2012 10-16 gettingpublishedslideshare
DESCRIPTION
Amended slides from workshop at University College London Training in Medical Education (UCL TiME 2) Oct 2012TRANSCRIPT
1
Getting published in medical education
Dr Katherine Woolf
Lecturer in Medical Education
@kathwoolf
What we will cover in the coming hour
• Why publish?• Deciding what to publish• Choosing a journal• Top tips on getting published• Get writing
Objectives
By the end of this session you will: Be able to give three reasons for publishing in
medical education Be able to describe how to choose a journal Be able to list 5 top tips for getting published Have started drafting something for publication
Why publish?
• Promotion/job applications• Share knowledge/experience• Raise profile of important issue• Helps think about ideas in depth
Where and what?
Peer-reviewed journals: various types of output
Original research
Editorial
“How to”
Letter
Where publish?
Peer-reviewed journals: Original research article (e.g. RCT, observational
study, systematic review) Editorial/Commentary Other type of publication (e.g. “how to” articles) Letter
Industry report (usually commissioned)Trade magazines (e.g. “BMJ Careers”/”The
Psychologist”)Blog
What we will cover in the coming hour
• Why publish?• Deciding what to publish• Choosing a journal• Top tips on getting published• Get writing
Medical education journals
Generic medical journals
Specialty-specific
Criteria for choosing a journal
Quality
Competition
Appropriateness/applicability
Judging quality
• Peer reviewed?• Impact factor?• Respected colleague’s opinions?
Judging quality: Impact factor
Frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a period
Published by ISI Web of Knowledge (Thomson Scientific)
Only rough indicator of quality
Impact factors 2010 (2006)Some medical education journals
Medical Education 2.6 (2.5)Academic Medicine 2.6 (2.6)Medical Teacher 1.5 (0.9) Advances in Health Sci Educ 1.4 (1.1)BMC Medical Education 1.2 (n/a)
Criteria for choosing a journal
Quality
Competition
Appropriateness/applicability
Competition
BMJ: ~7% of 7000-8000 articles received per year1
Medical Education: ~20% of 900-1000 articles received per year2
Harder to publish UK research in US journal Academic Medicine3
1. http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors2. http://www.mededuc.com/faqs.html3. Tutarel, O (2002) BMC Medical Education
Criteria for choosing a journal
Quality
Competition
Appropriateness/applicability
How do you judge it?
Judging appropriateness/applicability
Read regularly (or look at back issues)
Editorial policy/Aims and scope
Ask colleagues – do they read it?
Most downloaded
An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview (Eva, 2004)
Applying the science of learning to medical education (Mayer, 2010)
A critical review of simulation-based medical education (McGaghie, 2010)
Most read
Student selected components: do students learn what teachers think they teach? (Murphy et al. 2008)
Academic achievement, depression and anxiety during medical education predict the styles of success in a medical career: A 10-year longitudinal study (Walkiewicz et al. 2012)
Assessment of professionalism: A consolidation of current thinking. (Goldie J. Online first September 3, 2012)
Highly accessed
Prospective study of the effects of complimentary food on attendance and physician attitudes at medical grand rounds at an academic medical center (Sergovis et al., 2007)
Burnout and psychiatric morbidity among medical students entering clinical training: a three year prospective questionnaire and interview-based study (Dahlin & Runeson, 2007)
Role-play for medical students learning about communication: Guidelines for maximising benefits (Nestel & Tierney, 2007)
Getting published: top tips
1. Write to excite:help the editor accept your MS
Make your title: Self-explanatory Interesting to the journal’s audience
1. Write to excite:help the editor accept your MS
Make your title: Self-explanatory Interesting to the journal’s audience
Sell your idea in the first sentence of your introduction/abstract: What is the urgent gap your MS is filling?
Getting published: my 5 top tips
1. Write to excite
2. Fit in
2. Fit in: make your MS look ready to publish
Analyse papers and read journal-specific instructions re: Title format (colons? puns?) Length of paragraph Formality of language (1st or 3rd person?) Headings Referencing style Word count Font
Getting published: my 5 top tips
1. Write to excite
2. Fit in
3. Feedback
3. Feedback: get as much as possible
Ask for feedback on your MS from: Your intended audience Experienced colleagues People who know how to give it constructively
Getting published: my 5 top tips
1. Write to excite
2. Fit in
3. Feedback
4. Nobody’s perfect
4. Nobody’s perfect: so don’t try to attain perfection
Perfection is impossible Attempting to reach it can be destructive Peer reviewers will make you change your
manuscript however perfect you think it is
Getting published: my 5 top tips
1. Write to excite
2. Fit in
3. Feedback
4. Nobody’s perfect
5. Try again
5. Try again:and again, and again
The best papers are rejected, often many times Rejection usually comes with feedback: take it Papers are often better after feedback that comes
with rejection
What we will cover in the coming hour
• Why publish?• Deciding what to publish• Choosing a journal• 5 top tips on getting published• Get writing
Get writing
Get a pen and paper
Get writing
Get a pen and paper
Think of a medical education topic you are interested in (1 min)
Get writing
Get a pen and paper
Think of a medical education topic you are interested in (1 min)
Write continuously for 5 minutes on that topic (won’t share it with anyone now)
Summary
• Publishing is key to improving medical education & also helps our CVs…
• Lots of different avenues for publishing including variety of journals
• Write to excite the editor of your chosen publication
• Get feedback on your MS• Don’t be put off by rejection
For those who were there, solutions to the “guess the aim from the intro para” task…
Introductory paragraph 1:
Aim: To explore the decision-making processes of pre-clerkship medical students in the face of standardised professional dilemmas.
Ginsburg & Lingard (2011) ‘Is that normal?’ Pre-clerkship students’ approaches to professional dilemmas. Medical Education; 45(4):362–371
For those who were there, solutions to the “guess the aim from the intro para” task…
Introductory paragraph 2.
Aim: To assess perceived stress, sources of stress and their severity; and to assess the determinants of stressed cases.
Shah, Hasan, Malik & Sreeramareddy. (2010) Perceived Stress, Sources and Severity of Stress among medical undergraduates in a Pakistani Medical School. BMC Medical Education, 10:2
For those who were there, solutions to the “guess the aim from the intro para” task…
Introductory paragraph 3:
Aim: To compare the educational effectiveness of ward rounds conducted with two different learning methodologies.
Melo, Hannois, Rodrigues & Natal (2011). Active learning on the ward: outcomes from a comparative trial with traditional methods. Medical Education; 45(3):273-9.