kalpagiri.files.wordpress.com · 2019. 7. 25. · f. no. 8-6/2019-is.16 ministry of human resource...

F. No. 8-6/2019-IS.16

Ministry of Human Resource DepartmentDepartment of School Education & Literacy

IS.16 Section

Shastri Bhawan, New DelhiDate: 15^ July, 2019

Subject: Samagra Shiksha - Meeting of the Project Approval Board (PAB) held onIZ*"* June, 2019 to consider the Annual Work Plan and Budget (AWP&B) for the year2019-20 for the State of Manipur - Circulation of Minutes.

The Meeting of Project Approval Board (PAB) of Samagra Shiksha was held on12.06.2019 under the chairpersonship of Secretary (SE&L) in New Delhi to consider theAnnual Work Plan & Budget (AWP&B), 2019-20 of State of Manipur.

2. The undersigned is directed to forward herewith the approved PAB minutes in respectof Samgra Shiksha, State of Manipur for 2019-20 for further necessary action.

al Singh)

Under Secretary to the Government of IndiaTel: 011-23073842

Email: [email protected]: As above.

To,

1. Shri Rabindra Panwar, Secretary, Ministry of W&CD.

2. Shri Heeralal Samariya, Secretary, Ministry of labour & Employment.

3. Ms. Nilam Sawhney, Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment

4. Shri Deepak Khandekar, Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs.

5. Shri Parameswaran Iyer, Secretary, Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation

6. Shri Sailesh, Secretary, Ministry of Minority Affiars.

7. Ms. Shakuntala D. Gamlin, Secretary, Department of Disability Affairs, Ministry

of Social Justice & Empowerment.

8. Shri Alok Kumar, Dy. Adviser (Education), Niti Aayog.

9. Prof. Hrushikesh Senapaty, Director, NCERT.

10. ProfN. V. Varghese, Vice Chancellor, NIEPA.

1 1. Ms. Anita Karwal, Chairperson, NCTE

12. Prof. Nageshwar Rao, Vice Chancellor, IGNOU

13. Ms. Rupali Banerjee Singh, Member Secretary, NCPCR

14. Shri Sanjay Kumar , Joint Secretary (Inst.), MHRD, New Delhi15. Shri Ram Chandra Meena, JS (MDM), MHRD, New Delhi

16. Ms. Darshana M. Dabral. JS & FA, MHRD, New Delhi

17. Shri Rajib Kumar Sen, Joint Secretary and Economic Advisor, SE&L, MHRD

18. Ms. Lamchonghoi Sweety Changsan, Joint Secretary (SS-1), SE&L, MHRD19. Ms. R. Savithri, DDG(Stats.), SE&L, MHRD20. Mr. Sumant Singh, Commissioner Education(S), Manipur21. Th. KiranKumar, State Project Director, Manipur

Copy to;

1. All Divisional Heads of ISSE Bureau

2. All Under Secretaries of ISSE Bureau

3. All TSG Consultants

3. NIC-with request to upload minutes on the portal

Copy for information to:

1. PPS to Secy (SE&L)2. PPStoJS(SS-II)

*al Singh)Under Secretary to the Government of India

F. No. 8-6/2019-IS-16

Government of India

Ministry of Human Resource Development

Department of School Education and Literacy

Minutes of the meeting of the Project Approval Board held on 12*'' June 2019 toconsider the Annual Work Plan & Budget (AWP&B) 2019-20 of Samagra Shiksha for

the State of Manipur.

1. Introduction

The meeting of the Project Approval Board for considering the Annual Work Plan and

Budget (AWP&B) 2019-20 for SAMAGRA SHIKSHA for the State of Manipur was held on12"' June, 2019. The list of participants who attended the meeting is attached 2XAnnexure-I.

2. Initiatives of the State

Ms. Rina Ray, Secretary (SE&L) invited Manipur to give a presentation on school educationin the State. Shri Sumant Singh, Commissioner Education(S), Government of Manipur gave a

video presentation which included the following major points:

a. "The Manipur Coaching Institute (Control and Regulation) Act, 2017"has been

framed to control and regulate Private Coaching Institutes for providing better academic

support for competitive examinations and admissions to technical institutions, etc.Rules have been drafted and under consideration of the Government.

b. Transfer and Posting Policy Guidelines for Teachers and Institutions under the

Department of Education have been approved.

0. "The Manipur Private School (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2017" has been

framed and rules are under process for approval. It is aimedatregulating and supervising

the establishment and management of private schools and also to check un-controlled

growth of Private Schools in the State.

d. "School Amalgamation Exercise" and "School Fagathansi Mission"are two interrelated but independent initiatives to make schools more composite, competitive and

bring about trust of the public by bringing in quality in schools.

e. "Lairik Tamhanlasi - No Child Left Behind" is another major policy decision of the

Government to cater to education at Secondary and Higher Secondary level (Class IX-

XII). Children dropping out for various reasons are brought back to schools forcontinuing education and also to prevent children from joining unwanted elements.

Page 11

3. Review of Commitments and Expected Outcomes & Action Taken during 2018-19

The progress made in implementing the commitments and expected outcomes given by the

SI.

No.

Commitment and

Expected Outcomes Action TakenComments of

PAB 2019-20

1

The State will map all thestand alone governmentand government aidedprimary schools, developand finalize specificaction plans forimproving learning

, outcomes in these

schools.

State Government has targetedto complete the work within2019-20.

State has been requestedto take up the matter onpriority and completethe same within this

financial year.

2

The State will completeall the pending civilworks in 2018-19.

30% of the commitment is

achieved. Another 40% of the

remaining works are, targetedto be completed by September2019.

State has been requestedto take up the pendingcivil work on priorityand complete bySeptember 2019.

3

The proposal forrestructuring of SCERThas been placed beforeCabinet for the creation ofadditional posts. Thecadre of teacher educators

will be notified after the

fmalization of proposal.

The proposal for restructuringof SCERT has been sent to the

Govt. and placed before theCabinet, But due to Elections itcould not be finalized so far.The Cadre of Teacher

Educators will be finalizedafier fmalization of the

Manipur Teacher EducationService Rules which is under

process at the Governmentlevel.

State has been requestedto complete the work inthis financial year.

4. Review of Performance during 2018-19

State has secured a score of 608 in Performance Grading Index (PGI) and was placed inGrade V(601-650)(actually Category VIII as no States are in the levels of 850 and above

Category 1 Category 2 TotalDomain 1

(180)

Domain 2

(80)Domain 3

(150)Domain 4

(230)

Domain 1

(360)

All Domains

(1000)42 20 82 37 211 392

State was requested to examine its score in each domain and take measures to imnroveits overall PGI.

Page)2

a) Learning Outcomes & Quality (C-1, D-1): As per National Achievement Survey (NAS) score,there is need to lay more focus on Learning Outcomes of classes 3, 5and 8.

State was requested to analyse NAS results and provide interventions to improvelearning outcomes of the students.

b) Access Outcomes (C-1, D-2): The State has achieved maximum grade in Transition but100% transition has not been achieved.

State was requested to take steps to ensure 100% transition rate.

c) Infrastructure 4& Facilities (C-1, D-3): State needs to focus on provision of Computer

Aided Learning (GAL) facilities in Upper Primary Schools. Lab facilities in Secondary

Schools and Providing free text books to elementary schools students within a month of the

start of the academic session.

State was advised to set-up CAL facilities and Science Lab facilities in upper-primary

and secondary schools respectively and ensure timely delivery of text books before the

start of academic session.

d) Equity Outcomes (C-1, D-4):State needs to focus on provision of Ramps for Children with

Special Needs (CWSN), functional CWSN friendly toilets in schools and provision of Aids

and appliances for CWSN.

State was requested to focus on accessibility for CWSN in all schools.

e) Governance Process (C-2, D-1) Indicators requiring more focus are: Teachers'

attendance (2.1.4). Availability of teachers and principals (2.1.9, 2.1.10 and 2.1.11).

Occupancy rates of officers (2.1.13, 2.1.14). Visits to elementary schools (2.1.15). Online

recruitment and transfer of teachers (2.1.21, 2.1.22) and School Improvement Plans (2.1.19).

State was requested to examine all these indicators and take necessary actions forimproving them.

5. Appraisal issues

a) The Enrolment of (Govt.+Aided) has decreased by 8% at Primary level and 4% at Upper

Primary level as compared to 2016-17.

b) There are 35% Upper Primary schools where three subject teachers are not available as per

RTE.

c) There are 66% Secondary schools where four subject teachers are not available.

d) The retention rate is 50.67% at elementary level and 42% at secondary level which is very

low.

e) Out of 381 Upper Primary Schools sanctioned during the year 2004-05 to 2011-12, the State

has changed the location of 23 Upper Primary Schools at its level. The statement is enclosed

at Annexure V. The State proposed for approval for change of these 23 locations. The

appraisal team has found only two locations eligible as per norms. However, since the

Page I 3

schools have already been opened and functional since 2004-05 onwards, it is a fait accompliand therefore, PAB decided to relax the norms as a special case not to be treated as a

precedent and granted approval for change of location as proposed by the State.f) Special training for Out of School Children (GoSC): The State has not provided information

about how out of school children are identified and how these children are mainstreamed,

despite repeated requests.

g) The State has not started admission under Section 12 (1)(C) of RTE Act. The State isrequested to provide information regarding vacant seats in private aided, unaided andspecified category of schools as sought by MHRD vide D.O. Letter No. 12-12/2018- IS-5dated 13**^ November 2018 and Reminder D.O. No. 12-12/2018-IS-5 Dated 25.02.2019. No

information has been received from the State.

h) Six Block Institute of Training and Education (BITEs) were sanctioned in the year 2014-15.No BITE has been made functional till date.

i) The State will redeploy the additional teachers at CRC level as the overall PTR of the state is13.

j) The number of zero enrolment schools at upper primary level is very high i.e. 242 (25%) inthe state which was asked to take initiatives for the same.

k) The Gross Access Ratio (GAR) at upper primary level is very low i.e. 41.34%, whereas it is84.65% at primary level and 56.60% at Secondary level. The State was directed to takeinitiatives to improve the same.

I) The State was asked that only the trained and qualified teachers should be recruited.

6. New Approaches 2019-20

During the year 2019-20, certain new approaches have been introduced for enhancing theeffectiveness of the Samagra Shiksha scheme and making it more outcome oriented. Thesenew approaches aim to engage all administrators, schools, teachers and children in activitieswhich would enable to improve the learning outcomes and also measure the impact andoutcome of various components under the scheme. A presentation on the New Approacheswas given and after discussions, these details have been incorporated in the activity wisedetails mentioned in Para 10. These are given below:

i) PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment)

PISA is conducted by 'Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development' everythree years. It is a competency based assessment which unlike content-based assessment,measures the extent to which students have acquired key competencies. The assessment tests

the children in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Learning from participation in PISA willhelp to introduce competency based examination reforms in the school system and moveaway from rote learning. Schools run by Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), NavodayaVidyalaya Samiti (NVS) and Chandigarh all of which are affiliated to CBSE willparticipate in PISA, 2020-21. Although no specific activity or funding has been given forPISA to the States, MHRD will involve all States and UTs in orientation and capacitybuilding programme for PISA.

Page I 4

ii) Shagunotsav

This is a Census based audit to be carried out in September, 2019 of all 11.85 lakh

government and government aided schools in all States and UTs including nearly 7 lakhstandalone primary schools. Data on various school based parameters is presently collected

through the tools of Unified District Information System for Education (UDISE), SHAGUN,

Project Monitoring System (PMS) and Performance Grading Index (PGI) to assess the quality

and infrastructure at school level. However, the same is not corroborated through field visits.

Feedback received from Central Prabhari Officers of aspirational districts has shown that

many schools are not visited at all or the frequency of visit is very less. Therefore, a need was

felt to take up the exercise of school based census to cover each and every school to ascertain

•the adequacy of infrastructure facilities, teachers, students, school management and

community participation.

The parameters for the school census are to be based on the indicators monitored through

UDISE+, PGI and Shagun. Assessment of Learning Outcome will not be part of this

evaluation as it will be conducted through the next round of NAS/School Based

Assessments. The feedback will help in facilitating the system to be responsive to school

specific needs and initiate appropriate policy interventions. The guidelines for the

programme have been issued on IS*'' April, 2019.

iii) Integrated Teacher Training Programme (Elementary level)

In-service teacher and teacher educators training have been an integral part of erstwhile

Schemes of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA), Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan (RMSA)

and Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Teacher Education (CSSTE). As per the framework of

Samagra Shiksha, various kinds of trainings such as training for Principals/HMs (Refresher

and Residential), Teachers (Refresher and Induction), Teacher Educators (Residential,

Training of Master Trainers and Programme and Activities), Training of Educational

Administrators (Residential) and Training for School Management and Development

Committee (SMDC) Members are provided in different components. This kind of

segmentation has adversely affected the efficacy of training. Therefore, an integrated

approach by subsuming abovementioned trainings into a standardised comprehensive training

package has been envisaged in order to ensure effectiveness of school eco-system and

improvement in learning outcomes. This is first time when the Department through its

academic bodies such as National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT)

and National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration (NIEPA) is taking a lead

role and will conduct face to face training for around 32000 Key Resource Persons (KRPs)

across all the States and UTs.

Earlier in-service teacher trainings were conducted by the concerned States and UTs through

SCERTs or any other agency as selected by them. Even after providing teachers training for

last so many years, the efficacy of the training and its impact on improvement of learning

outcome remain a big question. Cascade method with multiple layers has resulted in high

percentage of communication loss when it reached grass root level. Requests have been

Page 1 5

received from many States and UTs to provide support in this regard. Recently, NCERT

conducted a pilot in Tripura and trained 31000 teachers directly through Key ResourcePersons (KRPs) trained by NCERT. After successful implementation of integrated teacher

training in Tripura, it has been decided to scale up this model at national level and implement

in all States and UTs. NCERT and NIEPA have been identified to lead this training in a

mission mode in defined time period.

• This would address concerns such as learner-centred pedagogy, learning outcomes,

creating safe and secure environment in schools, role of community in improving schooleducation, school based assessment, etc., which are required to reach the grass root level

(i.e., to the teacher). For this, an integrated teacher training programme will be conducted

in the months of June - November 2019 to directly train all 41 lakh teachers, school

heads, BRCs and CRCs at the elementary level.

• This training will prepare teachers for School Based Assessment to be conducted inDecember, 2019 in all the schools.

• NCERT will formulate 8 National Resource Groups (NRGs) having 15 Resource Persons

each, including experts from NIEPA. NRG from NCERT and NIEPA will include expertsin different subject areas and generic issues.

• NRGs will conduct face to face training for the Key Resource Persons (KRPs) identified

at the State and UT level, which shall include faculty members of DIETs, SCERTs,

lASEs, CTEs, Senior Secondary Schools, BRCs, etc.

• Key Resource Persons will form a group called State Resource Group (SRGs), which willhave 6 Resource Persons (5 KRPs + 1 School head trained under School leadershipProgramme of NIEPA). These SRGs will directly conduct training for teachers, HeadTeachers/Head Masters, BRCCs and CRCCs at block level. One SRG will train about

125-150 participants at a time.

• A Learning Management System (LMS) Portal and a Mobile App will be developed by

NCERT for registration of Resource Persons and Teachers, dissemination of resources,training gap analysis, monitoring, mentoring and measuring the progress online.Guidelines for the training of KRPs, SRPs and Teachers will be prepared along with themodules and shared with the States and UTs.

This training envisages to achieve both tangible and intangible benefits in terms of 100%coverage of elementary stage teachers. Head Masters/Head Teachers, Principals, faculty ofSCERT and DIETs, Block Resource Centre Coordinator (BRCC), Cluster Resource CentreCoordinator (CRCC), who are trained through an integrated teacher training package. Thiswill be helpful in making classrooms learner-friendly and improving children's competenciesincluding critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, as well as social-personal qualitiessuch as cooperation, team work etc.

iv) School Based Assessment (SBA)

Preparations for NAS 2020 (Pre NAS 2020) interventions have been initiated to reach out toail the districts of different States and UTs. In this context, a School Based Assessment

(SBA) is proposed to be conducted throughout the country to assess the Learning Outcomes

Page]6

of all the children at the Elementary level. The purpose of the SBA is to empower the

teachers to improve the learning levels of the students.

A framework to improve the quality of learning through SBA in the schools is being prepared

which would focus on bringing in its ambit school leaders, teachers and the whole network of

officials at blocks, DIETs, SCERT and the Directorates of Education in different States ad

UTs.

The key features of the School Based Assessment are:

• It is proposed to be a decentralised test where the preparation of the test papers will be

done at District level for which training will be given by NCERT and administration of

the test will be at the school level.

• Non standardized assessment would be used to link to individual learning styles of each

child. Emphasis will be on portfolio, self and peer assessment used in conjunction with

teacher assessment. Assessment of personal social qualities along with cognitive

competencies will be encouraged. A strong and relevant feedback mechanism will be

inbuilt allowing the teacher to give immediate and constructive feedback to students.

• SBA would have an online reporting system of both school and teacher level performancewhich can be monitored at the District, State and National level.

• Guidelines, handbook, videos, e-books and e-leaming materials will be developed forconduct of SBA and shared with the States and UTs.

• SBA would involve in its framework 'a whole school approach' which involves the

participation of the community in the learning process. Students' progress would bediscussed with the parents and shared with the SMCs and suggestions would be sought.

• In implementing the SBA, emphasis will be on on-site mentoring by the Cluster ResourceCentre Coordinator (CRCC). The CRCCs would nurture and support the teachers on a

regular basis. Teachers would be encouraged to participate in quality circles within theclusters.

• Sample checking by an external agency will be done to validate the data from the schools,

v) Strengthening of CRCs - Mobility support to CRCs

The Cluster Resource Centres are the most critical units for training and on-site support toschools and teachers. The CRCs need to undertake regular visits and organise monthly

meetings to discuss academic issues and design strategies for better school performance.Periodic inspection and supervision of schools to observe the infrastructure and facilities and

the administrative aspects is critical. In addition, a proper system of academic and curricularsupport has to be developed to serve the purpose of continuous professional up gradation ofteachers. In this context, each Cluster Resource Coordinator should visit the schools and

provide onsite academic support under his/her jurisdiction at least once in 2 months and sendreports on a common platform to be shared by MHRD.

vi) School Management Committee (SMC) Training

Training of SMC members is required to be conducted by the Cluster Resource Coordinator(CRC). Four Quarterly meetings of SMC would be held in a year on dates to be notified by

Page I 7

the state government for all the schools. Support for holding the meetings and uploadingquarterly reports on a Mobile App on the meeting held as well as on the status/activities ofthe school will be provided.

vii) Display of LOGO of Samagra Shiksha

A Logo is the symbol of the vision and sprit of the Scheme. A logo also helps in fostering thespirit and building a bond between the school, the student and the community at large.Earlier, SSA logo was painted on school walls which was very well received by thecommunity and helped in identifying the schools.

Thus, it becomes important for all schools to display the logo prominently on the premises.All schools will be required to display the logo of 'Samagra Shiksha' along with facilitiesunder the scheme such as free text books, free uniforms etc. at prominent place through wallpaintings or display board. The design of the logo will be shared by MHRD.

viii) Shagun Repository

This has been designed to change the narrative on school education by showcasing themultitude of innovative & successful models being implemented by all States and UTs indiverse circumstances. It enables the successful initiatives to be replicated & taken to scale. Itencourages all States and UTs to positively compete with each other to carry out and uploadbest practices. This repository of good practices focuses on positive stories and developmentsthat are driving performance improvements in school education. These innovative practicesare documented in the form of case studies, videos, testimonials and images for whichsupport is being provided under Samagra Shiksha.

ix) Constitution of Youth Club and Eco Club

Youth clubs in schools are an instrument to develop life skills, build self-esteem, developself-confidence and resilience and counter negative emotions of stress, shame and fear.

Eco clubs in schools will empower students to participate and take up meaningfulenvironmental activities and projects. It is a forum through which students can reach out toinfluence, engage their parents and neighbourhood eommunities to promote soundenvironmental behaviour. It will empower students to explore environmental eoncepts andactions beyond the confines of a syllabus or curriculum.

In view of the above, all schools will constitute Youth and Eco clubs for students where theycan participate in activities such as debates, music, arts, sports, reading, awareness on waterconservation, physical activities after school hours and during vacation. These would help inutilising the ideal school infrastructure particularly playing fields, sports equipment andlibraries which will help the students to develop hobbies, skills and interests they might nototherwise be able to explore.

x) Issue of Identity card to teachersIn order to ensure quality of education, it is essential that duly appointed teachers are presentin schools. Hence, the States and UTs are required to issue identity cards to all their regular

Page 1 8

and contractual teachers of elementary and secondary/higher secondary schools having the

details such as photograph & name of the teacher along with name of the School with U-

DISE Code, Full Address of the school with Block, Village, District, and Designation etc.

PGI indicator 2.1.6 will be amended to replace teachers' photos with ID cards for teachers.

xi) Rangotsav

For the promotion of experiential learning and joyful learning, various activities are

organized for both students and teachers. Some of the major activities under taken are Kala

Utsav; Role Play Competition; Band Competition; Music Teacher Competition and Folk

dance competition. While competitions will be organized at the secondary level, focus may

be on joyful learning at elementary level.

xii) School Safety & Security

The issue of school safety has become more complex moving beyond corporal punishment to

bullying, physical violence, sexual, psychological and emotional violence, even leading to

death in extreme cases. In the recent past, there have been reports of violence and tragic

incidents in schools including murder, assault and rape. This is a key cause of worry,

demanding a school safety and security framework and plan of action.

The scheme of Samagra Shiksha endeavours to provide every child access to education in an

environment that is safe, protective and conducive to growth & development. The teachersneed to function as first step counsellors within the school. Also, every school is reqmred todisplay a board on safety with helpline and emergency numbers and contact persons.

xiii) Performance Grading Index

The Performance Grading Index (PGI) has been designed to cater to the transformational

change in the field of school education, where the focus has now shifted to the quality ofeducation. The index comprising of 70 indicators would propel States and UTs towardsundertaking multipronged interventions that will bring about the much desired educationaloutcomes.

xiv) UDISE +

This is an improved and updated version of UDISE. The entire system will be online andgradually move towards collecting real time data. Some of the expected outcomes of UDISE+are: Evidence based planning and decision making: data analytics to identify factors affectingschool performance: time series data to study the trend over years and monitor improvementand growth: track key performance indicators and rationalization of schools and teachers

based on evidence.

xv) Reporting by the Head Masters/PrincipalsIn order to monitor the expenditure under Samagra Shiksha and ensure that all the services

and facilities reach the schools, a detailed system of obtaining reports every two months fromevery Head Master & Principal in a government school will be put in place. The reportingwill be done through a Mobile App, which will be compiled at a central server where thesoftware will generate discrepancy reports, which will then be followed up forcorrection/necessary action.

Page I 9

xvi) Reporting by the BRCs

The potential of BRCs as academic resource centre are yet to be realized and their role andfunctions are to be academically channelized. BRCs/URCs need to function as resourcecentres to study the problems and to design strategies to address the academic issues inschools.

The Block Resource persons will be adequately trained and utilized more effectively. Underthe Integrated Teacher Training Programme all the target groups, namely, teachers,principals, block and cluster resource persons, etc., will be brought on the same platform andoriented on similar content focusing on their specific roles and responsibility. There will beregular visits by the BRPs to schools for continuous monitoring, follow-ups and to ensurethat learnings from training are translated in classroom transactions. The reporting will bedone through the Mobile App which will be compiled at a central server where the softwarewill generate discrepancy reports which will then be followed up for necessary action.

7. Total Estimated Budget (2019-20)

The estimates for the AWP&B for 2019-20 under Elementary, Secondary and TeacherEducation are as under: -

HeadSpillover#

Non-Recurring(Fresh)

Recurring(Fresh)

Total

(Fresh)Total

i

Elementary6137.88 10236.52 18265.85 28502.37 34640.3

Secondary4502.72 8036.99 9376.94 17413.93 21916.7

Teacher Education810.81 436.73 1970.27 2407 3217.81

Total11451.41 18710.24 29613.06 48323.3 59774.7

*Includes Programme Management (MMER), #As per PMS

8. Actual Releases bv GOI during 2019-20

Against the above estimates. Central Government shall provide to the State Government,Rs.368.05 Crore as its share (Rs.250.01crore for elementary, Rs.89.08 Crore forsecondary & senior secondary and Rs.28.96 Crore for Teacher Education). The Statewould contribute Rs.40.9 Crore as its State share matching the above Central share as perthe existing fund sharing pattern of Samagra Shiksha.

State will also be able to utilise their unspent balances as on 3E* March, 2019 for theactivities approved in 2019-20 including spill over.

The additional requirement of funds as proposed by the States in the meeting has beenexamined and based on the norms & the criteria of the Samagra Shiksha Scheme, thefunds for the eligible activities has been considered and provided in the estimates.

There are likely to be savings under the scheme. Therefore, supplementary PABmeetings may be considered separately sometime in the month of October-November,2019, to consider the additional requirements of the States and UTs.

Page 110

Manipur State is advised to prioritise the following activities besides RTE entitlementswhich would help the States In improving the grades under PGI, and particularly

learning outcomes (as brought out from the post NAS-2017 analysis].

SI. No. Priority activities

1 Composite School Grant

2 Integrated Teacher Training (EE) including Printing of Integrated TeacherTraining package

3 CRC mentoring of Schools and Teachers

4 School Based Assessment (EE]

5 School Audit fShagunotsav] (EE & SE]

6 Display Board on Safety Guidelines (EE & SE]

7 Library Grant

8 Sports & Physical Education

9 Constitution of Youth Club and Eco Club (for all classes]

10 Logo and Display Board -Samagra Shiksha (for all schools]

As per Section 7(5) of the RTE Act, 2009, the State Government shall after taking into

consideration the sum provided by the Central Government above and the mandatory

matching State share, provide the balance funds necessary to fulfil the estimate for the

implementation of the Act. It is recommended that the State should meet the balance amount

from its own resources including the additional funds devolved under the 14

Commission.

thFinance

The interventions under the Samagra Shiksha comprise of activities pertaining to Elementary,

Secondary and Teacher Education respectively and there is a single Budget for Samagra

Shiksha in the Demand for Grants (BE) 2019-20.

The release of funds would be from a single Budget Head only. However, for purposes of

ascertaining the quantum of funds going to each component, the Sub-Heads for Elementary

(including Teacher Education) and Secondary Education has been classified separately.

The State should invariably provide Single Budget Head during 2019-20 and the

nomenclature should be Samagra Shiksha. Since Samagra Shiksha would be catering to

various activities relating to RTE entitlements and all other Elementary interventions as

well as Teacher Training and activities for BRC and CRCS which forms the portion of

Teacher Education activities as well as for Secondary Education, the States shall also

provide a suitable Nomenclature with Sub-Heads to identify the disbursement of funds

separately under all components of Samagra Shiksha.

9. Release of Funds:

The release of funds under the scheme will be further guided by the following conditions:

a) State should release/transfer the central share to State Implementing Society within 15 days

of its receipt in the State Treasury.

Page 111

b) The State share should be released to the State Implementing Society within one month of

the release of the central share.

c) All releases by the Centre would be subject to fulfilment of provisions of GFR by the State.The procurement guidelines as prescribed in the FM&P Manual should be adhered to andall procurement activities by the States and UTs should be routed through GEM portal.

d) All guidelines issued by MHRD regarding utilisation of funds under the scheme will befollowed.

e) The release of central share of funds to all the States and UTs is subject to fulfilling thesubmission of documents, reports, financial statements as prescribed in the Samagra

Shiksha FMP Manual.

f) The ad-hoc amount of instalment has been released to the eligible States during April-May,2019.

As regards the balance of funds to be released towards l^'instalment and 2"''instalment,the conditions to be fulfilled arc as under:

The T^Instalment would be released only after proposal for release of first instalment isreceived from State Government along with:

• Approval of Annual Plans by PAB;

• Transfer of GOl share of previous year to SIS from State Treasury;

• Release of commensurate State share for previous year; and release of full GOl share ofad-hoc release of Central Government to SIS along with matching State share by State

Government.

• Submission of provisional UC for previous year. The utilization certificate should be dulycountersigned by the Administrative Secretary/ Finance Secretary.

• Confirmation of state towards provisions of matching State share in the State Budget forthe current financial year.

• Provisional Expenditure Statement of the current year.

• Statement of Outstanding Advances Accrued, adjusted and pending till date.

• Physical Progress of Civil Works up to March 2019.

The 2"'^instalment would be released only after:

• Request letter is received from State/UT for release of 2"'' instalment.• Latest expenditure statement (Capital Head and General Head separately) of the State

Implementation Society for 2019-20 for EE, SE and TE components. Expenditurestatement should indicate the release of Gol share from previous instalment to SIS fromTreasury.

• Final Utilization Certification (Capital and General Head separately and on separatepages) for the year 2018-19 for EE, SE and TE components, along with consolidatedAudited UCs separately for General Head and Capital Head, must contain Generalcomponent, SC component and ST component-wise financial details. The audited UCs

Page 112

should be counter signed by Administrative Secretary of the Department/Finance

Secretary.

• Statement showing cumulative status of state share since inception of SSA, RMSA and

IE.

• Audit report of Samagra Shiksha for the year 2018-19.

• Statement showing details on outstanding advances accrued, adjusted and pending till

date for EE, SE and TE components.

• Action taken report on the Pending Audit observations for SSA and RMSA.

• Documents relating to creation of combined State Implementing Society (SIS) for

implementation of Samagra Shiksha.

• Receipt of Central Share of balance of 1st instalment by SIS.

• Receipt of Central Share along with matching State share of 1st instalment by SIS.

• Physical progress report of Civil Works.

• Latest Annual Report.

• All procurement activities are to be carried out invariably through the GEM portal only.These minutes have been designed as a working document to be implemented and monitored

throughout the year. They include the focus areas and new approaches of MHRD which havebeen deliberated in detail in the PAB meetings. The objective of this is to have emphasis onquality of education and real time monitoring of activities under Samagra Shiksha throughUDISE+, PGI, Mobile Apps, and Field Inspections. Many activities are shown separately forelementary and secondary due to different budget sub-heads. State specific projects areshown separately for clarity and monitoring purposes. State will provide details of the

Districts, Blocks and Schools, along with UDISE code where the activities have been

conducted. The minutes also include expected outcomes and monitoring mechanism for eachactivity which will help States and UTs in assessing their performance.

10. Activity wise details and estimates approved:

1) Infrastructure and Civil Works:

a) New Schools (ElementarvEAn outlay of Rs.472.40 lakh was estimated for civil

works for opening of composite elementary schools in 8 habitations and up-gradationof 2 Primary Schools to Upper Primary Schools. The list of schools attached at

Annexure-II(a)& (b).

An outlay of Rs.10.00 lakh was also estimated for recurring cost for 2 new upper primaryschools @Rs.5.00 lakh/school for 6 months.

Activity Physical Unit Cost Financial

Opening of New Schools - NR (Elementary)

1 Composite School for Elementary 8 47.87 382.962 Upgradation of PS to UPS (VI-VIII) 2 44.72 89.44

Total of Opening of New Schools - NR (Elementary) 472.4

Page 113

b) New Schools (Secondary^: An outlay of Rs.387.80 lakh was estimated for civilworks for Up-gradation of two Upper Primary Schools to Secondary Schools (1section). The list of schools is attached at Annexure-n(c).


Opening of New / Upgraded Schools - NR (Secondary)

1 1 Section School (Class IX-X) 2 193.90 387.80

Total of Opening of New / Upgraded Schools - NR (Secondary) 387.80

c) Strengthening of existing schools (Elementary); An outlay of Rs. 9125.67 lakh asper unit cost given below was estimated for various infrastructure interventions forelementary level schools. The list of schools is attached at Annexure-III.

(Is. in lakh'


Strengthening of Schools - NR (up to Highest Class VIII)

1 Additional Classrooms (Upto Class VIII) 72+210^^11*

=293

18.68 5473.24

2 Boys Toilets 1 4.31 4.31

3 Major Repair (Upto Class VIII) 5 2.00 10.00

4 Building Less Schools (Primary)-ACRs 76 47.87 3638.12

Total of Strengthening of Schools - NR (up to Highest Class VIII) 9125.67

^210 ACR in building less upper primary schools. * Under Fagathansi Mission

d) Strengthening of existing schools (Secondary): An outlay of Rs.2859.46 lakh wasestimated for various infrastructure interventions for secondary level. The list of

schools is attached at Annexure-IV.

(Rs. in lakh)

Activitv Physical Unit Cost Financial

Strenptheninp of Existins SchoolsdX - X) - NR

1 Additional Classroom 29+21*=

50

18.68 934.00

2 Science Lab 18+1*=19 17.74 337.06

3 Lab Equipment (Science Lab) I8+l*=19 1.00 19.00

4 Library Room 46+3*=49 22.28 1091.72

5 Drinking Water 3 ■ 3.04 9.12

6 Boys Toilet 6+7*=13 4.31 56.03

7 Girls Toilet 24+9*=33 4.81 158.73

8 Computer Room 15 16.92 253.80

Total of Strengthening of Existing Schools (IX-X) -NR 2859.46

*Under Fagathansi Mission

Page 114

e) Strengthening of existing schools (Higher Secondary): An outlay of Rs.2087.75lakh was estimated for various infrastructure interventions for higher secondary level.

The list of schools is attached at Annexure-IV.

(Rs. In lakh)


Strengthening of Existing Schools (XI - XII) - NR

1 Library Room 3 22.28 66.84

2 Drinking Water 1 3.04 3.04

3 Additional Classroom 49 18.68 915.32

4 Boys Toilet 26 4.31 112.06

5 Physics Lab 8+10*=18 23.39 421.02

6 Chemistry Lab 10 23.39 233.9

7 Girls Toilet 26 4.81 125.06

8 Biology Lab 7+2*=9 23.39 210.51

Total of Strengthening of Existing Schools (XI - XII) - NR 2087.75

* Under Fagathansi Mission

f) Residential Quarters and Major Repairs (upto highest class X or XII): An outlay

of Rs.2173.98 lakh was estimated for construction of 114 quarters for teachers in 27

schools and Rs. 160.00 lakh was estimated for major repairs of quarters in 64 schools.

The list of schools is attached at Anncxure-VI.

(Rs.In lakh)

Activity Physical Unit Cost FinancialTeacher Quarter - NR (up to Highest Class X or XH)

Residential Quarter 114 19.07 2173.98

Total of Teacher Quarter - NR (up to Highest Class X or XII) 2173.98

Major Repairs 64 2.50 160.00

Ma jor Repairs - NR (up to Highest Class X or XII) 160.00

Outcome: This would enable to maintain the enrolment and retention at Primary and

Elementary level and is covered under PGI Indicators 1.2.1,1.2.3, 1.2.4 and 1.2.6.

Monitoring- Census based audit of all government and government aided schools in all

States and UTs will be done in September, 2019 whereby physical inspection would be

undertaken to check the status of all schools on UDISE + and GIS Mapping. The reports tobe uploaded in the portal from various levels i.e., Principal/Headmaster, CRC coordinator and

District level Officials, will be checked to validate the progress.

2) Residential SchooIs/hostcls (Elemcntarvl:

a) Previous Residential Schools: An outlay of Rs.420.75 lakh was estimated for recurring cost

for 9 previous residential schools with intake capacity of 100 students each at elementary

level.

Page 115

(Rs. In lakh)


Residential Schools - Recurring (Previous Year) (Capacity 100)

1 Maintenance per child per month 9 18.00 ■ 162.00

2 Stipend per child per month 900 0.012 10.80

3 Supplementary TLM, Stationery and othereducational material

900 0.01 9.00

4 1 Warden 9 3.00 27.00

5 1 Head Teacher in case the enrollment

exceeds 100

9 3.00 27.00

6 4-5 Fulltime teachers as per RTE Norms 9 9.60 86.40

7 3 Part time teachers 9 1.80 16.20

8 1 Full time Accountant 9 1.20 10.80

9 2 Support staff - (Accountant/Assistant,Peon, Chowkidar)

9 1.20 10.80

10 1 Head Cook 9 1.80 16.20

11 Specific Skill training 900 0.01 9.00

12 Electricity / water charges 9 1.00 9.00

13 Medical care/contingencies 900 0.0125 11.25

14 Maintenance 9 0.75 6.75

15 Miscellaneous 9 0.75 6.75

16 Capacity Building 900 0.001 0.90

17 Physical / Self Defence Training 9 0.10 0.90

Total of Residential Schools - Recurring (Previous Year) (Capacity 100) 420.75

Out of above 9 residential schools, 7 residential schools were upgraded to secondary leveland recurring cost for these 7 residential schools (with capacity of 50 students each) wassanctioned for secondary level (class IX-X) in the year 2018-19. Therefore, an outlay ofRs. 123.76 lakh was estimated for recurring cost for these 7 residential schools at secondarylevel (capacity with 100 students each) in 2019-20.


Residential Schools - Recurring (New) (Capacity

b) New Residential hosteliAn outlay of Rs.45.86 lakh was estimated for recurring cost for one

new residential hostel with intake capacity of 100 students at Noney district which is newly

created district.

(Rs. In lakh)

Activity Physical Unit Cost 1 FinancialResidential Hostels - Recurring (New) (Capacity ICQ)

1 Food/lodging per child per month 1 18.00 18.002 Stipend per child per month 1.20 1.20

3 Supplementary TLM, Stationery and othereducational material

1 0.24 0.24

4 1 Warden 1 0.60 0.60


1 4.32 4.32

6 1 Head Cook 1 0.03 0.03

7 2 Assistant Cook 1 0.30 0.30

8 Electricity / water charges 1 0.60 0.609 Medical care/contihgencies 100 0.0075 0.7510 Maintenance 1 0.40 0.40

11 Miscellaneous 100 0.18217 18.217

12 Provision of Rent 100 0.012 1.20

Total of Residential Hostels - Recurring (New) (Capacity 10() 45.86

c) Previous Residential hostels: An outlay of Rs.324.93 lakh was estimated for recurring cost-

for 7 previous residential hostels with intake capacity of 100 students each.


Residential Hostels - Recurring (Previous Year) (Capacity 100)

1 Food/lodging per child per month 7 18.00 126.002 Stipend per child per month 7 1.20 8.403 Supplementary TLM, Stationery and other

educational material

7 0.85714 5.99998

4 1 Warden 7 0.60 4.20


7 4.32 30.24

6 1 Head Cook 7 0.03 0.21

7 2 Assistant Cook 7 0.30 2.10

8 Electricity / water charges 7 0.60 4.209 Medical care/contingencies 700 0.0075 5.2510 Maintenance 7 0.344 2.408

11 Miscellaneous 700 0.18217 127.519

12 Provision of Rent 700 0.012 8.40

Total of Residential Hostels - Recurring (Previous Year) (Capacity 100) 324.933) RTE Entitlements (Elementary)

a) Free Uniforms: An outlay of Rs.883.60 lakh was estimated for providing free uniforms to147266 children at elementary level @ Rs.600.00 each, thereby covering all eligible children,as per norms of Samagra Shiksha. The details are as under:

Page 117

(Rs. in lakh)

Activity MasterPhysical

(Children)Unit Cost Financial -

11

All Girls 74646 0.006 447.88

ST Boys 43503 0.006 261.02

SC Boys 2433 0.006 14.60

BPL Boys 26684 0.006 160.10

Total 147266 BBIHH 883.60

Outcome: 100% coverage of all eligible children within 3 months of start of academic year.

This is covered under PGI Indicator 1.3.10.

Monitoring: Through report to be uploaded oh the common portal meant for the purpose andother reports.

b) Free Textbooks: An outlay of Rs.489.99 lakh was estimated as per the unit cost mentionedbelow for free textbooks at elementary level as per norms of the scheme.


(Children)Unit Cost Financial

Text Books (Class I - II) 70971 0.0025 177.43

Braille Books (Class I - II) 22 0.0025 0.05

Large Print Books (Class I - II) 73 0.0025 0.18

Text Books (Class III - V) 62298 0.0025 155.75

Braille Books (Class III - V) 37 0.0025 0.09

Large Print Books (Class III - V) 237 0.0025 0.59

Text Books (Class VI - VIII) 38805 0.004 155.23

Braille Books (Class VI - VIII) 23 0.004 0.09

Large Print Books (Class VI - VIII) 145 0.004 0.58

Total 489.99

Outcome: 100% coverage of all eligible children within 1 month of start of academic year.This is covered under the PGI Indicator 1.3.11.

Monitoring: Through report to be uploaded on the common portal meant for the purpose andother reports.

c) Special Training for age appropriate admission of out-of-school children (OoSC)-Anamount of Rs.746.30 lakh was estimated for age appropriate admission of 5793 OoSCthrough residential and non-residential mode as per norms of the scheme.

Aetivity Physical Unit Cost Financial

12 Month (Non-Residential - Fresh) 1194 0.06 71.64

Total of Special Training for OoSC - Non-Residential (Fresh) 71.64

Special Training for OoSC - Residential (Fresh)

53.d 12 Month (Residential - Fresh) 1347 0.2 269.40

Rs. in lakh)

Page 118

Total of Special Training for OoSC - Residential (Fresh) 269.40

Special Training for OoSC - Non-Residential (Previous year)

12 Month (Non-Residential - Previous Year) 1751 0.06 105.06

Total of Special Training for OoSC - Non-Residential (Previous year) 105.06

Special Training for OoSC - Residential (Previous year)

12 Month (Residential - Previous Year) 1501 0.2 300.20

Total of Special Training for OoSC - Residential (Previous year) 300.20

Total of Special Training of Out of School Children (OoSC) 746.30

Outcome: Mainstreaming of out of School Children and improving enrolment rate at

elementary level. This is covered under PGI Indicator 1.2.1 and 1.2.8.


4) Media and Community Mobilization CEIemcntarvl

a) Display of Logo of Samagra Shiksha (SS): A logo of Samagra Shiksha along with facilitiesavailable under Samagra Shiksha such as free text books, free uniforms should be displayedat prominent place in each school through wall paintings or display board. The logo and thisinformation will be shared with the States and UTs. An amount of Rs.25.84 Lakh was

estimated for the above purpose @ Rs. 1000/- per school.

b) An amount of Rs.12.92 lakh was estimated for Community Mobilization activities @ Rs.500per school.

Activity Master Physical(Schools)

Unit Cost Financial

Media & Community Mobilization (Elementary^Display of Logo of Samagra Shiksha 2584 0.01 25.84Media & Community Mobilization 2584 0.005 12.92Total 38.76

5) Training and meetings of SMC (Elementary'^

An outlay of Rs.77.52 lakh @ Rs.3000 per school was estimated for training of SMCsmembers of 2584 schools. This includes provision for conducting/convening of SMCmeetings on a single notified date by the State once in every quarter, incentive for nominatedparents for attending the SMC meeting regularly, uploading of quarterly reports with respectto meetings held and status of the school on the web portal is being developed in MHRD.

Activity Master Physical(SMC/SMDC)

Unit Cost Financial

Training ofSMC/SDMC 2584 0.03 77.52

Outcome:

Page 119

The SMCs will hold quarterly meetings and upload reports on the portal to be set up for the

purpose. Also help generate awareness about the scheme.

Monitoring: Through report to be uploaded on the common portal meant for the purpose and

other reports.

6) Media & Community Mobilisation fSecondarvl:

a) Display of Logo of Samagra Shiksha (SS): A logo of Samagra Shiksha along with facilitiesavailable under Samagra Shiksha should be displayed at prominent place in each school

through wall paintings or display board. The logo and this information will be shared with theStates and UTs. An amount of Rs.3.93 Lakh was estimated for the above purpose @

Rs.lOOO/- per school.

b) An amount of Rs. 1.97 lakh is meant for Community Mobilization activities @ Rs.500/- perschool.

(Rs. in lakh)

Activity MasterPhysical(Schools)

Unit Cost FinancialK

Media & Community Mobilization (Secondary)

Display of Logo of Samagra Shiksha 393 0.01 3.93

Media & Community Mobilization 393 0.005 1.97

Total 5.90

7) Training and Meetings of SMDCs (Secondary)

A total amount of Rs. 11.79 Lakh @ Rs.3000/- per school per annum was estimated fortraining of SMDC members of 393 schools. This includes provisions for conducting /convening of SMDC meetings on a single notified date by the State once in every quarter,incentive for nominated parents for attending the SMDC meeting regularly and Uploadingquarterly reports with respect to meetings held and status of the school as per the Mobile Appwhich is being developed in MHRD.

(Rs. in lakh)

Activity MasterPhysical(SMDC)

Unit Cost Financial'i.

Media & Community Mobilization (Secondary)

SMDC Training 393 0.03 11.79

Total ■ 11.79

Outcome:

The SMDCs will hold quarterly meeting and upload reports on the portal to be set up for thepurpose. Also help generate awareness about the scheme.


Page I 20

8) Quality Interventions;

a) Learning Enhancement Programme/ Remedial teaching (Elementary): An amount of

Rs.845.19 lakh as per the unit cost given below was estimated at elementary level for

remedial material and other teaching activities. The main objective of LEP is to identify the

learning gaps and equip students with core learning prerequisites appropriate to the particular

grade.

Tls. in lakh^

Actiyity^Master*^(Schools)

Unit Cost;^Fihanciaf

LEP (Class I-II)

1 Supplementary Books 2432 0.05 121.60

2 Development of Indigenous Teaching LearningMaterials(TLMs). (Development andimplementation)

1947 0.01 19.47

3 Learning Enhancement Card (LEG) 1220 0.0212 25.864

4 MaheishangdagiMahei 670 0.15 100.50

Total of LEP (Class I-II) 267.43

LE]P (Class III-V)

5 Maheishangdagi Mahei 731 0.15 109.65

6 Development of Indigenous Teaching LearningMateriis(TLMs).

1947 0.015 29.205

7 Learning Enhancement Card (LEG) 1220 0.05 61.00

8 Supplementary Books 2432 0.05 121.60

Total of LEP (Class III - V) 321.46

LE]P (Class VI - VIII)

9 MaheisangdagiMahei(Knowledge from School) 474 0.4 189.6010 Learning Enhancement Card (LEG)

(Implementation)672 0.05982 40.19

11 Development of Indigenous Teaching LearningMaterials(TLMs)

474 0.05591 26.501

Total of LEP (Class VI - VIII) 256.30Total for Elementary for LEP 845.19

b) Learning Enhancement Programme/Remedial teaching (Secondary): An amount of Rs.

39.30 lakh @ Rs. 1000/- per students was estimated for providing LEP/Remedial teaching in

English language for covering the students of class Xth of 393 schools. The main objective ofLEP is to identify the learning gaps and equip students with core learning prerequisitesappropriate to the particular grade.


Unit Cost Financial

LEP (Class IX - XII)

Remedial Teaching 393 0.01 39.30Total 39.30

Page I 21

Outcome: The interventions at (a) and (b) above will help in improving the learning outcomesof identified children and are covered under PGI Indicators 1.1.2 to 1.1.9, 1.3.4 and 1.3.6.

Monitoring: On the basis of School Based Assessment (SB A) and other reports.

c) School Based Assessment (Elementary):

• A School Based Assessment (SBA) will be held in all the schools in December 2019 toassess the Learning Outcomes of all the children at the Elementary level. Prior to this,workshop will be held with all States and UTs to finalize the parameters.

• Module and guidelines will be prepared for SBA and shared with the States and UTs.• Sessions on SBA will be included in the Capacity Building programme for all the KRPs and

teachers.

• An amount of Rs.160.00 lakh @ Rs.10.00 lakh per district was estimated for carrying outSchool Based Assessment and related activities including amongst others collecting,

examining and utilizing the information regarding achievements of learning outcomes bystudents.

(Rs. in lakh)


(Districts)Unit Cost Financial

School Based Assessment (Elementary)Assessment at State level 16 10.00 160.00

Total 160.00

Outcome: This would enable the State to formulate appropriate strategies for improving theperformance of students and is covered under PGI indicators 1.1.1 to 1.1.9.

Monitoring: Third party evaluation for at least 1% of the total schools and other reports.

d) Composite School Grant (Elementary): An outlay of Rs. 625.75 lakh as per unit cost givenbelow for Composite School Grant, as per enrolment, was estimated for 2584 schoolsincluding 10% for Swachhta Action Plan. These funds should be utilized for the replacementof nori-functional school equipment and for incurring other recurring costs, etc., as per theguidelines laid down for utilization of school grant.


Unit Cost Financial1

Annual Grant (uu to Highest Class VIII)

School Grant - (Enrol > 1-15) 490 0.125 61.25

School Grant - (Enrol > 15-100) 1950 0.25 487.50

School Grant -(Enrol>100 and 250 and

of non-functional school equipment and for incurring other recurring costs, etc., as per the

guidelines laid down for utilization of school grant.

, (Rs. in lakh)

Activity MasterPhysical,

. (Schools)Unit Cost Financial

Annual Grant (up to Highest Class X or XII)

School Grant -(Enrol>l - 15) 6 ■ 0.125 0.75School Grant -(Enrol>15 - 100) 156 0.25 39.00School Grant - (Enrol> 100 and 250 and 1000) 5 1.00 5.00

Total 393 iHHn 178.00

Outcome: This would facilitate in improving school environment and adopt the Swachhta

Action Plan effectively and is covered under PGI indicators 1.3.9, 1.4.15 and 1.4.16.

Monitoring: Through UDISE + and PGI and Field Inspection as part of Shagunotsav to be

conducted during September 2019 and on the basis of other reports.

f) Library Grant (Elementary): An amount of Rs. 174.3 lakh as per unit cost given below wasestimated for library grant in 2584elementary schools.

Activity Master . Physical(SchooIs)

Unit Cost, Financial

Library (Upto Highest Class VIII)

Composite Elementary Schools (I - VIII) 550 0.13 71.50 ■

Upper Primary Schools (VI - VIII) 22 0.10 2.20

Primary School (I - V) 2012 0.05 100.60

Total 2584 174.3

g) Library Grant (Secondary): An amount of Rs.59.39 lakh as per unit cost given below wasestimated for library grants in 393 Secondary/Higher Secondary schools.


Unit Cost Financial

Library (upto Highest Class XII) 'Composite Secondary Schools (Class I - X) 250 0.15 37.50Schools "with Class VI - XII 15 0.15 2.25Composite Secondary Schools (Class IX - XII) 15 0.15' 2.25Senior Secondary Schools only(Class XI - XII) 2 0.10 0.20Composite Senior Secondary Schools (Class I - XII) 18 0.18 3.24Schools with Class VI - X 93" 0.15 13.95Total 393 59.39

Page I 23

The funds for both (f) and (g) should be utilized in accordance with the detailed guidelines

issued by MHRD. The following points also need to be kept in mind.

(h) Printing and Procurement of books:

• All the procurement of books from library grant should be done at State and UT level.The funds meant for library grant should not be released by the States and UTs to

Districts/schools.

• An age appropriate series of books is being published by NCERT especially forprocurement from Library Grant under Samagra Shiksha. States and UTs may placedirect orders to NCERT for procurement of these books from State Level. NCERT willmake the delivery of the books at the Central Level. States may further deliver thesebooks to schools. States and UTs may also obtain the copyright of these books fromNCERT and get them translated in their regional language with the help of SCERTsand print in the States and UTs with the help of their Printing Corporations/GovernmentPress. For this purpose. States and UTs may enter into MoU with NCERT.

• Books should be procured for use of children of different age-groups. Books for classesup to Grade V may be called Bulbul series, for Grades VI to VIII as Mynah series andGrades IX to XII as Koel series.

• States and UTs may if they so desire, procure books, meant for children, beyond theNCERT list from other Government publishers including SCERTs, Central Institute ofIndian Languages (CIIL) etc. States and UTs may also develop their own library booksincluding comics and illustrated books through the SCERTs and print and publish themfor use as library books. States can have their own folk tale series of books to promoteregional cultural heritage.

• All books procured for libraries must bear the year of purchase under Samagra Shikshascheme and name of the school. No newspaper and magazines can be purchased fromthe library grant.

(i) Reading:

• Schools may have provision of Reading Room/Reading Comer/Reading space and twoperiods in a week may be dedicated as reading periods in school time table.

• Children should have complete freedom of choosing books for themselves and readingfrom a range of attractively displayed books.

• The reading corner is the collective responsibility of teachers and children. Childrenshould be given responsibility of maintaining the books in the reading corner and itsusage.

• Engaging with children's literature should be an integral part of their classroomprocesses along with other day to day activities of reading and writing. As childrendevelop interest and engage with literature, they will be encouraged to visit the nearbylibrary also.

(j) Management:

• States and UTs may ensure delivery of library books to each school by using samechannel as distribution of text books.

Page I 24

• States and UTs may make guidelines for use of libraries including number of periods,

to be earmarked as library period in the govt. schools. The guidelines prepared by the

States and UTs may also include provision for inspection of libraries by Implementing

Officers so as to ensure that books procured are being issued on regular basis to

students.

• One teacher in each school may be given the additional responsibility for safe keeping

of library books, issuing them and receiving the books back from students. The library

in-charge teacher may be given relaxation from teaching for two periods in a week.

Further, there should not be any penalty on the library in-charge teacher for any wear

and tear of books by the students.

• School grant may be used for repairing of damaged books procured from Library grant.

• District and Block Education Officers (& their inspectors), Block Resource

Coordinators and Cluster Resource Coordinators should visit every school to see the

availability of library books and their utilisation.

Outcome: The above intervention is meant for improving the reading habits of children as

emphasized in Padhe Bharat Badhe Bharat and is covered under PGI indicators 1.3.4 and

1.3.6, 1.1.2 to 1.1.9).

Monitoring: Through regular reports and other reports to be uploaded on the portal atdifferent levels and physical inspection at the time of Shagunotsav.

(k) Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan (Elementary): An outlay of Rs.l 14.952 lakh as per unit cost

given below was estimated for Rashtriya Aavishkar Abhiyan (RAA) for various activities,

such as Science Exhibition/Book Fair, School Science club (upper primary). Exposure visitoutside State, Excursion Trip for students within state, Science Kit, Maths Kit, Inter school

quiz completion (district level) and Science Park for elementary level. State is requested to

provide UDISE code of selected schools within t>vo months where these activities will be

carried out. The State may also refer to detailed guidelines issued by MHRD for RashtriyaAvishkar Abhiyan.

0̂ s. in lakh)


Unit CostFinancia

1

Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan (Elementary)

Science Exhibition / Book Fair 16 (district) 0.94375 15.10

School Science club (upper primary) 136 (school) 0.10 13.60

Exposure visit outside State 56 (student) 0.20 11.20

Science Kit 136 (school) 0.09656 13.132

Math Kit 200 (school) 0.01661 3.32

Excursion Trip for students within state 6400 (student) 0.004 25.60

Inter school quiz completion district level 16(district) 0.50 8.00

Science Park 5 (district) 5.00 25.00

Total ijumi^iiin 114.952

Page 1 25

Outcome: This will help in improving overall performance in terms of PGI indicators 1.1.7and 1.1.8.

Monitoring: Through regular reports and other reports to be uploaded on the portal atdifferent levels and inspection by the BRPs, CRPs, DEOs etc.

(l)Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan(Secondary): An amount of Rs. 127.3 6 lakh as per unit costgiven below was estimated for Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan (RAA) for various activities,such as, Study Trip for Students to Higher Institutions (Within States), Science & MathKits, Science exhibitions/book fair; quiz Competitions, Exposure Visits within and outsideState, Vedic Maths, Science and Maths kits, etc. State is requested to provide UDISE codeof selected schools within two months where these activities will be carried out. The State

may also refer to detailed guidelines issued by MHRD for Rashtriya Avishkar Abhiyan.

(Rs. in lakh)

Activity Master Physical Unit Cost Financial

RashtriyaAaviskaarAbhiyan (Secondary)

Science Exhibition / Book Fair 16 (district) 0.30 4.80

Quiz completion 16 (district) 0.50 8.00

Study Trip for Students to HigherInstitutions (Within States)

1600 (Children) 0.002 3.20

Exposure visit outside State 2000 (Children) 0.02 40.00

Maths Kit 393 (Schools) 0.01907 7.494

Vedic Math for 9^& 10^*^ class students 163 (Schools) 0.02 3.26

Excursion Trip for students within state 8790 (Children) 0.002 17.58

Science Kit 393 (Schools) 0.10947 43.02

Total 127.36

Outcome: This would strengthen student's ability to handle competitions. This is coveredunder PGI indicator No.1.2.5,1.2.7,1.3.2.

Monitoring: Through regular reports and other reports to be uploaded on the portal atdifferent levels and inspection by the BRPs, CRPs, DEOs etc.

(m)Shagunotsav (Elementary):• This will be a Census based audit of all government and government aided schools in all

States and UTs in September 2019.

• It will have a questionnaire having parameters based on indicators monitored throughUDISE+, PGI and Shagun. Assessment of Learning Outcome will not be a part of thisevaluation.

• This will give feedback to verify the UDISE+ data-base and certain indicators under PGI.• It will lead to grading of schools for the purpose of understanding the gaps.• Assessors will be visiting every school and uploading their reports on a Mobile App which

will be centrally developed.

Page I 26

An amount of Rs.20.879 lakh as per unit cost given below was estimated for 3107elementary

schools for conducting Shagunotsav for assessing the physical, infrastructure and facilities asper guidelines issued by MHRD.


Unit Cost Financial

Shagunotsav (Elementary)

Shagunotsav 3107 0.00672 20.879

Total 20.879

(n)Shagunotsav (Secondary): An amount of Rs.3.727 lakh as per unit cost given below for

505Secondary/Higher Secondary schools was estimated for conducting Shagunotsav for

assessing the physical, infrastructure and facilities as per guidelines issued by MHRD.

(Rs. in lakh)


Unit Cost Financial

Shagunotsav (Secondary & Sr. Secondary)

Shagunotsav 505 0.00738 3.727

Total miBM 3.727

The funds for the above mentioned activities as mentioned in para j & k has been considered

for various activities which includes survey for urban & rural areas (for elementary &

secondary), internet facility for surveyors and also training of district coordinators etc.

Outcome: This would enable identifying School Specific needs and bring overall

improvement in functioning of Schools and covered under PGI indicators 2.1.19.

Monitoring: Although Shagunotsav is meant for assessing and knowing the facilities

available at school level, however, the same will also be monitored through UDISE +, PGI

and other reports.

(o) Sports and Physical Education (Elementary): An outlay of Rs. 157.80 lakh as per unit costgiven below for 2012 primary schools and 572 upper primary schools was estimated for SportsGrants.

(Rs. in lakh)


Unit

CostFinancial

Sports & Physical Education (upto Highest Class VIII)

Sports & Physical Education (Primary Schools) 2012 0.05 100.60

Sports & Physical Education (Upper Primary Schools ) 572 0.10 57.20

Total 2584 157.8

(p)Sports and Physical Education (Secondary): An amount of Rs.98.25 lakh @ Rs.25000/- wasestimated for sports & physical education in 343 Secondary and 50 Senior Secondary

Schools.

Page I 27

(Rs. in lakh)


Unit Cost Financial1!

Sports & Physical Education (upto Highest Class X I)Sports & Physical Education (Secondary) 343 0.25 85.75

Sports & Physical Education (Sr. Secondary) 50 0.25 12.50

Total 393 98.25

The utilization of the funds for sports and physical education at paras 1) and m) above needsto be in accordance with the detailed guidelines issued by MHRD. The following pointsneeds to be kept in mind;

• Age appropriate sports equipment for government schools may be procured as per theguidelines issued by this Department to the States & UTs. The States & UTs may if theyso desire, procure items from beyond this list subject to its actual requirement beingcertified by the head of school.

• Age appropriate sports activities may be organized in the Government schools of States &UTs as per the guidelines to be issued by this Department.

• Schools may include traditional/regional games of the respective State/Region. Formaintaining workable stock position of sports equipments, periodic record may bemaintained including workable equipment, repairable equipment, write-off equipment andnew items to be purchased to maintain the required stock position.

• One responsible person/PET/Teacher-in-charge may be given the responsibility to takecare of the equipment and maintaining the stock position of sports equipment in theschool.

Outcome: The above intervention is meant for improving the PGI indicators and contributesto overall improvement in mental and physical development of the student.

Monitoring: Through regular reports to be uploaded on the portal at different levels andphysical inspection at the time of Shagunotsav.

(q) School Safety Programme (Elementary): In order to encourage teachers to function as thefirst level counsellors an amount of Rs.lOOO/- per teacher has been provided for everyteacher. Further, an amount of Rs. 500/- has been earmarked for display of safety guidelinesand redressal mechanism in every school.

An amount of Rs.159.42 lakh as per unit cost given below was estimated to carry out variousactivities such as i) Guidance & Counselling ii) Sensitization of parents iii) Awarenessgeneration for Students and community, iv) provision for taking feedback of the studentsv)Suggestions/Complaint box in the schools, viii) Providing copies of safety guidelines to thestudents. Funds will be given to teachers for working as first level counsellors and schools fordisplaying safety guidelines and redressal mechanism. However, it should be ensured that

Page I 28

there is single display board in composite schools and duplicity of funds should not take

place.

(Rs. in lakh)

Activity Master Physical Unit Cost' > Financial

Quality Components

Display Board for safety guidelines/Fundfor Safety and Security at School Level

2584 (Schools) 0.005 12.92

Teachers • as first level

counsellors/Orientation Programme forTeachers on Safety and Security

14650 (Teachers) 0.01 146.50

Total SSSBBBEBBiEi 159.42

Outcome: The school report cards can be modified to provide for positive aspects of the

personality/performance of the students. The format of Parents Teachers Meeting will also bemodified providing for highlighting the positive aspects in the meetings. The state is advisedto set up an SCPCR cell at state level wherever it does not exist.

Monitoring: By assessing the extent of adherence to the Safety Guidelines to be issued bythe Department, field inspection through Shagunotsva and other reports.

(r) School Safety Programme (Secondary):In order to encourage teachers to function as the firstlevel counsellors an amount of Rs. 1000/- per teacher has been provided for every teacher.Further an amount of Rs.500/- has been earmarked for display of safety guidelines andredressal mechanism in every school.

An amount of Rs.39.535 lakh as per unit cost given below was estimated to carry out variousschool activities such as i) Guidance (^Counselling ii) Sensitization of parents iii) Awarenessgeneration for Students and community, iv) provision for taking feedbacks of the studentsetc. v) Suggestions/Complaint box in the schools, viii) Providing copies of safety guidelinesto the students. Funds will be given to teachers for working as first level counsellors andschools for safety guidelines and redressal mechanism, however, it should be ensured thatthere is single display board in composite schools and duplicity of funds should not takeplace.

Activity Master Physical Unit Cost Financial

Quality Components

Display Board for safety guidelines/Fundfor Safety and Security at School Level 393 (Schools) 0.005 1.965

Teachers as first level counsellors 3757 (Teachers) 0.01 37.57

Total 39.535

Page [ 29

Outcome: The school reports card will be modified to provide for positive aspects of thepersonality/performance of the students. The format of Parents Teachers Meeting will also bemodified providing for highlighting the positive aspects in the meetings.

Monitoring: By assessing the extent of adherence to the Safety Guidelines to be issued bythe Department, field inspection through Shagunotsva and other reports.

(s) Reporting by Head of Schools (Elementary): An amount of Rs. 12.92 lakh @Rs.500/-perschool was estimated for this activity under which the PrincipalA''ice Principal/HM/Teacher-in-charge will submit status report once in every two months through the Mobile App to beshared by MHRD. Funds will be given to Head of the schools for this purpose.

[Rs. In lakh)

Activity Master Physical(SchooIs) Unit Cost Financial

Quality Components (Elementary)

Reporting by Head of Schools 2584 0.005 12.92

Total 12.92

Outcome: This would be a progress report of the various activities and facilities beingprovided under Samagra Shiksha and assessing its impact in overall school development.

Monitoring: By analysis of the status report to be uploaded on a portal and other report andfield inspections through Shagunotsav.

(t)Reporting by Head of Schools (Secondary): An amount of Rs. 1.965 lakh @ of Rs.500/- perschool was estimated for this activity under which the PrincipaWice Principal/HM/ Teacher-in-charge will submit status report once in every two months through Mobile App to beshared by MHRD. Funds will be given to Head of the schools for this purpose.

Rs. In lakh)

Activity Master Physical(SchooIs)Unit

CostFinancial

Quality Components (Secondary)

Reporting by Head of Schools 393 0.005 1.965

Total 1.965

h)

Outcome: This would be a progress report of the various activities and facilities beingprovided under Samagra Shiksha and assessing its impact in overall school development.

Monitoring: By analysis of the status report to be uploaded on a portal and other report andfield inspections through Shagunotsav.

Support at Pre-Primary Level (Elementary): At pre-school level, support for co-locationof Anganwadis in Primary Schools and curriculum development in convergence withMinistry/Department of Women & Child Development is provided. An amount of Rs.365.62

Page I 30

lakh as per unit cost given below was estimated for support for pre-primary classes in

primary schools in the State. List of schools attached at Annexure-VII.


Unit

CostFinancial

Pre- Primary (Non- Recurring)

Support at Pre-Primary Level (NR) 507 0.50 253.50

Total 253.50

Pre-Primary (Recurring)

Support at Pre-Primary Level 507 0.22115 112.12Total 112.12

Grand Total 365.62

i) ICT and Digital Initiatives (Elementary): An amount of Rs.596.80 lakh as per detail givenbelow was estimated for ICT and Digital Initiatives for elementary schools including 58 newschools. 2"^^ year of recurring expenditure was approved for 36 schools sanctioned in 2018-19andlst year of recurring expenditure for new 58 schools. List of 58 new schools is at

Annexure-VIII.


Unit

CostFinancial

ICT and Digital Initiatives (upto Highest Class VI11)-NRTablets/Laptop/Notebook/PCs/Smart Classrooms 58 6 348.00Operating System / Softwares 58 0.20 11.60Furniture 58 0.20 11.60

Total 371.20

Recurring Components (ICT & Digital Initiatives upto Highest Class VIH)Recurring Cost (ICT & Digital Initiatives) 94 2.40 225.60Total 225.60

Total of ICT and Digital Initiatives 596.80

The utilization of these funds needs to be in accordance with the detailed guidelines issued byMHRD.

j) ICT and Digital Initiatives (Secondary): An amount of Rs.636.80 lakh as per detail givenbelow was estimated for ICT and Digital Initiatives for secondary/higher secondary schoolsincluding 50 new schools. 2"^ year of recurring expenditure was approved for 82 schools (34schools sanctioned in 2016-17, 8 schools sanctioned in 2017-18 & 40 schools sanctioned in

2018-19) andlst year of recurring expenditure for new 50 schools. List of 50 new schools isat Annexure-IX.


Unit

CostFinancial

ICT and Digital Initiatives (upto Highest Class XI[)-NRTablets/Laptop/Notebook/PCs/Smart Classrooms 50 6 300.00Operating System / Softwares 50 0.20 10.00

Page 1 31

Furniture 50 0.20 10.00

Total 320.00

Recurring Comnonents (ICT & Digital Initiatives upto Highest Class XII)

Recurring Cost (ICT & Digital Initiatives) 132 2.40 316.80

Total 316.80

Total of ICT and Digital Initiatives 636.80

The utilization of these funds needs to be in accordance with the detailed guidelines issued byMHRD.

MHRD will issue detailed Specifications and Guidelines on Operation Digital Board(ODB). All purchase from central fund should be made through GEM to ensureeffective prices and standardized equipments.

The following points need to be kept in mind during procurement:

• Inventory of each item will be maintained by the school and the concerned schoolPrincipal will be the in-charge for ensuring that all hardware and software has beenmarked as inventory items. The record of ICT inventory, school wdse, has to bemaintained online and made available to MHRD as and when required.

• States and UTs have to ensure that Annual Maintenance Contract (AMC) for eachhardware item procured under ICT scheme has been entered into.

• In order to ensure that computers installed in the schools are being used regularly,software which indicates when the computers are turned on or off, linked to the Stateserver must be put in place.

• As per IT Act 2000, it has to be ensured that effective firewalls and appropriate controlfilters and monitoring software mechanism ^e installed in all computers in schools.Please consult local NIC for installing a govt. approved, free firewall.

Outcome: Number of schools having ICT coverage and functioning of number ofSecondary/Higher Secondary schools. This will improve PGI indicator No. 1.3.3.

Monitoring: Field inspections through Shagunotsav and other report.

k) Integrated Teacher Training Programme (Elementary level):• As mentioned in Para 6 (iii) above, all elementary Government Teachers, Head

Teachers/Head Masters, BRCs, CRCs and faculty of DIETs and SCERTs will be trainedthrough a standardised comprehensive training module being prepared by NCERT in atime bound manner. This will help in preparing teachers for school based assessment tobe held in December, 2019.

• Module and guidelines will be prepared by the NCERT and shared with the States andUTs.

• Sessions will include, modules on inclusive education, improving social personalqualities of children, school based assessment, new initiatives in school education such as

Page I 32

Performance Grading Index(PGI), UDISE +, learner-centred pedagogies of different

subjects, School Leadership, Early Childhood Care and Education, Pre-vocational

' Education in Upper Primary Classes, etc.

• The focus of this training will be on competency based learning through experiential and

joyful learning including singing, dancing, book review, debate, youth and eco club

activities, This will be helpful in making classrooms leamer-ffiendly and improving

children' competencies including critical thinking, problem solving, creativity, as well as

social -personal qualities such as cooperation, team work etc.

An outlay of Rs.431.18 lakh as per unit cost given below was estimated for teachers training.

(Rs.372.43 lakh for in-service training of teachers and Rs.58.75 lakh for training of resource

persons, printing of modules and travel & accommodation).

(Rs. In lakh)

Activity Master PhysicalUnit

CostFinancial

In-Service Training (I - VIII)

Class I (& II 4794(Teachers) 0.025 119.85Class III to V 7I17(Teachers) 0.025 177.93Class VI to VIII 2986(Teachers) 0.025 74.65Total of In-Service Training (I - VIII) 372.43'Training of Key Resource Persons (Elementary)Printing of Integrated Teacher TrainingPackage

14897(Teachers) 0.0015 22.35

KRPs Training at State level ( Class I to VIII) lOO(KRPs) 0.06 6.00SRPs Training by NIEPA at State Level (Class I to VIII) 20(SRPs) 0.02 0.40

KRPs Travel/Accommodation 120(KRP&SRP) 0.25 30.00

Total of Training of Resource Persons & Master Trainers (Elementary) 58.75Grand Total 431.18

Outcome: This activity would help in overall improvement in Teacher Performance and

consequent improvement in Quality including Learning Outcomes and covered under PGl2.1.18 and 2.1.20.

Monitoring: Through School based Assessment to be conducted in December 2019 and

other reports.

1) Training for Teachers, Head Teachers (Secondary) (In-service, Induction, leadershipetc.): An amount of Rs.322.405 lakh was estimated for different eategories of training at

secondary level. A comprehensive teacher training module for secondary teachers is beingprepared by the CBSE with the help of KVS, NVS and other experts. States and UTs arerequested to use this module for in-service training.

Page 1 33

(Rs. In lakh)

Activity Master Physical (Teachers) Unit Cost Financial

In-Service Training (IX - XII)

Class IX to X 2247 0.05 112.35

Class XI to XII 815 0.05 . 40.75

Maths Teacher Training 192 0.025 4.80

Subject Specific training 815 0.025 20.375

Physical Educational Instructors on Yoga 160 0.025 4.00

Science Teacher Training 716 0.025 17.90

Total of In-Service Training (IX - XII) 200.175

Induction Training (IX - XII)

Secondary 138 0.075 10.35

Senior Secondary 626 0.10 62.60

Total Induction Training (IX - XII) 72.95

Training of Resource Persons & Master Trainers (Secondary)Master Trainers/Key Resource Persons(KRPs) Training for Class IX to X

160(KRPs) 0.025 4.00

Master Trainers/Key Resource Personstk-RPs) Training for Class XI to XII

80 (KRPs) 0.025 2.00

Total of Training of Resource Persons & Master Trainers (Secondary) 6.00

School Leadership Training of Head Teachers/ Principals/RPs (Secondary)

Training of SRGs (IX to XII) 212 (SRGs) 0.048 10.176

School Leadership Training Program(SLDPl 1 month Certificate Course

50(Head Teachers) 0.12 6.00

Training of HMs (SLDP) 398(Head Teachers) 0.048 19.104

Total of School Leadership Training of Head Teachers/ Prmcipals/RPs/Seeondarvl

35.28

Training of Educational Administrators (Secondary)

Secondary level (DC to X) 160 (EDs) 0.025 4.00

Secondary level (XI to XII) 160 (EDs) 0.025 4.00

Total Training of Educational Administrators (Secondary) 8.00

Total of Training for In-servicc Teacher, Induction, Head Teachers, SLDP,etc

322.405

Outcome:

1) Impact assessment of the training to be carried out by SCERT/third party impactanalysis reports should be shared.

2) The state should conduct pre- training needs assessment of the teachers and post-assessment to see the impact of training. This is covered under PGI indicator No.2.1.18 and 2.1.20.

Monitoring: Through School based Assessment to be conducted in December 2019 andother reports.

Page 1 34

m)Acadcmic support through BRC/URC&CRC (Elementary): Strengthening of CRCs -Mobility support to CRCs.

Each Cluster Resource Coordinator will visit the schools under his/her jurisdiction at least

once in 2 months. It is expected that in remote and rural areas the CRC will have five schools

while in urban areas this can go upto 10 schools.

• Cluster Resource Coordinator would visit the schools and provide onsite academic

support.

• Assess school performance and design Strategies for improvement of various

interventions at School Level.

• Will review the status of implementation at the cluster level so as to ensure better

outcomes.

• Upload at least 5 reports for each school in a year on a Mobile App based platform which

is being developed by the Department.

An outlay of Rs.1684.66 Lakh was estimated for Academic support through BRC/URC &CRC including Rs. 1422.57 lakh for BRC/URC and Rs.262.09 lakh for CRCs, including an

amount of Rs. 25.84 lakh for mobility support for CRCs.

Activity Master Physical Unit Cost FinancialProvision for BRCs/URCs

Salary for 6 Resource Persons at BRC 173 4.39 759.47Salary for 2 Resource Persons for CWSN 66 4.39 289.74Salary for 1 MIS Coordinator in position 28 4.536 127.008Salary for 1 Data Entry Operator in position 23 2.45 56.35Salary for 1 Accountant-cum-support staff 65 2.60 169.00TLE/T