2016 akblg resolutions

119
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NELSON REQUEST TO APPEAR AS A DELEGATION DATE: February 1, 2016 Regular TOPIC : Call for 2016 AKBLG Resol uti ons PROPOSAL: Second call for 2016 resolutions for the Association of Kootenay Boundary Local Governments (AKBLG) to be held in Kimberley in  April 2016 PROPOSED BY: Staff  ________ _______ _________ __________  ANAL YSIS SU MMARY: In advance of the 2016 AKBLG Annual General Meeting (in Kimberley) the City of Nelson has received two requests and a final call for resolutions for consideration at the  AGM to be hel d in Kimberl ey from Apr il 27 – 29 , 2016. Council dir ection is required for timely submission of resolutions from the City of Nelson. BENEFITS OR DISADVANTAGES AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS:  Each year local governments in the Kootenay Boundary region receive notice of the  AKBLG Annual Ge neral Mee ting and are reque sted to submit resolutions for the AGM in advance of the meeting. The deadline for resolutions is Monday, February 26, 2016 . Resolutions are required in the format specified on or before the deadline in order to be considered at the 2016 AGM. Resolutions that pass at the AKBLG AGM are presented at the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) Annual Convention each year.  AKBLG Resoluti ons for th e past tw o years c an be rev iewed on th e   AKBLG website. LEGISL ATIVE IMPACTS, PRECEDENT S, POLICIES: Section 10 of the AKBLG Constitution provides firm rules resolutions. It is important to note that - Special Resolutions are any resolution pertaining to a new  issue that has arisen between the deadline and the AGM. Special Resolutions require a two-thirds vote in support of consideration prior to being introduced onto the floor of the AGM, and may only be introduced after all Ordinary Resolutions have been considered or if two thirds of the Delegates present determine to hear the resolution immediately; and - Late Resolutions are held over to the next AGM. Background materials and a brief statement of any previous actions taken on the matter are also required in support of each resolution. Resolutions may only contain two ‘Whereas’ clauses. COSTS AND BUDGET IMPACT - REVENUE GENERATION:  There are no costs associated with preparation of AKBLG Resolutions. IMPACT ON SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES AND STAFF RESOURCES: Certified Council resolutions with relevant background information are sent to the  AKBLG as direc ted by Co uncil each year. COMMUNICATION:  Resolutions are submitted electronically to the AKBLG on City letterhead.

Upload: billmetcalfe

Post on 24-Feb-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 1/119

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NELSONREQUEST TO APPEAR AS A DELEGATION 

DATE: February 1, 2016 RegularTOPIC: Call for 2016 AKBLG ResolutionsPROPOSAL: Second call for 2016 resolutions for the Association of Kootenay

Boundary Local Governments (AKBLG) to be held in Kimberley in

 April 2016PROPOSED BY: Staff

 _____________________________________________________________________ ANALYSIS SUMMARY:In advance of the 2016 AKBLG Annual General Meeting (in Kimberley) the City ofNelson has received two requests and a final call for resolutions for consideration at the

 AGM to be held in Kimberley from April 27 – 29, 2016. Council direction is required fortimely submission of resolutions from the City of Nelson.

BENEFITS OR DISADVANTAGES AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS: Each year local governments in the Kootenay Boundary region receive notice of the

 AKBLG Annual General Meeting and are requested to submit resolutions for the AGM inadvance of the meeting. The deadline for resolutions is Monday, February 26, 2016. 

Resolutions are required in the format specified on or before the deadline in order to beconsidered at the 2016 AGM. Resolutions that pass at the AKBLG AGM are presentedat the Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) Annual Convention each year.

 AKBLG Resolutions for the past two years can be reviewed on the  AKBLG website. 

LEGISLATIVE IMPACTS, PRECEDENTS, POLICIES:Section 10 of the AKBLG Constitution provides firm rules resolutions. It is important to

note that- Special Resolutions are any resolution pertaining to a new  issue that hasarisen between the deadline and the AGM. Special Resolutions require a two-thirdsvote in support of consideration prior to being introduced onto the floor of the AGM, andmay only be introduced after all Ordinary Resolutions have been considered or if twothirds of the Delegates present determine to hear the resolution immediately; and- Late Resolutions are held over to the next AGM.

Background materials and a brief statement of any previous actions taken on the matterare also required in support of each resolution. Resolutions may only contain two‘Whereas’ clauses.

COSTS AND BUDGET IMPACT - REVENUE GENERATION:  There are no costs associated with preparation of AKBLG Resolutions.

IMPACT ON SUSTAINABILITY OBJECTIVES AND STAFF RESOURCES:Certified Council resolutions with relevant background information are sent to the

 AKBLG as directed by Council each year.

COMMUNICATION: 

Resolutions are submitted electronically to the AKBLG on City letterhead.

Page 2: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 2/119

 OPTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES: 1. Prepare and submit City of Nelson resolutions for 2016 AKBLG AGM2. Do not submit resolutions for the 2016 AKBLG AGM3. Refer to staff with other direction

 ATTACHMENTS:Final call for 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

Proposed resolutions with background information relating to1. Capital funding for hospitals2. Improvements to the income assistance service delivery3. Marijuana legislation4. Marijuana revenues

RECOMMENDATION:  That Council direct staff regarding City of Nelson resolutions for submission to the

 Association of Kootenay and Boundary Local Government Association Annual GeneralMeeting to be held April 27-29, 2016 in Kimberley, BC.

 AUTHOR: REVIEWED BY:

 _______________________________ ______________________________DEPUTY CORPORATE OFFICER CITY MANAGER

Page 3: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 3/119

DRAFT RESOLUTION #1

THAT the following recommendation be endorsed by Nelson City Council and submittedto the Association of Kootenay & Boundary Local Governments at the Annual GeneralMeeting to be held in Kimberley on April 27 - 29, 2016

Regional Hospi tal District Capital Funding

WHEREAS Regional Hospital Districts were created by provincial legislation to raise a

‘local share’ of capital costs for hospital equipment and building through property

taxation with the ‘local share’ historically held at 40% for regional hospital capital

projects with the Province contributing 60%;

 AND WHEREAS: local governments have limited ways to generate funding to pay for

local services and infrastructure since property taxes are the primary source of revenue

and are being stretched to meet the diverse demands local governments already face

and cannot sustain the increased load in meeting hospital board expenditures.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

The Union of BC Municipalities petition the provincial government to acknowledge that

property tax revenue is an unsuitable avenue to fund hospital infrastructure renewal

projects, and prioritizes the urgent review of the historic cost sharing ratio with a

recommendation to amend current policy accordingly.

Page 4: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 4/119

!"#$%&"'$%(%& "'$ )*+("*, +,*%%(%& *%- ).!"

!'*#(%& +#.)$!! / ! "!#$%&$ '%#!()%*&+ ,*# ( -.&$! 

 ! "#$%#& '( )*#  +,,- . '/) /*!"%01  "#$%#& 

!"#$% &'()&*

+','-.'& /001

234567789 7:;

-8<<=<> $? &6@A5:B9 CB9 D8E6B .=8F<78=G ,:H,AC6=<I.,- CB9 -)J2 2788=6BK ,:5567788

Page 5: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 5/119

!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

"0123 45 )4673678

$,D#)L%'+M'-'#*2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>"

'N',I*"O' 2I--$&P>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/

,J$(*'& Q; LJP *J' (&)R',* L$2 I#+'&*$D'#>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>S

,J$(*'& /; ,)#*'N* !)& ,$("*$% !I#+"#M "# .>,> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>T

,J$(*'& U; &',)--'#+$*")# .P &',)--'#+$*")# &'O"'L $#+ I(+$*'>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Q0

,J$(*'& V; &',)--'#+$*")#2 !)& -)O"#M !)&L$&+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QT

,J$(*'& S; J"MJ %'O'% "-(%'-'#*$*")# (%$# >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /T

,J$(*'& W; )*J'& ,)#2"+'&$*")#2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UQ

Page 6: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 6/119

$!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 $'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

*9:64;23<=3>3678

"?@8 A3B@3; ;4C2< 647 ?0B3 1336 D488@123 ;@7?4C7 7?3 @6B42B3>367 45 >06E D34D23F "?3

9468C27067G8 ;@8? 74 09:64;23<=3 022 45 7?3 @6<@B@<C028 ;?4 744: 7?3 7@>3 74 D0A7@9@D073H 3@7?3A

@6 @673AB@3;8 4A 1E 8CDD4A7@6= 7?3 54A>02 8CAB3E A38D46838 DA3D0A3< 1E #'-8 06< '3027?

*C7?4A@7@38F

I3 0284 ;067 74 7?06: 7?3 >3>13A8 45 7?3 !733A@6= )4>>@7733 06< I4A:@6= &A4CD >3>13A8

54A 7?3@A 8CDD4A7 06< =C@<0693F "?483H @6 02D?0137@902 4A<3AH 0A3J

,CX67C? &8K6:BC? J:<X67C? +6<7=6@7

!   ,3@5 I3A=3206< / '/012340 

!   #0K07 !?0A>0 / "565710 -15839 ,52/8/3/1: ;8566/67 '/</:/46

,C=64::H,A6?@:76B &8K6:BC? J:<X67C? +6<7=6@7

!   *2 #@9?>46< L (95/0 

!   ,E66 +073A846 / )015:=010 

"B78=6:= J8C?7A $37A:=67Y

!   )?A@8 M0NCA:3;@9? L (9/1> ,/6562/58 *>>/210 

!   %@9420 'CDD3A7N / (40?40531 '/012340@ ,52/8/3/1: "56571A163 

-6B6<7=Y :Z J8C?7A 28=E6@8<

!   M06K@7 !@<?C L .::/:3563 '1?=3B "/6/:310 

!   O3B@6 PA3;873A / !C12=3/<1 '/012340@ (5?/358 ;8566/67

!   !90A23773 Q3AK@689?@ / '/012340@ (5?/358 +10</21:

#:=7A8=B J8C?7A $37A:=67Y

!   P0AAE )?302 L (9/1> ,/6562/58 *>>/210 

!

  M@:3 '4353A / !C12=3/<1 '/012340@ (5?/358 ;8566/67 56D +=??403 +10</21:#:=7AF8<7 &8K6:BC? J:<X67C? +6<7=6@7

!   "46E PA@=2@4 L (95/0 

!   R406 #E80BE / .DA/6/:305340 

IB6:B :Z ., -3B6@6XC?6768<

!   $220 PA4;6 / (95/0@ -15839B (4AA=6/3/1: (4AA/3311

!   #413A7 '41846 E ;01:/D163 FGHHIJGHHKL

!   !C806 &@>83 / ;01:/D163 FGHHMJGHHIL

!   &0AE M09(8009 / !C12=3/<1 '/012340 

!   M0AE2E6 )?@06= / ;48/2B .658B:3 

OCB@:3E8= "<?CB9 J8C?7A $37A:=67Y

!   P@22 P44>3A / Q@93L+A38@<367 S )?@35 T@6069@02 .55@93A

!   )?A@8 !C22@B06 / -@A3974AH )0D@702 +2066@6=

Page 7: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 7/119

;!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

$U39C7@B3 !C>>0AE

(6 VWWXH 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 C6<3A744: 0 A3B@3; 45 7?3 9487 8?0A@6= DA4938838

387012@8?3< 7?A4C=? 23=@8207@46 137;336 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 YM.'!ZH '3027?

*C7?4A@7@38 Y'*8ZH 06< 7?3 #3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@978 Y#'-8ZF "?3 A3B@3; ;08 946<C973<

7?A4C=? 870:3?42<3A 9468C2707@46 06< A38C273< @6 0 A3D4A7 [M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 /#3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@97 )487 !?0A@6= #3B@3;\ ;?@9? 70123< ]^ A394>>36<07@468 74 0<<A388

7?3 @88C38 06< 94693A68 45 :3E 870:3?42<3A8F

* :3E A394>>36<07@46 45 7?3 VWWX A3B@3; ;08 7?3 633< 74 A3B@3; 7?3 @>D23>36707@46 8707C8

45 A394>>36<07@468 A38C27@6= 5A4> 7?3 A3B@3;F

N)91 "/6/:30B 4> -15839 :94=8D 01</1O 391 25?/358 24:3 :950/67 ?0421:: 39011 B150: 5>310 

/A?81A16353/46 34 5::1:: O913910 391 -15839 5=3940/3/1: 56D #-': 95<1 D1<184?1D 1>>123/<1

O40P/67 01853/46:9/?: 56D 501 >=8>/88/67 391 /63163 4> 391 0124AA16D53/46:QR 

* VWW_ 8707C8 A3D4A7 <3B324D3< 1E A3DA3836707@B38 5A4> #'-8 @6 P) A3@73A073< >06E 45 7?3

94693A68 7?07 24902 =4B3A6>3678 ?0B3 A3=0A<@6= 7?3@A A3207@468 ;@7? 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38F

T4224;@6= 7?3 VWW_ 8707C8 CD<073H 7?3 `6@46 45 P) MC6@9@D02@7@38 Y`P)MZ 06< 7?3 P) M@6@87AE

45 '3027? !3AB@938 <39@<3< 74 C6<3A70:3 0 5CA7?3A A3B@3; 74 >308CA3 7?3 DA4=A388 >0<3 46

@>D23>367@6= 7?3 A394>>36<07@468 45 7?3 VWWX #3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@97 Y#'-Z )487 !?0A@6=

#3B@3;F

"?3 >06<073 =@B36 74 7?3 9468C270678 @692C<3J

!   "?3 633< 74 A3B@3; 06< 94>>367 46 06E 10AA@3A8 7?07 >0E ?0B3 0553973<

@>D23>36707@46 45 DA@4A A394>>36<07@468a

!   "?3 633< 74 DA4B@<3 0<B@93 46 ?4; 74 >4B3 54A;0A< 06< 09?@3B3 @>D23>36707@46 45 7?3

C6<3A2E@6= @67367 45 DA@4A A394>>36<07@468a 06<

!   )4>>367 46 06E 63; @88C38 7?07 >0E ?0B3 1336 1A4C=?7 54A7? <CA@6= 7?3 DA49388F

"?3 DA49388 ;08 <38@=63< 74 360123 8@=6@5@9067 870:3?42<3A @6DC7H 147? 7?A4C=? 06 @673AB@3;

DA49388 08 ;322 08 0 54A>02 8CAB3EF #3DA3836707@B38 5A4> 7?3 #'-8 YVX @6 74702ZH 7?3 '3027?

*C7?4A@7@38 Y5@B3 45 7?3 8@U D0A7@9@D073< 08 +'!* <438 647 ?0B3 0 A3207@468?@D ;@7? 06E #'-8Z

06< 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 022 D0A7@9@D073<F "?3@A @6DC7 83AB3< 74 @654A> 7?3 DA49388

230<@6= 7?3 #3B@3; "30> 74 94692C<3 7?07H ;?@23 >06E 45 7?3 A3207@468?@D @88C38 DA3B@4C82E

A3D4A73< 46 0A3 64; 8336 74 13 @>DA4B@6=H 7?3A3 9467@6C3 74 13 84>3 94693A68 A32073< 74J

!   (=896@7C46?67Y :Z !3B96BK &8[36=858B7<

!   &:?8< CB9 &8?C76:B<A6X<

!   (=:@8<< "<<38<

!   "5X?858B7C76:B !=C58F:=\

Page 8: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 8/119

>!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 >

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

"?3 A3D4A7 DA4B@<38 A394>>36<07@468 C6<3A 309? 45 7?3 9073=4A@38 6473< 014B3F "?3 ]]

A394>>36<07@468 @<367@5@3< @6 7?@8 A3D4A7 0A3J

#]F "?3 +A4B@69@02 &4B3A6>367H 7?A4C=? 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938H @8 08:3< 74

94>>@7 74 7?3 <3B324D>367 45 0 246= A06=3 ?3027? @65A087AC97CA3 90D@702 D206 64

2073A 7?06 7?3 VW]WbVW]] 5@8902 E30AF "?3 D206 8?4C2< DA4B@<3 54A 0 >@6@>C>

D2066@6= ?4A@N46 45 7?A33 E30A8H ;@7? 0 246= 73A> =402 45 5@B3L 74 736LE30A D2068F

#VF "?3 #'-8 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 <35@63 5@U3< 5C6<@6= 0>4C67 7?07 ;@22 DA4B@<3

@69A3083< DA3<@9701@2@7E 45 7?3 5C6<@6= 412@=07@468 45 7?3 #'-8 54A 7?3 >0K4A@7E 45 022

90D@702 @6@7@07@B38 @692C<@6= >@64A 3cC@D>367H >0K4A 3cC@D>367H 509@2@7E A364B07@468

06< A4C7@63 90D@702 <3B324D>367 DA4K3978F "?@8 5@U3< 0>4C67 8?4C2< 13 9465@A>3<

54A 06 @6@7@02 D3A@4< 45 7?A33 E30A8 06< 7?36 CD<073< @6 7?A33 E30A 9E9238 1083< 46

7?3 246= A06=3 D2068 387012@8?3< 1E &4B3A6>367F

#XF '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 <3B324D <A057 90D@702 D2068 06< @<367@5E ;?@9? @6@7@07@B38 @7 @6736<8

74 8CDD4A7 C8@6= 7?3 #'- 5@U3< 8?0A3F `D<0738 74 7?483 D2068 08 ;322 08 D20663< 06<097C02 C83 45 5C6<8 8?4C2< 13 D0A7 45 7?3 A3=C20A A3D4A7@6= 07 89?3<C23< >337@6=8F

#dF "?3 M.'! @8 08:3< 74 ;4A: ;@7? 7?3 '*8 06< #'-8 74 CD<073b9465@A> 7?3 <35@6@7@46

45 90D@702F "?@8 <35@6@7@46 8?4C2< @<367@5E 0 <4220A B02C3 54A 20A=3 1C@2<@6= DA4K3978

7?07 ;@22 13 9468@<3A3< 4C78@<3 45 7?3 5@U3< 5C6<@6= >4<32 94673>D2073< @6

#394>>36<07@46 eVF

#^F "?3 M.'! 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 <3B324D 3<C907@4602 >073A@028 74 <35@63 7?3 +X

0273A6073 5@6069@6= >4<32 >4A3 9230A2E 74 022 D0A7@38H 368CA@6= 7?07 06E 8C9? >073A@02

0<<A38838 94693A63< 6473< DA3B@4C82E @6 7?@8 A3D4A7F

#fF "?3 M.'!H #'-8 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 920A@5E DA@69@D238 06< >39?06@8>8 A3cC@A3< 74

@>DA4B3 94>>C6@907@46 06< 360123 0 >4A3 A41C87 DA49388 54A K4@67 <@024=C3 46 :3E

@88C38 A32073< 74 7?3 4B3A022 94673U7 ;@7?@6 ;?@9? 90D@702 D2066@6= <39@8@468 0A3

13@6= >0<3F

#_F '*8 06< #'-8 0A3 08:3< 74 9467@6C3 ;@7? 7?3 <3B324D>367 45 DA4938838 74 368CA3

A3=C20A >337@6=8 0A3 89?3<C23< 137;336 A3DA3836707@B38 45 7?3 P40A<8 45 7?3 '*8

Y3F=F P40A< )?0@AZ 06< 7?3 #'-8 74J

!   $60123 94>>C6@907@46 45 :3E 87A073=@9 06< 4D3A07@4602 @6@7@07@B38 7?07

0A3 C6<3A;0E ;@7?@6 7?3 '* 08 7?3E A32073 74 90D@702 D2066@6= 06<<3B324D>367a

!   +A4B@<3 0 54AC> 74 8CDD4A7 0 K4@67 <@024=C3 46 :3E @88C38 54A 147? 7?3

'*8 06< #'-8a

!   .553A 7?3 #'-8 06 01@2@7E 74 @<367@5E 8D39@5@9 cC387@468 4A 94693A68 7?3E

?0B3 A3=0A<@6= ?3027? 90A3 <32@B3AE @6 7?3@A 94>>C6@7@38a 06<

!   -@89C88 D47367@02 90D@702 DA@4A@7@38F

Page 9: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 9/119

?!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ?

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

P47? '* 06< #'- 8?4C2< ?0B3 7?3 4DD4A7C6@7E 74 @652C3693 7?3 0=36<0 54A 7?383

>337@6=8 06< 0<3cC073 7@>3 8?4C2< 13 D20663< 74 0224; 54A 147? 54A>02 06<

@654A>02 <@89C88@468F

#gF '*8 06< #'-8 0A3 08:3< 74 89?3<C23 83>@L066C02 >337@6=8 137;336 #'- 87055 06<

7?3 0DDA4DA@073 87055 5A4> 7?3 '*F "?383 8?4C2< 13 B@3;3< 08 [;4A:@6= >337@6=8\06< 94C2< 13 94L89?3<C23< ;@7? 7?3 54A>02 P40A< <@024=C3 8388@468 8C==3873<

014B3F (6 7?@8 >4<32H 7?3 #'- >C87 13 ;@22@6= 74 0993D7 7?3 '*8 0C7?4A@7E 74

<38@=6073 7?3 >487 0DDA4DA@073 D3A846Y8Z 74 A3DA38367 7?3> 07 7?383 >337@6=8F

#hF '*8 06< #'-8 0A3 08:3< 74 <35@63 >39?06@8>8 74 0224; 54A 0< ?49 CD<0738 4C78@<3

45 A3=C20A2E 89?3<C23< >337@6=8 74 368CA3 7@>32E 94>>C6@907@46 45 @88C38 499CA8

137;336 87055 Y06< D488@12E 7?3 P40A<8ZF

#]WF "?3 #'-8 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 8?0A3 9CAA367 73>D20738 06< 74428 74 13 C83< 74

8CDD4A7 @>DA4B3< 94>>C6@907@46H DA4K397 >060=3>367 06< 9487 CD<0738F "?3

@67367 @8 74 9A3073 0 7442:@7 74 @69A3083 9468@87369E 45 74428 C83< 09A488 022 '*8 06<

#'-8F

#]]F "?3 M.'! @8 08:3< 74 CD<073 7?3 23=@8207@46 74 A352397 0 63; <35@6@7@46 45 90D@702F

#]VF "?3 M.'! @8 08:3< 74 70:3 7?3 230< @>D23>36707@46 A423H 74 368CA3 7?07 0 <370@23<

@>D23>36707@46 ;4A:D206 @8 <3B324D3< K4@672E ;@7? `P)MH 7?3 '*8 06< #'-8F

#]XF "?3 `P)M @8 08:3< 74 >46@74A @>D23>36707@46 DA4=A388 46 0 83>@L066C02 108@8 06<

A3cC387 3UD20607@46 45 06E B0A@06938 74 7?3 ;4A:D206F

Page 10: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 10/119

@!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 @

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

)?0D73A ]J I?E 7?3 +A4K397 I08 `6<3A70:36

"#*&)+I,*")# ] .$,DM&)I#+

(6 VWWXH !@3AA0 !E873>8 ;08 36=0=3< 1E 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 74 946<C97 0 A3B@3; 45 

7?3 9487 8?0A@6= DA4938838 387012@8?3< 7?A4C=? 23=@8207@46 137;336 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027?!3AB@938 YM.'!ZH '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 Y'*8ZH 06< 7?3 #3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@978 Y#'-8ZF "?3 VWWX

A3B@3; 9468@<3A3< 7?3 54224;@6= cC387@468J

]F I?07 @8 7?3 0DDA4DA@073 A423 54A #'-8 @6 90D@702 D2066@6= 06< 9467A@1C7@46 <39@8@468i

I?07 @8 A3cC@A3< 74 @>D23>367 7?3 0DDA4DA@073 A423i

VF I?07 0A3 7?3 90D@702 DA49388 94693A68 45 7?3 #'-8H '3027? *C7?4A@7@38H 06< 7?3

M@6@87AEi I?07 @8 A3cC@A3< 74 8@>D2@5E 7?3 DA4938838 06< 0<<A388 7?3 94693A68i

"?3 A3B@3; ;08 946<C973< 7?A4C=? 870:3?42<3A 9468C2707@46 06< A38C273< @6 0 A3D4A7 [M@6@87AE

45 '3027? !3AB@938 / #3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@97 )487 !?0A@6= #3B@3;\ ;?@9? 70123< ]^

A394>>36<07@468 74 0<<A388 7?3 @88C38 06< 94693A68 45 :3E 870:3?42<3A8F (88C38 @<367@5@3<

;3A3 9073=4A@N3< @674 54CA 7?3>38J

]F *994C6701@2@7E

VF -35@6@7@46 45 )0D@702

XF +A493<CA3

dF !7AC97CA3

* :3E A394>>36<07@46 45 7?3 VWWX A3B@3; ;08 7?3 633< 74 A3B@3; 7?3 @>D23>36707@46 8707C8

45 A394>>36<07@468 A38C27@6= 5A4> 7?3 A3B@3;F

N)91 "/6/:30B 4> -15839 :94=8D 01</1O 391 25?/358 24:3 :950/67 ?0421:: 39011 B150: 5>310 

/A?81A16353/46 34 5::1:: O913910 391 -15839 5=3940/3/1: 56D #-': 95<1 D1<184?1D 1>>123/<1

O40P/67 01853/46:9/?: 56D 501 >=8>/88/67 391 /63163 4> 391 0124AA16D53/46:QR 

* 8707C8 A3D4A7 <3B324D3< 1E A3DA3836707@B38 5A4> #'-8 @6 P) ;08 DA383673< @6 !3D73>13A

VWW_ 74 7?3 `6@46 45 P) MC6@9@D02@7@38 Y`P)MZ )46B367@46 8388@46 46 A3207@468 ;@7? ?3027?

0C7?4A@7@38H A3@73A07@6= 7?3 94693A6 7?07 24902 =4B3A6>3678 ?0B3 A3=0A<@6= 7?3@A A3207@468 ;@7?

7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38F "?3 A3D4A7 0284 4553A3< 0 DA32@>@60AE A3B@3; 45 7?3 DA4=A388 >0<3 46

@>D23>367@6= 7?3 A394>>36<07@468 45 7?3 VWWX #3B@3;F

#38C27@6= 5A4> 7?3 !3D73>13A VWW_ 8388@46H 7?3 `6@46 45 P) MC6@9@D02@7@38 Y`P)MZ 06< 7?3 P)

M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 YM.'!Z <39@<3< 74 C6<3A70:3 0 A3B@3; 74 >308CA3 7?3 DA4=A388

>0<3 46 @>D23>367@6= 7?3 A394>>36<07@468 45 7?3 VWWX #3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@97 Y#'-Z )487!?0A@6= #3B@3;F )4ADC8 !069?3N (673A607@4602 )468C27069E (69F ;08 8323973< 08 06 3U73A602

9468C27067 74 946<C97 7?@8 A3B@3; 1083< 46 7?3@A 3UD3A@3693 @6 946<C97@6= A32073< 06< 8@>@20A

A3B@3;8 @6 PA@7@8? )42C>1@0 06< 47?3A )060<@06 KCA@8<@97@468F "?3 A3B@3;H C6<3A 7?3 <@A397@46 45 

7?3 !733A@6= )4>>@7733 ;08 74 A38C27 @6 0 A3D4A7 7?07 8D39@5@9022E 4C72@63< 7?3 @>D23>36707@46

DA4=A388 >0<3 46 022 ]^ A394>>36<07@468F *27?4C=? @7 ;08 A394=6@N3< 7?07 7?3A3 >0E 13 7?3

633< 74 <@89C88 63; @88C38 0A@8@6= 8@693 7?3 VWWX A3B@3;H 7?3 8733A@6= 94>>@7733 9?483 74 549C8

<@A3972E 46 7?3 @88C38 45 7?3 VWWX A3D4A7F

Page 11: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 11/119

A!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 A

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

Phases Timelines

!"#$% &' B0,C28% D,:$&$E"%$,) F(&G ;<<=

!"#$% (' 7232&,#$)+ H"-2&$)2 B&"))$)+ '0"924,0I F(&GJK(+(-% ;<<=

!"#$% )' .%"I2/,&*20 L)+"+292)% K(+(-%J.2#%29:20 ; <<=

!"#$% *' M--( 2-J N##, 0% ()$%$2- M *2)% $O $8"% $, ) N8% ,:20 ; <<=

!"#$% +' 12#,0%$)+ N8%,:20 ;<<=

"?3 8397@468 45 7?@8 A3D4A7 ;@22 4C72@63 7?07 5@B3 E30A8 2073AH 7?3A3 ?08 1336 84>3 >4B3>367 46

A394>>36<07@468 1C7 >06E 94693A68 9467@6C3F "?3A3 @8 0284 0 =363A02 83683 7?07 7?3 8E873>

?08 647 5C22E @>D23>3673< 7?3 A394>>36<07@468a ?4;3B3AH @7 ;08 A394=6@N3< 7?A4C=? 7?@8

A3B@3; 7?07 A3207@468?@D8H DA4938838 06< 94>>C6@907@46 137;336 022 7?A33 D0A7@38 / M.'!H '*8

06< #'-8 / ?0B3 @>DA4B3< 9468@<3A012E 06< 7?3 36B@A46>367 C6<3A ;?@9? K4@67 90D@702

D2066@6= @8 946<C973< 74<0E @8 B0872E @>DA4B3< 4B3A ;?07 ;08 499CAA@6= ;?36 7?3 @6@7@02 A3B@3;;08 946<C973< @6 VWWXF

$((&)$,J $#+ -'*J)+)%)MP

I?36 7?@8 A3B@3; ;08 C6<3A70:36H 7?3 !733A@6= )4>>@7733 DA4B@<3< 9230A <@A397@46 46 7?3

894D3 54A 7?3 A3B@3; 06< 3UD39707@468 54A 7?3 A38C27@6= A3D4A7 45 5@6<@6=8 @6 7?07 7?3 4B3A022

41K397@B3 45 7?@8 088@=6>367

;08 74 A3B@3; DA4=A388 >0<3

46 @>D23>367@6= 7?3

A394>>36<07@468 45 7?3 VWWX

#3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@97Y#'-Z )487 !?0A@6= #3B@3;F

"?3 9468C270678 C6<3A 744: 0

5@B3 D?083 DA49388 74 A309? 7?3

<38@A3< 4C794>3F

(J$2' Q; (&)R',* -)."%"^$*")# _ RI%P /001

+?083 ] 549C83< 46 9465@A>@6= 7?3 DA4K397 >060=3>367 87AC97CA3 06< >3>13A8?@D 54A 7?3

A3B@3; !733A@6= )4>>@7733F "?3 5@A87 @673A097@468 137;336 7?3 9468C270678 06< 7?3 8733A@6=

94>>@7733 ;3A3 549C83< 46 !733A@6= )4>>@7733 @673AB@3;8H ;?@9? ;3A3 <38@=63< 74 9465@A>894D3 06< ?@=?2@=?7 @88C38 4A 94693A68 @6 0<B0693F

(6 0<<@7@46 74 @673AB@3;8 ;@7? :3E 230<3A8H 7?@8 D?083 @6@7@073< <070 06< @654A>07@46 9422397@46

097@B@7@38F (654A>07@46 54A>022E A3cC3873< 08 D0A7 45 7?@8 A3B@3; @692C<3<J

!   '3027? *C7?4A@7Eb#3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@97 M3>4A06<C>8 45 `6<3A8706<@6= YM.`8Za

!   M@6C738 45 R4@67 M337@6=8 137;336 7?3 014B3 V D0A7@38a

!   #'- P40A< >3>13A8 06< )467097 (654A>07@46a

!   +42@9@38H DA493<CA38 06< <35@6@7@468 A32073< 74 90D@702 5C6<@6=a

!   T@6069@02 <070 46 90D@702 8D36<@6=a

!   *6E 0DD2@90123 109:=A4C6< @654A>07@46b<49C>36707@46 46 DA4K3978 5C6<3< 4C78@<3 45 

7?3 dWj 9487 8?0A@6= >4<32a 06<

!   ,@878 45 870:3?42<3A8 74 13 94670973< <CA@6= 7?3 9468C2707@46 DA49388H @692C<@6= 1C7 647

2@>@73< 74 836@4A A3DA3836707@468 54A M.'!H '*8H 06< #'-8

Page 12: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 12/119

P!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 P

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

(J$2' /; +'O'%)("#M .$2'%"#' (%$##"#M !&$-'L)&D _ RI%P]$IMI2* /001

+?083 V 549C83< 46 <3B324D@6= 0 10832@63 45 @654A>07@46 7?07 ?32D3< 74 @654A> 7?3 9487 8?0A@6=

A3B@3;F

"?3 5@A87 94>D46367 45 ;4A: 7?07 633<3< 74 13 94>D2373< <CA@6= 7?@8 D?083 @692C<3< A3B@3;@6=

7?3 A323B067 DA3B@4C8 87C<@38 C6<3A70:36 08 ;322 08 47?3A @673A602 A3B@3;8 06< A3D4A78 7?07 ?0<1336 946<C973<F "?@8 D?083 ;08 C6<3A70:36 74 83AB3 7;4 DCAD4838J Y]Z 74 @654A> 7?3 9CAA367

87073 088388>367H 06< YVZ 74 13=@6 74 @<367@5E 06E 10AA@3A8 7?07 ?0B3 1336 3UD3A@3693< @6 7?3

D087 7?07 633< 74 13 @694AD4A073< @674 7?3 9?06=3 >060=3>367 D206 7?07 ;@22 C27@>0732E 13

A3cC@A3< 74 @>D23>367 A394>>36<07@468 45 7?@8 A3B@3;F

(J$2' U; 2*$D'J)%+'& '#M$M'-'#* _ $IMI2*]2'(*'-.'& /001

*8 DA3B@4C82E <@89C883<H 9A@7@902 74 0 A3B@3; 45 7?@8 :@6< @8 7?3 633< 74 9468C27 ;@7? :3E

870:3?42<3A8 36=0=3< @6 7?3 9487 8?0A@6= DA49388F "?3 @654A>07@46 =07?3A3< 7?A4C=? 7?@8 D?083

;08 C83< 74 @654A> 5C7CA3 842C7@468 06< 89360A@48F "?@8 9468C2707@46 ;08 0994>D2@8?3< @6 7;4

D0A78 / 463 7?A4C=? 0 cC02@707@B3 @673AB@3; DA49388 ;@7? @<367@5@3< @6<@B@<C028 06<b4A =A4CD806< 7?A4C=? 0 DA49388 45 ;A@7736 8CAB3E 8C1>@88@468 A38D46<@6= 8D39@5@9022E 74 7?3 ]^

A394>>36<07@468 45 7?3 VWWX A3D4A7F "?3 A38C278 45 7?3 8CAB3E 8C1>@88@46 ;@22 13 <@89C883<

2073A @6 7?@8 A3D4A7F (6B@707@468 74 D0A7@9@D073 @6 7?@8 @673AB@3; DA49388 ;3A3 8367 74 7?3

54224;@6=J

!   !323973< >3>13A8 45 `P)Ma

!   $U39C7@B3 >3>13A8 45 022 #'-8 Y3F=F )?0@AH Q@93 )?0@AH 06< "A308CA3AZa

!   !36@4A 0<>@6@87A07@B3 87055 5A4> #'-8a

!

  #3DA3836707@B38 5A4> !36@4A ,30<3A8?@D 45 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 Y3F=F )$.H Q+H +2066@6=H)T.Za

!   #3DA3836707@B38 5A4> 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938a 06<

!   .7?3A8 @<367@5@3< 1E 7?3 !733A@6= )4>>@7733H M.'!H '*8 06< #'-8F

"?3 >0K4A@7E 45 7?383 @673AB@3;8 ;3A3 946<C973< 1E 732394653A3693 06< ;?3A3 9@A9C>8706938

0224;3< 84>3 ;3A3 946<C973< 5093L74L5093 ;@7? @6<@B@<C028 @6 549C8 =A4CD8F *DDA4U@>0732E _W

870:3?42<3A8 ;3A3 @673AB@3;3< 4C7 45 h] @6B@73< Y__j D0A7@9@D07@46ZF (7 ;08 5327 1E 147? 7?3

A3B@3; 730> 06< 7?3 !733A@6= )4>>@7733 7?07 7?@8 23B32 45 D0A7@9@D07@46 ;08 8@=6@5@9067 =@B36

7?07 7?3 A3B@3; ;08 C6<3A70:36 <CA@6= 7?3 !C>>3A >467?8 06< 9468@<3A@6= 7?3 >06E 46=4@6=

DA@4A@7@38 022 870:3?42<3A8 0A3 DA383673< ;@7? 46 0 <0EL74L<0E 108@8F

(J$2' V; )(()&*I#"*P "+'#*"!",$*")# $#+ !)%%)LHI( 2*$D'J)%+'& '#M$M'-'#*

"?A4C=?4C7 7?3 A3B@3; DA49388H 7?3 )!( 730> 1A4C=?7 74=37?3A 022 45 4CA 5@6<@6=8 74 <35@63 7?3

:3E @88C38 06< !A107/67 '/0123/46: >40 (95671F "?3 DCAD483 45 7?@8 ?08 @692C<3<J

!   (<367@5@907@46 45 @664B07@B3 842C7@468 74 0<<A388 9CAA367 8E873> @88C38a

Page 13: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 13/119

=!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 =

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

!   )468@<3A 87A073=@9 06< 4D3A07@4602 @>DA4B3>3678 7?07 906 13 @>D23>3673< @6 7?3

@>>3<@073 06< 246=3A 73A>8a

!   .C72@63 DA32@>@60AE A394>>36<07@468 8CAA4C6<@6= DA@4A@7E @88C38a 06<

!   (<367@5E@6= 9?06=3 >060=3>367 @88C38 7?07 ;@22 633< 74 13 0<<A3883<F

*6 @673A@> 8C>>0AE 45 =363A02 7?3>38 06< 5@6<@6=8 5A4> 7?3 cC02@707@B3 @673AB@3;8 06< 8CAB3E

8C1>@88@468 ;3A3 DA383673< 74 7?3 8733A@6= 94>>@7733 46 !3D73>13A ]^H VWWg @6 DA3D0A07@46

54A 0 5CA7?3A B02@<07@46 45 7?3>38 1E 870:3?42<3A8 07 7?3 `P)M )46B367@46 @6 +367@9746F

(6 DA3D0A07@46 54A 7?3 5@602 A3D4A7H 06 4DD4A7C6@7E ;08 DA4B@<3< 54A 870:3?42<3A8 02A30<E

07736<@6= 7?3 `P)M 946B367@46 74 >337 74 <@89C88 7?3>38 06< 5@6<@6=8 0A@8@6= 5A4> 7?3

9468C2707@46 D?083 45 7?3 A3B@3;F (7 ;08 0284 06 4DD4A7C6@7E 74 DA4B@<3 533<109: 74 7?383

7?3>38 06< 74 <@89C88 A394>>36<07@468 06< <@A397@468 54A 7?3 CD94>@6= A3D4A7F (6B@73< 74

7?@8 >337@6= ;3A3 #'- $U39C7@B3 >3>13A8H *<>@6@87A074A8 S !36@4A 87055H 08 ;322 08 8325L

@<367@5@3< A3DA3836707@B38 5A4> '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 06< 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 74

D0A7@9@D073 @6 7?@8 K4@67 8388@46F (654A>07@46 =07?3A3< 7?A4C=? 7?@8 K4@67 8388@46 B02@<073< 7?3@654A>07@46 =07?3A3< 7?A4C=?4C7 7?3 A3B@3; 06< DA4B@<3< 9A@7@902 94>>C6@907@46 06< @6DC7 74

7?3 <@A397@468 45 7?@8 5@602 A3D4A7F

(J$2' S; &'()&*"#M _ ),*).'& /001

"?@8 D?083 549C83< 46 @88C@6= 7;4 A3D4A78J 0 <A057 A3D4A7 7?07 ;08 C83< 74 509@2@7073 <@89C88@46

1E 7?3 8733A@6= 94>>@7733 06< 0 5@602 54A>02 A3D4A7 ;?@9? <370@28 7?3 ;4A: 45 7?3 367@A3 DA4K397

Y;?@9? @8 7?@8 A3D4A7ZF

Page 14: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 14/119

Q!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 Q

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

)?0D73A VJ )4673U7 54A )0D@702 TC6<@6= @6 PF)F

+A@4A 74 <@89C88@6= 06E 5@6<@6=8 4A A394>>36<07@468 0A@8@6= 5A4> 7?@8 A3B@3;H @7 @8 @>D4A7067 74

9468@<3A ?4; 7?3 90D@702 D2066@6= 06< 5C6<@6= 36B@A46>367 ?08 9?06=3< 4B3A 7@>3H 08 7?@8

?32D8 74 <35@63 7?3 07>48D?3A3 ;@7?@6 ;?@9? 7?3 B0A@4C8 5C6<@6= D0A763A8 0A3 9CAA3672E

;4A:@6=F)0D@702 5C6<@6= A3cC@A3>3678 54A DC12@9 @65A087AC97CA3 0A3 8336 74 13 =A4;@6= 07 0 A073 7?07 @8

4C7D09@6= 7?3 01@2@7E 45 70U A3B36C38 74 >337 7?3 <3>06<F "?@8 @8 2@6:3< 74 D087 <39@8@468 74

<353A @6B387>3678 @6 @65A087AC97CA3H @692C<@6= 509@2@7@38H 3cC@D>367 06< (654A>07@46

M060=3>367 b (654A>07@46 "39?6424=EF *8 0 A38C27 45 7?383 94>1@63< @88C38H 7?3A3 @8 64; 0

8@=6@5@9067 @6B387>367 A3cC@A3< 74 8C870@6 7?3 9CAA367 ?3027?90A3 088378F (6 0<<@7@46H 7?3

<3>06<8 54A 90D@702 A3cC@A3>3678 74 :33D D093 ;@7? D4DC207@46 =A4;7?H 7?3 0=@6=

<3>4=A0D?@9H 7?3 @>D23>36707@46 45 63; @664B07@468H 06< A3<38@=6 45 7?3 ?3027? 90A3 <32@B3AE

8E873>H 022 ?0B3 8@=6@5@9067 D2066@6= @>D0978F

"?3A3 @8 0 83683 5A4> 7?3 '*8 06< #'-8 7?07 7?3 633<8 45 ?3027? 90A3 50A 3U933< 7?3 74702

90D@702 5C6<@6= 0B0@201@2@7E 5A4> 022 5C6<@6= 84CA938 L M.'!H #'-8 06< T4C6<07@468F &@B36 7?@894673U7H 84>3 #'-8 0A3 94693A63< 014C7 7?3 3UD39707@46 8CAA4C6<@6= dWj 54A 06E DA4K397F

I?@23 7?@8 @8 <389A@13< 08 B42C670AEH 84>3 #'-8 ?0B3 0 70U 1083 7?07 @8 647 02;0E8 90D0123 74

>079? 7?3 5C6<@6= A3cC387H ;?@9? 230<8 74 06 C6<3A2E@6= 530A 7?07 @5 7?3 dWj @8 647 0B0@20123

5A4> 7?3 #'-H 7?07 DA4K3978 ;@22 =4 3283;?3A3 230<@6= 74 94>>C6@7E @63cC@7EF

"?3 90D@702 @88C3 @8 94>D2@9073< 1E 7?3 5097 7?07 90D@702 D2066@6= 54A 7?3 '* ?08 1336 <35@63<

>4A3 1A40<2E 7?06 7?3 4A@=@602 <35@6@7@46 C6<3A 7?3 '48D@702 -@87A@97 *97F "?3 3UD06<3<

<35@6@7@46 A3DA383678 06 46=4@6= @88C3 45 94693A6 54A #'-8 06< 633<8 74 13 0<<A3883<F

T@6022EH 08 7?3 P) ?3027?90A3 8E873> ?08 8@=6@5@9067 4D3A07@6= 94878H 7?3A3 ;@22 9467@6C3 74 13 0

633< 74 ?0B3 A3<38@=6 @6@7@07@B38H 84>3 45 ;?@9? ;@22 A3cC@A3 90D@702 @6B387>367 74 09?@3B3 7?3

9487 355@9@369E 06< ?32D 360123 7?3 8E873> 74 0<<A388 4D3A07@4602 @88C38 Y3F=F ?3027? ?C>06

A384CA938 DA388CA38Z 06< >079? 7?3 ?3027?90A3 633<8 4B3A 7?3 63U7 ]W 74 VW E30A8F &@B36 7?3

D47367@02 @>D097 45 4D3A07@4602 @88C38 46 90D@702H 7?3 '*8 ;@22 633< 74 DA4B@<3 7?3 #'-8 ;@7? 0

246=3A 73A> D3A8D397@B3 46 7?3 90D@702 D2068 06< 7?3 13635@7 45 7?3 @6B387>367 74 7?3 20A=3A

94>>C6@7E 633<8F

Page 15: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 15/119

R<!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 R<

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

)?0D73A XJ #394>>36<07@46 PE #394>>36<07@46 #3B@3; 06< `D<073

*8 DA3B@4C82E <@89C883< @6 7?@8 A3D4A7H 7?3 A3B@3; @692C<3< 870:3?42<3A 9468C2707@468 7?A4C=? 06

@673AB@3; DA49388F *8 0 94>D46367 45 9468C2707@468H 06< 8CDD23>3670AE 74 @673AB@3;8 7?07

;3A3 C6<3A70:36 ;@7? :3E 870:3?42<3A8 5A4> 7?3 `6@46 45 P) MC6@9@D02@7@38 Y`P)MZH #3=@4602

'48D@702 -@87A@978 Y#'-8ZH '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 Y'*8ZH 06< 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 YM.'!ZHD0A7@9@D07@46 ;08 A3cC3873< @6 94>D237@46 45 0 8CAB3E 8C1>@88@46F

TA4> 7?3 ]^ A394>>36<07@468 45 7?3 VWWX !@3AA0 A3B@3; 06< 8707C8 45 @>D23>36707@46H

A38D46<3678 ;3A3 08:3< 74 @<367@5E 7?3 74D ^ A394>>36<07@468 7?07 A352397 7?3@A =A307387

94693A6 07 7?@8 7@>3H 06< A38D46< 74 7?3 54224;@6= 5@B3 Y^Z 8D39@5@9 cC387@468 54A 309? 7?3E

@<367@5@3<F "?3 cC387@468 ;3A3 08 54224;8J

]F I?07 @8 7?3 9CAA367 8707C8 45 @>D23>36707@46 45 7?@8 A394>>36<07@46 54A E4CA #'- 4A

'*i

VF I?07 0A3 7?3 10AA@3A8 74 5C22 @>D23>36707@46 45 7?@8 A394>>36<07@46i

XF *A3 7?3A3 06E 63; 8@=6@5@9067 63; @88C38 4A 94693A68 7?07 ?0B3 0A@836 <CA@6= 7?3@>D23>36707@46 DA49388i

dF I?07 0A3 7?3 A@8:8 06< 9A@7@902 8C99388 50974A8 @6 @>D23>367@6= 7?3 A394>>36<07@46i

^F (6 4A<3A 74 5C22E @>D23>367 7?3 A394>>36<07@46 54A E4CA #'- 4A '*H ;?07 0A3 E4CA

A394>>36<07@468 46 ?4; 74 8C993885C22E >4B3 54A;0A< ;@7? @>D23>36707@46i

]d 45 VX #'-8 06< 54CA YdZ 45 5@B3 Y^Z =34=A0D?@9022EL1083< '*8]

A38D46<3< 74 7?3 8CAB3EF (7 @8

6473< 014B3 7?07 8CAB3E A38D46<3678 ;3A3 08:3< 74 6473 7?3   34? S 0124AA16D53/46: 3953 

01>8123 391/0 701531:3 2462106 53 39/: 3/A1   ?4;3B3AH @7 8?4C2< 13 6473< 7?07 >06E <@< 647

DA@4A@7@N3 7?3@A A38D46838 Y@F3F 7?3E 6473< 022 A394>>36<07@468 08 @>D4A7067 4A 6473< 5@B3

A394>>36<07@468H 1C7 <@< 647 87073 ;?@9? 45 7?3 5@B3 ;08 <33>3< >487 @>D4A7067ZF

"?3 @67367 @6 08:@6= 54A 7?3 @654A>07@46 74 13 92C873A3< 0A4C6< 74D ^ @88C38 ;08 74 <373A>@63

;?@9? 45 7?3 @88C38 9467@6C3 74 13 45 =A307387 94693A6 06< 7?36 549C8 7?3 <@89C88@46 45 7?3

VWWX #394>>36<07@468 0A4C6< 7?483 @88C38F &@B36 7?3 B0A@07@46 @6 A38D46838H 7?@8 8397@46 45 

7?3 A3D4A7 ?08 1336 DA3D0A3< 74 A352397 06 CD<073 46 022 A394>>36<07@468H DA383673< @6 7?3@A

4A@=@602 4A<3AH 08 4DD483< 74 @6 4A<3A 45 D47367@02 9CAA367 DA@4A@7EF

"?07 @8 647 @6736<3< 74 8C==387 7?07 7?3 8CAB3E A38D46838 ;3A3 647 B02C0123F (6<33<H 8CAB3E

A38D46838 ;3A3 9422073< 06< @673=A073< ;@7? 7?3 0<<@7@4602 cC02@707@B3 @6DC7 4170@63< 7?A4C=?

7?3 @6<@B@<C02 06< =A4CD @673AB@3;8 74 DA4B@<3 0 946842@<073< 837 45 4183AB07@468 46 309? 45 7?3

4A@=@602 VWWX #394>>36<07@468F "?383 4183AB07@468 0A3 DA383673< 1324;F

1Note: PHSA was not included in the study as none of their programs have an RHD partner 

Page 16: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 16/119

RR!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 RR

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B Q;   #'- 9467A@1C7@468 0A3 B42C670AEF "?3 46C8 >C87 A387 ;@7? 7?3

'3027? *C7?4A@7E 74 <3B324D 06< >0@670@6 355397@B3 ;4A:@6= A3207@468?@D8 ;@7? 7?3 #'-8 @6 @78

A3=@46F+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5

+>

VW 45 7?3 VX #3=@4602 '48D@702 -@87A@978 4A@=@6022E 8@=63< M3>4A06<C> 45 `6<3A8706<@6= YM.`Z

*=A33>3678 ;@7? 7?3@A '3027? *C7?4A@7@38F !4>3 45 7?3 #'-8 ?0B3 8C183cC3672E 9468@<3A3<

7?483 M.`G8 74 647 13 @6 54A93 06< ?0B3 9?4836 647 74 [A363;\ 7?3>F !4>3 0284 ?0B3

@6<3D36<367 DA474942 0=A33>3678F #3207@468 06< 94>>C6@907@468 ?0B3 1336 @>DA4B@6= @6

>487 90838F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?3 !@3AA0 A3D4A7 6473< 7?07 7?3 >4<32 230<8 74 0 <C02 0994C6701@2@7E 9@A9C>870693 @6 ;?@9?

#'-8 0A3 0994C670123 74 7?3@A 24902 70UD0E3A8 ;?@23 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 0A3 0994C670123 54A?3027? 4C794>38 74 7?3 M@6@873A 06< 7?3 &4B3A6>367 45 P)F "?@8 <C02@7E @8 7?3 C6<3A2E@6=

90C83 45 >C9? 45 7?3 7368@46 8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3 A3207@468?@D 06< 7?3 5C6<@6= >4<32F

"?3 #3B@3; 730> 54C6< 7?07 A3207@468?@D8 9467@6C3 74 13 0 8@=6@5@9067 @88C3 8CAA4C6<@6= 9487

8?0A@6=F -38D@73 A3D4A73< @>DA4B3>3678 @6 A3207@468?@D8H >06E #'-8 9467@6C3 74 3UDA388 84>3

94693A6 8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3 633< 74 13 B@3;3< 08 [7AC3 D0A763A8\ @6 7?3 20A=3A ?3027? 90A3 <32@B3AE

8E873>H 06< 647 KC87 0 5C6<@6= 84CA93 54A 90D@702 DA4K3978F I?@23 7?@8 ;@22 13 <@89C883< @6 >4A3

236=7? @6 7?3 63U7 8397@46 45 7?@8 A3D4A7 F*<105029/67 )91A1:LH 7?@8 @8 =A4C6<3< @6 0 20A=3A @88C3

8CAA4C6<@6= 209: 45 920A@7E 06< 9468368C8 46 A4238 54A 7?3 #'-8 06< 7?3 633< 74 0<<A388 7?3

0994C6701@2@7E A3207@468?@D 7?07 7?3E ?0B3 ;@7? 7?3 24902 323974A073H 08 520==3< 1E !@3AA0 @6 VWWXF

I@7? A3=0A< 74 7?3 @88C3 45 [B42C670AE\ 9467A@1C7@468H >487 #'-8 09:64;23<=3 7?07 7?3E

7?34A37@9022E 906 Y06< 84>3 <4Z A35C83 74 0DDA4B3 7?3 5C22 dWj DA4K397 A3cC3878 5A4> '*8H 1C7

7?3E 5332 7?07 @7 @8 A@8:E 74 <4 84 08 7?3 DA4K397 94C2< 13 D2093< 07 A@8: 06< 7?3 24902 94>>C6@7E

94C2< 2483 633<3< @6B387>3678F

"?3 dWj 9487 8?0A@6= @88C3 @8 0284 94>D2@9073< ;?36 06 '* @8 9468@<3A@6= 946842@<07@46 45 

83AB@938 @6 #3=@4602 )367A38F I?36 7?@8 ?0DD368H 7?3 24902 #'- Y@F3F 7?3 463 7?07 @8 @6 7?3

94>>C6@7E ;?3A3 7?3 #3=@4602 )367A3 >0E 13 387012@8?3<Z ;4C2< 2@:32E 13 08:3< 74 9487 8?0A3

0 509@2@7E 7?07 83AB38 0 20A=3A =34=A0D?@9 0A30F TC7CA3 5C6<@6= DA4938838 >0E 633< 74 9468@<3A

?4; 7?@8 @88C3 ;@22 13 0<<A3883<F

2The RHD Observations were included in an update report from 2007 and do not necessarily reflect the views of the other two

partners in this process – the MOHS or the HAs.

Page 17: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 17/119

R;!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 R;

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B /;  '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 >C87 13 C653773A3< 1E 9487L8?0A@6=

A3cC@A3>3678 @6 7?3@A 01@2@7E 74 DA4B@<3 A3cC@A3< ?3027? 83AB@938 A3=0A<2388 45 7?3 5@8902 90D09@7E

45 0 A3=@46F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

#'-8 ?0B3 1336 0DDA409?3< 54A 5C6<8 06< 7?3 0B0@201@2@7E 45 7?3@A dWj ?08 1336 0 <302L1A30:3AF

M0E 13 DA4123>07@9 54A 8>0223A 94>>C6@7@38 74 DA4B@<3 dWj 1C7 94>>C6@7E 87@22 A3cC@A38 7?3

509@2@7@38F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?3 !@3AA0 A3D4A7 6473< 7?07 7?@8 A394>>36<07@46 ;08 @6736<3< 74 A352397 7?3 94693D7 7?07

<39@8@46 >0:@6= 54A 90D@702 94C2<H 06< 8?4C2<H 13 1C553A3< 5A4> 7?3 D42@7@902 DA49388 84 7?07 7?3

'*8 94C2< 13 7AC3 74 7?3@A >06<073 74 <32@B3A 83AB@938 06< 09?@3B3 @>DA4B3>3678 @6 ?3027?

4C794>38F "?3 @67367 ;08 74 A3>4B3 7?3 M@6@87AE 5A4> 7?3 7A0<@7@4602 90D@702 DA49388 06<0224; 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 74 <32@B3A 7?3@A 94>D23U >06<0738F *6< E37H 7?3 A302@7E Y08 6473<

C6<3A #394>>36<07@46 ]ZH @8 7?07 7?3 #'-8 90AAE 06 0994C6701@2@7E 74 24902 70UD0E3A8 7?07 @8

=A4C6<3< @6 0 D42@7@902 A3207@468?@D >4<32F !4 3B36 @5 7?3 DA4B@69@02 =4B3A6>367 ;08 8C993885C2

07 3U7A@907@6= @78325 5A4> 0 D42@7@902 >4<32H 7?3 #'-8 ;4C2< 9467@6C3 74 ?0B3 7?@8 2@6:F

"?3 367@A3 @88C3 @8 94>D2@9073<H 1C7 7?3 =363A02 0=A33>367 5A4> 870:3?42<3A8 @8 7?07 '*8 0A3

647 C653773A3< 06< D42@7@902 A302@7@38 >0E >0:3 @7 9?02236=@6= 74 0<<A388 7?@8 A394>>36<07@46

@6 7?3 8?4A7 73A>F "?3 20A=387 10AA@3A @8 7?3 83683 7?07 90D@702 633<8 50A 3U933< 7?3 01@2@7E 74

5C6< @6@7@07@B38 06< ?3693 =4B3A6>367 ;@22 633< 74 >0@670@6 0 ?@=? <3=A33 45 9467A42 4B3A

90D@702 <39@8@468F

"?07 13@6= 80@<H 7?3A3 @8 0 83683 7?07 7?3 DA49388 906 13 >4A3 7A068D0A367 Y3F=F A07@46023 54A<39@8@468 8?0A3< ;@7? 022 D0A7@38ZH 906 DA4933< ;@7? >4A3 920A@7E Y3F=F 90D@702 >4A3 9230A2E

<35@63<Z 06< 906 13 DCA8C3< 7?A4C=? 0 >4A3 944D3A07@B3 >4<32 ;?3A3 022 D0A763A8 5332

0DDA4DA@0732E @6B42B3< 06< 36=0=3< Y3F=F A3207@468?@D8 9467@6C3 74 3B42B3 06< @>DA4B3ZF

"?3 M.'! ?0< 1336 <3B324D@6= 0 7442 74 0<<A388 DA@4A@7@N07@46 06< 5C6<@6= 2@6:0=38F "?3 7442H

5@A87 <3B324D3< @6 VWW_H @692C<3< 0 >39?06@8> 74 A352397 0 D4@678L1083< 8E873> 7?07 906 ?32D 74

@654A> DA@4A@7@N07@46 <39@8@468F (6 @78 @6@7@02 54A>H 7?3 7442 @692C<3< 0 146C8 D4@67 94>D46367

7?07 A394=6@N3< 7?3 0B0@201@2@7E 45 #'- 5C6<@6= 08 0 50974A 7?07 94C2< @69A3083 7?3 D4@67 B02C3

54A 0 DA4K397F "?@8 A0@838 0 94693A6 7?07 7?3 90D09@7E 45 06 @6<@B@<C02 #'- 74 DA4B@<3 5C6<@6=

906 @652C3693 0 5@602 <39@8@46H ;?@9? ;4C2< 647 13 9468@87367 ;@7? 7?3 94693D7 45 7?3 '* 13@6=

N=6>133101D TB 24:3J:950/67 01U=/01A163: /6 391/0 5T/8/3B 34 ?04</D1 01U=/01D 915839 :10</21:01750D81:: 4> 391 >/:258 25?52/3B 4> 5 017/46QR 

Page 18: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 18/119

R>!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 R>

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B U;   #'-8 8?4C2< 647 13 3UD3973< 74 9467A@1C73 >4A3 7?06 dWj 45 63;

DA4K3978F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

!3B3A02 #'-8 9@73< 3U0>D238 45 13@6= 08:3< 74 9467A@1C73 ]WWj 74;0A<8 249022E @<367@5@3<

DA@4A@7@38F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?3 !@3AA0 A3D4A7 <@89C883< 7?3 5097 7?07 90D@702 DA4K3978 @6B42B3 '*H #'- 06< T4C6<07@46

YD?@2067?A4D@9Z 5C6<@6= 84CA938 06< 7?3 @67367 45 7?3 A394>>36<07@46 ;08 74 6473 7?07 5C6<@6=

<39@8@468 >C87 13 0 A38C27 45 84C6< @654A>07@46 3U9?06=38H <@89C88@46 06< 4D36 <39@8@468 1E

7?3 #'-8F

,@6:3< 74 7?3 <@89C88@46 8CAA4C6<@6= #394>>36<07@46 ]H #'-8 A3D4A7 7?07 dWj @8 3UD3973< 06<

<31073 4A <@89C88@46 @8 647 02;0E8 ;3294>3< 4A 3694CA0=3<F *7 7?3 80>3 7@>3H 0 53; #'-8A3D4A7 7?07 7?3E ?0B3 1336 742< 7?07 7?3E 906 5087 7A09: 0 24;3A DA@4A@7E @6@7@07@B3 @5 7?3E 9?4483

74 5C6< ]WWj 45 7?3 94878F "?@8 A0@838 7;4 D488@123 94693A68 A3=0A<@6= 7?3 246=3A 73A>

3UD39707@468 45 5C6<@6= DA4K3978 >4A3 7?06 dWjJ

!   -39@8@468 74 8CDD4A7 84>3 DA4K3978 07 ]WWj 94C2< 2@>@7 06 #'-8 01@2@7E 74 D0E 54A 47?3A

@6@7@07@B38H 3B36 @5 7?07 A3cC387 @8 462E 54A dWjH 06<

!   (7 94C2< 837 0 DA393<367 ;?3A31E 47?3A #'-8 94C2< 13 3UD3973< 74 5C6< DA4K3978 07

]WWjF

-38D@73 7?383 D488@123 94693A68H 7?3 >0K4A@7E 45 #'-8 A3D4A7 7?07 7?3E ;067 74 A370@6 7?3

523U@1@2@7E 74 5C6< DA4K3978 07H 1324; 4A 014B3 7?3 =363A02 =C@<32@63 45 dWjF

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B V;  "?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7E >C87 <3B324D 1C<=378 06< D2068 74 94687AC97H

09cC@A3 06< >0@670@6 90D@702 088378F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

+2068 54A 63; 90D@702 DA4K3978 633< 74 13 0994>D06@3< 1E 0 94>>@7>367 74 87055 7?483 63;

509@2@7@38F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?3 !@3AA0 A3D4A7G8 <389A@D7@46 45 7?@8 A394>>36<07@46 6473< 7?07 7?3 90D@702 D2066@6= A423 45 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 24=@9022E 230<8 74 0 9468@<3A07@46 45 ;?07 ?0DD368 @6 7?3 3B367 45 0 9487

4B3AAC6 46 0 D0A7@9C20A DA4K397F "A0<@7@46022EH 7?3A3 ?08 1336 06 3UD39707@46 7?07 >060=3>367

45 8C9? @88C38 ;4C2< 13 K4@672E >060=3< 137;336 7?3 24902 ?3027? 4A=06@N07@46 06< 7?3 #'-8H

1C7 7?3 C6<3A2E@6= DA@69@D23 @8 7?07 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 70:3 A38D468@1@2@7E 54A 9487 4B3AAC68

;?@23 >0@670@6@6= 7?3 90D09@7E 74 833: #'- 8CDD4A7 08 633<3<F "?@8 @8 924832E 2@6:3< 74 7?3

63U7 A394>>36<07@46F

Page 19: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 19/119

R?!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 R?

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

"?3 VWW_ #'- .183AB07@468 `D<073 8?@578 7?3 <@89C88@46 74 7?3 633< 74 368CA3 7?07 '*8

94>>@7 74 5C6<@6= 4D3A07@4602 94878 @5 7?3E A3cC387 90D@702 5C6<@6= 8CDD4A7 5A4> 06 #'-F .6

7?@8 D4@67H ;3 6473 7?07H @67C@7@B32EH 06E D206 74 1C@2< 0 509@2@7E 8C==3878 7?07 7?3 4A=06@N07@46 /

@6 7?@8 9083 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7E / @8 94>>@773< 74 4D3A07@6= 7?07 509@2@7EF *7 7?3 80>3 7@>3H

90D@702 DA4K3978 906 70:3 E30A8 74 94>D2373H <CA@6= ;?@9? 7@>3 0 6C>13A 45 C654A38336 50974A8

906 055397 7?3 D206H 8C9? 08J ?C>06 A384CA93 9?06=38 7?07 055397 7?3 01@2@7E 74 87055 06< <32@B3A90A3H 9?06=38 74 4D3A07@6= 4A 90D@702 5C6<@6=H 94687AC97@46 9487 3890207@46H 9?06=38 @6

=4B3A6>367 06< 9?06=38 @6 '* S #'- 87055F "?383 A302@7@38 >0E @>D097 7?3 01@2@7E 45 7?3 '* 74

54224; 7?A4C=? 46 7?3 4A@=@602 @67367 06< 7?3E >C87 ?0B3 7?3 01@2@7E 74 0<0D7 D2068 08 633<3<F

*647?3A @88C3 @8 7?3 633< 74 7@3 D2066@6= 94>>@7>3678 74 246= 73A> 5C6<@6= 94>>@7>3678 /

06< 7?@8 A3cC@A38 94>>@7>3678 74 1C<=37@6= 87A073=@38 13E46< 0 463LE30A D2066@6= ?4A@N46F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B S;   PC<=370AE 4B3AAC68 4A <320E8 8?4C2< 1394>3 7?3 A38D468@1@2@7E 45 

7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7EF #'-8 >0E 87@22 9?4483 74 ?32D 5C6< 4B3AAC68F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

+A4123>8 3694C673A3< ;?36 DA4K397 0<<@7@468 4B3A 7@>3 @69A3083 94878H 06< 7?3 dWj 8?0A3

@69A30838 08 0 A38C27F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

!@3AA0 6473< 7?07 7?@8 A394>>36<07@46 Y94CD23< ;@7? ed 014B3Z ;08 @6736<3< 74 DA4B@<3 7?3

1387 D488@123 4DD4A7C6@7E 54A 7?3 <3B324D>367 45 A302 D0A763A8?@D8 07 7?3 24902 23B32 ;?@23

>337@6= 5C6<0>36702 DA@69@D238 A32073< 74 7?3 633< 74 1020693 7?3 #'-8 24902 0994C6701@2@7E

;@7? <32@B3AE 45 7?3 '*8 >06<073F *8 45 VWWgH 7?3 @88C3 A3>0@68 7?3 80>3 / 7?3 #'-8 3UD397 74

13 B@3;3< 08 3cC02 D0A763A8 @6 7?3 D2066@6= DA49388H 06< 0A3 =363A022E ;@22@6= 74 94>>@7 74 7?34A@=@602 A3cC387 ;?36 7?@8 D0A763A8?@D @8 @6 D2093F '4;3B3AH ;?36 4B3AAC68 499CAH 7?3 633< 74

=4 109: 06< A0@83 >4A3 >463E 906 90C83 @88C38H 38D39@022E @5 0 1E20; ?08 1336 54A>022E A0@83<

06< 0DDA4B3< 74 DA4B@<3 7?3 4A@=@602 9467A@1C7@46F #0@8@6= 0 83946< 1E20; 46 0 DA3B@4C82E

0DDA4B3< DA4K397 74 0<<A388 4B3AAC68 906 13 DA4123>07@9F %47;@7?8706<@6= 7?@8H #'-8 ;067 74

368CA3 7?07 7?3 01@2@7E 74 <392@63 74 D0E 54A 4B3AAC68 8?4C2< 13 >0@670@63<F

Page 20: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 20/119

R@!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 R@

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B W;   T4A 7?3 DCAD4838 45 #'- 9487 8?0A@6=H 7?3 9073=4A@38 45 90D@702

8?4C2< 13 8@>D2@5@3<J

0F +A4K3978 4A 8@6=23 D@3938 45 3cC@D>367 ;@7? 0 B02C3 45 2388 7?06 k]WWHWWW

1F +A4K3978 4A 3cC@D>367 ;@7? 0 B02C3 =A3073A 7?06 k]WWHWWW

9F "?3 92088@5@907@46 45 3cC@D>367 B02C3 >C87 70:3 @674 0994C67 7?3 4B3A022 B02C3 45 0

l8E873>G 45 ;?@9? 0 8@6=23 D@393 45 3cC@D>367 @8 0 D0A7F

<F +XG8 A3cC@A3 7?3 <3B324D>367 45 9230A 0994C67@6= <35@6@7@468 74 A394=6@N3 4;63A8?@DF

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

#'-8 0A3 94693A63< ;@7? 9230A 0994C6701@2@7E @6 +X DA4K3978F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?3 209: 45 9468368C8 8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3 <35@6@7@46 45 90D@702 9467@6C38 74 13 06 @88C3 08 #'-8

3UDA388 46=4@6= 94693A68 7?07 @7 @8 64 246=3A 9230A ?4; 7?3@A 9467A@1C7@468 0A3 13@6= C83<F#'-8 0A3 0284 94693A63< 7?07 7?3E 0A3 64; 13@6= 08:3< 74 9467A@1C73 74 06 3B3AL;@<36@6= 837

45 DA4K3978 7?07 A352397 7?3 '* >06<073H 1C7 0A3 07 4<<8 ;@7? 7?3 4A@=@602 549C8 4C72@63< @6

23=@8207@46 Y3F=F ?48D@702 509@2@7@38 06< 3cC@D>367 B3A8C8 246= 73A> 90A3 509@2@7@38 06<

@654A>07@46 739?6424=EZF

P3E46< 7?3 cC387@46 8CAA4C6<@6= <35@6@7@46 45 90D@702H +X 9467@6C38 74 13 0 94693A6 54A 84>3

#'-8F !4>3 45 7?@8 A320738 74 7?3 24902 0994C6701@2@7E @88C3 06< 7?3 DC12@9 D3A93D7@46 7?07 24902

 K418 ;@22 13 2487 <C3 74 +X8F "?3A3 @8 0284 0 94693A6 7?07 7?3 +X >4<32 A38C278 @6 9467A@1C7@468 45 

70UD0E3A >463E 74 0 54ALDA45@7 367@7EF M487 45 7?383 94693A68 A352397 0 =363A02

>@8C6<3A8706<@6= 45 7?3 +X >4<32 06< 7?3 9467A428 7?07 7?3 +A4B@69@02 &4B3A6>367 ?08 DC7 @6

D2093 74 368CA3 7?07 7?3 DC12@9G8 @673A387 @8 >37F &@B36 7?@8H 7?3 M.'! 06< '*8 8?4C2< DA4B@<30<<@7@4602 @654A>07@46 46 7?3 +X 7A068097@468 74 0224; 7?3 #'- 74 C6<3A8706< 7?3 7A068097@46H

4;63A8?@D 45 088378H 7?3 A@8: 7A06853A 06< 0284 7?3 B02C3 54A >463E DA4D48@7@46 @6 +XG8F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B `;  #'-8 8?4C2< 02249073 2C>DL8C> 9467A@1C7@468 74 >@64A @73>8 1324;

k]WWHWWWF

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

#3cC@A3 0 13773A <35@6@7@46 45 >@64A 90D@702 @73>8 74 368CA3 7?07 #'-8 0A3 647 5C6<@6=

4D3A07@4602 94878F+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?3 >0K4A@7E 45 #'-8 DA4B@<3 2C>DL8C> 5C6<@6= 54A >@64A 90D@702 @73>8 06< 7?3A3 833>8 74 13

2@>@73< 94693A6 014C7 7?@8 >4<32F .63 @88C3 @8 7?07 84>3 #'-8 ;067 088CA06938 7?07 7?383

9467A@1C7@468 0A3 13@6= C83< 0DDA4DA@0732E 06< 7?07 DA4938838 3U@87 54A 355397@B3 A3D4A7@6= 06<

0994C6701@2@7E 109: 74 7?3 #'- A3=0A<@6= 06E 3UD36<@7CA38 <A0;6 5A4> 7?3 2C>DL8C> 5C6<@6=F

Page 21: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 21/119

RA!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 RA

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

"?@8 DA49388 @8 @6 D2093 54A >487 #'-8 06< '*8H 1C7 633<8 74 13 @6 D2093 9468@873672E 46 0

DA4B@693L;@<3 108@8F

*7 7?3 80>3 7@>3H 84>3 #'-8 87A388 7?07 9467A@1C7@468 A3>0@6 B42C670AE 06< 633< 74 13 8C1K397

74 0DDA4DA@073 DA4938838 54A K4@67 <@89C88@46 06< 0DDA4B02F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B 1;  * 9?06=3 @6 7?3 <35@6@7@46 45 90D@702 8?4C2< 647 @69A3083 7?3 4B3A022

A07@4 45 5@6069@02 9467A@1C7@46 45 7?3 #'-8 4A A3cC@A3 #'-8 74 088C>3 63; <317 13E46<

?@874A@902 06< DA4K3973< 5C6<@6= 23B328 54A 7A0<@7@4602 ?48D@702 90D@702 DA4K3978F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

#'-8 0A3 94693A63< 7?07 7?3E 0A3 13@6= 08:3< 74 5C6< 0 1A40<3A A06=3 45 DA4K3978F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?@8 @88C3 @8 <@A3972E 2@6:3< 74 7?3 <35@6@7@46 45 90D@702 Y<@89C883< C6<3A #394>>36<07@46 efZ

06< A3523978 0 633< 74 =0@6 9468368C8 46 7;4 @88C38J A363;3< <35@6@7@46 06< 7?3 94693D7 7?079467A@1C7@468 0A3 @6<33< B42C670AEF

"?3 1@==387 94693A6 54A #'-8 @8 A32073< 74 4B3A022 0554A<01@2@7E =@B36 0 =A4;@6= 6C>13A 45 

D47367@02 DA4K3978 ;?@9? 94C2< 2@>@7 7?3 #'-8 01@2@7E 74 5C6< DA4K3978 ;?@9? 24902 70UD0E3A8 ?0B3

7A0<@7@4602 8CDD4A73< Y3F=F 63; ?48D@702 509@2@7@38ZF

"?3A3 @8 0284 84>3 94693A6 7?07 06E 94>>@7>367 74 >0@670@6@6= ?@874A@902 C6<@6= 23B328

088C>38 7?07 ?@874A@902 5C6<@6= @8 84>3?4; 0 DA3<@974A 45 097C02 633<H ;?@9? 022 D0A7@38 0=A33 @8

647 7?3 9083H (5 7?3 DA@69@D23 45 >0@670@6@6= ?@874A@902 23B328 @8 0993D73<H 84>3 0A3 0284

94693A63< 7?07 @7 94C2< 13 C83< 74 367A369? ?@874A@902 B0A@07@46b@63cC@7@38 @6 5C6<@6= 23B328

137;336 #'-8

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B T;   (>D23>36707@46 45 7?3 A394>>36<07@468 DA49388 8?4C2< 13=@6 @6

7?3 5022 45 VWWX ;@7? 0 K4@67 D2066@6= >337@6= 137;336 309? '3027? *C7?4A@7E 06< @78 #'-8F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B Q0;   '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 8?4C2< >4B3 74;0A<8 0 ^LE30A A422@6= 90D@702

D206 06< 0 8706<0A< 94>>C6@907@46 DA49388F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

%C>3A4C8 #'-8 ;3A3 94693A63< 7?07 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 <@< 647 ?0B3 5C6<@6=

94>>@7>3678 5A4> 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938 13E46< 463 E30A 06< 7?3A354A3 4D3A073< 46

463 E30A D2066@6= 7@>32@638F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

*8 6473< DA3B@4C82EH 147? 7?3 #'-8 06< 7?3 '*8 3UDA388 8@=6@5@9067 5AC87A07@46 07 7?3 @601@2@7E 74

D206 13E46< 463 E30A <C3 74 7?3 5097 7?07 M.'! @8 462E 0C7?4A@N3< 74 DA4B@<3 5@A>

94>>@7>3678 @6 463LE30A 9E9238F T4A 7?3 #'-8H 7?@8 230<8 74 C6DA3<@9701@2@7E @6 908? 524;

D2066@6= 06< >060=3>367 06< 0 D3A93D7@46 45 @69A3083< A@8:F T4A 7?3 '*8H @7 230<8 74

5AC87A07@468 8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3 01@2@7E 74 <3B324D 9469A373 D2068 54A @65A087AC97CA3 @6B387>367F

Page 22: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 22/119

RP!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 RP

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B QQ;   (6 7?3 5022H 1354A3 '3027? *C7?4A@7E 06< #'- 1C<=378 0A3 5@602@N3<

0 K4@67 D2066@6= >337@6= Y4A 83A@38 45 >337@6=8Z 8?4C2< 13 ?32< 74 <@89C88 7?3 9467367 45 7?3

'3027? *C7?4A@7EG8 5@B3LE30A 90D@702 D206F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

,087 >@6C73 5C6<@6= A3cC3878 5A4> '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 0A3 <@55@9C27 54A #'-8 74 <302 ;@7?F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?@8 A394>>36<07@46 @8 <@A3972E 2@6:3< 74 7?3 @601@2@7E 74 <073 74 <3B324D 0 DA49388 7?07 0224;8

54A 5@B3LE30A D2068H 1C7 @7 0284 =438 74 7?3 ?30A7 45 7?3 A3207@468?@D @88C3 <389A@13< DA3B@4C82EF

M06E #'-8 ?0B3 3UDA3883< 5AC87A07@46 ;@7? 7?3 A3=C20A D2066@6= >337@6=8 @6 7?3 D087H 647@6=

7?07 7?3E <@< 647 5332 7?07 7?3 >337@6= A3523973< 7?3 7AC3 8D@A@7 45 0 D0A763A8?@D Y08

94673>D2073< 1E 7?3 VWWX !@3AA0 A3D4A7ZF .6 0 D48@7@B3 6473H >487 #'-m8 A3D4A7 7?07 7?3

A3207@468?@D8 0A3 @>DA4B@6= 06< 84>3 ?0B3 8D39@5@9022E 6473< 7?07 7?3 A3=C20A >337@6=8 0A3

1394>@6= >4A3 DA4<C97@B3 06< B02C0123F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B Q/;  "?3 K4@67 D2066@6= >337@6= 8?4C2< 13 C83< 74 >337 3<C907@46

41K397@B38 1E DA4B@<@6= 06 4DD4A7C6@7E 54A 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7E 74 3UD20@6 @78 D2066@6=

088C>D7@468 08 ;322 08 7?3 8D39@5@9 ?3027? 4C794>38 7?07 @7 @8 DCA8C@6=F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B QU;   "?3 >@<L9E923 >337@6= A3B@3;8 7?3 5@B3LE30A 90D@702 D2068 06<

<@89C8838 06E 6393880AE 0>36<>3678F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B QV;   * A3=C20A 9E92@902 DA49388 @8 A394>>36<3< 74 32@>@6073

944A<@607@46 @88C38F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

!4>3 #'-8 87@22 5332 7?07 7?3E 0A3 0DDA409?3< ;@7? 02A30<E <39@<3< D2068 06< 1C<=378 / 8@>D2E

08:3< 74 >0:3 7?3@A 9467A@1C7@46 A07?3A 7?06 DA4B@<3 24902 @6DC7 @674 D2066@6= DA4938838F #'-8

87@22 5332 7?07 7?3 944A<@607@46 45 <@553A367 1C<=37 9E9238 9A30738 <@55@9C27@38F )08? >060=3>367

@8 0284 06 @88C3 ;?3A3 7?3 #'- ?08 94>>@773< 74 5C6<@6= 0 DA4K397 06< 7?3 '* <438 647 A3cC387

7?3 5C6<8 @6 0 7@>32E >0663AF

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

*8 6473< 014B3H 7?3 A3207@468?@D8 137;336 '*8 06< #'-8 0DD30A 74 13 @>DA4B@6= 06< 7?3

<@024=C3 @8 1394>@6= >4A3 549C83< 46 36?069@6= 7?3 D0A763A8?@DF %47;@7?8706<@6= 7?@8H 7?3A3@8 06 46=4@6= 633< 54A 077367@46 74 7?383 A3207@468?@D8 06< DA4938838 54A @>DA4B3<

94>>C6@907@46 06< 730> 1C@2<@6=F *22 45 7?3 >337@6= 54AC>8 633< 74 13 <38@=63< 74

87A36=7?36 94>>C6@907@46 DA4938838H 1C@2< 13773A ;4A:@6= A3207@468?@D8 06< 1020693 7?3

<C02@7E 45 0994C6701@2@7E 7?07 @8 87AC97CA022E 1C@27 @674 7?3 5C6<@6= >4<32F I@7? 7?3 <@553A367

1C<=37 9E9238H 7?3A3 >0E 13 06 4DD4A7C6@7E 54A 147? '*8 06< #'- 74 >337 @6 7?3 5022 45 7?3

Page 23: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 23/119

R=!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 R=

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

90236<0A E30A 74 8?0A3 7?3 DA@4A@7@38 06< #'-8 94C2< <373A>@63 5C6<@6= 01@2@7E 06< D47367@022E

DA4B@<3 736707@B3 0DDA4B02 45 7?3 5C6<@6= 8C1K397 74 5@602 M.'! 0DDA4B02 45 7?3 DA4K397F

268==C &8@:558B9C76:B QS;   !D39@5@9 A353A3693 74 l?48D@7028 06< ?48D@702 509@2@7@38G 8?4C2< 13

A3D2093< ;@7? 0 1A40<3A <35@6@7@46 45 ;?07 @8 32@=@123 54A 9487 8?0A@6=F

+,,2 "*3 '456789:;<=5>

"?3 '48D@702 -@87A@97 *97 Y#!P) ]hhfZ )?0D73A VWV 87@22 94670@68 A353A36938 74 [?48D@7028 06<

?48D@702 509@2@7@38\F

+,,? "68;6@ '456789:;<=5>

"?3 *97 A3>0@68 4C7<073< 06< >0E 633< 74 13 A3B@83< 74 A352397 7?3 9CAA367 <0E DA097@93F

I?@23 84>3 A3B@8@468 A3D4A73<2E ;3A3 >0<3 74 23=@8207@46H >487 5332 7?07 >4A3 0A3 A3cC@A3< 74

CD<073 7?3 A4238H A38D468@1@2@7@38H 06< DA4938838F *7 7?3 80>3 7@>3H @7 ;08 6473< 07 7?3

!733A@6= )4>>@7733 >337@6= 7?07 7?3A3 >0E ?0B3 1336 0 <39@8@46 0573A 7?3 VWWX #3B@3; 7?07

9?06=38 74 7?3 *97 94C2< 13 4B3A2E A387A@97@B3 06<H =@B36 7?3 B42C670AE 607CA3 45 7?3 5C6<@6=

D0A763A8?@DH >0E 13 C66393880AEF (6 47?3A ;4A<8H @5 9467A@1C7@468 0A3 B42C670AE 46 7?3 D0A7 45 

7?3 #'-H 7?36 7?3E 906 87@22 5C6< DA4K3978 4C78@<3 45 7?3 7A0<@7@4602 <35@6@7@46  /> 391B 2944:1 34

D4 :4H 06< 7?3A354A3 7?3 *97 >0E 647 633< 74 13 A3B@83< 07 022Q

Page 24: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 24/119

RQ!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 RQ

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

)?0D73A dJ #394>>36<07@468 54A M4B@6= T4A;0A<

*8 6473< @6 )?0D73A ] 45 7?@8 A3D4A7H 7?3 #3B@3; DA49388 C7@2@N3< 7;4 DA4938838 74 360123

870:3?42<3A 36=0=3>367 / 0 ;A@7736 8CAB3EH 06< 0 83A@38 45 @673AB@3;8F "?3 @6DC7 ;08 C83< 74

@654A> 7?3 <@89C88@46 45 309? !@3AA0 A394>>36<07@46 @6 7?3 DA3B@4C8 9?0D73AH 1C7 @7 ;08 0284

C83< 74 @<367@5E 7?3 4B3A0A9?@6= 7?3>38 7?07 94C2< 13 C83< 08 0 5A0>3;4A: 54A 4A=06@N@6=A394>>36<07@468F (6 7?3 VWWX !@3AA0 A3D4A7H 7?3A3 ;3A3 54CA 7?3>38J *994C6701@2@7EH

-35@6@7@46 45 )0D@702H +A493<CA3H 06< !7AC97CA3F "?@8 9?0D73A 4C72@638 7?3>38 7?07 ?0B3 1336

@<367@5@3< @6 VWWg 74 360123 @>D23>36707@46 45 7?3 4A@=@602 A394>>36<07@468F

)O'&$&,J"#M *J'-'2

"?A4C=?4C7 7?3 A3B@3; DA49388H @7 ;08 3B@<367 7?07 027?4C=? 7?3A3 ;3A3 B0A@06938 137;336

D0A7@9C20A DA@4A@7@38 54A 870:3?42<3A8 7?3A3 ;08 0 =363A02 9468368C8 46 7?3 7?3>38 06< @88C38

8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3 VWWX A394>>36<07@468F "?3 >0K4A@7E 45 870:3?42<3A8 @673AB@3;3< 5A4> 7?3

M.'!H '*8 06< #'-8 @6<@9073< 7?07 7?3 VWWX A394>>36<07@468 94B3A3< 7?3 :3E @88C38 07 7?07

7@>3F * 6C>13A 45 9?06=38 499CAA3< ;?36 7?3 63; '*8 ;?3A3 54A>3< @6 VWW] 06< >06E@6<@B@<C028 7?07 ?0< 7?3 :64;23<=3 06< A3207@468?@D8 ;@7? 7?3 #'-8 ;3A3 =463F

M4B@6= 54A;0A< 74 VWWgH 7?3 >06<073 54A 7?@8 A3B@3; ;08 74 @<367@5E A394>>36<07@468 7?07

;4C2< 360123 7?3 5C22 @>D23>36707@46 45 7?3 4A@=@602 !@3AA0 A394>>36<07@468F *8 DA3B@4C82E

<@89C883< @6 )?0D73A X 7?3A3 ?08 1336 >4B3>367 46 >06E 45 7?3 DA3B@4C8 A394>>36<07@468F

(6 946<C97@6= 7?@8 VWWg 8707C8 A3B@3;H 54CA :3E 7?3>38 3>3A=3< 7?07 DA4B@<3 A363;3< 549C8 74

0<<A388 7?3 4C78706<@6= @88C38 7?07H 74 <073H ?0B3 2@>@73< 7?3 01@2@7E 74 5C22E @>D23>367 022

!@3AA0 A394>>36<07@468F "?3 7?3>38 @<367@5@3< 0A3J

!   (=896@7C46?67Y :Z !3B96BK &8[36=858B7<

!   &:?8< CB9 &8?C76:B<A6X<

!   (=:@8<< "<<38<

!   "5X?858B7C76:B !=C58F:=\

$09? 45 7?383 7?3>38H 06< VWWg A3B@3; A394>>36<07@468 A32073< 74 309?H 08 <@89C883< @6 7?3

8397@468 54224;@6=F

Page 25: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 25/119

;<!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;<

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

(=896@7C46?67Y :Z !3B96BK &8[36=858B7<;

"?3 9367A02 @88C3 @6 >06E 45 7?3 A394>>36<07@468 @6 7?3 VWWX !@3AA0 A3D4A7 ;08 7?3 633< 54A

DA3<@9701@2@7E 45 5C6<@6= 94>>@7>3678F "?@8 ;08 3UDA3883< @6 >06E ;0E8H A06=@6= 5A4>

A394=6@7@46 7?07 7?3 dWj #'- 9467A@1C7@46 @8 B42C670AE 74 90228 54A 246= A06=3 90D@702 D2068H

@>DA4B3< <35@6@7@468 45 90D@702 06< 0 633< 54A 7?3 '*8 74 13 C653773A3< 1E 7?3 9487 8?0A@6=

DA49388 08 7?3E D206 06< <32@B3A 46 7?3@A >06<073F

";4 45 7?383 @88C38 A3cC@A3 5CA7?3A <@89C88@46J

!   "?3 633< 54A 246= A06=3 90D@702 D2068H 06<

!   "?3 633< 54A 7?3 #'-8 74 13 0123 74 368CA3 46=4@6= 0554A<01@2@7E 45 7?3@A 5C6<@6=

94>>@7>3678

*22 D0A7@38 0=A33 7?07 ?:BK =CBK8 @CX67C? X?CB<  0A3 <38@A3< 06< A352397 1387 DA097@93 Y08 <35@63<

1E DA097@938 @6 B@A7C022E 022 47?3A @6<C87A@38 06< 83974A8ZF "?@8 @8 >4A3 94>>462E 8336 @6 DA@B073

@6<C87AE ;?3A3H 08 M9O@683E 06< *8849@0738X

6473 7?07 7;4 5C6<0>36702 @88C38 7?07 >C87 13

D0A7 45 06E 355397@B3 87A073=@9 D206 0A3J!   ;04</D/67 >52/8/3/1:V +A4B@<@6= 7?3 D2067H 3cC@D>367H 06< 47?3A D?E8@902 509@2@7@38 A3cC@A3<

74 90AAE 46 7?3 1C8@6388F

!   ;04</D/67 25?/358V   M0:@6= 8CA3 7?3 1C8@6388 ?08 7?3 >463E 06< 9A3<@7 633<3< 54A

D?E8@902 509@2@7@38 06< ;4A:@6= 90D@702F

P47? 45 7?383 DA@69@D238 A352397 7?3 633< 54A 147? 0 246= A06=3 90D@702 D206 06< 0 908? 524;

87A073=E 7?07 02@=68 ;@7? 7?07 D206H 1C7 84>3 D34D23 @673AB@3;3< <CA@6= 7?3 9468C2707@46

DA49388 cC387@46 ;?37?3A 7?3 80>3 @8 D488@123 @6 0 DC12@9 83974A 36B@A46>367F "?3 #3B@3;

730> 8C1>@78 7?07H ;?@23 @7 >0E 647 13 7?3 64A> 74 <073H @7 @8 147? D488@123 06< 388367@02F

"?3 )4>>46;3027? 45 Q@A=@6@0 @6 7?3 `6@73< !70738d

A394=6@N3< 7?3 633< 54A 246= A06=3 90D@702D2066@6= @6 7?3 >@<LhW8 ;?36 @7 <35@63< 7?3 8@U 1387 DA097@93 DA@69@D238 7?07 ;4C2< =C@<3 @78

D2066@6= DA4938838H ;?@9? 0A3J

!   W467J05671 ?8566/67 940/X46V )0D@702 A3cC@A3>3678 >C87 13 3U0>@63< 4B3A 0 54CAL 74

736LE30A D3A@4< 74 0<3cC0732E @<367@5E 06< 088388 90D@702 94687AC97@46 06< A364B07@46

633<8F "?3 246=LA06=3 D2066@6= DA49388 ?32D8 <39@8@46L>0:3A8 74 DA@4A@7@N3 90D@702

412@=07@468 06< 088@87 7?3> @6 >0:@6= @654A>3< 9?4@938 014C7 >060=@6= <317F (7 0284

509@2@70738 7?3 @<367@5@907@46 06< 3B02C07@46 45 4D7@468 06< >@6@>@N38 7?3 C66393880AE

3UD36<@7CA3 45 DC12@9 5C6<8F

!   %6317053/46 4> 25?/358 T=D713/67 O/39 :305317/2 ?8566/67V  "?A4C=? 7?3 87A073=@9 D2066@6=

DA49388H 0=369@38 @<367@5E 7?3@A >@88@46 06< DA4=A0> 41K397@B38 06< 088388 7?3 633<8 45 

7?3@A 9C874>3A8 06< 7?3 36B@A46>367 @6 ;?@9? 7?3E 0A3 4D3A07@6=F "?383 87A073=@9 D2068

8?4C2< 13 7?3 870A7@6= D4@67 54A @<367@5E@6= 90D@702 A3cC@A3>3678 06< <373A>@6@6= 7?3

3Bruce D. Cox, AIA,  Methods, Metrics, and Concepts for Building Dynamic Strategic Planning Processes , Newsletter for the Facility

Management Knowledge Community, 2008.4

Donald Darr, The Benefits of Long-Range Capital Planning – The Virginia Experience,  Public Budgeting and Finance, Fall 1998.

Page 26: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 26/119

;R!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;R

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

=0D 137;336 9CAA367 06< 5C7CA3 633<8F -CA@6= 7?@8 DA49388H 0273A607@B38 8?4C2< 13

0883883<H @692C<@6= 646L90D@702 4D7@468F

!   W/A/353/46 4> D1T3 >/6562/67V  "?3A3 633<8 74 13 0 >308CA3 45 <317 0554A<01@2@7E 7?07

@<367@5@38 7?3 0>4C67 45 70UL8CDD4A73< <317 7?07 >0E 13 DAC<3672E 0C7?4A@N3<

9468@87367 ;@7? 5@6069@02 =4028 06< 90D@702 633<8F #07@6= 0=369@38 B@3; 9467A42 45 70UL

8CDD4A73< <317 08 0 :3E 50974A 055397@6= 9A3<@7 cC02@7EF

!   Y=58/3B /6>40A53/46 /628=D/67 56 /6<16340B 4> 5::13: 56D 611D:V  +42@9E>0:3A8 >C87 ?0B3

CDL74L<073 @654A>07@46 06< 94>DA3?368@B3 <070 06< @654A>07@46 8E873>8 74 >0:3

355397@B3 <39@8@468F

!   $44D 24AA=6/253/46:V   &44< @673A602 94>>C6@907@46 0224;8 022 23B328 45 06

4A=06@N07@46 74 13 50>@2@0A ;@7? 7?3 0=369EG8 >@88@46 06< 87A073=@9 =4028F -@024=C3 06<

533<109: 137;336 2@63 06< 9367A02 0=369@38 @8 @>D4A7067 74 cC@9:2E A3842B3 cC387@468 4A

DA4123>8F * 9367A02 0=369E 906 0284 83AB3 08 0 9230A@6=?4C83 54A <@883>@607@6= 87073L45L

7?3L0A7 739?6@cC38F

!   "46/340/67 4> ?10>40A5621V   *=369@38 >C87 13 ?32< 0994C670123 54A A38C278 7?A4C=?

0DDA4DA@073 23B328 45 A3B@3;F .693 @6@7@073<H 7?3A3 633<8 74 13 0 8E873>07@9 ;0E 74

>46@74A 0 DA4K397G8 DA4=A388 06< 3B02C073 D3A54A>0693F T4A 3U0>D23H D3A54A>0693

>308CA38 906 13 C83< 74 088388 94>D237@46 70A=378 06< 9487 387@>0738F "?3 3B02C07@46

45 A38C278 0224;8 2388468 230A63< 74 13 @694AD4A073< @674 7?3 90D@702 <39@8@46 >0:@6=

DA49388F

,44:@6= 07 KC87 7?3 5@A87 7;4 DA@69@D238H 7?3 M.'! 06< 7?3 '*8 ?0B3 870A73< 7?3 DA49388 54A

246=3A A06=3 D2066@6=H ;@7? 84>3 @6@7@02 0773>D78 74 <35@63 90D@702 633<8 4B3A 7@>3F I?@23

7?3A3 ?0B3 1336 84>3 9?02236=38 ;@7? 7?@8 DA49388H @7 @8 9230A 7?07 @7 633<8 74 9467@6C3 06< 7?07

7?3 #'-8 633< 74 13 097@B3 D0A7@9@D0678F "?@8 ;4C2< =4 0246= ;0E 74 0<<A388@6= 7?3 @88C3 45 

:BK:6BK CZZ:=9C46?67Y 08 @7 ;4C2< DA3<@97 7?3 4B3A022 9487 06< 360123 <@89C88@46 ;@7? 7?3 #'-8

A3=0A<@6= 0554A<01@2@7E 06< 5@6069@6= 4D7@468F "?3 #'-8 02A30<E ?0B3 >C27@LE30A 5@6069@02 D2068

54A A3B36C3 5A4> 7?3 94>>C6@7E 70U 1083H 1C7 7?3E 0A3 94693A63< 7?07 90D@702 94878 906 9?06=3

1390C83 45 7?3 9CAA367 >4<32 7?07 A32@38 46 463LE30A D2066@6= 9E9238F * >4<32 =A4C6<3< @6 7?3

014B3 DA@69@D238 ;4C2< >4B3 13E46< 7?3 463LE30A D2066@6= ?4A@N46 06< 0<<A388 >06E 45 7?3

C6<3A2E@6= 94693A68F

I?@23 022 D0A7@38 A394=6@N3 7?3 13635@78 45 246=3A 73A> D2066@6= ?4A@N468 7?07 ;4C2< DA4B@<3

>4A3 DA3<@9701@2@7E 4B3A 5C7CA3 5C6<@6= 633<8H 84>3 8C==387 7?07 D42@7@902 D2066@6= 9E9238 906

@>D097 7?3 01@2@7E 74 94>>@7 74 246= A06=3 D2068F "?3 Q@A=@6@0 >4<32 0284 94673>D20738 7?@8

@88C3H 09:64;23<=@6= 7?07 7?3 5@602 DA@4A@7@N07@46 A3878 ;@7? 7?3 &4B3A64A 06< ?@8 901@637 06<

C27@>0732E ;@22 1020693 7?3@A D42@9E =4028 06< 7?3 0B0@201@2@7E 45 5C6<8F "?3 DA49388 0284 0224;8

7?3 &4B3A64A 74 5C6< DA4K3978 7?07 0A3 <3920A3< 74 13 45 06 3>3A=369E 607CA3F "?383 DA4K3978

0A3 >060=3< 4C78@<3 45 7?3 64A>02 9E92@902 D2066@6= DA49388 06< <4 647 055397 7?3 90D@702

5C6<@6= 94>>@7>3678 @692C<3< @6 7?3 246= A06=3 D206F

Page 27: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 27/119

;;!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;;

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

"4 0<B0693 7?3 9487L8?0A@6= >4<32 06< >337 7?3 633<8 45 022 D0A7@38 8CAA4C6<@6=  ;01D/235T/8/3B 

4> ,=6D/67 #1U=/01A163:H 7?3 54224;@6= A394>>36<07@468 0A3 4553A3<J

#]F "?3 +A4B@69@02 &4B3A6>367H 7?A4C=? 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 '3027? !3AB@938H @8 08:3< 74

94>>@7 74 7?3 <3B324D>367 45 0 246= A06=3 ?3027? @65A087AC97CA3 90D@702 D206 64

2073A 7?06 7?3 VW]WbVW]] 5@8902 E30AF "?3 D206 8?4C2< DA4B@<3 54A 0 >@6@>C>D2066@6= ?4A@N46 45 7?A33 E30A8H ;@7? 0 246= 73A> =402 45 5@B3L 74 736LE30A D2068F

#VF "?3 #'-8 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 <35@63 5@U3< 5C6<@6= 0>4C67 7?07 ;@22 DA4B@<3

@69A3083< DA3<@9701@2@7E 45 7?3 5C6<@6= 412@=07@468 45 7?3 #'-8 54A 7?3 >0K4A@7E 45 022

90D@702 @6@7@07@B38 @692C<@6= >@64A 3cC@D>367H >0K4A 3cC@D>367H 509@2@7E A364B07@468

06< A4C7@63 90D@702 <3B324D>367 DA4K3978F "?@8 5@U3< 0>4C67 8?4C2< 13 9465@A>3<

54A 06 @6@7@02 D3A@4< 45 7?A33 E30A8 06< 7?36 CD<073< @6 7?A33 E30A 9E9238 1083< 46

7?3 246= A06=3 D2068 387012@8?3< 1E &4B3A6>367F

#XF '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 <3B324D <A057 90D@702 D2068 06< @<367@5E ;?@9? @6@7@07@B38 @7 @6736<8

74 8CDD4A7 C8@6= 7?3 #'- 5@U3< 8?0A3F `D<0738 74 7?483 D2068 08 ;322 08 D20663< 06<

097C02 C83 45 5C6<8 8?4C2< 13 D0A7 45 7?3 A3=C20A A3D4A7@6= 07 89?3<C23< >337@6=8F

#dF "?3 M.'! @8 08:3< 74 ;4A: ;@7? 7?3 '*8 06< #'-8 74 CD<073b9465@A> 7?3 <35@6@7@46

45 90D@702F "?@8 <35@6@7@46 8?4C2< @<367@5E 0 <4220A B02C3 54A 20A=3 1C@2<@6= DA4K3978

7?07 ;@22 13 9468@<3A3< 4C78@<3 45 7?3 5@U3< 5C6<@6= >4<32 94673>D2073< @6

#394>>36<07@46 eVF

#^F "?3 M.'! 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 <3B324D 3<C907@4602 >073A@028 74 <35@63 7?3 +X

0273A6073 5@6069@6= >4<32 >4A3 9230A2E 74 022 D0A7@38H 368CA@6= 7?07 06E 8C9? >073A@02

0<<A38838 94693A63< 6473< DA3B@4C82E @6 7?@8 A3D4A7F .T4<1 GHHI 01</1O 0124AA16D53/46: 8/6P1D 34 5T/8/3B 34 >=88B /A?81A163 +/1005

0124AA16D53/46:V Z[@ ZG@ Z\@ Z]@ ZS@ Z^@ ZM@ ZI 56D Z[H

Page 28: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 28/119

;>!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;>

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

&:?8< CB9 &8?C76:B<A6X<;

.63 45 7?3 >0K4A @88C38 8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3 @601@2@7E 74 5C22E @>D23>367 !@3AA0G8 A394>>36<07@468

54A 7?3 9487 8?0A@6= >4<32 0A3 =A4C6<3< @6 7?3 94652@97 8CAA4C6<@6= A4238 06< A3207@468?@D8 7?07

499CAA3< 54224;@6= 7?3 A3=@4602@N07@46 45 7?3 ?3027? 90A3 8E873>F

_9101 _1 -5<1 (4A1 ,04A

+A@4A 74 A3=@4602@N07@46H #'-8 ?0< A3207@468?@D8 ;@7? @6<@B@<C02 ?48D@7028 Y45736 A3DA38367@6=

@6<@B@<C02 94>>C6@7@38Z 06< 7?3 #'- ?0< 0 ?@=?3A <3=A33 45 @652C3693 4B3A 7?3 DA@4A@7@N07@46 45 

90D@702 DA@4A@7@38 ;@7?@6 7?3 -@87A@97F MC9? 45 7?@8 @652C3693 3>06073< 5A4> 7?3 5097 7?07 0 8@6=23

#'- ?0< >C27@D23 A3207@468?@D8 ;@7? @6<@B@<C02 ?48D@7028 06< 633<3< 74 13 5C22E 1A@353< 46

?48D@702 D2068 @6 4A<3A 74 ?0B3 06 @654A>3< <@89C88@46 46 D47367@02 DA@4A@7@38F

T4224;@6= A3=@4602@N07@46H 7?3 '3027? *C7?4A@7@38 088C>3< 7?@8 DA@4A@7@N07@46 A423 08 7?3

?48D@7028 64; ;3A3 D0A7 45 0 20A=3A ;?423 06< >C27@D23 #'-8 64; ?0< 74 54A> A3207@468?@D8

;@7? 7?3 8@6=23 '*H 0 A3B3A802 45 7?3 DA@4A >4<32F "?@8 23< 74 0 =0D 4A B4@< 54A 7?3 #'-8 ;?4

D3A93@B3< 7?07 7?3E ;3A3 64 246=3A DA4B@<3< 7?3 23B32 45 @654A>07@46 7?07 7?3E ?0< DA3B@4C82EA393@B3<H 06< 7?3A354A3H ;3A3 647 @6 7?3 80>3 D48@7@46 74 <@89C88 06< <3536< D2066@6= <39@8@468

74 7?3 24902 323974A073F

*7 7?3 80>3 7@>3H 7?3 '*8 ;3A3 3UD3973< 74 <3B324D 90D@702 D2068 7?07 @692C<3< >4A3 7?06 KC87

?48D@7028H 06< >4A3 7?06 KC87 0 8@6=23 94>>C6@7E Y08 A3DA383673< 1E 7?07 ?48D@702ZF !4 0 83946<

8?@57 499CAA3< ;?3A3 7?3 549C8 45 D2066@6= ;08 1A40<363< 06< 7?3 D47367@02 5@6069@02

412@=07@468 54A #'-8 ;3A3 3UD06<3<F (6 0<<@7@46H >06E 45 7?3 @6<@B@<C028 7?07 #'-8 ?0<

;4A:3< ;@7? 07 ?48D@7028 ;3A3 64 246=3A @6 7?3 8E873>H 84 #'-8 <@< 647 :64; ;?4 74 9467097 74

A0@83 94693A68 06< 0<<A388 cC387@468F

"?3 36< A38C27 ;08 7?07 7A0<@7@4602 A3207@468?@D8H A38D468@1@2@7@38 06< 0994C6701@2@7E >4<328

Y>06E 45 ;?@9? ;3A3 @654A>02Z ;3A3 32@>@6073<H 1C7 7?3A3 ;08 64 920A@7E DA4B@<3< 08 74 ;?07;4C2< 70:3 7?3@A D2093F #'-8 / 833:@6= 7?3 80>3 23B32 45 <@024=C3 06< @652C3693 / 54C6<

7?3>832B38 @6 A3207@468?@D8 ;@7? 63; @6<@B@<C028H 63; 4A=06@N07@468 06< 4D3A07@6= C6<3A 0 63;

Y0213@7 E37 C6;A@7736Z 837 45 AC238F

_9101 _1 .01 &4O 

"?@8 ?@874AE @8 @>D4A7067 1390C83 7?3A3 9467@6C38 74 13 84>3 @88C38 A32073< 74 A423 920A@7E

137;336 7?3 D0A7@38H B0A@3< D3A93D7@468 45 0994C6701@2@7E A3cC@A3>3678 06< 2@6:0=38H 06< 7?3

633< 54A 4B3A022 @>DA4B3>3678 @6 A3207@468?@D8F #'-8 3UDA388 0 <38@A3 74 13 >4A3 097@B32E

36=0=3< 08 D0A763A8 @6 DA4938838 74 @<367@5E ?3027? 90A3 @88C38 06< <35@63 DA@4A@7@38H ;?@23 '*8

;067 74 368CA3 7?07 7?3E 0A3 0123 74 5C25@22 7?3@A >06<073 08 <35@63< 1E 7?3 DA4B@69@02

=4B3A6>367F "?383 A3207@468?@D @88C38 A352397 06 0A30 7?07 A3cC@A38 077367@46 46 06 46=4@6=

108@8F

.6 0 D48@7@B3 6473H 7?3 #3B@3; 730> 54C6< 7?07 7?3 B087 >0K4A@7E 45 #'-8 A3D4A7 7?07

94>>C6@907@468 ?0B3 @>DA4B3< 137;336 '*8 06< #'-8 8@693 7?3 VWWX A3B@3;F "?383

@>DA4B3>3678 @692C<3 A3=C20A >337@6=8 89?3<C23< 137;336 7?3 D0A7@38 06< 54A <@89C88@46 45 

7?3 '*8 90D@702 D206 06< DA@4A@7@38F M487 0284 64; ?0B3 M3>4A06<C> 45 `6<3A8706<@6= YM.`Z

0=A33>3678 137;336 #'- 06< '* 74 920A@5E 147? D0A7@38 A3cC@A3>3678 06< 3UD39707@468F

Page 29: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 29/119

;?!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;?

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

*27?4C=? 94>>C6@907@46 06< A3207@468?@D8 0A3 =363A022E A3D4A73< 74 ?0B3 @>DA4B3<H 7?3A3 0A3

87@22 84>3 7?07 633< 74 ;4A: 74 @>DA4B3 7?3 C6<3A8706<@6= 45 7?3 @88C38 5A4> 147? '*8 06<

#'- D3A8D397@B38 45 7?3 '3027? !3AB@938 A3cC@A3>3678 54A 94>>C6@7@38F )4A3 74 7?3 @88C3 @8 0

633< 74 9465@A> 7?3 D0A763A8?@D A3207@468?@D 137;336 7?3 '*8 06< #'-8F "?3 077A@1C738 45 06

355397@B3 D0A763A8?@DH 08 @<367@5@3< 7?A4C=? 7?3 9468C2707@46 DA49388H @692C<3J

!   *6 C6<3A2E@6= B02C@6= 06< A38D397 54A 7?3 A423 7?07 309? D0A763A D20E8 06< ?4; 7?07 A423

13635@78 022 D0A7@38 @6 7?3 A3207@468?@Da

!   "@>32E 06< 7A068D0A367 <@024=C3H 9468C2707@46 06< @654A>07@46 8?0A@6= 7?07 368CA38 7?07

022 D0A763A8 0A3 0DDA4DA@0732E @6B42B3< @6 7?3 D2066@6= DA49388 7?07 230<8 74 0 <39@8@46

055397@6= 022 D0A763A8a

!   *2@=6>367 45 D2066@6= DA4938838 74 >337 7?3 633<8 45 022 D0A7@38a

!   '0A>46@N3< D3A54A>0693 >46@74A@6= 06< A3B@3; A3=0A<@6= A384CA93 0224907@468F

)367A02 74 7?3 D0A763A8?@D @88C3 @8 7?07 #'-8 / 08 A3DA3836707@B38 45 24902 =4B3A6>367 230<3A8 /

5332 7?07 7?3E ?0B3 0 87A46= 06< 23=@7@>073 A423 74 D20E @6 7?3 0A308 45 9@7@N36 36=0=3>367F "45C25@22 7?07 A423H 7?3 #'-8 633< 74 13 13773A @654A>3< 8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3 '*8 87A073=@9 DA@4A@7@38

06< 4D3A07@4602 9?02236=38H 08 ;322 08 7?3 DA@4A@7@N07@46 DA4938838 54A 24902 ?3027? @6@7@07@B38F

'*8H 1E 9467A087H A0@83< 94693A68 7?07 06E DA49388 74 1A40<36 7?3 <@024=C3 137;336 '*8 06<

'-G8 13E46< KC87 90D@702 DA@4A@7@38 94C2< 230< 74 5CA7?3A 94652@97 4A 7368@46 08 @7 94C2< 230< 74 7?3

<@89C88@468 7?07 <A@57 @674 4D3A07@4602 0A308 7?07 0A3 9230A2E 7?3 DCAB@3; 45 7?3 '* ;?36 @7

94>38 74 <39@8@46 >0:@6=F "?3 :3E ;@22 13 74 0=A33 46 ;?37?3A 4A 647 7?3 A423 @8 0DDA4DA@0732E

549C83< 06< 7?36 87AC97CA3 94>>C6@907@46 >39?06@8>8 0DDA4DA@0732EF

*8 7?3 D0A763A8?@D >4<32 3B42B38H @7 ;@22 13 @>D4A7067 74 368CA3 7?07 022 D0A7@38 C6<3A8706< ?4;

7?3@A A4238 5@7 ;@7?@6 06 4B3A022 <39@8@46 >0:@6= 5A0>3;4A:F "4 088@87 ;@7? 920A@7EH 7?3 A3B@3;

730> ?08 9A3073< 7?3 )!( -39@8@46 M0:@6= M4<32 ;?@9? @8 A353AA3< 74 08 -#(Q$F -#(Q$ @8 0609A46E> 54A 7?3 5@B3 A4238 7?07 3U@87 ;@7?@6 0 54A>02 <39@8@46 >0:@6= 5A0>3;4A:F $09? @8

<389A@13< @6 7?3 70123 1324;J

Page 30: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 30/119

;@!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;@

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

,-.% /0 1%2/$/-0 3#4/05  675#0/8#9/-0#.

3#0:#9%

1S/2 O,09"&

  !"#$%$&'()*+", T U2 ,0 -/2 $- (&%$9"%2&G"88,()%":&2 O,0 %/2 *28$-$,) 6 +,,* ,0 :"* 6 ")* 9(-%

/"32 %/2 "(%/,0$%G %, 02-,&32 $9#"--2 $) %/2 *28$-$,)V

9"I$)+ #0,82-- "- 42&& "- *(0$)+ $9#&292)%"%$,)T

DNU.

-." /"#&))"'0",%T SG#$8"&&G 9"G 8,)-(&% 4$%/ ,%/20-W:(% %/2G /"32 02-#,)-$:$&$%G %, *232&,# %/2 (&%$9"%2

#0,#,-"& ")* 028,992)*"%$,)- .,92,)2 $- %G#$8"&&G

"--$+)2* 02-#,)-$:$&$%G %, O,09(&"%2 ") $)$%$"& #0,#,-"& ,002-#,)-2 %, " #0,:&29 ,0 $--(2 %/"% $- :2$)+ 2X"9$)2*T

U2"&%/ K(%/,0$%G

;

S/,-2 4$%/   1'234   %G#$8"&&G 4$&& #&"G " I2G 0,&2 $) 2)":&$)+

") $9#&292)%"%$,) ,O " 028,992)*"%$,) :28"(-2 %/2G

4202 #"0% ,O %/2 8,)-(&%"%$,) #0,82-- S/2-2 $)*$3$*("&-)22* %, :2 8,)-(&%2* ,) %/2 *28$-$,)W ")* %/2$0 "*3$82 $-

%G#$8"&&G -,(+/% :G " 028,992)*20W "- 42&& "- :G %/2

(&%$9"%2 *28$-$,) 9"I20W #0$,0 %, %/2 #0,82-- :2$)+O$)"&$E2*T

12+$,)"&

U,-#$%"& 7$-%0$8%

<S/,-2 4$%/   5"4&   #,420 9(-% "+022 4$%/ %/2

028,992)*"%$,) #0$,0 %, $% +,$)+ O,04"0* O,0 " O,09"&*28$-$,)T MO %/2-2 $)*$3$*("&- *, ),% "+022W %/2) %/2#0,#,-"& $- 023"9#2* ()%$& "+02292)% 8") :2 02"8/2*T

YJK

=

S/,-2 8/,-2) %,   67"#34"8   S/$- -%"+2 #0,3$*2- 8&"0$%G

02+"0*$)+ %$9$)+W 2X#28%2* *2&$320":&2-J,(%8,92- ")*8,)-2Z(2)82- O,0 O"$&(02 %, "8% ,)82 " *28$-$,) $- 9"*2T

U2"&%/ K(%/,0$%G

(6 7?3 9CAA367 90D@702 D2066@6= >4<32H 7?3 '*8 ?0B3 7?3 # A423 08 7?3E 54A>022E A394>>36<

DA@4A@7@38 74 M.'!F #'-8 8?4C2< ?0B3 06 @6DC7 A423 08 7?3E 0A3 :3E D0A7@9@D0678 @6 7?3 <@024=C3

46 @88C38F %4 463 ?08 0 Q YB374Z 06< M.'! 06< 7?3 DA4B@69@02 =4B3A6>367 C27@>0732E ?0B3 7?3

- 06< =37 74 <39@<3F .693 <39@8@468 0A3 >0<3H 7?3 '* 90AAE 7?3 $ A423 08 7?3E ?0B3

A38D468@1@2@7E 74 @>D23>367F

"4 0<B0693 7?3 9487L8?0A@6= >4<32 06< >337 7?3 633<8 45 022 D0A7@38 8CAA4C6<@6=   #481: 56D 

#1853/46:9/?:H 7?3 4224;@6= A394>>36<07@468 0A3 4553A3<J

#fF "?3 M.'!H #'-8 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 920A@5E DA@69@D238 06< >39?06@8>8 A3cC@A3< 74

@>DA4B3 94>>C6@907@46 06< 360123 0 >4A3 A41C87 DA49388 54A K4@67 <@024=C3 46 :3E

@88C38 A32073< 74 7?3 4B3A022 94673U7 ;@7?@6 ;?@9? 90D@702 D2066@6= <39@8@468 0A3

13@6= >0<3F

#_F '*8 06< #'-8 0A3 08:3< 74 9467@6C3 ;@7? 7?3 <3B324D>367 45 DA4938838 74 368CA3

A3=C20A >337@6=8 0A3 89?3<C23< 137;336 A3DA3836707@B38 45 7?3 P40A<8 45 7?3 '*8

Y3F=F P40A< )?0@AZ 06< 7?3 #'-8 74J

Page 31: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 31/119

;A!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;A

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

!   $60123 94>>C6@907@46 45 :3E 87A073=@9 06< 4D3A07@4602 @6@7@07@B38 7?07

0A3 C6<3A;0E ;@7?@6 7?3 '* 08 7?3E A32073 74 90D@702 D2066@6= 06<

<3B324D>367a

!   +A4B@<3 0 54AC> 74 8CDD4A7 0 K4@67 <@024=C3 46 :3E @88C38 54A 147? 7?3

'*8 06< #'-8a

!   .553A 7?3 #'-8 06 01@2@7E 74 @<367@5E 8D39@5@9 cC387@468 4A 94693A68 7?3E?0B3 A3=0A<@6= ?3027? 90A3 <32@B3AE @6 7?3@A 94>>C6@7@38a 06<

!   -@89C88 D47367@02 90D@702 DA@4A@7@38F

P47? '* 06< #'- 8?4C2< ?0B3 7?3 4DD4A7C6@7E 74 @652C3693 7?3 0=36<0 54A 7?383

>337@6=8 06< 0<3cC073 7@>3 8?4C2< 13 D20663< 74 0224; 54A 147? 54A>02 06<

@654A>02 <@89C88@468F

#gF '*8 06< #'-8 0A3 08:3< 74 89?3<C23 83>@L066C02 >337@6=8 137;336 #'- 87055 06<

7?3 0DDA4DA@073 87055 5A4> 7?3 '*F "?383 8?4C2< 13 B@3;3< 08 [;4A:@6= >337@6=8\

06< 94C2< 13 94L89?3<C23< ;@7? 7?3 54A>02 P40A< <@024=C3 8388@468 8C==3873<

014B3F (6 7?@8 >4<32H 7?3 #'- >C87 13 ;@22@6= 74 0993D7 7?3 '*8 0C7?4A@7E 74

<38@=6073 7?3 >487 0DDA4DA@073 D3A846Y8Z 74 A3DA38367 7?3> 07 7?383 >337@6=8F

#hF '*8 06< #'-8 0A3 08:3< 74 <35@63 >39?06@8>8 74 0224; 54A 0< ?49 CD<0738 4C78@<3

45 A3=C20A2E 89?3<C23< >337@6=8 74 368CA3 7@>32E 94>>C6@907@46 45 @88C38 499CA8

137;336 87055 Y06< D488@12E 7?3 P40A<8ZF

 .T4<1 GHHI 01</1O 0124AA16D53/46: 8/6P1D 34 5T/8/3B 34 >=88B /A?81A163 +/1005

0124AA16D53/46:V Z[@ Z[[@ Z[G@ Z[\ 56D Z[]

Page 32: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 32/119

;P!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;P

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

(=:@8<< "<<38<;

M06E 45 7?3 DA49388 @88C38 ;@22 1394>3 2388 45 06 @88C3 @5 7?3 A394>>36<07@468 4C72@63< @6 7?3

DA3B@4C8 7;4 8397@468 0A3 @>D23>3673<F %47;@7?8706<@6= 7?07H 7?3A3 9467@6C3 74 13 84>3

D47367@02 9?02236=38J

!   "?3 !@3AA0 #3D4A7 90223< 54A 06 CD<073< <35@6@7@46 45 90D@702F "?@8 A3>0@68 06 @88C3 06<2@:32E 633<8 74 13 0<<A3883<F

!   * 6C>13A 45 47?3A DA49388 @88C38 7?07 ;3A3 A0@83< @692C<@6= 7@>@6= @88C38 06< 7?3 633<

54A 02@=6>367 45 D2066@6= 90236<0A8H 94>>C6@907@46 06< DA4K397 >060=3>367H

A39469@2@07@46 45 1C<=37 B3A8C8 097C02 94878 06< 9?02236=38 08849@073< ;@7? >46@74A@6=

DA4K3978 7?A4C=? @>D23>36707@46F

!   "?3 +X >4<32 54A 5C6<@6= 63; @6B387>3678 9467@6C38 74 13 06 @88C3 45 D0A7@9C20A

94693A6 54A #'-8 06< A3cC@A38 46=4@6= <@89C88@46 06< 920A@5@907@46F

"4 0<B0693 7?3 9487L8?0A@6= >4<32 06< >337 7?3 633<8 45 022 D0A7@38 8CAA4C6<@6=  ;0421::1:H 7?3

54224;@6= A394>>36<07@468 0A3 4553A3<J#]WF "?3 #'-8 06< '*8 0A3 08:3< 74 8?0A3 9CAA367 73>D20738 06< 74428 74 13 C83< 74

8CDD4A7 @>DA4B3< 94>>C6@907@46H DA4K397 >060=3>367 06< 9487 CD<0738F "?3

@67367 @8 74 9A3073 0 7442:@7 74 @69A3083 9468@87369E 45 74428 C83< 09A488 022 '*8 06<

#'-8F

#]]F "?3 M.'! @8 08:3< 74 CD<073 7?3 23=@8207@46 74 A352397 0 63; <35@6@7@46 45 90D@702F

 .T4<1 GHHI 01</1O 0124AA16D53/46: 8/6P1D 34 5T/8/3B 34 >=88B /A?81A163 +/1005

0124AA16D53/46:V Z[H@ Z[[@ Z[\@ Z[] 56D Z[S

Page 33: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 33/119

;=!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ;=

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

"5X?858B7C76:B !=C58F:=\;

"?3 !@3AA0 A3D4A7 90223< 54A 7?3 54224;@6= >39?06@8> 74 A3B@3; @>D23>36707@46J

N)91 "/6/:30B 4> -15839 :94=8D 01</1O 391 25?/358 24:3 :950/67 ?0421:: 39011 B150: 5>310 

/A?81A16353/46 34 5::1:: O913910 391 -15839 5=3940/3/1: 56D #-': 95<1 D1<184?1D 1>>123/<1

O40P/67 01853/46:9/?: 56D 501 >=8>/88/67 391 /63163 4> 391 0124AA16D53/46:QR 

I?@23 0 7?A33LE30A A3B@3; ;08 8C==3873<H 870:3?42<3A8 6473< 7?07 7?3A3 ;08 64 54A>02

@>D23>36707@46 5A0>3;4A: 06< 64 D0A7E ;08 =@B36 54A>02 0994C6701@2@7E 06< D3A54A>0693

5A0>3;4A: 74 368CA3 @>D23>36707@46 45 7?3 A394>>36<07@468F *8 >06E 45 7?3

A394>>36<07@468 ;4C2< ?0B3 A3cC@A3< 8@=6@5@9067 D42@9E 06< 23=@8207@B3 9?06=38H 7?3 0183693

45 7?@8 5A0>3;4A: ;08 @<367@5@3< 1E 84>3 870:3?42<3A8 08 463 45 7?3 10AA@3A8 74 @>D23>367@6=

7?3 A3D4A7F

"4 0<B0693 7?3 9487L8?0A@6= >4<32 06< >337 7?3 633<8 45 022 D0A7@38 8CAA4C6<@6=

%A?81A16353/46H 7?3 54224;@6= A394>>36<07@468 0A3 4553A3<J

#]VF "?3 M.'! @8 08:3< 74 70:3 7?3 230< @>D23>36707@46 A423H 74 368CA3 7?07 0 <370@23<@>D23>36707@46 ;4A:D206 @8 <3B324D3< K4@672E ;@7? `P)MH 7?3 '*8 06< #'-8F

#]XF "?3 `P)M @8 08:3< 74 >46@74A @>D23>36707@46 DA4=A388 46 0 83>@L066C02 108@8 06<

A3cC387 3UD20607@46 45 06E B0A@06938 74 7?3 ;4A:D206F

Page 34: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 34/119

Page 35: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 35/119

><!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 ><

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

XF "?07 9?06=38 ;@22 13 @>D23>3673<F

* 870:3?42<3A 36=0=3>367 06< 94>>C6@907@46 87A073=E ;@22 13 D@B4702 74 7?3 8C993885C2

A4224C7 45 7?@8 A3D4A7 06< 7?3 8C183cC367 @>D23>36707@46 45 A394>>36<07@468F

"   %8C98=<A6X 7: M3698 CB9 23XX:=7 ,ACBK8>  ,30<3A8?@D ;@22 13 :3E 74 7?3 8C99388 45 7?3

@>D23>36707@46 3554A7F (7 8?4C2< 870A7 ;@7? 7?3 836@4A 230<3A8 07 M.'!H #'-8 06<'3027? *C7?4A@7@38H 1C7 >0E 0284 633< 74 @692C<3 54A>02 =4B3A6>367 36<4A83>367F *284

633< 74 6473 7?07 84>3463 633<8 74 70:3 A38D468@1@2@7E 54A @>D23>36707@46 / 4CA

A394>>36<07@46 @8 M.'!F `P)M Y4A 0273A6073Z 74 D20E >46@74A@6= A423F

"   23XX:=76BK (=:a8@7 -CBCK858B7 ,CXC@67Y>   +A4K397 >060=3>367 8CDD4A7 ;@22 0284 13

:3EF I3 ;4C2< A394>>36< 7?3 0DD4@67>367 45 06 @673A602 DA4K397 >060=3A 74 230< 7?3

8CDD4A7 A4224C7 06< 368CA3 7?07 @>D23>36707@46 870E8 46 7A09:F "?3 DA4K397 >060=3A

;@22 ?0B3 74 ;4A: 924832E ;@7? #'- 06< '* 230<3A8?@DH ;?4 @6 7CA6H ;@22 ;4A: 924832E ;@7?

87055 74 355397 9?06=3 06< 368CA3 7?07 7?3 A3D4A7 >0@670@68 0 A363;3< 06< A3B@702@N3<

549C8F (6 4CA 3UD3A@3693 C83 45 DA4K397 >060=3>367 74428 74 7A09: @>D23>36707@46 06<

74 DA4B@<3 7@>32E 3U39C7@B3 4B3AL8@=?7 @8 3U7A3>32E ?32D5C2F

278X V; .36?96BK C O6C4?8 "5X?858B7C76:B (?CB

.693 7?3 A3D4A7 ?08 1336 A393@B3< 06< 36<4A83< 06< 9A@7@902 8C99388 50974A8 ?0B3 1336

@<367@5@3<H M.'! 06< `P)M >C87 7A068@7@46 74 1C@2<@6= 0 B@0123 @>D23>36707@46 D206F "?@8

D?083H ;?@9? ;3 7ED@9022E A353A 74 08 M41@2@N07@46H @8 06 @>D4A7067 D2066@6= 097@B@7E ;?3A3

A3cC@A3< DA@4A@7@38 0A3 <35@63<H DA4K397 89?3<C238 ;?@9? <370@2 7@>32@638 06< <32@B3A01238 0A3

387012@8?3<H 06< A384CA938 0A3 @<367@5@3< 06< 088@=63< 74 7?3 DA4K397F

278X S; "5X?858B7C76:B CB9 'EC?3C76:B

.693 7?3 A3D4A7 M41@2@N07@46 @8 C6<3A;0EH `P)M ;@22 13 0123 74 >4B3 54A;0A< ;@7? >46@74A@6=

08 D3A <35@63< 7@>32@638 Y3F=F cC0A73A2E 4A 83>@L066C022EZ

*656BK ,:B<698=C76:B<

P083< 46 3UD3A@3693 @6 47?3A DA4K3978H ;3 ;4C2< 8C==387 7?07 !73D8 ] 7?A4C=? d 45 7?@8

@>D23>36707@46 8?4C2< 13 0123 74 13 94>D2373< 1E !3D73>13A 45 VWWhH 1C7 M.'! 06< `P)M

8?4C2< 13 08:3< 74 <35@63 8D39@5@9 7@>32@638F `P)M 8?4C2< 94>>3693 @78 83>@ 066C02

>46@74A@6= A423 ;@7?@6 8@U >467?8 45 <3B324D>367 45 0 54A>02 @>D23>36707@46 D206F

Page 36: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 36/119

>R!"#$%"& '()*$)+ !,-% ./"0$)+ 123$24 5#*"%2 >R

'$)"& 12#,0% 6 72829:20 ;<<=

)?0D73A fJ .7?3A )468@<3A07@468

*8 ;@7? 7?3 !@3AA0 #3D4A7H 7?@8 A3B@3; 54C6< 7?07 @88C38 90>3 CD @6 7?3 DA49388 7?07 ;3A3

4C78@<3 45 7?3 894D3 45 ;4A: =@B36 74 7?3 #3B@3; "30>F M487 45 7?383 A32073 74 cC387@468

8CAA4C6<@6= 7?3  :E8=C?? CXX=:X=6C78B8<< CB9 CXX?6@C46?67Y :Z 7A8 @:<7 <AC=6BK 5:98?>   +34D23

A0@83< 0 6C>13A 45 @88C38 A32073< 74 7?@8 @692C<@6=J

!   #'-8 <4 647 3U@87 @6 7?3 ,4;3A M0@6206< >306@6= 7?07 7?3 D4DC207@46 ;@7?@6 7?3

&Q#- <4 647 9467A@1C73 74 90D@702 DA4K3978 54A ?48D@7028 7?A4C=? 0 24902 =4B3A6>367

70U@6= 0C7?4A@7EF "?@8 A320738 74 0 <39@8@46 E30A8 0=4 74 ?0B3 7?3 &Q#- DA4B@<3

5C6<@6= 54A 90D@702 3UD36<@7CA38 54A 7A068@7 A07?3A 7?06 '48D@7028F *7 7?3 7@>3 @7 ;08

132@3B3< 7?07 7?3 7A0<3 455 137;336 7A068@7 06< ?48D@702 ;08 50@A2E 3cC02H ?4;3B3A

;@7? 7?3 DA4B@693 06< 47?3A #3=@4602 -@87A@978 DC77@6= >4A3 >463E @674 7A068@7H 7?3

cC387@46 ?08 4693 0=0@6 1336 A0@83< 08 74 7?3 50@A6388 45 7?@8 0AA06=3>367F

!   Q0A@07@46 @6 70U07@46 23B328H 0>4C678 D0@< @6 A302 <4220A8 06< B0A@07@46 46

D3A93670=38 45 DA4K3978 5C6<3< 1E #'-8 9A30738 0 83683 45 @63cC@7E 7?07 >0E 633<74 13 0<<A3883< >4A3 <@A3972E @6 7?3 246= 73A>F !@3AA0 6473< 7?07 64 #'- 8?4C2< 13

A3cC@A3< 74 D0E >4A3 7?06 7?3E ?0< ?@874A@9022EH 1C7 84>3 D34D23 cC387@46 @5 

?@874A@902 0>4C678 ;3A3 B02@< 4A 0DDA4DA@073F

!   .B3A022 cC387@468 45 0554A<01@2@7E 54A 7?3 #'-8 74 D0E 54A 90D@702 94878 A3cC@A38 0

>4A3 @6L<3D7? A3B@3;H 06< 63; 70A=378bDA4938838 >0E 13 A3cC@A3< Y1083< 46 06

C6<3A2E@6= DA@69@D23 45 01@2@7E 74 D0EZF

!   (88C38 A32073< 74 9487 8?0A@6= 90D@702 DA4K3978 @6 #'-8 ;@7? 20A=3 T@A87 %07@46

D4DC207@468 0A3 09:64;23<=3< 08 94>D23U 06< 13E46< 7?3 894D3 45 7?@8 A3D4A7H 1C7

;@22 A3cC@A3 84>3 549C8 @6 7?3 5C7CA3F

!   ?3 3>3A=@6= A423 45 7?3 M@6@87AE 45 T@60693 @6 7?3 90D@702 D2066@6= 06<

DA@4A@7@N07@46 DA49388 ?08 1336 @<367@5@3< 08 06 @88C3 A3cC@A@6= 84>3 920A@5@907@46F

!   T@6022EH 84>3 #'-8 9467@6C3 74 cC387@46 ;?37?3A 7?3E 8?4C2< 9467@6C3 74 3U@87 06<

13 3UD3973< 74 5C6< 90D@702 94878 @6 ?3027?F !4>3 '*8 0284 cC387@46 ;?37?3A #'-8

8?4C2< 3U@87 54A 7?@8 A423F Y%473J 7?@8 ;08 @<367@5@3< @6 7?3 !@3AA0 #3D4A7 1C7 7?3A3 @8

0 =363A02 83683 7?07 53;3A D0A7@38 cC387@46 7?3 A423 64; 7?06 <@< @6 VWWXZF

Page 37: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 37/119

DRAFT RESOLUTION #2

THAT the following recommendation be endorsed by Nelson City Council and submittedto the Association of Kootenay & Boundary Local Governments at the Annual General

Meeting to be held in Kimberley on April 27 - 29, 2016

Improvements to Income Assistance Service Delivery

WHEREAS; in recent years the Ministry of Social Development and Social Innovation

has changed its service delivery model such that in-person, direct services have been

dramatically reduced and income assistance services are now primarily provided

remotely by centralized telephone line and over the internet;

 AND WHEREAS; these service delivery changes have introduced significant barriers to

people on or seeking income assistance and made it excessively difficult for many

individuals to receive the support they require.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

The Association of Kootenay Boundary Local Government requests that the Union ofBC Municipalities work with the Ministry of Social Development and Social Innovation to

ensure that people requiring help to access income assistance receive such help

appropriate to their needs and abilities (in-person where required) in a timely manner,

and in a way that does not place additional economic burden on that person (e.g.

repeatedly using pay as you go cell phone minutes waiting on hold for excessive

lengths of time, paying for computer/internet usage, travelling long distances to Ministry

offices from surrounding areas due to local office closures, etc.) and further, in a

manner that does not download the responsibility for this assistance to other service

providers without compensation for such additional work.

Page 38: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 38/119

Welfare Service Delivery Problems at MSDSI

WELFARE SERVICE DELIVERY ISSUES AT

THE MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL INNOVATION

Backgrounder

Individuals receiving income assistance have very little money. Many live in unstable

housing and some are homeless. This means that many do not own a phone, and

many that do own phones use “pay as you go” plans that run out quickly. Most

income assistance recipients do not own a computer and many are not computer

literate. For those that do have a computer, few can afford internet access.

CHANGES TO MINISTRY’S SERVICE DELIVERY

Over the last five years, the Ministry of Social Development and Social Innovation

(“Ministry” or “MSDSI”) has made radical changes to the way it delivers its services:

•  Income assistance services are now delivered primarily through a centralized

phone line and over the internet.

•  While local Ministry offices still exist, in-person, face to face services have

been dramatically reduced. Fourteen Ministry offices have been closed

completely since 2005, and in September 2014, 11 more offices across the

province (including the Nelson and Trail offices) reduced their hours to onlythree hours a day, making it impossible for many in communities in the North

and Interior regions to be able to speak to Ministry staff in person. These

offices regularly have long lineups, and many people in surrounding

communities cannot get to the office during the short window it is open due to

limited bus schedules and ride availability.

•  Wait times on the centralized phone line are long (averaging almost an hour

as of September 2015), and when callers finally get through the Ministry

places limits on the length of the call.

•  The initial application for income assistance is confusing, lengthy and must be

done online, with no dedicated Ministry services available to assist applicants

with its completion.

Page 39: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 39/119

Welfare Service Delivery Problems at MSDSI

OMBUDSPERSON COMPLAINT

In May 2015, BC Public Interest Advocacy Centre (BCPIAC), a public interest law

office, filed a complaint with the BC Ombudsperson, asking that it review access and

service delivery issues at the Ministry. BCPIAC represented nine non-profit

advocacy and social service agencies from across BC (including The AdvocacyCentre in Nelson) in this systemic complaint to the BC Ombudsperson.

This complaint set out how the current administrative design of income assistance

services creates serious barriers for the most vulnerable people in the province to

access essential funding for their basic needs.

Then Ombudsperson Kim Carter declined to investigate the issues at a systemic

level, and said that they would prefer to continue to devote their resources to

investigating individual complaints. BCPIAC is currently working to assist individuals

in filing individual complaints about service delivery.

HOW MUNICIPALITIES CAN HELP

It is critical that these issues be raised and acknowledged at every possible

opportunity. Many of the people most impacted by the service delivery problems are

those least in a position to complain about them—many fear retaliation against them

by the Ministry if they complain, some have been so disempowered by their

interactions with the Ministry that they do not see service quality as something they

have a right to complaint about, and for many, entering yet another bureaucratic

process (i.e. the complaint process) is not possible when they are trying to secure

shelter and feed their families.

In November 2015 the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government

Service issued the following recommendation after their provincial tour where they

heard from individuals and groups about the barriers in accessing welfare:

Improve access to Ministry of Social Development and Social Innovationservices and resources by providing more in-person support to augmenttelephone and online service delivery models to ensure that those in needcan gain timely and efficient access.

We need more voices to call for changes to the way services are delivered so that

the most vulnerable are able to access the basic benefits to which they are legally

entitled. Municipalities taking a stand against these service delivery changes that

deny basic access would assist in demonstrating to the provincial government that

current way welfare services are delivered is unacceptable.

Page 40: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 40/119

Welfare Service Delivery Problems at MSDSI

BACKGROUND ON WAIT TIMES AND CUTS TO IN-PERSON SERVICE CUTS

i. WAIT TIMES ON THE CENTRALIZED PHONE LINE

Data from the MSDSI on the wait times on the Automated Telephone Inquiry (ATI)

phone line in response to an FOI request made by BCPIAC indicates that wait timesat the centralized phone line had reached an average of almost one hour in the

summer of 2015.

ii . OFFICE CLOSURES AND SERVICE HOUR REDUCTIONS

Since 2005, the following 15 MSDSI offices have closed:

•  610 St. John’s Street in Port Moody (2005)

•  5021 Kingsway in Burnaby (2006)

•  33 3rd Avenue in Burns Lake (2006)

•  1023 Davie Street in Vancouver (2006)

•  2100 Lableux Road in Nanaimo (2006)

•  7388 Vedder in Sardis (2007)

•  504 Cottonwood Avenue in Coquitlam (2009)

•  7953 Scott Road in Delta (2010)

Page 41: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 41/119

Welfare Service Delivery Problems at MSDSI

•  828 West 8th Avenue in Vancouver (2013)1 

•  2484 Renfrew St, in Vancouver (2013)

•  60 Needham St, in Nanaimo (2013)

•  475 E. Broadway in Vancouver (“China Creek”) (2014)2 

•  2280 Kingsway in Vancouver (“Killarney”) (2014)

•  10095 Whalley Blvd in Surrey (2014)

Since 2011 the Ministry has also reduced the number of hours clients can get

help from a Ministry staff person in at least 14 offices:

•  As of May 2011, the Ministry office in Hope went from being open five days a

week to two days a week.

•  In September 2014, the following 11 Ministry offices in the North and the

Interior reduced office hours to only three hours a day from 1pm to 4pmMonday to Friday:

o  Nelson

o  100 Mile House

o  West Kelowna

o  Oliver

o  Prince Rupert

o  Smithers

o  Trail

o  Grand Forkso  Merritt

o  Dawson Creek

o  Fort St John

•  the Kiwassa and Dockside Ministry offices in the Downtown Eastside have

limited their drop-in hours to two hours per day from 9am-10am and 1pm-

2pm

1 This office did not technically close but stopped providing face to face services to income assistance and

disability assistance recipients; these recipients were transferred based on postal code to the China Creek,Mountainview, and Killarney offices. The Killarney and China Creek offices both closed the following year, withthese clients then all being transferred to the Moutainview location.

2 These clients were transferred to the Mountainview location. 

Page 42: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 42/119

DRAFT RESOLUTION #3

THAT the following recommendation be endorsed by Nelson City Council and submittedto the Association of Kootenay & Boundary Local Governments at the Annual GeneralMeeting to be held in Kimberley on April 27 - 29, 2016

Integration of federal marijuana legislation with regional and local regulation

WHEREAS the Liberal Government of Canada has publicly declared its intention to

legalize, regulate and restrict access to marijuana with creation of a

federal/provincial/territorial task force with input from experts in public health, substance

abuse and law enforcement to design a new system of marijuana sales and distribution

with appropriate federal and provincial excise taxes applied;

 AND WHEREAS the Liberal Government of Canada Standing Policy Committee has

committed to working with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a

coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana, respecting provincial health jurisdiction

and particular regional concerns and practices;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Government of Canada formally recognizes

the importance of partnership with provincial and municipal governments in ending the

prohibition of marijuana in Canada; commits to consultations with provincial and

municipal governments, and adopts a coordinated approach when introducing

regulation of marijuana by providing provincial and municipal governments adequate

time to align and integrate regional and local regulations and practices with new federal

laws when they are enacted.

Page 43: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 43/119

 

Page 44: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 44/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 2 of 38 

“Bearing in mind $1 million/ year buys roughly 12 new cops, 14 teachers or public

health nurses, ask yourself: Couldn’t ($400 million in law enforcement, court and

corrections) be bett er spent? The federal Liberal Party obviously thinks so…”  –  Ian Mulgrew, Vancouver Sun, January 18, 2012

Table of Contents

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3

Policy Resolution 117: Legalize and Regulate Marijuana ............................................................................ 4

Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 5Questions .................................................................................................................................................... 8

Policy.........................................................................................................................................................9

International Response ........................................................................................................................ 11

Legal ...................................................................................................................................................... 11

Public Health ....................................................................................................................................... 121 

Logistics ................................................................................................................................................ 13

Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 17

Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................. 38

“Legalize weed, yes, but the devil is in the details…Although polls suggest

Canadians support the idea of legalizing marijuana in general, they’ll want to see

a detailed plan before backing the idea unreservedly. That’s where the work

needs to be done now by the drug reform proponents.”  –  Gary Mason, Globe and Mail, Feb 2012 

Page 45: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 45/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 3 of 38 

INTRODUCTION

In January 2012, close to 80% of delegates attending the Liberal Party of Canada's Biennial

Policy convention in Ottawa voted in favour of a policy resolution co-sponsored by the Liberal

Party of Canada - British Columbia (LPC-BC) and the Young Liberals of Canada (YLC) to:

LEGALIZE marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production,

distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal

importation and exportation, and impaired driving

INVEST significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to

promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and

dependency, especially amongst youth

EXTEND amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana

possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto

WORK with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory

approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana

control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns

and practices

Since the resolution was approved a growing number of Canadians and community leaders

have joined the call to end marijuana prohibition in Canada. At the same time, LPC-BC’s

Standing Policy Committee has been working with the YLC to prepare this paper.

In addition to capturing progress over the past year, the goal of this paper is to provide some

answers to legitimate questions Canadians have about the impact of implementing this policy.

Some questions are answered in one sentence. Others are more complex and require ongoingcivil dialogue. In total, close to 40 questions have been identified in five categories:

1. 

Policy

2. 

International Response

3.  Legal

4.  Public Health

5. 

Logistics

From the answers to these questions, a framework for legalization emerges – which is

summarized at the conclusion of this paper with suggested next steps.

This paper is not an academic research essay. It is intended to be a practical, plain language

and political document that takes the policy resolution approved by Liberals across Canada in

 January 2012 to its next logical step.

Page 46: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 46/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 4 of 38 

POLICY RESOLUTION 117: LEGALIZE AND REGULATE MARIJUANA

Passed January 15 2012 at the Ottawa 2012 Biennial Convention

WHEREAS, despite almost a century of prohibition, millions of Canadians today regularly consume

marijuana and other cannabis products;

WHEREAS the failed prohibition of marijuana has exhausted countless billions of dollars spent onineffective or incomplete enforcement and has resulted in unnecessarily dangerous and expensive

congestion in our judicial system;

WHEREAS various marijuana decriminalization or legalization policy prescriptions have been

recommended by the 1969-72 Commission of Enquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, the 2002

Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, and the 2002 House of Commons Special

Committee on the Non-Medical Use of Drugs;

WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians

by generating significant resources for gang-related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling  – a

reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada’s marijuana

industry;

BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will:

legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and

use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and

impaired driving;

invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote

awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially

amongst youth;

extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana

possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related theretowork with governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana

which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting

provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practices.

“After the resolution on marijuana today, there is going to be a group of even happier people

in the Liberal Party…If you want to be part of a free-thinking, innovative, thoughtful,

 pragmatic, hopeful, positive, happy people, come and join the Liberal Party of Canada.”  

- Interim Liberal Party of Canada Leader Bob Rae, January 15, 2012

Page 47: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 47/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 5 of 38 

OVERVIEW

A growing number of community and opinion leaders agree the current prohibition of cannabis

is only serving to protect the status quo for organized crime of rich profits, stockpiled weapons

and public executions.

Opinion polls reaffirm the Canadian public is ahead of the current federal government on this

issue. A 2012 poll from Toronto’s Forum Research just after the resolution to lega lize marijuana

was approved at the Liberal Party of Canada’s Policy Convention determined:

60% of respondents in every province support reform of marijuana laws - BC is most

supportive (73%)

the largest demographic group that supports reform of current law is 55 to 64

most favour full legalization and taxation over decriminalization of possession (40-26%)

NDP supporters were the most likely to say they were for easing of current laws (71%),

followed by Liberal supporters (64%) and Conservative supporters (59%)

Subsequent polls have suggested support continues to rise for legalization and regulation.

Here is a summary of other reports that have been published since January:

January 16, 2012 - “A new spirit of openness and a policy in favour of legalizing and

regulating pot will help breathe life into the Liberal Party in western Canada, party members

said Sunday...” –  Peter O’Neil, Vancouver Sun 

January 17, 2012  – “It is an excellent idea, and the resolution ticks all the correct boxes by

way of justifying it: marijuana’s widespread and safe use, revenue savings and generationthrough taxation, and the fact that it would make Canadians safer from criminal violence.” -

Chris Selly, National Post  

January 19, 2012  – “The Liberals are right to make it a political issue…One (Liberal) goal must

be to better differentiate the party from the ruling Conservatives, and in that respect, a new

policy on cannabis legalization represents a start.” (Globe and Mail editorial) 

February 15, 2012  – Four former BC Attorneys Generals write an open letter saying, “The

case demonstrating the failure and harms of marijuana prohibition is airtight. The evidence?

Massive profits for organized crime, wide-spread gang violence, easy access to illegal cannabis

for our youth, reduced community safety, and significant – and escalating – cost to taxpayers.” 

“ Hallelujah! Canadians agree it’s time to legalize marijuana”

- January 18, 2012 , Vancouver Sun Headline 

Page 48: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 48/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 6 of 38 

February 17, 2012  – The Vancouver Sun endorses legalizing marijuana.

March 28, 2012  – BC’s Provincial Health Officer and Nova Scotia’s Chief Public Health Officer

say Canada should consider the model used to control and tax the sale of tobacco and alcohol

with marijuana as a way to crack down on organized crime, control availability and influence

“cultural norms”. (Globe and Mail) 

 April 27, 2012   – Eight BC Mayors write a letter to provincial political leaders calling for an

end to marijuana prohibition...North Vancouver Mayor Darrell Mussatto says, “We think our

communities will be safer and our children better protected from criminal elements if we

overturn marijuana prohibition.” Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan says, “We put our citizens and

communities at risk by not talking action now.” (Province Newspaper) 

July 2, 2012  – A nationwide survey concludes 66% of Canadians think the law should be

changed so people caught with small amounts of marijuana no longer face criminal penalties.

Support is strongest in Atlantic Canada (72%) followed by BC, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and

Ontario (69%). Support is lowest in Alberta (42%). (Postmedia, Global TV) 

 August 24, 2012   – Due to a lack of resources, “Canadian border agents have been told to

stop looking for illegal drugs leaving the country and instead focus on stopping the export of

illicit nuclear material and stolen cars. The directive is unlikely to make US and other countries

very happy.” (Postmedia News)

September 27, 2012  – Hundreds of BC municipal leaders joined a vote for a policy resolution

at their annual conference to encourage the provincial government to research the regulation

and taxation of marijuana.

December 1, 2012  – A shortage of treatment facilities where drug-addicted parents can stay

with their children is having a devastating impact on at-risk youth in BC, advocates say. (Victoria

Times Colonist) 

December 5, 2012  – Health Canada is preparing to publish new regulations to its medical

marijuana access program that could make doctors the sole gatekeepers of the drug. The

President of the Canadian Medical Association says the proposed changes could see fewer

doctors willing to prescribe it. (Sharon Kirkey, Postmedia News) 

“As Washington State and Colorado voters now have shown, measures for legalizing the recreational use of

 pot increasingly appear to make sense. They may even help turn some young people off the drug. How thento proceed? Well, we obviously have to sort out the various federal/provincial jurisdictional niceties. And we

have to find a workable means of licensing, distributing and selling cannabis. Actually, we in BC already have

one –  our provincial liquor store system, which for all its faults, appears well-suited to handle

the drug and ensure it isn’t sold over the counter to kids.”

–  Jon Ferry, Province Newspaper, November 2012 

Page 49: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 49/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 7 of 38 

December 7, 2012  – Seattle smokes up – legally. First state to allow personal marijuana use

stands to fill coffers. (Vancouver Sun) 

“The result (of marijuana prohibition) is that thousands of otherwise respectable

 people, including lawyers, professors, bus drivers and yes, even journalists, engage in arecreational habit that risks a criminal record. But it’s not them I’m particularly

concerned with.

 Aside from making an ass of the law, the marijuana business –  one of the most

lucrative in BC –  enriches all the wrong people, and at no benefit to the community.

The scum who kill in cold blood to protect their turf are the beneficiaries of a

gratuitous shower of riches even Croesus would envy.

Would legalization make marijuana more widely available? Rather the opposite if itwere subject to proper retail controls, as is liquor.

Would it be safer for white-collar professionals indulging at weekends? Certainly.

Would we have at our disposal greater resources for research into addictions, both

alcohol and drug related? Of course. Would legal marijuana put us on a slippery stop

to moral decay? I doubt it.

But I do know it would put a crippling dent in the obscene profits of the drug lords and

their trigger-happy assassins for whom the present law is just dandy, thank you.”  - 

 Alan Ferguson, Province Newspaper column, June 3, 2008

Page 50: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 50/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 8 of 38 

“Everyone believes…that the current approach is not working, but it’s not clear

what we should do.”

–  Prime Minister Stephen Harper, April 17, 2012

QUESTIONS

As support for the policy to legalize, tax and regulate marijuana has increased over the past

year, Canadians have asked legitimate questions about how this policy can be implemented in a

practical and organized way. This happened at the end of alcohol prohibition too.

The goal of this paper is to answer common questions and gather the answers into a draft

policy framework. The questions are identified in five categories:

1.  Policy

2.  International Response

3. 

Legal

4.  Public Health

5.  Logistics

The answers are based on survey responses, new laws in Colorado and Washington, existingCanadian laws and policies, literature and publication reviews.

Page 51: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 51/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 9 of 38 

POLICY

WHY DO WE WANT TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA?

While there are many, we focus on five reasons Canada should legalize and regulate marijuana.

1.  Fight organized crime.

2.  Use the new revenue to support important government services.

3.  The current law does more harm than good. In addition to filling bank accounts of

criminals, prohibition delivers:

uncontrolled access for youth – and first contact with organized crime

no product safety and labeling standards for millions of consumers

criminal records for thousands of average Canadians

a significant burden on government budgets to enforce and prosecute

4. 

Millions already consume marijuana in Canada each year.

5.  Promotion of evidence-based policy instead of political ideology. The current law is not

achieving its goal to prevent use – particularly among youth who enjoy uncontrolled

access now. A growing number of community leaders, researchers, opinion leaders andvoters agree it is time to reconsider prohibition.

COMMONLY ASKED POLICY QUESTIONS ABOUT LEGALIZING MARIJUANA:

1. 

WHY DO WE WANT TO LEG ALIZE IT?2.   WHY NOT DECRIMINALIZATION INSTEAD OF LEGALIZATION?

3.   WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TAXATION AND REGULATION?

4.   SHOULD IT BE PART OF A FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL AGREEMENT?

5.   WHAT WOULD BE THE LEGAL AGE TO CONSUME IT?

6.   WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO CONSUME IN PUBLIC OR AROUND CHILDREN?

7.   SHOULD LEGALIZATION EXTEND TO OTHER DRUGS?

8. 

HOW WOULD THIS IMPACT PEOPLE AUTHORIZED TO USE IT FOR MED ICAL PURPOSES?

9.   WHAT WILL BE THE TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT?

10 . HOW WILL WE GUARANTEE THAT THERE WILL NOT CONTINUE TO BE A BLACK MARKET?

Page 52: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 52/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 10 of 38 

WOULD A SYSTEM OF PARTIAL LEGALIZATION LIKE DECRIMINALIZATION

BE OPTIMAL INSTEAD?

No. Decriminalization of small amounts would lead to a system where it is legal to possess but

not supply. Without legalizing production, sale and consumption together, organized crime

will continue to meet the market demand and law enforcement agencies and health care

professionals will remain in limbo.

WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TAXATION AND REGULATION OF

MARIJUANA? SHOULD LEGALIZATION BE PART OF A

FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL AGREEMENT?

While the implementation of a regulated system must include collaboration with provincial

and local governments, the Government of Canada must demonstrate leadership and take

the first step. We recommend this first step to be a legal framework which:

Is led by federal Ministers of Justice and Health

Developed by a special Cabinet Committee on Organized Crime

Reflects feedback from provinces and provides administrative flexibility

Includes a federal/provincial regulatory and revenue-sharing agreement based on

models established for the production, distribution and sale of alcohol and tobacco

Establishes an interim authority to oversee implementation

Is subject to review by a House of Commons Standing Committee

Once the law is approved in Parliament, provincial and local governments would be expected to

respect its provisions – as they do now with other controlled substances.

WHAT WOULD BE THE LEGAL AGE FOR CONSUMPTION?

We recommend the legal age for consumption be the same as alcohol for each province.

SHOULD LEGALIZATION EXTEND TO OTHER DRUGS?

No. Police, justice and correction resources should be redirected to support violent crime

investigations and attack other revenue streams of organized crime.

Page 53: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 53/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 11 of 38 

WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO CONSUME MARIJUANA IN PUBLIC OR

AROUND CHILDREN?

Provincial and municipal governments should have some flexibility within the federal regulatory

framework to place reasonable restrictions on where people can consume and purchase

cannabis – as is currently done with alcohol and tobacco use. This would include activities to

protect the health and well-being of children and employees.

Washington State is proposing to prohibit the consumption of marijuana in public places where

alcohol is banned and federal facilities (military bases, national parks, etc). Failure to comply in

Washington is subject to a fine of $100 however police officers are not yet issuing tickets.

WHAT WILL BE THE TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LEGALIZATION?

The economic impact of legalizing marijuana in Canada would be very positive for the

government and taxpayers. The full scale of this benefit is the only question and it has beenthe subject of increasing study. Here are some recent examples:

Washington State estimates a fully functioning marijuana market will generate over $1.9

billion over five years – based on 360,000 annual consumers. 

A November 2012 research paper from Simon Fraser University published in the

International Journal of Drug Policy concluded legalizing marijuana in BC may generate

$2.5 billion in government tax and licensing revenues over five years – based on a

domestic provincial market of over 400,000 annual consumers

A 2009 report from the RAND Corporation for the European Commission concluded

global retail expenditures on cannabis ranged from €40-120 billion ($60-180 billion CDN)

 – based on a global market of over 200 million consumers.

RAND’s 2009 report estimates Canada’s annual retail cannabis market at .29% of GDP or

€2.769 billion ($3 – 4 billion CDN) – based on a market of 3 million annual consumers

A 2004 Fraser Institute study estimated BC’s marijuana crop’s value at 2-4% of the

province’s GDP. 

New revenues will be complemented by the ability to reallocate law enforcement, correction,

border and justice resources.

Thousands of Canadians will also find direct and indirect employment. Opportunities include:

agriculture, technology and energy supply

specialty retail stores

transportation, distribution, packaging and manufacturing

inspectors, engineers, quality controllers, licensing officers and health researchers

legal, insurance, financial and accounting services

marketing, communication, tourism and public education

alternative products - non-smokable, cosmetic products, building materials, fabrics

Page 54: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 54/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 12 of 38 

WOULD PEOPLE CONSUMING MARIJUANA FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES

CONTINUE TO BE IN A SPECIAL CATEGORY?

The regulations exempting medical use of marijuana are only necessary because of the current

law. With the end of prohibition, there will be no need for this legal exemption – which has

proven difficult to manage for many patients, doctors, designated growers, municipal

authorities and law enforcement personnel.

In addition to saving tax dollars, replacing the federal medical marijuana program with a new

legal framework may encourage doctors and researchers to more freely explore health impacts,

alternatives to smoking and potential for inclusion of medical use in provincial health insurance

programs.

HOW WILL WE GUARANTEE THAT THERE STILL WON’T BE A BLACK

MARKET FOR MARIJUANA?While ending prohibition will put many criminals out of work, it won’t end organized crime.

That said, black market sales of illegal alcohol and tobacco have not become a problem post-

prohibition.

Ongoing vigilance will be required and the federal government should develop a

comprehensive set of policies to attach organized crime through the Special Cabinet Committee

we have proposed.

However, strategic elements of a legal framework can help prevent a marijuana black market

from re-emerging:

ensure the legal price is lower than the current price and quality is equal – or better

ensure packaging reflects consumer demand and product is accessible for adults

establish zero-tolerance on import/export

increase criminal penalties for export, unregulated suppliers and trafficking to minors

reallocate some police and law enforcement resources to border patrol

allow opportunities for Canadians to continue to grow limited amounts of marijuana

for personal use

Page 55: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 55/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 13 of 38 

INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE 

Background – United Nations

Canada is a party to three international conventions that regulate drug control:

  Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (“1961 Convention”) 

 

Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 (“1971 Convention”) 

  1988 United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances (“1988 Convention”).

Article 3, paragraph 2 of the 1988 UN Convention requires that:

 

“Each Party shall adopt such measures as may be necessary under its domestic law, when

committed intentionally, the possession, purchase or cultivation of narcotic drugs or

 psychotropic substances for personal consumption contrary to the provisions of the 1961

Convention, the 1961 Convention as amended or the 1971 Convention.” (Marijuana is one

such substance)

COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POTENTIAL INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO

ENDING MARIJUANA PROHIBITION IN CANADA:

1.   ARE WE ALLOWED TO LEGALIZE IT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW? IS IT AGAINST

CANADA’S TREATY? 

2. 

HOW CAN WE DO THIS W ITH THE UNITED STATES SO OPPOSED?

3.   HOW WILL WE CONTROL CROSS-BORDER TRAFFICKING?

4.   IS THE ILLICIT MARIJUANA TRADE IN C ANADA CONNECTED TO VIOLENT CARTELS IN

MEXICO, CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA?

Page 56: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 56/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 14 of 38 

ARE WE ALLOWED TO LEGALIZE IT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW?

IS IT AGAINST CANADA’S TREATY OBLIGATIONS?

This question is more common with government than the general public. Here are four answers:

1. 

Canada is a sovereign country - free to make our own laws through a democraticallyelected government in the House of Commons.

2. 

Other UN member countries have already improved their marijuana laws without

sanction.

3.  Canada should lead a movement to amend out-of-date international conventions to

reflect changes in medical evidence and international consumption rates. They have

been used as an excuse for inaction and regressive thinking for too long.

4. 

Canada has rights to withdraw from these UN conventions, as granted in the articles ofeach convention - exercisable by written notification to the UN Secretary-General.

Withdrawal would take effect one year after the date notification was received.

While some may still make the case that legalization is prima facie inconsistent with Canada’s

international legal obligations, Canada’s Special Senate Committee on Illegal Drugs identified

a number of factors in 2002 that provide state parties to these conventions with leeway

around strict application. For example:

Review, amendment and withdrawal mechanisms exist in the Conventions. (see answer

four above)

The conventions impose moral obligations on states, not legal ones. There are nopenalties or sanctions for violating the conventions other than a public rebuke by some

of the signatories.

Page 57: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 57/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 15 of 38 

HOW CAN WE LEGALIZE MARIJUANA IF THE UNITED STATES IS SO

OPPOSED TO IT?

This is an important question because the US is Canada’s most important international ally and

trading partner. The issue will continue to evolve against prohibition in the US with successful

November 2012 state referendums to legalize, tax and regulate marijuana in Colorado and

Washington state. This is reinforced by the subsequent reluctance of the US President to

enforce federal laws in these states.

In this light of these recent developments and estimates more than 25 million Americans

consume marijuana each year (RAND 2009), here are two answers to this question:

1. 

Public opinion is changing in the United States which does not appear to be as opposed

to the idea of legalization as they may have been in the past.

2.  Canada is a sovereign country and our domestic policies regarding crime prevention and

public health should not be dictated from Washington DC. While, federal Liberal

governments have a long history of co-operation with the US on a wide range of social,

economic and global issues, we also are not afraid of respectful disagreement. Recent

examples include made in Canada decisions to:

stay out of the Iraq war

recognize gay marriage

aggressively label tobacco products with health warnings

legalize marijuana for compassionate medical purposes

HOW WILL WE CONTROL INTERNATIONAL TRADE OF CANNABIS? WILL

CANADIANS BE ABLE TO TRAVEL WITH IT?

Out of respect to other countries that may not share Canada’s progressive views, we

recommend the government maintain a zero-tolerance of any import or export of marijuana – 

including countries and states that have decriminalized or ended prohibition.

To enforce this zero-tolerance policy, we recommend dramatically increasing criminal penalties

for the export of marijuana and reallocation of some domestic marijuana enforcement

resources to border patrol and intelligence. The vast majority of these resources would be

allocated at US border crossings.

Page 58: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 58/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 16 of 38 

“It is time to stop being dumb witnesses to a global deceit.”  - Guatemala President Otto Perez, April 13, 2012 

IS CANADA’S MARIJUANA TRADE CONNECTED TO VIOLENT CARTELS IN

MEXICO, CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA?

Numerous public and public police reports connect Canada’s marijuana industry to

international drug and weapons smuggling – including violent cartels operating in Mexico,

Central and South America. Here are some recent examples:

 April 18, 2012  - Linking the trade in B.C.-grown marijuana to drug violence in Mexico

and the United States, a former U.S. federal prosecutor has added his voice to a growing

chorus in favour of legalizing pot. “Gangs affiliated with dangerous drug cartels are

distributing marijuana grown in British Columbia – it’s being exchanged for guns and

cocaine that come up here [to BC]” John McKay, a former U.S. federal prosecutor, said

at a press conference in a downtown Vancouver hotel on Wednesday. “So the negative

impact of that is more than just proceeds going to Mexican drug cartels, but also what’s

coming back to Canada because of this production.” (Globe and Mail) 

 August 29, 2012   – “A fugitive Hells Angel wanted in connection with an alleged drug-

trafficking operation turned himself in at the Burnaby RCMP detachment Tuesday…The

charges follow a 21-month investigation into allegations that marijuana grown in BC’s

southeast was being sold in BC and elsewhere to fund the import of cocaine to

Canada…Mounties seized $4 million in the weekend ra id, including a plastic bag of $100

bills that was spotted with mould.” (Vancouver Sun) 

September 13, 2012  – “The number of gang-affiliate federal prisoners has increased

32% to more than 2300 in the past five years…Considering what smart people around

the globe have said for half a century, I say legalize pot. We have created a massive

underground global economy that generates billions for organized crime – drug profits

are the vital lifeblood of gangs, the primary source of disposable income supporting

their lifestyle and conspicuous consumption…The recent spate of killings should trigger

a realistic public discussion, one that considers radical solutions and broadens our

approach to dealing with gangs.” –  Ian Mulgrew, Vancouver Sun 

November 21, 2012  – Police allege marijuana grow-ops in the BC Okanagan area

were used to fund the importation of cocaine into Canada. They say they seized more

than $4 million in drug money during the 20 month operation. (Province Newspaper) 

Over the past year, leaders of Mexico, Central and South America have called on the United

States to reconsider the war on drugs and join a growing discussion about a new approach

that attacks the profit and business model of organized crime.

Page 59: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 59/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 17 of 38 

LEGAL

WHAT CANADIAN LAWS NEED TO BE CHANGED?

A new legal framework must repeal Schedule II of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act ,

establish new penalties for operating outside of the legal system, create a new taxation and

regulatory structure that reflects discussions with provinces and other stakeholders.

WHAT HAVE THE COURTS SAID ABOUT THE CURRENT LAW?

We feel legalization of marijuana should be achieved through the political process – not

imposed by courts. It is important for the Liberal Party of Canada to include ending prohibition

in its next platform as a strategy to combat organized crime. This will ensure a mandate for

change is offered to the majority of Canadians who want cannabis regulated and taxed.

Most recent court rulings on the legalization of marijuana have been focused on medical use.

Judgments have regularly favoured more access over less. Conclusions from these decisions

should be considered as a legal framework is developed. These may include:

It is likely possession can’t be legalized without provisions for purchase and supply -

an argument against a half-measure of decriminalizing possession of small amounts

any new policy framework would likely need to allow for alternative uses and

derivatives - including non-smokable and food products

people would likely be free to grow their own for personal use under a legalized

system – just as some make their own beer or wine today

the government should not overly limit supply options for consumers

In the absence of a progressive federal government, proponents may continue to initiate

expensive court challenges against prohibition in the future.

COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT LEGAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEGALIZATION OF

MARIJUANA:

1. 

WHAT LAW(S) NEED TO BE CHANGED?2.   WHAT HAVE THE COURTS SAID ABOUT THE CURRENT LAW?

3.   IS THE CURRENT LAW BEING ENFORCED? HOW MANY RESOURCES ARE ALLOCATED TO

MARIJUANA CONTROL NOW AND WOULD THOSE COSTS BE ELIMINATED IF IT WAS LEGALIZED?

4.   WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO GROW IT IN THEIR HOMES IF WE LEGALIZE IT?

5.   SHOULD THERE BE LIMITS PLACED ON THE A MOUNT ONE CAN POSSESS A ND/OR PURCHASE?

6.   WHAT WILL BE THE PENALTIES FOR PEOPLE WHO OPERATE OUTSIDE THE LEGAL SYSTEM?

7.   HOW WILL WE ENFORCE IMPAIRED DRIVING LAWS? WILL THEY NEED TO CHANGE?

8.   WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO CRIMINAL RECORDS OF PEOPLE CHARGED FOR MARIJUANA RELATED

OFFENCES?

Page 60: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 60/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 18 of 38 

“Across Canada 28,183 people were charged with possession of marijuana last

year, or about 81 charges per 100,000 people. According to a 2011 Health Canada

survey, about 9% of Canadians over 15 used marijuana in the past year. That

suggests one in 90 pot users was criminally charged.”  - Vancouver Sun, Zoe McKnight, November 2012 

IS THE CURRENT LAW BEING ENFORCED? HOW MANY RESOURCES ARE

ALLOCATED TO MARIJUANA CONTROL AND WOULD THEY BE

ELIMINATED OR REDUCED IF MARIJUANA WAS L EGALIZED?

The current law is not being enforced equally across Canada. In some jurisdictions, possession

is prosecuted vigorously. In others, charges are often not filed. Sentencing provisions are

similarly unequal across Canada.

Regarding the costs of enforcing the current law, these are often buried in operating budgets ofthe border agency, police, correction service and courts  – making them difficult to calculate.

However, 2005 federal Treasury Board documents published by the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal

Network suggest $368 million was spent that year on addressing illicit drugs. Of this, 73% ($271

million) was targeted to enforcement initiatives such as border control ($80 million), RCMP

investigations ($75 million), drug analysis services ($8 million) and federal prosecutions ($90

million).

While a legal framework will not eliminate these costs, we expect they will be reduced

significantly with opportunities to redirect savings to youth programs, border protection,addressing violent crimes, attacking other profits of organized crime and community

partnerships with provincial and municipal governments.

WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO GROW IT IN THEIR HOMES FOR

PERSONAL CONSUMPTION OR PRIVATE SALE?

Yes. While we expect the interest or need for individuals to grow their own to be greatly

reduced post-prohibition, it should not – and likely could not - be eliminated. At the same time,

sale of marijuana should be limited to businesses and require proper licensing.

The State of Colorado is planning to impose a limit of six plants per person as part of their

legalization plan scheduled to take effect in January 2013. We believe a maximum number of

plants for personal use should be determined following consultation with provinces, local

governments and other stakeholders.

Page 61: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 61/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 19 of 38 

SHOULD THERE BE LIMITS PLACED ON THE AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA

ONE CAN POSSESS AND/OR PURCHASE?

Yes. While we expect there will be little need for Canadian adults to “stock-up” on product if

quality cannabis is legal and readily available, we are concerned about the potential for

organized crime to easily stockpile legal product for smuggling to other countries.

According to consumption statistics (RAND 2009), monthly marijuana users in Canada consume

an average of 1 gram per day – or one ounce (28 grams) each month. Washington State plans

to allow adults to possess only one ounce of marijuana at a time.

We feel Washington’s one ounce limit may create unnecessary, ongoing enforcement

requirements and restrict people growing their own for personal use - where one plant may

yield more than an ounce of product.

In this light we recommend a four ounce (.10 kg) limitation be considered for the amount a

non-licensed vendor or distributor can purchase or possess without obtaining a special permit,

subject to consultation with consumers, distributors, law enforcement and producers. We feel

this is reasonable and akin to purchasing a 40 or 60 oz. bottle of vodka or whisky a couple times

a year instead of buying a small bottle each month.

Other limits would need to be established for cannabis-infused goods, plants for personal use

and marijuana in liquid form. Washington State has established a 16 ounce (.45kg) possession

limit on cannabis-infused goods or up to 72 ounces (2.4kg) for cannabis in liquid form.

WHAT WILL BE THE PENALTIES FOR PEOPLE WHO OPERATE OUTSIDE

THE LEGAL SYSTEM?

As marijuana will be legal, tougher penalties and sentences are justified for those operating

outside the legal system – particularly those attempting to sell marijuana to minors and/or

smuggle it into other countries for cash, other drugs and weapons. That said, experience with

the end of alcohol prohibition and tobacco regulation suggests few Canadians will be interested

in the black market as long as the product is more accessible, as good and less expensive.

Page 62: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 62/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 20 of 38 

What is THC?

“THC is Tetrahydrocannabinol - the principal psychoactive constituent of the cannabis plant. The amount

of THC in marijuana ranges from 1% to 20% and depends on how it was grown, the genetic makeup of the

plant and the amount of flower parts, leaves, stems and seeds. In hash THC amounts vary depending on

the source and how it is prepared. Hash oil generally contains 10% to 20% and considered the most

concentrated form of the drug.”  –  Health Canada | November 2012 

HOW WILL WE ENFORCE IMPAIRED DRIVING LAWS? WILL THEY NEED

TO CHANGE?

Driving impaired as a result of marijuana use is already against the law in all jurisdictions in

Canada. Provincial governments are able to introduce new regulations regarding impaired

driving as they choose this should be reaffirmed in a new federal framework.

However, we support increased penalties for all impaired drivers and providing police with

more accurate tools to detect when motorists are under the influence of marijuana. With

legalization, we recommend the federal government invest revenues to improve detection

technology, training support and research regarding effects of cannabis use and intoxication.

We also recommend monitoring the results of Washington State’s proposal to establish

presumptive levels of intoxication for THC concentration when a driver is arrested for suspicion

of being under the influence. These have been set at 0.0 for drivers under the age of 21 and 5

nanograms/milliliter of blood for drivers aver 21. Washington’s Licensing Department will be

able to revoke the driver’s license of a person who tests above the presumptive level of THC.

WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO CRIMINAL RECORDS OF CANADIANS CONVICTED

OF MARIJUANA RELATED OFFENCES?

A survey prepared for this paper invited federal Liberals and British Columbians to answer this

question. Of the 1000 respondents, approximately 80% said Canadians with prior convictions

for marijuana possession should have their records cleared. We agree.

Canadians convicted of trafficking marijuana or those who have been charged outside of

Canada should continue to have access to exiting processes associated with pardons, clemency

and the purging of records where minor infractions are involved.

Page 63: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 63/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 21 of 38 

“A 2010 Health Canada survey indicates that about 366,000 Br itish Columbians use

marijuana, almost exactly the number as in Washington State. “  - Province Newspaper, November 21, 2012

PUBLIC HEALTH

Common questions about the public health implications of marijuana use and the impact

legalization may or may not have:

1.  How many Canadians use it, how much do they use and how many are under 18?

2.  What are the health implications of chronic, moderate and occasional consumption?

3.  What are the public health impacts of legalizing it – or not?

4. 

Would legalization increase the number of consumers?

HOW MANY CANADIANS CONSUME MARIJUANA ON A REGULAR BASIS?

HOW MUCH DO THEY USE AND HOW MANY ARE UNDER THE AGE OF18?

In its 2011 report, the UN Office for Drugs and Crime estimated 5% of the world’s population

(230 million) used illegal drugs at least once in 2010. Cannabis was identified as the mostwidely used illegal drug in the world (estimated at 125 to 200 million people).

A breakdown of 2005 UN figures estimate Canada’s consumption rate to be one of the highest

in the world at 17% of the population aged 15 to 64 – much higher than Asia (2%), Europe (5%)

and the United States (12%). This translates to 3 million Canadians using marijuana each year.

These figures are similar to a 2009 report from the RAND Corporation for the European

Commission that generated country-level consumption and retail expenditure estimates for

cannabis. Among other things, the RAND report concluded:

global retail expenditures on cannabis range from €40-120 billion ($50-150 billion CDN)each year

Canada’s annual retail cannabis market is best estimated at €2.769 billion ($4 – 5 billion

CDN) or .29% of GDP

An estimated 2 million Canadians over 15 consume cannabis at least once a month and

3.4 million once a year

Monthly users consume an average of 2.5 cigarettes – or 1 gram – each day

Annual users in Canada consume an average of 1.25 cigarettes - or .5 grams – each day

Average total of marijuana in each Canadian marijuana cigarette is just under .5 grams

Page 64: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 64/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 22 of 38 

“Numbers supplied by the Toronto-based Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

study show the percentage of the population 50 and older indulging (in marijuana)

has increased 500% since a 1977 report, with them now making up 14% of dope

smokers. When the study looked at the general population, it found puffing pot

was going up in almost every age group. People who admitted smoking cannabis intheir latest study jumped from just under 9% to more than 13%; 30-49 year olds

had doubled their use.”- Postmedia News, David Sherman, November 24, 2012

HOW MANY CANADIANS CONSUME MARIJUANA HOW MANY ARE

UNDER THE AGE OF18? (CONT.)

Regarding youth consumption, we believe unregulated access to marijuana has contributed

to growing rates of use – as opposed to tobacco where regulatory controls have led to

declining youth smoking rates. Here are some recent reports:

A 2007 Health Canada report concluded 8.2% of young Canadians used cannabis on a

daily basis.

In August 2012, the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS reported more than half of

adolescent drug users surveyed said they could access marijuana, heroin, cocaine or

crystal meth within 10 minutes.

We recommend the new framework include significant direct investments on youth

engagement initiatives ranging from prevention, awareness and treatment services to

recreation, employment, community and cultural programs.

We also recommend increasing penalties for those convicted of trafficking to minors.

Page 65: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 65/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 23 of 38 

WHAT ARE THE HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC, MODERATE AND

OCCASIONAL MARIJUANA CONSUMPTION?

As marijuana has been legalized for medical use and more accepted in general, an increasing

amount of research is emerging on its effects. Canadian doctors prescribe marijuana to more

than 20,000 people to treat conditions ranging from Alzheimer’s, premenstrual syndrome,

seizures and migraines to glaucoma, MS, OCD, ADD and HIV/AIDS.

As this paper is not presented as a scientific document, we don’t make any conclusions based

on recent research findings on the health impacts of marijuana – or lack of them.

Instead we have conducted a scan of media reports over the past year and explored what a few

doctors have to say. All demonstrate conflicting views and the need for more research in a

regulated legal environment instead of the murky edges of the black market.

Here is a sample of some reports that have appeared in various media over the past couple

years about cancer and cannabis use:

2012 US HMO Study of 61,000 insured patients showed no increased risk of lung,

colorectal, melanoma, or breast cancers in current or former cannabis smokers versus

those who have never smoked or experimenters when controlled for tobacco use,

alcohol intake and socioeconomic status.

2012 report from the British Lung Foundation warned smoking marijuana is hazardous

to the lungs and can also cause tuberculosis and Legionnaires’ disease. The study

showed public awareness of the health consequences was low with almost one-third ofthe British population believing it is not harmful.

2011 University of Colorado Cancer Centre Study concluded that there is little direct

evidence that THC or other cannabinoids are carcinogenic.

A 2007 study by Harvard University researchers found that THC in marijuana cut tumor

growth in half in common lung cancer tumours and significantly reduced the cancer’s

ability to spread.

2005 University of California study concluded that smoking marijuana - even regularlyand heavily - does not lead to lung cancer.

Page 66: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 66/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 24 of 38 

“The University of Victoria Centre for Addiction found alcohol causes more than

twice as many deaths as all major illicit drugs combined, and tobacco causes on

average five times more deaths than alcohol.”  –  Globe and Mail, November 4, 2008 

WHAT ARE THE HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC, MODERATE AND

OCCASIONAL MARIJUANA CONSUMPTION? (CONT.)

 Addiction Impact

The Lancet has compared the harm of 20 drugs using a 0-3 scale to measure addiction. Theresults:

Heroin – 3.00

Cocaine – 2.37

Tobacco – 2.23

Barbiturates – 2.01

Alcohol - 1.93

Benzodiazepines - 1.83

Amphetamine – 1.67

Cannabis – 1.51

LSD – 1.23

Ecstasy – 1.13

IQ Impact

In August 2012, Reuters reported on one of the world’s largest and longest running

marijuana research studies that concluded people who wait until they are adults to take

up cannabis do not show any significant mental declines in their memory and

intelligence. However, the unprecedented study concluded that teenagers who become

hooked on cannabis before they reach 18 may be causing lasting damage.

“A recent report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences about a long-term study of more than 1000 pot-using teens

in New Zealand said that those who continued smoking into their

30s suffered significant cognitive deficits related to memory,

reasoning and ability to process information.”- Globe and Mail, November 23, 2012  

Page 67: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 67/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 25 of 38 

 ASK THE DOCTOR

We decided to get a rural doctor’s opinion on the health impacts of marijuana use. Here is what PortAlberni’s Dr. Michael I. McGuire told us:

“ In recent years, pharmaceutical companies have worked to license THC (the active ingredient in cannabis) for

medical purposes, in particular Nabilone (an oral medication used for nausea from cancer chemotherapy and

as an appetite stimulant in the cancer setting) and Sativex (an oral spray licensed for treating neuropathic

 pain in multiple sclerosis). In the extensive testing required for licensing by Health Canada, virtually no serious

side effects were encountered.

There is addiction potential with cannabis, in fact some authorities estimate as many as 10% of regular users

will develop an addiction syndrome and suffer personal, social and occupational harm as a consequence. To

keep a proper perspective, the frequency and severity of cannabis addiction is on the low end of the scalecompared to alcohol and tobacco. In addition, the withdrawal syndrome resulting from sudden cessation is

relatively mild, consisting of drug craving and irritability lasting 3-7 days.

There is an observed statistical correlation between cannabis and the onset of schizophrenia with psychotic

symptoms. However, there is no evidence that there is a causal relationship between cannabis and

schizophrenia. Over the past 50 years, cannabis use in North America has increased several-fold, whereas

schizophrenia rates have remained constant.

Studies have not demonstrated a link between lung cancer and cancers of the neck and throat despite

researcher’s expectation to the contrary. Cannabis has not been shown to cause chronic lung disease,

although it does cause worsening of symptoms in those already suffering from cigarette induced chronic

obstructive lung disease.

 A Canadian performed study reported in the CMAJ (Dr. Peter Fried 2002) showed that current heavy cannabis

smokers demonstrated a 4% drop in measured IQ compared to pre-adolescent testing. Light smokers showed

no change, and previous heavy smokers similarly showed no change. Conclusion: you are dumber while you

are stoned but there does not seem to be any lasting effects on intelligence. “  

DR. MELDON KAHAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF THE SUBSTANCE USE SERVICE AT WOMEN’S

COLLEGE HOSPITAL IN TORONTO SAYS, “(BUT) THERE’S NO ROLE, OR HARDLY ANY ROLE FOR

SMOKED CANNABIS IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN. THERE ARE SAFER ALTERNATIVESSUCH AS CANNABIS IN PILL FORM OR INHALERS. THERE ARE TOXINS IN CANNABIS SMOKE THAT

ARE CARCINOGEN AND ACCELERATE HEART DISEASE. SMOKED CANNABIS IS ADDICTING, UNSAFE

DURING PREGNANCY AND ESPECIALLY DANGEROUS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE IN TERMS OF

TRIGGERING PSYCHOSIS, DEPRESSION AND MOOD DISORDERS.” - GLOBE AND MAIL, NOVEMBER 2012 

Page 68: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 68/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 26 of 38 

“By moving from a violent, unregulated  market whose motive is profit to a strictly

regulated market whose goals are public health

–  we can actually reduce rates of use.”  –  Dr. Evan Wood, Simon Fraser University researcher, Vancouver Sun, November 21, 2013

WHAT ARE THE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACTS OF LEGALIZING MARIJUANA  – 

AND/OR NOT DOING IT?

We conclude legalizing marijuana and regulating its sale, distribution, promotion and price

will have a positive impact on public health and safety by:

Making it easier to prohibit youth access – as has been the case for tobacco.

Ensuring marijuana is grown in a controlled and regulated setting with strict labeling

provisions to better protect the health of consumers and producers.

Delivering billions of dollars in new revenue that government can reinvest in public

health care – including mental illness, treatment, education and awareness initiatives.

Encouraging the private sector and academic organizations to expand research into

health impacts.

Reducing profits for organized crime which results in safer communities and less

opportunity for young people to join gangs.

Forcing fewer Canadians to live with stress and stigma associated with having a criminalrecord for doing something 3 million other Canadians do each year.

Increasing availability of marijuana for people who use it for medical reasons or already

have prescriptions for a doctor.

Increasing availability of police resources to control violent crime and other revenue

streams of organized crime.

Reducing disincentives for people to reveal personal use will lead to earlier treatment as

needed.

Creating a responsible and accountable industry that becomes a co-regulator and

complies with improving regulations.

In contrast, maintaining the current prohibition will protect the status quo for organized

crime, guarantee ongoing and uncontrolled access to marijuana for youth and continue to

create more harm than good. 

Page 69: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 69/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 27 of 38 

“But what about the innocent children who will be exposed to these drugs if they

become freely available throughout society? The answer is nothing that d oesn’t

happen to them now. There is no city and few rural areas in the developed world

where you cannot buy any illegal drug known to man within half an hour, for an

amount of money that can be raised by any enterprising 14-year old. Indeed, the

supply of really nasty drugs would probably diminish if prohibition ended because they

are mainly a response to the level of risk the dealers must face.”–  Gwynne Dyer, January 14, 2007

WOULD A LEGALIZED SYSTEM OF MARIJUANA REDUCE OR INCREASE

THE NUMBER OF CONSUMERS?

There are already a significant number of

Canadians consuming cannabis. Studies

identified in this paper estimate more than 3

million Canadians use marijuana each year – 

and 2 million do it every month. Children and

youth under 18 are accessing marijuana easily

with the current prohibition.

Some countries that have introduced decriminalization policies have seen drug use and petty

crime rates decline. Since Portugal abolished criminal penalties for possession in 2001, teenage

drug use has declined while referrals to addiction treatment have doubled. The rate of cannabis

use in the Netherlands is 5% compared to 12% in the United States.

There is little evidence to suggest that consumption rates will rise dramatically if marijuana is

legalized – particularly since cannabis is not as addictive as most drugs.

In Canada, some doctors and researchers have said a strictly regulated legal marijuana market

has the potential to meaningfully reduce rates of marijuana use, in the same way that

regulatory tools have dramatically cut rates of tobacco use.

We recommend that a new federal framework include particular emphasis on restricting access

for youth, promoting prevention partnerships with local school districts to educate students

and teachers and tough penalties for anyone convicted of selling to minors. This will be

particularly important since we expect the price of legal marijuana to be lower than it is now.

Students who tried cigarettes in 1998: 56%.

Students who tried cigarettes in 2008: 26%.-

McReary Centre Society, April 15, 2009

Page 70: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 70/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 28 of 38 

LOGISTICS

WILL A LEGAL SYSTEM OF MARIJUANA CULTIVATION, DISTRIBUTION

AND SALES RESEMBLE ALCOHOL, TOBACCO OR NEITHER? ARE THERE

OTHER MODELS TO CONSIDER?

Since marijuana is an intoxicant, we recommend the federal/provincial system of alcoholproduction, distribution and sale provides the best model for Canada’s legal marijuana

framework. This approach would include:

consultation with provincial and municipal governments

elements of tobacco control policy – particularly as it relates to packaging, labeling

youth strategy and restrictions on promotion, point of sale and marketing

consultation with retailers, producers and consumers

elements of other national regulatory regimes such as natural health products, medical

marijuana, fisheries, agriculture and hemp cultivation

COMMON QUESTIONS ABOUT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES THAT MAY BE

ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA:

1.   WILL A LEGAL SYSTEM RESEMBLE THE CURRENT WAY WE BUY AND SELL ALCOHOL AND

TOBACCO?

2.   WHICH FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL AGENCIES WOULD BE INVOLVED?

3.   HOW WILL LEGALIZATION IMPACT CURRENT CONSUMERS AND PRODUCERS?

4. 

HOW MUCH WILL IT COST? WHERE WILL PEOPLE PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE

PACKAGED?

5.   HOW WILL IT BE TAXED? HOW WILL THE REVENUE BE REALLOCATED?

6.   WHAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS WILL BE APPLICABLE TO THE PRODUCERS AND

DISTRIBUTERS?

7.   HOW MUCH WOULD CANADIAN PRODUCERS NEED TO G ROW?

8.   WOULD WE LIMIT THE MARKET TO CANADIAN COMPANIES AND DOMESTIC SUPPLIERS?

9.   WHO WILL GROW IT?

10. 

WILL COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS BE ABLE T O PUT COMMERCIAL PRO TECTIONS ON

CERTAIN STRAINS, AND BRANDS? WHAT WILL BE THE POTENCY?

Page 71: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 71/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 29 of 38 

WHICH FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENTS WOULD BE INVOLVED

IN THE REGULATION, INSPECTION AND MONITORING OF PRODUCTION,

DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL SALES?

We recommend federal Ministers of Justice and Health be responsible for leading a policy

that would be developed with the support of a Special Cabinet Committee on Organized

Crime. The Committee would include Ministers for other federal departments with an

interest in the policy:

Solicitor General/RCMP

Ministry of Agriculture

Department of Finance

Department of Foreign Affairs

Canada Revenue Agency

Industry Canada

Human Resources DevelopmentPrivy Council Office/Intergovernmental Affairs

These federal agencies will be required to work with provincial counterparts and include an

emphasis on municipal affairs. We recommend this work be supported by an interim project

management authority and refer items to relevant House of Commons Committees.

Washington State’s proposal to transition from prohibition to taxation provides a preview of

the some administrative requirements agencies may need to consider in Canada. They

estimate a five-year cost of $65 million to fully implement a licensing, regulatory and taxation

plan for a market of 360,000 consumers. Supported by a Dedicated Marijuana Fund, theseoperating requirements include:

Liquor Control Board (LCB) for rulemaking, licensure and enforcement - $13.6 million

Departments of Social and Health Services for implementation services - $10 million

Washington State Patrol for additional training on marijuana impairment - $2 million

Department of Licensing to revoke licenses for driving under the influence - $425,000

Office of the Attorney General for legal services to LCB - $318,000

Washington State Patrol Toxicology Laboratory for blood testing cases - $125,000

Offices of the Attorney General and Administrative Hearings for appeals - $125,000

Department of Revenue to administer tax collection from license holders - $90,000Washington State Patrol for background checks for LCB license applicants - $28,000

Department of Agriculture to develop testing laboratory accreditation standards -

$26,000

Administrative Office of the Courts for information technology changes to the Judicial

Information System - $3,000

Washington State is proposing a one-year timeline to fully implement their system.

Page 72: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 72/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 30 of 38 

HOW WILL LEGALIZATION IMPACT CURRENT CONSUMERS?

We believe marijuana legalization will have a positive impact on the 3 million-plus annual

adult consumers in Canada. Among other things they will experience:

no more contact with illegal drug dealers and organized crimeaccess to safer and labeled product

reliable and convenient access

lower prices

increased access to treatment as needed

public benefits associated with reallocation of new government revenues

Non-adult marijuana users will experience significantly reduced access to marijuana and

more exposure to more education, awareness and prevention programs.

HOW MUCH WILL LEGAL MARIJUANA COST, WHERE WILL PEOPLE BE

ABLE TO PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE PACKAGED?

COST

To be successful and prevent organized crime from maintaining a black market, the price of

legal marijuana must be lower than it is now. At the same time, the product’s quality must be

at least as good – if not better.

In Canada, pricing legal marijuana should consider:

the black market cost of marijuana differs from one region to another

bulk purchase is encouraged in the black market - the more you buy, the cheaper it is

consumers commonly purchase either one gram, seven grams (1/4 ounce), 14 grams

(1/2 ounce) or 28 grams (one ounce) at a time

very few consumers purchase more than one or two ounces (28-56 grams) at a time

legal growers, distributors and retailers will still need to make a profit in a legal system

The 2009 RAND Corporation Report for the European Commission measured the street price of

cannabis around the world. They concluded the average price in Canada per bulk gram was

$6.50. The federal government initially set their price of medical marijuana in Canada at $5 persingle unit gram but with new rules it is expected to increase to at least $8 per single unit gram.

Meanwhile, Washington State expects their average retail price under their legalized system

will be $12 per gram. They have based this price on medical marijuana dispensaries and do not

assume any increased consumption or competition will reduce prices. Washington’s estimate

assumes a $3 per gram producer price and a $6 per gram processor price.

Page 73: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 73/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 31 of 38 

HOW MUCH WILL LEGAL MARIJUANA COST, WHERE WILL PEOPLE BE

ABLE TO PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE PACKAGED? (CONT.)

COST (CONT.) 

Based on these factors, we recommend the price of legal marijuana be lower than whatWashington State is proposing and at least 30-35% lower than the current black market price.

We think this is achievable because marijuana is relatively easy to produce and process. One of

the most significant costs of production now is the risk of being caught by authorities or being

robbed by a violent criminal.

We also recommend a new legal framework allow provinces to adopt pricing variations which

could facilitate the sale and marketing of “premium brands” – as is the case with alcohol today.

Subject to discussions with provincial authorities, consumers, potential producers and

distributors, here is a basic proposed price list for legal marijuana in Canada compared to thecurrent black market rates (all taxes included):

PACKAGING

Product packaging will be determined almost exclusively by market research and demand. The

vast majority of black market marijuana is sold in dried plant form in bag pouches.

Other than established labeling and product safety requirements, we recommend the new

framework allow consumers to have access to a variety of packaging options, which could

include rolled cigarettes, bag pouches, plastic jars/bottles, edible products and teas.

ILLEGALALL PROCEEDS TO ORGANIZED CRIME

 

1 gram - $10-$15

 

7 grams (quarter ounce) - $65-$80

 

14 grams (half ounce) - $120-$150

 

28 grams (ounce) - $220-$260

LEGALALL PROCEEDS TO TAXPAYERS 

 

1 gram - $6-$10

 

7 grams (quarter ounce) - $40-$50

 

14 grams (half ounce) - $90-$100

 

28 grams (ounce) - $140-$170

Page 74: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 74/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 32 of 38 

“Liquor store locations are usually discreet and not near schools and don’t have the product in window displays and have age-restriction protocols in place. It would be

the simplest business model that currently exists to use, so I would recommend it and

then gain consumer feedback over three years and see what changes the consumer

would like, balanced with any public safety concerns.”–  Marc Emery, Province Newspaper, November 9, 2012

HOW MUCH WILL LEGAL MARIJUANA COST, WHERE WILL PEOPLE BE

ABLE TO PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE PACKAGED? (CONT.) 

POINT OF PURCHASE

To many Canadians, point of purchase will be the most visible element of a new legal framework. 

For those who chose not to grow their own for personal use, we recommend legal marijuana be

sold to the public through specialty private stores and/or anywhere regulated liquor sales take

place. Limiting point of purchase to these locations will help ensure minors cannot come in

contact with the product.

We do not recommend allowing marijuana to be sold at convenience stores and gas stations as

is the case with tobacco, however provincial and municipal governments will have flexibility to

place reasonable restrictions on where people can consume and purchase cannabis – as is

currently done with alcohol and tobacco use. A license to sell would need to be obtained.

This approach reflects Washington’s State’s plan to require purchase through a Liquor Control

Board (LCB) licensee. Their plan makes no assumptions that a portion of users will purchase

from the illegal market or from medical marijuana retailers. They also make no assumptions

about consumer migration from out of state or the consumption of marijuana-infused products.

Washington’s proposal includes a $250 application fee and a $1,000 issuance/renewal fee for

each licensee. All fees will be deposited into the state’s Dedicated Marijuana Fund. Some

recovery fees will also be applied to licensees for activities related to enforcement of quality

control measures such as product sampling, testing, labeling and inspection.

To determine the number of retail outlets/licenses, Washington State plans to allow LCB to

caps retail licenses by county, consider population, security issues and discouraging purchases

from illegal markets. They expect over 320 retail outlets will serve their domestic annual

market of 360,000 consumers – or over 1100 per location.

At the same rate, Canadian businesses and non-profit organizations would need to staff over

2,700 retail locations to serve Canada’s three million annual consumers – creating significant

direct and indirect employment opportunities.

Page 75: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 75/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 33 of 38 

HOW WILL MARIJUANA BE TAXED, HOW WILL THIS REVENUE BE SHARED

BETWEEN VARIOUS LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND HOW WILL IT BE

REALLOCATED?

When considering the taxation rate on legal marijuana, it is worth noting that in some regions

of Canada, as much of 45% of the total cost of a package or carton of cigarettes is tax for the

government.

Washington State is projecting annual revenue of over $565 million by 2015 based on 360,000

annual consumers and excise taxes of 25% on the selling price on each wholesale and retail sale

of marijuana from a licensed producer, processor or retailer. State business and occupation

taxes will also apply to these activities.

Based on Washington State’s projections (363,000 consumers = $565 million annual revenue)

and in light of similar consumption and price trends in Canada, we conclude annual government

revenue in Canada from legalized marijuana based on 3 million annual consumers would likely

exceed $4 billion/year.

We recommend that 30-35% as the preferred tax rate of legalized marijuana in Canada. This

would include HST, GST and PST wherever relevant and some flexibility for provinces to

adjust rates.

In addition to the final tax rate, we also recommend local and provincial governments adopt a

cost recovery approach to the collection of business, licensing, inspection and workplace safety

fees and services.

We recommend the majority of new revenue from legalization be reinvested to strengthen

Canada’s public health care system in partnership with provincial governments. This should

include a special emphasis on mental illness, health promotion, addiction treatment and

community youth partnerships.

As an example, Washington State has identified funding priorities for some of their new

revenue. These include (figures are annual):

Health Care - $135 million

General Revenue - $45.7 millionInitiatives to prevent and reduce substance abuse - $36.6 million

Marijuana education and public health program - $24.4 million

University of Washington and Washington State University for research on effects of

marijuana use and development of web-based public education materials - $2.5 million

Page 76: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 76/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 34 of 38 

WHAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS WILL BE APPLICABLE TO THE

PRODUCERS AND DISTRIBUTERS?

In cooperation with provincial governments, we recommend the new framework include

comprehensive provisions to ensure quality control based on established standards for tobacco,

alcohol and hemp production – and compliance with municipal by-laws and business licensingrules.

In addition to site safety requirements and inspection powers for relevant federal agencies,

these guidelines should allow for various levels of THC, other cannabinoid content and cannabis

strains.

Washington State’s prohibition transition plan acknowledged a lack of sufficient data to

estimate the number of marijuana producers and marijuana processers they expect to apply for

a license. However, for 363,000 annual consumers they expect 100 marijuana producers and

55 processers. They also assume 50% of marijuana is produced and processed by the sameseller - with the rest produced and sold to a processor.

HOW MUCH MARIJUANA WOULD CANADIAN PRODUCERS NEED TO

GROW?

Producers will grow as much marijuana as needed to meet public demand – recognizing that

cannabis is a storable product that will maintain its quality over extended periods of time.

The 2009 RAND Corporation Report for the European Commission calculated the amount of

marijuana consumed in countries around the world. The report concluded that Canada’s 3

million annual cannabis consumers use 410 metric tonnes of marijuana – or 410 million grams.

Washington State measured frequency of consumption using the pattern contained in the UN

Office on Drug and Crime. The frequency ranged from a low of 18% using once a year to 3%

consuming daily. Applying this pattern and assuming 2 grams of marijuana per use, they

estimate 85 million grams are consumed annually per year to serve 360,000 annual consumers.

The same formula applied to Canada’s domestic market of 3 million annual consumers would

require the production of at least 800 million grams per year – or 800 metric tonnes.

WOULD WE LIMIT THE MARKET TO CANADIAN COMPANIES AND

DOMESTIC SUPPLIERS?

Based on our recommendation to apply a zero-tolerance to import/export of marijuana, we

recommend that the new Canadian legal framework limit market access to domestic suppliers.

Page 77: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 77/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 35 of 38 

WHO IS GOING TO GROW IT?

In addition to allowing individual Canadians to grow a limited number of marijuana plants for

personal use, we expect Canada’s private sector and local non-profit societies will likely be the

main producers, distributors and retailers of marijuana products.

We recommend that before final decisions are made about the structure of this new industry,

the federal government consult the sector and other interested parties as the new framework

is constructed. These discussions should focus on the roles of each level of government,

identifying consumer demands and the scope of a new regulatory framework.  Among other

things, we recommend these discussions include the following policy objectives: 

government should regulate but not have any direct ownership in any corporation that

produces marijuana

the market should be open to a large range of Canadian businesses from very small

farms to medium size and large-scale operationsdiscretion regarding the purchasing of marijuana rest primarily with entities that have

been licensed by provinces to sell it

flexibility for packaging options

establishment and enforcement of quality control and product safety standards by

relevant federal health and agriculture agencies

price controls to curtail black market

WILL COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS PLACE COMMERCIAL PROTECTIONS

ON STRAINS AND BRANDS? WHAT WILL BE THE POTENCY?

The new framework will respect Canada’s current laws and processes regarding patent and

trademark protection. However, we recommend this issue be explored more thoroughly to

consider which protections currently exist and new discoveries associated with a decade of

legal medical marijuana production. These discussions may also consider current models

applied in the agriculture sector regarding particular strains of products.

With regard to THC levels, as noted earlier in the paper, the new framework must ensure legal

marijuana is at least the same quality as to what is found on the street today – if not better.

According to the RCMP, Health Canada found an average THC level of 4.8% in marijuana sold on

the street in 1988. The average level was 11.1% in 2008.

We recommend the new framework allow for variance in THC rates and be subject to

consultation with various levels of government and potential sector partners. Marketing of

various premium brands should be allowed with the understanding that growing conditions

and THC level must be included on the product label. This can be based on current alcohol

content requirements for beer, wine and spirits.

Page 78: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 78/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 36 of 38 

SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. 

A growing number of Canadians and community leaders have joined the call to endmarijuana prohibition in Canada. However, there are legitimate questions about how

legalization would work and what the public impact will be.

2.  The five best reasons to end the current prohibition are:

Fight organized crime.

Significant new revenue will support important government services.

The current law does more harm than good.

Commitment to evidence-based policy instead of political ideology.

Millions are using cannabis now.

3. 

Decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana is a compromise that will please no

one. It would result in a system where it is legal to possess but not to sell or purchase.

Law enforcement agencies would remain in limbo.

4.  Changing opinions in the Unites States are weakening a long-standing obstacle to ending

the prohibition of cannabis in Canada.

5. 

While ending prohibition will require partnership with provincial and municipal

governments, the federal government must take the first step by introducing

legislation in the House of Commons that would be:

led by federal Ministers of Justice and Health and a special Cabinet Committeeon Organized Crime

responsive to feedback from provinces and provide administrative flexibility

overseen by an interim authority to implement and consult with stakeholders

subject to review by House of Commons Standing Committee

6.  Ending prohibition will have a positive impact of the Canadian economy. In addition to

generating an estimated $4 billion each year in new government revenue, there will be

thousands of new direct and indirect employment opportunities.

Page 79: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 79/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 37 of 38 

SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT.) 

7.  Ending prohibition will have a positive impact on public health and safety in Canada

by:

Regulating the sale, distribution, promotion and price of marijuana, making it

easier for government to prohibit youth access

Ensuring marijuana is grown in controlled and regulated settings with strict

labeling provisions to better protect the health of consumers and producers

Delivering billions in new government revenue which can be reinvested in public

health care – including mental illness, treatment, education and awareness

Expanding private sector and academic research into health impacts

Decreasing profit for organized crime, creating safer streets and communities – 

and less opportunity for young people to join gangs

Increasing availability of police resources to fight violent crime and other

revenue streams of organized crime

8. 

The new federal legal framework should include the following elements:

The minimum age of consumption should be same as alcohol for each province.

A revenue-sharing template with provinces.

Significant investments for youth health promotion initiatives.

Provisions for provincial and municipal governments to place reasonable

restrictions on where people can consume and purchase cannabis.

Comprehensive packaging, labeling, promotion, point of sale, price, quality andmarketing regulations

Provisions that allow individual Canadians to grow limited number of marijuana

plants for personal use.

Establish zero-tolerance and increase criminal penalties for import/export,

unregulated suppliers and trafficking to minors.

Reallocate police and law enforcement resources.

Tougher penalties for impaired driving

Limitation on the amount of marijuana a non-licensed vendor or distributor can

purchase or possess without obtaining a special permit.

Limit point of purchase to specialty stores and regulated liquor stores.

Enable open marketplace for wide range of Canadian businesses

Flexibility for variety of packaging options.

Process to clear records for Canadians with prior convictions for marijuana

possession.

Page 80: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 80/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 38 of 38 

NEXT STEPS

LPC-BC and YLC should distribute this policy paper to:

YLC and LPC-BC members and post on-line for public comment.

Liberal Party of Canada provincial associations across the country.

Federal Liberal Caucus members and invite their response.

Candidates seeking the leadership of the Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada with a

recommendation to:

  include the policy resolution to legalize marijuana that was approved by close

80% of delegates at the January 2012 Biennial Policy Conference in the next

election platform

 

consider paper as a foundation for the establishment of new policy framework

to facilitate the end of marijuana prohibition in Canada and proactively respond

to questions Canadians are rightfully asking about the proposal

Page 81: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 81/119

DRAFT RESOLUTION #4

THAT the following recommendation be endorsed by Nelson City Council and submittedto the Association of Kootenay & Boundary Local Governments at the Annual GeneralMeeting to be held in Kimberley on April 27 - 29, 2016

Revenue sharing from sale and distribution of legalized marijuana 

WHEREAS the Liberal Government of Canada has publicly declared its intention to

legalize, regulate and restrict access to marijuana with creation of a new system of

marijuana sales and distribution with appropriate federal and provincial excise taxes

applied;

 AND WHEREAS the new legal framework will not completely eliminate the costs

associated with enforcement initiatives related to drugs in Canada, it is expected they

will be significantly reduced, providing the federal government opportunities to redirect

savings and invest in youth engagement and prevention programs and initiatives that

include community partnerships with provincial and municipal governments;

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

The Union of BC Municipalities petition the Government of Canada to share a portion of

revenues realized from the legalization and regulation of marijuana together with a

share of savings realized from reduced enforcement costs with provincial and municipal

governments given the marked impact that marijuana sales and distribution will have

upon Canadian communities and the need for direct investments to youth engagement

initiatives not limited to recreation, employment, community and cultural programs.

Page 82: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 82/119

 

Page 83: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 83/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 2 of 38 

“Bearing in mind $1 million/ year buys roughly 12 new cops, 14 teachers or public

health nurses, ask yourself: Couldn’t ($400 million in law enforcement, court and

corrections) be bett er spent? The federal Liberal Party obviously thinks so…”  –  Ian Mulgrew, Vancouver Sun, January 18, 2012

Table of Contents

Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3

Policy Resolution 117: Legalize and Regulate Marijuana ............................................................................ 4

Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 5Questions .................................................................................................................................................... 8

Policy.........................................................................................................................................................9

International Response ........................................................................................................................ 11

Legal ...................................................................................................................................................... 11

Public Health ....................................................................................................................................... 121 

Logistics ................................................................................................................................................ 13

Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 17

Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................. 38

“Legalize weed, yes, but the devil is in the details…Although polls suggest

Canadians support the idea of legalizing marijuana in general, they’ll want to see

a detailed plan before backing the idea unreservedly. That’s where the work

needs to be done now by the drug reform proponents.”  –  Gary Mason, Globe and Mail, Feb 2012 

Page 84: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 84/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 3 of 38 

INTRODUCTION

In January 2012, close to 80% of delegates attending the Liberal Party of Canada's Biennial

Policy convention in Ottawa voted in favour of a policy resolution co-sponsored by the Liberal

Party of Canada - British Columbia (LPC-BC) and the Young Liberals of Canada (YLC) to:

LEGALIZE marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production,

distribution, and use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal

importation and exportation, and impaired driving

INVEST significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to

promote awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and

dependency, especially amongst youth

EXTEND amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana

possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related thereto

WORK with the provinces and local governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory

approach to marijuana which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana

control while respecting provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns

and practices

Since the resolution was approved a growing number of Canadians and community leaders

have joined the call to end marijuana prohibition in Canada. At the same time, LPC-BC’s

Standing Policy Committee has been working with the YLC to prepare this paper.

In addition to capturing progress over the past year, the goal of this paper is to provide some

answers to legitimate questions Canadians have about the impact of implementing this policy.

Some questions are answered in one sentence. Others are more complex and require ongoingcivil dialogue. In total, close to 40 questions have been identified in five categories:

1. 

Policy

2. 

International Response

3.  Legal

4.  Public Health

5. 

Logistics

From the answers to these questions, a framework for legalization emerges – which is

summarized at the conclusion of this paper with suggested next steps.

This paper is not an academic research essay. It is intended to be a practical, plain language

and political document that takes the policy resolution approved by Liberals across Canada in

 January 2012 to its next logical step.

Page 85: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 85/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 4 of 38 

POLICY RESOLUTION 117: LEGALIZE AND REGULATE MARIJUANA

Passed January 15 2012 at the Ottawa 2012 Biennial Convention

WHEREAS, despite almost a century of prohibition, millions of Canadians today regularly consume

marijuana and other cannabis products;

WHEREAS the failed prohibition of marijuana has exhausted countless billions of dollars spent onineffective or incomplete enforcement and has resulted in unnecessarily dangerous and expensive

congestion in our judicial system;

WHEREAS various marijuana decriminalization or legalization policy prescriptions have been

recommended by the 1969-72 Commission of Enquiry into the Non-Medical Use of Drugs, the 2002

Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, and the 2002 House of Commons Special

Committee on the Non-Medical Use of Drugs;

WHEREAS the legal status quo for the criminal regulation of marijuana continues to endanger Canadians

by generating significant resources for gang-related violent criminal activity and weapons smuggling  – a

reality which could be very easily confronted by the regulation and legitimization of Canada’s marijuana

industry;

BE IT RESOLVED that a new Liberal government will:

legalize marijuana and ensure the regulation and taxation of its production, distribution, and

use, while enacting strict penalties for illegal trafficking, illegal importation and exportation, and

impaired driving;

invest significant resources in prevention and education programs designed to promote

awareness of the health risks and consequences of marijuana use and dependency, especially

amongst youth;

extend amnesty to all Canadians previously convicted of simple and minimal marijuana

possession, and ensure the elimination of all criminal records related theretowork with governments of Canada on a coordinated regulatory approach to marijuana

which maintains significant federal responsibility for marijuana control while respecting

provincial health jurisdiction and particular regional concerns and practices.

“After the resolution on marijuana today, there is going to be a group of even happier people

in the Liberal Party…If you want to be part of a free-thinking, innovative, thoughtful,

 pragmatic, hopeful, positive, happy people, come and join the Liberal Party of Canada.”  

- Interim Liberal Party of Canada Leader Bob Rae, January 15, 2012

Page 86: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 86/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 5 of 38 

OVERVIEW

A growing number of community and opinion leaders agree the current prohibition of cannabis

is only serving to protect the status quo for organized crime of rich profits, stockpiled weapons

and public executions.

Opinion polls reaffirm the Canadian public is ahead of the current federal government on this

issue. A 2012 poll from Toronto’s Forum Research just after the resolution to lega lize marijuana

was approved at the Liberal Party of Canada’s Policy Convention determined:

60% of respondents in every province support reform of marijuana laws - BC is most

supportive (73%)

the largest demographic group that supports reform of current law is 55 to 64

most favour full legalization and taxation over decriminalization of possession (40-26%)

NDP supporters were the most likely to say they were for easing of current laws (71%),

followed by Liberal supporters (64%) and Conservative supporters (59%)

Subsequent polls have suggested support continues to rise for legalization and regulation.

Here is a summary of other reports that have been published since January:

January 16, 2012 - “A new spirit of openness and a policy in favour of legalizing and

regulating pot will help breathe life into the Liberal Party in western Canada, party members

said Sunday...” –  Peter O’Neil, Vancouver Sun 

January 17, 2012  – “It is an excellent idea, and the resolution ticks all the correct boxes by

way of justifying it: marijuana’s widespread and safe use, revenue savings and generationthrough taxation, and the fact that it would make Canadians safer from criminal violence.” -

Chris Selly, National Post  

January 19, 2012  – “The Liberals are right to make it a political issue…One (Liberal) goal must

be to better differentiate the party from the ruling Conservatives, and in that respect, a new

policy on cannabis legalization represents a start.” (Globe and Mail editorial) 

February 15, 2012  – Four former BC Attorneys Generals write an open letter saying, “The

case demonstrating the failure and harms of marijuana prohibition is airtight. The evidence?

Massive profits for organized crime, wide-spread gang violence, easy access to illegal cannabis

for our youth, reduced community safety, and significant – and escalating – cost to taxpayers.” 

“ Hallelujah! Canadians agree it’s time to legalize marijuana”

- January 18, 2012 , Vancouver Sun Headline 

Page 87: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 87/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 6 of 38 

February 17, 2012  – The Vancouver Sun endorses legalizing marijuana.

March 28, 2012  – BC’s Provincial Health Officer and Nova Scotia’s Chief Public Health Officer

say Canada should consider the model used to control and tax the sale of tobacco and alcohol

with marijuana as a way to crack down on organized crime, control availability and influence

“cultural norms”. (Globe and Mail) 

 April 27, 2012   – Eight BC Mayors write a letter to provincial political leaders calling for an

end to marijuana prohibition...North Vancouver Mayor Darrell Mussatto says, “We think our

communities will be safer and our children better protected from criminal elements if we

overturn marijuana prohibition.” Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan says, “We put our citizens and

communities at risk by not talking action now.” (Province Newspaper) 

July 2, 2012  – A nationwide survey concludes 66% of Canadians think the law should be

changed so people caught with small amounts of marijuana no longer face criminal penalties.

Support is strongest in Atlantic Canada (72%) followed by BC, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and

Ontario (69%). Support is lowest in Alberta (42%). (Postmedia, Global TV) 

 August 24, 2012   – Due to a lack of resources, “Canadian border agents have been told to

stop looking for illegal drugs leaving the country and instead focus on stopping the export of

illicit nuclear material and stolen cars. The directive is unlikely to make US and other countries

very happy.” (Postmedia News)

September 27, 2012  – Hundreds of BC municipal leaders joined a vote for a policy resolution

at their annual conference to encourage the provincial government to research the regulation

and taxation of marijuana.

December 1, 2012  – A shortage of treatment facilities where drug-addicted parents can stay

with their children is having a devastating impact on at-risk youth in BC, advocates say. (Victoria

Times Colonist) 

December 5, 2012  – Health Canada is preparing to publish new regulations to its medical

marijuana access program that could make doctors the sole gatekeepers of the drug. The

President of the Canadian Medical Association says the proposed changes could see fewer

doctors willing to prescribe it. (Sharon Kirkey, Postmedia News) 

“As Washington State and Colorado voters now have shown, measures for legalizing the recreational use of

 pot increasingly appear to make sense. They may even help turn some young people off the drug. How thento proceed? Well, we obviously have to sort out the various federal/provincial jurisdictional niceties. And we

have to find a workable means of licensing, distributing and selling cannabis. Actually, we in BC already have

one –  our provincial liquor store system, which for all its faults, appears well-suited to handle

the drug and ensure it isn’t sold over the counter to kids.”

–  Jon Ferry, Province Newspaper, November 2012 

Page 88: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 88/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 7 of 38 

December 7, 2012  – Seattle smokes up – legally. First state to allow personal marijuana use

stands to fill coffers. (Vancouver Sun) 

“The result (of marijuana prohibition) is that thousands of otherwise respectable

 people, including lawyers, professors, bus drivers and yes, even journalists, engage in arecreational habit that risks a criminal record. But it’s not them I’m particularly

concerned with.

 Aside from making an ass of the law, the marijuana business –  one of the most

lucrative in BC –  enriches all the wrong people, and at no benefit to the community.

The scum who kill in cold blood to protect their turf are the beneficiaries of a

gratuitous shower of riches even Croesus would envy.

Would legalization make marijuana more widely available? Rather the opposite if itwere subject to proper retail controls, as is liquor.

Would it be safer for white-collar professionals indulging at weekends? Certainly.

Would we have at our disposal greater resources for research into addictions, both

alcohol and drug related? Of course. Would legal marijuana put us on a slippery stop

to moral decay? I doubt it.

But I do know it would put a crippling dent in the obscene profits of the drug lords and

their trigger-happy assassins for whom the present law is just dandy, thank you.”  - 

 Alan Ferguson, Province Newspaper column, June 3, 2008

Page 89: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 89/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 8 of 38 

“Everyone believes…that the current approach is not working, but it’s not clear

what we should do.”

–  Prime Minister Stephen Harper, April 17, 2012

QUESTIONS

As support for the policy to legalize, tax and regulate marijuana has increased over the past

year, Canadians have asked legitimate questions about how this policy can be implemented in a

practical and organized way. This happened at the end of alcohol prohibition too.

The goal of this paper is to answer common questions and gather the answers into a draft

policy framework. The questions are identified in five categories:

1.  Policy

2.  International Response

3. 

Legal

4.  Public Health

5.  Logistics

The answers are based on survey responses, new laws in Colorado and Washington, existingCanadian laws and policies, literature and publication reviews.

Page 90: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 90/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 9 of 38 

POLICY

WHY DO WE WANT TO LEGALIZE MARIJUANA?

While there are many, we focus on five reasons Canada should legalize and regulate marijuana.

1.  Fight organized crime.

2.  Use the new revenue to support important government services.

3.  The current law does more harm than good. In addition to filling bank accounts of

criminals, prohibition delivers:

uncontrolled access for youth – and first contact with organized crime

no product safety and labeling standards for millions of consumers

criminal records for thousands of average Canadians

a significant burden on government budgets to enforce and prosecute

4. 

Millions already consume marijuana in Canada each year.

5.  Promotion of evidence-based policy instead of political ideology. The current law is not

achieving its goal to prevent use – particularly among youth who enjoy uncontrolled

access now. A growing number of community leaders, researchers, opinion leaders andvoters agree it is time to reconsider prohibition.

COMMONLY ASKED POLICY QUESTIONS ABOUT LEGALIZING MARIJUANA:

1. 

WHY DO WE WANT TO LEG ALIZE IT?2.   WHY NOT DECRIMINALIZATION INSTEAD OF LEGALIZATION?

3.   WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TAXATION AND REGULATION?

4.   SHOULD IT BE PART OF A FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL AGREEMENT?

5.   WHAT WOULD BE THE LEGAL AGE TO CONSUME IT?

6.   WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO CONSUME IN PUBLIC OR AROUND CHILDREN?

7.   SHOULD LEGALIZATION EXTEND TO OTHER DRUGS?

8. 

HOW WOULD THIS IMPACT PEOPLE AUTHORIZED TO USE IT FOR MED ICAL PURPOSES?

9.   WHAT WILL BE THE TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT?

10 . HOW WILL WE GUARANTEE THAT THERE WILL NOT CONTINUE TO BE A BLACK MARKET?

Page 91: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 91/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 10 of 38 

WOULD A SYSTEM OF PARTIAL LEGALIZATION LIKE DECRIMINALIZATION

BE OPTIMAL INSTEAD?

No. Decriminalization of small amounts would lead to a system where it is legal to possess but

not supply. Without legalizing production, sale and consumption together, organized crime

will continue to meet the market demand and law enforcement agencies and health care

professionals will remain in limbo.

WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TAXATION AND REGULATION OF

MARIJUANA? SHOULD LEGALIZATION BE PART OF A

FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL AGREEMENT?

While the implementation of a regulated system must include collaboration with provincial

and local governments, the Government of Canada must demonstrate leadership and take

the first step. We recommend this first step to be a legal framework which:

Is led by federal Ministers of Justice and Health

Developed by a special Cabinet Committee on Organized Crime

Reflects feedback from provinces and provides administrative flexibility

Includes a federal/provincial regulatory and revenue-sharing agreement based on

models established for the production, distribution and sale of alcohol and tobacco

Establishes an interim authority to oversee implementation

Is subject to review by a House of Commons Standing Committee

Once the law is approved in Parliament, provincial and local governments would be expected to

respect its provisions – as they do now with other controlled substances.

WHAT WOULD BE THE LEGAL AGE FOR CONSUMPTION?

We recommend the legal age for consumption be the same as alcohol for each province.

SHOULD LEGALIZATION EXTEND TO OTHER DRUGS?

No. Police, justice and correction resources should be redirected to support violent crime

investigations and attack other revenue streams of organized crime.

Page 92: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 92/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 11 of 38 

WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO CONSUME MARIJUANA IN PUBLIC OR

AROUND CHILDREN?

Provincial and municipal governments should have some flexibility within the federal regulatory

framework to place reasonable restrictions on where people can consume and purchase

cannabis – as is currently done with alcohol and tobacco use. This would include activities to

protect the health and well-being of children and employees.

Washington State is proposing to prohibit the consumption of marijuana in public places where

alcohol is banned and federal facilities (military bases, national parks, etc). Failure to comply in

Washington is subject to a fine of $100 however police officers are not yet issuing tickets.

WHAT WILL BE THE TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LEGALIZATION?

The economic impact of legalizing marijuana in Canada would be very positive for the

government and taxpayers. The full scale of this benefit is the only question and it has beenthe subject of increasing study. Here are some recent examples:

Washington State estimates a fully functioning marijuana market will generate over $1.9

billion over five years – based on 360,000 annual consumers. 

A November 2012 research paper from Simon Fraser University published in the

International Journal of Drug Policy concluded legalizing marijuana in BC may generate

$2.5 billion in government tax and licensing revenues over five years – based on a

domestic provincial market of over 400,000 annual consumers

A 2009 report from the RAND Corporation for the European Commission concluded

global retail expenditures on cannabis ranged from €40-120 billion ($60-180 billion CDN)

 – based on a global market of over 200 million consumers.

RAND’s 2009 report estimates Canada’s annual retail cannabis market at .29% of GDP or

€2.769 billion ($3 – 4 billion CDN) – based on a market of 3 million annual consumers

A 2004 Fraser Institute study estimated BC’s marijuana crop’s value at 2-4% of the

province’s GDP. 

New revenues will be complemented by the ability to reallocate law enforcement, correction,

border and justice resources.

Thousands of Canadians will also find direct and indirect employment. Opportunities include:

agriculture, technology and energy supply

specialty retail stores

transportation, distribution, packaging and manufacturing

inspectors, engineers, quality controllers, licensing officers and health researchers

legal, insurance, financial and accounting services

marketing, communication, tourism and public education

alternative products - non-smokable, cosmetic products, building materials, fabrics

Page 93: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 93/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 12 of 38 

WOULD PEOPLE CONSUMING MARIJUANA FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES

CONTINUE TO BE IN A SPECIAL CATEGORY?

The regulations exempting medical use of marijuana are only necessary because of the current

law. With the end of prohibition, there will be no need for this legal exemption – which has

proven difficult to manage for many patients, doctors, designated growers, municipal

authorities and law enforcement personnel.

In addition to saving tax dollars, replacing the federal medical marijuana program with a new

legal framework may encourage doctors and researchers to more freely explore health impacts,

alternatives to smoking and potential for inclusion of medical use in provincial health insurance

programs.

HOW WILL WE GUARANTEE THAT THERE STILL WON’T BE A BLACK

MARKET FOR MARIJUANA?While ending prohibition will put many criminals out of work, it won’t end organized crime.

That said, black market sales of illegal alcohol and tobacco have not become a problem post-

prohibition.

Ongoing vigilance will be required and the federal government should develop a

comprehensive set of policies to attach organized crime through the Special Cabinet Committee

we have proposed.

However, strategic elements of a legal framework can help prevent a marijuana black market

from re-emerging:

ensure the legal price is lower than the current price and quality is equal – or better

ensure packaging reflects consumer demand and product is accessible for adults

establish zero-tolerance on import/export

increase criminal penalties for export, unregulated suppliers and trafficking to minors

reallocate some police and law enforcement resources to border patrol

allow opportunities for Canadians to continue to grow limited amounts of marijuana

for personal use

Page 94: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 94/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 13 of 38 

INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE 

Background – United Nations

Canada is a party to three international conventions that regulate drug control:

  Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961 (“1961 Convention”) 

 

Convention on Psychotropic Substances, 1971 (“1971 Convention”) 

  1988 United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances (“1988 Convention”).

Article 3, paragraph 2 of the 1988 UN Convention requires that:

 

“Each Party shall adopt such measures as may be necessary under its domestic law, when

committed intentionally, the possession, purchase or cultivation of narcotic drugs or

 psychotropic substances for personal consumption contrary to the provisions of the 1961

Convention, the 1961 Convention as amended or the 1971 Convention.” (Marijuana is one

such substance)

COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POTENTIAL INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO

ENDING MARIJUANA PROHIBITION IN CANADA:

1.   ARE WE ALLOWED TO LEGALIZE IT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW? IS IT AGAINST

CANADA’S TREATY? 

2. 

HOW CAN WE DO THIS W ITH THE UNITED STATES SO OPPOSED?

3.   HOW WILL WE CONTROL CROSS-BORDER TRAFFICKING?

4.   IS THE ILLICIT MARIJUANA TRADE IN C ANADA CONNECTED TO VIOLENT CARTELS IN

MEXICO, CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA?

Page 95: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 95/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 14 of 38 

ARE WE ALLOWED TO LEGALIZE IT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW?

IS IT AGAINST CANADA’S TREATY OBLIGATIONS?

This question is more common with government than the general public. Here are four answers:

1. 

Canada is a sovereign country - free to make our own laws through a democraticallyelected government in the House of Commons.

2. 

Other UN member countries have already improved their marijuana laws without

sanction.

3.  Canada should lead a movement to amend out-of-date international conventions to

reflect changes in medical evidence and international consumption rates. They have

been used as an excuse for inaction and regressive thinking for too long.

4. 

Canada has rights to withdraw from these UN conventions, as granted in the articles ofeach convention - exercisable by written notification to the UN Secretary-General.

Withdrawal would take effect one year after the date notification was received.

While some may still make the case that legalization is prima facie inconsistent with Canada’s

international legal obligations, Canada’s Special Senate Committee on Illegal Drugs identified

a number of factors in 2002 that provide state parties to these conventions with leeway

around strict application. For example:

Review, amendment and withdrawal mechanisms exist in the Conventions. (see answer

four above)

The conventions impose moral obligations on states, not legal ones. There are nopenalties or sanctions for violating the conventions other than a public rebuke by some

of the signatories.

Page 96: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 96/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 15 of 38 

HOW CAN WE LEGALIZE MARIJUANA IF THE UNITED STATES IS SO

OPPOSED TO IT?

This is an important question because the US is Canada’s most important international ally and

trading partner. The issue will continue to evolve against prohibition in the US with successful

November 2012 state referendums to legalize, tax and regulate marijuana in Colorado and

Washington state. This is reinforced by the subsequent reluctance of the US President to

enforce federal laws in these states.

In this light of these recent developments and estimates more than 25 million Americans

consume marijuana each year (RAND 2009), here are two answers to this question:

1. 

Public opinion is changing in the United States which does not appear to be as opposed

to the idea of legalization as they may have been in the past.

2.  Canada is a sovereign country and our domestic policies regarding crime prevention and

public health should not be dictated from Washington DC. While, federal Liberal

governments have a long history of co-operation with the US on a wide range of social,

economic and global issues, we also are not afraid of respectful disagreement. Recent

examples include made in Canada decisions to:

stay out of the Iraq war

recognize gay marriage

aggressively label tobacco products with health warnings

legalize marijuana for compassionate medical purposes

HOW WILL WE CONTROL INTERNATIONAL TRADE OF CANNABIS? WILL

CANADIANS BE ABLE TO TRAVEL WITH IT?

Out of respect to other countries that may not share Canada’s progressive views, we

recommend the government maintain a zero-tolerance of any import or export of marijuana – 

including countries and states that have decriminalized or ended prohibition.

To enforce this zero-tolerance policy, we recommend dramatically increasing criminal penalties

for the export of marijuana and reallocation of some domestic marijuana enforcement

resources to border patrol and intelligence. The vast majority of these resources would be

allocated at US border crossings.

Page 97: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 97/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 16 of 38 

“It is time to stop being dumb witnesses to a global deceit.”  - Guatemala President Otto Perez, April 13, 2012 

IS CANADA’S MARIJUANA TRADE CONNECTED TO VIOLENT CARTELS IN

MEXICO, CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA?

Numerous public and public police reports connect Canada’s marijuana industry to

international drug and weapons smuggling – including violent cartels operating in Mexico,

Central and South America. Here are some recent examples:

 April 18, 2012  - Linking the trade in B.C.-grown marijuana to drug violence in Mexico

and the United States, a former U.S. federal prosecutor has added his voice to a growing

chorus in favour of legalizing pot. “Gangs affiliated with dangerous drug cartels are

distributing marijuana grown in British Columbia – it’s being exchanged for guns and

cocaine that come up here [to BC]” John McKay, a former U.S. federal prosecutor, said

at a press conference in a downtown Vancouver hotel on Wednesday. “So the negative

impact of that is more than just proceeds going to Mexican drug cartels, but also what’s

coming back to Canada because of this production.” (Globe and Mail) 

 August 29, 2012   – “A fugitive Hells Angel wanted in connection with an alleged drug-

trafficking operation turned himself in at the Burnaby RCMP detachment Tuesday…The

charges follow a 21-month investigation into allegations that marijuana grown in BC’s

southeast was being sold in BC and elsewhere to fund the import of cocaine to

Canada…Mounties seized $4 million in the weekend ra id, including a plastic bag of $100

bills that was spotted with mould.” (Vancouver Sun) 

September 13, 2012  – “The number of gang-affiliate federal prisoners has increased

32% to more than 2300 in the past five years…Considering what smart people around

the globe have said for half a century, I say legalize pot. We have created a massive

underground global economy that generates billions for organized crime – drug profits

are the vital lifeblood of gangs, the primary source of disposable income supporting

their lifestyle and conspicuous consumption…The recent spate of killings should trigger

a realistic public discussion, one that considers radical solutions and broadens our

approach to dealing with gangs.” –  Ian Mulgrew, Vancouver Sun 

November 21, 2012  – Police allege marijuana grow-ops in the BC Okanagan area

were used to fund the importation of cocaine into Canada. They say they seized more

than $4 million in drug money during the 20 month operation. (Province Newspaper) 

Over the past year, leaders of Mexico, Central and South America have called on the United

States to reconsider the war on drugs and join a growing discussion about a new approach

that attacks the profit and business model of organized crime.

Page 98: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 98/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 17 of 38 

LEGAL

WHAT CANADIAN LAWS NEED TO BE CHANGED?

A new legal framework must repeal Schedule II of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act ,

establish new penalties for operating outside of the legal system, create a new taxation and

regulatory structure that reflects discussions with provinces and other stakeholders.

WHAT HAVE THE COURTS SAID ABOUT THE CURRENT LAW?

We feel legalization of marijuana should be achieved through the political process – not

imposed by courts. It is important for the Liberal Party of Canada to include ending prohibition

in its next platform as a strategy to combat organized crime. This will ensure a mandate for

change is offered to the majority of Canadians who want cannabis regulated and taxed.

Most recent court rulings on the legalization of marijuana have been focused on medical use.

Judgments have regularly favoured more access over less. Conclusions from these decisions

should be considered as a legal framework is developed. These may include:

It is likely possession can’t be legalized without provisions for purchase and supply -

an argument against a half-measure of decriminalizing possession of small amounts

any new policy framework would likely need to allow for alternative uses and

derivatives - including non-smokable and food products

people would likely be free to grow their own for personal use under a legalized

system – just as some make their own beer or wine today

the government should not overly limit supply options for consumers

In the absence of a progressive federal government, proponents may continue to initiate

expensive court challenges against prohibition in the future.

COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT LEGAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEGALIZATION OF

MARIJUANA:

1. 

WHAT LAW(S) NEED TO BE CHANGED?2.   WHAT HAVE THE COURTS SAID ABOUT THE CURRENT LAW?

3.   IS THE CURRENT LAW BEING ENFORCED? HOW MANY RESOURCES ARE ALLOCATED TO

MARIJUANA CONTROL NOW AND WOULD THOSE COSTS BE ELIMINATED IF IT WAS LEGALIZED?

4.   WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO GROW IT IN THEIR HOMES IF WE LEGALIZE IT?

5.   SHOULD THERE BE LIMITS PLACED ON THE A MOUNT ONE CAN POSSESS A ND/OR PURCHASE?

6.   WHAT WILL BE THE PENALTIES FOR PEOPLE WHO OPERATE OUTSIDE THE LEGAL SYSTEM?

7.   HOW WILL WE ENFORCE IMPAIRED DRIVING LAWS? WILL THEY NEED TO CHANGE?

8.   WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO CRIMINAL RECORDS OF PEOPLE CHARGED FOR MARIJUANA RELATED

OFFENCES?

Page 99: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 99/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 18 of 38 

“Across Canada 28,183 people were charged with possession of marijuana last

year, or about 81 charges per 100,000 people. According to a 2011 Health Canada

survey, about 9% of Canadians over 15 used marijuana in the past year. That

suggests one in 90 pot users was criminally charged.”  - Vancouver Sun, Zoe McKnight, November 2012 

IS THE CURRENT LAW BEING ENFORCED? HOW MANY RESOURCES ARE

ALLOCATED TO MARIJUANA CONTROL AND WOULD THEY BE

ELIMINATED OR REDUCED IF MARIJUANA WAS L EGALIZED?

The current law is not being enforced equally across Canada. In some jurisdictions, possession

is prosecuted vigorously. In others, charges are often not filed. Sentencing provisions are

similarly unequal across Canada.

Regarding the costs of enforcing the current law, these are often buried in operating budgets ofthe border agency, police, correction service and courts  – making them difficult to calculate.

However, 2005 federal Treasury Board documents published by the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal

Network suggest $368 million was spent that year on addressing illicit drugs. Of this, 73% ($271

million) was targeted to enforcement initiatives such as border control ($80 million), RCMP

investigations ($75 million), drug analysis services ($8 million) and federal prosecutions ($90

million).

While a legal framework will not eliminate these costs, we expect they will be reduced

significantly with opportunities to redirect savings to youth programs, border protection,addressing violent crimes, attacking other profits of organized crime and community

partnerships with provincial and municipal governments.

WILL PEOPLE BE ALLOWED TO GROW IT IN THEIR HOMES FOR

PERSONAL CONSUMPTION OR PRIVATE SALE?

Yes. While we expect the interest or need for individuals to grow their own to be greatly

reduced post-prohibition, it should not – and likely could not - be eliminated. At the same time,

sale of marijuana should be limited to businesses and require proper licensing.

The State of Colorado is planning to impose a limit of six plants per person as part of their

legalization plan scheduled to take effect in January 2013. We believe a maximum number of

plants for personal use should be determined following consultation with provinces, local

governments and other stakeholders.

Page 100: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 100/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 19 of 38 

SHOULD THERE BE LIMITS PLACED ON THE AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA

ONE CAN POSSESS AND/OR PURCHASE?

Yes. While we expect there will be little need for Canadian adults to “stock-up” on product if

quality cannabis is legal and readily available, we are concerned about the potential for

organized crime to easily stockpile legal product for smuggling to other countries.

According to consumption statistics (RAND 2009), monthly marijuana users in Canada consume

an average of 1 gram per day – or one ounce (28 grams) each month. Washington State plans

to allow adults to possess only one ounce of marijuana at a time.

We feel Washington’s one ounce limit may create unnecessary, ongoing enforcement

requirements and restrict people growing their own for personal use - where one plant may

yield more than an ounce of product.

In this light we recommend a four ounce (.10 kg) limitation be considered for the amount a

non-licensed vendor or distributor can purchase or possess without obtaining a special permit,

subject to consultation with consumers, distributors, law enforcement and producers. We feel

this is reasonable and akin to purchasing a 40 or 60 oz. bottle of vodka or whisky a couple times

a year instead of buying a small bottle each month.

Other limits would need to be established for cannabis-infused goods, plants for personal use

and marijuana in liquid form. Washington State has established a 16 ounce (.45kg) possession

limit on cannabis-infused goods or up to 72 ounces (2.4kg) for cannabis in liquid form.

WHAT WILL BE THE PENALTIES FOR PEOPLE WHO OPERATE OUTSIDE

THE LEGAL SYSTEM?

As marijuana will be legal, tougher penalties and sentences are justified for those operating

outside the legal system – particularly those attempting to sell marijuana to minors and/or

smuggle it into other countries for cash, other drugs and weapons. That said, experience with

the end of alcohol prohibition and tobacco regulation suggests few Canadians will be interested

in the black market as long as the product is more accessible, as good and less expensive.

Page 101: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 101/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 20 of 38 

What is THC?

“THC is Tetrahydrocannabinol - the principal psychoactive constituent of the cannabis plant. The amount

of THC in marijuana ranges from 1% to 20% and depends on how it was grown, the genetic makeup of the

plant and the amount of flower parts, leaves, stems and seeds. In hash THC amounts vary depending on

the source and how it is prepared. Hash oil generally contains 10% to 20% and considered the most

concentrated form of the drug.”  –  Health Canada | November 2012 

HOW WILL WE ENFORCE IMPAIRED DRIVING LAWS? WILL THEY NEED

TO CHANGE?

Driving impaired as a result of marijuana use is already against the law in all jurisdictions in

Canada. Provincial governments are able to introduce new regulations regarding impaired

driving as they choose this should be reaffirmed in a new federal framework.

However, we support increased penalties for all impaired drivers and providing police with

more accurate tools to detect when motorists are under the influence of marijuana. With

legalization, we recommend the federal government invest revenues to improve detection

technology, training support and research regarding effects of cannabis use and intoxication.

We also recommend monitoring the results of Washington State’s proposal to establish

presumptive levels of intoxication for THC concentration when a driver is arrested for suspicion

of being under the influence. These have been set at 0.0 for drivers under the age of 21 and 5

nanograms/milliliter of blood for drivers aver 21. Washington’s Licensing Department will be

able to revoke the driver’s license of a person who tests above the presumptive level of THC.

WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO CRIMINAL RECORDS OF CANADIANS CONVICTED

OF MARIJUANA RELATED OFFENCES?

A survey prepared for this paper invited federal Liberals and British Columbians to answer this

question. Of the 1000 respondents, approximately 80% said Canadians with prior convictions

for marijuana possession should have their records cleared. We agree.

Canadians convicted of trafficking marijuana or those who have been charged outside of

Canada should continue to have access to exiting processes associated with pardons, clemency

and the purging of records where minor infractions are involved.

Page 102: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 102/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 21 of 38 

“A 2010 Health Canada survey indicates that about 366,000 Br itish Columbians use

marijuana, almost exactly the number as in Washington State. “  - Province Newspaper, November 21, 2012

PUBLIC HEALTH

Common questions about the public health implications of marijuana use and the impact

legalization may or may not have:

1.  How many Canadians use it, how much do they use and how many are under 18?

2.  What are the health implications of chronic, moderate and occasional consumption?

3.  What are the public health impacts of legalizing it – or not?

4. 

Would legalization increase the number of consumers?

HOW MANY CANADIANS CONSUME MARIJUANA ON A REGULAR BASIS?

HOW MUCH DO THEY USE AND HOW MANY ARE UNDER THE AGE OF18?

In its 2011 report, the UN Office for Drugs and Crime estimated 5% of the world’s population

(230 million) used illegal drugs at least once in 2010. Cannabis was identified as the mostwidely used illegal drug in the world (estimated at 125 to 200 million people).

A breakdown of 2005 UN figures estimate Canada’s consumption rate to be one of the highest

in the world at 17% of the population aged 15 to 64 – much higher than Asia (2%), Europe (5%)

and the United States (12%). This translates to 3 million Canadians using marijuana each year.

These figures are similar to a 2009 report from the RAND Corporation for the European

Commission that generated country-level consumption and retail expenditure estimates for

cannabis. Among other things, the RAND report concluded:

global retail expenditures on cannabis range from €40-120 billion ($50-150 billion CDN)each year

Canada’s annual retail cannabis market is best estimated at €2.769 billion ($4 – 5 billion

CDN) or .29% of GDP

An estimated 2 million Canadians over 15 consume cannabis at least once a month and

3.4 million once a year

Monthly users consume an average of 2.5 cigarettes – or 1 gram – each day

Annual users in Canada consume an average of 1.25 cigarettes - or .5 grams – each day

Average total of marijuana in each Canadian marijuana cigarette is just under .5 grams

Page 103: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 103/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 22 of 38 

“Numbers supplied by the Toronto-based Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

study show the percentage of the population 50 and older indulging (in marijuana)

has increased 500% since a 1977 report, with them now making up 14% of dope

smokers. When the study looked at the general population, it found puffing pot

was going up in almost every age group. People who admitted smoking cannabis intheir latest study jumped from just under 9% to more than 13%; 30-49 year olds

had doubled their use.”- Postmedia News, David Sherman, November 24, 2012

HOW MANY CANADIANS CONSUME MARIJUANA HOW MANY ARE

UNDER THE AGE OF18? (CONT.)

Regarding youth consumption, we believe unregulated access to marijuana has contributed

to growing rates of use – as opposed to tobacco where regulatory controls have led to

declining youth smoking rates. Here are some recent reports:

A 2007 Health Canada report concluded 8.2% of young Canadians used cannabis on a

daily basis.

In August 2012, the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS reported more than half of

adolescent drug users surveyed said they could access marijuana, heroin, cocaine or

crystal meth within 10 minutes.

We recommend the new framework include significant direct investments on youth

engagement initiatives ranging from prevention, awareness and treatment services to

recreation, employment, community and cultural programs.

We also recommend increasing penalties for those convicted of trafficking to minors.

Page 104: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 104/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 23 of 38 

WHAT ARE THE HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC, MODERATE AND

OCCASIONAL MARIJUANA CONSUMPTION?

As marijuana has been legalized for medical use and more accepted in general, an increasing

amount of research is emerging on its effects. Canadian doctors prescribe marijuana to more

than 20,000 people to treat conditions ranging from Alzheimer’s, premenstrual syndrome,

seizures and migraines to glaucoma, MS, OCD, ADD and HIV/AIDS.

As this paper is not presented as a scientific document, we don’t make any conclusions based

on recent research findings on the health impacts of marijuana – or lack of them.

Instead we have conducted a scan of media reports over the past year and explored what a few

doctors have to say. All demonstrate conflicting views and the need for more research in a

regulated legal environment instead of the murky edges of the black market.

Here is a sample of some reports that have appeared in various media over the past couple

years about cancer and cannabis use:

2012 US HMO Study of 61,000 insured patients showed no increased risk of lung,

colorectal, melanoma, or breast cancers in current or former cannabis smokers versus

those who have never smoked or experimenters when controlled for tobacco use,

alcohol intake and socioeconomic status.

2012 report from the British Lung Foundation warned smoking marijuana is hazardous

to the lungs and can also cause tuberculosis and Legionnaires’ disease. The study

showed public awareness of the health consequences was low with almost one-third ofthe British population believing it is not harmful.

2011 University of Colorado Cancer Centre Study concluded that there is little direct

evidence that THC or other cannabinoids are carcinogenic.

A 2007 study by Harvard University researchers found that THC in marijuana cut tumor

growth in half in common lung cancer tumours and significantly reduced the cancer’s

ability to spread.

2005 University of California study concluded that smoking marijuana - even regularlyand heavily - does not lead to lung cancer.

Page 105: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 105/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 24 of 38 

“The University of Victoria Centre for Addiction found alcohol causes more than

twice as many deaths as all major illicit drugs combined, and tobacco causes on

average five times more deaths than alcohol.”  –  Globe and Mail, November 4, 2008 

WHAT ARE THE HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC, MODERATE AND

OCCASIONAL MARIJUANA CONSUMPTION? (CONT.)

 Addiction Impact

The Lancet has compared the harm of 20 drugs using a 0-3 scale to measure addiction. Theresults:

Heroin – 3.00

Cocaine – 2.37

Tobacco – 2.23

Barbiturates – 2.01

Alcohol - 1.93

Benzodiazepines - 1.83

Amphetamine – 1.67

Cannabis – 1.51

LSD – 1.23

Ecstasy – 1.13

IQ Impact

In August 2012, Reuters reported on one of the world’s largest and longest running

marijuana research studies that concluded people who wait until they are adults to take

up cannabis do not show any significant mental declines in their memory and

intelligence. However, the unprecedented study concluded that teenagers who become

hooked on cannabis before they reach 18 may be causing lasting damage.

“A recent report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences about a long-term study of more than 1000 pot-using teens

in New Zealand said that those who continued smoking into their

30s suffered significant cognitive deficits related to memory,

reasoning and ability to process information.”- Globe and Mail, November 23, 2012  

Page 106: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 106/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 25 of 38 

 ASK THE DOCTOR

We decided to get a rural doctor’s opinion on the health impacts of marijuana use. Here is what PortAlberni’s Dr. Michael I. McGuire told us:

“ In recent years, pharmaceutical companies have worked to license THC (the active ingredient in cannabis) for

medical purposes, in particular Nabilone (an oral medication used for nausea from cancer chemotherapy and

as an appetite stimulant in the cancer setting) and Sativex (an oral spray licensed for treating neuropathic

 pain in multiple sclerosis). In the extensive testing required for licensing by Health Canada, virtually no serious

side effects were encountered.

There is addiction potential with cannabis, in fact some authorities estimate as many as 10% of regular users

will develop an addiction syndrome and suffer personal, social and occupational harm as a consequence. To

keep a proper perspective, the frequency and severity of cannabis addiction is on the low end of the scalecompared to alcohol and tobacco. In addition, the withdrawal syndrome resulting from sudden cessation is

relatively mild, consisting of drug craving and irritability lasting 3-7 days.

There is an observed statistical correlation between cannabis and the onset of schizophrenia with psychotic

symptoms. However, there is no evidence that there is a causal relationship between cannabis and

schizophrenia. Over the past 50 years, cannabis use in North America has increased several-fold, whereas

schizophrenia rates have remained constant.

Studies have not demonstrated a link between lung cancer and cancers of the neck and throat despite

researcher’s expectation to the contrary. Cannabis has not been shown to cause chronic lung disease,

although it does cause worsening of symptoms in those already suffering from cigarette induced chronic

obstructive lung disease.

 A Canadian performed study reported in the CMAJ (Dr. Peter Fried 2002) showed that current heavy cannabis

smokers demonstrated a 4% drop in measured IQ compared to pre-adolescent testing. Light smokers showed

no change, and previous heavy smokers similarly showed no change. Conclusion: you are dumber while you

are stoned but there does not seem to be any lasting effects on intelligence. “  

DR. MELDON KAHAN, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF THE SUBSTANCE USE SERVICE AT WOMEN’S

COLLEGE HOSPITAL IN TORONTO SAYS, “(BUT) THERE’S NO ROLE, OR HARDLY ANY ROLE FOR

SMOKED CANNABIS IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PAIN. THERE ARE SAFER ALTERNATIVESSUCH AS CANNABIS IN PILL FORM OR INHALERS. THERE ARE TOXINS IN CANNABIS SMOKE THAT

ARE CARCINOGEN AND ACCELERATE HEART DISEASE. SMOKED CANNABIS IS ADDICTING, UNSAFE

DURING PREGNANCY AND ESPECIALLY DANGEROUS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE IN TERMS OF

TRIGGERING PSYCHOSIS, DEPRESSION AND MOOD DISORDERS.” - GLOBE AND MAIL, NOVEMBER 2012 

Page 107: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 107/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 26 of 38 

“By moving from a violent, unregulated  market whose motive is profit to a strictly

regulated market whose goals are public health

–  we can actually reduce rates of use.”  –  Dr. Evan Wood, Simon Fraser University researcher, Vancouver Sun, November 21, 2013

WHAT ARE THE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACTS OF LEGALIZING MARIJUANA  – 

AND/OR NOT DOING IT?

We conclude legalizing marijuana and regulating its sale, distribution, promotion and price

will have a positive impact on public health and safety by:

Making it easier to prohibit youth access – as has been the case for tobacco.

Ensuring marijuana is grown in a controlled and regulated setting with strict labeling

provisions to better protect the health of consumers and producers.

Delivering billions of dollars in new revenue that government can reinvest in public

health care – including mental illness, treatment, education and awareness initiatives.

Encouraging the private sector and academic organizations to expand research into

health impacts.

Reducing profits for organized crime which results in safer communities and less

opportunity for young people to join gangs.

Forcing fewer Canadians to live with stress and stigma associated with having a criminalrecord for doing something 3 million other Canadians do each year.

Increasing availability of marijuana for people who use it for medical reasons or already

have prescriptions for a doctor.

Increasing availability of police resources to control violent crime and other revenue

streams of organized crime.

Reducing disincentives for people to reveal personal use will lead to earlier treatment as

needed.

Creating a responsible and accountable industry that becomes a co-regulator and

complies with improving regulations.

In contrast, maintaining the current prohibition will protect the status quo for organized

crime, guarantee ongoing and uncontrolled access to marijuana for youth and continue to

create more harm than good. 

Page 108: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 108/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 27 of 38 

“But what about the innocent children who will be exposed to these drugs if they

become freely available throughout society? The answer is nothing that d oesn’t

happen to them now. There is no city and few rural areas in the developed world

where you cannot buy any illegal drug known to man within half an hour, for an

amount of money that can be raised by any enterprising 14-year old. Indeed, the

supply of really nasty drugs would probably diminish if prohibition ended because they

are mainly a response to the level of risk the dealers must face.”–  Gwynne Dyer, January 14, 2007

WOULD A LEGALIZED SYSTEM OF MARIJUANA REDUCE OR INCREASE

THE NUMBER OF CONSUMERS?

There are already a significant number of

Canadians consuming cannabis. Studies

identified in this paper estimate more than 3

million Canadians use marijuana each year – 

and 2 million do it every month. Children and

youth under 18 are accessing marijuana easily

with the current prohibition.

Some countries that have introduced decriminalization policies have seen drug use and petty

crime rates decline. Since Portugal abolished criminal penalties for possession in 2001, teenage

drug use has declined while referrals to addiction treatment have doubled. The rate of cannabis

use in the Netherlands is 5% compared to 12% in the United States.

There is little evidence to suggest that consumption rates will rise dramatically if marijuana is

legalized – particularly since cannabis is not as addictive as most drugs.

In Canada, some doctors and researchers have said a strictly regulated legal marijuana market

has the potential to meaningfully reduce rates of marijuana use, in the same way that

regulatory tools have dramatically cut rates of tobacco use.

We recommend that a new federal framework include particular emphasis on restricting access

for youth, promoting prevention partnerships with local school districts to educate students

and teachers and tough penalties for anyone convicted of selling to minors. This will be

particularly important since we expect the price of legal marijuana to be lower than it is now.

Students who tried cigarettes in 1998: 56%.

Students who tried cigarettes in 2008: 26%.-

McReary Centre Society, April 15, 2009

Page 109: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 109/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 28 of 38 

LOGISTICS

WILL A LEGAL SYSTEM OF MARIJUANA CULTIVATION, DISTRIBUTION

AND SALES RESEMBLE ALCOHOL, TOBACCO OR NEITHER? ARE THERE

OTHER MODELS TO CONSIDER?

Since marijuana is an intoxicant, we recommend the federal/provincial system of alcoholproduction, distribution and sale provides the best model for Canada’s legal marijuana

framework. This approach would include:

consultation with provincial and municipal governments

elements of tobacco control policy – particularly as it relates to packaging, labeling

youth strategy and restrictions on promotion, point of sale and marketing

consultation with retailers, producers and consumers

elements of other national regulatory regimes such as natural health products, medical

marijuana, fisheries, agriculture and hemp cultivation

COMMON QUESTIONS ABOUT LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES THAT MAY BE

ASSOCIATED WITH THE LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA:

1.   WILL A LEGAL SYSTEM RESEMBLE THE CURRENT WAY WE BUY AND SELL ALCOHOL AND

TOBACCO?

2.   WHICH FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL AGENCIES WOULD BE INVOLVED?

3.   HOW WILL LEGALIZATION IMPACT CURRENT CONSUMERS AND PRODUCERS?

4. 

HOW MUCH WILL IT COST? WHERE WILL PEOPLE PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE

PACKAGED?

5.   HOW WILL IT BE TAXED? HOW WILL THE REVENUE BE REALLOCATED?

6.   WHAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS WILL BE APPLICABLE TO THE PRODUCERS AND

DISTRIBUTERS?

7.   HOW MUCH WOULD CANADIAN PRODUCERS NEED TO G ROW?

8.   WOULD WE LIMIT THE MARKET TO CANADIAN COMPANIES AND DOMESTIC SUPPLIERS?

9.   WHO WILL GROW IT?

10. 

WILL COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS BE ABLE T O PUT COMMERCIAL PRO TECTIONS ON

CERTAIN STRAINS, AND BRANDS? WHAT WILL BE THE POTENCY?

Page 110: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 110/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 29 of 38 

WHICH FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENTS WOULD BE INVOLVED

IN THE REGULATION, INSPECTION AND MONITORING OF PRODUCTION,

DISTRIBUTION AND RETAIL SALES?

We recommend federal Ministers of Justice and Health be responsible for leading a policy

that would be developed with the support of a Special Cabinet Committee on Organized

Crime. The Committee would include Ministers for other federal departments with an

interest in the policy:

Solicitor General/RCMP

Ministry of Agriculture

Department of Finance

Department of Foreign Affairs

Canada Revenue Agency

Industry Canada

Human Resources DevelopmentPrivy Council Office/Intergovernmental Affairs

These federal agencies will be required to work with provincial counterparts and include an

emphasis on municipal affairs. We recommend this work be supported by an interim project

management authority and refer items to relevant House of Commons Committees.

Washington State’s proposal to transition from prohibition to taxation provides a preview of

the some administrative requirements agencies may need to consider in Canada. They

estimate a five-year cost of $65 million to fully implement a licensing, regulatory and taxation

plan for a market of 360,000 consumers. Supported by a Dedicated Marijuana Fund, theseoperating requirements include:

Liquor Control Board (LCB) for rulemaking, licensure and enforcement - $13.6 million

Departments of Social and Health Services for implementation services - $10 million

Washington State Patrol for additional training on marijuana impairment - $2 million

Department of Licensing to revoke licenses for driving under the influence - $425,000

Office of the Attorney General for legal services to LCB - $318,000

Washington State Patrol Toxicology Laboratory for blood testing cases - $125,000

Offices of the Attorney General and Administrative Hearings for appeals - $125,000

Department of Revenue to administer tax collection from license holders - $90,000Washington State Patrol for background checks for LCB license applicants - $28,000

Department of Agriculture to develop testing laboratory accreditation standards -

$26,000

Administrative Office of the Courts for information technology changes to the Judicial

Information System - $3,000

Washington State is proposing a one-year timeline to fully implement their system.

Page 111: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 111/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 30 of 38 

HOW WILL LEGALIZATION IMPACT CURRENT CONSUMERS?

We believe marijuana legalization will have a positive impact on the 3 million-plus annual

adult consumers in Canada. Among other things they will experience:

no more contact with illegal drug dealers and organized crimeaccess to safer and labeled product

reliable and convenient access

lower prices

increased access to treatment as needed

public benefits associated with reallocation of new government revenues

Non-adult marijuana users will experience significantly reduced access to marijuana and

more exposure to more education, awareness and prevention programs.

HOW MUCH WILL LEGAL MARIJUANA COST, WHERE WILL PEOPLE BE

ABLE TO PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE PACKAGED?

COST

To be successful and prevent organized crime from maintaining a black market, the price of

legal marijuana must be lower than it is now. At the same time, the product’s quality must be

at least as good – if not better.

In Canada, pricing legal marijuana should consider:

the black market cost of marijuana differs from one region to another

bulk purchase is encouraged in the black market - the more you buy, the cheaper it is

consumers commonly purchase either one gram, seven grams (1/4 ounce), 14 grams

(1/2 ounce) or 28 grams (one ounce) at a time

very few consumers purchase more than one or two ounces (28-56 grams) at a time

legal growers, distributors and retailers will still need to make a profit in a legal system

The 2009 RAND Corporation Report for the European Commission measured the street price of

cannabis around the world. They concluded the average price in Canada per bulk gram was

$6.50. The federal government initially set their price of medical marijuana in Canada at $5 persingle unit gram but with new rules it is expected to increase to at least $8 per single unit gram.

Meanwhile, Washington State expects their average retail price under their legalized system

will be $12 per gram. They have based this price on medical marijuana dispensaries and do not

assume any increased consumption or competition will reduce prices. Washington’s estimate

assumes a $3 per gram producer price and a $6 per gram processor price.

Page 112: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 112/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 31 of 38 

HOW MUCH WILL LEGAL MARIJUANA COST, WHERE WILL PEOPLE BE

ABLE TO PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE PACKAGED? (CONT.)

COST (CONT.) 

Based on these factors, we recommend the price of legal marijuana be lower than whatWashington State is proposing and at least 30-35% lower than the current black market price.

We think this is achievable because marijuana is relatively easy to produce and process. One of

the most significant costs of production now is the risk of being caught by authorities or being

robbed by a violent criminal.

We also recommend a new legal framework allow provinces to adopt pricing variations which

could facilitate the sale and marketing of “premium brands” – as is the case with alcohol today.

Subject to discussions with provincial authorities, consumers, potential producers and

distributors, here is a basic proposed price list for legal marijuana in Canada compared to thecurrent black market rates (all taxes included):

PACKAGING

Product packaging will be determined almost exclusively by market research and demand. The

vast majority of black market marijuana is sold in dried plant form in bag pouches.

Other than established labeling and product safety requirements, we recommend the new

framework allow consumers to have access to a variety of packaging options, which could

include rolled cigarettes, bag pouches, plastic jars/bottles, edible products and teas.

ILLEGALALL PROCEEDS TO ORGANIZED CRIME

 

1 gram - $10-$15

 

7 grams (quarter ounce) - $65-$80

 

14 grams (half ounce) - $120-$150

 

28 grams (ounce) - $220-$260

LEGALALL PROCEEDS TO TAXPAYERS 

 

1 gram - $6-$10

 

7 grams (quarter ounce) - $40-$50

 

14 grams (half ounce) - $90-$100

 

28 grams (ounce) - $140-$170

Page 113: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 113/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 32 of 38 

“Liquor store locations are usually discreet and not near schools and don’t have the product in window displays and have age-restriction protocols in place. It would be

the simplest business model that currently exists to use, so I would recommend it and

then gain consumer feedback over three years and see what changes the consumer

would like, balanced with any public safety concerns.”–  Marc Emery, Province Newspaper, November 9, 2012

HOW MUCH WILL LEGAL MARIJUANA COST, WHERE WILL PEOPLE BE

ABLE TO PURCHASE IT AND HOW WILL IT BE PACKAGED? (CONT.) 

POINT OF PURCHASE

To many Canadians, point of purchase will be the most visible element of a new legal framework. 

For those who chose not to grow their own for personal use, we recommend legal marijuana be

sold to the public through specialty private stores and/or anywhere regulated liquor sales take

place. Limiting point of purchase to these locations will help ensure minors cannot come in

contact with the product.

We do not recommend allowing marijuana to be sold at convenience stores and gas stations as

is the case with tobacco, however provincial and municipal governments will have flexibility to

place reasonable restrictions on where people can consume and purchase cannabis – as is

currently done with alcohol and tobacco use. A license to sell would need to be obtained.

This approach reflects Washington’s State’s plan to require purchase through a Liquor Control

Board (LCB) licensee. Their plan makes no assumptions that a portion of users will purchase

from the illegal market or from medical marijuana retailers. They also make no assumptions

about consumer migration from out of state or the consumption of marijuana-infused products.

Washington’s proposal includes a $250 application fee and a $1,000 issuance/renewal fee for

each licensee. All fees will be deposited into the state’s Dedicated Marijuana Fund. Some

recovery fees will also be applied to licensees for activities related to enforcement of quality

control measures such as product sampling, testing, labeling and inspection.

To determine the number of retail outlets/licenses, Washington State plans to allow LCB to

caps retail licenses by county, consider population, security issues and discouraging purchases

from illegal markets. They expect over 320 retail outlets will serve their domestic annual

market of 360,000 consumers – or over 1100 per location.

At the same rate, Canadian businesses and non-profit organizations would need to staff over

2,700 retail locations to serve Canada’s three million annual consumers – creating significant

direct and indirect employment opportunities.

Page 114: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 114/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 33 of 38 

HOW WILL MARIJUANA BE TAXED, HOW WILL THIS REVENUE BE SHARED

BETWEEN VARIOUS LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND HOW WILL IT BE

REALLOCATED?

When considering the taxation rate on legal marijuana, it is worth noting that in some regions

of Canada, as much of 45% of the total cost of a package or carton of cigarettes is tax for the

government.

Washington State is projecting annual revenue of over $565 million by 2015 based on 360,000

annual consumers and excise taxes of 25% on the selling price on each wholesale and retail sale

of marijuana from a licensed producer, processor or retailer. State business and occupation

taxes will also apply to these activities.

Based on Washington State’s projections (363,000 consumers = $565 million annual revenue)

and in light of similar consumption and price trends in Canada, we conclude annual government

revenue in Canada from legalized marijuana based on 3 million annual consumers would likely

exceed $4 billion/year.

We recommend that 30-35% as the preferred tax rate of legalized marijuana in Canada. This

would include HST, GST and PST wherever relevant and some flexibility for provinces to

adjust rates.

In addition to the final tax rate, we also recommend local and provincial governments adopt a

cost recovery approach to the collection of business, licensing, inspection and workplace safety

fees and services.

We recommend the majority of new revenue from legalization be reinvested to strengthen

Canada’s public health care system in partnership with provincial governments. This should

include a special emphasis on mental illness, health promotion, addiction treatment and

community youth partnerships.

As an example, Washington State has identified funding priorities for some of their new

revenue. These include (figures are annual):

Health Care - $135 million

General Revenue - $45.7 millionInitiatives to prevent and reduce substance abuse - $36.6 million

Marijuana education and public health program - $24.4 million

University of Washington and Washington State University for research on effects of

marijuana use and development of web-based public education materials - $2.5 million

Page 115: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 115/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 34 of 38 

WHAT TERMS AND CONDITIONS WILL BE APPLICABLE TO THE

PRODUCERS AND DISTRIBUTERS?

In cooperation with provincial governments, we recommend the new framework include

comprehensive provisions to ensure quality control based on established standards for tobacco,

alcohol and hemp production – and compliance with municipal by-laws and business licensingrules.

In addition to site safety requirements and inspection powers for relevant federal agencies,

these guidelines should allow for various levels of THC, other cannabinoid content and cannabis

strains.

Washington State’s prohibition transition plan acknowledged a lack of sufficient data to

estimate the number of marijuana producers and marijuana processers they expect to apply for

a license. However, for 363,000 annual consumers they expect 100 marijuana producers and

55 processers. They also assume 50% of marijuana is produced and processed by the sameseller - with the rest produced and sold to a processor.

HOW MUCH MARIJUANA WOULD CANADIAN PRODUCERS NEED TO

GROW?

Producers will grow as much marijuana as needed to meet public demand – recognizing that

cannabis is a storable product that will maintain its quality over extended periods of time.

The 2009 RAND Corporation Report for the European Commission calculated the amount of

marijuana consumed in countries around the world. The report concluded that Canada’s 3

million annual cannabis consumers use 410 metric tonnes of marijuana – or 410 million grams.

Washington State measured frequency of consumption using the pattern contained in the UN

Office on Drug and Crime. The frequency ranged from a low of 18% using once a year to 3%

consuming daily. Applying this pattern and assuming 2 grams of marijuana per use, they

estimate 85 million grams are consumed annually per year to serve 360,000 annual consumers.

The same formula applied to Canada’s domestic market of 3 million annual consumers would

require the production of at least 800 million grams per year – or 800 metric tonnes.

WOULD WE LIMIT THE MARKET TO CANADIAN COMPANIES AND

DOMESTIC SUPPLIERS?

Based on our recommendation to apply a zero-tolerance to import/export of marijuana, we

recommend that the new Canadian legal framework limit market access to domestic suppliers.

Page 116: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 116/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 35 of 38 

WHO IS GOING TO GROW IT?

In addition to allowing individual Canadians to grow a limited number of marijuana plants for

personal use, we expect Canada’s private sector and local non-profit societies will likely be the

main producers, distributors and retailers of marijuana products.

We recommend that before final decisions are made about the structure of this new industry,

the federal government consult the sector and other interested parties as the new framework

is constructed. These discussions should focus on the roles of each level of government,

identifying consumer demands and the scope of a new regulatory framework.  Among other

things, we recommend these discussions include the following policy objectives: 

government should regulate but not have any direct ownership in any corporation that

produces marijuana

the market should be open to a large range of Canadian businesses from very small

farms to medium size and large-scale operationsdiscretion regarding the purchasing of marijuana rest primarily with entities that have

been licensed by provinces to sell it

flexibility for packaging options

establishment and enforcement of quality control and product safety standards by

relevant federal health and agriculture agencies

price controls to curtail black market

WILL COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUALS PLACE COMMERCIAL PROTECTIONS

ON STRAINS AND BRANDS? WHAT WILL BE THE POTENCY?

The new framework will respect Canada’s current laws and processes regarding patent and

trademark protection. However, we recommend this issue be explored more thoroughly to

consider which protections currently exist and new discoveries associated with a decade of

legal medical marijuana production. These discussions may also consider current models

applied in the agriculture sector regarding particular strains of products.

With regard to THC levels, as noted earlier in the paper, the new framework must ensure legal

marijuana is at least the same quality as to what is found on the street today – if not better.

According to the RCMP, Health Canada found an average THC level of 4.8% in marijuana sold on

the street in 1988. The average level was 11.1% in 2008.

We recommend the new framework allow for variance in THC rates and be subject to

consultation with various levels of government and potential sector partners. Marketing of

various premium brands should be allowed with the understanding that growing conditions

and THC level must be included on the product label. This can be based on current alcohol

content requirements for beer, wine and spirits.

Page 117: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 117/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 36 of 38 

SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. 

A growing number of Canadians and community leaders have joined the call to endmarijuana prohibition in Canada. However, there are legitimate questions about how

legalization would work and what the public impact will be.

2.  The five best reasons to end the current prohibition are:

Fight organized crime.

Significant new revenue will support important government services.

The current law does more harm than good.

Commitment to evidence-based policy instead of political ideology.

Millions are using cannabis now.

3. 

Decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana is a compromise that will please no

one. It would result in a system where it is legal to possess but not to sell or purchase.

Law enforcement agencies would remain in limbo.

4.  Changing opinions in the Unites States are weakening a long-standing obstacle to ending

the prohibition of cannabis in Canada.

5. 

While ending prohibition will require partnership with provincial and municipal

governments, the federal government must take the first step by introducing

legislation in the House of Commons that would be:

led by federal Ministers of Justice and Health and a special Cabinet Committeeon Organized Crime

responsive to feedback from provinces and provide administrative flexibility

overseen by an interim authority to implement and consult with stakeholders

subject to review by House of Commons Standing Committee

6.  Ending prohibition will have a positive impact of the Canadian economy. In addition to

generating an estimated $4 billion each year in new government revenue, there will be

thousands of new direct and indirect employment opportunities.

Page 118: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 118/119

 

Legalization of Marijuana – Policy Paper 2013 - Liberal Party of Canada in BC | Page 37 of 38 

SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT.) 

7.  Ending prohibition will have a positive impact on public health and safety in Canada

by:

Regulating the sale, distribution, promotion and price of marijuana, making it

easier for government to prohibit youth access

Ensuring marijuana is grown in controlled and regulated settings with strict

labeling provisions to better protect the health of consumers and producers

Delivering billions in new government revenue which can be reinvested in public

health care – including mental illness, treatment, education and awareness

Expanding private sector and academic research into health impacts

Decreasing profit for organized crime, creating safer streets and communities – 

and less opportunity for young people to join gangs

Increasing availability of police resources to fight violent crime and other

revenue streams of organized crime

8. 

The new federal legal framework should include the following elements:

The minimum age of consumption should be same as alcohol for each province.

A revenue-sharing template with provinces.

Significant investments for youth health promotion initiatives.

Provisions for provincial and municipal governments to place reasonable

restrictions on where people can consume and purchase cannabis.

Comprehensive packaging, labeling, promotion, point of sale, price, quality andmarketing regulations

Provisions that allow individual Canadians to grow limited number of marijuana

plants for personal use.

Establish zero-tolerance and increase criminal penalties for import/export,

unregulated suppliers and trafficking to minors.

Reallocate police and law enforcement resources.

Tougher penalties for impaired driving

Limitation on the amount of marijuana a non-licensed vendor or distributor can

purchase or possess without obtaining a special permit.

Limit point of purchase to specialty stores and regulated liquor stores.

Enable open marketplace for wide range of Canadian businesses

Flexibility for variety of packaging options.

Process to clear records for Canadians with prior convictions for marijuana

possession.

Page 119: 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

7/25/2019 2016 AKBLG Resolutions

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2016-akblg-resolutions 119/119

 

NEXT STEPS

LPC-BC and YLC should distribute this policy paper to:

YLC and LPC-BC members and post on-line for public comment.

Liberal Party of Canada provincial associations across the country.

Federal Liberal Caucus members and invite their response.

Candidates seeking the leadership of the Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada with a

recommendation to:

  include the policy resolution to legalize marijuana that was approved by close

80% of delegates at the January 2012 Biennial Policy Conference in the next

election platform

 

consider paper as a foundation for the establishment of new policy framework

to facilitate the end of marijuana prohibition in Canada and proactively respond

to questions Canadians are rightfully asking about the proposal