2012 it industry survey
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 4: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
![Page 6: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
•
•
•
7
![Page 8: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
![Page 10: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
![Page 11: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
![Page 12: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
![Page 13: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
24.6%
32.7% 12.9%
16.4%
4.0%
9.4%
13
![Page 14: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Less than 1% 3.3%
7.2% 4.4%
37.6%
47.0%
14
![Page 15: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
![Page 16: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
30.7%
32.9%
36.4%
16
![Page 17: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
![Page 18: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
![Page 19: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
68.3%
31.7%
•
•
•
19
![Page 20: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Yes
No
Projects Awarded Projects Won20
![Page 21: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
![Page 22: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
•
77.1%
22.9%
22
![Page 23: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
![Page 24: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Ap
pic
ati
on
Dev
elo
pm
en
t
Ma
infr
am
e M
igra
tio
n,
Re-e
ng
ine
eri
ng
,e
tc.
Te
sti
ng
an
d Q
ua
lity
As
su
ran
ce
ER
P S
olu
tio
ns
Su
pp
ort
Se
rvic
es
E-L
earn
ing
Pro
ject
Man
ag
em
en
t S
olu
tio
ns
Sta
ffin
g
Se
rvic
e O
rie
nte
d A
rch
itec
ture
Infr
astr
uc
ure
Mo
bil
e A
pp
s
Mo
bil
e T
es
tin
g
43
.1%
41.3
%
45.8
%
43.8
%
50.0
%
24.4
% 3
6.7
%
36.7
%
31.8
%
43.5
%
44.0
%
38.8
% 44.2
%
36.8
%
39.2
%
42.5
%
57.3
%
38
.4%
37.3
%
44.3
%
35.4
%
58.7
%
34.6
%
30.7
%
Anticipated investments for 2013 Reported Investments made in 2012
![Page 25: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
![Page 26: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
![Page 27: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
![Page 28: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Co
st
Ben
efi
t
Ex
peri
en
ce a
nd
Ex
pe
rtis
e
Pro
du
ct
/ S
olu
tio
ns
Off
eri
ng
Min
ori
ty / S
ma
ll /
Dis
ad
van
tag
ed
Bu
sin
es
s S
tatu
s
Dev
elo
pm
en
t C
ert
ific
ati
ns
(C
MM
I, IS
O,
etc
.)
Pa
rtn
ers
hip
Cert
ific
ati
on
s (
Mic
roso
ft,
IBM
, e
tc.)
Glo
ba
l C
ap
ab
ilit
ies
(O
n S
ite
, O
ff S
ite
,O
ff S
ho
re)
4.8
%
3.2
%
3.2
%
48.1
%
34.5
%
29.6
%
24.6
%
19.4
%
12.9
%
19.4
% 33.3
%
29.1
%
25.9
%
29.8
%
75.8
%
83.9
%
77.4
%
18.5
% 36
.4%
44.4
%
45.6
%
Weakest Strong Strongest
29
![Page 30: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
![Page 31: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
7.6%
36.4% 56.1%
Least Satisfied
Satisfied
Very Satisfied
31
![Page 32: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
![Page 33: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
81.1%
18.9%
Employment Status
Yes
No
33
![Page 34: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
![Page 35: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
On
lin
e C
are
er
Bo
ard
s (
Mo
ns
ter,
Dic
e,
etc
)
Fa
ce
bo
ok
Lin
ke
dIn
Tw
itte
r
De
part
me
nt
of
La
bo
r (D
OL
) R
es
ou
rces
Refe
rra
ls
Jo
b F
air
s
Jo
b G
rou
ps
Online CareerBoards
(Monster, Dice,etc)
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Department ofLabor (DOL)Resources
Referrals Job Fairs Job Groups
76.9
%
23.1
%
70.5
%
9.0
%
21.8
%
51.3
%
25.6
%
38.5
%
35
![Page 36: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
![Page 37: 2012 IT Industry Survey](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022051611/54b4ab4f4a7959803d8b457f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)