20170119 amecfw lower cache creek gravel borrow final...change of investigation methodology to that...
TRANSCRIPT
Technical Memorandum
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, 3456 Opie Crescent, Prince George, B.C. V2N 2P9
phone: (250) 564-3243 fax: (250) 562-7045 www.amecfw.com
Page 1
FROM: Peter O’Sullivan, EIT. (Amec Foster Wheeler) Our ref: KX052805.2.G110
TO: Gordon Wagner P.Eng. (R.F. Binnie) [email protected] Eddie Ballarin (R.F. Binnie) [email protected] James Norris (R.F. Binnie) [email protected] Don Gillespie, P.Eng. [email protected]
DATE: 19 January 2017
SUBJECT: Gravel Investigation – Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Prospect Highway 29: Bear Flat - Cache Creek
1.0 Introduction
This memo summarizes the results Amec Foster Wheeler’s investigation for granular construction borrow at the Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Prospect in support the geometric design for the Bear Flat – Cache Creek segment of Highway 29. This area is essentially the 62 ha agricultural field on a low elevation (elev. 427 to 428 m) river terrace adjacent to the Peace River, located south of Highway 29 and east of Cache Creek (refer to Figure 1). 2.0 Site Investigation This area was originally planned for an extensive test pit investigation. However, concerns regarding potential crop disturbance and indications of an excessive thickness of fine-grained soil cover resulted in a change of investigation methodology to that of an initial auger drill screening-type investigation. On 21 and 22 April 2016, Amec Foster Wheeler supervised the drilling of five widely spaced (>400 m apart) auger test holes (TH16-C-301, -319, -325, -343, -349) across the site, to depths ranging between 6.1 and 9.8 m below surface. Selected samples were retrieved and send to the Amec Foster Wheeler’s Prince George lab for moisture content (ASTM D2216), grain size distribution (ASTM D422/C136/C117) and Atterberg limit (ASTM D4318). Lab test results are appended, as are summary logs for the drilling. The locations of the completed test holes are shown on Figure 1. 2.1 Geology The soil deposits encountered can be separated into four distinct units, in descending stratigraphic order; topsoil, silt, dirty sand, sand and gravel. Topsoil: Encountered at surface with a thickness of 0.2 to 0.3 m, consisting of organic rich silt and sands. Silt: Encountered below the topsoil. The silt was light brown, layered, low to non-plastic with a natural moisture content generally below its plastic limit. The natural moisture content typically ranged from 3 to
19 January 2017 KX052805.2.G110
Page 2
8 %, except at TH16-C-301 where the moisture was 20 %. The silt’s plastic limit ranged from 18 to 25 %, and its liquid limit from 21 to 25 %. Sand content ranged from 14 to 48 %, with the sand content increasing with closer proximity to the river and creek, and with depth. Thickness varied from 0.6 m to 4.0 m, with the thickness tapering out closer to the Peace River. Dirty Sand: Beneath the silt deposit there was a variable thickness unit of fine grained, layered sand extending to depths between 4.4 and 7.0 m below ground surface. The sand had a silt content ranging from 10 to 30 %. Moisture ranged from 2 to 15 %. Groundwater was encountered generally at or just below the bottom of this unit. Gravel and Sand: Encountered below the dirty sand at depths ranging from 4.4 to 7.0 m (below elevation 421.2 to 422.5 m), except at TH16-C-349 where it was encountered at a shallower depth of 1.2 m (elevation of 425.9 m). The gravel clasts were rounded, with a maximum diameter encountered of 50 mm. The material had a variable gradation, with fines (passing 0.075 mm sieve) ranging from 5 to 15% depending on location. The gravel and sand was wet to saturated where coincident with the groundwater table. 2.2 Groundwater Groundwater was encountered at by the drilling at depths ranging from 4.9 to 6.2 m (elevations between 420.9 to 423.2 m). Groundwater levels can be expected to vary seasonally and in response to precipitation and snow melt events. 3.0 Conclusion The preliminary drill results were somewhat unfavourable, as a thickness of 4.6 to 7.0 m of overburden consisting of topsoil, silt and/or dirty sand was encountered over material potentially suitable for granular borrow. The groundwater table was also encountered at depths ranging between 4.9 and 5.2 m, limiting the likely extractable granular borrow zone to at most a 1 m thickness of sand and gravel above the groundwater table over the majority of the site, where investigated. Only one drill location (TH16-C-349, completed in an area close to the river bank) encountered better granular borrow potential. This local area had 1.2 m of silt over a 5 m thickness of gravel and sand located above the groundwater table. That material as sampled was gap graded and had fines in excess of 5%. However, that result may not be truly representative of the in-situ deposit as it could be an artifact of the auger drilling method used. The encountered silt and/or dirty sand overburden is not considered a favourable material for general construction borrow, mostly due to its dominant silt content and sensitivity to erosion, frost and moisture.
Based on these preliminary results, further field and laboratory assessment of this area was not considered warranted. 4.0 Closure If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. The commentary above is based on preliminary results of five widely spaced test holes conducted over a significant area. Subsurface conditions can be expected to vary with time, and vary below and between the areas investigated. This document was prepared for the exclusive use of the R.F.Binnie, BC Hydro and their project team for specific application to the project area described herein. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Amec Foster Wheeler accepts no responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.
Photos 1 to 4
PROJECT No: KX052805.2.G110
PREPARED BY: P. O’Sullivan
SCALE: NTS
DATE PREPARED: January 2017 BC HYDRO C/O
R.F. BINNIE & ASSOCIATES LTD
SITE C- HIGHWAY 29 – Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Prospect
Taken: April 2016
Photo 3: TH16-C-301: 0.0 m to 1.5 m. Silt, moisture near plastic limit Wp . Photo 4: TH16-C-325: 0.0 m to 1.5 m. Dry silt and sand.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Environment & Infrastructure
3456 Opie Crescent Prince George, BC, CANADA, V2N 2P9
Tel. (250) 564-3243 Fax. (250) 562-7045
Photo 1: View south across lower Cache Creek gravel borrow investigation area, taken at TH16-C-325; relatively flat agricultural land / old river terrace.
Photo 2: View northeast towards TH16-C-349. B54 drill and support Morooka.
0.0 m
1.5 m
0.0 m
1.5 m
Photos 5 to 7
PROJECT No: KX052805.2.G110
PREPARED BY: P. O’Sullivan
SCALE: NTS
DATE PREPARED: January 2017 BC HYDRO C/O
R.F. BINNIE & ASSOCIATES LTD
SITE C- HIGHWAY 29 – Lower Cache Creek- Gravel Borrow Prospect
Taken: April 2016
Photo 5: TH16-C-343: 3.0 m to 4.6 m. Wet sand, some silt to silty. Photo 6: TH16-C-325: 4.6 m to 6.1 m. Wet sand and gravel, some silt. Photo 7: TH16-C-349: 3.0 m to 4.6 m. Moist gravel and sand, trace silt.
Amec Foster Wheeler
Environment & Infrastructure
3456 Opie Crescent Prince George, BC, CANADA, V2N 2P9
Tel. (250) 564-3243 Fax. (250) 562-7045
3.0 m
4.6 m
4.6 m
6.1 m
3.0 m
3.7 m
4.6 m
Highway 29
Ca
ch
eC
re
ek
P e a c e R i v e r
*301(See Note 1)
*319
*325
*343
*349
SCALE:
PROJECTION:
DATUM:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
This drawing was originally produced in colour.
CLIENT: DATE:
S:\Internal\KX052805-GIS\4CacheCreek\LowerCacheCreek-GravelBorrowProspect-Figure1-SitePlan.mxd
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure3456 Opie Crescent
Prince George, BC, CANADA V2N 2P9Tel. (250) 564-3243Fax (250) 562-7045
KX052805
JANUARY 2017
A
SITE PLANLOWER CACHE CREEK
GRAVEL BORROW PROSPECT
HIGHWAY NO. 29BEAR FLAT – CACHE CREEK
FIGURE 1
TITLE:
PROJECT:
0 100 200 300 40050m
1:7,500
UTM Zone 10
NAD 83
PO
BBPROJECT NO.:
REV NO.:
Notes:1. Hole location is estimated and elevation is based on 2011 LIDAR.2. Preliminary Impact Lines provided by BC Hydro 11 November 2015.3. Ortho imagery provided by R.F. Binnie & Associates on 14 September 2016.
Legend
Borehole Location (*BH16-C-XXX)
Preliminary Impact Lines(See Note 2)
Full Supply Level (FSL)
Stability Impact Line (SIL)
Erosion Impact Line (EIL)
Flood Impact Line (FIL)
-
-
24
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
19
20
20
12
15
TOPSOIL, silt, sandy, black, moist.
SILT, sandy, some clay, stiff, lowplasticity, brown, layered, moisture~Wp.
-below 2.8 m, SAND (fine tomedium grained), seams (~300 mmthick), interbedded, brown
-at 4.0 m, brown to dark brown,moisture >WP
SAND (fine to medium grained)AND GRAVEL (fine to coarsegrained), silty, maximum particle sizeencountered = 19 mm, rounded tosubrounded, dense, brown, moist towet.
GRAVEL (fine to coarse grained)AND SAND (fine to mediumgrained), some silt, maximumparticle size encountered = 50 mm,rounded to subrounded, dense,brown, wet.
0.3m
4.3m
6.1m
Bag
Bag
Bag
Bag
Bag
Switched tohollowstemat 7.6 m.
-
-
-
-
-
21 April 2016Elev. 423.2 m
[0
[0
0
[35
[60
25
25
27
40
35
TP
ML
SM2
GP
75]
75]
73
25]
5]
-
-
-
-
-
------
SHEET 1 of 2
Driller/Operator
TESTS
She
arS
tren
gth
(kP
a)
Gra
vel
San
d
MQ, R, S
CDS
wL, wP
w
------
Mechanical AnalysisTriaxial CompressionConsolidationDirect ShearLiquid, Plastic LimitsMoisture Content
Gradation %
Rec
ove
ry (
m)
UFV
LV
RPP
Blowcount = Standard Penetration Test (ASTM-1586)
TEST HOLE No.SUMMARY LOG
KX052805.2.G108
PO
FILE No.
Blo
wco
unt
Unconfined CompressionField VaneLab VaneRemouldedPocket Penetrometer
-----
Fin
es
Index
Properties
wL wP
PREPARED By:
Method S.S./H.S. Auger
w
ACGST
W
AugerCoreGrab SampleSplit SpoonShelby TubeWash
Drilling
Details
Dep
th (
m)
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Cla
ssifi
catio
n
Description
Oth
er T
ests
NOTE: Brackets [ ] denote field estimate. Lab sieves done on material <75 mm only.
SAMPLE TYPE SHEAR STRENGTH kPa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Project
Location Elevation
Dates
428.31m21 April, 2016
TH16-C-301Hwy 29 Realignment - Lower Cache Creek BorrowN237,532.528/E609,299.239Westech Drilling Corp
Ministry of Transportation
& Infrastructure
AMEC Foster Wheeler
Environment & InfrastructureA
ME
C-S
UM
MA
RY
LO
G K
X05
280
5.2.
G10
8 T
ES
T P
IT L
OG
S.G
PJ
MO
T-B
C-D
AT
AT
EM
PLA
TE
.GD
T 1
9/1
/17
- - 5
-below 9.1 m, sandy, trace silt.
End of Borehole at 9.8 m.Moderate sloughing below 4.6 m.Groundwater encountered at 5.1 m.Backfilled with drill cuttings, topsoil atsurface.
9.8m
S
76 mm splitspoon used
0.2 70 26 GP350
------
SHEET 2 of 2
Driller/Operator
TESTS
She
arS
tren
gth
(kP
a)
Gra
vel
San
d
MQ, R, S
CDS
wL, wP
w
------
Mechanical AnalysisTriaxial CompressionConsolidationDirect ShearLiquid, Plastic LimitsMoisture Content
Gradation %
Rec
ove
ry (
m)
UFV
LV
RPP
Blowcount = Standard Penetration Test (ASTM-1586)
TEST HOLE No.SUMMARY LOG
KX052805.2.G108
PO
FILE No.
Blo
wco
unt
Unconfined CompressionField VaneLab VaneRemouldedPocket Penetrometer
-----
Fin
es
Index
Properties
wL wP
PREPARED By:
Method S.S./H.S. Auger
w
ACGST
W
AugerCoreGrab SampleSplit SpoonShelby TubeWash
Drilling
Details
Dep
th (
m)
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Cla
ssifi
catio
n
Description
Oth
er T
ests
NOTE: Brackets [ ] denote field estimate. Lab sieves done on material <75 mm only.
SAMPLE TYPE SHEAR STRENGTH kPa
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Project
Location Elevation
Dates
428.31m21 April, 2016
TH16-C-301Hwy 29 Realignment - Lower Cache Creek BorrowN237,532.528/E609,299.239Westech Drilling Corp
Ministry of Transportation
& Infrastructure
AMEC Foster Wheeler
Environment & InfrastructureA
ME
C-S
UM
MA
RY
LO
G K
X05
280
5.2.
G10
8 T
ES
T P
IT L
OG
S.G
PJ
MO
T-B
C-D
AT
AT
EM
PLA
TE
.GD
T 1
9/1
/17
-
25
-
-
-
25
-
-
7
7
8
7
TOPSOIL, silt, sandy, black, moist.
SILT, some sand, stiff, no to lowplasticity, layered, brown, mositure<Wp.
-from 1.8 m to 2.1 m, SAND (fine tomedium grained)
SAND (fine grained), trace to somesilt, loose to compact, brown to lightbrown, layered, moist.-at 3.8 m, moist to wet
GRAVEL (fine grained) AND SAND(fine to coarse grained), trace silt,maximum particle sizeencountered = 40 mm, rounded,brown, moist to wet.
End of Borehole at 6.1 m.Moderate sloughing below 4.0 m.Groundwater encountered at 5.2 m.Backfilled with drill cuttings, topsoil atsurface.
0.3m
3.4m
4.4m
6.1m
Bag
Bag
Bag
Bag
Switched tohollowstemat end ofhole todeterminewater level
-
-
-
-
22 April 2016Elev. 421.7 m
[0
0
[0
[50
15
14
90
45
TP
ML
SP-SM
GP
85]
86
10]
5]
-
-
-
-
------
SHEET 1 of 1
Driller/Operator
TESTS
She
arS
tren
gth
(kP
a)
Gra
vel
San
d
MQ, R, S
CDS
wL, wP
w
------
Mechanical AnalysisTriaxial CompressionConsolidationDirect ShearLiquid, Plastic LimitsMoisture Content
Gradation %
Rec
ove
ry (
m)
UFV
LV
RPP
Blowcount = Standard Penetration Test (ASTM-1586)
TEST HOLE No.SUMMARY LOG
KX052805.2.G108
PO
FILE No.
Blo
wco
unt
Unconfined CompressionField VaneLab VaneRemouldedPocket Penetrometer
-----
Fin
es
Index
Properties
wL wP
PREPARED By:
Method S.S./H.S. Auger
w
ACGST
W
AugerCoreGrab SampleSplit SpoonShelby TubeWash
Drilling
Details
Dep
th (
m)
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Cla
ssifi
catio
n
Description
Oth
er T
ests
NOTE: Brackets [ ] denote field estimate. Lab sieves done on material <75 mm only.
SAMPLE TYPE SHEAR STRENGTH kPa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Project
Location Elevation
Dates
426.93m21 April, 2016
TH16-C-319Hwy 29 Realignment - Lower Cache Creek BorrowN237,541.963/E609,718.966Westech Drilling Corp
Ministry of Transportation
& Infrastructure
AMEC Foster Wheeler
Environment & InfrastructureA
ME
C-S
UM
MA
RY
LO
G K
X05
280
5.2.
G10
8 T
ES
T P
IT L
OG
S.G
PJ
MO
T-B
C-D
AT
AT
EM
PLA
TE
.GD
T 1
9/1
/17
-
21
-
-
-
20
-
-
3
2
2
4
TOPSOIL.
SILT AND SAND, no to lowplasticity, loose, light brown, layered,moisture <Wp.
SAND (fine grained), silty, loose,layered, moist.
-between 3.0 m and 4.6 m,interbedded silt (300 mm) and sand(300 mm) layers
GRAVEL (fine to coarse) ANDSAND (fine to coarse), trace silt,maximum particle size encountered = 40 mm, rounded, compact, moist.-at 4.9 m, wet to saturated
End of hole at 6.1 m.Moderate sloughing below 3.0 m.Groundwater encountered at 4.9 m.Backfilled with drill cuttings, topsoil atsurface.
0.3m
1.5m
4.6m
6.1m
Bag
Bag
Bag
Bag
-
-
-
-
22 April 2016Elev. 422.4 m(Estimated)
[0
0
[0
[55
50
48
70
40
TP
ML -SM4
ML -SM4
GP
50]
52
30]
5]
-
-
-
-
------
SHEET 1 of 1
Driller/Operator
TESTS
She
arS
tren
gth
(kP
a)
Gra
vel
San
d
MQ, R, S
CDS
wL, wP
w
------
Mechanical AnalysisTriaxial CompressionConsolidationDirect ShearLiquid, Plastic LimitsMoisture Content
Gradation %
Rec
ove
ry (
m)
UFV
LV
RPP
Blowcount = Standard Penetration Test (ASTM-1586)
TEST HOLE No.SUMMARY LOG
KX052805.2.G108
PO
FILE No.
Blo
wco
unt
Unconfined CompressionField VaneLab VaneRemouldedPocket Penetrometer
-----
Fin
es
Index
Properties
wL wP
PREPARED By:
Method S.S. Auger
w
ACGST
W
AugerCoreGrab SampleSplit SpoonShelby TubeWash
Drilling
Details
Dep
th (
m)
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Cla
ssifi
catio
n
Description
Oth
er T
ests
NOTE: Brackets [ ] denote field estimate. Lab sieves done on material <75 mm only.
SAMPLE TYPE SHEAR STRENGTH kPa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Project
Location Elevation
Dates
427.33m22 April, 2016
TH16-C-325Hwy 29 Realignment - Lower Cache Creek BorrowN237,692.108/E610,297.526Westech Drilling Corp
Ministry of Transportation
& Infrastructure
AMEC Foster Wheeler
Environment & InfrastructureA
ME
C-S
UM
MA
RY
LO
G K
X05
280
5.2.
G10
8 T
ES
T P
IT L
OG
S.G
PJ
MO
T-B
C-D
AT
AT
EM
PLA
TE
.GD
T 1
9/1
/17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8
4
4
15
12
TOPSOIL, sand and silt, black,moist.SAND (fine grained), silty, loose,light brown, moist.
SAND (fine to medium grained),trace to some silt, loose, light brown,moist.
-at 4.9 m, medium to coarse grainedsand, wet to saturated
-below 5.3 m, trace gravel
-below 6.7 m, grey
GRAVEL (fine to coarse) ANDSAND (fine to coarse), rounded,maximum particle sizeencountered = 50 mm, grey, moistto wet.End of Borehole at 7.6 m.Moderate sloughing below 4.0 m.Groundwater encountered at 4.9 m.Backfilled with drill cuttings, topsoil atsurface.
0.2m
3.7m
7.0m
7.6m
Bag
Bag
Bag
Bag
Bag
-
-
-
-
-
22 April 2016Elev. 423.3 m(Estimated)
[0
[0
[0
[0
[50
75
75
90
90
40
TP
SM2
SP-SM
GP-GM
25]
25]
10]
10]
10]
-
-
-
-
-
------
SHEET 1 of 1
Driller/Operator
TESTS
She
arS
tren
gth
(kP
a)
Gra
vel
San
d
MQ, R, S
CDS
wL, wP
w
------
Mechanical AnalysisTriaxial CompressionConsolidationDirect ShearLiquid, Plastic LimitsMoisture Content
Gradation %
Rec
ove
ry (
m)
UFV
LV
RPP
Blowcount = Standard Penetration Test (ASTM-1586)
TEST HOLE No.SUMMARY LOG
KX052805.2.G108
PO
FILE No.
Blo
wco
unt
Unconfined CompressionField VaneLab VaneRemouldedPocket Penetrometer
-----
Fin
es
Index
Properties
wL wP
PREPARED By:
Method S.S. Auger
w
ACGST
W
AugerCoreGrab SampleSplit SpoonShelby TubeWash
Drilling
Details
Dep
th (
m)
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Cla
ssifi
catio
n
Description
Oth
er T
ests
NOTE: Brackets [ ] denote field estimate. Lab sieves done on material <75 mm only.
SAMPLE TYPE SHEAR STRENGTH kPa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Project
Location Elevation
Dates
428.21m22 April, 2016
TH16-C-343Hwy 29 Realignment - Lower Cache Creek BorrowN237,250.397/E609,383.631Westech Drilling Corp
Ministry of Transportation
& Infrastructure
AMEC Foster Wheeler
Environment & InfrastructureA
ME
C-S
UM
MA
RY
LO
G K
X05
280
5.2.
G10
8 T
ES
T P
IT L
OG
S.G
PJ
MO
T-B
C-D
AT
AT
EM
PLA
TE
.GD
T 1
9/1
/17
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
2
1
TOPSOIL.
SILT, sandy, low plastic, brown,moisture <Wp.
SAND (fine to medium), some silt,brown, moist.GRAVEL (fine to coarse grained)AND SAND (fine grained), trace silt,rounded, maximum particle sizeencountered = 50 mm, brown,moist.
End of hole at 6.2 m.Significant sloughing below 1.8 m.Groundwater encountered at 6.2 m.Backfilled with drill cuttings, topsoil atsurface.
0.3m
0.9m
1.2m
6.2m
Bag
Bag
Bag
little to norecoveryfrom 3.0 mto 4.6 m,
Switched tohollowstemat end ofhole todeterminewater level
-
-
-
22 April 2016Elev. 420.9 m
[0
[0
52
30
80
40
TP
ML
SM2
GP-GM
70]
20]
8
-
-
-
------
SHEET 1 of 1
Driller/Operator
TESTS
She
arS
tren
gth
(kP
a)
Gra
vel
San
d
MQ, R, S
CDS
wL, wP
w
------
Mechanical AnalysisTriaxial CompressionConsolidationDirect ShearLiquid, Plastic LimitsMoisture Content
Gradation %
Rec
ove
ry (
m)
UFV
LV
RPP
Blowcount = Standard Penetration Test (ASTM-1586)
TEST HOLE No.SUMMARY LOG
KX052805.2.G108
PO
FILE No.
Blo
wco
unt
Unconfined CompressionField VaneLab VaneRemouldedPocket Penetrometer
-----
Fin
es
Index
Properties
wL wP
PREPARED By:
Method S.S./H.S. Auger
w
ACGST
W
AugerCoreGrab SampleSplit SpoonShelby TubeWash
Drilling
Details
Dep
th (
m)
Sam
ple
Typ
e
Cla
ssifi
catio
n
Description
Oth
er T
ests
NOTE: Brackets [ ] denote field estimate. Lab sieves done on material <75 mm only.
SAMPLE TYPE SHEAR STRENGTH kPa
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Project
Location Elevation
Dates
427.14m22 April, 2016
TH16-C-349Hwy 29 Realignment - Lower Cache Creek BorrowN237,314.885/E609,988.304Westech Drilling Corp
Ministry of Transportation
& Infrastructure
AMEC Foster Wheeler
Environment & InfrastructureA
ME
C-S
UM
MA
RY
LO
G K
X05
280
5.2.
G10
8 T
ES
T P
IT L
OG
S.G
PJ
MO
T-B
C-D
AT
AT
EM
PLA
TE
.GD
T 1
9/1
/17
R.F. Binnie & Associates Ltd. PROJECT: KX052805.2.G108678 Vancouver Street OFFICE: Prince GeorgePrince George, BC TECHNICIAN: Amec Foster Wheeler LabV2L 2P3 DATE: 09-Jun-16
PROJECT NAME:
TEST PIT NUMBER: SAMPLED BY:
SAMPLE NUMBER: SOURCE:
DEPTH: DATE TESTED:
Grain size Passing(mm) (%)100.0 100.075.0 100.050.0 100.037.5 100.025.0 100.019.0 100.012.50 100.09.50 100.04.75 100.02.00 99.90.850 99.50.425 98.80.250 95.30.150 89.80.075 73.50.0484 49.80.0342 42.90.0216 34.20.0153 29.30.0125 27.30.0088 24.40.0061 20.50.0043 17.60.0030 15.60.0012 11.7
GRAVEL= 0.0%SAND = 26.5%
SILT = 60.2%CLAY = 13.3%
Moisture = 21.1%
COMMENTS: D10 = N/AD30 = 0.016D60 = 0.058
Per:
Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.
SUMMARY
Glenda Michaud
Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Source
G03 21-Apr-16
3.4m - 4.3m 08-Jun-16
BH16-C-301 P. O'Sullivan
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONASTM D422
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000.0010.010.1110100
PER
CEN
T PA
SSIN
G
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
GRAVEL
Coarse CoarseCOBBLES
SANDSILT CLAY
Fine FineMedium
R.F. Binnie & Associates Ltd. PROJECT: KX052805.2.G108678 Vancouver Street OFFICE: Prince GeorgePrince George, BC TECHNICIAN: Amec Foster Wheeler LabV2L 2P3 DATE: 09-Jun-16
PROJECT NAME:
TEST PIT NUMBER: SAMPLED BY:
SAMPLE NUMBER: SOURCE:
DEPTH: DATE TESTED:
Grain size Passing(mm) (%)100.0 100.075.0 100.050.0 100.037.5 100.025.0 100.019.0 100.012.50 100.09.50 100.04.75 100.02.00 100.00.850 100.00.425 100.00.250 99.70.150 97.10.075 86.40.0483 70.10.0342 60.70.0216 39.80.0153 33.20.0125 30.30.0088 24.60.0061 19.00.0043 16.10.0030 13.30.0012 9.5
GRAVEL= 0.0%SAND = 13.6%
SILT = 75.4%CLAY = 11.0%
Moisture = 7.2%
COMMENTS: D10 = 0.001D30 = 0.012D60 = 0.034
Per:
Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.
SUMMARY
Glenda Michaud
Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Source
G02 21-Apr-16
1.5m - 2.7m 08-Jun-16
BH16-C-319 P. O'Sullivan
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONASTM D422
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000.0010.010.1110100
PER
CEN
T PA
SSIN
G
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
GRAVEL
Coarse CoarseCOBBLES
SANDSILT CLAY
Fine FineMedium
R.F. Binnie & Associates Ltd. PROJECT: KX052805.2.G108678 Vancouver Street OFFICE: Prince GeorgePrince George, BC TECHNICIAN: Amec Foster Wheeler LabV2L 2P3 DATE: 09-Jun-16
PROJECT NAME:
TEST PIT NUMBER: SAMPLED BY:
SAMPLE NUMBER: DATE SAMPLED:
DEPTH: DATE TESTED:
Grain size Passing(mm) (%)100.0 100.075.0 100.050.0 100.037.5 100.025.0 100.019.0 100.012.50 100.09.50 100.04.75 100.02.00 100.00.850 100.00.425 99.90.250 96.50.150 79.40.075 52.40.0483 36.70.0341 29.50.0216 19.90.0153 15.90.0124 14.30.0087 12.00.0061 10.40.0043 8.00.0030 6.40.0012 4.8
GRAVEL= 0.0%SAND = 47.6%
SILT = 47.0%CLAY = 5.4%
Moisture = 2.4%
COMMENTS: D10 = 0.006D30 = 0.035D60 = 0.091
Per:
Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.
Glenda Michaud
SUMMARY
Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Source
BH16-C-325 P. O'Sullivan
G02
1.8m - 2.4m 08-Jun-16
22-Apr-16
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONASTM D422
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000.0010.010.1110100
PER
CEN
T PA
SSIN
G
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
GRAVEL
Coarse CoarseCOBBLES
SANDSILT CLAY
Fine FineMedium
R.F. Binnie & Associates Ltd. PROJECT: KX052805.2.G108678 Vancouver Street OFFICE: Prince GeorgePrince George, BC TECHNICIAN: Amec Foster Wheeler LabV2L 2P3 DATE: 08-Jun-16Attention:
PROJECT NAME:
Grain size Passing(mm) (%)100.0 100.075.0 100.063.0 100.050.0 78.037.5 78.025.0 67.419.0 57.312.5 47.49.5 41.44.75 29.72.36 22.41.18 18.60.600 14.30.300 8.40.150 5.10.075 3.4
GRAVEL = 70.3%SAND = 26.2%FINES = 3.4%
D10 = 0.36D30 = 4.84D60 = 20.44
Cu = 56.65Cc = 3.18
Moisture = 5.0%Tested Weight
(g) = 1,710.8
COMMENTS:
Per:
Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.
9.1m - 9.8m 07-Jun-16
Bridge End Fill
Glenda Michaud
DEPTH: DATE TESTED:
Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Source
BH16-C-301 P. O'Sullivan
D01
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONASTM C136/ASTM C117
TEST PIT NUMBER: SAMPLED BY:
SAMPLE NUMBER: DATE SAMPLED: 21-Apr-16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000.010.1110100
PER
CEN
T PA
SSIN
G
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
GRAVEL
Coarse CoarseCOBBLES
SANDFINES
(silt &clay)
Fine FineMedium
R.F. Binnie & Associates Ltd. PROJECT: KX052805.2.G108
678 Vancouver Street OFFICE: Prince George
Prince George, BC TECHNICIAN: Amec Foster Wheeler Lab
V2L 2P3 DATE: 01/18/2017
Attention:
PROJECT NAME:
Grain size Passing
(mm) (%)
100.0 100.0
75.0 100.0
63.0 100.0
50.0 100.0
37.5 100.0
25.0 85.6
19.0 75.7
12.5 60.7
9.5 55.5
4.75 48.1
2.36 45.1
1.18 43.2
0.600 40.8
0.300 23.5
0.150 12.2
0.075 7.5
GRAVEL = 51.9%
SAND = 40.5%
FINES = 7.5%
D10 = 0.11
D30 = 0.39
D60 = 11.08
Cu = 102.63
Cc = 0.13
Moisture = 5.0%
Tested Weight
(g) =2,720.3
COMMENTS:
Per:
Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow Source
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTIONASTM C136/ASTM C117
Bridge End Fill
TEST PIT NUMBER: TH16-C-349 SAMPLED BY: P. O'Sullivan
SAMPLE NUMBER: G3 DATE SAMPLED: 21-Apr-16
DEPTH: 6.0ft - 7.5ft DATE TESTED: 01/18/2017
Glenda Michaud
Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1000.010.1110100
PE
RC
EN
T P
AS
SIN
G
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
GRAVEL
Coarse Coarse
COBBLESSAND
FINES(silt &clay)
Fine FineMedium
Client: R.F. Binnie
Project No.: KX052805.2.G108
Project Name: Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow SourceTechnician: G. Michaud Date:
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m) 0.1 0.1 1.8 2.7 3.4 4.3 7.0 7.3 4.6 6.1 9.1 9.8Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m) 0.6 1.2 1.5 2.7 3.4 4.0 4.9 5.2Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m) 0.6 0.9 1.8 2.7 3.7 4.3 4.9 5.5Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m) 0.3 0.9 1.7 2.3 3.4 4.0 4.9 5.5 7.0 7.3Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Amec Foster WheelerEnvironment & InfrastructurePrince George, BC
Per: _______________________________
13-May-16 MOISTURE CONTENT - ASTM D2216
BH16-C-301 BH16-C-301 BH16-C-301 BH16-C-301 BH16-C-301 BH16-C-301G01 G02 G03 G04 B01 S01
33.63 33.74 33.8 299.9 2109.8 396.9111.45 102.2 116.94 1106.3 19151.4 217198.89 90.63 102.93 1001.7 17398.3 2085.912.6 11.6 14.0 104.6 1753.1 85.1
19.2% 20.3% 20.3% 14.9% 11.5% 5.0%
BH16-C-319 BH16-C-319 BH16-C-319 BH16-C-319G01 G02 G03 G04
33.88 33.54 33.8 321.493.04 97.36 99.96 3264.689.17 93.06 94.99 3080.6
3.9 4.3 5.0 184.07.0% 7.2% 8.1% 6.7%
BH16-C-325 BH16-C-325 BH16-C-325 BH16-C-325G01 G02 G03 G04
33.91 33.84 33.95 308.275.23 82.49 81.78 4509.973.89 81.47 80.77 4349.4
1.3 1.0 1.0 160.53.4% 2.1% 2.2% 4.0%
BH16-C-343 BH16-C-343 BH16-C-343 BH16-C-343 BH16-C-343G01 G02 G03 G04 G05
33.94 34.04 33.77 349 305.475 84.71 97.36 2369.8 2073.3
72.06 82.96 95.15 2105.3 1884.32.9 1.8 2.2 264.5 189.0
7.7% 3.6% 3.6% 15.1% 12.0%
Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.
Client: R.F. Binnie
Project No.: KX052805.2.G108
Project Name: Lower Cache Creek Gravel Borrow SourceTechnician: G. Michaud Date:
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m) 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.8 2.3Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m)Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m)Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Hole No.Sample No.Depth (m)Wt. of TareWt. Sample WetWt. Sample DryWt. WaterMoisture Cont. %HCL Reactivity
Amec Foster WheelerEnvironment & InfrastructurePrince George, BC
Per: _______________________________
Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request.
4.2% 2.1% 1.0%2.0 1.2 26.4
81.92 91.88 3022.783.96 93.08 3049.133.78 33.95 299.5
G01 G02 G03
MOISTURE CONTENT - ASTM D2216
BH16-C-349 BH16-C-349 BH16-C-349
13-May-16
ATTERBERG LIMITSASTM D4318
PROJECT: Sample ID:Project Number: Date Sampled:Technician: Depth:Date: Comments:
Liquid LimitTrial No. 1 2 3No. of Blows 17 21 31Tare ID 22 12 10Mass Wet + Tare 27.19 28.52 30.37Mass Dry + Tare 24.50 25.58 27.25Mass Tare 13.79 13.66 13.85Mass of Water 2.69 2.94 3.12Dry Soil Mass 10.71 11.92 13.40Moisture Content 25.1 24.7 23.3Liquid Limit 23.9 24.1 24.0 Average Liquid Limit: 24
Plastic LimitTrial No. 1 2 3Tare ID 28 8 13Mass Wet + Tare 23.06 23.50 22.63Mass Dry + Tare 21.64 22.05 21.28Mass Tare 13.58 13.91 13.63Mass of Water 1.42 1.45 1.35Dry Soil Mass 8.06 8.14 7.65Moisture Content 17.6 17.8 17.6 Average Plastic Limit 18
Plasticity Index 6Received Moisture 20
Plasticity Index PI = LL - PLLiquidity Index LI = (MC - PL) / PI
08-Jun-16
Lower Cache Creek BH16-C-301-G03KX052805.2.G108 21-Apr-16S. McMahon 3.4m - 4.3m
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 20 40 60 80 100
Plas
ticity
Inde
x
Liquid Limit
Plasticity Chart
CL-ML
"A"- LineWL=50
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Moi
stur
e C
onte
nt (%
)
# of blows
Flow Curve
45201510 25 403530
CH
MH & OH
ML & OL
CL
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Moi
stur
e C
onte
nt (%
)
# of blows
Flow Curve
45201510 25 403530
ATTERBERG LIMITSASTM D4318
PROJECT: Sample ID:Project Number: Date Sampled:Technician: Depth:Date: Comments:
Liquid LimitTrial No. 1 2 3No. of Blows 7 9 12Tare ID 0 9 11Mass Wet + Tare 24.87 27.75 29.38Mass Dry + Tare 22.18 24.52 25.92Mass Tare 13.57 13.68 13.81Mass of Water 2.69 3.23 3.46Dry Soil Mass 8.61 10.84 12.11Moisture Content 31.2 29.8 28.6Liquid Limit 26.8 26.3 26.1 Average Liquid Limit: 25
Plastic LimitTrial No. 1 2 3Tare ID 19 20 34Mass Wet + Tare 24.94 26.43 28.37Mass Dry + Tare 22.77 23.91 25.43Mass Tare 13.96 13.81 13.66Mass of Water 2.17 2.52 2.94Dry Soil Mass 8.81 10.10 11.77Moisture Content 24.6 25.0 25.0 Average Plastic Limit 25
Plasticity Index 0Received Moisture 7
Plasticity Index PI = LL - PLLiquidity Index LI = (MC - PL) / PI
Lower Cache CreekKX052805.2.G108S. McMahon08-Jun-16
BH16-C-319, G0221-Apr-161.5m - 2.7mNon Plastic
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 20 40 60 80 100
Plas
ticity
Inde
x
Liquid Limit
Plasticity Chart
CL-ML
"A"- LineWL=50
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Moi
stur
e C
onte
nt (%
)
# of blows
Flow Curve
45201510 25 403530
CH
MH & OH
ML & OL
CL
35
36
37
38
39
40
Moi
stur
e C
onte
nt (%
)
# of blows
Flow Curve
45201510 25 403530
ATTERBERG LIMITSASTM D4318
PROJECT: Sample ID:Project Number: Date Sampled:Technician: Depth:Date: Comments:
Liquid LimitTrial No. 1 2 3No. of Blows 5 6 7Tare ID 1 2 7Mass Wet + Tare 25.56 24.94 27.27Mass Dry + Tare 23.23 22.74 24.62Mass Tare 13.83 13.68 13.58Mass of Water 2.33 2.20 2.65Dry Soil Mass 9.40 9.06 11.04Moisture Content 24.8 24.3 24.0Liquid Limit 20.5 20.5 20.6 Average Liquid Limit: 21
Plastic LimitTrial No. 1 2 3Tare ID 42 45 46Mass Wet + Tare 30.68 25.90 27.25Mass Dry + Tare 27.84 23.84 24.97Mass Tare 13.77 13.65 13.66Mass of Water 2.84 2.06 2.28Dry Soil Mass 14.07 10.19 11.31Moisture Content 20.2 20.2 20.2 Average Plastic Limit 20
Plasticity Index 1Received Moisture 2
Plasticity Index PI = LL - PLLiquidity Index LI = (MC - PL) / PI
08-Jun-16 Non Plastic
Lower Cache Creek BH16-C-325, G02KX052805.2.G108 22-Apr-16S. McMahon 1.8m - 2.4m
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 20 40 60 80 100
Plas
ticity
Inde
x
Liquid Limit
Plasticity Chart
CL-ML
"A"- LineWL=50
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Moi
stur
e C
onte
nt (%
)
# of blows
Flow Curve
45201510 25 403530
CH
MH & OH
ML & OL
CL
25
26
27
28
29
30
Moi
stur
e C
onte
nt (%
)
# of blows
Flow Curve
45201510 25 403530