2018 stp & cmaq project selection process(project cap)$ 4.75 $9.51 (project cap)$ 4.75. n/a n/a...

2018 STP & CMAQ Project Selection Process Available Funding: (In Millions)

CMAQ STP Preservation TOTAL

2021 2022 2021 2022 2021 2022

Regional $14.27 (project cap)$7.13

$14.27 (project cap)$7.13



N/A N/A $47.57

Countywide $2.41 (project cap)$1.2




$2.01 (project cap)

$750,000

$2.01 (project cap)

$750,000

$18.95

Target for Rural STP is a minimum of $0.36m per year or $0.72m total. Target for Non-Motorized STP or CMAQ is $3.0m.

Funding Year Dates Funds are Available Obligation Date 2021 10/01/2020 June 1, 2021 2022 10/01/2021 June 1, 2022

You must complete and submit an accurate obligation package to WSDOT by June 1st of your funding year to allow processing time for obligation by the end of the federal fiscal year, September 30th.

Important Dates:

PSRC Regional – STP/CMAQ ICC Countywide – STP/CMAQ STP/CMAQ Workshop March 7th March 9th Call for Projects February 22nd March 23rd Screening Forms Due March 12th April 9th Applications Due April 19th May 18th Sponsor Presentations April 26th-27th N/A Committee Recommendation Meeting RPEC May 24th-May 25th ICC Meeting June 8th Executive Committee Approval TPB Meeting July 12th SCT Steering June 13th 2019-2022 Approval October 25th

Changes to the PSRC Regional Competition

• Only two years of funding for this competition • Funding must be balanced by year • CAPS for amount of money will apply for each funding source • CAPS for amount of money will apply for each funding source

CAP for Regional CMAQ Requests are $7.13 million CAP for Regional STP requests is $4.75 million

• Project Readiness/Financial Plan worth 5 points, using the PSRC Regional Criteria • Remaining points were reallocated to Mobility & Accessibility Benefit for Cat A & B and System Continuity for Cat B

Proposed Changes to the Countywide 2018 Project Selection Process:

• Only two years of funding for this competition • Funding must be balanced by year • CAPS for amount of money will apply for each funding source

CAP for CMAQ Requests are $1.2 million CAP for STP requests is $2.52 million CAP for Preservation Requests is: $750,000

• Project Readiness Criteria has changed in definition and points Project Readiness/Financial Plan worth 5 points, using the PSRC Regional Criteria Project Match max of 15 points for Centers and Connection Projects, Max of 5 points for Preservation Projects. Remaining points from Project Readiness we spread equally between categories

Important things to remember:

• You must pick either 2021 or 2022 funding in your application obligation by June 1st of the year chosen • Applicants may apply for more than one phase, funding awards are limited to Preliminary Engineering phase + one (i.e. PE + ROW, or

PE + CN. ROW + CN are not eligible for funding) • Screening forms must be completed and approved by PSRC before you can submit an application to the PSRC Regional or ICC

Countywide competitions.

ICC – Snohomish County 2018 STP/CMAQ Countywide Application

1

Snohomish County Tomorrow Infrastructure Coordinating Committee

2018 Call for Projects FHWA – STP & CMAQ Countywide Funds

ICC Project Selection Process Every two years the Puget Sound Regional Council conducts a competitive grant program to award FHWA Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds. These funds are awarded at the Regional level by PSRC and at the countywide level by the Infrastructure Coordinating Committee (ICC). The ICC is a standing sub-committee of Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT) comprised of public works representatives of the cities, the County and the Tulalip Tribe; representatives from the PUD, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Port of Everett, and local transit agencies. The ICC is responsible for coordinating a competitive process to recommend projects to receive the countywide portions of estimated STP and CMAQ funds available for programming. The countywide allocations include non-motorized-transportation funds, roadway preservation funds, and the minimum amount of STP Rural (STP/R) funds to be programmed to projects located outside the federal-aid urbanized and federal-aid urban areas. Funding recommendations from the ICC for the countywide allocations of the STP and CMAQ funds are forwarded through SCT to PSRC’s Transportation Policy Board for review/discussion and approval for the draft Regional TIP. For the Countywide STP/CMAQ competitions the policy focus is on providing transportation improvements to a center or centers and the corridors that serve them. Centers are defined as regional growth and regional manufacturing/industrial centers, centers as designated through countywide processes, town centers, military bases/facilities and other local centers. Materials included in the Call for Projects include:

• PSRC Policy Framework • PSRC Screening Form • Call for Projects Schedule • Application • Evaluation Process

Projects must meet the following criteria:

• Must be consistent with Transportation 2040 • Must meet the “support for centers and the corridors they serve” policy

focus • Must be consistent with a jurisdiction’s most recently amended or updated

comprehensive plan certified by PSRC.


2

• All matching funds must be secured or reasonably expected to be secured for the phase being applied for

Countywide STP & CMAQ Funding Amounts (estimates): (in millions, rounded)

CMAQ STP Preservation TOTAL 2021 2022 2021 2022 2021 2022

$2.41

Project Cap $1.2

$2.41

Project Cap $1.2

$5.05

Project Cap $2.52

$5.05

Project Cap $2.52

$2.01

Project Cap $750,000

$2.01

Project Cap $750,000

$18.95

Evaluation Process:

• An ICC Sub-Committee will score all applications and provide a draft list of ranked projects to the ICC Committee. Scores will be based on the criteria and point distribution as identified in the scoring matrix

• The ICC Committee may revise the ranked order of the list after consideration of available funding sources, geographic equity, multiple funding to one agency and full phase funding.

• A separate list will be compiled to reflect different sources of funding • The ICC Committee recommends a final list of projects for SCT review

and approval. • The SCT approved list of ranked projects is forwarded to the Puget

Sound Regional Council’s Transportation Policy Board for award of funds.

Operating Procedures

• The ICC will conduct a competitive grant process every 2 years for a 2 year funding cycle upon direction of the PSRC.

• It is the intention of the committee to reach consensus on a ranked list of projects, in the event that consensus is not met a majority vote will be taken. Each jurisdiction present is allowed one (1) vote.

• Screening forms for all applications must be submitted and projects approved by PSRC prior to submitting an application.

• Applications will be reviewed and a ranked list will be generated. • All projects screened and approved by PRSC and submitted shall be

included on the ranked list of projects • An agency may accept partial funding for their project if they can

complete a full phase of the project and they commit all additional funding needed for that phase at the time of acceptance/award.

• If funding is not available for all projects on the list, a contingency list of projects will be created and maintained in the event that additional funds become available.

• Projects on the contingency list will remain in ranked order.


3

Countywide Project Evaluation Process

Instructions for STP/CMAQ Funding The purpose of this application process is to assist the ICC in selecting projects to receive Countywide STP and CMAQ funding under the Federal FHWA Program (through PSRC). This application should be used for all STP and CMAQ funding requests. Please review the instructions below thoroughly:

Application Checklist

PSRC Countywide Screening Form *Screening forms must be submitted to PSRC and approved prior to submitting an Application – Screening Forms Due April 9th PSRC Countywide Online Application – Applications Due May 18th Questions, please contact Doug McCormick at (425) 388-6655 [email protected] or Melissa Cauley @ (425) 438-6190 [email protected]

Application Tips Applicants may apply for more than one phase, funding awards are limited to: Preliminary engineering phase “plus one”, (i.e. PE + ROW, or PE + CN. ROW + CN are not eligible for funding. Things to keep in mind if funds are requested for Right-of-Way What is the status of Preliminary Engineering/Design?

• Is the PE/Design phase complete? • If not, identify all relevant milestones, including the current status and estimated completion date of each.

For example: o What is the level of environmental documentation under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

for this project? Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Environmental Assessment (EA) Documented Categorical Exclusion (DCE) Categorical Exclusion (CE)

o Has the NEPA documentation been approved? Please provide the date of approval, or the anticipated date of completion.

o At what stage of completion is your design? Have Preliminary Plans been submitted to WSDOT for approval? • If not, when is this milestone scheduled to be complete? When are Preliminary Plans expected to be approved?

o Are there any other PE/Design milestones not listed above? Please identify and provide estimates dates of completion.

mailto:[email protected]


4

What is the status of Right of Way?

• How many parcels do you need? • What is the zoning in the project area (e.g., commercial, residential, etc.)? • Discuss the extent to which your schedule reflects the possibility of condemnation and the actions needed

to pursue this. • Does your agency have experience in conducting right of way acquisitions of similar size and complexity?

• If not, when do you expect a consultant to be selected, under contract, and ready to start? • Identify all relevant right of way milestones, including the current status and estimated completion date of

each. For example: o True cost estimate of Right of Way o Right of Way Plans (stamped) o Relocation Plan (if applicable) o Right of Way Certification o Right of Way Acquisition o Certification Audit by WSDOT Right of Way Analyst o Relocation Certification, if applicable

Things to keep in mind if funds are requested for Construction Funds

What is the status of the milestones for the construction phase?

• Do you have an Engineer’s Estimate? Please provide a copy if available. • Identify the environmental permits needed for the project and when they are scheduled to be acquired.

• Is PS&E approved? Please provide the date of approval, or the date when PS&E is scheduled to be

submitted for approval. • When is the project scheduled to go to ad?


5

A. Centers

A1. Problem Significance Describe the nature and magnitude of the problem (safety, concurrency, congestion, incomplete sidewalk, bicycle or trail network, inadequate transit service or access to facilities, freight delays, economic development constraints etc.) that your project is seeking to address

a. 15 points Project addresses a problem with county-wide effects AND impacts a significant number and variety of users and/or modes.

b. 9-14 points Project addresses a predominantly local problem with limited

countywide benefits AND affects a moderate number and variety of users and/or modes.

c. 0-8 points Project addresses a local problem with no countywide benefits AND

affects a limited number and variety of users and/or modes. A2. Project Impact Identify how your project will remedy the existing or anticipated problem (i.e. improves safety conditions, raises the level of service, completes a missing sidewalk, bicycle path or trail, adds transit capacity in an underserved area, reduces travel time or modal conflict, promotes economic development etc.)

a. 15 points Project provides a long-term solution that will substantially address the targeted problem;

b. 9-14 points Project partially addresses the targeted problem with a long-term

solution, but relies upon other measures for full improvement; c. 0-8 points Project provides a short-term solution that marginally addresses the

targeted problem; A3. Circulation within A Locally Designated Center, Designated Regional Growth Center, or

Manufacturing or Industrial Center, Describe how the project will provide access to a major destination or significantly improve circulation, movement of people and/or goods to destinations (i.e. employment sites) within the designated center... If appropriate, describe how the project contributes to transportation demand management and commute trip reduction opportunities.

a. 10-15 points Project significantly improves access within a center AND benefits a

variety of travel modes AND benefits a large number of users; b. 6-9 points Project improves circulation for one or more modes within a center AND

benefits a moderate number of users; c. 0-5 points Project offers limited improvement to circulation for one or more modes

within a center AND benefits a limited number of users;


6

A4. Center Development Describe how the project will assist the center to develop in a manner consistent with adopted policies and or plans. Describe how the project will support increased activity in the center and otherwise implement adopted development plans. Describe how the project results in more reliable travel for various user groups, including residents, transit riders, employees, goods transporters and customers.

a. 10-15 points Project significantly increases activities and densities within a center; OR significantly streamlines the efficient movement of freight AND implements specific policies in locally adopted plan;

b. 6-9 points Project will moderately increase activity and densities within a center;

OR moderately streamlines the efficient movement of freight AND implements general policies in locally adopted plan;

c. 0-5 points Project supports a limited amount of increased activity OR provides

minimal or no demonstrated improvements to efficient movement of freight AND is consistent with locally adopted goals;

A5. Populations served by this Project Describe the user groups that will benefit from the project, including commuters, residents, commercial users, highly impacted communities and those groups identified in the President’s Order for Environmental & Social Justice, seniors, people with disabilities and/or areas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment.


7

B. Connections B1. Problem Significance Describe the nature and magnitude of the problem (safety, concurrency, congestion, incomplete sidewalk, bicycle or trail network, inadequate transit service or access to facilities, freight delays, economic development constraints etc.) that your project is seeking to address.

a. 10-15 points Project addresses a problem with county-wide effects AND; affects a facility with a level of service of F for two or more hours OR affects a significant number and variety of users and/or modes.

b. 9-14 points Project indirectly addresses a county-wide problem by targeting a

significant local issue AND; affects a facility with a level of service of E for two or more hours OR affects a moderate number and variety of users and/or modes.

c. 0-8 points Project addresses a predominantly local problem with countywide

benefits AND; affects a facility with a level of service of D for two or more hours OR affects a limited number and variety of users and/or modes.

B2. Project Impact Identify how your project will remedy the existing or anticipated problem (i.e. raises the level of service, completes a missing walkway, adds transit capacity in an underserved area, reduces travel time or modal conflict etc.) and will provide long-term improvements to safety or congestion.

a. 10-15 points Project provides a long-term solution that will substantially address the targeted problem;

b. 9-14 points Project partially addresses the targeted problem with a long-term

solution, but relies upon other measures for full improvement;

c. 0-8 points Project provides a short-term solution that marginally addresses the targeted problem;

B3. Mobility Benefits Describe how the project benefits centers and connecting corridors by providing for a range of travel modes, if appropriate, describe how the project contributes to transportation demand management and commute trip reduction opportunities.

a. 10-15 points Project expands person carrying capacity between centers OR helps a center meet its development goals OR improves access for multiple modes;

b. 6-9 points Project improves and/or benefits developments along a major corridor

leading to and from a center OR improves circulation for two or more modes;;


8

c. 0-5 points Project improves and/or benefits developments in minor roadways that connect to major corridors leading to and from a center OR provides limited improvements for one mode;

B4. System Connectivity Describe how the project creates more reliable and efficient travel flows along the corridor by filling missing links or removing barriers along connecting corridors and to/from centers.

a. 10-15 points Project addresses critical linkages in a major connecting corridor OR eliminates a significant bottleneck in system performance;

b. 6-9 points Project addresses important (not critical) gaps in the development of a

corridor OR provides limited relief to a bottleneck in system performance;

c. 0-5 points Project addresses marginal gaps/barriers with limited efficiency

improvements; OR minimal or no demonstrated improvement to identified bottleneck in system performance;

B5. Populations served by this Project Describe the user groups that will benefit from the project, including commuters, residents, commercial users, highly impacted communities and those groups identified in the President’s Order for Environmental & Social Justice, seniors, people with disabilities and/or areas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment.


9

C. Preservation

o Eligible roadways must be at least an urban collector (or above) or a minor collector (or above) to be eligible for STP funds;

o It is assumed that sponsors have an existing PMS rating systems in place, which evaluates roadway segments on a scale of 1 to 100. If sponsor does not have a PMS system in place, alternate methods may be available to evaluate roadways for grant purposes.

C1. Pavement Preservation Level of Effort: Does your agency have a pavement management program? Yes (5 pts.) No (0 pts.) If yes provide a short description of your program: Does your agency have identified sources of funding for pavement preservation projects? Yes (5 pts.) No (0 pts.) If yes provide a brief description of these sources: Provide average PCI of agency’s system wide roadway system.

System wide PCI a. 15 points 70 or above b. 10 points Between 50 and 69 c. 0 points 49 or below

C2. Roadway Condition Describe the preservation priorities of the agency and the nature and magnitude of the problem that the project is attempting to solve. What preservation method will be used on this road and how was it determined? What is the most recent PCI for this road? (For projects covering several roadways, provide the average or median score and provide a brief summary of each.) If PCI is less than 50, provide justification for minimum 7 year extended pavement life.

Proposed Treatment Proposed Treatment Points Asphalt Surface

Treatment PCI Points Overlay PCI

0 80 to100 0 70 to 100 30 60 to 79 20 60 to 69 20 50 to 59 30 50 to 59 10 40 to 49* 15 40 to 49 0 0 to 39 0 0 to 39

*Double chip seal must be proposed.


10

C3. Project Significance

Describe how the project will benefit a locally recognized center. Include the type and number of users benefited, the ADT, and the federal functional classification.

Centers & Corridors (Circle correct category) 15 points Within Centers 10 points Connecting Corridor within ½ mile of center 5 points Connecting Corridor outside ½ mile of center Transit Service 5 points Project area has transit service 0 points Project area does not have transit service Identify transit route(s) that serve your project area: https://www.communitytransit.org/busservice/schedules/stop-list ADT 10 points >15,000 8 points >10,000 6 points > 5,000 4 points 5,000 or less

Federal Functional Classification (Circle classification)

Points

Rural Functional Classification

(under 5,000 population)

Urban Functional Classification (Over 5,000 population)

5 02 Principal Arterial 14 Principal Arterial 5 06 Minor Arterial 16 Minor Arterial 3 07 Major Collector 17 Collector (Major/Minor) 3 08 Minor Collector

C5. Populations served by this Project Describe the user groups that will benefit from the project, including commuters, residents, commercial users, highly impacted communities and those groups identified in the President’s Order for Environmental & Social Justice, seniors, people with disabilities and/or areas experiencing high levels of unemployment or chronic underemployment

https://www.communitytransit.org/busservice/schedules/stop-list


11

Part 2 – Questions for All Projects D1 Project Readiness/Financial Plan Funding Request: Sponsors may request funding for any single project phase, but requests for multiple phases are limited to preliminary engineering plus the subsequent phase necessary. i.e, a sponsor may request funding for both preliminary engineering and right of way phases, or preliminary engineering and construction phases, but not both right of way and construction phases. (i.e. PE + ROW, or PE + CN. ROW + CN are not eligible for funding.)

Funding Requirements: A minimum of 13.5% of local matching funds is required for STP and CMAQ funds. The combination of the requested PSRC funds plus all other identified funding must be adequate to fully fund that phase. Requests that do not result in a phase being fully funded will be considered ineligible for PSRC funding. Sponsors will be asked to provide more detail on their financial plan in the next section.

Obligation Requirements: Funding is awarded by year, and sponsors are asked to select their first and second preference for the year of funding requested. Per PSRC's project tracking policies, all project phases awarded PSRC funds must obligate by June 1st of the program year selected. For more information, see PSRC’s project tracking policies: http://www.psrc.org/transportation/tip/tracking check link PSRC recognizes that the complexity of some projects can trigger a variety of prerequisites that must be satisfied before federal funding is typically eligible to be obligated. These questions are designed to identify those requirements and assist sponsors to:

• Identify which obligation prerequisites and milestones apply to their specific project. • Identify which of these have already been satisfied at time of application. • Provide an explanation and realistic completion date for all obligation prerequisites and

milestones not yet completed. NOTE: Sponsors applying for funds for only planning studies or preliminary engineering/design phases are not required to provide further information for project readiness Total Estimated Project Cost and Schedule Please include all funding amounts by source (including the requested PSRC funds) and status of each. If funds are not yet fully secure but are anticipated to be available for the project, please select “reasonably available” and identify the specific source on the next page, along with the current status of the funds and the steps you’ll take to secure them by the requested obligation date. If funds are not secure and there is not yet a plan in place to obtain them by the requested obligation date, please select “unsecure,” and provide additional information on the next page. PSRC's definitions and guidance for determining secure and reasonably expected funds may be found on PSRC’s website.

http://www.psrc.org/transportation/tip/tracking


12

D2 Project Match Information from the Budget & Schedule worksheet will be used to score this question. What percentage of matching funds is provided for this project? Category A &B Category C 15 points 5 points 50% matching funds and above 12 points 4 points 40% matching funds 9 points 3 points 30% matching funds 6 points 2 points 20% matching funds 3 points 1 points 13.5% matching funds

Note: A minimum match of 13.5% for each project phase is required. For example, if CN is $100,000, a minimum of $13,500 of local agency match is required. E Air Quality Please select all of the elements in the list below that are included in the project’s scope of work, and provide the requested information below.

� Diesel Particulate Emissions Reduction Projects (e.g. diesel engine retrofits) � Roadway Capacity (general purpose and high occupancy lanes) � Transit � Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities � Intelligent Transportation Systems (signalization, etc.) � Alternative Fuels or Vehicle Technology � Other

Diesel Particulate Emissions Reduction Projects: Describe the types of vehicles, vessels, engines, duty cycles, etc. being addressed. Describe the emissions vintage of the existing engines, and the number of vehicles to be addressed. Describe how often they are used, where they are used, how much fuel is consumed annually and when the benefits from this project will occur. Roadway Capacity (general purpose and high occupancy lanes): Describe the roadway and travel conditions before and after the proposed project, including average daily traffic and travel speeds. Describe the potential for multimodal connections, shorter vehicle trips, etc. Describe the transit routes currently using the facility and anticipated in the future. Does this project connect to or expand an existing high occupancy vehicle or business access transit lane system? What is the length of the project and the population served? What source of data indicates the expected conversion of single occupant vehicle trips to transit or carpool? Transit (park-and-ride lots, new or expanded transit service, transit amenities, etc.): Describe the current transit ridership in the project area. Describe the current transit routes serving the project area, including average trip length. If a park-and-ride lot, how many stalls are being added? Describe how the amenities (or other components of the project) are expected to encourage new transit ridership and shift travel from single occupant vehicles to multimodal options. Describe the population served that will be expected to use the new/improved service. What source of data indicates the expected conversion of single occupant vehicle trips to transit?


13

Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities: Describe the length of the proposed facility, including connections to other non-motorized facilities and to the larger non-motorized system. Describe the expected travel shed (i.e., land use and population surrounding the project). Does the facility connect to transit? What is the expected population served, and what source of data indicates the expected conversion of single occupant vehicle trips to this mode? Intelligent Transportation Systems: Describe the existing conditions in the area, including level of service, average daily traffic, average speed, etc. Describe how the project is expected to improve traffic flow through improved speeds, reducing idling, reducing accidents, etc. What is the percentage of heavy trucks using the facility? Does the project improve traffic flow for particular modes ( e.g. HOVs) or types of vehicles ( e.g. transit buses or freight trucks)? What are the transit routes along the corridor, and will this project improve transit reliability on the corridor? Alternative Fuels or Vehicle Technology: Describe the change in fuel or vehicle technology. How many vehicles are affected? What are the current conditions? Other: Describe how your project has the potential to reduce emissions through technology, improved management or other means, e.g. “no idling” signage & enforcement, auxiliary power units to operate heating, cooling & communications equipment, truck stop electrification, etc.

Other Considerations (innovations, addressing practical design, etc.):

• Please describe any innovative components included in your project: these could include design elements, cost saving measures, or other innovations.

• Please describe the process that your agency has used to determine the benefits of projects.

• Please describe any additional aspects of your project not previously addressed in the

application that could be relevant to the final project recommendation and decision-making process.


14

2018 – STP Snohomish County ICC

Countywide Process Scoring Matrix

STP Funding

Maximum Points Per Question

Maximum Points Available

Category Category Specific – Choose only one (A, B or C)

A. Centers Problem Significance 20 Project Impact 15 Circulation Within a Center 15 Center Development 15

B. Connections Problem Significance 20 Project Impact 15 Mobility Benefits 15 System Connectivity 15

C. Preservation Level of Effort/System wide condition 25

Roadway Condition 30

Project Significance 35

D. Project Readiness Project Match Cat A & B =15

Cat C =5

Project Readiness/Financial Plan 5

E. Air Quality Cat A & B = 15 Cat C = 0

Cat. A or B Maximum Points Available 100

Cat. C Maximum Points Available 100

2018 stp & cmaq project selection process(project cap)$ 4.75 $9.51 (project cap)$ 4.75. n/a n/a...

Documents