2015naemsp poster (boland - wellbeing02) final

2
LIMITATIONS  54% response rate  Accuracy of recall of CI not examined  Terms “threatened” or “assaulted” not dened Exposure to critical incidents in a cohort of US emergency medical services providers: career frequency , perceived difculty with coping, and association with burnout and st ress Lori L. Boland, MPH; Russell N. Myers, BCC; Pamela J. Mink, PhD; Karl M. Fernstrom, MPH; Kai G. Hanson, MS; William M. Spinelli, MD Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA BACKGROUND  Studies of exposure to critical incidents (CI) in emergency medical services (EMS) responders have largely focused on police ofcers and reghters  Exposure to CI has not been well-studied in US ambulance workers OBJECTIVES  Assess CI exposure in a cohort of US ambulance personnel Measure coping difculty associated with specic types of CI  Explore the association of CI exposure with burnout and stress METHODS Setting & Design  Large ambulance service in Minnesota  Cross-sectional, 165-item electronic survey  Distributed to all employees (n=400) in September 2012 Measures  Critical Incident History Questionnaire (CIHQ)   Developed in law enforcement, modied for this use in EMS   Asks about frequency and coping difculty (“severity”) of 29 CI (Figure 1)  Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) – used to assess professional burnout  Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) – score range 0-14, higher values indicate more stress 111024 1214 ©2014 ALLINA HEALTHSYSTEM. TM A TRADEMARKOF ALLINA HEALTHSYSTEM. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric CI are particularly distressing for EMS responders and the experience of being assaulted by a patient or threatened with a gun or other weapon is disturbingly common. Cumulative frequency of exposure to CI was not strongly associated with burnout or stress in this cohort, but studies should continue to explore how CI inuence the psychoemotional wellbeing of ambulance workers in the US.  Years in EMS Median # (IQR) of CIs recalled Overall (0.5-30) 154 (59, 267) Quartile I (6) 58 (20, 155) Quartile II (7-12) 146 (66, 226) Quartile III (12-24) 154 (80, 236) Quartile IV (25-30) 287 (194, 419) Total # CI Recalled Burnout Perceived Stress  Quartile I (0-59) 11% (5) 3.8 (2.7)  Quartile II (60-154) 24% (11) 5.1 (3.3)  Quartile III (155-266) 15% (7) 5.3 (3.2)  Quartile IV (267-658) 22% (10) 5.2 (3.3) RESULTS  N = 217 survey responses (54%; Table 1)  CI involving children received 7 of the top 10 mean severity scores (Table 2)  Mean frequency of exposure to CI was negatively correlated with mean severity rating (Table 2)  43% of respondents report having been threatened with a gun/weapon while on duty (Table 3)  Median CI recalled increased with years as EMS provider (Table 4)  Burnout and perceived stress were not strongly associated with cumulative exposure to CI (Table 5)  Variable N=217 Age categories 18-29 30-39 40-49 50+ 27% (58) 20% (43) 25% (54) 27% (57) Gender Male Female 60% (131) 40% (84)  Years as EMS provider = 1 year 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years >20 years 3% (6) 18% (40) 23% (50) 24% (51) 32% (70) Primary response setting Metro Non-Metro or Rural 70% (152) 30% (64) Table 4: Median number of CIs recalled in EMS career, by quartiles of years in EMS Table 1: Demographic characteristics of survey respondents Table 5: Prevalence of burnout and mean perceived stress score by quartiles of total # of CI recalled Results are expressed as mean (SD) or percent (n) Figure 1: Format of the 29-item CIHQ Table 2: Critical incident types (n=29), ranked by mean severity score and mean reported career frequency Table 3: Proportion of respondents who report having been threatened with a gun/weapon, or assaulted by a patient while on duty Overall By Provider Gender Male Female Threatened with gun or other weapon? 43% 50% 33% Assaulted by a patient? 68% 73% 60% Pearson correlation between mean severity and mean frequency = -0.72 (p< 0.001) Never 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10-20 21-50 51+ Been seriously injured Been present when a fellow paramedic/EMT was seriously injured Been threatened with a gun or other weapon No t at all A little bit Mode ra tely Q uite a bit Extremely Been seriously injured Been present when a fellow paramedic/EMT was seriously injured Been threatened with a gun or other weapon During your career as a paramedic/EMT/dispatc her, how many times have you…. In your opinion, how difcult would it be for paramedics/ EMT s/dispatchers to cope with this type of incident?  Score = 0 1 2 3 4 Mean S everity S core* Mean R eported C areer F requency Encountered murdered child 3. 46 E nc o un te re d re ce n tl y de ad bo dy 28 .5 Encountered child badly beaten 3.25 Seen someone dying 26.5 Made mistake that lead to injury/death of patient 3.20 Made a death notication 18.0 Encountered child ac ci de nt al ly ki ll ed 3. 15 Encounte red a suic ide v ic ti m 14.8 Encountered child sev erely neg le ct e d 3. 12 En co un tered adult bad ly beat en 14. 0 Encountered child sexually assaulted 2.99 Encountered mutilated body or human remains 9.3 Encountered a SIDS death 2.93 Encountered child severely injured 8.9 Encountered child severely injured 2.75 Encounter ed adult sexually assaulted 7.1 Present when paramedic seriously injured 2.74 Exposed to AIDS/life-t hreatenin g diseases 6.6 Thr eatened with a gu n or othe r weapo n 2.71 Elde rly pers on s ever ely abus ed/n egle cted 5.9 Trapped in life-threatening situation 2.66 Encountered a SIDS death 4.8 Resp onse in volv ing per sons kn own to cr ew 2.63 Response involving persons known to crew 4.8 Been seriously injured 2.62 Responded to MCI 4.4 Bee n i n a seriou s mot or veh icl e a cc ide nt 2.5 8 Encoun tered child ac cid ent all y k ill ed 4.2 Eld er ly pe rson sev er ely a bus ed/ neg lected 2.5 2 Enc oun tered patien t sev er ely b ur ned 3.9 Had life end angered i n a large-s cale disast er 2.50 Exposed to life-threatening toxic substance 3.8 Ex po se d to l if e- th re at en in g t ox ic su bs ta nc e 2. 33 Been as sa ul te d by a p at i en t 3 .6 Exp ose d to AIDS /li fe- thr eaten ing dise ases 2.3 0 Enc oun tered c hil d sev er ely ne gle ct ed 2.7 Encounter ed adult sexually assaulted 2.24 Encounter ed child sexually assaulted 2.5 Enc oun ter ed pa tie nt sev er ely burne d 2.2 3 Res pon ded to lar ge-sc ale dis ast er 2.4 Res pon ded to lar ge-sc ale dis ast er 2.1 7 Enc oun tered child ba dly bea ten 1.7 Encountered mutilated body or human remains 2.1 6 Thr eat ene d wit h a gun o r other we apo n 1.7 En c ou n te red ad ul t ba dl y be at en 2. 09 Tra pp ed in li fe -t hr eate ni ng si tu at io n 1. 4 Responded to MCI 2.04Been seriously injured 1.1 Ma de a d ea th n ot i c at i on 1. 99 P re se nt wh en pa ra m ed i c se ri ou sl y in ju re d 0 .8 Be en as s ault ed by a pat ie nt 1. 99 En co u nt ered mu r der ed chi ld 0. 6 Enco untered a suic ide victim 1.96 Been in a serious moto r vehicle acci dent 0.4 Seen someone dying 1.64 Had life endangered in a large-scale disaster 0.3 Encounter ed body of someone recent ly dead 1.45 Made mistake that lead to injury/death of patient 0.2

Upload: allina-health-ems

Post on 01-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2015NAEMSP Poster (Boland - Wellbeing02) FINAL

 

LIMITATIONS 54% response rate

 Accuracy of recall of CI not examined

 Terms “threatened” or “assaulted” not defined

Exposure to critical incidents in a cohort of US emergency medical services providers:career frequency, perceived difficulty with coping, and association with burnout and stress

Lori L. Boland, MPH; Russell N. Myers, BCC; Pamela J. Mink, PhD; Karl M. Fernstrom, MPH; Kai G. Hanson, MS; William M. Spinelli, MD

Allina Health Emergency Medical Services, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

BACKGROUND Studies of exposure to critical incidents (CI) in emergencymedical services (EMS) responders have largely focused onpolice officers and firefighters

 Exposure to CI has not been well-studied in US ambulanceworkers

OBJECTIVES Assess CI exposure in a cohort of US ambulance personnel

Measure coping difficulty associated with specific types of CI

 Explore the association of CI exposure with burnout and stress

METHODSSetting & Design

 Large ambulance service in Minnesota

 Cross-sectional, 165-item electronic survey

 Distributed to all employees (n=400) in September 2012

Measures

 Critical Incident History Questionnaire (CIHQ)  

– Developed in law enforcement, modified for this use in EMS

  – Asks about frequency and coping difficulty (“severity”) of29 CI (Figure 1)

 Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) – used to assessprofessional burnout

 Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) – score range 0-14,higher values indicate more stress

111024 1214 ©2014 ALLINA HEALTHSYSTEM. TM A TRADEMARKOF ALLINA HEALTHSYSTEM.

CONCLUSIONSPediatric CI are particularly distressing for EMS respondersand the experience of being assaulted by a patient orthreatened with a gun or other weapon is disturbinglycommon. Cumulative frequency of exposure to CI was notstrongly associated with burnout or stress in this cohort, butstudies should continue to explore how CI influence thepsychoemotional wellbeing of ambulance workers in the US.

 Years in EMS Median # (IQR) of CIs recalled

Overall (0.5-30) 154 (59, 267)

Quartile I (≤6) 58 (20, 155)

Quartile II (7-12) 146 (66, 226)

Quartile III (12-24) 154 (80, 236)

Quartile IV (25-30) 287 (194, 419)

Total # CI Recalled Burnout Perceived Stress

  Quartile I (0-59) 11% (5) 3.8 (2.7)

  Quartile II (60-154) 24% (11) 5.1 (3.3)

  Quartile III (155-266) 15% (7) 5.3 (3.2)

  Quartile IV (267-658) 22% (10) 5.2 (3.3)

RESULTS N = 217 survey responses (54%; Table 1)

 CI involving children received 7 of the top 10 mean severityscores (Table 2)

 Mean frequency of exposure to CI was negatively correlatedwith mean severity rating (Table 2)

 43% of respondents report having been threatened with agun/weapon while on duty (Table 3)

 Median CI recalled increased with years as EMS provider(Table 4)

 Burnout and perceived stress were not strongly associatedwith cumulative exposure to CI (Table 5)

 Variable N=217

Age categories

18-2930-3940-4950+

27% (58)20% (43)25% (54)27% (57)

Gender MaleFemale

60% (131)40% (84)

 Years as EMS provider

≤= 1 year2-5 years

6-10 years11-20 years>20 years

3% (6)18% (40)23% (50)24% (51)32% (70)

Primary response setting MetroNon-Metro or Rural

70% (152)30% (64)

Table 4: Median number of CIs recalled in EMS career, byquartiles of years in EMS

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of survey respondents

Table 5: Prevalence of burnout and mean perceived stressscore by quartiles of total # of CI recalled

Results are expressed as mean (SD) or percent (n)

Figure 1: Format of the 29-item CIHQ

Table 2: Critical incident types (n=29), ranked by meanseverity score and mean reported career frequency

Table 3: Proportion of respondents who report having beenthreatened with a gun/weapon, or assaulted by a patientwhile on duty

OverallBy Provider Gender

Male Female

Threatened with gun or other weapon? 43% 50% 33%

Assaulted by a patient? 68% 73% 60%

Pearson correlation between mean severity and mean frequency = -0.72 (p< 0.001)

Never 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10-20 21-50 5 1+

Been seriously injured

Been present when afellow paramedic/EMTwas seriously injured

Been threatened with agun or other weapon

N ot at all A little bit Mod era tely Q uite a bit Extremely

Been seriously injured

Been present when afellow paramedic/EMTwas seriously injured

Been threatened with agun or other weapon

During your career as a paramedic/EMT/dispatcher, howmany times have you….

In your opinion, how difficult would it be for paramedics/ EMTs/dispatchers to cope with this type of incident? 

  Score = 0 1 2 3 4

Mean Severity Score* Mean Reported Career Frequency

Encountered murdered child  3 .46 Encountered recent ly dead body 28.5Encountered child badly beaten 3.25 Seen someone dying 26.5Made mistake that lead to injury/death ofpatient

3.20 Made a death notification 18.0

Encountered child accidentally k il led 3.15 Encountered a suicide victim 14.8Encountered child sev erel y ne gl ect ed 3 .12 E nco un tere d adul t ba dl y bea ten 14 .0

Encountered child sexually assaulted 2.99Encountered mutilated body or humanremains

9.3

Encountered a SIDS death 2.93 Encountered child severely injured 8.9Encountered child severely injured 2.75 Encountered adult sexually assaulted 7.1Present when paramedic seriously injured 2.74 Exposed to AIDS/life-threatening diseases 6.6Threatened with a gun or other weapon 2.71 Elderly person severely abused/neglected 5.9Trapped in life-threatening situation 2.66 Encountered a SIDS death 4.8

Response involving persons known to crew 2.63Response involving persons known tocrew

4.8

Been seriously injured 2.62 Responded to MCI 4.4Been in a serious motor vehicle accident 2.58 Encountered child accidentally killed 4.2Elderly person severely abused/neglected 2.52 Encountered patient severely burned 3.9

Had life endangered in a large-scale disaster 2.50Exposed to life-threatening toxicsubstance

3.8

Exposed to li fe -threa tening toxi c substance 2 .33 Been assau lted by a pa tien t 3 .6Exposed to AIDS/life-threatening diseases 2.30 Encountered child severely neglected 2.7Encountered adult sexually assaulted 2.24 Encountered child sexually assaulted 2.5Encountered patient severely burned 2.23 Responded to large-scale disaster 2.4Responded to large-scale disaster 2.17 Encountered child badly beaten 1.7Encountered mutilated body or humanremains

2.16 Threatened with a gun or other weapon 1.7

Encountered adu lt bad ly bea ten 2 .09 Trapped in l if e- th reaten ing s itua tion 1 .4Responded to MCI 2.04 Been seriously injured 1.1Made a dea th not ifica tion 1 .99 Present when paramed ic ser ious ly i njured 0 .8B ee n a ss aul te d by a pa ti en t 1 .99 E nco un tere d mu rde re d ch il d 0 .6Encountered a suicide victim 1.96 Been in a serious motor vehicle accident 0.4

Seen someone dying 1.64Had life endangered in a large-scaledisaster

0.3

Encountered body of someone recently dead 1.45Made mistake that lead to injury/death ofpatient

0.2

Page 2: 2015NAEMSP Poster (Boland - Wellbeing02) FINAL