2016 accounting & controls update - austin...

144
2016 Accounting & Controls Update

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

2016 Accounting amp Controls Update

A few housekeeping notes hellip

About Holtzman Partners

Formed 12 years ago

Serve the growing Austin market

70 team members

To empower our team to provide exceptional

service to clients in every phase of growth

Our Mission Statement

Todayrsquos Agenda

bull PCAOB Hotbutton Issues - Management Review and IPEbull Tax Update bull Accounting amp Compliance Update

PCAOB Hotbutton Issues

Management Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements

- What Wersquove Learned

- Example Refresh Approach

- Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Key Topics

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 2: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

A few housekeeping notes hellip

About Holtzman Partners

Formed 12 years ago

Serve the growing Austin market

70 team members

To empower our team to provide exceptional

service to clients in every phase of growth

Our Mission Statement

Todayrsquos Agenda

bull PCAOB Hotbutton Issues - Management Review and IPEbull Tax Update bull Accounting amp Compliance Update

PCAOB Hotbutton Issues

Management Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements

- What Wersquove Learned

- Example Refresh Approach

- Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Key Topics

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 3: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

About Holtzman Partners

Formed 12 years ago

Serve the growing Austin market

70 team members

To empower our team to provide exceptional

service to clients in every phase of growth

Our Mission Statement

Todayrsquos Agenda

bull PCAOB Hotbutton Issues - Management Review and IPEbull Tax Update bull Accounting amp Compliance Update

PCAOB Hotbutton Issues

Management Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements

- What Wersquove Learned

- Example Refresh Approach

- Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Key Topics

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 4: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

To empower our team to provide exceptional

service to clients in every phase of growth

Our Mission Statement

Todayrsquos Agenda

bull PCAOB Hotbutton Issues - Management Review and IPEbull Tax Update bull Accounting amp Compliance Update

PCAOB Hotbutton Issues

Management Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements

- What Wersquove Learned

- Example Refresh Approach

- Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Key Topics

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 5: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Todayrsquos Agenda

bull PCAOB Hotbutton Issues - Management Review and IPEbull Tax Update bull Accounting amp Compliance Update

PCAOB Hotbutton Issues

Management Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements

- What Wersquove Learned

- Example Refresh Approach

- Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Key Topics

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 6: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

PCAOB Hotbutton Issues

Management Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements

- What Wersquove Learned

- Example Refresh Approach

- Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Key Topics

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 7: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements

- What Wersquove Learned

- Example Refresh Approach

- Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Key Topics

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 8: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

I Review of MR and IPE Requirements

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 9: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Commission Guidance Regarding Managementrsquos Report on Internal

Control Over Financial Reporting Under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC Release No 33-8810)

The 2013 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO) Internal Control mdash Integrated Framework (the

COSO Framework)

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)

What Has Driven the Increased Focus

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 10: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo ControlsEx

ampl

esSignificant Estimation Processes

Significant Risks

Fraud Risks

Unusual or Non-routine Classes of Transactions

Compensating Controls Being Relied Upon

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 11: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

bull Purpose and intent of the control

bull What are the expectations

Scope

bull Quantitative thresholds

bull Qualitative thresholds

Precision

bull Systems usedbull Completeness amp

accuracy of underlying data

Data

bull What types of questions arise

bull Nature of resolution

Follow Up

Whatrsquos Required for Management Review

Increased documentation is required for management review controls that considers the following

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 12: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation

Low risk of failure or misstatement

Higher risk of failure or misstatement

Evidence required to substantiate

managementrsquos review

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 13: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

What is IPE

IPE = Information Produced by the Entity

Information presented in reports used in the operation of a control

Reports run and data extractions used to support audit tests

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 14: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

IPE Examples

Management Examples

IT System Dependent

Customer AR Aging

Financial Information

Manual

Excel Variance Analysis

Excel Calculation of Deferred Rent

Internal Audit Examples

IT System Dependent

Listing of Invoices for The Period

Manual

Listing of New Leases

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 15: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Why IPE matters

Control execution dependent on reports

and data

Management reviews the

operation of the control

Management reviews the

validation of the completeness and

accuracy of the data

The effectiveness of the control depends on both the review of operation and evaluation of the underlying data used

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 16: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Report generated from

IT System

Report Logic Controls

Parameter Controls

Source Data Controls

Yes

How do we know the report

is pulling the correct

information

Is the report relevant to the period under

review

Is the underlying data

accurate

Is report manipulated from original

output

No

Input Controls

Output Controls

ITGCs

Yes No

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 17: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE

Accounts Receivable Aging ListingControl over the

calculation of

Allowance for Bad Debt

Accuracy

Clerically test the listing

Recalculate the aging category for a random sample of

invoices

Completeness

Select a random sample of invoices from the subledger

and agree to the Aging listing

Agree to the general ledger

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 18: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR

and IPE Requirements

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 19: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Everybody is going through some level of pain

- additional time being incurred by all parties (management and auditors)

- procedures moving from the auditor to the control owner (reviewer)

- internal auditors are incurring significantly more time performing walkthroughs

Each audit firm may have received different comments from the PCAOB

- different comments are driving different implementation requirements

- specific requirements vary by audit team within the same firm

- we have met with the partners from one firm in Austin to help set expectations

Each company should come up with its own formal implementation plan

- donrsquot ask external auditor to tell you what they want

- companies should come up with a risk-based plan and present it to their auditors to get their feedback (at salient points during its rollout)

- focus on areas that have the highest impact on the external auditorrsquos reliance strategy

What wersquove learned

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 20: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Summary Some companies are using the implementation of the MR and IPE requirements to take a ldquoRefreshrdquo approach to review all of its SOX controls The following is an example of such an approach

1 Take an inventory of your significant financial processes and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

2 Take an inventory of internal controls within each process and benchmark against other companies (if possible)

3 Identify which controls are impacted by the MR and IPE requirements and assign them a High or Medium impact (no impact on low controls)

4 Develop MRIPE ldquoBefore and Afterrdquo standard templates for High and Medium impact controls ndash see example on upcoming slide

Example Refresh Approach

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 21: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

5 Review prior year documentation of controls and tailor ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo for each control

6 Review new ldquoDesign Attributesrdquo with process owners and agree on game plan for implementation of the steps to meet those attributes

7 Process owners implement the controls

8 Internal auditors walkthrough the controls

9 Document new process in external auditorrsquos walkthrough templates

10 Create test plans which coincide with ldquoDesign attributesrdquo

Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 22: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Before and After Control TemplateExisting Attribute New Considerations Prospective Design Attribute

A The bank reconciliation was performed by the Senior Accountant

Timeliness of the reconciliation The bank reconciliation was performed monthly by the Senior Accountant within 30 days of month-end

B Verifying the completeness and accuracy of system reports used in the performance of the control

In order to support the Deposits In Transit (DIT) and Outstanding Checks (OC) listings generated from the GL the Senior Accountanta) generates screenshots of the parameters used to generate GL reports and includes the screenshots in the bank reconciliation workbookb) agree the total DIT and OC from the generated report to the bank reconciliation

C The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller

1 Validating that the reconciliation is complete and accurate (a b c d e)2 Validating that the system reports used in the reconciliation were properly generated (c d)3 The level of precision is appropriate (e)4 The workbook is clerically accurate (f)

The bank reconciliation was reviewed by the Controller and this review included verifying the followinga) book balance agreed to the GLb) bank balance agreed to the bank statementc) the parameters used to generate the DITOC system reportsd) DIT and OS checks agreed to system generated reportse) support for other reconciling items greater than $5000f) the clerical accuracy of the reconciliation

D Reconciling items were pursued and resolved

Follow up items are documented To the extent that the reconciliation or review identified issues obtain support to verify that the issues were addressed and appeared to have been resolved

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 23: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Account Reconciliations

Perform risk assessment of accounts and enforce MR and IPE requirements on only high risk accounts

No IPE requirements on subledger reconciliations

Standardization of MR and IPE procedures is important

Challenge grouping controls into one main ldquoaccount reconciliationrdquo control

Documentation of IPE procedures could be quarterly (making them quarterly controls)

Since account recs are key control journal entries do not require changes for MR and IPE

Budget to Actual Reviews

Focus on income statement (not balance sheet)

IPE control requirements may be significant (including tying out totals to budgeting system and GL)

Clearly defining company level specific thresholds (for explaining variations) and comparisons (to budget forecast prior year) is important

Identify how to address changes from GL amounts used in this control and the final GL (included in the 10QK)

Specific Control Considerations

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 24: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

III Questions Shared Experiences

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 25: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Tax Update

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 26: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Key Topics

PATH Act

Tax Filing Deadlines

Changes to Partnership Audit Regime

Research Tax Credit

Export Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Succession Planning

Planning for 2017 and Future Tax Years

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 27: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

PATH Act

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 28: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

PATH Act

Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015

bull Signed December 18 2015

bull Extended key provisions

bull Made some provisions permanent

bull Made some provisions extended beyond 2016

Permanently extended

bull Research credit (discussed in detail later)

bull Increased Sec 179 (discussed in detail later)

bull 15 year straight-line cost recovery for qualified leasehold improvements

bull Exclusion of 100 of gain on certain small business stock

bull Built-in-Gains recognition period reduced to 5 years

bull Tax-free distributions from IRAs for charitable purposes

bull Deduction for state and local general sales tax

bull Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 29: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

PATH Act

Extended through 2019

bullBonus depreciation (discussed later)

bullNew Markets Tax Credits

bullWork Opportunity Tax Credits

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 30: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Tax Filing Deadlines

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 31: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Due Dates The Highway Trust Fund Extension legislation included many changes to the due dates of tax returns

Applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31 2015

bull C corporations

o All year ends other than June 30mdashthe due date is the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 6 month extension except for a December 31 year end which will receive a 5 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 a December 31 year end will receive a 6 month extension

o June 30 year endsmdashthe due date is the 15th day of the third month following the close of the taxable year

ndash Can receive an automatic 7 month extension for taxable years beginning before January 1 2026

ndash Effective for taxable years beginning after December 31 2025 the due date becomes the 15th

day of the fourth month and a 6 month extension may be received

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 32: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Due Dates

S corporations ndash no changes

bull Due date ndash the 15th day of the third month after the close of the taxable year

bull 6 month extension is available

Partnerships

bull All year ends ndash the 15th day of the third month

bull A 6 month extension is available

Change in due dates does not change the timing of any accrued expenses related to compensation

Change in due dates does impact the timing of when an accrued qualified retirement plan contribution must be paid to be deductible

Not all states have conformed to this change

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 33: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Due Dates

Forms W-2 and Forms 1099-MISC with amounts in box 7 Non-Employee Compensation with the IRS or SSA by January 31

FinCEN Form 114 (foreign accounts) is changed from June 30 to April 15

bullWill now allow a 6 month extension

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 34: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Partnership Audit Regime

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 35: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 provides for a new partnership audit regime

Effective for tax years beginning after December 31 2017

Partnerships may elect to have these provisions apply to tax years beginning after November 2 2015 and before January 1 2018

bull This election must be made within 30 days of when the IRS first notifies the partnership in writing that the partnership has been selected for examination

o This election provides more control of an audit with the TEFRA positions apply under the existing audit regime

Will generally require a partnership adjustment to be taxed to the partnership in the year the adjustment is made

The partnership can elect to have the adjustment flow-through to the partners and have them pay the tax instead

Partnerships will be able to elect out of this new audit regime on an annual basis

bull Limitations apply

bull Annual election must be made

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 36: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change

Top tax rate used if partnership pays the tax

A partnership has 45 days after the date of the notice of the final partnership adjustment to elect an alternative regime with respect to the imputed underpayment

bullPartner includes change in income in the year the statement is received not the year audited

Rules only apply to taxes under Chapter 1 of the IRC

bullNIIT and SE tax are computed under Chapter 2 and 2A respectively of the IRC

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 37: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Research Tax Credit

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 38: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company

Credits reduce tax liability dollar per dollar

bull A $50000 credit reduces cash outflow to the IRS andor state

bull Limitations apply (discussed later)

Rules discussed are applicable for all open tax years

bull Allows returns to be amended to claim credit even if not previously claimed

bull Special rules for companies with NOLs may allow you to go beyond the normal statute of limitations

Deductions currently reducing taxable income and costs that may be classified as fixed assets are identified as qualified research expenditures (QRE)

bull Not creating additional deductions

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 39: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Common Myths

The credit applies only to large businesses

bull False There is no minimum amount of expense required to qualify for the credit

We are a custom manufacturer and do not develop our own products therefore our customers may qualify for the credit but we do not

bull False The credit applies to both products and processes often custom manufacturers are required to develop the processes that are capable of producing the partproduct based on specifications provided by the customer

We do not have a time tracking system in place therefore there is no way to determine our costs

bull False The courts have ruled that a time tracking system is not required to claim the credit rather businesses must be able to connect employeesrsquo activities to the qualified projects

If we claim the credit we will be audited

bull False The credit is one of many factors used to identify taxpayers for audit but it is not the only factor

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 40: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses

We have found that many companies apply their own definition of research and development when determining the opportunity for the credit

The tax rules can vary significantly from what someone may consider research and development

Product development and product improvement activities may qualify

Process development and process improvement activities may qualify

bull These include activities to produce your own products as well as those required by contract manufacturers to develop a part that meets the customerrsquos part print andor specifications

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 41: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test

New or improved business component

Deductible under IRC Section 174

Process of experimentation

Technological in nature

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 42: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Funded Research

Research funded by another person is not eligible for the credit

bullReview of contract is required

o Fixed fee Qualified

o Time and materials Nonqualified

o Not to exceed Qualified

Certain related-party payments not considered funding

Fully funded if the taxpayer retains no substantial rights

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 43: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Examples of Qualified Activities

Develop new improved or more reliable products

Develop or improve manufacturing processes

Automate processes

Develop prototypes

Design andor build tools jigs fixtures dies and molds

Contract to have tools jigs fixtures dies and molds designed and built

Develop or apply for patents

Perform continuous improvement activities of manufacturing processes

Conduct testing of new concepts and technology

Develop new technology

Develop software

Design products to customer specifications

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 44: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Examples of Qualified Activities

Improvement or building of new manufacturing facilities

Implementation of new technologies to the manufacturing floor

Development of specialized machinery and modifications to existing equipment

Improvements made to a production process or to the materials used in a manufacturing process intended to result in lower environmental contaminants

Improvements to processes to lessen emissions of various gases

Manufacturing efforts that support new product development

Performance of certification testing

Attempting to use new materials

Scaling up of formulations from labs or a test facility to a production facility

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 45: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Qualified Research Expenditures

Qualified wages

Contract research expenses

Supplies

Computer lease time

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 46: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity

IRS issued new regulations effective July 21 2014 regarding the definition of research and experimental expenditures

Prior to the issuance of the regulations the IRSrsquos position was that any cost related to an item which was a fixed asset (regardless of who owned the asset) tainted the cost from qualifying as a research expense

Definition of a product is expanded to include a ldquopilot modelrdquo

Pilot model

bull Any representation or model of a product that is produced to evaluate and resolve uncertainty concerning the product during development or improvement of the product the term includes a fully functional representation or model of the product or a component of the product

This is a significant positive change for taxpayers

Opportunities for companies that develop custom machinery modify a stock model for customers produce tooling used in production develop automation equipment etc

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 47: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Regular Method

Federal credit of 20 of the lesser of

bullThe qualifying expenditures in excess of a base amount or

bullOne-half of the qualifying expenditures

bullCredit is added to income

Reduced credit is 13

bullCredit is not added to income

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 48: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Example Calculation 1

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 1

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 49: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Example Calculation 1

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 1 = $250000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $ 250000

Eligible = $1150000

Limited to = $ 700000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 140000

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 50: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Example Calculation 2

AAGR $25000000

Current-year QREs $1400000

Base period percentage 55

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 51: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Example Calculation 2

AAGR x base period percentage $25000000 x 55 = $1375000

Total QRE = $1400000

Base = $1375000

Eligible = $ 25000

Credit rate = 20

Credit = $ 5000

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 52: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Alternative Simplified Credit

Benefits companies with high fixed base percentage that have not increased research activities over time or for which computation of the base period is impossible

Enacted January 1 2007

Threshold = Half the average QREs for prior three years

Credit rate of 14

If no QREs in any one of the prior three years credit rate of 6 of current-year QREs

Is treated as an election

bull If ASC is claimed on a return it is irrevocable without IRS consent for that tax year

bull Can change from ASC to traditional from one tax year to another

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 53: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Example 1

QREsbull2013 - $1250000

bull2014 - $1300000

bull2015 - $1350000

bull2016 - $1400000

2016 QRE = $1400000

Base = $650000

Eligible = $750000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $105000

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 54: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Example 2

QREsbull2013 - $400000

bull2014 - $400000

bull2015 - $400000

bull2016 - $400000

2016 QRE = $400000

Base = $200000

Eligible = $200000

Credit rate = 14

Credit = $28000

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 55: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Significant Changes from the PATH Act

Key changes

bullRampD credit made permanent

o Previously was a ldquotemporaryrdquo credit meaning Congress needed to continually extend the credit

bullOffset against AMT for certain taxpayers

bullPayroll tax credit for certain taxpayers

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 56: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

An ldquoeligible small businessrdquo will be allowed to offset both the regular tax and the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)

bullAdditional limitation applies may not be able to eliminate 100 of tax

Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1 2016

Eligible small business

bullA corporation that is not publicly traded

bullA partnership or

bullA sole proprietorship (single-member LLC owned by an individual is a sole proprietorship unless a check-the-box election is made)

bullThe average annual gross receipts for the preceding three taxable years do not exceed $50000000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 57: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Related-party rules apply in determining the $50000000 gross receipts tests

bullParentsubsidiary relationships

bullBrothersister relationships

bull50 common ownership

bull If applicable treated as one taxpayer for determining the $50000000 gross receipts test

Partners and shareholders of S corporations are subject to the $50000000 gross receipts test at the partner or shareholder level in addition to the entity level

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 58: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Overall tax limitation

bullCredits from an eligible small business cannot offset more than 25 of the tax liability in excess of $25000

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 59: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

Example

XYZ Manufacturing Inc is an S corporation owned by Shareholder A

XYZrsquos 2016 RampD credit - $50000

Shareholder Arsquos tax liability before RampD credit - $60000

Shareholder Arsquos tentative minimum tax - $58000

Without New Rule

Credit utilized - $2000 ($60000 minus $58000)

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 60: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business

With New Rules

Credit utilized - $50000

Lesser of

bull Credit = $50000

bull Overall limitation = $51250 ($60000 total tax less $8750 [$60000 - $25000] x 25)

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 61: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Must be a ldquoqualified small businessrdquo

bullCorporation partnership or individual

bullLess than $5000000 in gross receipts in the current year and

bullDid not have gross receipts for any tax year before the five-tax year period ending with the tax year

o No receipts prior to 2012

Can make the election for only five years

All businesses owned by an individual must be aggregated in determining the $5000000 gross receipts test

Must be a true start-up asset purchase of an existing business does not qualify

Maximum credit per year is $250000

Must first apply general business credit utilization and carryback rules before electing to offset payroll taxes

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 62: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Payroll Tax Credit Offset

Offsets FICA tax only

Election is made on the entity-level tax return

Credit is allowed for the first calendar quarter that begins after the date on which the taxpayer files the tax return with the election made

Excess credit is carried forward

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 63: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Texas RampD Credit

Enacted in 2014 Taxpayers may claim either

bullSales and use tax exemption on the purchase lease rental storage or use of depreciable tangible personal property directly used in qualified research or

bullFranchise tax credit based on qualified research expensesbullCannot claim both in the same periodbullMay change between a sales tax exemption and a franchise tax credit from period to period

If the sales and use tax exemption is claimed the business must be registered with the Comptrollerrsquos office

The research credit must be applied for on or with the tax report for the period for which the credit is claimed

Expires December 31 2026

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 64: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Texas RampD Credit

Follows federal laws in determining what is qualified researchbull Change in Sec 174 supplies Regulations has potential positive benefit for self-constructed assets

Form 01-931 is used to claim the exemption Credit

bull 5 of the difference between the QREs for the report year and 50 of the average amount of QREs for the three prior report years

bull Only expenses incurred in Texas qualifybull Total credit is limited to 50 of the amount of franchise tax due before any other applicable

creditsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Contract research with a public or private institution of higher education in Texas is eligible for a

credit rate of 625 (3125 if no QREs in any one of the three preceding yearsbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 yearsbull If no qualified research expenses are incurred in one or more of the three tax periods preceding

the period on which the report is based the credit is 25 of the QREs for that yearbull Unused credits carryforward for 20 years

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 65: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 66: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

IC-DSC

What is an IC-DISC

bullDomestic C corporation

bullOwned by a corporation or individuals

bullDeemed to perform export services on behalf of a supplierexporter

o No true active operations

bullReceives commissions from supplierexporter (the business with active operations) for export service

bullPays a dividend to shareholders

bullDoes not pay any federal income tax

bullNot a tax shelter

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 67: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

IC-DSC

Commission is the greater of

bull50 of combined taxable income or

bull4 of export receipts from qualifying export profits

Commission is deductible by the operating entity as an ordinary deduction

Dividend

bullAmount is either paid or deemed to be paid by the IC-DISC entity to the parent corporation or shareholders depending on structure

bullDividend is a qualified dividend

o 15 or 20 rate

o 38 NIIT applies

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 68: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

IC-DSC

Typical structures

bullParentsubsidiary

ndash Parent is generally a pass-through entity

bullBrothersister

o Operating company is a regular corporation or

o Ownership of IC-DISC is not identical to ownership of operating entity

Export sales

bullBoth direct and indirect qualify

Can mix and combine transactions for determining the commission

Additional requirements apply

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 69: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

IC-DSC

Example

Export sales ndash $4000000

Combined taxable income on export sales ndash $430000

Commission is greater of

bull $160000 = $4000000 x 4 or

bull $215000 = $430000 x 50

Tax benefit

bullTax savings from commission ndash $215000 x 396 = $85140

bull Income from dividend ndash $215000 x 238 = $51170

bullTax savings = $33970 ($85140 minus $51170)

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 70: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Depreciation Incentives

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 71: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Depreciation Incentives

Bonus depreciation

bull Applicable to new qualified property

bull Allowable in the year the property is placed in service

bull Bonus depreciation allowed

o 50 for assets placed in service on or before December 31 2017

o 40 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2018

o 30 for assets placed in service in calendar year 2019

o 0 for assets placed in service after calendar year 2019

bull AMT depreciation = Regular depreciation for assets with bonus depreciation claimed

bull Certain real estate assets qualify

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 72: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Section 179

First year expensing of qualified property

Generally applies to new or used tangible personal property

Certain real property assets qualify

Aggregate cost that can be expensed for any tax year cannot exceed $500000

Dollar-per-dollar reduction of the maximum expense limit if the cost of qualified property exceeds $2010000 (2016 amount)

Amounts above are adjusted for inflation

Business income limitation applies

$500000 limit applies at the ownership level for pass-through entities

bull If an individual is allocated more than $500000 from multiple entities the excess deduction is lost

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 73: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Planning for Depreciation

You may not want to claim bonus depreciation or Section 179

bull Income in the future is at a higher tax rate than the current rate

bullLoss carryovers are expiring

bullCredit carryovers are expiring

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 74: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Succession Planning

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 75: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Proposed 2704 Regulations

Released August 4 2016

Aimed directly at valuation discounts in intra-family transfers in particular aimed at voting and liquidation rights

Will become final 30 days after publication in the Federal Register

bullLikely early 2017

Mark Mazur Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Tax Policy

bull ldquoToday the US Department of the Treasury announced a new regulatory proposal to close a tax loophole that certain taxpayers have long used to understate the fair market value of their assets for estate and gift tax purposesrdquo

Removes the ability to apply discounts in determining the value used for gifting of shares from one generation to another

This is a very complex area and additional rules apply

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 76: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 77: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bullReduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 15

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 15

ndash Eliminate most incentives other than the RampD credit

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Impose a one-time 10 deemed repatriation tax on corporate profits held offshore

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 78: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Tax Proposals - Trump

Trump tax plan

bull Individual

o Top individual rate ndash 33

o Maintain current capital gains tax rates

o Increase standard deduction

o Eliminate personal exemptions

o Cap itemized deductions at $200k for MFJ

o Repeal AMT

o Repeal Obamacare and NIIT

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 79: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Tax Proposals - GOP

GOP (Ryan) tax plan

bull Reduce both corporate and individual tax rates

o Corporate

ndash Cut tax rate to 20

ndash Small business income (flow-through) max rate 25

ndash Repeal AMT

ndash Immediate expensing of assets

ndash No deduction for interest

o Individual

ndash Top individual rate ndash 33

ndash Increase standard deduction

ndash Eliminate personal exemptions

ndash Repeal AMT

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 80: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Planning for Potential Changes

Regardless of which plan or a combination of the two planning can be utilized to minimize tax liability

bullAccelerate deductions

o Review accounting methods for changes

ndash Prepaid expenses is an easy change

o Ensure all accruals are properly stated

bullDefer income

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 81: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Questions

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 82: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Contact Info

Scott R Schumacher CPA MSTTax Partner Wipfli LLP

4144319334sschumacherwipflicom

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 83: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Disclaimer

This information is provided solely for general guidance and informational purposes and does not create a business or professional services relationship Accordingly this

information is provided with the understanding that the authors and publishers are not herein engaged in rendering legal accounting tax or other professional advice and

services As such it should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional accounting tax legal or other competent advisers Before making any decision or

taking any action you should obtain appropriate professional guidance

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 84: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Accounting amp Compliance Update

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 85: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Key Topics

Financial Statement Restatement Trends

Material Weaknesses

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Fraud Risk Management

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 86: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Restatement TrendsA 15-year Comparison

Mike Panozzo

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 87: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Types of Restatements

1 Reissuance Restatements

bull Past financial statements can no longer be relied upon

bull Disclosed in an 8-K

2 Revision Restatements

bull Presumably does not undermine reliance on past financials

bull No 8-K disclosure requirement

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 88: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Trends

Overall ndash Both types of

restatements show six years

of relatively stable

restatement counts from

2009-2014 however this

trend stopped in 2015

when the quantity dropped

138 to a total of 737

Source Audit Analytics

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 89: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Reissuance Restatements

Nine consecutive

years of decline

down to 161 in 2015

which is the lowest

since 8-K disclosures

came into effect in

August 2004

Source Audit Analytics

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 90: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Restatement IssuesAccording to Audit Analytics a review of the top 10 issues in 2015 shows that the top two issues have

been the same for the past five years but their prevalence has decreased

1 Debt Quasi-Debt Warrants amp Equity (beneficial conversion features) Security Issues

2 Cash Flow Statements

3 Tax Expense Benefit Deferral and Other Issues

4 Liabilities Payables Reserves and Accrual Estimate Failures

5 Foreign Related party Affiliated or Subsidiary Issues

6 Revenue Recognition Issues

7 Expense (Payroll SGA Other) Recording Issues

8 AccountsLoans Receivable Investments amp Cash Issues

9 Inventory Vendor andor Cost of Sales Issues

10 Acquisitions Mergers Disposals Reorganization Accounting Issues

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 91: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Restatement Issues

Source Audit Analytics

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 92: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Restating Registrants By Filer Status

Source Audit Analytics

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 93: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015

bull $711 millionbull Company was Alphabet Inc (Parent company for Google)bull Nature of error was the incorrect classification of certain revenues

between legal entities which resulted in incorrect income tax expense dating back to 2008

bull Consolidated revenues were not impactedbull Revision restatement due to immaterial impact to financial

statements

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 94: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Material Weaknesses

Cassie Crist

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 95: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

What is a Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of

deficiencies in internal control such that there is a reasonable

possibility that a material misstatement of an entityrsquos annual

or interim financial statements will not be prevented or

detected and corrected on a timely basis

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 96: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Material Weakness Drivers

The four primary drivers of material weaknesses

ldquoActualrdquo financial statement misstatements or errors

Internal control deficiencies

Significant accounting estimate variances

Financial fraud by management or other employees

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 97: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Types of Material Weaknesses

Source CFGI

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 98: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Material Weakness Trends

Source CFGI

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 99: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector

Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs

Consumer 14 12Energy 7 11Financial 6 11Healthcare 31 28Industrial 7 10REIT 2 5Technology 33 23Total 100 100

IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector

IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector

Source PwC Study

Sheet1

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
IPO Material Weakness Disclosures by Sector
Sector of total IPOsDisclosing MWs of Total IPOs
Consumer 14 12
Energy 7 11
Financial 6 11
Healthcare 31 28
Industrial 7 10
REIT 2 5
Technology 33 23
Total 100 100
IPOs between January 1 2011 and September 30 2015 by sector
Page 100: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Material Weakness Case Studies

A few specific exampleshellip Walmart (September 2015) Misapplication and misrepresentation of ASC 840 ndash Leases specifically sale-

leaseback transactions

Resulted in an increase in 2014 SGampA by $277M

Etsy IPO (March 2015) Inappropriately accounted for certain non-income tax-related expenses and

did not comply with the related filing requirements

Lack of adequate cut-off procedures to ensure the timely recording of certain period-end accruals

Resulted in restatement of 2013 net income before taxes of $518K to $58K

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 101: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Material Weakness Mitigation

How to mitigate these riskshellip

Hire or outsource qualified technical accounting tax or internal controls resources

Increase management oversight

More effective IT systems

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 102: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Ruth Snell

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 103: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they

SEC staff comments are in response to a companyrsquos

disclosure and other public information and are based on

the staffrsquos understanding of that companyrsquos facts and

circumstances

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 104: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

SEC Comment Letter Trends

Source Ernst amp Youngrsquos SEC Comments and Trends September 2016

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 105: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

SEC Areas of Focus

Fair value measurements

Business combinations

Contingencies

Goodwill and intangible assets

Income taxes

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 106: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

SEC Areas of Focus

Technology

Revenue recognition and related cost of sales

Gross vs net revenue reporting

Multiple element arrangements

Segment disclosures

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 107: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

SEC Areas of Focus

Retail amp Consumer Goods

Key performance metrics

Healthcare

Revenue recognition and contractual allowances

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 108: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Kat Peterson

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 109: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Going concern

Share-based payments

Statement of cash flows

Revenue

Leases

Credit losses on financial instruments

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 110: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

ASU 2014-15 Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entityrsquos Ability to Continue as a Going

Concern

Effective for 2016

The amendments define managementrsquos responsibility to evaluate whether there is

substantial doubt about an organizationrsquos ability to continue as a going concern and

to provide related footnote disclosures

Management is now required to proactively evaluate organizationrsquos ability to

continue as a going concern

Auditors will now evaluate managementrsquos assessment

Going Concern

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 111: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

ASU No 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

Effective for 2017 for calendar year end public companies and 2018 for calendar year end

nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Changes how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments including

bull Elimination of APIC pools

bull Allow repurchase shares from employees for tax withholding without triggering liability accounting

bull Companies can elect to account for forfeitures as they occur

Additionally private companies can elect to use a practical expedient to estimate an awardrsquos

expected term as midpoint between vesting date and contractual term

Share-Based Payments

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 112: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

ASU 2016-15 Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments and ASU 2016-18

Restricted Cash

Effective for 2018 for calendar year end public companies and 2019 for calendar year

end nonpublic companies but can be early adopted

Requires certain cash flow presentation for specific situations

Requires the change in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents to be included

with the change in cash and cash equivalents on the SOCF

Statement of Cash Flows

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 113: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Type of Payment Classification on the Cash Flow Statement

Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination

If paid at or near the time of purchase investing activityOtherwise cash outflow from financing activities for the contingent consideration liability recognized at acquisition-date fair value (including measurement period adjustments) Cash outflow from operating activities for the balance

Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims Based on the insurance coverage (iethe nature of the loss)

Distributions received by an investor from an equity method investee

Cumulative earnings approach All distributions would be presumed to be returns on the investment and classified as operating inflows

Debt prepayment costs Financing activities

Debt modification costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Operating

Debt extinguishment costs Creditor fees ndash Financing 3rd party fees ndash Financing

Statement of Cash Flows

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 114: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

ASU No 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and related

amendments (ASU 2016-08 ASU 2016-10 ASU 2016-12)

Effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2017 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2018)

With three-year income statement presentation requirement public companies will need 2016 2017 and 2018

financial statement information presented under the new guidance

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15

2018 and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019

(calendar year 2019)

bull With two-year income statement presentation requirement nonpublic companies will present 2018 and 2019

Revenue

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 115: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Increases the volume of required disclosures

bull Disaggregation of revenue

bull Contract asset and liability disclosures

bull Performance obligations disclosures

Significant judgments need to be disclosed

bull Determining transaction price

bull Allocation of amounts to obligations

Revenue

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 116: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Other widespread changes include capitalizing and

amortizing incremental costs of obtaining a contract

Revenue

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 117: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

ASU No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842)

Effective for 2019 for public business entities and effective

2020 for nonpublic entities

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2017 2018 and 2019

revised presentation for SEC filers

bull Modified retrospective transition will require 2019 and 2020 revised

presentation for non-SEC filers

Leases

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 118: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

All leases will be recorded on the balance sheet with a right of

use (ROU) asset and liability recorded at the present value of

future lease payments

Leases with a term 12 months or less can be excluded from

balance sheet recognition and recorded same as today

Finance and operating lease ROU assets and liabilities must each

be presented in separate line items on the balance sheet (andor

disclosed in the notes)

Leases

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 119: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Leases

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 120: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Leases

Scenario based on Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 121: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Leases

Source Illustration 9 in EampY Technical Line Final standard on leases is taking shape March 25 2015

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 122: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Key balance sheet metrics could change

Debt covenants and borrowing capacity might be affected

Decisions about whether to lease or buy significant assets

might change

Leases

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 123: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 124: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

Source PWCCBRE 2016 Lease Accounting Survey

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 125: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

McDonaldrsquos disclosed 15115 operating leases in 2015 10-K

bull $19 billion in rent expense

bull Future minimum lease payments of $125 billion

Starting in 2019 these leases will come on the balance sheet as an

asset and liability

Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015Leases

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 126: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

ASU 2016-13 Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Changes the impairment model for most financial assets including trade receivables and

held-to-maturity debt securities to an ldquoexpected lossrdquo model

Changes the impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities and requires

determining if unrealized loss is all or partially a credit loss

Includes requirement for significantly more disclosures

Effective for public SEC filers for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2019 and

interim periods therein (calendar year 2020)

Effective for nonpublic entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15 2020

(calendar year 2021)

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 127: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Estimate lifetime ldquoexpected credit lossrdquo and record an allowance that when deducted

from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset presents the net amount expected to

be collected on the financial asset

An expected credit loss estimate should

bull be based on an assetrsquos amortized cost (including premiums or discounts net deferred fees and costs

foreign exchange and fair value hedge accounting adjustments)

bull reflect losses expected over the remaining contractual life of an asset considering the effect of voluntary

prepayments

bull consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows including information about

past events current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts

bull reflect the risk of loss even when that risk is remote meaning that an estimate of zero credit loss would

seldom be appropriate

Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 128: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Risk Management

Gretchen Leifeste

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 129: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Definitions

Any intentional act committed to secure an unfair or unlawful

gain

Occupational fraudmdashthe use of onersquos occupation for personal

enrichment through misuse of the organizationrsquos resources or

assets

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 130: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Statistics

According to the 2016 Global Fraud Study done by the Association of Certified Fraud

Examiners (ACFE)

bull Typical organization loses 5 of annual revenues to fraud

bull Median loss from a single case of occupational fraud was $150000

bull More than 23 of occupational fraud cases resulted in a loss of at least $1M

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 131: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Statistics

$125000 $200000

$975000

Median Loss per Scheme for Major Categories of Occupational Fraud

Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 132: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Statistics

$65000 $173000

$703000

Median Damage per Scheme for Levels of Perpetrators of Occupational Fraud

Employee Manager OwnerExecutive

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 133: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

The Fraud Triangle

Model for explaining the factors that cause someone to commit

occupational fraud

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 134: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Case Studies

A few case studieshellip

Wells Fargo (2016) bull Employees opened more than 2 million checking savings and credit card

accounts without customer approval to meet sales quotasbull $185M fine

Satyam Computer Services (2009)bull Massive accounting fraud that cost investors an estimated $2 billionbull Fraud lasted for 8 years with company recording more than $1 billion in phony

revenue

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 135: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Risk Management

An effective fraud risk management approach encompasses controls that have

three objectives

1 Prevent

2 Detect

3 Respond

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 136: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Fraud Risk Management

Organizations that lacked anti-fraud controls suffered greater median losses

According to ACFE 2016 Global Fraud Study

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 137: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Jamie Holtzman

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 138: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities

Issued August 2016 First overhaul of NFP financial presentation since early lsquo90s (SFAS

115116)Applies to all NFPs including business-oriented health care entities Effective Annual financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning

after December 15 2017 (early adoption permitted)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 139: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Replace existing three classes of net assets (unrestricted temporarily restricted and permanently restricted) with two classes (net assets withwithout donor restrictions) Expiration of donor-imposed restriction on long-lived asset will be

when asset is placed in service rather than over useful life of assetUnderwater portion of endowments will be presented with donor-

imposed net assets rather than unrestricted net assets

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 140: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Could choose direct method or indirect method of reporting cash flowsNo longer would require reconciliation of ldquochange in net assetsrdquo to ldquonet

cash flows from operating activitiesrdquo

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 141: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Require NFPs to define the time horizon used to manage liquidity and disclose useful quantitative and qualitative informationQualitative info relative to how liquidity is managed (ie strategy for

addressing risks that may impact liquidity and basis for time horizon)

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 142: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Would require investment returns to be reported net of external and direct internal investment expensesNo longer require disclosure of investment-related expenses netted

against returnsWould require disclosure of any employee comp expenses that are

netted against returns

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 143: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding

Not-for-Profit Financial Statements

Report expenses by functional and natural classification in a single location in the financial statements Require disclosures about method used to allocate costs between

program and support functions and to clarify definition of management and general activities

  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144
Page 144: 2016 Accounting & Controls Update - Austin TXholtzmanpartners.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/2016-12/201… · 2016 Accounting & Controls Update. ... Commission Guidance Regarding
  • Slide Number 1
  • A few housekeeping notes hellip
  • About Holtzman Partners
  • Slide Number 4
  • Todayrsquos Agenda
  • PCAOB Hotbutton IssuesManagement Review (MR) and Information Produced by Entity (IPE)
  • Key Topics
  • I Review of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What Has Driven the Increased Focus
  • What Are ldquoManagement Reviewrdquo Controls
  • Whatrsquos Required for Management Review
  • Whatrsquos The Sufficiency of Documentation
  • What is IPE
  • IPE Examples
  • Why IPE matters
  • Slide Number 16
  • Example of Review over Completeness amp Accuracy of IPE
  • II Practical Considerations for the Application of MR and IPE Requirements
  • What wersquove learned
  • Example Refresh Approach
  • Example Refresh Approach (contrsquod)
  • Before and After Control Template
  • Specific Control Considerations
  • III Questions Shared Experiences
  • Tax Update
  • Key Topics
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • PATH Act
  • Tax Filing Deadlines
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Due Dates
  • Partnership Audit Regime
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Partnership AuditsmdashSignificant Change
  • Research Tax Credit
  • How Can the RampD Credit Benefit Your Company
  • Common Myths
  • Does Your Company Incur RampD Expenses
  • Tax Definition of RampD The Four-part Test
  • Funded Research
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Examples of Qualified Activities
  • Qualified Research Expenditures
  • Supplies Change in Regulations Provides Increased Opportunity
  • Regular Method
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 1
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Example Calculation 2
  • Alternative Simplified Credit
  • Example 1
  • Example 2
  • Significant Changes from the PATH Act
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • AMT Offset for Qualified Small Business
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Payroll Tax Credit Offset
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Texas RampD Credit
  • Export IncentivesmdashIC-Disc
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • IC-DSC
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Depreciation Incentives
  • Section 179
  • Planning for Depreciation
  • Succession Planning
  • Proposed 2704 Regulations
  • Planning for 2017 and Future Years Taxes
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - Trump
  • Tax Proposals - GOP
  • Planning for Potential Changes
  • Questions
  • Contact Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Accounting amp Compliance Update
  • Key Topics
  • Restatement TrendsA 15-year ComparisonMike Panozzo
  • Types of Restatements
  • Trends
  • Reissuance Restatements
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restatement Issues
  • Restating Registrants By Filer Status
  • A Deeper Dive Into the Largest Restatement of 2015
  • Material WeaknessesCassie Crist
  • What is a Material Weakness
  • Material Weakness Drivers
  • Types of Material Weaknesses
  • Material Weakness Trends
  • IPO Material Weakness Trends by Sector
  • Material Weakness Case Studies
  • Material Weakness Mitigation
  • SEC Comment Letter TrendsRuth Snell
  • SEC Comment Letters ndash what are they
  • SEC Comment Letter Trends
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • SEC Areas of Focus
  • Recently Issued Accounting StandardsKat Peterson
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 110
  • Slide Number 111
  • Slide Number 112
  • Slide Number 113
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Revenue
  • Slide Number 117
  • Slide Number 118
  • Slide Number 119
  • Slide Number 120
  • Slide Number 121
  • Slide Number 122
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Other Guidance Becoming Effective after 2015
  • Slide Number 126
  • Slide Number 127
  • Fraud Risk ManagementGretchen Leifeste
  • Fraud Definitions
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • Fraud Statistics
  • The Fraud Triangle
  • Fraud Case Studies
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Fraud Risk Management
  • Not-for-Profit Financial StatementsJamie Holtzman
  • ASU 2016-14 Presentation of Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Entities
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Not-for-Profit Financial Statements
  • Slide Number 144