2013 ices conference - etsi

2013 ICES Conference 2013 ICES Conference

De eloping national st ct es in E opeDeveloping national structures in Europe

Laurent OBERLÉChair JWG CEN-CENELEC-ETSI « Education about Standardization »2013-06-13

Link with the EaS policyLink with the EaS policy

PolicyPolicyPolicy

Master

Policy

Master A progressiv consolidationMaster Plan

Master Plan

A progressiv consolidationfrom the policy to actions!

Implem

ePl

Implem

ePl entation

an entation an

© CEN-CENELEC 2013 - 2

ActionsActions

Complementarities between the pEuropean and the national level

MiMirror organisations & actions should be done in paralleldone in parallel with EaS!


6 structures 6 structures

European Stakeholder

Steering Task Force

JWG-EaS

gGroup Masterplan

Task Force Task Force Task Force Engagement &

partneringNational

StructuresRepository


Main achievements of the JWG EaS

• A concerted policy on education about

standardization

• A 'repository' of tools and materials A repository of tools and materials

• A model curriculum for higher education

• A model curriculum for vocational training

• A new Masterplan and a new Implementation plan on


education about standardization, endorsed end 2012

From reflection to action: our common challenges

•Ensure that our strategy will be implemented

•Establish national structures

•Engage key stakeholders : national and European authorities education and businessauthorities, education and business


JWG EaS/Task Force National /Structures (TF NF)

ScopeTo promote and facilitate the creation of national EaSpstructures, give guidance to launch a national structure, provide ideas to improve the initiatives at national level also based on already existing best practice.based on already existing best practice.

Actions identified in the Implementation Plan that will be undertaken by this TF:3. Action: Establish needs in order for members to create national EaS structures national EaS structures 6. Action: Perform a gap analysis of education about standardization


ActionsActions

Actions identified in the Implementation Plan that will be undertaken by the TF National Structures:

Sharing experience at national level and/or other regions

Discover specificities for different countries

Establish needs in order for members to create national EaS structures Establish needs in order for members to create national EaS structures

To convince at national level the need for actions in terms of education and training about standardization; • Government, & Standardisation body

• Trade associations & professional associations & companies

• Academia

To ensure the monitoring of progress of national structures at national level.

To implement in the guidance the recommendations from other EaS


To implement in the guidance, the recommendations from other EaSTask Forces.

Targets/priorities of the TF NSTargets/priorities of the TF NS

Provide guidance:

-Issue questionnaire

-Share best practice

Monitor progress-Monitor progress

-Define what kind of guidance

-Provide tracking/monitoring of progress


Outcome brainstorming TF meetingOutcome brainstorming TF meeting

National model:1 T h t i t ti l l l 1. To have a steering group at national level

(governmental, academia, trade associations, other stakeholders)other stakeholders)

2. To appoint a person/team in charge at the national standardization bodies, government and national standardization bodies, government and academic bodies

3. To find persons who can start the project in p p jcountries where nothing exists yet (3 à 4 persons)

4. To appoint an academic regional responsible


person

Outcome brainstorming (cont’d)Outcome brainstorming (cont’d)

T t f th idTargets of the guidance:Provide attractive solutions for first steps at national level when they want to install a national structurey

Guidance (1/2):1. Support from national standardization body2. Money to allocate persons in the standardisation body to

invest time & effortinvest time & effort3. Provide solutions to solve difficulties e.g.

The autonomy of the university, y y,

Difficulty to change curricula,

Education is not a national responsibility but curricula

d d d b l l b l


are decided by universities or local responsibility,

Brainstorming OutcomesBrainstorming Outcomes

Guidance 2/2:4. Role of national structure is to track and coordinate

existing activities5. To build upon those existing activities6 A t t d d f t h d t d t6. Access to standards for teachers and students7. To find support from academia and businesses8 To address difference about education and training on 8. To address difference about education and training on

standardization (and standards) at strategic, tactical and operational level

9. To inform and train teachers and trainers


Sharing ExperienceSharing Experience…

Ad hoc steering group at Ecodime 28 March 2013 Ad-hoc steering group at Ecodime 28 March 2013

An example from France: experience brakes success An example from France: experience, brakes, success and how to improve (with thanks to Mr Collignon):

1. His mission: In charge of EaS for the Ministries of Education & Research & high educationEducation & Research & high education

2 What has been done & success? Sagaweb2. What has been done & success? Sagawebeducation, meetings with Afnor, area relays,…, Acanor+UTE,


,…

Sharing Experience (cont’d)Sharing Experience… (cont’d)

3. Past difficulties, brakes: Not enough inputs/expression of the needs from Not enough inputs/expression of the needs from professional stakeholdersAutonomy of universities & scientifics not naturally motivatedMore easy to implement in programs for technical diplomas for doing the job than to given a general diplomas for doing the job , than to given a general culture about standardisation…Teachers/Professors sometimes not aware how to Teachers/Professors sometimes not aware how to present the benefits regarding market access through participation in the standardization process


Discussion about the key ypoints/actions for a success

• Difficulties / challenges :

• Autonomy of Universities, scientific, no motivation

• not enough education on standardization required

in curricula

• Internal standards / sector specific e.g. Chemistry

• Before/after• Before/after

• Access to, identification of standards, strategic aspects en popularizationp p p

• No modules adapted to primary objectives


Discussion about the key ypoints/actions for a success

• What improve together: national deployment:• Select stakeholders• Budget project payment (by the government & • Budget, project, payment (by the government &

stakeholders, links with training fees to be created• Arguments to obtain funding

• Improves the quality of standards and coherence with EC marking

• Challenges : US & China• Challenges : US & China• Formalise governmental and stakeholder needs, • Toolkit to convince stakeholders, newsletters,

events• Mission Eurefer for receiving European Structural

Fund support


Fund support

Proposals for improvementProposals for improvement

How to do better tomorrow :

1. With support from Trade Associations, in particular if

specific WG linked to education

2. Identify 4 champions to ensure the « lead »y p

3. To focus on the wishes of the “in” sectors like energy efficiency or renewable energy

4. Identify active and strategic partners

5. Create networking

6. To define which skills for which diplomas and life-long training (e.g. Ifan table)

7. Importance to involve research


7. Importance to involve research

8. Find a good business model for EaS at national level

In additionIn addition…

1. Strategic help needed from trade associations

2. Adaptation budget & missions in National Standards Bodies

3 Improve the expression of the needs of governments & 3. Improve the expression of the needs of governments & stakeholders

4. Exchange experience in order to win in the current : s ccess sto ies b t also fail essuccess stories but also failures

5. Taking into account the new standardisation challenges, not only focus on products standards but g , y pmore on systems approach

6. Difficulties for a national education system:1 Not enough open access to the standards for each school 1. Not enough open access to the standards for each school,

teacher and pupil

2. How to identify the relevant standards for the each diploma

3 P liti l t


3. Political aspects

4. Internal standards in some sectors (e.g. chemistry)

ConclusionConclusion

It’s really time to go It s really time to go together 1 from a volunteer1. from a volunteer

organisation …

2. …to a more structured d t and stronger

organisation in each ti l b t t !


national member state!

Thank you Thank you

Any questions ?

Laurent Oberlé, Chairman of the Joint Working Group on Education about Standardization


[email protected]

2013 ices conference - etsi

Documents