20110622-texas forces firms to open up on fracking

Upload: schaliegas

Post on 07-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 20110622-Texas Forces Firms to Open Up on Fracking

    1/2

    Independent.co.uk

    Texas forces firms to open up on 'fracking'For years, the industry in the US has refused to declare what toxic chemicals it uses during fracking, a policy

    that has bred public mistrust and accusations of pollution

    By Guy Adams in Los Angeles and Jonathan Brown

    Wednesday, 22 June 2011

    As the spiritual home of big oil, Texas may fairly be seen to be to environmentalism what its official food, chilli

    con carne, is to vegetarianism.

    But that hasn't stopped the state becoming the first corner of America to require energy firms to disclose

    information about the chemicals they are pumping into the ground in order to release natural gas during the

    hugely controversial process of "hydraulic fracking".

    The Lone Star state's Governor, Rick Perry, quietly signed a law last week which forces gas companies topublish a list of the 600 or so substances they add to a mixture of water and sand during the process. This

    mixture then gets fired deep underground at high pressure to release deposits of gas locked up in formations

    of shale and other rocks.

    For years, the industry in the US has refused to declare what toxic chemicals it uses during fracking, saying

    that to do so would amount to revealing trade secrets. But that policy has bred public mistrust, with the

    industry accused of contaminating local water supplies and creating other environmental hazards.

    The film GasLand, which was nominated for this year's Best Documentary Oscar, showed a homeowner in

    Weld County, Colorado, holding a cigarette lighter over his kitchen sink. When he turned on the tap,

    flammable gas emerged from it. The homeowner blamed the phenomenon on nearby fracking projects. Gas

    companies have always insisted their process has only a minimal impact. They argue that its risks are a smallprice to pay for a potential energy boom which could dramatically reduce US dependence on foreign oil.

    However, since they have refused to name the exact chemicals being used, that claim has until now been

    taken with a pinch of salt. Governor Perry's new law is designed to reduce mistrust, since it will require firms

    to submit the substances being used on individual projects to a database, which will then be published on the

    website fracfocus.org. It is supported by the energy industry, which apparently has come to the see that its PR

    will in future be better served by transparency.

    The increased levels of disclosure are broadly welcomed by environmental groups. But some are critical of an

    exemption which allows certain pieces of information deemed "commercially sensitive" to be withheld. They

    are also suspicious of the fact that the rules were devised in collaboration with fracking companies.

    Governor Perry, a long-standing friend of the oil industry, is currently considering a bid for the Republican

    presidential nomination. Though he primarily appeals to the party's most conservative supporters, the new

    fracking law may demonstrate that he is also a figure whom centrists can do business with.

    No other states have laws which require disclosure of fracking chemicals (though some have non-binding

    guidelines to that effect). That means America still has some way to go until it is brought in line with the

    European Union, where regulators require fracking companies to disclose the exact type, volume and

    The Independent - Print Article http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/gree

    of 2 07/02/2011 05:11

  • 8/6/2019 20110622-Texas Forces Firms to Open Up on Fracking

    2/2

    concentration of all chemicals used.

    Cuadrilla Resources, which has been controversially using the process to drill for gas in Lancashire, recently

    revealed that it principally uses four or five chemicals. Its CEO, Mark Miller, told MPs that they include

    hydrochloric acid or muriatic acid, to open up rock perforations, and polyacrylamide, a non-toxic friction

    reducer. A biocide is also used to treat water.

    Although Cuadrilla stressed that the chemicals make up just a tiny proportion of the liquids used in fracking,the British public remains wary of the process. The firm recently bowed to pressure to suspend drilling amid

    allegations that it had caused a series of minor tremors off the coast of Blackpool.

    independent.co.uk Terms & Policies | Privacy Policy | Email newsletter | RSS | Contact us | Syndication |

    Advertising Guide | Subscriptions | Jobs | Evening Standard | Homes & Property | London Careers | Novaya

    Gazeta (English)

    The Independent - Print Article http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/gree

    2 of 2 07/02/2011 05:11