38%
30%
21%
19%
17%
Shippers3PLs
Based in Emerging Markets Based in Mature Markets
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
20 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
21/52
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
22/52
Balancing long lead times with short product liecycles
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
23/52
Electronics products are oten the rock
stars o the consumer and business prod-
ucts worlds, with buyers eagerly anticipat-
ing the next release with the latest and
greatest eatures. But along with enviable
demand comes pressure to make products
smaller, aster, cooler and at a lower price
point. Some electronics products liecycles
closely resemble ashion: Whats in today
is out tomorrow. But even everyday devices
are eeling the heat. Everyone wants to pro-
duce the next iPad.
Hitting these targets demands a ast and
nimble supply chain. The challenges o
attaining this all into three major buckets:
global manuacturing and sourcing issues,
channel and network complexity and the
implications o an intricate, high-value
product set.
Electronics Manuacturing andSourcing Challenges
Electronics products liecycles are growingever shorter and margins tighter, increas-
ing pressure to lower costs and manage ma-
terial and suppliers more eciently. This
has triggered the ollowing trends in man-
uacturing and sourcing:
Asset Lightness: One industry trend
is toward ewer original equipment
manuacturers (OEMs) actually manu-
acturing, moving or storing their own
products. Many preer to engage both
contract manuacturers and third-partylogistics providers or these services. For
example, Sonys adoption o an asset
light philosophy prompted the com-
pany to sell o assets including a major
TV manuacturing acility in Mexico to
Foxconn Electronics in January, 010.
Emerging Markets Sourcing: Many
electronics companies have sought out
manuacturing and logistics partners
in emerging markets, a move which can
lower costs but at the same time create a
long, thin supply chain. Sourcing rom
emerging markets also oten means
insucient inrastructure and emerging
logistics capabilities, creating challenges
in expediting reight and maintaining
pipeline inventory, as well as increasing
supplier and global trade compliance
risks. 3PLs with experience in these mar-
kets can play a critical role in devising
strategies to overcome these obstacles.
Global Supply Chain Complexity and
Risk: Too many product lines and too
many components sourced rom too
many araway places creates a com-
plex, costly and long supply chain. As
seen in Figure 15 on page 4, supply
chain complexity and risk is the second-
highest-ranked challenge or shippers.
Figure 18 on page 30 reveals that 3PLs
are somewhat more condent in their
ability to help address this challenge
than shippers are (4% to %), per-
haps because more o the cost empha-
sis is on the product itsel and not the
logistics wrapped around it. An excep-
tion is Philips, which merged two divi-
sions, both selling to retail and at timesto the same customers, in an eort to
reduce complexity and lower its ware-
house count.
Make to Order/Make to Stock: A make
to order production strategy enables
electronics companies to customize
products such as computers to cus-
tomers exacting specications. Dell
achieved signicant supply chain rec-
ognition or its work toward its make to
order supply chain model. The majorityo electronics companies in the survey
(78%) agree that or most electron-
ics companies, a make to order supply
chain model may not always be as cost
eective as a make to stock model. It
can also lead to inventory obsolescence,
especially when product liecycles are
short. Dell maintains as many as six
supply chains. Business products are
made to order, but diering demand
requirements mean some move via air
reight while others leverage alternative
modes, according to a Supply Chain Digest
Webcast. Dells retail products are made
to stock and planned well in advance to
get products to market cost eectively
or peak seasons.
Complexity Iside ad Ot
Electronics
23ELECTROnICS
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
24/52
Figure 15: Price Pressure Tops Electronics Shippers Logistics Challenges
Pressure to ManufactureOnshore or Near Shore
Make/Configure to Order Products
High Obsolescence RatesAssociated with Stocked Product
High Product Throughput LevelsAssociated with New Product
Launches and Seasonal Demand
Data Integration and Synchronization
Short Product Lifecycles
Supply Chain Security
Service Parts Logistics, IncludingProduct Returns Processing
Supply Chain Disruptions
Volatile/Unpredictable Demand
Lack of Supply Chain Visibility
Global Supply Chain Complexityand Risk (Including Compliance)
Price Pressure to Reduce Operating Costs60%
60%
47%
37%
38%
54%
47%
44%
28%
40%
37%
24%
24%
59%
54%
41%
37%
36%
36%
35%
30%
30%
20%
17%
14%
13%
Shippers3PLs
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
24 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
25/52
The bottom line is that one size does
not t all, even within one electronics
company, due to varying market and cus-
tomer needs.
Postponement: A related strategy
avored by electronics manuacturers,
which both reduces inventory and pro-
vides a higher level o customization, is
postponing nal conguration, includ-
ing packaging, until the product is in or
close to the market where the product
will be consumed services that may be
perormed by 3PLs in these markets.
People want the benets o manuactur-
ing in China, but are doing more pack-
aging in the US, as well as light assembly
where possible, says Wally Shaw, Market
Group Supply Lead, Americas at Philips
Consumer Liestyle. This helps with
orecasting by reducing the number o
SKUs you are planning, and also helps
reduce cube in transportation by using a
bulk pack.
Price Pressure: Shippers view price
pressure to reduce operating costs as
their top logistics challenge (59%). One
increasingly common solution is to shit
rom a heavy emphasis on ast but costly
air reight to other modes according to
specic channel needs, but this requires
signicant advance planning. Nearly
two-thirds (65%) o electronics shippers
in the survey avor air reight over slower
modes to shorten supply chain transittime. 3PLs believe they can play a larger
role in helping electronics shippers
address this challenge than shippers do
(Figure 18, 38% vs. 8% o shippers).
Use o Contract Manuacturers as 3PLs:
The lines between industry groups are
blurring as contract manuacturers in
emerging markets oer services that
are more traditionally associated with
3PLs, a trend noted by about two-thirds
o shippers and 3PLs in the survey. Most
common services include transportation
management, warehousing and distri-
bution services and returns manage-
ment. Some contract manuacturers are
oering the more advanced services
typically provided by 3PLs, such as sup-
ply chain network design, logistics plan-
ning and consulting services. Contract
manuacturers see this as a logical
extension o their services and a higher-
margin opportunity. Discussions with
3PLs reveal that they do not see this as
a major threat yet, since logistics is their
core competency and they believe that
electronics companies will choose them
over contract manuacturers or complex
international logistics needs.
Environmental and Social
Sustainability: Like many industries,
electronics manuacturers are con-
cerned with CO2 emissions and uel
consumption, particularly with long sup-
ply chains. Manuacturing byproducts
such as lead rom printed circuit board
production are an additional concern;
70% o heavy metals in US landlls
come rom discarded electronics prod-
ucts, according to Supply Chain BrainsHigh Tech Outlook, February 011.
Companies and savvy 3PLs are get-
ting creative to solve materials and pack-
aging problems. Dell is trying protective
packaging made o bamboo and even
mushrooms and is scaling down package
sizes to t more on a pallet, according to
an April, 011, article inFortune.
Complex Networks and ChannelsThe electronics industry is notoriously
segregated, with multiple players involved
in the supply chain, not all o which are
marching to a common beat. These play-
ers include:
Component suppliers
Contract Manuacturers, Original
Design Manuacturers and Joint Ventures
Original Equipment Manuacturers/
Brand Owners
Distributors/Partners/Value-Added
Resellers
End Customers
Electronics is also a highly dynamic indus-
try: Technology changes so rapidly that
many companies are driven to ailure due
to their inability to keep up with changing
technologies. That in turn drives signi-
cant merger, acquisition, and divestiture
activity; Cisco alone has acquired more
than 145 companies in the last 18 years,according to the companys Web site.
Motorola recently split into a consumer
products company and a business and gov-
ernment products company while selling
o a division that makes network inra-
structure equipment.
Further complicating matters, electronics
companies sell into many vertical markets,
each with its own unique needs. Among
the most trying is retail, which oers
opportunity but also complexity to elec-tronics supply chains. Among the challeng-
es o interacting with retailers:
Inaccurate retail-level orecasts
Retailers risk tolerance
Exacting vendor compliance programs
with signicant penalties
Consumer electronics products oten
have a long lead time and a short prod-
uct cycle, which creates obsolescence or
excess stock
25ELECTROnICS
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
26/52
More than two-thirds o electronics com-
panies in the survey (73%) agree that
establishing a branded retail presence
themselves is a good way or consum-
er electronics manuacturers to driveincreased revenue.
Multiple layers, mashed-together supply
chains and the specic challenges o retail
channels introduce cost, saety stock, ore-
cast challenges and additional time into
logistics processes.
One impact can be seen in electron-
ics companies orecast accuracy, which
averages 60% to 70%. Chris Armbruster,
Senior Director, Business Transormation,
at Motorola Solutions, who participated in
the ASE workshop in Chicago, noted that
the vertically dis-integrated supply chain
common in electronics slows and oten
limits the sharing o orecasts, leading to
a bullwhip eect in inventory levels at both
the retail and sourcing levels, when chang-
es in supply or demand occur. Sharing
inormation on true demand more quickly
would result in improved orecasts and
reduced inventory levels. Electronics com-
panies must be agile to adapt to market
changes and unanticipated events, such asthe recent Japanese tsunami or earthquake
in China, and use demand sensing and
shaping to detect and infuence demand.
Another challenge is to design a common,
cost-ecient inrastructure across supply
chains. Lean is a common goal reducing
inventory, containing SKU prolieration,
and limiting xed assets, such as in Sonys
supply chain, described previously.
These challenges provide opportunity or3PLs to oer services such as visibility, set-
ting up inventory hubs in key locations,
helping to rationalize inventory across the
supply chain and nding ways to reduce
cycle time on transit legs. Fully 55% o
3PLs report that they can help electron-
ics companies redesign supply chain
networks, which can help them respond
to diering channel needs while shar-
ing common inrastructure and services
wherever cost eective. However, as seen
in Figure 17 on page 9, only 14% o ship-
pers use 3PLs or this service. To capture
more o this business, 3PLs need to invest
in understanding the customer at all lev-
els in the organization. An electronics
manuacturers Supply Chain Manager
participating in the ASE workshop in
Utrecht noted that in his experience some
3PLs lack the ability to eectively respond
to shippers organizational changes.
Consumer electronics products share
characteristics with ashion retail (veloc-
ity) and consumer products (short lie-
cycles, demand volatility, peak season
demands); 3PLs with experience in retail
and consumer products can also cross-pol-
linate best practices in product distribu-
tion and demand management with elec-
tronics companies.
High-Demand, High-Value ProductsElectronics companies build products peo-
ple want, with the latest, most in-demand
eatures that appeal to specic markets.
That makes them high valued and sub-
ject to thet, countereit and the whims o
consumer tastes. These are some o the
challenges this poses:
Visibility: Global supply chain visibility is
a clear priority or electronics shippers. In
Figure 15, its the third-most-cited logistics
challenge (41%). Electronics shippers in
the US rank this more highly than thosein Europe and Latin America, and larger
shippers place more importance on it than
smaller companies. Visibility is essential to
provide inventory availability and order sta-
tus to customers as well as to provide secu-
rity while in transit.
In Figure 16, 74% o electronics companies
cite visibility as the top service they would
like to see rom 3PLs, no matter the size or
location o the shipper. A leading comput-
er manuacturer, or example, has begunto pursue a model in which a 4PL manages
all o its 3PLs in a given country in order to
ensure visibility.
Figure 17 reveals that improved orecast-
ing and inventory visibility is the third
most-used cost-saving strategy by elec-
tronics companies, although curiously,
despite the act that 3PLs are ideally situ-
ated to provide visibility to customers,
both shippers and 3PLs report that 3PLs
are not very likely to be assisting in this
improvement process. Perhaps 3PLs are
providing sucient visibility, but work
needs to be done on the shipper side to
maximize its use.
74%o electronics companies cite
visibility as the top service they
would like to see rom 3PLs
26 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
27/52
Figure 16: Visibility Tops Services Electronics Companies Seek rom 3PLs
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
Software Loading/Flashing
Launch of New Product
Warranty Processing
Testing
Willingness to Own and Manage Inventory
Managing Global Production Supply
Lean/Six Sigma
Environmental Certifications Such as ISO 14000
Final Assembly/Configuration/Postponement
Facilitate Just in Time (JIT)Manufacturing/Kanban Systems
Kitting
Service Parts Logistics
Quality Certifications Such as ISO 9000
Experience with Local Product Regulations
Vendor Managed Inventory
Reverse Logistics
Supply Chain Security
Global Supply Chain Visibility 74%
56%
44%
40%
11%
6%
11%
7%
25%
12%
21%
19%
17%
12%
8%
15%
40%
38%
4%
8%
26%
11%
22%
15%
21%
9%
34%
27%
24%
32%
6%
11%
22%
9%
5%
8%
Important Today
Important in Near Future
27ELECTROnICS
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
28/52
Security: As seen in Figure 15, 35% o ship-
pers call security a supply chain challenge;
while thet o electronics goods has steadilydeclined over the past ve years, it still rep-
resents 1 in 5 thets across all industries,
according to FreightWatchs Annual Supply
Chain Survey. Figure 16 reveals that security
is the second most important capability
that electronics companies look or when
they hire 3PLs. Security is a particular pri-
ority in emerging markets which dont have
all o the protections available in mature
markets. Technologies can help, such as
covert and visible shipment tracking solu-
tions, GPS and engine shutdown systems,
as well as practices including driver train-
ing and use o transportation security com-
panies such as FreightWatch. As the results
indicate, shippers are looking to 3PLs to
enact these measures.
Countereiting: A related need is to com-
bat countereiting o goods through pre-
vention and detection; electronics compa-
nies must thoroughly vet their suppliers
and employ security measures or com-
ponent parts as well as nished goods.
Package seals with serial numbers are animportant anti-countereit measure. One
potential concept is to borrow e-pedigree
practices rom the pharmaceuticals indus-
try; 3PLs could provide the supply chain
integrity and manage the component pedi-
gree processes.
On-Board Intelligence: Electronics compa-
nies are beginning to tap the digital supply
chain or applications such as remote mon-
itoring and diagnosis. Diebold, or exam-
ple, enables predictive maintenance oATMs via an embedded device, according
to a company white paper. The company is
notied when a component is at risk o ail-
ure and dispatches a service repair person
with the correct part beore it ever aects a
user, reducing costs and increasing custom-
er service. 3PLs could act as the centralized
depot in this scenario to receive service
messages and send replacement parts.
Packaging: Shiny packaging or oten-del-
icate electronics products is designed to
attract customers, but oten requires outer
boxes to protect it. Electronics companies
are testing cost-reduction and sustainabil-
ity strategies such as using new protective
materials, including the mushrooms andbamboo mentioned on page 5, as well as
smaller packages and postponement o
light assembly and packaging to the desti-
nation market also a SKU reducer, and
an opportunity or 3PLs.
Many retailers place electronics cartons
right on the sales foor. I this packag-
ing is too thin, it is susceptible to damage,
and glossy coatings can be slick, causing
cartons to shit in transit and pallets to
collapse, damaging cartons and, poten-
tially, contents. Sony solved this problem
by improving shipment integrity through
the use o corner boards, banding, air bags
and improved shrink wrapping techniques.
Local Market Customization: Individual
markets come with their own appetites
and preerences, such as 0-volt electric
service in Europe and Asia with dierent
electrical outlets in dierent countries vs.
110-volt in The United Sates and Canada.
Regulation may also dictate specic design
eatures. 3PLs might help electronics com-panies with sotware downloads or minor
localization o the hardware, such as power
supply units, as well as insight into local
regulations and import/export require-
ments, especially in emerging markets.
Short Liecycles: Like ashion apparel,
many electronics products are made in
emerging countries such as China, Taiwan,
India and Brazil and consumed in US and
European markets. This means a relatively
long supply chain or liecycles that otenrun just six to 18 months, creating obsoles-
cence issues.
These short liecycles combined with
the challenges o accurately orecasting
demand also means inventory obsolescence
is a signicant problem or electronics
companies, particularly or make to stock.
The majority (69%) o electronics ship-
pers believe 3PLs can help them deal with
inventory obsolescence by proactively iden-
tiying slower moving items and items that
have been replaced with newer releases.
26%o shippers eel 3PLs can help
them improve distribution center
processes as a cost-saving
strategy, the top-ranked way
they believe 3PLs can assist
them in lowering costs
28 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
29/52
Figure 17: Electronics Companies Employ Many Logistics Cost Savings Methods
Employed More Fuel-Efficient Transport
Moved to a Make to Order Model
Improved Inventory Turns ThroughVendor Managed Inventory
Rationalized or Decreased the Number of SKUs
Implemented or Improved Logistics-RelatedInformation Technology Tools or Enablers
Improved Returns Management/Reverse Logistics Processes
Improved Shipment Density/Load Utilization
Redesigned Supply Chain Network
Switched to Multimodal or Slower Mode of Transport
Increased Outsourcing
Instituted Internal Training Programs to EncourageCost Effectiveness/Lean Behaviors
Renegotiated Rates for Warehouse Services
Improved Forecasting and Inventory Visibility
Improved Distribution Center Processes
Renegotiated Rates for Logistics Services63%
62%
57%
52%
49%
49%
48%
45%
39%
37%
18%
26%
10%
17%
10%
10%
19%
18%
14%
10%
47%
41%
37%
31%
22%
14%
16%
2%
6%
9% Our Company Uses
Assisted by 3PLs
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
29ELECTROnICS
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
30/52
Figure 18: More 3PLs Than Shippers Believe 3PLs Can Help with Challenges
Other
Pressure to ManufactureOnshore or Near Shore
Make/Configure to Order Products
High Obsolescence RatesAssociated with Stocked Product
Short Product Lifecycles
High Product Throughput LevelsAssociated with New Product
Launches and Seasonal Demand
Volatile/Unpredictable Demand
Data Integration and Synchronization
Supply Chain Disruptions
Service Parts Logistics, IncludingProduct Returns Processing
Supply Chain Security
Global Supply Chain Complexity andRisk (Including Compliance)
Lack of Supply Chain Visibility
Price Pressure to Reduce Operating Costs38%
39%
42%
32%
43%
27%
17%
16%
26%
14%
13%
11%
13%
28%
24%
22%
21%
20%
17%
13%
11%
9%
4%
4%
2%
0%
1%
0%Shippers3PLs
Source: 2012 16th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study
30 2012 16Th AnnuAL ThIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS STuDY
-
8/2/2019 21.10Third Party Logistics-Studie 2012
31/52
3PLs could help to identiy at risk inven-
tory in the warehouses that they manage,
as well as arrange intermodal and other
consolidation services to increase the sup-
ply chain velocity without dramatically
increasing transportation costs. You need
a very good level o integration to be adap-
tive and fexible to cope with these shorter
lie cycles, says Tony Xia, Sr. Logistics
Manager with Emerson Electric.
When inventoried items become obsolete,
58% o electronics shippers in the survey
agree that online auctions are an impor-
tant means or electronics companies to
reclaim some value. Facilitating online
inventory disposition is the next logical
step in a 3PL value-added service oering.
A number o electronics companies use
FreeFlow, provider o online private mar-
ketplaces and auctions, to sell at-risk inven-
tory through secure channels or each
stage o the inventory aging process.
The Role o 3PLsAs seen throughout this chapter, electron-
ics companies avor outsourcing in both
manuacturing and logistics services.
Thats especially true in emerging markets.
Yet there is a clear gap between the services
3PLs are currently providing and the addi-
tional value they could provide.
As seen in Figures 15 and 18, electronics
shippers give low marks to 3PLs ability to
solve their top logistics challenges. The
largest gaps occur on their highest pri-orities: 59% call price pressure to reduce
operating costs their top challenge, while
just 8% believe 3PLs can help them with
this challenge. A similar gap is revealed
in 3PLs ability to help electronics com-
panies with global supply chain complex-
ity and risk, including compliance. 3PLs
themselves also see a gap, albeit smaller,
between these challenges and their involve-
ment in helping their customers with these
challenges.
The same is true in top savings methods
used by electronics companies in Figure 17;
there are signicant gaps between strate-
gies used and assistance by 3PLs in those
eorts, conrmed by 3PLs themselves.
At the ASE workshop in Utrecht, one con-
tract manuacturer shed some light on
one o the reasons shippers may not seek
to undertake problem-solving with 3PLs.
They do not bring cost reductions and
a lean approach to the table very oten,
he said. They will do only what they are
asked to do; they do not proactively oer
many value-added services.
Its clear in Figure 18 that 3PLs see oppor-
tunities to support shippers in ways elec-
tronics shippers themselves do not. Both
sides need to meet in the middle: 3PLs
need do a better job in selling the quality
and value o their capabilities to electron-
ics customers, and shippers need to be
more open to collaborating with 3PLs to
address their top challenges.
Generally speaking, electronics shippers
view 3PLs as skilled and capable at un-
damental