2018 audience & demand planning benchmark...
TRANSCRIPT
SURVEY REPORT
SPONSORED BY
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark SurveyCurrent State of Marketer’s Challenges, Priorities, and Goals Around Total Audience Measurement and Demand Planning
Marketing’s ability to be effective and efficient is directly related to how much a company
knows about its customers and total audience. Having the right total audience metrics
— insights that go a step beyond the traditional total addressable market assessment
— is necessary for key marketing tasks, such as persona modeling, potential customer
identification, buyer journey creation, account-based marketing (ABM) program
planning, demand planning and customer-centric personalization.
Introduction
HOW CONFIDENT ARE YOU THAT YOU HAVE DATA COVERAGE ON YOUR TOTAL TARGET AUDIENCE IN TERMS OF FRESH, ACCURATE CONTACT AND ACCOUNT DATA?
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey2
Extremely confident
Mostly confident
Somewhat confident
Not very confident
Not at all confident
10%
30%
33%
17%
8%
New research from Demand Gen Report shows that, to promote business growth, B2B
marketers must prioritize initiatives, which gather total audience metrics, to gain deeper
insights on their audience coverage. This ultimately positions B2B companies to better
plan demand generation campaigns and drive results.
The 2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey shows that most companies
realize the importance of having good data about their total target audience and see it
as a key to important business initiatives. Specifically:
• 82% of survey respondents said it is a priority or major priority to know their target audiences in terms of data coverage and data quality;
• 56% said that starting or scaling ABM efforts drove a high priority to expand
data coverage for target accounts and contacts. An overlapping 56% pointed to a
need for more accurate, current and deeper contact information for segmented
campaigns; and
• 68% expect that improved audience coverage will help them achieve better
conversion rates through better buyer targeting and more personalized campaigns.
The ultimate result would be improved conversion rates and greater revenue.
Despite the importance of knowing your total audience, relatively few companies
have excelled in their efforts. Close to two-thirds (60%) of respondents said they lack
confidence in the data coverage of their total target audience — the targets in their
CRM or MAP systems. Only 45% said they currently invest in processes or solutions to
improve their coverage.
Other findings show that:
• Few used useful data like technographics (17%) or intent (35%);
• Less than a third (30%) undertake demand planning on a quarterly basis; and
• Only 20% use third parties to help improve data.
The following report will break down the survey results to examine:
f The contrast between prioritizing the total target audience and a lack of confidence
in how fresh and accurate their account and contact data are;
f Business initiatives that drive priorities and solution investments;
f Expected investment payoffs;
f The current state of demand planning; and
f What drives demand planning and what parts of the business will benefit.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey3
Audience Data Is A Priority, But Most Marketers Lack Confidence In Its Quality
The survey shows that respondents realize the importance of both data coverage of
their total audiences and data quality. About 82% of the respondents said coverage, as
well as better insight and analysis of data quality, were either a priority or major priority.
Another 14% said they are paying attention to the issue of data coverage and quality,
but didn’t yet consider it a priority.
However, the survey shows that priorities don’t necessarily translate into successful
efforts for most respondents. When asked how confident they were in their data
coverage on their total target audience in terms of fresh, accurate contact and account
data, 60% had a significant or complete lack of confidence in their data coverage, based
on its quality. Only 40% were extremely or mostly confident about their data coverage.
Without accurate, high-quality data, a company’s data coverage is worthless. This can
ultimately lead to poor marketing decisions and wasted company resources.
The survey results also illuminate a gap between where many companies wish
to be regarding contact and account data, and where they currently are. The gap
suggests that a significant majority of companies cannot depend on the quality of
their target audience data. The implication is that they can’t tell whether marketing
campaigns and strategies are working or if shortcomings are due to poor data.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey4
33%
49%
14%
2%
1%
1%
It’s a major priority
It’s a priority
It’s on our radar, but not a priority
It’s not on our radar and we don’t plan to pursue it
We’re comfortable with our current level of analysis/coverage
Not sure
HOW BIG OF A PRIORITY IS IT TO KNOW YOUR DATA COVERAGE AND GAIN BETTER INSIGHT AND ANALYSIS OF YOUR DATA QUALITY FOR YOUR TARGET AUDIENCES?
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey5
ABM, Segmentation And Other Growth Initiatives Drive Audience Coverage Prioritization
The study found that there are three types of initiatives that are driving better coverage
and insights: growth strategy, greater effectiveness and efficiency of marketing, and a
way to help feed demand planning.
For growth, 48% sought new markets. More than half (56%) wanted information to
support segmented marketing. In addition, 27% sought deeper information on contacts
as part of efficiency and effectiveness. Starting or scaling ABM efforts (56%), deeper
reach into audiences (54%) and information for segmented campaigns (56%) can benefit
both business growth and efficiency.
Surprisingly, the study shows that most are currently not investing in the processes and
solutions necessary to achieve these goals. Only 45% currently invest in processes and
solutions to better measure and understand current coverage of total target audience.
Close to one-quarter (23%) do not invest at all now and another 24% said they plan
to invest within the next year. Although there is no explicit correlation, it is curious
that that answers roughly mirrored respondents’ confidence in their efforts. Without
investment, companies are less likely to overcome limitations and achieve their goals,
especially in growth.
Only 45% currently invest in processes and solutions to better measure and
understand current coverage of their total target audience.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey6
56%
56%
53%
48%
38%
27%
Starting/scaling ABM efforts
Looking for more accurate, current and deeper contact information to support segmented campaigns
Sales team looking for deeper reach into audiences
Looking for new markets to target as part of growth strategy
Providing intelligence/validation for our demand planning initiatives
Need for deeper information on contacts identified through intent, AI tools
WHAT CURRENT BUSINESS INITIATIVES MAKE EXPANDED COVERAGE OF ALL POTENTIAL TARGET ACCOUNTS AND CONTACTS A BIGGER PRIORITY FOR YOUR COMPANY?
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey7
Increased Engagement, Conversion Rates Expected Payoffs Of Better Audience Coverage
The companies that are currently investing or planning to invest are doing so with
expectations of what they will gain. There are two major desires — better efficiency and
effectiveness on one side, and growth and scaling on the other — and many companies
look to both types of payoff.
The biggest single segment (68%) wants more personalized campaigns that could
increase engagement by better targeting buyers, with a focus on how well marketing
reaches individuals. This fits with refined target messaging and criteria for higher
conversion rates (43%) and using better data to build confidence, trust and alignment
with sales (49%).
A growth focus includes identifying prospects to grow pipelines (51%) and reaching a
larger audience, and expanding total market opportunity (39%).
68% of B2B orgs expect more personalized campaigns that could increase buyer
engagement to be biggest payoff of better audience coverage.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey8
68%
51%
49%
43%
39%
More personalized campaigns to better targeted buyers are increasing engagement
We’ve identified new accounts and/or contacts that fit our buyer criteria, and used those to grow pipeline
More refined account and contact criteria, and better account and contact data are building confidence, trust and alignment with sales
We’ve refined our targeting criteria and messaging to where we’re achieving higher conversion rates on outbound marketing and sales campaigns
We’ve refined our targeting criteria to reach a larger audience and expanded our total market opportunity
IF YOU ARE INVESTING — OR PLAN TO INVEST — IN EXPANDING/IMPROVING YOUR TOTAL AUDIENCE COVERAGE, WHAT ARE THE EXPECTED PAYOFFS OF YOUR AUDIENCE ANALYSIS INVESTMENTS?
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey9
Companies Lack Holistic View Of Total Audience Across Internal Departments
Respondents addressed not only their activity in using processes and solutions to
expand or improve audience coverage, but also what departments were involved in the
ongoing efforts.
An overwhelming majority (89%) said the marketing team was involved in defining and
analyzing their company’s audience coverage, while 41% said they include the marketing
ops team in the process. Similarly, 51% of respondents included sales, while 32%
included sales ops and 28% included sales development or inside sales.
Executive leadership were included less often (39%) and demand generation only
contributed in less than a third of organizations (31%). Customer support, which can
offer critical information on both accounts and contacts, is only added by 18% of
respondents. Credit from finance and product teams were almost never added. The
pattern suggests that many companies miss important sources of insight into account
and contact data.
The involved groups had varying criteria for identifying and measuring audience coverage
and its expansion. Most companies have an internal focus, whether they identify criteria
for contacts and stakeholders in target accounts (60%) or target accounts (58%).
Interestingly, only 42% focus on individuals with the appropriate job titles or use multiple
roles and job titles that have use cases for products and services (55%). Although useful,
these are some of the more basic criteria a company could choose.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey10
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey11
WHICH ROLES WITHIN YOUR ORGANIZATION ARE INVOLVED IN DEFINING AND ANALYZING YOUR AUDIENCE COVERAGE?
Marketing
Sales
Marketing Ops
Executive leadership
Demand Gen
Sales Ops
Sales Development/SDR/ Inside Sales
Customer support/success
89%
51%
41%
39%
32%
30%
28%
18%
WHAT CRITERIA DO YOU FOLLOW WHEN IDENTIFYING AND MEASURING YOUR AUDIENCE COVERAGE?
What stood out was that only 20% of companies either measure the contacts or accounts they have in CRM or MAP systems and compare that to the total audiences that fit persona or account criteria.
Without such a comparison, it becomes difficult for a company to use what it has learned
to achieve growth, which is one of the major strategies that companies want to achieve.
12
We identify persona criteria for the contacts/stakeholders in our target accounts
We identify target account criteria
We identify multiple roles/job titles that have use cases for our products/services
We focus specifically on individuals with the appropriate job titles
We measure how many accounts we have in our CRM/MAP system, and compare that to the total available audience of accounts that fit our criteria
We measure how many contacts we have in our CRM/MAP system, and compare that to the total available audience of contacts that fit our persona criteria
60%
58%
54%
42%
20%
20%
Major Shortcomings In Data Types Used To Assess Audience Coverage
A deeper examination of the types of data companies use to identify and measure
audience coverage shows some major shortcomings that are also opportunities for
improvement.
Contact data is the most broadly used type of data — 87% of respondents said they
use this type of data to identify and measure coverage. Only 45% use account and
firmographic data to broaden the view of their total target audience.
Other types of data used include:
• Product usage data (40%);
• Intent data (35%); and
• Technographic data (17%).
While 87% of respondents use contact data to identify and measure total audience,
surprisingly, only 45% said they use account and firmographic data.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey13
87%
45%
40%
35%
17%
3%
Contact data and related contact information (email, phone, address)
Account data and related Firmographic data
Product usage data
Intent data
Technographic data
Other
WHAT TYPES OF DATA DO YOU USE IN IDENTIFYING AND MEASURING YOUR AUDIENCE COVERAGE?
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey14
Demand Planning Efforts Are Falling Flat
Survey respondents were also assessed on their demand planning efforts, which
highlighted that more than half (51%) do not conduct formal demand planning sessions.
Of those respondents, only 19% plan to begin conducting demand planning sessions
within the business in the next year.
Close to one-third (31%) of companies do demand planning on a quarterly basis to
track the changing needs and directions of customers. An additional 19% perform such
planning only once a year, making a total of only about half of companies that do so at
all. Close to one out of every four respondents (23%) have no expectations of adding
demand planning practices to their company’s processes.
For those that do perform demand planning, the primary activities incorporated into
their initiatives focus on sales pipeline analysis and budgeting (79%). Roughly two-thirds
(63%) focusing on sales and marketing alignment.
Other activities incorporated into demand planning initiatives include:
• Account and contact quality/quantity assessment (54%);
• Account and contact selection (37%); and
• Tool selection (35%).
More than half (51%) of B2B organizations do not conduct formal demand
planning sessions.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey15
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey16
DO YOU CURRENTLY CONDUCT FORMAL DEMAND PLANNING SESSIONS WITHIN YOUR BUSINESS?
19%
30%
19%
23%
9%
Yes, on a yearly basis
Yes, on a quarterly basis
Not yet, but we plan to start within the next 12 months
No, and no plans for formal demand planning
Not sure
Executive Leadership Playing Major Role In Demand Planning Efforts
Survey respondents noted that the departments involved in demand planning are most
often marketing (93%) and executive leadership (79%).
Sales is involved in only 62% of companies, although it is sales that ultimately closes the
business. Again, customer support would have important insights, but only take place in
23% of cases.
79% of B2B organizations said that executive leadership is involved in demand
planning processes.
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey17
Marketing Executive leadership
Sales Customer support/success
Other
WHO IS INVOLVED IN YOUR COMPANY’S DEMAND PLANNING PROCESS?
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey18
92%
79%
62%
23%
8%
Fueling Sales Pipeline, ABM Key Demand Planning Drivers
The drivers of demand planning among respondents showed another significant
contradiction between need and implementation, in particular the regularity with which
companies undertook demand planning.
Three-quarters of companies feel an ongoing need to fuel sales pipelines, which should
mean regular demand planning. Account-based marketing (52%) would also seem to
need regular planning. Annual budgeting (56%), sales kickoffs (42%) and new product
and service releases (46%) would be either explicitly annual in nature or more ad hoc.
Again, corporate needs seem out of sync with practices.
Perhaps the issue is the perception of who benefits from demand planning. When asked
what parts of the business benefit from their demand planning efforts, respondents said:
• The marketing department (85%);
• The sales department (85%); and
• The business/sales development team (71%).
The critical reason marketers conduct demand planning is the ongoing need to help
fuel sales pipeline (75%).
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey19
Ongoing need to help fuel
sales pipeline
Annual budgeting process
Account-based marketing
Releasing new products and
services
Sales kick-off / Sales initiatives
WHAT ARE THE MAIN DRIVERS FOR YOUR DEMAND PLANNING EFFORTS?
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey20
75%
56%52%
46%42%
Although companies largely see better and more extensive target audience data as
a priority, a significant majority are uncertain about their current efforts. They want
to improve data quality, expand ABM initiatives, and undertake more personalized
campaigns. But at the same time, a majority lack confidence in their ability to do so.
Most companies miss important types of data, don’t invest in necessary processes
and systems, fail to undertake demand planning on a regular basis, and don’t make
use of third-party vendors that could help improve their results and take pressure off
internal resources. Investing in these initiatives to maintain data accuracy, coverage
and TAM analytics can resolve many of the concerns marketers have with their CRM
and MAP Systems.
Marketing teams are far more likely to achieve their goals for company growth, go-to-
market efficiency and demand generation, including ABM, if they spend adequate time
and budget on the following:
• Improving their data coverage and quality;
• Aligning with sales and other internal teams on their target buyer personas and
ideal customer profile; and
• Measuring their total audience coverage with a TAM analysis and meeting regularly
for formal demand planning.
Conclusion
2018 Audience & Demand Planning Benchmark Survey21
Demand Gen Report surveyed 105 marketing executives from B2B companies; 86%
of respondents were from U.S. companies and represented numerous industries,
including business services; software as a service (SaaS), platform as a service (PaaS),
and infrastructure as a service (IaaS); telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing,
media, and marketing; advertising agencies; financial services; consulting; real estate;
logistics; and higher education.
When it comes to company size:
• 36% fell under the SMB category (defined as <100 employees);
• 27% fell under the Mid-market category (defined as 25-500 employees); and
• 36% fell under the Enterprise category (defined as 501+ employees).
When assessing the size of their sales teams, respondents said they have:
• 1-10 reps on the sales team (42%);
• 11-50 reps on the sales team (20%);
• 51-250 reps on the sales team (16%); and
• 250+ reps on the sales team (23%).
About The Survey
DealSignal helps B2B marketing and sales teams maximize growth and conversions
by providing the freshest, most relevant and accurate contact and account data, on
demand. We strive for 100% data perfection, unparalleled email deliverability and
direct dial phones, and back it up with a 100% guarantee. The DealSignal Dynamic Data
Platform can accurately measure your total audience (TAM), deliver you those contacts
and accounts, and enrich your current CRM and marketing automation system with
complete and up-to-date data to power your ABM and outbound marketing. Learn more
at www.dealsignal.com.
Demand Gen Report is a targeted online publication that uncovers the strategies and
solutions that help companies better align their sales and marketing organizations, and
ultimately, drive growth. A key component of the publication’s editorial coverage focuses
on the sales and marketing automation tools that enable companies to better measure
and manage their multi-channel demand generation efforts.
802.LEADS4U (802.532.3748)
201.257.8528