2014 naec coen teulings 14_feb
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EMPLOYMENT AND MACRO POLICYIN THE AFTERMATH OF THE CRISIS
Coen TeulingsUniversity of Cambridge
Presentation OECD, Paris14 February 2014
NEW APPROACHES TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
![Page 2: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
Employment at this stage of European history
Based on my previous CPB experience Minimum wages? EPL? Wage subsidies?
?
![Page 3: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Introduction
Employment at this stage of European history
Based on my previous CPB experience Minimum wages? EPL? Wage subsidies?
![Page 4: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
Employment at this stage of European history
Based on my previous CPB experience Minimum wages? EPL? Wage subsidies? Housing and macro policy On-going research
![Page 5: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Overview of the talk
1. Stylized facts2. Theory framework3. Outline of the model4. Policy experiment5. The 10 commandments
![Page 6: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Overview of the talk
1. Stylized facts2. Theory framework3. Outline of the model4. Policy experiment5. The 10 commandments
![Page 7: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The effect of Financial Crises
15 cases (Reinhart & Rogoff)Peak to Trough (%)
Duration (years)
Income per head -9 1.9
Unemployment 7 4.8
House prices -36 6.0
Stock prices -56 3.4
Sovereign debt 86 3.0
![Page 8: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
GDP effect largely permanent
Sweden Finland
Hong Kong, Indonesia
![Page 9: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
House price slumps
Benetrix, Eichengreen, O’Rourke
![Page 10: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Anecdotical Evidence on Europe House price decline ↔ Unemployment
Small decline: Ger, Swe, Nl (till 2010) Strong decline: Esp, Ire, UK, Denmark, Nl (since
2010) Denmark and Nl high mortgage debt,
unemployment Spain
25% males work in construction fall in human capital
Current account since 2002 Surpluses: Ger, Swe, Denmark, Nl, Austria, Finland Deficits: UK, Gre, Esp, Por
![Page 11: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
House prices
![Page 12: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Unemployment
![Page 13: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Sovereign debt interest rate
![Page 14: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
House price overvalued?
![Page 15: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
House prices, wealth, employmentMian & Sufi
![Page 16: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Decomposition of demand
![Page 17: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Fiscal multiplier
![Page 18: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Overview of the talk
1. Stylized facts2. Theory framework3. Outline of the model4. Policy experiment5. The 10 commandments
![Page 19: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
House price decline =Wealth transfer between generations
High house prices Good for current generation: wealthier Bad for future generation: must buy expensive houses
Hence: fall in house prices = wealth transfer Large! 30% decline = 60% of GDP
= 80% of sovereign debt Balance budget reduction in tax deductibility
= intergenerational wealth transfer Value of housing captures NPV deductibility
![Page 20: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Saving response
Take a real, not a financial view of saving
What is saving in a small open economy? Export more! Shift of employment from domestic to
tradable
![Page 21: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Keynes or Friedman?
Paradoxical situation Only current income matters?
House price decline would be irrelevant
Argument relies on Permanent Income Hypothesis
Can we do macro without rigid prices? Would be much simpler! It turns out we cannot
![Page 22: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Overview of the talk
1. Stylized facts2. Theory framework3. Outline of the model4. Policy experiment5. The 10 commandments
![Page 23: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Structure of Economy Overlapping generations model Blanchard-
Yaari Workers die at fixed rate 2. 5%, new cohorts enter
Once and for all shock, perfect foresight after 5 industries + share in consumption
Tradable 20% Domestic 25% Informal 25% Construction/Land 5% Government 25%
Cobb Douglas utility Both inter-temporal and across commodities Hence: constant gross consumption shares over
lifetime
![Page 24: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Unemployment
Workers enter unemployed Industry specific human capital Switching industries requires
unemployment 2-5 years period
No congestion effects Runs counter to empirical evidence
![Page 25: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Labour reallocation
If wages are flexible Hiring industries pay full wage Non-hiring industries pay lower, clearing wage
downsizing by retirement Firing industries pay lower bound wage
firing = quitting unemployment = good limit to wage reductions, though at low levels: 50% fall
If wages are inflexible Wage determined by competitiveness on global
market Drop in industry demand? Firing workers
firing ≠ quitting unemployment = bad
![Page 26: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Government
Pays interest on debt 1.5% Pays its civil servants (Pays mortgage subsidy) Collects consumption tax
VAT … but also income tax: pension contributions are
tax exempt Policy instrument: future taxes
We assume an exponential path back to LR equilibrium
Hence: Model = system of linear differential equations … if there is no construction (housing is only land)
![Page 27: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What not?
Apart from housing, no capital Constant interest rate
Hence: no sovereign debt crisis No financial intermediation No uncertainty / precautionary saving No bequest motive More general: no behavioural issues Perfectly elastic demand for tradable
![Page 28: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Overview of the talk
1. Stylized facts2. Theory framework3. Outline of the model4. Policy experiment5. The 10 commandments
![Page 29: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Policy experiment
Start from a steady equilibrium Applies to the Netherlands (?) … but not to Spain (excess construction, bubble) … and Denmark (overheating?) … Germany (catching up due to labour market
reform) Shock to productivity ↓and debt↑ (e.g. 10%)
Hence: excess housing (e.g. 5%) Policy response, fully credible Perfect foresight of adjustment path
![Page 30: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
What policy response?
No response = No option: higher interest Raise taxes to cover only higher interest?
Optimal from tax smoothing perspective Sovereign debt becomes random walk Increases vulnerability for future shocks
Hence: recovery of old public debt level 60%? Temporarily higher taxes, converging to steady
state Question however: at what speed?
Risk of (too much) overshooting
![Page 31: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Phases in adjustment processTypical adjustment process
1.Initial non-hiring/firing in domestic (construction?)
Firing only under wage inflexibility Accelerator mechanism
2.Substitution to informal industry due to high tax3.Domestic starts rehiring4.Construction starts rehiring
![Page 32: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Effect on wealth and consumption Human capital current generation falls
1. Lower wages in non-hiring industries2. Unemployment
Financial capital falls due to house prices Hence: permanently lower consumption
Retirement + interest rate = 4% Fits wealth effect of 4 cents per euro
New generations gross consumption unaffected
Conditional on tax policy
Consumption effect lasts long Unemployment effect not
![Page 33: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Implications for debt and deficit
Higher taxes reduce wealth current generation
… and induce inter-temporal substitution Hence: aggregate consumption postponed Leads to employment shift to tradable
… which reduces value of human capital … and hence current consumption ... and house prices, hence consumption
Short run effect on deficit is negative Might even be negative? Open research question Fits multiplier studies Auerbach & Gorodnichenko
![Page 34: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Welfare evaluation
Optimal fiscal policy = setting wealth distribution between generations
Market is efficient Hence, postponing hurts future generations? Might be false: taxation leads to distortions
Temporary overshooting Inefficient unemployment instead of retirement Substitution to informal sector
All depends crucially on degree of wage flexibility Assuming wage flexibility contradicts empirical evidence
![Page 35: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Other things
Tax treatment mortgage interest: balance budget reform makes things worse!
Same applies to NPV of market distortions Italy … and in the future Germany?
Bubbles? Lead to excess consumption Adjustment unavoidable Critical role trade balance Also bubble adjustment can be overshooting
![Page 36: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Overview of the talk
1. Stylized facts2. Theory framework3. Outline of the model4. Policy experiment5. The 10 commandments
![Page 37: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The 10 Commandments (I)
1. House price decline = intergenerational wealth transfer (large!)
2. House price variability, not level is main concern
3. Reduction sovereign debt = substitute, not complement
4. Adequate response fiscal policy: intergenerational insurance
5. Requires long run stance fiscal policy
![Page 38: 2014 Naec coen teulings 14_feb](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052619/5568602dd8b42a203d8b48ee/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The 10 Commandments (II)
1. House price decline = intergenerational wealth transfer
2. House price variability, not level is main concern
3. Reduction sovereign debt = substitute, not complement
4. Adequate response fiscal policy: intergenerational insurance
5. Requires long run stance fiscal policy
6. Shock therapy likely to be counterproductive
7. Maybe adverse short run response budget deficit
8. Hence: budget deficit=wrong control variable
9. Hence: EU regulatory framework inadequate role output gap
10. Applies also to product market reforms