2016 employee survey results draft · about eid engagement employees feel valued by their...

2016 Employee Survey Results

6/2/2016 2Facilities Planning & ManagementUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON

Mission, Vision, and Values

MissionProviding excellence in facilities and services for our university community.

VisionAn inclusive and diverse team working together to provide exceptional service for our university community.

Core Values• People Centered• Stewardship• Integrity• Innovation and Discovery• Safety


About EIDEngagementEmployees feel valued by their organization, find pride and personal meaning in their work, and are willing to go above and beyond for their employer.

InclusionEmployees have a sense of belonging and of being respected for who they are and as a contributing member of the team.

DiversityEmployees possess the range of human qualities that impact and influence how people are perceived and how they behave, including (but not limited to) age, gender, race, ethnicity, color, physical and mental attributes, sexual orientation, marital status, spirituality, education, values and beliefs.


Survey Methods Conducted by the UW Survey Center on behalf of the Vice Chancellor for Finance and Administration (VCFA).

Electronic and paper surveys. Paper surveys were offered in English, Spanish, Hmong, Tibetan, and Mandarin Chinese.

All survey responses were confidential. Only demographic data was collected. Results are grouped by division, department, and unit.


Survey Purpose Gather your opinions about your job, work unit, supervisors, and peers.

Understand the issues that are important to you at work.

Improve relationships between supervisors and co‐workers.

Assess strengths, identify gaps, and help ensure that FP&M has high levels of employee satisfaction.

Provide a way to evaluate the success of current EID initiatives and help focus future EID efforts.


Survey Response Rates

Year Distributed Completed Resp. Rate

2012 1211 482 40%

2014 1117 949 85%

2016 1146 806 70%


40%

85%

70%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%2012 2014 2016

Results by Section

Environment of Work Unit (Q1a‐l) Relationship with Co‐workers (Q2a‐d) Tools & Opportunities (Q3a‐j) Work Unit (Q4a‐d) Supervisors in Work Unit (Q5a‐j) Overall Satisfaction (Q6a‐b) Other Questions (Q7‐Q9)


Mean Scores by Section

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

3.9

4.0

4.1

2012 2014 2016

Environment of the Work Unit Relationship with Co‐Workers Tools and Opportunities

Work Unit Supervisors in Work Unit Overall Satisfaction


Environment of Work Unit

68.5%

71.5%

75.4%

16.6%

22.6%

13.5%

14.6%

5.9%

11.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

Favorable Neutral Unfavorable


Relationship with Co‐workers


69.3%

76.2%

75.2%

20.3%

18.5%

15.7%

10.8%

5.2%

9.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016


Tools & Opportunities


56.9%

53.6%

59.2%

22.9%

36.3%

20.1%

19.0%

10.2%

20.7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016


Work Unit


75.3%

80.0%

79.2%

15.8%

16.0%

13.7%

8.0%

4.0%

7.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016


Supervisors in Work Unit


65.3%

61.2%

70.2%

20.4%

25.9%

17.2%

14.1%

12.9%

12.6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016


Overall Satisfaction


72.5%

69.0%

74.4%

15.5%

20.7%

15.2%

11.5%

10.3%

10.4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016


Considering Leaving FP&M?27.6% of FP&M employees are considering leaving the division in the next year.


To retire 18.0%

To take another job at UW‐Madison 25.4%

To take another job outside UW‐Madison 37.5%

Other plans 19.1%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0%

Satisfaction with Work ExperienceWhich factor greatly affects your satisfaction with your work experience?


Pay/Benefits 32.1%

Work environment 20.8%

Immediate supervisor 10.3%

Work variety 9.3%

Training opportunities 4.2%

Advancement opportunities 6.0%

Experience working at UW‐Madison 8.5%

Other 8.7%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Composite Scales

Engagement Diversity and Inclusion Best Places to Work Questions Respect‐related Questions


Engagement


35.0%

36.3%

54.5%

48.0%

47.6%

35.5%

17.0%

16.0%

10.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

Engaged Somewhat Engaged Not Engaged

Diversity & Inclusion


48.0%

47.5%

43.2%

40.0%

40.3%

44.4%

13.0%

12.2%

12.4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

High Medium Low

Best Places to Work


70.0%

68.7%

72.9%

17.0%

18.1%

15.7%

12.0%

13.2%

11.4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

I would recommend my unit as a good place to work.


Best Places to Work


74.0%

66.6%

73.9%

15.0%

17.9%

14.9%

11.0%

15.5%

11.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

Considering everything, I am satisfied with my job.


Best Places to Work


71.0%

68.1%

74.9%

16.0%

17.4%

15.6%

12.0%

14.4%

9.5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

Considering everything, I am satisfied with my work unit.


Respect‐related Questions


73.0%

71.7%

77.5%

15.0%

16.3%

13.1%

12.0%

11.9%

9.4%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

I am treated with respect at work.




63.0%

68.0%

71.2%

22.0%

19.4%

15.8%

15.0%

12.5%

13.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

In my unit, co‐workers value and respect each other.




76.0%

73.7%

78.4%

14.0%

15.1%

13.3%

10.0%

11.2%

8.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2012

2014

2016

My supervisor respects me and values my work.


StrengthsNotable Areas of Improvement Environment of Work Unit (Q1a‐l) Supervisors in Work Unit (Q5a‐j) Overall Satisfaction (Q6a‐b) Engagement (Composite) Respect‐related questions (Q1l, Q2b, Q5e)


StrengthsFive Highest Rated Questions in 2016 (1‐5 Scale) Q4C: The work I do is meaningful to me – 4.15 Q3B: I know what is expected of me on the job – 4.13 Q1C: My work unit is welcoming to all people regardless of

gender – 4.10 Q4B: My work unit produces high‐quality products and services –

4.07 Q1J: My work unit feels safe to me – 4.05


WeaknessesOpportunities for Improvement Relationship with Co‐workers (Q2a‐d) Tools and Opportunities (Q3a‐j) Work Unit (Q4a‐d) Diversity and Inclusion (Composite)


WeaknessesFive Lowest Rated Questions in 2016 (1‐5 Scale) Q3G: I am satisfied with my pay/compensation – 2.29 Q3J: It is clear to me what I need to learn to be adequately

prepared for promotional opportunities – 3.17 Q3E: Recognition is based on performance in my work unit – 3.35 Q3F: I am satisfied with the recognition I receive for my work –

3.43 Q5G: Overall, I am satisfied with the managers/leaders above my

immediate supervisor – 3.45


Summary Results have continued to improve since 2012. There are still opportunities for improvement. FP&M will continue to work on areas that present opportunities for improvement.

The FP&M divisional EID plan will be revised before July 1, 2016 to address these areas of opportunity.


2016 employee survey results draft · about eid engagement employees feel valued by their...

Documents