2014-influence of thermal shrinkage on protective clothing performance during fire exposure...

Upload: 03lena03

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    1/15

    Mechanical Engineering Research; Vol. 4, No. 2; 2014ISSN 1927-0607 E-ISSN 1927-0615

    Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

    1

    Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance

    during Fire Exposure: Numerical Investigation

    AhmedGhazy11Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt

    Correspondence: Ahmed Ghazy, Faculty of Engineering, Ibrahim Abel Razik Street, Ain Shams E., 11718, Cairo,

    Egypt. E-mail: [email protected]

    Received: March 31, 2014 Accepted: May 8, 2014 Online Published: June 20, 2014

    doi:10.5539/mer.v4n2p1 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mer.v4n2p1

    Abstract

    The thermal shrinkage of protective clothing during fire exposure plays a crucial rule in reducing the clothing

    protective performance. The transversal reduction in the fabric perimeter around the body due to the fabric thermal

    shrinkage causes a dynamic reduction in the air gap between the clothing and the body. This leads to a dynamic

    change in the heat transfer modes within the gap. Despite of its influential effect on the clothing performance, the

    thermal shrinkage of protective clothing during fire exposure has not been yet addressed in the literature. This

    can be attributed to the absence of a gap model that can capture the reciprocal change in heat transfer modes

    within the gap due to clothing shrinkage. This paper develops a finite volume model to investigate the influence

    of the fabric thermal shrinkage on protective clothing performance. A special attention was drawn to the model

    of the air gap between the clothing and skin as it responds directly to the clothing thermal shrinkage. The

    influence of a variation in the fabric shrinkage rate and the overall reduction in the fabric dimensions was

    investigated. The paper demonstrates that the clothing protective performance continuously decreases with the

    reduction in the fabric dimensions while the decay in the clothing protective performance is limited to small

    shrinkage rates of the fabric. Moreover, this decay in the clothing performance vanishes at high shrinkage rates

    of the fabric.

    Keywords:fabric shrinkage, fire exposure, conduction-radiation, thermal radiation, finite volume method.

    1. Introduction

    Protective clothing is widely used in many industries and applications such as petroleum and petrochemical

    industries and municipal firefighting to seek protection from thermal and fire exposures. The thermal protective

    performance (TPP) of the clothing is determined by estimating heat transfer from the thermal source to the skin

    through clothing, which causes skin burns as a result. Standard bench top tests (ISO 9151, 1995, ASTM D 4108,

    1987, ASTM F, 1999, and NFPA, 2007) are used to evaluate the TPP of fabric specimens while manikin test

    (ASTM F, 2000) is used to evaluate the TPP of the whole garment at different locations of the body.

    Modeling the thermal performance of protective clothing has been extensively reported in the literature during the

    past decade. Torvi (1997) and Torvi and Dale (1999) modeled heat transfer in Kevlar/PBI and Nomex

    flame-resistant fabric during a flame TPP test. Mell and Lawson (2000) modeled heat transfer in multiple layers

    protective garment during radiant exposure. Tan, Crown and Capjack (1998) studied the design of flightsuitprotective garment for optimum protection to flight personnel. Chitrphiromsri and Kuznetsov (2005) and Song,

    Chitrphiromsri and Ding (2008) modeled heat and moisture transfer through firefighters clothing in fire exposure

    and local flame test, respectively. Zhu and Zhang (2009) considered the fabric thermal degradation at high

    temperature during radiant exposure. Mercer and Sidhu (2008, 2009) investigated the performance of protective

    clothing with embedded phase change material.

    The air gap between the fabric and skin plays an essential role in determining the performance of protective

    clothing during fire exposure. This role was acknowledged in the literature in several studies. For example, Torvi,

    Dale and Faulkner (1999) investigated the effect of the gap width on the protective performance of a

    flame-resistant fabric during a flame TPP test. Sawcyn and Torvi (2005) and Talukdar, Torvi, Simonson and

    Sawcyn (2010) attempted to improve the modeling of the air gap in bench top tests of protective fabrics. The 3-D

    body scanning technology was used (Song, Barker, Hamouda, Kuznetsov, Chitrphiromsri, & Grimes, 2004; Kim,

    Lee, Li, Corner, & Paquette, 2002; Mah & Song, 2010a; Mah & Song, 2010b) to determine the widths and

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    2/15

    www.ccsenet.org/mer Mechanical Engineering Research Vol. 4, No. 2; 2014

    2

    distribution of air gaps between flame-resistant garment and manikin body. Ghazy and Bergstrom (2010)

    developed a numerical model for single layer protective clothing that considers the combined conduction-radiation

    heat transfer between the fabric and the skin. Then, Ghazy and Bergstrom (2011) further investigated the influence

    of the conduction-radiation in the gap between protective clothing and the skin on the overall performance of the

    clothing. Ghazy and Bergstrom (2012) also developed a model for heat transfer in multiple layers firefighters

    clothing that considers the combined conduction-radiation heat transfer within the air gaps between clothing layers.

    Ghazy (2013) developed a novel air gap model that stands middle way between the conduction-radiation modelintroduced in Ghazy (2011) and the approximate air gap model exists elsewhere in the literature.

    The thermal shrinkage of protective clothing in thermal or fire exposures significantly affects the clothing

    performance. The transversal reduction in the fabric perimeter around the body due to fabric thermal shrinkage

    causes a dynamic reduction in the air gap between the clothing and the body. This leads to a corresponding

    variation in the total heat transfer through the gap and an interchanging variation in its modes. In addition, the

    reduction in the gap width caused by thermal shrinkage and hence the overall protective performance of the

    clothing depends on the total reduction in fabric dimensions and the shrinkage rate of the fabric.

    The influence of the thermal shrinkage on the performance of protective clothing during fire exposure has not been

    yet addressed in the literature. This is because the lack of knowledge about shrinkage rates of fire-resistant fabrics

    during fire exposure. In addition, the approximate analysis of the air gap that most of the models in the literature

    adopted is not capable of considering the dynamic variation in the air gap between the clothing and the skin due to

    fabric thermal shrinkage. This paper numerically investigates the effect of the fabrics thermal shrinkage during

    fire exposure on the overall performance of protective clothing. A special attention was drawn to modeling heat

    transfer through the gap since it responds directly to the fabric thermal shrinkage. The temperature dependence of

    the thermophysical properties of the air gap and the fabric was accounted for. The influence of a variation in the

    fabric shrinkage rate and the reduction in the fabric dimensions on the clothing protective performance was studied

    to capture different forms of fabric thermal shrinkage.

    2. Problem Description

    A typical protective clothing system is shown in Figure 1. The clothing system comprises a fire-resistant fabric

    that is exposed to a heat flux of about 80 kW/m2from a lab burner, the human skin that consists of epidermis,

    dermis and subcutaneous layers and an air gap enclosed between the fabric and the skin. The energy equations

    for the clothing elements are expressed as follows.

    Figure 1. A schematic diagram of protective clothing

    2.1 Heat Transfer in Fire-Resistant Fabrics

    The transient energy equation for the Kevlar/PBI fabric was introduced by Torvi (1997) and Torvi and Threlfall

    (2006) as

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    3/15

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    4/15

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    5/15

    www.ccsenet.org/mer Mechanical Engineering Research Vol. 4, No. 2; 2014

    5

    PbP

    l

    P IS ,= (23)

    The boundary conditions for the air gap energy equation (Equation 5) are as follows.

    fabfab LyfabLyair

    TT==

    =

    0>t (24)

    airfabairfab LLy

    epLLyairTT

    +=+= =

    0>t (25)

    whereepT is the epidermis surface temperature and airL is the air gap width.

    The initial condition of the air gap is

    ambair TtyT == )0,( (26)

    2.3 Heat Transfer in the Human Skin

    Heat transfer in the human skin is modeled by the bioheat transfer equation developed by Pennes (1948). The

    energy equations for the epidermis, dermis and subcutaneous layers of the skin are written as

    =

    y

    Tk

    yt

    Tc epepP)(

    (27)

    )()()( TTcyTk

    ytTc crbbPdsdsP +

    =

    (28)

    )()()( TTcy

    Tk

    yt

    Tc crbbPscscP +

    =

    (29)

    whereb is the blood perfusion rate, crT is thecore body temperature.

    The boundary conditions of the skin are

    airfab

    airfab

    airfab LLy

    airairLLyy

    LLy

    ep

    epy

    TTkrq

    y

    TTk

    +=

    +=

    +=

    =

    )()()(

    r 0>t (30)

    crLLLLLyscTT

    scdsepairfab

    =++++=

    0>t (31)

    whereairfab LLy

    y rq+=

    )(r is the incident radiation heat flux on the skin (Equation 16) and

    epL , dsL and scL are the

    thicknesses of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous layers, respectively.

    The initial conditions of the skin are represented by a linear temperature distribution from the epidermis surface

    (32.5C) to the subcutaneous base (37C). Skin burn injury takes place when the basal layer (the base of the

    epidermis layer) temperature reaches 44oC. Henriques integral (Henriques & Moritz, 1947) is employed to predict

    times for the skin to receive burn injuries as follows.

    =

    t

    dtRT

    EP

    0

    exp (32)

    where the values for the activation energy E

    of the skin and the pre-exponential factor Pwere determined by

    Weaver and Stoll (1996) for seconddegree burns and by Takata, Rouse and Stanley (1973) for thirddegree burns.The basal layer temperature is employed in the aforementioned integral to predict times to first and second

    degree burns. First and seconddegree burns take place when reaches 0.53 and 1, respectively. Whilst the

    dermal base (the base of the dermis layer) temperature is employed in the integral to estimate times to thirddegree

    burns, which occur when reaches 1.

    3. Numerical Solution

    The fabric, air gap and the skin (epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous) energy equations were solved along with

    their boundary conditions using the finite volume method (Patankar, 1980) using the Gauss-Seidel point-by-point

    iterative scheme. The solution proceeds as follows. Within each time step, temperatures calculated in the previous

    time step are used as initial guess for the iteration loop. The air gap width is updated according to Equations 6 and

    7. A uniform reduction in the air gap control volumes sizes is assumed whereas the air properties in each control

    volume do not change. Within the iteration loop, temperatures of the air gap, fabric backside and epidermis surface

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    6/15

    www.

    are used t

    of radiati

    energy eq

    with the

    equations

    a time step

    times to s

    4. Results

    Simulatio

    used in th

    Table 2. T

    reduction

    representa

    shrinkage

    Table 1. S

    Table 2. TPr

    De

    Sp

    Th

    Th

    Bl

    Fi

    ccsenet.org/me

    solve the RT

    e heat flux ar

    ation of the

    ost recent te

    from the fabri

    , temperature

    in burns.

    and Discussi

    s were carrie

    e simulation a

    he dynamic re

    in the gap

    tives for the p

    rate of the fab

    imulation par

    P

    L

    T

    h

    hermophysicaperty

    nsity (Kg/m3)

    ecific Heat (J/

    ermal Conduc

    ickness (m)

    od Perfusion

    gure 2. Comp

    E of the gap.

    e estimated to

    ap. The sourc

    peratures wit

    exposed surf

    of the basal l

    on

    out for an ex

    re listed in T

    duction in the

    idth and th

    rcentage redu

    ric, respective

    meters

    roperty

    ab Fabric

    ab Fabric

    ab Fabric

    ab Fabric t

    ab Fabric t

    g Hot gas

    Hot gas

    l Flame

    l properties of

    KgoC)

    tivity (W/moC

    Rate (m3/s)/m

    arison betwee

    Mechanical

    ext, the radia

    be used in t

    e terms and p

    in the loop.

    ace to the sub

    yer and derm

    osure period

    ble 1 whilst t

    gap width bet

    rate at whi

    ction in the fa

    ly.

    ensity

    xtinction fact

    missivity

    ransmissivity

    hickness

    es temperatur

    es emissivity

    onvective he

    the human skEpi

    120

    359

    ) 0.25

    813tissue -

    measured an

    Engineering Re

    6

    tion heat flux

    e boundary c

    roperties of th

    hen, new tem

    utaneous base

    l base are use

    f 10 seconds

    e thermophy

    een the fabri

    ch this reduc

    ric perimeter

    or

    e

    t transfer coe

    inermis D

    0 12

    8 32

    5 0.

    0-5

    2

    -

    d predicted te

    search

    at the bounda

    onditions of t

    e fabric and a

    peratures are

    . When tempe

    in Henriques

    ollowed by a

    sical propertie

    c and the skin

    tion takes pl

    around the bo

    Val

    323

    0.0

    0.9

    0.0

    0.6

    200

    0.0

    ficient 40

    rmis Sub

    00 100

    22 276

    23 0.1

    10-

    11

    -

    peratures of

    ies of the gap

    e fabric and

    ir gap are upd

    alculated by

    rature conver

    integral (Eq

    ool down peri

    s of the hum

    was introduce

    ace. These t

    y due to fabri

    e

    kg/m

    mm

    0 K

    /m2K

    cutaneous

    0

    0

    7

    0-

    the skin simul

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    and the diver

    the skin and i

    ated in accor

    olving the dis

    ence is reach

    ation 32) to p

    od. The para

    n skin are list

    d by the perce

    o parameter

    c shrinkage an

    lood

    1060

    770

    1.2510-3

    ant surface

    2014

    ence

    the

    ance

    crete

    d for

    edict

    eters

    ed in

    tage

    are

    d the

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    7/15

    www.

    The mode

    skin simul

    measured

    2. The mo

    periods. T

    not consi

    discrepan

    The effect

    to the ski

    through t

    decreases

    heat flux

    divergenc

    radiation

    compared

    within the

    in the ene

    from 10%

    the condueffect of

    performan

    Figure 3.

    (a)

    (b)

    ccsenet.org/me

    validation ha

    ant gauge an

    temperatures

    del successfull

    he small devi

    ered in the m

    y noted in Fi

    of a variation

    is compared

    e air gap inc

    with the incre

    ith a variatio

    in the condu

    eat flux. Mor

    to the condu

    gap is not line

    gy transfer (c

    to 30% is les

    tion and radihe fabric the

    ce.

    ffect of a red

    s been done b

    a constant ai

    f the skin sim

    y predicted th

    tion between

    odel such as

    ure 2 may req

    in the percent

    to the case of

    eases as the

    ase in the perc

    in the perce

    ction heat flu

    over, the dive

    tion heat flu

    arly proportio

    onduction and

    than that due

    tion heat fluxmal shrinkag

    ction in the g

    fab

    Mechanical

    simulating t

    r gap width o

    ulant surface

    e skin simulan

    the prediction

    he fabric ther

    uire extensive

    ge reduction i

    no fabric shr

    ercentage re

    entage reducti

    tage reductio

    with a varia

    rgence in the

    . In addition,

    al to the vari

    /or radiation)

    to a variation

    s within the ge on the heat

    ap width on h

    ric, (b) emitte

    Engineering Re

    7

    e open flame

    f 6.4 mm (1/4

    uring the exp

    t surface temp

    and measure

    mal pyrolysis.

    experimental

    n the gap widt

    nkage and ill

    uction increa

    on, Figure 3(b

    is bigger tha

    ion in the per

    adiation heat

    the divergen

    tion in the per

    within the ga

    from 30% to

    ap from the c transfer to t

    at transfer thr

    radiation fro

    search

    ench top test

    in.). A comp

    osure and coo

    erature during

    ents can be

    . However, id

    data.

    h on heat tran

    strated by Fi

    ses, Figure 3(

    ). Neverthele

    that in the r

    centage reduc

    flux drops qui

    e in the con

    centage reduc

    due to a vari

    50%. Further

    se of no fabrie skin and

    ough the gap:

    m the fabric

    performed by

    rison betwee

    l down period

    both the expo

    ttributed to ot

    entifying the

    fer within the

    gure 3. The c

    a), while the

    s, the variatio

    diation heat fl

    ion starts earl

    ckly during th

    uction and ra

    tion. For exa

    ation in the p

    ore, the rem

    c shrinkage prence on the

    (a) conductio

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    Torvi (1997)

    the predicte

    s are held in F

    sure and cool

    her factors th

    ource of the

    gap from the

    nduction hea

    radiation heat

    n in the condu

    ux. In additio

    ier than that o

    e cool down p

    diation heat f

    ple, the diver

    rcentage redu

    rkable deviati

    oves the influclothing prote

    heat flux fro

    2014

    sing

    and

    gure

    own

    t are

    mall

    abric

    flux

    flux

    ction

    , the

    f the

    eriod

    uxes

    ence

    ction

    on in

    ntialctive

    the

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    8/15

    www.

    Figure 4.

    The influe

    skin is sh

    dermal ba

    layers tem

    the fabric

    the tempe

    surface an

    base temp

    skin layer

    (a)

    (b)

    (c)

    ccsenet.org/me

    Effect of a re

    nce of a variat

    wn in Figure

    se (Figure 4c)

    peratures is n

    to the skin du

    ature distribu

    d the basal la

    erature develo

    last during t

    uction in the

    s

    on in the perc

    4. The temp

    increase with

    ot linearly pro

    to the shrink

    tions within t

    er become ev

    ps during the

    e cool down p

    Mechanical

    ir gap width

    rface, (b) bas

    entage reducti

    ratures of th

    the increase i

    portional to t

    age, the highe

    e skin. In ad

    ident by the e

    cool down pe

    eriod.

    Engineering Re

    8

    n the temper

    al layer, (c) d

    on in the gap

    epidermis su

    the percenta

    e increase in

    the influence

    dition, the di

    d of the expo

    riod. Neverth

    search

    ture distributi

    rmal base

    idth on the te

    rface (Figure

    ge reduction.

    the percentag

    of the variati

    ergences in t

    sure period w

    less, the dive

    on within the

    perature dist

    4a), basal lay

    owever, the

    reduction. M

    n in the perc

    e temperatur

    hile the diver

    gence in the

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    kin: (a) epide

    ibutions withi

    er (Figure 4b

    ncrease in the

    oreover, the c

    ntage reducti

    s of the epid

    ence in the d

    emperatures

    2014

    mis

    n the

    and

    skin

    loser

    n on

    rmis

    rmal

    f the

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    9/15

    www.

    The influe

    is shown i

    the increa

    50% does

    shown in

    Figure 5.

    Figure 6 il

    the gap. A

    notable inas the red

    reduction

    flux from

    heat flux

    distributio

    reduction

    than that o

    (a)

    (b

    ccsenet.org/me

    nce of a variat

    n Figure 5. Ti

    e in the perce

    not affect ti

    igure 5b, con

    ffect of the r

    lustrates the e

    s shown in Fi

    rease in the cuction rate in

    ate. This dive

    he case of no

    ithin the gap

    n of conducti

    rate. Neverthe

    f the conducti

    )

    ion in the red

    es to first a

    tage reductio

    es to first a

    tinuously decr

    duction in the

    fect of a varia

    ure 6a, any d

    nduction heatcreases, the d

    gence drops o

    hrinkage vani

    decreases wit

    n heat flux, t

    less, the diver

    on heat flux.

    Mechanical

    ction in the g

    nd secondde

    from 0% (no

    d secondde

    ease with the

    air gap width

    (b) thi

    ion in the red

    eviation in the

    flux within thivergence in

    ff by the end

    shes graduall

    the increase i

    he divergence

    gence in the r

    Engineering Re

    9

    p width due t

    ree burns, sh

    shrinkage) to

    gree burns. O

    increase in the

    on skin burn

    ddegree bur

    ction rate (fab

    reduction rat

    e gap. In addithe conductio

    f the exposur

    during the co

    n the reductio

    in the radiati

    diation heat f

    search

    fabric shrink

    wn in Figure

    50%. Any red

    the other h

    percentage r

    redictions: (a

    s

    ric shrinkage

    from the cas

    ion, althoughheat flux de

    period and th

    ol down perio

    rate, as sho

    on heat flux d

    lux with a var

    age on times t

    5a, decrease

    ction in the ai

    nd, times to t

    duction.

    ) first and se

    ate) on the en

    of 0%/s (no

    he conductioncreases with

    e deviation in

    . On the other

    n in Figure 6b

    ecreases with

    iation in the r

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    o skin burn inj

    lmost linearly

    r gap width be

    hirddegree b

    onddegree b

    rgy transfer

    hrinkage) ca

    heat flux incrthe increase i

    he conductio

    hand, the radi

    . However, li

    the increase i

    duction rate i

    2014

    uries

    with

    yond

    urns,

    urns,

    ithin

    ses a

    easesthe

    heat

    ation

    e the

    n the

    less

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    10/15

    www.

    Figure 6.

    The variat

    temperatu

    decreases

    the tempe

    layers tem

    by a varia

    of no shri

    (a)

    (b

    ccsenet.org/me

    Effect of the r

    flux

    ion in the te

    es increase as

    as the reducti

    ature distribu

    peratures due

    ion from 0%/

    kage lasts du

    )

    eduction rate i

    t the fabric ai

    perature distr

    the reduction

    n rate increas

    tions within t

    to a variation i

    (no shrinkag

    ing the cool d

    Mechanical

    n the air gap

    interface, (b)

    ibutions withi

    rate increases

    es; a rapid re

    e skin as co

    n the reductio

    e) to 5%/s. Ho

    own period.

    Engineering Re

    10

    idth on energ

    emitted radia

    n the skin is

    . Nevertheless

    uction in the

    pared to a sl

    rate from 5

    wever, the di

    search

    y transfer thro

    ion from the

    llustrated in

    , the divergen

    ir gap width

    ow one. For

    /s to 50%/s is

    ergence in th

    ugh the gap: (

    abric backsid

    igure 7. Exp

    ce in the skin l

    oes not make

    xample, the i

    minimal com

    skin tempera

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    a) conduction

    ctedly, skin l

    ayers temper

    a big differen

    ncrease in the

    ared to that c

    tures from the

    2014

    heat

    yers

    tures

    ce in

    skin

    used

    case

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    11/15

    www.

    Figure

    The influe

    and secon

    There is al

    Times to t

    However,

    (

    ccsenet.org/me

    . Effect of th

    nce of a variat

    degree burn

    most no chan

    irddegree b

    for reduction

    (a)

    (b)

    )

    reduction rat

    epider

    ion in the red

    s, shown in Fi

    e in times to fi

    rns, shown in

    ates that are

    Mechanical

    e in the air ga

    is surface, (

    ction rate on

    ure 8a, decre

    rstand secon

    Figure 8b, dr

    reater than 20

    Engineering Re

    11

    width on the

    ) basal layer,

    kin burn pred

    se with the in

    ddegree burn

    p sharply as t

    %/s, times to

    search

    temperature

    (c) dermal bas

    ctions is illus

    crease in the r

    s for reductio

    e reduction r

    hirddegree b

    istribution wi

    e

    rated by Figu

    duction rate f

    rates that are

    te increases f

    urns tend to b

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    hin the skin:

    e 8. Times to

    om 0%/s to 2

    greater than 2

    om 0%/s to 1

    e almost cons

    2014

    a)

    irst

    %/s.

    %/s.

    %/s.

    ant.

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    12/15

    www.

    Figure 8.

    Figure 9 il

    percentag

    and third (

    become al

    increase a

    burn injuri

    ultimate r

    protective

    5. Conclu

    A finite v

    of protectithe fabric

    perimeter

    conclusio

    1) The pro

    exposure,

    unequally

    2) A varia

    heat fluxe

    skin is big

    3) The clo

    body whil

    (

    ccsenet.org/me

    Effect of the

    lustrates the i

    s in the gap

    Figure 9c) de

    most constant

    s the percenta

    es increases

    duction in th

    performance

    sions

    lume model

    ve clothing dand the skin

    around the b

    s can be dra

    tection provid

    articularly by

    affect the heat

    ion in the clot

    from the clot

    ger than that i

    thing protecti

    e its reduction

    )

    (a)

    reduction rate

    fluence of a v

    idth. Similar t

    ree burns dec

    for higher red

    e reduction i

    ith the increas

    e gap width

    f the clothing

    as developed

    ring fire expoduring the f

    dy and the s

    n from the stu

    d by the cloth

    the reduction

    transfer from

    hing perimete

    hing to the ski

    the radiation

    e performanc

    with the incr

    Mechanical

    in the air gap

    burns, (b)

    ariation in the

    o the trends sh

    ease with the

    ction rates. T

    creases. In ot

    e in the perce

    ue to the fab

    than the rate

    to investigate

    sure. The mobric thermal

    rinkage rate

    dy.

    ing is conside

    n the clothing

    he fabric to th

    r or the fabric

    n. However, t

    heat flux.

    e linearly dec

    ase in the fab

    Engineering Re

    12

    width on skin

    thirddegree

    reduction rate

    own in Figure

    increase in the

    he reduction r

    er words, the

    tage reductio

    ic thermal sh

    at which this r

    the effect of t

    el carefully ashrinkage. T

    of the fabric

    ably reduced

    perimeter and

    e skin and hen

    shrinkage rate

    he variation i

    eases with th

    ic shrinkage r

    search

    burn predictio

    urns

    on skin burn

    8, times to fir

    reduction rat

    ates at which t

    influence of t

    in the air gap

    rinkage is mo

    eduction take

    e fabric ther

    counted for te influences

    were numeric

    y the thermal

    the shrinkage

    ce the clothin

    nonlinearly a

    the conducti

    reduction in

    ate is limited

    ns: (a) firsta

    redictions for

    st (Figure 9a),

    for low reduc

    mes to skin b

    e reduction r

    width. Lastly,

    re influential

    place.

    al shrinkage

    e changes inof the reducti

    ally investiga

    shrinkage of t

    rate of the fabr

    protective pe

    ters the cond

    n heat flux fr

    he clothing p

    o small shrin

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    d secondde

    different redu

    second (Figur

    tion rates then

    rns become s

    te on times to

    Figure 9 sho

    in determinin

    on the perfor

    he air gap beton in the clo

    ted. The follo

    e fabric durin

    ic. Both para

    formance.

    ction and radi

    m the fabric t

    rimeter aroun

    age rates.

    2014

    ree

    ction

    e 9b)

    they

    eady

    skin

    s the

    g the

    ance

    eenhing

    wing

    g fire

    eters

    ation

    o the

    d the

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    13/15

    www.

    4) The re

    shrinkage

    protective

    5) The red

    worsened

    Finally, ththe skin p

    context, c

    dynamical

    heat flux c

    Figure 9.

    (a)

    (b

    (c)

    ccsenet.org/me

    uction in the

    rate of the fab

    performance

    uction in the c

    by the reducti

    e paper, in allays in determ

    ontributes to

    ly changing

    onditions.

    Skin burn pre

    )

    clothing peri

    ric. The close

    f the clothing

    lothing protec

    on of the cloth

    events, demoining the clot

    the knowledg

    idths filled wi

    ictions for di

    degree burns

    Mechanical

    eter is more

    r the clothing

    .

    tive performa

    ing perimeter.

    strates the ining performa

    e of the com

    th a radiation

    ferent reducti

    , (b) second

    Engineering Re

    13

    influential o

    is to the skin

    ce caused by

    fluential role tnce during fir

    ined conduct

    articipating

    n rates and re

    egree burns, (

    search

    the clothing

    ue to the fabr

    an increase in

    hat the air gape exposure. F

    ion-radiation

    edium and bo

    duction perce

    c) thirddegre

    protective pe

    ic thermal shr

    the shrinkage

    between protrthermore, th

    heat transfer

    unded with hi

    tages in the g

    e burns

    Vol. 4, No. 2;

    formance tha

    inkage, the le

    rate of the fab

    ective clothine paper, in ge

    in enclosures

    gh temperatur

    ap width: (a)

    2014

    the

    s the

    ric is

    andneral

    with

    e and

    irst

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    14/15

    www.ccsenet.org/mer Mechanical Engineering Research Vol. 4, No. 2; 2014

    14

    References

    American Society for Testing Materials. (1987). ASTM D 4108 Standard Test Method for Thermal Protective

    Performance of Materials and Clothing by open-Flame Method. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.

    American Society for Testing Materials. (1999). ASTM F 1939 a Standard Test Method for Radiant Protective

    Performance of Flame Resistant Clothing Materials. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.

    American Society for Testing Materials. (2000). ASTM F 1930 Standard Test Method for Evaluation of FlameResistant Clothing for Protection Against Flash Fire Simulations Using an Instrumented Thermal Manikin.

    West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.

    Chai, J. C., & Patankar, S. V. (2000). Finite-Volume Method for Radiation Heat Transfer. In J. P. Hartnett, & T. F.

    Ivrine (Ed.),Advances in Numerical Heat Transfer(Vol. 2, pp. 109-141). New York: Academic Press.

    Chitrphiromsri, P., & Kuznetsov, A. V. (2005). Modeling Heat and Moisture Transport in Firefighter Protective

    Clothing during Flash Fire Exposure. Heat and Mass Transfer, 41, 206-215.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00231-004-0504-x

    Ghazy, A. (2011).Air Gaps in Protective Clothing during Flash Fire Exposure (Doctoral dissertation). University

    of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

    Ghazy, A. (2013). Numerical Study of the Air Gap between Fire-Protective Clothing and the Skin. Industrial

    Textiles. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1528083713483784Ghazy, A., & Bergstrom, D. J. (2010). Numerical Simulation of Transient Heat Transfer in a Protective Clothing

    System during a Flash Fire Exposure. Numerical Heat Transfer A, 58, 702-724.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2010.516691

    Ghazy, A., & Bergstrom, D. J. (2011). Influence of the Air Gap between Protective Clothing and Skin on clothing

    Performance during Flash Fire Exposure. Heat Mass Transfer, 47, 1275-1288.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00231-011-0791-y

    Ghazy, A., & Bergstrom, D. J. (2012). Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer in Firefighters Protective Clothing

    with Multiple Air Gaps during Flash Fire Exposure. Numerical Heat Transfer A, 61, 569-593.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2012.666932

    Henriques, F. C., Jr., & Moritz, A. R. (1947). Studies of thermal injuries I: The conduction of heat to and through

    skin and the temperatures attained therein. A theoretical and experimental investigation.American Journal ofPathology, 23, 531-549.

    International Organization for Standardization. (1995). ISO 9151 Protective Clothing against Heat and Flame

    Determination of Heat Transmission on Exposure to Flame. Geneva, Switzerland.

    Kim, I. Y., Lee, C., Li, P., Corner, B. D., & Paquette, S. (2002). Investigation of Air Gaps Entrapped in Protective

    Clothing Systems.Fire and Materials, 26, 121-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fam.790

    Mah, T., & Song, G. (2010a). Investigation of the Contribution of Garment Design to Thermal Protection. Part 1:

    Characterizing Air Gaps using Three-dimensional body Scanning for Womens Protective Clothing. Textile

    Research Journal, 80, 1317-1329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040517509358795

    Mah, T., & Song, G. (2010b). Investigation of the Contribution of Garment Design to Thermal Protection. Part 2:

    Instrumented Female Mannequin Flash-fire Evaluation System. Textile Research Journal, 80, 1473-1487.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040517509358796

    Mell, W. E., & Lawson, J. R. (2000). Heat Transfer Model for Fire Fighter's Protective Clothing.Fire Technology,

    36, 39-68.http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015429820426Mercer, G. N., & Sidhu, H. S. (2007). Mathematical modeling of the effect of fire exposure on a new type of

    protective clothing.ANZIAM, 49, C289-C305.

    Mercer, G. N., & Sidhu, H. S. (2009). A Theoretical Investigation into Phase Change Clothing Benefits for

    Firefighters under Extreme Conditions. Chemical Product and Process Modeling, 4(3),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1934-2659.1349

    Modest, M. F. (2003).Radiative Heat Transfer(2nd ed.), New York, NY: Academic Press.

    National Fire Protection Association. (2007).NFPA 1971 Standard on Protective Ensemble for Structural Fire

    Fighting, Quincy, Massachusetts.

  • 8/12/2019 2014-Influence of Thermal Shrinkage on Protective Clothing Performance during Fire Exposure Numerical Investiga

    15/15