div class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=1Page 1button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=1 data-page=1 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 1: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails1jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=2Page 2button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=2 data-page=2 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 2: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails2jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=3Page 3button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=3 data-page=3 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 3: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails3jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=4Page 4button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=4 data-page=4 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 4: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails4jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=5Page 5button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=5 data-page=5 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 5: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails5jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=6Page 6button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=6 data-page=6 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 6: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails6jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=7Page 7button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=7 data-page=7 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 7: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails7jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=ts-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=8Page 8button div class=ts-imageimg data-url=2017-11-14-kesling-1963-1966-suggested-that-the-class-cyclocystoidea-was-derivedhtmlpage=8 data-page=8 class=ts-thumb lazyload alt=Page 8: · 2017-11-14 · Kesling 1963 1966 suggested that the class Cyclocystoidea was derived from a diplopore-bearing cystoid ancestor resembling the mid-Ordovician genus Tholocystis loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAIAAAACCAQAAADYv8WvAAAAD0lEQVR42mP8X8AwAgiABKBAv+vAXklAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC data-src=https:reader033vdocumentsusreader033viewer20220420095e714d15cc3c35085d2b5858html5thumbnails8jpg width=140 height=200 divdiv
