2019 michigan soybean performance report
TRANSCRIPT
Putting Your Checkoff To Work
Michigan Soybean Promotion CommitteePO Box 287
Frankenmuth, Michigan 48734
The 2019 Michigan Soybean Performance Report is a result of a cooperative effort of Michigan State University, Michigan State University Extension and the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This information will help you to make informed critical choices for your 2020 soybean crop. Publication and distribution of this report is provided by checkoff funds through the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This data can be accessed electronically at www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean and in a searchable database at www.soybeanyielddata.msu.edu.
Extension Bulletin E2947 • 12-19
Fellow Soybean Producers,
The selection of the best soybean varieties for your farm is likely to be the most critical decision to impact your soybean yields. To inform your decision, this report contains the most complete source of unbiased yield comparisons from across the state.
The investment of checkoff funds in this publication is an example of our mission to “Manage checkoff resources to increase return on investment for Michigan soybean farmers while enhancing sustainable soybean production”. We feel confident in the value of this resource and hope that it proves as a valuable resource for your farm.
We wish you a safe and profitable 2020 season.
Sincerely,Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee Directors
District #1 Sarah Peterson, Niles District #2 Pete Crawford, Dansville District #3 Laurie Isley, Palmyra District #4 Dennis Gardner, CroswellDistrict #5 Mike Sahr, Saginaw District #6 Mark Senk, OwossoDistrict #7 Steve Koeman, Hamilton
**Jan and Scott: Wording for front Cover of the 2018 Performance Report. The logo embedded here is the most current logo to use. We will not be mailing to individuals this year. We are needing 250 printed and shipped to Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee and 250 printed and shipped to MSU for a total of 500. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION 2018 Michigan Soybean Performance Report "Putting Your Checkoff to Work" The 2018 Michigan Soybean Performance Report is a result of a cooperative effort of Michigan State University, Michigan State University Extension and the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This information will help you to make informed critical choices for your 2019 soybean crop. Publication and distribution of this report is provided by checkoff funds through the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This data can be accessed electronically at www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean and in a searchable database at www.soybeanyielddata.msu.edu.
add in Soy Ink logo Cover pic – provided by MSU Extension Bulletin E2947 ● 11/16 – needs to be updated by MSU
**Jan: Letter for back cover of 2018 Performance Report. Keep the mail panel at the bottom 1/3 of the page the same as last year’s.
Fellow Soybean Producers, The selection of the best soybean varieties for your farm is likely to be the most critical decision to impact your soybean yields. To inform your decision, this report contains the most complete source of unbiased yield comparisons from across the state. The investment of checkoff funds in this publication is an example of our mission to “Manage checkoff resources to increase return on investment for Michigan soybean farmers while enhancing sustainable soybean production”. We feel confident in the value of this resource and hope that it proves as a valuable resource for your farm. We wish you a safe and profitable 2019 season. Sincerely, Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee Directors District #1 Sarah Peterson, Niles District #2 Pete Crawford, Dansville District #3 Laurie Isley, Palmyra District #4 Dennis Gardner, Croswell District #5 Mike Sahr, Saginaw District #6 Alan Moore, Bannister District #7 Steve Koeman, Hamilton
2019 Michigan SoybeanPerformance Report
Goldenview Farms, St. Joseph, MI
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 2 - - 19 -
**Jan and Scott: Article for the blank page. Carry over soybean seed: dead, alive or somewhere between? By: Mark Seamon, Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee Research Coordinator
One of the tales from the 2019 growing season is that some seed did not get planted as planned. Many farms have carried soybean seed over with intentions to plant it in 2020. A few bags or partial boxes of seed have been planted a year after they were purchased with good results, but the quantity of seed, and its value, carried over from 2019 suggests that we manage it more carefully.
The first step in managing this carryover seed is to figure out how much of it is still viable. Not only is it important to determine if it is still live seed, but if it has vigor to make a successful productive soybean plant. While we all hope for ideal conditions at planting, it more likely that the seeds that are put in the ground will need to survive through some challenges. Jim Palmer, Michigan Crop Improvement Association, suggests submitting seed samples for both warm and cold germination tests. “This will gauge seed performance in less than ideal conditions,” Jim shared. These two tests require a two-pound seed sample and about two weeks to analyze.
When sampling carryover seed be sure to take a representative sample. This means taking seed from multiple bags or reaching deeply into seed boxes or tote bags. Samples can be taken anytime, as the biggest changes in seed quality have already happened between when it was harvested, maybe as long as 16 months ago, and now. Keep in mind that this seed was harvested in the fall of 2018, which included some challenging conditions leading to seed quality issues. The quality of seed is at its highest point when it dries down naturally in the pod. After that time it does not improve - the quality only decreases.
A few suggestions for getting the most of carryover soybean seed are: • Know both warm and cold germination rates • Increase planting rate to adjust for decreased germination rate and/or vigor • Plant into good conditions (warm soil, minimum residue) • Handle as little as possible (to avoid seed damage)
Some growers have used a home germination test in wet paper towels to get an idea of seed viability. This should be used at a minimum, as it may only give you best-case scenario results since the seed is germinated indoors in warm conditions.
The fact that the seed is treated is not a good indicator of whether it will perform well a year later than it was intended to be used. Some seed-applied pesticides can negatively affect seed quality after a year of storage while others may improve seed performance. Conversely, untreated seed cannot be assumed to be high quality after being stored for extended periods.
Managing seed quality before planting will help to avoid problems such as a replant situation that would take a couple of weeks after planting to diagnose. There will be enough challenges in profitably producing crops in 2020, so let’s take proactive steps to minimize the negative and maximize the positive.
Here is the contact information for the Michigan Crop Improvement Association: Phone 517 332-3546, [email protected], www.michcrop.com To mail: MCIA Seed Lab, P.O.Box 21008, Lansing, MI 48909 To ship: MCIA Seed Lab, 2901 West Jolly Road, Okemos, MI 48864
2019 MICHIGAN SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE
REPORT D. WANG, R.G. LAURENZ, R. STOUTENBURG,
DEPT. OF PLANT SOIL & MICROBIAL SCIENCES This report provides information on the performance of Conventional, Liberty Link, and Roundup Ready soybean varieties in Michigan in 2019. The presentation of data for the entries tested does not suggest approval or endorsement of varieties by Michigan State University. This data is posted at https://varietytrials.msu.edu/.
TESTING PROCEDURES
Eight trials are reported here. The Central locations for the Conventional, Roundup Ready and Liberty Link trials include test sites in Allegan, Gratiot, Saginaw and Sanilac Counties. The Southern locations for the Conventional, Liberty Link and Roundup Ready trials include test sites in Hillsdale, Ingham, Lenawee, and St. Joseph (irrigated) Counties. Twenty-one seed companies entered a total of 194 commercial varieties. There are many new products in the trials this year. Since varieties that contain Enlist and GT27 herbicide resistant traits were deregulated, we were able to include those lines in the trials. The cooperators, planting dates, harvest dates, and other site details for the locations are listed below. Seed was planted in 6-row plots, 20 feet long with 15-inch row spacing, at a depth of 1.5-inches. The planting rate was 160,000 seeds/acre. At each location, varieties were replicated four times in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). All locations were planted to 16 feet with 4 foot alleys that were not trimmed. Only the center four rows were harvested. Experimental design, data management, and data analysis were conducted with AGROBASE Generation II, (Agronomix Software, Inc., Winnipeg, Canada).
TEST SITE INFORMATION Allegan County Nearest city: Wayland Cooperator: Jim Wykoski Planting date: 5-17-19 Harvest Date: 11-9-19 Previous Crop: Corn Soil Type: Colwood Silt Loam Fertilizer: 50 lb/A DAP, 50 lb/A AMS, 110lb/A potash, 11.5 lb/A micronutrients Herbicides: Preemergent 12 oz/A Authority MTZ, 1.5 pt/A Medal II Postemerge 5 oz/A Assure II-over entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trial- 1 qt/A Basagran, 5 oz/A Raptor Roundup Ready Trials- 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax Gratiot County Nearest city: Breckenridge Cooperator: John Hardman Planting date: 5-16-19 Harvest date: 12-23-19 Previous crop: Corn Soil type: Parkhill Loam Fertilizer: none Herbicides: Preemerge Lorox 1.5 lb/A, 1.5 pt/A Medal II Postemerge 5 oz/A Assure II over entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trials- 1 qt/A Basagran, Roundup Ready Trials – 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax 5 oz/A Ingham County Nearest city: Mason Cooperator: MSU Planting date: 6-7-19 Harvest date: 11-5-19 Previous crop: Corn Soil type: Loam Fertilizer: none Herbicides: Preemerge 12 oz/A Authority MTZ, 1.5 pt/A Medal II- over the entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trials- 1 qt/A Basagran, 5 oz/A Raptor Roundup Ready Trials – 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax Hillsdale County Nearest city: Reading Planting date: We were unable to plant this location, due to excessive rainfall. Lenawee County Nearest city: Britton Cooperator: David & Jason Woods Planting date: 6-9-19 Harvest date: 11-7-19 Previous crop: Soybeans Soil type: Sandy Clay Loam Fertilizer: 250lb/A K2O
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 3 -
Herbicides: Preemerge 12 oz/A Authority MTZ, 1.5 pt/A Medal II-Over the entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trials- 1 qt/A Basagran, 5 oz/A Raptor Roundup Ready Trials – 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax Saginaw County Nearest city: Saginaw Cooperator: Tom Hoff Planting date: 6-8-19 Harvest date: 10-20-19 Previous crop: Corn Soil type: Clay Loam Fertilizer: 200lb/A Potash Herbicides: Preemerge 12 oz/A Authority MTZ, 1.5 pt/A Medal II- over the entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trials- 1 qt/A Basagran, 5 oz/A Raptor Roundup Ready Trials – 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax 5 oz/A Assure II Sanilac County Nearest city: Sandusky Planting date: We were unable to plant this location, due to excessive rainfall. St. Joseph County - Irrigated Nearest city: Mendon Cooperator: Roger and Anne Gentz and Family Planting date: 6-7-19 Harvest date: 10-25-19 Previous crop: Seed Corn Soil type: Oshtemo Fertilizer: 200 lb/A 0-0-60 Variable Rate Spread Herbicides: Preemerge 12 oz/A Authority MTZ, 1.5 pt/A Medal II over the whole field Conventional & Liberty Link Trials- 1 qt/A Basagran, 5 oz/A Raptor Roundup Ready Trials – 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax LIBERTY LINK TRIAL
The Central Liberty Link soybean varieties were tested in Allegan, Gratiot, Saginaw and Sanilac Counties. The South Liberty Link soybean varieties were tested in Hillsdale, Ingham, Lenawee, and St. Joseph Counties. Both trials were treated with conventional herbicides as noted in test site information.
GROWING CONDITIONS / COMMENTS
Wet conditions plagued the planting season and many fields did not get planted, including 2 of our test sites. According to USDA statistics, as of June 16th, only 53% of Michigan soybeans were planted compared to the 94% average over the last five years. After the very wet spring, most of the summer growing season was dry. This resulted in shorter plants and reduced lodging.
Rain, again, restricted the harvest season. Wet conditions delayed harvest in many areas. As of November 4th, 2019, only 57% of soybeans grown in Michigan were harvested (USDA-NASS). At the time of printing this report, the Gratiot county trial has not been harvested.
USING THE DATA
Results are presented in Tables 1 through 8. Yield: Yield is expressed as bushels per acre at 13% moisture and is reported as single and across site averages for 2019. Two and three year means are also presented when applicable. Height: Plant height, reported in inches, was measured at maturity from the soil surface to the tip of the main stem. The reported values are means of 4 reps at all sites. Lodging: Lodging scores reflect the erectness of the plants before harvest. The reported values are means of 4 reps at all sites. Ratings are based on the following scale: 1= Almost all plants are erect. 2= All plants leaning slightly, or fewer than 25% of the plants are down. 3= All plants leaning moderately (45%), or 25% to 50% of the plants are down. 4= All plants leaning considerably, or 50% to 80% of the plants are down. 5= Almost all plants are down. Protein and Oil Content: Protein and oil content of the seed was determined using near-infrared reflectance and is expressed on a DRY MATTER basis (previous years were reported as 13% moisture basis). The analysis was done on seed from all 4 replications from the Gratiot location for the central trial and the Ingham location for the southern trial. Phytophthora Resistance: Information on the presence of Phytophthora resistance genes was provided by the organizations entering varieties. Varieties denoted with:
• 1a are resistant to phytophthora Races 1, 2, 10, 11, 13-20, 24, 26 & 27.
• 1b are resistant to Races 1, 3-9, 13, 15, 18, 21, & 22. • 1c are resistant to Races 1-3, 6-11, 13-15, 17, 21,
23, 24 & 26. • 1k are resistant to Races 1-11, 13-15, 17, 18, 20-24
& 26. • 3 are resistant to Races 1-5, 8 and 9. • 6 are resistant to Races 1-4, 10, 12, 14-16, 18-21 &
25. • 7 are resistant to Races 12, 16, 18 & 19.
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean
MSU is an affirmative-action, equal-opportunity institution. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status. Issued in furtherance of MSU Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Thomas C. Coon, Extension Director, Michigan State University, E. Lansing, MI 48824.This information is for educational purposes only. Reference to commercial products or trade names does not imply endorsement by MSU Extension or bias against those not mentioned. This bulletin becomes public property upon publication and may be reprinted verbatim as a separate or within another publication with credit to MSU. Reprinting cannot be used to endorse or advertise a commercial product.
- 4 -
Comparing Soybean Varieties Has Never Been Easier!
Soybeanyielddata.msu.edu
3 Sort by location
3 Compare specific brands
3 Select by resistance traits
3 Limit the range of maturities
3 View only the top varieties
3 Use the statistical data for validity
Soybean Cyst Nematode Resistance (SCN): Seed companies that screen varieties for SCN resistance have indicated if the variety has known susceptibility or resistance:
• R – Resistant • MR – Moderately Resistant • MS – Moderately Susceptible • S – Susceptible
These notations followed by a number indicate the identified cyst nematode race.
SELECTING A VARIETY
LSD (least significant difference, found at the bottom of each data column) values are useful when comparing two varieties in the same table. If the difference between two varieties is less than the LSD value, this difference is probably due to chance or minor environmental differences. However, if the difference between two varieties is greater than the LSD, there is a 95% or greater probability that the difference in performance is due to the greater yield potential of one variety. Valid comparisons can only be made between averages in the same column. The C.V. (coefficient of variation, found at the bottom of each data column) is indicative of the trial precision. Lower C.V. values indicate more precise trials. The primary consideration in selecting a variety is yield. When evaluating a variety, consider yield performance over locations and across several years, if available. Considerations other than yield are also important in selecting a variety. It is especially important to select a variety that will mature before the first frost in the fall. The degree of lodging varies among varieties. Lodging ratings should be used to evaluate potential harvest losses. Growers who have experienced lodging in the past and have had harvest problems may want to select a more lodging-resistant variety. Alternatively, a variety susceptible to lodging may be planted at a slightly lower population to increase standability. Growers should note seed size when selecting planting rates. Planting rates should be based on number of seeds per acre and not on pounds per acre. It often benefits growers to select a few good varieties for planting each year. Yield determination and careful field evaluation during the growing season will add to the grower’s knowledge of variety performance and allow for better selection.
SEED TREATMENT Treated soybean seed submitted for Michigan State University’s Soybean Performance Trials are noted by abbreviation in the ‘TMT’ column. Questions concerning treatments should be directed to the seed company. Contact information can be found in the ‘Directory of Companies’. Code Treatment • AA AgArmour • ACL Acceleron • AGR Agrishield Max • ALL Allegiance • AM Apron Maxx (Maxim) • AM-C Apron Maxx & Cruiser • Clar Clariva • CM Cruiser Maxx • D DFender • Ecl-US-Q EclipseUS quad IM • EG EverGolEnergy • ENC Encase • ESC Escalate • EQ Equity VIP • G Gaucho • I ILeVO (BayerCropScience) • MER Mertect • N NForce • NS NemaStrike • N-H Inhibit • O Optimize • P Poncho • PA PA2030 • R Redigo • SmartCote S SmartCote Supreme • SS SureStand • Vib Vibrance • V Votivo
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 5-
BRAND COMPANY NAME AND ADDRESS BRAND COMPANY NAME AND ADDRESS
AG AMOUR AG Armour Seeds Inc. MCIA Michigan Crop Improvement Assn.8236 N. Williams Rd. 2905 Jolly Rd. St. Johns, MI 48879 Okemos, MI 48864 www.ag.armourseeds.com www.michcrop.com
CREDENZ BASF NATURE’S Citizens LLC2 TW Alexander Drive, GENETICS 421 N Cochran Ave.Durhamn, NC 27709 Charlotte, MI 48813www.agriculture.basf.com www.citizenselevator.com
DF SEEDS DF Seeds, LLC DYNA-GRO Nutrien Ag Solutions P.O BOX 159 4648 S. Garfield Rd.Dansville, MI 48819 Auburn, MI 48611www.dfseeds.com www.dynagroseed.com
FS HiSOY® Growmark, Inc. RENK SEED Renk Seed1701 Towanda Ave 6809 Willburn Rd.Bloomington, IL 61701 Sun Prairie, WI 53590www.fsseeds.com www.Renkseed.com
GOLDEN Syngenta Seeds Inc. RUPP Rupp Seeds, Inc.HARVEST 11055 Wayzata Blvd. 17919 Co. Rd. B
Minnetonka, MN 55440 Wauseon, OH 43567www.syngenta.com www.ruppseeds.com
HDC Hensall Co-op SEED Seed Consultants Inc.1 Davidson Drive CONSULTANTS 648 Miami Trace Rd. SWHensall, ON N0M1XO Washington Court House, OH 43160www.hensallco-op.ca www.seedconsultants.com
KEY AGRA Solutions LLC SEVITA Sevita International23778 Jennings Delphos Rd. INTERNATIONAL 595570 Hwy 59, R.R. #6Delphos, OH 45833 Woodstock, ON N4S 7W1www.agrasolutions.com www.sevita.com
LEGACY Legacy Seeds, Inc. SPECIALTY Specialty HybridsPO Box 68-290 Depot St. 306 N Main St.Scandinavia, WI 54977 Monticello, IN 47960www.legacyseeds.com www.specialtyhybrids.com
LG SEEDS LG Seeds WELLMAN Wellman Seeds, Inc.9915 W M21 23778 Delphos Jennings Rd.Ovid, Mi 4886 Delphos, OH 45833 www.legendseeds.net www.wellmanseeds.com
LOCAL Local Seed Company ZFS Zeeland Farm Services, Inc.SEED 802 Rozelle Street 2525 84th Avenue
Mephis, TN 38104 Zeeland, MI 49464 www.localseed.com www.zfsinc.com
M&W M&W Seeds Inc.8443 Wilcox Rd.Eaton Rapids, MI 48827www.mwseeds.com
2019 DIRECTORY OF COMPANIES
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 6 -
Mat
urity
Phyt
oAp
hid
2019
18-1
917
-19
BR
AND
VAR
IETY
Gro
upTM
T1R
esSC
NR
esAV
GAV
GAV
GAl
lega
nG
ratio
tSa
gina
wH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
nO
ilAG
Arm
our S
eeds
AA 1
914
N1.
9Ag
Arm
our
R60
.7
70
.455
.756
.032
1.5
38.0
21.9
AG A
rmou
r See
dsAA
211
4 N
2.1
Ag A
rmou
r1k
MR
65.4
72.6
66.9
56.7
321.
138
.220
.3AG
Arm
our S
eeds
AA 2
214
N2.
2Ag
Arm
our
1aR
63.4
74.7
58.5
56.9
351.
739
.519
.9D
F Se
eds
DF
155
F2.
5D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
64.5
63.7
62.6
78.4
58.7
56.3
341.
540
.320
.8D
F Se
eds
DF
187
N1.
8D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
62.6
64.9
63.1
68.2
62.2
57.4
311.
440
.619
.9D
F Se
eds
DF
210
N2.
1D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R66
.9
74
.5*6
9.6
56.6
321.
437
.921
.7D
F Se
eds
DF
227
N2.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1a
R63
.668
.866
.673
.059
.957
.934
1.8
38.2
20.3
DF
Seed
sD
F 26
0 N
2.6
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
69.2
76.1
68.1
63.5
331.
636
.522
.4D
yna-
Gro
See
dS2
207N
2.2
Eq,C
lar
1aM
R63
.968
.066
.668
.565
.358
.034
1.6
38.8
20.1
Dyn
a-G
ro S
eed
S240
9N2.
4Eq
,Cla
rR
65.6
73.0
60.9
63.0
311.
138
.220
.9H
ensa
ll C
o-op
HD
C A
dare
1.5
Vib,
O**
****
61.6
331.
1**
**H
ensa
ll C
o-op
HD
C B
lake
1.9
Vib,
O**
****
50.5
341.
1**
**LG
See
dsC
2300
2.3
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
1aR
62.9
66.4
67.7
64.0
56.9
331.
437
.820
.3LG
See
dsLG
S201
02.
0Ag
riShi
eld
Max
, I1a
R60
.871
.355
.755
.532
1.1
36.6
21.5
LG S
eeds
LGS2
765
2.7
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
R63
.468
.371
.958
.260
.032
1.3
37.7
21.0
MSU
E120
76T
2.9
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R67
.969
.566
.878
.164
.261
.334
1.6
37.8
20.9
MSU
E120
76T-
032.
4D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
*69.
9*8
2.5
65.7
61.6
331.
638
.120
.7M
SUE1
3100
-03
2.5
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R63
.875
.058
.857
.735
1.4
39.1
21.5
MSU
E132
681.
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1c
62.2
63.2
63.3
73.5
57.0
56.2
301.
236
.721
.4M
SUE1
4077
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
65.4
69.2
67.0
76.4
60.1
59.7
351.
439
.521
.0M
SUE1
5339
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R68
.473
.070
.678
.561
.865
.034
1.9
37.2
21.4
MSU
E153
452.
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
68.2
72.8
69.8
77.9
60.3
*66.
335
2.0
37.1
20.8
MSU
E153
472.
5D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
62.7
68.2
66.5
67.6
60.2
60.4
331.
437
.421
.0M
SUE1
5351
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R64
.066
.565
.971
.759
.061
.333
1.4
37.3
20.6
MSU
E159
012.
3D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
RR
60.3
68.2
56.7
55.9
311.
239
.719
.7M
SUE1
6189
2.8
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1c63
.768
.471
.760
.259
.141
2.2
40.4
19.8
MSU
E162
662.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
RR
68.1
66.1
68.7
**57
.033
1.2
37.5
21.3
MSU
E163
802.
8D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R68
.571
.274
.169
.462
.034
1.1
36.7
21.3
MSU
E163
872.
6D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R66
.370
.171
.7**
60.8
321.
136
.221
.2M
SUE1
6410
2.8
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
66.4
69.5
76.9
63.5
58.7
341.
337
.421
.7M
SUE1
7004
2.3
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
61.9
74.1
55.9
55.6
321.
239
.120
.8M
SUE1
7054
2.1
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R65
.778
.4**
57.9
321.
439
.620
.0M
SUE1
7062
2.7
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
62.6
72.8
56.4
58.5
341.
839
.620
.6M
SUE1
7069
3.0
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R67
.577
.7**
60.8
412.
441
.619
.8M
SUE1
7167
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R63
.576
.855
.658
.238
1.6
39.2
21.4
MSU
E171
842.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
64.9
73.0
61.8
59.8
361.
839
.321
.4M
SUE1
7203
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R69
.881
.865
.162
.633
1.3
39.2
20.9
MSU
E172
052.
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
I65
.574
.262
.360
.036
1.5
37.6
21.9
MSU
E172
272.
3D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
62.9
70.9
57.6
60.2
341.
237
.821
.5M
SUE1
7269
2.1
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R61
.366
.960
.756
.232
1.3
37.4
20.8
MSU
E172
742.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
60.6
71.0
52.2
58.5
352.
138
.019
.9M
SUE1
7275
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R68
.177
.964
.961
.434
2.3
38.7
19.8
TAB
LE 1
. 20
19 M
ICH
IGAN
CEN
TRAL
CO
NVE
NTI
ON
AL S
OYB
EAN
VAR
IETY
TR
IAL
REP
OR
T YI
ELD
(BU
/AC
)20
19 A
VER
AGE
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 7 -
Mat
urity
Phyt
oAp
hid
2019
18-1
917
-19
BR
AND
VAR
IETY
Gro
upTM
T1R
esSC
NR
esAV
GAV
GAV
GAl
lega
nG
ratio
tSa
gina
wH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
nO
il
TAB
LE 1
. 20
19 M
ICH
IGAN
CEN
TRAL
CO
NVE
NTI
ON
AL S
OYB
EAN
VAR
IETY
TR
IAL
REP
OR
T YI
ELD
(BU
/AC
)20
19 A
VER
AGE
MSU
E172
832.
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
67.0
78.3
66.5
56.1
311.
239
.720
.2M
SUE1
7506
T2.
3D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
59.8
67.0
51.3
61.0
351.
739
.520
.2M
SUE1
7508
3.0
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R61
.170
.857
.255
.328
1.0
40.0
21.3
MSU
E175
202.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I58
.367
.156
.651
.232
1.2
37.4
21.3
MSU
E175
452.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I59
.668
.6**
51.6
311.
137
.822
.3M
SUE1
7550
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
58.1
67.1
55.2
52.0
341.
237
.421
.4M
SUE1
7801
-08
2.9
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
51.3
63.6
47.0
43.2
341.
639
.419
.5M
SUE1
7808
-01
2.0
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
52.4
62.4
46.8
48.1
341.
439
.721
.5N
atur
e's
Gen
etic
sN
at G
en 2
.42.
5V
54.3
63.8
**47
.632
1.5
42.4
19.8
Nat
ure'
s G
enet
ics
Nat
. Gen
. 192
62.
4V
63.0
64.0
75.2
58.6
55.2
341.
339
.621
.3Se
vita
Inte
rnat
iona
lC
ando
r1.
9U
ntre
ated
52.5
59.3
48.8
49.3
291.
242
.419
.8Ze
elan
d Fa
rm S
ervi
ces
e12H
902
1.2
R51
.354
.251
.848
.026
1.2
40.6
22.0
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
se1
3H98
81.
31k
R54
.660
.952
.350
.527
1.1
41.0
21.9
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
sZF
S 13
262.
6Ec
l-US-
Q, N
R65
.168
.667
.171
.361
.662
.433
1.8
39.6
20.3
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
sZF
S 17
161.
6Ec
l-US-
Q, N
R57
.959
.060
.168
.051
.254
.629
1.3
41.0
20.1
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
sZF
S 17
191.
9Ec
l-US-
Q, N
1kR
58.6
59.8
61.4
63.6
57.1
55.1
311.
038
.320
.8Ze
elan
d Fa
rm S
ervi
ces
ZFS
1821
2.1
Ecl-U
S-Q
, N1k
R66
.669
.978
.763
.457
.634
1.0
37.7
20.7
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
sZF
S 19
25H
O2.
5Ec
l-US-
Q, N
R52
.158
.650
.047
.636
1.4
40.6
21.5
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
sZF
S 19
30H
O3.
0Ec
l-US-
Q, N
R49
.556
.347
.744
.636
1.8
40.1
20.0
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
sZF
S 20
25H
O2.
5Ec
l-US-
Q, N
R55
.661
.453
.552
.033
1.3
41.0
20.6
GR
AND
MEA
N62
.071
.258
.956
.833
1.4
38.8
20.9
Max
. 69
.982
.569
.666
.341
2.4
42.4
22.4
Min
. 49
.554
.246
.843
.226
1.0
36.2
19.5
LSD
(0.0
5)4.
87.
06.
55.
22.
80.
42.
20.
7C
V (%
)6.
05.
96.
65.
59.
031
.63.
42.
01 Se
ed T
reat
men
t: Se
e 'S
eed
Trea
tmen
t' pa
ragr
aph
(und
er 'U
sing
the
Dat
a') f
or p
rodu
ct c
ode
* H
igh
yiel
d in
plo
tPr
otei
n an
d oi
l are
bas
ed o
n dr
y m
atte
r**
Insu
ffici
ent d
ata
Mic
higa
n St
ate
Uni
vers
ity v
arie
ties
are
expe
rimen
tal
Top
1/3
of tr
ial i
s B
old
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 8 -
TABL
E 2.
201
9 M
ICHI
GAN
SO
UTH
CONV
ENTI
ONA
L SO
YBEA
N VA
RIET
Y TR
IAL
REPO
RT
Mat
urity
Phyt
oAp
hid
2019
18-1
917
-19
BRAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
TMT1
RES
SCN
Res
AVG
AVG
AVG
Lena
wee
St. J
osep
hH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
n O
ilD
F Se
eds
DF
155
F2.
5D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
S64
.165
.565
.565
.762
.534
1.9
38.2
22.2
DF
Seed
sD
F 26
0 N
2.6
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
*74.
1
*7
9.7
68.5
312.
334
.623
.5D
F Se
eds
DF
278
N2.
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
73.8
72.2
72.2
73.7
73.9
341.
835
.921
.9D
F Se
eds
DF
317
N3.
1D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R69
.869
.871
.775
.464
.336
2.3
37.7
22.0
Dyn
a-G
ro S
eed
S240
9N2.
4Eq
,Cla
rR
68.0
68.3
67.7
321.
536
.622
.2D
yna-
Gro
See
dS2
908N
2.9
Eq,C
lar
R67
.170
.364
.569
.837
1.6
37.6
21.3
LG S
eeds
C23
002.
3Ag
riShi
eld
Max
, I1a
R63
.265
.063
.063
.336
2.0
36.2
21.8
LG S
eeds
LGS2
010
2.0
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
1aR
65.9
66.3
65.5
321.
134
.522
.1LG
See
dsLG
S276
52.
7Ag
riShi
eld
Max
, IR
68.2
70.1
75.3
61.1
352.
136
.022
.0M
SUE1
2076
T2.
9D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
66.1
68.1
68.2
75.0
57.2
372.
536
.222
.0M
SUE1
2076
T-03
2.4
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R69
.1
65
.672
.635
2.4
36.7
21.8
MSU
E131
00-0
32.
5D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
65.3
64.7
65.9
381.
936
.622
.9M
SUE1
3268
1.7
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1c66
.567
.066
.863
.969
.033
2.1
35.5
22.4
MSU
E140
772.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R69
.269
.268
.466
.971
.437
1.8
36.8
22.4
MSU
E153
392.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
69.8
69.9
70.1
68.0
71.7
372.
635
.222
.9M
SUE1
5345
2.7
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R70
.470
.870
.872
.468
.334
2.4
34.9
21.7
MSU
E153
472.
5D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
68.8
66.4
71.2
331.
835
.122
.4M
SUE1
5351
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R73
.272
.671
.972
.274
.235
2.5
35.3
21.8
MSU
E159
012.
3D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
RR
67.8
65.2
70.4
351.
436
.721
.3M
SUE1
6189
2.8
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1c70
.469
.670
.670
.244
1.9
38.0
21.0
MSU
E162
662.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
RR
70.8
70.3
70.1
71.5
341.
637
.521
.9M
SUE1
6380
2.8
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
68.4
68.7
64.5
72.2
341.
335
.422
.4M
SUE1
6387
2.6
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
62.9
66.8
59.0
332.
034
.822
.2M
SUE1
6410
2.8
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
66.0
67.8
59.3
72.6
341.
535
.423
.2M
SUE1
7004
2.3
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
72.2
66.7
*77.
635
1.5
36.7
22.9
MSU
E170
542.
1D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
72.0
70.5
73.4
351.
836
.821
.4M
SUE1
7062
2.7
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
70.9
68.9
72.8
362.
637
.921
.6M
SUE1
7069
3.0
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R69
.3
71
.666
.942
2.6
39.3
20.9
MSU
E171
672.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
72.6
68.8
76.4
392.
337
.622
.4M
SUE1
7184
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R65
.1
58
.371
.838
1.9
36.5
23.5
MSU
E172
032.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
65.9
64.3
67.5
331.
537
.022
.2M
SUE1
7205
2.7
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
62.8
64.0
61.5
391.
934
.723
.3M
SUE1
7227
2.3
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R72
.6
70
.374
.934
1.4
35.3
23.1
MSU
E172
692.
1D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
72.0
71.6
72.4
342.
035
.521
.6M
SUE1
7274
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R60
.3
66
.454
.137
3.8
34.6
21.0
MSU
E172
752.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
69.6
69.2
70.0
363.
834
.921
.6M
SUE1
7283
2.7
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R70
.3
69
.571
.033
2.1
38.8
21.0
MSU
E175
06T
2.3
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R64
.2
65
.063
.338
2.0
38.2
20.9
MSU
E175
083.
0D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
59.4
56.0
62.8
281.
139
.522
.2M
SUE1
7520
2.2
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
63.7
59.8
67.4
362.
035
.922
.2
YIEL
D (B
U/AC
)20
19 A
VER
AGE
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 9 -
TABL
E 2.
201
9 M
ICHI
GAN
SO
UTH
CO
NVE
NTIO
NAL
SOYB
EAN
VARI
ETY
TRIA
L RE
PORT
Mat
urity
Phyt
oAp
hid
2019
18-1
917
-19
BRAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
TMT1
RES
SCN
Res
AVG
AVG
AVG
Lena
wee
St. J
osep
hH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
n O
il
YIEL
D (B
U/A
C)20
19 A
VER
AGE
MSU
E175
452.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I54
.4
47
.860
.933
2.1
37.5
22.8
MSU
E175
502.
2D
Fend
er N
N-H
I62
.8
57
.867
.837
2.0
36.8
21.9
MSU
E178
01-0
82.
9D
Fend
er N
N-H
I52
.1
50
.054
.139
2.6
39.5
19.4
MSU
E178
08-0
12.
0D
Fend
er N
N-H
I59
.5
53
.165
.832
1.5
39.1
22.1
Nat
ure'
s G
enet
ics
Nat
. Gen
192
62.
4V
68.1
68.0
68.1
342.
039
.821
.9N
atur
e's
Gen
etic
sN
at. G
en 2
.42.
5V
57.8
50.2
65.4
352.
040
.521
.0W
ellm
an S
eeds
W 2
96
2.6
ENC
ASE
MR
69.1
67.2
70.9
361.
637
.821
.1Ze
elan
d Fa
rm S
ervi
ces
ZFS
1326
2.6
Ecl-U
S-Q
, NR
66.3
68.5
67.8
69.1
63.4
352.
036
.521
.7Ze
elan
d Fa
rm S
ervi
ces
ZFS
1629
N2.
9Ec
l-US-
Q, N
R64
.165
.266
.168
.863
.835
2.4
35.6
21.9
Zeel
and
Farm
Ser
vice
sZF
S 18
212.
1Ec
l-US-
Q, N
1kR
63.8
66.4
70.3
57.3
331.
137
.520
.3Ze
elan
d Fa
rm S
ervi
ces
ZFS
1925
HO
2.5
Ecl-U
S-Q
, NR
52.3
50.0
54.5
361.
939
.722
.3Ze
elan
d Fa
rm S
ervi
ces
ZFS
1930
HO
3.0
Ecl-U
S-Q
, NR
51.7
55.3
48.1
382.
939
.219
.6Ze
elan
d Fa
rm S
ervi
ces
ZFS
2025
HO
2.5
Ecl-U
S-Q
, NR
62.8
66.0
59.6
322.
038
.221
.9G
RAND
MEA
N66
.165
.666
.735
2.0
3722
Max
. 74
.179
.777
.644
3.8
4123
Min
. 51
.747
.848
.128
1.1
3519
LSD
(0.0
5)8.
28.
111
.23.
20.
71.
20.
8C
V (%
)9.
59.
210
.17.
831
.02.
02.
21 Se
ed T
reat
men
t: Se
e 'S
eed
Trea
tmen
t' pa
ragr
aph
(und
er 'U
sing
the
Dat
a') f
or p
rodu
ct c
ode
* H
igh
yiel
d in
plo
tPr
otei
n an
d oi
l are
bas
ed o
n dr
y m
atte
r (re
porte
d as
13%
moi
stur
e in
pre
viou
s ye
ars)
Top
1/3
of tr
ial i
s B
old
Mic
higa
n St
ate
Uni
vers
ity v
arie
ties
are
expe
rimen
tal
St. J
osep
h lo
catio
n is
irrig
ated
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 10 -
Mat
urity
Phyt
o20
1918
-19
17-1
9B
RAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
Her
bTM
T1R
esSC
NAV
GAV
GAV
GAl
lega
nG
ratio
tSa
gina
wH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
nO
ilAG
Arm
our S
eeds
AA 2
017
GT
2.0
GT
Ag A
rmou
r1k
53.5
61.8
57.8
54.6
48.1
301.
040
.820
.7C
rede
nzC
Z 15
49G
TLL
1.5
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1k
R56
.465
.453
.550
.331
1.0
38.5
21.8
Cre
denz
CZ
1660
GTL
L1.
6LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
1kR
61.8
71.2
55.2
59.0
291.
039
.422
.0C
rede
nzC
Z 18
50G
TLL
1.8
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1k
R62
.173
.156
.556
.728
1.0
38.5
21.5
Cre
denz
CZ
1859
GTL
L1.
8LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
1kR
64.1
74.6
62.3
55.3
291.
039
.721
.6C
rede
nzC
Z 20
40G
TLL
2.0
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1a
R62
.370
.459
.057
.631
1.0
38.0
21.4
DF
Seed
sD
F 31
30 N
E3
1.3
ENLI
STD
Fend
er N
N-H
I1c
R59
.070
.048
.058
.931
1.1
38.9
21.3
DF
Seed
sD
F 31
80 N
E3
1.8
ENLI
STD
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
58.6
67.9
55.0
52.9
271.
039
.021
.3D
F Se
eds
DF
3190
N E
31.
9EN
LIST
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1cR
59.4
70.4
53.0
54.8
291.
037
.922
.2D
F Se
eds
DF
3200
N E
32.
0EN
LIST
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1cR
63.6
78.6
54.7
57.4
311.
039
.521
.3D
F Se
eds
DF
5100
N R
2Y1.
0R
R2Y
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R54
.966
.251
.946
.727
1.0
38.9
21.7
DF
Seed
sD
F 51
73 N
R2Y
1.7
RR
2YD
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R61
.768
.567
.768
.158
.258
.732
1.0
38.1
21.6
DF
Seed
sD
F 52
27 N
R2Y
2.2
RR
2YD
Fend
er N
N-H
I1c
R63
.473
.260
.756
.435
1.0
38.2
20.7
DF
Seed
sD
F 61
50 N
LLG
T27
1.6
LLG
T27
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
61.1
75.4
51.3
56.6
291.
037
.922
.4D
F Se
eds
DF
6189
N L
LGT2
71.
8LL
GT2
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1c
R64
.674
.758
.7*6
0.4
301.
037
.821
.8D
F Se
eds
DF
6210
N L
LGT2
72.
0LL
GT2
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
IR
60.4
74.8
48.4
58.1
281.
038
.921
.9D
F Se
eds
DF
6219
N L
LGT2
72.
1LL
GT2
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1c
R61
.073
.657
.152
.330
1.1
37.0
21.5
DF
Seed
sD
F 70
90 N
X0.
9R
R2X
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R55
.064
.648
.751
.627
1.0
37.8
21.6
DF
Seed
sD
F 72
20 N
X2.
2R
R2X
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1cR
65.2
77.7
60.0
57.9
331.
337
.821
.6D
yna-
Gro
S13X
T89
1.3
RR
2XEq
,Cla
r1c
R56
.667
.053
.849
.029
1.0
37.9
21.3
Dyn
a-G
roS1
4EN
901.
4EN
LIST
Eq,C
lar
1cR
61.7
71.2
58.2
55.6
301.
040
.020
.7D
yna-
Gro
S17E
N80
1.7
ENLI
STEq
,Cla
rS
R58
.664
.358
.952
.728
1.0
38.6
21.0
Dyn
a-G
roS1
7XT2
91.
7R
R2X
Eq,C
lar
1cR
60.3
71.5
55.3
54.2
281.
039
.221
.2D
yna-
Gro
S18X
T38
1.8
RR
2XEq
,Cla
r1a
,3a
MR
62.4
69.2
67.2
78.1
54.1
55.0
331.
040
.121
.3D
yna-
Gro
S19E
N59
1.9
ENLI
STEq
,Cla
r1c
R60
.073
.148
.758
.128
1.0
37.3
22.1
Dyn
a-G
roS1
9XT3
01.
9R
R2X
Eq,C
lar
SR
61.4
72.8
58.4
53.0
301.
038
.421
.4D
yna-
Gro
S21E
N70
2.1
ENLI
STEq
,Cla
r1c
,3a
R61
.276
.355
.351
.930
1.0
39.3
21.4
Dyn
a-G
roS2
1XT4
92.
1R
R2X
Eq,C
lar
1a,3
aR
*66.
072
.177
.563
.257
.332
1.0
39.6
20.8
FS H
iSO
Y®H
S 19
X90
1.9
RR
2XAC
L +
IR
63.4
77.7
56.8
55.6
301.
037
.521
.4FS
HiS
OY®
HS
21X9
02.
1R
R2X
ACL
+ I
1cR
59.2
74.5
50.6
52.6
281.
037
.721
.1G
enes
isG
1680
GL
1.6
LLG
T27
ECLI
SPE
US
1kR
63.2
67.6
*63.
958
.027
1.0
38.4
22.3
Gen
esis
G18
40E
1.8
ENLI
STEC
LISP
E U
SR
57.2
64.3
56.4
51.0
261.
038
.321
.4G
enes
isG
2140
E2.
1EN
LIST
ECLI
SPE
US
1c,3
aR
58.0
72.6
48.7
52.7
311.
138
.821
.6G
enes
isG
2181
GL
2.2
LLG
T27
ECLI
SPE
US
R61
.474
.757
.751
.929
1.0
39.8
21.8
Gol
den
Har
vest
GH
1915
X1.
9R
R2X
AM-C
, Cla
r + M
er1c
R3M
R14
62.9
67.7
67.3
72.8
56.1
59.9
301.
038
.421
.9G
olde
n H
arve
stG
H20
41X
2.0
RR
2XAM
-C, C
lar +
Mer
1cR
3MR
1462
.267
.767
.173
.057
.156
.629
1.0
38.5
21.4
Gol
den
Har
vest
GH
2230
X2.
2R
R2X
AM-C
, Cla
r + M
er1c
R3M
R14
59.9
66.1
66.5
68.9
55.8
55.0
301.
137
.621
.5Le
gacy
See
dsLS
-103
9N1.
0R
R2Y
L-C
oat T
otal
1k,3
aR
1, R
3, R
551
.666
.149
.039
.826
1.0
37.3
21.9
Lega
cy S
eeds
LS-1
439N
1.4
RR
2XL-
Coa
t Tot
al1c
R3,
MR
1457
.974
.047
.252
.528
1.0
38.4
21.0
Lega
cy S
eeds
LS-1
510N
1.5
LLG
T27
L-C
oat T
otal
1kR
3 M
R14
60.7
74.6
56.1
51.5
281.
039
.022
.1Le
gacy
See
dsLS
-163
9N1.
6R
R2X
L-C
oat T
otal
1cR
358
.263
.668
.753
.652
.328
1.0
40.7
21.2
Lega
cy S
eeds
LS-1
810N
1.8
LLG
T27
L-C
oat T
otal
R3,
MR
1459
.771
.655
.452
.127
1.0
37.7
22.3
Lega
cy S
eeds
LS-1
820N
1.8
ENLI
STL-
Coa
t Tot
alR
3, M
R14
60.3
66.3
62.8
51.8
281.
038
.921
.5Le
gacy
See
dsLS
-183
8N1.
8R
R2X
L-C
oat T
otal
1a,3
cM
R3,
MR
1461
.269
.870
.157
.755
.731
1.0
39.3
21.0
Lega
cy S
eeds
LS-2
139N
2.1
RR
2XL-
Coa
t Tot
al1a
,3c
R3,
MR
1462
.069
.477
.653
.255
.332
1.0
38.6
21.2
LG S
eeds
C18
38R
X1.
8R
R2X
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
1cYe
s63
.370
.774
.560
.255
.232
1.0
38.4
21.5
LG S
eeds
LGS1
635R
X1.
6R
R2X
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
1cYe
s59
.262
.467
.657
.352
.828
1.0
39.9
21.9
TAB
LE 3
. 201
9 M
ICH
IGAN
CEN
TRAL
RO
UN
D-U
P R
EAD
Y / E
arly
Mat
urity
, (1.
3 - 2
.2),
SOYB
EAN
VAR
IETY
TR
IAL
REP
OR
TYI
ELD
(BU
/AC
)20
19 A
VER
AGE
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 11 -
Mat
urity
Phyt
o20
1918
-19
17-1
9B
RAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
Her
bTM
T1R
esSC
NAV
GAV
GAV
GAl
lega
nG
ratio
tSa
gina
wH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
nO
il
TAB
LE 3
. 201
9 M
ICH
IGAN
CEN
TRAL
RO
UN
D-U
P R
EAD
Y / E
arly
Mat
urity
, (1.
3 - 2
.2),
SOYB
EAN
VAR
IETY
TR
IAL
REP
OR
TYI
ELD
(BU
/AC
)20
19 A
VER
AGE
LG S
eeds
LGS2
007R
X2.
0R
R2X
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
3a,1
aYe
s65
.972
.2*7
9.7
60.2
57.7
311.
039
.821
.2Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
LS18
87X
1.8
RR
2XR
adiu
s 50
01a
MR
3,M
R14
61.7
73.3
55.2
56.7
311.
039
.321
.0Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
ZS19
99 G
L1.
9LL
GT2
7R
adiu
s 50
0R
3,M
R14
59.9
70.3
55.6
53.9
301.
038
.121
.7Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
ZS20
97 E
32.
0EN
LIST
Rad
ius
500
1c,3
aR
3,M
R14
61.9
74.8
55.0
55.8
311.
038
.221
.9M
&W S
eeds
19R
32 G
T27
1.9
LLG
T27
1kM
R14
60.7
69.3
5656
.730
1.0
38.5
21.4
M&W
See
ds20
E51
E32.
0EN
LIST
60.1
73.9
53.7
52.8
291.
037
.322
.4M
&W S
eeds
21E2
6 E3
2.1
ENLI
ST59
.569
.455
.054
.229
1.0
38.0
21.1
MC
IA21
19 G
TLL2
72.
1LL
GT2
7C
M62
.473
.454
.059
.830
1.0
39.2
21.3
Ren
k Se
edR
S149
NX
1.4
RR
2XEc
lips
US
1cR
57.8
62.9
69.8
50.8
52.7
271.
039
.220
.9R
enk
Seed
RS1
53N
R2
1.5
RR
2YEc
lips
US
1c60
.067
.857
.554
.630
1.0
39.2
21.8
Ren
k Se
edR
S170
NX
1.6
RR
2XEc
lips
US
1cR
59.4
68.4
56.5
53.2
281.
038
.521
.4R
enk
Seed
RS2
00N
X2.
0R
R2X
Eclip
s U
S1c
R59
.672
.553
.952
.329
1.0
37.3
20.8
Ren
k Se
edR
S213
NR
22.
1R
R2Y
Eclip
s U
S1c
R59
.366
.566
.069
.450
.258
.231
1.0
39.6
21.7
Ren
k Se
edR
S219
NX
2.1
RR
2XEc
lips
US
1a,3
aR
64.5
71.9
75.3
57.9
60.3
331.
040
.220
.9R
upp
Seed
sR
S 18
XT17
1.8
RR
2XAM
-C1a
,3a
R3,
MR
1463
.071
.969
.973
.959
.855
.231
1.0
39.9
20.7
Rup
p Se
eds
RS
21XT
182.
1R
R2X
AM-C
1a,3
aR
3, M
R14
64.6
72.6
76.1
61.3
56.4
331.
038
.821
.0Sp
ecia
lty H
ybrid
s20
83R
2X2.
0R
R2X
ACL,
G, N
emaS
trike
1a, 3
aR
364
.973
.578
.058
.857
.933
1.0
39.6
20.9
Spec
ialty
Hyb
rids
2293
R2X
2.2
RR
2XAC
L, G
, Nem
aStri
ke1c
R3
60.8
67.4
59.5
55.6
321.
037
.922
.2G
RAN
D M
EAN
63.2
71.7
55.7
54.6
301.
038
.721
.5M
ax.
65.9
79.7
63.9
60.4
351.
340
.822
.4M
in.
51.6
57.8
47.2
39.8
261.
037
.020
.7LS
D (0
.05)
4.6
6.6
7.9
7.1
20.
12.
10.
7C
V (%
)8.
05.
68.
57.
88
7.9
3.2
1.9
1 Se
ed T
reat
men
t: Se
e 'S
eed
Trea
tmen
t' pa
ragr
aph
(und
er 'U
sing
the
Dat
a') f
or p
rodu
ct c
ode
Pr
otei
n an
d oi
l are
bas
ed o
n dr
y m
atte
r (re
porte
d as
13%
moi
stur
e in
pre
viou
s ye
ars)
* Hig
h yi
eld
in p
lot
Top
1/3
of tr
ial i
s B
old
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 12 -
Mat
Phyt
o20
1918
-19
17-1
9B
RAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
Her
bTM
T1R
ESSC
NAV
GAV
GAV
GAl
lega
nG
ratio
tSa
gina
wH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
nO
ilC
rede
nzC
Z 23
60G
TLL
2.3
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1a
R65
.674
.560
.461
.933
1.0
37.2
22.2
Cre
denz
CZ
2550
GTL
L2.
5LL
GT2
7T-
Met
hyl
1aR
66.0
72.5
64.4
61.2
331.
139
.621
.0C
rede
nzC
Z 25
79G
TLL
2.5
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1k
R65
.069
.665
.060
.535
1.4
38.9
20.9
Cre
denz
CZ
2760
GTL
L2.
7LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
Test
ing
R67
.475
.463
.263
.632
1.0
38.9
21.6
Cre
denz
CZ
2889
GTL
L2.
8LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
1aR
62.9
67.8
60.1
60.8
371.
537
.820
.6C
rede
nzC
Z 30
99G
TLL
3.0
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1k
R64
.971
.263
.560
.036
1.5
40.4
20.4
DF
Seed
sD
F 32
40 N
E3
2.4
ENLI
STD
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R61
.270
.852
.860
.031
1.0
36.3
21.7
DF
Seed
sD
F 62
69 N
LLG
T27
2.6
LLG
T27
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1cR
68.2
75.6
65.7
63.3
341.
338
.621
.4D
yna-
Gro
S23X
T69
2.3
RR
2XEq
,Cla
r1c
R62
.867
.759
.960
.732
1.0
39.9
21.3
Dyn
a-G
roS2
3XT9
02.
3R
R2X
Eq,C
lar
1cR
61.7
68.5
60.5
56.1
321.
038
.620
.3D
yna-
Gro
S27E
N89
2.7
ENLI
STEq
,Cla
r1k
R64
.067
.4*6
6.5
58.2
311.
237
.422
.4D
yna-
Gro
S28X
T58
2.8
RR
2XEq
,Cla
r1c
R68
.177
.279
.362
.462
.734
1.1
39.0
20.9
FS H
iSO
Y®H
S 23
B90
2.3
LLG
T27
ACL
+ I
1kR
63.6
75.7
59.9
55.2
321.
038
.421
.7FS
HiS
OY®
HS
24X8
02.
4R
R2X
ACL
+ I
1cR
66.5
77.3
59.7
62.6
291.
038
.320
.5FS
HiS
OY®
HS
26B9
02.
6LL
GT2
7AC
L +
IR
65.4
77.3
60.8
58.1
331.
039
.022
.1FS
HiS
OY®
HS
28X7
02.
8R
R2X
ACL
+ I
1cR
66.8
76.4
63.7
60.3
341.
139
.120
.7G
olde
n H
arve
stG
H25
37X
2.5
RR
2XAM
-C, C
lar +
Mer
1cR
3MR
1463
.069
.567
.071
.758
.359
.134
1.2
38.2
20.9
Gol
den
Har
vest
GH
2552
X2.
5R
R2X
AM-C
, Cla
r + M
er1c
MR
364
.672
.359
.861
.834
1.0
39.1
21.1
Gol
den
Har
vest
GH
2788
X2.
7R
R2X
AM-C
, Cla
r + M
er1c
MR
3MR
1463
.674
.270
.871
.060
.159
.628
1.0
39.6
20.9
LG S
eeds
C22
55R
22.
0R
R2
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
1cR
3,M
R14
60.4
64.8
57.9
58.5
321.
039
.121
.2LG
See
dsC
2888
RX
2.8
RR
2XAg
riShi
eld
Max
, I1k
R66
.875
.376
.764
.559
.134
1.1
40.1
20.6
LG S
eeds
LGS2
444R
X2.
4R
R2X
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
1cR
*68.
775
.6*8
1.4
63.1
61.5
291.
039
.720
.2Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
LS26
85X
2.6
RR
2XR
adiu
s 50
01c
R3,
MR
1357
.562
.452
.957
.232
1.3
40.5
20.9
Loca
l See
d C
ompa
nyZS
2496
E3
2.4
ENLI
STR
adiu
s 50
01k
R3,
MR
1461
.064
.757
.860
.629
1.0
37.2
21.5
Loca
l See
d C
ompa
nyZS
2898
GL
2.8
LLG
T27
Rad
ius
500
R3,
MR
1464
.771
.260
.362
.532
1.1
38.3
21.8
Loca
l See
d C
ompa
nyZS
3097
E3
3.0
ENLI
STR
adiu
s 50
0R
3,M
R14
62.5
65.7
60.2
61.5
331.
137
.221
.7M
&W S
eeds
23E5
2 E3
2.3
ENLI
ST59
.161
.856
.658
.931
1.0
37.8
21.2
M&W
See
ds23
T88
GT2
72.
3LL
GT2
763
.770
.959
.061
.333
1.0
38.6
21.7
M&W
See
ds26
T32
GT2
72.
6LL
GT2
765
.568
.863
.5*6
4.1
311.
239
.320
.8M
CIA
2319
GTL
L27
2.3
LLG
T27
CM
66.0
71.6
64.8
61.5
331.
038
.221
.7R
enk
Seed
RS2
48N
X2.
4R
R2X
Eclip
s U
SR
66.8
74.4
64.8
61.3
311.
137
.522
.0R
upp
Seed
sR
S 23
BG30
2.3
LLG
T27
AM-C
1kR
3, M
R14
62.8
67.9
59.1
61.3
321.
038
.421
.9R
upp
Seed
sR
S 23
EL91
2.3
ENLI
STAM
-CR
59.6
62.7
59.2
56.8
301.
037
.721
.2R
upp
Seed
sR
S 23
XT22
2.3
RR
2XAM
-C1c
R3,
MR
1459
.668
.751
.159
.031
1.0
39.3
20.7
Rup
p Se
eds
RS
25XT
122.
5R
R2X
AM-C
1kR
65
.473
.360
.762
.232
1.1
38.0
20.4
Spec
ialty
Hyb
rids
2583
R2X
2.5
RR
2XAC
L, G
, Nem
aStri
ke1c
R3
64.3
73.5
58.7
60.8
331.
039
.220
.5Sp
ecia
lty H
ybrid
s28
94R
2X2.
8R
R2X
ACL,
G, N
emaS
trike
1cR
366
.876
.263
.061
.234
1.0
38.7
20.5
Spec
ialty
Hyb
rids
2983
R2X
2.9
RR
2XAC
L, G
, Nem
aStri
ke1c
R3
65.9
75.2
74.5
60.2
62.9
361.
237
.720
.4G
RAN
D M
EAN
64.2
71.4
60.6
60.5
321.
138
.621
.1M
ax.
68.2
81.4
66.5
64.1
371.
540
.522
.4M
in.
57.5
61.8
51.1
55.2
281.
036
.320
.2LS
D (0
.05)
5.7
8.5
7.3
6.0
20.
31.
70.
6C
V (%
)6.
77.
27.
25.
98
24.3
2.7
1.7
1 Se
ed T
reat
men
t: Se
e 'S
eed
Trea
tmen
t' pa
ragr
aph
(und
er 'U
sing
the
Dat
a') f
or p
rodu
ct c
ode
Pr
otei
n an
d oi
l are
bas
ed o
n dr
y m
atte
r (re
porte
d as
13%
moi
stur
e in
pre
viou
s ye
ars)
* Hig
h yi
eld
in p
lot
Top
1/3
of tr
ial i
s B
old
TAB
LE 4
. 201
9 M
ICH
IGAN
CEN
TRAL
RO
UN
D-U
P R
EAD
Y / L
ate
Mat
urity
, (2.
3 - 3
.1),
SOYB
EAN
VAR
IETY
TR
IAL
REP
OR
T YIEL
D (B
U/A
C)
2019
AVE
RAG
E
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 13 -
Mat
Phyt
o20
1918
-19
17-1
9BR
AND
VARI
ETY
Gro
upHe
rbTM
T1Re
sist
.SC
NAV
GAV
GAV
GIn
gham
Lena
wee
St.J
osep
hHe
ight
Lodg
ing
Prot
ein
Oil
Agra
Sol
utio
nsKE
Y 10
25G
L2.
5LL
GT2
7EN
CM
R72
.170
.172
.873
.430
1.3
36.3
21.3
Cre
denz
CZ
2040
GTL
L2.
0LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
1aR
71.8
66.5
71.4
77.5
271.
135
.722
.6C
rede
nzC
Z 23
60G
TLL
2.3
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1a
R73
.6*7
4.0
71.0
75.9
301.
136
.322
.7C
rede
nzC
Z 25
50G
TLL
2.5
LLG
T27
T-M
ethy
l1a
R70
.861
.675
.974
.928
1.1
36.3
21.9
Cre
denz
CZ
2579
GTL
L2.
5LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
1kR
70.5
66.7
73.0
71.7
341.
338
.321
.5C
rede
nzC
Z 27
60G
TLL
2.7
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,ITe
stin
gR
73.4
65.6
70.8
83.8
311.
235
.422
.7D
F Se
eds
DF
3240
N E
32.
4EN
LIST
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
68.9
64.1
71.1
71.6
281.
134
.622
.8D
F Se
eds
DF
5227
N R
2Y2.
2R
R2Y
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1cR
74.2
67.8
74.3
80.5
331.
435
.121
.3D
F Se
eds
DF
6269
N L
LGT2
72.
6LL
GT2
7D
Fend
er N
N-H
I1c
R72
.762
.774
.381
.231
1.3
35.9
21.8
Dyn
a-G
roS2
3XT6
92.
3R
R2X
Eq,V
,I,P,
Cla
r1c
R64
.761
.163
.069
.928
1.1
35.9
23.1
Dyn
a-G
roS2
3XT9
02.
3R
R2X
Eq,C
lar
1cR
69.5
65.6
68.9
74.1
291.
135
.721
.0D
yna-
Gro
S27E
N89
2.7
ENLI
STEq
,Cla
r1k
R66
.855
.971
.073
.429
1.2
34.6
23.0
FS H
iSO
Y®H
S 24
X80
2.4
RR
2XAC
L +
I1c
R73
.369
.473
.077
.425
1.1
37.3
21.2
FS H
iSO
Y®H
S 26
B90
2.6
LLG
T27
ACL
+ I
R74
.565
.471
.4*8
6.6
301.
235
.722
.4G
enes
isG
2840
E2.
7EN
LIST
ECLI
SPE
US
1kR
69.5
62.3
73.8
72.4
281.
234
.323
.0G
olde
n H
arve
stG
H22
30X
2.2
RR
2XAM
-C, C
lar +
Mer
1cR
3MR
1472
.163
.871
.281
.427
1.0
35.1
22.5
Gol
den
Har
vest
GH
2537
X2.
5R
R2X
AM-C
, Cla
r + M
er1c
R3M
R14
71.0
71.3
70.9
66.6
72.0
74.5
321.
436
.021
.4G
olde
n H
arve
stG
H25
52X
2.5
RR
2XAM
-C, C
lar +
Mer
1cM
R3
74.4
69.8
76.1
77.4
321.
237
.322
.0G
olde
n H
arve
stG
H27
88X
2.7
RR
2XAM
-C, C
lar +
Mer
1cM
R3M
R14
71.7
71.7
76.3
60.7
72.9
81.5
261.
036
.722
.1LG
See
dsC
1838
RX
1.8
RR
2XAg
riShi
eld
Max
, I1c
Yes
70.6
66.7
71.1
74.1
281.
038
.021
.4LG
See
dsC
2255
R2
2.0
RR
2Ag
riShi
eld
Max
, I1c
R3,
MR
1473
.974
.966
.1*7
6.2
79.4
321.
234
.721
.9LG
See
dsLG
S200
7RX
2.0
RR
2XAg
riShi
eld
Max
, I3a
,1a
Yes
72.8
74.3
71.9
70.5
76.0
281.
037
.120
.9LG
See
dsLG
S244
4RX
2.4
RR
2XAg
riShi
eld
Max
, I1c
Yes
*76.
075
.773
.174
.580
.328
1.2
37.0
21.2
Loca
l See
d C
ompa
nyLS
1887
X1.
8R
R2X
Rad
ius
500
69.5
66.1
66.1
76.2
291.
038
.121
.8Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
LS26
85X
2.6
RR
2XR
adiu
s 50
071
.169
.666
.177
.731
1.4
38.0
21.2
Loca
l See
d C
ompa
nyZS
1999
GL
1.9
LLG
T27
Rad
ius
500
MR
3,M
R14
71.9
65.6
72.7
77.3
281.
135
.522
.0Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
ZS20
97 E
32.
0EN
LIST
Rad
ius
500
1c,3
aM
R3,
MR
1467
.760
.868
.973
.530
1.3
38.0
21.7
Loca
l See
d C
ompa
nyZS
2496
E3
2.4
ENLI
STR
adiu
s 50
01k
R3,
MR
1466
.560
.268
.470
.927
1.0
36.1
22.2
M&W
See
ds26
T32
GT2
72.
6LL
GT2
771
.566
.970
.277
.330
1.2
35.7
21.5
MC
IA21
19 G
TLL2
72.
1LL
GT2
7C
MR
68.9
62.3
64.7
79.7
261.
036
.422
.4M
CIA
2319
GTL
L27
2.3
LLG
T27
CM
1kR
72.5
65.8
69.1
82.6
311.
134
.622
.1R
enk
Seed
RS2
48N
X2.
4R
R2X
Eclip
s U
SR
73.0
76.1
74.3
66.9
68.6
83.5
281.
235
.522
.2R
enk
Seed
RS2
50N
X2.
5R
R2X
Eclip
s U
S1k
R73
.470
.769
.180
.528
1.0
36.3
21.3
Rup
p Se
eds
RS
23XT
222.
3R
R2X
AM-C
1cR
3, M
R14
66.8
60.6
66.3
73.6
251.
135
.521
.4R
upp
Seed
sR
S 25
XT12
2.5
RR
2XAM
-C1k
R
72.1
65.2
71.4
79.7
291.
136
.721
.3Sp
ecia
lty H
ybrid
s20
83R
2X2.
0R
R2X
ACL,
G, N
emaS
trike
1a,3
aR
370
.573
.664
.668
.778
.327
1.0
38.3
21.9
Spec
ialty
Hyb
rids
2293
R2X
2.2
RR
2XAC
L, G
, Nem
aStri
ke1c
R3
70.6
67.8
66.6
77.4
291.
036
.522
.6Sp
ecia
lty H
ybrid
s25
73R
2X2.
5R
R2X
ACL,
G, N
emaS
trike
1cR
375
.176
.473
.768
.376
.081
.132
1.2
37.1
22.0
Spec
ialty
Hyb
rids
2583
R2X
2.5
RR
2XAC
L, G
, Nem
aStri
ke1c
R3
70.6
64.2
71.2
76.4
301.
137
.721
.3W
ellm
an S
eeds
W 5
926X
2.6
RR
2XEN
CAS
E1c
MR
75.6
74.5
71.2
70.2
85.3
321.
335
.622
.7W
ellm
an S
eeds
W 6
023E
2.3
ENLI
STEN
CAS
EM
R68
.063
.767
.472
.927
1.0
35.4
21.6
GRA
ND M
EAN
71.3
65.8
70.8
77.4
291.
136
.221
.9M
ax.
76.0
74.0
76.2
86.6
341.
438
.323
.1M
in.
64.7
55.9
63.0
69.9
251.
034
.320
.9LS
D (0
.05)
4.6
8.3
6.2
5.2
2.4
0.3
1.8
0.6
CV (%
)6.
17.
66.
54.
08.
627
.32.
91.
71 Se
ed T
reat
men
t: Se
e 'S
eed
Trea
tmen
t' pa
ragr
aph
(und
er 'U
sing
the
Data
') fo
r pro
duct
cod
e
Prot
ein
and
oil a
re b
ased
on
dry
mat
ter (
repo
rted
as 1
3% m
oist
ure
in p
revi
ous
year
s)* H
igh
yiel
d in
plo
tSt
. Jos
eph
loca
tion
is ir
rigat
edTo
p 1/
3 of
tria
l is
Bold
TABL
E 5.
201
9 M
ICHI
GAN
SO
UTHE
RN Z
ONE
RO
UND-
UP R
EADY
/ Ea
rly M
atur
ity, (
1.7
- 2.7
), SO
YBEA
N VA
RIET
Y TR
IAL
REPO
RTYI
ELD
(BU/
AC)
2019
AVE
RAG
E
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 14 -
Mat
Phyt
o20
1918
-19
17-1
9B
RAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
Her
bTM
T1R
esis
t.SC
NAV
GAV
GAV
GIn
gham
Lena
wee
St.J
osep
hH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
nO
ilAg
ra S
olut
ions
KEY
1031
GL
3.1
LLG
T27
ENC
1cM
R76
.673
.575
.281
.232
1.3
36.9
20.7
Agra
Sol
utio
nsKE
Y 10
36G
L3.
6LL
GT2
7EN
CM
R76
.275
.076
.677
.035
1.7
36.0
21.3
Cre
denz
CZ
2889
GTL
L2.
8LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
1aR
71.2
71.1
66.7
75.7
341.
636
.021
.2C
rede
nzC
Z 30
99G
TLL
3.0
LLG
T27
R,A
,P,V
,I1k
R73
.874
.772
.674
.134
1.5
37.9
20.7
Cre
denz
CZ
3100
GTL
L3.
1LL
GT2
7R
,A,P
,V,I
1cR
74.6
70.1
74.1
79.5
311.
236
.020
.4D
F Se
eds
DF
3280
N E
32.
8EN
LIST
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1kR
69.7
64.5
73.6
71.0
291.
435
.622
.8D
F Se
eds
DF
3300
N E
33.
0EN
LIST
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R76
.574
.674
.680
.432
1.2
36.1
21.6
DF
Seed
sD
F 62
80 N
LLG
T27
2.8
LLG
T27
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R77
.679
.871
.581
.631
1.3
37.5
22.2
DF
Seed
sD
F 72
90 N
X2.
9R
R2X
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
1cR
75.6
75.8
70.8
80.3
311.
237
.120
.9D
yna-
Gro
S28X
T58
2.8
RR
2XEq
,Cla
r1c
R81
.879
.976
.083
.776
.385
.434
1.0
38.4
20.6
Dyn
a-G
roS3
1XT5
93.
1R
R2X
Eq,C
lar
R78
.475
.975
.777
.781
.936
1.6
36.9
21.2
Dyn
a-G
roS3
2EN
603.
2EN
LIST
Eq,C
lar
1kR
69.1
65.0
71.6
70.8
341.
436
.420
.8FS
HiS
OY®
HS
28B9
02.
8LL
GT2
7AC
L +
IR
75.3
71.7
70.4
83.9
311.
233
.621
.7FS
HiS
OY®
HS
28E9
02.
8EN
LIST
ACL
+ I
1kR
72.6
72.3
72.0
73.5
301.
436
.821
.3FS
HiS
OY®
HS
28X7
02.
8R
R2X
ACL
+ I
1cR
77.1
76.0
76.6
78.6
341.
338
.120
.8FS
HiS
OY®
HS
31E9
03.
1EN
LIST
ACL
+ I
R75
.875
.775
.476
.231
1.3
35.1
21.2
FS H
iSO
Y®H
S 32
X90
3.2
RR
2XAC
L +
IR
79.5
77.8
79.1
81.7
341.
337
.219
.7FS
HiS
OY®
HS
33X8
03.
3R
R2X
ACL
+ I
1cR
78.2
78.3
79.5
76.9
321.
238
.919
.8G
olde
n H
arve
stG
H30
88X
3.0
RR
2XAM
-C, C
lar +
Mer
1cR
3,M
R14
77.6
76.0
78.7
76.3
77.9
321.
135
.222
.0LG
See
dsC
2888
RX
2.8
RR
2XAg
riShi
eld
Max
, I1k
R81
.979
.1*8
4.9
*81.
679
.235
1.3
39.0
20.4
LG S
eeds
LGS3
060R
X3.
0R
R2X
AgriS
hiel
d M
ax, I
R80
.982
.380
.180
.234
1.3
37.0
20.4
Loca
l See
d C
ompa
nyZS
3296
GL
3.2
LLG
T27
Rad
ius
500
1cR
3,M
R14
76.1
71.8
76.2
80.2
321.
537
.620
.6Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
ZS33
99 E
33.
3EN
LIST
Rad
ius
500
1cR
3,M
R14
75.6
70.2
75.8
80.8
331.
335
.422
.0Lo
cal S
eed
Com
pany
ZS34
96 G
L3.
4LL
GT2
7R
adiu
s 50
0R
3,M
R14
82.2
84.4
76.7
85.4
351.
336
.620
.9M
&W S
eeds
28E6
5 E3
2.8
ENLI
ST72
.076
.967
.1ns
311.
435
.022
.4M
&W S
eeds
28T7
6 G
T27
2.8
LLG
T27
78.1
69.8
76.6
87.9
321.
236
.121
.9M
&W S
eeds
29E8
5 E3
2.9
ENLI
ST74
.872
.172
.180
.131
1.2
34.8
21.8
MC
IA28
19 G
TLL2
72.
9LL
GT2
7C
MR
77.9
76.5
73.6
83.7
321.
335
.521
.8R
enk
Seed
RS2
80N
X2.
8R
R2X
Eclip
s U
S1k
R*8
2.7
79.1
80.5
*88.
431
1.5
35.4
21.2
Rup
p Se
eds
RS
28BG
902.
8LL
GT2
7AM
-CR
3,M
R14
78.2
76.0
77.7
81.0
311.
635
.822
.2R
upp
Seed
sR
S 28
XT37
2.8
RR
2XAM
-C1c
R3,
MR
1479
.078
.279
.078
.879
.233
1.2
37.3
21.0
Rup
p Se
eds
RS
31EL
413.
1EN
LIST
AM-C
R74
.774
.273
.176
.831
1.3
35.3
21.8
Rup
p Se
eds
RS
31XT
403.
1R
R2X
AM-C
1cM
R78
.875
.276
.379
.780
.332
1.3
37.0
20.4
Spec
ialty
Hyb
rids
2894
R2X
2.8
RR
2XAC
L, G
, Nem
aStri
ke1c
R3
79.6
77.3
79.9
81.6
341.
236
.420
.2Sp
ecia
lty H
ybrid
s29
83R
2X2.
9R
R2X
ACL,
G, N
emaS
trike
1cR
380
.076
.881
.478
.879
.736
1.5
36.7
19.9
Spec
ialty
Hyb
rids
3192
R2X
3.1
RR
2XAC
L, G
, Nem
aStri
ke1a
,seg
3aR
1/R
375
.973
.079
.575
.233
1.6
36.1
20.5
Wel
lman
See
dsW
503
3X3.
3R
R2X
ENC
ASE
MR
78.6
77.1
79.3
79.3
341.
538
.119
.6W
ellm
an S
eeds
W 5
928X
2.8
RR
2XEN
CAS
E1c
,3a
MR
74.8
71.8
75.8
76.8
341.
639
.021
.2W
ellm
an S
eeds
W 5
932X
3.2
RR
2XEN
CAS
E1c
MR
76.1
73.5
77.8
79.7
70.8
371.
539
.419
.9W
ellm
an S
eeds
W 6
030E
3.0
ENLI
STEN
CAS
EM
R75
.574
.171
.181
.431
1.3
37.4
21.0
Wel
lman
See
dsW
603
2E3.
2EN
LIST
ENC
ASE
1kM
R69
.565
.973
.669
.134
1.3
35.4
21.0
Wel
lman
See
dsW
603
4E3.
4EN
LIST
ENC
ASE
1cM
R74
.668
.775
.080
.232
1.3
34.4
21.8
Wel
lman
See
dsW
692
8E2.
8EN
LIST
ENC
ASE
1kM
R72
.368
.776
.072
.130
1.3
35.7
22.8
GR
AND
MEA
N76
.475
.075
.579
.033
1.3
36.5
21.1
Max
. 82
.784
.981
.688
.437
1.7
39.4
22.8
Min
. 69
.164
.566
.769
.129
1.0
33.6
19.6
LSD
(0.0
5)4.
77.
38.
16.
62.
10.
42.
20.
6C
V (%
)5.
85.
96.
45.
06.
729
.43.
51.
81
Seed
Tre
atm
ent:
See
'See
d Tr
eatm
ent'
para
grap
h (u
nder
'Usi
ng th
e D
ata'
) for
pro
duct
cod
e
Prot
ein
and
oil a
re b
ased
on
dry
mat
ter (
repo
rted
as 1
3% m
oist
ure
in p
revi
ous
year
s)* H
igh
yiel
d in
plo
tSt
. Jos
eph
loca
tion
is ir
rigat
edTo
p 1/
3 of
tria
l is
Bol
d
TAB
LE 6
. 20
19 M
ICH
IGAN
SO
UTH
ERN
ZO
NE
RO
UN
D-U
P R
EAD
Y / L
ate
Mat
urity
, (2.
8 - 3
.5),
SOYB
EAN
VAR
IETY
TR
IAL
REP
OR
T YIEL
D (B
U/A
C)
2019
AVE
RAG
E
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 15 -
TAB
LE 7
. 20
19 M
ICH
IGAN
LIB
ERTY
LIN
K C
ENTR
AL S
OYB
EAN
TR
IAL
REP
OR
T
Mat
urity
Phyt
o20
1918
-19
17-1
9B
RAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
Her
bTM
T1R
ESSC
NAV
GAV
GAV
GAl
lega
nG
ratio
tSa
gina
wH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gAG
Arm
our S
eeds
AA 1
520
E31.
5EN
LIST
Ag A
rmou
rR
3,M
R14
56.7
52.7
62.0
55.4
251.
0AG
Arm
our S
eeds
AA 2
019
LL/G
T27
1.9
LLG
T27
Ag A
rmou
rR
62.1
62.6
67.7
55.9
281.
0AG
Arm
our S
eeds
AA 2
020
E32.
0EN
LIST
Ag A
rmou
r1c
,3a
R3,
MR
1461
.961
.365
.559
.029
1.0
AG A
rmou
r See
dsAA
232
0 E3
2.3
ENLI
STAg
Arm
our
59.5
57.8
62.1
58.5
281.
0D
F Se
eds
DF
9171
N L
L1.
7LL
DFe
nder
N N
-H I
R61
.265
.662
.261
.559
.928
1.0
DF
Seed
sD
F 92
32 N
LL
2.3
LLD
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R60
.766
.567
.159
.263
.859
.229
1.0
Dyn
a-G
roS2
1GL4
02.
1LL
GT2
7Eq
,Cla
rR
59.4
57.1
64.7
56.4
271.
0D
yna-
Gro
S24L
L98
2.4
LLEq
,Cla
r1k
R63
.267
.567
.964
.565
.259
.830
1.0
Dyn
a-G
roS2
6GL3
02.
6LL
GT2
7Eq
,Cla
rR
*65.
0*6
7.5
*68.
359
.331
1.0
MC
IA22
12LL
2.2
LLC
M60
.461
.663
.256
.432
1.0
MC
IA23
14LL
2.3
LLC
M63
.662
.466
.8*6
1.7
311.
0G
RAN
D M
EAN
60.9
60.8
64.6
58.3
291.
0M
ax.
65.0
67.5
68.3
61.7
321.
0M
in.
56.7
52.7
61.5
55.4
251.
0LS
D (0
.05)
4.6
7.5
7.3
5.1
2.9
CV
(%)
6.6
7.1
5.4
5.0
81
Seed
Tre
atm
ent:
See
'See
d Tr
eatm
ent'
para
grap
h (u
nder
'Usi
ng th
e D
ata'
) for
pro
duct
cod
e
Prot
ein
and
oil a
re b
ased
on
dry
mat
ter
* Hig
h yi
eld
in p
lot
Top
1/3
of tr
ial i
s B
old
Ther
e w
as n
o lo
dgin
g in
any
loca
tion
for t
his
tria
l
YIEL
D (B
U/A
C)
2019
AVE
RAG
E
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 16 -
TAB
LE 8
. 20
19 M
ICH
IGAN
LIB
ERTY
LIN
K S
OU
TH S
OYB
EAN
TR
IAL
REP
OR
T
Mat
urity
Phyt
o20
1918
-19
17-1
9B
RAN
DVA
RIE
TYG
roup
Her
bTM
T1R
ESSC
NAV
GAV
GAV
GIn
gham
Lena
wee
St.J
osep
hH
eigh
tLo
dgin
gPr
otei
nO
ilAG
Arm
our S
eeds
AA 2
820
E32.
8EN
LIST
Ag A
rmou
r1k
R3,
MR
1460
.456
.662
.062
.634
1.9
34.8
22.9
AG A
rmou
r See
dsAA
291
8 LL
2.9
LLAg
Arm
our
R67
.070
.9*7
1.5
61.0
68.5
371.
637
21.4
DF
Seed
sD
F 92
32 N
LL
2.3
LLD
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R67
.864
.061
.378
.136
1.8
37.9
20.8
DF
Seed
sD
F 92
51 N
LL
2.5
LLD
Fend
er N
N-H
I1k
R65
.268
.667
.062
.063
.570
.136
1.9
3820
.8D
yna-
Gro
S24L
L98
2.4
LLEq
,Cla
r1k
R65
.568
.455
.468
.872
.234
2.0
37.5
22.2
Dyn
a-G
roS2
6GL3
02.
6LL
GT2
7Eq
,Cla
rR
67.4
58.3
69.2
74.8
362.
337
.922
.8D
yna-
Gro
S28G
L80
2.8
LLG
T27
Eq,C
lar
R*7
0.5
62.9
*69.
479
.337
1.6
36.9
22.6
MC
IA23
14LL
LLC
M68
.155
.666
.6*8
2.0
351.
136
.122
.3G
RAN
D M
EAN
65.9
60.8
65.2
73.4
361.
837
22M
ax.
70.5
71.5
69.4
82.0
372.
338
23M
in.
60.4
55.4
61.0
62.6
341.
135
21LS
D (0
.05)
13.0
10.3
9.2
11.7
40.
81.
00.
4C
V (%
)9.
69.
57.
98.
58
39.6
1.5
1.0
1 Se
ed T
reat
men
t: Se
e 'S
eed
Trea
tmen
t' pa
ragr
aph
(und
er 'U
sing
the
Dat
a') f
or p
rodu
ct c
ode
Pr
otei
n an
d oi
l are
bas
ed o
n dr
y m
atte
r (re
porte
d as
13%
moi
stur
e in
pre
viou
s ye
ars)
* Hig
h yi
eld
in p
lot
St. J
osep
h lo
catio
n is
irrig
ated
Top
1/3
of tr
ial i
s B
old
YIEL
D (B
U/A
C)
2019
AVE
RAG
E
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 17 -
TABLE 1 TABLE 2 TABLE 3 TABLE 4 TABLE 5 TABLE 6 Central Southern Central Early Central Late Southern Early Southern LateConventional Conventional Roundup Ready Roundup Ready Roundup Ready Roundup Ready Allegan Gratiot Allegan Allegan Gratiot Gratiot Gratiot Lenawee Gratiot Gratiot Lenawee Lenawee Saginaw St. Joseph Saginaw Saginaw St. Joseph St. Joseph TABLE 7 TABLE 8 Central SouthernLiberty Link Liberty Link Allegan Gratiot Gratiot Lenawee Saginaw St. Joseph
Ag Armour D.F. Seeds, Inc. (continued) Nutrien Ag Solutions (continued)AA 1520 E3 (7) (P8) DF Seeds DF 260 N (1,2 ) (P8) Dyna-Gro S23XT90 (4,5) (P8)AA 1914 N (1) (P8) DF Seeds DF 278 N (2) (P8) Dyna-Gro S2409N (1,2) (P8)AA 2017 GT (3) DF Seeds DF 3130 N E3 (3) (P8) Dyna-Gro S24LL98 (7,8) (P8)AA 2019 LL/GT27 (7) (P8) DF Seeds DF 317 N (2) (P8) Dyna-Gro S26GL30 (7,8) (P8)AA 2020 E3 (7) (P8) DF Seeds DF 3180 N E3 (3) (P8) Dyna-Gro S27EN89 (4,5) (P8)AA 2114 N (1) (P8) DF Seeds DF 3190 N E3 (3) (P8) Dyna-Gro S28GL80 (8) (P8)AA 2214 N (1) DF Seeds DF 3200 N E3 (3) (P8) Dyna-Gro S28XT58 (4,6) (P8)AA 2320 E3 (7) DF Seeds DF 3240 N E3 (4,5) (P8) Dyna-Gro S2908N (2) (P8)AA 2820 E3 (8) (P8) DF Seeds DF 3280 N E3 (6) (P8) Dyna-Gro S31XT59 (6) (P8)AA 2918 LL (8) DF Seeds DF 3300 N E3 (6) (P8) Dyna-Gro S32EN60 (6) (P8)
DF Seeds DF 5100 N R2Y (3) (P8)Agra Solutions LLC DF Seeds DF 5173 N R2Y (3) (P8) Syngenta (Golden Harvest)AGRA SOLUTIONS KEY 1025GL (5) (P8) DF Seeds DF 5227 N R2Y (3,5) (P8) Golden Harvest GH1915X (3) (P8)AGRA SOLUTIONS KEY 1031GL (6) (P8) DF Seeds DF 6150 N LLGT27 (3) (P8) Golden Harvest GH2041X (3) (P8)AGRA SOLUTIONS KEY 1036GL (6) (P8) DF Seeds DF 6189 N LLGT27 (3) (P8) Golden Harvest GH2230X (3,5) (P8)
DF Seeds DF 6210 N LLGT27 (3) (P8) Golden Harvest GH2537X (4,5) (P8)Bayer CropScience DF Seeds DF 6219 N LLGT27 (3) (P8) Golden Harvest GH2552X (4,5) (P8)Credenz CZ 1549GTLL (3) (P8) DF Seeds DF 6269 N LLGT27 (4,5) (P8) Golden Harvest GH2788X (4,5) (P8)Credenz CZ 1660GTLL (3) (P8) DF Seeds DF 6280 N LLGT27 (6) (P8) Golden Harvest GH3088X (6) (P8)Credenz CZ 1850GTLL (3) (P8) DF Seeds DF 7090 N X (3) (P8)Credenz CZ 1859GTLL (3) (P8) DF Seeds DF 7220 N X (3) (Peking)Credenz CZ 2040GTLL (3,5) (P8) DF Seeds DF 7290 N X (6) (P8)Credenz CZ 2360GTLL (4,5) (P8) DF Seeds DF 9171 N LL (7) (P8) Hensall Co-opCredenz CZ 2550GTLL (4,5) (P8) DF Seeds DF 9232 N LL (7,8) (P8) HDC Adare (1)Credenz CZ 2579GTLL (4,5) (P8) DF Seeds DF 9251 N LL (8) (P8) HDC Blake (1)Credenz CZ 2760GTLL (4,5) (P8)Credenz CZ 2889GTLL (4,6) (P8) Nutrien Ag Solutions Legacy Seeds, Inc.Credenz CZ 3099GTLL (4,6) (P8) Dyna-Gro S13XT89 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-1039N (3) (Peking)Credenz CZ 3100GTLL (6) (P8) Dyna-Gro S14EN90 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-1439N (3) (P8)
Dyna-Gro S17EN80 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-1639N (3) (P8)Citizens LLC Dyna-Gro S17XT29 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-1810N (3) (P8)NATURE'S GENETICS 1926 (1,2) Dyna-Gro S18XT38 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-1838N (3) (P8)NATURE'S GENETICS 2.4 (1,2) Dyna-Gro S19EN59 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-1820N (3) (P8)
Dyna-Gro S19XT30 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-2139N (3) (P8)D.F. Seeds, Inc. Dyna-Gro S21EN70 (3) (P8) Legacy LS-1510N (3) (P8)DF Seeds DF 155 F (1,2) Dyna-Gro S21GL40 (7) (P8)DF Seeds DF 187 N (1) (P8) Dyna-Gro S21XT49 (3) (P8)DF Seeds DF 210 N (1) (Peking) Dyna-Gro S2207N (1) (P8)DF Seeds DF 227 N (1) (P8) Dyna-Gro S23XT69 (4,5) (P8)
INDEX FOR 2019 SOYBEAN VARIETY PERFORMANCE TRIALS
There were 194 varieties from 21 private seed companies entered in 8 county test sites in the 2019 Soybean Variety Performance Trials. The first number within parentheses refer to the table in which the variety appears. Company names
used in association with variety numbers refer to the brand, and the numbers are the variety designation.The SCN source of resistancem if any, is listed in a second parentheses. PI88788 is abbreviated as P8.
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 18 -
LG Seeds Michigan State University (continued) Wellman Seeds, Inc.LG Seeds C1838RX (3,5) (P8) MSU E17069 (1,2) Wellman W 296 (2) (P8)LG Seeds C2300 (1,2) (P8) MSU E17167 (1,2) Wellman W 5033X (6) (P8)LG Seeds C2888RX (4,6) (P8) MSU E17184 (1,2) Wellman W 5926X (5) (P8)LG Seeds LGS1635RX (4) (P8) MSU E17203 (1,2) Wellman W 5928X (6) (P8)LG Seeds LGS2007RX (3,5) (P8) MSU E17205 (1,2) Wellman W 5932X (6) (P8)LG Seeds LGS2010 (1,2) (P8) MSU E17227 (1,2) Wellman W 6023E (5) (P8)LG Seeds C2255R2 (4,5) (P8) MSU E17269 (1,2) Wellman W 6030E (6) (P8)LG Seeds LGS2444RX (4,5) (P8) MSU E17274 (1,2) Wellman W 6032E (6) (P8)LG Seeds LGS2765 (1,2) (P8) MSU E17275 (1,2) Wellman W 6034E (6) (P8)LG Seeds LGS3060RX (6) (P8) MSU E17283 (1,2) Wellman W 6928E (6) (P8)
MSU E17506T (1,2)Local Seed Company MSU E17508 (1,2) Zeeland Farm Services, Inc.Local LS1887X (3,5) MSU E17520 (1,2) ZFS 1326 (1,2) Local LS2685X (4,5) MSU E17545 (1,2) ZFS 1629 N (2) Local LSX1901GL (3,5) MSU E17550 (1,2) ZFS 1716 (1) (P8)Local LSX2001E (3,5) MSU E17801-08 (1,2) ZFS 1719 (1) (P8)Local LSX2301E (4,5) MSU E17808-01 (1,2) ZFS 1821 (1,2) (P8)Local LSX2801GL (4) ZFS 1925HO (1,2)Local LSX3001E (4) Renk Seed ZFS 1930HO (1,2)Local LSX3101GL (6) Renk RS149NX (3) (P8) ZFS 2027HO (1,2)Local LSX3401E (6) Renk RS153NR2 (3) ZFS e12H902 (1) Local LSX3402GL (6) Renk RS160NGL (3) (P8)
Renk RS170NX (3) (P8)M&W Seeds Renk RS180NE (3) (P8)M&W 19R32 GT27 (3) Renk RS200NX (3) (P8)M&W 20E51 E3 (3) Renk RS210NE (3) (P8)M&W 21E26 E3 (3) Renk RS213NR2 (3) (P8)M&W 23E52 E3 (4) Renk RS219NX (3) (P8)M&W 23T88 GT27 (4) Renk RS220NGL (3) (P8)M&W 26T32 GT27 (4,5) Renk RS248NX (4,5) (P8)M&W 28E65 E3 (6) Renk RS250NX (5) (P8)M&W 28T76 GT27 (6) Renk RS279NE (5) (P8)M&W 29E85 E3 (6) Renk RS280NX (6)(P8)
MI Crop Improvement Assoc. Rupp Seeds, Inc.MCIA 2119 GTLL27 (3,5) (P8) Rupp RS 18XT17 (3) (P8)MCIA 2212LL (7) Rupp RS 21XT18 (3) (P8)MCIA 2314LL (7,8) Rupp RS 23BG30 (4) (P8)MCIA 2319 GTLL27 (4,5) (P8) Rupp RS 23EL91 (4) (P8)MCIA 2819 GTLL27 (6) (P8) Rupp RS 23XT22 (4,5) (P8)
Rupp RS 25XT12 (4,5) (P8)Michigan State University Rupp RS 28BG90 (6) (P8)MSU E12076T (1,2) (P8) Rupp RS 28XT37 (6) (P8)MSU E12076T-03 (1,2) (P8) Rupp RS 31EL41 (6) (P8)MSU E13100-03 (1,2) (P8) Rupp RS 31XT40 (6) (P8)MSU E13268 (1,2)MSU E14077 (1,2) (P8) Sevita InternationalMSU E15339 (1,2) (P8) Sevita Candor (1)MSU E15345 (1,2) (P8)MSU E15347 (1,2) (P8) Specialty HybridsMSU E15351 (1,2) (P8) Specialty 2083R2X (3,5) (P8)MSU E15901 (1,2) Specialty 2293R2X (3,5) (P8)MSU E16189 (1,2) (P8) Specialty 2573R2X (5) (P8)MSU E16266 (1,2) (P8) Specialty 2583R2X (3,6) (P8)MSU E16380 (1,2) (P8) Specialty 2894R2X (4,6) (P8)MSU E16387 (1,2) (P8) Specialty 2983R2X (4,6) (P8)MSU E16410 (1,2) (P8) Specialty 3192R2X (6) (Peking)MSU E17004 (1,2)MSU E17054 (1,2)MSU E17062 (1,2)
www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean- 2 - - 19 -
**Jan and Scott: Article for the blank page. Carry over soybean seed: dead, alive or somewhere between? By: Mark Seamon, Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee Research Coordinator
One of the tales from the 2019 growing season is that some seed did not get planted as planned. Many farms have carried soybean seed over with intentions to plant it in 2020. A few bags or partial boxes of seed have been planted a year after they were purchased with good results, but the quantity of seed, and its value, carried over from 2019 suggests that we manage it more carefully.
The first step in managing this carryover seed is to figure out how much of it is still viable. Not only is it important to determine if it is still live seed, but if it has vigor to make a successful productive soybean plant. While we all hope for ideal conditions at planting, it more likely that the seeds that are put in the ground will need to survive through some challenges. Jim Palmer, Michigan Crop Improvement Association, suggests submitting seed samples for both warm and cold germination tests. “This will gauge seed performance in less than ideal conditions,” Jim shared. These two tests require a two-pound seed sample and about two weeks to analyze.
When sampling carryover seed be sure to take a representative sample. This means taking seed from multiple bags or reaching deeply into seed boxes or tote bags. Samples can be taken anytime, as the biggest changes in seed quality have already happened between when it was harvested, maybe as long as 16 months ago, and now. Keep in mind that this seed was harvested in the fall of 2018, which included some challenging conditions leading to seed quality issues. The quality of seed is at its highest point when it dries down naturally in the pod. After that time it does not improve - the quality only decreases.
A few suggestions for getting the most of carryover soybean seed are: • Know both warm and cold germination rates • Increase planting rate to adjust for decreased germination rate and/or vigor • Plant into good conditions (warm soil, minimum residue) • Handle as little as possible (to avoid seed damage)
Some growers have used a home germination test in wet paper towels to get an idea of seed viability. This should be used at a minimum, as it may only give you best-case scenario results since the seed is germinated indoors in warm conditions.
The fact that the seed is treated is not a good indicator of whether it will perform well a year later than it was intended to be used. Some seed-applied pesticides can negatively affect seed quality after a year of storage while others may improve seed performance. Conversely, untreated seed cannot be assumed to be high quality after being stored for extended periods.
Managing seed quality before planting will help to avoid problems such as a replant situation that would take a couple of weeks after planting to diagnose. There will be enough challenges in profitably producing crops in 2020, so let’s take proactive steps to minimize the negative and maximize the positive.
Here is the contact information for the Michigan Crop Improvement Association: Phone 517 332-3546, [email protected], www.michcrop.com To mail: MCIA Seed Lab, P.O.Box 21008, Lansing, MI 48909 To ship: MCIA Seed Lab, 2901 West Jolly Road, Okemos, MI 48864
2019 MICHIGAN SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE
REPORT D. WANG, R.G. LAURENZ, R. STOUTENBURG,
DEPT. OF PLANT SOIL & MICROBIAL SCIENCES This report provides information on the performance of Conventional, Liberty Link, and Roundup Ready soybean varieties in Michigan in 2019. The presentation of data for the entries tested does not suggest approval or endorsement of varieties by Michigan State University. This data is posted at https://varietytrials.msu.edu/.
TESTING PROCEDURES
Eight trials are reported here. The Central locations for the Conventional, Roundup Ready and Liberty Link trials include test sites in Allegan, Gratiot, Saginaw and Sanilac Counties. The Southern locations for the Conventional, Liberty Link and Roundup Ready trials include test sites in Hillsdale, Ingham, Lenawee, and St. Joseph (irrigated) Counties. Twenty-one seed companies entered a total of 194 commercial varieties. There are many new products in the trials this year. Since varieties that contain Enlist and GT27 herbicide resistant traits were deregulated, we were able to include those lines in the trials. The cooperators, planting dates, harvest dates, and other site details for the locations are listed below. Seed was planted in 6-row plots, 20 feet long with 15-inch row spacing, at a depth of 1.5-inches. The planting rate was 160,000 seeds/acre. At each location, varieties were replicated four times in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). All locations were planted to 16 feet with 4 foot alleys that were not trimmed. Only the center four rows were harvested. Experimental design, data management, and data analysis were conducted with AGROBASE Generation II, (Agronomix Software, Inc., Winnipeg, Canada).
TEST SITE INFORMATION Allegan County Nearest city: Wayland Cooperator: Jim Wykoski Planting date: 5-17-19 Harvest Date: 11-9-19 Previous Crop: Corn Soil Type: Colwood Silt Loam Fertilizer: 50 lb/A DAP, 50 lb/A AMS, 110lb/A potash, 11.5 lb/A micronutrients Herbicides: Preemergent 12 oz/A Authority MTZ, 1.5 pt/A Medal II Postemerge 5 oz/A Assure II-over entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trial- 1 qt/A Basagran, 5 oz/A Raptor Roundup Ready Trials- 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax Gratiot County Nearest city: Breckenridge Cooperator: John Hardman Planting date: 5-16-19 Harvest date: 12-23-19 Previous crop: Corn Soil type: Parkhill Loam Fertilizer: none Herbicides: Preemerge Lorox 1.5 lb/A, 1.5 pt/A Medal II Postemerge 5 oz/A Assure II over entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trials- 1 qt/A Basagran, Roundup Ready Trials – 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax 5 oz/A Ingham County Nearest city: Mason Cooperator: MSU Planting date: 6-7-19 Harvest date: 11-5-19 Previous crop: Corn Soil type: Loam Fertilizer: none Herbicides: Preemerge 12 oz/A Authority MTZ, 1.5 pt/A Medal II- over the entire field Conventional & Liberty Link Trials- 1 qt/A Basagran, 5 oz/A Raptor Roundup Ready Trials – 32 oz/A Roundup Powermax Hillsdale County Nearest city: Reading Planting date: We were unable to plant this location, due to excessive rainfall. Lenawee County Nearest city: Britton Cooperator: David & Jason Woods Planting date: 6-9-19 Harvest date: 11-7-19 Previous crop: Soybeans Soil type: Sandy Clay Loam Fertilizer: 250lb/A K2O
Putting Your Checkoff To Work
Michigan Soybean Promotion CommitteePO Box 287
Frankenmuth, Michigan 48734
The 2019 Michigan Soybean Performance Report is a result of a cooperative effort of Michigan State University, Michigan State University Extension and the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This information will help you to make informed critical choices for your 2020 soybean crop. Publication and distribution of this report is provided by checkoff funds through the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This data can be accessed electronically at www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean and in a searchable database at www.soybeanyielddata.msu.edu.
Extension Bulletin E2947 • 12-19
Fellow Soybean Producers,
The selection of the best soybean varieties for your farm is likely to be the most critical decision to impact your soybean yields. To inform your decision, this report contains the most complete source of unbiased yield comparisons from across the state.
The investment of checkoff funds in this publication is an example of our mission to “Manage checkoff resources to increase return on investment for Michigan soybean farmers while enhancing sustainable soybean production”. We feel confident in the value of this resource and hope that it proves as a valuable resource for your farm.
We wish you a safe and profitable 2020 season.
Sincerely,Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee Directors
District #1 Sarah Peterson, Niles District #2 Pete Crawford, Dansville District #3 Laurie Isley, Palmyra District #4 Dennis Gardner, CroswellDistrict #5 Mike Sahr, Saginaw District #6 Mark Senk, OwossoDistrict #7 Steve Koeman, Hamilton
**Jan and Scott: Wording for front Cover of the 2018 Performance Report. The logo embedded here is the most current logo to use. We will not be mailing to individuals this year. We are needing 250 printed and shipped to Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee and 250 printed and shipped to MSU for a total of 500. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION 2018 Michigan Soybean Performance Report "Putting Your Checkoff to Work" The 2018 Michigan Soybean Performance Report is a result of a cooperative effort of Michigan State University, Michigan State University Extension and the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This information will help you to make informed critical choices for your 2019 soybean crop. Publication and distribution of this report is provided by checkoff funds through the Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee. This data can be accessed electronically at www.variety trials.msu.edu/soybean and in a searchable database at www.soybeanyielddata.msu.edu.
add in Soy Ink logo Cover pic – provided by MSU Extension Bulletin E2947 ● 11/16 – needs to be updated by MSU
**Jan: Letter for back cover of 2018 Performance Report. Keep the mail panel at the bottom 1/3 of the page the same as last year’s.
Fellow Soybean Producers, The selection of the best soybean varieties for your farm is likely to be the most critical decision to impact your soybean yields. To inform your decision, this report contains the most complete source of unbiased yield comparisons from across the state. The investment of checkoff funds in this publication is an example of our mission to “Manage checkoff resources to increase return on investment for Michigan soybean farmers while enhancing sustainable soybean production”. We feel confident in the value of this resource and hope that it proves as a valuable resource for your farm. We wish you a safe and profitable 2019 season. Sincerely, Michigan Soybean Promotion Committee Directors District #1 Sarah Peterson, Niles District #2 Pete Crawford, Dansville District #3 Laurie Isley, Palmyra District #4 Dennis Gardner, Croswell District #5 Mike Sahr, Saginaw District #6 Alan Moore, Bannister District #7 Steve Koeman, Hamilton
2019 Michigan SoybeanPerformance Report
Goldenview Farms, St. Joseph, MI