2013 india: national survey of banking agents
DESCRIPTION
A survey of banking agents (customer service points) across India from September/October 2013. Trend lines are established based on comparisons to the same survey carried out 15 months earlier.TRANSCRIPT
1
2013 India: National Survey of Branchless Banking Agents
Authors: Gregory Chen, N. Srinivasan & Aimthy Thoumoung
16 December 2013
2Photo credit: Sudipto Das
0
1 to
10
11
to 2
0
21
to 3
0
31
to 4
0
41
to 5
0
51
to 6
0
61
to 7
0
71
to 8
0
81
to 9
0
91
to 1
00
10
1 to
11
0
11
1 to
12
0
12
1 to
13
0
13
1 to
14
0
14
1 to
15
0
15
1 to
16
0
16
1 to
17
0
17
1 to
18
0
18
1 to
19
0
19
1 to
20
0
> 2
00
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%Daily Transaction Frequency
3Transactions Per Day
2012
2013
Main Findings: leading indicators show stagnation
% Of Customer Service Points
(Agents)
Agents in other countries are more active with higher median transactions per day:
Kenya: 62 *Tanzania: 35 *Uganda: 34 *India:
9
* MicroSave
No increase 2012 to 2013
4
Main Findings: few signs of progress by 2013
Customer service points are more experienced: after 8 years of Business Correspondent guidelines, most CSPs active for >24 months
Some positive outliers, but in aggregate signs point to stagnation from 2012 to 2013
• Low level of client use• Low level of CSP compensation
Strong evidence of viability problems in bank-led BC deployments: • Push into rural areas• Geographical targets met, but banking activity low
Little evidence that the present trajectory will contribute much to financial inclusion or financial sector development, despite increasing years of experience
5
2013 Survey BackgroundPhoto credit: IMRB
6
2013 Survey: Background
In 2006 India’s central bank (Reserve Bank of India) permitted banks to use Business Correspondents (BCs) to organize networks of customer service points (CSPs) – also commonly known as banking agents.
National surveys of CSPs have been undertaken jointly by CGAP and the College of Agricultural Banking (an affiliate of the Reserve Bank of India) in March/April of 2012 and again in September/October 2013. MicroSave provided critical input as a partner.
This powerpoint provides highlights of the survey results from 2013. The earlier results from 2012 can be viewed at:http://www.slideshare.net/CGAP/a-survey-on-bc-csps-in-india-2012
The College of Agricultural Banking expects to complete a comprehensive report on the 2013 survey data in the coming months.
7
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 -
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2013 Survey: BackgroundBC guidelines in place for 8 years, 2 national surveys 15 months apart
BC* Guidelines in Place
Number of RBI reported BC* Customer Service Points is increasing
*Business Correspondent (BC): regulatory category created by Reserve Bank of India which allows organizations to partner with banks to set up one or more customer services points (bank agents)
2012Survey
2013Survey
15 month interval
Number Of
CSPs
2013 Survey: Sample Selection
8
All 5 regions: North, South, East, West & Northeast of India
Prioritized 15 states for nationally representative coverage
Drawn from bank lists of CSPs reported as active as of 31 December 2012
Survey Details13 September - 6 November 2013Business hours, weekdays & weekendsLocal languagesIMRB http://www.imrbint.com/ survey firm
Tried to contact 2,358 CSPs 1,104 unable to survey:
983 not reachable: wrong phone #, no response
87 unwilling: stopped CSP work or unhappy with CSP work
1,254 surveyed are the sample
NotAvailable
Available
9
2013 Survey: Sample Selection
CSP Sample
Reached & surveyed 1,254
That work for: 7 Public Sector Banks 5 Regional Rural Banks 3 Private Banks 12 BC Companies*
Note: added 219 customer interviews to double check CSP responses
220 158
30
15
117
108
64
117
68
75
75
* 592 of the CSPs surveyed were individuals contracted directly by banks and not through BC companies.
43
67
2
95
10
Agent CharacteristicsPhoto credit: IMRB
11
Technology used and CSP demographics held steady
Demographic Profile
2012 2013
Male 85% 87%
25-35 47% 46%
12th Pass or Graduate 66% 76%
POS+Card Personal Computer Mobile Phone None0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%53%
26%
18%
3%
57%
22%18%
3%
CSP Technology
2012
2013% CSPs
12
Rising proportion of corporate and individually contracted CSPs; offset by a decrease in specialized BC CSPs
Specialized BCs Large Corporate BCs Individual BCs0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
78%
5%
17%
38%
20%
42%
CSP Categories2012
2013
% CSPs
Specialized = BC companies whose primary business is managing CSPsLarge Corporates = BC companies who have other business, but who also manage CSPsIndividual = individual CSPs that are contracted directly by banks
2012 Survey 2013 Survey0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
70%
53%
30%
47%
Larger proportion of moving point
2012 Survey 2013 Survey0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
69%60%
18%
16%
13%24%
Still predominantly rural
Fixed Point
Moving Point
FI Village*
Non FI Village*
Urban
Location of CSPs
% CSPs
* An FI (financial inclusion) village is location identified with less than 2,000 inhabitants targeted under a national financial inclusion plan established in 2010. Banks set geographic coverage targets against this plan.
13
<3 4-6 6-12 12-24 24-36 36-48 48-60 >600%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
6%
20%
36%
31%
5%
1% 1% 1%2%
6%
13%
26%
33%
17%
3%1%
The typical CSP has many more months of experience today
14
2012
2013
CSPs gaining more experience, even as some drop out
% CSPs
Between surveys 25-34% formally ceased their CSP operations
(dropped out)
Months as CSP
15
Value to CustomersPhoto credit: Quicksand
Reliability problematic in 2012, worse by 2013
16
CSP readiness to transact
16% (198/1254) never transacted, increased from 5% in 2012.
48% (602/1254) technical capability that allows clients to transact at other CSPs, down from 65% in 2012
11% (134/1254) unprepared to transact at moment of survey, improved from 25% in 2012
Tried to contact 2,358
1,104 not possible
to survey
1,254 surveyed
CSP availability
198 no transactions yet
17
Accounts open quickly; but speed of account activation slower than in 2012
% of CSPs
1 2 4 7 15 30 45 60 >600%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40% DAYS: Account activation time
% of CSPs
1-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-60 60-90 >900%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40% MINUTES: Account opening time
Median remained at 10 minutes
Median increased from 4 to 9 days
2012
2013
Note: often in other countries account activation can be a few minutes or within 24 hours
18
CSPs continue to provide primarily savings and payments
G2P P2P Savings Insurance Credit0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
31%
50%
97%
23%
12%
30%
52%
88%
11%
17%
Product Offering
% of
CSPs
2012
2013
Insurance offerings decreased while credit
offering rose
19
CSP MotivationPhoto credit: IMRB
20
CSP earnings remain low – near minimum wage; No change from 2012 to 2013
0
0-0
.5
0.5
-1
1-1
.5
1.5
-2
2-2
.5
2.5
-3
3-3
.5
3.5
-4
4-4
.5
4.5
-5
5-5
.5
5.5
-6
6-6
.5
6.5
-7
7-7
.5
7.5
-8
8-8
.5
8.5
-9
9-9
.5
9.5
-10
10
-10
.5
10
.5-1
1
11
-11
.5
11
.5-1
2
12
-12
.5
12
.5-1
3
13
-13
.5
13
.5-1
4
14
-14
.5
14
.5-1
5
>1
5
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14% No increase in CSP income from 2012 to 2013
% CSPs
2012
2013
Median stayed the same in 2012 and 2013 at 2,700₹
180 CSPs surveyed in 2012 show little change in income in 2013
Urban CSPs median 5,441 three times rural 1,968₹ ₹
Income per month from CSP work ( 000s)₹
21
30%
23%
7%5%
3%7%
Sole Income (53%)
Other Income (47%)
3%
16%
5%
AgricultureKiranaShop
SalariedSelf
EmployedOther
Fixed Point(52%)
Moving Point(48%)
1% 0%
0%
+12%
-10%
+1%
+4%
+3%
-5% -2%
+4%
-8%
-2%+4%0%
Majority continue to rely on CSP work as sole income; Increase in Kirana Shop CSPs
Denotes change from 2012 survey
22
Monitoring of CSPs by BC/Banks improves, but other measures of support worsen
2012 2013
Visited by Bank/BC in prior month
82% Improved 89%
Visited by BC/Bank in prior week 60% Improved 72%
Those paid on time 50% About the same 48%
Received training 90% Worsened 85%
Positively viewed Bank’s/BC Support
64% Worsened 58%
Attrition rate 25-34% annually
23
860 Surveyed in 2012
267 no longer agents
Tried to contact again in 2013 (15 months later)
500 remain agents 93 unreachable
Attrition rate (minimum): 267/860 = 31% (annualized to 25%)Attrition rate (maximum): (267+93)/860 = 42% (annualized to 34%)
Note: the rate used measures formal cessation of service by CSPs, but does not include dormancy of CSPs in either 2012 or for 2013.
24
CSPs are motivated by qualitative aspects of CSP work, but low pay will continue to push CSPs out
Reason for continuing CSP work:
53% "Enhanced reputation / goodwill in the community“ OR "Personal choice” (decreased from 59% in 2012)
47% “Revenue / income generated” (increased from 41% in 2012)
Satisfaction from CSP work:
82% Satisfied or Very Satisfied with "Enhanced reputation / goodwill in the community“ (same as 2012)
Only 24% stated they were Satisfied or Very Satisfied with respect to “Revenue / income generated” (decreased from 32% in 2012)
Attrition likely to continue as income expectations are not being met, despite positive perception of enhanced reputation and goodwill. High number of rural CSPs testing CSP work as a long term livelihood opportunity and the willingness to remain may dwindle, especially since CSP compensation is close to minimum wage levels.
25
Learning from CSP variations
Photo credit: IMRB
26
CSPs delivering G2P perform better on a number of indicators
Only 23% of CSPs offer G2P services:
Most CSPs established to meet financial inclusion geographical targets and majority are still not linked to G2P delivery
G2P CSPs Non-G2P CSPs
Median Transactions per Day 15 8
Monthly Earnings – Rural ( )₹ 2,497 1,865
Readiness to transact 95% 88%
Local Language Forms 50% 38%
92% of G2P CSPs work in rural areas; despite greater challenges in rural areas G2P delivery has a number of positive correlations:
27
CSPs at fixed locations who earn other income, are substantially different than other CSPs
27
Daily transactions (8) are lower than other CSPs (10)
However, • Earn more than double the monthly income• Hold 2-4 times the amount of cash/float liquidity
Variation by income from CSP activities
28
Variable
2013 Survey Data
ObservationCSPs Above
Median Income
CSPs Below Median Income
Rural vs. Urban 37% vs. 57% 63% vs. 43% Lower income for rural
Median Cash In Hand ₹ 19,122 5,972
CSPs who make more money also hold more floatMedian Settlement
Account Balance ₹ 23,889 9,827
Proportion offering Credit services 20% 14% CSPs who earn more are more likely
to offer credit
Variation by income from CSP activities
29
Variable
2013 Survey Data
ObservationCSPs Above Median Income
CSPs Below Median Income
Type of CSPFixed Point 57% 43% Fixed Point CSPs correlated with
higher incomeMoving Point 25% 75%
Technology Category
POS + Cards 33% 67%Mobile Phones associated with higher income
Mobile Phones 60% 40%
PC 47% 53%
Top 3 States for Rural CSPs
Karnataka 89% 11%
Significant variation in earnings by state
Tripura from North East in the Top 3; remote region not necessarily a barrier to higher income
Orissa 79% 21%
Tripura 73% 27%
Bottom 2 States for Rural CSPs
Uttar Pradesh 12% 78%
Tamil Nadu 20% 80%
30
Advancing financial inclusion to improve the lives of the poor
www.cgap.org