2013 state programs meeting national transit database topics
DESCRIPTION
2013 State Programs Meeting National Transit Database Topics. Rural NTD Reporting & Findings. Outline. NTD data on rural transit Growth in demand for transit service 2010 Census and rural/small city transit MAP-21 changes affecting state programs NTD rewrite Accessing NTD data. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
2013 State Programs Meeting
National Transit Database Topics
Rural NTD Reporting &
Findings
2
Outline• NTD data on rural transit• Growth in demand for transit service• 2010 Census and rural/small city
transit• MAP-21 changes affecting state
programs• NTD rewrite• Accessing NTD data
3
Section 5335 RequirementsEach transit operator that benefits from 5307 or 5311 grants must submit an annual report containing information on capital investment, operations, and service provided with the funds received, including:
– Total annual revenue– Sources of revenue– Total annual operating costs– Total annual capital costs– Fleet size and type, and related facilities– Revenue vehicle miles– Ridership
3
“Cutaway” small bus
4
FY 2011 Rural Data138 rural transit providers
– 50 States & 4 US Territories• 1647 subrecipients (including 75
Indian tribes)– 84 Tribes (Tribal Transit Program)
222 urban providers of rural service
– 143 providers receiving both 5307 and 5311 funds
– 79 Intercity Bus providers4
Most RuralTransit Providers
Kansas 87
Georgia 85California 84North Carolina 80
Michigan 71New York 65Nebraska 61Minnesota 57Wisconsin 56Indiana & Texas 46
5
Rural Subrecipients
6
Tribal Program
7
Urban Reporters with Rural Service
8
Counties Served by 5311 Reporters
• 76% (3,194) of US counties have transit service
States with 50% or less Served
Counties Served Percent
Utah 6 of 29 21%
Delaware 1 of 3 33%
Rhode Island 2 of 5 40%
Ohio 36 of 88 41%
Pennsylvania 29 of 67 43%
West Virginia 25 of 55 45%
Louisiana 32 of 64 50%
States with 100% ServedCounties
Connecticut 8
Maine 16
Vermont 14
Tennessee 95
Iowa 99
North Dakota 53
9
Rural Transit Modes Reported
DR61.0%
MB25.3%
IB4.3%
DT4.2%
CB3.2%
VP1.0%
OT0.8%
FB0.2%
DR – Demand Response, 61%
MB – Motor Bus, 25.3%
IB – Intercity Bus, 4.3%
DT – Demand Taxi, 4.2%
CB – Commuter Bus, 3.2%
VP – Vanpool, 1.0%
OT – Other, 0.8%
FB – Ferryboat, 0.2%
10
Rural Transit Vehicles
• 816 demand response only systems
• 197 bus only systems
• 217 systems with both
11
Financial Overview, 2011• $1.3 billion in operating expenses
– With 34.5% from Federal funding• $276 million in capital expenses
– With 85.4% from Federal funding• $1.5 billion total expenses
– With 43.4% from Federal funding– Compared to around 20% for urban
systems
12
5311 Funds Reported
12The SAFETEA-LU Years
11% avg. annual growth
13
2011 Operating Funding Sources
FTA31.8%
Contract Revenues17.6%
Fares7.1%
State17.3%
Local23.0%
Other Federal2.7%
Other0.4%
14
2011 Capital Funding Sources
FTA85.3%
Local7.3%
State7.1%
Other0.2%
Other Federal0.1%
15
2011 FTA Operating Funding
531185.6%
5311 (c) 3.5% 5316
3.3%
ARRA2.9%
53102.3%
53171.2%
53090.7%
Other FTA0.5%
53200.0%
16
2011 FTA Capital Funding
ARRA59.7%
531120.2%
530915.1%
53103.1%
53160.5%
53170.5%
Other FTA0.4%
5311 (c) 0.4%
53200.1%
17
Vehicle Types
17
Cutaway47.2%
Van18.8%
Bus15.6%
Minivan15.1%
Automobiles1.8%
Sports utility ve-hicle0.8%
Over-the-road bus0.4%
School Bus0.3%
Ferryboat0.0%Other
0.0%
18
Vehicles by Year Built19
6319
7919
8119
8419
8619
8819
9019
9219
9419
9619
9820
0020
0220
0420
0620
0820
1020
12
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000• 1963 oldest vehicle (a
ferryboat)• 1967 oldest bus• 1984 oldest automobile• 36% built after 2008• 89% built after 2001
19
Fleet Size
• 23,132 vehicles• 296 (22%) with just one or two
vehicles• Largest has 435 vehicles• 2,274 Personal vehicles• 700 maintenance facilities
20
ADA Accessibility• 5 States reported 100% ADA• 59.6% States reported 80% or
more ADA compliance• 93.9% of buses and cutaways were ADA
compliant– 65.1% of vans and minivans were ADA
compliant– 37.5% of non-ADA vehicles were vans,
minivans, or autos
21
Rural Service• 143.0 million Unlinked Passenger Trips
(UPT)– 1.4% of the National total– 2.7% of the National Non-Rail Total
• 571.2 million Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM)– 14.6% of the National Total– 20.0% of the National Non-Rail Total
• 31.5 million Vehicle Revenue Hours (VRH)
22
Ridership – Top States
* In millions
State UPT*Colorado 10.0
North Carolina 8.4Washington 7.8California 7.3Maryland 6.2Michigan 5.7Iowa 5.3Pennsylvania 4.7New York 4.5Minnesota 4.4
23
Ridership – Top 10 (By Subrecipient)
Subrecipient State UPTRoaring Fork Transportation Authority CO 3.3
Ocean City, MD MD 3.1County of Maui - Dept. of Transportation HI 2.3Park City Municipal Corporation UT 1.8Summit County Board of Community Commissioners CO 1.7City of Macomb IL 1.7OATS, Inc. MO 1.6Pullman Transit WA 1.4City of Clemson/Clemson Area Transit SC 1.4County of Hawaii Mass Transit Agency HI 1.3
* In millions
24
Safety• 10 reported fatalities• 261 reported injuries
– Requiring immediate medical attention away from scene
• 283 reported incidents– Event with 1 or more of the
following• Injury• Fatality • $25,000 or more of property
damage
25
Safety
2007 2008 2009 2010 20110
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
894
1202
483
340283
10 21 9 6 10
190
307372 410
261
IncidientsFatilitiesInjuries
2007 2008 2009 2010 201105
10152025
10
21
96
10
Fatalities
26
Fatalities by Mode (Urban)
27
Rural vs. Urban Cost Effectiveness
• Bus Operating $ per Vehicle Revenue Mile– Urban = $18.5B / 1.85B mi =
$10.00/mile– Rural = $161M / 56.0M mi =
$2.87/mile(using data on197 bus-only rural reporters)
• Demand Response $ per ride (UPT)– Urban = $3.17B / 96.9M rides =
$32.71/ride– Rural = $545M / 42.9M rides =
$12.70/ride(using data on 816 DR-only rural reporters)
28
Rural Bus Operating Costs
Average is $2.87
29
Rural DR Operating Costs
Average is $12.70
30
Growth in rural transit• 3.5% annual
growth (Rural only)
• Data on rural service provided by urban reporters started in 2010
• Data on rural service started in 2007
31
Growth in Demand for Transit Service
(1.3%) (2.1%)
32
Factors Affecting Urban Ridership
33
Michigan Light-duty VMT Study
http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/98982/102950.pdf
34
2010 Census Changes• 36 new urbanized areas >50K
population• 27 new urbanized areas >200K
population• Urban (5307) vs. Rural (5311) formula
– Urban $/pop (200K to 1M pop) = $1.27/person– Rural $/pop = $1.91/person– Urban $/revenue mile = $0.26/VRM– Rural $/revenue mile = $0.02/VRM
(Rural also gets $ for land area and low income)
• From: http://www.fta.dot.gov/grants/15032_15393.html
35
MAP-21 changes• Tribal grants
– Formula grants, w/ small discretionary component– VRM and low-income population
• Asset management requirements– Apply to rural as well as urban– Need plans & asset inventories
• Safety oversight – Not just for rail systems
• BRT & Fixed guideway funds – Rural not eligible (must be >200,000 population)
36
NTD Rewrite• Same data• Revised interface• Improved validation• Better documentation• New ideas for state oversight
– Integrated with State Safety Oversight data collection
– Upload data from spreadsheets– Option for subrecipients to report directly?
37
www.ntdprogram.gov
38
39
Rural Data
In 2011 Moscow, Idaho, reported 3920 trips and 27,581 revenue miles, average speed was 47 mph
40
Time Series Data
• Urban data• Data back to 1991• By agency and mode
41
Monthly Data from Jan 2002
Katrina 7/29/2005
42
Annual Data Tables
43
Does it cost more for larger fleets to provide an hour of bus service?
44
Other Stuff on NTD Data Page
• Annual National Transit Summary and Trends
• Safety & Security data• Agency Profiles
45
46
FTA.dot.gov Apportionment Data
• FY 2013 Apportionment tables:http://www.fta.dot.gov/grants/15105.html
• Funding by state:http://www.fta.dot.gov/12853_88.html
• NTD & Census data used in apportionment formulas:http://www.fta.dot.gov/12853_13935.html
• NTD data used for the 5311(Rural) formulahttp://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/Copy_of_Section_5311_NTD_Data_for_the_Full_Year_Apportionment.xlsx
Note: CR= Continuing Resolution (part-year funding)